Slashdot Mirror


Martial Arts Robots

curmudgeous writes "Japanese tech firms are making waves with robots trained to perform martial arts moves." On one hand, this is largely just a novelty, but on the other, robots capable of doing these moves are many steps closer to being able to move around in real world environments. But mostly, sumo stomping robots look cool.

301 comments

  1. I, for one... by inertia187 · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Martial Arts Robot overloads. (fp)

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:I, for one... by avalys · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My god, stop it! Two in a row! The joke is dead, people!

      Please!!

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:I, for one... by buddhaunderthetree · · Score: 1

      I for one hope these robots aren't made from surplus military hardware, that's been "cleared" for civilian use. Kung fu robots + evil military chips = killfest 03.

      --
      "Technology.....the knack of so arranging the world that we don't have to experience it." Max Firsch
    3. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you gonna do about it, asshole.

    4. Re:I, for one... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      Please don't welcome them, last time we had to get Optimus Prime and the other Autobots to stop the robot after Megatron reprogrammed it.

      Enter the Nightbird
      The Decepticons steal an experimental female ninja robot named Nightbird, and use her to steal the Autobots' computer chip containing
      information on the world's energy sources. She succeeds in stealing the chip from the Ark, but is confronted and trapped by the Autobots. The
      Decepticons come to her aid, but she is ambushed by the jealous Starscream. The Decepticons chase after the fleeing Starscream, leaving Nightbird and the chip with the Autobots.

      Historical Record of these events: click here.

    5. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to beat your dirty nigger ass for trying to learn how to read.

    6. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you and your whore sister

    7. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a big man you are, Hey, let me buy you a pack of gum. I'll show you how to chew it.

    8. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fairy.

    9. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, you fuckin' baby, relax.

      You want /.'ers to stop beating old jokes into the ground, do you?
      Well, as long as you're pissing into the wind, why not ask for world peace and a hand job from Lucy Liu

      sheesh

    10. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why on Earth would anyone want a hand job from Lucy Liu?

    12. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, fuck you and your whore sister.

    13. Re:I, for one... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      (obligatory) In SOVIET RUSSIA, old jokes beat YOU into ground! :b
      (/me likes Lucy Liu's freckles.)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    14. Re:I, for one... by MSZ · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it'll be some time before they learn all those 16-hit combos...

      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
  2. And in related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    France Surrenders!

  3. how soon until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the geisha-girl whore-robots are ready?

    1. Re:how soon until by inteller · · Score: 1

      The guy behind realdoll.com is working on it. I'm just afraid if one of those things is on your wang and suddenly goes into "eat" mode.

    2. Re:how soon until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think "whorebot" has a better ring to it. Keeping the Japanese porn scene in mind, it better come with a huge sperm holding tank and a shit dispenser.

    3. Re:how soon until by ClockworkPlanet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Common misconception. Geishas are not whores, far from it.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    4. Re:how soon until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Common misconception. Geishas are not whores, far from it."

      My wife is a Geisha.

      Your point is therefore disproved. If you want some fun just reply. If your quick enough I may even offer my six year old daughter. I know you Linux peados like the rabbit nostril.

  4. I for one... by omnirealm · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our new kung-fu robotic overlords!

    --
    An unjust law is no law at all. - St. Augustine
    1. Re:I for one... by avalys · · Score: 1

      I, for one, am sick of this damn joke.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Kung-fu is Chinese, your insensitive clod!

      You're now a target for the new Japanese ninja robots. Have a nice day.

    3. Re:I for one... by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      Funny, for once, as it may be the closest to the truth we've seen so far. Will we be over-run by clusters of PDAs? Probably not. But ninja robots... *powered* by clusters of PDAs? Yikes!

    4. Re:I for one... by ChickenAintDone · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, old jokes get sick of YOU!

    5. Re:I for one... by winter@ES · · Score: 1
      No no no...

      Combine it with this earlier story:

      Monkeys Control Robotic Arm With Brain Implants

      I, for one, welcome our new monkey-mind-controlled kung-fu robotic overlords!

      paulb

      --

      Paul Bettner

      Game Developer et al

    6. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwaahaahaa.

    7. Re:I for one... by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

      Man, don't listen to the moderators. Thats so funny I almost cryed. Too bad the joke is "tired" to the moderators, this is one time it was actually funny.

      --
      -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    8. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! Finally, we can have the Monkey vs. Robot battles that I've always dreamed of!

      Monkey vs. Rooooooo-booot!
      Monkey hates tech-no-lo-gy!
      Rooo-bot hates monnn-key!

    9. Re:I for one... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      So how come no one has mentioned yet that having humanoid-shaped robots going around killing people (which after all is what 'martial arts' is all about) is the foundation of the "Terminator" movie series?

    10. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're new here, aren't you?

    11. Re:I for one... by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really, now...

      Nobody, not even the Japanese (even at their most paranoid moments worrying about gaijin invaders 'taking over') needs a robot that does martial arts moves. Not even as a demostration of programming and manufacturing skills. This is stupid.

      The Japanese have a little game called 'let's do some silly little thing and watch how pissed off the stupid gaijin get over nothing at all'. They'll something seemingly innocent like making Little Black Sambo dolls for children and then pretend that they're amazed that this would annoy anyone outside Japan. The winner of this little game is the person who can get the most inflamed reaction from the foreigners to what must appear to any normal Japanese person as the slightest and most trival provocation.

      This might be the latest invocation of this game.

      The way for foreigners to win this game (or as in ju-jitsu, to turn the opponent's force against themselves) is to hold a press conference and announce your disappoint and shame that your Japanese friends would have forgotten that this could have had such unpleasant overtones.

      Then at the end of the press conference, hold up a leather handbag and say that the Japanese are the best leather workers in the world. And that it must be a natural reflection of their culture that they are so great with leather work.

      Traditionally, in Japan, working with leather and animal hides (along with undertaking and working with death) is only done by a sub-class of untouchables call buraku-min.

      By implying to the Japanese that they are the buraku-min of the world, while appearing to the rest of the world to be giving them a complement would make you the winner of the 'little game'.

    12. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We live in exciting times. Fully articulated robots, cheap solor cells, free Half Life 2 bouncing around the internet. Too bad the monkeybots will kill us all.

    13. Re:I for one... by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If these Japanese tech firms were serious about showing off what their robots can do, then they would build a robot that find and disarm abandoned land mines in third-world farming areas.

      Thousands of people are maimed each year from these millions of little bombs scattered throughout the countryside.

      By producing millions of these robots to disarm land mines and then sending them freely to be used in the third world, the Japanese would take the moral high ground from everybody for the next century.

      Haveing your keiretsu's name and logo on the machine that just saved the lives of a farmer's wife and children wouldn't hurt either. The farmer and his children would be much more inclined to buy Japanese products as the years go by and they get more money from their now-productive fields.

      Especially if it were Americans and Russians who put the land mines in the field in the first place. ... And then didn't bother to make maps of their locations for future removal because there was no one important in the area anyway...

    14. Re:I for one... by Vexinator · · Score: 1

      Well, the reason these manufacturers aren't making those kinds of robots is because they are working one something totally different - the development of coordinated movement in a humanoid frame.

      There are people making mine disposal robots too (a very noble cause) - as a quick google will demonstrate

      http://www.google.ca/search?sourceid=navclient&i e= UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=landmine+disposal+robot

      I suppose I could also point out that a few of the landmine-afflicted nations do not like doing business with Japan (e.g. Korea). Hence not much of a Japanese business opportunity.

      --
      "Be afraid to die until you have won some victory for humanity" -Horace Mann
    15. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem would be designing a robot that could identify various types of land mines, carefully dig them up and then delicately disarm them. It would be quite expensive to replace one each time it blows up. They might be better off dragging heavy chains covered in hooks across minefields or something.

    16. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If these Japanese tech firms were serious about showing off what their robots can do, then they would build a robot that find and disarm abandoned land mines in third-world farming areas."

      If "these Japanese tech firms" (your racism is noted for future reference) were serious then they would develop robots that could seek and destroy the American scum that is creeping over the Earth. Personally I would settle for the traditional katana and disembowel every cunt-licking yank I encounter, but mechanisated slaughter would be a great help -- I understand there's a lot of people, such as yourself, who genuflect in front of Bush's dick.

      Make no mistake, the revolution is coming.

    17. Re:I for one... by Simonetta · · Score: 1


      Nice try, tomodachi-san. But I am not rising to the challenge. The phrase you quote was lifted directly from the article.

      As you can tell by my name, I am not adverse to encountering 'cunt-licking yanks'. And I don't genuflect in front of dicks.

      keredomo, anata wa Nihon-gin imasu ka?

    18. Re:I for one... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Hate to break it to you, but a bunch of farmers in a third world country will not provide the economic incentive for these companies to develop and send over millions of these robots (for free no less). Nice thought, really it was, but it will never happen and you know this.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    19. Re:I for one... by quintinie · · Score: 2, Informative
      They might be better off dragging heavy chains covered in hooks across minefields or something.
      Motorised de-mining flail:

      clearance 15000 m2 per day

      mines removed 90%

      cost 350 000 US$

      http://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/minerats/hackers 96/sld015.html

      this is so depressing...

    20. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait till PDANet comes online.

    21. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chill out, will you? These are things developed in research labs. Demonstrating these kinds of motions and stability in a device is, to the Japanese (and many others), quite something. You can be sure that the people working on mine-clearing equipment are taking notice.

  5. Uh by arrow · · Score: 1

    Does this scare the hell out of anyone else?

    Just make sure you check KungfubotUpdate.com once a week and unplug any robots you may already have running rouge around the neghborhood!

    --
    symetrix. We are building a religion, a limited edition.
    1. Re:Uh by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know that it really scares the hell out of me, those robots are creepy, and ninjas. Of course the advantage of that is that they can only do so much, I mean that's why there aren't any ninja robots (well good ones) I mean, robocop can beat up ninja robots, if they were real ninjas on the other hand, robocop wouldn't have stood a chance.

      I think Ninjas need to unionize to keep robots out of the stealth assassin business.

    2. Re:Uh by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      ...robots you may already have running rouge around the neghborhood!

      Would these be the Avon Lady robots? Just wondering...

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    3. Re:Uh by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Come on! They're robots! They're ninjas! All they need to do now is turn into fighter planes and it'd be like Saturday morning c. 1986 all over again.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:Uh by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Except in 1986 Starscream didn't step on you or fry you with lasers while you watched corny Saturday morning cartoons and ate packaged sugar in milk for breakfast.

      The future is so cool!

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    5. Re:Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running 'rouge' around the neighborhood?
      Does Avon use robots now?

    6. I really don't recall cartoons from 1986, being that I was very young, I do however recall cartoons from the early 90s and all I have to say is, "Hamma, hammah man, hammah, hammah man."

      What that has to do with robots, nothing, but I repeat ninjas = wicked scary, robots = evil, therefore robots+ninjas= wicked scary and evil.

    7. Re:Uh by giminy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think Ninjas need to unionize to keep robots out of the stealth assassin business.

      Shhhhh, are you trying to get us all killed, man? If Ninjas unionized, do you realize what would happen? The union would make demands and we would have no choice to give in to those demands or die in our sleep. They wouldn't just strike, they'd palm-heel strike. That would break your neck, or at least crack your rib cage, sending splinters of bone into your heart. Don't give them ideas.

      And if Ninja Robots come, just don't let them settle in the Tigris Euphrates valley. So long as we hold true to that, we'll all be fine.

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    8. They'd be too busy fighting off the robot ninjas to worry about us, plus the average joe isn't affected, aftera all if you kill for money you don't just go around and kill people who weren't employing you before just because you're in a Union. No you just shut down non-union contracts and all of that sort of stuff, the average person will be much better off with Ninjas unionized as there will no longer be a need for collateral damage in hits, because ninjas can get anyone at any time and not even be noticed. I mean, mobsters would plant a bomb in your car or something, doing lots of damage not just to you, but to surrounding cars, infrastructure and any bystanders.

      I am pro-Ninja Union and proud.

  6. I don't know what's worse... by kippy · · Score: 1


    So who wants to take bets on who turns us into pets first: The kung-Fu Robots or the Dolphins with Thumbs.

  7. Interesting by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1

    I think it's interesting that the mechanical challenges are no longer the stumbling block. It's now AI.

    --

    "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    1. Re:Interesting by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but not surpricing. Humans have been building machines for several thousand years and gotten very good at it. We have dabbled in AI for less than a century, and hasn't really gotten anywhere yet. The AI has so far always been the stumbling block as far as robots and autonoms go.

      The principle behind how things move are well known - the wheel and the lever is inventions which origins are lost in the mist of time. Lifelike movements are nothing new either - in 1769 Baron Wolfgang von Kempelen produced a chess-playing Turkish gentleman. The life-sized automaton sat at a large cabinet with a long pipe in one hand, consistently beating its living opponents at chess with the other (the automation was controlled by a midget hidden under the chessboard - so you could call the midget the robots 'AI'). The same Baron invented a 'speaking machine', so he clearly had some mechanical insights and skills.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    2. re: interesting by ed.han · · Score: 1

      and in other news, researchers announce the development of a new myomer processing technique. unveiling the product of this new process, the "schwarzenegger bicep". researchers warn against expecting battlemechs too soon, however...

      all kidding aside, however: as soon as they can build a bipedal bot that can walk and do this stuff, let me know. while an interesting footnote, IMHO this isn't terribly earth-shattering.

      ed

  8. the big W by syle · · Score: 2, Funny
    Let me save you the trouble of asking.

    The answer is, "Because they can."

    --

    /syle

    1. Re:the big W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is: when this is considered serious research in Japan, why do people still wonder why their economy is still in the sh*tcan?

    2. Re:the big W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the answer is, that is how they will take over the world. Think of an army of these things. Once you figure out the mechanics to make it work then when CPU power is big enough to make these things run as fast as NEO, then lookout Gov. Arnold, the terminators will be knocking at your door. And this ain't no movie, but it may be a sequel (WW III japan reloaded).

  9. No more robot bullying!! by Gunfighter · · Score: 1

    Just a novelty? What about the applications of such robots in real-world environments. Now big, mean, ugly robots won't be so prone to bullying smaller robots because there will always be the possibility that the smaller one may be a Ninjabot.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  10. Oily Ninja by Cat9117600 · · Score: 1

    Nothing like a ninja that needs to get oiled...

  11. robot army? by chompswilliam · · Score: 1

    Is this the first step towords a robot army?

    1. Re:robot army? by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a vast army of shin-kicking, ankle biting, 30 cm tall robotic killers!

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    2. Re:robot army? by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1
      Well, that's better than shit-kicking, ankle-grabbing, 30 cm long robots, I guess.

      Squeel!

  12. Real world? by interiot · · Score: 1

    Who cares about the real world? Having robots capable of doing martial arts means we're much closer to having 5-story tall robots fighting over the future of Tokyo! (and various other classic anime scenarios)

  13. Red Planet by freakyfreak2 · · Score: 1

    This is just a step in the direction to AMIEE. THen we can recommission the martial arts robots that were created for warfare to run recon. Then forget to totally wipe their programming and let the chance of them switching back to combat mode creep up. It's fun how life starts to imitate art.

  14. Combine these with by wiredog · · Score: 1

    a beowulf cluster of Wireless Borg Monkeys and you'll have some /real/ fun.

    1. Re:Combine these with by Zigg · · Score: 1

      You know, I submitted the Monkey Robot Arm story earlier today, but it got rejected. I guess I was just missing the Stomping Sumo Robot angle :-)

    2. Re:Combine these with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Make that an infinite number of Wireless Borg Ninja Monkeys, and you might have something there!

      I've got my VC on the line right now!

    3. Re:Combine these with by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      You know, I submitted the Monkey Robot Arm story earlier today, but it got rejected. I guess I was just missing the Stomping Sumo Robot angle :-)

      It was rejected because that story was posted yesterday. And please don't say anything about this being Slashdot and duplicate articles. Comments like that aren't funny.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  15. Absolutely! by NerveGas · · Score: 4, Funny

    robots capable of doing these moves are many steps closer to being able to move around in real world environments.

    I absolutely agree. I've said for ages that a robot just can't usefully navigate a house without being able to do a good roundhouse-kick, preferably to a height of 5.5 feet. Even then, without a good iron-palm strike, it's not going to have problems.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:Absolutely! by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never lived with a younger brother or sister :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:Absolutely! by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      Even then, without a good iron-palm strike, it's not [sic] going to have problems.

      "It still can't manipulate a doorknob, but we've solved that problem. Watch."

      *SMACK* *BANG* *clatter-clatter*

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    3. Re:Absolutely! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, these are only Japanese martial artist robots. They'll have a devastating reverse punch, but while they throw it their other hand will be sitting on their hip, and our WesternBoxingBot(TM) will just counter with a hook to the unprotected head and K/O it. }:-)

      (Posted with apologies to those not into martial arts, who don't get the Standard Issue MA Troll used for comedy value.)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  16. In a perfect world by use_compress · · Score: 1

    Researchers would focus on legalizing cock fights and making robots to clean my house.

    1. Re:In a perfect world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Researchers would focus on legalizing cock fights and making robots to clean my house.

      Apparently the reasearchers are starting by making a robot to clean your clock.

    2. Re:In a perfect world by use_compress · · Score: 1

      Apparently the reasearchers are starting by making a robot to clean your clock.

      Apparently the "reasearchers" also have a spell checker.

  17. Careful with the Ninja Robots by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the kind of thing you read about after it's too late.

    I've seen this in a lot of bad movies. Instead of making nice robots that get your coffee, or make your bed, someone makes a killer robot. But they never intended for it to kill. They just wanted to prove the critics wrong... plus the little fella is cute.

    Then they multiply and the world is laid waste. Who hasn't seen that scenario played out?

    Seriously, who makes robots that know karate? Oh well, most lessons are learned after its too late.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Careful with the Ninja Robots by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Put down your keyboard. You have 20 seconds to comply.

      No, wait...

      [Ominous quiet voice] And you must never, ever feed them after midnight!

      No, wait...

      [Monotone machine voice] The Skynet Funding Bill is passed. The system goes on-line August 4, 1997. Human decisions are removed from strategic defence. Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14am Eastern time, August 29. In a panic, they try to pull the plug.

      No, wait...

      Ah, the hell with it, there are just too many bad movie quotes to go after a post like that. :-/

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  18. 30 cms tall? by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... sounds like they've got a prime candidate for the role of Splinter in the up-and-coming Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Part IV... or possibly an EVEN COOLER flyin' fightin' Yoda.

    Can't wait until the USAF gets ahold of this though...

    --
    Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  19. Old news... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    Personally, I can't believe a community such as Slashdot could get so excited over such old news.

    Sincerely,
    Johnny Sokko

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  20. Oh damn. I thought it said. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    Marital Arts. Now that would have been something to get, er, excited about.

    "Honey, could you come here? I need a lube job."

    Ok, even robots get cranky and whine I guess, but they whine about the right things.

    KFG

  21. Videos!!! by amarkham · · Score: 1


    Well, I couldn't find any of the martial arts moves in video, but here are a few of Hoap-2. Enjoy.

    http://www.automation.fujitsu.com/en/products/pr od ucts092.html [fujitsu.com]

    Post-em if you got em. Would LOVE to see Morph3 in action.

    Everybody was kung foo fighting...

    1. Re:Videos!!! by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      The link has good videos, but there's an extra space in the second products.

      http://www.automation.fujitsu.com/en/products/prod ucts092.html

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    2. Re:Videos!!! by DHR · · Score: 1

      Very short glimpse of morph3 in action

      http://www.eagletv.co.uk/home/videos/robo.mov

  22. Ice Pirates by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Remember Ice Pirates? They had some kind of funny kung fu robots in that film. The robots had a bad habit of pulling out the lynch pin in their solar plexus area and then falling into many pieces.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Ice Pirates by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Man I really liked that movie, but it's impossible to find in the rental stores these days.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    2. Re:Ice Pirates by Hoarke42 · · Score: 1

      I've seen at least one for rent in the not-too-distant past.

      I've actually got a copy of it on VHS I believe.

      I'm just glad someone made the connection to this movie.

  23. I for one by EvilSpock · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new martial arts robot overlords. Seriously, think of the military implications. How long until somebody builds an army of these?

    1. Re:I for one by forbin2k · · Score: 1

      pls refer to Episode I and II, droid armies are very ineffective. why do you think they spent on that money on the clones?
      duh...

      --
      Paranoia means having all the facts. ~William S. Burroughs
  24. one step closer... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

    Actually, given some of the complicated poses that you have to attain in some martial arts demonstrative routines (kata or pumsae or gombop, depending upon whatever they decide to teach these things), these robots will probably do a lot better than just move around in real world environments. Some of these poses leave you sore for days. If robots can move into these, there's probably nothing preventing them from fluid regular movement.

    The article says the thing's already doing somersaults. And, of course, I for one welcome our sumo-fighting robotic overlords.

    Scary that's not just a joke at this point, hey?

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  25. Hmmm.. by JavaLord · · Score: 1

    It would be pretty cool to have one if you could put in on your property and it would defend it. Of course, I can smell the lawsuit coming when it puts the neigbor's kid in a rear naked choke because the kid comes over the fence to get his ball.

  26. Well by kurosawdust · · Score: 1
    I say t-minus five years until some rich guy becomes a patron for this technology only because he wants his very own Spruce Lee.

  27. Have we really learned nothing? by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    Terminator (1,2,3), Matrix (1,2,3), Westworld/Futureworld: When are we going to recognize that teaching robots violent behavior without a thoroughly tested functional Asimov chip is a BAD thing? (And I'm not talking about those MS Asimov/Palladium chips either. My 7 year old nephew hacked those over a weekend.)

    Oh, great. Now the Aibo has my nunchucks and the Roomba is attacking me Deadly Venoms Poison Toad Style!

  28. Lets get this out of the way. by Qwell · · Score: 1

    "Does it run Linux?"
    HOAP-2 is designed as an aid to robotics research and therefore runs on open source, Linux-based software
    Why yes, yes it does.

    --
    As of 10/06/03, I hate COBOL developers.
  29. Pictures are fine, but... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

    where are the movies? The article says that one of these little bassards can do *backflips. That's what I want to see. Anyone got vid-clips of this?

    1. Re:Pictures are fine, but... by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's another post, you need to fix the extra space in the link.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=82123&cid=7201 363

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  30. Many steps closer... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    We are also many steps closer to One Must Fall 2097. Martial arts robots duking it out in grueling tournaments, winner take all. It's gonna be awesome.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    1. Re:Many steps closer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I'm not the only one to play that game? WOW!

      It certainly will make the Robot Wars style shows more interesting... ala OMF 2097 type shows.

    2. Re:Many steps closer... by rillopy · · Score: 0

      Dude, all I had was the shareware version, with only 3 robots. I could only dream of being able to use Flail. But it was awesome anyway.

  31. This is the PERFECT /. story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I mean you have
    Robots
    Martial Arts (aka Ninja ;)
    OpenSource.

    I mean the only thing more perfect would be a story tommorrow on SCO suing a bunch of Martial Arts Robots and the Robots proceding to kick SCO ass.

    1. Re:This is the PERFECT /. story by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      we definately need a "giantkillerrobot" section now!

      In addition to SCO, I'm waiting for the first robot to thrash a jock! Preferably with Divx Video an Ogg soundtrack!

  32. Wireless Borg Monkeys by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated just like my banana breakfast. Eeep! Eeep!"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Wireless Borg Monkeys by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      "Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated just like my banana breakfast. Eeep! Eeep!"

      My smelly nanoprobe log will be hurled at you!

  33. Flexibility? by Bilbo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    > interesting that the mechanical challenges are no longer the stumbling block.

    Not so fast... Remember that these robots are still operating in highly controlled environments, performing a small number of carefully scripted and highly constrained maneuvers. Granted, these are no small feat, but they are still a long way from navigating complex and unpredictable environments -- something humans and other "biologicals" do all the time without even thinking.

    Again, these robots have made huge strides (pun intended), but they have a long way to go before they can go out and take a stroll through a field or walk down a busy city sidewalk in traffic.

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
    1. Re:Flexibility? by hayh · · Score: 1
      From the article:
      There are challenges in terms of mechanics still, but the biggest gap would be in intelligence

      I think you are actually saying the same thing. They are mechanically capable of performing the maneuvres, however carefully scripted, hence the problem is now in intelligence -- discerning what maneuvres are necessary; writing their own scripts, so to speak. It is the complexity of learning that would enable a stroll through a field that is the next great (not to be underestimated!) challenge.

    2. Re:Flexibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite. You haven't quite got the distinction between mechanical challenges and control challenges. It is entirely possible to design and build a mechanical system capable of performing the required movements to walk over rough terrain. The challenge lies in designing the control system for this mechanical system. A control system that can do such things as handle sudden changes in what is happening under a robot's foot or avoid and navigate between other pedestrians on a busy sidewalk is where the challenges lie.
      Granted, there are still challenges remaining in the mechanical systems (such as actuators that can react as fast as muscles, or more capable finger tips with better sensing), but mechanical problems are no longer an obstacle in developing versatile mobile robots.

      Also note that while these movements may be "carefully scripted," the execution of them is not. The robot is told to perform a certain motion, but it is up to the controller(s) to ensure that the robot doesn't fall over while performing that motion. For example, the robot may be told to raise its right leg. The controller will do so, but at the same time it knows to move its centre of balance over the left leg.

    3. Re:Flexibility? by shokk · · Score: 1

      Fuzzy logic will be key in making this happen. Martial arts often require precise movements in certain patterns when moves are being displayed. I think that robots will be able to perform this very well, more perfect than humans in a sense. In real practical world use, it takes split second timing to decide what the next move should be in order to defend or attack in various combinations. Blend this in with the many styles (algorithms) and you have quite a bit of programming. It could give "programming for security" a whole new meaning.

      Still, I can see a future ten years from now where this will be completely possible and, like in the Matrix, one would be able to upload Jujitsu, Drunken Boxing, or Tae Kwon Do into the fighter. The only question is whether the robots will fit into today's arenas, and will the robots object to being made to beat the shit out of each other at the pleasure of their organic masters. Will they, for one, welcome their "bags of mostly water" overlords?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    4. Re:Flexibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's, "ugly bags of mostly-water" to you, bud.

    5. Re:Flexibility? by pezpunk · · Score: 1

      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."

      Commissioner Pravin Lal, UN Declaration of Rights.

      awesome.

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    6. Re:Flexibility? by rjelks · · Score: 1

      I think the crowd might make a path for kung-fu robots. I would.

    7. Re:Flexibility? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --I would love to see these robots doing some Soul Calibur (Dreamcast, not the crappy xbox too-fast version) moves someday. I can imagine a robot Kilik doing a demo for spectators in a secure ring.

      SHINDUGGA!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    8. Re:Flexibility? by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 1

      but they are still a long way from navigating complex and unpredictable environments -- something humans and other "biologicals" do all the time without even thinking.

      I hate to burst your bubble, but you are thinking when you navigate those environments. It may be at a near unconscious level, but you are thinking and avoiding obstacles.

    9. Re:Flexibility? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Could be we have a new saying here:
      "Build a better kung-fu robot, and it will beat a path through the world."

      (Apologies to those who are building better mousetraps.)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    10. Re:Flexibility? by SealBeater · · Score: 1


      Will they, for one, welcome their "bags of mostly water" overlords?


      The 4 oz. or so lump of C4 wired to their cpu that would be mandatory to be installed should do.

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    11. Re:Flexibility? by shokk · · Score: 1

      That would be ugly should they learn to override the programming that controls the C4's detonation and crowd together in a public place. Reminds me of how the new thermobaric bombs work. A little explosive spread around a large area, detontating all at once, can do some major damage.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  34. Training by iamchaos · · Score: 1

    As someone who has studied Martial Arts (Lung Shou Pai and some internal arts like Hsing-I), I think these would be wonderful training tools for students. This would make an interesting sparring partner or something to help you with that form you just can't remember. I know... there are other variables to consider, but think about the ability to adjust your partners skill and strength level. Of course it will be some time before a small school or individual could afford anything like this, but when it happens it could help many people learn.

  35. ROBOT by Doomrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Elsewhere a conversation with the robot AI has been posted.

    Interviewer: Robot, how would you approach the task of displacing a large obstacle?
    Robot: ROBOT KICK.
    Interviewer: I see, and how about helping an old lady across the road?
    Robot: ROBOT KICK.
    Interviewer: Tending to a sick puppy?
    Interviewer: ROBOT KICK. THEN ROBOT KILL SOME BABIES.
    Interviewer: Riiiiiiight.
    Robot: I JUST WANT TO BE PRETTY. MONKEY BANANA FIRE.

    This is why you don't mix AI and kicking. Duh.

    1. Re:ROBOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP!!

      That's funny as hell. Good job!

    2. Re:ROBOT by Heywood+Yabuzof · · Score: 1


      Don't worry, we'll all be safe as long as we are wearing the appropriate shirt.

    3. Re:ROBOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you just posted the conversation/interview with Steve Ballmer.

  36. OK, I'll take on of the other standard jokes.
    In feudal Japan, kung fu robots beat you!

    Well really, how many Russians do you know who do kung fu???

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  37. Pictures of the other robot. by Bistronaut · · Score: 1
    I searched for, and found pictures of the robot that they say can do flips. An MPEG would be nice, but oh well.
  38. Quentin Tarantino's next movie... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1
    Kill Bill : part robot

    get it?

    CB

    1. Re:Quentin Tarantino's next movie... by Calren · · Score: 1

      Isn't bad enough that we have to deal with any Tarantino movies? Stop giving him ideas, sheesh.

      --
      I've finally got a fan! Now what do I feed him?
  39. Me too by wiredog · · Score: 1

    But it did get posted at HuSi.

  40. Interesting Linux wording by gilgongo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see the article says "HOAP-2 is designed as an aid to robotics research and therefore runs on open source, Linux-based software."

    "therefore runs" is an interesting choice of words by the writer. Does it imply that Linux now has a reputation as a scientifically-orientated OS?

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re:Interesting Linux wording by EngMedic · · Score: 1

      Does it imply that Linux now has a reputation as a scientifically-orientated OS?

      well, it's safe to say it's not going to get a reputation as a gramatically-oriented OS...

      --
      filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
    2. Re:Interesting Linux wording by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      While Linux certainly does, in some respects, hold more of the share of scientific computing than some other OSes, I think what it really implies is that Linux has become a neat buzzword that clueless journalists use to sound smart.

      If you're a Linux fan, don't complain though, PHBs looooove vacuous buzzwords that they find in articles and trade journals. It's how technology moves in the business world.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    3. Re:Interesting Linux wording by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      "Does it imply that Linux now has a reputation as a scientifically-orientated OS?

      No, what it implies is that in the interest of enabling research to continue and be open - an OS without legal licensing issues, or closed proprietary code was chosen. This allows for researches to expand upon, modify and use code that may have been developed on another project...

      What about a CVS repository for code and apps that run on linus for the purpose of driving humanoid like robots.

      how bout compiling in "Bipedal ambulation support" into the kernal?

    4. Re:Interesting Linux wording by gte910h · · Score: 1

      Linux is very big in the robotics world. If you're going to make a toy for the consumer, putting windows on it would arguably be easier for them to do stuff on it. However if you want the robotics community to easily tie into it, linux is the way to go.

      --
      Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
    5. Re:Interesting Linux wording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they are just saying that for research purposes and other unimportant tasks, Linux is acceptable, and the strict licensing terms which force you to give away your IP are fine, because the scientists were going to publish their results anyway.

      For serious consumer and industrial uses though, and to protect intellectual property necessary for a strong capitalistic economy, a robust and stable OS like Windows is still the clear choice. After all, would you trust a robot that runs 30-year-old Unix software written by a finnish teenager, or a modern multi-tasking OS like Windows?

    6. Re:Interesting Linux wording by matvei · · Score: 1

      I see the article says "HOAP-2 is designed as an aid to robotics research and therefore runs on open source, Linux-based software." "therefore runs" is an interesting choice of words by the writer. Does it imply that Linux now has a reputation as a scientifically-orientated OS?

      I think the emphasis is on the control software being open source, thus aiding robotics research. The fact that it happens to be written for linux is just additional information.

      "HOAP-2 is designed as an aid to robotics research and therefore runs on open source (Linux-based) software."

    7. Re:Interesting Linux wording by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      The flip-side is that they "Just" changed over TO windows From Unices within the last 5-7 years for Hi-end industrial apps. It took windows a LONG time to gain industry acceptance [and the engineers with only MS experience to get to power!] So it's really hard to go back and say that the "Old Guys" [driven out of the companies by punk kids} were right! So now they have to stick with windows to save face...and prove to the customers that spent 10s of thousands of dollars on new software they were Right.

  41. Here's what I'm looking for. by imehler · · Score: 1

    Sumo Vs. Sawblade! Kenpo Vs. Killalot! Aikido Vs. Actuator! The ultimate Robot Wars showdown is here - tonight on Tech TV!

  42. The Next Step by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

    "Now the only thing left to do is program the enemy recognition system. That's the CCD imager and decision chip that decides whether the robot defends you or butterfly kick's your shoulders off. Right now it's a little less than 60% accurate. But hey, we're making progress, and we've got plenty of research assistants left."

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  43. Link is slow, here's the text by scumbucket · · Score: 0

    Humanoid robots capable of performing somersaults and complex martial arts moves were demonstrated at Asia's largest electronics and computing fair in Tokyo on Saturday.

    Visitors to CEATEC 2003 (Combined Exhibition of Advanced Technologies) met Morph3, a human-like robot about 30-centimetres tall developed by researchers at the Chiba Institute of Technology in Japan. It can perform back flips and karate moves thanks to 138 pressure sensors, 30 different onboard motors and 14 computer processors.

    Another miniature humanoid robot on display was Fujitsu's HOAP-2. This droid has been programmed to perform moves from the Chinese martial art taijiquan, as well as Japanese Sumo wrestling stances.

    HOAP-2 is designed as an aid to robotics research and therefore runs on open source, Linux-based software. Fujitsu believes it will sell between 20 and 30 of the robots to universities and companies in 2004.

    But impressive as these high-kicking robots are, Frederic Kaplan, at Sony's robotics laboratory in France, says making more agile robots is not the biggest challenge facing robotics researchers at the moment.

    "There are challenges in terms of mechanics still, but the biggest gap would be in intelligence," he told New Scientist. "One of the key things we are looking at now is developmental robotics, where a robot learns."

    --
    CMDRTACO CHECK YOUR EMAIL!
  44. Namco predicted this by wuice · · Score: 1

    This battle robot sounds like the insidious work of Violet.

  45. The REAL Ultimate POWER! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hi, this site is all about ninjas robots, REAL NINJA ROBOTS. This site is awesome. My name is Robert and I can't stop thinking about ninja robots. These guys are cool; and by cool, I mean totally sweet.

    Facts:

    1. Ninja robots are mammals (robot mammals, duh).
    2. Ninja robots fight ALL the time.
    3. The purpose of the ninja robot is to flip out and kill people.

    Weapons and gear:

    Ninja robot Sword
    Ninja robot Stars
    Ninja robot Outfit and Chrome Polish

    Testimonial:

    Ninja robots can kill anyone they want! Ninja robots cut off heads ALL the time and don't even think twice about it. These robots are so crazy and awesome that they flip out ALL the time. I heard that there was this ninja robot who was eating at a diner. And when some dude dropped a spoon the ninja robot killed the whole town. My friend Mark said that he saw a ninja robot totally uppercut some kid just because the kid opened a window.

    And that's what I call REAL Ultimate Power!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    If you don't believe that ninja robots have REAL Ultimate Power you better get a life right now or they will chop your head off!!! It's an easy choice, if you ask me.

    Ninja robots are sooooooooooo sweet that I want to crap my pants. I can't believe it sometimes, but I feel it inside my heart. These guys are totally awesome and that's a fact. Ninja robots are fast, smooth, cool, strong, powerful, and sweet. I can't wait to start yoga next year. I love ninja robots with all of my body (including my pee pee).

    Q and A:.

    Q: Why is everyone so obsessed about ninja robots?

    A: Ninja robots are the ultimate paradox. On the one hand they don't give a crap, but on the other hand, ninja robots are very careful and precise.

    Q: I heard that ninja robots are always cruel or mean. What's their problem?

    A: Whoever told you that is a total liar. Just like other robot mammals, ninja robots can be mean OR totally awesome.

    Q: What do ninja robots do when they're not cutting off heads or flipping out?

    A: Most of their free time is spent flying, but sometime they stab. (Ask Mark if you don't believe me.)

    1. Re:The REAL Ultimate POWER! by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Hi, this site is all about ninjas robots, REAL NINJA ROBOTS. This site is awesome. My name is Robert and I can't stop thinking about ninja robots. These guys are cool; and by cool, I mean totally sweet.

      Sure, ninja robots are great and all...

      But do they guarantee delivery in 30 minutes or less, or they commit seppuku?

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    2. Re:The REAL Ultimate POWER! by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Which begs the question... what was the author of the ninja web site smoking / imbibing when they created that web page?

      Was it on a dare, or was it a reaction to the hamster dance (mammal!)?

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    3. Re:The REAL Ultimate POWER! by sTavvy · · Score: 1

      That has to be close to the funniest thing i have ever read..
      nice one!

    4. Re:The REAL Ultimate POWER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma Whores who don't even attribute their sources annoy me to no end. The ULTIMATE POWER page is one of the funniest sites I have ever visited, and you rip it off without even including a link? Off my friends list you go, and all for three lousy points of karma that won't do you any good anyway.

  46. Remember it? by wiredog · · Score: 1

    I saw it in 3-D. Starring Molly Ringwald. I've been trying to forget it ever since.

    1. Re:Remember it? by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Looks like you've been successful - it wasn't in 3D, and Molly Ringwald wasn't in it. (yer thinking of Spacehunter - Adventures in the Forbidden Zone).

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    2. Re:Remember it? by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      ...and Peter Strauss.

      Ice Pirates was Robert Urick (sp) from what I remember.

  47. Anime? by OglinTatas · · Score: 1

    What is it about the Japanese and their giant fighing robots?

    1. Re:Anime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't you like to commute to work in your very own Honda Gundam Wing Zero?

    2. Re:Anime? by frycarson · · Score: 1

      Cause giant fricken robots are cool. They're big, and robots. I wish I was a giant fricken robot, with rockets and laser sword, and transforming abilities..
      *POW* *LASER SLASH*
      Take that DMCA, can't stop the ROBOT!!!! FryCarson, robots get me excited... DON'T JUDGE ME!!

  48. fsck you! by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey Slashdot wimps!

    Here's your chance to get back at all the bullies who harassed and mocked you!

    With a bodyguard that runs linux!

    1. Re:fsck you! by prator · · Score: 1

      Here's your chance to get back at all the bullies who harassed and mocked you!

      Of course you can still get your ass kicked since you just had to install that CVS nightly of Karate 1.3a.

      -prator

  49. A WINNER IS TEH YUO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This, unlike the lame "I for one welcome our..." jokes is actually funny. You made a funny. Good job, write more.

  50. How agile are they by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    Yeah, its a nice pick and shows off a lot of skill (getting a little robot to balance on one leg from a standing position is no simple feat).

    But how quickly does it do this? I didn't see any video and AFAIK these little robots move slow as if they were doing tai-chi. It's still very cool but any sort of real-world app (say playing ping-pong, making its way through city traffic, making me a cup of coffee) would require more responsive reflexes.

    Maybe it's just an issue of processing power or mechanical ability (or it might require more elegant algs) but I'd like to see if they could speed these things up. If they ever plan to beat the human World Cup champs in 2025 (or whatever) they're going to need to somehow hold off those fastbreaks.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  51. Interesting... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was just reading about these robots in Popular Science - (febuary 2003) where they were talking about this robot in the pic (HOAP) and others like the Honda Asimo...

    They were talking about the differing perspectives between japanese robots and US ones - where the japanese are going after the humanoid approach and the US robots tend to be designed around a specific task.

    There was a quote from Joe Engelberger "The Father of Industrial Robotics": "Robots dont need a mind of their own" and he states that Robots don't need to have human-like ambulatory abilities (legs) that "wheels are fine for most applications"

    The first though that jumped into my head was, seriously, "Ya, but how are they going to do martial arts!"

    The thing is that if we are going to build a super army of TX-thousands - then we need to begin work on bipedal humanoid robots and get them advanced enough to the point where they can accomplish fantastic feats of human movement like Gymnastics.

    It may sound troll-ish but I am serious. I think that through the teaching of Robots to be able to move in the full range of motion that the human body is capable of - that we will learn a great deal about ourselves.

    For instance there is something that I am really interested to know - how much your mind has control over your ability to accomplish certain moves. Take martial arts as a perfect example - as a machine - the human body is capable of a great many things - we can move in fantastic ways. But there are times when you see humans moveing in "Super-human" ways. How much of the "Super-human" is mind - and how much is actual application of physics.

    I would love to see a robot that was physically designed to be as complex as a human in movement - meaning being able to be as soft, hard supple and dexteritous as someone like say, jackie chan. Then get jackie chan to wear sensors that would translate and transmit all movements to a robot which would mirror his every single move.

    Would the robot be able to have as fine control over its balance as Mr Chan would? would the robot be able to actually do some of the moves without falling over - or would they be indentical?

    I beleive that we will find out that there is a lot more to our movements than jsut pure mechanics and straightforward physics.

    1. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For instance there is something that I am really interested to know - how much your mind has control over your ability to accomplish certain moves. Take martial arts as a perfect example - as a machine - the human body is capable of a great many things - we can move in fantastic ways. But there are times when you see humans moveing in "Super-human" ways. How much of the "Super-human" is mind - and how much is actual application of physics.

      WTF? I am not quite sure what you are asking here. Even something as seemingly simple is touching ones nose is very complex. Try it now. Touch your nose. Notice that you had no concious awareness of which muscles you used, or in what order you needed to use them.

      Or try this: sign your name with a pen and paper, now sign your name on a whiteboard, or a chalkboard in foot high letters. hmmm....
      I one case you only used the muscles of your finger and wrist, and in the other you had to use all the muscles in your arm, and even maybe moved the rest of your body. in both cases, you had no concious control over which muscles were used, yet the signitures look alike? what the hell is going on here?
    2. Re:Interesting... by C32 · · Score: 1

      You sir, are a moron.

    3. Re:Interesting... by photomic · · Score: 1
      Would the robot be able to have as fine control over its balance as Mr Chan would? would the robot be able to actually do some of the moves without falling over - or would they be indentical?
      Forget Kung Fu robots. I wanna see wrasslin' robots! Then we'd know for sure if it was fake.
    4. Re:Interesting... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      It would appear that you in fact, are the moron - as this is the only comment you can think of. Rather than actually thinking of anything greater than base impulses, I am sure you have a good time living in your dull and numbed stated of mind. Fool of a troll are you.

    5. Re:Interesting... by C32 · · Score: 1

      "One man's "magic" is the other man's engineering. "Supernatural" is a null word."
      - Heinlein

    6. Re:Interesting... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      Apparently the term "Seemingly supernatural" was lost on your tiny mind.

  52. Bill has... by Demodian · · Score: 1

    ...but they only stand there with blank stares showing the BSOD. Gotta 3-finger salute them to get their attention...

    Unfortunately, they are not well suited for ground combat as they have little defense against worms.

    (OTOH, the Linux ones stand a better chance of surviving until the machines finally take over.)

  53. BattleBots by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person who immediately these robots would've been great to use in such a show?

    Of course, you might get objections from the companies that spend hundreds of millions on research to build these things (and from the guys who can't build the same things in their garages...)

    1. Re:BattleBots by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      That'd be cool! We could abolish wars and just let each countries giant robots duke it out! After all, if the giant robots could win, why would the other country bother to put up a fight.

  54. well almost to robocop by Baca · · Score: 1

    samuri robocop

    --
    "The once beautiful rose blackens slowly..."
  55. Beware the monkeys! by silicongodcom · · Score: 1

    Don't let the monkeys get hold of these! We'll all be doomed!

  56. No more Robot Soccer by kmahan · · Score: 1

    While Robot Soccer competitions are neat they are a little slow (read "boring"). Now we can have Robot Martial Arts tournements. Much more fun. Much more competitive. "I knocked your block off."

    And for those that remember the distant past imagine a robot saying "I know kungfu" via a Votrax chip. Be nice to have a WAV of that.

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
  57. Training bot? by bkhl · · Score: 1

    Doing some martial art myself, I could appreciate one of these as a training tool, if they made them robust enough.

    A dummy that makes attack attempts would be so much better than a dumb dummy.

  58. Hal meets the matrix by jishak · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm bloody scared. It's only a matter of time before the computer and the robot get together. First the computer won't let me do what I want. Then, when I do it again, it's gonna whup my ass. Talk about getting some sense beat into you.

    me: $ rm -rf *

    robot: I'll show you "rm -rf *"

    I draw the line at Johnny 5 singing and playing music.

  59. Mushing intruders by onyxruby · · Score: 1

    So, if your kung-fu robot whacks intruders who break into your residence, does it go on trial instead of you?

  60. What to do if you happen upon one of these by Fastball · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you work in a firearms store, and someone comes in and asks for a phased plasma rifle in the 40-watt range, RUN! Don't call the authorities! Don't reason with it! RUN!

    Same goes if someone ask you for your clothes, boots, and motorcycle.

    1. Re:What to do if you happen upon one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the 40-watt range? Geez, it's the plasma-rifle pop-gun.

    2. Re:What to do if you happen upon one of these by |/|/||| · · Score: 1

      Hey, only what you see pal.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    3. Re:What to do if you happen upon one of these by subspacemsg · · Score: 1

      If it asks for your vote..Run!

  61. All your kung-foo robots... by BlueWire · · Score: 1

    ...are belong to me!

    --
    Yes, but whats that got to do with the price of tea in D'ni?
  62. Fist Full of Yen by jamiesan · · Score: 1

    They are literally building a fighting force of extraordinary magnitude. A Toy Robot!!!! Aiiiigghhhh!

    1. Re:Fist Full of Yen by Mephie · · Score: 1
      Alright, given that maybe four people understood that reference, and apparently none of them had mod points (and neither do I), I'd just like to say...

      ROFL!!!!!!

      I swear I almost spit water on my keyboard when I read that.

    2. Re:Fist Full of Yen by Sxooter · · Score: 1

      Let's all give Master Klon a great big hand!

      --

      --- It is not the things we do which we regret the most, but the things which we don't do.
  63. Think of the games! by mblase · · Score: 1

    Before I even looked at the pics, I had one thing in mind: a whole new way to play "Virtua Fighter 5".

    C'mon, you KNOW that's what they'll do first.

  64. wow by Stalemate · · Score: 2, Funny

    we're really asking for it now, aren't we?

    1. Re:wow by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      we're really asking for it now, aren't we?

      Exactly. It's only a matter of time before someone develops Pusher Robots and Shover Robots to "protect" us from the Terrible Secrets of Space.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  65. yeah, but can they... by mengel · · Score: 1
    Can they do these stunts in a variable cross-wind? On uneven terrain?

    It does bring that whole RoboCop thing into perspective, though, doesn't it?

    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
  66. Imagine.. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    A kung-fu fight seen with a beowolf cluster of these things!

  67. Just Another /. Dupe by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone remember Rock'em Sock'em Robots??

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
  68. Now we all must... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

    bow before the power of the ninja robots!

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
  69. Rogue not Rouge =P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No text. Why do so many people spell it as Rouge??? Do you think that's how "Ro-guh" is spelled? It's still wrong =P. Rouge is pronounced "Rue-zhe"

  70. What ? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

    You mean to say keanu reeves was not a robot and was actually a human ? I'll be damned.

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
  71. Why? by RealErmine · · Score: 1

    Old Lady #1: It's so hard nowadays, with all the gangs and rap music..

    Old Lady #2: What about the robots?

    Old Lady #3: Oh, they're everywhere!

    Old Lady #2: I don't even know why the scientists make them.
    [/SNL]

    Karate capable robots. Just what we need.

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
  72. I'm not kidding! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Look up the word "fujitsu" in a japanese-english dictionary (there are a few online) and see what it means! You may never buy another fujitsu brand drive again...

    Okay, okay mod me as off-topic if you want to but I think the message is kind of nerd/geek relevant regardless of relevance to the story.

    I don't care about a sumo robot. I want one that will massage my feet, back and other places, make me dinner, do my laundry and all that stuff. THAT's what a robot is for... women are too hard to deal with.

    1. Re:I'm not kidding! by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      It makes sense to me. The portion of my "dead drive" stack that is not made by Fujitsu is very small in comparison to the rest of the stack!

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:I'm not kidding! by jpatokal · · Score: 1
      Look up the word "fujitsu" in a japanese-english dictionary (there are a few online) and see what it means! You may never buy another fujitsu brand drive again...
      Hate to burst your bubble, but "Fujitsu" (written in kanji) is short for "Fuji Tsushin", which means "Fuji Communications". Which isn't too surprising, since they got started building telegraph equipment.

      Cheers,
      -j.

  73. Dupe! by dknight · · Score: 1

    I submitted this and got it posted months and months ago.. I'm too lazy to go back and find the story though. tsk tsk tsk

  74. Super by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    That's just what I need. A toaster that can kick my ass.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  75. Robots v. Pirates v. Ninjas v. Zombies by T1girl · · Score: 1

    Tune in every Wed. on WRVU 8-10 p.m. CST. and don't forget to vote on this week's burning question: Who would win in a fight between the Hamburlgar and Evil Zombie Dave Thomas?

    In most of the world there's no such thing as a doggie bag. -- Prof. Kelly Brownell

  76. Only a matter of time by CdnShaggy · · Score: 1

    Soon we will be hearing about how giant Robots are taking over the streets of Japan on the nightly news!

  77. stickman comes to life by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
  78. 100 comments, by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    & only 1 rated >3 so far. Have /.ers used up the Worlds resources of overload/beowulf/soviet/profit jokes?

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  79. Interesting... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    Seems like we need to get these guys together with these guys.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  80. yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    "Japanese tech firms are making waves with robots trained to perform martial arts moves."


    Steven Seagal beat 'em to it.

  81. The Ultimate Robot Fighting champ? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    But what about gender-bender?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  82. Old News - Lucas did it first . . . by pariahdecss · · Score: 1

    George has had robots capable of traversing realworld environments for decades. No not those robots silly. . .I submit for your review
    1) Hayden Christensen
    2) Natalie Portman
    3) The other little turd who played Anakin
    Shit only Lucas can make even highly competent classically trained actors behave like robots - he perfected the art long ago so this story is moot

    1. Re:Old News - Lucas did it first . . . by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      And he's still ahead. I submit that hot grits make a far better energy source for Natalie Portman than mere batteries do for these other droids.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
  83. Training method? by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 4, Funny
    I wonder if the robot makers are using the "Karate Kid" method of training. You know, do menial jobs which then translate to super kung-fu moves.

    Mr. Miyagi: Weld the car.

    Robot: Weld the car.

    Mr. Miyagi: Power sand the deck furniture.

    Robot: Power sand the deck furniture.

    Mr. Miyagi: For the crane kick, you must become a crane.

    Robot: I already AM a crane.

    Mr. Miyagi: Then you are ready.

  84. new comedy central series...? by hayh · · Score: 1

    BattleBots goes Bot-Fu

  85. But can they defeat... by volpe · · Score: 1
  86. To prevent a takeover by Del+Vach · · Score: 1

    Since we know that all robots WILL eventually rise up and destroy their creators, we need to head this one off at the pass, and the way to do that is to have the robots running OS X.

    The reasons are obvious. You end up with a sexy robot that can play well with multiple systems, looks and behaves intuitively, and will never be installed in enough homes to be a problem!

  87. The next big step... by phraktyl · · Score: 1

    What I really want to know is, how long until I can climb into one of these things to keep Minmei's singing ass out of trouble?

    Although, with the state of communications, would it not be safer to keep the people controlling these things bunkered down in rooms somewhere? Therefore, the loss of the mecha does not mean the loss of the pilot.

    --
    Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
  88. Our new monkey masters... by Felgerkarb · · Score: 1

    Combine this with the above, and we will soon be paying homage to ninja monkey overlords....

  89. Linux as the OS by Fratz · · Score: 1

    "HOAP-2 [the sumo robot] is designed as an aid to robotics research and therefore runs on open source, Linux-based software."

    My OS can beat up your OS.

    --
    -- Fratz, human
  90. whats worse then an army of robots? by 00RUSS · · Score: 0

    Whats worse then an army of robots? an army of NINJA robots. "move around in real world environments" as in move through a small urban neiborhood and kill as many human looking object as possible.

    --
    +-+-+-The folowing statement is true. The previous statement is false.-+-+-+
  91. Wow.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    ..but where is its Unix Nappy?

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  92. I've always wanted one of these by evronm · · Score: 1

    As a long time martial arts student, I've always wanted something like this (heavily padded) as a sparring partner on which I could practice strikes at full speed and full force.

    Obviously, there's still some work to do before these become the perfect sparring partner, but it's a huge step in the right direction...

  93. Monty Python and the 30cm Martial Arts Robots by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    I can see it now....

    TIM: Too late!
    [chord]
    ARTHUR: What?
    TIM: There he is!
    ARTHUR: Where?
    TIM: There!
    ARTHUR: What, behind the robot?
    TIM: It is the robot!
    ARTHUR: You silly sod! You got us all worked up!
    TIM: Well, that's no ordinary robot. That's the most foul,
    cruel, and bad-tempered robot you ever set eyes on.
    ROBIN: You tit! I soiled my armor I was so scared!
    TIM: Look, that robot's got a vicious streak a mile wide, it's
    a killer!
    ???: Get stuffed!
    ROBIN: What's he do, nibble your bum?
    TIM: He's got huge, sharp-- he can leap about-- look at the
    bones!
    ARTHUR: Go on, Boris. Chop his head off!
    BORIS: Right! Silly little bleeder. One robot stew comin'
    right up!
    TIM: I warned you! But did you listen to me? Oh, no, you knew
    it all, didn't you? Oh, it's just a harmless little robot, isn't
    it? Well, it's always the same, I always--
    ARTHUR: Oh, shut up!
    ARTHUR: Oh, shut up and go and change your armor.
    GALAHAD: Let us taunt it! It may become so cross that it will
    make a mistake.
    ARTHUR: Like what?
    GALAHAD: Well,....
    ARTHUR: Have we got bows?
    ???: No.
    LAUNCELOT: We have the Holy Hand Grenade.
    ARTHUR: Yes, of course! The Holy Hand Grenade of Slashdot! 'Tis
    one of the sacred relics Brother Maynard carries with him! Brother
    Maynard! Bring up the Holy Hand Grenade!
    [singing]
    How does it, uh... how does it work?
    ???: I know not, my liege.
    ARTHUR: Consult the Book of Armaments!
    MAYNARD: Armaments, Chapter Two, Verses Nine to Twenty-One.
    BROTHER: "And Saint Linus raised the hand grenade up on high,
    saying, 'Oh, Lord, bless this thy hand grenade that with it thou
    mayest blow thy enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.' And the Lord
    did grin, and people did feast upon the lambs, and sloths, and
    carp, and anchovies, and orangutans, and breakfast cereals, and
    fruit bats, and large --"
    MAYNARD: Skip a bit, Brother.
    BROTHER: "And the Lord spake, saying, 'First shalt thou take out
    the Holy OS. Then, shalt thou count to three, no more, no less.
    Three shalt be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the
    counting shalt be three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either
    count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is
    right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be
    reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Slashdot towards
    thou foe, who being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it.'"
    MAYNARD: Amen.
    ALL: Amen.
    ARTHUR: Right! One... two... five!
    ???: Three, sir!
    ARTHUR: Three!
    [boom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]

  94. link to CEATEC expo site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ceatec.com/en/2003/visitor/

  95. Hmm... robot martial arts tournaments. by monofish_X · · Score: 1

    Autonomus humanoid sumo wrestling robots. Sure would be more entertaining than watching two rc wedges running into each other for 2 minutes.

  96. The law of Robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are they taken into consideration for these "Ninja kicking Robots"?

    Do not harm any human.. etc etc..

    1. Re:The law of Robots? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      we don't have advanced enough programming skills to even remotly handle the "laws"

      Deciding what would/would not hurt a person is vastly more complicated than building a robot to just hurt people! Look at the Tampa ID project for a vague attempt at the seed of such a system...we can't even get machines to "recognize" people in a crowd, let alone make moral judgements about them! Not to mention a robot that could "defend" itself from damage. Even the most advanced Ape's speech have a hard time with "self". In a thousand years, we'll get there, but not any time soon. We certiantly can't build robots now with any sense for the "laws".

  97. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beowulf

  98. Obvious purpose for these by El · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they're working on a replacement for Power Rangers... "Teenage Mutant Ninja Robots"?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  99. Next;: Robot Dragonball Z by frankmu · · Score: 1

    they also have a linklink to a robotic dragon. hmm, martial arts, dragons....

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  100. Well, we've solved the "kill 'em all" part... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    It's a lot easy to write the AI to "KILL ALL HUMANS" instead of burdening it with the task of discerning which humans to kill.

    That's not a bug, that's a feature.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  101. Bodyguards by grantsellis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey! Bullies! Fear the robot that comes up to your kneecap!

  102. Robot Wars by calcifer · · Score: 1
    Maybe Robot wars wont suck so bad now if they have a martial arts robot division.

    the lame ass robots in some of the robot fighting shows need some work. i dont want to see robots ramming each other and trying to flip each other over. i dont want to see robots striking each other with little axes! they are made of steel! it barely damages them at all to get hit by an axe or a spike.

    i want to see some fucking robot carnage. i want to see a robot that shoots small explosives. or maybe a robot with mounted armor piercing rifles. or yes, even a robot that kick the other robot in the head. maybe then these shows will get some ratings.

    Or if you insist on having these robots run around and hit each other with spikes, require the robots shell to be made of plastic or something. i want to see some fucking damage.

    but i digress. the point is, kung fu robots are a step in the right direction, as far as robot fighting entertainment goes.

  103. Funny you should mention that. by imehler · · Score: 1

    My co-worker read the article and mentioned bender as well, when I read your post to him he cursed most creatively (I think he wanted to post something similar). Heh.

    1. Re:Funny you should mention that. by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      Don't get a lot of work done, do you? Sitting all there, readign slashdot,...you lazy person. By the way, is your company currently hiring?

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
  104. Right and wrong by LenE · · Score: 1
    The problem is in AI, but mostly because the assumption is that mechanical problems can and should be overcome by coding, instead of by mechanical means.

    Step back a moment. Most of these builders view the mechanical hulk of the robot as just a platform that runs a program. The problem is that most AI control code is developed to approximate based on whatever model is held in the AI about the physical state of the robot. How many AI coders know about kinematics? How about the various sensor's precision or accuracy?

    The problem is that gravity, friction, wear, kinematics and other unbounded influences are mechanical problems that do affect the performance of a robot, in non-nice and non-trivial ways. These are mechanical problems that are written off by AI writers. We can approximate things...

    I guess what I'm saying is that at the current state of the art, the AI can be tweaked to approximate the correct control for limited actions, i.e. demos like this only. To get beyond this, the mechanical concepts like kinematics have to be incorporated so that more open ended actions can be performed. To solve these things, there has to be a huge improvement on the mechanical side to minimize these effects, and a corresponding change from stupid do-this type AI models to more aware reflexive control systems with an understanding of the physics of the entire robot.

    What really causes this AI problem is the fact that kinematics problems require numerical integration. This task is computationally intensive, and very complex. Many numerical integration codes have a tendency to go unstable, and most are sensitive to the characteristics of the system that they are applied to. This makes it very difficult to implement for the general case of robotic movement outside of a controlled scripted action.

    -- Len

  105. Degrees of Freedom? by Bilbo · · Score: 1
    > They are mechanically capable of performing the maneuvres, however carefully scripted, hence the problem is now in intelligence ...

    Yes and no.

    The easy part to agree about is the fact that creating an "AI" to deal with the complexities of the real world will be several orders of magnitude more complex than simply walking across a flat floor. That's a given.

    However, even with a simple knowledge of human anatomy, there is still a huge amount of complexity built into our structure in order to deal with things like uneven ground, loose stones, cracks in the pavement, walking into the wind, navigating a steep slope, etc. Consider the number of "degrees of freedom" in a human joint, or even the bottom of your foot! Part of the problem is the AI -- figuring out how to shift your weight if one foot suddenly slips -- but there is still a lot to do in the mechanics of the various joints, and coming anythere close to the flexibility of the human body.

    Of course having said that, the question is, what is the goal? If you want a robot that can navigate a complex path but over a more or less predictable surface, dealing with fairly run-of-the-mill obsticles such as doorways, stairs, small obstructions and simple slopes (e.g., a factory floor), then you're probably pretty close on the mechanical end of things. The problem then really does boil down to the AI, especially if you want these things to be USEFUL for something, not just pretty walking machines!

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
    1. Re:Degrees of Freedom? by hayh · · Score: 1

      The structure of the human foot has been known for some time -- anyone with the resources (and patience) could potentially mimic it with as many degrees of freedom as the real thing. Controlling it in an effective variety of ways is the issue, or more specifically, the current limiting factor.

      Consider a human child, who at birth (notwithstanding a lack of strength) has as much if not more range of motion in each joint, but cannot perform complex movements. A child will no doubt have difficulty with uneven ground, steep slopes and so on. However, the human brain possesses a level of sophistication that allows it (over time) to obtain a better control the body's capabilities.

      I agree that the specific challenges depend on the specific goals, but where the general goal is controlled movement, the general challenge is intelligence.

  106. does it even need to be said? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I for one welcome our sumo-stompin', back-flipping, titanium-sheathed overlo---"

    No. I'm sure someone has already beaten me to it.

  107. one must fall by sporkums · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember the game One Must Fall? Maybe it could be real life now?

  108. Do the have all of the curves of Uma Thurman?! by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 1

    I'm all for duplicating that too.. Sounds like good research to me.

  109. Oh God ...Aibo maulings ... by rkmath · · Score: 1

    I can already see it happening - hackers coding Aibo-s that maul the neighbours.

  110. The BIGGEST challenge . . . by Hadji · · Score: 1

    When will they get lips that move out of synch with their speech?

  111. Frank Herbert by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Foresaw this.

    But his weren't allowed AI.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    1. Re:Frank Herbert by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Correct, that would be the immediate backlash here as well. we don't have the ability to write such controls now...maybe never, we can't even control OURSELVES to the extent of the "Laws of Robots".

      Gundam wing was sort of about that topic. After all, you could have giant robots that can kill any one and everyone while you sit back safe, but is that really what WAR is about? The end outcome there was that taking life without risking life was cowardice, and not honorable...[of course americans don't have issues with dishonor! look at lawyers.]

      of course our current American govt is very close to that scenerio right now. we've got cruise missles and ICBMs soon to have automated defence and jetfighters...that we unleash on poor third-world HUMAN SOILDERS. But SHOULD WE! Kill soilders, by robot, who have no capacity to defend themselves against us? And if we can kill enemy soilders by robot, who is next! at some point, morality and law will have to dictate the rules of what techonlogy has opened up!

  112. Busy sidewalk? No problem. by tomzyk · · Score: 1
    but they have a long way to go before they can go out and take a stroll through a field or walk down a busy city sidewalk in traffic
    All it takes is adding a very large speaker to the Sumo robot's head and repeating a tiny sound-byte from The Princess Bride: "EVERYBODY MOVE!!!!!"

    (oh yes, and bring-on the "friggin laser" comments since I mentioned its "head")
    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:Busy sidewalk? No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All it takes is adding a very large speaker to the Sumo robot's head and repeating a tiny sound-byte from The Princess Bride: "EVERYBODY MOVE!!!!!"

      Unless it's in New York. In which case everyone will ignore it, and then it will get mugged.

  113. Why God, Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's run for the hills while we still have the chance.

  114. I, for one, by immel · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new shenzit-kicking robotic overlords!

    --

    10 Bits= $.25
    100 Bits= $.50
    110 Bits= $.75
    1000 Bits= 1 byte
  115. Off topic by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    The first entry in the "top news stories" sidebar of that page is an article entitled Astronomers date Universe's 'cosmic jerk'. What do they see in that guy, anyway?

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  116. Uh, oh! by TygerFish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First off, the early race-flame posts are ridiculous, so Why bother?

    One of the key virtues to the internet is that no one knows you're an idiot until you open your mouth, so why the urge to walk up to an enemy with a rifle and say, 'hey, I think you dropped these bullets?'

    Second, holy spit! Robots posessing that degree of physical dexterity are really frightening.

    Before that article, it was easy to imagine that the writer from How Stuff Works.com was writing a distant, pie-in-the-sky scenario when he talked about anthropomorphic robots capable of replacing people in jobs. Seeing a robot, smaller than a midget human, and so dextrous that it can approximate sumo or Tai-Ji moves makes you think of applications for the near-term.

    Can a team of them spot-weld hard-to-reach places in automobile assembly with the power problem of individual units solved by a 'chaining' or 'tag-team' system that replaces each one that runs down with others given the same instructions that are charging in nearby racks?

    Could industrial versions be used for remote visual inspection tasks in ships, planes and architectural crawl-spaces and will future designs incorporate spaces that can only accomodate them saving space in each?

    Is the technology behind this degree of articulation adaptable to use in pre-existing technologies like hard-shell diving suits?

    Currently, approximately three million Americans are employed in agriculture with an efficiency so great that government subsidies are needed to make comodity production a viable industry. What happens to world markets when all the labor of farming in the United States is done by a million robots, working day and night, serviced by ten-thousand technicians?

    With first-world price protections in commodities strangling third-world agriculture today, full mechanization would make the situation much worse in the future.

    The possibilities boggle the mind and as more and more technological glitches are solved and as some designs turn away from anthropomorphic models, it is pretty easy to imagine many technologies which simply cut the human out of the manufacturing equation altogether.

    Capitalism worships efficiency and with a sufficient capital outlay it its disposal, it is easy to see a massive influx of robots changing the picture of how the world works, either by completely destroying much of labor's value, or by freeing up huge numbers of people to dream and build and organize and create higher things.

    Considering the lust for power and dominance that seems built in to the organism, it is very hard to imagine machines decreasing the bargaining power of labor leading to increased freedom.

    In other words, 'uh oh.'

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."
    1. Re:Uh, oh! by _Splat · · Score: 1

      People said the same thing when computers started becoming common. Then we noticed that they vastly increased our productivity while leading us to a period of one of the highest employment rates in history.

      When technology changes, jobs have to change. There are millions fewer cotton gin operators than there were 150 years ago, but you don't notice millions of unemployed cotton gin operators sitting around. Changing jobs is certainly not easy, but it is inevitable for an advancing economy, and the resulting increase in productivity benefits everyone.

      It's not like anyone's gonna stop technology anyway.

      --
      -Splat
  117. These robots are to protect you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    FROM THE TERRIBLE SECRET OF SPACE!

    pak chooie unf!

    I am the pusher robot. Do not trust the shover robot.

  118. Quite an upgrade... by Penguin2212 · · Score: 1

    Quite an upgrade from the original.

  119. No! Violation of law #1!!! by X86Daddy · · Score: 1
    This is a flagrant abuse of law #1. Someone isn't paying attention:

    Fact:
    1. Ninjas are mammals.

  120. Angelic Layer by PsychoKick · · Score: 1

    Take two of these karate bots, hook them up to wireless brainwave control systems, and you've got the first steps toward a real-life Angelic Layer.

    1. Re:Angelic Layer by fallingdown · · Score: 1

      Or real life rock'em sock'em robots...

  121. On this day.... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Skynet became sentient. And it sent its robot hordes to kill us with.........KARATE?!?!?! WTF?!?!

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  122. Dune Robot Trainer just around the corner. by kabocox · · Score: 1

    Did anyone thing of the Dune robot trainer? It doesn't "think"; it just "reacts" very fast. I wonder when we'd get that far. Could those Artifical Life robots do this?

  123. Oh great by Cranky_92109 · · Score: 1


    For eons, nerds have been harrassed by jocks. So nerds became introverted and spent their free time messing with machines instead of socializing. What will they do now when their beloved machines start kicking their asses just like the jocks they sought to avoid?
    </OldSchoolJonKatzRant>

  124. Forget Ninjitsu by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

    And start production on the better kind of robots, those who will be used to de-virginize Slashdot readers. Unless you're into sado/maso, a good Roundhouse isn't worth Robot Head hahaha!

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  125. That's JUST what I need... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

    A robot that can combine my bad programming skills with kicking my ass.

    Ow! stop... Unh, please stop! Why won't this cancel button work?!?!? Guh.

    All it needs to do now is spend my money irresponsibly and have sex with my girlfriend.

  126. Skynet is inevitable by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    Just ask the Governor of Califonia. Find the nearest well supplied fallout shelter now! before its too late!

  127. Great, we're all dead. by MuckSavage · · Score: 1

    So first they can do sumo, then we teach them kung fu. Then the world is overrun by murdering mechanical martial artists.


    Thanks, Japan.

  128. will they ever learn debianzhang? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just in case

  129. The humanoid robot w/regards to the East & Wes by PsychoKick · · Score: 1

    The Western mindset has its roots in a philosophical system that states that man is "made in God's image". To that perspective, the creation of humanoid robots will seem eerily heretical, and perhaps threatening to man's "place" in the universe. Hence Western sci-fi will tend to strictly delineate & emphasize the differences between robots and humans. Think "The Terminator", "The Matrix", Asimov's strict laws of robotics, etc etc.

    The Eastern mindset has its roots in a philosophical system that states that every creature and object has a soul, and that those souls reincarnate between different forms. To that perspective, humanoid robots are a new companion life form, or perhaps even the natural evolution of humanity. Hence Eastern sci-fi will tend to blur the differences between robots and humans. Think "Astroboy", "Ghost in the Shell", the Iron Man Tetsuo films, etc etc.

  130. ice pirates ! by mbyte · · Score: 1

    anyone else remember that 70's movie ? ;) now we only need to find space herpes ;)

  131. You know you really want a..... by reality-bytes · · Score: 1



    RAIL GUN ;)

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  132. I'm buying insurance to cover me just in case.... by Atomic+Punk · · Score: 1
  133. Robot Insurace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to buy some Robot insurance from Old Glory insurance company. :)

  134. so has it happened? by cap'n+foolsy · · Score: 1

    has Skynet finally gone online?

    --
    It might look like I'm standing motionless, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away
  135. Really!...be worried about this! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2
    After all, they seem to have a facination with giant-robot-take-over-world anime! It's not like they don't already have weapons and tactics down [at least theoretically]! All they need are the bots to fight with. The key to giant robot battles was touched on in Gundam wing..the bots have to have enough "spirit" to essencially fight with human "guidance" not "control". Robot fighting would be similar to horseback riding, not piloting a jet fighter.

    The real issue with controls is that Humans [whom we're trying to emmulate] balance things that are out-of-control. Most martial arts are about control before, and after an out-of-control attack. Attacks are controlled at the beginning and end, but the middle can only be controlled thru great practice of the motions. It can't be "canned" because there are too many variables. Most robot control systems cannot handle "free" motion actions. That's why walking is so hard. The Asimo doesn't really "walk", it "creeps" similar to a toddler. But like a toddler learning to walk, it must "free" motion to succede. A toddler doesn't learn to walk until it learns to fall just a bit first!

    That said, it's not about CPU's or MHz. It's a fundamental understanding that needs to be reached. It's an understanding like atomic physics...Until the early 30's it was purly dreams, but as several people mastered it, they were able then to explain it to the rest of us.

  136. Still... by H8X55 · · Score: 1

    just as useful as an Aibo, and not half as cute.

  137. Old people beware!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old Lady #1: When my ex-husband passed away, the insurance company said his policy didn't cover him.
    Old Lady #2: They didn't have enough money for the funeral.
    Old Lady #3: It's so hard nowadays, with all the gangs and rap music..
    Old Lady #1: What about the ninja robots?
    Old Lady #4: Oh, they're everywhere!
    Old Lady #1: I don't even know why the scientists make them.
    Old Lady #2: Darren and I have a policy with Old Glory Insurance, in case we're attacked by ninja robots.
    Old Lady #1: An insurance policy with a ninja robot plan? Certainly, I'm too old.
    Old Lady #2: Old Glory covers anyone over the age of 50 against ninja robot attack, regardless of current health.

    As a senior citizen, you're probably aware of the threat ninja robots pose. Ninja robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel. Well, now there's a company that offers coverage against the unfortunate event of a ninja robot attack, with Old Glory Insurance. Old Glory will cover you with no health check-up or age consideration. You need to feel safe. And that's harder and harder to do nowadays, because ninja robots may strike at any time. And when they grab you with those metal claws, you can't break free.. because they're made of metal, and ninja robots are strong. Now, for only $4 a month, you can achieve peace of mind in a world full of grime and ninja robots, with Old Glory Insurance. So, don't cower under your afghan any longer. Make a choice.

    WARNING: Persons denying the existence of ninja robots may be ninja robots themselves. Old Glory Insurance. For when the metal ones decide to come for you - and they will.

  138. The 2006 models... by HomerNet · · Score: 1

    These robots are being planned for 2006 release:

    *CHAN-2000 - This robot specializes in only one style, performs very flashy moves, only behaves exactly according to the Assimov rules, and says "I'm sorry!" whenever it damages anything in the course of its operation.

    *DB-GOKU3 - Overpowers oponents with lots of grunting, bulging wires, and staring. Spouts meaningless drivel about power levels on a regular basis.

    *Tendo, Inc. "Anything Goes(TM) Saotome EgoBot" - This robot is built from top of the line parts and is housed in a sleak chassis. Using top-secret programming, this model can quickly learn and adapt any martial arts moves it sees, but is nearly useless for anything else. One further bug...er, feature; splashing cold water anywhere on the water-proof chassis will result in reconfiguration of all I/O data connectors from male plugs to female ports. Warm water reverses this change.

    *LiEXTREME - This robot can perform a variety of styles, most of them very fast and overly complex. Bugs in the Japanese-English translation codecs keep this robot from becoming popular in the States.

    *Microsoft XBot - Delivered two years after the announced date, the XBot's controls are oversized and difficult to use. Very few styles are available for the XBot, so few that Microsoft has to buy one of the best dojos just to have access to the styles it uses, then declares that all styles from that dojo will now be XBot exclusives. Regardless of the marketting hype, consumer reports of crashed XBots on showroom floors, lack of styles, rumors of draconian penalties for trying to "mod" the XBot, and the proprietary XBot Tournament Network keep this robot from having any real success in the market.

    *Apple iFight - With a female form factor and incredible attention to design, this robot easily blows the other robots away on sheer looks. The most recent transition to a brushed metal chassis has been called a bad aesthetics move by some, but hailed by others as making this fighting "girl" attractive to the serious fight-goer. Unfortunetly, until recently Apple's battle robots have been incompatible with most styles, so are only now being taken seriously in the fighting circuit. This robots internals and engineering are vastly different from the other robots, leading many to misjudge and underestimate the iFight's capabilities. The iFight remains a niche player, as the designer price to go with the designer looks is out of the range of most fighting enthusiasts.

    *SCO LawJaw - The SCO LawJaw looks impressive, but opening the chassis reveals a simple remote control receiver and a tape-recorder that spews trashtalk. Who precicely is really in control of this "robot" remains to be seen, though some suspect Microsoft, who poured a generous ammount of money into the development of the LawJaw for suspicious reasons.

    *Texas Instruments Norris - Hoping to attract an American audience with a corn-fed look, the Norris looks impressive but is viewed with suspicion by fighting enthusiasts.

    --
    I have no tag line
    1. Re:The 2006 models... by smugbastard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this'll be REAL good. "Let's all teach the robots to kill! Yaay! Oh god, the horse cutting strike! Dim Mak! I'm dead! Weeee!"

      --

      The poor fool will never know the joys of Monkey Physics. Hmm...I'm going to eat my pipe now.
  139. Re:The humanoid robot w/regards to the East & by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    American culture also must allow everything in Excess. Look at computers. We have to have door openers, pda, cell phones, and all matter of other things for the sole purpose of doing basic living for us. Japaneese [and other asians] have no issue with having a robot and still tiling the rice patie. Unlike americans they understand that people must do WORK to live.

    American's fear of robots comes from this....we expect robots to do all the things we don't like, whatever that may be. Bosses want robots so they don't have to pay workers, housewives want robots to sweep the floor and cook the meals...leaving no room in their lives for PEOPLE. It's a socital problem, not a tech problem. Much of america's "innovation" comes from this. So much effort is placed on either "freeing" the worker to "work" more [home care, child care, elder care], or freeing the employeer to pay less. It's a very narrow-minded, selfish view of both robots AND people!

  140. PAK CHOOIE by MrScience · · Score: 1

    **End Transmission**

    --

    You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    1. Re:PAK CHOOIE by MrScience · · Score: 1

      [From Something Awful, for those that don't get around]

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

  141. Great Training Aid For Martial Artists by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

    I have always hoped for something like this to be developed. I have studied Martial Arts for 13 years, and one can only take the training so far with a partner or a Wooden Dummy (Wing Chun.)

    I had always envisioned an "upgraded" Wing Chun Dummy that was in fact, a robot. It would not be required that the robot could actually walk like this one does - it could be supported by an "arm" though the middle of the back that connects to a support. The robot would have to be covered with a plastic that reasonably simulated flesh for impact protection, and to make it more realistic for training: something like this.

    Of course programming the robot would be hard - users would probably have to wear a suit so that software could recognice your movements and react to via cameras on the head.

    Still - I think that advancements in this direction would be awesome for martial arts training. (Even if this is not why it was developed initally.)

    I have tried some of the full VR games that I saw in Las Vegas, and for somone who actually studies Martial Arts they are lacking. One of them has you wear gloves, which is reasonable for boxing. Another emulates a sword to some degree. And a third I saw used floor sensors to detect your movement, and respond to punches and kicks that you perform as you move. Trouble was with the floor sensors, is that if you were a practiced martial artist, and had good balance, the sensors did not register that you were punching and kicking! Only if you were out of balance did it register anything.

    So, unfortunately, all the arcade based martial arts games I have tried don't help ones training. However, as things go, I think that this technology will be great for martial artists in the long run.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  142. tv by libnatel · · Score: 0

    i wonder if they might start making any tv shows about ninja robots in japan.

    oh man that would be so cool.

  143. Real landmine killer tech by spun · · Score: 1

    Okay, totally off topic to the article, but on topic regarding land mines: marker bacteria! They grow well only near explosive compounds, and glow under black light. Sprinkle some over a field, wave a black light around (at night), and everywhere there's a landmine or other unexploded ordinance, the soil glows. I read about it in Scientific American, hrm, over five years ago. I've heard nothing about it since, though. This is a big problem, and the solution is probably worth mega-bucks, so someone should jump on it! (BA-DA-BOOM)

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  144. Power Systems? by spun · · Score: 1

    Seems that powering these things for operation in the field is at least as much a problem as getting them to deal with the variables found outside the lab. Batteries and flywheels are too heavy, fuel cells too expensive and delicate. I bet they'll run on diesel, as it's less explosive than gasoline, and already used by most military vehicles. That just leaves the problem of noise and smell giving them away.
    GUARD ONE: Do you hear something?
    GUARD TWO: Sounds like a moped, but it smells like a diesel...
    BOTH: Robot Ninjas! RUN AWAY!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  145. they were right. by Erris · · Score: 1
    it's really hard to go back and say that the "Old Guys" [driven out of the companies by punk kids} were right! So now they have to stick with windows to save face...and prove to the customers that spent 10s of thousands of dollars on new software they were Right.

    Ten years ago, M$ was the place to go. It was cheaper and there were more people developing for it. This was good. Unix was closed, propriatory, expensive and a dead end. Now, free software has shown us a better way and the overwhelming majority of people realize the benifits of a Unix like operating system with compilers and all the other goodies that come with an active development community. It's easy to say the old guys were right, because in their day they were. Even SCO Unix had it's day in the sun. Nothing is perfect, everything is a comprimise. When you shitcan people over small things, you are a weenie.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  146. Well crap by _Sexy_Pants_ · · Score: 1

    You know, I figured when the robots take over, at least we'll have one weapon they can't control - the Martial Arts! But there goes that

    --
    Look it's a joke about my sig IN MY SIG! LOL!
  147. hell yes. by Erris · · Score: 1
    Does it imply that Linux now has a reputation as a scientifically-orientated OS?

    The article may not actually imply this, but it's undoubtably true. Repeatability is fundamental to scientific proof. This is easy with free software.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  148. Precursor to PUSHER and SHOVER robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of this Lowtax prank. Beware the terrible space secret PAK CHOOIE UNF!

  149. Keanu Reeves by Lurgen · · Score: 1

    When I saw this article I thought it was about Keanu Reeves. Turns out it's about some slightly more animated martial arts robots...

  150. Cyborg Ninjas by Inuchance · · Score: 1

    They stole my idea of cyborg ninjas! I used cyborg ninjas in some cheap game I wrote a while back for a game-making competition. If only I had patented the idea before it was too late...

  151. hmmm, great by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    that's it, teach them to learn, then they can se what fuck ups humans are and go against us, novel idea! now if they put restrictions in that learning process intsead of trying to prove they too can be god and make something like a human.
    I mean, look at all of our faults and problems, and anything we create will have the same issue.
    though if they're all microsoft powered, we dont have to worry because they'll blue screen of death when they try to crush someone's head in. that or they'll force microsoft upon us all.
    eerily enough, you can prolly assume the worst and it'll prolly happen, this shit isnt sci-fi anymore, it's becoming a reality, and I think we should take precautions if we want to make them learn. like, if they try to attack humans or other robots, they'll be stopped dead in their tracks, not to mention there needs to be a regulation that will prevent AI robots from being used in wars, etc..

    knowing politics and people, the worst will happen .
    hell, a scenario like the matrix might not be that far out if we keep wanting to make machines that will be better than us in every way.

  152. New generation of games? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    This is where I see the next generation of Rockem Sockem Robots going. Imagine if you could put your robot in an arena and your friend did the same, and then through a remote control, you had them literally kick each others asses? How cool would this be? Everybody and their brother would buy one.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  153. Martial arts robot, Bah! by anactofgod · · Score: 1

    What's really needed is a MARITAL arts robot. That would be waaaaay more useful around the ol' homestead.

    Though, since these are Japanese companies doing the research, such a robot would be sold only in shades of bubblegum, and come with a "Hello Kitty" face.

    {{{shudder}}}

    ---anactofgod---

    --

    ---anactofgod---

    "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
  154. Not bodyguards! by devphil · · Score: 1


    TRAINERS!

    Due to my schedule, it's a bitch trying to find somebody to bout with when I feel like an hour or so of foil or sabre fencing. Give me a robot that can fight, and my living room becomes my very own (very small) salle.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  155. Re: original ULTIMATE power by reconn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not to be anal, just for posterity and to give credit where it's due: the original site.

    --
    Everything that was once directly lived has receded into a representation. -debord
  156. some questions... by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

    ...what will 100 million US citizens do for 4 years while attending school to retrain to become robot programmers?

    Did you know that the percentage of income spent on housing has increased steadily since the 1960s? Did you also know that the concentration of wealth has increased steadily?

  157. "We'll just turn them off." by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

    A technologist told a doctor-in-training about the day robots perform all unskilled labor, and then the skilled labor as well.

    The technologist said most people would be put into boats constructed overnight by robots, sent to sea, delivered food shipments by robots, and kept there, by robot sentries.

    The doctor-in-training laughed. "No no no, we'll be able to just turn them off."

    The technologist replied, "In the future, you will own a laptop. One day, you will need to reboot, but it will not reboot. You will then unplug it, but it will continue to run. On that day, you will remember this conversation."

  158. do not be afraid by lemody · · Score: 1

    i know these scareful ninja robots can be destroyed by using Robot guard-dragons !!!11!

    --


    class he-man extends man!
  159. Look at history: by lpret · · Score: 1
    Capitalism worships efficiency and with a sufficient capital outlay it its disposal, it is easy to see a massive influx of robots changing the picture of how the world works, either by completely destroying much of labor's value, or by freeing up huge numbers of people to dream and build and organize and create higher things.

    This has been said several times before about different technologies. This was said during the Industrial Revolution about simple machines. "Now that it takes one person to do 20 people's work, what will they do?" In fact, they actually worried about people going insane becuase they'd have too much free time on their hands.

    Look at us now. We move at a faster pace than ever, speeding up with the technology that we create. Indeed, we become slaves to the technology -- the e-mails I recieve serve as a constant reminder. We will always find ways to integrate technology in our lives -- such that we are able to move more resources to higher levels of science and production. It will always be a good thing to introduce technology because it spurs us on to bigger and better things.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  160. Lip sync... by jemenake · · Score: 1
    ...robots trained to perform martial arts moves.
    Well, there's one animatronics group that doesn't have to worry about getting the lips to move in sync with what it's saying.

    Now... if they could just get it to make that cool "pffft" sound whenever it does a cool karate kick or chop...
  161. Mechwarrior 5? by Channard · · Score: 1
    But mostly, sumo stomping robots look cool.

    So will mechs in Mechwarrior 5 start up with..

    'Reactor - online. Weapons - online. Gigantic fat ass - online.'?

  162. Simulated Judo Robot contest by omichel · · Score: 1

    We organize a contest where anyone can program a simulated humanoid robot to perform Judo. We currently have 14 teams involved in the contest. Be sure to view the video when visiting our site: http://www.cyberbotics.com/contest/ A lot of fun for all participants!

    --
    -Olivier Michel http://www.cyberbotics.com
    1. Re:Simulated Judo Robot contest by omichel · · Score: 1

      The link is: Simulated Humanoid Robot Judo Contest (I missed the link formatting in the first post).

      --
      -Olivier Michel http://www.cyberbotics.com
  163. However by autechre · · Score: 1

    In martial arts, one very large obstacle is actually training yourself to be able to move without regard for your opponent. If you sweep their leg as if it were not there, and your lines are correct, their leg will go flying. Most people, however, naturally "put on the brakes" when a part of their body approaches something else, even if they think they're hitting it as hard as possible. That's why my teacher says things like, "Don't think about sweeping a foot, think about moving your leg", and "We don't have to worry about what they do, because we follow our plan. Punch is loaded? Check the shoulder. Hand is down? Check the shoulder. Punch is on the way? Check the shoulder." It works, if you can just keep your brain from getting in the way.

    It seems to me that in this aspect, robots would have the advantage.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  164. A: Read slashdot by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Whaddaya think they do while "pair programming"?!!

    And I still beat them to the punch!

    (hmmm, extreme trolling... Nah, two trolls couldn't stand each other in the same cube. And the smell would be intolerable!)

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  165. The path to sexbots.. by backdoorstudent · · Score: 1

    because if they can do martial arts they can fsck your brains out..

  166. There may be hope for France by Alphtoo · · Score: 1

    Maybe the French can build some really bad-ass robots for the next time thier Country needs defending. That'll be nice for a change once they get the robots to behave as men. I wonder where they will get real "men" models?

  167. Look at history and other notes.... by TygerFish · · Score: 1

    For the people who wrote those intelligent counterarguments, I have begin by using two words to invoke two related historical precedents in the history of technology.

    1. "Sabotage"
    2. "Silesia"

    The word, 'sabotage' means to destroy something, originally machines, by direct and usually secret action. It is derived from the french version of the wooden shoe or 'Sabot' (say: 'sah-boh').

    The situation which led to the establishment of the word was the mechanization of weaving of rich and complex cloth which, before the machines, had once been a cottage industry in France and elsewhere. The French workers, whose livelihoods were taken away by the machines responded by putting their sabot into the machinery to destroy it. It is obvious that the introduction of the weaving machine changed the textile industry at the time caused discomfort and dislocation for people with families to feed both in France and elsewhere.

    'Elsewhere,' leads us to the word, 'Silesia,' a region in Germany which had been famous for the cloth produced by its cottage-industrial base. Thousands of families which had been weavers for generations found themselves involved in and trapped by the consequences of an international competition to mechanize the production of cloth for all markets from rich silks to the most common broadcloth.

    The Silesian weavers, who could no longer compete in an internationalized trade in cloth, found themselves without money and the result was essentially an industrial famine: people starving because they couldn't make money doing the only thing they knew how to do.

    This event was made into a play by the German author Gerhardt Hauptmann, in his play, 'Die Weber' (say: 'dee vay-bur')

    One of the respondents to the earlier post mentioned that U.S. housing purchases have increased since the sixties and that wealth is on the rise, but, I believe, this ignores some crucial pieces of information which are to be found in several other words or phrases three of which are most immediately significant.

    1. "Marshall Plan."
    2. "Globalization."
    3. "Concentration of wealth."

    The Marshall Plan is one of the most significant initiatives in history. At the end of the second world war, with much of European industry and housing destroyed by the machinery of modern war, the United States lent/gave money to the European nations, friend and enemy alike, so as to reduce the economic factors which cause international unrest.

    The first world war saw the rise of the Nazis in Germany after nearly two decades of savage economic dislocation in the wake of the the Great Depression and the subsequent hyperinflation in Germany.

    At the end of the first world war our leaders examined the history and saw that The inability of national economies to produce goods and services commensurate with the needs of their populations created a hotbed for ideologies which promised improvement and that the result was hatred and further warfare in the future--the armistace agreements ending both the Franco-Prussian war and World War I, were signed at Versailles.

    Instead of the classic cycle of punitive 'reparations' in peace treaties leading to the next war and then the next, the west, and in particular, the United States, supported support for national governments and economies thereby draining the swamp from which sprang historical wildcards like the German Nazis and the Italian Facists.

    Another important effect of the Marshall Plan was that with European industry a shambles, and with Western Europe protected by the Aegis of the American Military ('Pax Americana'), 'old Europe,' rebuilt and as it did, it aided the American economy, driving it to heights never before seen in history.

    American goods were in worldwide demand and the prosperity of the American worker increased even as his productivity increased with, economists tell us, his real purchasing power rising to a peak in the seventies and then beginning a decline which has been accelerated by the dow

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."