Slashdot Mirror


Rockstar Investigated Over GTA - Vice City

Jubii writes "Seems the State of Florida is about to investigate Grand Theft Auto: Vice City for possibly violating state hate crime laws. This comes right after Rockstar and Take-Two issued an apology and a promise to remove offensive dialog found in the game. This could cause significant changes for 'mature' games in the future." Since Rockstar has already apologized and pledged to update the game, is it just me, or is the state of Florida only looking to line its pockets with some best-selling game profits? Update: 12/12 00:19 GMT by S : Haitian community leaders aren't satisfied either, saying "the manufacturer's pledge to change future editions did not solve the problem with games on store shelves now."

201 comments

  1. So frecking useless! by Txiasaeia · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Should car companies sue Rockstar because GTA and VC take well-known cars, give them a different game, then allow players to bash them up in the streets? Should gun makers sue Rockstar for giving them a bad image?

    When I played VC, I *never* once thought, "hey, those haitians, they're pretty bloodthursty!" And you wanna know why? Cuz it's a GAME, not a how-to guide or a travel brochure!

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:So frecking useless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, but pimps and whores should sue Rockstar for giving them a bad image!

    2. Re:So frecking useless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn idiot moderators. This is so not offtopic. Fuck you all.

      P.S. I'm not the poster.

    3. Re:So frecking useless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I didn't see any pimps in Vice City, but I sure ran over my share of whores (to get my money back of course).

    4. Re:So frecking useless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is of topic, idiot

    5. Re:So frecking useless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you can't fucking read.

      Or spell.

    6. Re:So frecking useless! by Draigon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Video games made me do shrooms and become a plumber. I can't be held responsible for my actions. This is America.

      --
      -Rabbit
    7. Re:So frecking useless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was agreeing with you! It was of topic. OF, not OFF.

      Tee Hee

    8. Re:So frecking useless! by mo^ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, i like yer turn of phrase.... so much fresher than the "running around in darkened rooms listening to electronic music and eating magic pills" quote.....

      Is it an original?? if so can i steal it shamelesly to impress da ladies with?

      --
      bah!*@%!
    9. Re:So frecking useless! by Reapy · · Score: 1

      When I played VC, I *never* once thought, "hey, those haitians, they're pretty bloodthursty!"

      Me niether, but hell, now I have a reason to run all those bastard over! In fact, these last two articles have inspired me to boot up gta again and see how high I can get my number of hatians killed. Thanks for the motivation guys!

  2. Hate crime by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought the whole premise of the hate crime laws was that the offender had to be doing something else illegal that was motivated by hate, and that was the only way it skirted the 1st amendment.

    I guess all the people that say "slippery slope" is an invalid argument don't know much about governments or laws.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Hate crime by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Inciting people to violence against a particular ethnic group would be a hate crime, but "KILL ALL THE HAITIANS!" is a fictional utterance by a fictional character in a dramatic work of fiction. It is clearly protected speech. Florida is smoking crack.

    2. Re:Hate crime by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      you know what? i wish more people just watched southpark and shutted the hell up. the hate crime episode in this case particular.

      it's not just about it being a funny show.. it's the social commentary that makes it great.

      anyways, how long has the game been on the shelves? hmm? a freakking long time perhaps hmm? somebody fishing for extra points somewhere hmm? being kyle's mum hmm?

      it's largely a parody of stereotypes anyways(the game).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Hate crime by p2sam · · Score: 1

      We present to you:

      Hate Crime Laws:
      A Savage Hypocrisy ...

    4. Re:Hate crime by cicatrix1 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      i wish more people just watched southpark and shutted the hell up.

      I wish more people just watched their Kindergarten teacher tell them that 'shutted' is not a word.

      --

      I know more than you drink.
    5. Re:Hate crime by cicatrix1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention that the phrase is displayed out of context, since in the game "The Hatians" are a gang. It is clearly not referring to Hatians as a nation, culture, race, or a people in general.

      --

      I know more than you drink.
    6. Re:Hate crime by BTWR · · Score: 0, Redundant

      mod up! mod up! mod up!

    7. Re:Hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people don't watch South Park because it stereotypes people. Maybe you're comfortable with seeing someone of another background stereoptyped, but many people aren't, especially when its there background.

    8. Re:Hate crime by superyooser · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What a cop out.

      Kill the Jews! No, that's not racist. The Jews are a gang. I mean.. uh.. it's just some people we're calling "Jews", maybe not actually Jews. Err, okay they are, but it's just referring to some bad apples. Yeah, that's it.

      Kill the Africans! Death to Americans! Come on, that's evil. What's going through a game designer's mind when he names a gang after the people of a nation? Kill the Poles! Gas the Kurds! Just because the Haitians don't have a well-renowned history of being persecuted or enslaved (I don't know their history) doesn't mean the statement isn't wrong.

      Having said all that, I am extremely wary of "hate speech" laws. I dread them, but speech that explicitly encourages genocide probably should be illegal.

      It's interesting what issues get people into trouble these days and what things don't. It seems to me that the more obvious complaints against GTA would be that it promotes... *cough*... Grand Theft... and prostitution, both of which are illegal and cruel -- and the latter, deadly.

    9. Re:Hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy is not from a country where English is a primary language.

      So, yes, cicatrix1, you can unclench now. I wonder (well, not really) how good your Finnish is.

    10. Re:Hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or, when it's their background.

      Get over yourself. Do you know why there are stereotypes? Because there is a certain amount of truth to them.

    11. Re:Hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I never got a negative opinion of Haitian from playing VC. In fact, I would have been hard pressed to remember what they were called in the game. But now, I definately will remember them for being dicks in real life about a ficticious game. Way to improve your image, Haitians!

    12. Re:Hate crime by iocat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Rockstar's only mistake was apologizing in the first place, IMHO! They made this controversial and offensive (but oh-so-fun) game. It's rated M. There are no toys based on it. It's, as the parent notes, a dramatic work of fiction. No apologies necessary! If you don't like, don't buy it, don't recommend it, and don't talk about it.

      It's like the Sopranos. If you're ethnically Italian, as I am, and it offends you (which I don't understand, since the show obviously doesn't represent the life of most Americans of Italian descent), don't watch it. What's the big deal?

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    13. Re:Hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It's fine and all o.k. in these shoot 'em up games to kill white people but no others. I guess I'll have to note that otherwise I'm a criminal. What a surprise.

      Hate crimes are a bunch of bull--all they exist for is to make it less of a crime to kill a white person. It should carry equal weight for everybody.

    14. Re:Hate crime by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I wish more people just watched their Kindergarten teacher tell them that 'shutted' is not a word.

      Really? My beef is people that ignored their teacher telling them not to randomly capitalize words and to use double quotes around quoted text.

    15. Re:Hate crime by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      The issue isn't that they're a gang. It's that they're fictional characters in a fictional game where a fictional protagonist is taking fictional action. That should be enough to make the claims of advocating violence against Haitians simply ridiculous. I mean, I should be able to write a book where the main character happens to be a Vichy France collaborator without being attacked for inciting people to violence.

      Thre are a lot of other reasons that this should have been thrown out cited here (the character plays both for and against the Haitians, the line never appears in the game, etc, etc, etc). However, the ones I mentioned above should be enough on their own.

    16. Re:Hate crime by lehyeong · · Score: 1

      What if the gang had been named 'The Jews' or 'The Arabs'?

    17. Re:Hate crime by ringbarer · · Score: 1, Funny

      The guy is not from a country where English is a primary language.

      What? America?

      --
      "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
    18. Re:Hate crime by johndoejersey · · Score: 0

      what if the gang had been called "black single parent lesbian mothers on crack"<br><br>
      Does it make any difference in the slightest?

    19. Re:Hate crime by Bazzargh · · Score: 2, Informative
      What was going through his mind was probably that this was a gang member from one minority group (Cubans) talking about a gang from another minority group. Unless street gangs have suddenly adopted a forward-thinking racial integration policy, they may well refer to each other like that.

      Here is the script. The "single line" most objected to is probably this one:

      UMBERTO: Hey, ladies. You know what I'm gonna do?
      UMBERTO: I'm gonna kill me a Haitian. And then?
      UMBERTO: And then I'm going to make love like a man.

      GTA:VC isn't alone in depicting gang characters as speaking like this. Its heavily influenced by films like the one this line came from:

      TONY: So nothin'. Fuckin' I just don't like Columbians that's what. They're animals!

      ...which is from Scarface. Its hardly an incitement to race crime, its just a depiction of the speech patterns of an obvioulsy repellent character.

    20. Re:Hate crime by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      South Park stereotypes pretty much everyone. The majority of people have some form of stereotype which - if taken seriously - would have cause to offend them in South Park.

    21. Re:Hate crime by cicatrix1 · · Score: 1
      --

      I know more than you drink.
    22. Re:Hate crime by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      speech that explicitly encourages genocide probably should be illegal.

      1. I disagree.

      2. This wasn't speech designed to encourage genocide, it was speech from fictional character(s) designed to make you kill members of a gang of Haitians.

      Was it stupid for them to have something like that in the game? Probably. Was it a crime, should it be illegal? No-fucking-way.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    23. Re:Hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, just take your foot out of your mouth. We all knew it was a joke, and the joke on you was a joke too. Quite being a jack...

  3. What games need... by HolyCoitus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is a strong arm militant group to bribe the government officials like the RIAA and MPAA. I can't even begin to think of all the racial, sexist, and otherwise hateful things I've heard in music or in movies and GTA gets hit on something completely stupid? I'm serious though. Video games are just as legitimate a form of expression and entertainment as movies and music. Why isn't it treated as such?

    --
    That's scary.
    1. Re:What games need... by cgenman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Video games are just as legitimate a form of expression and entertainment as movies and music.

      What do you mean? No videogame has yet to touch the delicate artistic expressionism found in the simple lines "F---, F---, F--- the Po-lice." Or Eminem's heartfelt ballads to killing his wife in front of his daughter. Or for that matter, Eminem's hearfelt ballads to murdering fags. Such obviously worthwile expression of the human sexual condition is worthy of the protection of the law. This television game, or "videoed-game" as they call it, is teaching children that gangs in poor neighborhoods form from people with ethnic and historically shared backgrounds, and such subdivisions once formed naturally lead to cultural tensions. How can they sleep at night, knowing they sell such obviously racist filth?

      I'm sorry sir, but the blips and bleeps of your "videoed-games" can have no cultural or artistic value... They're just a waste of time. Furthermore, you should be ashamed of playing with children's toys. Now go out and get a job, you long haired hippie! I hear Shell is expanding its operations in the Niger Delta.

      Some day you'll thank me for setting you straight.

    2. Re:What games need... by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      Well, there is this . . .

      http://www.siia.net/

      Do they count?

    3. Re:What games need... by HolyCoitus · · Score: 1

      Haven't heard of them. Means they don't fit some of the requirements to get people to take them seriously, such as having a ton of money and being complete assholes or at least associated with some religious group. (Note, the last thing was a joke. Laugh)

      --
      That's scary.
  4. What Problem? by Nasarius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That GTA:VC is a generally offensive game, yet they want Rockstar to remove one relatively innocent line? It's ridiculous, because it's a game. Rockstar isn't advocating killing Haitians. They aren't encouraging people to go on killing sprees to make their own criminal empire either. It's a freaking game, a work of fiction.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    1. Re:What Problem? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, it's amazing isn't it? They're not demanding they remove the violence or the killing. It's perfectly okay to run people over on the streets, or shoot them repeatedly. However, God (oops...can I say that?) forbid they should say something bad about Haitians. I mean, that's just unforgivable.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:What Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok to run people over in the street; well, yes, especially if it's a Cuban!

  5. Dear Delray... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

    "To me it sounds like this has got to be against the law," Levinson said. "To tell people to kill a particular group of people? That has to violate some law."

    It's FICTION, and thats protected speech. No one was telling people to kill Haitians! IT IS A V-I-D-E-O G-A-M-E.

    I am losing more faith in the elected officials of Florida. Keep this moron away from butterfly ballots.

    1. Re:Dear Delray... by El · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember, if you advocate killing cops in a Rap song, that's protected free speech! But if you advocate killing a particular group of people in a videogame, that has to be against the law! (Of course, I'm sure these same people would probably like to make offensive songs and movies illegal too, but unfortunately the record and motion picture industries have more powerful lobbying groups.)

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:Dear Delray... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      Didn't 2 Live crew get arrested for obscenity in Broward County in Florida? It seems like Florida has a general disrespect for Free Speech in the arts.

    3. Re:Dear Delray... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      I am losing more faith in the elected officials of Florida.

      That's a joke, right? The mob stays out of Miami because the elected officials have all the lucrative territory pretty much wrapped up. All they have to do to stay elected is keep the AARP card holders scared about black people carjacking them. Woo, negroes! (Vote incumbent.)

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:Dear Delray... by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yea, we should really kick Florida out of the union.

      The dead vote there, they can't hold a proper election, they don't seem to comprehend what free speech is... I mean the list goes on and on.

      We're watching you Florida, one more screw up, and your phallic landmass is out!

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    5. Re:Dear Delray... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Of course, I'm sure these same people would probably like to make offensive songs and movies illegal too, but unfortunately the record and motion picture industries have more powerful lobbying groups.)

      So, the RIAA and MPAA are good again? Argh, my head hurts...

    6. Re:Dear Delray... by El · · Score: 1

      When you realize we do not live in a binary world where everything is either purely good or purely evil, then, grasshopper, you will have acheived enlightenment. And when you realize that that is no one universal slashdot group-think, then you will be able to post without all your comments having score: -1!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    7. Re:Dear Delray... by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Not only is it fiction, it's funny. The Haitians in the game are a GANG. So when the Cubans say "Let's go kill some Haitians"...he's talking about the GANG.

      This is getting ridiciulous. Lousy whiners. They can't even get the CONTEXT right for the "offensive" phrase. JEEZ, this is SUCH a bunch of crap.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    8. Re:Dear Delray... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      Or just give John F Hickory a digger and let him build his river..... ;)

    9. Re:Dear Delray... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dead vote there, they can't hold a proper election, they don't seem to comprehend what free speech is... I mean the list goes on and on.

      These blanket statements made about the residents of an entire state prove how stupid you are. Here's a tip for you - quit watching Jay Leno.

    10. Re:Dear Delray... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? They have some prime vaction land there! It would be far better to remove all the problem people to some place else. Like Cuba or maybe Iraq. Then we'll let them complain there.

  6. Research.. by NegativeK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How much have the people who are making these claims looked into the game? That game bashes pretty much every group out there. You have the religious right guy talking about the commy Reds and his statue/spaceship, a goth guy that goes outside when it rains or he needs milk, some happy woman who's just.. Disturbing, NPR like announcers who are money grubbing [edit].. And that's just from a radio station. So, if that game is guilty for hate crimes, it sure isn't guilty for discrimination, because it hates everyone. It's humor, guys. Get over your ego.

    Things like this make me doubt the future of the human race.

    --
    This statement is false.
    1. Re:Research.. by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      How much have the people who are making these claims looked into the game?

      The problem with this is that the kind of people who buy this kind of game, are not the same kind of people who take this sort of stand on racism and hate crimes.

    2. Re:Research.. by Naikrovek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Things like this make me doubt the future of the human race.

      the future is clear to me - in 20 years no one will be able to say anything for fear that it will offend someone.

      currently you can't do/say anything that will offend someone, but what about the countless people that are not offended by an action? should we lower our society to suit the most sensitive and most irrational people, or should the majority win?

      well the majority isn't winning anymore when it comes to things like this. the feelings of one person now override the feelings of millions of others, and even that is based on someone's word - they SAY they're feelings were hurt. its a good thing people don't lie for money ... because then even the basis that someone's feelings are hurt could be labelled as a frivelous (sp?) lawsuit.

      I agree that hateful and slanderous remarks should be removed from our collective conscience, but is attacking video games the way to do it? if the collective conscience of america wasn't already thinking of such things then they would have never made it into the game - the game is the symptom of racial slurs, not the cause, you fucking prats.

      outside of the USA everyone makes fun of us Americans. do I care? no. should i? no. if someone makes an anti-america game do i give a flying patootie? hell no - its just a damn game.

      so i say bring it on. hey foreigners, make lots of games that poke fun at americans: "hey, you gonna eat that untouched entire large super-supreme pizza," "now just wait a minizzle," "i'm 28 and i can't do long division anymore," "i've never voted, voting doesn't matter!!" and various other stupid (yet all too common) american sayings should be included. will we care? fuck no. we'll think its funny. I will anyway.

      Haiti: take it as the joke its meant to be, not as the money grubbing, attention-seeking opportunity you seem to think it is. If you get offended you are weak. why don't you get offended that Haitian language support was left entirely out of perl 5.8? oh wait, i know: no money to be won.

    3. Re:Research.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What do you mean by "the kind of people who buy this kind of game"?

      Are you trying to stereotype me? Tell me, what kind of person am I?

    4. Re:Research.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "why don't you get offended that Haitian language support was left entirely out of perl 5.8? oh wait, i know: no money to be won."

      80% of the population can't eat well, and you're asking why thye don't care about a stupid computer language?! WTF??

    5. Re:Research.. by thelenm · · Score: 1

      We don't have to wait 20 years for that... it's here today. You don't even have to say that you personally are offended. Just mention that someone might be offended, and you can probably get just about anyone in big trouble for almost anything they say.

      Personally, I am offended by all the hypersensitivity and political correctness (i.e. thought control) we have allowed ourselves to be subjected to. But does anyone care if I, a white American male, am offended by that? Nope.

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
    6. Re:Research.. by RisingSon · · Score: 1
      the future is clear to me - in 20 years no one will be able to say anything for fear that it will offend someone.

      Newspeak is double plus good! Perhaps in the future we won't literally be able to say anything that will offend people. (Thinking Master/Slave drives in California).

  7. Oversensitivity and Greed by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Video game developers are just seen as an easy target because they don't have the massive financial backing of the MPAA or RIAA (movies and music routinely have far more offensive content).

    The supposed Haitian community leaders (9 times out of 10, "community leaders" are just obnoxious individuals who decide that they speak for everyone else) are simple using this as a chance to grab some attention at Rockstar's expense.

    The state of Florida is just going after the cash, because they know that video games don't have enough popular esteem yet among those with power to be well-defended.

    I'm going to go out and buy GTA3, just to spite them.

    1. Re:Oversensitivity and Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that they don't have massive financial backing. It's that game companies don't typically have moutains of lawyers at their beck and call. I've been saying all along. The game company's just gotta bitch slap someone like Jack Thompson so hard that he has to pay their legal bill for people to stop trying this shit.

      The judges have told them "No." enough. Now it's time to go upside someone's head.

    2. Re:Oversensitivity and Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I whole-heartedly agree. I am not a lawyer, but I think that all the game companies, not just Rockstar, can sue Jack Thompson(the other "Wacko Jacko") for, in my humble opinion, defamation of character, harassment(considering that he sends threatening letters to the companies and retailers), and libel(for making up B.S. claims he's made in the past, like the asinine claim that DC sniper suspect Lee Malvo trained on Halo while convienantly(sp?) ignoring John Muhammed, who has extensive military training). Hell, Wal-Mart can even sue Thompson for harassment, since they get the brunt of his stupidity, even though Wal-Mart has been having a carding system in place since at least 2000.

      This would be similiar to a case I referenced further down this thread, WWE's lawsuit against the Parents Television Council.

    3. Re:Oversensitivity and Greed by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not entirely sure why the above was modded as flamebait. Paragraph by paragraph, I agreed.

      Videogames are easier targets than movies or music because, by and large, the developers don't have as much money and they're viewed as 'bad' forms of entertainment. Much like when speaking against pornography, it's an easy publicity move to take the moral high road against videogames. That isn't to dismiss what affect videogames may (and probably do) have on the players. I know I get wired after a long session of Battlefield 1942, and definatly think bad thoughts while driving after playing GTA3. (But their car looks so much faster! And why can't I hit that old bitty who's driving at 23 MPH in a 45 zone?!) But (as has been beaten to death on /.) that doesn't negate personal responsibility. So while I support groups that advocate game ratings and such, this is nucking futz. Put money into community centers or whatnot if you think it's that important to build love between groups.

      And I agree that "community leaders" don't always speak for communities. I bet the Haitian "community" didn't give a rats ass about GTA3:VC. But some people can't stand to see others having a non-PC good time.... (PC meaning politically correct, although I suppose using an Xbox might be considered a hate crime....)

      And Florida pushing for GTA restrictions goes back to videogames being easy to attack. As has been cried many times by many posters, here on Slashdot and elsewhere, PARENT YOUR FUCING CHILDREN!

      And honestly, so am I. I had tons of fun playing and beating GTA3, and have been meaning to pick up GTA:VC for a while. I now have to pick it up, even if it sits on my shelf for a while before i get around to playing it, just so I can piss some people off.

      -Trillian

    4. Re:Oversensitivity and Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm not entirely sure why the above was modded as flamebait.

      Me either actually. Meta-modded "unfair". Hope they enjoyed their mod points while they lasted.

  8. *sigh* by schapman · · Score: 1

    this has to be... quite possibly... the stupidest thing I have ever heard of. I mean common... they take the line completely out of context, and then bitch and moan over it. hey, im part italian... how about all the games/movies that portray italians as mobsters... should i rage.. NO. Its fiction... a "game"... not real. This is just another example of stupid people following other stupid people who have nothing better to do.

    --
    Wouldnt you like to be a pepper too?
  9. Come on /. by satanami69 · · Score: 1

    So far, the results of the poll are a little under the numbers. Let's set the vote right!

    Should Grand Theft Auto Vice City be pulled from the shelves?

    Yes. It is racist and offensive. 20.00% 52
    No. It's just a game. 21.54% 56
    No. If you're offended, just don't buy it. 58.46% 152

    --
    I really hate Dan Patrick.
    1. Re:Come on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm sure that we've all got a lot more to say on the completely idiotic investigation. Instead of just taking the poll, how about actually telling the florida general idiot what you feel.

      http://myfloridalegal.com/contact

  10. This keeps getting 'stupider' by Cosmik · · Score: 1

    Before they investigate a game, they should read some studies themselves to see that a game alone won't cause someone to kill.

    And where are these idiots when we see people killing Mexicans, blacks, whites, Russians, Arabs etc in movies, books and television? Are they not possible hate crimes by the definition these idiots will use to try and change/stop production of GTA:VC? You can't change rules or laws, and introduce made-up ones, just to suit your effort to garner a few votes from fanatical parents.

    Besides, is there anyone on the face of the earth who might have an interest in computer games that has not seen or played GTA:VC? If there is the possibility of any damage, it has been done. The game went through the appropriate channels to get its appropriate classification (note to fanatical parents: It's an MA game! You aren't meant to get crazy when your kid plays it because you shouldn't have bought it for them in the first case!). All requirements were met for it to be sold, so no use crying about it now. Grrr. These idiots continue to make me angry. Think I'll go load up GTA:VC and kill me some stupid white men. I'll be awaiting the knock on my door from someone charing me with a hate crime.

  11. GTA by epsilon720 · · Score: 1
    So if this would possibly fall under hate crime legislation, what would become of games like RtCW, where in multiplayer you can play on a team that killed a lot more people than any organized crime group, real or fictional. (Note: unlike the GTA Capos, the Nazis *actually* killed people, too) Would the makers of movies like American History X be similarly liable, since there were characters that encouraged hateful activity?

    You know, characters in Fight Club really seemed to suggest that destroying skyscrapers is a good idea. Does that mean Paulahniuk (or whoever adapted the screenplay in the case of the movie) could be prosecuted under anti-terrorism laws?

    As has been said already, it's a game(/movie/book)!! Get over it!

    I think I'm going to prosecute the makers of Railroad Tycoon, since we all know that railroads were built largely with immigrant labor working under harsh conditions. Do we want people to get the idea that we want harsh working conditions (or for that matter, immigrants) in this country??

    1. Re:GTA by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      what would become of games like RtCW, where in multiplayer you can play on a team that killed a lot more people than any organized crime group, real or fictional.

      Actually, Joseph Stalin killed over twice as many people as Hitler did, but Stalin didn't descriminate. He rounded up millions of his own people during his "purges", labeling them traitors, and sent them to gulag (Siberian labor camps), including heros of the siege of Stalingrad who were getting too popular for their own good.

    2. Re:GTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, Joseph Stalin killed over twice as many people as Hitler did, but Stalin didn't descriminate. He rounded up millions of his own people during his "purges", labeling them traitors, and sent them to gulag (Siberian labor camps), including heros of the siege of Stalingrad who were getting too popular for their own good.

      Get a life loser

    3. Re:GTA by epsilon720 · · Score: 1
      "but Stalin didn't descriminate"
      So, you admit that your comment has nothing to do with this at all, since the legal dispute is over specifically anti-Haitian portions of the game that certain community members feel to be discriminatory. I am familiar with this Stalin character, but no games come to mind in which you play a Soviet soldier defending the purges from the attacking peasants.

      Not meaning to rant angrily here, but what did that reply have to do with anything?

    4. Re:GTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalin Vs Hitler - The Comic!

      http://ocd.crazybrain.org/~cnelson/_mirrors/stalin _vs_hitler/rus/stalin/

  12. Crossing the Line by illuminata · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've made comments about this situation in the last thread, so I'll try not to repeat too much.

    I think that this effects much more than M-rated games now that the State of Florida is getting involved. When Rockstar and Take Two self-censored, I didn't like it, but it was their decision. However, to use political muscle to try to censor the comment that the Haitian group misinterpreted is fascism. The Florida Attorney General should be removed. No matter how you slice it, it's protected speech. Not to mention, it's pretty scary that the government is trying to blatantly censor speech.

    But, can the State of Florida even do anything? Does Rockstar or Take Two even have offices there?

    Good work Rockstar and Take Two, now that you tried to please the Haitian community by removing the content, but because you apoligized you indirectly admitted that you were wrong when indeed you were right. You made it that much harder to say that it was protected speech considering that you wouldn't even protect it yourselves.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:Crossing the Line by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      The Florida Attorney General should be removed. No matter how you slice it, it's protected speech.

      Correct me if I'm wrong (which I know someone will), but wasn't there a big stink about six to ten months ago when some judge, in his infinite wisdom, declared video games not to be protected speech?

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    2. Re:Crossing the Line by illuminata · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I checked in to what you said because it did ring a bell somewhat, and you're not wrong. But that ruling was overturned.

      In short, St. Louis County tried to limit the access of mature games to children, won its initial case, but had it overturned. Here's more information.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  13. Ok, answer me this... by Cosmik · · Score: 1

    In a continuation of my rant about the idiots that throw up their arms about computer games, I pose this question to the State of Florida and other like-minded idiots:

    Since GTA:VC hit the shelves, how much of an increase in Hatian murders has occured? How much of an increase in Cuban murders has occured? And how many of all the Hatian/Cuban murders in the period since GTA:VC was released are not related to gang crime between existing rival gangs?

    Answer me that, showing me a significant increase that can be attributed to the release of GTA:VC, and I'll eat my 80's Hawaiian shirt.

  14. Politcally Correct Art by Datasage · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What freedom of speech protections apply to this? Does Take2 have to censor thier creative work becuase certain groups take offense to that work?

    Im definetly not advocating discrimination, but it is a part of human nature. Do we have to ignore it to remain politcally correct? The same goes for certain words that are now considered taboo. But what if someone was writing a book with a character who might use those words? Do they have to censor themselves?

    IMHO politcal correctness has sheilded the real issues that are part of our socity. There are people who discrimate, sterotype or hate one type of group or another. Vice city show some of that, both for humor and realism. But is covering that up going to solve the problem? I really doubt it.

    --
    In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
  15. Hmm... by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 1
    "To me it sounds like this has got to be against the law," Levinson said. "To tell people to kill a particular group of people? That has to violate some law."

    Ok, lets replace the line with "kill the bastards" instead of "kill the haitians" - this makes no difference to the context. In that case, the 'particular group of people' we are being told to kill are SPECIFICALLY the X number of haitian characters shooting at us, IN THE GAME.

    How this could possibly be construed as a hate crime is beyond me. Sure, they're taking a lot of incorrect and poor stereotypes into the game (italian mobsters to start with) but that's part of the stereotyped setting they're going for (almost 70s-ish).

    If they were to replace all Haitian references with Aliens, it would spoil the mood and setting, but at least we wouldn't have alien activists acting like idiots about it.

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an Alien community leader, I take great offense to your suggestion. The Alien community has never done anything to deserve this kind of treatment.

      The stereotyped idea of aliens that humans continue to have is completely false. I don't have slimy eggs, a pointy head and I don't make any kind of clicking noises. My young will not gestate in the human chest cavity and will not burst through your ribcages. We will not stand idly by as humans advocate violence against us.

      Fuck you all. I'm going to get my death ray gun.

    2. Re:Hmm... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      but at least we wouldn't have alien activists acting like idiots

      You haven't been on the Internet long, have you? :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  16. Take-2 can learn from recent events by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a wrestling fan, is it just me, or does this remind you of the WWE's battle with the Parents Television Council, in which the PTC attacked WWE's advertisers with bogus claims that wrestling caused children's death(including the Lionel Tate case). These attacks caused several sponsors including Coca-Cola, Wrigley's, the U.S. Army, AT&T, and Wendy's to stop advertising on WWE programming, causing WWE to tone down their programming, yet the PTC continued to attack WWE because they wanted WWE Smackdown! off the air. In Nov. 2000, WWE sued the PTC, winning a $3.5 million settlement and a public apology from the PTC's founder Brent Bozell to Vince McMahon last July.

    It seems to me like the Haitian groups are only in it for publicity and money, considering that Vice City has sold close to 10 million copies(my estimate, remember that VC sold 4.5 million copies from the time of its release on Oct. 29, 2002 to the end of 2002). Take-Two can use WWE's lawsuit against the PTC as a blueprint for their own lawsuit against the Haitian-American Coalition. But then again, does the Haitian's actions really matter? Only if they succeed, which, in my opinion, they won't.

  17. Games on the shelves now? by Snowspinner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry, what are they supposed to do with the games on the shelves now? Release magic DVD fairies that will change the dialogue to less offensive dialogue?

    What this amounts to is that the censor-happy idiots weren't able to block the game because fo the sex and violence like they wanted to, and so they had to resort to getting it on a crap charge like this. /shrug

    The censors never win in the long run.

    1. Re:Games on the shelves now? by August_zero · · Score: 1

      I think what they (those that are offended) want, is for Rockstar to recall and drop the title from production.

      I am not saying that this is even a realistic option, but honestly I don't see any way to appease the offended mob at this point. A lot of people have been against GTA3 from day one and this out of context hate thing is just a cause to champion before the neutral public. I think that the anti-"Kilographic" (those are quotes of disdain BTW) games people are just drooling over the marketing potential of games as hate speech.

      --
      On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    2. Re:Games on the shelves now? by showler · · Score: 1

      Damn Rockstar and their inability to retroactively alter history.

  18. They should have known better... by BlueSteel · · Score: 1

    I know it's just a game and all, but come on. I'd think it would be clear by now that making negative race related comments in any media is going to get you into trouble. It's a hard lesson for Rockstar, but they'll recover from it. They make great games, and I'm sure they're kicking themselves now for their lack of foresight.

    1. Re:They should have known better... by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd think it would be clear by now that making negative race related comments in any media is going to get you into trouble.

      I take it you haven't seen Three Kings.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  19. should be protected by pretzel_logic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am not a lawyer, I am a programmer. That said IMHO, If I was the game manufacturer I would simply hide behind freedom of speech and freedom of press.

    It seems that our local governments have forgotten that freedom is the key. The judge should remind them of this and toss it out of court.

    If I want to make a product, and there is a market for the product, I should be able to sell it on the market. It should be up to the retailers to decide if they want to put it on the shelf.

    The leftist or rightist or whatevers will always be yelling about right and wrong, but thats their opinion and they are allowed to say it.

    The product is already listed as an adult game. For end users that are responsible enough to understand the game is fiction.

    "kill the Haitians" is simply a line in the plot of a fictional game. If they started a kill the Haitians advertising campaign available to the public eye, thats different.

    ..don't tread on me..

    --

    pretzel_logic
    1. Re:should be protected by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but free speech is not unlimited. For example incitement to racial hatred or violence is usually illegal.

      Still, in this case I think it's pretty stupid. You're role-playing a gangster. Going around gratuitously killing lots of people is what gangsters do. I mean you can equal well argue that the game promotes dangerous driving or mowing down pedestrians. The cartoon level of violence that the game portrays is hardly different, probably far less graphic than reading a book. And it's not as if Haitians are outrageously picked on in the game, as far as I can recall, pretty much everyone get's topped at one time or another in the game.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:should be protected by eht · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quick google search turned up Wired News:Games Elevate Hate to Next Level, hate crime games have been around for quite some time, most don't make enough money to interest lawyers and groups that are playing the "victim" card, but are actually playing the "I want money" card.

    3. Re:should be protected by prockcore · · Score: 1


      "kill the Haitians" is simply a line in the plot of a fictional game. If they started a kill the Haitians advertising campaign available to the public eye, thats different.


      You think the outcry would be any different if Rockstar had decided to name the gang "Mexicans" or "Southern Hicks"?

      This should suprise no one... the lawsuit may not have a leg to stand on, but it makes you wonder if there isn't a guy a rockstar who hates people from Haiti and is responsible for this whole thing.

    4. Re:should be protected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that. The game is supposed to take place in a fictional Miami enviroment. I would assume that there are Cuban and Haitian gangs there.

  20. Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same old culture nazi garbage. Next it will be a "hate crime" to say anything critical of the government.

  21. It's ENTERTAINMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are these idiots going to figure this out?

    All Italians don't work for the mob, all lawyers aren't weasely all insane murdurous women don't look like Sharon Stone.

    If you're not mature enough to play a title, you aren't mature enough to judge it.

  22. What the hell COULD Rockstar do at this point? by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1
    Exactly what I was thinking.

    It's impossible to alter the games that have already been sold, or at least the PS2 versions. An XBox patch might be possible, and a patch for the PC versions is almost a certainty. Still...what do they do with the PS2 versions?

    The hard drive hasn't been released yet, so there appear to be only two viable options. Either try to destroy all existing copies of the game and replace them at no cost, which would cost a huge amount of money, or find some way to alter the game via a file on a memory card.

    Neither of these solutions are at all financially feasible for Rockstar. Unless the state of Florida is willing to pay to replace all existing copies of the game, I suggest they stop bitching ASAP.

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  23. 1st Amendment by Dr.+Smack+PhD · · Score: 0

    *Disclaimer -- I think this whole situation is moronic and I do not agree with what I am about to say. It is more of a devil's advocate sort of thing.* IANAL, but I can offer a thought. The argument can be made that Rockstar is encouraging the killing of all Hatians. That is not speech that is protected by the 1st Amendment. I am not free to say I am going to kill the president, nor am I free to tell someone else to go commit genocide. I believe the Haitian Community leaders can make this overly-weak argument.

  24. From now on.. by lpontiac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. I am making fun of this ethnic group at every opportunity.

    They weren't targeted specifically in the game. The game leveraged and/or poked fun at a plethora of stereotypes. They need to get the fuck over it.

    1. Re:From now on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't the Haitians be more upset with the stereotyping of zombies in games like Resident Evil?

    2. Re:From now on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are "Pittsburgh zombies", a la George Romero, not Haitian zombies. Haitian zombies don't eat brains.

    3. Re:From now on.. by Maserati · · Score: 1

      I say Rockstar should replace the entire mission with a new one: a pro-censorship group is in town... KILL 'EM ALL !!!

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  25. Rockstar's Mistake by setik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my opinion, I think the point at which Rockstar lost was the instant they decided to issue a statement apologizing to the Haitian community, they basically said "we are wrong, everyone feel free to sue us now, because we admit defeat".

    Rockstar should have done the right thing for all games everywhere and fought this out in court as a free speech issue, which it clearly is.

    Wont be long till we see other developers and publishers get sued, or worst of all banned or censored industry wide. If you though games were getting too many sequels and relying too much on franchise IP because publishers were not will to take risks, I can only imagine how much harder it will be to make original games with realistic content.

  26. Rockstar announcement by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

    In order to satisfy the demands of the florida haitian community, Rockstar has degun devellopment in a time machine that will be used to go back in time in order to remove offensive content from their game.

    The machine will then be used to back to the paleozoic era and Rockstar employees will then wipe out all life on earth as we know it, applying the only possible way to never offend anyone ever again.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  27. Speaking of prejudice... by jermyjerm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a Miami Herald story about the issue:

    "American society is racist, even though there are antiracist laws," Lesly Voltaire, minister for Haitians living abroad, told The Herald. "It's based on a formerly slave-owning society, which has left its mark, and there are people who think they can make money on that racism."

    And it's not offensive and prejudicial when a government official from another country makes a judgement on an entire society based on a practice abolished over 100 years ago?

    The world makes me so mad, and this issue is just idiotic.

    --
    --- "Yeah, I'm a bit stressed out. I have a research paper due tomorrow and it has to be +5, Insightful."
    1. Re:Speaking of prejudice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. stupid voodoo-lovin' chickenhumpers.

  28. Watch out for the opportunitsts by thirty2bit · · Score: 1

    "the manufacturer's pledge to change future editions did not solve the problem with games on store shelves now."

    I can see eBay auctions now:
    -- BANNED uncensored GTA game!
    -- rare GTA original version, low re$erve!
    -- HOT GTA GAME recalled InSuLtInG FUNNY!

    There is a ton of tongue-in-cheek ethnic humor in that game. Jaysus Christ on a jumped-up, chariot driven crutch --- will Comedy Central be the next target?!

  29. NYC news media lied to begin with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the game script found on Gamefaqs.com, the line "Kill all the Haitians" is not said by any of the characters in the game! NOT ONE!!

    If that is the case, then Rockstar/Take-Two is owed an apology by every single one of these Haitian popcorn farts.

  30. Two Words by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Free Speech.

    I know this will result in a discussion of "is it ok to make potentially racist material available to children?" but IMHO, that's where parenting comes in.

    --
    Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
  31. Shut up by josath · · Score: 1

    I would understand if Haitians were the only ethnic group singled out for mindless killing, but honestly....at a point in the game, you actually -work- for the Haitians, specifically for the purpose of killing the rival Cubans. At other points in the game, you kill Italians, French, Colombians, hell, I think I even killed some seagulls. If one took killing people out (and don't whine about ethnicity - in case it's not obvious, -everyone- is part of some ethnicity), you'd have.....nothing. And if you have a problem with killing in general........ DON'T BUY THE FSCKING GAME!!!!! I swear, we need to hold a telethon for these people......

    --
    sig? uhh, umm, ok
  32. Manufacturers of Scrabble are next by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Giving low point scores to all the vowels is clearly racist" said Aiiiaoa Oaoaiuuii for the Hawaiian state prosecutor's office.

    World Scrabble champion Hzbrgzny Zgknyskqjz of Poland is rumoured to be a key witness for the defence at the trial.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:Manufacturers of Scrabble are next by shadowcabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's not forget the Japanese delegates who were pissed that their proposed 4,000-tile kanji expansion was turned down.

      You can't make everybody happy. Deal with it.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  33. Perhaps they should retract it by Jerf · · Score: 1

    The (most likely) goal of the apology is to quell criticism that might adversely affect the sales of their games, current and future.

    If the apology does not accomplish that goal, perhaps they should now retract it. Use the resulting publicity to take a stand for free speech and gain some noteriety.

    Just a thought. I haven't done a full analysis, I really can't without intimate knowledge about Rockstar etc., but it's worth thinking about. If the recipients aren't going to be gracious about it, perhaps it's time to stop bending over for them.

  34. Knee-jerks by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "To me it sounds like this has got to be against the law," Levinson said. "To tell people to kill a particular group of people? That has to violate some law."

    Well, if a game were to attempt to motivate people to commit genocide, then yes, I'd agree, it probably violates some law. The problem is, even out of context, "kill the Haitians" doesn't imply killing a group of people from a particular community. It implies killing specific people, i.e. a gang. Since the Haitians that the line referred to was in reference to that gang, it's even harder to bend the facts in order to support the idea that Vice City is anti-Haitian.

    Frankly, this whole fiasco is doing more to make people dislike the Haitian Community than anything Vice City did. Nobody likes misunderstanding to be used for frivilous lawsuits and the like.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Knee-jerks by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I just think it's funny to read it deliberately mis-pronounced:

      Hate-ians.

      Of course you have to kill them, they hate you! (Or, they hate blokes from Scotland...)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  35. Proud GTA player from Florida by JonnyRo88 · · Score: 1

    I'm a current resident of florida, and a proud owner of Grand Theft Auto III and Vice City. I never once felt the desire to carry out any acts of violence at a particular ethnic group after playing the GTA series.

    What is so special about that game is that it makes fun of EVERYONE equally, there is no one safe from the dark humor of the game's authors.

    I think in Florida you will find an extremly large difference of opinion depending on the age group, and between Orlando / Tampa / Miami.

    A lot of the younger people (20-30) like myself moved from out of state to Orlando and find it to be a modern and happy place to live. I have no idea who would want to move to Tampa or Miami though. I can tell you this, in Orlando a VERY high percentage of the people I know in my age group play Grand Theft Auto.

    Long live Rockstar, i really dont even think they should start pulling out one liners like the one the Miami people had issue with, if they do that they are going to open themself up to a storm of other groups asking similar things.

    --
    The Ro Factor - Jeep/Linux Weblog
    1. Re:Proud GTA player from Florida by 1eyedhive · · Score: 1

      i'm to the SE in Sarasota thanks to my parents, heh. Also a proud owner of GTA-VC. haitian violence prone? hell no.

      these people need to get their heads outta their asses.

      --
      Logistical Chaos Officer http://www.slagg.org - LAN Gaming in Sarasota FL,USA
  36. Keep up the publicity! by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1
    did not solve the problem with games on store shelves now
    They won't be there for long!
    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  37. GTA doesn't tell me to do anything by obsid1an · · Score: 1
    "To me it sounds like this has got to be against the law," Levinson said. "To tell people to kill a particular group of people? That has to violate some law."

    Holy shit, it isn't telling you to kill the Haitians. It is telling your character, Tommy Vercetti, to kill all the Haitians. If you are unable to make that distinction you are either way too young to be playing it or you have probably already killed someone before touching this game and should be locked up.

    1. Re:GTA doesn't tell me to do anything by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that goes for any games. I mean, Christ. Suppose you're playing Yoshi's Cookie. I mean, God forbid the instructions say that "Yoshi should eat cookies", because some idiot might, at least in a totally distorted reality, manage to interpret this as a mandate to eat cookies without stop in real life. Furthermore, this is clearly targetting the defenseless bulimia sufferers of the world.

      Sigh.

      You know, I really don't have feelings about most minority groups one way or the other. Except when crap like this comes out. The game didn't make me dislike Haitians as a general group nearly as much as said Haitians are doing.

    2. Re:GTA doesn't tell me to do anything by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      Calm down.

      These Haitian "community leaders" are represent their community in the same way ESR represents everyone who's ever written code. That is to say, they don't.

      It's just a bunch of whiny people whining.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  38. While we're at it by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

    Call of Duty unfairly targets Germans.
    Hell, the whole game is about killing Germans. At least in Vice City they mix it up. But CoD takes hate to a new level.

    And it goes far beyond video games.
    In Independence Day they targeted aliens. They tried to kill all of them on or near Earth. Thats genocide my friends.

  39. You know... by neelm · · Score: 1

    I can think of one music artist who changed his lyrics and videos in response to claims like these of "hate"... ...and that's Michael Jackson.

    So we need to ask ourselves, do we want to repeat these mistakes!?!

  40. Kill all the Haitians by borg1238 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I thought I was the only one who's television told him to do things like that.

  41. incitement to racial hatred by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Then wouldn't that make Islam illegal? After all, some portions of the Koran say that those that follow Allah to kill all Jews?

    You see, one should not be punished for what they THINK, they should be punished for what they do.

    Lasty, don't forget. Laws like these could be turned around to come after you.

    1. Re:incitement to racial hatred by lounger540 · · Score: 1

      After you learn to speak Arabic and actually read the Quran you can explain to us all where in it states to kill all Jews. The fact is that Muhommad's profocies say that the Jews are counsins to the Jews (sons of Abraham I believe) and that they should be treated well. It's uninformed propoganda like your statement that sparks hate crimes, not well designed and entertaing video games.

      --
      LOOP1: MOV CX,2 LOOP LOOP1
    2. Re:incitement to racial hatred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please learn to spell before you call others uninformed.

    3. Re:incitement to racial hatred by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      surat number 29, verse 29, "fight against those who believe not in Allah; nor in the last day, nor forbid that which have been forbidden by Allah and his messenger Mohammed; and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth, Islam, among the people of the scripture.

    4. Re:incitement to racial hatred by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      surat number 29, verse 29, "fight against those who believe not in Allah; nor in the last day, nor forbid that which have been forbidden by Allah and his messenger Mohammed; and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth, Islam, among the people of the scripture.

    5. Re:incitement to racial hatred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Your version of Islam is dead. You've lost, and have given it away. Now Islam is a little bitch religion. One day, they'll go to far, and we will kill their God, no matter what the passages may say. Our history books will all agree the world is better for it.

      America isn't weak. The islamists misunderstand our humanity, compasion and generosity. Who is it that cares if their children get an education? Not the muslims, but white affluent people a world away, who never have, and never will see those kids. But all goodwill is finite, and when it is spent, they should expect to see our engineering prowess and darker parts of human nature fused and turned against them in a horror which defies description and escape. That darkness is a part of our mythos, and it isn't shuned or denied, but embraced, guided or confronted.

      In fact it's likely they underestimate the will of many americans to start down that path right now. Most aren't unhappy with Bush for killing Iraqis, those that didn't want him to lie about it, they didn't want him to make Americans do it up close, prefering to do so far from the reach of their capabilities. We all but exterminated a plethora of peoples and cultures for nothing more than an aethstetic of "sea to shining sea." This is taugh in every public school, and we've all made our peace with it. Underestimating our will to kill would likely be a final mistake.

    6. Re:incitement to racial hatred by lounger540 · · Score: 1

      Ummm as far as the spelling comment goes, sorry I typo-d at 12am after studying for finals all day. And if you think I spell Quran wrong, you're wrong. And as far as that verse goes, Allah is the Muslim word for God, the same God that the Jews believe in. The Jews just don't accept Muhommad as the prophet. Secondly, any Muslim would be offended that you tried to display the meaning of the Quran in a translated text becuase it is susposed the be the divine words of God as spoken by him through the mouth of Muhommad, and only exists in one version in one languge (according to them. I'm aware it's been "interpreted" into English.), but you're translation is still not correct becuase the Jews technically do believe in Allah, they just don't call It that because they don't speak Arabic.

      --
      LOOP1: MOV CX,2 LOOP LOOP1
    7. Re:incitement to racial hatred by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      First, respond to the AC who posted about your spell, not me.

  42. Dear lobbyists... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

    Look up the definition of the word "metaphor". Going after Rockstar for having racist slurs in a game is like going after Stephen King for murder.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  43. Jesus Fucking Christ! by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1

    Goddamnit! I just lost two "Respect for Humanity" points. And I'll tell you, nowadays, those suckers are hard to come by.

    Have these people totally lost thier minds? Have they really become so wrapped up in fighting the Politically Correctness war that they don't understand how amazingly lame this is?

    Of course, this is a perfect example of why hate crime laws are bad, bad news. Equal protection? Who needs that! Only minorities with well funded PACs deserve justice in this country. I mean, they've been mistreated for so long we've got to give them something, right? The 14th Amendment sounds good to me...we weren't really using it anyway.

  44. What about a patch? by strangel · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody mentioned releasing a patch yet. That's all they're doing, right? They're patching all new versions to change the dialog. So release the new dialog in an incremental patch. And if there are complaints about having to download it, put the patch on cd's and ship them out to game retailers to package with the games currently on the shelf, and to give out to those customers who want the patch, all free of charge. The cost sucks, I'm sure, but it would likely avoid any more whoopty-hoo.
    Personally I agree with all of the other posters about the sanity of the people pursuing this stupid issue, but at least this might satisfy someone.

    1. Re:What about a patch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ps2? Xbox?

      that would be a hell of a patch...

    2. Re:What about a patch? by strangel · · Score: 1

      the xbox has a hard drive for such things, and i don't know much about ps2 but you can't win em all.

  45. Just wait it out... by dswensen · · Score: 1

    "The presence of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City on the shelves of national distributors and retailers ... continues to constitute a clear and present danger for Haitian nationals in the United States. Residents of Little Haiti (in Miami) have become like a sitting duck," Jean-Robert Lafortune of the Haitian-American Grassroots Coalition told Reuters on Thursday."

    So, apparently, all we need to do is just wait a bit, and the massive tidal wave of death, carnage, and destruction will wipe out every last Haitian on the planet, due to the blood-crazed killing madness that is evidently sweeping the nation at this very moment.

    So, once all Miami is in flames, no more Haitians... no more fuss. We won't even have to get the courts involved. From what this guy is saying, in fact, it's useless to get them involved anyway... all we can do is declare martial law to try to stem the tide of hate crime devastation.

    Unless, of course, Jean-Robert Lafortune is overstating things... just a wee bit.

    I mean, I'm all for cultural sensitivity and all, but this guy makes it sound like Haitians are being lynched in the street. What are GTA players going to do? Beat them to death with their PS2 controllers?

  46. Enough of this! by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    I am so sick and tired of the crap hate gets. Personally I don't think it's too much of a crime to hate. The government has no business telling me who I can hate or not. Hate is a natural part of human existance. Maybe unpleasant for some but no less unpleasant then driving through Los Angeles and seeing bumper stickers that say "Fuck You, this is Mexico now!" Fact is this is America and it's our right to hate for any reason we choose. If I shoot someone then why not come after me for the crime of shooting them. Whether or not I like them is nobody's business but my own.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    1. Re:Enough of this! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hate (alone) is not illegal. In fact, criticism of people based on race or whatnot is quite legal, First Amendment-protected speech (as long as you don't violate slander/libel laws, of course).

      Hate crimes refer to a specific class of crimes that are always illegal, but have punishments elevated by being classified as a hate crime.

      If you kill someone, you might be looking at, say, a second-degree murder charge. However, if it is found that you killed the other person because you hated the color of his skin and killed him *for that reason*, then you may be charged with a hate crime, and may undergo nastier penalties.

      The rationale, as far as I know, was to prevent racial violence against blacks in the South by jacking up punishments against their attackers. Now, I suspect that a lot of this is emotional and not particularly well-founded, but there is some argument. The idea is that you don't want to make penalties worse than necessary to discourage people from committing the crime. If you have a group of people that have a much higher punishment threshhold before they will stop committing a crime (the KKK, for instance), it might be nice to punish them and them alone more harshly.

      I'm not saying that I agree or disagree with this approach (I tend to think that at the least, hate crime laws are quite out-of-date and produce nasty social artifacts), but it isn't quite as scary as attempting to outlaw your thoughts or verbal/written expression.

    2. Re:Enough of this! by Deanasc · · Score: 1

      So the end result is that it's ok to punish people you don't like or agree with more harshly then another group for the same crime. In any case, Rockstar hasn't comitted any crimes so why is the state threatening them with punishments under the hate crime laws?

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    3. Re:Enough of this! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      In any case, Rockstar hasn't comitted any crimes so why is the state threatening them with punishments under the hate crime laws?

      It isn't. Some random commissioner (i.e. not important and probably trying to win Haitian votes) "forwarded information on the game to a friend at the Attorney General's office". It's awfully unlikely that the state would go for this case.

      IIRC, "inciting to violence" is illegal, which they might try. I'm not really familiar with crimes that fall under it, but I suspect that Rockstar is once again fine. The law is designed for when you have a bunch of people yelling at someone "come on, blow the punk's head off!" -- -- I believe it only applies to speech that would cause immediate violence.

      Other than that, I can't imagine what they'd do. They might boycott the game, but they aren't going to be able to smack Rockstar with much of anything.

      Rockstar's PR people just decided that the fuss wasn't worth fighting over.

    4. Re:Enough of this! by thelenm · · Score: 1

      The law ought not to afford special protection for certain people or groups of people. That's really all hate crime legislation is (well, that and the beginning of prosecution for thoughtcrime, of course :-)

      Who's to determine who should get special protection? When they start prosecuting people for hate crimes committed against men, white people, Christians, and heterosexuals, then maybe my attitude toward hate crime legislation will change. But of course, if hate crimes are prosecuted equally when committed against all groups of people, then almost by definition hate crime legislation will be unnecessary.

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  47. The ESRB rating system should be enforced. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can imagine the groans I would get if I openly said that "they should require an ID to purchase M rated games," but they should. The majority of the controversy that you hear about this game involves some minors shooting something in real life and saying they are doing it because they saw it in the game. It's too easy of a defense, and it leaves the developers open to attacks from people and parents who never should have been playing/let their kids play the game in the first place. The majority of the problems caused by this type of game envolves kids who are under the age M rated games are rated for. Just like alchohol isn't necesarily NOT for everyone under 21, not all M rated games are NOT for everyone under 18, but there's enough problems involved now, we need to have the sales of these games restricted, and that restriction enforced. If you read no other line of this post, read this one. Enforcing a purchase age or parental consent of M rated games would give the developers something arm themselves with going into this type of litigation. They would be able to argue that someone else approved the purchase of the game for that individual, and that it was not intended for that person to play that game. While they can argue that now, they have no legal backing for it, other than the ESRB's flakey rating system. They would have the backing of the government in most cases because of this. You don't see busch beer getting sued everytime a minor gets drunk, do you?

    While this wouldn't instantly fix the problem, it would protect the developers from expensive litigation in an industry that is growing more and more expensive to just stay in it. And something needs to be done to end these rediculous lawsuits and blame placed upon developers. While I believe rockstar should be held accountable for what they release, much of this has gone on far too long, and the blame is not even close to soley theirs.

  48. The whole thing is funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole thing is funny. I live in Miami and I can 100% assure you that GRAND THEFT AUTO is far less likely to incite violence against Haitians than public access TV. You know, where Haitians make fools of themselves calling everybody and their mother racist at City Council meetings.

    True Story.

    Haitian Councilman: "We're going to allocate X amount of money to celebrate "

    Gringo Councilman: "Where are we going to get the money for that?"

    Haitian Councilman #2: "Oh, we can cancel the New Year's festivities!"

    Gringo Councilman: "But... everybody loves the New Year's parade. This is outrageous..."

    Haitian Councilmen (in unison): "RACIST!"

    True fucking story.

    Kill all the Haitians? Sounds like a fucking plan.

  49. maybe we should get rid of "Scarface" by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

    you know cause that could be hatefull too.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  50. Hatians not winning any fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the Hatians don't like Vice City?

    I'll bet 5 minutes with a plunger handle will change their minds.

  51. Replacement dialog? by Mister+Cookies · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now that Rockstar has caved and announced that the dialog will be removed, what will it be replaced with? I mean, you can't just dump the player into a situation with no objective, that was the purpose of the phrase in question in the first place. In today's America, there is no proper solution. SOMEONE would find SOMETHING wrong with some little bit of something totally trivial, as they have here. Add in a bit of whining and complaining to some sympathetic politician, and nothing is safe.

  52. Vice City is worth defending by PerpetualMotion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would pay more retail if it meant it went into some kind of defense slush fund just for these kinds of suits at this level/quality game.

    If they asked for donations for a defense fund for this game I would put up some money, as very rare an occasion as that would be for me.

    If we don't pay to support the games we like, and want to see more of, the litigation and new laws will bog them down and keep developers away. A few victorys with a 10$/game defense fund for the next Manhunt could go a long way twords keeping games free from political influence.

  53. You are wrong. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    What they, and most other groups of this type, is for Rockstar to 'donate' to them to show how sorry they are for what the did.

    It is all about money.

  54. Why did this take so long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The game has been out for a year, why did it take the Haitian so long to start complaining? Maybe because they had to wait for it to hit the discount bin at Wal-Mart, so their welfare checks could cover it?

    Now Florida is in on it too? Well I guess that means the Cubans are pissed too.

    Come on people get a grip...IT'S A GAME!

  55. The copies in the store already... by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Aren't technically Rockstars property. They now belong to the retailer, so unless Rockstar caves even more and takes them all back tough titty.

    I'll be pissed if their next patch for the pc version alters the game. I realize I can always uninstall and play it fresh, they can't change the cd, but I bought the game last spring and understand it how its meant to be understood.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  56. 2 Live Crew said it best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out "Fuck Martinez" [Download it legally, y'all] to hear that classic rap group's take on Florida attacking 1st Ammendment rights...

  57. The definition of America: Yin and Yang by bmnc · · Score: 1

    In a culture that produces people who creat works of art, culture and entertainment that push the boundaries on what is the accepted norm one must pay the price by producing people who disagree with the former and act to stem this flow of new information.

    And then theres the money grubbing leeches. I'd put the Haitians and lawyers in the last basket.

  58. And...? by silentbobdp · · Score: 1

    "...saying "the manufacturer's pledge to change future editions did not solve the problem with games on store shelves now." "

    What the fuck are they supposed to do? Knock on everyone's door and stand over their shoulder and just make a beeping noise when the character says that?

    The stupidity of sensitivity amazes me...

    --
    --Moo.
  59. Priorities by dafoomie · · Score: 1

    Maybe these Haitian community 'leaders' should stop making a big deal over one out of context phrase in a silly video game, and start concerning themselves with, oh, I dunno, Haiti. It's one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere, it lacks food and drinking water, and their government is riddled with corruption. And never mind the 300,000+ children that are virtually sold into slavery in Haiti, known as 'Restavecs'. I find it ironic that they refer to slavery here, which was abolished over a century ago, but they continue to practice it themselves. But I guess its ok for them to do it, since they do it to themselves. No, those kids aren't important at all, compared to one line in a video game. This is not to say that Haitians are bad people. But Haiti, and Haitians living here have some problems, and these 'community leaders' need to get their priorities straight.

  60. I think this is a publicity stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They knew that there wasn't much that could be done at this point due to VC being old news, they don't any solutions or tell us what they really want, and they probably never intended to work things out with rockstar in the first place.

    Besides, I bet they would still be crying about it even if rockstar did what they requested. They probably will try to milk this for as much as they possibly can. From what I can tell they haven't speciffly said what they want done, nor do I expect they will.

    Now in addition to the frivolous law suits against blaming rockstar for the actions of morons, we have more people trying to cash in. Looks like this will be more fuel for those anit-video game nuts, just look at this quote from a Florida attorney general

    "To me it sounds like this has got to be against the law," Levinson said. "To tell people to kill a particular group of people? That has to violate some law."

    Sounds similar to Bloomberg's "we are going to get these bastards any way we can" type quote.

    Looks like more people are taking this FUD as a fact, or are just looking for some way to punish those no good evil games and their companies that are corrupting our society. Looks like the papers love it, at the top of both articles they link to the quote out of context and make it seem as if the game is instructing people to kill real Haitians. Then at the bottom section where no one really reads, or have already formed the belief that the above quote is true, it mentions how the quote may have been taken out of context.

    Sheesh, if it was a movie, tv show, book, music they would have probably would have checked the context, but since it is a video game they take the claim and sound bites as a fact. Then again, the media has been lacking in the research and validity department for quite some time.

  61. Well geez... by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    ... now I'm even more sympathetic to the sentiment of the game's Cubans!

    So the Haitians are offended by a line in the game about killing Haitians? You know what? I'm offended that the god damned Haitians try to kill me in the game!

  62. However, it does occur to me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that killing all the Haitians actually solves this problem. I guess there is something to be learned from Grand Theft Auto.

    I for one blame not myself, nor Rockstar, nor ass-hats who shoot at people driving on the highways. I blame the Haitians, because if they weren't fuckwits and cowards they'd be living in and running their own fucking third-world country. Just because they're humourless pussies is no reason we should follow suit, especially since they're just lucky to be here.

  63. missing the point by August_zero · · Score: 1

    Maybe, but I think it is more about egos. Some people don't like other people that don't agree with them. If they inflict harm on Rockstar, then they feel good about themselves, and their little special interest group now has power (if the world bends once it will bend again sort of thing). Money may play into it eventually, but the real struggle here is power. Look at prohibition in the U.S. Most of the protesters and common citizens campaigning and crusading against liquor did not stand to gain any monetary compensation for their efforts. The only reward was the forcing of their beliefs on other people. Sure some people made loads of dough on the situation when it came to fruition, but not Joe activist.

    Do not be so quick to assume that money is the only thing people are after, you have to remember what the money represents.

    And thanks for not being at all hostile.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  64. But after their little hissy fit.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It really should.

    Seriously, we need more pansey ass-clowns who take themselves too seriously?

  65. Bugs Bunny has shown us the way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All we must do is follow.

  66. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, these people need to just find a dark place of their anatomy and adress any future concerns to that dark place. The "offensive" statement was only used in the context of the game, and I'm sure they'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who committed a hate crime because of the game. I'm constantly amazed at how blind and stupid some of these people are, that they can make complaints like this with a straight face. They complain a lot about people taking the game's statement literally due to an inability to separate the game world from the real world, yet they themselves seem to be the only people with that problem.

    Incredible.

  67. One better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have hooked up with the free speech foundation which is essentially a trade association for the porn industry.

    1) Rockstrs and Pornstars. They just go together.

    2) Porn is BIG business. That's right GE, a company that produced componants for satellites, cruise missles, and nuclear weapons sells porn. That's the kind of team I want to be on.

    3) Get to wrap yourself in the american flag, and blast those little (virtual) haitian mothers! While trying to rescue Jenna Jamison thanks to a cross licencing agreement.

    4) Programmers, and gamers, not the most suave of cats by reputation. Contacts in the porn industry couldn't hurt.

    5) Ron Howard directs Grand Theft AutoErot-o! A whole franchise including R rated theatrical release, Affiliated DVD with vinettes by the anime porn masters, Special Editions, Hardcore editions, interactive titles for both the console markets and DVD's, and promotional stunts like tickets to the premier or trips with the starletts that end up at the bunnyranch, replicas of the starts from realdolls.com.

    I, for one, welcome seeing what 150 million dollars of porn looks like.

  68. Secret Weapons of the Luftwaffa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still Legal.

    FWIW, I always play civ to genocide. I don't always raze their cities, but they follow my laws and fly my colors.

    And what about DooM II, don't the minnions of Hell deserve the same rights as everyone else even if they're bent on the destruction of our way of life?

  69. If this goes on... by Siener · · Score: 1
    From the article :
    "To me it sounds like this has got to be against the law," Levinson said. "To tell people to kill a particular group of people? That has to violate some law."

    In other news EA Games today announced that to prevent future lawsuits they will not ask players to "kill Germans" in the upcomming sequel to their Medal of Honour WWII first person shooter. The sequel has now been renamed to Medal of Honour, Let's all live together in peace.

  70. How about this then by dalek_killer · · Score: 1

    Well, since it seems that it is the State of Florida, then just don't sell the games there. After all its only one state. lol

    1. Re:How about this then by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      It's ridiculous, I think RockStar should make the next GTA more offensive just to shit on the Politically Correct a-holes!

    2. Re:How about this then by dalek_killer · · Score: 1

      Hey that works for me ;-)

  71. Oh That's A hate crime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, please change every movie ever made that has had a racist in it or you get investigated for hate crimes. HOW insanly poltically correct has the country gotten, when you can't even have a racist charectar in a medium? there goes out a ton of story-telling, even having a racist charectar in a movie is grounds for it to be fined BECAUSE OF HATE CRIME.

    THrow out all your copies of missipi burning people

    Thanks

    - Hatiain groups

  72. Obligatory follow-up by Belgand · · Score: 2, Funny

    After playing Super Mario Bros. I spent a significant portion of my childhood running around the house looking for gold coins. These games are teaching our kids to chase money! Don't even get me started on the aftermath of my bananna cannon rampage.

    1. Re:Obligatory follow-up by Psx29 · · Score: 1

      Come on now, everyone knows mario is communist

  73. along those lines by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No offense to Haitians or anyone else, but WTF took them so long to get pissed off and organized about this game? "Blah blah blah... its to late, they already made their money." Yea, why weren't you protesting a year ago when it would have been easier to resolve the situation? Anyone think Florida would be thinking about hate crime laws if this whole brewhaha happened a month after the game was released?

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  74. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *nt*

  75. Similiar thing in NY by nickyj · · Score: 1

    In NYC the Haitian groups are protesting and getting media coverage on this same issue. The makers removed the line(s) from the game in new copies, but the Haitian groups are not satisfied and want the option to return the uneditted game for the editted one.

    --
    Causing Chaos Everywhere,
    Nik J.
    The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    1. Re:Similiar thing in NY by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

      Haitian groups are not satisfied and want the option to return the uneditted game for the editted one.

      This is why there's a problem. Nobody cares but the Haitians. Nobody in their right mind will have puchased a known offensive game and return it for a less offensive one. This is part of the game's appeal.

      There's been a lot of speculation on media like this lately. We devoloped a rating system for a reason and it seems people are ignoring them. This game is rated mature because it is offensive, and it is violent. People are still stupid enough to think that those who play these games will be inclined to go on killing sprees. If they would just adhere the rating system, we would find that only 18 year olds and older would be playing the game. If you have enough money to even buy the game and(/or) the console/computer to go with it, you obviously have enough intelligence to distinguish the difference between a video game and real life. It's time everybody started to practice some rationality.

      This doesn't just include video games. Movies and Television shows are subject to the same irrational scrutiny.

    2. Re:Similiar thing in NY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The makers removed the line(s) from the game in new copies, but the Haitian groups are not satisfied and want the option to return the uneditted game for the editted one."

      I hope they also remove the Haitian Gang's guns from the game too, as this would help me finish the Cuban Gang missions...

  76. Anyone Care about Real Violence Anymore? by crombie · · Score: 1

    I mean, come on, there's a lot of REAL killing going on in the U.S.

    Why don't we worry about solving that problem first, and then we can get around to protesting and investigating the FAKE killings in books, video games, movies, and other entertainment media?

  77. What we don't need... by plastid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is yet another *AA telling us what criminals we are.

    1. Re:What we don't need... by HolyCoitus · · Score: 1

      That's those organizations out of hand... Instead of founding it based on the industy as a whole, why not just something for PR and governmental greasing? The reason the MPAA and RIAA are a problem is because they were made out to be an organization that also would be allowed to attack the consumer. There is no need for that. An organization that attacks stupidity in the media and hypocrisy in the government is legitimate in my opinion. The issue is though, would it turn into another group lobbying for new laws and attacking consumers? There should be ways to prevent that, and make something focused on the needs of gamers and game makers at the same time.

      --
      That's scary.
  78. Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it seems likely that there is reason to believe that the person who committed the hate crime will do so again, since there are more people for whom he/she is motivated to kill.

  79. The game is bad for Florida's Disneyfied image. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that Florida doesn't like being portrayed in the game as a coke infested craphole that it is and not the Disneyfied infomercial that it wants us all to believe.

  80. Common Sense by UconnGuy · · Score: 1

    I think what all this comes down to is a loss of common sense in America. As Americans, most have the mentality of 'it has to be someone else's fault'. A lady spills hot coffee on her lap while driving and talking on a cell phone and sues because the coffee is too hot. Where was the common sense in 1. the coffee would be hot, 2. I am driving and talking on a cell phone, lets put the hot (styrofoam) cup between my legs? There was none, I can pitcure her to her lawyer (or her lawyer saying her to say this) "it must be McD's fault that I had it between my legs, was driving and on a cell phone. Plus, I don't expect hot coffee from them."
    Getting back to the topic...you have the Hatians and State of Confusion.....err...Florida complaining about this. IT'S A FRIGGIN GAME. If you don't have the common sense to know that, then don't play it. Personally, I never even really noticed that line until they made a big deal out of it. I never related that line to a whole group of people - no one with common sense would. However, in our common senseless society (in conjunction with the politically correct attitude), people don't think anymore, they do what they are told/fed to do and feel. I think this point is proven with the fact they waited so long. As said on previous posts, if they are really offended, then why wait so long to complian? Well, perhaps it's because they are being told what to think/say/feel by the vultures.

    Yes - I am having a bad day and needed to rant because I am starting to get sick of all this...time for judicial (and society) reformation

    People need to start thinking for themselves and use common sense - their brains and society will thank them!

  81. Racism vs. Violence by nickyj · · Score: 1

    But there problem is that it's racist against their group. I am wonder what would happen if there was a game that was racist against all groups, (you pick one character and you have kill everyone that is black, a different character and you kill all the whites, etc.) What will then happen?

    Or what about those games that depict World War II? Should the Germans or the Russians be pissed? It's hard to draw the line.

    --
    Causing Chaos Everywhere,
    Nik J.
    The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    1. Re:Racism vs. Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't racism. Last I checked, Haitians, Germans, and whoever else you want are all of the HUMAN race. This is crybabyism. Fuck them in their stupid haitian aids-infested asses.

    2. Re: Racism vs. Violence by Tired_Blood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or what about those games that depict World War II? Should the Germans or the Russians be pissed?

      When I was looking up info on DukeNukem3D for a post, I noticed this nifty litte blurb for "Wolfenstein 3D":

      Due to the game content, this game may not be ordered by residents of Germany.

      I'm not going to look for other examples, but if they can't purchase the game...

      --
      This is not my sig.
    3. Re: Racism vs. Violence by Snak+Attack · · Score: 1

      Nazi symbols are outlawed in germany, except for in historical and maybe artistic works - that's probably the reason

      --
      "Chaos, Mr. Who, that is our mode and modus. That is our central kick"
    4. Re: Racism vs. Violence by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Wolfenstein 3d could not be purchased by germans because it depicted the swastika, hence violating local laws. It was later released with the swastikas removed and (iirc) hitler's moustache was gone from the paintings.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  82. Pfft. by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

    If I was Rockstar, I'd have a press conference and in classic Johnny Cash style flip them the bird.

    This is all a joke. It will fade away and be long forgotten. It's clearly protected under free speech (and last time I checked, even "race hating" speech is free.) Besides, it's a video game, with fictious characters/situations/stories.

    Blah.

    --
    Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  83. Sad, sad, sad... by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 0, Troll
    You know, Barry Bonds once claimed that certain ratial groups have genetics suited for sports. Jimmy the Greek also made the same claim and was forced to resign over it. Ditto Al Campanis.

    Then there's the case of a Washington staffer forced to resign for saying "niggardly", because it sounded like a racial slur, but actually meant "miserly".

    Using "kill the Hatians" in the game was probably over the top, but I can't help but look at this and think that if the phrase used was "kill the whites", we'd not have even noticed.

    Before you mod me off for trying to troll, I'll just ask you what is more offensive: not paying attention to a "racial slur" because you think people are above the touchiness, or constantly spending your life looking at a certain race as your oppressors without first looking for motivations, or even correct word definitions?

    --
    There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
  84. Re:Petrus Steele said it best... by bl0nd13 · · Score: 1

    Normally, I'm a big fan of rational discourse and measured debate... but... NAZI SKINHEADS FUCKING DIE!!!!

  85. The Press Conference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's what I would say if I were a Rockstar executive:

    TO ALL THE HAITIAN HYPOCRITES OUT THERE, if our apology isn't good enough for you, then I say that we gave you an apology that we DID NOT MEAN! And if you don't understand what I'm saying, I always have a little bit of sign language, so here's to ya.... (flips bird with both hands). ALL YOU HAITIANS ARE NOTHING BUT GARBAGE!!!! GARBAGE FOR FLEAS!!!!

    Okay, maybe that was going a little too far, but the those ass-clowns would deserve it.

  86. Smogarians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It would be very different if they meant, in the game, kill ALL the Haitians, not just the rival gang. You can't do that just running around, even heavily armed and jacking cars. You'd need an army, and crematoriums... you'd need real run-anywhere-do-anything gameplay to fly to Haiti and establish a genocide.

    Clearly, if a soldier says "kill all the Germans" in a WWII game, he doesn't mean kill millions of German innocents. He means the armed Germans nearby.

    I suppose we can just stick to inventing Eastern Bloc countries for statments like this... "Kill all the Logobrovians." It's anti-slavic, but it's nicely generic, and well-established. I had a book of jokes where all the Polack jokes have been replaced with Smogarian equivalents... I was only eight, so I really wondered what the hell could be wrong with these Smogarian fellows. Interestingly, I assumed they were black, because of the Smog.

  87. First Amendment? by spitzig · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this decision doesn't break freedom of speech. However, wouldn't Ethnic Cleansing put out be a LITTLE more about hate crime stuff? I mean, it's object is to kill "sub-humans" -- i.e. Blacks and Latinos -- and their "masters," the Jews, who are portrayed as the personification of evil. The ads said, "Celebrate Martin Luther King Day with a virtual Race War!"
    http://www.adl.org/videogames/videogames_print.a sp

  88. What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What happened to free speech in the US? Where is your defence for your constitution? This is just free speech. If I decide to go out and shout at the rafters that I hate Haitans and wish them all dead (I obviously don't get involved in any Haitan killings) then as a US citizen I have that right. Whether it be on a rooftop or that I put it in a game I make.

    Defend your constitution!Screw state laws!

  89. BULLSHIT by willr7 · · Score: 1

    If a movie (re:art) says i hate hatians, mexicans, canadiens, white people, black people, whoever...you don't sue the movie for a hate crime. WHY? FREEDOME OF SPEECH>

  90. I hate lawyers by t0ny · · Score: 1
    This is exactly the reason why companies NEVER, EVER admit any wrong-doing. Once you say "ok, I see your point, and will correct the problem", you open yourself up to all kinds of liability.

    Now, because Rockstar did something nice for them, they are getting shafted. They would have been better off telling them to go fly a kite (or at least lighten up).

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  91. Re: (poster is) So frecking useless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it's not so much off-topic as much as it's a knee jerk response to an article you obviously didn't read because a bad image isn't the basis for the lawsuit, violation of a hate crime statute is. Can we get an option for "Don't pay attention to this guy because he's so bloody oblivious to the topic at hand, any argument he might make would be utter bullshit"

    So basically, yeah, you're right, it's not off-topic, it's the rantings of an uninformed jackass.

  92. test by xiopher · · Score: 0

    sdf afsadf sadf sdafsadf sdf sdaf sdaf
    sadf sdf sbdf sdf sdfa asf sdaf sdfsadfsd
    sdf afsadf sadf sdafsadf sdf sdaf sdaf
    sadf sdf sbdf sdf sdfa asf sdaf sdfsadfsd
    sfa sdaf sdaf sdaf
    sdaf sfsda fsadf dasfsda fasdf sdaf
    sdf afsadf sadf sdafsadf sdf sdaf sdaf
    sdf afsadf sadf sdafsadf sdf sdaf sdaf

  93. What a Moron! by evilspyperson · · Score: 1

    "To me it sounds like this has got to be against the law," Levinson said. "To tell people to kill a particular group of people? That has to violate some law."

    WHAT AN IDIOT! "Some law"? I'm ashamed to be a floridian.

  94. check yourself by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "Kill the Haitians" is specific. You are now planning to target "Haitians" specifically, because of a complaint against a publisher by someone in Florida. GTA is a fun way to release agressions and repressed hatred against many kinds of fictional people, in your home where it doesn't insult anyone. Now you're letting it influence your behavior towards other real people, who you haven't even met. Get your head together, lest you become a parody of the kind of person the censors usually just have to invent.

    --

    --
    make install -not war