Slashdot Mirror


Cell Phones May Spread Infections

CHaN_316 writes "Yahoo is running an article talking about how cell phones from health workers are helping spread dangerous infections in hospitals. 'They found that 12 percent of healthcare providers' cell phones were contaminated with [Acinetobacter baumannii]. The results are disturbing because [it] has the propensity to develop resistance to almost all available antibiotics ... Cell phones provide a large dry surface that allows survival of A. baumannii--it requires no nutrients ... [it] is found in intensive care units, and the mortality rate among infected patients is very high -- between 50 and 60 percent.' The hospital that conducted this research no longer allows the use of cell phones, and are switching to devices that don't require hand contact like pagers." So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

286 comments

  1. Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by mfarah · · Score: 5, Funny

    Douglas Adams was, once again, an incredible visionary (even if he didn't intend to be one).

    --
    "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
    - Sledge Hammer
    1. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A solution, of course, is readily available. At my work we have a regular supply of "screen wipes", basically towlettes moistened with isopropyl alcohol. Before cleaning my screen, I wipe off my cell (and regular) phones first. I just think it doesn't occur to most people that these things need to be cleaned...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by FTL · · Score: 4, Informative
      > Douglas Adams was, once again, an incredible visionary (even if he didn't intend to be one).

      Actually, he wasn't. His ludicrous "telephone sanitizers" weren't made up. It's a normal part of British culture. Don't believe me? Get your telephone sanitizers here, here and here. All .co.uk addresses, natually.

      Yes, it did blow my mind when I moved to the UK and discovered that this wasn't Douglas Adams fiction, it was sitting on every desk.

      --
      Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    3. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sledge Hammer! Finally someone who remembers this classic piece of culture from the eighties!

    4. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by zaphodbblx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah but just remember all the telephone sanitizers ended up on the "c" ark :-)....You would think dr's would know better. I mean christ they scrub their hands raw but carry a cellphone thats been breathed all over and been in a non sterile enviroment around criticaly ill paitents. You can't teach COMMON SENSE!

      --
      "A towel is the most astounding Mind-boggleing useful thing in the universe, allways know where your towel is"
    5. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by mfarah · · Score: 1

      >> Douglas Adams was, once again, an incredible visionary (even if he didn't intend to be one).
      Actually, he wasn't. His ludicrous "telephone sanitizers" weren't made up. It's a normal part of British culture. Don't believe me? Get your telephone sanitizers here, here and here. All .co.uk addresses, natually.

      >Yes, it did blow my mind when I moved to the UK and discovered that this wasn't Douglas Adams fiction, it was sitting on every desk.



      Wow. Brits can be incredibly odd sometimes.

      --
      "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
      - Sledge Hammer
    6. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by henben · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes, it did blow my mind when I moved to the UK and discovered that this wasn't Douglas Adams fiction, it was sitting on every desk.

      Sitting on every desk? Bollocks. I'm sure they exist, but I've never seen them used in my life. Come off it, old chap.

      Signed,
      A. Brit

    7. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by Xugumad · · Score: 0

      Wow, I live in the UK, and I've never seen them. I vaguely remember hearing of them, but certainly never seen them.

    8. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      Oh indubitably sir, we attempt to excell at our eccentric ways whenever possibly. Anything else.. well, it wouldn't be British, would it?

    9. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by tony_000001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are available as wipes, most large companies supply them.

    10. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      Sanitizers already exist.. as alcohol wipes. When I became a Certified Nurse Assistant, we were taught that before you use your stethescope, to wipe the ear pieces and the bell with an alcohol wipe. This doesn't damage the plastic parts and kills any bacteria that may exist on it and prevent you from transporting it to another patient.

      I think using an alcohol wipe on a cell phone would be just effective and prevent the nosocomial infections they are worried about.

      Nurses, Aides and doctors aren't stupid. They know quite a lot about bacterial contamination and how to prevent it. I assume this study was meant for the hospital staff information only, not the general public to gawk at.

    11. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by Xaoswolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Differance being of course, that Mr. Adams had an entire section of the workforce devoted to going around and sanatizing phones, not just little wipes sitting on the desk.

    12. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by FroMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am not absolutely positive, but I believe they were on the "B" Ark, not "C". You'll have to double check ofcourse, but since I am not at home I do not have my HHGTTG with me. :-(

      I should have my towel around here though...

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    13. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      They may not be "sitting on every desk" (that particular description fits NOTHING), but they're certainly pretty common.

      In fact, the best think about Rabbit (remember them?) 'phones was that they used to send you a new pack of wipes every month, and those little lemony bastards were just about the greatest ANYTHING cleaners ever - Wet Ones? Not even close.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    14. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      The thing that puzzles me about all this is that people DON'T SHARE their mobiles. Mobile 'phones are personal things - like your wallet or car keys - how is something that is not shared ever going to be a vector for infectious disease?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    15. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by chmod000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      We should note that on one occasion an interstellar space flight was delayed for >900 years on account of those little lemon-soaked paper thingies.

      --
      Aptal soru yoktur; sadece merakli aptallar vardir.
    16. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Didn't Douglas Adams imply that we DIDN'T need telephone sanitizers?

      --
      Jeremy
    17. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Please return to your seat!!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    18. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by eam · · Score: 1

      > Nurses, Aides and doctors aren't stupid.

      I work in a hospital. I once worked with the Neurology department & I've been in Radiology for the past four years. I can say with absolute certainty that nurses, aides, and doctors are just as stupid as everyone else.

      The idea that some doctor would walk into an ICU with a cellphone that is contaminated with bacteria doesn't suprise me at all.

      You might feel that an alcohol wipe would be as effective on the grooved, seamed, and perforated surface of a cell phone as it is on a stethescope, but I would rather see a study *prove* it works.

    19. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by GiMP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because you touch the bathroom door, then you touch your cellphoene. You touch a patient, you touch your cellphone. You touch a dog, touch your cellphone.

      And your wallet and keys should be cleaned too.

    20. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by hackwrench · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, In fact, once the planet got rid of their telephone sanitizers the people on the planet "were suddenly wiped out by a virulent disease contracted from a dirty telephone."

      Also, here is a link to the history of the term "telephone sanitizer".

    21. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by zaphodbblx · · Score: 1

      ACHOOO.....need i say more?

      --
      "A towel is the most astounding Mind-boggleing useful thing in the universe, allways know where your towel is"
    22. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by zaphodbblx · · Score: 1

      just ran a quick "google" on it...MY bad! It was the "b" ark...whoopsie

      --
      "A towel is the most astounding Mind-boggleing useful thing in the universe, allways know where your towel is"
    23. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by FroMan · · Score: 1

      And you dare call yourself Zaphod. :-P

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    24. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by zaphodbblx · · Score: 1

      Find a Vogon and i'll let him read poetry to me "-)

      --
      "A towel is the most astounding Mind-boggleing useful thing in the universe, allways know where your towel is"
    25. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      The other solution is not having them ring within a 10 foot radius of me. If your phone does ring, and or you proceed to talk REALLY LOUDLY TO THE PERSON OVER THE PHONE, it's been known to become contaminated with E-Coli and other contents of your rectum.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    26. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by binarybum · · Score: 1

      Actually, he wasn't.

      Actually, he was.

      --
      ôó
    27. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by loosewing · · Score: 1

      In case of medical emergency please dial 911...

      Doh!

    28. Re:Telephone Sanitizers are what we need... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      We had one girl in the office who used them a lot. Mind you, she also disinfected her entire desk every morning using Dettox spray. Since she left, a bearded vegetarian has taken over that desk, and takes his shoes off before starting work. As they say in Yorkshire, "there's nowt so queer as folk".

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  2. Already done. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol

    Samsung already has. They may not have intended it but mine has been accidently soaked in booze more times than I care to (or can) remember.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Already done. by bfandreas · · Score: 0

      Alcohol might only desinfect the phone. Problem ist that there is enough unpleasant stuff out there that will survive this treatment(obviously including you ;). I doubt that the 'tronics(or even the plastic) would respond well to the process of actually getting it sterile.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    2. Re:Already done. by larien · · Score: 1

      My brother had a ruggedized Nokia; it got dunked in alcohol several times on nights out, apparently, as people tested its waterproof status.

    3. Re:Already done. by CelloJake · · Score: 1

      I lost at least one Motorola Startec to a coffee cup that I didn't notice in my center console while I was driving. And my brother has lost two while being pushed into a lake/swimming pool with them in his pocket.

    4. Re:Already done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to NOT BE FUNNY.

    5. Re:Already done. by arttu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Samsung is not the only one. Nokia has this model 6250 which is made to be shock proof and water proof.

      You may drop it from 3 meters, and/or put it into water for 24 hours. (This according to the manual)

      I own one of those, and I usually take it with me to the sauna / shower. And, I have dropped it numerous times, etc.

      The only bad thing is that I can't use any regular cell phones anymore, I'd break them instantly.

    6. Re:Already done. by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I don't see why any cell phone couldn't be dunked in alcohol, though I'd remove the battery first. Every person I know who knows anything about hardware repair uses isopropyl for their board cleaning.

      The autoclave might be a different story, I don't know how hot they get, but I suspect that would be fine also.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    7. Re:Already done. by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      Samsung already has. They may not have intended it but mine has been accidently soaked in booze more times than I care to (or can) remember.

      Reminds me of my old Nokia (don't remember which model). I dropped it in snow once unintentionally while walking the dog. I found it several hours later by taking my wife's phone, and calling myself. I've seen a cool green glow from under the snow, no problems there.

      On another occasion I dropped it into my coffee cup (half full). It stopped working for a day, then after it dried out, it worked as if nothing has happened.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    8. Re:Already done. by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      Judging by the size of the autoclaves I've seen they get hot enough to melt cellphones into unrecognizable lumps of plastic. So that's probably a bad idea.

    9. Re:Already done. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I would think that any cellular phone could survive being immersed in anhydrous alcohol. The only thing I would worry about is the batteries, and that is not necessarily a show stopper, only a concern. Correction: Also the vibration system. I could easily see the alcohol washing away the lubricant.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. What about consumers? by Firehawke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Alright, but how many consumer phones are also a breeding ground for this sort of thing now? I'm sure the bacteria spread fairly quickly, so I have to wonder. Also, how would a consumer clean such an infected phone without destroying it?

    1. Re:What about consumers? by kryliss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know in alot of grocery stores the little hand baskets and the plastic on the carts are using some plastic called Microbiotic (or something like that) Couldn't they use the same stuff on cel phones? Anyone know more about this?

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    2. Re:What about consumers? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Isn't wood alcohol (the non-drinkable kind used to sterilize) non-conductive? It should be usable, provided it doesn't melt any of the plastic or other parts.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:What about consumers? by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      Water is (believe it or not) nonconductive. Pure water has a resistance in the megaOhm range (18 MOhm water is considered "ultrapure").

      It becomes highly conductive once "impurities" (salts and some gasses) have been introduced. Alcohols can dissolve salts, and will become conductive once they do. It probably won't be too much of a risk, though, as that small alcohols (such as ethanol and propanol) evaporate very quickly. The major problem would be that repeated use of alcohol would eventually degrade the plastic; the alcohol would probably slowly dissolve the organics in the plastic.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    4. Re:What about consumers? by aswang · · Score: 2, Informative
      This "news" is unnecessarily alarmist. Acinetobacter baumannii usually doesn't cause infection in healthy individuals. Notice that they did this study in the intensive care unit, where they've known for a while that patients get this sort of infection. The patients might have open wounds or burns. Their immune systems tend to be shot to hell, from, for example, chemotherapy, HIV, some other illness, or just from the high levels of cortisol in their blood because of stress from, e.g., the extreme amounts of pain and/or respiratory distress they are in.

      From Harrison's Princples of Internal Medicine 15th edition, 2001:

      Acitenobacter is highly prevalent in the environment. It is found in most water and soil samples and has a wide habitat. Acitenobacter has been cultured from the moist skin of healthy humans; increased colonization of the skin and the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts occurs in individuals in long-term-care facilities and hospitals. Reservoirs for acquisition in these settings include health care personnel, medical equipment, food, and the surrounding environment. Infections in healthy people in the community are unusual, but a few reports of pneumonia have been published. The overwhelming majority of infections are acquired in the hospital and long-term-care facilities.... Acinetobacter species account for 1 to 3% of hospital-acquired infections and affect primarily immunocompromised hosts and patients with comorbid disease. ICUs are a prominent site of Acitenobacter infections.
      (bold is my emphasis added)
  4. EVIL Verizon Guy calls the hospital ICU... by eviltypeguy · · Score: 3, Funny

    EVIL Verizon Guy calls the hospital ICU...

    Ring...
    "Can you hear me now?"
    "Good!"

    EVIL Verizon Guy hangs up, cackles madly...

    1. Re:EVIL Verizon Guy calls the hospital ICU... by grain · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Can you heal me now?"
      "Good!"
      *gurgle*

    2. Re:EVIL Verizon Guy calls the hospital ICU... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      That's the same Verizon guy that rings the tub too.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  5. Bugs... by johnwyles · · Score: 2, Funny

    So now I have to worry about two kind's of bugs on my cell phone... The diseased bug and the FBI...

    --
    [[ the only 15 letter word that is spelled without repeating a letter is uncopyrightable: it may soon be, however. ]]
    1. Re:Bugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't worry about this too much it doesn't sound like the etiology is there. I mean possibly if the person is reinfected with something like Ebola after then there is some play there. I didn't read the article so don't know the speed of this, however, say you have an encephalitis strain ... poison someone with that ... observe the ass swelling in a clinical setting ... see if the guy figures out if it is a persistent virus or an autoimmune response ... label as MS ... coinfect with Lyme ... observe ankle swelling. Now clinically the encephalitis is "covered" because you can say that was the Lyme and moreover you can say the Lyme was actually alcohol, adult diabetes, tobacco induced etc. and not from infected fly vectors. Possibly they are trying to find new diseases to bring up the stroke figures. Possibly you should ask your neighborhood zen master about this to help you relieve yourself from the worry.

      Simon.

  6. Ya by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And while we're at it, we should sterilise the healthcare workers too. Honestly, this is just another knee-jerk pogrom against a new technology, wasting money that could have been better spent elsewhere.

    1. Re:Ya by sniser2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WTF? They simply concluded that 12% of the phones they looked at where infected with that thing - what you make of it is your choice. How is this "just another knee-jerk pogrom against a new technology, wasting money that could have been better spent elsewhere"?? Nuts.

    2. Re:Ya by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is a waste of time. All it is saying that germs pass through physical contact. A water pump in London proved that a hundred years ago.

      Other things that will have the same problem:

      • Jewelery
      • Watches
      • Makeup/lipstick
      • Any damn object in the hospital

      Banning the offending object isn't the way ahead. Increasing awareness of the problem is much better.

    3. Re:Ya by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doesn't even have to be something in/from a hospital!

      Some of the biggest spreaders of disease, even as simple as the common cold or the flu, right on up to SARS, are everyday items such as computer keyboards, regular twisted pair phones, (especially payphones!), and even coinage!

      This is why properly washing your hands often is so important in stopping the spread of contagious diseases.

    4. Re:Ya by bhima · · Score: 4, Funny

      The biggest spreaders of disease are my co-workers small children.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    5. Re:Ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Other things that will have the same problem:

      I guess I should stop sharing my toothbrush at the office.

    6. Re:Ya by Afty0r · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is why properly washing your hands often is so important in stopping the spread of contagious diseases.

      For some people this is very true - for others we just don't care.
      Having been the kid who always bit his fingers+nails, put his hands in his mouth and ate stuff that was a little too old/spilled on the floor etc. I've probably had very low doses of just about everything going.

      By ensuring that you don't do things STUPIDLY dirty you can effectively vaccinate yourself against many things early in life. People who incessantly clean everything merely condemn their children to living their adult lives unwell (unless they too are ridiculously hygienic) as they have no chance to build up a resistance to common infections.

      If something falls on the floor, I blow dust off and eat it, I don't wash my hands except if I've been handlin particularly nasty/messy stuff and I haven't been ill beyond a bad cold (or hangover) in 10 years.
    7. Re:Ya by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You just described my whole family :)

      We've never had any diseases more serious than the flu in our family, and none of us are allergic to anything.

      My parents were always very insistent that I went outside at least 2 hours each day. Back then it was annoying, but I thank them for it now.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    8. Re:Ya by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      Yes, that will strengthen your immuno system and is a generally healthy outlook.

      But what you are describing are the two extremes. Licking crap of public toilets before you french kiss the next person that passes you by, much like what you do, or washing your hands every five minutes, it's just as bad.

      There will come more serious diseases than the common flu or SARS, and then people like you are going to be the downfall of humanity.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    9. Re:Ya by Sgt+York · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think the problem is less technical than psychological. Many MD's aren't going to think of their phone/pager as a vector. They wash their hands after each patient, but can contaminate their hands when they touch their phone or pager to turn it off (an unconscious move for most MD's).

      If the risk is brought to their attention, they wil react. Most are actuely aware of the special vector issues in a hospital. The banning of phones in the hospital was probably a little severe; just the knowledge of the risk would probably be enough to cause the MD's to take their own precautions.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    10. Re:Ya by Kurin · · Score: 1

      Or we could stop being such pussies. Christ, wash your hands after you use the toilet. That's all you need to do.

      If you sanitize EVERYTHING all of the time, your immune system will not be as strong. Eventually you'll run into something that's not so clean, and it will kill your stupid hand-washing ass.

    11. Re:Ya by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Aren't cellphones normally banned in hospitals? Of the three I've been in, all of them had signs saying cellphones must be turned off. I never asked why, but possibly because of concerns re. interference with sensitive equipment...

  7. And I thouth the real reason... by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    They always said that they didn't want you to use your phone in the hospital, as it would interfere with hospital equipment. Turns out it interferes with your own equipment. Heart, lungs, etc...

    1. Re:And I thouth the real reason... by ksheka · · Score: 1

      As a doctor, I can say that the evidence for this is weak, at best.

      People with permanent pacemakers use cell phones without problems. The signal dissipates by the inverse cube of the distance from the device. If they can't use the most minimal of shielding of equipment, cell phones are the least of their problems. (MRI and CAT scan machines, portable X-Ray machines, and wireless computers come to mind)

      --
      alias uptime="echo '5:33pm up 22342352324 days, 6:28, 2124315623 users, load average: 2432.40, 12312.31, 123123.19'"
    2. Re:And I thouth the real reason... by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      As a doctor, I can say that the evidence for this is weak, at best.

      So. All doctors can make this assessment even if they did not participate in the research?

      I'm not a doctor, but I sometimes play one on /.

      People with permanent pacemakers use cell phones without problems...If they can't use the most minimal of shielding of equipment, cell phones are the least of their problems.

      I have a picture in my mind of people with pacemakers wearing tin-foil around their chests...

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    3. Re:And I thouth the real reason... by nytes · · Score: 1

      My local hospital claims that the cellphones interfere with the fire alarm system.

      I know whether that is really the issue, but that's what they claim.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  8. ericson phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I own an ericson R310 Waterproof shockproof phone (antenae that looks like a sharks fin). I noticed that during the recent sars outbreak they seemed to be the phone of choice for the men in bunny suits!

    1. Re:ericson phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but this phone still has the "nooks and crannies" problem with sanitization.

      bacteria can hide in cracks and be protected against biocidal agents.

      in any case, whatever epidemic doesnt kill off all humans only makes us stronger.

      it's called darwinism. it works for bacteria and viruses, and it works for us too (albeit at a slower rate).

  9. Hand Contact? by Musashi+Miyamoto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why wouldn't a pager require hand contact? I bet what he really meant to say was _head_ contact.

    That would make a lot more sense.

    1. Re:Hand Contact? by afniv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe for skinny people. I always had to adjust the pager to read the little screen. This was a few years ago when I had a pager with a small screen for some months. Of course, then I had to touch a phone that everyone else touches to return the page.

      What is it about mobile phones in a hospital that they get infected, when all the other wall phones in the hospital that doctors will use to return pages won't get infected? Too me, as long as the bacteria is on the health care worker's hands, it will be everywhere else.

      --
      ~afniv
      "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
      Richard von Weizs
    2. Re:Hand Contact? by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Instead of everyone using thier own phones, they all use pagers and use the same phone on the floor. How is this better? Just need to clean your cellphone just like you do your watch and glasses when your a health care worker.

    3. Re:Hand Contact? by Juju · · Score: 1

      Bacteria and Virus spread mostly through hand contact. Nothing to do with the head. You are better off kissing someone sick on the cheek than actually shaking hands...

      --
      Black holes occur when God divides by zero.
    4. Re:Hand Contact? by Godin21 · · Score: 1

      There are voice pagers available that play a recorded message. Requires no hand contact. But the big thing is that with the phones on the walls (or desk/counter tops) they should be getting cleaned by housekeeping whenever the room is vacated. If not then the issue is lack of clenliness not the dirty instrument. The problem is that doctors don't leave their cells to be cleaned, they take them home, and to other patient rooms. But yeah, it seems to me that the issue is about washing hands not banning Cell phones.

    5. Re:Hand Contact? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      What is it about mobile phones in a hospital that they get infected, when all the other wall phones in the hospital that doctors will use to return pages won't get infected?

      Immediacy.

      A pager is happy to wait until you've removed protective garb and washed up before you check it. A central phone at a nurses station will likely be answered by the unit clerk and put on hold or a message taken.

      Cell phones ring for a short period and people tend to think they have to answer them or lose the call. I even see people who have voice mail act like they have to get the call before it's "lost". If someone's been playing "phone-tag" they also won't want to miss the "important" call when it finally comes.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    6. Re:Hand Contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - this story is basically bollocks. I mean, over here you are supposed to turn off cell phones in hospitals in any case so they don't interfere with the equipment.

      I also can't see why normal POTS phones don't also spread bacteria - in fact a POTS phone is probably more likely to spread disease because multiple people are likely to use it than an individuals cellphone.

  10. Finally... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...another reason to dislike cellphones. They really are toxic!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  11. No Hand Contact by Jammer@CMH · · Score: 1

    When a pager beeps or vibrates, you can (depending on the model) just look at the top screen as its clipped to your waist to see the number, your hand doesn't have to touch the pager.

    1. Re:No Hand Contact by zaphodbblx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      to me the point is that cell phones are used in non controlled, non-sterile enviroments. if the pager was a doctors personal one it would cause the same problem. you'd have to have "hospital only" units kept at work and sanitised daily to be safe(r).

      --
      "A towel is the most astounding Mind-boggleing useful thing in the universe, allways know where your towel is"
    2. Re:No Hand Contact by sowellfan · · Score: 1

      Not just sanitized daily - sanitized between patients, if the doctor touched the patient and then touched the pager before washing up for the next patient

    3. Re:No Hand Contact by zaphodbblx · · Score: 1

      True,true but at least if were kept within the hospital and sanatized daily it would alleviate the danger....its a little much to ask to sanatize between patients..it just would't be practiceable unless you were in an infectious ward!

      --
      "A towel is the most astounding Mind-boggleing useful thing in the universe, allways know where your towel is"
    4. Re:No Hand Contact by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      When a pager beeps or vibrates, you can (depending on the model) just look at the top screen as its clipped to your waist to see the number, your hand doesn't have to touch the pager.

      I haven't used a pager for several years now, but I remember I had to press a confirm button for it to stop paging. If I didn't it would keep paging forever, several pages every minute, or every 3 minutes or something. Similar to a clock radio.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  12. Well, makes sense to me... by big_groo · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...and are switching to devices that don't require hand contact like pagers.

    I keep my pager in my desk drawer. When I'm not in the office, I set it to the most annoying ring/beep, and stick it up in a ceiling tile. Hilarity ensues for co-workers in office.

  13. You do realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    that health care workers DO take all kinds of sterile environment precautions, right?

    1. Re:You do realize... by gobblez · · Score: 0

      then why sterilize the phones?

    2. Re:You do realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To stop them bringing bacteria in.

  14. Actually... by MoeMoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

    Actually, you can dunk your phone in alcohol right now if you wanted (minus the screen)... I was a part-time cell phone dealer about 2 years ago, whenever a phone had water damage or got dirty internally, all we did was take the phone apart, get a toothbrush and rubbing alcohol (isopropyl) and start scrubbing away at the corrosion.

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  15. How about irradiation? by Progman3K · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wouldn't simply irradiating the cel phone do the trick?

    Maybe some internal parts would need to be shielded to withstand it, but the external surface could be sterilized that way.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    1. Re:How about irradiation? by zenrandom · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking, that simply bombarding the phone with UV radiation would probably kill the greatest amount of the germs. Of course if you used one of those waterproof cell cases, you wouldn't have to worry about the internal parts. Get to work in the morning, put on cell cover, work, toss phone in UV sterilizer, take phone out of cover, go home... repeat. -zr

    2. Re:How about irradiation? by mikeee · · Score: 1

      UV would be easy. UV tends to be hard on plastics, though; I don't know if the high-grade stuff used for cellphone cases would be damaged by heavy doses of it or not.

    3. Re:How about irradiation? by an_art · · Score: 1

      UV would work somewhat, but if the surface has a lot of organic dirt, the UV could be somewhat attenuated, hence weakened, before getting to bugs at the plastic surface. XRAY or gamma would surely be better, but they may tend to erase your non-volatile memories. These sorts of problems always get more interesting as details emerge.

      Art

    4. Re:How about irradiation? by benjonson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wouldn't simply irradiating the cel phone do the trick?

      At least then we could put to rest the question of whether or not cell phones cause brain damage.

      --
      =-+
    5. Re:How about irradiation? by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      Maybe the procedure could be something like this:

      Wipe phone down with alcohol-based cleaning solution first, then put it in the irradiation box.

      Some of the internal components would need to be well-shielded, no doubt, but they would be INSIDE the phone and away from direct contact with the user's face, so they wouldn't need to be disinfected.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    6. Re:How about irradiation? by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Maybe some internal parts would need to be shielded to withstand it, but the external surface could be sterilized that way.

      The problem with this is that any radiation (UV, X-ray, hard gammas) that you might choose to use to sterilize the telephone will also likely degrade the plastic from which it is constructed.

      Depending on the particular composition of the telephone, radiation may cause either brittleness or softening of the plastic case and buttons. The clear display window will probably yellow or cloud, before failing completely. I would anticipate that there is potential for damage to the LCD itself, but that's not one of my areas of expertise.

      In addition, UV has virtually zero penetrating power, so bacteria can hide inside cracks and openings in the phone, or even behind little bits of dirt or grime.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  16. Couldn't a cell phone just be sealed? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    It makes sense that in hospitals, there should be some sterilizable version of everything. They don't use operating equipment that can't be sterilized, so why not cellphones? The only problem is, Excess sterilization leads to super-bugs, so maybe just administering an immunization for this bug would be a better idea. :)

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Couldn't a cell phone just be sealed? by EChris · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You would think it'd be pretty easy to make some kind of plastic bag that would act like a thin sleeve for the phones, like disposable gloves and whatnot.

      It could just be thin cellophane in the shape of a tube sock, maybe even with a zip lock on one end. Even a flip-open phone could be put in flipped open, then shut (plastic would fold over inside it).

      That way, you could dispose of the bag and not worry about getting a special phone or banning them in hospitals altogether.

      Chris

    2. Re:Couldn't a cell phone just be sealed? by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      Just dunk it in bleach, nothing can survive that. Right? OK, maybe except my little brother. Anyone know an antidote for bleach?

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    3. Re:Couldn't a cell phone just be sealed? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      such cases and bags aren't that uncommon(theres hard cases and some bags made of fairly durable material).

      but you still see rarely people using them, except when hiking&etc(doh).

      i don't smoke but those bags are excellent place to store cigs too if you're camping(or on some stinky army prac camp).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Couldn't a cell phone just be sealed? by philip_bailey · · Score: 1

      Excess sterilization leads to super-bugs

      No, it doesn't. Sterilisation methods, e.g. heat, radiation, when performed correctly, kill all pathogens. You're thinking of antibiotics, which select for organisms with some degree of resistance to them, and may indeed create so-called "super bugs".
      --
      There is no place like ~!
    5. Re:Couldn't a cell phone just be sealed? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      It could just be thin cellophane in the shape of a tube sock
      If such a thing existed you could put it on your willy before having a bit of the old horizontal action ... it would reduce the chance of catching a dose of the clap. Not only that, I guess it would prevent pregnancy too.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. Easy, by that1guy · · Score: 1

    Use an ethelyne oxide sterilizer

  18. And spreading divorce. by pubjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

    More interesing recent story on cell phones:

    Mobiles 'betray' cheating Italians.

    1. Re:And spreading divorce. by Raindeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A couple of months ago I overheard someone say: I 'll never get one of those camera phones. Just think of when my girlfriend asks, where are you? She will want me to send a picture. I'll never be able to go out again!

    2. Re:And spreading divorce. by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If a girlfriend is that suspicious all the time, it's probably time to get a new girlfriend. If she's that suspicious all the time for _good reason_, she's probably going to be getting a new boyfriend anytime soon.

    3. Re:And spreading divorce. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Just keep some pictures on the phone ... your office, inside of a train, whatever, and send one of those

      She'll never know you're in the pub.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  19. that'll never happen, by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

    "So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it? "

    Never will happen. The market is too small. It will never be profirtable

    --
    "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    1. Re:that'll never happen, by nenya · · Score: 1

      Given the fact that the vast majority of hospitals aren't profitable anyway, this doesn't seem to be too much of an issue. If the government decides it wants to regulate this - like it's decided it wants to regulate just about everything else having to do with healthcare - then cost is all of a sudden no object. Furthermore, hospitals are in the business of regularly buying sizable quantities of high-tech electronics that have no conceivable use outside their walls. If anyone decided to go after this market, it would be in a low-quantity high-margin mindset, not high-quantity low-margin.

    2. Re:that'll never happen, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what they said about lots of things in the medical profession.

      You just jack up the price, and it'll pay off.

  20. News Flash! by superdan2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NEWS FLASH: If you have bacteria on your skin and that spot touches an object, other people touching that object can pick up the bacteria! What can you do to protect your children? Are you safe? Watch Channel 14 KSLSHDOT tonight at 10 and find out!

    This isn't news. This is fear-based ratings pandering by the source.

    --
    blog |
    1. Re:News Flash! by mgrassi99 · · Score: 1

      Why is this problem specific to cell phones? What about regular phones? Regardless, there is a material that they use to make sandals with that is impregnated with some sort of anti-bacterial compound. I believe Teva uses it...anyone familiar with it, and could it be used for phones? -Mike

    2. Re:News Flash! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Totally agree with your This isn't news. This is fear-based ratings pandering by the source.
      comment. It's just like the 11pm news, which I why I stopped watching the news in the first place.

      So devices in hospitals that come in to close contact with people have bacteria, [ sarcasm ]I am shocked! [ /sarcasm ] Hello! It's a smeggin hospital for Christ sake. I would have been shocked if the study said these cell phones didn't have any infectious "stuff" on them. This is not news this is common sense.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    3. Re:News Flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does every one think that because there is an article like this, people are trying to push FUD on everyone? The article merely describes a study about cell phones in hospitals carrying bacteria. It doesn't try to scare you by saying that you will die if your doctor has a cell phone. And to all you knee-jerk reaction people, it doesn't say that they are going to spend a billion dollars to combat this.

    4. Re:News Flash! by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      This is fear-based ratings pandering by the source.

      And in geek style I read it as:

      This is fear-based ratings pandering by The Force.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    5. Re:News Flash! by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      I prefer GSLSHDOT, thank you very much. I find KSLSHDOT to be too bloated.

      Chris

  21. And what about Medical PDAs??? by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If cell phones harbor nasty germs, what about those PDA and Tablet PC medical terminals? The construction is equivalent -- lots of plastic, elastomeric buttons, touch screens, stylus, etc. Worse, medical terminals are more likely than are cell phones to be handled by multiple people.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:And what about Medical PDAs??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use systems with sealed membrane keyboards, and should be able to clean them with alcohol

    2. Re:And what about Medical PDAs??? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Too sexy.

      That's the problem. People want their toys.

      Let me back up a bit. Ages ago I was evaluating laptop computers to be used in an operating room. The computers were to be placed in disposible plastic bags for sanitation reasons. Hence, they were not going to get any ventilation. Having the laptops burn up was not going to be acceptible either.

      So, a search was conducted for a laptop that could run in the bags without overheating. I belive one of the 603e-based Powerbooks came out the winner, and was the only machine that met the spec. that was currently manufactured.

      But, it was a slower machine at the time and didn't have the latest and greatest capabilities. So, it was decided that the plastic bags were just overkill, and they'd bring regular hot laptops into the OR unshielded.

      That's how it works.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:And what about Medical PDAs??? by know_gnus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Medical PDAs? I thought we were trying to *stop* the spread of infection. Public displays of affection, like any sort of bodily contact, can easily continue to propigate disease. Besides, PDA makes me sick to my stomach anyway...

    4. Re:And what about Medical PDAs??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how come medical workers were not dropping like flies when clipboards with pencils/pens and paper were used for recording patient information?

    5. Re:And what about Medical PDAs??? by ergulon · · Score: 1

      Cell phones have a lot more surface area contact with people's hair, mouth than medical PDAs. OTOH, 37% of medical personnel don't wash their hands between patients, so it might be a wash (sorry).

      --
      Eastern Mass.
    6. Re:And what about Medical PDAs??? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The simple solution to the medical pda problem is to make them entirely wireless, and potted in plastic, then sealed smooth. Better still would be to make them all thin clients. You can charge them by induction, so you don't even need any contacts, which are a very realistic problem because standards for medical equipment (at least in the U.S., and I would assume other countries) mandate covering all electrical contacts with a nonconductive cover. If you don't need any contacts, you can make the device as simple as you like. Use a radio pen for a stylus, removing the need for a touch-sensitive screen which is necessarily made of a different plastic than the rest of the device, and pay wacom for the privilege of having a stylus which needs no batteries (damn patents, tesla laid the groundwork there and it's an obvious idea from that point) if you go the active stylus route (please do) so you can make those seamless as well. If you use touch sensitivity, maybe you can invent a cheap process for making the screen out of a different material than the rest of it and still molding the thing. Why molding? Because it's cheap, yay!

      I don't see any reason you couldn't incorporate these ideas into cellular phones as well.

      However, I do recall that someone had made some kind of slipcover for phones that kept it water-safe and did not significantly distort sound passing through it. Perhaps it would be possible to invent a cellphone prophylactic?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. Sterile cell phones by DdJ · · Score: 5, Interesting
    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?
    Not necessary. Get a bluetooth cell phone, and seal it in a sterile plastic bag while at work. Then develop a bluetooth headset that can be sterilized. You can push the buttons on the phone through the plastic bag.

    Heck, come to think of it, the plastic bag would let sound through without a problem. Just get a cell phone that you don't need to fold or unfold to use, and heat-seal it in a fresh sterile plastic bag every time you enter the hospital, and remove the plastic bag every time you leave. That would do the trick, wouldn't it?
    1. Re:Sterile cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just dunk the user in alcohol?

    2. Re:Sterile cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just throw it inside something thin like a rubber. It should be thin enough for the sound to pass through without much distortion. Replace it as frequently as you would anything else in a hospital. You could even use lambskin for those with latex allergies.

    3. Re:Sterile cell phones by elem · · Score: 1
      I actually used to do something similar to this. I used to work in a kitchen and spent a lot of time doing things like washing vegetables. Since I didn't want to get my phone wet everytime it rang, and I didn't want to drop it in the water by mistake, I used to tie it into a surgical glove. The glove was just thin enough to make out the screen and see the buttons.

      This lo-tech approach worked fine - even saved my phone when I droped into the sink. The only downsides were that it was hard to get it out of the glove (they're supprisingly strong) and that you like really fucking stupid with a glove up against your ear.

    4. Re:Sterile cell phones by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Better yet, develop a plastic bag large enough to go completely over the head of the next person I see on a Cell phone.

      I think I'll call it Cell-O-Phone. Won't turn off those annoying rings, but it does dramatically reduce the volume of the speaker.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  23. Cell phone contaminants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, you can sterilize just about anything but the cost and time are prohibitive. There is a sterilization process that uses gas where I have sterilized entire computers, monitors, mouse and keyboards that were placed in operating rooms. Also I have sterlized sensitive electronics that could not take either pressure or temperature that survived gas sterilization just fine. It is a trade off between cost of the sterilization process, the time it takes the equipment to be done, and the usefullness of the equipment.

  24. Wow, and next week... by quinkin · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Next week we discover that healthcare workers keys are infected, then pens, then wallets/purses, then healthcare workers...

    Well lets see here, send all the sick to one place, get the same subset of the population to treat them all and wierdly enough you get concentrations in infections (including all these wonderful antibiotic resistant/immune strains we are breeding with our idiotic farming and medical practices... but that's another rant for another day). Especially in and around those brave enough to be on the frontline as it were.

    If you aren't sick, stay the hell away from hospitals or you will be.

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
    1. Re:Wow, and next week... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You could make a killing (har har) selling a kit for people who go to the hospital, which contained gloves, a mask, and hand sanitizer. Plus maybe the equivalent of one of those toilet seat covers, but with no hole, for sitting in the waiting room. It would be nice if it covered you back. On second thought, maybe transparent bunny suits would be more practical.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. Cell phones in hospitals?? by mgs1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought people were not supposed to use cell phones in hospitals. Why are they even there?

    1. Re:Cell phones in hospitals?? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought people were not supposed to use cell phones in hospitals. Why are they even there?

      There was some panic over this early on, but it turned out to be a minimal issue.

      When I was working at a hospital, we did some testing of cellular devices and medical equipment. See, medical equipment gets an exemption from the regular FCC shielding requirements for some historical reason, and we all know if you're broadcasting interference you're an antenna too, and you don't have to accept interference if you're a medical device.

      That said, abuse isn't as rampant as assumed. With older analog phones (higher wattage) the only device found to be a problem was a ventilator device within about 6' of the cell phone, IIRC.

      What's not terribly intuitive is that one of the best ways to deal with the problem is to work with a cellular provider to put a 'tower' right on the hospital. If the tower is that close, the phones need to use far less power to broadcast, hence less interference. The new digital units are all lower-powered to begin with too, so the problem is further decreased.

      So, if you're going to visit a friend in the ICU, make sure you turn off your phone before going into the patient's room, but if you're sitting in the waiting room, it's not likely you'll cause problems.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  26. sterilizable cell phones? by Fratz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, you can't autoclave it. They usually only do this with certain metals, since they can withstand the heat involved.

    You could theoretically dip it in a biocide of some sort (they use stuff tougher than alcohol in operating rooms and on used surgical tools) but there's a "nook & cranny" problem. When designing non-metal surgical tools, you have to make sure you don't make any tiny cracks, holes, or grooves where stuff can cling and avoid the biocide. The last cell phone I saw had a lot of nooks and crannies. You'd possibly need to redesign one to be completely sealed, which is getting more feasible because of wireless battery charging technologies and wireless connectivity technologies.

    Another alternative is that you could stick it in a sterile container and use it wirelessly, but then your wireless headset would still need to be sterilizable.

    --
    -- Fratz, human
    1. Re:sterilizable cell phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Autoclaves don't get that hot. Not compared to modern electroncis. the plasic cna take or it won't, there is only one way to tell.

    2. Re:sterilizable cell phones? by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My fiancee works in a research facility that requires disinfection of all items brought in. To bring her cell phone in she puts it in a zip lock bag and dips it in whatever they use as a disinfectant solution. The phone works fine through the bag without a headset.

    3. Re:sterilizable cell phones? by Tux2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I couldn't agree more. When I did my alternative civilian service [Zivildienst] in a sheltered workshop [Werkstatt fr Behinderte], the handicapped people built the wiring harnesses for medical autoclaves from wire and crimp contacts. We had to rework the wiring harnesses several times, because the wires (mainly their electric insulation) and the contacts did not stand the conditions (heat and humidity) inside the autoclaves. The contacts corroded, the insulation melted or broke and caused short circuits, and so on.

      Those parts were specified for this hard conditions (but they actually did not met the specifications). Now guess what happens to a mobile phone that is certainly not designed for that conditions if you put it inside an autoclave.

      You may find some more information about autoclaves at the web site of the company we worked for: www.melag.de (english pages available). (I'm no longer related with that company, it's just the only company I know that produces autoclaves.)

      --
      Denken hilft.
    4. Re:sterilizable cell phones? by Dr.Enormous · · Score: 1

      Dude, you can autoclave lots of stuff. Research facilities do it all the time with plastic tubes and other plastic lab equipment. Though I agree that it would probably damage the current models...

    5. Re:sterilizable cell phones? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Well, you can't autoclave it.

      You most certainly can. A gas autoclave does not use heat and is used for instruments and things that will not tolerate either heat or humidity. In fact, it is likely the moisture that would render your cellphone 'sterile' (functionally as well as medically) in a standard autoclave.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    6. Re:sterilizable cell phones? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Can't I just autoclave a/o sterilize the Cell Phone user?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    7. Re:sterilizable cell phones? by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      Just put it into a plastic bag that you discard regularly. You can hear through it and operate it through it.

  27. Use earbuds! by bourne · · Score: 1

    Why switch back to pagers, as the article suggests? Wire up with an earbud, get voice-activated dialing, and you're off and running without having to touch it all the time.

  28. Banning cell phones is not the answer. by ksheka · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Sure, cell phones can spread disease. But so can any other dry surface. Like skin, clothing, stethoscopes, etc.

    The nasal passages of more than half the health care workers that work in a hospital for more than a year are colonized with MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus).

    Banning cell phones is not the answer. Universal precautions is. Universal precautions includes cleaning your hands and instruments after every single patient contact. How many health care workers do that, do you suppose?

    --
    alias uptime="echo '5:33pm up 22342352324 days, 6:28, 2124315623 users, load average: 2432.40, 12312.31, 123123.19'"
    1. Re:Banning cell phones is not the answer. by jayayeem · · Score: 1

      Problem is that people forget that they phone is an instrument that they use during care. As an EMT I regularly call the hospital while treating a patient in the ambulance. The fact is people know to clean up there medical equipement, but often forget about the other equipment they use in the course of a call. Radios, pagers and cell phones and such should all be sanitized after any call they are used on.

      --
      I metamoderate, therefore I am
    2. Re:Banning cell phones is not the answer. by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Radios, pagers and cell phones and such should all be sanitized after any call they are used on.

      Not necessary. It's not the call that infects the equipment. If it's the user that infects it you've got a different problem. It's only necessary to disinfect between patients. If a doctor/nurse/whatever examines a septic patient and then sterilizes equipment immediately, it should be perfectly fine to use repeatedly until the next patient is visited. It would probably be best to sanitize both before and after patient care since some patients (burn patients for example) are more succeptible to infection. In that case you're not trying to stop a particularly nasty pathogen from spreading, but ordinary day-to-day stuff from infecting a particularly receptive host.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  29. So what's the tally now ... by Kombat · · Score: 1

    Cars, movie theaters, gas stations, airplanes, and now hospitals. Perhaps the list of where you CAN use your cellphone would be shorter?

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  30. Better hospital staff hygiene is the answer by spacecomputer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    All hospital staff should sanitize their hands using soap or gel before and after contact with patients. Multiple studies have shown that hospital staff practice poor hygiene, putting themselves and us all at risk.

    --

    Remember, Amateurs built the ark. Professionals built the Titanic

    1. Re:Better hospital staff hygiene is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like what % of nurses smoke?

    2. Re:Better hospital staff hygiene is the answer by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but that doesn't make headlines, attract viewers, OR scare the general public.

      We used to take calculators into quarantine areas by sealing them in a plastic bag and discarding the bag along with our protective gear when we left. I could put my phone in a zip-lock, punch through it with the headset connector, and have most of the system inside protective gear. My headset has a "push to answer" doodad, so I don't have to even find the phone.

      And the desk phones in the nurses stations are CESSPOOLS!

  31. Ahem by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

    My new product, "Safone", is an adapted rubber preservative, designed to fit snugly over your mobile phone. There are two models, one for the standard vertical phone, and one for the flip-phones popular in Asia.

    Safone(tm) comes in handy 5-packs, in a choice of colours and flavours, and for only $19.50 you can get three packets now.

    It's time to roll on your Safone now!!

    Don't phonome, Safone!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  32. Ummmm.... by hashwolf · · Score: 1, Insightful

    While working at a hospital.... how about putting the mobile in a transparent plastic bag, and discard the bag after use?
    Seems fairly easy to implement.

    --
    - "They misunderestimated me."
  33. Sterilizable cell phones. by kimmop · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

    Do you mean something like Nokia 6250? Anyways, at least Finnish hospitals don't allow GSM phones on their premises. Worry about mixing radio transmitters and heart monitors, I guess.

    --

    --
    Binaries may die but source code lives forever

  34. Really.. by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 1

    I would think this would be obvious. Anything that you put directly against your skin, and in this case right next to your ear, no less, is going to pick up organic matter from you. And that organic matter may include pathogens. It isn't a surprise that you can spread them to others.

    It's just like using other people's keyboards. You have NO idea where it has been or what it has been through ;)

  35. lucky me, i'm neurotic. by *weasel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    so I'm not surprised/affected in the least by this.

    c'mon people, any object that is carried -everywhere- or used daily (potentially used by or in the immediate proximity of sick people) provides an opportunity for disease to spread. particularly when it's something that people never clean.

    i honestly hope no-one is surprised by this.

    it's reminicent of the studies that surprised you all a few years back, that showed the average computer workstation is dirtier (bacteria) than the average bathroom.

    primarily because: how often do you clean around your PC? actually picking it up, moving it around, and wiping it all down with sanitizing pads? (particularly keyboard,mouse,wrist pads,power buttons,etc)

    ok, now how often do you wipe down your cell phone with a sanitizing pad? exactly.
    your phone is almost certainly more filthy than your toilet. think about that.

    and while you do your reactionary one time cleaning, don't forget your pager, pda, land-lines, av remotes, video gaming controllers, camera, keys, wallet, laptop, and car interior (radio, steering wheel,shifter,beltbuckler,door handles,etc).

    me? my neuroses keeps me well protected from you damned dirty apes.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:lucky me, i'm neurotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* You are an idiot since I would think this would be obvious. Anything that you put directly against your skin, and in this case right next to your ear, no less, is going to pick up organic matter from you. And that organic matter may include pathogens. It isn't a surprise that you can spread them to others.

      It's just like using other people's keyboards. You have NO idea where it has been or what it has been through ;)

    2. Re:lucky me, i'm neurotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and while you do your reactionary one time cleaning, don't forget your pager, pda, land-lines, av remotes, video gaming controllers, camera, keys, wallet, laptop, and car interior (radio, steering wheel,shifter,beltbuckler,door handles,etc).

      me? my neuroses keeps me well protected from you damned dirty apes.


      "What do you think you have an immune system for? It's for killing germs! But it needs practice. It needs germs to practice on. So, listen, if you kill all the germs around you and live a completely sterile life, then when germs do come along, you're not going to be prepared. And never mind ordinary germs, what are you going to do when some supervirus comes along that turns your vital organs into liquid shit? I'll tell you what you're gonna do. You're gonna get sick, you're gonna die, and you're gonna deserve it, cuz you're fuckin weak, and you've got a fuckin weak immune system."

      -- George Carlin
    3. Re:lucky me, i'm neurotic. by *weasel · · Score: 1

      oh don't worry - you won't get them all.

      in fact, mostly all you will do is weaken them, providing exactly what mr carlin is looking for.

      has sanitation (via indoor plumbing), anti-bacterial soap, and better hygiene made human beings sicker or healthier since they were invented?

      exactly, so you apply that gained knowledge from a thousand years of improved health (and non-depressed immune systems) to other places that disease hangs out.

      sure, if you live in a bubble, you'll have problems. but i'm far from advocating that. i'm just aware of where germs and pathogens hang out that you people happily ignore. you don't need to scrub them down daily - but at least once a month would be nice.

      i don't have allergies and haven't been sick in years. how about you?

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    4. Re:lucky me, i'm neurotic. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      ok, now how often do you wipe down your cell phone with a sanitizing pad? exactly.
      your phone is almost certainly more filthy than your toilet. think about that.


      Yeah. But what kind of bacteria. I'd definitely prefer to lick the bottom of my monitor than to lick the bottom of a toilet seat in my office's bathroom.

      There might be fewer bacteria there, but they just shot out of someone's anus.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:lucky me, i'm neurotic. by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Additionally, plastic is much harder to clean effectively than tile and such, particularly the textured sort of plastic that computers and phones are covered with.

      My toilet is cleaner than my telephone, which can easily be determined by inspection. Of course, my toilet is a device whose purpose is to clean itself after every use, so it would be obviously broken if it were not cleaner than most anything else in my house (aside from things like the tea kettle which are designed to be boiled on a regular basis, or the dishwasher, which also cleans itself, but isn't as dirty beforehand).

      The reason people find this sort of thing surprising is that, when asked to think of the average bathroom, they actually think of a public restroom in need of cleaning, rather than the actual average bathroom. Certainly the worst bathroom is worse than the worst computer, and people only tend to remember the bad bathrooms.

  36. Hospitals by thorgil · · Score: 2, Informative


    Simple... Do not use cellphones in hospitals.

    All radio (send) devices in hospitals should be (and are in some hospitals) banned due to possible interferrence with sensative medical equipment.

    --
    Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
  37. Simple solution... by Noryungi · · Score: 1

    In many countries in Europe, cell phones are simply forbidden in hospitals. They must be turned off, and (in the most extreme case) left at the entrance counter.

    I fail to see why some people (nurses, health care workers) are allowed to use cell phones in a hospital, while most others are not.

    Ban cell phones in hospitals, or at least require personnel to leave them switched off in their lockers, and the problem is solved... isn't it?

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  38. Just coat it with silver by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

    That'll sterillize it AND make it look Ghetto too....

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  39. Oh? by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can alcohol- or autoclave-sterilize any cell phone today! It just won't work afterwards.

    Seriously though...*doodeedooeeannoyingpolyphonicringTONE* "Hello? Yeah. Uh huh. Well I'm just working on a patient right now. Uh huh. A gallon of milk and some laundry detergent? Ok. Yes I'll remember. I said I'd remember! Last time? But... Yeah last time there was a big traffic jam and I just wanted to get home. Hold on for a sec, I need to install this catheter. Ok, I'm back. What do you mean I don't love you? What? That's not true! I'm sorry? When did I... No that's not what I meant. Ok I'm sorry. What? No, my patients are not more important than you. Uh huh. Yeah. Hmm. Well I'll try harder from now on. Yeah? Ok. All right. Yes I'll remember: milk and detergent. Ok. I love you too. What? Oh. Buh-bye. Yes I love you too. Ok. Bye then."

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Oh? by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Nurses at many hospitals carry cell phones now. They give their number to the patients they work with.

      Why? Because nurses tend to be very busy and are damn hard to find. Either the patient or other nurses can quickly reach anyone they need.

      That the phones pick up hospital super-bacterial isn't suprising. The problem is that since nurses handle them frequently and don't wash them at the same time the wash their hands (which is supposed to be, and frequenly acutally is, often), their handwashing is less effective, because they pick up the same contaminants again when they handle their phone.

      The simple solution is to just provide those steralizing wipes you find all over the hospital at handwashing stations, and train personnel to wipe the phone first, then wash their hands. Cleaning every nook and cranny on and in the phone is not necessary, just as complete steralization of the hands is not.

      Incidentally, I read a study a few years ago that showed that the vast majority of clensing of bacterial matter on hands came from the rubbing of the surface, not the soap. Even dry rubbing had a large impact.

  40. Banning cell phones is not the answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Sure, cell phones can spread disease. But so can any other dry surface. Like skin, clothing, stethoscopes, etc.

    The nasal passages of more than half the health care workers that work in a hospital for more than a year are colonized with MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus).

    Banning cell phones is not the answer. Universal precautions is. Universal precautions includes cleaning your hands and instruments after every single patient contact. How many health care workers do that, do you suppose?

  41. "I feel raped." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And while we're at it, we should sterilise the healthcare workers too. Honestly, this is just another knee-jerk pogrom against a new technology, wasting money that could have been better spent elsewhere.

  42. finally a job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cell-phone stanitizer/cleaner.... oh what do the brits call them....

    9M unenployed americans, and how many freeking cellphones all over the place....

  43. You'd be suprised at the things you can do! by jolshefsky · · Score: 1
    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

    You can today!

    I tried dunking mine in alcohol and it worked. The phone successfully entered the liquid and there was enough alcohol to completely submerge the phone.

    I tried the autoclave too, and that worked too. The phone was placed in the autoclave and the autoclave was turned on then it ran through a full 10 minute sterilization cycle.

    No more bacteria on my phone!

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

  44. Star Trek to the rescue... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    With current technology, cell phones have voice/speech recognition, decent battery life, and have decreased in size approximately equal to a pager. There is no reason a small cell phone-like device a little larger than a Star Trek Communicator could not be manufactured. All the technology is there, and with low power embedded AltiVec'd-PowerPC chips, intelligent voice (user) command recognition should not be a problem to engineer into such a small device. The problem is there must be a market for such a device. The other problem is that one loses the "private" conversation with such a device unless s/he is alone. But if the device is used for work place communication, privacy is of no concern.

    The bacteria have always been there and always will be present. Cell phones shouldn't be engineered to destroy bacteria because as we educated folk know, biological systems always find a way to work around obsticles. The phones should not be used in a hospital setting. Hospitals are notorious breeding grounds for all kinds of nasty bugs; I know, I worked in one for 7 years. The best way to prevent spreading bacteria is to clean all surfaces effectively with the appropriate surfactant and minimize contact.

    1. Re:Star Trek to the rescue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But if the device is used for work place communication, privacy is of no concern." ???

      We are talking about hospitals. What about doctor-patient confidentiality? What about HIPPA?

    2. Re:Star Trek to the rescue... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

      One shouldn't even be discussing patient confidentiality issues over a telephone either. Half the conversation can be heard, and most of what is said from one party can be inferred to get much of the meaning of the whole conversation. The example to which I was referring would involve requesting assistance in another area of the hospital or requesting supplies to a specified area, or for making a generalized announcement of an emergency procedure, such as a fire located in a certain area, or flooding from a water main break, or a critical equipment failure in an intensive care unit. Those examples would be ideal for hands-free communication.

    3. Re:Star Trek to the rescue... by Laplace · · Score: 1

      Hospitals are notorious breeding grounds for all kinds of nasty bugs; I know, I worked in one for 7 years.

      Adds weight to a phrase I always heard my pharmacist father say: "people don't go to hospitals to be cured, they go to hospitals to die."

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
  45. Samsung ACH460 by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

    I know for a fact that the Samsung ACH460 (or maybe is it the AHC? I'm out of the country at the moment) can handle a bit of liqour, wine, beer... It also seems to posses magical abilities to keep track of who I called the night before when I can't remember.

  46. My phone gets dunked in alchohol all the time by Alien+Conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I keep dropping it in my beer when I get drunk.

    Never did it any harm.

    1. Re:My phone gets dunked in alchohol all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly do you manage that? Once I can see, sure, but repeatedly?

    2. Re:My phone gets dunked in alchohol all the time by Alien+Conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was always unintentional

  47. Not to worry... by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Surely we can just crank up the transmission power of the phones and fry the little beggars!? Die Die Die!

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  48. A new Paper Tiger by rdewald · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am a nurse. Cell phones aren't the problem, people are the problem.

    Want to stop the spread of the pathogens on your cell phone or _______ ? It's easy.

    1. Wash your fscking hands before and after you examine any patient.

    2. Don't use the device during an examination.

    Problem solved.

    You don't have to kill the little germies on the phone, just wash them off your hands, for %#^$&! sake.

    --
    The best way to do is to be.
    1. Re:A new Paper Tiger by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
      I am a nurse. Cell phones aren't the problem, people are the problem.

      Possibly, but what the hell are medical staff doing with cell phones on them in the first place while they're on the job, working with patients? "Hi, sorry, I'm smack in the middle of cracking open someone's ribcage, can I call you back?"

      People seem to think they have a god-given right to carry a fucking cell phone with them at work. Everyone in healthcare is always talking about how goddamn busy they are, but they have time to answer their cells? I wish my company would ban them- people set their ringer volumes to max, leave the phone at their desk, and go off to meetings. The polyphonic ring tones are pretty bad, but NOTHING compared to the standard Nokia ring, which makes me want to rip my hair out.

    2. Re:A new Paper Tiger by rdewald · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Possibly, but what the hell are medical staff doing with cell phones on them in the first place while they're on the job, working with patients? "Hi, sorry, I'm smack in the middle of cracking open someone's ribcage, can I call you back?""

      There are a lot of different answers to this question because the term "medical staff" covers a lot of different people with different functions.

      Surgeons take calls during procedures. They always have, long before there were even cordless phones, much less cell phones. Medical treatment is sometimes dependent upon the rapid dispersal of information and an equally rapid decision being made in response to said information. I've talked to more than a few chest surgeons on the phone while they had their hands in someone else's chest. This was accomplished (aseptically) by speaker phone.

      With the advent of cell phones, many health care providers who care for patients dependent upon rapid decision-making carry cell phones with them 24/7/365. This easy access to decision-making resources has saved lives and reduced suffering, but these people represent a tiny, tiny fraction of the health care workers carrying cell phones today.

      Having said that, health care workers are people first, and there exists roughly the same proportion of stupid, thoughtless people in the industry as exist in the world at large. So, many health care workers use phones thoughtlessly. Should they stop? Sure.

      Wedding rings are virtual cesspools of virulent bacteria, particularly if they are engraved and/or contain a complex setting. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to get people to take off their wedding rings while working in ICU's even though we have reams of good, hard science demonstrating that rings are a very efficient way to infect patients with all kinds of deadly bugs? Forget cell phones, it's just another surface, just another pathogen vehicle. It's just a particularly powerful vehicle because people touch it with their hands.

      I despise cell phones only slightly more than I despise strollers. They are both a menace to civility in public space. But, there's nothing new here. My point is the cell phone problem discussed in this story, and all other similar hand-contamination vectors (past, present and future) can be stopped dead with 15 seconds of hand-washing. Just using running water , i.e., without soap, is almost as effective. It's not hard, it's just inconvenient.

      --
      The best way to do is to be.
    3. Re:A new Paper Tiger by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Possibly, but what the hell are medical staff doing with cell phones on them in the first place while they're on the job, working with patients?

      Some hospitals use cellphones now instead of the old PA systems for communication between the staff on large units.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  49. Cell Phones in Hospitals? by CaptainZapp · · Score: 2, Informative
    Maybe I live in a strange part of the world on the edge of civilisation so to speak; but

    Every damn hospital I've ever set foot in outright forbids the use of cell phones on hospital premises. (Use as defined in having it switched on)

    Apparently they can lead to nasty interactions with some of the delicate electronics they have running in hospitals and kill patients in the process.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

    1. Re:Cell Phones in Hospitals? by xA40D · · Score: 1

      Every damn hospital I've ever set foot in outright forbids the use of cell phones on hospital premises. (Use as defined in having it switched on)

      But then one poster claimed mobiles in waiting rooms would be OK, and that Mobiles are not really the problems those signs make out...

      We trust doctors... People who are ill are delicate... And the machines must be delicate too... So I must turn off my mobile.... I could hurt somebody... They wouldnt lie.

      But then how may of us would happily lie to get mobiles banned from ALL waiting rooms, cinemas, busses & bus stations, trains & train stations, outside my bedroom window in the middle of the freaking night...

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  50. It's the worker's *hands* that are the problem. by upstateguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Certainly the cell phone is a conveinent place to pick up bugs. But so are doorknobs, restrooms, etc.

    The real problem...and working in public health I know this hasn't changed even since the advent of germ theory...is just getting the damn workers (I *include* physicians) in hospitals to wash their hands corrrectly before working with a patient. I still see plenty of infectious disease workers more than happy to walk out of a bathroom without washing their hands.

    And even if you do, when you touch just about anything (or just wait, as the stuff as you left on your hand grows) you could be putting patients...esp immunosuppresed patients (HIV/chemo/elderly) at great danger.

    I always shudder seeing hospital staff walking outside on the streets in their scrubs, shoe covers and hair covers like they are some magical shield that will never pick up pathogens harmful to the patients.

    1. Re:It's the worker's *hands* that are the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a fuck about patients? You people are only interested in money anyway. (And if that's not true, explain why you are paid such an obscene amount.)

  51. Good!! by moehoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new toxic wireless overlords.

    Now, I can kill my enemies with a simple "Here, it's for you..."

    In the past, I had to pass them a tin can connected to a string that previously contained bad salmon.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:Good!! by glucoseboy · · Score: 1

      Ha Ha Ha LOL Although, technically, the term should be pathogenic, not toxic.... Ahh, the Simpsons,

    2. Re:Good!! by thunderbird46 · · Score: 1
      In the past, I had to pass them a tin can connected to a string that previously contained bad salmon.

      Nice dangling participle there -- unless you really mean that the bad salmon had been tied up in a string? :) /grammar_nazi

  52. Let's make cellphones out of wood by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Studies of cutting boards show that wooden cutting boards are safer than plastic ones. The research shows that you can find bacteria on plastic cutting boards (even ones that where hand-scrubbed), but that even unwashed wooden boards have no bacteria on the surface after they dry. Apparently capilliary action pulls bacteria into the wood's pores and away from the surface of the wood, leaving the surface sterile.

    Wooden cellphone skins would make a nice retro-fashion statement. For extended use, the wooden phone skins could be removed and autoclaved.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Let's make cellphones out of wood by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Apparently capilliary action pulls bacteria into the wood's pores and away from the surface of the wood, leaving the surface sterile.

      Very interesting. Do you have a reference for that study?

      I'd be concerned that subsequent use would expose bacteria to the food. For example, you cut up some raw chicken and rinse the board. Next day you slice up some juicy apples, and the knife, which cuts into the surface slightly, pulls up bacteria from yesterday and deposits it on the apple.

      I think those disposable cutting mats are a great idea for meats and other substances likely to carry nasties.

  53. So it goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would appear that they do indeed.

  54. ICU staff wash hands constantly by BreadMan · · Score: 1

    First hand knowledge: Folks in the ICU constantly wash hands. Each station has a sink and *everyone* washes with soap and water before and after going to a patient's bed. Infection is the biggest risk in ICU.

    The phones, I'm sure aren't the biggest problem. I was surprised I could go in there with my feet and hair uncovered. I'm sure even one "clean" human hair or dandruff (sic) flake has more germs on it than a cell-phone.

  55. The solution is.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    The solution? Eat garlic according to this article on BBC news. Its a suprisingly effective antibiotic, without all the drawbacks of normal antibiotics.. Me? I swear by it. Also a strong curry followed by a few beers usually kills all those germs. You can read about another cause of antibiotic-resistant superbugs here.. This article is also interesting - I think it will be proven true, a few years after everyone has stopped laughing. And all this time you thought it was alternative hippy bullshit.. :-) Oh and Douglas Adams rules..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  56. It's not only the phones by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    Hospitals do everything to keep medical instruments not only desinfected but also sterile. But when it comes to furniture/floor/etc they do a really shoddy job. You stand a good chance to contract a fascinating disease whenever they put you there. I once worked in a hospital and the first thing I learned was not to take personal stuff with me. They provided the stylish white clothing and everything else I'd need. I wouldn't want anything at home that I had with me when I pulled some old people out of their own poo. Stupidity is a disease that is wide spread in all professions.

    --
    20 minutes into the future
    1. Re:It's not only the phones by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      ...and even in mine. Sorry for not previewing. *stupid* *stupid* *stupid*

      --
      20 minutes into the future
  57. can't the bacteria mutate? by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    Yeeeeee haaaaaa.......if the bacteria is on the surface of the cell phone, and of course "everyone knows" that cell phones cause cancer, mayber we are going to have the bacteria mutate into a 3 eyed fish from the radiation coming off the cell phone? Yipee! three eyed fish.....yummmmmmmmmmmm

  58. autoclave by Luveno · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll gladly volunteer my pager for autoclave survival testing.

  59. Eradicate them! by jargoone · · Score: 1

    Someone should really think of some sort of built in counter-measure. Perhaps alter the phones so that they emit low-level radiation. This would likely destroy the harmful bacteria.

  60. Now the bag is infected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Infinite recursion looms...

  61. Re:Sterile cell phones +5 interesting???????? by jazman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then we'd see the /. headline "Plastic Bags May Spread Infections." The infections aren't coming from the cellphone itself, but from whoever touches it, therefore the same problem will exist however the cellphone is covered.

    (Duh. I can't believe I have to explain that one. Still, it was modded +5 Interesting so I suppose some folks just haven't got the ability to think about things for a microsecond or two.)

    Dunking the user in alcohol has a number of merits though...:-)

  62. Pagers aren't hands free by absolutezeroLAN · · Score: 1

    Pagers aren't really hands free at all. i mean you still have to put your and on it to see who it is, plus you must take them off from time to time. Pagers could also be a large carrier of dangerous infections.

  63. You certainly *can* autoclave a cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And it certainly will be sterile afterwards.

    And it won't ring in the middle of a dinner date anymore! Woot!

  64. Let this be a lesson! by Pitr · · Score: 1

    I knew sending all the telephone sanetizers to another planet was a bad idea! Where's our superior intellect now?

    --

    --Not to be worried, Pitr fix.
  65. I assume this is America we're talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm staggered that you can use mobile phones in American hospitals. They aren't allowed in the UK and from what I remember most of europe - they interfere with all the monitoring equipment.

    1. Re:I assume this is America we're talking about by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      I believe that it's only GSM band phones that are a problem with some very specific varieties of medical equipment. I don't think any 3G or *DMA phones cause problems.

      For once the american's incompat. phone system is useful? =P

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  66. Not quite the same but.... by h4mmer5tein · · Score: 1

    My ex is a doctor. During her junior doctor days in hospital medicine ( Intern type thing ) they had a pair of Gameboys sealed in sterile plastic bags for the theater staff to use during long operations.

  67. Mine's been cleaned... by solarcardork · · Score: 1

    I also have a Samsung - mine survived a full cycle through a washing machine, powered on, with no ill effects. Actually, it has developed a nice fresh smell since then.

  68. Novel lifeform by desolation+angel · · Score: 1
    A. baumannii it requires no nutrients

    presumably it derives it's energy from an internal cold fusion plant.

    --
    This time I could be arsed.
  69. telephone sanitizers by option8 · · Score: 1

    this is what you get for sending off all the telephone sanitizers in a space ship to crash on another planet, just because they're a bunch of useless bloody loonies.

    though i guess it's better than being eaten by a giant mutant space goat.

    (anyway, that's the first thing that came to mind when i read this.)

  70. good synchronicity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there's an article at wired today about a cure for superbugs:

    bacteriophages!

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.10/phages_ pr .html

  71. Cell phones in hospitals? by Gunfighter · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute... every time I step foot in the hospital, they tell me to turn off my cell phone because it interferes with their equipment. If the phones have to be turned off, why are the doctors and nurses even carrying them?

    -- Gun

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  72. This is SO wrong! by spineboy · · Score: 1
    Well, he's right about not being able to autoclave the phone, since the plastic might melt, electronics get wet.

    As far as METALS not being able to withstand the heat? WTF? autoclaves only get to around 120 deg C and 10-15 atmospheres - pretty much ANY metal can withstand that - except I guess mercury ;-)

    As far as sterilizing non-heat safe stuff, there is ethylene-oxide sterilization available - it's how most of our delicate electronic stuff (arthroscopy cameras, lenses, etc) is sterilized - lots o' nooks and crannies, but that's not a problem for gas anyway.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  73. Make cellphones out of Microban? by ayden · · Score: 1

    Microban Antimicrobial Product Protection is the global leader in built-in antimicrobial solutions and can be found in consumer, industrial, building and medical products around the world. From toothbrushes to humidifiers, foodservice equipment to building materials and dental trays to surgical drapes, Microban technology is your promise of antimicrobial protection that will inhibit the growth of bacteria and mold that can cause stains, odors and product deterioration. And because Microban protection is built-in during the manufacturing process it keeps products cleaner and fresher, for the useful life of the product. For an added level of protection from microbes look for products with Microban antimicrobial protection.

    --
    "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
  74. Re:Sterile cell phones +5 interesting???????? by DdJ · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Then we'd see the /. headline "Plastic Bags May Spread Infections." The infections aren't coming from the cellphone itself, but from whoever touches it, therefore the same problem will exist however the cellphone is covered.
    But you're not getting what the problem is. The same plastic surface is used constantly, so stuff gets on it one day, and grows, and is still there the next day, and grows, and that's the problem. Plastic bags that are replaced every day would indeed be at least a partial solution to the problem.
  75. To cure the dryness apply liberal amouts of KY2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    To cure the dryness apply liberal amouts of KY2. No more problem if the bacteria only lives in dry areas.

  76. Sterilizing heat-sensitive components by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is already done in most hospitals by using an EO (Ethylene Oxide) autoclave. Most hospitals have one to clean rubber instuments that would melt in the regular clave. EO is very dangerous stuff (you have to wear a detection badge), and is especially dangerous to pregnant women. The temp for a gas clave is right around body temp, so it should work fine if you remove the battery from the cell phone first.

  77. New Verizon commercial by Boyceterous · · Score: 1

    Can you hear me gag? hic...Good!

  78. bacterial breeding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure cell phones in the past weren't the bacterial breeding ground that they are now. At least, not until this product came along..

  79. Eliminate hands not cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone catch that the infection rate for hands (24%) was higher than the infection rate for cell phones (12%)? This suggests that there's a breakdown in the sanitary practices of the personal, not an inherent problem with cell phones or other common surfaces in the hospital. Hospitals have always been fertile ground for harboring nasty germs. Does anyone have information on successful germ control. Or is (24%) hand contamination typical.

  80. Re:Sterile cell phones +5 interesting???????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about "Condoms May Spread Infections." The infections aren't coming from the penis itself, but from whoever touches it, therefore the same problem will exist however the penis is covered.

    (Duh. I can't believe I have to explain that one. Still it was modded +3 Insightful ... whoops, guess someone saw how overrated it was ... I suppose some folks have the ability to think about things for a microsecond or two.)

  81. I used to wash my hands in Carbon Tet. by jbottero · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ahhhh, in the day, before the EPA, OSHA and FDA got their hands on workplace health hazards, we used to use Carbon Tet to clean EVERYTHING.

  82. Why not just WASH YOUR HANDS by xA40D · · Score: 2

    how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it

    Yeah, then people will forget clean them.

    The basic problem is that antibiotics has made us all blase about the dangers of Bacteria. So even basic hygene measures, like washing your hands, are being ignored. Every doctor I've had has washed their hands AFTER examining me. But I remember as a child they also did so BEFORE examining me... not seen them do that for years.

    But not to worry, soon our lazy approach to the use of antibiotics will make most bacteria resistant in a decade or two... so we'll soon get the knack again one day.

    Sarcasm aside, I'm sure I read something to back this up... 10% of patients in UK hospitals catch somthing whilst in hospital owing to poor hygene (and it can't be mobiles as they've always been banned).

    --
    Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  83. Hands free pager? Hand free land line phone? by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    How is cellphone any worst for transmitter disease than the landline phone used inside the hospital?

    How can one read a pager with out using one's hand?

    This article makes no sense.

  84. Uh huh...Microwave by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1


    Mandatory microwaving of cellphones for 60 second in the hospitals....

    But wait, no one wants the leftover bacteria sneaking into the film cover opening of their TV dinners....

  85. The folly of the Golgafrinchams by n1ywb · · Score: 1
    Remember in The Guide, how the Golgafrinchams banished all of their payphone sanitizers (and hair dressers, etc) to the primitive earth? And then all of the remaining Golgafrinchams dies of a virulent disease spread through dirty payphones? Yeah...

    From SadGeezer:
    It was decided that three large Arcs were to be built which would carry the whole population across the galaxy to find a new planet for them to colonise. In the 'A Arc' would go all the leaders, the brilliant scientists, the great thinkers and clever politicians, in the 'C Arc' would go all the doers, the builders and fabricators, the people who made things. The 'B Arc' would therefore carry all the middlemen such as telephone sanitisers and management consultants.

    Anyway, the plan involved the building of the B Arc first. All the 'middle' people were rounded up and sent off to find a new home, oblivious to the fact that the A and C Arcs would never be built.

    It's ironic that the planet Golgafrincham suffered a virulent and ultimately fatal virus a few years later. It was transmitted by dirty telephones.
    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  86. Infections? by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

    I don't know about in hospitals, but I know they certainly spread the 'I don't know enough to shut the hell up in a movie theater' infection.

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
  87. Practice Safe Calls. by AlecC · · Score: 1

    While wiping the phone with an alcohol wipe would be beter than nothing, I don't think it would solve the problem. Most medical equipment which contacts the patient ia made smooth and wipeable so that there are no unwipeable cracks to harbour bacteria. Mobile phones are not: bacteria could go down the cracks alonside the buttons etc, and nestle inside the case, to be shaken out later.

    I could imagine making a phone safe with a sort of "phone condom" - which could in turn be under a removable, sterilisable case so that it wouldn't look too ugly, but I have never seen such a thing.

    The other point is tha thr most usefule thing about mobile is that you always have them on you. If you have to swap for a "safe" mobile on entering the hospital, you might as well use a landline.

    A new acronym for AIDS - Audio Induced Disease Syndrome.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  88. Why is this surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I just got back from this conference.

    The issue here is not so much that they're running around with A. baumanii on their phones; you could probably grow similarly nasty things from the one(s) currently hanging from your own person. The true emphasis of this study is the lack of appropriate handwashing and barrier precautions by hospital staff.

    This is heavily overshadowed, of course, by the fact that we're rapidly running out of antibiotics that still work, thanks in part to the scores of parents who load their kids up with cipro every time they get a runny nose.

  89. Buckets of water... by Rai · · Score: 2, Funny

    I used to work for a hospital's IT dept and part of the job was maintaining Nortel companion phones for one of the nursing depts. Every couple of months, they would bring a non-working phone to us saying it fell in a bucket of water. We always wonder why the nursing dept would keep a bucket of water at their station. Eventually, we learned that "bucket of water" was their term for "toilet." How's that for sanitary? :)

    1. Re:Buckets of water... by Uthiroid · · Score: 1

      gives "refurbished" a new meaning at the cell phone shop, eh?

  90. sterilize by gregeth · · Score: 1

    Actually, you have a good point. There is a problem currently with doctors not sanitizing enough in hospitals. Of all the people I've known who have had surgery, a large percent of them have developed some kind of infection like staph.

    This website discusses how common the infection may really be. The bacteria is often best spread through contaminated instruments during things like surgery.

  91. Pagers by operagost · · Score: 1

    The hospital that conducted this research no longer allows the use of cell phones, and are switching to devices that don't require hand contact like pagers.

    Because, as we all know, one can operate a pager with one's toes.
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  92. large dry surfaces? by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

    What percentage of large dry surfaces do cell phones constitute in hospitals?

    If cell phones are a problem, I'd think that regular phones, desktops, countertops, garbage cans, stretchers, ventilation ducts, pens, PDA's, handrails, keyboards, monitors, walls, and floors would be a veritable public health nightmare. Yes, some of these things are cleaned from time to time, but many are not. When was the last time you saw a doctor wipe down his pen with alcohol?

  93. Pagers that don't need hand contact? by ziriyab · · Score: 1, Funny
    ...and are switching to devices that don't require hand contact like pagers.

    They must be talking about those new anal pagers that give you the message by anal-braille. The anus has a pretty high concentration of sensory endings, so it makes perfect sense to use it instead of less sensitive parts like the hip or back. Plus it's close to where the pager is usually located anyway.

    You may think that clean-up would be an issue, but you can buy these cute little disposable latex covers for the insertable part.

  94. Numbers too high by bug-eyed+monster · · Score: 1

    The article says 12% of cellphones are contaminated, and 50% of infected people die. Adding these up, we must conclude that 6% of people carrying a cellphone into ICUs will die.

    6% is nothing to laugh at. I'm guessing somewhere, somebody inflated a number just to make it into the news.

    1. Re:Numbers too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the critical percentage: What percentage of 'contaminated' phones directly lead to infections in people?

  95. Re:Hands free pager? Hand free land line phone? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

    The landline phone does not leave the hospital and go into the outside world, unlike your cell phone.

  96. Or else by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
    as in the original post run through the autoclave to sterilize it.

    Although I have yet to see any kind of phone that can stand an autoclave, I personally know three hospital workers who have solved their own mobile phone problems by drowning the machines in the toilet :-)

  97. Since we all know that cellphones are dangerous by Mordant · · Score: 1

    emitters of radiation, one would think this wouldn't be a problem. ;>

  98. Mod him up... he's right by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Informative

    It really comes down to hand-washing.

    If you wash your hands between patients (and especially before going to see someone who's immune system has taken a hit... chemo, HIV, SCID, etc, etc), you'll cut down dramatically on the spread of disease.

    The nosocomial, or hospital-acquired infections are the worst actors... multiply-resistant, and prevelant in the one location where sick and vulnerable people are gathered in one place.

    This doesn't leave out healthcare workers. Your own commensal organisms that live on your skin and in your gut tend to be wild-type, and less-resistant than nosocomials.... until you wipe them out by doing something dumb, like taking antibiotics for an infection that's viral, or would clear up on its own given a little time (mild sinusitis, for example). This is why I advocate avoiding antibiotics unless clearly indicated... this includes taking antibiotics for infections that would get better with good wound care alone... like boils and smaller cutaneous abscesses. If you work in a health care facility, your normal bacterial population is the only thing protecting you from mass colonization with resistant bugs, particularly if you work with critically-ill patients. You don't want to get really sick with something, then find out there's nothing that can treat your infection... I've seen it happen to too many patients.

    So yes, wash your hands... and don't take antibiotics unless you damned well NEED them... If I personally get sick, and all the antibiotics are going to do is shorten my disease course by a day or two, I'll skip them... I'm not sacrificing my precious normal flora for such a minimal gain.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  99. Unnecessary by chaoticset · · Score: 1
    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

    Actually, there's already bacteria-unfriendly plastic in existence. All you'd really need is a faceplate/shell made of that stuff.


    Although I bet the first guy to make one of those will make a small fortune selling them in all-white in medical mail-order catalogs...

    --

    -----------------------
    You are what you think.
  100. a pager? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    How does a pager not require hand contact? Dont you touch it? This is stupid the solution is to make health care workers actually wash their hands more. Plus, outpatient care generally results in fewer infections.

  101. UV irradiation by saikou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, why would not they make a desk with UV lamp, where people can put their phones/PDAs/whatever else. Hard UV radiation is quite effective as a decontamination mechanism. In some countries (Russia, for example), UV lamp is used daily in examination rooms (while no humans are present, of course ;) ), to reduce amount of airborne contaminants in the air and on irradiated surfaces.

    Not sure if it would harm the screen of cellphone (a simple UV protective transparent sticker would help) but all other surfaces would be clensed without problems. No?

    1. Re:UV irradiation by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not sure if it would harm the screen of cellphone (a simple UV protective transparent sticker would help) but all other surfaces would be clensed without problems. No?

      Unless specifically designed with UV irradiation in mind, the plastic of the phone would probably become brittle.

      Also, UV is extremely vulnerable to nook-and-cranny failures. Any part of the phone that is potentially shaded--around buttons, holes in the speaker or microphone grille--can protect bacteria from UV exposure. Actually, just a little bit of dirt or dust can provide sufficient shade to permit bacteria to survive. UV works quite well on airborne pathogens, but surfaces must be carefully designed with UV sterilization in mind.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:UV irradiation by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia ... oh nevermind.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  102. Germ Free Cellphones by CHaN_316 · · Score: 1

    Someone make me a cellphone made completely out of soap. After the initial prototype is complete, we can consider adding extra bells and whistles to the phone like pleasent scents. Consumers should be able to choose from a variety of scents like Spring Breeze, Summer Passion, Crisp Winter Air, or Beach (dead fish). Mmmm.... frilly soaps

    --
    "There is no spoon." - The Matrix
  103. How long until??? by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

    I'm sure that will happen.... shortly after someone invents a ziplock baggy.

  104. Dunked by cpopin · · Score: 1

    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

    I killed a waterproof watch with alcohol and gasoline. I accidently knocked a gas can over onto my arm and drenched my watch. I tried everything to get the smell out. When I finally soaked it overnight in rubbing alcohol, it got the smell out but it stopped working. I guess alcohol can get in some places that water can't.

    Charging it would be interesting. I own the Braun Oral-B 3D toothbrush and it's completely sealed. It has no metal contacts for charging. It must use induction to charge while it's sitting in its cradle.

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
  105. Precisely the point by bug-eyed+monster · · Score: 1

    You're right, but the news article also seems to have conveniently forgotten to give us that number. If a high percentage of contaminated phones lead to infections, then my point stands, where are all the people dropping dead after visits to ICUs? If a low percentage, then why worry so much about contaminated cellphones? Just give them a good wipe on the way out and you're done.

  106. Shrink-wrap 'em by jurgen · · Score: 1

    TThe solution is trivial. Require workers to shrink-wrap or vacuum wrap their phone when they come in... provide a vacuum or shrink wrap machine (available for a couple of hundred bucks) for the purpose. The phone will work fine inside the shrink-wrap, and you just rip it off before leaving the hospital. Voila. :j

  107. Pay attention, slashdorks, he's right, too. by rdewald · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem with antibiotic abuse in health care workers is particularly troubling, as you describe. I'm like you, I don't take them unless my clinical situation indicates it--meaning I have the right drug for the right bug and I'm getting worse instead of better.

    Don't even get me started on anti-bacterial soaps.... Not only does their misuse compound the problems we've discussed above, but these soaps only kill off the same flora that our antibiotics (particularly the cheap and safe ones) do, leaving the drug-resistant flora relatively unaffected. As they get washed into our communal water-treatment facilities, the drug-resistant strains are then left with reduced competiton for the limited, consumable resources (like food) that they need to live and multiply.

    Because of the use of the "New and Improved Anti-bacterial ____," we encourage the survival and colonization of the very bugs that cause the illnesses for which we don't have good and/or cheap antibiotics. I particularly regret seeing antibacterials used routinely at home around infants, which is the use for which they are most aggressively marketed....

    But, I've wandered sufficiently off topic for now.

    --
    The best way to do is to be.
  108. Re:Sterile cell phones +5 interesting???????? by Linux+Ate+My+Dog! · · Score: 1

    Then what you need to do is to sterilize the cell-phone covers every day. Almost every Nokia phone can have its covers taken off completly.

    They woud probably deform if you tried to autoclave them. An alcohol-based sterilization would be better, with a little extra wipe of the screen.

  109. If only... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now if only a similar scare could make it into the headlines saying "Using a cellphone when driving can give you SARS." Or better still, "Using a cellphone when driving and simultaniously talking at the top of your voice so that everyone else stopped at the lights can hear you as you wave your arms around emphatically can seriously increase risk of developing a serious illness." Maybe then I could get to work without having at least one near-death experience every morning.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  110. Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    although many hospitals do not permit cellphones (including doctors) because of the effect upon equipment (in fact, many insulate so standard cells don't work), they do have a special type of phone which will work inhouse and not tamper with the signals. And these phones are no more different WRT cleanliness.

    If the first thing a caregiver does when they walk in and potentially touch you is *not* to wash their hands, they're likely introducing bugs - either to you or to the next patient they don't wash their hands for.

    Remember the episode of Seinfeld where Poppi is in the bathroom stall with Jerry and Jerry sees him walk out without washing his hands, bragging how he will personally make a perfect meal? (Jerry then won't eat any of that food) That's exactly what you're talking about with any caregiver who makes contact with anyone|anything. Period. Endofsentence.

  111. sterilizing and refueling at once by eisenbud · · Score: 1

    What would really be cool is a cellphone that you could dunk in alcohol to sterilize it and refill its fuel cell at the same time!

  112. ... since by hatrisc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when can you use cell phones in hospitals?? EVERY hospital i've been in in the last 5 years has signs at every entrance saying, "Cellular phones may interfere with life saving equipment. TURN THEM OFF"

    --
    I write code.
  113. My "favorite" medical practice by Anonymous+Cowdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My favorite is when they wear nice gloves, at the dentist for example, and are continually opening this or that drawer with their gloves. I suppose they think the germs from my mouth aren't going to get onto the drawer, because they have gloves on??!! Of course they wipe all surfaces down with antiseptic, even every nook and cranny behind those drawer pull knobs, between every patient. Right.

    Then there was the dental assistant who used her own five-second rule (oops, wrong story) to quickly pick up and start to re-use a tool she had dropped on the floor.

    Apply the same mentality to a cell phone, which has much greater mobility in and out of the environment, and it does make an effective germ vector.

    1. Re:My "favorite" medical practice by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      The gloves are to protect THEM from YOU. And for the record at my Dentist they use strips of plastic over handles, drawers, and tables tops that are replaced between patients.

      And no, there is no 5 second rule. Just a vat of Isopropyl for re-cleaning the tool.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  114. Sounds like a job for . . . by Nerodias · · Score: 1

    . . . Star Trek communicators!

    Crusher to Picard: Stop calling me when I'm working.

  115. Burn, baby, burn. by LiberalApplication · · Score: 1
    Solutions:

    1) dunk healthcare workers in 90% ethanol thrice daily. It will sanitize, sterilize, and blotto-ize.

    2) autoclave healthcare workers following each procedure they are involved in. Life insurance policies may not be taken out by healthcare workers.

    3) (this one is serious) There are little protective slips for just about every part of a healthcare worker's body. There are face masks, gowns, shoe-covers, latex gloves, hair nets, caps, and goggles. Why not require that all cellphones in use by on-the-clock healthcare workers be kept within little, sterile, porous pouches made of material like facemasks? They can be semitransparent and still sterile, disposable, usable, and inexpensive. And just like changing gloves, you can swap them out whenever you get blood, bile, saliva, urine, and/or semen on yourself (preferably not all at the same time).

  116. Mobile phone condoms hit the big time by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a burdgeoning new market for the condom/prophylactic industry. Perhaps, we could soon buy mobile phone rubbers that work just like surgical gloves. Put them on the phone to protect from germs, and change regularly to prevent spread of infeciton.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  117. Rise of the sterling silver faceplate by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    Silver has long been used as an effective agent against germs. Perhaps the sterling silver faceplate will become standard issue on mobile phones.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  118. heh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a relieve; i OWN skin!
    kidding!
    okay (got the germ), i got this finger full of germs what do i have to do now to get sick please?
    can someone point a HOW-TO out somewhere?

  119. Re:Sterile cell phones +5 interesting???????? by DdJ · · Score: 1
    Then what you need to do is to sterilize the cell-phone covers every day. Almost every Nokia phone can have its covers taken off completly.
    Yeah, if the cell phone cover prevents contacts with the buttons and display -- that is, if there's no surface at all that isn't covered by a removable cover -- then that would indeed work. A plastic bag sort of solution would work for a wider variety of phones.
  120. Is the it the raise of SoBlaster.G ? by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 1

    OK, it shall not be hard for cell phones to spread Outlook Viruses through SMS's and MMSs alike.

    I can foresee these biological Pathogens merging thenselves whith their eletronic counterparts on the CDMA Processor Cores, and wipping out the information society as we know it.

    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
  121. Urban Myth by rdmiller3 · · Score: 1
    This sounds like an urban myth, big-time.

    Like there aren't any other dry surfaces on objects being toted around by people passing through hospital wards?

    Oh, come on.

  122. No platform is safe... by retro128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    See everyone? Your cell phone CAN spread viruses!

    --
    -R
  123. Pay phones are worse by yintercept · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Phones only spread infections when people share the phones. So a pay phone or other public phone would do more to spread infection than a cell phone.

    The fact that we are all running around with our private little phones means that we are exposing ourselves to fewer phone carried bugs than we would get by using a common phone.

    I really can't remember the last time I handed my phone to a stranger. In fact, its been several month since anyone other than myself has touched my cell phone.

    As for companies that have use a common phone for people on call...they really should just get forwardable 800 number...that way they could swith duties by pointing to different phones...it is much more convenient.

  124. "resistance to almost all available antibiotics" by mraymer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ah, yes. I suppose it would be, since almost all available antibiotics promote resistant strains.

    Except, however, the one form of antibiotic that is frowned upon by professionals. Let me introduce you to colloidal silver. It's a suspension of silver particles in water... and guess what? It has been shown to kill germs including bacteria, viruses, yeast, mold, fungus and parasites, many of which are resistant to antibiotics.

    I know many of you are saying "snake oil" right now, but I've used the stuff to cure ear infections, and it works a lot faster and at a much lower price than antibiotics.

    You can even make your own.

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  125. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cell phones can bake your brain and make you go senile.

    Cell phones can cause you to have accidents while driving.

    Cell phones can make you unable to have children.

    Cell phones can make other people irritable and cause fights to break out.

    Cell phone usage can clog up the radio spectrum.

    Cell phones are clearly a choking hazard.

    Cell phone calling plans can make people poor.

    Did I leave anything out?

  126. Re: reference for study on wooden cutting boards by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    I first read about this in a 1996 Science News article. This article mentions work by Philip H. Kass and his colleagues at the University of California, Carl A. Batt of Cornell University and his colleagues, and Dean O. Cliver. Sorry, but I don't have any citations for articles in more scholarly journals.

    Most importantly, it appears that even if you cut up another food on a previously contaminated (by now dry) wooden cutting board, the likelihood of contamination is low. Wood apparently pulls the bacteria fairly deeply into the board (about 1 mm down), out of reach of subsequent activities. By contrast, bacteria can survive in the knife-cuts of plastic cutting boards and spread during subsequent uses.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  127. Causes other things, too by Le+Marteau · · Score: 2, Funny

    I gave up my cell phone years ago when I realized that 75% of the time I saw a cell phone, I saw it attached to the ear of a jackass, and I'm not taking any chances... I quit the things cold turkey.

    Not sure if the cell phone causes its user to become a jackass, or if jackasses use cell phones, but why take the chance unnecessarily?

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  128. Cellphones and infections. by Chompster · · Score: 1

    Cellphones already spread one infection;

    Friends don't let friends call and drive.

    (supposedly, talking on a cellphone and driving is like driving while under the influence of alcohol)
    -Chompster

    --
    This isn't a redundant post; I just set my threshold to 6.
  129. This is worthless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a common dilusion spread by the popular media that 'germs' be it bacteria or what ever are the evils of mankind. In fact the human body is littered with trillions of germs, of a vast variety. If you want to find a bug, you will. I know, I am a physician and I work in a burn intensive care unit. The breading ground for more bugs than any intensive care setting known to man. The populus is absolutely paranoid about things that they understand nothing about. Furthermore, it is unlikely that any attempt to prevent the spread of infection from cell phones will have any effect on the overall outcome as far as hospital infection rates are concerned. There have been several well done studies that have shown infection rates to be no higher for surgeons who scrub for 5 minutes prior to a case and those that only wash their hands for a short period of time. There are many factors that go into getting an infection. Ultimatly we can only afford so many stupid hat tricks to make us feel like we are making a difference. Lastly, though I have not read this study, the real question is whether or not the conclusions are even valid based on the data. What was their negative control, are they just spewing numbers that have no coorelation. Did they compare the rate of infection to patients by physsicians who carry cell phones compared to those that did not. Just because it falls under the guise of science does not mean it is good science, in fact it may be HORRIBLE, missleading, and down right dead wrong.

  130. The only solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bathe regularly in a vat of bacteria. Better to keep the immune system nice and strong....

  131. morons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it so hard to wipe off the phone with some 99% iso-alchohal swabs???? you dont need to drench the thing, you just need to wipe it down... 99% alchohal will kiil anything... or bleech wipes. no need to ban phones as long as your being sanitary.

    But then again there is always going to be that stupid asshole who wipes back to front.

  132. why not use UV light ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well? why not ? So the plasticizer would need added UV protection, but otherwise it would work fine.

  133. Alcohol by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

    Where I work (biotech company), I spray 70% denatured ethanol on my calculator, mouse, and phone frequently. They've never crapped out on me because of it. I imagine the results would be similar for a cell phone.

    --
    Nice Marmot
  134. Re: reference for study on wooden cutting boards by yo5oy · · Score: 1

    usually i just add a 1/2 capful of bleach to the soapy water and sponge to clean anything like utensils, cutting boards (wood or plastic) and dishes.

    --
    a slut did tulsa
  135. seems like a great market for antimicrobal plastic by binarybum · · Score: 1

    I have not seen much of this technology at my local hospital yet, but it seems like this would be a great application for antimicrobal plastics. The problem with any kind of sterilization procedure is that serious problems can start with just one transfer and sterilization can only be realistically performed at some deterimined interval during which multiple exchanges are likely to happen. The key is making an environment that is unwelcoming to microbes in the first place.

    This company claims to have a working product.

    Not sure if it's the same stuff or not, but This page (google cache) also talks about the development of such materials.

    I first heard about this stuff right here on /., but wasn't able to find the article.

    --
    ôó
  136. Nonsense by epaiuk · · Score: 1

    Everything needs to be taken in context. Acetinobacter is a very uncommon infection, even among ICU patients. A better study would study whether the presence of cell phones actually changed the infection rate, not just colonization rates. Hospitals are colonized by may different bacteria, but that is not necessarily clinically significant. It only makes a difference if people actually get infected at a higher rate.

    --
    Elian Paiuk
  137. Seems like an overreaction. by WoTG · · Score: 1

    Really, what doesn't pose a risk? How about shoes? Visitors? What about patients?! If they prevent sick patients from being in the hospital, they can't spread germs, right?

  138. wine changed my phone forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone spilled red wine on my Siemens, which must have coated the light behind the screen with a dark purple film.

    To this day the screen doesn't light up nearly as bright as it once did.

  139. You aren't kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certainly the worst bathroom is worse than the worst computer, and people only tend to remember the bad bathrooms.

    Not only do they remember...sometimes they even take pictures.

    Posting anonymously for the first time in over a year for obvious reasons...

  140. Cell phones in Hospitals? by Rarcke · · Score: 1

    Um, I don't know about where these guys are but in EVERY hospital I've ever been in it was completely aganst the rules it have your cell phone on at all. The cell phone's signal affects the reading of the telemetry units in the ICU (Intensive Care Unit). My mom, who works in a hospital is constantly having to remind patients and visitors to tunr off their cell phones. It seems very strange to me that any hospital would rely on cell phone to contact their staff.

    --
    -Department Head of the Department of Redundancy, Department Head