Slashdot Mirror


Rio Karma 20GB Reviewed

asv108 writes "The Rio Karma has been out on the market for over a month now with very little mainstream press. Slashdot covered the product announcement back in August for one of the first mainstream devices that supports OGG and FLAC playback. I've posted a little review of the 20 GB Rio Karma, which, besides OGG/FLAC/MP3/WMA playback, has a great little dock that syncs the player via ethernet. One little known gem is that this player comes with java-based software that allows users to download the software directly from the player via any browser and sync the Karma with Linux, Mac OS X, and any other OS that Java runs on."

355 comments

  1. why no AAC? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is there some reason that players are not supporting the New MPEG audio format?

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:why no AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Patents and royalties.

    2. Re:why no AAC? by HebrewToYou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm, because they've no real incentive to support AAC. They *ought* to support MPEG 4, which is the codec, and not AAC specifically, which is DRM encoding. Market forces are not pushing for the adoption of Apple's standards, so Apple must rely on sales of its own product to push said standards. The interesting thing about this is that even this new Rio isn't that much of a contender versus the iPod. The prices are nearly identical and the form factor almost in favor of the iPod. NTM the ridiculous "hype" behind the iPod, including these recent commens on iPod "jacking" -- sharing ones iPod with a passerby. I own an iPod, and like Jack of AtAT says: someone comes up trying to stick their headphones in my jack and I'll mase their ass.

      --
      I'm not popular enough to be different.

      Homer Simpson, The Simpsons

    3. Re:why no AAC? by femto · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is the AAC Licensing FAQ. Lots of answers there.

    4. Re:why no AAC? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Karma can be purchased for $290 on amazon.com, with another $20 off with a rebate. That's $270 versus $400.

      I bought one last week, and my roomate has the recent 20GB iPod. While I think his iPod is slightly nicer (in design), I don't think it's $130 nicer. But, to each his own.

    5. Re:why no AAC? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Noooo..AAC is the audio coded for MPEG 4.

      just becasue Apple DRMs AAC does not mean that AAC is DRMed. hell, you can DRM an MP3 if you like, all you need to do is encript it which is what Apple does. you can DRM an OGG or a FLAC file too.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:why no AAC? by Zelet · · Score: 1

      Actually you are wrong. AAC is an open codec. What apple uses is AAC wrapped in a quicktime thing to add the DRM.

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    7. Re:Why No AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the fuck does Aple have to do with AAC?

      ohhhh..Apple chose an industry standard format, so it must be bad.

      pull your empty head out of your fucking ass you ignorent fuck-face and educate yourself as to what the fuck AAC is!!!

    8. Re:why no AAC? by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      They *ought* to support MPEG 4, which is the codec, and not AAC specifically

      MPEG is not a codec, it's a file format, just like AVI is a file format and divx is a codec.

    9. Re:why no AAC? by Pheersum · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're wrong. AAC is the generic term for the codec of MPEG-4 audio. Apple's iTunes is AAC encoded with drm. An MPEG-4 file is a QuickTime file... did you know that? MPEG-4 video, AAC audio, with the wrapper being QuickTime... of course, things like DivX are MPEG-4 video in AVI.

    10. Re:why no AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that means DivX is QuickTime in AVI?

    11. Re:Why No AAC? by MoneyT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Right, DRM everything. Like what? The RTF files that Tex Edit makes? Maybe the PDFs that preview and every other app can make? Surely you meant the MP3s, AACs, AIFFs or WAVs that iTunes makes? Maybe you meant the GIFs, PNGs, JPGs, BMPs and PICTs that Immage Capture makes? Oh I know, you meant the .mov .qtl .pct .mp4 .flc .dv .avi or .3gp files that quicktime exports to rght? Or the other formats supported simply by installing a plugin. Er, wait a minute, that's not right because none of those files have DRM built in. In fact the only format that does are the .m4p's used by iTunes Music Store by order of the RIAA. Well I guess that shoots your theory to hell doesn't it.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    12. Re:why no AAC? by ultrapenguin · · Score: 4, Informative

      AAC has nothing to do with DRM. You are saying just because it supports DRM, it should not be used? Like it or not, within next few years you won't be able to pickup a player which DOESN'T support DRM.
      And no, your "current players" won't be able to interface with newer stuff, exactly because of DRM. So badmouthing AAC, (which is by the way a fine audio codec, which scales well from low bitrate to high bitrate professional broadcasting) just because of DRM is pretty stupid.

      And MPEG4 is not a "codec", its a collection of intellectual property which covers advanced audio and video compression/encoding techniques.

    13. Re:Why No AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple should just sell .Oggp files, then all those fucking anti-DRM fucks will wise up and realise that ANYTHING IS DRM-ABLE.

    14. Re:why no AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AAC is not an Apple standard. It is licensed by the MPEG. Apple's DRM is an extension to AAC called FairPlay which operates thru QuikTime somehow.

      http://www.vialicensing.com/products/mpeg4aac/st an dard.html

    15. Re:why no AAC? by goofballs · · Score: 1

      wrong. aac has provisions built in for drm. apple doesn't "wrap" aac in anything- it has an aac codec, and plays aac files.
      see www.aac-audio.com for more info.

    16. Re:why no AAC? by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      ...and the karma has longer-lasting batteries.

    17. Re:why no AAC? by jnik · · Score: 1

      I own an iPod, and like Jack of AtAT says: someone comes up trying to stick their headphones in my jack and I'll mase their ass.
      What's such a big deal about a headphone splitter, anyhow?

    18. Re:why no AAC? by Golias · · Score: 4, Informative
      You are also wrong. Apple's iTunes does not encode DRM when you rip your CD's to AAC. You can copy them as freely as any MP3 or OGG file.

      Only songs from the iTunes Music Store are encoded with DRM.

      So, to summarize:
      AAC does not mean DRM.
      iTunes AAC encodings do not mean DRM.
      Songs purchased from the iTMS, which come in the AAC format, include DRM, but permit copying for fair use, so long as you don't have it loaded on more than a few computers at the same time.

      Any questions, class?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    19. Re:why no AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because it's widely used in iTunes, iPod, and QuickTime.....not exclusive to Apple products at all!

      Yes, I know precisely what AAC is, and when you have the superior sounding OGG, the only people still clamoring for it are Apple zealots who are trying to push Apple products. They feel all picked on, when Apple won't support shit beyond their own bizarre little subset of technology.

      Do you even know what OGG and FLAC are? Fucking idiot? No, of course not, because you don't have them on your iPod.

    20. Re:why no AAC? by Hooded+One · · Score: 1

      Not quite. IIRC, DivX was taken from one of Microsoft's proposals for the MPEG-4 standard, while Quicktime uses the standard that was eventually accepted.

      I honestly don't know how much of a difference there is performance-wise or quality-wise. Though I will admit that while I don't like Quicktime in general, its wrapper is a lot nicer than AVI. (It can stream, and has the best seeking of any format I've seen.)

    21. Re:why no AAC? by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      no, avi is a container (like MP4) while divx is a bitstream codec (like AAC). MPEG2/4 are specifications, not file formats at all. AAC is an MPEG2 and MPEG4 audio bitstream format, while MP4 is a container for said bitstream.

      --
      Jeremy
    22. Re:why no AAC? by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Uhm, go to www.hydrogenaudio.com and take a look at their recent double-blind codec comparisons. While close, The current Quicktime AAC beats Vorbis hands down. The fact is, Vorbis is a promising codec that has 1 full-time developer working on it right now, while AAC has probably hundreds. As a result, AAC encoders have improved markedly in even the past 4 months while Vorbis has had one minor bugfix release in the past year.

      --
      Jeremy
    23. Re:why no AAC? by iamacat · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Karma can be purchased for $290 on amazon.com, with another $20 off with a rebate. That's $270 versus $400.

      I heard about EverQuest items sold on e-Bay, but $270 for karma?? No way! I think some people take slashdot way too seriously.

    24. Re:why no AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then of course there is the Neuros, which has had .ogg support for months and months and months, is cheaper ($229 for device with a CF and a HD backpack) than both the iPod and the Rio, is modular, and is in the process of open sourcing their software and firmware.

      But, it isn't made by apple so nobody knows about it.

      -=-Neuros. For those who know.-=-

    25. Re:Why No AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it an "industry standard" format, when they are virtually the only ones using it?

      Oh wait, it's Apple, so they're doing "industry standard" work, AKA, "works with almost nobody else."

    26. Re:why no AAC? by Alpha_Geek · · Score: 1

      I got my 20GB iPod for $270 from the refurbed section of Apple's store. Its a great place to get Apple gear if you don't want to pay full price.

    27. Re:why no AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a floor wax, and a dessert topping!

    28. Re:why no AAC? by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1

      Is it any wonder why people get confused, and pissed off. The whole specifications vs file format vs container vs codec referencing needs to be simplified or standardized. For instance, I can't tell how many times I've downloaded an AVI file that I didn't have the codec for. A friend bought a camera that records video to AVI's. I thought this was good until I found out it has a proprietary codec and will only play on the manufacturers software. Now the same thing with MPEG/AAC. I give up.

  2. I guess it's cool by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But can't they make it less ugly?

    I know everyone is trying to make these as small and unobtrusive as possible, but this little guy is a little too small and too oddly-shaped (a square???) to be comfortably used.

    What would be nice would be a set of bluetooth headphones so that a wire from my pocket to my ear wasn't necessary.

    1. Re:I guess it's cool by kannibal_klown · · Score: 5, Informative

      I bought one a week ago, and I was afraid that was the case. However, I couldn't be more wrong. Holding it in my hand (Im right-handed) feels, well, right. The wheel is reasily accessible to my thumb.

    2. Re:I guess it's cool by quinkin · · Score: 1
      "a little too small and too oddly-shaped (a square???)"

      Oh come on... a square is an odd shape???

      "What would be nice would be a set of bluetooth headphones so that a wire from my pocket to my ear wasn't necessary.">

      So buy one...

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
    3. Re:I guess it's cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be nice would be a set of bluetooth headphones so that a wire from my pocket to my ear wasn't necessary

      So buy one...

      Built-in, dumbass.

    4. Re:I guess it's cool by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      Haha: Supported by All major Oses (OSX, Linux, BSD and Solaris with the lite version of the media manager software)

      I think they missed the most popular OS there...

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    5. Re:I guess it's cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they missed the most popular OS there...

      Amiga?

    6. Re:I guess it's cool by rreay · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bluetooth does not have the bandwidth to run stereo headphones... But, If you willing to listen to you music in phone quality mono you're good.

    7. Re:I guess it's cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That thing is tiny! Who cares if its a square?

      Still, for the money, I'm quite satisfied with my
      $27.99 5" CD player with 10 hours/700MB on it.

      Now, if only I could get one that would play Ogg Vorbis?

    8. Re:I guess it's cool by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, where the hell is OpenVMS?

      I'd elaborate, but I have to install an update to my OS/2 box.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    9. Re:I guess it's cool by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      More importantly, how does Bluetooth get power to the headphones to run the drivers? There's wireless electricity now? Crazy.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    10. Re:I guess it's cool by AndreyF · · Score: 1

      the headphones have their own batteries silly :-p

    11. Re:I guess it's cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how's it feel in the back pocket of your jeans? I refuse to buy an MP3 player that's less comfortable to tote around than a wallet.

    12. Re:I guess it's cool by Nexzus · · Score: 1

      So you too can now look like Lobot

      --
      Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    13. Re:I guess it's cool by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      I know everyone is trying to make these as small and unobtrusive as possible, but this little guy is a little too small and too oddly-shaped (a square???) to be comfortably used.

      I wonder how well these small players (this one, and iPod) work on desks? My player is mostly used at work, sitting on my desk, connected to full sized headphones with one of those coiled cords. When I step over to the bookshelf to get a book, it does pull on the player. My Archos is heavy enough, and has these rubberish dodads on the corners, so that it doesn't come flying off the desk.

      Would these other players do be as stable? The iPod in particular looks awfully smooth.

    14. Re:I guess it's cool by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      * 1 GB equals 1,000,000,000 bytes

      Damn well not going to buy an MP3 player from someone who doesn't even know how big a gigabyte is!

      Surely this company can't run linux?!? It's unclean!

    15. Re:I guess it's cool by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      There's wireless electricity now?

      Go play golf in a thunderstorm, and you might see a first hand example of wireless electricity.

    16. Re:I guess it's cool by rainer3 · · Score: 1

      But...

      What if you're left-handed?

      The design of it seems to prefer right-handed usage.

    17. Re:I guess it's cool by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Yes, a square is an odd shape.
      A golden rectangle is not.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    18. Re:I guess it's cool by nerph · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm gonna be kinda vague here, but I don't want to get my friend canned...

      Anyways my friend just got hired by a design firm to develop prototype bluetooth headphones. From what I understand the transmitter would be modular so that it could plug into existing cell phones and mp3 players.

      Obviously this particular design won't be hitting stores by Christmas, but I would expect to see them by this time next year.

    19. Re:I guess it's cool by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      There's an option for left-handed people in the settings. It essentially tilts eveything 180 degrees.

      If you use the toption, and place the player in the palm of your hand, the wheel is towards the bottom-left (near the base of the thumb).

      I use my left hand a lot (I'm not ambidexterous, but I try not to solely focus on my right), and it doesn't feel AS comfortable there as my right hand, but it's do-able. I'd prefer it would instead flip it by 90 degrees, placing the wheel towards the TOP of the left thumb, but I guess there was a limitation to the screen.

      I recommend trying it before you buy it.

    20. Re:I guess it's cool by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I put the karma in my shirt-pocket, where it fits perfectly.

      I don't wear jeans often (usually kacki's and dress pants), and it fits alright in them.

      I don't know about jeans. The Karma is a little thick, so it might be snug in some (unless they're broken-in really well or loose-fit). If you DO put it in your jeans pocket, then make sure to "lock" the device (via the switch on teh side). Otherwise, teh joystick may move.

      The one sucky thing is the karma doesn't come with a belt clip, nor is one made for it.

    21. Re:I guess it's cool by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      The iPod has a dock that sits on a desk. Presumably it has rubber feet.

  3. my god. by Valar · · Score: 5, Funny

    What will we complain about now?
    It plays ogg.
    It sync via ethernet.

    We're going to have to find a new gold standard, and fast!

    1. Re:my god. by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Funny
      "We're going to have to find a new gold standard, and fast!"

      It only holds 5000 128kbps mp3 songs you insensitive clod! True /. nerds rip everything in 320kbps blade-enc with lib-froffer.0.024-alpha!

      Sheesh!

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    2. Re:my god. by glwtta · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well...
      • first off we'll whine about how this isn't a "story," but rather an "advertisement"
      • then I think we'll come up with some obscure codec that it doesn't play
      • then we'll bitch about the price-tag for a bit
      • then someone will declare that portable music players are balls to begin with, and that portable video players are where the future is (this will be presented in a very authoritative tone)
      • then someone will come up with a list of all the idiotic things that have been said so far

      did I miss anything?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:my god. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shaddup, you script kiddie.

      True Slashdotters use -q7 Vorbis, or perhaps FLAC.

    4. Re:my god. by Espectr0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      did I miss anything?

      Yes, you forgot to welcome our new MPEG overlords

    5. Re:my god. by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      System Requirements: Windows 98SE, 2000, ME, XP

      Do people still use that stuff?

    6. Re:my god. by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      I'll complain...the capacity.

      I don't even have 10 GB of ogg files...so having all that extra space for the price does nothing for me. FINALLY a player that supports what I want but it has way more space than I need (and therefore won't pay for at the moment).

      Oh well, good to see progress :).

    7. Re:my god. by dubiousmike · · Score: 2, Funny

      "did I miss anything?"

      You forgot one; Someone will create your laundry list of typical posts types.

    8. Re:my god. by buddha42 · · Score: 3, Funny
      first off we'll whine about how this isn't a "story," but rather an "advertisement"

      Actually I was thinking more along the lines of 'Karma whoring'.

      da da, ding

    9. Re:my god. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you missed that it's a duplicate of a story they ran last week.

    10. Re:my god. by OMEGA+Power · · Score: 2, Funny
      did I miss anything?

      1. Imagine a beowulf cluster of these
      2. ???
      3. Profit in Soviet Russia
    11. Re:my god. by stilij · · Score: 1

      Can't be used as a USB mass storage device. That's pretty big in my book. How are you supposed to carry around all your non-music files?

    12. Re:my god. by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      You missed the one bitching about how it's cheaper to buy an MP3 CD player.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    13. Re:my god. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The 90 day warranty is doubleplusungood. Sadly, that is the state of most consumer electronics. I'll pay more for a product good enough to merit a 1 year or more of standard warranty.

      I'm not going to spend money on a service plan, I want the original company backing up this thing. I realize that is somewhat difficult in the age of rebadges but the principle still holds, IMO.

    14. Re:my god. by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Informative

      You CAN use it as an external mass storage device, but not in the normal context.

      Using either the java applet, or a very lite file transfer app for windows (called taxi), you can transfer files of any types to it. With taxi, you can drag-and-drop files into taxi and it immediately transfers to the device.

      It's not as efficient or as nice as having it recognized as a USB device, but it works for me. There WERE 3rd party drivers for it, but rio broke them with their most recent version of their connection software.

      The problem is the Karma uses an odd partition-format (perhaps proprietary, I don't recall).

      This, in my opinion, is the Karma's one major flaw, but I don't mind it that much. I primarily use windows pc's, so using taxi is not a pain for me. But I can understand how many would be turned off by this.

    15. Re:my god. by damiam · · Score: 1

      Someone's going to rant about how it's still not as good as the iPod.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    16. Re:my god. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      How about the OGG zealots saying that OGG is the only real digital music format and everyone who doesn't use it is 'teh ghey'.

    17. Re:my god. by erik_fredricks · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      "In Soviet Russia..."

      Oh, never mind.

      --

      THE GOOD HUMOR MAN CAN ONLY BE PUSHED SO FAR
      Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F18

    18. Re:my god. by pixel.jonah · · Score: 2, Informative
      then someone will declare that portable music players are balls to begin with, and that portable video players are where the future is (this will be presented in a very authoritative tone)

      Oh, Like this? http://www.hheld.com/

      And you can't even complain about the price. (It's only $99US!)

      I saw one last week - interesting - but how useful, I dunno.

    19. Re:my god. by mblase · · Score: 1

      did I miss anything?

      It doesn't support DRM! Where am I supposed to legally download music to play on it?

    20. Re:my god. by Alan · · Score: 1

      Integrated syncing with itunes I think. I'm all for the beauty that is the iPod, but it plays ogg and friends, and is compatible via java.... hopefully it's under $500CND... I'm in!

    21. Re:my god. by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Ugh... Just go with a Neuros. At least then you won't be stuck with a 20gb player for the rest of the time that you own the device & and you get a standard FAT32 USB Mass Storage Device.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    22. Re:my god. by radish · · Score: 1

      It's a proprietary journalling FS, I don't know whether the partition layout is standard or not.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    23. Re:my god. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      no, that was the punchline:

      "then someone will come up with a list of all the idiotic things that have been said so far"

    24. Re:my god. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool Eurythmics quote

    25. Re:my god. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 90-day warranty is not enforceable - the minimun statutory right is 1 year. They probably say "90 day warranty" then later on "this does not affect your statutory rights". This means that the contract is not illegal, and therefore is actually enforceable where it does not affect statutory rights. They'll get enough sheeple to give up after 90 days.

      When this is available in the UK, I'll sic the Trading Standards Office on them for deceptive practices.

    26. Re:my god. by Walterk · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. I bet the ethernet is 10Mbit? I won't buy it until it supports Gigabit! And I need at least 30GB anyway. And no, I will not buy an iPod.

    27. Re:my god. by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Yes. You missed the part where someone, in a most holier-than-thou attempt to differentiate himself from the throng and make himself feel better than the rest of us, will predict all the things that the slashdot horde will say about the article.

    28. Re:my god. by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      Well, I can always whine that it STILL requires software to sync, rather than just showing up as a network share (via samba or the equivalent)... but that's mostly just me whining about how most of the newer crop of memory-based players don't show up as plain USB drives...

      How about that it uses moving parts and doesn't have support for crystal memory yet? :)

    29. Re:my god. by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! I second that!
      Can't even find a seller in canada at the moment though. Wish Walmart US would ship to canada, $280 US -> Canadian + shipping would only be around $400, not bad at all! alas...not going to happen today.

      --
      No Comment.
    30. Re:my god. by cepler · · Score: 0

      > did I miss anything?

      Battery life?

      [20 second timer...20...19...18...17...16...15...14....13.... 12....11...10....9...8.....7......6.....5....4.... .3.....2.....1... OK, now I can post, right?] *GRR*

    31. Re:my god. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, true nerds rip everything in LAME 3.90.3 --alt-preset-standard (the gold standard of mp3), or Ogg Vorbis GT3b1 --quality 6 or up... or, of course, FLAC. All three of which this player supports. It's on my list.

    32. Re:my god. by Jon-o · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's what keeps me from buying it:

      THe biggest thing is the transfers: it needs a special program. While this wouldn't be SO bad at home, it means it's not nearly as useful if I want to transfer something from someone else's machine. They probably wouldn't want me installing the software.

      As well, I believe that the USB only works in the windows client. The java version is restricted to just using the ethernet, which is rather more annoying to use for this sort of thing.

      What I'd like to see is a machine like this one that works as a USB mass storage, and can therefore be an easily used portable hard drive. (I know some can do this, but they have other issues...). Just transfer the oggs/mp3s/FLACs(not much mention of those around!) or anything else, and then you could play them. Database info is generally available in properly tagged files, and they could be organized by directory fairly easily, making it perfectly usable, and much simpler. Playlists could be uploaded in the same way.

      The main reason I would want a little machine like this would be for quick and easy recording - I've heard that this records well, and records to OGG and WAV nicely (don't know if it records to FLAC, but it'd be very nice). I don't know if it's got any editing features though - nothing complicated would be expected, of course, but just splitting/combining/deleting tracks like a minidisc recorder does would be plenty. I'm not sure how it does this - the reviews I've seen haven't gone into any detail about it. But it's essential.

      The main issue is the transfers though. I don't want to have to use a special program, and I ESPECIALLY don't want to need a graphical one. Until a player that has that along with everything the Karma has, I'll be stuck with my minidisc, and its complete lack of digital out. *sigh*

    33. Re:my god. by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Can't even find a seller in canada at the moment though.

      I saw one at Futureshop the other day, but I don't remember the price.

      At any rate, I'm waiting for somebody to buy my old minidisc player, and for the 40GB model to be released (so that the prices fall), before I buy this. But I think I will buy it :)

  4. OGG by typobox43 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's nice to see that some mainstream players are finally starting to add OGG support to their products. It's about time for a change.

  5. Cheaper price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    A cheaper place to find this item is www.newegg.com. Last I checked it was 295 w/ free shipping. They are a fairly reputable dealer.

    1. Re:Cheaper price by punker · · Score: 1

      I'm still kicking myself over this. About a month ago, Dell had this for $78, with a $20 rebate to boot. Too bad I didn't see it until the morning after when they pulled it.

    2. Re:Cheaper price by fantastic+max · · Score: 1
      I'm still kicking myself over this. About a month ago, Dell had this for $78, with a $20 rebate to boot. Too bad I didn't see it until the morning after when they pulled it.

      And those of us who did order it got it cancelled by Dell soon after.

    3. Re:Cheaper price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter. They didn't honor the price and cancelled all the orders.

      - Jon (someone who did get in on that deal)

    4. Re:Cheaper price by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      Heck, just a quick search on shopper.cnet.com shows it as low as $269 (after $20 rebate/free shipping).

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    5. Re:Cheaper price by uradu · · Score: 5, Funny

      > www.newegg.com [...] They are a fairly reputable dealer.

      OH MY GOD! A heretic! Someones pass me the noose! Dude, calling The Egg "fairly reputable" amongst geeks is like drinking your gruel with extended pinky on a Viking longboat.

    6. Re:Cheaper price by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Calling Newegg "fairly reputable" is like calling Hitler "fairly intolerant".

    7. Re:Cheaper price by ahaning · · Score: 1

      It may be obvious to some, but it wasn't to me.

      For those who aren't up on who makes what portable audio player these days, you can find this player on newegg.com under their MP3-Digital Audio Players and then under SonicBlue.

      The SonicBlue part was what was tripping me up. I was looking for Rio. So, it's the SonicBlue Rio Karma 20GB. Eesh.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    8. Re:Cheaper price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not sure you phrased that the way you might have intended...

      In other words, Hitler was obviously VERY intolerant, therefore, by your analogy, Newegg is VERY reputable.

      Is that what you meant? If not, what's wrong with Newegg? I've both several items from them with zero problems. Even RMAed one thing (nothing wrong with it, just didn't fit my needs).

    9. Re:Cheaper price by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is no longer correct.

      Some time ago, the rio line was bought by another company, "Digital Audio Networks", a maker of high-quality sound products. They've made sure that the customer service (online and phone) are better than Sonic's was (which isn't hard, considering how bad they were).

    10. Re:Cheaper price by virtualkuz · · Score: 1

      You must not have seen the sarcasm. Newegg is the de facto standard for online computer/electronics sales. Calling them fairly reputable is an insult to them.

    11. Re:Cheaper price by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      OH MY GOD! A heretic! Someones pass me the noose! Dude, calling The Egg "fairly reputable" amongst geeks is like drinking your gruel with extended pinky on a Viking longboat.

      This "Anonymous Coward" character seems pretty shady. Better keep an eye on him.

    12. Re:Cheaper price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod's, you know what do to with goatse morons

    13. Re:Cheaper price by Digital11 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Neuros 128MB/20GB combo is only $229 right now... Heck, they dropped the 128MB stand-alone (which is upgradeable via the backpack system) to $99.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    14. Re:Cheaper price by radish · · Score: 1

      You can find it on the web easily for $280, plus there's a $20 rebate right now, making it $260. I know people who (with price matching & special deals) have got it for under $250.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    15. Re:Cheaper price by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Informative
      They are a fairly reputable dealer

      FYI, a very useful place to go before ordering from a mail order or internet place is Reseller Ratings. Newegg is one of the highest rated general computer components places, and it is based on thousands of reviews, so is a pretty reliable rating.

      Reseller Ratings is particularly useful when considering ordering from a place listed at Pricewatch. The vendors listed at pricewatch range from great to total sleazebags that I would not order from even if their price was half anyone else's and included shipping and a blow job from the UPS person.

    16. Re:Cheaper price by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 1

      Indeed, what *can* Brown do for you!

  6. Rio Riot by DanThe1Man · · Score: 3, Informative

    Though it dosn't support .ogg, Rio made a similar 20 gig player a year or two ago that is really cheap now. You can get one on ebay for around $120.

    1. Re:Rio Riot by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct link. Opps.

    2. Re:Rio Riot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord! That dress doesn't leave much to the imagination.

    3. Re:Rio Riot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir:

      I appreciate your exaltations, but please, I would prefer she just wore the dress I gave her.

      Thank you and have a nice day.

      The Good Lord

    4. Re:Rio Riot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen.

  7. Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    and any other OS that Java runs on.

    Isn't there some law against using the words Java and runs in the same sentence?

    1. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      and any other OS that Java **** on.

      Try any of the following:

      plods
      walks
      crawls
      crashes
      leaks
      gums

    2. Re:Yeah, right by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's more of a brisk stroll, never too much of a run. Heh.

    3. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is, you just broke it.

  8. It's called Karma? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I mean c'mon... the news submitter is clearly trying to please Slashdot.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  9. neuros have had the same features for a while by croFrog · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can't go wrong with them. Plays Mp3's oggs's. Works with linux. Supports the community what more do you need. http://www.neurosaudio.com/

    1. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by marderj · · Score: 1

      Neuros doesn't play ogg. If you can overlook that it's got some very compelling features that the Rio lacks like built-in FM modulator and HiSi (let's you record a sample off the radio, then tells you what song it is when you sync). They both look like excellent players though. Don't think you can really go wrong with either one.

    2. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by wfrp01 · · Score: 1

      Umm, does play ogg. They partnered with xiph.org (the nice people who gave us the free codec in the first place) to make it happen. There's still some work to do, I think, but their support of xiph is a big plus in my opinion.

      I haven't had the spendies to pick one up, though. Anyone have some first hand insight/comments?

      --

      --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
    3. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by tuffy · · Score: 1
      The Neuros seems to be toast. The "official" beta firmware plays vorbis, but only those encoded at low quality (5 or under). Otherwise you'll get nasty skipping. Better firmware available at open.neurosaudio.com hasn't been updated since late August. It plays high quality vorbis with barely perceptable "scratchy" sounds (very slight skipping, I guess), but it's billed as being "very beta" - though I haven't experienced problems.

      Neuros owners were promised a USB 2.0 update to their existing units in August, but that's not happening either according to their founder. So the result is a USB 1 device with incomplete vorbis support.

      Skip the Neuros and get a Rio Karma or iRiver device.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    4. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      The Neuros as we know it is indeed toast. They laid off all of the engineers on the project just a couple of weeks before the new player was finished. It has USB 2.0 and a couple other improvements, but unless some benefactor comes along and buys all that IP, it will never be built.

    5. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      You can get them for about $200 now. Ogg Vorbis support is in beta and unfortunately it disables MP3 playback. However, they say the stable release will support both. Don't know why they disable MP3 playback except maybe that they want people to test the Vorbis playback as much as possible.

      The Linux sync program has hit 1.0 though.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    6. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by marderj · · Score: 1

      oops. was just reading a review the other day and it said it didn't. must have been an old review.

    7. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by gimpboy · · Score: 1

      according to the latest firmware release, you can get bowth ogg and mp3 support:

      http://www.xiph.org/neurosetta/

      i've also read this on the web forums.

      --
      -- john
    8. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Caveat: Neuros ogg playback is still in beta. They are working with the people from Xiph I believe, so if anyone can do it right, they should be able to.

      I did just buy one, mainly because the 20 gig model is only $199 and I wanted something that could transmit to FM and record. Its not pretty or small, but its feature rich and cheap compared to other hard drive based players. I believe they're trying to clear out their inventory as they've been working on a new model or may be going out of busines, bought up, etc. I remember the 20 gig model retailing at $300 or so not too long ago.

    9. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 128mb one is reatiling for 99$ dollars now.

    10. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by Greg+W. · · Score: 1

      The "official beta" firmware (1.40) plays only Oggs, and has horrendous skipping/performance problems (runs out of CPU because it's not sufficiently optimized) at high bitrates.

      The "really beta" firmware (1.40A is the one I have) addresses both of these problems. It plays both MP3 and Ogg. It can play high-bitrate Ogg files without problems if you use the headphones. (I still get some chirps with -q 6 Oggs over the FM radio transmitter.)

      There are still "issues" with the Neuros and the firmware -- for example, it can't play beta4 and older Oggs, which isn't that big a deal for most people, but it also happens to lock up the entire device if you try it, rather than just skipping over that song... which makes it a bit more painful than it has to be. (Solution: remove the beta4 Oggs from the Neuros, or replace them after you re-rip the CD [or re-download a different encoding of the song].) Also, it has no "gapless" playback -- there's a two-second gap between songs, and if you concatenate two Ogg files together, there's a "stutter" when it switches to the second Vorbis stream. (Of course, you could rip the whole CD as one giant Ogg Vorbis file.)

      The biggest "issue" I have with the Neuros is the fact that there is not a single unused frequency on the FM spectrum where I live. Not one. I've found one that's only used by a weak signal, but I still get static/interference sometimes, particularly in the mornings. But that's not something the Neuros has any control over. (If they boosted the power on the FM transmitter, they'd be in violation of some FCC regulations.)

      In short: it's not a perfect device, but it's good enough for me. It makes my one-hour-each-way commute much less painful.

    11. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, from what I've been seeing lately it doesn't look like it's perfect, but I think the fact that they've released a Linux sync program and I can get one for $200 may be enough reason to get one for me. When I really think about it Ogg playback isn't really a big deal to me and the other features are really more interesting. I don't even really need to use the FM broadcast feature since my car has an aux jack.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    12. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The latest official beta 1.45 supports OGG, MP3, WMA, and WAV.

      It also supports encoding in MP3, and WAV

      Some people are just uninformed!

    13. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now this is how vicious rumors start! The Neuros, is not toast, I've just recently invested quite a bit into it. It's true we are restructuring but it's out of the need to be more competitive not because we've lost interest in the product.

      In fact, quite a bit of development is ongoing on all fronts, firmware, hardware, etc. You've seen and will continue to see enhancements. Don't believe the rumors!

      Joe Born
      Founder and CTO, Digital Innovations

    14. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by Jon-o · · Score: 1

      Plays ogg with BETA FIRMWARE.

      Also, they don't have FLAC at all yet (though it's planned for the distant future) and it's much bigger. Also doesn't support recording to anything but mp3.

    15. Re:neuros have had the same features for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Bzzzt. Wrong. Records WAV as well.

  10. The Rio Riot is not too big either by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2, Informative

    Before someone say's that this player is too big, its Dimensions are 5 1/2" x 3 3/4" x 1 1/4" (the iPod's dimensions are 4.2" x 2.43" x 0.78"). There isn't that much of a difference.

    It's weight is 8.8oz while the ipod is 5.6 oz.

    1. Re:The Rio Riot is not too big either by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you're talking about something small, an extra inch is a big deal. And if you look at volume, the Volt is 3.2 times as large. It's not the same at all.

    2. Re:The Rio Riot is not too big either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using your numbers, it is only MORE THAN THREE TIMES BIGGER.

      5.5" x 3.75" x 1.25" = 25.7813 cubic inches for the Rio, versus

      4.2" x 2.43" x .78" = 7.96068 cubic inches for the iPod.

      Not to mention that the iPod (even the bigger older models) can fit in nearly anyone's front shirt pocket, whereas you would have to have a really big pocket to fit the rio in it. If you buy your clothes in the big and tall shops, this might not be a problem, but I will stick with my iPod.

    3. Re:The Rio Riot is not too big either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When you're talking about something small, an extra inch is a big deal.

      you're a girl, right?

    4. Re:The Rio Riot is not too big either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to own a Riot and I assure you it is WAAAY too big. It's about the size of a thick paperback book (think "Shogun") with the case on it. The user interface was quite nice, with a large display, but you have to use Rio-supplied software to get stuff into it, and USB 1.1 at that. I was getting unhappier by the day when I accidently knocked it off an airline seat (while playing) and it never worked again. I returned it to Circuit City who refunded my money which I used to buy a 20 GB Archos Recorder.

      I LOVE my Archos. Well, OK, I love it once I installed the excellent RockBox software on it. The Archos is under $250 nowadays and even tho it's a bit bulky (still fits in a shirt pocket tho!) and lacks codec support (MP3 only) it's a great value. I record my MP3s at max quality VBR MP3 and they sound great! The USB 2.0 harddrive it great - just drag-n-drop (from Windoze).

    5. Re:The Rio Riot is not too big either by dmaxwell · · Score: 4, Funny

      When you're talking about something small, an extra inch is a big deal.

      Must...resist...urge..to..post...lowbrow...reply .

    6. Re:The Rio Riot is not too big either by _Spirit · · Score: 1

      Undercover spammer eh ?

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

  11. One little review... by EvilBuu · · Score: 1

    times a thousand avid link-clickers equals no review.

    I hope its favorable though, looks like a nice little player, little bigger than an iPod but it actually has more features (absent iPhoto dock, etc). If this gets popular enough to get the price on this and the iPod to drop a hundred then I could afford to get myself one for Xmas.

    --

    Green-voting, republican-registered, socialist-libertarian.
  12. Obligatory joke by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0

    And what do you call a music fan prostitute reading Slashdot, uuh ?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  13. Compatibility? by lplatypus · · Score: 4, Funny

    How can I use this Rio Karma device to get a +1 bonus for my slashdot posts?

    1. Re:Compatibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I understand now... I think I already used the Rio Karma device to get a +1 bonus for my last slashdot post :-)

      I'd better not abuse the Karma device so I'm posting this one as an anonymous coward

      - lplatypus

  14. fuck ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'll stick with my ipod thanks. just cause something is "more free" doesn't make it inherently better. just my CAN $0.02.

  15. example.... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Funny

    My review of the Karma : Excellent.

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    1. Re:example.... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "My review of the Karma : Excellent."

      Now if only they named their next product "+4 funny"

  16. Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by danaris · · Score: 4, Informative

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't FLAC fall inside the Ogg container? I know that most people think of Vorbis as just "Ogg," but it's just one of the parts of Ogg, another of which, if this page says what I think it does, is FLAC.

    Regardless, it doesn't hurt to be accurate. It's great that it plays Ogg Vorbis and Ogg FLAC files, and has lots of other cool features; however, I'll not give up my iPod till you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    1. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      Why support FLAC? Granted, I love a free, lossless codec. It's great for listening on your computer ... but you listen to your portable MP3 player with headphones. You're probably not going to notice the difference between lossless and lossy compression. Let's also not forget that playing lossless audio will suck up battery power because it'll take more of the player's RAM for the same amount of skip protection as compared to MP3, Vorbis or AAC. Portable players just aren't the market for supporting lossless audio, but whatever. If it wasn't a whole lot of extra effort on their part, why not?

      The great thing about the iPod is that its firmware is upgradeable. This means that Apple could support Ogg Vorbis in the future, though I kind of doubt they will. They might end up undermining everything they worked for by dragging the MPEG group kicking and screaming to more reasonable licensing. But you never know ...

    2. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by MrHanky · · Score: 3, Informative
      Not necessarily. I thought FLAC used the Ogg container, and just renamed some .flac-files to .ogg: xmms refused to play them. It turns out that FLAC by default uses its own container, but, according to Debian's man page for flac (1), you can also encode with the --ogg option:
      When encoding, generate Ogg-FLAC output instead of native-FLAC. Ogg-FLAC streams are FLAC streams wrapped in an Ogg transport layer. The resulting file should have an '.ogg' extension and will still be decodable by flac.
    3. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My suspicion is that Apple will never support Ogg Vorbis directly on the iPod (a.k.a. The Biggest Reason For iTunes), for reasons having nothing to do with technology and everything to do with politics.

      iTunes is so popular because Apple managed to get a huge number of songs licensed for download. The only way the music industry would have done that is if Apple assured them that the music would be protected with some sort of DRM.

      If Apple makes solid Ogg Vorbis support available for iPods, they are afraid that people will start clamoring for unprotected files. That, in turn, means they either have to tell those people to piss off, or alienate the music industry and risk losing (or having a lot of trouble getting future) licenses.

    4. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by damiam · · Score: 1
      but you listen to your portable MP3 player with headphones.

      Maybe you do. Some of us hook up portable players to real speakers, at home or in a car, and appreciate high-quality audio. Also, in those situations, battery life is generally not an issue.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      If Apple makes solid Ogg Vorbis support available for iPods, they are afraid that people will start clamoring for unprotected files.

      Slashdot readers are already "clamoring" for DRM-less files (are unprotected files like unprotected sex?). But then again, slashdot readers are clamoring for unrestricted, non-lossy (FLAC, WAV, or AIFF) songs for $0.25 each. Meanwhile Apple sells millions of 128kbps, DRM songs. iTunes/iPod already support both DRM-less AAC and MP3 files, as well as AIFF and WAV.

      Whatever reason Apple has for not supporting ogg has nothing to do with a handful of cranks and kooks.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by k8to · · Score: 1

      You're quite right of course, but as a side note: your experiment is hardly a good one. XMMS makes all kinds of assumptions about files based on their extension. I wouldn't at all be surprised it assumed that .ogg was a vorbis file. I've actually had to recompile xmms more than once to convince it to play files it already could.

      --
      -josh
    7. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know that most people think of Vorbis as just "Ogg,"


      Thats what most people think of vorbis as? Are you sure you want to be opening that door?
    8. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting a mp3 player with a tape adapter was a helluva lot cheaper & easier than replacing my car's radio. Plus, I can plug it into the car's DC power.

    9. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      The real problem is that the "ogg" plugin for xmms only recognizes vorbis...

    10. Re:Ogg *and* FLAC? (pedant alert) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "are unprotected files like unprotected sex?"

      Yes, both are alot more fun.

  17. I for one... by MikeXpop · · Score: 4, Funny

    won't buy one until it supports...

    um... I mean until it syncs via...

    until it runs... YEAH! Still doesn't run linux. Therefore I won't buy one.

    Phew. For a minute there I thought I was going to have to buy it.

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    1. Re:I for one... by Durandal64 · · Score: 1, Informative

      You know, they've put Linux on the iPod. :)

    2. Re:I for one... by The+Munger · · Score: 1, Funny

      But $20 says that SCO still claim IP rights ;-).

      --
      Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
    3. Re:I for one... by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

      Actually, I bought an iPod because it was bar none the best mp3 player money could buy (at the time I bought it, and I'm not sure much has changed). Contrary to your mocking, people *have* gone "Oooooh... cool! iPod!"

      It's really quite a phenomenon.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    4. Re:I for one... by mrfrostee · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't run linux

      It runs Red Hat's eCos. Is that close enough?

    5. Re:I for one... by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      Uh ... yeah. People go "Oooh, cool!" all the time.

  18. System Requirements: Microsoft OS by olddoc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look at the site and click on the system requirements and you'll see RIO states it needs Windows.
    The least they could do is say GNU/Linux can be used but there will be no telephone tech support.

    --
    Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
    1. Re:System Requirements: Microsoft OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't support GNU/Linux. It supports Linux.
      No GNU tools are required to make it work.
      However, a kernel is.

    2. Re:System Requirements: Microsoft OS by shione · · Score: 1

      It sorta is. The driver to update the firmware is windows only.

      The Karma ships with 1.0 and 1.2 has a couple of bug fixes for the java client.

    3. Re:System Requirements: Microsoft OS by agurkan · · Score: 1

      aha. because C library is part of kernel not GNU.

      --
      ato
    4. Re:System Requirements: Microsoft OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You plan on booting this kernel?

  19. Device with multiple use by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1, Funny

    this player comes with java-based software

    Great, I bet you can put a casserole on it and boil eggs while you listen to music ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  20. Looking for an audio jukebox by Prince+Cyph0r · · Score: 0

    I have read the reviews of the Rio Karma, The iRivaer ihp-120, and even the ipod, and I dont know which one to go with. These three players have a lot going for it; the iPod with its firewire and powerful hardware, the karma with the ogg and flac support, and the iriver with the ogg and FM support. It's just when you think something comes out that you think would be perfect for your needs, there is always some flaw stopping you from purchasing it, such as the ipod only being able to play mp3 and aac, iriver being expensive, and the karma that can't be read as a system volume. At one time, i was going to go for the ipod when I learned about the ipod linux project, as i thought that with some time, they will be able to successfully port linux to the ipod so that it will be able to play many types of files. There hasn't been any work on linux on the ipod, so I am once again leaning towards the karma or the ihp 120, but cant shake off the lack of hard drive recognition and past support of the rio karma, and the price of the ihp-120. Hopefully something nice will happen soon to further narrow down my decision...

  21. Uh-Oh... by Hanji · · Score: 0

    Why do I fear a sudden wave of
    Karma: ....
    jokes?

    --
    A Minesweeper clone that doesn't suck
    1. Re:Uh-Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they're all gonna be as SHITHOUSE as your attempt at humour!

  22. Yes it is too big. by wemmick · · Score: 3, Informative
    First, the 4.2" vs 5.5" that's over an inch longer (or 30% longer) that it sticks down into your pocket. That's exacerbated by the extra half an inch of depth of the Riot over the iPod. And this auction says it weighs 10 oz.

    This Rio Karma, on the other hand, is small. Its longets dimension is only 3" and it weighs 5.5 oz.

    --
    ___
    Cognitive Overflow
    more than yo
    1. Re:Yes it is too big. by DanThe1Man · · Score: 1

      And this auction says it weighs 10 oz

      here is my source for the dimensions.

      I looked again on google and according to this site it is 10 oz. I guess the second is correct.

    2. Re:Yes it is too big. by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      maybe 8.8 oz is the empty weight: without any songs on it?

    3. Re:Yes it is too big. by DanThe1Man · · Score: 1

      thats funny =)

  23. tres cool by byrd77 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have had mine for three days now. Loving it.

    Only problem is you have to use USB to upgrade the firmware and it's proprietary driver is Windows only. Once you've upgraded the firmware though, the java client works great. Be sure to dl the latest version though. The developer himself has a site, check out www.riovolution.com's forums for details.

    I have mine hooked to my stereo in my living room with a wireless bridge connecting to my network. Files sync faster than USB2 over 100mb ethernet, slower over my 11b link.

    Plays ogg like a charm. The UI is slick and the quickest and most responsive I've seen on an mp3 player (including ipod).

    Well worth the ~$300 I paid. Pick one up today!

    And yell at them to make the firmware upgradable under Linux.

    --
    - Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.
    1. Re:tres cool by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More to the point, the firmware updater ought to be a java app like the sync tool. No reason to add linux support, when you can add platform-agnostic support.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:tres cool by ckimyt · · Score: 1

      Hey byrd77...hopefully you'll see this reply...

      You said you own this Rio Karma gizmo. I've got a test I'd love for you to run:

      Rip two songs from a live album that are back-to-back (i.e. the second track starts while there's crowd noise) and encode them in Ogg. Alternatively, record two connecting songs from a progressive rock artist (like Dream Theater's Erotomania/Voices/Silent Man)...the point is, the two tracks should play one after the other with no gap or pop. MP3 format (or others) won't work.

      Then load it on the Karma and play them. Could you post the results or email them to me? I'm at ckimyt [at] yahoo [dot] com. I really want to buy a player that handles this condition correctly...i.e. plays the audio seamlessly (Ogg format supports exact sample length coding).

      Thanks in advance for any help...

      --

      Putting the sig back into +1, Insightful since 1995!
    3. Re:tres cool by byrd77 · · Score: 1

      check out the threads at:
      http://riovolution.com/forums/index.php

      this is apparently a much demanded feature, seems like it will be in an upcomming firmware release.

      --
      - Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.
    4. Re:tres cool by byrd77 · · Score: 1

      from what I can tell, that shouldn't be to difficult, may just be a political decision waiting to happen. When I upgraded my firmware, it simply dl'd the file to the karma, then the karma updated itself. don't see why it couldn't do that through java. If I had to guess, I'd say they want to keep the firmware process from being sniffed on ethernet and people hacking their own. doesn't make too much sense, since I've already read about people sniffing the USB link...

      --
      - Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.
    5. Re:tres cool by codej · · Score: 2, Informative

      The latest firmware was released today. With it comes support of gapless playback of OGGs.

    6. Re:tres cool by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      The UI is slick and the quickest and most responsive I've seen on an mp3 player (including ipod).

      One thing I noticed about my iPod: When I originally got it, if I navigated to a Genre or something that had a lot of subfolders for the first time, it could take seconds just to load the list of folders. During that time it would freeze and be totally unresponsive. This really only started happening when I loaded it up (26 out of 27GB) of music on the thing. I was using EphPod with Windows.

      When I switched to iTunes for Windows and resynced my entire music library, everything on the iPod was way more responsive, and pretty much any list loaded instantly. No more annoying lag navigating through the menus.

      I believe this is due to the fact that EphPod and other "iTunes replacement products" that you might use on Windows or Linux don't write the iPod music database in the optimal format. They probably don't organize the XML in the proper way because the format was reverse engineered without access to Apple's internal documentation.

      So if your iPod's menus are anything other than "instant", definitely switch to iTunes, it will make a world of difference.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    7. Re:tres cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's cool, but what's nice with the Karma, is that it is all almost simultaneous, which is where the proprietary filesystem/database comes into play as it is more efficient than a standard FAT filesystem

      ~Edvard_Grieg

    8. Re:tres cool by mrfrostee · · Score: 1

      Rip two songs from a live album that are back-to-back (i.e. the second track starts while there's crowd noise) and encode them in Ogg.

      I just tried this with the v1.25 firmware and The Who - Live at Leeds. It worked great: no gaps.

  24. Made for right-handed people by woogli · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's obviously 'designed' for right-handed people. Interestingly, the iPod doesn't appear to favour one hand over the other.

    Just a thought. -- and I'm not even left-handed. :) Granted, that's the larger majority of the population...

    1. Re:Made for right-handed people by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1
      Funny, I was thinking it was the smaller majority. But what do I know?

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
    2. Re:Made for right-handed people by Scyber · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the display rotates 90 degrees. So it works just as well for lefties

    3. Re:Made for right-handed people by Cushman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The device works left-handed. The display even can be re-oriented to better suit lefies.

    4. Re:Made for right-handed people by nolife · · Score: 1

      Nice plug attempt for the iPod.
      The apparent lack of left handed ability is not a problem for a left handed person and IMHO, not something that needs to be designed around. If a left hander has not got used to the general right usage, the Rio is the least of thier problems. Have you seen pair of left handed scissors since you left grade school? How many left handed people actually configure the mouse buttons and/or use the left hand for the mouse? How about a left handed joystick for a console game or even the real arcade games? Of course just about every game now uses many buttons and both hands but the old school games and joysticks were based on the right hand. I don't think I could use my Blackberry if the scroller wheel was actually on the left, same with my cell phone configuration. I would guess that unless a product is symetrical, right handed use was probably a design consideration.

      As a lefty, I can say that I see no left handed conspiracy going on. Maybe a small percentage may have not been able to adapt. You get used to what you have. I even golf right handed because that's what clubs I had when I started, I putt lefty though.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:Made for right-handed people by woogli · · Score: 1

      I wasn't suggesting an anti-lefty conspiracy. I haven't even seen the thiing in person -- it was just the first thing that jumped into my head when I saw the picture. As you can see from other replies, apparently the screen rotates or something to make it easier for lefties. Seems kind of annoying to have to do that... but that's just me.

      Yes, I do have an iPod -- and I love it, but I'm not a frothing-at-the-mouth fanatic, I wouldn't try to plug it over this one just to be a lemming. Interestingly, I use it often in my left hand, because more often than not I'm carrying something or whatever in my right hand. It works really well for one-handed use in either hand. I hadn't thought about it though, until I saw the picture of this one. Good design doesn't hit you until you see 'less good' (opinion only) design. ;)

      Remember -- I'm not even left handed! And just because you are a minority, doesn't mean you should 'have to get used to what you have.'

      cheers.

    6. Re:Made for right-handed people by woogli · · Score: 1

      That's interesting (re: display). However, the form still seems to fit one-handed use in the right hand better.

      My feeling is that, depending on how much of a hassle it was to switch the screen, you wouldn't find people doing it on the fly. Having said that, I've not held one, or seen one other than the picture -- this is just my initial impression from that, and from comparing it to what I have, which works really well one-handed in either hand -- without fiddling about. ;) No plugs for what I have.

      :)

    7. Re:Made for right-handed people by woogli · · Score: 0, Troll

      The larger majority of people, not you yourself, of course, don't notice the use of multiple redundancy in text.

      Proofreading is usefully handy though, eh?

      :)

    8. Re:Made for right-handed people by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Good. I'm right handed and I'd rather have something optimized for me.

  25. Gnu/Karma anyone by pardasaniman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unfortunately the embedded market is run by proprietary monopolizing OSs.

    The RIO unfortunatly comes with proprietary firmware. I strongly reccomend the birth of GNU/Karma.

    (You thought we couldn't find anything to complain about!!)

    1. Re:Gnu/Karma anyone by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Neuros plug: The developers of the Neuros (who are very active in their own forums, including the CTO) plan to open up portions of their firmware to developers (can't do everything because of the issues with licensing the tools for the TI DSP.)

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    2. Re:Gnu/Karma anyone by lelnet · · Score: 1

      It's not a general purpose computing device, so you won't be writing applications for it even if it's open-sourced. The client interface is Java-based and runs on any OS that supports Java, so they're not dictating your desktop OS. It supports data in both closed and open formats...once again offering all the choice you need.

      I don't get why closed firmware is a problem worth protesting over in this case.

    3. Re:Gnu/Karma anyone by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1


      I strongly reccomend the birth of GNU/Karma

      You can't release karma under the GPL, think of all the Karma whores you'll put out of business!
      </caffine_overload>

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    4. Re:Gnu/Karma anyone by BigJimSlade · · Score: 1

      I strongly reccomend the birth of GNU/Karma.

      Does that make someone doing anything they can to get one a GNU/Karma Whore?

    5. Re:Gnu/Karma anyone by nytes · · Score: 1

      Do you work for Digital Innovations? You seem to have a lot to say about the Neuros.

      (Just asking - I'm expecting my Neuros to arrive today, and I think it may have been your post in another thread that informed me of its existence.)

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    6. Re:Gnu/Karma anyone by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Nope... Just a satisifed customer. I'm Trig on the Neuros forums.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  26. FLAC != Ogg by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Informative

    FLAC is a lossless compression algorithm, Ogg is not. Other than that, they're identical. Well, except for the fact that Ogg offers streaming and 'bitrate peeling' functionality, where a server can prune out data and preserve (some semblance of) the original tune.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:FLAC != Ogg by binarytoaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Two things:

      As the original poster pointed out, Ogg is a container. It can contain Vorbis or FLAC equally well. We just call Vorbis "ogg" for the same reason we refer to Sorenson as "QuickTime" - certainly there are other things that can be stored in the container but it's a bit like a Kleenex type convention.

      And, yes, Vorbis "supports" bitrate peeling, but no one has yet written the program that will peel it, in fact several of the developers have stated that the current way the Vorbis stream is (dis)organized, it's impossible to write such a program.

  27. 20GB is not enough! by El · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've already ripped 30GB of MP3s off my CD collection; best estimate is that the whole collection will take ~50GB. Good thing I'm putting it on a Creative Nomad Zen Xtra 60GB, instead of one of those wimpy Rios! (The Archos looks like it might be a good alternative to the Rio too, once they add a larger drive.)

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:20GB is not enough! by bitty · · Score: 1

      (The Archos looks like it might be a good alternative to the Rio too, once they add a larger drive.)

      That's why you buy a 6 gig Archos on eBay and put in a bigger drive. A trained monkey could do it. Hell, even I did it.

    2. Re:20GB is not enough! by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

      Now here comes the stories about nerds and how much of their crappy "techno" music they can "rip".

      The excitement is never going to end!!!

      --

      YOU'RE WINNER !
      Another lame blog

    3. Re:20GB is not enough! by Yawgm8th · · Score: 0

      Heh, and i'm content with the 512 card in my pocket pc. The only reason this looks appealing to me is the flack option. I figure 512 worth of mp3's would still fit in 20GB if they were flacks instead. Also, the pocket pc is hard to get going.. as in you can't really just whip it out and start listening.

      --
      do unto others as you would have them do unto you
    4. Re:20GB is not enough! by Ankle · · Score: 0

      If you need more space there is supposibly a Karma 40 model that will be comming out next which holds 40GB. Check out the riovolution forums, the developers are quite active there.

    5. Re:20GB is not enough! by sk3tch · · Score: 1

      ...And you need to carry your whole collection with you at all times because....?

    6. Re:20GB is not enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because some times you just want to listen to some special band/tune/style/whatever.
      and even if i have 250+ gigs of mp3s, if i can't listen to the one pink floyd tune i want to hear _right now_, the world sux...

      so yeah, you need to have your whole collection with you, or at least as much of it as possible...

  28. parent is a moron by orthancstone · · Score: 1

    Argh...just avoid parent...you know what it is...

  29. Don't worry by Scyber · · Score: 1

    I saw it shortly after it was posted and still got the order cancelled.

  30. Dell Woes by blackmonday · · Score: 1

    About a month ago this player came up on Dell.com for 70 dollars PLUS a 20 dollar rebate. I bought it and 3 days later got an email saying it was a mistake. I figured it was but I took a chance. Apparently it happened to lots of other people too...

    1. Re:Dell Woes by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      They actually are required to abide by that, by the law (and if you said this, they probably wouldn't argue, since the legal fees are hardly worth it).

      In order for a contract to be binding, you must have proper consideration (i.e., both sides must do or pay something) and `offer and acceptance.' In the case of a retailer, the offer and acceptance is really just the offer; it is taken as a given that the retailer accepts your offer to buy something for a stated price, if that price is listed. In other words, if a retailer offers something for a mistaken price and you accept, he must accept as well, since that acceptance was understood prior. There are similar situations, such as where I say, `I'll pay $50 to anyone who can cure my foot itch,' etc.

      It should be noted that if the bargain is not reasonable, i.e. will not be believed by a normal, reasonable person, it isn't binding. But this was entirely believable and in-keeping with Dell's claim of having good deals ;)

      You should threaten legal action and see what they say.

    2. Re:Dell Woes by calbanese · · Score: 1

      Um, no.

      The general rule is that an advertisement does not constitute an offer. (See Restatment (Second) of Contracts. Though it is possible to make a definite offer, it is not customary and the presumption is the other way. Advertisements and order forms are notices and solicitation for offers which create no power of acceptance in the receipient.

      Its good business to accept these offers as normally you want to foster good will, but absent a statute in whatever state Dell is in, they are not required to sell at that price.

    3. Re:Dell Woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUT... Did Dell's online store accept and confirm a PURCHASE for that price, which they later backed out of? That's a whole different story from a mistaken advertisement, depending on how far it went. Did they bill your credit card?

    4. Re:Dell Woes by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      Um, no.

      A price tag constitutes and offer. If you walk into Gap and see a leather jacket for $120 when it's supposed to be $220 (I had a professor in a legal studies class who used this exact example), and you take it to the counter and say, `I'll take it,' that alone constitues offer/acceptance. No further acceptance is necessary, since the nature of the contract agreement by a price-tag is such that merely by accepting the posted price, a customer can complete the contract. IANAL, etc, but this is how I was taught by someone who is.

      Regardless, as the prior poster commented, the Dell Online Store completed the contract, in what is surely a binding form.

    5. Re:Dell Woes by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      No they never billed my CC. My Purchase was immediately put into pending, then was cancelled with an email saying the price was much too low and they would not honor it, They offered 10% off my next purchase. if you know Dell, you know that 10% off a purchase is commonplace. End of story was I got nothing.

  31. Battery? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is the Li Ion internal battery replaceable?

  32. How come theres no posts on the iRiver iHP-120 by Spikeman56 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    cmon folks the iRiver iHP-120 is one of the best players out there and is constantly invloved in the best HD-DAP debate against the iPod and the Karma. search the internet, check out head-fi.org, check for reviews on the internet and you'll find that the iHP-120 is no little player... all iRiver needs is more publicity... shame shame

    1. Re:How come theres no posts on the iRiver iHP-120 by Spikeman56 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      oh actually there was a post on this b4 but still the iHP-120 needs more publicity!

  33. Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In, your post s/Ogg/Vorbis/

    Ogg is a container. Vorbis is the audio codec.

  34. Yikes Slashdotted review... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    Now if their webserver could only get a little karma. Wait, maybe the problem is that it is a Karma.

  35. Humph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously designed for righties, and only works on Windows.

    You'll never go broke playing to the lowest common denominator, but your product will never become an icon in its category, either.

  36. iRiver ihp-120 by drivelikejehu · · Score: 5, Informative
    I came awfully close to getting the 20gb rio karma, then considered getting an ipod, until i found out about the iRiver iHP-120. I chose this because it has the features I really wanted out of an portable mp3 player. First, it's the same size as an ipod 20gb (a few milimeters bigger, but that's nothin), and while the joystick/button design for navigation isn't quite as intuitive (or cool) as the ipod's, it's definitely usable, and from what I've seen from the Rio, probably alot better. It's also black, which I prefer to the ipod's white.

    Now, moving on from usability issues and looks, it has some other features that I just couldn't pass up. First, it has an internal mic that can make voice recordings. Secondly, it also has line in and line out ports, that work as optical OR analog. For recording via the input, you can choose to record via an external mic, line in, or optical in. The external mic is a hell of alot hotter than line in, by the way. For all this recording, you can record to wav (optical does 48khz while the rest do 44), or to mp3 that is encoded on the fly, at bitrates ranging from 40kpbs to 320. This sold it for me, as I am an avid show taper (with a pair of clip on mic's and a sony DAT), and this will be fun to play with - I plan to do a double recording sometime to do a comparison of quality between the DAT and iHP-120, but I've already done a test recording at a show and it didnt sound bad at all. My only gripe would have to be that there doesn't appear to be a way to control the level of the line-in, but you CAN adjust the level of the external mic, just not while you are recording. Also, it doesnt show levels so you won't know if it's redlining until you actually listen to it. I'm hoping they might fix this in a firmware update but I'm not very hopeful, although from what my test showed, it might not even be needed.

    Anyways, just wanted to chime in, I too think the karma is rather ugly, and the slightly bigger size of the iHP-120 is not a deterrant at all. I guess the only one would be the price - it's around $355 or so, a bit more than the karma but with the extra features, I think it's worth it. It does play OGG's, by the way, and transferring files is painless with USB as the unit shows up as another hard drive connected to your system - you can easily use it as a portable hard drive if you want. There's more reviews around the net if you look, for more indepth information.

    1. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by ckimyt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey drivelikejehu...hopefully you'll see this reply...

      You said you own this iRiver iHP-120 gizmo. I've got a test I'd love for you to run:

      Rip two songs from a live album that are back-to-back (i.e. the second track starts while there's crowd noise) and encode them in Ogg. Alternatively, record two connecting songs from a progressive rock artist (like Dream Theater's Erotomania/Voices/Silent Man)...the point is, the two tracks should play one after the other with no gap or pop. MP3 format (or others) won't work.

      Then load it on the iHP-120 and play them. Could you post the results or email them to me? I'm at ckimyt [at] yahoo [dot] com. I really want to buy a player that handles this condition correctly...i.e. plays the audio seamlessly (Ogg format supports exact sample length coding).

      Thanks in advance for any help...

      --

      Putting the sig back into +1, Insightful since 1995!
    2. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by cdh · · Score: 1

      This looks great! My big gripe? Why does everybody have FM receivers but no AM? I listen to a lot of talk radio on AM, but at times want my MP3 player (Archos). Currently I have to bring 2 different devices along. I don't understand why "ancient" technology like AM has to be exluded.

    3. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by drivelikejehu · · Score: 2, Informative

      ckimyt, just tried your test, and there is no seamless transfer...there's a one to one and a half second pause as it switches to the next track. hopefully they'll fix this with a firmware update, but as of now it has no gapless.

    4. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by drivelikejehu · · Score: 1

      another thing i forgot to mention is the remote that comes with the iriver. it's seriously badass - it actually has an LED that is backlit like the main display, and you can do anything with the remote that you can do with the main unit - just stash the unit in your backpack with the remote clipped to your shirt or whatever. and did i mention it looks really freakin cool, too?

    5. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by _|()|\| · · Score: 2, Informative
      while the joystick/button design for navigation isn't quite as intuitive (or cool) as the ipod's, it's definitely usable

      I bought an iRiver iHP-120 for my wife. We both hated the joystick, so we returned it and got an iPod (with free shipping, free personalization, and a $25 coupon). I really wanted to like the iRiver, because of the features and battery life. Besides the joystick, I was disappointed that the DB feature didn't support Ogg out of the box, effectively making it a second-class format. (Check out iRipDB for a free third-party solution.)

      If you're considering the iRiver, I encourage you spend some time with a display model. If you like the user interface, it's a terrific device. Otherwise, I don't see anything better than the iPod.

    6. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by Bishop · · Score: 1

      There is too much interference from the microcontroller and related logic to properly recieve AM.

    7. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by Cash+Mitchell · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, I've been scouring the forums tonight looking into gapless playback, as well as the quirks of both these players. While there are plenty of posts on iRiver's forum requesting gapless playback, I have not seen any statement from iRiver stating whether it will or will not be implemented. Also of note, I didn't see any evidence of iRiver employees posting to the forum though I didn't read all of it. Perhaps there is a better forum somewhere else?

      OTOH, as of 11/24/03, the Karma has new firmware (v1.25) that now supposedly supports gapless playback. It also addresses many of the other bugs people have been complaining about here on /. and riovolution's forum. According to this thread, gapless playback is working on most Ogg files and Rio seems to be genuinely committed to resolving the issue. There are several Rio employees who make frequent contributions to theKarma forum making it quite informative and worthwhile, as far as forums go....

      Since I'm still deciding between the two, I don't have any personal experience with them to share. From what I've read tonight, both players have their bugs/issues which is why I'm waiting a bit to see how the firmwares progress. That being said, I'm strongly leaning towards the Karma at the moment.

    8. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by cdh · · Score: 1

      Ahh...OK, that makes sense. Thanks!! Still sucks :)

    9. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by Greenisus · · Score: 1

      i have an iPod, so i'm not sure about your device, but from my experience recording music, you'll do a lot better with a line in if you can amp it somehow. at least that's something to try. you should be able to beat the external mic with a line in

    10. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by ouzel · · Score: 1

      drivelikejehu - seems like you'd want to record shows in a lossless format (i.e., wav). In that case, how much time can you record in wav format using the iHP-120? Does anyone know whether the Karma also allows you to record to wav using an external mic?

    11. Re:iRiver ihp-120 by drivelikejehu · · Score: 1

      good question, another thing i forgot to mention - i read that the limit is 75 minutes, which is ok for your average show but occasionally they go alot longer than that.

  37. and it doesn't include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it doesn't include PIM features and touchscreen features like the Palm Tungsten T! Yeah! Or even better, the Sharp Zaurus!

    (ok, seriously, I *am* waiting for the HD MP3/OGG players and PDAs to merge - call it a personal data store... but this still looks like a sweet little device).

  38. features I'm looking for by David+Jao · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Hey, I hope you don't mind me fishing for responses, but I have a few things I'd like to ask you about the Rio Karma. I have not seen these things discussed in any online reviews so far.

    Does the Karma support dynamic playlist building? That is, can you program a playlist on the device while it is playing music?

    Does the Karma support gapless playback? I've heard about the crossfade feature, but I'm much more interested in gapless transitions between tracks.

    Does it display non-western charsets in the song titles? Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc. Even accented ISO-8859-1 European characters would be a good start.

    Finally, does it play vorbis files at all bitrates? libvorbis 1.0 can encode 48kbps up to about 320 kbps. I was quite disappointed that my neuros was unable to play anything below 64kbps. Some of Garf's demo files contain entire songs encoded in vorbis at as low as 4kbps. I have not heard of anyone who has tried to play these back on a portable.

    Note that I am very close to getting a Karma anyway, even if the answers are all no... but if you could tell me that some of them are yes, then that would really seal the deal.

    1. Re:features I'm looking for by byrd77 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yup, you can create and edit playlist while music is playing.

      I have a friend who has played back ogg files at 400+ kbps on his karma. Not sure what he encoded them with, but he said the playback was great.

      I tried the ogg files from here:
      http://users.pandora.be/sjeng/floggy.html
      they didn't play too well, too fast, but you could almost make out the song. Don't know about intermediate rates, all my stuff is 160.

      Don't know about the charsets either.

      I suggest you check out the forums on riovolution.com. I know there have been several threads about the gapless issue - apparently that's something slated to be added in an upcomming firmware releast. I have the crossfader turned on, just a preferrence. You can probably find out about the charsets here too. Several of the Rio developers hang out on the forums regularly.

      --
      - Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.
    2. Re:features I'm looking for by CodeRed · · Score: 1

      Dynamic Playlist building - yes.
      gapless - yes (and even a little mp3 gapless in new firmware)
      not sure on the non-western chars, but the new firm supports multiple languages, so possibly.
      Not sure about bitrates that low on ogg.

      Karma is very very cool. I use to own Rio 500 and Archos 20 gig (with Rockbox on it) and this is by far my best mp3 player.

      --

      --
      CodeRed, the lower user #. No relation to SirCam.
    3. Re:features I'm looking for by Godai · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got one of these two -- had it a week now and have nothing but good things to say.

      Does the Karma support dynamic playlist building? That is, can you program a playlist on the device while it is playing music?

      Oh yes. It's quite powerful in that regard. The Rio DJ is goddamned fabulous.

      Does the Karma support gapless playback? I've heard about the crossfade feature, but I'm much more interested in gapless transitions between tracks.

      This works for mp3s that were encoded -nogap only at the moment. Some of the Rio developers hang out and post at the Riovolution forums and they've said the forthcoming 1.2.x firmware (due out any day now) should make gapless a reality for ogg (which was supposed to, but had a bug) and even non-nogap mp3s (the Karma will now drop silent frames starting and trailing mp3s).

      Does it display non-western charsets in the song titles? Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc. Even accented ISO-8859-1 European characters would be a good start.

      I believe the latest PC client software (Rio Music Manager) was just updated to support this. I think the next firmware will provide it on the Karma.

      Also note, that while firmware upgrades are USB & Windows only, I believe the java RMML (Rio Music Manager Lite) developer has said that eventually it should be possible to udpate firmware via ethernet and his java client.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    4. Re:features I'm looking for by radish · · Score: 1


      Dynamic playlists were on there from the word go. Firmware 1.25 was just released today. Fully supports multiple languages (including japanese by the looks of it). Don't think it's "any" charset, but certainly the obvious ones. Can certainly play vorbis well over 200 kbps, not tried any at 300. No idea about low bitrates...ask someone on the forum to try it out for you :)

      Oh and gapless playback is supported now under 1.25 as well (woot!). That's the killer feature I've been waiting for. There are still a few (tiny) glitches between some tracks but I am totally confident they'll be fixed - the dev team are amazingly responsive.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:features I'm looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newest firmware was released yesterday, as such:

      RioDJ kicks ass in it's on the fly ability

      Full gapless support

      Kanjii characters are supported, however chinese/korean are not (yet?) and I am not sure about cyrillic

      I am not sure how low on the ogg spectrum the Karma will play, but I encode at 80kbps and it sounds awesome. Further I believe it supports down to 64kbps (at least that's what the internal encoder supports) dunno if it'll go lower or not.

      ~Edvard_Grieg

  39. Rio and Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a good 80's compilation album...but I suppose that would be based on the definition of "good"

  40. mirror by asv108 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I set up a mirror since the last time /. linked to my site it died within 10mins due to my host provider putting a ridiculous amount of sites on one ancient sparc machine.

  41. Key point you missed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You can't go wrong with them. Plays Mp3's oggs's. Works with linux. Supports the community what more do you need.

    Umm, something that fits in my pocket?

  42. Built-in = dumbass by quinkin · · Score: 0, Troll
    So you haven't had any compatability problems between manufacturers?

    So you don't mind paying for unwanted functionality that will be used by 5% of purchasers?

    What would be nice would be a set of bluetooth idiot detectors so that a wire from the car battery to your testicles wasn't necessary.

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  43. Few questions by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

    I can't seem to find any useful system specs on the site/forum: Does it work over Samba/FTP/SSH, or is it all via Windows software or some crappy Java applet? Does it appear as a USB hard drive with a FAT32 filesystem or similar? Does it run ethernet at 100BaseT? Are there any hacking efforts to put these features in?

    --
    #include <sig.h>
    1. Re:Few questions by kannibal_klown · · Score: 5, Informative

      I hope I can answer some of these questions. I'm quite happy with my Karma. It may not be as stylish as the iPod (and has a couple moving parts), but it sounds great, cost $130 less, and is good value for my money (though some people have had problems).

      Does it work over Samba/FTP/SSH, or is it all via Windows software or some crappy Java applet?
      You can use native windows software, or a java applet. The applet isn't crappy, but it isn't as feature-rich as the win32 native app. The win32 app is similar to itunes (though not as nice), and now allows the sending of play lists.

      Does it run ethernet at 100BaseT?
      Yes

      Does it appear as a USB hard drive with a FAT32 filesystem or similar?
      Unfortunately, no. It uses a different (perhaps proprietary) format. It does not show up as an external hard drive (anymore), and you must use some sort of software to transfer files. At one point, there were 3rd party drivers that let Windows recognize it as a removable drive, but with their recent software (not firmware) update, they broke the driver support on purpose, due to problems on some drives.

      Are there any hacking efforts to put these features in?
      Like I said, there was a 3rd party driver to allow windows recognition, but they don't work anymore. There IS talk of rio developing their own driver, but I've yet to read any confirmation.

  44. headphone quality by David+Jao · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why support FLAC? Granted, I love a free, lossless codec. It's great for listening on your computer ... but you listen to your portable MP3 player with headphones. You're probably not going to notice the difference between lossless and lossy compression.

    Believe me there are headphones where you can tell the difference. The $300 Etymotic ER-4P headphones are more than portable enough for a portable player and produce better sound than all but maybe a half dozen (no exaggeration) full size headphone models. In fact for regular stereo audio (i.e. not surround sound), a good pair of headphones is almost guaranteed to sound better than the same amount of money spent on speakers, because speakers have to contend with reflection noise off your walls.

    So I'd say you have it backwards -- computer listening doesn't really benefit much from lossless audio, but headphone listening sure can.

    Even if you don't feel like spending $300 on headphones, there are still many lesser headphones for which FLAC is worthwhile. Don't judge headphone quality based on the cheap headphones included with the player.

    1. Re:headphone quality by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I listen on some nice $800 Grado headphones.. and I can tell you,

      On the best of gear, professionals can't tell which track is original, between high bitrate mp3 and uncompressed.

      You might, side by side, be able to hear slight differences, and tha'ts if you are on really good gear, and have really good ears (I have really good gear, and fairly good ears, and I sure can't tell)

      I'd be willing to bet, for instance, you couldn't tell the difference yourslef. I know I can't.

      Second... he wasn't judging headphone quality. Very, very few people out of the portable market use Etys, for a variety of obvious reasons (price, comfort, isolation). Yes, I know they can be comfortable. Yes, they are worth it if you like pure sound. Yes, sometimes you want lots of isolation.

      BTW, your ER-4P is not that accurate, it actually enhances bass response for portable listening.. it's ety's jump into the portable market.

      Ask anyone who knows me, I love headphones... it's what I predominantly use, all day, every day... but you are forgetting something.

      Many of the tracks people listen to were made to listen to on speakers, not headphones. They are not binaural recordings, desgined for 100% stereo isolation you get with headphones (Unless you use amps with crossfeed, that's another story).

      Studios often use speakers, not headphones, for mastering. It's more true to what the end user hears.. so before you go claiming your headphones give more perfect sound... think again.

      So don't go saying headphones are the absolute bomb in listening.. they are certainly not. They do not necessarily provide the listening experience that was intended.

      That said.. my grados are more revealing than any speakers I've ever had, or seen anywhere near the same price range. When I listen to even my mp3s on speakers here and there, I can hear defninite things that are missing, compared to when I use my grados.

      When I go from my desk to my iPod with it's apple headphones.. I can certainly hear how constrained it is. It's night and day.

      What I'm saying is twofold.
      - There is still a case for speakers.
      - 360kbps mp3 and friends are not as low quality as you think. Take a track you like, make a good quality 360kbps mp3, and 256, and the raw track. Turn the mp3s back into wavs.

      Then get a friend to mix them up and burn you an audio CD, in no particular order, so you have no way of knowing which track is which (let your friend keep track). Heck, do this with a few songs.

      Then sit down with your gear, and listen. Write down which you think is which. In fact, get your friend to also double up on some. I bet, statistically, you can't tell.

      Further.. the portable gear you are listening on is no where near good enough quality for you to hear the differences we are talking about anyway... especially in the noisy environment we are used to listening in.

    2. Re:headphone quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm - I have the Grado SR125s, a pair of Mackie HR824 studio monitors, some cheap DIY bookshelf speakers with an old Pioneer amp, some cheap radioshack portable headphones - a really high end soundcard (Lynx L22) and a cheap SoundBlaster

      For 192kbit MP3, I can hear artifacts on certain material (usually involving electric guitar) with any of the above playback systems. (Meaning I can definitely tell the difference between the MP3 and the original.) I'm sure that at some higher bitrate (maybe 256, maybe 320) the artifacts go away. However, hard drives are relatively affordable these days so just going with a lossless codec (FLAC) is very attractive:

      1) you can be sure you will never hear a compression artifacts

      2) there are other advantages to FLAC such as seamless playback of tracks from CDs that are mastered in this way (sometimes called "gapless" playback.)

      I wish Apple would add FLAC / gapless to the iPod.

      I could care less about Vorbis - I don't need support for yet another lossy codec.

    3. Re:headphone quality by David+Jao · · Score: 1
      On the best of gear, professionals can't tell which track is original, between high bitrate mp3 and uncompressed.

      This may be true for most tracks, but it is definitely not true for all tracks. For example I have never heard any mp3 copy of the notorious fatboy slim track, at any bitrate, that sounds like the original, and I am nowhere near a professional. I think the vast majority of people with normal hearing would be able to identify the lossy copy of the fatboy slim track at any bitrate nearly 100% of the time.

      BTW, your ER-4P is not that accurate, it actually enhances bass response for portable listening.. it's ety's jump into the portable market.

      I actually like the extra bass, so call it euphonic distortion if you will ... but on the other hand I also have the 4P to 4S converter dongle which still sounds to me better than speakers.

      Many of the tracks people listen to were made to listen to on speakers, not headphones. They are not binaural recordings, desgined for 100% stereo isolation you get with headphones (Unless you use amps with crossfeed, that's another story).

      I do happen to use amps with crossfeed with the 4S (but not the 4P, since an amp hinders portability).

      Also, I admit I am guilty of confusing the issue somewhat, as the original issue was about lossless vs. lossy instead of headphone quality. However, given that a portable is always going to be listened with headphones, the problem of stereo isolation is not relevant to the lossless vs. lossy debate. After all there is no way you can argue that lossy compression somehow ameliorates the stereo isolation problem.

    4. Re:headphone quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      may i ask which fatboy slim track that is?

  45. i don't concur by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

    After bouncing around their site for a bit, i don't really agree with you. They seem to be pretty alive and well, and there is recently released software. *shrug*

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
    1. Re:i don't concur by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      There may be recently release software, because it's pretty recent that everyone got let go. It was in mid-September. I know for a fact that the Neuros with USB 2.0 is not being produced, though, because I was selling them the USB chip and no orders have been placed. They are looking for an investor to take the whole thing and build it on his dime, since their investing group pulled the plug on the project and went back to just making CD scratch removers under the Digital Innovations name. I think you can still buy the original Neuros, because they had quite a bit of stock on those. They might have a software guy or two for support, but hardware design is pretty much gone.

  46. Joystick? MAME? by jfisherwa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since it has a joystick and a decently sized display, who wants to take a stab at porting MAME to it?

    I want to play Space Invaders while I rock out to 70's supergroup Foreigner.

  47. Battery life by NetCAM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, what happens when the batterys in these things crap out? As far as I've seen you cant buy replacement batteries for any of the large (10gig+) portable players like the iPod or even the Dell clone. Thats one of the main concerns I have when they want me to drop $200-300+ for a decent portable mp3 player. When I buy one of these players I want to know that if the battery craps out I can swap it out with a new one instead of having to buy another $200-300 player or swap in a fresh battery if I'm on the road instead of having to find a place to recharge it.

    1. Re:Battery life by drivelikejehu · · Score: 1

      Another thing about the iriver 20gb is that it has about 16 hours of battery life...

    2. Re:Battery life by bash_jeremy · · Score: 1

      You can get a replaceable battery for the iPod from here (it costs $50 and you have to install it yourself), or directly from Apple (it costs $99 but you aren't guaranteed that you'll get your own iPod back).

  48. I call BS by Xoder · · Score: 1

    Bluetooth can get up to 1Mibps.

    --
    The previous sig has been removed due to /. protecting your best interests
  49. Re:your god. by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Compatibility with OpenVMS and OS/2. Now that Linux is mainstream, we must needs move to more obscure operating systems. Join me, free your mind!

    We will not rest until every operating system has drivers for every USB device in existence!

    --
    Ron Paul 2012
  50. Re:OGG not by Markus+Registrada · · Score: 1, Informative
    Nothing plays OGG. There's no such thing as OGG. It's Ogg. It's not an acronym, it's just a name. Ogg is the name. The name is Ogg.

    Can somebody explain why this such a difficult concept?

    Ogg. Ogg. Ogg. Not so hard.

    Incidentally, I'll bet it doesn't play every kind of Ogg. I'll bet it plays only Ogg/Vorbis and (probably) Ogg/FLAC, but probably not Ogg/Speex, yet. In principle it could play Ogg/Theora, but the display's probably not up to the job -- Theora is a video compression format.

  51. Built in ethernet, eh? by sootman · · Score: 1

    Then I guess that's what he's running the site on. Ba-dump-bum. Thank you, I'll be here all week.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  52. Had some ugly flaws by SendBot · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I got one of these a month ago, and after trying so hard over a couple days to want to keep it, I had to take it back in exchange for an ipod.

    After spending weeks deciding in the back of my mind, these are the features that sold me on the Karma:

    Small size (although I decided the thickness made a huge difference)

    Ogg support. This was a big factor in my decision.

    Cool dock with ethernet

    Nice display, 'analog' level dials were cool

    And I found the following to be critical flaws:

    Bugs! Too many inconveniences made it feel like it was rushed to market without sufficient QA. Songs would start over around 90 seconds into a track, or skip to another track altogether.

    The management software (a java version is available to run on any platform) is crappy. No progress meters, lame compared to itunes or musicmatch or even windows explorer. This is the only way to transfer music or files.

    Ethernet doesn't run at full duplex. WTF!?

    Nothing esepcially useful about ethernet connectivity like a web server, ftp server, or smb. You might as well just hook it up over usb2 to avoid shitty transfer rates.

    The physical controls on the device suck. It's awkward to use with one hand, especially if you wish to look at the screen and not your thumb/fingers. Some buttons are redundant, and it's not especiially clear at first how the scroll wheel will fuck up whatever you're listing to. It has separate volume buttons, but they're not exactly convenient.

    It's physical presence is very... present. It's thicker in real life than I wanted to believe. It's also a little heavy. Ipod rules this comparison.

    So, I just got an ipod instead. Same price and features, less annoyances, better support/accessories, iTunes isn't too bad. I like the 1394 better than usb2 for recharging it with the data cable. I'm sure there are a few other reasons to go with an ipod. I just figure it's no comparison with the karma, except that current lack of ogg support is kind of weak. I wish apple would pull their head out of their asses on this issue.

    Short version. The Karma is crap unless it can get some major annoyances resolved.

    1. Re:Had some ugly flaws by radish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doh! Guess you missed out, firmware 1.25 was just released which fixed all those initial bugs, and gave us lots of cool toys (like the beat matched flashing dock!). Oh well, you can keep your heavier, bigger, more expensive (if you can ell me where I can get a 20gb ipod for $250 I'll be very impressed!), mac-centric ipod.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Had some ugly flaws by SendBot · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was hoping those things would be fixed. It was nice, but the flaws I experienced were too much to bear. When I got mine, new Rio devices were showing up in stores, but only a handful of stores in the nation were actually stocking the karma. I had to order it to be shipped. I found out why they weren't in stores yet.

      They were also priced differently at the time, and I'm glad to see that this has changed. I was confused when I said the karma was heavier. It's actually .2 oz lighter. I was thinking it had a larger overall size, which it does by over a cubic inch. And the thickness account for much of that, and I think makes for a weaker design while holding it in your hand. I kept wanting to use two hands with the karma and it still never felt right.

      As long as we're doing a comparison, I should point out that the karma also has a longer battery life. rated at 15 hours compared to 8.

      And I think it's incorrect to call an ipod mac-centric. With the right software, you can use it on mac,linux, and pc interchangably. I use mine with win XP most of the time.

      As for the lack of decent built-in server software, I still think it sucks to have to use some proprietary softare to access the device's contents. At least with an ipod hooked up to a computer you can share its files in any method the computer allows, and even share streams over itunes for novices.

      I shoulda done a little more research before posting, and thanks for clearing it up.

    3. Re:Had some ugly flaws by radish · · Score: 1

      No probs - apologies if I came over like an idiot - it was late ;) Anyhoo - I actually find it easier to hold than an ipod, but I guess it comes down to the size of your hands. A friend of mine who has very large hands has trouble pressing the menu button. The super scratchy case is kind of a pain too...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  53. http://www.ipodbattery.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As far as I've seen you cant buy replacement batteries for any of the large (10gig+) portable players like the iPod or even the Dell clone.
    You haven't seen much.
  54. How about by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1
    • You can't skin it, its only ion one colour, not allowing me to express my 'individuality'
    • The screen is to small, and not colour
    • Battery life sucks. Even if it doesn't


    Haven't read the article. Just guessing.
    --

    Yay me!

  55. headphones by AndreyF · · Score: 1

    What would be nice would be a set of bluetooth headphones so that a wire from my pocket to my ear wasn't necessary. yeah, I would really like to be the first to own those tiny droplet headphones, except WIRELESS! that would OWN sooo much.

  56. Re:Joystick? MAME? by Quobobo · · Score: 1

    Heh.. if I had mod points, you'd get them for the ATHF reference.

  57. Very, very buggy. by Mr_Icon · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have one -- and boy I wish I held on to my money.

    The firmware is very, very buggy. Go to riovolution.com and check out the karma board. People are having problems galore. In fact, having a unit that works reliably is incredible luck. The firmware problems are:

    1. Karma spontaneously reboots during various tasks, usually song upload via the network. Anything you've uploaded in that session goes poof. I've had to do one album at a time, though the java client has a "upload this directory" feature. Going back and hunting which uploaded and which didn't kinda sucks.
    2. When it doesn't reboot, it also likes to randomly hang during song upload. Only hardware reset convinces it to go out of that state. Any song you've been uploaded when it hung gets lost, but the client doesn't know this, so you end up missing random songs from your collection.
    3. Sometimes, during song playback, it will randomly stop and go back to the beginning of the track.
    4. Higher-bitrate MP3s sometimes started skipping and pausing for me, like it was having trouble filling up the playback buffer. Then it would freeze, requiring an on/off or a reset.
    5. No gapless playback for non-mp3 tracks. Sucks to be you if you like oakenfold and ripped all your stuff to oggs. You'll have nice 2-second pauses between each track.
    6. Flac will quickly drain your battery, as Karma doesn't have a very large flash buffer, and it ends up constantly spinning up and spinning down the hard drive.

    I've had all of these problems, and I'm not alone, as the message boards show. And, to top it off, 3 weeks into usage, after I've finally sort of gotten used to all of its quirks, it completely died -- from the sound of it, the hdd went South. Rio's support is horrible: I've had a ticket open for over a week and a half, and though the customer service drone took down my serial number, order number, etc, I've not heard from anyone since, and I've sent repeated emails. I'll be calling tomorrow, and boy, am I going to be unhappy.

    So, there you have it. If I were you, I'd wait at least half a year before I would buy a Rio Karma, otherwise invest in a nice toupee -- you'll be tearing out your hair in handfuls.

    Yes, I'm a little bitter, as I've been really waiting on an ogg-compatible, linux-friendly player for a loooong time now, and ended up paying $400 for a lemon instead (there is a reason prices on it dropped so dramatically after it's been first released).

    Sigh.

    --
    If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
    1. Re:Very, very buggy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read on riovolution.com that the FLAC playtime was inbetween the time for OGG and MP3.

    2. Re:Very, very buggy. by altman · · Score: 4, Informative

      There were bugs, yes, which were unfortunately hardware bugs that needed to be worked around. However, 1.25 is out now which fixes these.

      It also fixes the gapless issues, the ethernet transfer issues, etc.

  58. Call BS all you want... by rreay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bluetooth can get up to 1Mibps.

    Yup, that's true. But... at the application level pulling out all the a stops (5 slice packets and no error bits) and with a quality radio signal you'll get 723 kbps (that's bits). Uncompressed CD quality stereo is 16 bits * 44100 samples per second * 2 channels or 1400 kbps. You can not transmit uncompressed cd-quality audio over Bluetooth.

    If you want to transmit compressed audio you can, however since compression schemes are vulnerable to noise you have to turn on the Error Detection bits and that drops your throughput to around 500 kbps. Less if you're not willing to take all of the BT bandwidth.

    Assuming you're happy with transcoded/compressed audio from your $300 player lets look at the ramification:
    * you have compressed audio
    * you have added transcoding HW or SW to the player
    * you have added decoding hardware to the headphones
    * you have added 2 bluetooth radios (player and headphones)
    * you can not replace your headphones with 3rd party headphones
    * you have battery management issues with your headphones.
    * you have interference issues with microwaves, 802.11b and 802.11g APs and other BT devices
    * the extra hardware will cost $20 to manufacture, so your player now costs an extra $60 to $80

    I repeat my original statement, Bluetooth is not an appropriate technology for stereo headphones.

    1. Re:Call BS all you want... by INSSOMNIAK · · Score: 1

      However, if you build the MP3 decoder into the headphones you could probably stream the data off the hard drive just fine.

      I concede that these headphones would be expensive but as you could pair them to your computer/portable dvd player/gameboy etc etc they might be worth it.

  59. *1 GB equals 1,000,000,000 bytes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The product page says "*1 GB equals 1,000,000,000 bytes". The last I checked, you multiply by 1000's when you're dealing with bits, and by 1024's when dealing with bytes.

    So... typo, non-geeky documentation for a product geared toward geeks, or sneaky marketing ploy? You decide!

    1. Re:*1 GB equals 1,000,000,000 bytes?? by Bernie · · Score: 1
      If one is to be totally anal, then
      • 1 gigabyte = 1000**3 bytes
      • 1 gibibyte = 1024**3 bytes
      But nobody really cares about such discrepancies in today's bloated world!
    2. Re:*1 GB equals 1,000,000,000 bytes?? by acb · · Score: 1

      Actually, the appropriately anal term is "gibioctet", to rule out the possibility of non-8-bit bytes. (They exist on some architectures, you know.)

  60. not true by asv108 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Bugs! Too many inconveniences made it feel like it was rushed to market without sufficient QA.

    Although you may have had a bad experience or you may just be trolling, I've not had any of the experiences you've had so far after 2 weeks of heavy use. The management software (a java version is available to run on any platform) is crappy

    The windows software seems to be refreshing to me because it doesn't take a swiss army approach, instead it focuses on sync and organization. The nice thing about rio management software is the ability to have multiple sources without any bs. The java version works but it is certainly not full featured by any means and is not designed to be, remember they don't even advertise non-windows capabilities.

    Nothing esepcially useful about ethernet connectivity The whole point of the Ethernet sync is to be able to have your player hooked up to the dock in your home theater area and being able to sync it from a computer located somewhere else.

    like a web server, ftp server, or smb.

    I can transfer music or non-music files to my Karma from anywhere, why the fuck would I need ftp or smb?

    The physical controls on the device suck. I've found them to rival the ipod, I've owned both generations of Apple's player, they may not be to your liking but they certainly don't "suck."

    It's also a little heavy. Ipod rules this comparison.

    The rio karma actually weighs less.

    So, I just got an ipod instead. Same price and features

    The 20GB karma cost $100 less than the 20GB ipod and has support for OGG, FLAC, WMA, along with ethernet sync, and better accessories.

  61. Non music files? by DynamiteNeon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Does the Rio let you copy non music files to the hard drive? I was looking on the site and I couldn't find any mention. It sounded like the music manager only supported music files. Isn't that the same problem with the iPod?

    I think I would probably go with the neuros or the iriver if I had to choose one right now since they both let you copy any type of file and I like the idea of it doubling as a portable hard drive.

    1. Re:Non music files? by altman · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will store any filetype, though you have to use the Rio Taxi application (or the Java version, served from the internal webserver).

    2. Re:Non music files? by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've probably heard this before, but guys? When you sit down to design the Karma v2, or for that matter any other product of this sort?

      Please don't ever do that again.

      The USB mass storage protocol exists for a reason. Use it.

      If the architectural wheel-reengineering madness (with attendant support nightmares) of designing your own file transfer regime doesn't give you pause, the fact that this gives your competitors (who include little companies like Apple and Dell fer chrissakes) a feature bullet-point which you don't have damn well should.

      --

      News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  62. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have a Neuros 20GB. Plays Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WMV, MP3, syncs with Java on anything that can see a USB hard drive and cost me under $200. It has an FM tuner, broadcasts your songs on FM with its built in transmitter, has a built in microphone to record MP3s, has line in for recording that way, too. And if you hear a song on the radio and you want to know the title, hit a button, record a sample and the sync software will tell you the artist and the song title. It's not the prettiest thing in the world, but it's a hell of a deal.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all this and only the size of a household brick!

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      The size isn't that bad at all. It easily fits into a shirt pocket. I figured I'd use the 128MB backpack more when working out because its smaller but the HD backpack hasn't been a problem at all... In fact the 128mb backpack hasn't been on since the first day I received my Neuros.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  63. Re:Joystick? MAME? by Chen · · Score: 1

    > I want to play Space Invaders while I rock out to
    > 70's supergroup Foreigner.

    No no no...don't you mean listen to your all-Rush mix tape?

  64. Re:OGG not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If there is no acronym that's spelled "OGG", then "OGG", "Ogg", "ogg", and "oGg" all mean the same thing, and you have actually managed to sound even more pedantic than Richard Stallman on his daily "GNU/Linux" rant.

    I mean, I can almost understand people getting bent out of shape about the difference between MAC and Mac, because they mean different things, but you are just being silly.

  65. LMAO!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod up! too true!

  66. I've got myself a Rio Karma... by twifkak · · Score: 2, Informative

    And I'm quite happy with it. Where to start?

    UI: It's grand. I dunno, some people claim they can't use it one handed, but that doesn't make sense to me. On the iPod, the distance your thumb has to stretch to reach all the buttons is much greater than for the Karma (which is barely at all), and it sits very well in my right hand (which is quite small). The wheel is a very nice way to navigate long lists, as you can just flick it at the appropriate speed to go any distance at all (the cursor "accelerates"). Weight? Err... the iPod 20 is 5.6 oz, while the Karma 20 is 5.5 oz... It certainly feels fine, and is much smaller than it looks in most pictures. Check riovolution.com for a good set of pics.

    The menu system looks very pretty. :) While some of the UI is not immediately obvious, it becomes real intuitive real fast.

    Sound: Many people say it's good. I really wouldn't know better, but the numbers (SNR, power, all that jazz) suggest it. Not quite powerful enough for my Senn 580s, but certainly has the bass (assuming you mess with the 5-band para eq appropriately). A number of improvements have been made -- the Karma supports --nogap mp3s, and now supports playing vorbis gaplessly (something the iRiver doesn't), as well as gapless FLAC and, well, as much as WMA supports it, any way.

    Features: I don't think this has been touted enough: the Karma's "on-the-go" playlist support ROCKS. You can append an item (song/album/artist/etc.) to and insert an item into the currently playing list of tracks. You can remove tracks (or albums, etc.) from the list. You can reorder the list (a track at a time, any way). You can save the list as a playlist (and name it) for permanent storage. The RioDJ feature is not quite to the level of "smartlists" in iPod, but the devs have said that all that's missing is the UI -- the backend code is all there.

    Configurability: It's not a PC or anything, but compared to other DAPs I've seen it's quite configurable. I believe IGN has a menu breakout?

    Service: Well, the unofficial service is great. The developers visit a number of boards (empeg, rioworld, riovolution) and actually listen to ideas and take suggestions (they added one of mine!) when they're not troubleshooting, etc. This is all, of course, unofficial, but it's still really cool.

    Cons: Until, well, the firmware just released yesterday, there were problems with crashing for a number of people. The plastic case isn't "sealed" like the iPod. When building up a playlist on the player, you have to go back through the menu each time after you add an item (be it a track or an entire album, artist, genre, etc.). No real case or remote. Well, pretty much *insert feature request here*.

    --
    I know you were joking, but I want my Karma, so I'm going to reiterate your post in a serious tone.
  67. typical slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the informative comment is scored 2. with any luck, your important info about the product, which a consumer might want to know, will disappear as irrelevant comments about whether ogg is flac get modded up.

  68. Tempting... by Hooded+One · · Score: 1

    It's a bit hidden on the product page (click "box contents") but the earbuds that come with it are from Sennheiser. Rawk. That'd mean I could still have non-shitty sound when I don't feel like taking my full-sized headphones with me.

    I'd prefer a 40 gig variety though... I don't have the extra money to buy one at the moment anyway, so I'll just wait and see.

  69. Mmm Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rio became /. moderators?

  70. Karma battery basics by Pippity · · Score: 1
    BATTERY BASICS

    The following is culled from this forum and other sites, with some of the more detailed information provided by UK Rio Engineer's posts.

    Q: What kind of battery does Karma have?
    A: Karma has a non-replaceable Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) battery, identical to the ones found in most other MP3 players, cell phones and a wide range of electronic products.

    Q: How long does a full battery charge last?
    A: Rio advertises the battery lasting 15 hours per full charge, using the following criteria: 128 MP3, Volume: 15, EQ: Off. The reality is that this battery has tested at about 16 hours with these criteria.

    Q: How should I care for my battery when I first get my Karma?
    A: When you first get your Karma, it will be at slightly less than a half charge. As per the included intructions, charge it for five hours before use. Then, fully charge and discharge your battery the first few times to properly calibrate it, helping to maximize your potential battery cycle length. After that, you may do partial charges without any adverse impact. Therefore, you won't need to fully charge/discharge each time.

    Q: If I won't be using my Karma for an extended period, how should I leave the battery?
    A: For long term storage, leave your battery about 40% charge, which reduces long-term battery degradation substantially.

    Q: If my Karma is connected to AC, will it still drain the battery?
    A: No. When AC is connected, Karma is powered directly from the power supply unit (charger).

    Q: Can I overcharge my battery by leaving it plugged in to AC too long?
    A: No. You have nothing to worry about if you forget to unplug your AC after the player is fully charged.

    Q: How long does it take to charge my battery?
    A: From empty, it takes about 2 hours to get to ~80-90% full. It will then trickle charge the last 10% or so, which can take another hour or so.

    Q: What is the battery life of Karma?
    A: Like other Li-Ion products, a good rule of thumb is about 500 cycles at 100% (don't worry, partial charges count as partial cycles). After 500 cycles, it will reduce to about an 80% charge. Based on your average daily use, do the math. This battery should last you many, many years.

  71. other players by glassesmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative
    I did some research and the coolest features I've found for 20GB MP3 players:
    (a) iRiver iHP-120 and Rio Karma both support Ogg
    (b) Rio Karma supports ethernet LAN charger with RCA plugs for home theatre
    (c) Samsung YP-910 has FM encoder and antenna for FM broadcast
    (d) iRiver iHP-120 allows realtime recording from and of its inputs
    (e) Almost all new players match iPod footprint

    Most players typically have:

    MP3/WAV playback

    2" backlit monochrome LCD display

    In-line remote

    USB 2.0 support

    Built-in Li-Ion rechargable battery
    (Prices are estimates from pricegrabber.com)

    iPod ($388)

    IEEE 1394a (USB 2.0 extra)

    AAC/AIFF

    Dimensions: 4.1" x 2.4" x 0.62" (5.6 oz)
    Dell Digital Jukebox 20 ($325)

    Front mounted 3-way scroll-barrel

    WMA (7,8,9 DRM)

    Built-in Voice Recorder Mic (WAV IMA ADPCM 8kHz Mono)

    Dimensions: 4.1" x 2.7" x 0.86" (7.61 oz)
    iRiver iHP-120 ($358)

    FM Tuner and digital input & output

    Backlit inline remote w/ 4-line LCD

    Realtime MP3 recording from voice, FM, optical or analog inputs

    Supports Ogg/ASF/WMA

    Dimensions: 4.1" x 2.4" x 0.7" (5.3 oz)
    Samsung YP-910GS ($315)

    FM encoder (tx) and antenna (broadcasts to FM freq)

    Built-in FM tuner

    Dimensions: 4.19" x 2.54" x 0.78" (6.0 oz)
    Rio Karma ($277)

    Ogg/FLAC support

    Base-station supports ethernet LAN with RCA jacks

    Greyscale LCD with visualizations

    Dimensions: 2.7" x 3.0" x 0.9" (5.5 oz)
    Archos Gmini 120 ($306)

    Supports CompactFlash

    Upgradable Voice Recorder/FM/PhotoWallet modules ($$)

    Dimensions: 4.45" x 3.07" x 1.02" (8.61 oz)
    Nomad Jukebox Zen ($220)

    Dimensions: 4.43" x 2.99" x 0.95" (9.5 oz)
    Nomad Jukebox Zen NX ($250)

    Dimensions: 4.4" x 3.0" x 0.86" (7.9 oz)
    Philips HDD100 15GB MP3 Player ($269)

    Dimensions: 4.19" x 2.54" x 0.78" (5.92 oz)
    RCA Lyra 20 GB Jukebox MP3 ($240)

    CompactFlash

    mp3PRO/WMA

    Dimensions: 5.2" x 3.14" x 1.0"
    Archos Jukebox Multimedia ($229)

    MPEG4

    Dimensions: 4.45" x 3.11" x 1.18 in (10.23 oz)
    RCA Lyra 40GB Jukebox RD2840 ($260)

    mp3PRO/WMA

    Dimensions: 4.5" x 3.2" x 0.9" (9.6 oz)
    RCA Lyra Audio/Video Jukebox RD2780 20GB ($389)

    3.5" color LCD QVGA 320 X 240

    MPEG1/MPEG4 video

    mp3PRO/WMA

    Dimensions: 5.37" x 3.13" x 0.95"
    Archos AV320 MP3/Video Player ($450)

    Dimensions: 2.3" x 2.1" x 1.2"

    1. Re:other players by Mindcry · · Score: 1

      How could you possibly leave out the neuros ;) ?

      Its been out forever, had ogg support, detachable hard drive (for when you want a smaller player for jogging etc), and i believe re-configurable menus...

      I believe its also much bigger than the other players...

      I don't own one (got me a 15gb ipod v2), but figure if you're comparing 20gb players, you might as well include it.

  72. I got a Neuros instead by bios10h · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got a Neuros from the Neuros online store and I am very happy with my purchase. They are running a sale right now and you can get a Neuros in a bundle that includes 2 backpacks: 128 Flash and 20 Gb HD (read the website if you don't know about the Neuros backpack concept) and some accesories for less than 250$ shipped. I don't wanna marketing for them, I just think it's a great deal! Down side: it uses USB 1.1 so transfers can take a long time especially when you sync the 20 Gb HD for the first time (~10 hours). This device supports OGG, WAV, WMA and MP3. There're 2 sync managers and one of them is open-source and on SF.net. Digital Illusions, the manufacturer, is planning to release the device firmware source and the sync software source so that the community will be able to modify the way the player is programmed and add supports for more formats. There're also talks about getting a programming language (or scripting language) for the device so that people could write some basic applications and games for it. Anyway, check out the website! The forum is also very active.

  73. Re:f*ck ogg by EventHorizon · · Score: 1

    quit trolling. dare to compare:

    http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/listen.html

  74. Here's where to get some tunes for your new player by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You don't need to spend your hard-earned cash at the iTunes store, or get into trouble with the RIAA if you read:

    It has been Google's #1 hit for the query legal music downloads for three months, and has had 14872 hits so far this month.

    It has a Creative Commons license. You are encouraged to copy it.

    A Romanian translation will be posted soon, kindly provided by Ciprian Mihet. I am actively seeking translations to other languages.

    Here's the introduction:

    You don't need to worry about getting sued by the Recording Industry Assocation of America or arrested by the FBI if you download legal music. Many independent and unsigned musicians offer downloads of their music in hopes of attracting more fans. Here's some music from my friends The Divine Maggees, Oliver Brown and Rick Walker's Loop.pooL.

    If everyone started downloading legal music instead of violating copyright with the file sharing programs, we would make short work of the RIAA, because people would start buying CDs directly from the artists and seeing their shows instead of enriching the major labels by buying CDs from the bands the labels have chosen for us to listen to. The RIAA would also have no cause to complain - these music downloads do not infringe copyright because the artists give you permission to download them.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  75. Man, I just don't get it by melted · · Score: 1

    $350 for a fragile device used to listen to compressed music? Aren't plain old CD/MD players good enough anymore? After all, how many CDs do you listen to during the day? Two? Three?

    You know, I envy the French. They can make some weird useless things, publish enough ads about them and women will sell their kidneys to get the latest fashions, no matter how useless, stupid and uncomfortable to wear/use they are.

    I observe the same kind of trend here. Apple told them it's "cool", so peer pressure hit really hard. Lickable enclosure, you know (drool). Like, 40GB, dude (drool). And ads make gullible people believe they'll look like dorks if they don't have the latest HD jukebox attached to their belt. And there we have it. $100 HDD coupled with $50 enclosure and electronics go for $350 like hot cakes. "Because you're worth it" (TM).

    1. Re:Man, I just don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm french and I still use my walkman, you incensitive clod !

  76. UK release dates? by Glyndwr · · Score: 1

    I ran across these nifty devices a few weeks back but the UK release timescale was horrific -- mid 2004, I think I read. Does anyone have any firm information on when it might be, and why they aren't available right now?

    --
    You win again, gravity!
    1. Re:UK release dates? by altman · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's due to ship in the UK and some parts of Europe before Christmas this year. Keep an eye on amazon.co.uk.

      They weren't available instantly because of localisation and packaging issues. The software is developed here in Cambridge, UK :)

  77. For all you tech hardware geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A little known factoid....

    Uses same processor as iPod(ARM DM7) except that the Karma actually has two running as SMP which allows for the dynamic/on-the-fly updating of playlists, EQ settings etc.

    1. Re:For all you tech hardware geeks... by altman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, it uses a later generation CPU than the iPod (though both have dual ARM7TDMI cores), with many enhancements.

      The iPod also runs multi-CPU... it just has less features :)

    2. Re:For all you tech hardware geeks... by juuri · · Score: 1

      The iPod does all that too, so your point was?

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
  78. Not what consumers want by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    "One little known gem is that this player comes with java-based software that allows users to download the software directly from the player via any browser and sync the Karma with Linux, Mac OS X, and any other OS that Java runs on"

    Consumers (read: me) don't want to install yet more software, especially java software that takes 45 million instructions to print "Hello World!" on the screen.... They want to drag their MP3s into a folder.. SonicBlue never did understand this with the Rios, which is why they skim so close to the surface of the water and risk either going bankrupt or being acquired.

    I hated my Rio and I'll never own another one... The software was HORRIBLE, and I can't emphasize that enough. I don't know what they were smoking, but that software utility they had for the 600/800 series really ruined it. It took all the mp3's on your entire system and lumped them into one gigantic list. Talk about a pain in the ass!

  79. Only windows support is "official"... by rvcx · · Score: 1
    A month ago I mailed sonicblue support asking whether the Karma would work with Linux, FreeBSD, or MacOS X, what the technical details of the interfaces (USB, ethernet) were, and what kinds of DRM were supported. Their response:
    Dear Customer

    Following is the response to your query

    Karma is not compliant with Linux or FreeBSD, but yes we are DRM compliant-

    The Technical specifications for karma are as follows-

    Signal Strength (mV): 1.0 V
    Power per Channel (mW): 30 mW
    Frequency Resp: 20 - 20000 Hz, +/- 0.5 dB
    SNR+N, A-Weight (dB): >95 dB
    Channel Sep @ 1 kHz (dB): > 95 dB
    Dyn Rng A-Weight (dB): > 95 dB
    THD+N (%): < 0.01%

    We hope these recommendations solve your problem, but if for any reason you need further assistance, please get back in touch and we'll do our best to help you further.

    Sincerely,

    DNNA,

    http://www.digitalnetworksna.com

    So I sent a followup again requesting technical details. If their software didn't run on Linux or FreeBSD, then did the player at least offer USB mass storage support? Ethernet for ftp or http? The response:
    Dear Customer

    Following is the response to your query

    We apologize for the late response and would like to assure you that this is not typical of our services. As for your queries, following are your answers.

    Rio Karma supports WMA DRM for Windows Media Audio format.

    Rio Karma is not designed to be accessed via a USB mass storage interface. It can only be interfaced through Rio Music Manager, Rio Music Manager Lite, Rio Taxi, and Windows Media Player. **In case of Windows XP the device may be accessed through Power toy plugins for Win XP.

    Ethernet is interfaced as USB is for this player. Rio Karma does not offer http or ftp interface.

    Supported OS: Windows 98 Second Edition or above / Mac OS X and above.

    We hope these recommendations solve your problem, but if for any reason you need further assistance, please get back in touch and we'll do our best to help you further.

    Sincerely,

    DNNA,

    http://www.digitalnetworksna.com

    So what customer support can offer seems to contradict what the review says. At the very least, I think we have some answer to the question of how their customer support compares to Apple's...
  80. True by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1
    When you're talking about something small, an extra inch is a big deal.
    Why do you think my nick doesn't have Small in it?
  81. Semi-OT: true gapless MP3 playback by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1
    ...and even non-nogap mp3s (the Karma will now drop silent frames starting and trailing mp3s)
    This is an imperfect hack as certain tracks have deliberate silence that will be inadvertently trimmed off with this method, therefore failing to preserve integrity.

    The best [and flawless] approach to this is two-fold:
    1. Use an encoder that stores two important variables, encoder delay and encoder padding, such as LAME 3.90.3 (recommended version.)
    2. Play back MP3s that knows how to use these values to achieve perfectly gapless playback - I only know of foobar2000 that does this at present.
    This has been tested to work successfully - a long-awaited dream come true :-) I'm sure I'm not alone here, hence the inspiration for this post.

    I also recommend you use --alt-preset standard as the encoding parameter for MP3s virtually indistinguishable from the original.
    1. Re:Semi-OT: true gapless MP3 playback by Godai · · Score: 1

      I think the developers have, in fact, mentioned this. Their problem is, of course, that they can't say to their users that they must use LAME 3.90.3 :( I know that their RMM software does not actually do mp3 decoding unless you upgrade for $10 to the RMM Pro version (I'm sure this has to do with the mp3 patent since they give the non-Pro RMM away for free). I'm not sure what decoder they use in RMMP.

      foobar2000 and the encoder delay/padding variables have been mentioned though. I know they're trying to support this as best as possible. The developers on the forums are quite knowledgable and very responsive. The dropping of silent frames may or may not be a user option or a stopgap (no pun indended) measure while they look at other approaches.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    2. Re:Semi-OT: true gapless MP3 playback by Godai · · Score: 1

      Note: "actually do mp3 decoding" should be "actually do mp3 ENcoding".

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
  82. Gapless MP3 playback by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1

    Hi ckimyt,

    FWIW I've detailed how to get true gapless MP3 playback on your PC earlier.

    The iRiver folks plan to include gapless MP3 playback in a future firmware update; however I hope they don't use any hacks [such as trimming silence off the files' extremities.] The best way to do it would be as detailed in my previous post.

    Cheers,
    CD

  83. Does anyone know about the HD in the Rio? by adzoox · · Score: 1
    If this unit is 20 GB, what hard drive is it using? I know iPods use PCMCIA hard drives, but this unit is smaller in length and width than a PCMCIA card. It also seems a little lighter than the iPod.

    I also can't seem to find anywhere how well it handles files and if files can be streamed directly off the unit from ethernet or USB 2.0? In other words, can it go directly from the unit to say a laptop to show a DIVX movie and vice versa?

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  84. Hmmm by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    Ok. I have to choose between the iriver, the karma or the archos whatever. The archos does video playback and stuff but is it really worth it. I am siding towards the karma but what does everyone think.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    1. Re:Hmmm by acb · · Score: 1

      I've got an Archos Jukebox Recorder (the older, pre-video model), and am very happy with it. It's a USB2 mass storage device, which means I can mount it and copy files to/from it without using any proprietary software, and it also does recording (and did so a year or two before Apple added recording to the iPod). The internal firmware is nothing to write home about, but there exists open-source replacement firmware for it which is excellent. Also, its batteries are standard NiMH AA batteries which are easily replaced when they wear out.

      I haven't looked at the new Archos units, but, IMHO, Archos tend to be first in terms of adding features (look at the plug-in modules for the Gmini, for example), and tend to have fairly sensible design.

    2. Re:Hmmm by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      sweet. sounds good. i think i am heading in that direction. the new one has an optional PVR attachment

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  85. Does it depend on special software? by acb · · Score: 1

    Can you mount it as a filesystem (as you can a USB Mass Storage device like the Archos Jukebox) and copy files to it, or are you at the mercy of proprietary software?

    This is not a minor nit-picking point; if the only way I have of accessing a device is to click through menus on a piece of software that comes with it, I won't buy it. For one, it makes automating things with scripts more difficult.

    Secondly, software written specifically to accompany hardware tends to often be shoddy, poorly-designed and bug-ridden. I once had a 640x480 camera which didn't follow any standards and required special software (consisting of a jury-rigged TWAIN driver which treated the serial interface on the camera as a dial-up modem to a TCP/IP network running a proprietary protocol of some sort). The software was awkward to use and badly designed, the dialogs were in broken English (think "All Your Base"), and the software didn't run on anything other than Windows 9.x and MacOS 8/9 (no NT, no OSX, and don't even think about Linux, even with WINE or VMWare). As you can imagine, downloading photos from the damned thing was a headache.

    If the only way of getting MP3s onto (or off) the Karma is using the Java applet, then that is an unacceptable single point of failure. OTOH, if it has a SMB/NFS server, it would be very nice indeed. (If it has only a FTP server onboard, it would be usable, though somewhat awkward.)

  86. Free advertising by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Put OGG support in your MP3 player, and you'll instantly appear on Slashdot!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  87. Detailed Features Comparison vs iPod and iHP120 by Deslock · · Score: 1

    I originally bought a 20GB G3 iPod but changed my mind and went with the RIO Karma instead. The Karma was buggy initially, but is quite stable with the recent firmware (anyone having problems should update to firware v1.25). The gapless playback, bookmarks, long battery life, and sound quality (G3 iPod suffers from bass distortion) are ultimtely why I chose it.

    But none of these playeres are perfect... if possible, you should try them all before you choose one.

    Here's a list I compiled while choosing between these three hdd players:

    20GB iPod 3G: $369
    - superb button/controls layout... that scroll wheel is pure genius
    - pocket-friendly device dimensions and ergonomics, comfortable to hold and use one-handed
    - exellent menuing system
    - replaygain
    - aesthetically pleasing
    - firewire connection
    - syncs with iTunes
    - 4 to 6 hour real-world battery life (Karma and iHP120 more than double this)
    - very fast start-up (2-3 seconds)
    - AAC support
    - smartlists offer cool playlist customization
    - can charge through 6-pin firewire port (Karma and iHP120 need AC)
    - remote has only a few functions
    - bass distortion during playback (especially when using equalizer)
    - MAC support

    iHP-120: $359
    - mediocre button layout... no scroll wheel
    - edges not as curved as other players; not as comfortable to hold or pocket
    - mediocre menuing system
    - USB hdd-mounting possible without drivers
    - can organize by DB or by directories
    - long startup time if using DB
    - limited shuffling abilites (especially if organizing by directories)
    - fully functional, backlit remote
    - voice recording
    - FM receiver
    - line-in and line-out
    - OGG support

    RIO Karma: $264
    - great ergonomics... especially for one handed operation
    - excellent controls layout; thumb wheel works well (though iPod's wheel is better for scrolling long lists)
    - small foot print, but thick profile (not comfy in tight pants; fine in loose ones)
    - excellent menuing system
    - impressive number of shuffle/track selection options
    - gapless playback (works with OGG and MP3... I haven't tried with FLAC yet)
    - bookmarks
    - USB and ethernet connection (ethernet is through cradle)
    - can manage, backup, and stream through network (from Linux, MAC, or Windows box)
    - fast start-up (5-6 seconds)
    - OGG and FLAC support
    - line out (through cradle)
    - responsive development community (RIO is not the crappy company they used to be)
    - no remote
    - included "case" is just a bag with drawstrings
    - short warranty (I used my AMEX card, so not an as much of an issue for me)

    I recommend that anyone buying a hdd-player try all of them before choosing one.

    Some forums:
    http://www.ipodlounge.com/forums
    http:// www.iriver.com/community
    http://www.riovolution.c om/forums

    Some reviews:
    http://gear.ign.com/objects/611/611801.h tml
    http://gear.ign.com/objects/611/611888.html
    http://gear.ign.com/objects/552/552410.html
    http: //reviews.cnet.com/Apple_iPod__20GB_/4505-649 0_7-20155133.html
    http://reviews.cnet.com/iRiver_ iHP_120/4505-6490_7 -30571493.html
    http://reviews.cnet.com/Rio_Karma_ _20GB_/4505-6490 _7-30474134.html

    Additional Karma ethernet JAVA utilities:
    http://www.inzyme.com/rio

  88. who uses FLAC? by syrinx · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I've heard people say that live show traders use FLAC, but every show I've ever downloaded, and every show I've ever seen available, has been in SHN.

    Except for one that was in some obscure format that I searched around to find an extractor, and then put into SHN. Even that wasn't FLAC, it was "mkw" or "mwk" or something, I don't remember exactly.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:who uses FLAC? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I use FLAC. I store all my music in FLAC. I then switch it to a different format for transfer to my portable player.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  89. Rio experience by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Sounds good, i have an old rio 500 and it seems good but ive had problems with it corrupting the firmware and needing a recovery and also some files just wont go through usb - it disconnects, i have no idea why, its always the same files and its nothing to do with them being corrupt (it takes any file) and no firmware has fixed it, maybe its just my comp. All in all the rest of the 500 has no problems.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  90. newegg? Never heard of them... by psxndc · · Score: 1
    Why's everyone making a fuss about newegg? I've never even heard of them

    *click* *click* *typing* *page loading*

    :-o

    *fighting with credit card as it leaps out of my wallet*

    go! save yourself! warn the others!

    -psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

  91. Emmitt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to mention that the current acceptence of OGG by hw manufacturers is due almost entirely to the work of Emmitt Plant, who the Xiph people fired.

    1. Re:Emmitt by Emmettfish · · Score: 1

      I would like to mention that the current acceptence of OGG by hw manufacturers is due almost entirely to the work of Emmitt Plant, who the Xiph people fired.

      Um, no.

      The primary reason that manufacturers are adopting Ogg Vorbis is because it's a great codec at a great price. I'm proud of the work I did for Xiph, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that I single-handedly brought Vorbis to portable devices and manufacturers.

      Thanks for the vote of confidence and all, but I think that the rabid fandom that Vorbis enjoys has a lot more to do with convincing manufacturers that they'll have an audience for Vorbis-playing devices.

      Emmett

  92. Firmware Du Jour by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 1

    Although you may have had a bad experience or you may just be trolling, I've not had any of the experiences you've had so far after 2 weeks of heavy use.

    He's not trolling. The Karma is an interesting product, but spend a little time poking through the unofficial support forums on riovolution.com, and it becomes very obvious that their development/QA process still needs some work. There are a lot of crippling bugs in the currently available firmware revisions.

    Some people, to be sure, don't seem to have any problems at all, but power users who don't feel like playing the early-adopter/public-beta game might want to give the Karma a few months for the software to mature.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  93. Good use of Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'm glad that a few product managers here and there are figuring out how to leverage Java's cross-platform capability. More Java apps equals less Windows dependence.

  94. it sucks (kinda) by Snorp · · Score: 1

    I owned one of these when they first came out. Within a few hours of owning it, I dropped it about 10" onto my shoe, and it broke the little scroll wheel. I got a replacement unit, and the hard drive crapped out. Several of my friends got these as well, and two of them have experienced the scroll wheel breakage (it is very fragile). Also, the firmware seems to be a little unstable (random reboots, pauses, etc) but the Rio guys are totally cool and seem to be active about fixing those bugs. I really liked the player when it worked, but I've reluctantly bought an ipod now....

  95. Is it solid state or not? by BLKMGK · · Score: 1
    Sincer you've bought one perhaps you can answer this please... On the front page it says:
    Its 20GB* drive can carry over 5,000 songs**.


    Drive implies to me that it has a small HD inside ala iPOD. But in the detailed specs it says:

    All of the player's storage and playback happens on the circuits of electronic chips. There are no moving parts to skip, break down, or collect dust, as with traditional portable players.

    So is it solid state or not? If it's solid state I'm WAY excited but if it's a HD I'm less excited. The iPOD is pretty sweet and at $349 (did you find it cheaper?) this is fairly close to the iPOD's price. A HD inside would put the iPOD ahead of this one simply because it's a known quantity and there's nothing too innovative other than OGG. Since every piece of music I've got, well over 130GIG(!), is in MP3 I don't see myself switching anytime soon. OGG buys me nothing right now even if it might be argued that it's better....
    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    1. Re:Is it solid state or not? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      The paragraph is misleading. It has a 20GB hard drive. However, it also has some memory (either traditional or flash). When you select a song (or songs), it caches the song onto the memory and plays it from there. That means that it doesn't have to spin the hard drive while the song is playing.

  96. what about iRiver iHP-120? by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 1

    Interresting nobody mentioned it. Supports OGG, supports recording, and is completely plug-and-play with Windows XP/2K/ME. No weird software required.

  97. fatboy slim track by David+Jao · · Score: 1

    Look for fatboy.wav on the LAME test samples page.

  98. FLAC by akira69 · · Score: 1

    Oh Man. FlAC support Rocks. How freakin hard would it be to add it to the iPod??? My one gripe about digital music would be smashed. Lossless compression is KING. Now my Phish live downloads don't have to be re-compressed. So do I sell my iPod now?

  99. Nice. by wezelboy · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see other manufacturers step up to the plate and make a good product that can compete with the iPod. Now hopefully this will force Apple to quit holding back and put some real innovations into their player instead of bigger hard drives.

  100. Re: warranty by Refrag · · Score: 1

    The Ipod has a one year warranty.

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  101. $2 headphones better than WATT puppies by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

    but you listen to your portable MP3 player with headphones. You're probably not going to notice the difference

    Why why why why do people keep saying that headphones don't show defects in reproduction????

    Most headphones don't have a frequency response that reaches as low as some speakers, but the artifacts of lossy CODECs pushed too far (too low a bitrate for too challenging material) are mostly in the higher octaves. Swirl, warble and pre-echo don't need bass response to be obvious.

    The distortion of cheap headphones (when not overdriven) isn't even that obvious. The sound isn't as "good" as with better headphones, but it doesn't jump out like lossy artifacts. It's subtle stuff (besides lack of bass mind you) like a lack of "air" or "harshness" or "flatness."

    Now, earbuds in a Manhattan subway station aren't a good critical listening environment, but speakers wouldn't work there either. If the room is reasonably quiet, you're going to hear artifacts better in $2 earbuds than speakers and if the room has AC and computer fans going, fully enclosed headphones will beat speakers to death with a titanium pipe.

    While I worked on pro audio equipment (I'm a firmware engineer) for four years & watched Dave Rossum test H-chips with Sennheiser elements inside over-ear hearing protectors (the "dave clark specials"), my own experience backs up the theory. Try it yourself sometime. A/B a marginal mp3 with phones & with speakers & see which shows defects better.

  102. Continuous Access by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Flac will quickly drain your battery, as Karma doesn't have a very large flash buffer, and it ends up constantly spinning up and spinning down the hard drive.

    All the hard drive players have this problem when playing large files that demand continuous, prolonged disk access. The iPod does a good job of conserving its tiny battery when playing MP3s due to its 32MB buffer and 2-3 song read-ahead. But when it plays AIFF, this quickly drains its battery. There is no easy solution to this problem for small form factor devices with limited battery capacity.

    --

    Da Blog
  103. Does any one else hate it that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Players like this do not allow you to replace the battery? It seems as if they want you to buy another player when the battery dies or pay them to replace it for you.

    Besides the way it is degsign and the above theory, I don't see a good reason for not allowing one to replace the battery.

  104. Oh yeah? by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    total sleazebags that I would not order from even if their price was half anyone else's and included shipping and a blow job from the UPS person.

    Even if it came from her? [NSFW]
    ;)

    -T

  105. Darn all you lefties and righties! by Westacular · · Score: 1

    I have no hands, you insensitive clod!

    It took me fourty-five minutes to type this!

  106. Neuros by glassesmonkey · · Score: 1
    I didn't see many references to the Neuros until after this post:

    Neuros HD 20GB MP3 Digital Audio Computer ($199)

    USB2.0 support not yet available

    Five programmable preset buttons on case

    Beta WMA/OGG support (linux also)

    FM tuner

    FM broadcast for play on FM radio

    Can also carry other files as portable HD

    Record to MP3 from mic, line-in, FM tuner

    Dimensions: 5.3" x 3.1" x 1.3" (9.4 oz)