Slashdot Mirror


Satellites Used to Stop Car Thieves in Pakistan

zymurgy_cat writes "Yahoo has an interesting story about a company in Pakistan that uses satellites and mobile phone networks to monitor and disable stolen cars. Looks like they can also monitor people's driving habits and whether or not they're using the air conditioner. The article comments about how much easier it is for them to do things like disabling cars remotely than in Western countries. (Remind me to never rent a car in Pakistan.)"

215 comments

  1. We have that in the US.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its called Onstar!

  2. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    Pakistan? I thought they'd just shoot the mule.

    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Locate Pakistan and do what? As though Pakistan matters!

  3. Too bad by tofubar · · Score: 0

    They haven't caught bin Laden yet using this technology. Sometimes I wonder if he really is still alive.

    1. Re:Too bad by dicepackage · · Score: 1

      I don't think Bin Laden is going to fill out the required paperwork to rent a car.

  4. Pakistan by Gareman · · Score: 3, Funny
    Never rent a car in pakistan.

    You've been reminded.

    1. Re:Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if your rental car can be disabled by satellite? If the car is mistakenly disabled, get on your cell phone, call a cab, then call the rental company and complain. Seriously, some of you geeks are WAY too paranoid. As if the government cares about how mundane your life is...

    2. Re:Pakistan by Hi_2k · · Score: 1

      Dude, the govenment has jailed US citizens for years in the past. Its not paranoia, its saftey.

      --
      When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
      Sluggy Freelance.
    3. Re:Pakistan by Ichijo · · Score: 1
      Never rent a car in pakistan.
      Rent, schment. Never steal a car in Pakistan!
      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    4. Re:Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All north american citizens are so stupid... you only drive automatic cars... so... better dont rent a car in a intelligent country (from europe, asia, south america, etc)

    5. Re:Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Automatic transmission systems are more fuel-efficient than manual transmissions.

      Formula One racing cars would use automatic transmissions if it weren't for the weight problem.

    6. Re:Pakistan by PoorAggies50to20 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm an American and my car has a manual transmission, and so do the cars of several Americans I know. Yup, we Americans sure are stupid. Where was the car invented? Don't hate on us just because you're mad that you live in a country that is so damn crowded and where gas is so expensive that you have to drive a Cooper Mini or some other tiny wuss car.

    7. Re:Pakistan by drauh · · Score: 1

      All your car are belong to us.

      --
      This is a tautology.
    8. Re:Pakistan by Gareman · · Score: 1
      The car appears to be invented in France: http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aacarsst eama.htm

      But yeah, my car has a 5-speed manual, as did the car I had before it. I chose it for performance reasons.

    9. Re:Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Never rent a car in pakistan.

      Never rent a car in Pakistan,
      be you an Israeli or Saudi or Jew.
      Never rent a car in Pakistan,
      No matter what you do.

      Never get petrol from a nigger,
      A spic or a wop or a kraut,
      And never drive a

      **BOOM**

  5. It's gonna happen: by Bendebecker · · Score: 0, Funny

    I wonder if you can use these satalites to look at naked chicks. Maybe the paparizzi can get one...

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
    1. Re:It's gonna happen: by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Are Pakistani chicks hot?

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    2. Re:It's gonna happen: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah! Trust me!

    3. Re:It's gonna happen: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://ww3.voyeurweb.com/main/Pre44b/ps20031016-55 465/index.html one specimen

    4. Re:It's gonna happen: by p4nymph · · Score: 1

      Not as "hot" as your barnyard inbred american sluts.It is disappointing (actually not) to see the redneck attitude displayed toward another culture by most of the supposed "enlightened" /.s. I think most of the people here are especially the delusional americans are in no place to comment on socio-economic or psychological nature of another country whose ancient culture and civilizations can be traced to post sumerian times ( Mohenjadaro). When most of "enlightened" westerners were still learning how to make ants stick better to twigs for extraction...they were learning and innovating cultivation and irrigation. So show some respect where its due,and get over the delusion that you serve as a moral compass to the world.

    5. Re:It's gonna happen: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yummy ANTS!

  6. karma whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jesus, karma whore. would you please stop posting this one-liner bullshit in hopes for a few "insightful" mods before the rest of /. says the same thing, but better?

  7. nothing new here, just like lojack, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or onstar or boomerang service.

    Only new thing is that it's in pakistan

    1. Re:nothing new here, just like lojack, by mad_dog3283 · · Score: 1

      Onstar can control your car remotely? That's news to me.

      --
      Reprise the theme song and roll the credits!
    2. Re:nothing new here, just like lojack, by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      Wait until drive-by wire becomes standard on GM cars. Then remote control is merely a matter of software...

    3. Re:nothing new here, just like lojack, by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Onstar can unlock the door on your car, and can listen into the vehicle to hear what is happening. It can also pinpoint the vehicle's location.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:nothing new here, just like lojack, by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I almost forgot, it also monitors the airbag. If your airbag deploys it calls the car phone. If you don't pick up the phone and tell them everything is just peachy they roll EMS (ambulance, etc.) to your location.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  8. Oh, Come on. by Davak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Give me a break slashguys...

    Stopping stolen car = good thing
    Disabling stolen car = good thing
    Monitoring driving habits = good/bad thing

    Good if you are an employer and want to make sure your employees are not abusing the company time. Bad if this information is used to harm your personal rights...

    Just because this is in a different nation that many of you consider "backwards" doesn't mean that this is a stupid idea... or an upcoming technology here in America.

    Davak

    1. Re:Oh, Come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thank you for calling OnStar..."

    2. Re:Oh, Come on. by Eccles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disabling stolen car = good thing

      Unless it's smack-dab in the middle of a highway, or blocking an ambulance, etc. At the very least the car should warn of the imminent disabling and slowly reduce the throttle, so the perpetrator can pull off the road.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:Oh, Come on. by tobym03 · · Score: 0

      in america theyd get sued for the "stopping stolen car" thing.

    4. Re:Oh, Come on. by Greenisus · · Score: 1

      Thank you. It's easy to become disallusioned reading these forums. If there's something that has a possibility for abuse for end users (i.e. RFID), it's the end of the world and we all need to buy tin foil hats. But, if it's something that can potentially about the corporations/big brother (i.e. P2P file sharing), everyone's pointing out the possible good uses (e.g. sharing research papers, etc). When I read these comments, I think of the Buddhist "everything in moderation" idea. P2P is good and bad, just like RFID and satellites tracking cars.

    5. Re:Oh, Come on. by Nos. · · Score: 1

      True, and I don't think stolen cars should be "automatically disabled". What should happen is the owner notifies police that the car is stolen and that it has the Trakker thing on it. Police use GPS to locate car. When they are close enough and the situation is safe, they notify company to turn off the car.

    6. Re:Oh, Come on. by dafoomie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good if you are an employer and want to make sure your employees are not abusing the company time.

      Bad if you are an employee and don't want to get grief for stopping for coffee at Dunkin Donuts for 5 minutes.

      Bad if you are an employee and aren't allowed to use the air conditioning unless a client is with you.

      I do agree with your point, it's not the idea or the technology thats "evil" or "stupid", like anything its just a tool that can be used for good things or abused. I think concerns of abuse are legitimate until there are checks and balances in place to prevent it. If my car got stolen, I'd want it disabled and found. But I also don't want the company to monitor what I do and where I go.

    7. Re:Oh, Come on. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The difference is who's being restricted. If P2P networks are banned, then you're eliminating civil liberties ("civil liberties" being defined as anything that a citizen can do). If you restrict the usage of RFID as use in evidence in criminal trials, then it's government that's being limited.

      The United States was born when it was decided that government was getting out of hand. The Bill of Rights was born in order to resist it happening again. Thomas Jefferson and his allies had in mind the prevention of too much government control, and that's the general opinion you read on Slashdot.

      More powers and abilities to government/less priviledges to citizens = BAD.

    8. Re:Oh, Come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stopping stolen car = good thing
      What about stopping a non-stolen car? The system can't differentiate; it's up to anyone with access to the system. This includes anyone with illegitimate access.

      Disabling stolen car = good thing
      What about disabling a non-stolen car? Again, the system can't differentiate.

      Monitoring driving habits = good/bad thing
      Rephrase that to be "an unknown third party monitoring everywhere you go."

    9. Re:Oh, Come on. by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Well, I think FedEx actually tracks their drivers.
      I'm a ham op and I've heard some intresting conversations over the air.

      This guy was talking about working for FedEx. He stopped by a 7-11 to grab some food.
      When he got back to the truck, the company wanted to know why he was stopped for 5 minutes. They thought he was lost and even sent him a map.

      So i guess FedEx drivers are digitally tracked.

      Remind me. If i ever work delivery.
      Pizza hut or Dominos.
      (those are too cheap to track right?)

      -Grump.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    10. Re:Oh, Come on. by Animaether · · Score: 1
      Bad if you are an employee and don't want to get grief for stopping for coffee at Dunkin Donuts for 5 minutes.


      Is stopping for any reason not required for the activity that you are paid to perform whilst operating the vehicle explicitly 'against the rules' of e.g. your contract ?

      If so - you would deserve the grief. Get over it, or adjust the contract and send it back to legal for review -before- you would've signed it.
    11. Re:Oh, Come on. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Bad if you are an employee and don't want to get grief for stopping for coffee at Dunkin Donuts for 5 minutes.
      Bad if you are an employee and aren't allowed to use the air conditioning unless a client is with you.

      And too bad for you if, when you find out about these policies, your first inclination is not to start looking for another job.

      It's easier to find a job when you have one. I'm not advocating quitting in protest; protest quietly once, then start looking for other employment. When you find it, tell them what you think of their policies (politely) and that it's why you are leaving the company. Leave it up to the company to find a peon who will put up with their nonsense.

      They're paying you to do things their way. If you don't follow their rules, you're not earning your money. If you don't like the rules, the solution is to move along to a company that either won't monitor you or doesn't care, not to be upset that they want things done a certain way and they're making sure that they're being done that way.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Oh, Come on. by nyseal · · Score: 1

      Since when did ANYONE in Pakistan have personal rights? They're not exactly a democracy 'ya know.

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    13. Re:Oh, Come on. by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      I've spent like 2/3 of my life in Pakistan First off the speed limits in Pakistan are much lower unless you're on a highway and highway driving in Pakistan is minimal. I've been on a highway 3-4 times in 10-15 years there ;). The in city speeds are between 40-60 km /h (25-35 mph?). So the chances of serious accidents happening if you lose power arent that high, not to mention traffic issues. Anyways about the police, they are very very corrupt. So, not involving them usually is a good idea. Anyways two thumbs up to whoever implemented the idea

    14. Re:Oh, Come on. by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      They try? And democracy isn't always a panacea. Pakistan was a democracy from I think 1988 to 1999. The government was massively corrupt. Search on Google , a twice elect PM (Benazir) was convicted of embezzling state funds in Switzerland (so you can't exactly accuse the new government to be persecuting the old ;)). The issue in Pakistan is that the literacy rate is around 30% and a lot of people are farm workers that are dependent on land owners good will. Hence landowners always win and a lot of people vote for completely lame people (people that are known felons etc). I don't know, from what I've read, it ssems democracy works when there are a couple of successive sincere/ real governments that set up worthwhile / strong institutions (judiciary branch etc). Heh a couple of years ago in Pakistan there was a case in court again the then PM (Nawaz Sharif) and he had the supreme court attacked ;).
      Anyways not to be doom and gloom, a lot of great people over there, just well as a lot of people here have realized sucky leaders can ruin any country and being stuck with sucky leaders for a few decades well..... ;)

    15. Re:Oh, Come on. by Phantom_newbie · · Score: 1

      Davak quoted, "Good if you are an employer and want to make sure your employees are not abusing the company time. Bad if this information is used to harm your personal rights..." I agree with that idea totally. Even though the fact is that they may only use it to only monitor thefts, etc. This idea can be easily flawed. Although it was mentioned before that the car tracking system is optional. Considering the fact that these days where privacy can be seen as a big issue, it still needs to be focused on. Claims are just claims, but there are times where corporate/government bodies try to ensure that people will have their privacy respected. Have you ever considered that it could be looked as somewhat a little 'threatening' when they abuse it and cover it all up? There are many many cases that can back up my claim on this.. have a look at CIA, and how some corporate bodies try and cover up their tracks when they do something that was not supposed to happen. I'm sure that these sorts of people have been trying to cover up many of their facts that they were hiding the truth and bludging the whole idea that it was not true. With the help of satellite technologies nowadays where they use it to do various things apart from checking out weather patterns, sending transmissions across, etc. They are expanding into an area that can be considered as tempting with the privacy laws. Think about it for a few moments....

    16. Re:Oh, Come on. by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      Pizza places don't track you, but you would be hard pressed to fit an extra stop that took any longer than 5 minutes into your delivery route.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
  9. Overly concerned? by digital+bath · · Score: 1
    Trakker can record a vehicle's movements and even excessive engine idling -- an indication a driver may be using fuel-guzzling air-conditioning without permission.


    Are they seriously that concerned over gas there?
    --
    find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    1. Re:Overly concerned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they seriously that concerned over gas there?

      Dude, Pakistan is a poor country.

      And unlike much of the Arab world, they don't have vast reserves of petroleum.

    2. Re:Overly concerned? by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      it's A/C... how much gas can it use? It's a serious question, I'd like to know...

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    3. Re:Overly concerned? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      The compressor for air conditioning puts more load on your engine. This means more gas needs to be used to keep the engine at the same level of power. I'm not a mechanic, but I'm pretty sure it works that way.

      As for how much it uses, I'm not sure. I think people see a 1-2MPG decrease when they have the a/c on.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    4. Re:Overly concerned? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If that's a problem for car rental companies over there, they should take out the A/C units, but that would be cost effficient and make sense.

    5. Re:Overly concerned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's A/C... how much gas can it use? It's a serious question, I'd like to know...

      Dude, Pakistan is often HOT... when my mother's company sent her to Karachi for a business trip, it was regularly more than 40C (105 F). Every building she went to had A/C, but you had to face the furnace to get to your car.

      And most people don't have A/C.

      A/C use reduces mileage by 3-5 mpg. Your car manual or the EPA would probably have more precise numbers.

    6. Re:Overly concerned? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Since they said "engine idling", I assume it means that they're sitting parked with the engine on just so they can run the A/C. I'm guessing that this would consume a gallon every couple of hours.

      As I understand it, when driving at highway speeds, using the A/C actually saves fuel vs. keeping the windows rolled down (because of lower air drag).

    7. Re:Overly concerned? by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      Wow. That seems like a lot for some cold air.

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    8. Re:Overly concerned? by Teun · · Score: 1

      And the rental company gets only paid per kilometer/ mile you used the car.
      So (ab)use of it as a little airconditioned mobile home would be a bad return on investment for the owner.
      And it would not surprise me at all if this would be a real(tm) issue in Pakistan with it's climate and the few places having A/C.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    9. Re:Overly concerned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Pakistan is not an oil-producing state.

      Many of the cars over there have been converted to run on natural gas. Regular old gas, though, is very expensive. The feature that they are talking about (monitoring driving habits) is not for the rental car companies, it's for the individual owners--many of whom employ drivers.

      If your driver is racing around when he's porting your little one's to school, or idling with the air-conditioner running while waiting for Mem-sahib (your wife) to finish shopping, then you'll want to reprimand him, fire him, warn him, whatever.

    10. Re:Overly concerned? by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Having a car with a programmable ECU that does datalogging and has an AC unit, I can tell you that the only time that the A/C consumes extra fuel is at idle, where the injectors have to supply fuel to an operating RPM that is about 200 rpm higher (if even). This is often the difference between operating the injectors at .70% duty cycle instead of .65% (I have fairly large injectors).

      The rest of the time, the A/C consumes power, but the car does not expend extra gas to create this power. The car's output remains the same, there is just less left over to drive the wheels afterwards.

    11. Re:Overly concerned? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      The car's output remains the same, there is just less left over to drive the wheels afterwards.

      Doesn't that lead to needing more gas to make the same power to the wheels, which means worse gas mileage?

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    12. Re:Overly concerned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

      --Dr. Doctor give me the news--

  10. Sucks if they click the wrong car. by Polly_was_a_cracker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Driving along drinking your morning coffee, when your car goes from 40-0 and your face goes from normal to peeling in 2 seconds.

    --
    I have a Cig, but do you have a light?
    1. Re:Sucks if they click the wrong car. by ndfa · · Score: 1

      Please they are talking about Pakistan here, so that would mean the morning cup would be of Tea!!!

      --
      Non-Deterministic Finite Automata
  11. Oh.. *whew* by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    Here i was thinking some unsuspecting car thief was getting walloped over the head with a $1.5B night-stick descending from the heavens....

    But hey! we were able to return most of that '78 corolla taxi!

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  12. Onstar anyone? by ajohnj1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Onstar has had these capabilities in most GM equipped cars for quite some time now. They use the tracking abilities for catching car thieves, they use Onstar to unlock car doors if you lock your keys in the car, they also have the ability to monitor or change any of the guages in the car as well. Whether they use all of the technology or not is another question, but the technology is in the US already.

    1. Re:Onstar anyone? by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've heard of OnStar being able to disable stolen vehicles at traffic lights, too, just as the police are pulling up behind them.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    2. Re:Onstar anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a Cadillac dealership and one of my co-workers told me a pretty good tale of how useful the Onstar system is.
      3 kids broke into a man's house that they had been staking out for some time, killed the old man, and took off in his new Cadillac. (Onstar equipped.)
      His relatives found him dead after a few days when he didn't answer calls or show up to work. The police were notified and that day, the Onstar service was called and they tracked their location to a nearby hotel. The police waited for the kids to come out and arrested them on the spot.
      So yeah, this technology is nothing new or special.

    3. Re:Onstar anyone? by smoyer · · Score: 1

      This can also be added (along with location and speed tracking) to any car through a MobileGuardian dealership (MobileGuardian is a GPS/Cellemetry combination from Numerex).

      I am not affiliated!

  13. This is done in Brazil for about 8 years for cars by aod7br · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are several companys in Brazil doing the same, using GPS, satellites and cel phones. It has been done for eight years for cargo trucks and 3 years ago for cars.

  14. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    not only can those towel heads build nuclear bombs and steal our jobs, they can also track cars. Or car, since they are a 3rd world country.


    FACT: all jewish-controlled countries are first world. All mulsim controlled countries are 3rd world.

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiight, they've got it all straightened out in Israel. Way to go, guys.

    2. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, once the towels are no longer head gear, they will.

  15. Oh, Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People should do what The Man tells them to do: why think and risk harm when you can just follow and trust in the System? I think that everyone should speak English, convert over to Imperial units, and have RFID tags implanted in their right hand at birth! Human rights? How old-fashioned--who needs them?

  16. Re:Satellites Used to Stop Car Thieves in Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the fuck? are you vying to be the anti-ekrout?

  17. I want access to Zion's mainframe. by anaphora · · Score: 0

    Anyone willing to sell me a copy of the software they use to shut off engines? I've got $37 and a half-eaten hamburger for any takers.

    1. Re:I want access to Zion's mainframe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would take that deal only if you had cheese on that burger. Sorry, not going to access Zion's mainframe tonight.

  18. You have a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to rent one of their cars.

  19. HALT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It exists in the US as well. It's called HALT. It allows a police officer to aim some sort of radio gun at your car, and it will come to a halt. It relys on a chip built into the car. They are actively trying to pass legislation to make it mandatory on all new cars? Hacking/abuse anyone? Can you imagine how a molester would use one?

    1. Re:HALT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the fact that 8 year old girls don't drive cars, I don't see how a molestor would use one?

  20. Yay for nobody reading the article. by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try reading the article next time, people. There is no rights violation going on here. This is something people CHOOSE to have installed in their car and actually PAY for the service. It's not like it's automatically placed in every car so that they can watch you wherever you go.

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

    1. Re:Yay for nobody reading the article. by danharan · · Score: 0

      It's not your choice if you're an employee.

      Sure, the law there may not qualify that as a rights violation, but it still wouldn't be my CHOICE if I were driving someone's delivery vehicle.

      Also, what's to guarantee that this won't be used to monitor the whereabouts of politically active people?

      However, I'd be more concerned about stolen vehicles being stopped without warning and causing accidents... I wonder if insurance companies factored that in when deciding to give people discounts on premiums.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    2. Re:Yay for nobody reading the article. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      It is your choice to work at a place where they monitor usage of the vehicle. Anyways, why should you EXPECT privacy when using the property of other people? Unless they tell you that you're not being monitored when you actually are, I see nothing wrong with it. It's their property, and they have every right to install whatever tracking devices they want on it. Don't like it? Don't use their property.

      As for the stolen vehicles being stopped, it's not like when you turn off the engine on a car it immediately comes to a screeching halt. Try it sometime - find a deserted parking lot, drive up to 30 or so, then cut the engine. Everything still works (except acceleration, of course), it's just a little harder to steer at low speeds and braking is a bit harder (but people managed to live without power steering and braking for a long time...). The only accidents this would cause would be someone hitting a car sitting there in the middle of a street, which would be THEIR fault anyway.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    3. Re:Yay for nobody reading the article. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      So what about American cars where the equipment is built into the car either way? If the equipment is there (and powered) then data and commands can be exchanged, whether or not the car owner is paying for access to that data.

      This is just the sort of thing that I expect we'll see used by the FBI in terrorism "investigations"

    4. Re:Yay for nobody reading the article. by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Good point, but this doesn't even cut the motor. It just puts it into idle only. Power steering and powered brakes will still work. So a better measure of what it would be like is...drive up to 30, then take your foot off the gas.

      Plus, since they KNOW where the car is, they can avoid doing it while the person is flying at 120 around a sharp highway corner in rush-hour traffic, and wait until they are stopped at a light or something, and the cops are nearby to arrest him when he can't drive away.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  21. Why, it's outrageous! by HardCase · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The article comments about how much easier it is for them to do things like disabling cars remotely than in Western countries.


    Yeah, nobody tell General Motors about this or they might invent OnStar.


    -h-

  22. You mean they have satellites in Pakistan? by rushibhai · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow!

    1. Re:You mean they have satellites in Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have CARS in Pakistan?

      Wow!

    2. Re:You mean they have satellites in Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have ROADS in Pakistan?
      Wow!

    3. Re:You mean they have satellites in Pakistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days everyone has a satellite; Even Nigeria, the second most corrupt country in the world has one.

  23. Phone log: by bcolflesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, where's my car?

    - Qatar

    Allah! That's too far!

    1. Re:Phone log: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're speaking in English and using words like "dude," it's unlikely that they'll say "Allah!" whether they're muslim or not. More likely they'll say "God!" which is, after all, what "Allah" means in Arabic.

      That's what's wrong with the youth these days, they can't even get a racist joke right.

  24. Not a rights issue by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    its a RENTAL car.. its not a privately owned vehicle. It was a *choice* that they rented it, and signed the waiver of privacy.

    Now when they get to the stage where the police can track and control private cars.. then we can discuss violations..

    But then again its their conutry, they can just change the law to make it mandatory, like they are going to do here in the US soon.

    Many people believe its not a "right" to drive, our constitution does guarantee that you have basic rights of the pursuit of happiness, which in this day and age REQUIRES private transportation.. So extrapolation means driving a guaranteed right, here at least... .

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Not a rights issue by TruelyGeeked · · Score: 1

      Driving is NOT a right. It is a priviledge. I see way too many people out there that think they are entitled a roadway. Yes we pay taxes (some are mandatory) to maintain roads, but that doesn't mean we have the undenyable right to drive. We are on public property when we drive (except your driveway), and therefore we have no right to privacy. Whenever people start clamoring about secret agenda's and Big Brother secretly trying to control your mind with RFID tags, the quicker we will get to a society where no one can break into your home, where no one can steal your car, where no one can do anything that violates SOMEONE ELSE's rights, without that action being recorded.

    2. Re:Not a rights issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Constitution of the US, does not actually guarantee anything about the purfuit of happinefs. That's in the Declaration of Independence, which is not part of the US code of law.

    3. Re:Not a rights issue by efflux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      which in this day and age REQUIRES private transportation.. Well, transportation at any rate. Hell, let *no one* except those with special commercial permits drive privately... and finally we'll have a decent public transportatin system.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    4. Re:Not a rights issue by efflux · · Score: 1

      by privately I mean alone (as an entity, not necessarily an individual person). I see there's a bit of an ambiguity there that may lead to a contradiction with commercial.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
  25. So they saw me picking my nose... by tofubar · · Score: 0

    This violates my privacy rights!

  26. Superheroes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Behind the satellite system ... stands businessman and crime fighter Jameel Yusuf

    Crime fighter, eh? Does that mean he wears his underwear outside of his pants?

    1. Re:Superheroes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean he wears his underwear outside of his pants?

      That's how they do it pakistan. One week inside pants, right side in. One week inside pants, inside out. One half week outside pants, right side in. One half week outside pants, inside out. (This is known as "the cleaning cycle.") Then the pants are reveresed for one day.

  27. 300 car thefts a month by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    In Britain, that would be considered a marked improvement.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:300 car thefts a month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      300 car thefts a month

      Every car in Pakistan gets stolen 3 times a month. You know when the country gets a new car because the thefts per month go up by 3.

  28. Solar Flare by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    How about during magnetic solar storms (like what we're getting right now)?

    could that make them hunt down the wrong guy and cut his arm off?

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  29. I'd use it. If I owned, a car rental place. by kabocox · · Score: 1

    If it was my business, I'd want it in as many of my cars as possible. I'd also want a little camera in the steering wheel that would take a picture of who ever was driving the vechile, like an ATM machine that would start wirelessly transmitting ASAP when the car is reported stolen.
    You don't like it; don't try to steal it. Plain and simple. As far as monitoring the cars, you are renting them, not buying them.

    1. Re:I'd use it. If I owned, a car rental place. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Actually, you'd probably want the system to take and transmit a picture every time the car is started. You can discard the images when the car is returned safely.

      As a speeder myself, I'm a little wary of having a system that reports my speed, though. You can't drive safely on many highways in my area without exceeding the speed limit by 10-20% - because everyone else is speeding and travelling at a vastly different speed from the majority of traffic is more likely to cause an accident than speeding itself. Forcing drivers of corporate or rental cars might actually increase accident rates.

    2. Re:I'd use it. If I owned, a car rental place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forcing drivers of corporate or rental cars might actually increase accident rates.

      While I think that is obviously true, and any denial of that observation is not only futile, but idiotic, those accidents will be blamed on the speeders, not the people who caused them. (For the children, naturally.)

  30. Car's 'black box' convicts Montreal driver by doublesix · · Score: 1

    Friday, Oct 24, 2003 Car's 'black box' convicts Montreal driver
    Quebec police won a dangerous-driving conviction Friday using evidence from the "black box" in the car, a first in the province.
    The black box or event data recorder (EDR), which automatically records a car's speed and other information, showed Eric Gauthier was driving at least 131 km/h when he hit another car in downtown Montreal in April of 2001.
    Yacine Zinet, 19, was killed in the crash.
    There were no witnesses, but police used the black box in 20-year-old Gauthier's car to determine his speed and build a case against him.
    Here's the rest: http://www.mytelus.com/news/article.do?pageID=cbc/ canada_home&articleID=1441967

    1. Re:Car's 'black box' convicts Montreal driver by garfield1979 · · Score: 1

      I think the company i worked for other post Was the "black box" in that car.

    2. Re:Car's 'black box' convicts Montreal driver by MrBlackBand · · Score: 1
      The couldn't tell that he was going that fast by the damage to the vehicles?

      "Sure, the bumper is fused to the engine block, but the guy swears he was doing the speed limit. I guess we gotta let him go."

      --
      "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
  31. Why Has This Being Posted ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The technology has been around for a _long_ time and is used all over the world.I can`t see why this warrants any attention.

  32. Similar thing in the US by garfield1979 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work for a company that would track cars with a GPS/Cellphone tracker, installed in the vehicles of people who bought them, the service was primarily to give courtesy services, such as directions and locate businesses in proximity, Through a radius search in a database which was merged with Navtech data.
    The Tracker was superior technologically to that of OnStar, in fact the service was called OnGuard, the main advantage of their tracker is that you did not have to put the customer on hold to get an update on their location (OnStar does). If the vehicle is running we could get a location on it when we would call the cell, if the car was off we would have a 7 minute window every 1 hour to call it if it was in a cell area.
    There were other uses for the trackers. Police agencies throughout the States and Canada used them in "bait" cars where they'd leave the keys on the seat of the car, and wait for someone to take it for a ride, with the door handles triggering a switch that'd call us.
    Unfortunately they ceased operations in our area, and moved else where. It was a great pioneering technology.

  33. Carjackings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For instance, the system provides a panic button that sets off an alarm in the control center and has helped thwart more than a dozen carjackings and kidnap attempts, Yusuf said.

    I fail to see how setting off an alarm in some remote control room actually thwarts a carjacking, especially a violent one. Sure, it allows them to chase down the perpetrators soon after they've made away with your car, but that does you little good if you're maimed or dead on the roadside somewhere. In the long run, it might eventually cut down on the number of carjackers in the wild, but as for stopping a jacking-in-progress... how?

  34. This system sounds nice.. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the exception of what is legally allowed in the USA, I see no difference in this and Lowjack or other tracking systems.

    To my understanding, many large commercial fleets already have tracking systems in place, which was originally designed for the trucking industry.

    Also, most new cars have extensive logging. I was unaware of this until the shop manager at my VW dealership complimented my easy driving. I asked how he knew, and told me some details and funny stories about how it's already saved them money.

    For instance, Joe Abusive buys a new VW. He doesn't like the deal he got, so he breaks stuff on his car because he's one of those types. Say, he sits on his porch and clicks the locks on and off with his remote until they are burned out. Upon taking it back to the dealer, they can see he accessed his car locks remotely 9500 times in the last 24 hours. A clear sign of abuse and would not be covered by warranty. That's a true story, by the way. I think the car in question was a new Passat.

    The tracking systems for truckers has been around for 10-15 years. It seems about that long ago that my uncle (a truck driver) was complaining about not being able to speed or take senic routes anymore due to some heavy new electronics on board.

    If I were a company owner and had a fleet of cars for employees to use for business use, I'd definitely investigate getting a service like this. Everyone I've known who uses a company car on a regular basis always drives them like there's no tomorrow. A terrible waste for the folks paying for that luxury.

    1. Re:This system sounds nice.. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your dealer's shop manager just proved those logging systems should either be disabled or subject to some legal protection.

      The dealership SHOULD have the right to check those logs for information directly related to a problem reported with the vehicle - and maybe for indicators of impending failures. However, walking through the logs to check out your driving habits is a disgusting invasion of privacy, no matter how harmless it seems.

    2. Re:This system sounds nice.. by devphaeton · · Score: 1

      Upon taking it back to the dealer, they can see he accessed his car locks remotely 9500 times in the last 24 hours

      Yep. A friend of mine bought a (then new) 2001 Silverado. He works construction so he spends a lot of time in the truck. At one point in time the interior of the truck started to come apart- stuff like the color flaked off the dash, the headliner started drooping, the seat sagged, the pedals got loose. He takes it to the dealer and they told him "sorry, you've spent 457 hours in this truck. We only warranty the interior to 300 hours".

      True story, and it was just the beginning of his woes with that truck.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    3. Re:This system sounds nice.. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1


      It's fine by me. I actually prefer this to being without. Sure, they can see I occasionally drive 98mph, but am very easy on my car.

      If something happened while the car is under warranty, and the dealer tried to pull some crap about it not being covered due to improper use or abuse, then I could get a printout of my driving activities to take to court with me.

      "See, your honor, this car has not exceeded 5,000 rpms once in it's logged history and has had all the required service performed on it".. "The engine failure had to be due to a defective component." Just a thought.

    4. Re:This system sounds nice.. by karnal · · Score: 1

      Now, come on. The newer systems that I know of don't log every second that you're in the car -- not saying that it won't get to that, but anyways -- they just can tell "abusive conditions".

      For instance, like doing burnouts? The computer can probably be set to record an event where the car is travelling 0 and then hits 40 within 1 second... That's usually a sign that the traction is overcome on the rear wheels, causing spin (and lots of smoke).

      Or, they could record when you've hit that rev limiter for the hundredth time that day, causing undue stress on the engine. Either you don't know how to shift, or you're racing all over town like a madman.

      If conditions are met that could cause failure (that is NOT under warranty) there is no reason we as consumers should expect the car makers to pay for it. Our level of common sense should kick in at that point, but as people, we like things for free.

      As well, I'm not saying I've never done any of this, but I'm certainly not going to blame the shop who tells me that I'm fucking around with the true limits of a car, and that's what caused the defect....

      --
      Karnal
  35. US Rental Companies already track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they monitor cars, there a couple of good new pieces (60 minutes?) about folks who were taken to the cleaners by rental companies by driving outside of state lines without having checked the little box on their rental application.

    this sort oof thing makes too much sense to the comapnies bottom line not to do. the question is what proctections should individuals have on the use of information about their habbits.

    1. Re:US Rental Companies already track by eadint · · Score: 0

      what was the name of the rental car companie.

  36. pick up pakistan sat. feed and haxor it all with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your own little dish.

  37. Been there had that got the T shirt... by tazanator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On all semi trucks made after 2000 they have an onboard computer system for the ABS this is also tied into the Qualcom communications system. My company had monthly printouts they showed where I had driven and when and where I slept. They than reviewed my driving style (shifting vs. RPM's how fast was I going when I hit the brakes - was it slow even pressure or quick pumping of the pedal - They even showed how fast and what gear to what RPM I rolled down hills in.) In the event of a highjack or even driver off course they will turn the governer down to allow idle only (i.e. driver drove to many hours, or unsafe). I did see one episode the satillite transmitter went out on a "high dollar" load, 4 hours after signal died the driver pulls into our terminal for fuel. He swiped the fuel card and the computer on the fuel pump sent the location into headquarters. Before he finished fueling the governor was set to no more than Idle and the police (city, county, state, and a couple US marshals) were sourounding the place. He was tackled and stuffed into a squad car till it was all sorted out.

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
    1. Re:Been there had that got the T shirt... by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      But the onboard computer doesn't drive the rig itself, ala Homer Simpson, right? :)

    2. Re:Been there had that got the T shirt... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      And THAT is a violation of civil rights! What works in Pakistan is that these are the car's OWNERS [mostly corps] installing this in THEIR property...which I guess would be OK, even for /.

      In your example, this is why Corporations should be regulated as governments and not private "entities" This person could have been KILLED over a simple missunderstanding that probably wasn't his fault! That is completely unacceptable in the USA

      Also, remote disabling wouldn't work here. Or rather, lets make the person who pushed the button go out in downtown NYC [or LA] traffic to collect the car they disabled....any takers? didnt' think so!

    3. Re:Been there had that got the T shirt... by tazanator · · Score: 1

      I wish it did, would have made it alot easier .. :)

      --
      I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
    4. Re:Been there had that got the T shirt... by tazanator · · Score: 1

      Well as a driver you surender many rights, In fact the hours and how much you sleep are controlled by law .. the simple diffenition is you can drive for 10 hours than you have to sleep for 8 before anymore driving ... if you run out of hours in chicago traffic it's you fault. The fine can be as high as $10,000 many times the driver is placed"out of service" and told to park his truck right there where he was stopped and sleep for 8 hours, if he leaves they will report him to the feds.

      --
      I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
  38. Can't wait for the movie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are other things in Pakistan i'd be a little more worried about. Like having my head cut off.

    Although, I really would get a chuckle out of the obviously forth coming The Pashtun Chainsaw Massacer. Four teenagers (2 boys and 2 girls) are heading to a mosque in Islamabad for evening prayers with a visiting Imam in a rented VW van. You can tell who's going to die immediately when the less hot girl removes part of her burka to wring the sweat out, and the two boys look.

    Then they see a bloody Christian girl, dazed and bloody, walking down the middle of the dirt road that is their interstate. They reach out to this person in distress, and continue driving in Pakistan. But she won't back, and blows her head off rather than go where they're going. The kids are horrified, and eventually killed, all of them. You ever tried running from a chainsaw wielding religious fanatic in a burka in 120 degree heat?

  39. Well by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Considering your odds of getting carjacked, held for ransom, and then murdered in the name of Allah in Pakistan are about 1:1, I'm all for it.

    If I had to go to Pakistan, then the more people on my side watching me 24/7 the better.

    Fuck privacy. I'd be saying, "if you lose sight of me for more than 5 seconds, drop the fucking hammer!"

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Well by Polly_was_a_cracker · · Score: 1

      And How!!!

      --
      I have a Cig, but do you have a light?
    2. Re:Well by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      If I were in a region known to be supportive of militant muslim fanatics, I'd be more like "if you lose sight of me for more than five minutes, drop a nuke on my last known co-ordinates."

      The Western version of a suicide bomber is just SO much more effective.

      Damn, but I'm going to get flamed for this, aren't I?

  40. Know whats the REAL problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone, who knows how the system works and can brodcast pirate signals imitating the stations shutdown command. LOL

    Man if they ever do that here, hell I would try and hack it just to watch people go 60 to 0 in under 4 seconds!

    Nothing like this I'm sure can be too secure.. I also see this to be a problem in say massive cities running their cars on autopilot as they are researching right now.

  41. Shouldn't we be? by MacFury · · Score: 1
    Are they seriously that concerned over gas there?

    Shouldn't we be, within reason? Have you totalled how much you spend on gas in a given year? It's not exactly chump change to most people there.

  42. Versus flamthrowers by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    Not as good as the flamethrower option for South African cars: http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/africa/9812/11/flame.thro wer.car/

    For an idea of why this was ever considered you can read a few articles of Natasha Marchetti's Mandela Porn: http://exile.ru/176/176160000.html

    Guaranteed to make you loose that good feeling that you got when you helped defeat Apartheid.

    1. Re:Versus flamthrowers by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for the option .50 calibur mahcine gun or 40mm gernade launcher on the hummers...

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  43. What does Osama drive? by VoidPoint · · Score: 1

    Can you see me now? GOOOD.

  44. Re:This system sounds nice.. For rentals by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    The rental companies will pay for this also. Provided the device can be removed when the car is sold. How many time have you heard the line "Who cares it's just a rental?".

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  45. Leave out some additional facts, don't RTFA by Alton_Brown · · Score: 1

    After actually READING the article and not reading much into the headline, it looks a lot like lojack - available right here is the USA as well if you want to track your own car to prevent theft and misuse (in the case of corporate vehicles). /. editors are wannabe NYT headline writers...

  46. end result by E1v!$ · · Score: 1

    Here we use things like Lo-Jack for the consumer, and AirIQ for the corporation.

    http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,45163,0 0. html

  47. This has been available in Australia for years.... by B747SP · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... In fact, several (5-6-ish?) years ago, I made enquiries with insurance companies about premiums and conditions to cover a (then) late model Subaru Impreza WRX car. (The Impreza WRX has the dubious distinction of being very popular with ram raiders, etc, in Australia because it is wideley known to be able to outrun anything the Police have. It's popular enough that a bunch of guys tried to steal one from it's owner and passenger at gunpoint just this week)

    Anyhoo, most insurance companies either flat-out weren't interested in covering the car, or asked for incredibly high premiums. One *did* offer a premium in-line with other similar cars *but* with the condition that I have satellite tracking fitted by one of a couple of companies nominated by them. IIRC, at the time, the cost of installing the kit would have been circa AUD$1000-$1500. There was an annual monitoring fee too, don't remember what it was, but it was at least a couple-o hundred bucks.

    This whole business of locating a car, waiting for the police to catch up, then disabling the vehicle at a point when the orificer on the scene advises that it is safe to do so is something that has been advertised in car/bike 'enthusiast' circles here for quite some time.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  48. Herf gun application. by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Can you just imagine: Road side herf guns stopping runners by satelite. Ronald Reagan would approve.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  49. Question by tazanator · · Score: 1

    I have yet to learn ... Whats a 2nd world country?

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second worldcountries were basically communist countries. Since this was defined during the Cold war we didn't consider themas high as ourself.

  50. Re:This has been available in Australia for years. by B747SP · · Score: 1
    A bit more info...

    I think this, 'QuikTrak', was one of the companies that the insurance mob pointed me to...

    Also, a year-old story from the Sydney Morning Herald on a carjacked porsche recovered within 30 mins with satellite doo-da's...

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  51. Math error by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Those units of measure don't make sense. The power consumed by the compressor isn't related to the power put through the other devices, and should be fairly constant.

    Let's take a test case where you run your car for 60 miles at 30 mph and then 60 miles at 60 miles per hour. In the first case, your compressor's running for 120 seconds, in the second case, you're running for 60 seconds. Over the same distance, your compressor will consume twice the energy in the first case as in the second.

  52. Shocking statistics by u19925 · · Score: 1

    The article mentions 300 cars stolen a month in Karachi which has population about 13 million. Total new cars sold in Pakistan is about 80000 a year which has a population of 150 million. At that proportion, Karachi share is about 7000 cars new cars a year. That means 1 out of 2 cars on average gets stolen in its lifetime!

    1. Re:Shocking statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all cars come with AK-47 mounts, Free!

  53. Re:This system sounds nice.. For rentals by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1


    I learned how to do 180's in a GradPrix rental by yanking the E-brake and turning the wheel sharply.

    The brake quit working after the 5th or 6th demonstration of my new skill.

  54. ORC ANAL!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now that is hot! anyone have pix???

  55. Never rent a car in Pakistan. by Teun · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Indeed, never rent a car in Pakistan.

    Unless it includes a driver.
    (For a Westerner) the low additional cost of a chaufeur is nothing vs. the chance of becoming the victim of someone trying to take you for a ride on an insurance scam through a staged accident.

    This is something to keep in mind in virually all third world countries!

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  56. Re:Pakistan? by u19925 · · Score: 1

    Just like you do in USA? ha! ha! ha!

  57. Quck! Nobody's looking! by KFury · · Score: 2, Funny

    So is there a rush of vehicle thefts during periods of high sunspot activity and coronal mass ejections like now?

  58. Big Brother by harperbl · · Score: 1

    Big Brother is very much alive.....

  59. I wouldn't care... by fejikso · · Score: 1

    I believe that if you're not doing anything wrong then you shouldn't care if this company/goverment knows where you're going...

    I mean, what use could they give to this information?

    Privacy freaks look to me like if they want to do something wrong or illegal.

    I even wouldn't mind having the same service back home. I rather give up some of my overrated "privacy" but be able to recover my car in case of theft, or being able to located in case of a kidnap, for instance.

    Actually, if done responsibly, having this aggregate information of the driving habits of a population would help a lot in the future planning of transportation networks, etc...

    I know my opinion sort of differs from the usual trend, but thats what I think.

    1. Re:I wouldn't care... by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you don't have the kind of boss a lot of these people in Pakistan would have. I had one here in Oz, who would complain when the car came back with the Power/Econ switch on the transmission set to "Power". "The car is not to be driven in the Powe r mode"

      Ignorant git. Imagine if someone like that had a complete log of every action you took while you were driving. You could get sacked because some dimwit dived out in front of you and you had to brake hard and it got logged.

      There are bosses who would do this.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  60. Can I have permission? by MhzJnky · · Score: 1

    " Trakker can record a vehicle's movements and even excessive engine idling -- an indication a driver may be using fuel-guzzling air-conditioning without permission."

    I'm going to Phoenix this weekend. Sure hope my friend asked his wife for permission to guzzle some fuel...

    --


    "Failure is not an option, it's part of the standard package"
  61. And we've seen the story on /. by Teun · · Score: 1

    I remember having seen a discussion about this right here on /.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  62. Don't trust the box by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure you've actually argued against my point - that the dealer should only be allowed to view relevant data from the black box.

    As for your example... I'm pretty sure a corrupt dealer and mechanic could either BLANK your black box, or replace it with a blank one without your knowledge, anyway.

    That, of course, brings up another possibilty - how long until someone hacks the black box through the standard dataport and starts selling a module to fake the recording to ensure it complies with your version of events?

    1. Re:Don't trust the box by stubear · · Score: 1

      "As for your example... I'm pretty sure a corrupt dealer and mechanic could either BLANK your black box, or replace it with a blank one without your knowledge, anyway.

      That, of course, brings up another possibilty - how long until someone hacks the black box through the standard dataport and starts selling a module to fake the recording to ensure it complies with your version of events?"


      Which would likely be as illegal as turning back the odometer and it seems it would be just as easy to discover by etching the vin number onto the black box itself. If the vin numbers don't match you had better have a damn good excuse.

    2. Re:Don't trust the box by plover · · Score: 1
      He wasn't saying "switch black boxes", he was saying "hook up this simulated speed sensor, these simulated engine sensors, this simulated oil-pressure sensor, these simulated brake sensors, etc."

      Then, drive like a bat out of hell until you have an accident. Disconnect simulated sensors before police arrive. Reconnect the original sensors. "Honest, sir, I was only going 30. You can check my black box if you'd like."

      Now, you have proof you're an "easy driver" who never speeds, and never jackrabbit starts from a standstill. Your service garage would warranty all your parts, and you could apply for a good driver discount on your insurance. You could argue speeding tickets (although that would probably quickly become self-defeating...)

      Of course since this same system is the computer that decides whether or not to fire your airbags, how to optimally adjust the fuel flow, etc., I'm not really sure I'd want to mess that much with it...

      --
      John
  63. Re:Pakistan? by ross.w · · Score: 1

    You've got them confused with Israel

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  64. I guess it has to be said..... by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Funny

    In A.D. 2003
    Car was stolening

    Thief: What happen?
    Mechanic: Someone set up us the brake.
    Car Jacker: We get signal.
    Thief: What!
    Car Jacker: Radio turn on.
    Thief: It's You!!
    Cops: How are you gentlemen!!
    Cops: All your brake are belong to us.
    Cops: You are on the way to destruction.
    Thief: What you say!!
    Cops: You have no chance to escape make your time.
    Cops: Ha Ha Ha Ha ....
    Thief: Take off every 'Zig'!!
    Car Jacker: You know what you doing.
    Thief: Move 'Zig'.
    Car Jacker: For great justice.

  65. Better advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez, that's not very useful! Try this:

    crontab -e

    * * * * * echo 'Never rent a car in Pakistan!' | mail -s 'Never rent a car in Pakistan!' your@email.com

    BTW, I think better advice would be to never DRIVE or even RIDE in Pakistan.

  66. Remind you ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Look, there is nothing wrong with disabling a stolen car if this is done by just shutting off the engine. Stop whining and get real, some countries have serious car theft problems.

    and YOU are paying for the service. it is not like someone from the government is monitoring what you do with your own AC, rather a company doing that with its employees (which explains why they also monitor obvious signs of incompetent driving -- they obviously have a Boston-like situation with drivers in Pakistan ;-), so I see no reason to be concerned.

    Yes. Someone could steal those records and track you. But it is probably a secondary concern when what you are worried about is kidnapping, theft, isn't it ?

  67. WOLFGANG DENK READ THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no such word as "redundand." The word you mean to use is "redundant."

  68. errr LOJACK by Archfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    has been in use in california for about 10 years now, GPS locator, engine kill switch, road-side assistance, etc...

    BTW wether you pay for it or not EVERY CADDILAC has an active monitoring system running. Some friends had a new caddy but opted not to pay for the northstar system, while trying to find parking at a resturant in Vegas they went around the block like 8 times, the northstar operator came on and asked if they needed asistance, she was very helpful and polite but needless to say they were disturbed to find that their location data was being tracked anyways, and further it is being stored as aggregate data, but their unique vehicle id number is associated with this data, and the fact that they are not paying for the service means they have no ability to opt out, and Caddilac stated that the system was tied into the airbags, and anti theft system, so removal or alteration would void warranty, and likely disable airbags and such....

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:errr LOJACK by kobotronic · · Score: 1

      Where's the power to grant "Interesting" moderation when you want it.

  69. Does Pakistan Have a Satelite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, does pakistan even have a satellite? Didn't know they were capable of launching their own satellites?

  70. Same in Belgium... by morzel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's basically the same situation over here in Belgium: a lot of luxury cars (Mercedes-BMW-...) are only accepted for full coverage by insurance companies if a certified anti-carjacking system (ie: satellite tracking, remote shutdown) is installed.

    The price tag for such a system is about EUR 1.500, plus EUR 30 monthly fee for the tracking and GSM communication costs (you can use the cellphone).

    They are not tracking your every move, since that would be too costly; you're only being tracked when actively requested:

    Entering the wrong or no access code when starting

    Somebody hitting one of the 'Assistance' buttons (technical assistance, medical assistance, panic button)

    Car movement without running engine (ie: being towed)

    Crash sensors detected probable accident

    Contacting their callcenter directly in case of theft (by either you or the police)

    They have the power to remotely stop the vehicle (progressive slowdown initiated by motor management, stop the engine when the car is doing less than 5 km/hr), but can legally only do so when adviced by the police.

    Will it put of possible thieves? May be.
    Will the chances of retrieving the stolen vehicle increase? Probably
    Will professional thieves be stopped by this? Absolutely not.

    --
    Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
    [Zappa]
  71. Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Akhmed: Ali, my car got stolen!
    Ali: No problem, it WAS a stolen car boss!

  72. Re:This has been available in Australia for years. by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aussie cops must not have such great equipment.

    Somehow, I always picture them having souped-up V8's with 'INTERCEPTOR' printed on the back...

  73. Pakistan Humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A man is taking a walk in Central park in New York. Suddenly he sees a little girl being attacked by a pit bull. He runs over and starts fighting with the dog. He succeeds in killing the dog and saving the girl's life. A policeman who was watching the scene walks over and says:

    "You are a hero, tomorrow you can read it in all the newspapers:

    "Brave New Yorker saves the life of little girl"

    The man says: - "But I am not a New Yorker!"

    "Oh then it will say in newspapers in the morning:

    'Brave American saves life of little girl'" - the policeman answers.

    "But I am not an American!" - says the man. "Oh, what are you then?"

    The man says: - "I am a Pakistani!" The next day the newspapers say:

    "Islamic extremist kills American dog. Connections to terrorist networks are being explored"

  74. Now North Korea too uses Sats to stop thieves! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm! I wonder how that happened!

  75. Sometimes tracking is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I lived in Pakistan when I was young and my father was in the Foreign Service. It is definitely a place where I would feel safer if there were an RFID/GPS chip in me AND my car. It's just not very safe there for Westerners (or locals, either).

  76. Re:All muslims are terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you did that you might as well nuke Russia too. If you nuke Russia, we should go all the way and take out China and any other nation that has a nuclear arsenal. Think before you speak schmuck.

  77. Re:This has been available in Australia for years. by B747SP · · Score: 2, Informative
    Aussie cops must not have such great equipment.

    For whatever reason, no, they don't. I see a lot of stuff about US State cops kitting themselves out with proceeds from crime, etc, etc. That doesn't happen here - proceeds from crime go straight back into gummint coffers.

    At various times they have dabbled with whatever was the latest/greatest/fastest. 10-15 years ago, when the Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo was the dogs nuts of fast small cars, the police in my state (NSW) got a few of them and let the Highway Patrol group use them. Apparently the Cordia went fast in a straight line, but couldn't go around corners particularly well. They quietly and quickly dissapeared.

    More recently, the aforementioned Subaru Impreza WRX made an appearance. I saw a couple of those painted up in police colours in active use just a few years ago. Again, they have quietly dissapeared from the scene, dunno why.

    Somehow, I always picture them having souped-up V8's with 'INTERCEPTOR' printed on the back...

    Well, you're close-ish to the truth. NSW police have pretty much always had the Holden Commodore and/or the Ford Falcon (sorry, lots of evil javascript and flash there, couldn't find an alternative) de jour. They're low quality, fuel guzzling Australian built hunks-o-junk, but the manufacturers have probably backed the government into a support-local-industry corner, and they're probably only paying three-fiddy apiece for them (that's all they're worth!!!).

    Both of those cars have a V8 in the model range, and I think the Highway Patrol at least get V8s. Most of the common-or-garden police cars I see around at the moment seem to be Holden Commodores, but Ford have an 'SV6' and 'SV8' model, gofasta ones that they're using in some police applications. No "Intruders" tho!

    Here, I googled, and found a few pictures...

    This is a pretty standard NSW Police card right now. (a holden commondoor)

    This is an example of a Subaru Impreza WRX in NSW Police colours...

    An old Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo

    They just keep going back to Commodores and Falcons though...

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  78. Its a right. Peroid by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    In todays society its a right. ITs also revokable if you act stupid.

    Just as the right to vote, or carry a firearm.

    If you get convited of a felony, you loose many rights. But until then you get them. Including driving. ( 100 years ago, people walked.. today its different. If you cant drive then you cant surive in many areas.. simple as that. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  79. when I was in northern Pakistan... by danny · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I visited Northern Pakistan in 1999 - and I certainly wouldn't want to go driving anywhere there myself! The roads are often crumbling one-car-wide tracks cut into cliffs or landslides, and when vehicles going opposite ways meet someone has to reverse half a kilometre... I was happy to leave that to the local drivers to negotiate!

    This photo shows a place (between the Shandur Pass and Gilgit) where we had to wait three hours while they re-dynamited the road...

    Danny.

    --
    I have written over 900 book reviews
  80. Re:All muslims are terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuking the epicenter of world terrorism is a good idea.

  81. Ram Raider by EmpNorton · · Score: 1

    What isa "ram raider"?

    1. Re:Ram Raider by B747SP · · Score: 1
      What isa "ram raider"?

      A person (or persons) who drives (rams - uses the car to break the window and/or security gates) a car (usually not their own) through the front window of a shop that sells jewelry (sp?), electronic good, or other expensive stuff, loads the car up with said expensive goodies, and does the Harry[1]. They like the fast cars, because they can outrun the police.

      [1]"The Harry" == "a runner", "the bolt", "the harry holt bolt" - named for the Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt who, one day, when swimming at a seaside beach somewhere in Australia, and was never seen again. True story.(ie: he did the bolt, a runner!)

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    2. Re:Ram Raider by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

      an automitive smash and grab to you yankers :p

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  82. Not even news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What up with such a discovery! This has been available for ages all across Europe, mainly installed in trucks and such but also pretty common for certain kind of cars... not lexus yay nor cheap us sat kittens of course

  83. Do they even ask Cars in Pakistan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No seriously... Do they ?

  84. well how about this? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, cars disable satellites!

  85. The danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The danger of such technology is great as I'm sure many/most can see.

    Power = information + force.

    The information and the control that information represents is bound to be enourmously attractive to both corperate control freaks and their counterparts in government.

    It can be sold on its good points as a means to protect the consumer. The danger of accidents can be overcome by forcing the car to come to a slow stop.

    It could be foisted on people in a variety of ways. As a law, as a requirement for affordable insurance, or as a requirement for employment in some cases.

    The more standard it becomes the harder it would become for people to fight.

    You have a right for example to refuse drug screening for example but try getting/keeping employment in many cases while holding to this.

    As far as the negative possabilities I shouldn't even need to go into them but I will.

    -Giving employers the ability to force their employees to live in a glass bottle their every move monitored.
    -Creating the possability for this sensitive data to be misused.
    -By a stalker
    -By a suspicious spouse/relative
    -By an overzealous government or agency thereof
    -Creating the mechanism that allows the car to be stopped/locked up represents its own dangers.
    -The possability that your car can be "hacked"
    causing an accident or allowing someone to
    harm or kidnap you.
    -The possability that someone could gain access
    to the main computers and wreak havoc/cause
    major inconvenience when thousands or millions
    of cars screech to a halt and lock up.

    When you come down to it the dangers seemingly outweigh the benifits.

    "They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety."

    Benjamin Franklin

    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it."

    Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart

  86. Re:All muslims are terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again, are you guys morons? Do you know what repercussions would come of this? Of course not because you are morons. How can you label all Muslim people as terrorists? SCHMUCK, that is what you are!

  87. Oh.. *whew*-Stolen Bicycles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be nice if a stolen bicycle could be tracked and stopped from space. You think the stolen car market is bad? You haven't seen anything yet.

  88. Re:All muslims are terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you want to blow away Bush's Amerika? I'd recommend just nuking all Republicans.

  89. Muslim Method: Just blow them up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I thought that's how they did it in Pakistan and all those other 'stans.

    Islam: Winning the world, one bomb at a time

  90. If it were available here, I'd pay for it by pj737 · · Score: 0
    "Trakker's Chief Operating Officer Omar Hatmi says the system has now been installed in 12,000 vehicles in Pakistan and attracts 500 new customers a month, paying up to 43,000 rupees ($740) for installation and $17 monthly"

    I'd pay $740 to install a system like that on my $22,000 Honda. Heck, my insurance discount alone for having this device in my car should be close to $17/month. I get $4.50/month off my premium for a practically useless alarm system.

  91. sue-happy by pj737 · · Score: 0
    "In some other countries, stopping a stolen car remotely is illegal and you could end up being sued if there is an accident," he said. "We don't have that restriction, we just shut it off."

    What if they just shut it down when the car made a stop or slowed to 10 mph? That wouldn't be as unsafe as slamming the brakes at 60 mph. Would we Americans still want to sue? Sorry, stupid question.

  92. in planes by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    Now if only they could put that in planes...hmmm...flame me. I don't care. You're birthday wasn't forever ruined by september 11th

  93. Re:This has been available in Australia for years. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    For once the japanese got it right in terms of outfitting their cops with cars. In order to deal with the problem of street racers, there are some R-34 skylines setup for police duty. Now THAT is a highway patrol car. It would eat a WRX for breakfast.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  94. another great reason.. by RevSmiley · · Score: 0

    Another great reason to use public transportation.

    --
    As you can see I don't care about my karma.
  95. Tracket Network & NavTrak by rapiddescent · · Score: 1
    here in the UK - I was obliged to get tracking facilites inserted into the fabric of my Subaru Impreza WRX in order to get insurance. Here in the UK, Scooby-Do's are 260bhp - 280bhp and AWD - favoured by the criminal fraternity because they are great for ram-raiding and faster than police cars.

    It costs about UKP 100 (US$150) a year - if the car gets moved or is opened when the key is not in the ignition, Tracker Network give me a ring on my cellphone. I've heard that people have also used Tracker to tell them where they left their car after a night at the pub!

    Sure, now they can tell where I go and how fast I go - but we've got no privacy rights in the UK anyway so its not worth complaining about it.

    rd

  96. ___PAKISTAN_USA_ENGLAND__ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think most ppl in the western world think you just get your head choped off or something, but it's not like that. i mean i diden't come accross Islamic Militants but i did talk to alot of Pakistani ppl to find out what thay think about USA an the West. i found out thay was pissed off coz America fighting the commies in Afgan used pakistan coz pakistan was a US alie and USA Trained ppl like Binladen and Most Islamic Militans and even thay army was trained by the Us marines, an Britians SAS like The SSG Commandos [http://www.pakistanidefence.com/PakArmy/ssg.html] an thay where pissed off American wasen't helping them giving them aid an stuff. i have seen the PAK-army (Ranked joint 10th with india in the top 10 armies of the world) thay can give a good fight if thay had too an thay have Nukes. that can hit deep inside india an are working on making nukes that can hit Jews in Isreli i hope some one nuke the jews

  97. Re:This is done in Brazil for about 8 years for ca by rednaxel · · Score: 1
    They call it AVL, acronym for "Automatic Vehicle Localizer". Google is our friend.

    According to this site, "AVL is a microprocessor-based module with integrated GPS, and transmits all the vehicle's geo-reference and status data via radio or celullar phone. The AVL module, of compact size, is assembled in a high-resistence aluminium box (sealed), has simple and discrete installation and excellent performance and safety".


    Another text states that "From your office, the [truck] fleet's owner controls and communicates with all his vehicles. It is possible query the status, the location, send short messages, commands and, among other possibilities, even shut down the engine remotely".

    --
    If you can read this, thank an english teacher.
  98. Re:This has been available in Australia for years. by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    The Holdens can't be much worse than the CNG-powered Chevy Luminas the city cops around here drive. The highway patrol is another matter... wouldn't want to try to outrun the CHP on the open road.

    I saw some Commodores in New Zealand... not too impressive looking. But come to think of it, I can't remember seeing any cops in the whole two weeks I was there.