Slashdot Mirror


Personal File Server For The Masses

prostoalex writes "California-based Inspiri is coming to the market with Mirra - a personal file-server with simple backup solutiion, remote access as well as file-sharing capabilities. The $399 device comes with 120 GB hard drive, front-mounted USB ports and Ethernet interface. There are some pictures of Mirra on the corporate Web site. The founder of Inspiri, Tim Bucher, according to the corporate documents, had an interesting career, having worked at both Apple and Microsoft, while the VP of Engineering in this company used to work as acting CEO of Apple's Newton business group."

182 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Not needed by yotto · · Score: 2, Funny

    For $400 bucks, I can buy a bajillion CDs and back up that way.
    And go out to dinner with the wife, and maybe get some drinks.
    And a new puppy.

    1. Re:Not needed by MickLinux · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you think that the new puppy might cause some compatability issues with the CDs? I predict some data loss unless you do your homework...

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    2. Re:Not needed by SheldonYoung · · Score: 2, Funny

      Silly boy, buy the puppy and the drinks and the girls are free.

    3. Re:Not needed by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and scramble for those cd's then too when you need something from them?

      that said, it's a ridiculous price for 120gb and 120gb isn't that much at all anyways.

      but i'd very much rather have few tb's of hd space that could fit all my shit than having a stack of cd's with a list of what's in them.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Not needed by isorox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So a "bajillion" is arround 2000?

      CD's are not good for backing up - if you have a 100GB hard drive you need arround 150CDs. Lets say you can burn a CD in 5 minutes (allowing time for coasters), that takes 12 hours of your time, cost arround $50 for the CD's, and at $20 an hour $240 for your time. That 100GB file server starts looking more tempting.

      Of course if you're going for a file server, you should be going for a fast box with gigE, booting off a CD into RAM, and 8 200GB or 300GB hard drives, giving you between 1.5 and 2.5TB of readilly available storage, should cost more then $3000 even with a top of the line processer and a gig of ram.

      Obviously HDD's crash, so have them as a raid array - Still get 1.2TB of data on there, for $2.50 a gig. More expensive then DVDR or CD, but more convienent, and a lot cooler when you can answer "how much disk space you got" with terrabytes.

    5. Re:Not needed by hayden · · Score: 1
      and at $20 an hour $240 for your time.
      You get payed $20 an hour to sit around on your arse watching TV? WOW! How can I get in on this scam?
      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    6. Re:Not needed by spike+hay · · Score: 2, Informative


      Of course if you're going for a file server, you should be going for a fast box with gigE, booting off a CD into RAM, and 8 200GB or 300GB hard drives, giving you between 1.5 and 2.5TB of readilly available storage, should cost more then $3000 even with a top of the line processer and a gig of ram.


      What would really make sense instead of buying this $400 contraption, is buying a 160 gig HDD, which will run you up a little over $100 for a good one on Pricewatch grabbing a cheap 1 gig Duron and a K7S5A mobo, a cheap vid card for a few bucks, a stick of PC133, and throw Linux or Win2k on there, and you have yourself more storage space than this network fileserver for less money.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    7. Re:Not needed by isorox · · Score: 1

      Actually its more like $15 an hour at the moment. Get a job at a TV station.

    8. Re:Not needed by isorox · · Score: 1

      Or have the raid array stored 5 miles away on another part of the national grid (with its own UPS obviously) connected via wlan.

  2. That's odd by mrpuffypants · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the bigwig at the company used to work for apple but the site says that his new appliance will only work with a WinXP machine?

    What's that about?

    1. Re:That's odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You so understate that, allow me to help:

      What's that about?

    2. Re:That's odd by Technician · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Linksys will drop the price of their network attached storage appliance. The Linksys EFG80 is close to the same price, looks more useful, it will talk to a UPS, is expandable, and is primarily a network storage device, not a backup solution. I think it will work in a mixed network environment, not just XP boxes. It also does not assume an Internet broadband connection which worries me about this new offering since if I have sensitive stuff on my machines.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:That's odd by dublin · · Score: 1

      The Linksys EFG80 is close to the same price, looks more useful, it will talk to a UPS, is expandable, and is primarily a network storage device, not a backup solution. I think it will work in a mixed network environment, not just XP boxes. It also does not assume an Internet broadband connection which worries me about this new offering since if I have sensitive stuff on my machines.

      Unfortunately, the product seems to be pretty much abandoned, even though it's probably the best implementaitn of the idea since the original Zenith Z-Stor server. The Linksys is the only small server appliance I know of I know of that has the ability to RAID-1 mirror the disks for safety and/or periodic backups, or RAID-0 stripe for more capacity. I think they upgraded the 40GB HD to 80 GB almost two years ago, and there have been no substantial price drops or any improvements at all since then. Too bad...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  3. Strong credentials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    > used to work as acting CEO of Apple's Newton business group.

    A recipe for success, obviously.

    1. Re:Strong credentials by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Informative
      And it looks like they don't think much of Macs or Linux at the moment... Don't think many /.ers will be buying it in it's present configuration.

      Which computers does it work with? With Macs? With Linux?

      You can remotely access your photos and files from any Internet-connected PC, including Mac's. Currently only computers that run Windows 2000 or Windows XP are supported for Mirra Backup and Restore within your home network. We're considering support for Macintosh, Windows 98 and Linux. Please let us know at sales@ispiri.com if you would purchase a Mirra to use with those computers.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    2. Re:Strong credentials by JoeCommodore · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then again... Windows XP and 2000 users are a good market, they need that extra capacity to back up all those worms and viruses they are spreading amongst themseleves... :-/

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    3. Re:Strong credentials by tb3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And WebTV.

      We have a winnar!

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    4. Re:Strong credentials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I see we share the same sense of smug confidence about our superiority in the world. I know when I walk down the street and see some "bigwig" or "PHB" striding up to me with his well groomed hair, expensive Italian suit, and a beutiful woman hanging on his arm, I think "Heh, he probably runs Windows. Sucker." For I know -- despite my physical unattractiveness and subpar social skills -- through my superior operating system, I am the winner at life.

    5. Re:Strong credentials by jasoncart · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I hear they use leftover Newtons as doorstops at Apple HQ.

    6. Re:Strong credentials by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1
      I know when I walk down the street and see some "bigwig" or "PHB" striding up to me with his well groomed hair, expensive Italian suit, and a beutiful woman hanging on his arm, I think "Heh, he probably runs Windows. Sucker."

      He probably pays You to run Windows; that's why he has a bunch of women hanging on his arm. I myself have women screaming my name all day (well, ok, I do tech work in an office full of women...)

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  4. Replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet that this can be replaced with a pentium 1 + ethernet card + Linux/BSD. It doesn't take a whole lot to be a file server.

    1. Re:Replacement by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I've seen this case sold as a Mini-ITX case. They're using a Mini(FlexATX/ITX) board, which has INTEGRATED Ethernet, and if you're thinking it has a proprietary OS, you're wrong. RTFA and find out it has Linux.

    2. Re:Replacement by Phillup · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mine works fine... dual 133Mhz Pentium classic... Tyan Mobo.

      Linux OS is installed on my trusty old 1.6 Gig Maxtor hard drive (Mondo restore copy on CD... just waiting for it to die so I can put in the "big" 4 Gig drive ;-)) and a Maxtor 160 G for storage... formatted using ReiserFS.

      Just set the controller to ignore the hard drive and let Linux figure it out once it boots.

      Hardest part was turning off the controller in the BIOS. (not hard)

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    3. Re:Replacement by dghcasp · · Score: 1
      Another case of misunderstanding the common user...

      Joe Average isn't going to know how to set up a *nix server, nor is he even going to think about it. Joe Average wants to go into his local computer shop and buy something that just works.

      I had the same idea for this product last year, but couldn't find an affordable way to build it. He's got a nice price point; let's see if the masses take it on.

    4. Re:Replacement by scarolan · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're absolutely right:

      The backup server / trouble ticket server at my office was built for $100:

      $20 for a pentium 133 mhz bought on ebay
      $80 for a 80gb hard drive

      Loaded up debian, added a few applications and services and voila - works like a champ.

  5. Get a bigger hard drive by ricembr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Save a little money. Just get a 120 GB IDE hard drive and an old box with Linux.

    1. Re:Get a bigger hard drive by AnyoneEB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In case you hadn't noticed, "the masses" don't tend to throw parts together and configure Linux installs.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    2. Re:Get a bigger hard drive by Lussarn · · Score: 1

      It's a pitty 99.98% of slashdot users don't know how to install Linux, don't care, and would be thrilled to have something they can just plug in that just works.

      (And that doesn't make Linux any less good, so don't mod this flamebait.)

    3. Re:Get a bigger hard drive by rokka · · Score: 1

      Actually he is right. I can see no market for this product. The advance segment (that'd be us then) would be interested in this product if it had features like Raid-1, extra 3,5"-space, very low noice etc. The "masses" won't be interested either, but because it's to advanced. For instance: Most "normal" people I know with two computers have only one of them connected to the Internet. Setting up a simple connection sharing is waaay out of their legue. Sure, I'll wish them good luck, but I think they'll fail so don't invest all your money here.

      --
      I could be wrong. I'm always wrong...
    4. Re:Get a bigger hard drive by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      Why is it a pity?

    5. Re:Get a bigger hard drive by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      In case you hadn't noticed, "the masses" don't tend to throw parts together and configure Linux installs.

      Neither do the masses buy and setup dedicated file servers to backup, share and remotely access their data. At most, they burn the data to CD's or something. Or just complain when their unbackuped HDD finally dies.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Get a bigger hard drive by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 1

      Man, if your time isn't valuable enough that $399 doesn't seem entirely reasonable to have someone install, configure, and lock down the OS on what is probably $250 worth of hardware, you're not valuing yourself highly enough.

      The Windows client software alone would be worth it, to me. Most of my client's workstations don't get backed up nearly often enough.

      --
      Free music from Jack Merlot.
    7. Re:Get a bigger hard drive by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Hey, Sherlock: 99.99% of computer users don't know how to install Linux

      Yeah? 99.99% of computer users also don't have any use for a personal File Server. I don't understand who they are marketing this towards.

  6. Yes....but when did CD's have ethernet jacks? by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's all about the ethernet...

    1. Re:Yes....but when did CD's have ethernet jacks? by Lshmael · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Couldn't you just buy an old computer, install a 120 GB hard drive and a network card? Unless you really need the point-and-click "convenience" of Mirra, I think you could build a comparable system for a comparable price.

  7. Inspiri takes a simple backup solutiion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to the EXXTREME! (but with extra Is)

  8. Finally someone got the price right. by dhwebb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Snap servers have always been more expensive than they should be. At cdw a comparable box would cost you $857.78 for the Snap Server 1100 120GB.

    For over a year I've been using old P2's and debian to make large 1TB+ network storage for just around $1000. That's 8X more than what the Snap has for around the same price.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    1. Re:Finally someone got the price right. by buckminster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check eBay for used SNAP servers. They generally go for quite a bit less than the current list price. Old 4000 series are around $400. It's easy enough to pull the standard drives and replace them with new high capacity drives.

  9. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, I'd expect that from a clearly white and heterosexual individual such as yourself.

    I for one, welcome our new Gay Nigger overlords.

  10. i must be missing something... by mOoZik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...like the point of this? It's 400, pretty big in size, and all it does is store files? For 400, you could get a bare-bones system running Red Hat or something and shove in near half a terrabyte. Or just get tape backups and save a gazillion dollars. I think it's too soon to feature a product like this, as the people aren't ready and the entreprise can surely spend the money more wisely.

    1. Re:i must be missing something... by EddyMerckx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But its not for someone who could set up a Linux box.

      Its for people who click on any atachment in Outlook and corrupt their machine on a regular basis.

      People like my dad and grandmother.

    2. Re:i must be missing something... by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      but then again, can those same people go about setting up a file server to work with their computers? it may seem basic to us, but there may still be trouble for the average user.

    3. Re:i must be missing something... by EddyMerckx · · Score: 1

      I think thats the whole purpose of the device. Its seams all you have to give is give it a nice name.

    4. Re:i must be missing something... by jph · · Score: 1

      > Or just get tape backups and save a gazillion ollars.

      You might want to check the GB/$ ratio. it's not that cheap anymore, plus you have to be inserting cartidges every few days etc.

    5. Re:i must be missing something... by hackstraw · · Score: 1
      you are. Everyone is saying that you can throw linux/other free os here on a cheap box, but that does not have any client software or consise documentation. From the article:
      You can back up any folder with a simple mouse click, and all backup is fully automatic.

      Besides simple backup, the client software handles version control (making sure the backed-up file is the most recent version), and provides access to other users to whom the files' owner has given permission.


      I think it's too soon to feature a product like this, as the people aren't ready and the entreprise can surely spend the money more wisely.

      I don't. Havn't you seen these cablemodem/dsl firewall router thingys? They even have them for modems as well. I expect to see many more appliances like this in the future. One reason most people dread upgrading thier computers is because of transfering thier data. If they get used to putting thier data on something like this, then this would be a non issue.
    6. Re:i must be missing something... by dublin · · Score: 1

      But its not for someone who could set up a Linux box.

      Exactly. Which is why there are Linux distros like e-Smith and ClarkConnect that offer exactly the same sorts of functions to run on most any standard hardware.

      This is nice, and interesting, but hardly newwsworthy, right? I mean, is there anything this box does that hasn't been done for years by other appliance servers from Cobalt, Gallantry, and the like? (Not to mention any ordinary machine loaded with one of the distros above...)

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  11. Wow It is Just So Expandable by cybercrap · · Score: 5, Funny

    With its 4 usb 1.1 ports that run at a whopping combined throughput of 11mbps. I can add 4 external hds that end up having the same throughput as my old floppy drive.

    1. Re:Wow It is Just So Expandable by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Cost, cost, and cost.

      Seriously, this box should have gigabit ethernet, USB2.0 and/or firewire. That would rock. But they are trying to use off-the-shelf components and as far as I know there is no mini-ITX board with those features. Atleast not a cheap one.

  12. Just for clarification by iomud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this an Ad or an article?

    1. Re:Just for clarification by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 1

      Is this an Ad or an article?

      Neither: Its Today's Theme.

      -B

  13. Why do we need this? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    Cant we do this kinda thing on our own?

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  14. $400? by dildatron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    $400 is a bit steep. I just built a computer for one of my relatives. Pentium 4 Celery, 1.7GHz, 256MB DDR RAM, 30G hard drive, keyboard, optical mouse, nice small form factor IWILL case. Total cost was $369 with shipping from newegg.com. A larger hard drive would not have cost much more, and I got a whole computer minus monitor.

    So the question is, how much will people pay for a convenience? It just seems most people interested in having their own file server would be the crowd of people that would just make their own.

    Your average home user would probably not need or even know exactly what a fileserver/backup solution would do for them.

    Still though, we will see what happens. I think at $300 it would be a much more attractive solution.

    --


    If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    1. Re:$400? by tsm_sf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wait...

      - $400 is steep
      - you built a similar system with 30Gb storage for $369

      how much do you think a 120Gb drive goes for?

      "So the question is, how much will people pay for a convenience?"

      I'm guessing that with shipping included, the cost is just about even. I mean, you guys are talking about being able to build the same system for $350... that's NOT a huge savings, considering the time you'll spend on the install.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    2. Re:$400? by tdrury · · Score: 1

      and your labor to put it all together, install the OS and software, and ensure that it works was $31? Want a job?

    3. Re:$400? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      But this solution seems to be simply a storage/backup solution whereas the system he made is a fully-fledged computer (minus monitor).

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    4. Re:$400? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're putting together a system to only fill the role of a storage/backup solution, then what's the big deal? Costs the same either way, and one of them takes a lot less of YOUR time to put together/take care of.

    5. Re:$400? by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      ...Pentium 4 Celery...

      No wonder it was so cheap; you were using produce.

    6. Re:$400? by Soothh · · Score: 1

      Ok, so its a P4, or a celeron? which is it?

      --
      We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully "designed" to have come into existence by chance.
  15. Does it run Linux or another UNIX workalike, by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and can I get a shell on it?

    Anything powerful enough to act as a decent fileserver for me, by which I mean able to tunnel rsync through ssh at a decent rate, is fast enough to run inetd servers of BSD games or host a MUD.

    I won't buy machines that are crippled. Does it do more than an $80 120gb hard disk dropped into a $5 PC with an ethernet card?

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:Does it run Linux or another UNIX workalike, by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA, and look at the pics. It's a Mini(FlexATX/ITX) board (I've seen the case sold as a Mini-ITX case that could also hold the smaller MFATX boards), and yes, it DOES run Linux. I don't think port 23 would be open, though.

  16. Re:I wish... by Shard013 · · Score: 1

    s/solutiion/solution/g is the solution!

  17. That looks Familiar by fidget42 · · Score: 1

    Having been looking to put together a HTPC, that case looked awfully familiar. My guess that it is just an EPIA (mini-ATX) system that you can buy, already assembled, for around US$400. And that is for a 1GHz C3 processor, otherwise the system would cost about US$350.

    --
    The dogcow says "Moof!"
    1. Re:That looks Familiar by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Mini-ATX?!?!? I think you mean Mini-ITX. But yeah, you're right about that. Of course, it could be MiniFlex-ATX (170x180mm instead of 170x170) - that case can barely hold that too.

    2. Re:That looks Familiar by fidget42 · · Score: 1

      You are right, it is a mini-ITX. I've been making too many systems lately.

      --
      The dogcow says "Moof!"
    3. Re:That looks Familiar by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Of course, there IS such a thing as Mini-ATX, just nobody uses it. It's not big enough to be really expandable (but ATX is), and it's not small enough to shrink the computer much (but microATX is).

  18. Newton? by xyzzy · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but being head of the Newton group is not necessarially a mark in your favor.

    1. Re:Newton? by doogles · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sorry, but being head of the Newton group is not necessarially a mark in your favor.

      As the proud former owner of an Apple Newton MP110, I can tell you never played with one. They were revolutionary before their time, trying things that only now are catching on (Write in your own handwriting->Text; oh wait, that's Tablet PC)

      A little on the large side, but this was 1995 -- yes, 8 years ago.

    2. Re:Newton? by xyzzy · · Score: 1

      I wasn't referring to their technical prowess, but to their ability to actually *sell* something (to someone other than you, of course :-)

  19. Microsoft, Apple, and... by elid · · Score: 5, Informative
    The founder of Inspiri, Tim Bucher, according to the corporate documents, had an interesting career, having worked at both Apple and Microsoft...

    And, even more interesting, ended up with Linux:

    Because the Mirra server is built on a Linux software platform, the files stored on the appliance should be safe from worms and viruses that attack Windows-based servers
    Link

    1. Re:Microsoft, Apple, and... by FattMattP · · Score: 4, Informative
      Because the Mirra server is built on a Linux software platform, the files stored on the appliance should be safe from worms and viruses that attack Windows-based servers
      Don't fool yourself. Files can be deleted from a network share as easily as they are from a local drive. Just because the OS is secure doesn't mean that you won't lose all your data because of some virus on your Windows machine.
      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    2. Re:Microsoft, Apple, and... by Avihson · · Score: 1

      Yes sir!, As fast as the infected OS can read the file list, that is how fast the virus will infect a smb share. And it takes forever to scan and clean using AV software under Windows.

      I had to shut down a local Doctor's network for 36 hours to clean the latest nonsense from 5 PCs and one server. He had each PC sharing something, so all were infected. Had to bring them up one at a time, download the latest AV and updates, shutdown and move to the next. With all the damn word .docs on the server, it took forever to clean.

      I could not convince him to switch to OO and RTF files, maybe HIPAA will force him to get his stuff together, and keep my medical records out of YOUR hands!

    3. Re:Microsoft, Apple, and... by windlord · · Score: 1

      Ermm... What happens if somethng like this pops out again?
      Heaven for the script/warez kiddies is near!

  20. Mirra ... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mirra ... remote backup for the Gangsta!"

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:Mirra ... by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it was for Bostonians, but I like yours bettah!

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    2. Re:Mirra ... by Otter · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I was envisioning a lawsuit from Dave Mirra.

  21. you can, yes by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

    Most people can't. This is for them, not us.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:you can, yes by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



      The Mac and OSX makes it trivially easy to set up a server.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  22. Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is fine, but I think what many people would like to see is a relatively inexpensive, small, fileserver that does RAID mirroring, and has low power consumption.

    1. Re:Suggestion by azzy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my mum was saying something about that earlier, that's exactly what she wants.

  23. Why? by joel8x · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Mirra appliance is expandable through its four USB 1.1 ports, and Ispiri plans to release hard disks and other devices for the server in 2004, Mandeberg says.

    The image make it look like the size of a tower which could take internal IDE hard drives. It seems like the wording of this may be misleading, because who in their right mind would use a USB 1.1 external hard drive on a file server? If that is the case, who are they marketing this too?

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
    1. Re:Why? by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1
      who in their right mind would use a USB 1.1 external hard drive on a file server?
      Considing the price, "people in their right mind" are probably not part of their target market.
      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
  24. They're late to the game by cgthayer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I can already buy a linux box from martian.com (the netdrive) which includes the same features plus:
    • It's linux and I can muck around.
    • It's got WiFi.
    • Setup to handle printing for my home net.
    Been there done this. There must be dozens of these kind of devices on the market already.
    --
    /charles
    1. Re:They're late to the game by damiam · · Score: 1

      This is Linux.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  25. a little behind, perhaps? by penguin7of9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They seem to be a little behind: seen today at my local computer store: 160G, Ethernet and USB2.0, SMB file server, $289. It's about the same size as your regular desktop disk enclosure. Don't remember the brand name, however. Didn't do NFS.

    1. Re:a little behind, perhaps? by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      The software and service on this thing may be worth the difference in price if it allows you to totally transparently backup and web serve everything from your hard drive. Okay, not worth the difference to me, but to someone who doesn't want to build it themselves for reasons of cost or competence.

    2. Re:a little behind, perhaps? by moreati · · Score: 1

      If you do remember the brand of this device could you post it, I've been looking for something similar for a while (of course I was hoping firewire and IR too, but one can't be too picky :).

      Regards

      Alex

    3. Re:a little behind, perhaps? by StevenHallman76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      this looks like it.

      "Ximeta Netdisk Portable 160GB. NetDisk is a HDD that is connected directly to the network through the Ethernet interface."

      TigerDirect.com sells them. I think I want one!

    4. Re:a little behind, perhaps? by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      Thanks; I think that's it. It doesn't look too friendly to non-Windows clients, however.

      The best thing is probably still just to get a small Mini-ITX box (under $200), stick one or two large hard disks into it, and run Linux on it. Or just one of the $199 Mini-ITX-based desktop machines and replace the hard drive.

  26. For the masses? by flogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure what this phrase means. "Something for the masses" is usually a euphamism for "mass produced item sold at walmart stores that takes no intelligence to use."

    Now computers and extra equipment usally are not for the masses if they requirme more thought than pointing and clicking. When you start mentioning things like (from the article:) Mirra comprises three pieces: hardware, software, and service, you start start losing the masses. If I were to say this to my grandmother, mother, sister, brother, father, etc they would all think I was talking about some slothing line and laundry service.

    For those of use that are not part of the masses and know how to install an operating system, There are may great linux distros that do everything that is offered in the article for much cheaper. Look at E-Smith for a great solution for home/office/small business, or even school districts. It's free for the developer release and it even runs on those old Pentium 233 machines that are laying around.

    /plug

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    1. Re:For the masses? by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      According to your definition, computers, VCRs and printers are not "for the masses". The masses span a wide spectrum, from people afraid to touch computers to people who regularly install their own software and drivers. As long as this thing is as easy to install and use as (e.g.) a firewall, it could have a market.

      I took a look at the esmith pages. They obviously aren't as adept at marketing as these Mirra guys. Not only would the masses tune out trying to figure out what e-smith is from their pages, I DID! It is actually pretty hard to figure out what they are trying to accomplish from reading the first few pages.

    2. Re:For the masses? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      That is the developers' release pages. They expect that you already know. Try Mitel Networks for the marketized version of everything.

  27. support for WebDAV by stonebeat.org · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish they had included support for WebDAV

  28. Curiouser and curiouser... by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And it runs Linux! So its a box built by a guy from apple that runs linux thats only compatable wiht XP. Ow, my head...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Curiouser and curiouser... by arivanov · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few projects like this around. The XP requirement comes from using Universal Plug and Pray.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  29. If it's Mini-ITX like I think it is... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    ...then they need to stop running their corporate site off of their backup servers! (the PCWorld review still works fine - PCWorld isn't that stupid)

  30. How innovative... by Ibby · · Score: 1

    A company building something that lots of us have been building for years. I guess all the WinSheep will love it though...

    --
    Karma: Good. I'm hoping in the same way as pizza is 'good'...
  31. The service is the killer app by poptones · · Score: 4, Interesting
    that's the thing. There are several brain dead linux server installs. I haven't looked but it wouldn't surprise me if there were even a knoppix based CD-booting server distro out now.

    The thing is, I doubt most folks have the skills to cobble together the box itself. And many who do simply don't have the time or desire to screw with it - especially when 120GB of online storage is $400. You or I wouldn't buy this, but we're not the market - and 400 bucks is pretty good price when you consider most folks would end up paying $200 just to get a 120GB drive installed in their existing machine, or even a $399 e-machine.

    But the "Inspiri" service is the killer app. Because you can run a stateful firewall and still get your files from a relatively secure home network by authenticating through their service. If the system works as advertised, that's a really nice feature. No need to configure "pinholes" or setup a DMZ on the home network or even know what any of that crap means. All they need now is a "matching" firewall appliance and they got a potentially killer business model: protecting home networks against intrusion while allowing plug and play telepresence.

    And if they would just market it in Hong Kong and Japan and plug up all those leaky high speed home lines they might actually make the internet a better place. Very nice.

    1. Re:The service is the killer app by lakeland · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, I would be tempted. A secure, reliable backup 'appliance' would be pretty conveniant. Sure, I could save money by putting it together myself but not much, and while the end result would be more flexible, it would take a lot more time, and be less reliable.

      If I went second hand I'd have to go to about 500MHz in order for the MB to support 120GB properly. That would cost say $200 for the machine (cheaper if I shopped around, but I'm busy), and $100 for the new drive. So I save $100, and get a louder, clunkier and less reliable server.

      If I went new then the mini-itx would be hard to squeeze under $400 with a 120GB drive, and that excludes installation. $75 case, $100 MB+CPU, $50 RAM, $100 drive, $50 CD (RW) for installation and offline backup.

      Either way, I'd have to install an OS on it (knx-hdinstall probably). BSD would be better, but I'm lazy :-). Then I'd have to configure IP tables, install coda/NFS/whatever. etc, etc, etc. Lotsa work.

      Of course, if your needs go beyond just a backup appliance, then the extra flexability of the ITX or xbox approach has got to make it the best option.

    2. Re:The service is the killer app by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      It IS a Mini-ITX mobo - look at the case, then google the FIC Falcon.

  32. *smack* by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Because the Mirra server is built on a Linux software platform, the files stored on the appliance should be safe from worms and viruses that attack Windows-based servers, Mandeberg adds. While stored files may be infected with electronic vermin, the Mirra server itself is not vulnerable to most of the common infections.

    I be ole Bill is fuming right about now.

  33. It's all about the source code.... by Jeremy+Allison+-+Sam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they're using Linux, they need to make sure the source code is available under GPL terms. I hope that's the case - has anyone bought one and does it include source code or a written offer for source code ?

    I'm on HP's Open Source review board, and one of the things we make damn sure of before shipping any HP product with GPL code in it is that the product includes source code or an offer for the customer to get it.

    That's the really important thing all these embedded Linux using compaies need to understand.

    Jeremy Allison,
    Samba Team.

    1. Re:It's all about the source code.... by WaKall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IANAL, but I think you're misinterpreting this. If I sell a box running a linux kernel plus my own binary, which was compiled with gcc and uses libc, I do NOT have to distribute source code to my binary.

      Now, if I had rolled my own kernel, then I would have to release source for those changes. But so long as I use something stock, it's no big deal.

      After all, how many companies sell proprietary software for Linux? Oracle, IBM, Tibco, Mathematica. Enough that we've all heard of them and know that they make money doing it. You DO NOT have to GPL your code just because it runs on linux. You have to GPL your changes to GPL code though - which is why most black-box vendors will NOT alter the kernel or GPL'ed libraries at all. It makes their job tougher, as they don't have the flexibility to alter/strip down the low level pieces, but they don't help out their competitors either.

    2. Re:It's all about the source code.... by Jeremy+Allison+-+Sam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      INAL either, but I talk to them a lot. It's different when you ship a linux distribution. Selling proprietary software for linux isn't the same. But when you ship the Linux kernel, modified or not, you need to obey the GPL and provide source code.

      Jeremy Allison,
      Samba Team.

  34. This is actually well thought out by Bruha · · Score: 1

    At first I scoffed thinking what's the difference between this and a usb hard drive. But then I said ok lets at least read about it. I was surprised that it ran Linux (That screenshot threw me off) which provides some security (I'm sure it can be hacked to run some sort of AV program though) and that you can request your files if you're away.

    My only problem is not with the unit itself but the fact that requesting large files will be a pain for many users due to the bandwidth restrictions on users to the standard 384/128k (SBC) and 768/128k (Verizon) requesting a large file will still take some time.

  35. 400 PC /w Linux does much more than serv files. by pstreck · · Score: 1, Redundant

    With computer prices as low as they are today you could spend 400 bucks on building a new Athlon based PC, slap your favorite *nix variety on it and you can do much more than serv a file or two.

    --

    Later,
    Phil
    1. Re:400 PC /w Linux does much more than serv files. by aastanna · · Score: 1

      It also comes with a little client program that tells you what you should be backing up. I think they are selling the added value of ease of use, especially for people who don't understand what they should be backing up/how to do it (i.e. there's a little checkbox to back up your outlook stuff, I'll be damned if I know where outlook puts all its crap).

  36. Re:Riiiiight by ditto999999999999999 · · Score: 1

    In my case, I am at school and use a laptop as my main box and cannot add a drive to the case. I use a WDC 80Gig disk and a external USB 2 house for it. Just the other day I bought a 180GB Maxtor on sale for like $150Ca. I wonder why "the masses" need to have network storage as opposed to what I use...

    Ditto

  37. No need for Mac support by sakusha · · Score: 1

    It is unlikely anyone would ever want this for use with Macs. MacOS X already has Apache for file serving, and you'd have to be an idiot to spend $400 for a CPU with a 120Gb drive when you could get a 120Gb Firewire drive for backups, that would only cost about $175.
    Now the question is, why would ANYONE need this product?

    1. Re:No need for Mac support by sakusha · · Score: 1
      Uh, yeah, Apache makes a marvelous Fileserver , especially with mod_dumbshit enabled.

      I defer to your obvious expertise with dumb shit, but my MacOS X system uses Apache to serve files quite nicely without any mods. MacOS X also has Samba, FTP, and anyt other flavor of file serving you could want.
  38. Re:Sounds like a bad deal by westlake · · Score: 1

    You shouldn't. You're a hobbyist who likes to build from scrap box parts. Most folks aren't.

  39. Falcon CR51 PC?? by -tji · · Score: 1

    From the picture in the pcworld.com article, it looks like a standard system that has been around for quite a while, a Falcon CR51.

    The standard box, which they sell at Fry's, includes a VIA mini-ITX motherboard, with a VIA C3 processor.

    It's a decent system, but the fan on the power supply is VERY loud. Hopefully they've addressed that.

    I like the concept. A simple file server that I could even stick at my Parent's home to save digital pictures, documents, etc. But, it should be a small/silent device; maybe the form factor of a 5.25" firewire enclosure. Or, make it a bit bigger, and put two drives in a RAID configuration for file server reliability..

  40. The point... by djrogers · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You're all asking what the point of this is. Talking about how you could build a cheaper, better, faster one with a bigger pen^H^H^H hard drive in it, but you've missed the point. This isn't for YOU, it's for your neighbor. Or your uncle, your Mom, or anyone else who DOESN'T have a closet full of overclocked Celeron 366 motherboards, and a working knowledge of Linux. It's also for the people who don't have static IP addresses at home, but want to access their backed up files from anywhere:
    Mirra's installation assumes that its location has an "always on" broadband connection, and uses it to reach out and touch the Ispiri corporate service. Most of the time, this is a simple "ping" every couple of seconds, although it also provides an opportunity for unattended software updates and fixes. If an off-site user has properly authenticated to the Mirra service at the Ispiri host, and requests a file, the service makes the request when the Mirra next touches base. The advantage of this approach is that the connection is initiated by the Mirra server inside the user's router or firewall.
    Sounds like a handy little box to me if it does all it says: Automatic background backups Automatic background file synchronization Remote access that works behind a NAT-box Expandable I'm not gonna buy one, mostly because I don't need one, but when my Dad asks me about backing up his important info I just might tell him to get one....
    --
    Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    1. Re:The point... by smallpaul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are totally right. Also think about the long-term direction. This box will get smaller and smaller as parts shrink, whereas desktop PCs stay roughly the same size because of the need to add cards and expansion devices. This box will also get cheaper and cheaper over time as the establish some volume.

  41. indeed by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    But it would take a great deal longer to set up and get working than this device which requires you to a. Plug it in. b. Turn it on. c. Give it a name.

    Not to mention the fact its targetted at the general population who could care less about what operating system its running and just want the thing to do as its advertised. Which is back up files and make them easily accessible in little time.

    --

    -

  42. What protocols? by xant · · Score: 1

    That's what I want to know. SMB? SSH? (probably not). NFS? What services is it actually running?

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  43. no RAID == no point by GenDEM · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone want this over another hard drive if there is no advantage to data security?

    1. Re:no RAID == no point by scm1999 · · Score: 1

      I completely agree! I have a PUG Server just for this reason. http://www.pugservers.com/

  44. backup? by acaird · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So, if you were going to build one of these yourself, what would you use for backup?

    Say, for example, you have an old tower, a couple of 80GB IDE disks in it (no scsi), and one spare PCI slot. The whole thing is worth well under $1000, so is there a tape drive (or other hi-cap backup device) that would be suitable for this?

    You can get Seagate Travan drive on ebay for about $200, but they do 10GB native, which makes for something around 10 tapes for a complete backup - not very practical.

    There are internal IDE/EIDE AIT drives with decent capacities, but they are in the $1000 range.

    So, do people:

    1. Not back up their systems.
    2. Use a 50 pack of CDs everytime (if so, what software?
    3. Spend a G on a drive?
    4. Spend less on a drive and invest in tapes? (again, using what software to span the tapes and keep track of them?)

    Maybe this should be (or already was?) an Ask Slashdot...

    --
    Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely. E. Tufte
    1. Re:backup? by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      I think that most people pick option 1.

      I use one of my old machines with 4 ide drives running software raid 5 under linux. Granted it won't protect against a fire or some other disaster that takes out the box, but it will protect against drive failure.

      At work I encourage users to archive their own data to CD-R, however they typically only need to backup documents and what not so it only takes a fraction of a single cd. For the servers I use two rotating usb drives and rsync. This protects against hardware failure and I use two in case a hardware failure occurs right in the middle of a backup (i.e. I've still got the previous backup). The system doesn't handle archival, but that's why I encourage users to do it...our organization doesn't really have the resources to archive everyone's data anyway.

    2. Re:backup? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Most people don't backup at all it seems.

      I say the cheapest and easiest way to backup against drive failure is Raid 1. With disk drives under $1/gig, that makes Raid 1 less than $2/gig. It's cheap, it's easy, especially with many motherboards supporting it. It would be ten times easier for most people if Windows 2000/XP Pro supported software mirroring, but it seems someone at Redmond decided you had to fork out the $$$ for 2000 Server if you wanted that.

      For external backup, the cheapest and easiest route I say is an external USB 2.0/Firewire hard drive. With ~200 Gigs of external storage running a little more than $200, it's cheap, easy, fast, compact and pretty reliable.

    3. Re:backup? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      RAID-1 is not a backup.
      Sure it saves your data when a disk crashes. But when you remove or overwrite a file it is gone from both your disks.

      I have a RAID-1 setup in my system but I still make backups. One backup is to a spare drive that stores only my valuable data (i.e. not the OS and software), and then there is an old DAT drive for the same purpose but with more generations.
      Should the whole system crash, I will have to re-install and rebuild the system, and will lose some large things that are impractical to backup.
      (like recorded video)

      Don't think "I have RAID-1 so I don't need a tape".

    4. Re:backup? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > So, do people:
      > 1. Not back up their systems.

      They selectively backup files -- having a full 80GB hard Drive does not mean you HAVE to back up all 80 Gigs. If 20 Gigs of that is Windows (sounds right), 1 Gig for linux, 4 Gigs random programs, then they only have to back up 55 Gigs of useless crap.

  45. exactly by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    I like the 'well just set linux up' on whatever machine.

    Hmm, lets see, do i have a good portion of a weekend to waste sitting in front of a monitor... or just buy a little box I can plug in and thats it, and you know, go do other more interesting stuff.

    Which to recommend, which indeed.

    --

    -

  46. security?! by Noctilux · · Score: 1

    I might be missing the point, but isn't putting your important data on the same appliance as the firewall missing the point?

  47. Doesn't anyone do market research anymore? by zaqattack911 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok "the masses" to me means people who aren't overly computer literate, but are interested in transporting data from home to work or wherever.

    As for backup, usually that is handled automatically at work. At home maybe all they would need to do is backup documents and email.. which will fit on a cd. And besides, relying on one 120gb HD as a backup makes no sense. If you want incremental backups... it won't last long. And you need removable media to store somewhere else.

    As for the "computer saavy" person. Christ.. It'd be much cheaper for me to simply carry around an HD on it's own, open the friggin case and plug it into an IDE channel.

  48. In case you were wondering.... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

    It's essentially a barebones VIA MiniITX motherboard with (most likely) an EPIA-10000 1Ghz processor and a case (that's usually sold as a bundle). I've seen these online for about $180.

    The dimensions are 5.3" (W) x 12" (H) x 10.2" (D).

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  49. Most people don't back up period by xtal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do what I do, store files on your local machine, sync to network storage, and once in awhile buy a new HD and store the old one someplace safe. I burn really important files - source code and the like - to CD on odd intervals.

    It isn't ideal, but it's good enough for my purposes (and most others, I assume).

    These little boxes are great for that. Just don't use them for primary storage is all.

    --
    ..don't panic
  50. This is a great idea... by tomem · · Score: 1

    Let's say you've been migrating to your laptop, and your old desktop is getting kind of superfluous. Perhaps you are still using it for a backup repository and as a web site. But it's getting kind of dated and stale, because you are on your third laptop since you started migrating. But it works ok for what you are doing with it. At some point it will fail and not be worth repairing. What do you do then? Buy the latest and greatest new desktop when you are doing everything on your laptop? Hardly.

    This is just the device you need. It is the perfect base station for a laptop computing lifestyle! Not more capable than it needs to be, and far easier to use than a full up desktop PC or Mac. And it provides a permananent presence on the web for you, plus the ability to get at all your files if you should need them while traveling or just away from the office.

    I want one to go with my PowerBook G4!

    --
    ThosEM
  51. external disk by dioscaido · · Score: 1

    why not just buy external firewire/USB HDDs? Cheaper. Same deal.

  52. I bought one by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 3, Informative

    I bougt one of these exact cases w/ a Cyrix 933mhz to be my OpenBSD 3.2 firewall. Uptime is about 190 days so far. Usually load is at 3% or less and used memory is 34 megs. Only caveat is that the powersupply fan is surprisingly loud. The box w/ motherboard and chip, nothing lese was $120 at Fry's. The box is actually a Falcon PC.

  53. Through-firewall remote access ? by RGRistroph · · Score: 1

    The martian does not offer the service this one does, by which the devices pings out through the firewall to a central server so that the user can connect to their NAT'd box and get files remotely.

  54. a physical box per service by dgp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    thats what their angle is. dont have enough admin skills to install samba on your linux box? buy our box and plug it into your ethernet network. Need a DNS server? there's a box for that too. Google sells its search server in a rack mount box. just plug it in and go. if unix was made of many command line programs that could be piped together, the thinking at this company is that server should be purchased in pieces - one service per piece. I hate to think of the wasted coal exhaust or force of a mighty river that is slowed a bit for each 400W the power supply that is powering a cpu/mobo/hd to be idle 99% of the time.

    when i first read the article, judging by the specs i thought they were describing a product that was esentially an iPod with out the mp3 player. that would be somewhat interesting.

    1. Re:a physical box per service by keirnoff · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just for the record, just because a PS is 400W doesn't mean it consumes 400W. If a CPU/MB/HD sits idle most of the time it doesn't consume much power, and certainly not 400W. A couple idle boxes consumes as much power is one active one and allows for easier redundancy.

  55. Sharing across multiple sites, oh yes by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    My mother, is a nitwit when it comes to machines.. if I can have one on my network, and one on her computer, and know that within 24hours they'll always be synchronized?

    Damn! think about the usefulness of that?!

    plus, ideal for off site backup, I take pictures of my son with my digital camera, it's all stored on a maxtor external that my wife knows to grab in an emergency (fire) but this allows me to know I'll still have them if the house burns down.. one complaint, if it won't do ntfs/user permissions, I can't back up my porn at my moms house....

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Sharing across multiple sites, oh yes by Jacer · · Score: 1

      It runs linux, so your ntfs permissions are out. chown?

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  56. Re:Sounds like a bad deal by artg · · Score: 1

    Or an Xbox with a new disc drive ?

  57. Yep by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    When I asked my mom if she'd prefer the external storage that lost all data once every few years or the one that you could replace wearing parts on, just like a car... she said she'd take the latter.

    Without some means of real backup or at least mirroring, all of these devices are recipies for heartbreak and angry customers. Why would you like to build a product that you would be pretty sure of failure in about two years with loss of tremendous amouts of data?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  58. Re:Sounds like a bad deal by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    dunno.

    you tell me why car mechanics should take their cars to somebody else to be fixed?

    the point is, not everybody can roll that out themselfs.

    -

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  59. Break out the Tin Foil Hats by mzungu · · Score: 1

    Has anyone noticed that the Mirra software is just another Trojan Horse. Well it acts like one, in my opinion.

    It phones home.
    It gets unattended software updates.
    It accepts remote commands to upload the users' files, bypassing firewalls.

    Why would one trust a third party with sensitive or private data without checking them out first?

    I think services like this, although hugely useful, have significant privacy risks. Somebody will hack this service eventually - who will have your data then?

    I am surprised nobody has raised this so far.

  60. Two words by stewby18 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the bigwig at the company used to work for apple but the site says that his new appliance will only work with a WinXP machine?

    What's that about?

    Market share.

  61. Re:Power usage, convenience by Phillup · · Score: 1

    >>Is there a way to get that from Linux, apart from setting up CVS or similar software?

    ----

    Since they are using Linux... obviously a yes.

    This comes to mind:

    http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapsho ts /

    --

    --Phillip

    Can you say BIRTH TAX
  62. Do it yourself by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did.

    I got an Apple Beige G3 Desktop (266MHz, 256MB RAM) system for $50 from my father's Employer.

    Bought a 120GB WD1200 Drive (Drivezilla). And a A-CARD ATA/66 IDE Card.

    Installed OS X. Installed Samba with Fink. (later upgraded to 10.2 where Samba through fink wasn't needed).

    That's all.

    AppleShare for connecting my Mac OS 9 System. SMB for my wintel boxes.

    Could share a printer if I wanted as well.

    SpamAssassin and pop3proxy.pl (aka SAproxy) allows it to serve as a spam filtering proxy server.

    Usermin (part of Webmin) for changing password.

    Apache with mod_DAV allows for WebDAV support when on the road (very cool I might ad).

    Works like a charm.

    1. Re:Do it yourself by stickyc · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's pretty darn cool. Now can your mom do that? Without calling you? I'm pretty sure you've completely missed the point of this product.

    2. Re:Do it yourself by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

      Not saying the product has no merit, or audience..

      Just saying you can in theory do it yourself with an old system.

      IMHO a good company would come out with a Linux distribution that was designed for running a fileserver. Just pop it in an old computer, and install everything. Easy config... that's it.

  63. too big, too $$ by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    I would rather have 20 GB for $100 than 120 GB for $400. When can I expect a Linksys/Netgear/D-Link clone of this?

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  64. Re:Sounds like a bad deal by gspr · · Score: 1

    Well no, but most slashdot readers can...

  65. I would much rather have one of these... by greendot · · Score: 1

    http://www.ximeta.com/netdisk_portable.html

    You can also rig up some RAID thing with 'em.

  66. backup for the price by Nykon · · Score: 1

    I don't know, for the price, I'll stick to a much larger [then 120GB] external FW400/800 HD. If I need to have multiple machiens write to it i can just make it a shared drive. But my preference, not the best for everybody.

    --
    "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
  67. software and web servers are the unique features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Way to much babble from /.'rs about how they can build their own cheaper.

    - This is for the masses where (masses="total population" - geeks). It isn't 4 u.
    - It does the backups automatically by just selecting files from interface integrated with Windows explorer.
    - It keeps the last 8 versions of the files
    - You can access your files from anywhere on the internet. Even from behind a corporate firewall cause it authenticates thru their server.

    Can your crappy home built server do all that (without spending a few weeks writing scripts)?
    I wouldn't buy one, but I think it is cool.

  68. Finally, A Linux box that will stay up to date by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

    Thats got to be the biggest feature - it auto-updates itself and reconfigures as needed.

    Although linux is secure - it sure goes downhill when people forget to patch their machine :|

  69. this product is really cheap by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

    Let's compare...

    An 8-pack of 750 MB zip disks: 6 GB for $100.00

    $400.00 gets you... 24 GB forever

    x-drive online storage is 2 GB for $29.95 per month

    $400.00 gets you... 26 GB per month

    Yahoo! Briefcase is 100 MB for $35 per year

    $400.00 gets you... 1.14 GB per year

    with Mirra, $400.00 gets you 120 GB forever.

    Mirra beats all of the above storage options, despite the fact that online storage tend to be more expensive than portable media storage. This could make a whole slew of storages irrelevant. Of course, free software on your OS that serves as FTP is probably the cheapest. A peer-to-peer network of encrypted personal backups could be great for future harddrive backups.

    (btw, having trouble logging in...)

  70. This mentality hurts... by 32bitwonder · · Score: 1
    Ok, this hits home where it hurts and I'm sick to death of this mentality. Here's what I've done in my own little way stop this where I live. Using two garage sale Macintoshes, an LC III and a PowerMac 6100/60, I've put together essentially the same type of idea but with very minimal hardware and even less $$$.

    Both Macs run Debian Linux, and between the two I have a working "personal server" complete with:
    Web Server
    File Server
    Web Based Email Server
    Streaming MP3 Server
    with more features to be added as needed.

    All this on less than 100Mhz (collectively).

    The whole point of this project was to cobble together something that was a little unique and forced me to learn Linux better. It was also an attempt to bring back a bit of enjoyment to my computing experience in a day when everything is done for you and everyone who can "point and click" considers themselves an expert.

    <sarcasm>So way to go! Bring on the pre-builts so everyone with $399 to spend can have one more thing done for them. They'll feel better for it, because like everything else, they didn't bother to learn how to do it themselves.</sarcasm>


  71. I do this now by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    I've sold a few of those to small businesses with really good success.
    I take an old P2 300, drop in a 120GB disk and install Linux, Samba and Webmin. Give the users their home directory as an "M:\" drive and use Webmin's automated backup tools to backup their home dir every night.
    Using webmin, you can even walk a non-technical user through a restore over the phone.
    I usually charge around $400 for one of these setups and it's a good deal for them and a nice easy project for me.
    Cheers,
    Jim

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  72. Re:Mandrake 9.1 by rebelcool · · Score: 1
    Oh, and you get: an ftp server, smb, sftp, ssh, httpd with CGI support, pop3/imap4, and postfix for smtp


    And you expect Joe Blow to be able to administer these in a safe way? Isn't the main complaint against microsoft's insecurity the result of having too many services running on a default install? What the hell does Joe know about any of this crap?


    Then you're done, though every once in awhile you should use the pretty graphics and MandrakeUpdate program to keep the bad guys out.


    Too much work. No good.


    If you buy it at Best Buy (like a lot of people I know), it costs you $30, the computer you were going to throw away, and an hour of your time.

    Most people don't have a computer to throw away. Not everyone keeps their closet full of random spare parts, you know. And an hour is alot of time. And easily stretches into 10 when something goes wrong as it inevitably will. I hate Linux when something doesn't install as the instructions say it will. Seems to happen about half the time in my experience, and boy do I curse it because getting help with linux is an exercise in frustration. And I work with it on a daily basis... I imagine most people would give up and return the damn thing to best buy.


    When you tell people they are buying a web server for $30, it makes following a few pictures to install Mandrake very easy.

    The people this device is aimed at don't want a webserver they have to administer. They want a backup solution with *secure* sharing abilities where installation is a matter of plugging it in and turning it on. The device updates itself with no user interaction. It is in effect an ubiquitous silent device you're not supposed to notice nor touch after you plug it in.

    You are not the target market. And not surprisingly for slashdot, appear unable to grasp that.

    --

    -

  73. I found one the other day by beavis88 · · Score: 1

    Of course, now I can't find it. But it was USB2.0/Fwire interface, dual HDs with hotswap carriers, and built in hardware RAID 0/1. $600 for one with 2x120GB, which makes it a MUCH better deal than this one IMHO.

    'Course, it ain't a "fileserver", and, I can't find the damn thing anymore! It was on backorder anyway. I'll post back if I can dig it up.

  74. here's one by beavis88 · · Score: 1

    Not the one I was thinking of, but good enough by means of comparison:

    http://www.miglia.com/store/index.html

    Check out the "MediaBank". 629 euros for one with 2x120GB IBM (*cough* *wheeze* *die laughing* HDs), or 449 euro without.

  75. Security problem? by lpq · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Did anyone noticed this little "blurb"...
    • If an off-site user has properly authenticated to the Mirra service at the Ispiri host, and requests a file, the service makes the request when the Mirra next touches base. The advantage of this approach is that the connection is initiated by the Mirra server inside the user's router or firewall. This means that no firewall or router reconfiguration is required to allow an external server to get information from within the network. It's an approach that minimizes user effort and security risk.
    Great....someone hacks the protocol, and a remotely controlled server running proprietary software hands them the keys to my network?

    I'm not sure about the no router or FW reconfig -- my stupid Replay TV box never did work behind my FW...it couldn't understand a proxy (unless it was setup as transparent). Of course ReplayTV has in their contract that they can download any update they want that may disable any feature they want like Tivo has done in the past. Now some company wants me to put a file-server on my network that is designed to regularly ask them for instructions to execute on itself behind my FW -- with it designed to understand and work through a FW? Why does this make me uneasy. ([shhhhh, just close your eyes and put your fingers in your ears and all will be well; this isn't the opendoor security breach you are looking for....])

    Huh, wuh...sounds secure to me!

    -l

  76. backup solution? by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    "a personal file-server with simple backup solutiion, remote access as well as file-sharing capabilities."

    Is it me, or _IS_ there no backup solution? Or is the box the "simple backup solution" for _another_ fileserver?

    If it is, is it any good? I hesitate to put my RAID 10 MPG's on anything lesser, and call that a BACKUP. /Dread

  77. It should have RAID. by scm1999 · · Score: 1

    It should have RAID. I have a PUG (www.pugservers.com) and it works great!

  78. Or.. by phorm · · Score: 1

    it's for your neighbor. Or your uncle, your Mom, or anyone else who DOESN'T have a closet full of overclocked Celeron 366 motherboards

    They could just hire the guy with "a closet full of overclocked Celeron 366 motherboards" as it were, have him build a comparable system for a reasonable fee... and have it be both upgradable, possibly cheaper, and probably more effective?

    1. Re:Or.. by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      When you really need to worry that much if you can get a completely working box for significantly less than the $399 this one costs, you are probably not their intended customer.

      Not everybody wants to hire a nerd to setup a box at their home, then having to find him again when something goes wrong.
      A standard appliance that does the same thing for a few dollars more can have the advantage of commercial support.

      Why doesn't every multinational buy their PC's and servers at pop-and-mom around the corner and then let it setup by some hired "guy"? They could save a lot of money...

  79. This looks like an EPIA box by cypherz · · Score: 1

    from the pictures it looks lot like it is a "Falcon" EPIA format case. (idot.com, logicsupply.com and many others). So basically all he did is whip up a little VIA SFF pc, stuff Linux and a big drive in it. I've been wanting to build one of these for a while. The case is about 65 bucks at most places. The 1 ghz "Nehemiah" motherboards are cool, complete with proc for about $169. Couldn't find specs on the Mirra anywhere, I wonder which mb the Mirra has?

    --
    This sig kills fascists.
  80. Re:Painful lesson on MaxAttach 3000, by wskan · · Score: 1

    I've got a painful lesson on MaxAttach 3000, in which one of the hard disk died recently. I have no way to revive it, because it's running FreeBSD and a proprietary version of JFS, and there's no way to download the source OS from Maxtor, even it's licensed under GPL!

    Also, there's no way to copy the content out because the disk are configured in a way that even PartitionMagic 8 can't recognize it! So I don't believe in device running 'Open source/GPL' software, because there's no way you can gaurantee they'll publish their source code.

  81. My dream file server... by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

    Apple should just add a hard disk to their Airport base stations . Add rendez-vous and iDisk-like management to it, and you have a sweeeet, cheap, easy-to-use and completely unobstrusive personal web server ('cause there's no way I leave that 90-dB G4 on 24/7).

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  82. you could, but your mum probably couldn't by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...try putting in an easy-to-use backup system for your parents gigs of photos and video. it's not easy...

    1. Re:you could, but your mum probably couldn't by xtink · · Score: 1

      yea it's to bad you couldn't setup some kind of script to run at a certain time to automatically backup certain files

      oh wait never mind

      --
      I've never noticed it before but my thinking cap does sort of resemble a hockey helmet
  83. Facts by Britz · · Score: 1
    From what it looks like the case of that thing seems to be a: Casetek CK-1010-1B, which one could get a online shops like Portatech, or Aaronix for about 50 bucks.

    Since those are Mini-Itx form factor cases I suspect that Inspiri put a Via Epia board inside.An Epia 5000 can be bought at Ebay. Then get an hd (160 GB are cheaper per GB nowdays).

    The price will be lower than 300 bucks.

    Epia 5000 have the lowest power intake, which should be considered if the box is to be run 24/7. But the prices on ebay seem to allow an M10000 to be had for not much more. The Epia M10000 has the advantage that one can change it to a media box for the living room (like Tivo), since it is fast enough for Divx and has TV-Out. This way one could have everything in one box. By putting mldonkey on it it could even run as a server for filesharing 24/7 while one could access mldonkey from everywhere using its http interface.

    Much more for much less money without having them spy on your data. Sometimes it pays to be geek ;-)

  84. NAS appliance anyone? by fallen1 · · Score: 1

    You could go with a NAS appliance from someone like Iomega or even Snap. I have installed a small Snap Server into a client's practice (less than 30 users) and they are quite happy with it - as am I so far. No major configuration hassles, no need for tons of M$ licenses, etc, etc. Iomega even offers a Unix-based NAS if memory serves.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  85. Meaning of "P4 Celeron" by yerricde · · Score: 1

    "P4 Celeron" is an unofficial term for an Intel Celeron processor using a Pentium 4 style core, as opposed to an Intel Celeron processor using one of the P6-core (PII and PIII derived) Celeron designs.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  86. Re:software and web servers are the unique feature by onrop · · Score: 1

    Easily.

    - ssh, samba, and nfs allow me to get to all of my files anytime I want from anywhere I want.
    (and for those quick to assume, no nfs and samba are not available outside of my home network, with the exception of ssh tunnelling).
    - a simple cron job with tar does all of my backups for me, to a separate HDD
    (took me all of 30 seconds; plus, if I wanted to store multiple versions, wouldn't take but a few minutes to write a script for that)

    The pro's of my "crappy home built server":
    - much more flexible. If I want more space, add a HDD. According to the article, Mirra will be releasing add-on HDDs for the appliance "soon". How much will these cost over the standard cost of a HDD, assuming you have to have one from them?

    - Also, if I want a file immediately, from anywhere I have access, I can get it. With the Mirra appliance, I would have to request the file from Ispiri, wait for the box to connect and upload the file, then get the file from Ispiri.

    - It's a fileserver. Not a backup appliance, which is what the Mirra sounds like. Even if the Mirra is a true fileserver, it sounds like CIFS is the only method of access; so if you want NFS, AFS, etc., you're SOL.

  87. Some consumers don't know jack. by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

    Woah. You just lost me at "mobo".

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  88. Re:Mandrake 9.1 by hesiod · · Score: 1

    Where, exactly, does the file versioning come in? Sure, the user could rename their files 8 times, but they won't. This box gives functionality that IS NOT IN LINUX. Yes, of course, you can write it yourself, but the time to do this well exceeds $400, unless you are without a job or get paid shit.

  89. Low power file server by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

    I seem to be the only one, but I don't want an overclocked high-end machine buzzing along under my desk. I'd prefer a decent quiet and environmentally friendly little file server, which doesn't get on my ears or my electricity bill.

    Alas, like with motorcycles, there doesn't seem to be any demand in this direction.

    Prove me wrong! Do you have or know of such a thing?

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
  90. Most consumers don't know jack by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

    Woah. You just lost me at "ssh".

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  91. Not needed by GreggBert · · Score: 1

    My Mom and Dad never back up their pr0n.

    --


    If you don't understand anything I post, please accept that I ate paste as a small boy...
  92. Re:Painful lesson on MaxAttach 3000, by prizog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FreeBSD isn't licensed under the GPL.

    But if you do find a product like this running GNU/Linux, and not distributing the source code, please let FSF know at license-violation@fsf.org. We've seen it before on products just like this one, and we'll get you source code.

  93. How is this a backup? by The_ForeignEye · · Score: 1

    Forget about the fact that you could do it cheaper on your own.

    Forget about the fact that this is targeted for the "masses", which don't include geeks. ...How is this device a "backup"?

    It's a computer with a hard drive inside. Hard drives fail (and IDE are more prone to failures that SCSI)! That's one of the reasons you perform backups!

    Who can guarantee me that two weeks after I'm using that thing the HD doesn't die? ...If it at least copied its content to a web space so I could recover it later, that would be a different thing.

  94. Re:software and web servers are the unique feature by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

    Simpler solution then this (if you have only 1 machine, which is most folks).

    (1) USB HD (120Gb are around $200)
    (1) license for Second Copy 2000 ($20)

    Hook the USB HD up to your system, install SC2000 and configure it to keep 8 versions of files.

    If you have an older HD laying around, USB HD enclosures are around $50-75, which might mean that you can do it for under $100.

    The personal file server is a nice idea, but unless they're doing RAID1 (preferably with a hot-spare), I can't see it as being any better then leaving the files on the user's machines. (Better 2 small baskets then 1 large basket.)

    Getting to your files from outside your firewall sounds good... until you realize that what you can do, a hacker can do twice as easily. Better to carry CD media, DVD media, USB key-fob, USB HD, iPod, or just get a laptop and carry that around.

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  95. Power Saver by meehawl · · Score: 1
    So the question is, how much will people pay for a convenience?
    The issue is also, how much extra power will your "P4 Celeron" consume over its working lifespan, compared to the "presumably) low-energy consumption, low-power Mini-ITX box. Say your system costs an extra $5-$10 a month for 36 months. You've just helped your relatives spend a lot more on utility bills. If you don't need all the bells and whistles of a system, including floating point, 80W+ chips, and mondo gfx cards, going with a smaller cooler system for *file sharing* will save big bucks over the medium- to long-term. Mike
    --

    Da Blog
  96. For those smart enough to do a 1 disk install by webweave · · Score: 1

    http://www.e-smith.org/

    Looks like it does all the same things plus apple file sharing.

    E-smith has a user/developer community at http://www.e-smith.org/bboard/index.php

    E-smith has a nice nice list of developed add on packages at http://www.e-smith.org/cgi-bin/contrib.cgi

  97. wow! you're so friggin 133t! by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    and they're backing up to what? a centralised disk outside of their pc or a partition on their single disk? or are you assuming that joe sixpack has a home network? jesus, some people.

  98. $399 I'll buy that by tommyboyprime · · Score: 1

    I'm not exactly one of the "masses" but for $399 and not much effort, I've got a 120GB server. My time is valuable to me and although I'd like to, I'm not going to throw a box together and install some distro or another. Like I said I'll buy that.

    --
    This parrot has ceased to be!