Slashdot Mirror


Online! The Book

honestpuck writes "Titling a volume 'Online! The Book' and putting "The perfect gift for any computer user!" amongst other hyperbole on the back cover must rank as this years greatest act of hubris." Honestpuck has a strong opinion of whether this hubris is justified or insane -- read on below for his review. Online! The Book author John C. Dvorak and Chris Pirillo (with Wendy Taylor) pages 701 publisher Prentice Hall PTR rating 3 reviewer Tony Williams ISBN 0131423630 summary Padding, information and errors all in the one volume. Could be worse, but not by much.

If only John C. Dvorak and Chris Pirillo (with Wendy Taylor) had been able to deliver. If only they had not strewn the book with error, verbiage and irrelavancy. Ah, well.

This volume in its 700 pages (divided into 28 chapters) tries to cover everything from hardware basics to voice over IP, in between touching on e-commerce, security, web programming, networking, content management and business websites, to name just six of the topics perhaps each better suited to a volume of their own.

This book skims, and skims fast, over a number of important and vital topics while dwelling on others that many will find useless. Chris Pirillo seems to be an expert on marketing, so that gets thirty pages, while web programming languages get ten. We get forty pages of 'Hardware Basics,' which cover information vital to getting online such as operating systems, varieties of Intel chips, video cards and gaming audio drivers. I know that if I wanted to find the perfect spot to put breakout boxes about Babbage and von Neumann (essential to any book about getting online) I'd put them in the chapter on viruses. It seems as if the three authors said "we're contracted to seven hundred pages so let's just throw in topics we know a lot about until we get to seven hundred pages -- then stop."

Then there are the errors. We get editing errors like the text that tells us a 'geostationary satellite' orbits at 'about 22,300 miles,' next to a diagram showing the number 20,300 miles. We get errors in logic like the breakout box that has "DNS servers may run Apache, which is an open source Web server program" and goes on to imply that all DNS servers will run a web server. We get errors in grammar. We get paragraphs like "Although there are dynamic Web page URLs (meaning they change, or at least part of it does), most are static (stay the same). These can be dynamic by use of a programming error or dynamic because someone named the URL extension without adding a link elsewhere on the web site." With sentence construction like that I'm still not sure if the claim intended is true or not.

Did I like anything about this book? Sure, the chapter on 'How A Modem (Really) Works' was full of good solid information. Other chapters were similar, particularly the two following on networking and handhelds, phones and PDAs. Others did contain some good information, just surrounded by dross.

You can go to the book's website, which is basically just a single page with yet more hyperbole ("Everything is here. Well-written. Comprehensive.") or visit the Prentice Hall page, which actually gives you a table of contents and a sample chapter. Just don't go straight to the Prentice Hall PTR home page and search for books with "Online" in the title, as that won't find it. Instead search for books with "Book" in the title.

I'd only recommend this book to those who want to spend a lot of time finding the good bits, a few minutes chuckling over some of the errors, and thirty dollars on a paperweight. If you're really looking for a 'perfect gift' for people new new to the net, then find something cheaper covering just the essentials, and for those more expert, find a volume that actually covers a topic of interest well.

You can purchase Online! The Book from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

210 comments

  1. duh by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    ...and putting "The perfect gift for any computer user!"

    Gee, and it's just out in time for Christmas. What a coincidence. No wonder they didn't have time to get their facts straight, December was coming.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:duh by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The perfect gift for any computer user!" points obviously to "A new computer".

      This should be a "Perfect gift for people who read computer books".

    2. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      [Text of article in case it gets /.ed. Posted as AC so I can't be accused of karma whoring.]

      Online! The Book

      Posted by timothy on 12-03-03 11:15
      honestpuck writes "Titling a volume 'Online! The Book' and putting "The perfect gift for any computer user!" amongst other hyperbole on the back cover must rank as this years greatest act of hubris." Honestpuck has a strong opinion of whether this hubris is justified or insane -- read on below for his review. Online! The Book
      author John C. Dvorak and Chris Pirillo (with Wendy Taylor)
      pages 701
      publisher Prentice Hall PTR
      rating 3
      reviewer Tony Williams
      ISBN 0131423630
      summary Padding, information and errors all in the one volume. Could be worse, but not by much.

      If only John C. Dvorak and Chris Pirillo (with Wendy Taylor) had been able to deliver. If only they had not strewn the book with error, verbiage and irrelavancy. Ah, well.

      This volume in its 700 pages (divided into 28 chapters) tries to cover everything from hardware basics to voice over IP, in between touching on e-commerce, security, web programming, networking, content management and business websites, to name just six of the topics perhaps each better suited to a volume of their own.

      This book skims, and skims fast, over a number of important and vital topics while dwelling on others that many will find useless. Chris Pirillo seems to be an expert on marketing, so that gets thirty pages, while web programming languages get ten. We get forty pages of 'Hardware Basics,' which cover information vital to getting online such as operating systems, varieties of Intel chips, video cards and gaming audio drivers. I know that if I wanted to find the perfect spot to put breakout boxes about Babbage and von Neumann (essential to any book about getting online) I'd put them in the chapter on viruses. It seems as if the three authors said "we're contracted to seven hundred pages so let's just throw in topics we know a lot about until we get to seven hundred pages -- then stop."

      Then there are the errors. We get editing errors like the text that tells us a 'geostationary satellite' orbits at 'about 22,300 miles,' next to a diagram showing the number 20,300 miles. We get errors in logic like the breakout box that has "DNS servers may run Apache, which is an open source Web server program" and goes on to imply that all DNS servers will run a web server. We get errors in grammar. We get paragraphs like "Although there are dynamic Web page URLs (meaning they change, or at least part of it does), most are static (stay the same). These can be dynamic by use of a programming error or dynamic because someone named the URL extension without adding a link elsewhere on the web site." With sentence construction like that I'm still not sure if the claim intended is true or not.

      Did I like anything about this book? Sure, the chapter on 'How A Modem (Really) Works' was full of good solid information. Other chapters were similar, particularly the two following on networking and handhelds, phones and PDAs. Others did contain some good information, just surrounded by dross.

      You can go to the book's website, which is basically just a single page with yet more hyperbole ("Everything is here. Well-written. Comprehensive.") or visit the Prentice Hall page, which actually gives you a table of contents and a sample chapter. Just don't go straight to the Prentice Hall PTR home page and search for books with "Online" in the title, as that won't find it. Instead search for books with "Book" in the title.

      I'd only recommend this book to those who want to spend a lot of time finding the good bits, a few minutes chuckling over some of the errors, and thirty dollars on a paperweight. If you're really looking for a 'perfect gift' for people new new to the net, then find something cheaper covering just the essentials, and for those more expert, find a volume that actually covers a topic of interest well.

    3. Re:duh by mikew03 · · Score: 1

      Actually the book has been out for several months now. I'm not defending it necessarily, but it wasn't rushed out for Christmas.

    4. Re:duh by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Text of article in case it gets /.ed. Posted as AC so I can't be accused of karma whoring

      Karma whoring? More like you didn't post w/ your username because you would look like a bloody idiot, posting /. article text to /. in case of /.ing. DUH.

    5. Re:duh by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I think it was his idea of humor.

    6. Re:duh by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I think it was his idea of humor.

      I had considered that, but I couldn't see how it was at all humorous. Maybe he has a bad sense of humor. Or maybe it's just me :)

    7. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It *is* you.

  2. What were you expecting? by belgar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's Dvorak we're talking about here. The guy's too busy writing his Trolltech columns to actually learn anything new. I mean, thanks for explaining how a modem (really) works, guys. The 90's called -- they want their chapter back.

    --
    What does it mean to wake out of a dream
    and be wearing someone else's shorts?
    BNL, Born on a Pirate Ship (1998)
    1. Re:What were you expecting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would have been way funnier if you had said 70's or 80's instead of 90's. As is, it's kind of stupid. Hopefully gets modded down...

    2. Re:What were you expecting? by ahdeoz · · Score: 0

      you mean it would have been way funnier if he had used the joke back in the the 70's or 80's.

    3. Re:What were you expecting? by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a wonderful book by Reader's Digest (go figure)that explains how an automobile works better than any popular book on the subject I have ever seen.

      Should I continue to recommend it or send a note to Reader's Digest that the 1890s called and want their book back?

      KFG

    4. Re:What were you expecting? by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Ok, not beeing picky here but I guess he also stole the phrase from this article.

      Quote from the article:
      "Upcoming features? PAM. files larger than 2 gigs. NFS over TCP. The 80's called, they want their features back. NTPv4 was a listed big feature on a slide of 10 to 15 upcoming enhancements. How does an NTP enhancement get mentioned as a 'big' feature? Wow."

      Actually I remember this because that quote IS in fact quite funny.

    5. Re:What were you expecting? by tsmccaff · · Score: 1

      I doubt he directly stole his stupid line from that article. "The blank called, they want their blahbity-blah back" is pretty common phraseology. BTW, my creditors called, they want my school loans back.

      --
      "the starry sky above and the moral law within"-Kant
    6. Re:What were you expecting? by decepty · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, the "blank called, they want their blankety-blank" is thoroughly covered in "Rapier Wit: A Guide to Sarcasm & Other Forms of Negative Reenforcement" By Sean Crespo (of National Lampoon). Take this excerpt:

      STRUCTURE #2
      Hey, ----- called, it wants its ----- back.

      Many people seem to be out of touch with what is really going on out there - not you, of course - so it's sometimes helpful to wake them up. For example, if you were to pay witness to another human being, fully sentient, no concern over his possibly being descended from a race of man-ape hybrids, not just wearing but in fact showing off a new set of bell-bottom corduroy trousers, a loud pastel shirt unbuttoned down to the navel, and anything resembling platform shoes, it is your god-given right, nay, duty, to inform that person "Hey, the Smithsonian Museum of American History called, they want their Studio 54 exhibit back."


      You can read the full article here.
      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    7. Re:What were you expecting? by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Learning english is fun. ;-)
      Since I am german I didn't recognize this as a common phrase until the named article. It's a true shame that it translates so badly into german it ruins the fun of it:

      "Hey, die 80iger haben angerufen, sie wollen ihre Features zuruck!" oder "Hey, das Smithsonian hat angerufen, sie wollen Ihr Studio 54 Ausstellungsstuck zuruck." just sounds kinda lame...

    8. Re:What were you expecting? by cmacb · · Score: 1

      I think the point might have been that modem usage is in such sharp decline that the information is fairly irrelevent. The same is not true of cars.

    9. Re:What were you expecting? by Shoggoth+of+Maul · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken this very joke appeared in the Bible.

    10. Re:What were you expecting? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you mean that dial up usage is declining. I suspect that such is not the case, but even if it were that would still leave tens of millions of users the book is directly aimed at using dial up modems. Not to mention the vast majority of users outside the books target market.

      Surely you can't be suggesting that most home users (to whom the book is aimed) simply plug an RJ-45 cable directly into their NIC without a modualtion/demodulation device acting as an intermediary to the raw signal?

      http://www.cable-modems.org/tutorial/07.htm

      I have not read the book myself. Do you have any particular reason to suspect/know that the chapter on modems isn't inclusive to cable modems and DSL transcievers?

      KFG

    11. Re:What were you expecting? by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      The local stores are still selling dial-up modems by the bucketload.

    12. Re:What were you expecting? by cmacb · · Score: 1

      All I was pointing out was that the original comparison between a Readers Digest book on cars and an end-user in-depth discussion of modems is not appropriate.

      Regarding the other issues you raised:

      Everything I have read indicates that modem use is giving way to either DSL or Cable modem for accessing the internet. I have not read the book either, but if the section on modems includes DSL and Cable modems that would be an odd conglomeration.

      The point made by the review was that there was sparse coverage on some areas and overkill on others. Most end-users don't need to know the details of how a modem works these days since almost all modems use the same command set, operate at the same speeds and are detected automatically by the operating system. Much more time is spent in setting up (and fixing) the myriad of network settings for DNS, DHCP, gateway, etc.

      Keep in mind that modems came to the fore in advance of the internet. I was using modems for years to access Prodigy, Genie, and local BBS systems. Back then you really needed to know how your modem worked to get best results. Now most of them are truly plug-and-play, and rarely are modems used today for anything that does not involve networking, specifically TCP/IP. For the 5 years or so before I got DSL at home I was using a device that went between my external modem and one or more PCs. The PCs were networked using TCP/IP and knew nothing of the modem which established the internet connection on demand. I'm pretty sure that if modems didn't already exist and someone were to "invent" dial-up networking today it would simply look like todays DSL routers with little more than a web interface to set ID, Password, and phone number.

    13. Re:What were you expecting? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And I was using modems before Prodigy, GEnie and their ilk existed. I could still hack AT codes if I had to.

      The fact that one no longer necessarily (although occasion can still crop up)has to understand how a modem works sometimes people just like to know how things work. See the popularity of How Things Work in print and on the web.

      Criticizing a book for explaining how things work is just gratuitous anti-intellectualism. People who couldn't care less can skip it and those that do have it available to them.

      If it comes to that most people don't have any real reason to know how their car works either, and most of them don't.

      KFG

    14. Re:What were you expecting? by benjj · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken this very joke appeared in the Bible.

      Don't you mean "Jesus called, and he wants his joke back"?

    15. Re:What were you expecting? by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      The jibe "The called, they want their back." is exactly the sort of thing David Spaid would say on Saturday Night Live. In fact, I think he did on a number of occasions.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
  3. If wishes were fishes ... by Rudisaurus · · Score: 3, Funny
    If only John C. Dvorak and Chris Pirillo (with Wendy Taylor) had been able to deliver. If only they had not strewn the book with error, verbiage and irrelavancy.
    If only I had run a spell-checker before posting ... (it's irrelevancy).
    --
    licet differant, aequabitur
    1. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna start charging you spelling Nazi fuck-wits for my bandwidth. Maybe English isn't the posters first language, did you think of that, you intolerant turd? You obviously understood what was meant, otherwise you wouldn't have been able to submit your self-important message to the world, you can spell big deal, now get a life in which to use that ability.

    2. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was ist ein "turd"?

    3. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please take the time properly to construct your sentences. Run-on sentences and misuse of punctuation are rather annoying to the more educated among us. Allow me to offer a corrected version of your post:

      I'm going to start charging you spelling Nazi fuck-wits for my bandwidth. Maybe English isn't the poster's first language; did you think of that, you intolerant turd? You obviously understood what was meant, otherwise you wouldn't have been able to submit your self-important message to the world. You can spell; big deal. Now get a life in which to use that ability.

      You're welcome.

    4. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Das ist ein turdengruben.

    5. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by fhknack · · Score: 1

      ...and in context, "verbage" would probably have fit better than "verbiage."

    6. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please take the time properly to construct your sentences.

      Please take the time to construct your sentences properly. Now STFU.

    7. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. "Verbiage" is the common form; "verbage" is a rare (obsolete?) variant. Is that what you were aiming for? If so, "verbiagerie" is more colorful.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    8. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Big deal" isn't exactly a sentence, now is it?

    9. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it depends. In this context, there is an implied "that's a" (or "that's not a" if you eschew sarcasm), much like the implied "you" in the sentence "Stop!" (Incidentally, "Stop!" may also have an implied "it" or "doing that", also depending on context.)

    10. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by fhknack · · Score: 1

      I knew I should have put the dictionary.com links. Verbage is a deliberate misspelling, implying garbage. I get a kick out of the usage here at my job for a major US bank, because the two are used interchangeably. I have not yet found a positive correlation between the use of "verbage" and the subject matter being such tripe as mission statements and the like, so I usually just snicker to myself at the ignorance. Simple things, and all that.

    11. Re:If wishes were fishes ... by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      Despite what the Jargon File may think, "verbage" has been around at least since 1787, not long after "verbiage" arrived in English, making it a suboptimal choice for deliberate verbicide.

      Such situations are annoying, aren't they? I think that practically everyone who uses "flounder" as a verb really meant to say "founder," but, since they're invariably speaking metaphorically anyway, they end up accidentally making sense.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
  4. I think I'll wait.... by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I'll wait for the movie adaptation of the book.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:I think I'll wait.... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Tom Hanks can play Dvorak: "Life is like a dynamic Web page URL, you never know what you're gonna get."

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:I think I'll wait.... by schnablebg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Online! The movie.

      "I saw the shit out of it!"

    3. Re:I think I'll wait.... by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think I'll wait for the movie adaptation of the book.
      Personally, I'm looking forward to the promotional website for the movie.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    4. Re:I think I'll wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did it already. It was called Swordfish.

    5. Re:I think I'll wait.... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      "Warm ... and mandatory."

      "A required romp."

      "This is the movie all of America must see."

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    6. Re:I think I'll wait.... by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      > > I think I'll wait for the movie adaptation of the book.
      > Personally, I'm looking forward to the promotional website for the movie.

      Personally, I (for one) welcome our online.. promotional.... website? Wait, this is the wrong joke! (Isn't it always, though?)

    7. Re:I think I'll wait.... by falsified · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the swordfish does YOU!

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    8. Re:I think I'll wait.... by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      I think I'll wait for the MMORPG adaptation

    9. Re:I think I'll wait.... by j3110 · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the action figures.

      --
      Karma Clown
    10. Re:I think I'll wait.... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      I think they already made it. It was called The Net or... Hackers or... The Matrix*... something like that it's all the same.

      (* But I liked the Matrix)

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
  5. Say what you want about Dvorak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but I really love his keyboards.

    1. Re:Say what you want about Dvorak... by ultrasound · · Score: 1

      and his New World Symphony

    2. Re:Say what you want about Dvorak... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny
      and his New World Symphony

      Actually someone else wrote it, but he came up with a new arrangement.

    3. Re:Say what you want about Dvorak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same last name, different person. Though you may have known that.

  6. Table of Contents by MagicDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    If every chapter has information about the internet and technology, I guess the table of contents sould be titled "Slashdot" :)

    1. Re:Table of Contents by cgenman · · Score: 0

      A chapter on security and a chapter on viruses? A chapter on downloading content and a chapter on music? Chapters on corporate IM, P2P IM, and VOIP?

      "Slashdot" wouldn't be a bad title, with this many dupes.

    2. Re:Table of Contents by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      If every chapter has information about the internet and technology, I guess the table of contents sould be titled "Slashdot" :)

      There're only so many times a publisher will erroneously reprint the same chapter without lobbyists getting in the way of their tree consumption :-x

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  7. God.... by Kirk+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I first saw it, I thought it was some attempt to be a hard copy of the internet.

    *remembers Dilbert boss joke.*

    Heh heh...

    1. Re:God.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I first saw it, I thought it was some attempt to be a hard copy of the internet.


      Anyone remember that "Internet Yellow Pages" book? That was so completely useless, most of the links were probably dead by the time it hit the stores.

    2. Re:God.... by Chalybeous · · Score: 3, Funny

      Reminds me about a joke about computer-illiterate people that started doing the rounds when British libraries began to introduce cheap (later free) internet access:

      Customer: Excuse me, do you have the Internet here?
      Librarian: Yes, sir - the computer suite is over there, I'll be along to help you in a moment.
      Customer: Oh, I didn't want to use a computer. Do you have it in book form?
      Sounds rather like it could be a PHB or BOFH situation here... lusers, anyone?
      (Then again, for several years you've been able to get a map of the internet...)

      What's next - Online! - The Rock Opera, written by Pete Townshend and Bill Gates?

      Ever since I was a young boy, I've been a techie geek,
      From dial-up BBSs, to broadband fast and sleek,
      Downloading Linux .isos, md5sums and all,
      Though I find books for dummies, a real-pain-in-the-b@lls...

      (Sung to the tune of "Pinball Wizard")
      --

      "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

    3. Re:God.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's next - Online! - The Rock Opera, written by Pete Townshend and Bill Gates?

      Well, there is a lot of child porn out there on the Internet, or so I'm told....

    4. Re:God.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THANKS! that has inspired me to actually write ONLINE! The Rock Opera.

  8. Mel Brooks, eat your heart out... by shadowcabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Merchandising, merchandising! Online! The Book, Online! The Movie, Online! The Breakfast Cereal... Online! The Flamethrower! (The kids love that one.)

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    1. Re:Mel Brooks, eat your heart out... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Web Site, Online!

      Email, Online!

      pr0n, Online!

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Mel Brooks, eat your heart out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOT COM! Online!

  9. Look! The rating is a 3! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

    A 3? I think the Slashdot Universe is going to implode! Run for your lives!!!

    1. Re:Look! The rating is a 3! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oops, my bad.


      It was supposed to say: Rating: 3 (out of 4).


      HonestPuck.

    2. Re:Look! The rating is a 3! by dmorin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Look closer, it's really the 8 that they've just used so much some of the pixels are starting to fall off.

  10. Why only computer books? by Felonius+Thunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Junk, all in one books like this have always been quite common. It seems that computers have been around long enough that even the completely uninitiated know that computing is reasonably complicated. Do they try to sell "the only book you'll ever need" style books for business? Construction? Medicine? Maybe they don't feel there are quite enough fearful dupes to be had in those topics.

    1. Re:Why only computer books? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      I can't remember the last time I found myself wandering around Home Depot looking for the perfect book to give me all the advice I'd need to build my own home. People wander around Best Buy looking for books on how to do things with their computer all the time.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  11. Hardly Suprising by JSkills · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It doesn't surprise me at all that this is light on any real technical details. John C. Dvorak, although obviously a pretty astute individual, has been part of PC Magazine or some other end-user (i.e. barely technical) related publication for quite some time. Although I have found some of his positions on technical and business ethics of interest, his technically oriented editorial contributions have typically been geared for the person who is just getting into understanding a PC, certainly not people in the /. community.

  12. Great!! by Cap'nMike · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I don't have to keep paying those damn ISP fees every month. I can just buy the book. What? You mean they haven't just printed out the internet? Crap!

    --
    Celebrities are like ads, if we all ignore them, they'll just go away.
  13. Perfect gift idea for the newbies! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    Forget the book then, I'll be giving out AOL 9.0 CDs! It's faster, more secure, and has an assload of ads!

    What a way to introduce someone to the World Wide Wow!

    1. Re:Perfect gift idea for the newbies! by burrows · · Score: 1

      Cheaper, too. If you don't have enough, let me know.

  14. this book is too long... by Savatte · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll just wait for Online for Dummies.

  15. The sequels are even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Coming soon from PTR:

    Offline! Tales of slashdotting

    Spelling! Secrets of the Slashdot editors

    1. Re:The sequels are even better by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      My CS lecturer said that you aren't meant to use PTR any more, apparently Reference books are the 'in' thang now.

  16. Speaking of hubris; try THIS on for size: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "news for nerds, stuff that matters"

  17. Time warp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    1999 called, they want their book back.

    1. Re:Time warp? by Fjord · · Score: 2, Funny

      while they are on the line, can they take that joke back, too?

      --
      -no broken link
    2. Re:Time warp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1999 called, they want their book back.

      Wrong! Wrong! Wrong! You'll never get a response with a post like that. Well, except for this one.

      If you really want to provoke a response you should say it this way:

      The 90's called, they want their book back.

      Now you will get 20 to 30 posts discussing your grammar.

    3. Re:Time warp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goatse.cx called, they want your ass back.

  18. What does it cost? by Daath · · Score: 1

    What does it cost? What I really mean is, can we get the book, online? :P

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  19. Destined to be... by ii-v-i-head · · Score: 5, Funny

    On sale for $2.99 by mid March 2004

    1. Re:Destined to be... by Patrick · · Score: 3, Funny
      On sale for $2.99 by mid March 2004

      $2.99? I got Bill Gates's "The Road Ahead" in a 50-cents bin. Are you telling me "Online!" is worth nearly six times as much as BillG's 1995-era visions of the future?

      Well, OK, maybe.

  20. This is the same Dvorak... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... who's been predicting the imminent death of Apple for 20+ years.

    And now he claims "...no more junk email"

    OK. That's quite simply not possible, and he must know it.

    "Packed with secrets never before revealed"

    You're telling me there's a lot (wnough to "pack" a book this size) important useful things about the internet that only these three people knew until now?

    Hogwash.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:This is the same Dvorak... by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      John Dvorak is a professional troll. What various slashdotters only dream of, he lives. What is a troll? Someone who writes something deliberately provocative to make people angry and respond. Accuracy doesn't even show up on the list of priorities. Dvorak has figured out how to make a living as a troll. Instead of trolling in forums, he trolls in his columns and books. Even though everybody knows that what he writes is crap and has no connection with reality, it still pisses people off enough that they read it, and point it out to their friends.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:This is the same Dvorak... by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      We can punish him by pronouncing his name wrong

  21. correct me if I'm wrong by theMerovingian · · Score: 1


    But I thought geostationary satellites are at an elevation of about 22,239 miles. It is important to get this right, otherwise your geostationary satellite isn't stationary.

    Both figures in the book are wrong.

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by Doppleganger · · Score: 1

      1) Anyone using a book like this for numbers to put up a geostationary satellite will probably have one that is stationary.. after it crashes back to earth (or hits some other body in space)

      2) Many people would think 22,239 miles is close enough to satisfy 'about 22,300 miles'.

    2. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange choice to round up though. Wouldn't 22,200 have just looked like a cleaner number?

    3. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      22,200 just looks made up.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    4. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by Doug-W · · Score: 1

      I think what both original posters are missing is the line from the review: 'about 22,300 miles,' next to a diagram showing the number 20,300 miles. Regardless as to wether or not 22,300 miles is close to 22,239 miles, it's NOT close to 20,300 miles which is what the diagram showed.

    5. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by PiratePTG · · Score: 1
      Strange choice to round up though. Wouldn't 22,200 have just looked like a cleaner number?

      I've heard it quite commonly referred to as "22,500 miles". Yes, I'm a Broadcast Engineer and know that it's actually 22,239 +/- a few feet, but in general conversation, 22,500 is what I've heard the most...

      --
      The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
    6. Re:correct me if I'm wrong by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      Hey, the Dark Ages called, they want their non-metric systems back

  22. Quote makes it sound authentic. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...."If only they had not strewn the book with error, verbiage and irrelavancy."....

    Hmm... sounds exactly like being online.

    1. Re:Quote makes it sound authentic. by jlleblanc · · Score: 1

      Hmm... sounds exactly like being online.

      Well, at least on Slashdot.

  23. Considering... by KC7GR · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...that one of the book's authors is the same one who tried to inflict the (in)famous "Dvorak Keyboard" on an unsuspecting world, the fact that the book itself is full of errors comes as no surprise whatsoever.

    Heck, Dvorak probably wrote his portion on one of his goofball keyboards...

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:Considering... by rleibman · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Please mod down. Parent has no idea what he's talking about.
      Yes, I am writing on a Dvorak Keyboard:
      The keyboard was designed from work started in about 1930, by Dr. August Dvorak, an American from Seattle (distantly related both to composer Antonin Dvorak and the John Dvorak in question).

    2. Re:Considering... by Chmarr · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Err... no. The columust is John C. Dvorak. The Dvorak Keyboard inventor is Dr. August Dvorak.

    3. Re:Considering... by Saganaga · · Score: 1

      You're probably just kidding, but it should be noted that John Dvorak had nothing to do with the keyboard of the same name. Look at this article for starters.

    4. Re:Considering... by dmoore · · Score: 1

      Relax, the poster was just trying to be funny, taking a jab at the die-hard followers of the Dvorak keyboard like yourself.

    5. Re:Considering... by Chmarr · · Score: 1

      True. But, in that case, the post really needed a ";)" at the end :)

    6. Re:Considering... by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Dvorak the PC Magazine columnist and the Dvorak keyboard layout are, perhaps surprisingly, unrelated. The keyboard is older than the columnist. It just never caught on until the era of computers, with their easily-remappable keys. (Arguably, it still hasn't really caught on; but anyway...)

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:Considering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      unsuspecting world

      Don't you mean "New World"? ;-)

    8. Re:Considering... by Hayzeus · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're obviously confused. Just to clear up any confusion, the book's author is not the inventor of the Dvorak keyboard, but is instead the famous Czech composer who brought us "The Moravian Duets" and "Slavonic Dances". Common mistake.

    9. Re:Considering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's so much more fun to leave it out and make people like yourself look like morons.

      The intelligent people get the joke. The yokels who need everything spoonfed to them are not going to understand it anyway, so why bother pointing it out to them?

  24. Ed Kroll by wheezl · · Score: 1

    Where is Ed Kroll when you need him?

    --
    -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
  25. Re:Why post? by The+Raven · · Score: 1

    Oh come on. The /. editors get enough slack for always posting rah-rah reviews. Now you wanna give them slack for posting a negative review? Pfft. Variety is good. It is nice to get opinions on what is great, and what might look good, but actually sucks.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
  26. Metacomment by Azghoul · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, I guess this will shut up the morons who complain that every Slashdot review is positive...

    (since this is a comment about comments, but on-topic because it's about reviews, does this count as a "metacomment"? My guess is I'm just an ass...)

    1. Re:Metacomment by Trigun · · Score: 1

      My guess is I'm just an ass...

      No, but certainly an optomist if you think it will shut someone up around here.
      "This book is pure hogshit! How can you sleep at night, rating it a three?!?!"

    2. Re:Metacomment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I guess this will shut up the morons who complain that every Slashdot review is positive... ...the same way that changing story comment numbers to not start at zero has shut up the morons making "First post!" comments.. ...the same way that putting the domain name after a url has stopped goatse links.. ...the same way that putting "this has been reported on Slasdot before, but..." at the beginning of a story stops people from posting "this is a duplicate!!!!1".. ...

  27. from the don't-hold-back-now dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad timothy's father (some drunk guy at a 70s orgy) didn't hold it back.

    1. Re:from the don't-hold-back-now dept. by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Come on, Pirillo. Timothy just posted the review, Honestpuck wrote it.

  28. ebook? by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 1

    what? no e-book format?

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    1. Re:ebook? by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1

      You mean I can't read Online, The Book while I'm online? HAHA +5 FUNNY!

  29. Re:Why post? by Kombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Slack" is good. I think you meant to say "flack." Slashdot gets flack for posting too many positive reviews.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  30. Re:Goatse ! The link ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    goatse.cx link warning! please don't click if you're at work!

  31. sadly.... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...i dont trust anyone who uses so many bevels, saturated colours and drop shadows on their site, so i wont be buying this book

    1. Re:sadly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...i dont trust anyone who uses so many bevels, saturated colours and drop shadows on their site, so i wont be buying this book.

      Indeed! My eyes! Ouch, my eyes! It hurts!

      Also, 1980 called, they want their designs back.

  32. please don't click grandparent if you're at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead, click here.

  33. Re:more reviews of this book by royhuggins · · Score: 1

    They're all the same reviews over and over again. All the more reason to think less of this book.

  34. Online The Book - Review by phunster · · Score: 0

    What a shame, when I first came upon Chris Pirillo a few years ago I found him to be a good resource, especially for newbies. Over time though he has lost his focus entirely. His newsletters have become useless.

    As he has expanded his "empire" he has come to expect people to write for him for free. He's lost two very good Linux Writers over the past year.

    I think the Dot boom went to his head and his brains went Kaboom.

  35. If this is a book about the internet.. by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

    It doesn't mention that one time, I did that thing, and my friend deleted it, then I uploaded it again, and he deleted it again, then I transfered some bytes, and disconnected?!?!?

    --
    Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
  36. Re:more reviews of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're all the same reviews over and over again.

    Yes, but zontroll needs a thinly-veiled excuse to flog his affiliate links. I've come to find some small amount fo comfort in his endless spamming.

  37. Dead tree internet directories by British · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always thought those "white pages" and "yellow pages" Internet directory books were funny. With the ever-so-changing web, you would end up with a book containing a bunch of URLs to nonexistant pages within a few months. Why bother with such a book when a search engine would do?

    Oh yeah, marketing. Of course, you could just make annual editions of internet "yellow pages" with corrected links, etc.

    It's like going to the mailbox outside the post office to mail a letter.

    1. Re:Dead tree internet directories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the box outside the post office (for important mail) because they are the first boxes to get picked up in the morning and the post office itself is closed when I get home from work.

  38. Re:you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the contrary, you'd think that someone would have noticed that this is the same post that this moron keeps posting in every single book review, and moderated it down into oblivion. Way to leech those sponsor dollars, spammer.

  39. P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by DoctorScooby · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to his webblog, in the last few months, this poor bugger got his ass fired from TechTV, only to be replaced by the uber-knowledgeable (*snicker*) Leo Laporte; gotten sick; gotten food poisoning; has a conspiracy theory that Doc Searls is actually Colonel Sanders; has a beef with hydrogenated oils in soda crackers; has sunk to the oh-so pathetic level of doodling on his own body in order to get hits to his website, "C:\PIRILLO.EXE -- Getting Screwed While Everybody Else is Getting Laid".

    And to top it all off, he writes a newsletter called "Windows Fanatics". I feel so bad for this guy. World Vision should add this guy to their client list, he's at least as pathetic as the starving AIDS-ridden African child with flies crawling on his face.

    BSD isn't dying, this guy is.

    1. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by LokiSteve · · Score: 1

      It looks like he dropped quite a bit of weight too, and has a nice 5 O'clock shodow in that pic. If I remember correctly, he at least has a hot girlfriend/wife, correct me if I'm wrong.

      --
      END OF LINE.
    2. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by plasmasurfer · · Score: 0

      Gretchen Pirillo is one hot number. She's living proof that there is justice in this world and hope for single geeks.
      Especially really ugly ones like Mr Pirillo.

      --
      To spot the expert, pick the one who predicts the job will take the longest and cost the most.
    3. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      Why does he have the Lockergnome guy all over his website?

      (*crosses fingers* I hope it's not the obvious answer..)

    4. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by DoctorScooby · · Score: 0

      Feast your eyes on what good Slashdot Karma and a penchant for self-doodlation can get you! She's no Missus Scooby, but I suppose she'd do in a pinch for the unwashed geek masses.

    5. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he IS the lockergnome guy. ;/

    6. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Because he IS the Lockergnome guy.

    7. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      She is quite hot.

    8. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      Lockergnome is actually quite cool (well, it was back in 1999, I haven't read it lately). Maybe he deserves some credit after all.

    9. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It was pretty cool but lately it seems so...I don't know, too marketing oriented.

    10. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Lockergnome WAS once great...(when it was small and geared for the average geek, and newbies to computers). And at one time, it had a lot to offer people for free..that's why LG was successful in the beginning and had a good run for a few years.. then along the way Pirillo's ego began to grow and grow, and LG lost it's original vision and began to derail and go off track. Then the Tech TV gig came along and gave LG a boost and it looked like it might make it for a while...It's on the way out now...sigh. all good things must end. I forsee Pirillo in the near future running a Peets coffee franchise somewhere in Iowa.

      And yes all LG is now is simply a NOT very well hidden marketing angle.. Don't believe me ? E-mail Chris and suggest something.. some great hardware or software that he is not a$$ociated with, or from a developer or company that won't let him weasel in. (And then check the reply you get).

      Sooner or later people get tired of the constant LG product push and the charges for this and that and the Gnomedex bombardments for 'next year' that start almost immediately after a Gnomedex takes place..Gnomedex this and Gnomedex that all year long. sheeesh. I know I got tired of it quite some time ago.

      LG is anymore just marketing directed at you hidden under the guise of helpful technical information.. it reminds me of programs like Bonzai Buddy or Gator, or Hotbar.. on the surface seemingly offering you something cool...in reality being spyware/malware underneath... same concept...that's the Lockergnome of today.

      It's clear that all LG's about now is $. People know that and that's why the LG newsletters are dead (not newsletters in general as C. Pirillo would have you believe).

      I like how after getting canned from Tech TV... it was all kept pretty much hush hush throughout the LG site(s) and then -snicker- when they did the recent combination makeover/overhaul to the LG newsletters...for a while (before they changed the look a second time)..it looked just like a part of the Tech TV website. Same color theme.. everything. I suppose that was a subconscious flashback to when Chris Pirillo had something really good going for him - and blew it.

      Chris Pirillo is a money grubbing ugly geek - period ! (I'll bet ya ten bucks he votes republican too. :)

    11. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't hate the big P, slashdot people. I don't know who you are, but I know you're an emotionless geek that stays cooped up in his mom's basement typing away command lines. I'll never visit this site again, now that I know you're so abusive to your fellow bloggers. And I see how you insult guest posters by calling them an "Anonymous Coward", tehe. Bottom line, just lay off the insults.

    12. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This shit is utterly pointless... Why you feel the need to bash someone for absolutely no reason is beyond me... to make yourself feel less of a loser maybe? There is absolutely no reason to insult Chris Pirillo. If you don't like him, don't read his blog or any of his publications; it's as simple as that. I'm sure there are more productive things you feel you could be doing. Chris Pirillo is just trying to make his way through life, just like we all are... there is no way you can say you would have done anything different if you were in his position, because you are not and will never be in his shoes. Stay away from bashing other people you do not know, and stick to what you're good at... at this point I'm not sure what that could be, as you obviously spend most of your time critiqueing what you believe is wrong with everyone else.

    13. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris Pirillo and LG has sold out. what once was an ok newsletter has become a marketing hob bob of crap.

      also, any tips you and readers submit, become part of his tutorials that you have to pay for. do the submitters get a cut? no! why pay for something when you can get it off google for free?

      And his LG readership will back him up blindly. they love to get their nose brown. just look at the comments on his blog. he's leading the blind and his fans have no clue.

    14. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's as much reason to insult chris pirillo as there are tabloids out there to destroy celebrities' reputations. just because we can and for him to bare his soul through his blog gives us the right to do so.

      if all of this causes him to cry and go home to mommy, then he should work at a peets.

    15. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pirillo's desperation to get attention is only exceeded by his immaturity and naivety. I think his wife finally got sick of it and left him recently to top it off. Lockergnome has had to lay off most of the decent technical writers they used to have so the site is now a useless collection of cut and paste rip-off articles from sites like Slashdot. Don't waste your time over at Lockergnome....it's a dinosaur.

      xoxo

      The Anonymous Coward

    16. Re:P Is For Pirillo, P Is For Pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man the last poster said it all. The people who still follow Lockernerd are the lamest bunch of brownies to ever touch a computer. Most of them don't have pc literacy of a 5 year old so of course they would worship a guy like Pirillo who is an English major. The guy has absolutely no tech skills whatsoever and THAT is a fact. The only technical writing that you could find on that site was spawned by individuals who have long since gone on to bigger and better things. Now all you have left for writers on that pathetic site is a spoiled rich kid from Virginia, a midget housewife, and Pirillo the English major. Why would any serious computer professional seek answers from a site with idiots like that doing the writing????

  40. Perhaps their logic runs deeper than the Obvious. by the+web · · Score: 1

    Maybe they are trying to mimic the rise and fall 1999-2000. You know when people still thought they would make their fortune on the internet.

    If there's one thing I know about computers and the internet, it's that fluff is a very big part of it's culture. Also, Pr0n is a very big part of the internet and computers, fluffing is even more pronounced by this.

    I feel that by your review you have exposed the book to be far more accurate in delivery then it ever could dream to be in content.

    --
    __
    Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
  41. why not 'online for dummies'? by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This book is as perfect for every computer user as the 'Internet Yellow Pages' are. HMM, lets make a BOOK out of PAPER that lists all the websites we can find. Brilliant. These books are for people who always say,

    'One of these days, you are going to have to teach me how to use computers'.

    No, I won't.
    Teach yourself or find something else to do. Writing a book like this is obviously going to make the authors and publishers some money, which is the point. This book was written by 'internet experts', the kind of people who get fired as soon as their companies find out how useless they really are. Then they get hired to write about what they barely know.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
    1. Re:why not 'online for dummies'? by teiresias · · Score: 1

      the kind of people who get fired as soon as their companies find out how useless they really are

      these people don't get fired? They get made CIO/CEO's.

      --
      -Teiresias
  42. What does it take to get a 1? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean really, there should be a competition to find a book which sets new lows.

    What's the point of having a scale of 1 to 10 if nobody has a 1?

    If Dvorak put out a book with so little value that it's not worth reading, will mislead anyone who doesn't know any better, would corrupt young minds if given to a library, would shame you to admit to have read it, much less purchased it, invokes sadness to look upon -- knowing that trees died to print it, leads you to question the sanity of the publisher or the motives of the author, then by all means, give it a 1!

    1. Re:What does it take to get a 1? by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 1
      I'd bet to get a one, you'd have to print out all the links to slashdot comments, that involved stupid jokes about Hot Grits, Goats.ex, "In Soviet Russia", and "imagine a cluster of those".

      Notice, how you'd have to print URL's to it (so you have to type it in), not the actual comments. Someone might find the comments amusing for the first 5 pages. Enough to earn it a 2 by rounding error or something. So even most of all the worthless comments on Slashdot (some of which are mine), wouldn't even rate a 1. Forcing someone to type the links to get them, would rate a 1 however.

      Kirby

  43. Look on the bright side... by Apostata · · Score: 1

    ...if you purchase a first edition book with spelling mistakes (particularly if you can get the authors to sign it), it will be worth more in proportion to the evidently etherous value of it's contents.

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
    1. Re:Look on the bright side... by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a photograph from the late 70's, Richard Nixon at a book signing, handing a copy of his autobiography and saying something to the person in front of him. The caption read "It's cheaper with the autograph...."

  44. Well, about as accurate anyway... by dswensen · · Score: 1

    I think it's already out, it's called "Hackers."

    1. Re:Well, about as accurate anyway... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      This is mildly disturbing--we came up with almost the same reply. Yours was first though.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
  45. Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I seem to have misplaced my pants...
    Have you checked with the guy who posted 11 messages after yours?
    1. Re:Your sig by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Oh man, that's creepy. I'm going to have to lock my front door before I go to bed from now on...

  46. Orbit by boatboy · · Score: 1

    editing errors like the text that tells us a 'geostationary satellite' orbits at 'about 22,300 miles,' next to a diagram showing the number 20,300 miles.

    "Geostationary orbit" seems like a misnomer itself. If it's geostationary, is it really orbiting around anything besides the sun?

    1. Re:Orbit by travisbecker · · Score: 1

      "Geostationary" refers to a satellite that appears to be stationary from a viewer on the Earth's surface. The satellite orbits once every 24 hours (actually every 23 hrs 56 mins 4 secs, but that's another story) and so stays roughly at the same point in the sky. It still orbits the Earth (which orbits the Sun).

      Travis

  47. ..."Never Before Revealed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I like how to the book site says,
    Packed with secrets never before revealed
    Gee, what secrets were these? I didn't realize the Internet had secrets. Maybe they're in a secret RFC somewhere that nobody knows about. Well, thank goodness for this book!

    1. Re:..."Never Before Revealed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think everything about the internet is in an RFC? I certainly hope not. Fuck you.

  48. Re:Why post? by The+Raven · · Score: 1

    Er. I could pretend English is my second language... but I have no excuse. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
  49. Re:more reviews of this book by zontroll · · Score: 1

    it's not my fault sites copy and paste each other's reviews

  50. Re:more reviews of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not my fault sites copy and paste each other's reviews

    So what you're saying is that you don't read the reviews to verify if they're different, you just link to them so that you can attach your affiliate links to them. That's a great help. Certainly justifies your spam.

  51. Scratch that Itch! (To the tune of Devo) by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Well,
    It sounds like you just got yourself an itch to scratch.

    Get to it .. and I'll look forward to reading the review.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  52. Re:more reviews of this book by zontroll · · Score: 1

    actually, what happened in this case is that each of those 3 sites had one review and then all of a sudden all 3 of them had all 3 reviews. I can't do anything about the fact that they updated them after I linked to them.

  53. It is missing a few things by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    They left out blinking text and scrolling banners.

    BTW, the "Early Comments" section is just BEGGING for /. abuse.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  54. Not exactly by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    "Hmm... sounds exactly like being online."

    To sound exactly like being online it would have to include hardcore photos of the authors and ads for penis enlargement.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  55. Dvorak's an idiot? Stop the frigging presses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    The problem is, Dvorak's ALWAYS been an idiot. Remember, this is the guy who said that the iBook would fail because it was "too girly." This is the man that swore up and down that Apple would be out of business by 1995...1996...1997...etc.

    I'm sure Dvorak is an idiot on topics other than the Apple, but those are the examples of idiocy that come most readily to mind.

    - Crow T. Robot

  56. Oh the irony of it all by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seems sort of ironic that they would have a website online for a book about computer and internet basics. It should have a message like those bumper stickers, "If you can read this you don't need this book".

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  57. 700 pages? by Spikescape · · Score: 1

    I don't have time to read all that. When will the Cliff's Notes version be out?

  58. Full as a baked potato by inio · · Score: 1

    120 comments and nobody has written a compare/contrast piece between Online! The Book! and Cannibal! The Musical! yet?

    This can't be slashdot.

  59. Dial-up Ain't Gone... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and it may never be. I still help out at a dial-up ISP that's been open for business since 1989. We're a local mom and pop shop.

    We have a lot of customers. There's seniors who don't do anything but email, so our "PAYING" rate works well, at $5 for 20 hours of connection time, tracked by the second. (Who'd have thought $5 could last you six months?) Then there's joe and jane parent who don't want their kid on Kazaa all the time.

    All in all, dial-up still fills a niche. The low-bandwidth, low-cost niche. That's not going to be satisfied until there's datacount-based wireless service.

    1. Re:Dial-up Ain't Gone... by jlleblanc · · Score: 1

      Besides which, there are many areas that still don't have broadband connections at all. And not just in rural areas. I was staying at a friend's house in suburban St. Louis (Eureka) and not only were they too far out for DSL, they couldn't even get cable tv.

  60. And in other news... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    ... Imminent releases from the same author include "Stuff" and "Things," and he is currently working on "Whatyamacallit."

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  61. Surely someone has done this better before by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Ru$$ia, a Beowulf cluster of "it is now official, a Netcraft survey confirms: all your BSD are dying" IMAGINES YOU!!!

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  62. Even better by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
    Cannibal! The Musical!

    Maybe you meant Silence! ?

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  63. ``How a modem works'' chapter recycled by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    (probably) from Dvork's classic guide to PC Telecommunications, a mainstay back in the days of BBSs.

    Sad.

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  64. The internet is like a box of donuts... by Shoggoth+of+Maul · · Score: 1

    That's the evil, mind-ripping beauty of the Free Internet. Be careful where you click.

  65. Breakout box? by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 3, Informative
    This is a breakout box.

    While this is an example of a page with a sidebar.

    This is only worth commenting on because I had no idea what the hell you meant.

    --
    There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
  66. I think Chris is CUTE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Count me as one AC who (for the obvious reason that I don't want to embarass myself in public) thinks Chris is lots cuter than Gretchen.

  67. Contractual obligation? by timbck2 · · Score: 1

    This book sounds like the equivalent of some music artist putting out an album full of filler just to fulfill a contractual obligation. Is that what's going on here -- Dvorak has a contract with Prentice-Hall that says he has to write n books in x years?

    --
    Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  68. John Dvorak by Feral+Bueller · · Score: 1
    Why is anyone surprised that a book by this asshat would suck?

    ugh.

    He's the retarded Andy Rooney of computer journalism.

    --
    - learn to swim.
  69. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Old+Wolf · · Score: 0, Troll

    new arrangements of you come up.

    Now why wasn't that one in the Rapier Wit webpage?

  70. Ahhh! My eyes! My eyes!!! by rscrawford · · Score: 1

    I clicked through to the book's website. ACK! I think I'm pernanently blind! I haven't seen something that ugly since my 5 year old niece made a web page about her puppies.

    Nah, the puppy page was better.

    *shivers* Oh my Lord, that was scary.

    --
    -- The reason it's called the right wing? Irony.
  71. Hubris by murr · · Score: 1

    On the hubr-o-meter, this does not quite measure up to O'Reilly publishing a book The Whole Internet: User's Guide & Catalog.

    Admittedly, they published it in 1992...

  72. One Better... by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

    1999 called, they want their "In Soviet Ru$$ia, a Beowulf cluster of 'it is now official, a Netcraft survey confirms: all your BSD are dying' IMAGINES YOU!!" back... I, for one, welcome our new 1999 joke-taking-back overlords.

    1. Re:One Better... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
      Touche, my brother.

      Truly an American icon.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  73. The ed. isn't one to be critical of sentence logic by acabrera · · Score: 1

    [i]We get errors in logic like the breakout box that has "DNS servers [b]may[/b] run Apache, which is an open source Web server program" and goes on to imply that all DNS servers will run a web server.[/i] Since when does [i]may[/i] mean [i]must[/i]?

  74. Omg Scotty I missed you!!! ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give JPL a kiss for me, luv.

  75. HEY FATTY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Janez Pavel gunna get fucked up da ASS!!!

  76. chapter 288.. by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    Goatse.cx ...as the man bent over, he grabbed the sides of his anus and....

    you get the idea.

  77. Filthy Liars by Aytros · · Score: 1

    "This may be the single most important book ever written fro people who go online and for people who want to go online." (From the book's website Lies. All lies.

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it.
  78. Find something better to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh, this Slashdot entry is nothing more than incoherent babble. I had to read through it three times to understand exactly what the point was -- and I'm *still* not entirely sure I get it. You have a problem with him "doodling on his own body," I take it? Why care? Did seeing his bare nipples give you an erection and put your sexuality in question?

    Good gawd, man. Get out of the basement and do something constructive already.

  79. Re:-1, Buy an ad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you vlaggot.