Slashdot Mirror


Robotics + Car = Hallucigenia

News for nerds writes "I4U has news about a new transportation concept, called The Hallucigenia 01, which is a working 1/5 scale vehicle prototype, designed by Japanese design firm Leading Edge Design. PC Watch (Japanese) has photos and movies. Its 8 wheels are independent robotic arms controlled by their own satellite CPUs, interconnected to the main CPU by an internal LAN."

165 comments

  1. What ever happened to style? by Vokbain · · Score: 3, Funny

    It looks like a spider crossed with a skateboard. I wouldn't drive that.

    1. Re:What ever happened to style? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      maybe it's really just an attempt at making that other over-hyped piece of shit (segway) look trendy?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:What ever happened to style? by Steve+'Rim'+Jobs · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but it's perfect for Spider Man's new car!

    3. Re:What ever happened to style? by PsychoFurryEwok · · Score: 1

      This one looks good though: http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2003/1127/10704 29.jpg

    4. Re:What ever happened to style? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 3, Funny

      Going by the name, it sounds like they're tarketing a group of people to whom 'most' things look like spiders crossed with other things.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    5. Re:What ever happened to style? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Engval pulls his Hallucigenia into a gas station. The attendant walks out, looks at his car, looks at Bill, looks back at the car, and says, "Tire go flat?"

      "Nope. I was driving around and them other seven just swelled right up!"

    6. Re:What ever happened to style? by IroNick · · Score: 1

      I think it kinda looks like a over-sized Lego...
      And I dig it!

    7. Re:What ever happened to style? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Can go up stairs, rides flat on hills, extremely stable... Yeah, forget the car that would make a kick-ass skateboard.

    8. Re:What ever happened to style? by Artcfox · · Score: 1

      Here's your sign...

    9. Re:What ever happened to style? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does the passenger seat look very different from the driver's seat?

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  2. What a name by OSUJoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they implying that the idea for the car came from a night spent tripping on acid.. or... ??

    1. Re:What a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hallucigenia is a fossil. Very old, early Cambrian, I believe. And very weird, hence the name. Check the logo.

    2. Re:What a name by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 4, Informative

      Judging from the shape of the logo, I suspect this is a reference to Hallucigenia sparsa, a reasonably famous critter they dug out of the Burgess Shale, missassigned as part of genus Canadia and was later renamed and reassigned by Simon Conway Morris. More here. Article links to a possible reconstruction which seems to be down for me.

      Paleobiology. This is a nerdy conveyance if I ever saw one.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    3. Re:What a name by aeoneal · · Score: 1

      The Smithsonian also has a good image. Personally, I think it's a brilliant interpretation of a very old design. Anyone who's read about the Burgess shale and the pre-Cambrian extinctions knows the variety of structure that was lost. (S. J. Gould's Wonderful Life is a great read.) This is a useful, inventive translation of old structure into modern use. What a great source for inspiration.

  3. Make it out of something more durable by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    Then you can use it as your casket after you smear your brains all over the windshield during a crash.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Make it out of something more durable by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      Make it out of something more durable

      Since you are so fluent in Japanese, please tell the rest of us precisely what it is constructed of and why you think it is not a sufficient material. I assume you are also a structural and/or materials engineer and therefore have significant subject knowledge.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    2. Re:Make it out of something more durable by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      I make no claim to be fluent in Japanese.

      The Hallucigenia 01 shown on the pcwatch page is a 1/5 model and is not necessarily made of the same material a full-size version would be.

      The Toyota PM which I have seen first hand seems to be made a fiberglass polymer around an aluminum frame. The canopy is made of hard plastic.

      None of that information is on the site linked to in the story, though.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    3. Re:Make it out of something more durable by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      The Toyota PM which I have seen first hand seems to be made a fiberglass polymer around an aluminum frame. The canopy is made of hard plastic.

      Interesting. FYI Audi has been selling passenger cars (currently the Audi A8, S8 and the A2) for over 10 years now which are entirely constructed of aluminum. No steel anywhere in the frame - 100% aluminum construction, and they are some of the safest cars in the world. The marketing name for it is the "Audi Space Frame" (ASF).

      Obviously the design plays a huge role in how rigid the structure is - just because it's made of aluminum doesn't mean that it's safe or unsafe.

      I don't think I like the sound of the Toyota's "hard plastic" canopy though. Do you have any links to more information about the Toyota PM?

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    4. Re:Make it out of something more durable by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      There are some links at the bottom of the page.

      The big thing to remember here about these guys is that they are only prototypes and I'd assume they have quite a bit more engineering that needs to go into them. One of those design needs is how to fit an average-sized person into the driver's seat.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  4. I don't get it by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does it need to have multiple computers networked? Doesn't this add latency that could be very dangerous at high speed? Wouldn't one computer, rather than several, with the proper sensory and control hardware be a better choice? Will I only use question marks to end sentences in this post?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:I don't get it by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why does it need to have multiple computers networked? Redundancy in case of failure. You see, they'll be running Windows.

    2. Re:I don't get it by TWX · · Score: 1

      > > Why does it need to have multiple computers networked?

      > Redundancy in case of failure. You see, they'll be running Windows.

      Ah.

      Wait, but if all of the computers are running at the same time, wouldn't you multiply the odds that at least one of the computers would fail? If there's a 5% chance that one computer will fail, would that make there a 30% chance that one of six would fail?

      I hope it's not an n + 1 type of redundancy, else the driver is just screwed...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:I don't get it by NegativeK · · Score: 1

      By that logic, 21 computers would fail with a 105% chance. I can't remember the exact math for multiplying those statistics (I've blocked statistics from my memory), but it isn't simple addition. =)

      --
      This statement is false.
    4. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it wouldn't be 30%. One can see that the probability cannot be computed in this way by considering 30 computers. There couldn't be a 150% chance of failure.

      It's 1-(.95)^6 which is about 26.5%.

    5. Re:I don't get it by razberry636 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Wouldn't one computer, rather than several, with the proper sensory and control hardware be a better choice?
      The eight independent robots can separate at will. They join together and magically work in unison to form megaHallucigenia .

      It also has a really cool glowing sword and can shoot plastic missiles.

    6. Re:I don't get it by MindNumbingOblivion · · Score: 1
      Quoth the poster:
      Why does it need to have multiple computers networked? Doesn't this add latency that could be very dangerous at high speed?

      Yes, there would be latency. However, it would be miniscule, especially in this scenario, well, assuming, as I do, that the CPUs would each only be dealing with the affairs of their one robotic wheel and axle assembly and recieving orders from the UberCPU. Think about it this way: when you play CS over the net, there is some latency, correct? Depending on connection speed, processor load, and other factors, this can be just seemingly instantaneous response from a lagless game, or it can be the dear...god...why...i...s...my...con..n.e..c.t..i.o ...n....so...freaking......s.....l....o....w. I assume that in this setup, the magnitude would be the former, instantaneous, goodness.

      My only concern (probably unfounded) is what would happen if you had a wireless hookup along with these babies...imagine being warhacked while warhacking...Wardriving indeed...

      Quoth the Poster:
      Will I only use question marks to end sentences in this post?


      I see in your future....a career...as a cheesy serial radio announcer...
      --
      #define CLUE 0
    7. Re:I don't get it by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
      If there's a 5% chance that one computer will fail, would that make there a 30% chance that one of six would fail?

      With one computer, you have a 95% chance of having a functional computer. With six computers, you have a 1-0.05^6 = 99.999998% chance of having a functional computer.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    8. Re:I don't get it by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this add latency that could be very dangerous at high speed?

      "latency" is a vauge term. There's "latency" in that information can only travel at c between two points; there's "latency" in that the car's controls aren't responsive. And, there's "latency" in that a human needs to see and react to what's around them.

      Even a modest-speed LAN can have plenty of bandwidth to keep up with a car's latency issues--assuming, of course, that the darn thing is wired correctly.

      An F-22, for example, is all fly-by-wire, and has several internetworked computers working to keep it aloft. And, as it's an unstable body, if the computers fry, the darn thing drops like a rock.

    9. Re:I don't get it by TWX · · Score: 1

      I see in your future....a career...as a cheesy serial radio announcer...

      At least you see something in my future that could be called a career...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    10. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, in fact, this will reduce the latency of the overall system. On a good network, the latency between one computer and the next will be little more than latency of a sensor to a computer the same distance away. In fact, in systems like this, sensors tend to be connected to the computer by simple networks anyways. By placing a specialized controller next to the sensor, you reduce the latency over a sensor further away from a general purpose processor.

      There are other advantages to having multiple controllers in a system like this. First, you have parallel processing. It should be obvious that have eight seperate controllers means you can do eight tasks at the same time, while a single processor can only do one task at a time. Second, you have reduced complexity. Yes, REDUCED complexity. Each controller can be programmed to do only the tasks that it needs to do in its own region of the machine. The network can then carry only the information that one controller needs from another. Third, you get reduced cost. Eight specialized microcontrollers cost less than a single general purpose processor.

      Just think about how your own body works. We have the central nervous system, but we also have the autonomic nervous system. When you place your hand on something hot, and your arm jerks back, it's not your brain that did it. It would actually take far too long for the brain to respond to that stimulus. Instead, jerking your hand back is an automatic reaction that is handled closer to the stimulus.

      If it's good enough for us highly developed organisms, then it should be good enough for a machine.

    11. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC above you got it correctly. You forgot to use the chance of success instead of the chance of failure in your math. Rolling multiple dice does not make one less likely to roll a six on one of them.

    12. Re:I don't get it by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
      Redundancy as a concept would be flawed if losing a single item out of an ensemble rendered the system usless.

      If you read what I said, I was talking about the chance of having at least one functioning computer. By adding computers, you do make it less likely that all of them will fail, and therefore you make it more likely that at least one will work.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  5. Movies? On slashdot? by Steve+'Rim'+Jobs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soon we will hear the deep voice of Darth Vader saying "I find your lack of bandwidth disturbing..."

    Why did I think of that? I dunno, maybe it's because the car looks kinda like Darth's friggen head..

  6. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How can I give these guys money?! Someone tell me quick... nevermind, the drugs are losing their effect.

  7. Re:Movies? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This probably wont be as bad as those kids that dropped all those bouncy balls off a four story building, with a 650 meg video for download on the front page.

  8. Star Wars by PsychoFurryEwok · · Score: 1

    Looks like a mouse droid to me. Meep, meep.

    1. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Looks like a mouse droid to me. Meep, meep.
      What does a mouse droid have to do with the roadrunner noise?
    2. Re:Star Wars by PsychoFurryEwok · · Score: 1

      It goes meep meep and then runs into walls. Haven't you watched the movies?

  9. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that japanese tend to be small but somehow that thing doesn't look to roomy...

    1. Re:well by patman600 · · Score: 1

      Look closer, and you will see it is a 1/5 scale prototype

  10. Hallucigenia! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 0

    That's right, "Hallucigenia"! You can get really drunk or drop acid until you Hallucinate, and our Hallucigenia will take you home safely.

    Bet your puny Explorer can't do that!

    Hallucigenia! Yeah, now that's the nice schnizzit!

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  11. Re:Movies? On slashdot? by armando_wall3 · · Score: 1


    "I find your lack of bandwidth disturbing..."

    And the poor server gets on its knees, gasping.

    I already got a "OPEN Hallucigenia Web Site
    Leading Edge Design" on the site, and nothing else.... oh, the /. force!!!

  12. Wow by nnnneedles · · Score: 2, Funny
    Its 8 wheels are independent robotic arms controlled by their own satellite CPUs, interconnected to the main CPU by an internal LAN." Got Bloat?

    Do the wheels play multiplayer Quake with each other in their spare time?

    Is the communication between the wheel and the brake done using XML protocols?

    Do the wheels send an email to your mobile phone when your refrigerator has run out of milk?

    Critical Joke Possiblities OVERLOAD

    Brain Terminated.

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
    1. Re:Wow by umofomia · · Score: 1
      Its 8 wheels are independent robotic arms controlled by their own satellite CPUs, interconnected to the main CPU by an internal LAN."

      This also means we can slashdot the thing. :)

    2. Re:Wow by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Hey guys! Check it out! I just modded ALL of my wheels with chrome trim and windows with LED backlighting and... oh my god! Where's the brakes?! Why didn't I mod in some brakes?! Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaa#!DG9059n!#$c 4341[NO CARRIER]

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those things!

    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in soviet russia the beowulf cluster imagines you!

  13. Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the central tenents of all good engineering is "As complex as is needed, and NO MORE." Any more you add after that point is just "more to go wrong".

    Eight wheels, eight suspension systems, eight control systems. True, perhaps the system is designed with failure in mind, but think about owning this as a vehicle for normal use - how often will you be taking in to be fixed, because one or more wheels have broken?

    It's just like the fools who buy 4 wheel drive SUVs when what they need is a minivan - now they have what amounts to a whole extra powertrain to go wrong.

    Now, if the intent was for this to be used in unusual circumstances (forestry work, extreme rough road work or the like) I could believe this was "as complex as needed but no more".

    1. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by dbleoslow · · Score: 1

      That was an explanation a Boeing person said when asked why they didn't consider 4 engines when designing the 777. His answer was it increases the likelyhood of a failure. This thing seems so complicated something is likely to fail every other day.

    2. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The question is, how many wheels does this thing need to drive? If it can drive on four wheels then this is safer than a car. If it needs all eight (or close to it) then it's less so.

      BTW, they make AWD minivans, too. And everyone needs AWD because it's more stable all the time, at least if you have limited slip diffs. (And viscous limited slips just about never wear out, before you object to THAT.)

      Oh sure, people can live without AWD... but plenty of people dead today would be alive if they had it. Those people who died because they were hotdogging would have done something even more ridiculous with AWD and thus could not be saved, but I'm not talking about them :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess you missed the picture of it climbing stairs, staying level on hills, and changing direction 90 degrees without changing yaw. That's why it has eight wheels.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    4. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by rzbx · · Score: 1

      I agree. It is a little too much, but I did find this vehicle to be quite interesting: http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2003/1127/10704 29.jpg

      I wish I had one of those.

      So unless that eight wheel vehicle has a purpose besides a transportation vehicle for their average customer, then it is a waste of time.

      --
      Question everything.
    5. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is the modern car with the modern computer controlled internal combustion engine you're talking about. If you've looked under the hood recently, you'd see that 4 extra wheels could only add a tiny smidge to the complexity that's already there.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    6. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by cerebralpc · · Score: 1

      Actually the axiom is:
      As simple as it needs to be, but no simpler.

    7. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Isn't it:
      As complex as necessary, but simple as possible?

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    8. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AWD? Is that 4-wheel drive?

    9. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about the mechanical complexity, not the electronic complexity.

    10. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      So was I. The internal combustion engine is a very complex device.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    11. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by jason0000042 · · Score: 1
      Yes, but one of the central tenants of concept cars is "push it to the limit; let's see how far we can take idea".

      As an example, I saw a story on a full size concept car; if I remember rightly it was by Volkswagen. Anyway, it was fly by wire. As a proof of concept thing, they put in a joystick instead of a steering wheel. But they came right out and said that they didn't intend to make production cars with joysticks, it was just to show what you could do with the technology.

      --
      i don't like my old sig.
    12. Re:Yes. Great. More to go wrong. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. Four wheel drive usually means that you operate in two wheel drive mode most of the time, and you can switch into four wheel drive mode; all wheel drive is all wheel all the time. AWD systems vary; sometimes it's just the front wheels doing the driving, until they slip, and the rears engage, but usually it's split 50/50 between the front and back all the time.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Nothing New by cybercomm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GM also came up with the "skateboard" design, the only difference that i see is this one has more wheels, more gdgets, and better control; which may be good for suspension and stability, but it makes me wonder as to the economy of producing a full scale unit, due to cost, complexity, maintenance and later on replacement (as if replacing 4 tires wasnt expensive enough). Not to say that this vehicle doesent have a bright future, heck, im guessing this will make one helluva city car. They did borrow one good thing from GM though, for if this car gets mass produced the owners or factory, will be able to change "skins" (IE top part of the car) intermittently.

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
    1. Re:Nothing New by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 2, Informative
      GM also came up with the "skateboard" design,

      I bet it's not as cool as the BMW Streetcarver. I want one, but no doubt I'd just write it off with my dismal 'skillz'.

      Seriously, I would love some kind of powered skateboard, as they're very good for getting around tight parts of town ( and being able to pick them up is very convenient... ), but they're going to have to make them very easy riding ( perhaps with that suspension system from Snow Crash ) before it will ever take off with the masses.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
  15. 'internal LAN' by IANAL(BIAILS) · · Score: 0

    That's what must have been powering their webserver... I have a mental picture of a car pulled off on the side of the road, hood open, smoke coming from the engine...

  16. Hallucigenia by ObviousGuy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Trippy

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  17. What is hallucigenia ? by andy666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is a little animal found in the Burgess Shale of Canada. See the Stephen Jay Gould Book "Wonderful Life" for details. Here is a picture:

    http://www.karencarr.com/gallery_hallucigenia.html

    1. Re:What is hallucigenia ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that had to be named for the Magic Mushroom head (I think thats a head.) However I think the car was named for what you'd have to eat to be willing to get in it.

    2. Re:What is hallucigenia ? by andy666 · · Score: 1

      Nope, take a look at their logo - it is the fossil.

    3. Re:What is hallucigenia ? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the vehicle doesn't look at all like the critter, either the early version in Gould's book, or the more recent reconstructions based on a few more fossils.

      Maybe they just like the fossil (or the name).

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:What is hallucigenia ? by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      I think the Japanese must have failed to appreciate both the connotations that that name has in English, as well as the fact that that line became extinct very early on in the evolution of animals. In different words, not a good name for a vehicle...

  18. GM built the Autonomy (skateboard) for one reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To prove that a mass production fuel cell powered automobile won't sell. This will go just like the EV1. Great concept. Great design. Zero marketing. Ludicrous rules such as "lease only". And then they will go to the government and complain that they can't sell them but the technology they created will help a gas powered full size pickup get 1 more mile per gallon.

    And then the Japanese will do it and once again steal the American auto industry's lunch just like the 80's with the quality gap (which still exists today).

  19. parallel parking by grey3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From looking at the pictures, it seems that the wheels can rotate perpendicular to the length of the vehicle. Should make parallel parking a breeze.

    1. Re:parallel parking by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Informative

      From looking at the pictures, it seems that the wheels can rotate perpendicular to the length of the vehicle. Should make parallel parking a breeze.

      From looking at the videos, it does.

      It also goes sideways, up and down a bit, and can walk (akwardly) on them 4 at a time.
      Does all sort of crazy cool stuff.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:parallel parking by Osty · · Score: 1

      From looking at the pictures, it seems that the wheels can rotate perpendicular to the length of the vehicle. Should make parallel parking a breeze.

      Parellel parking is already a breeze, assuming you:

      1. Are not blind
      2. Have a minimal amount of hand-eye coordination and depth-perception.
      3. Are not driving a Maibotsu Monstrosity

      I've never had a problem parallel parking any car I've ever driven (well, with the exception of large trucks, but I don't take those where I would be parallel parking them).
    3. Re:parallel parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be even easier. But you Linux geeks probably don't like things being easy.

  20. %@!*'ing powermorph GO!! by eyenot · · Score: 0

    "Leading Edge Design next seeks to realize their ultimate ranger vehicle -- car-Voltron's left foot!"

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  21. 8 wheels by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    Gah think of the road noise.

    It would stop on dime tho...

    1. Re:8 wheels by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could make it cruse along on 4 wheels by flicking a switch. Wear the tires unevenly though...

  22. Spider by BlueValve · · Score: 1

    I say we name it Shelob...

  23. This think should be able to WALK! by gacp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know wheter this model can or not, and the wheels are toys in this model, but the think should be able to turn the wheels flat and use them as rubber feet and WALK over obstacles. I like the idea. Complicated gizmo, though.

    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''
    1. Re:This think should be able to WALK! by bpb213 · · Score: 2, Informative

      But it DOES walk.

      you simply need to WTFV (watch the f'ing videos)

      http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2003/yajiuma/ 12 /furo236.mov

      --

      This .sig looking for creative and witty saying.
    2. Re:This think should be able to WALK! by gacp · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Sorry, I guess I was not clear in my wording, I was predicting from the design that it would be able to do so, but I found no mention of that anywhere.

      --
      ``L'imagination au povoir.''
    3. Re:This think should be able to WALK! by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      I would say that's more of a shuffle than a walk.

    4. Re:This think should be able to WALK! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      should be able to turn the wheels flat and use them as rubber feet and WALK over obstacles.

      It does walk, akwardly, but they don't need to turn the wheels over, they just lock 'em and use the regular surface. One less thing to break.

      Hey, maybe they'll put these things in matches of robot soccer! They can walk, so they might also be able to kick a ball!

      P.S. Your sig (``L'imagination au povoir.'') is missing a "u". Its "pouvoir".

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:This think should be able to WALK! by gacp · · Score: 1

      Yes, one less thing to break, but FAR less surface in contact with the ground. I don't know...

      Thanks for the correction. I hate French, but I love the quote and always try to keep the original forms.

      --
      ``L'imagination au povoir.''
    6. Re:This think should be able to WALK! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Yes, one less thing to break, but FAR less surface in contact with the ground. I don't know...

      It still keeps 4 wheels on the ground at all times...that is as much surface in contact with the ground as every car out there today...
      Thik of that next time you jaywalk ;- )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  24. Impressed 5/8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Its 8 wheels are independent robotic arms controlled by their own satellite CPUs, interconnected to the main CPU by an internal LAN.

    OVERKILL.

    Lets not get fancy with the GPS guvey just because we have it. I dont see the scenerio that is going to require each wheel on a fixed platform base to 'fix' it's position from space in order to move around on a bit of little earth. Perhaps if it was nurual learning computer that fixed it's position from space, learned from it and added that terriain information to a database for relationshional logistics, fields and scenerios. Not to discredit them, its still a neat-o project, just too long on the imagination and too short on the practability. But untill they reach a level on something akin to NASA's crawler http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/facilities/crawler.htm l. I'll reserve real judgement.

    1. Re:Impressed 5/8 by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      You seem to assume the satellite CPUs will be some 2.5GHz Pentium VII or something. What if it's a 2.5MHz 8080, or something similar with just enough power to do the job at hand? Embedded systems tend to have low power (i.e., cheap) processors.

      What if each wheel/suspension assembly contains it's own CPU, making eight identical, interchangeable, mass-produceable components that can plug onto virtually any chassis? That would not be overkill, that would be sensible.

      Until I can read an English translation, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:Impressed 5/8 by Clinoti · · Score: 1

      For heavy mechanizations usage like the nasa mover or moving pipelines undersea in rough terrain I can see it. But I have to agree on 'the overkill / wait till we see what they do with it' parts.

      --

      Let's keep in mind that patents are in place to keep lawyers employed and keep them litigating. -CatGrep

  25. Mirror of Movies & Pictures by Ironix · · Score: 4, Informative


    In preparation for the sites inevitable /.ing, I have prepared a mirror of the pictures and movies.

    Mirrors:
    Pictures
    Movies

    --
    Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
  26. The Hallucigenia by zr-rifle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hallucigenia means "Dream Children" and is a name of a small worm belonging to the Burgess-Shale collection of fossils

    Researcher Simon Conway Morris had probably been working overnight a little too often, since he mistook the fossil for an eerie monster-like creature with a blob like head and spikes for legs, thus dubbing it "Hallucigenia". See the picture. Looks a little bit like Alien, doesn't it?

    It was only in 1991 that this strange little animal's anatomy was correctly interpreted as a worm, the Onychophore, with spikes on it's back and tentacles or, better, pseudopods for walking (and probably eating).

    I wonder if the pictures of this car are upside down...

    --
    Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
    1. Re:The Hallucigenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /.

      Nobody's going to believe me on this one, but:

      When I read the Whittington/Morris/Briggs stuff from the Burgess Shale (I was working at the ANSP at the time) I immediately said "Simon's got this thing upside down!". After all, a kneeless pentaped is a little hard to believe when the alternative is so much more functional.

      Unfortunately everyone I spoke to about it at the time is now dead, except Bhil and possibly Art, and who's going to believe them anyway?

      On the other claw, Conway-Morris is a rather odd duck himself, and people believe him on occasion...

      --Charlie

  27. ummm wow by britrock · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, it does a great job of navigating over the rough terrain of that flat smooth table top. Whats the point again?

  28. But I'm a Plus_size guy. by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    It was a long time since I was 1/5th scale!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  29. I don't like it because by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 0

    it's too small and the wheels are solid which means that it will be a bumpy ride.

  30. Re:GM built the Autonomy (skateboard) for one reas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez... are you misinformed.

    Car companies DO NOT CARE what fuel you use, they just want to sell you a car, any car. The reason for the "lease only" terms of the hybrid cars is that after about 2 years, the huge bank of batteries they have crap out. Customers would not be happy shelling out 50% of the original price to replace the batteries.

    Car manufacturers are very very conservative when it comes to implementing new technology, the costs of retooling and the reliability unknowns make them very weary of mass producing new(very different) cars. New models, even significant redesigns usually retain 80 plus percent of the previous models parts.

    For example, electronic ignitions (the thing that replaced points) took over 20 years to go from after market accessory to standard feature.

    To recap, Car companies are not evil and don't care what fuel you use, they are VERY cautious because mistakes are very expensive.

    Oh, and where do you suppose we are going to get all of this super cheap hydrogen in the future?

  31. Motion sickness much? by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

    Also it can drive through a slalom without changing the direction of the body. I hope they include standard travel sickness bags, because that's just begging to make people throw up.

  32. Actually its easier by bpb213 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ability to travel in one direction while independantly rotating in another (and it looks like this eight legged freak can do that to an extent) is called holonomic motion. Robotics people have been doing this for years with something called an omniwheel. Basically its a wheel that contains many other smaller wheels that roll perpendicular to the axis of the big wheel.
    We can do holonomic motion with as little as three wheels (popularlized by the palm robots from carnegie melon). Of course, four wheeled models have been made.
    And I really think that it is from the four omniwheel concept that will really revolutionize travel, not this eight legged, asking to break down, feat of engineering.

    (Of course, mandatory info links:
    The wheels found on the palm robot:
    http://www.acroname.com/robotics/parts/R76 -4CM-ROL LER.html
    Cheaper, and larger, omniwheels:
    http://www.omniwheel.com/cgi-bin/plug ins/MivaEmpre sas/miva?plugins/MivaMerchants/merchant.mvc+Screen =PROD&Store_Code=KCWD&Product_Code=2052-38&Categor y_Code=Transwheel2
    The above are one of each, there are many more on both sites. Just start url hacking :) )

    --

    This .sig looking for creative and witty saying.
    1. Re:Actually its easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you can climb up and down with 4 or 3 wheels. See movies of this Hallucigenia walking.

  33. Why drive... by OriginalArlen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    when you can smoke dope and fly? Once upon a time I was a passenger in a car when the driver got the passenger to rack em out & hold up the lines just under his face. He took his eyes off the road, took a careful look, pinched up the spare nostril and carefully did a line, going back for the bits he'd missed. Eyes back to road, slight swerve, drive on like 'no big deal...'. Jeez, he was a helluva boss... **DISCLAIMER** Consuming illegal drugs is dangerous and Bad. Doing so and then driving is criminally irresponsible. Doing so WHILST driving suggests you should be in hospital, preferrably before you get carried there in a blue-light vehicle. Apart from a spot of weed late at night on those empty motorways...

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  34. Interface by bpb213 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok, one thing I think drivers expect, is the following interface:

    One steering wheel.
    One gas pedal
    One brake pedal.
    Some gauge things, that lie about how fast you are really going.
    And if you drive a manual, like me:
    One clutch.
    One shifter.

    Now, how do you modify something simple and ingrained like the above interface, which btw has stood since Ford put out the model T?

    Answer, you cant. Result: customers have to learn an entirely new control mechanism. Very bad.

    --

    This .sig looking for creative and witty saying.
    1. Re:Interface by dieman · · Score: 1

      Except the Gas Pedal was really a lever. Perhaps you need a ride in a Real Model T and not whatever you think you might be talking about.

      --
      -- dieman - Scott Dier
    2. Re:Interface by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      Maybe I missed something, but where did it show any other user interface? Or did you think those eight wheels each had their own controls?

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    3. Re:Interface by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Any good Interface Designer could take your requirements and make this vehicle work within them.

      In fact to pare down that list of expected interface items:

      Steering wheel
      Gas pedal
      Break pedal
      Speedometer

      Let's see what other interfaces people have adapted to their normal driving routines though... just to see how adaptable they really are.

      - Radio with tuning knobs then sliders then up/down buttons plus presets, volume, bass, treble, balance
      - Tape deck/CD deck with programming buttons
      - Air conditioning / heater interface with climate control
      - Various cruise controls, etc
      - Shortwave radio
      - Cellphones
      - all the other meters on the dash and more lately, heads up displays

      - plus all the other random gadgets they use while driving

      I think people can handle a few new interface extras, though safety is becoming the biggest concern.

      Most of the new modes demonstrated by this vehicle are special circumstance or automatic adjustment modes which don't require manual interfaces anyways. Some terms for these modes would be, parallel parking, driving up an incline, 3-point/u- turn, all-terrain... as in; parallel park: you pull up to the spot get into position then pull a trigger on the wheel... the vehicle pivots all wheels and pulls into the space sideways; or driving up an incline: obvious, it's all automatic... car adjusts as you drive based on a sensor; all-terrain: etc. you get the idea.

      As for manual? No such thing, why would you want it for a vehicle like this?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:Interface by Technician · · Score: 1

      I think an aircraft type yoke would be an easy to learn interface. To go forward, push the yoke forward. To turn while stopped or moving, rotate the yoke like a steering wheel (simple learning curve here). To go sideways, stop going forward and tilt the entire yoke the desired direction of travel. A pedal could be used to switch from highway driving mode to stair climbing mode (great for getting unstuck in downtown gridlocks near a public park ;-). A curb and pedestrian path would be no problem except for narrow skybridges, stairwells and the bike cop..

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:Interface by DRACO- · · Score: 1

      You know, the learning curve of learning to drive a standard forklift isnt much higher than driving a car. Most forklifts are AT, with a 3rd pedal that acts like a clutch/brake combo.. then you just have 3 hydrolic levers to contend with shifting loads. I have no problem driving forklifts pallet jacks and pallet stackers, the former two employ a tow stick style steering and the final one employs trigger throttle control and drop the stick braking. You could 180 any 3 of these machines easily placing pivot point at near center between the nonsteer wheels (meaning almost spin in place ability).

      Now you guys should see the forklift at a metal shop I recently heard about. It can drive sideways as well as forward/reverse. Im told the guy just engages a switch and it changes to sidways movement.

      The system described in the article would be interesting if applied to forklift situations, Load leveling, capable of side movement and 180 in place is really needed in small warehouses and shipping docks.

      DRACO-

      --
      Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
  35. Looks like Akira Manga "Caretaker" by feelyoda · · Score: 1

    Seen modified in the center here:
    http://www.bbakira.co.uk/animevmanga/gangs. htm

    or here on the cover of the 3rd Manga volume:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/156971525 4/ref=sib _dp_pt/102-3299208-5287367#reader-link

    This car would be great...
    more control to the robots the better

    --

    Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
  36. Sounds suspicious by _Sexy_Pants_ · · Score: 1

    Imagine 13 year old Jimmy saying saying to his friend, "My neighbor's got hallucigenia in his garage. Oh yeah, every once in a while he takes it out and we go on a trip!"

    --
    Look it's a joke about my sig IN MY SIG! LOL!
  37. Re:frosty post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fristy frost and frosty frist, the fritzen blitzen schietzen fritzed! are two "d", too? flagrant flames and friendly facts, who makes such aerobic bats? no one like you, face the news, and go make me some fragant blues!

  38. Re:frosty post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    brought to you by Burma Shave, king of the information superhighway.

  39. This will allow good population growth by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    We can now safely increase earth's people-capacity by 2 or 3 fold. 20 billion babies is not out-of-the-question. This is a very good thing, I believe.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  40. Re:GM built the Autonomy (skateboard) for one reas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The entire point of my post is that the US auto industry isn't slow to change. It doesn't change at all. They'd rather keep on the same course with no changes and no innovation. Fuel cells and BEVs are so different that the Big 3 want nothing to do with them.

    >>For example, electronic ignitions (the thing that replaced points) took over 20 years to go from after market accessory to standard feature

    Because some company said they could manufacture them for less than 80% of the old style points. And the Big 3 never looked at the new tech a moment beforehand.

    >>Car companies are not evil

    It has nothing to do with being evil. Toyota sells the Prius and Honda has the Civic Hybrid and Insight which all get about double the mileage of an ICE-only powered car of the same size. When those vehicles first went on sale, not a single one made money. It was considered an extended research project. Now, every one of them is profitable. Next year will see a hybrid Lexus RX330 (called RX400H) and Toyota Highlander, hybrid Honda CRV and Element. Toyota will happily sell you a license to mass produce their Hybrid Synergy Drive. Nissan has a license. Why bother making such products when their ICE-only vehicles sold just fine? No one forced them to do it. They did it because they can.

    In two years, two Japanese companies will have at least seven hybrid vehicles available for sale. The Big 3 will have only two (Ford Escape and Chevy Silverado "Contractor's Edition" mild hybrid). From the standpoint of technological innovation (which includes quality as well as horsepower, MPG, emissions, features, etc), who would you want to buy a car from?

  41. What I really like about Japan... by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... is that Japanese engineers are allowed to explore interesting and creative new technology designs, despite every armchair critic in the world immediately telling them how stupid/unsafe/infeasible/unnecessary their prototype is.


    That's why they'll eventually have their giant killer robots, while we're still optimizing the super-sized cup-holder layout for our pickup trucks.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:What I really like about Japan... by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's well established that Japanese engineers largely use foreign designs as their prototypes.

    2. Re:What I really like about Japan... by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Actually, it's well established that Japanese
      > engineers largely use foreign designs as their
      > prototypes.

      It's great when things are "well established" isn't it? We can just accept them as a given and shift our critical reasoning down a gear or two.

      Here is a list of other things that have been well established about the Japanese:

      - They are short.
      - They wear little round glasses.
      - They have buck teeth.
      - They are all Ninjas.

      I'm British and I'd guess you're an American. Perhaps someone would like to contribute some "well established" facts about us? I'm sure we'd be glad to confirm them.

      Excuse me, must dash, my butler has just informed me that Mary Poppins has dropped in for afternoon tea...

    3. Re:What I really like about Japan... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, must dash, my butler has just informed me that Mary Poppins has dropped in for afternoon tea...

      Whatever you do don't take the sugar.

    4. Re:What I really like about Japan... by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please take your racist stereotypes elsewhere. I was talking about historical business practices, not racial characteristics.

  42. CPU by oddmake · · Score: 1

    Main CPU is 400MHz 64bit NEC Processor.
    called ATOM.
    Satellite CPU would be same or nearly equally powerful(cost) processor,I assume.

    1. Re:CPU by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      I've worked with NEC processors that were 4 bit and ran at 400 KHz. This isn't exactly a symmetric multiprocessor design. The 'satellite' processors probably gather data and feed it to the main, and respond to simple commands from the main to drive various peripheral controllers and motors.

  43. Clearance? by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

    From what I can tell from the pictures all those individual arms leave the car without any clearance. You would have be drving the car on a perfectly smooth road. A pothole or debris in the road would cause major problems.

    --
    Long live the Speaker Bracelet
    Rolo D. Monkey
  44. The new industrial revolution ii? by t0qer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The new industrial revolution part ii

    In my
    previous post on the new industrial revolution I discussed how the impact of
    robotics and cad design would result in more variety seen on the road.
    This post will focus on the technological impact these will have on car features
    and safety.


    1 wheel is good, 2 wheels are better, 4 are better still. When you
    start to go into 8 wheel designs you start to run into problems with friction
    (due to bad wheel alignment). This isn't noticeable on vehicles carrying
    large mass (such as semi trucks) because the momentum of the mass keeps the
    vehicle going in a straight line, but on small less than 2 ton vehicles one
    wheel out of alignment would be very noticeable. Although technology
    exists to re-align your tires on the fly exists, current auto makers have yet to
    implement that type of self repair into their vehicles. Instead they rely
    on good old physics and mechanical engineering to figure out how best to tune
    the suspension for maximum performance.


    With robotics and sensors implemented mechanical suspension systems will be
    obsolete. Cars like this one will make adjustments on the fly to suite current
    road conditions, instead of the specialized approach used by automakers today.
    If you want to go really fast, you buy a car with a big engine, low to the
    ground. If you expect to be driving on rough terrain you buy a 4wd vehicle
    with adequate ride clearance. Shouldn't transportation be able to adapt to
    it's environment?


    The main reason automakers take this specialized approach is so they can
    break the car market into different segments. Instead of creating a cheap, one
    size fits all vehicle we get many choices that are basically the same ideas all
    rehashed in one form or another so they can appeal to a wider audience. Jim bob
    likes his ford f150, soccer mom likes her GMC suburban, Gary geek loves his
    prius hybrid. For the most part though, all these cars still have the same
    wheels, drive train, suspension as the other does. How can one justify
    that as truly different?


    Because of our new industrial revolution and the rising computation power of
    electronics, we'll start seeing things like self driving cars as standard
    equipment. This will in turn drive down the prices of material logistics
    for manufacturing plants as they will no longer have to rely on teamsters unions
    to deliver materials or finished products to market. With robotic factories and
    robotic delivery bringing the labor cost down to near zero, hopefully we will
    see the prices of these new vehicles drop in line with that of the manufacturing
    costs. An added benefit to the consumer will be the inclusion of these new high
    tech features as standard option packages.


    Right now is a transition time to this new industrial revolution. I
    know in the long run my children will benefit from both the choice and low price
    of these internationally produced goods. As more of the world produces a
    product, their need for this product increases as well, whether it be cars, IT
    services, computers, or what not. Demand creates necessity, which turns into
    invention.


    We won't see much of the old technology on the road in 20 years. By then the
    57 Chevy will be 66 years old, old enough to collect social security if it still
    exists. I think the car of the future wont look anything like the car of
    the present because of all the variety that will exist.

  45. Um, Internal LANs have been on cars for ages... by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    J1850, CAN... nothing special about that. Cars have had "internal LANs" for decades.

    The interaction is certainly becoming more pervasive, though: Don't try removing your factory stereo in the upcoming models, as you car will not work correctly (No, Windows is NOT involved, either)

  46. I'd like to see.. by trybywrench · · Score: 2, Funny

    the japanese take on the club sandwich. I bet it's smaller and more efficient.

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    1. Re:I'd like to see.. by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      the japanese take on the club sandwich. I bet it's smaller and more efficient.

      What? Have you never seen temaki (hand rolls)? Carbs, protein, and great seasoning in a convenient hand-held form. It's like a club sandwich, but smaller and more efficient. Or maybe it's more like a sub/hoagie/hero/grinder. Well, it's like both...but better.

    2. Re:I'd like to see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I don't like temaki? It wouldn't really be better then, would it?

    3. Re:I'd like to see.. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      It would help the comparison out if temaki and club sandwiches actually shared even just one ingredient. You might as well compare Indian samosas or seasoned pork tacos.

      Now having been to Japan, I can say that their club sandwiches are smaller, though I don't know how you measure their efficiency.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    4. Re:I'd like to see.. by lingqi · · Score: 1

      I was actually gonna say MOS burger...

      Or heck any of the sandwiches they sell in convenience stores and supermarkets (most all of which only uses the white part of the bread) - because well, temaki is kinda expensive; so from a dollar / calorie (erm, yen / kilojoule, maybe) perspective, temaki is pretty damn inefficient.

      Otherwise I'd be eating it more.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

  47. same Leading Edge from 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't suppose this is the same company as the one that made Leading Edge computers in the 1980's. They were some of the earliest IBM PC clones available.

  48. Re:Movies? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else thinking the big jawa moving city thing from EpIV

  49. bling bling by bobo+the+hobo · · Score: 0

    that'd be so much cooler if you could make it iced out with fatty rims and stuff. And hydraulics.

  50. But Can It? by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

    ..run fast enough to avoid a /.ing?


    And yeah, I say it's a mouse droid.

  51. Ech! That things ugly... by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    You have to be on hallucinagens to want to own one if those things. It's extinction can be predicted with good accuracy.

  52. Heavy Weather by sandbenders · · Score: 1

    They have cars kinda like this in Heavy Weather, by Bruce Sterling. The sucky part of it, though, was that when the car's OS crashed, well, you got a really dramatic reminder of the origin of the 'crash' metaphor. So the software has to be stable, and when it fails, it has to fail gracefully, or you're in trouble, especially on the highway.

    It brings new meaning to the phrase "Blue Screen of Death." Pray it doesn't use embedded Windows.

    --
    Eagles may fly, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
    1. Re:Heavy Weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, computer systems on air planes are using MS Windows.

      I'd stick to walking, but when the planes start falling out of the air that might not be safe, either.

      To be fair, it was the in flight entertainment system that BSOD'd. Don't know what they use for the avionics.

  53. KISS by yelligsc · · Score: 1

    My version of the rule: Keep It Simple, Stupid.

    1. Re:KISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My version of the rule: Keep It Simple, Stupid.

      That phrase is already trademarked. You'll have to refrain from using it.

  54. Minority Report by chendo · · Score: 1

    This car kinda reminds me of those funky cars in Minority Report, how they can move sideways and go vertical without the passengers feeling anything.

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  55. Perhaps... by qeveren · · Score: 1

    ... the precursor to someone building a Tachikoma?

    --
    Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
  56. Rhinoceros? by planetoid · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing the designers made this in Rhinoceros. It has that "oh, look how cool I am, I'm using NURBS for the sake of using NURBS!" look to it. Someday, the 90 degree angle will only be seen in museums and archive footage.

    --
    Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  57. More amusingly... by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
    The initial assessment of hallucigenia, IIRC, was upside down, and maybe back to front .

    I certainly don't want a vehicle so orientationally confused.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  58. From SciFi by MACC · · Score: 1

    This looks like the exploration vehicle
    from Hal Clements "Mission of Gravity"
    from ~ 1955

  59. Just as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Critical Joke Possiblities OVERLOAD

    Brain Terminated."

    Oh, well, at least that prevented n^4eedles from imagining a Beowulf clus*THUD*...

  60. Re:Sounds suspiciously like American Beauty by adzoox · · Score: 1
    Sexy Pants said:bImagine 13 year old Jimmy saying saying to his friend, "My neighbor's got hallucigenia in his garage. Oh yeah, every once in a while he takes it out and we go on a trip!" Reply:

    And then the next door neighbor blows Jimmy's Dad's head off - just like in American Beauty.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  61. no Microsoft butterfly guys by glyph42 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft sure doesn't use those silly butterfly guys in Japan!

    --
    Music speeds up when you yawn, but does not change pitch.
  62. Car Area Network by sharkey · · Score: 1
    Its 8 wheels are independent robotic arms controlled by their own satellite CPUs, interconnected to the main CPU by an internal LAN.

    Shouldn't that be "CAN"?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  63. I want to be the Red Ranger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hallucigenia, is just the main body of the new MegaZOrdPower Tron Galactic Defender Robot!!!!!

    The head will be a Lion shaped Plane, the arms will be Snake and Gator shaped Buses, and the legs will be Centipede trains.

    The combined vehicles will be filled with Happy Super fun time awesome POWER!!!!

    No word yet on whether or not there will be a Flaming Sword.

  64. Side-on collisions by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    Actually, changing direction without changing yaw, though impressive, seems problematic to me. Imagine the guy in the next lane taking the curve while his car still points straight. Isn't he going to hit my car since the LANE curves while the body of his car doesn't?

  65. What's weird about that is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that I fit into most Japanese cars (all but the super-small ones) and I don't fit into most American cars.

    At 6'2" most American cars in my price range are neck- and back-destroying.

    I understand excessively fat people don't have this problem, apparently American autos are marketed to people with overconsumption problems. Illuminating if true, neh?

  66. Correct me if I'm wrong... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    But isn't the central "problem" of transportation the power plant? All the degrees of freedom motion is cool, but what's the problem that it's solving? Wouldn't it still need to be powered by ICE, hybrid or battery?

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  67. That thing looks like it'll be a blast... by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    ...when it comes to potholes.

    Just imagine driving that thing through Midtown...

  68. Never drove a Prius, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /.

    The control system was designed specifically for people like you.

    Incredibly boring car to drive - you just point it and go, it acts like what you expect and not like what it is. And I've never been able to get it to break contact with the road without doing bad-crazy maneuvers (60 MPH on sheet ice did the trick, and I came pretty close to rolling it doing 90 coming down an off-ramp).

    I enjoy driving unloaded manual-shift rear-wheel-drive pickups at high speed over ice during whiteouts, so I generally find the Prius driving experience to be lame. Too much control, too little to do.

    --Charlie

  69. Hooray for the wall of flesh!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Down with population control! Kill the abortionists! Hooray for the human monoculture!

    We didn't need all those other creatures anyway, and if God wanted us to preserve nature he'd have said so in the Bible.

    Mmm, human flesh. Tasty!

  70. Forget Style. What ever happened to safety? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I'd honestly like to see this thing drive away from an accident still mostly intact. I don't think this system looks very robust. It looks to me like any kind of impact would seriously damage one or more of the wheel assemblies, especially if you pit one of these things against an SUV.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  71. dymaxion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buckminster Fuller designed a car, it was large and tear-droped shaped that could roll sidways and in a complete circle with the front of the car facing the center during the circling turn. That one had three wheels tho.

    Heres a couple of links:
    http://www.washedashore.com/projects/dymax /chronol ogy.html
    http://www.thirteen.org/bucky/car.html

  72. Re:IS Steve 'Rim' Jobs == Pingular??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all THREE of you are ON TEH SPOKE!!!!!!1112

  73. re: looks like... by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    reminds me of stan mott's cyclops...all it needs is the single headlight;-)

  74. wheels and surface by gacp · · Score: 1

    But not anywhere as much surface as a tracked vehicle...

    And if you need to move beyond the ability of wheels... I think surface is a big concern: mud, sand, snow, oiled slippery surface, &c. Both for traction and to spread the vehicle's weight and not sink.

    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''