Slashdot Mirror


Dumpster-Diving for Your Identity

The NYT magazine has a story titled Dumpster-Diving for Your Identity - the author interviews two convicted identity thieves talking about their methods and successes.

344 comments

  1. I tried, really! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Funny

    I tried to use Google News to find a registration-free link. No luck. Will this do?

    Dumpster-diving bears at greater risk

    It's not about bears stealing your identity, though I pity the bear that applies for a Visa card with a FICO as bad as mine! But it is an interesting tale:

    Then there are the people: One older woman set out a batch of syrup-slathered pancakes for the bears, and some parents smeared peanut butter on their children's faces so they could photograph cubs licking it.

    Where's Darwin when you need him?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:I tried, really! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need a google news link. Simply search for the url of the story iteslf kind of like this and then click on the link following "If the URL is valid, try visiting that web page by clicking on the following link:"

      NYT simply does a referrer check.

    2. Re:I tried, really! by grahamwest · · Score: 1

      That's a mauling waiting to happen. There's a great book called "Bear Attacks: Their Causes And Avoidance" by Stephen Herrero (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/158 574557X/) which explains the kind of things that happen whenbears get used to humans and human food. One of those kids will probably get his/her head bitten clean off.

      The book is a great read, by the way. It alternates between very dry, clinical explanations of statistics and brutally graphic retelings of people being gnawed and clawed and generally brutalised by wild bears. Bill Bryson mentions it in his travelogue "A Walk In The Woods". If it's good enough for him to read, it's good enough for me :-)

      --
      Graham
    3. Re:I tried, really! by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 5, Funny

      You don't need a google news link. Just pick it up from the trash at the back of the NYTimes building

  2. Shredding doesn't offer much protection either... by shakamojo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Remind me to check my dumpster here at the office for a NYT login...

    But seriously, we use a shredding company here at my office for our important papers. They're supposed to do all the shredding "on site" in their truck. Yesterday they were here to empty our shred bins, and they brought in a big trash bin to haul our stuff out to the truck. One of these bins was sitting in the hallway, and no one was around, so I took a peek inside. It was papers from an accounting firm down the street! I mean, we're supposed to be paying these guys to keep our info secure, but here they are waiting until their bin is full before they shred anything?! Needless to say, I had a long conversation with our facilities manager after this...

    If you want something done right, better do it yourself! I'm now using a $30 shredder BEFORE I dump anything in our shred bins! Who knows where our important documents have been travelling to before they actually got shredded?!

    This is why I burn all my important docs, credit card offers, old checks, etc... at home, who knows who is going through your trash? All they need is an account number, and a shredded document can be taped back together with enough motivation and time... (although with some people being easy marks, I guess the harder you can make it, the better!)

  3. avoid recycling bins for financial mail by js7a · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ''It was the first time I had ever been to the dump,'' Massey recalled, wrinkling his nose. ''I said, 'I'm not going to get dirty,' so I wandered over to a shed where the recycling was stored. I notice there's a big barrel for recycled paper that's full of discarded tax forms from an accounting firm.'' Each form had the person's name, date of birth, Social Security number -- all the information necessary for taking out a line of credit.

    My local police department recently published a blurb asking residents to dispose of identity theft-related materials (e.g., financial statements, anything with a SSN, etc.) in the ordinary garbage, instead of the "mixed paper" recycling bins as we've been asked by the rest of the city government.

    It seems that identity thieves are very happy about the shared, clean, and portable "mixed paper" recycling containers found throughout my (rather affluent) city, and they tend to pick them up, quickly sort through the cereal and microwave dinner boxes for the good stuff, and have the container back before anyone notices.

    Presumably today's dumpster divers have the luxury of avoiding coffee grounds, so you can go a long way towards protecting yourself by dumping the financial correspondence in with the smelly stuff.

    1. Re:avoid recycling bins for financial mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It helps to also shit in your garbage can. That should drive most thieves away. I think it's best to layer your shit. You know, throw in some garbage, shit on top of it, then throw in another layer of garbage... and continue so on. But don't shit on the topmost layer, we want for the dumpster divers to reach in and find a surprise! (wink)

    2. Re:avoid recycling bins for financial mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is the most useful household hint that can be gleaned from slashdot. May I recommend that a round of delicious Mexican cuisine preceed this glorious endeavour?

    3. Re:avoid recycling bins for financial mail by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny

      Each form had the person's name, date of birth, Social Security number -- all the information necessary for taking out a line of credit.

      Interesting. William Henry Gates, III, 539-60-5125, October 28, 1955. Now, how do I take out that line of credit?

    4. Re:avoid recycling bins for financial mail by Colazar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Interesting. The City of Seattle recently decided that they are going to start fining people for putting recyclable materials in the garbage, instead of in the recycling bins.

      So that won't work for me.

      link=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/152676_re cycle16.html

      --
      He decided to just watch the government, and kind of scale it down to size, and run his life that way. --Laurie Anderson
    5. Re:avoid recycling bins for financial mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, your garbage can shits on you!

    6. Re:avoid recycling bins for financial mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You laugh, but a big story about five years ago was the busboy who went down Forbes' list of the 100 richest people and got credit cards in their names. Maybe not with Billy boy's, but there's plenty of other names that are less recognizable.

    7. Re:avoid recycling bins for financial mail by jweickum · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see you've found my shit covered shred paper. Are you people all just paranoid schizophrenics or just Fvcking retarded. Come on now, noone is going to put little pieces of paper together to read your information.

    8. Re:avoid recycling bins for financial mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About fucking time someone did this too. The city council earns money by selling stuff for recycling, whereas it spends money sending stuff for landfill. By kicking polluters in the wallet, the city's residents will finally get the low taxes they deserve.

    9. Re:avoid recycling bins for financial mail by Technician · · Score: 1

      You know, throw in some garbage, shit on top of it

      It may be beneath my dignity, however the grandkids diapers work wonders. Roll up your financial's in a soiled diaper. Never had any problems yet. I might now since my secret is out.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  4. TV ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    those TV ads on ID theft are pretty damn funny though (the ones with voice-overs; grandma talking about 500hp pickup trucks with them naked ladies... mamacita). I have yet to be scammed, but I do now: that AIN'T funny. And those scumbags need to spent as much time in prison as rapists, pedophiles and murderers.

    1. Re:TV ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, those ads are ones that we actually stop fast-forwarding past and watch a couple of times when we see a new one. Yay TiVo!

    2. Re:TV ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but we need more of 'em ads. They are the best ads on the TV right now.

    3. Re:TV ads... by devaudio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yes but those ads imply most of it's over the internet; it's not. I had my identy stolen in 1995, when i was a college student -- taken from a job application in NYC. The worst part was, after i found out, and the bank had me fill out an affidavit of fraud, my student loans were cancelled for bad credit. I called and explained the situation, and they restored my loans at a higher interest rate because now i was a "credit risk" due to my credit report having to be cleansed. I wish i could have hunted down the guy and smacked him around some

  5. I'm not as worried... by irokitt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I produce very few pieces of paper that have sensitive information like this. I am more worried about the information on my computer, which is sensitive. Companies, on the other hand, do need to worry.

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    1. Re:I'm not as worried... by PianoComp81 · · Score: 1

      You don't get credit card or other account statments?

      I was just going through all of my accounts today, and realized I had no way to shred the paper besides tearing it a few ways. Each of those statements has an account number, address, and other information that could easily let someone steal my identity.

    2. Re:I'm not as worried... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I was faced with the same problem a few years ago, and decided to move all of my documents to electronic filing.

      I moved everything to Scansoft's Paperport system.

      When I get bills in the mail, I load them into my scanner (new model has an automatic document feeder), and scan them into Paperport. Then it's just a matter of dropping them in the proper folders for filing.

      The originals go through my confetti-shredder before going into the trash.

      The electronic versions are backed-up nightly to a seperate drive in the system, and archived on CD-R every few months. I've got documents (credit card statements, bank statements, paystubs, tax forms, insurance, car maintenance, store receipts, etc) dating back to 1999 stored on the system, and I can pull any of them up in seconds.

      The initial setup took me a full day of scanning to empty out my big acordion-folder of papers, but it's been clear-sailing ever since.

      Highly recommended.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  6. The solution is easy by Kirk+Troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you're so worried about ID theft, then maybe you should keep a close eye on your credit card bills, credit scores, etc.. Buy a paper shredder. Shred all bank statements and whatnot before you throw them out. Internet-shminternet, dumpster diving is the fastest way to someone's finances. Get the carbons at the gas station, or stores where they still use the old carbon-thinger credit card machine.

    I knew someone who got screwed big time by a gas station who would keep the carbons, and double bill her every time she filled up, the cash going straight into the owners pocket. She was a dope for letting it go on so long, as she never bothered scrutinizing her Visa bills. Turned out the station was owned by a Russian mobster. This was long before the world wide weeb.

    Just don't toss your sensitive data into the dumpster where any bum can get your CC number.

    1. Re:The solution is easy by A+Commentor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How does that protect you from the information theft that occurs with others that you have to deal with? If you have to see the doctor, and had it billed to insurance, most likely you're Social Security Number was seen by many people. Anyone of them could copy the number name and start opening accounts. I guess you could avoid the doctor offices too.

      Having gone through this a few years back, it not as simple as you state. They didn't have any personal Credit Card numbers, just the SS # and they opened new accounts with that. Luckily one of the companies actually took time and flag the application for inconsistencies... Credit Report showed working at a computer company, yet the application said I cut hair... not many people make that kind of job change. The lady actually track me down, and I was able to clean it up relatively easy. If I had to wait for the next review of my credit report (which is recommended every year) with could be upto 12 months before this is detected, would make it much harder to clean up.

      When a few companies was questioning me, as if I was involved in the scheme: "How did you find out about this if you weren't involved", it was quite satisfying to respond: "Mrs. X at company Y actually inspected the credit application and contacted me to verify that I didn't sign-up. She was the first to notify me and you can reach her at: xxx-xxxx. Don't blame me for your companies lack of verification."

      --

      Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    2. Re:The solution is easy by waveclaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shred all bank statements and whatnot before you throw them out.

      You throw these out!?!? Never, in my wildest imagination would I consider taking such critical records and disposing of them. I've got my account histories (at the touch of a lock) form three banks over 15 year - I've even got records fom companies that closed, long before the whole 'get it online' rush. This is why I request paper copies of those records: so I can keep them.

      Certainly, someone can break into my house, ignore all the shiny, expensive and portable things and got straight for the heavy, ugly, locked boxes obviously full of useless paper that are being used as a table for dirty laundry and AOL CD's (same really). But I degress.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    3. Re:The solution is easy by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you have to see the doctor, and had it billed to insurance, most likely you're Social Security Number was seen by many people.

      And those people don't necessarily work for your doctor or your insurance agency. I worked as a temp for a few weeks at a medical imaging billing company. Since a doctor that works in medical imaging processes a *ton* of patients, the billing becomes a large portion of their office's work. This is (I suspect) almost always outsourced.

      My first day on the job, they handed me a stack of several hundred people's names, addresses, phone numbers, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS AND MEDICAL RECORDS. This is pre-HIPAA. Dunno how it works now.

      Let alone identity theft, one of the records they handed me that week was a well known elected politician's totally routine mammogram. Her results were clear. Imagine what that kind of leak could do to an election if it were not.

      Obviously their entire business process needed to be completely redesigned if they wanted to provide some semblance of privacy. And you don't know if this company handles your bill or not. And such a redesign would raise their costs astronomically. It might even make them non-competitive with in-house billing. This doesn't mean it's ok, it just means it's not going to happen unless they're forced.

      Obviously, I could go on and on.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:The solution is easy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How does that protect you from the information theft that occurs with others that you have to deal with? If you have to see the doctor, and had it billed to insurance, most likely you're Social Security Number was seen by many people.

      Many of those people weren't even supposed to see it. I was just in the doctor's office recently and when I looked in through their window I could see a woman's name, DOB, and SSN on a piece of paper right in front of me. The SSN was helpfully written very large on a post-it note.

      Clinics and hospitals do not take privacy seriously, at all.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:The solution is easy by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Let alone identity theft, one of the records they handed me that week was a well known elected politician's totally routine mammogram. Her results were clear. Imagine what that kind of leak could do to an election if it were not.

      Oh, the fun we could have at the cable office! The first-level technicians we hire here are basically nothing more than warm bodies, and there's been rumors of some of them "accidentally" hanging on to pages and pages of credit-card numbers and expiration dates... But then again, anyone desperate enough to be paying their bill over the phone probably doesn't have a whole lot in the ol' account anyway.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    6. Re:The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no my friend, the solution is much easier... I just use a stolen identity constantly, that way if anyone steals my identicy there stealing the stolen identiyt of the stolen identity... if you really want security you find someone stealing identities then steal there identity...

      BRB, my brain is bleeding...

    7. Re:The solution is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for Washington Dental Service as a temp.

      First day they were handing us reams of paper w/ SSNs for entire families. Yeah, we had to sign a paper saying we weren't going to distribute the info, but someone with a really good memory, or a camera, could have easily taken thousands of SSNs per day.

    8. Re:The solution is easy by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

      With the new HIPPA rules, your doctor is supposed to jealously guard your personal identifying information. Although that's not the way it works...

      If you file for insurance for a doctor visit, then everything on your claim is essentially public information. However, if you *don't* use insurance for regular doctor visits, your information can actually be private. An alternative to insurance is a non-profit association like IAB. Just pay the discounted amount at your doctor's office, and don't bother with insurance if your privacy is worth anything to you.

      With that approach, the insurance companies cannot verify pre-existing conditions, which can be very valuable to you. The HIPPA rules forbid your doctor from disclosing anything about you without your permission (which you automatically sign away when you file even a minor claim). Unfortunately, for most people, it's too late, because they've alread been suckered into the insurance system.

    9. Re:The solution is easy by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      I am so glad that in the UK we don't all have a magic number which identifies us and has to be filled in on every form. The closest here would be the National Insurance number, which is not used for identification and is hardly ever asked for by anyone but the government.

      I mean having one number which isn't kept at all secret but is used as the equivalent of a password for everything from CC applications to health insurance. Yes you aren't obliged to give it out to anyone except certain specific parties, but if they demand it at a job interview and you say no, then you aren't going to get the job.

  7. But... by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if all your bills are past due? Then it doesn't matter. It's like that old joke (or is it a scene from a movie?)...

    "A thief stole my credit card and has been using it for the past couple of months."
    "Oh my! Why haven't you reported it?"
    "Because it still works out to be cheaper than me using it!"

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember it as "A thief stole my wife's credit card and has been using it for the past couple of months."

  8. Burn Them. by vspazv · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the reason i have a fireplace in addition to central heat and air. Well, that and the fact that i like making smores.

    1. Re:Burn Them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer a shreader, but my shreader died (again). You reminded my I have a half grocery bag full of credit card offers. Ok, I had that much, it's getting smaller by the minute. Lots of fun too.

    2. Re:Burn Them. by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      This is the reason i have a fireplace in addition to central heat and air.

      We used to shred constantly until we moved out to the country. Now, we're never short of kindling for the trash barrel! Too bad I didn't "remember" to update the address on all my domain name registrations, though. Heh.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  9. Re:OK..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    [since I'm waiting for a build to complete, I'll bite..]

    This is because back in the day (~1985) when people used to go 'trashing', they were usually buying various techno goodies (anyone remember the Prometheus modem with the clock?) for even more mischief. If the early hacking/phreaking geeks didn't invent trashing, they certainly brought it to a higher level...or lower depending on your perspective.

    Not advocating btw, just relaying...

  10. a little while back by dandelion_wine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've always taken a few moments to shred my bank machine receipts when I get them. Since sorting for recycling takes time anyway, I've always gone through it and shredded anything remotely useful, long before the notion of "identity theft" became mainstream.

    Honestly, if people would just be a bit more paranoid, and not worry about being casual with risk as a fashion statement, these guys would have a lot less to go on.

    That's with regard to personal papers. Businesses should know better, and should get their asses sued for failing to protect sensitive information that was entrusted to them by their clients.

    1. Re:a little while back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Diligence is well worth it. Before I met my wife, she had dramas with her card. The short story is a male several hundred miles away used her card and number to pay for his utility bill. It was a small enough amount that she didn't notice immediately, but came to notice almost a year's worth of payments to a company she had no dealings with.

      The dumb bit? They were useless to deal with. Despite the fact a male had been paying his utility with her card (her name's Katie, it's not like that could be mistaken :P) each time she phoned them to try clearing things up they INSISTED on asking for her boyfriend or husband and she was single at the time.

      The fourth call to them slipped up, and she got the name of the guy whose account it was paying. He was arrested soon after (and yes, her card was cancelled)

      Despite her protestations, the utility co didn't immediately believe there could be an identity theft problem, but presumed it was a girlfriend/wife trying to meddle in her partner's affairs... despite the card belonging to her.

      This happened in the early 1990s, I don't know of it would happen today, but it seemed to be institutionalized by the number of calls she made with the same result.

    2. Re:a little while back by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      I love futility mired in irony.

      "But it's my card!"

      "I'm sorry miss, but it's obviously not your card as this account belongs to a male; now can we speak to him?"

    3. Re:a little while back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... That exact same thing happened to my girlfriend last year. Except her name is Lisa...

    4. Re:a little while back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Despite her protestations, the utility co didn't immediately believe there could be an identity theft problem, but presumed it was a girlfriend/wife trying to meddle in her partner's affairs... despite the card belonging to her.

      This was all too common in the late 1960s at least, when my mother supported myself and my 3 brothers as a single woman, through working 2 jobs. The amount of times banks, electricity, gas or other suppliers would ask for her husband's signature when doing anything related to finance was offensive.

      "I'm sorry ma'am, we'll need your husband's signature before we can release a sum of cash this large"

      "Don't be so stupid. my husband died 12 years ago, this is my account"

      "That's fine then, your current partner's signature will do"

      ick.

  11. Well... by EdgeShadow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shredders are a form of technology, last time I checked. And, seeing as how this story comes straight from the "buy-a-shredder" department, it is directly related to shredders and is thus quite applicable to technology in general.

    Go buy a shredder and port Linux to it today!

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ESR was more than happy to oblige.
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/ 09/212920 7&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=156&tid=187&tid= 88

    2. Re:Well... by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Go buy a shredder and port Linux to it today!"

      Linux is still a little behind Windows in the document destruction department.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding?!
      rm -fr / home/myuser/file
      works great for document destruction when executed as root!

  12. Punishment != Harm Caused by Lancer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    By the time investigators broke the case, Massey and his partner in crime, a computer whiz named Kari Melton, had ruined hundreds of people's credit. A judge sentenced them to prison in 2000; Melton was released in 2001, Massey the next year.
    Given the amount of turmoil, headache, as well as real monetary loss these crimes must have caused, it's amazing to me that they each spent less than two years locked up.

    I'd argue that was nothing but a slap on the wrist, and not much of a deterrent to future fraudsters.

    --
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
    1. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by merikus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you know, you have to keep all those pot users in lock up for five-to-ten. Imagine what *they* would do if they got out!

    2. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'd argue that they were only partly to blame for ruining the credit histories of all those people. Some liability must be given to the credit card companies and credit history maintainers as well. The fact that a Name/SSN/address is enough to open a line of credit is seriously negligent.

      It should be up to the financial services companies to either design a system that is hard to game or to absorb all of the ill effects of identify theft. That the consumer is forced to prove that they did not perform the actions of the identity thief is an outrage.

    3. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by gblues · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll tell you what they'd do: single-handedly revive the bread market that's starting to suffer because of people starting the Atkins diet.

      Nathan

    4. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by Lancer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's too bad you've been modded up as funny so far - you've nailed the issue.

      I'd be willing to bet that most Americans would choose to put away criminals like those in this article for much longer sentences than they would choose to put away marijuana pushers, if ever give na direct choice.

      Regrettably, most of our politicians, DAs, and judges don't have the backbone to rethink our drug policies.

      I'm getting off-topic, clearly, but the point is that if they had locked these guys up for 20 years, it wouldn't have seemed like too long to me.

      --
      Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
    5. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by Lancer · · Score: 1
      I'd argue that they were only partly to blame for ruining the credit histories of all those people. Some liability must be given to the credit card companies and credit history maintainers as well.

      And the rape victim should accept some of the blame for being a woman?

      Let's face it - it's easy to break a window to get into a house. Should we therefore blame window manufacturers for the burglaries in our neighborhoods?

      It's time we started expecting people to take responsibility for their own actions - the criminals in the article took the actions they did on their own. That it was easy or hard for them to commit their crime does not lessen the impact of their deeds.

      --
      Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
    6. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal accountability?! That's just crazy talk!

    7. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't turn this into a dope issue. They stole identities, ruined lives and got a short sentence. I think people who sell drugs and ruin lives should get long sentences too. The two are not related.

    8. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by number11 · · Score: 1

      Let's face it - it's easy to break a window to get into a house. Should we therefore blame window manufacturers for the burglaries in our neighborhoods?

      Please. In the case of the credit bureaus, we're talking about companies whose business is selling personal data. The problem (from identity theft) arises when they sell data that is false (it wasn't you but someone else who incurred those bills). And often fail to correct the matter when it is brought to their attention.

      So, to use your analogy, we're blaming window manufacturers who sell broken windows, who knows that a certain percentage of their windows have broken locks when they leave the factory, and who fail to correct the situation.

      Anybody who sells personal data should be liable for damages arising from the data being incorrect.

    9. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      Given the amount of turmoil, headache, as well as real monetary loss these crimes must have caused, it's amazing to me that they each spent less than two years locked up.

      And furthermore, given their propensity for identity theft, how can we be sure that it's really them?

      (I still can't get over the fact that in an article about identity theft, the photo that was supposed to be a black woman looked an awful lot like a fat white man.)

      -a

    10. Re:Punishment != Harm Caused by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      So, to use your analogy, we're blaming window manufacturers who sell broken windows, who knows that a certain percentage of their windows have broken locks when they leave the factory, and who fail to correct the situation.

      So, we are speaking about Microsoft here, then?

  13. Important add-on by karevoll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Im not saying Im agreeing with the parent post, but if you do, please remember that certain papers must be filed by you for a period of up to 10 years.. so you might want to do what most people in this situation does: buy a small file-safe... othervise you might end up having troubles with the IRS, and we dont want that, do we?

    1. Re:Important add-on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm not saying you are wrong, but when my mom's house was broken into, they largest damage was to the paper safe. The broke into it, for nothing, but about $5 worth of silver coins (and lots of papers).

    2. Re:Important add-on by pliny3 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Im not saying Im agreeing with the parent post, but if you do, please remember that certain papers must be filed by you for a period of up to 10 years.. so you might want to do what most people in this situation does: buy a small file-safe... othervise you might end up having troubles with the IRS, and we dont want that, do we?

      With regards to US personal federal income tax, the recordkeeping requirement is 3 years from filing or 2 years from payment, whichever is later. See 2002 Form 1040 Instructions (pdf), page 60.

    3. Re:Important add-on by karevoll · · Score: 2, Informative

      YMMV, as this is figures that will vary between country and country. Also, there are different kinds of papers for different purposes (of course), which will (of course) have to be properly stored for different amounts of time. :)

  14. Cringely articles on identity theft by UrgleHoth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is an interesting couple of articles on identity theft by Robert X. Cringely (or Mark Stephens, depending on your version of reality).

    Ego, Super-ego, and ID Theft
    How to Steal $65 Billion

    --

    Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  15. Shredder sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Splinter rules!

  16. How ironic by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    The New-York "registration required" Times running an article on people fishing for other people's personal information, that's amusing ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  17. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quick question...since personal shredders are only $30, why does your company use the shredding service at all? It would probably be cheaper to outfit every employee (or at least every department) with their own shredder than pay for 2 months of that service, when you empty your personal shredders, just use ordinary recycling for the shreds.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

  18. Same Story without the Registration by FelixCat · · Score: 4, Informative
    The NY Times article is about a guy named Stephen Massey.
    A little googling resulted in the same basic story without the registration:

    refers to future article in NY Times

    and

    Over a year ago on CBS News

  19. YHBT. YHL. HAND :-) [n/t] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon that wasn't even a decent troll. Pathetic.

  20. Dumpster Diving for MY identity? by Metallic+Matty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do I need to do that? I know who I am..

    1. Re:Dumpster Diving for MY identity? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone stole it from you, and you need to get it back. That's why I always keep a few documents with my information locked in a safe. Gotta back up my identity in case someone steals it, after all.

    2. Re:Dumpster Diving for MY identity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bob: "Jenkins, where's your name tag?"

      Jenkins: "I memorized it!"

  21. Well, who cares about them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To be honest I'm not so curious to hear from these two. What worries me is what the identity theives who DON'T get caught are doing!!!

  22. Anonymous FTP by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One electronic version of "dumpster diving" would be looking through a company's website/anonymous FTP server. Sometimes, a few moronic folks decide to store otherwise-vital information in these "undisclosed" locations that anyone can get into over the web.

    Somewhat popular among the consulting types, they upload client data to an FTP server, then fly off to the client's office, and download it from there...or maybe use it as a means to "share" data among themselves. Some forget to password-protect it, relying instead on security through obscurity.

    How is this related to dumpster diving? Well, if you look hard enough, those servers are just like public-access trash bins fit for people to...um...recycle data.

    If you're a consulting group, make sure you treat your client data with absolute confidentiality. If you're a business working with consultants, make sure they don't leak your info to the world.

    1. Re:Anonymous FTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you how many servers have the username qwerty with the password qwerty ?

  23. NYT random login by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    >>Remind me to check my dumpster here at the office for a NYT login...

    Use this to randomly generate a login for you
    http://www.majcher.com/nytview.html

  24. Just do what my parents do... by Stu+Catz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...burn it in the barbeque, or in a fireplace if you have one.

    1. Re:Just do what my parents do... by JW+Troll · · Score: 1

      ..or you could just put it through my cat a couple times. That seems to take care of the most sensitive bits.

      --
      just like the humble blood clot... turboporsche@telus.net
  25. Full Article Text without Karma Whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dumpster-Diving for Your Identity
    By STEPHEN MIHM

    Published: December 21, 2003

    tephen Massey was only a few minutes late, yet he apologized profusely as he strode into the lobby of a crowded restaurant in downtown Eugene, Ore. ''I'm very punctual about my time,'' he said, clasping my hand in a firm shake. With his freshly combed hair, crisp white shirt and trimmed mustache, he looked like an off-duty cop or fireman -- a ''pillar of the community,'' as he later described himself, a wolfish smile playing across his lips. Far from it: Massey, 39, directed one of the most extensive and notorious identity-theft rings prosecuted so far by federal authorities. By the time investigators broke the case, Massey and his partner in crime, a computer whiz named Kari Melton, had ruined hundreds of people's credit. A judge sentenced them to prison in 2000; Melton was released in 2001, Massey the next year.

    Advertisement

    The Federal Trade Commission estimates that identity theft costs nearly $53 billion annually. Some seven million people were victimized in 2002. Yet little is known about how the perpetrators actually operate. It's a popular perception that most identity theft happens on the Internet, but over the course of dinner, Massey quickly made clear that low-tech methods of getting people's personal information are far more effective. ''Every day was exciting,'' he recalled between mouthfuls of potato skins. ''We went to Vegas, Atlantic City. We made a business of it. It was like James Bond . . . 'Mission: Impossible.'''

    In late October, Massey disappeared, violating the terms of his supervised release and prompting a national warrant for his arrest. It had become clear to me in five months of interviews that not everything he said was to be trusted, although much of it was verified by the detectives and prosecutors who had already investigated his crimes and by Kari Melton. As for Massey's current whereabouts, Steve Williams, a detective in the Eugene Police Department, who worked on the first case against Massey and is once again on his trail, said: ''My gut feeling is that he is in the Seattle area'' -- where he has family -- ''back to his old tricks, doing drugs, identity theft and counterfeit checks.''

    If Massey has indeed resumed operations, it's a sure thing that he's not working alone. His identity-theft crimes depended on the work of a carefully built ring, one that employed hordes of petty thieves and drug addicts. If he sticks to his old techniques, his crimes will originate in Dumpsters and garbage cans, where information can be culled from discarded personnel files and other trash. It's not the most glamorous crime, but that doesn't make it any less devastating to its victims.

    Discovering the Dump

    Massey's life began to unravel in his late 20's, soon after he started experimenting with the highly addictive stimulant methamphetamine. Before that, Massey achieved some semblance of success, managing an awning-maintenance company, marrying and, with his wife, having two daughters. Then he and his wife divorced in 1992. Soon after, he remarried, and divorced a year later. His business began to decline. Sometime in the mid-90's, his teenage girlfriend offered him some meth. ''So here I am with no place to live, on the rebound and with a habit,'' Massey recounted. ''Who wants to look for a job again?'' Massey began hanging out with a much younger crowd of meth addicts, called ''tweakers,'' and forging checks to feed his drug use. It was during this time that he began to wonder if he could hijack people's identities for profit. He stumbled onto the answer soon after, when the meth-heads invited him to go ''Dumpster diving'' for junk. Massey and the teenagers piled into his Ford Explorer and drove to the outskirts of Eugene.

    ''It was the first time I had ever been to the dump,'' Massey recalled, wrinkling his nose. ''I said, 'I'm not going to get dirty,' so I wandered over to a shed where the recycling was stored. I notice there's a big barrel for rec

  26. Re: Shredder is no protection by FractusMan · · Score: 1

    "A little tape, and a lotta patience goes a long way, get the picture?"

  27. .seeth. .seeth. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    "I was an actor," Massey told me. "I could put on a new hat every day. Who do I want to be today? The feeling after you've just hooked them, is just, like, bam!" He smacked his fist into the palm of his hand. "Take that, Bank of America!"

    Of course, by which he means, "Take that, people who have spent their lives helping other people and getting paid for it! All that money you saved is mine now!"

    Not only is a two year sentence too short, it'd be fine with me if this guy were beaten to death.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:.seeth. .seeth. by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      I hear this all the time. Every act of theft or vandalism is an act against "The Man".

      Nice political-identity theft.

    2. Re:.seeth. .seeth. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Better to have the state tag them with something indelible and obvious. Not only would they never be put in a position of trust again, people would be able to read the content of their character from across the room.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:.seeth. .seeth. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Somehow "poor impulse control" wouldn't seem strong enough. How about:

      DESERVES TO DIE

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  28. I don't know if he was kidding... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a fiancee of my cousin (who is in the Air Force), says that US military top secret documents, which are destined for destruction, have to be escorted by 2 armed guards, and thrown into an oven which bakes the quadruple-shredded-and-reshredded dust of the formerly top-secret document at 1600 F for 1 hour.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    1. Re:I don't know if he was kidding... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can't shred a classified document. It has to be "declassified" and then you can destroy it. My mom used to do it as a summer job for the Navy. Basically you stamp it "declassified" with a rubber stamp first. (Of course after the proper parties sacrificing the appropriate number and quality of chickens.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:I don't know if he was kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That sounds extreme for TS documents. When I was handling them they went into burn bags that got thrown (by the lucky volunteer) into the massive shredder. The cool part was "feeding" the shredder a 2x4 every day or so to keep it sharpened. Milk Bones for Machines.

      I assume the "burn bag" moniker was a throwback to the older days, as there was no "burn" step after the shredding.

      So folks, if you simply shred, it's good enough for government work!

    3. Re:I don't know if he was kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Depends on the location and the epoc. In the early 90s we cross shredded in Huachuca, fine enough that you could take the residue home for garden mulch. However, we burned in Honduras and other remote airfields. Big mesh barrel, would hold 100gal if it was solid. Had rocks in it and we turned it on a spit as the fire burned. The rocks acted like a ball-mill and pulverized the ashes. Was a damn pity, since we burned a lot of film. Back in Ft Huachuca, we shredded the film, and then we were able to turn it in for silver recovery. Bought plenty of beer with the proceeds for the department.

      Anon 96Hotel

    4. Re:I don't know if he was kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't shred a classified document. It has to be "declassified" and then you can destroy it. My mom used to do it as a summer job for the Navy.

      Thats bogus, maybe you should check again with your Mom. When a document is declassified that means that the content is no longer is protected, i.e. confidential, secret, top secret. Declassified documents can be released to the public, classified documents can't. Classified documents are destroyed all of the time by whatever means, including burning and shredding. There are tough standards for shredding classified documents that most common equipment can't meet, but you can shred classified documents with the proper equipment.

    5. Re:I don't know if he was kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure that is true. When the CIA came to do interviews they showed the burn room for the main offices and the people working there had clearence levels so high the name itself is classified. It would seem silly to declassify it when the burn people are all cleared.

    6. Re:I don't know if he was kidding... by Artifakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The DOD standard for wiping a hard disk that has held "secret" grade info involves an appropriate screwdriver, and a power sander applied to all magnetic surfaces until the oxide coat is polished away to bare aluminum.
      Even "Confidential" requires a cross cut shredder built to certain standards to destroy. The most common reason for confidential classification is the document contains personal information, such as SSNs. It's common for military units to read a briefing statement that explains what a SSN is being asked for each and every time it is mentioned, and to warn service members when it is optional to provide one.
      "It is your option not to provide your SSN for this insurance document. The Department of the Army may have difficulty tracking the issued policy, and it may delay your designated heirs receiving benifits if you elect not to do so".
      Can you imagine if the average doctor's office took it this seriously?

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    7. Re:I don't know if he was kidding... by Lagrange5 · · Score: 0
      You can't shred a classified document. It has to be "declassified" and then you can destroy it. My mom used to do it as a summer job for the Navy. Basically you stamp it "declassified" with a rubber stamp first.


      Sorry, you're making a blanket statement and it isn't always true. I've worked for a government contractor and have legally shredded hundreds, if not thousands of classified documents as a matter of course. Classified documents are routinely destroyed without needing declassification beforehand.

      Declassification may be customary or even required before document destruction in some institutions, but this isn't standard operating procedure everywhere.

      Documents are often left declassified for a period of time before destruction (i.e. months or years). In your example, the simple fact that those documents were declassified is more important than their destruction.
      --
      "Folks just call him Buckethead." -- Les Claypool
  29. Compost them, don't burn them! by wart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fireplaces produce too much air pollution. The ecologically correct way to dispose of these sensitive documents is to first shred them. Then mix the paper shredding into your backyard compost bin or worm bin and let nature dispose of it cleanly.

    I doubt that many id theives would want to rummage through your compost bin, if they even thought to look there in the first place.

    For added security, add a couple of large dogs to your backyard. They will help deter personal property thieves in addition to compost-diving identity thieves!

    1. Re:Compost them, don't burn them! by irokitt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right on. I have a doberman, and I don't even have to deal with the Jehovah's Witnesses!

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Compost them, don't burn them! by xyote · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, don't do either. Some of those colored inks are quite toxic.

    3. Re:Compost them, don't burn them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I shread all of the sensitive paperwork that comes through my house. In the winter, it becomes tinder in the fireplace. I don't care if it is ecologically correct. Talk to the people who keep sending it to me if you have a problem with it. The ashes (in winter) or shreadings (in summer) get mixed with the used kitty litter.

      There's an old saying: "I don't have to run faster than the bear. I just have to run faster than you." I presume that someone else's trash will be pilfered. Mine is rather unappealing.

    4. Re:Compost them, don't burn them! by logpoacher · · Score: 1

      ... and once you've finished composting them, don't forget to turn your electric heating up a notch.

      I burn my private papers on my fire, and it helps heat my house. I may create a little extra CO2++, but at least it's largely sustainable (unlike gas or the fossil fuels used to produce electricity). More importantly, there are zero generational or transmission losses - the heat's produced right where it's used. Can't get more efficient than that.

      And it's free.

    5. Re:Compost them, don't burn them! by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      Who's modding this stuff up to 'interesting'? This was obviously made to be a humorous comment. Oh well, I guess I wont die from it...or will I?

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    6. Re:Compost them, don't burn them! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered about that... aren't there nasty chemicals in some paper that you don;t want in your compost?
      If not bleaches in regular paper, then at least chemicals in the microencapsulation in NCR paper used for receipts & stuff?

      --
      This space available.
    7. Re:Compost them, don't burn them! by logpoacher · · Score: 1
      I just looked you up in God's Big Book, and, unfortunately, yes, it says:

      "Cause of death: Criticizing moderations on Slashdot."

      Pretty unusual way to go though. :-)

      Seriously though, you think it was humorous? I thought it was serious ... maybe not. Shall we ask?

    8. Re:Compost them, don't burn them! by johnmig · · Score: 1

      I burn my shredded docs. In my high tech fireplace, complete wth catalytic converter (www.fireplacextrordinair.com/). It great, provides that boost to get thi living areas up to a comfy level on the brisk nights.

    9. Re:Compost them, don't burn them! by wart · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was completely serious. I've been composting my shredder material for about 5 years now. I kept running out of "brown" material for my compost pile and decided to start putting the shredder material in it.

      The folks at the local nursery didn't think that there was any significant harm from the inks. By now the amount of shredder material is small compared to the rest of the compost material, so it's pretty dilute. The plants sure dont' seem to mind it either. :)

  30. A good neighbour always burns late at night. by openmtl · · Score: 1
    I'm a good neighbour. Late at night I grab this months paper records and a bottle of white spirit and some beer and matches and go have a burn in the yard. That way I can see the cinders and so don't burn the shed down plus no-one else is doing gardening at midnight !

    Hums, FIRE do do do do do, FIRE da da da...(Santana ?)

    --

    1. Re:A good neighbour always burns late at night. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Hums, FIRE do do do do do, FIRE da da da...(Santana?)"

      Probably The Crazy World of Arthur Brown.

    2. Re:A good neighbour always burns late at night. by openmtl · · Score: 1
      Thanks for that - Yup its certainly him - ta thanks !

      • http://www.arthurbrownmusic.com/
        • http://www.godofhellfire.co.uk/
        • Wow pre-8086/Z80 CPU era music !

      --

  31. Not news by cpopin · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is not a new technique and doesn't seem worthy of a Slashdot story. Low tech identity theft is nothing new or hard to do.

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
    1. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to add, moderators can blow me.

      Yours,

      cpopin

  32. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Brushfireb · · Score: 5, Informative

    While I cannot say for what reasons the poster above uses professional shredding services, I do know why such services still exist.

    The difference between a $30 Office-Depot Shredder and a good commercial shredder is significant. The Cheapo shredder usually shredes only vertically, and does so usually so that there are about 20 cuts down one page. People sending 3-4 documents in at once will find that they have those 3-4 documents nearly intact, just cut into 20 vertical peices which are easy to put back together if someone is careful in extraction.

    On the other hand, good commercial shredders litterall demolish the paper, turning it into sawdust like material that would be impossible (virtually) to reconstruct. Along these same lines, good document security companies use combination of methods, not just shredding to ensure security (read: chemical treatment, randomization, etc).

    Brushfireb

  33. Get a locking mailbox too. by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    If your mailbox is on the curbside like mine, seriously consider getting a secure lockable one where the mailman can only drop mail off, but a key is required to retreive it. I just received mine from oregontrailbox. I did some research, there are a few places that sell those under different names, but the ones I liked are actually the same box that seems to be manufactured by pinnacle (or pinnacle is yet another reseller of the same box made by a unknown third party....)

    In any event, I will be installing my Heavy Duty Standard tomorrow...

    --
    OpenHosting Virtual Servers for the geeks.

    1. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by igrp · · Score: 1
      Mailboxes like the one you purchased are pretty much standard in Europe.

      The downside is that you can't just leave your outgoing snail-mail in your mailbox, put up the flag and have the mailman pick your stuff up (thereby saving you a trip to the post office). Well, I'm not even sure if this is customary elsewhere but it seems to work pretty well around here.

      Of course, you also have to take into account that those little mailbox locks hardly provide any security or even deterence.

      Heck, people have armored mailboxes these days...

    2. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by JediTrainer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In Canada, hardly anybody has a curbside mailbox anymore (or even mail delivered to individual homes), unless you live on a farm or something. How's it work in other countries?

      Most neighbourhoods here have a bank of mailboxes, each with a lock (small door, but deep enough to hold a standard letter envelope). Walk (or drive, if lazy) down the street to your mailbox. I guess Canada Post likes that system because they can deliver our mail much easier this way - essentially in bulk. Each bank has a pair of larger parcel boxes, in case you get a deliver that doesn't fit in your letter-size box. The nice man leaves you a key for 'compartment A or B', you take your package out, and deposit the key in the mail slot so the mailman can retrieve it with tomorrow's mail.

      My only annoyance is some neighbours, who don't like receiving junk mail, leave it on top of the cabinet, leaving the garbage for everyone else to see. Why they can't just take it home and stick it in their recycling box is beyond me.

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    3. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by sohp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Excellent idea. Check the lock regularly, by the way. Here's what happened to me. I had my identity stolen because the outgoing mail slot at my apartment complex had a busted lock. In my case the thief got an insurance form with my SSN and checking account number. The mail slot door was cleverly wedged shut so that it wasn't obvious that the lock was busted, but after I and several other residents reported thefts the problem was discovered by accident when one of the on-site managers was just checking to see if the mail could be reached by putting a finger in the slot. Now I take all mail to directly to the post office. It's a little bit extra effort, but far less work than the endless forms and phone calls it took to clear up the theft.

    4. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 1
      Actually, you can.

      The flag is mostly for decoration - you never raise it, because it's like shouting "steal my mail!".

      Inside there is a little clip into which you place outgoing mail. When the mailman comes by to deliver incoming mail, he will open the little door to deposit it, and the outgoing mail will stick out.

      But the instructions say that if you're really serious, you will put your mail into a post office drop off box.

    5. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Britain, your "letter box" is just a slot in your front door, far enough from the locking mecchanism that you can't put your hand in and open the door. Stuff can be pushed in, but not taken out. It works quite well.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      My only annoyance is some neighbours, who don't like receiving junk mail, leave it on top of the cabinet, leaving the garbage for everyone else to see.

      It's a hint for the facility manager to put a recycle bin near that bank of mailboxes. But unfortunately, the manager doesn't seem to get that hint...

      (At university, the dorm had also such a bank of mailboxes... And there was a garbage can suitably placed nearby)

    7. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Canada, hardly anybody has a curbside mailbox anymore (or even mail delivered to individual homes), unless you live on a farm or something. How's it work in other countries?

      In America it varies from place to place. In my experience, the better the neighborhood, the more likely they deliver to your door.

    8. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, you also have to take into account that those little mailbox locks hardly provide any security or even deterence.

      Any lock that will shows signs of force entry is a very good deterent. The big problem is people stealing your mail without you knowing. Of course the locks are easy to pick, but that takes too much time for most theives.

    9. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      In the UK we have letter boxes, which are slots in the front door, all of your post just gets pushed through the slot. The wonders of a system where you don't have to go out into the cold to get your post. The only downside is that if it doesn't fit through the letter box the postman will knock on the door and wake you up.

      I can't imagine having all of my post left in a box next to the street its seems like an incredible liability. Not just for someone stealing your post but also for random idiot kids taking it for fun.

    10. Re:Get a locking mailbox too. by boskone · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've had great luck with www.steelmailbox.com they have a cool "smartlock" technology too that is pretty handy.

  34. Good Ideas on what to protect. by CresentCityRon · · Score: 1

    I found the article useful since it provided ideas on HOW people gain access to your info. Made me think I have to do more.

    One thing that was disappointing is that its not always a slip on an individual's part. A hospital could be sloppy with records and you've got a big target on your head. (...or wallet.)

    Ron

    PS: I do like those Citibank identity theft ads. They're funny. Too bad they didn't tell you more about how to protect yourself except to buy something.

    1. Re:Good Ideas on what to protect. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      All the more reason to stop blaming the victim. I love how authorities seem to think that handing out assinine advice is better than actually prosecuting these cretans.

      If jail space is the issue, stop locking up drug offenders and/or bring back corporal punishment. A nice "IDENTITY THIEF" brand on the forehead would be a good start. Perhaps reversed so they can read it for themselves in the mirror every day. My other thought is a tattoo on the fingers, one ring for each guilty conviction. Heck, I'd even chip in for some local for the schmucks, because they are going to have hell getting the time of day from anyone in the street.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Good Ideas on what to protect. by HillBilly · · Score: 1

      Doesn't help much when the mail-person leaves the mail half hanging out anyway. We caught our neighbours drug addictted son with his fingers in our mailbox once... we beat the crap out of him.

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
  35. Re:OK..... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

    "How, exactly does this apply to technology? Am I mistaken by assuming this is a "news for nerds" website? Oh well..."

    Hmmm... I can't find the word technology in the phrase "news for nerds, stuff that matters." I even tried CTRL + F. No luck. I'm having serious trouble finding the source of your complaint here. Help?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  36. A friend used to do "self identity theft". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    He had good credit and always got offers. He'd have bums sign the forms for beer money and have them sent to different places. Once enough cards came he would suck all the money out on cash advances, then clear up his credit, he knew how to do get it cleared quickly. It didn't take long before he got offers again and would start the cycle again.

  37. Abolish the SSN! by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have had way too many people asking for my SSN in the last few years. It started with my dentist's secretary demanding it, and when I declined to provide it, she insisted that they needed it for my dental records.

    I told her, "You're not offering me a job, and I'm not opening an iterest-bearing account with you. You don't need my SSN, and you're not getting it."

    About a month ago, a freaking cell phone provider asked me for an SSN just to get an account with them? WTF?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Abolish the SSN! by MrEnigma · · Score: 1

      Well, the cell phone provider is technically borrinwg the money to you every month until you pay it...so it's a credit, that's why those applications exist.

      If you don't want to deal with that, get a prepaid phone, which does not require a SSN.

      --
      GeekWares - Buy and Download Today!
    2. Re:Abolish the SSN! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      About a month ago, a freaking cell phone provider asked me for an SSN just to get an account with them? WTF?

      A cell phone account is a line of credit.

    3. Re:Abolish the SSN! by c1pher · · Score: 1

      "About a month ago, a freaking cell phone provider asked me for an SSN just to get an account with them? WTF?"

      credit "ID"

      yes, we can play the big brother argument, but it's a fact of life that your SSN has become a player in the game, for credit scores and decisions for or against you.

      --
      The Adult Happy Meal - "I'm lovin' it!"
    4. Re:Abolish the SSN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Interesting...

      And I naively thought that medical services were the primary purpose of the SSN, all other uses (financial, tax, ...) only came afterwards...

    5. Re:Abolish the SSN! by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      They're realizing it's really easy to fake someone's identity, so they need to use progressively more private and dangerous information. To even get tech support or discuss services like wireless internet on my Cingular account, they need the last 4 digits of my Mom's SSN!

      Of course, Cingular just seems to suck in many ways...

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

  38. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by the+pickle · · Score: 5, Informative

    since personal shredders are only $30, why does your company use the shredding service at all? It would probably be cheaper to outfit every employee (or at least every department) with their own shredder than pay for 2 months of that service

    Because $30 personal shredders suck ass. They're cheaply made, their motors burn up if you put more than 5 sheets at a time through them with any regularity, and they jam very easily.

    Spend a hundred for each one and you might get something worth using.

    Spend $1500 for a serious industrial crosscut confetti model and let 30 employees share it and your company is probably far better off than with either of the above options, or the shredding service.

    Bonus points if the company then sells the shredded paper *directly* to a pulp mill ;)

    p

  39. Recycling.... by Avihson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That is why I recycle all my personal papers into tinder for my wood stove.
    Properly rolled and bound newpaper "logs" burn for a long time, and give up some nice heat.
    I use the cheap single cut shredder to shred everything with personal info, this is good enough for starting the fire.
    I cut the address from my old trade periodicals before I drop them off at the waiting room at my Doctor's office. Better computer magazines than Women's Day.

    Now before all of you green geeks flame me, the county stopped collecting paper, ever since the price dropped. They had a scandal when it was exposed that they were dumping sorted recycle paper in the landfill with regular garbage.

    As far as I know they still properly recycle glass, plastic and metals.

    1. Re:Recycling.... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Now before all of you green geeks flame me, the county stopped collecting paper, ever since the price dropped. They had a scandal when it was exposed that they were dumping sorted recycle paper in the landfill with regular garbage.

      What all of the environmental nutbags fail to mention is that in this day and age, recycling to more expensive and more resource intensive than creating new material. Most municipalities have to *pay* to have their stuff recycled. In the case of paper, it's cheaper to make/buy new paper than it is to recycle it.

  40. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by igrp · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well, in my experience it usually boils down to one, or a combination of, the following:

    • ignorance
    • incomptence
    • liability

    That's one of the reasons the military and (some) government agencies have adopted standarized protocols to deal with this kind of stuff and generally are quick to reprimand those who violate policy.

    Many security problems these days have to do with the fact that people for some reason refuse to apply common sense -- requiring people to wear ID tags at all times and conducting thorough background checks is not going to do any good if you just dispose of confidential documents into some backyard alley dumpster.

  41. Three Stacks of Paper: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    accounts receivable
    accounts payable
    accounts incinerable

    1. Re:Three Stacks of Paper: by freeweed · · Score: 1

      accounts receivable
      accounts payable
      accounts incinerable


      Personally, I find combining these last 2 helps my financial situation immensely!

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  42. What I wonder when I read these by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I read about guys like this - they are always idiots. Basically he got caught because he was hanging around a bunch of crazy drug addicts.

    I keep wondering if for every guy like this they catch, there must be like 3 guys who are really careful and "normal people" (i.e. professionally minded, don't take drugs or hang around prostitutes, etc.) who do these type of crimes to build up some large amount of money, then move someplace and live off the interest. Those would be the guys that would be real hard to catch.

    I wonder if those kind of criminals exist and in what numbers?

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:What I wonder when I read these by humuhumunukunukuapu' · · Score: 1

      according to the author on NPR this afternoon, 1 in 700 are caught.

      --
      i saw the baby, and the baby looked at me
    2. Re:What I wonder when I read these by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Did you RTFA?

      The fact that he hung around a bunch of crazy drug addicts is exactly why he was so successfull.. he had basically an army of people willing to work for pennies, and to do mundane things (like stick together shredded personnel reports, read the article).

      They were only so prolific because of the network of contacts that they had working for them..

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    3. Re:What I wonder when I read these by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did RTFA. Having drug addicts working for you and having them hanging out in your hotel room to socialize are two different things. I could very well imagine having an intermediary who works with the addicts. Or at least keeping some kind of personal distance from them.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    4. Re:What I wonder when I read these by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      1) Steal personal information from dumpsters
      2) Hire someone to find street kids addicted to meth to reassembled shredded personal information and files; take information and open credit cards
      3) Profit!

      So I guess now we know the missing step 2.. ;)

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    5. Re:What I wonder when I read these by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I wonder if those kind of criminals exist and in what numbers?

      Just look at the CEO of every major company... Or the majority of the board of directors...

      Hell, we've even got one as the current president.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:What I wonder when I read these by Seeka · · Score: 1

      >according to the author on NPR this afternoon, 1 in 700 are caught.

      Oh. Really.

      Please, enlighten me as to how the NPR knows that "only 1 in 700 are caught"? Is there any way to track this?

      This is a guess. Maybe they could track it based on the number of people who "filed claims" and then based on the number of people convicted of identity theft ... that's still not very convincing. I want to see this study they did to find out that 1 in 700 people are caught practicing identity theft. How can they possibly know how many they aren't catching? Simple answer, they can't.

      I would also doubt that they would discriminate at all between "soft" identity theft, and "hard" identity theft. "soft" being the type of guy who will do a bunch of research on somebody, and maybe buy a couple things on his credit card. "hard" being the guys that steal people's complete identities, totally mess up other people's records intentionally, and live a life of indiscriminate luxury because of it.

      The difference would be that the soft guy rationalizes to himself that if he charges things to the guy's credit card, that's not that bad because he'll recognize them, refute the charges, and that's nothing big.

      Of course he might not realize that credit companies limit the number of refutations you can do against bogus charges.

      In short, it's basically a statistic. Which can be manipulated in so many ways, especially when you don't have the data they are tabulating.

    7. Re:What I wonder when I read these by humuhumunukunukuapu' · · Score: 1

      they were interviewing the reporter, and he came up with that number. Sorry I was not more clear. You are right though. Trust no one except yourself, for you are a GOD among men. Whatever.

      --
      i saw the baby, and the baby looked at me
  43. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    yeah, if you put your documents inside there I doubt any dumpster diver would be willing to touch it. :)

  44. STUPlD MODS (+1 INFORMATIVE) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was this modded offtopic. Identity theft rings are operating overseas due to this kind of information whoring

  45. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by timshea · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The cost of having every employee or department having their own shredder isn't restricted to the initial $30/seat investment. There's also the time involved in shredding documents.

    Probably not a good example, but:

    I once had a job which involved faxing purchase orders to suppliers. When I first started, the process was:

    1. Print batch of purchase orders.
    2. Go to accounting department. (I didn't have a fax machine on my desk.)
    3. Fax each purchase order individually.
    This process consumed 2 to 3 hours of each of my days.
    COST: 2 to 3 hours employee time per day.
    SAVINGS: $100 one-time cost of fax machine

    Upper management greatly improved the situation when they donated a fax machine from their office for my desk...because it didn't meet their needs - it didn't automatically identify the sender in the page headers.
    COST: 45 to 60 minutes employee time per day; plus additional 40 minutes of long-distance calling per day for the header page.
    SAVINGS: $100 one-time cost of fax machine; 2 to 2-1/4 hours employee time per day.

    Although it saved the daily trip to the accounting office, faxing now required a header page identifying where the fax was coming from. At least I could be mostly-productive while doing the mindless hours of fax work.

    1. Print batch of purchase orders.
    2. Fax each purchase order individually, with header page.

    Eventually, we did end up with a fax modem which was connected directly to the mainframe which saved even more time.
    COST: $300 for the fax modem; software written in-house in about an hour
    SAVINGS: 2 to 3 hours of employee time per day

    Queue batch of purchase orders.

    Time is money - even if it is 15 minutes.

  46. Dumpster diving old home directories by mikewas · · Score: 4, Informative
    I just had to run in to work to create a report. I needed some data in a former employee's directory, so logged on as root & changed permissions so I could read anything in his directory tree.

    He had all sorts of personal data in his home direcrtory: passport & visa applications, paycheck stubs for several years, copies of expense accounts including scans of credit card statements, info about his retirement from the company we used to be a part of, ...

    Once I realized what it was I rm'ed it, but what would posses a supposedly rational person to not only save this data to a networked machine at work but to leave it there after leaving the company?

    --

    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    1. Re:Dumpster diving old home directories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't know about your case there, but in some cases, the dismissed employee doesn't exactly have the time to pack up his things, and go through all his files as well. Depending on how immediate your termination is, companies don't really like "ex-employees" to have computer access.

      The real lesson there is not to have personal information on work-machines to begin with.

    2. Re:Dumpster diving old home directories by mikewas · · Score: 1
      True enough, though in this case he had a month's notice. He's just a packrat. The sort of guy who brought almost 100 boxes of junk along on our last move and who kept his home directory in a similar jumble, using 10 times the space of anybody else.

      Keeping unneeded personal files, electronic or hardcopy, are a chance for somebody to steal data, and it's especially risky to keep them at work.

      I use tax time to review what I have saved. Anything that isn't required for my records is shredded or wiped. It can only hurt to keep it around, especially at work or other place not under my physical control.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    3. Re:Dumpster diving old home directories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but in some cases, the dismissed employee doesn't exactly have the time to pack up his things, and go through all his files as well. Depending on how immediate your termination is, companies don't really like "ex-employees" to have computer access.

      He has a damn good point. Mod this fella up

  47. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by migstradamus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Getting all your employees to do it is the main problem. There is no way you're going to get the consistency you need.

    Another reason is liability. Having a company you can sue is nicer than having to cut your own throat by firing someone who screws up.

  48. same goes for Kazaa by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a journalist in my country (Poland) made an investigation about possible uses of Kazaa to find data of national importancy (I cannot find URL now, and the article is written in polish ;).

    In just a few hours he found documents related to national security and bussiness. Mostly because careless employers of crucial national institutions carelessly install Kazaa just to download junk, and don't even know (or understand) that they share C:\My Documents\ directory. This is outrageous.

    The journalist said that not all national-importancy institutes suffer this sick employers behaviour, but some of them do. Which is proven by simple Kazaa search.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:same goes for Kazaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty bad. I just tried the same, looking for 'doc' files on kazaa. I found plenty of resumes, some business docs, and some internal newsletters for small businesses on how to handle customers (or how to ignore their complaints).

      Browsing the files available for one fellow gave me his resume, and dozens of other personal and business files of his, INCLUDING bank account info.

      No SSN or CC info, but hey, that'd only be a matter of time before someone would put that up online in the same accidental way.

  49. MOD PARENT DOWN! REPRODUCED W/O PERMISSION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This blatant theft of services is *exactly* how most people imagine Open Source users to be. I'm appalled to see Slashdot assisting in perpetuating this stereotype. We shouldn't steal content from other sites without their expressed written permission.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN! REPRODUCED W/O PERMISSION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 19, @08:09PM (#7770624) This blatant theft of services is *exactly* how most people imagine Open Source users to be. I'm appalled to see Slashdot assisting in perpetuating this stereotype. We shouldn't steal content from other sites without their expressed written permission.

      And you should not steal my Anonymous Coward byline without MY permission

      I am the original AC and your blatent theft of my identity will not be tolerated! I am calling the Feds, Scotland Yard and Interpol. Oh yeah and the RCMP! Give me back my Identity, you fraudulent coward.

      Of course I gave myself permission to use your comment, since it was entered under my name!

  50. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Radical+Rad · · Score: 4, Funny
    Quick question...since personal shredders are only $30, why does your company use the shredding service at all?

    $30 personal shredders won't handle many items such as old badges, bernoulli disks, floppies, backup tapes, CD's, last year's Xmas fruitcake, whistleblowers, etc.

  51. Dumpster Diving Moose, Too! by Colymbosathon+ecplec · · Score: 2, Funny
    Here's a story about Moose getting into peoples garbage.

    ""Initially they were Dumpster diving (a few years ago), but now they've actually progressed into tearing open black garbage bags in cans that don't have lids," said Jessy Coltrane, the assistant area biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. "When moose start getting into garbage, they're almost worse than bears because they're pretty persistent about it."

    1. Re:Dumpster Diving Moose, Too! by Aussie · · Score: 5, Funny

      My sister got bitten by a moose once.

    2. Re:Dumpster Diving Moose, Too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that before or after she saw the lovely lakes?

      PS: The link should be rather obvious....

    3. Re:Dumpster Diving Moose, Too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well then she shouldn't be hanging around in dumpsters.

    4. Re:Dumpster Diving Moose, Too! by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      I wonder how Canadians distinguish, phonetically,
      'moose' and 'mouse'?

      Or, for that matter Aussies and 'pig' vs 'peg'?

      good job English doesn't have phonetic spelling really...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    5. Re:Dumpster Diving Moose, Too! by jo42 · · Score: 1


      It's "meese", eh?

  52. We don't need to abolish it... by devphil · · Score: 4, Insightful


    ...because something even more invasive would be put in its place. The Devil that ya know, and all that.

    We don't even need to pass new laws to restrict the use of the SSN, because we already have them. It's not supposed to be used for any identification purpose other than actual Social Security.

    Once again, the problem is not lack of laws. It's lack of enforcement. (Look at Bush and Kenny Boy, and tell me if you're surprised.)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:We don't need to abolish it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it only the government which is prohibited from using it for any purposes but Social Security and taxes? I thought, for some reason, that anyone else could ask for it. You, of course, 'can' choose not to give it to them. But at this point, I challenge people to find an HR person willing to submit forms without SSNs on them and insurance companies willing to cover said person.

    2. Re:We don't need to abolish it... by princewally · · Score: 1

      They don't have a choice if you have legally rescinded your ssn.

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
    3. Re:We don't need to abolish it... by jcr · · Score: 1

      How do I legally rescind my SSN? I'll do it in a heartbeat!

      Please fill me in!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:We don't need to abolish it... by princewally · · Score: 1

      All you have to do to rescind your ssn is fill out a form with the social security office and filing that form with your local recording office. Here, that means the county treasurer/auditor's office.

      This isn't a decision to make lightly. There are many pros and cons. In my opinion, more cons than pros.

      On the pro side: this makes you a sovereign citizen, exempt from many laws, including driver's licenses and the need for car insurance. You are also exempt from paying federal taxes. This exempts you from almost everything at the federal level.

      Cons: You are exempt from almost everything at the federal level. No bank accounts because they are FDIC. No post office. They are actually flexible on this one. They let you use the post office, as long as you don't use a street address or zip code. All of you mail is received general delivery. You can't receive social security if you retire or get disabled. You can't receive federally guaranteed loans, including student loans. You can't make use of any federal program or institute. If you do, they will revoke you rescinsion(sp?).

      You can find more information here and here.

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
    5. Re:We don't need to abolish it... by jcr · · Score: 1

      All you have to do to rescind your ssn is fill out a form with the social security office and filing that form with your local recording office.

      Maybe I'm missing something, but that's not the read I'm getting from the links that turned up in those two google search URL's you posted.

      I saw one form, SSA-521, which is to cancel an application for social security benefits, which says nothing at all about exemption from payroll taxes (FICA). Besides that, the rest of the links seem to be various nazi whackos pretending to be lawyers.

      Now, I have been told that the Amish in particular do not participate in social security, even when earning ordinary taxable wages, and if they have a way to opt-out then we all must be able to do likewise since you can't have a law in the USA that pertains only to members of one particular religion.

      If anyone can fill me in on how the Amish are able to opt out of FICA, I'm all ears.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  53. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it saved 2-3 hours of your time each day, aren't you worried about being expendable? If you're still there for the same amount of time, the company hasn't really saved anything, they've just made you a happier employee (and we know where that is on their priority list).

  54. Re:Solution: Max Your Credit by igrp · · Score: 1
    There might be other problems associated with that strategy.
    AFAIR, a closed CC account still shows up seven years after the last payment on that account was made. If you repeatedly close accounts and shortly afterwards open new ones, your credit scores are likely to suffer (think about it - a potential lender is going to consider this suspicious behaviour, resulting in jacked up interest rates or denied loan applications).

    If you've been "a good customer"(tm) and try to cancel one of your credit cards they might actually be willing to waive your annual fee in order to "convince" you to stay. I got a two-for-one airline ticket deal that way once...

  55. As long as banks can write off 100% of loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    we will continue to have situations where the banks don't give a damn about your identity being stolen, and will continue to refuse assisting in investigations.

    Why should they? It's a 100% writeoff.

    Start changing the writeoff to 95% next year, 90% the year after that, 85% 3rd year, and see how fast they change their attitude.

  56. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We use a shredding company to do our work as well. The papers are put into a loosely locked box and picked up monthly.

    The man who picks ours up is a toy short of a happy meal. He rarely says more than an incoherent mumble or two. Something usually about the damn lock on the door (I share his frustration).

    We started using them after we shred about 5000 pounds of confidential data. I filled 12 large bins that they provided for us. These were probably 3.5 feet tall and large enough for at least two of my fat asses to fit inside easily.

    Why do we use them? Because it would take me two or three days to destroy a single box of paper records that we have. I don't have time for that.

    It's something like $500 for 5000 pounds. You do the math... Pay an employee $15/hr to shred documents for 3 days ($15 x 8) x 3 or $500 for 5000 pounds.

  57. how to find out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How would I go about finding out if someone else has some form of credit opened in my name?

    Would a credit report indicate all of my accounts? (even the ones opened by fraud?)

    1. Re:how to find out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, do it once a year as a matter of course, probably twice a year these days.

      I've heard you shouldn't get reports too often 'cause the # of report requests is listed somewhere and that high levels were frowned on by the lending industry, likely urban legend tho. Otherwise a highly recommended course of action, my brother stepped on my dad's credit report (same first/last/addr) with impunity.
      Granted I had records to prove otherwise and "lawyers guns and money" so it was all cleared up but..it's best to be proactive about such things if you got something worth protectin', there are obviously an abundance of thieves afoot.

      In Soviet Russia, the government steals your identity!

    2. Re:how to find out? by princewally · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you check your own credit report with the the credit bureaus, it does not get reflected on your credit rating.

      Banks don't get to see how often you check your report.

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
    3. Re:how to find out? by thogard · · Score: 2

      How would I go about finding out if someone else has some form of credit opened in my name?

      If the offers you get change, its time to start looking at your credit report. If your getting offers for gold cards and then you start getting offers for secured credit cards, there is a reason and it will be on one of your credit reports.

  58. Re:Solution: Max Your Credit by John+Meacham · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A credit rejected letter is an identity theifs DREAM! by law, credit rejection letters contain not only pertinent stuff like your social security number, but they must give you a copy of your credit report if asked to show why you were denied. Once a thief gets your credit report it is all over. the credit report has every bank account and credit card number you own. as well as a lot of other personal info.

    --
    http://notanumber.net/
  59. Curtail use of your SSN by Presence1 · · Score: 5, Informative
    When the Social Security Act was originally passed in the 30s, there was a significant concern that the SSN would become a de-facto Citizen ID. To allay this concern, the law contained specific provisions making it ILLEGAL to require the use of the SSN for any use not directly related to its purpose in identifying income and determining benefits. In other words, if you are not being paid, or having the opportunity to earn interest, they cannot require you to divulge your sSSN

    The two primary examples of this use are the medical profession adn the Motor Vehicles establishment, both of whom seem to think the SSN is a handy Unique ID. Obviously, this magnifies the security risk for anyone who complies. Here's how to deal with both.

    When you sign up for health insurance, fill in the SSN field with the phrase "assign ID". Sometimes they will just do it, but usually some clerk will complain that you haven't completed the form, they can't process it, etc. Firmly explain (often several times) that this is illegal, and that their companies have procedures to handle this, and that they need to speak to their manager. They will soon return with a sheepish demeanor, and you will get an ID in the SSN format.

    Now, whenever you go to ANY doctor, dentist, hospital, or whatever, fill in this assigned ID as your SSN on their form. If asked whether this is your SSN, simply respond that "This is the correct ID.", and do not let pressure you into revealing your SSN.

    The DMV and police may be easier or more difficult to deal with. The DMV should have a checkbox on the form which allows you to decline using the SSN, usually with some corresponding inconvenience. E.g., some states will require you to come in for renewed licenses, whereas they will mail them if your SSN is in their system. If your state doesn't have this option and you cannot argue them out of it, transposing a few digits might not be a bad idea.

    When dealing with the police (e.g., in a speeding ticket situation), I've found it is best not to tell them that their request for your SSN is illegal. Best to just say that you don't remember it. Of course you don't want to give false information, right?

    These tactics will obviously not close all vulnerabilities, but they will eliminate two major potential sources of identity theft. Good Luck.

    1. Re:Curtail use of your SSN by michael · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is not really accurate. The whole first paragraph of that comment is false.

      There are no laws that forbid the private use of the SSN for any reason whatsoever. Any private entity may demand your SSN as a condition for interacting with you; you must provide it or they may refuse to interact with you. (For instance, getting health insurance or a credit card.) The Privacy Act of 1974 made some restrictions relating to *governmental* (only) uses of the SSN as an identifier; when government agencies demand your SSN, they have to tell you their legal authority for requesting it and what the penalties are for failure to comply. This requirement is largely ignored in practice - for instance, when I was serving on jury duty, the court clerk demanded my SSN (to withhold income taxes on the $12/day jury payment), and when I pointed out that they were violating the law by not disclosing the authority for this request, the clerk was singularly unimpressed. If the court system is violating the law... but I digress.

      The rest of the comment (seek to use an assigned number rather than your SSN whenever possible) is good advice, and will often work, albeit at the cost of some hassle. CPSR has a good FAQ with some more information.

    2. Re:Curtail use of your SSN by Oswald · · Score: 1

      I've seen this exact post before. I guess you're repeating yourself as a public service, but the link provided in the first response (to the CPSR FAQ) certainly makes it look like you're propagating an urban legend here. I've heard the "illegal to use" thing for almost 30 years, but now I think it's most likely untrue. Do you have any references to back up your statements?

    3. Re:Curtail use of your SSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its probably not that much of a hassle in California, given that illegal immigrants don't have SSNs.

    4. Re:Curtail use of your SSN by yourmom16 · · Score: 1

      Which section is that in? Title 42 is a bloated piece of ^G; I'm not going to look through the whole thing.

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
    5. Re:Curtail use of your SSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the DMV screwed up the SSN on my drivers license, I always use it for non-important things. It's amazing how many people just treat that number as the absolute truth because it is on your drivers license. Even when I tell them that is not my ssn, they refuse to believe me, "because it's on your license". DUH.

    6. Re:Curtail use of your SSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few replies argue that the "illegal" part is urban legend. I know it is true in Canada (with many exceptions)!

      It is often hard to get out of it anyway, but as a last resort I explain (lie) that I just moved in this country a few weeks ago, that I am not here to work but to write my next novel in the next 2 year, that I have millions in my Swiss bank account, and have no use for an SSN. "You dig it Dude?"

    7. Re:Curtail use of your SSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_
      g_______________________________________________g_ _
      o_/_____\_____________\____________/____\_______o_ _
      a|_______|_____________\__________|______|______a_ _
      t|_______`._____________|_________|_______:_____t_ _
      s`________|_____________|________\|_______|_____s_ _
      e_\_______|_/_______/__\\\___--___\\_______:____e_ _
      x__\______\/____--~~__________~--__|_\_____|____x_ _
      *___\______\_-~____________________~-_\____|____*_ _
      g____\______\_________.--------.______\|___|____g_ _
      o______\_____\______//_________(_(__>__\___|____o_ _
      a_______\___.__C____)_________(_(____>__|__/____a_ _
      t_______/\_|___C_____)/______\_(_____>__|_/_____t_ _
      s______/_/\|___C_____)_______|__(___>___/__\____s_ _
      e_____|___(____C_____)\______/__//__/_/_____\___e_ _
      x_____|____\__|_____\\_________//_(__/_______|__x_ _
      *____|_\____\____)___`----___--'_____________|__*_ _
      g____|__\______________\_______/____________/_|_g_ _
      o___|______________/____|_____|__\____________|_o_ _
      a___|_____________|____/_______\__\___________|_a_ _
      t___|__________/_/____|_________|__\___________|t_ _
      s___|_________/_/______\__/\___/____|__________|s_ _
      e__|_________/_/________|____|_______|_________|e_ _
      x__|__________|_________|____|_______|_________|x_ _
      *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_


      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

      Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

  60. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides the obvious answer of spend the money on an industrial shredder and have people shred their own material, why do you have to shred so much? It sounds like an insane waste of resources. 5000 pounds of printed paper probably costs about $10,000 to produce.

  61. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by hdc · · Score: 1

    This again goes to the point made in the article that corporations bear at leaast some responsibility in this problem. Don't just gripe about it here, tell your legal department about what you saw. Tell the people in your company who are responsible for hiring that document shredding company. Tell that accounting firm that this company is not doing the job that they are hired to do. Speak up man! It may well have been your SSN, home addy, and other personal info in that bin.
    Doing right for yourself is good, but take it a step better and help your company be a better corporate citizen. Tell everyone who will listen that they need to re-evaluate who they have shredding their docs!

  62. Trust no one with a fax... by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it is not bad intention, it is just stupidity. For a while, I had a fax number, which was the same as that of some medical lab (or insurance company) -- except for the area code.

    Twice a week a fax would arrive from a doctor's office in my area -- thanks to an absent minded "office manager" or some such. Due to the nature of the business, all faxes contained not only the patients' names, SS#, but also diagnoses, health histories -- the works! I called them back every time -- boy, were the morons surprised... They never even bothered to check the fax ID string, which I had configured to my company's name.

    Not to give any ideas, but how difficult is it for a scumbag to get a phone number similar to that of a claims department of an insurance company?.. Or a mortgage department of a bank? You can guess the other steps she/he will need to make. Mind you, completely passive and impossible to detect. No dumpster diving involved either -- totally white-collar job...

    We can moan about the need to use encryption and authentication, but faxes don't have this feature at all. As long as this sort of information passes over telephone lines unencrypted, your info is not safe.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  63. College Anyone? by saderax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about idiot colleges who require are not allowed (legally) to request your social security number, but anyone can ask for your "student ID" which is coincidently the same?

    (all sarcasm aside, really what could one do?)

    1. Re:College Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to whoever issued you the student ID (Registrar?) and raise the same stink as previously noted. They likely either have an alternative procedure, or should if not. If their manager denies you, check with Student Affairs/Politics peeps and if they claim they can't do anything, write a letter to the paper explaining the whole thing. It's a serious issue everywhere and the more activism the better. You'll probably become a big target of derision and whatnot, people will tell you you're paranoid etc., but the next generation will be better for it :). Any use of an SSN other than it's lawfully mandated one is a BAD one, the more people that know it the better.

    2. Re:College Anyone? by frycarson · · Score: 1

      You request a non SSN based student ID. My comp-sci teacher told us this on like the third day of class because he felt it was the worst system ever to protect one's identity. Your SSN is probably easier to memorize though. Most colleges need to do it for foreign students anyways, so the system is in place.

    3. Re:College Anyone? by calethix · · Score: 1

      There may be some instances where they need it (i.e. if you get a job on campus) but otherwise they must have some other way of generating an ID for you. Foreign students tend not to have SSNs.

      Incidentally, my college used to do that (use your SSN as your Student ID by default). We recently converted to generated numbers. I think more colleges are making this switch as well.

    4. Re:College Anyone? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You don't have to give it to them. AFAIK, they are all setup to generate random ones for anyone who requests it.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:College Anyone? by isaac · · Score: 1
      What about idiot colleges who require are not allowed (legally) to request your social security number, but anyone can ask for your "student ID" which is coincidently the same?

      This sentence is garbled, but if you're implying that most colleges aren't legally permitted to require your SSN, and similarly free to use it as your student ID number, you're wrong.

      A private school can require you to tattoo your ssn on your forehead as a condition of enrollment.

      If you go to a *public* college or university that has been collecting SSNs since before 1975 (i.e. most of them), your university is free to make you hand it out like candy to any and every jerk remotely affiliated with the school. They are exempt from the terms of the Federal Privacy Act of 1974. See 5 USC Sec. 552a. I learned this first hand after fighting with Florida State University to get a non-SSN student ID number assigned to me. They won. They were allowed to tell me to pound sand if I didn't like it, and I didn't, but it was too late to change schools. Even if I paid my tuition in cash, they would simply not assign an ID that was different from the student's SSN, if the student had an SSN. (Of course they assigned IDs all the time to international students who had no SSN.)

      Nice, huh?

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    6. Re:College Anyone? by taped2thedesk · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The University of Michigan implements this policy, and I think it works pretty well:

      A. Systems purchased or developed by the University of Michigan will not use Social Security numbers as identifiers unless required by law or business necessity.

      B. Each member of the University community will be assigned a unique identification number that is not the same as, or derived from, the individual's Social Security number.

      C. Systems purchased or developed by the University of Michigan will use Social Security numbers as data elements only, not as keys to databases.

      D. Systems purchased or developed by the University of Michigan will not display Social Security numbers visually, whether on computer monitors or on printed forms or other system output, unless required by law or business necessity.

      E. Name and directory systems purchased or developed by the University of Michigan will be tied to individuals' unique identification numbers, not to Social Security numbers.

      F. When databases require Social Security numbers, the databases may automatically cross-reference between the Social Security numbers and other information through the use of conversion tables within systems or other technical mechanisms.

      G. No new system or technology will be developed or purchased by the University of Michigan unless it is compatible with these regulations.

      The only times I'm asked for my SSN are for tax, financial aid, and health purposes.

      If you're concerned about the use of your SSN, and your school does something that blantently stupid (especially if they print your SSN on all your documents and on your ID card), you should go to a meeting of the governing body of the University (Regents, etc.) and present your case. Bring some examples of policy from other schools. It's kind of pointless to argue with the desk staff who ask for your SSN, as they are just doing what they are told and can't do much to help your privacy concerns. It might be hard to change the system, but it's worth a try.

    7. Re:College Anyone? by chaotixx · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately not all of us go to schools with such nice policies. I have some professors who will dock you points if you fail to put your SSN next to your name at the top of your test.

  64. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by CmdrTHAC0 · · Score: 1

    Okay, I did the math. If it takes you 4 days to shred 5K pounds, and that rate is sufficient to meet or exceed the production rate, then you still win in employee time at $15/hr. (It'd be even cheaper to hire another person at $7.50/hr if they're spending all day at it.) This doesn't account for equipment, power, maintenance, or depreciation, but what did you expect for asking /. to do business math?

    --
    __CmdrTHAC0__
    In Soviet Russia, Spanish Inquisition doesn't expect YOU!!
  65. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by agrippa_cash · · Score: 1

    I'd prefer the one mentioned here to your puny cross-cutting confetti.(To find the relevant passage do a search for "flour".) http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/7.11/cheyenne_p r.html Ahh, our tax dollars at work.

  66. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We started using them after we shred about 5000 pounds of confidential data. I filled 12 large bins that they provided for us. These were probably 3.5 feet tall and large enough for at least two of my fat asses to fit inside easily.

    You guys ever hear of the paperless office? We're not even ALLOWED to have printers at my office anymore. Everything must be transmitted electronically. If something absolutely must be printed on dead wood then you need to order it special through a once per month batch job that runs. It's an insane pain in the ass and not worth it so NO ONE uses paper anymore.

  67. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by evil_roy · · Score: 1

    It's the bulk. You can't rely on *all* staff to carry out disposal in accordance with legal/policy requirements, so it is up to the knowledge manager/records/archives staff. Disposal can then be carried out at regular intervals - but generally speaking no-one cares too much until they run out of physical space. By then, we could be talking tonnes of paper to be effectively disposed of - hence the outsourced shredding companies.

    Digital purging is another issue, certainly no easier though unless documents are sentenced correctly at the time of creation. It is a massive task to carry out at 'disposal time'.

  68. Please Mod my post -1, seriously by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    Based on the two replies so far, it appears that my original idea is worse than I possibly imagined. If /. had an editing feature, I would remove the post myself. Perhaps a -1 mod will keep others from reading it.

    I want to sincerely thank igrp and John Meecham for pointing out the error of my ways. (And I am not being facetious)

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  69. Re:Solution: Max Your Credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did this in the early 1990's.

    Worst. Idea. Ever.

    My son knew I had the credit there, and bought EIGHT apple macintoshes. I can't tell you how it feels to be living in 2003 and still be paying off part of a Performa 630.

  70. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Cheapo shredder usually shredes only vertically, and does so usually so that there are about 20 cuts down one page
    ...
    On the other hand, good commercial shredders litterall demolish the paper, turning it into sawdust like material that would be impossible (virtually) to reconstruct.


    I have the second-cheapest cross-shredder I could buy from WallyWorld (Yeah, I know, evil, but show me a Mom&Pop that carries cross-shredders). For USD$25, I end up with 0.25" by 1.5" confetti. Good luck putting that back together.

    And for a teensy bit extra security, when I empty the bin, I dump a cup of water on it for good measure. 15 minutes later I have paper mache - Even if you could still recognize a word here and there, how do you scoop it out of the wet blob to reassemble without obliterating it?. I suppose I could go a step further and burn it as well, but really, why bother? Anyone wanting my personal data that badly can get it a lot easier than searching my garbage for paper mush.

  71. Attacking the actual problem by tempshill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The easiest problem to attack here is that it's too easy to open a credit card account. If this were made a grueling, lengthy process requiring written correspondence, with extra safeguards for changing addresses, then all the credit card side of identity theft would be mooted.

    The FTC website says that if you're the victim of identity theft, you can contact the credit bureaus to put a FRAUD WARNING on the top of your credit card report. This makes me wonder whether we should all just do this anyway.

    I have read that in Europe, getting a credit card is difficult and not instantaneous, and that identity theft (at least, on the credit card side) is less of a problem.

    1. Re:Attacking the actual problem by Ozan · · Score: 1

      Less of a problem? The first time I read about so-called 'identity theft' in America I was wondering what the heck they were talking about. There simply is no identity theft, 'no' as in 'no people killed by sleeping in heavy rain and accidentaly drowned'. Maybe this is the result of a system of evil communist child-eating ID cards. Getting a credit-card itself is about as easy as in the US I would guess, although I can't say for sure since I never needed to apply for one thanks to handy bank-account cards and easy bank transfers.

    2. Re:Attacking the actual problem by oskarfasth · · Score: 1

      As another citizen of an european country, I must concur.

      I would also like to add that handling of SSN-equivalents etc (in my country at least) is, to say the least, relaxed. Even my local martial arts club requires it. And in our "SSN:s" the date of birth is literally embedded. To make matters worse, anybody who knows that number can, providing I do not have a "protected identity", get my tax records, address and more. Even my passport photo. Yet, identity thefts continue to be unheard of.

      Blame the credit companies, I say.

      --
      "Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand..." - James Randi
  72. Just wondering by lurker412 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, I'll burn some karma here by being off-topic and politically incorrect. I don't understand why everyone seems to be so concerned about NYT registration. I registered years ago, and just out of curiosity I looked at my user profile just now. It showed an old, long-defunct email address and a fraudulant zip code. There were some other demographic drop-down boxes that I had never selected. So what's the big deal? I had to supply an email address to register for /. too. Neither one has abused that information AFAIK.

    1. Re:Just wondering by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      You are asked for your gender. Why do you suppose this is so, if they are not proposing marriage? Put simply, they use this information to show women adverts for shoes and men adverts for video games. If someone is listening to your inbound traffic and sees you are receiving advertisements for shoes, they can infer that you are a woman, and therefore a suitable potential rape victim.

      That's why giving away unnecessary information is dangerous.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  73. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    heh. we have some german made beast of a shredder at my work. cant recall the brand name off the top of my head.... but it has no problem with floppy disks and CDs, we shred those in there all the time.

    remove the safety guard, it would have no problem with backup tapes, last years xmas fruitcake, or the occasional whistleblower...

  74. A memory hole in every wall by kiltedtaco · · Score: 2, Funny


    I'm looking to get a memory hole installed in my house actualy.

  75. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by yourmom16 · · Score: 1
    Because it would take me two or three days to destroy a single box of paper records that we have. I don't have time for that.

    I could burn it a lot faster than that.

    --
    "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
  76. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by mrgodzilla · · Score: 1

    Same thing happens at my building in Phoenix.. The State of Arizona has quite a few offices in my building, and they use a shredding service.

    The shredding service parks large bins outside my datacenter while they take each one outside to the truck. These bins spend the majority of their time unattended and I've had more than a few opportunities to read what's in the bins.

    It's amazing the amount of personal info I could walk away with if I was malicious. A lot of personal information related to child support payments and the like.. crazy the amount of stuff that is mishandled.

  77. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by ddent · · Score: 1

    Wow, that sounds great for productivity...

    I'm all for the paperless office, but sometimes things are taken to an extreme IMHO... there are exceptions that come up sometimes where paper simply is the best (or only) choice -- and having employees paid to wait around for a month seems a bit... backwards.

  78. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On topic and Funny. Of course you'll be modded "Troll".

    Thanks though.

  79. Dead but not retired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So why does SprintPCS have an account on me despite my not having any services from them? Why does the Paypal credit card from Providian still let me log in and shows my credit limit and last payment, 6 months after I cancelled that account?

  80. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it would take me three days to shred one box. One box holds 120 files. 5000 pounds is about 125 boxes.

    ((15 x 8) x 3) x 125.

  81. Personal Information by Detritus · · Score: 1

    Sometimes you need to store personal information on your work computer. The company may require you to create and maintain electronic forms for employee master records, resumes, skills lists, security clearance applications, expense accounts, travel requests and other forms with sensitive information. Many companies and organizations now use MS Office and Outlook/Exchange to handle all of their paperwork. It costs money and time to shuffle physical pieces of paper. It's easier to tell the employee to use an electronic form and email it to the appropriate person/department. It also creates a whole new set of security issues that few managers are willing to address.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Personal Information by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Many companies and organizations now use MS Office and Outlook/Exchange to handle all of their paperwork.

      One more reason not to leave any sensitive information on the system for a prolonged time. Numerous Outlook/Office viruses are in the habit of takeing a random file present on the hard disk, attach themselves to the file, and sent it to random recipients. With a little bit of "luck" that's the file with all your personal info.

      I'm just wondering if the employee has grounds to sue if identity theft happens due to such Outlook or Office virus.

  82. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by mattACK · · Score: 1

    I bought mine at target. Better than Wal-Mart.

    --


    "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
  83. Dumpster-diving for my identity!?!? by soybean · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dumpster-diving is my identity!

  84. Liability by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about changing the law so lenders are required to verify the identity of the people they lend money to? If they don't, they would be prohibited from taking any legal action against the debtor, referring the debt to a collection agency, or putting a black mark on the debtor's credit record. The identity verification process would have to meet high standards, comparable to what the government requires before issuing sensitive licenses and identification documents. Maybe a current photograph, thumbprint, and signature, collected by someone like a notary public or other trusted person, and submitted directly to the creditor.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Liability by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I think that if identity theft occurs due to the creditor failing to take acceptable precautions the thief should not have to pay back the money at all, if the credit card companies had to take the hit themselves they would care alot more,

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  85. Credit Verification system by Aetrix · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know exactly how this is setup, but my father has some type of high-security flag set with the credit agencies. I found out about when he cosigned for a loan with me. He owns his own business and his business had identity-theft problems a few years back.

    So basically how it works, is that there's a phone number specified on his credit report and a secret question and answer. So if anyone makes an attempt to check my father's credit history, or take out credit in his name or SSN, the creditor must call the listed phone number and my father must answer the phone. They identify themselves and what creditor they're representing. Then they ask the security question and my father gives the correct answer. Now business can proceed as usual.

    It gets more secure when the security question/answer must be changed each time it's used. Plus, changing the phone number requires a 30-day written notice.

    I think that's a GREAT idea... Why don't more people implement that? Once I get some actual credit, instead of just Student Loans, I'm going to put that security measure on MY credit!

    --

    "One touch of Darwin makes the whole world kin." George Bernard Shaw
    1. Re:Credit Verification system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Anyone can do this (in the U.S. at least)... just call the three credit reporting agencies, and ask your account to be flagged with a "Fraud Alert". As an added bonus, companies that use your credit report to see if you are 'eligible' for their junkmail (i.e. credit card applications) are prohibited from sending you anything further.

      I had to do this a couple of years ago after someone stole my identity and started opening credit card accounts and spending thousands of dollars. Fortunately one of the banks caught some inconsistencies (very similar story to one of the above posts) which alerted me to the whole situation.

      Fraud Alerts 'expire' after a certain period (I think 2 years or 7 years depending which credit agency) but you can easily reinstate them. I will definitely continue to 'renew' mine. The minor inconvenience is that it will be more difficult/impossible to open a credit card account for a retail store (but these are mostly pointless) unless your cell phone number is the one associated with the fraud alert.

    2. Re:Credit Verification system by mshultz · · Score: 1

      I visited the Experian website to try to find out how to do this for my credit report, and it looks like they only do this if you actually have been a victim of identity fraud. But I (like many people!) would rather do this as a way of preventing fraud.

      My best guess is that they're trying to limit the availability of this service, which is obviously a good idea, because it would cost them a huge amount of money for the extra labor required to make a phone call or two to verify somebody's identity every time a credit check is made.

      Has any non-victim had any luck with setting up fraud alerts? I'd like to know if this is possible. Do the credit reporting agencies ask for "proof of fraud" before they will flag any further credit checks with SSN?

    3. Re:Credit Verification system by mabu · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is called Fraud Alert and it's a very useful utility and a device to get free copies of all your credit reports.

    4. Re:Credit Verification system by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      the creditor must call the listed phone number and my father must answer the phone. They identify themselves and what creditor they're representing. Then they ask the security question and my father gives the correct answer. Now business can proceed as usual.

      Which means that the creditor would need to know the right answer, in order to know whether your father gave the correct answer. So, what's to stop a would-be identity thief to pass himself off as a potential creditor, and run with the info?

  86. Shredder Chair by shadowcabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Easiest solution to this whole mess, and one I'm seriously considering.

    1. Buy a personal cheapo shredder with a small wastebasket and shred stuff until the basket is full.
    2. Buy a beanbag chair.
    3. Remove the styrofoam packing peanuts from the beanbag chair, they'll be mashed flat and useless in a week anyway.
    4. Place the shredded documents into the beanbag chair.
    5. Repeat until the beanbag chair reaches the desired firmness.

    Instant furniture, very comfy when playing games.

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    1. Re:Shredder Chair by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Before you mod this off-topic, please bear in mind that I accidentally omitted the word "personal" in step 1. It should read....

      1. Buy a personal cheapo shredder with a small wastebasket and shred personal stuff until the basket is full.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  87. as they say by mcguyver · · Score: 1

    one mans trash is another mans treasure.

  88. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it would take me three days to shred one box. One box holds 120 files

    so, you shred 40 files per day?

    At 8hrs/day, that's 5 files per hour, or one file every 12 minutes.

    You can't work faster that that!?!?!?!?

  89. dumpster diving speed freaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome the ddsp overlords!

  90. I cant believe you people... by ArcticCelt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I cant believe you people don't simply get the free registration to New York times Magazine. This article is very useful to help you protect your identity. To register you just have to give your email, gender, zip code, date of birth, address, industry in which you work, household income range, job title, credit card number, ATM nip and the last ten years of data of your tax income.

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    1. Re:I cant believe you people... by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      you're francophone, aren't you?

      S

    2. Re:I cant believe you people... by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1

      Actually I refer to myself as a Euro-Spanio-Canado-Francophone cause I was born in Spain but live in French Canada. English is my third language so sorry for the imperfections.

      P.S. : You grammar nazis ts ts ;)

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    3. Re:I cant believe you people... by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      I could tell by your use of "nip" instead of "pin".

      (-:

      S

    4. Re:I cant believe you people... by 56ker · · Score: 1

      What's that got to do with it? Is nip pin in Spanish or French?

    5. Re:I cant believe you people... by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      Numero d'Identification Personnel
      NIP (french)

      Montrealers use NIP in both languages.. kinda like "all dressed" pizza (-:

      yep.. WAAY offtopic. (-: (no +1)

      S

  91. Re:Libya to give up WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    total waste of time.

  92. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

    really ? are you trying hard enough ?
    I just got done shredding a package of pistachios mgmt thought was a good xmas gift. worked great.

  93. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by timshea · · Score: 1
    If it saved 2-3 hours of your time each day, aren't you worried about being expendable? If you're still there for the same amount of time, the company hasn't really saved anything, they've just made you a happier employee (and we know where that is on their priority list).

    Actually, I was worried about getting the rest of my job done in the time allotted without having to work extra-fast/hard the other 5-6 hours/day.

    Yes, it did make me a happier employee, but that's because I was a more productive employee. (That ought to be a popular statement! lol)

    The time savings resulted in higher productivity, saving my employer from hiring yet another full-time employee. This was the result of not having to waste my time 2-3 hours per day I had enough time to make my whole department more streamlined by being afforded a little "spare" time each day to work on tuning the various processes within the department.

    The "spare" time was at first my breaks, which had previously been donated to my employer in the form of getting-everything-done-on-time. After a year, my "spare" time was part of my work day, sometimes half of it. This was without hiring another employee in the department, and with increasing work output as needed (about 200% over the course of a year).

    I no longer work there - after I decided to move away from the area and gave my two months' notice, they offered me a part-time job from home programming...which lasted for 5 years.

  94. Dumpster Diving Deterrents by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you feel you're being spied-on by individuals poking through your garbage, toss into the bag a few carefully selected, ummm, "leavings" as a bonus for the sifters.

    This should point the searchers in a different direction, causing them to move on to a more attractive find, much as car alarms doo.

  95. Actually... by twoslice · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is a well known fact that if you keep crumpling up a piece of paper over and over, it gets so soft you can use it as asswipe. Let someone try to get the information off that!

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:Actually... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      It is a well known fact that if you keep crumpling up a piece of paper over and over, it gets so soft you can use it as asswipe. Let someone try to get the information off that!

      Assmap

    2. Re:Actually... by The+Creator · · Score: 1

      So they can get your DNA and fingerprints too? No thanks :)

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
    3. Re:Actually... by rapiddescent · · Score: 1
      during the cold war - a massive amount of western intelligence was found from soviet army toilet paper. The red army were not issued with toilet paper - so they just used whatever paper they had that they thought was useless, e.g. cipher pages, orders and so on.

      The story goes that loads of shi9t covered intelligence material had to be analysed every day during the cold war!

  96. Re:SLASHDOT PERSONALS??? by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, slashdot personals. It's part of the new OSDN - Open Source Dating Network.

    Dating must go by the GPL - General Personal License, where if you date someone, you may only continue to date them if they may also date others. This however, is not a viral license. If you already have a partner and pick up another GPL'd partner you need not give up your original partner.

    It's really quite simple.

  97. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When working with government documents they have specific requirements for how "shredded" it is.

    I'll say it's a lot smaller than any cheapo shredder will do. Like the poster above said, it must be almost like sawdust or powder.

    Those 1.5" by 0.25" can easily be reconstructed by people with the resources. I've seen it done and it didn't take long at all. Water makes no difference. Same with trying to stain it. Hell they can reconstruct burnt material if it hasn't been crushed afterwards.

    With that said, I use a regular cross-cut cheapo shredder at home. I don't worry about large entities trying to get my credit card offers and other crap I shred.

  98. Instant NYTimes registration by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1, Informative

    Go grab the random NYTimes registration form. Works every time!

    --
    Yeah, right.
  99. Re:Libya to give up WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yeah thank fuck we had that war.

    Though it's shame about the USA ignoring the Soviet's multiple offers of complete nuclear disarmament..
    Surely having taken the Russian's ideas on board would have sent a better message to countries like Libya?
    There certainly would have been a lot less collateral damage.. without killing any innocents or obliterating any countries.

  100. My solution is better by John+Courtland · · Score: 4, Funny

    Having abhorrently bad credit is the best way to protect your financial assets. No one is going to get a credit card under MY name, that's for damn sure.

    Easy way to do it is to not pay a utility at an old residence (People's Energy is trying to extort $50 for the 0.07 therms of natural gas I used at my last apartment, and they will never see a dime of it. And no, I'm not kidding about the 7/100ths of a therm.)

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  101. Good clarification by Presence1 · · Score: 1

    I didn't mean to imply that the act forbade PRIVATE use of the SSN. I should have been more clear on the context. The law only regulates public functions, not private business contracts, a rather basic right in our society. As a private business I could demand your SSN, Driver's license, the number of every ccard you own, and all your children's ages and shoe sizes in order to do business with me. You can freely tell me to screw off, or not, depending on your assessment of the benefits my buiness offers. This is a good thing, until monopoly power comes into play.

    I don't have the citations for the original SS Act, but I believe that the 1974 law updates the original act by requiring and/or allowing specific actions by the govt agencies, rather than just the original general limitation. Note that the first item in the FAQ is that the agency must have specific authoriation to use the SSN; i.e., use is forbidden unless it is specifically authoried.

    I do not know the specific law that controls use in the medical/insurance industry, but their behavior clearly indicates compliance with such a regulation.

    Interesting that you found that the court was out of compliance with the law. I wonder what they'd do if you forgot your SSN, or if you refused payment?

  102. Meow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    call me paranoid, but I have a $150 crosscut shredder that can even shred the credit card itself.. and in the end, I still scoop my cat's poop and pee clumps into the same trashbag

  103. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please, you can get shredders from Target, Walmart, etc that shred it into tiny confetti for $25-$35. Most of the new ones shred credit cards too. No excuse.

  104. You don't have to give out your SSN by mabu · · Score: 3, Informative

    By law, with few exceptions relating to the government, you are not obligated to give *anyone* your social security number. This is protected by the Fair Credit Billing Act of 1976 and the 1974 Privacy ACt. The ACLU has some good info on your rights andn your SSN.

  105. It used to be extremely lengthy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They ask for all sorts of corraborating info, and even verify the phone, and then even require a voice confirmation for a measly $500 limit card. Then they charged you a fee just to have the card.

    Then to gain an advantage on competitors, they'd loosen a bit on certain requirements. Of course this sparked off a game of oneupmanship for qualifying, and we have what we have nowadays.

  106. Oh, corporations are benevolent now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just love this convenient scapegoating that Slashdot seems to rule their moral compass with. 10-1 odds tomorrow we'll see a story on how "evil" Bank of America is, and the techno-bourgois here will gleefully lap it up like pablum, and ask for seconds. Slashdot, news for nerds, and stuff that matters depending on how convenient it is for us to have a consistent view of things

    Either corporations are good or evil. Pick one and stay with it.

    1. Re:Oh, corporations are benevolent now? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Hey, jackass.

      My post exhibits no opinion of B of A. My point is just that the guy actually isn't taking money from B of A. He is taking money from their customers, directly.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  107. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 1

    I'm going to assume that when he says files, he mean folders stuffed with papers. If we assume letter sized pieces of paper (8.5x11 inches 20lbs weight). Now, the weight of that size of paper is roughly 5 pounds per 500 sheet ream. So, if we divide 125 out of 5000, we get a 40 pound box of paper, or 8 reams of paper (4,000 sheets). So, the average file is in fact 33 and a third pages long.

    So, out friend the office worker is pulling off about 2 and 2/3rd reams of paper a day, which is roughly 1333.33 sheets. This makes it about 166.66 sheets an hour, or 2.66 sheets of paper a minute.

  108. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by karnal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In addition, there's the "liability" factor.

    If someone happens to get ahold of your sensitive data, it's nice for the bigwigs to have someone to blame other than themselves....

    Think about it. Someone forgets to shred some confidential documents in their own personal shredder, and they get into the dumpster intact. That would be a whole lotta egg on the company. But, if the shredding company acidentally let a document "leak", then they'd probably lose more than just face... they'd probably lose a lotta money!

    --
    Karnal
  109. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Lagrange5 · · Score: 0
    That's one of the reasons the military and (some) government agencies have adopted standarized protocols to deal with this kind of stuff and generally are quick to reprimand those who violate policy.

    Many security problems these days have to do with the fact that people for some reason refuse to apply common sense -- requiring people to wear ID tags at all times and conducting thorough background checks is not going to do any good if you just dispose of confidential documents into some backyard alley dumpster.


    This is true. Many government contractors who handle classified work use certified shredding companies to handle large-scale document destruction (usually those too time consuming for employees to perform in-house).

    Employees/drivers of those shredding companies have to be background-checked for the appropriate security level before they're allowed to handle classified material. The security issues involved are fairly analogous to handling money for an armored car company ... background checks, rigid documentation, time sensitivity, regular performance reviews, etc.
    --
    "Folks just call him Buckethead." -- Les Claypool
  110. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by inode_buddha · · Score: 3, Informative
    Taking it a step further... some family members work for DoD contractors. They have a system where used toner cartridges are accounted for before incinerating them because a bit of skill can retrieve the last few pages from them. Same for media such as CD's and HDD's. The machines these parts come from are locked in a bank vault with *no* networking, no portable devices allowed, etc.

    I can vouch for the effectiveness of dumpster diving; I snarfed the entire budget info for the science dept. in college once. Interesting reading, too.

    --
    C|N>K
  111. Actually, we use rodents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, really. Three gerbils = 1 5-year-old in terms of destructive capacity. Just feed sheets of paper into the cage, and stand back. It takes a little longer, but you still end up with confetti.

    Having a security clearance, I can vouch for the fact that few techniques that don't involve fire destroy documents so thoroughly as rodents.

    1. Re:Actually, we use rodents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah ..... how many of your fancy top grade cross-cut shredders run on sunflower seads and output small pellets which are great for the garden? Gerbils are slightly better than rats in terms of paper-to-body weight ratio.

      Of course you can combine two methods, use a cheap strip cut shredder with a piece of metal bent to act as a deflector, which will send every alternate strip into one of two receptacles, both containing hungry gerbils.

  112. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by berzerke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...Anyone wanting my personal data that badly can get it a lot easier than searching my garbage for paper mush.

    And there lies the answer. You don't have to perfectly destroy the papers. Just make it cost more to get the data than the data's worth. Even the most basic methods (straight shredder) will deter most thieves. Unless you're being specifically targeted, there's always the idiot down the street (or next door) that's an easier target.

  113. Newer methods by AndreyF · · Score: 1
    Everything I read about this seems to note that there is a new generation of identity thieves comming about... I wonder what methods they use...
    • phone/fax tapping
    • worms, viruses, etc. reporting back documents
    any other ideas?
  114. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

    And the $1500 models make a perfect Christmas gift for that special someone in your life.

  115. Re:THERE'S REALLY ONLY ONE QUESTION, MR. GOATSE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  116. No you didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    so logged on as root & changed permissions so I could read anything in his directory tree

    You know, as root you don't need to change permissions in order to read/write his files. That's why it's called superuser, it has read access to everything.

    Either you're a troll, or you're a pretty stupid sysadmin for not knowing this. If I were you're boss, you'd be fired right now for abusing your sysop powers, for not destroying his home dir in the first place when he left and for being stupid overall.

    1. Re:No you didn't by TheMidget · · Score: 2, Informative
      You know, as root you don't need to change permissions in order to read/write his files.

      He was root on an NFS client, browsing files on the server. In that situation, root (on the client) is mapped to nobody on the server, i.e. not very useful.

      In order to read the data, he need to change his identity to the file's owner first.

      Either you're a troll, or you're a pretty stupid sysadmin for not knowing this.

      Or, maybe he had only the root password of a couple of NFS clients, but not the server?

      for not destroying his home

      If he was not the sysadmin of the server, it was none of his responsibility to do this kind of cleanup when the guy left.

    2. Re:No you didn't by mikewas · · Score: 1
      This is fodder for another thread.

      I am not the sysadmin, nor would I want to be. We've been downsized to the point where our sysadmin isn't always available -- he does have a life. I have root access for emergency use, when he's not available, though in a real emergency I'd get somebody with real skills.

      I prefer to not stay logged on as root.

      The directory had data that was needed, and it is customary at my company to leave old home directories in place. When employees leave they are tasked with cleaning their own home directory, in this case he had over a month to purge personal files.

      No, I did not browse through all of his personal files. Once I figured out what was there I did log back on as root & blocked access to the private files.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  117. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Entropy248 · · Score: 1

    Or combine your $30 shredder with a $0.75 lighter...

  118. It seems to me by ajs318 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems to me that the problem is a social one, not a technological one, and therefore we should be looking for solutions in the social domain.

    Somebody who knows me is better qualified to say "That is the real ajs318" {or not} than some piece of machinery ever will be. A human being can check subtle things like signatures far more reliably than a machine. But the corporate mentality seems to be far too trusting of machines and far too distrustful of human beings. It's well known that humans make mistakes, but who designed and built the machines?

    In Britain, we have a National Insurance Number as a unique per-person identifier, but it is only used for taxation purposes. Also, your employer is responsible for stopping your tax right out of your wages before you ever see them, making it physically impossible for the working classes to commit tax fraud.

    With no national identity card, anyone requiring ID has to seek it from multiple sources ..... usually official letters such as gas / electricity statements and bank statements for your address, and a passport or driving licence for your signature and photo. If you join a video club, for example, you might have to produce two bills and a signature, and you'll get a card which is only good for renting videos; there is no information on the video card that links it back to the papers you submitted. Of course you could mug someone on their way to or from joining a video club and get their papers that way, but if you already knew what they were about to do you probably already know enough about them.

    Now, your name and address are published in the telephone directory. So places insist on official letters. Of course these could be forged ..... but it's recognised that the name and address aren't enough, so other documents are also usually required. {And if, say, my electric bill shows I paid 10 last Saturday, they might want to see my payment card and make sure the account number matches.} Most places also require a signature, and you may even be required to sign the form in front of them. It does take skill to forge signatures with an audience ..... I could do a very convincing one of my last-but-one boss's, but nowhere near as quickly as he could.

    It seems the problem in the USA is that the social security number {which uniquely identifies a person} is treated as though it were a secret, unknown to any entity beyond the person it identifies. That clearly is not the case. Look at how PGP works ..... there is a published part known to everybody, a secret part known only to one individual and a mathematical relationship that makes it difficult to determine the secret part from the published part. If I just send you ajs318's public key, that doesn't prove I am ajs318. If I sign something with ajs318's secret key, and you can recover it with ajs318's public key, then that at least proves I know ajs318's secret key, and there's a better chance that I might actually be ajs318. It seems to me that the SSN {which identifies without authentiation} is being misused.

    The other thing is, when you go into somewhere like a newsagent's shop, you are recognised by the regular staff there. {Kids in my old village used to shoplift from the local newsagents' once at most. The items they took got added onto their parents' slate.} The point is, the main identity used in that situation is the person themself, which is hard to forge. In a large impersonal supermarket, there is less potential for recognition, so if you pay by payment card or credit card then they require a signature {though trials are underway where the shopper will merely have to enter a 4-digit PIN, thus relieving the cashier of the responsibility to check a signature and not at all paving the way for brand new opportunities in crime}; on the Internet, none at all.

    If you want security, stick with old fashioned pound notes, because they can only steal as many of those as you actually have. And, until they get RFID in money, it's untraceable. You can't look at a 20 note and see it was won in a poker game, for instance.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:It seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      {though trials are underway where the shopper will merely have to enter a 4-digit PIN, thus relieving the cashier of the responsibility to check a signature and not at all paving the way for brand new opportunities in crime};

      In The Netherlands, the vast majority of payments work this way. It's actually reasonably safe; when you enter the number, the machine "dials" to your bank and verifies whether this PIN belongs to this card.

    2. Re:It seems to me by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but my concern is that it is far quicker to memorise a four-digit number than to learn to forge a signature. And the machine can't pick up on as many subtle clues as an experienced human being. Awkward pen holding angles, facial expressions, hesitation, that sort of thing. If the thief has to spend an hour perfecting an imitation of a signature and the associated body language, then you have an hour in which to discover and report the card stolen. In an urban area, there are more security personnel available; in a rural area, people are naturally suspicious of strangers. {Now hold on there a minute, bawy. I knows you ain't ol' Jed Baxter, 'cause the Jed Baxter done gotten him a wooden leg, an' your two legs there, see, they don't look to me like they's a-made o' woood ..... <sound of shotgun being loaded>}

      It would perhaps be more secure if the hologram on the card was of the cardholder. Then the thief would at least have to look like the victim as well as be able to remember four digits. Surely this is possible nowadays? Actually, even if it isn't used for bank cards, a 3D digital camera would be a bloody nice toy :-)

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:It seems to me by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the problem is a social one, not a technological one

      The use of the term "social engineering" to mean tricking people into giving you protected data dilutes the real meaning of the term. "Social engineering" refers to the mass conditioning of people to do what you want them to do. While "social engineering" is a term adopted by the tech crowd, it ignores the global ramifications.

      Keep using it, though, sociologists will keep fixing your mistakes.

    4. Re:It seems to me by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Steady on there, tiger. I never mentioned "social engineeering". For what it's worth, I agree with your observations. Persuading someone to hand over a password &c. is just a straightforward confidence trick - manipulation by deception. What you're talking about is propaganda - the means to manipulate a large audience through deliberate distorted messages. It goes on, too - and the subtler, the scarier.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  119. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by thogard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I end up with 0.25" by 1.5" confetti. Good luck putting that back together.

    Its simple, you dump the stuff out on a scaner, do a boundry scan and then run length encode each end and then sort thouse. The result is a map of how to put it all back together. No big deal and there is shareware that will do it.

    That size of paper is good for running through a blender with a bit of water.

  120. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by karb · · Score: 1
    For USD$25, I end up with 0.25" by 1.5" confetti. Good luck putting that back together.

    As the article noted, never underestimate the computing power of a meth junkie.

    Better to turn it into sawdust. And then burn it.

    --

    Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

  121. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

    "But seriously, we use a shredding company here at my office for our important papers."

    I never figured that one out completely. If you want document security, the answer is to collect up all the most important, most embarassing, most confidential documents, and then give that pile of paper to someone who puts it in his van and promises to shred it sometime.

    Yeah right...

    Would be cool to buy a shredding company though, and then make a huge lump of money on the stock market with insider knowledge of lots of companies. Not that people would ever modify their ethics if there were phenomenal amounts of money involved.

  122. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

    "Why do we use them? Because it would take me two or three days to destroy a single box of paper records that we have. I don't have time for that."

    I know this isn't the official opinion of the shredder company, but... have you ever considered a bonfire?

    I know if I had a box full of paper to securely dispose of, I would't be feeding each sheet into a shredder...

  123. automated reassembling shredded files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.stern.de/id/computer-technik/computer/5 15817.html
    They have a little problem scanning the confetti though..

  124. This is where you should be worried... by blankmange · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I work for the fed. Our sensitive material is shredded through a large, commercial shredder. It only does a vertical shred, so you could reconstruct fairly easily. The best part is this: once the shredding is bagged, it goes out to our dumpster out back in the alley. It is not secure, guarded, or anything else.

    Also, per our regulations, if you don't run it through the shredder, you have to manually tear up the piece of paper 6 times. This is social security numbers, addresses, medical information, etc.

    I have often wondered how wrong this is, but my boss never seems concerned when I bring it up.
    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    1. Re:This is where you should be worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for the Fed too. That nasty three letter agency everyone loves to hate because they think we take their money. Actually we just enforce the taking, Congress is the one of specifies what to take. Anyways we have this big rule about how you are supposed to put sensitive materials in our burn barrels. In our city, a local article reported that the firm we were using was simply taking our shred stuff and tossing it in the trash. Just lovely.

  125. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    a fire is good for a few papers, but not if you have a lot of paper in neat stacks.
    A few years ago i burned around 10KG of old records (they were on some kind of ultra thin paper that made shredding a pain in the ass).
    It burned quite well, than smoldered and went out. the next day i went through the ashes and there were whole piles that werent burned at all. Paper can be quite a good insulation, and the heat of the fire quickly goes up, not touching the heavy paper stacks at the botton of the light ash.

    In the end, it was a really big mess to clean up (i wanted to wash the ash away with water->lots of drenched paper...), so i bought a better shredder.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  126. only a desperate many could get my info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    i always throw personal info shreaded into the bottom of the bag i empty the cat litter into. If someone wants it THAT bad they can have it

  127. The problem is that you dont' have the papers.. by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    You personally might not have a lot of papers with this information on them, but the companies you deal with probably do. If you read the article, it talks about how the group in question would harvest papers from dumpsters outside of accountants, law firms, hospitals, colleges, ect. All of these businesses generate lots of paper, some of it with information like Social Security numbers, and they don't always dispose of it properly. THAT is what's scary - that it's the actions of another organization that can screw up YOUR credit rating for life.

  128. Not after you shit all over them. (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  129. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by nameer · · Score: 1

    Because you can't fit a binder of blueprints into a 8-1/2" wide shredder.

    --
    "Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?" --Pinky
  130. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use lighter fluid...
    if it was good enough for caesar's military missives, it should be good enough for you.
    really, just get a small funace setup... something with a draft.

  131. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by fataugie · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OK, true story...

    Before my illustrative career in IT, I worked in the Facilities dept. of a bank (S&L to be exact). We were responsible for all sorts of things, one of which was transporting cancled checks to storage after microfilming, and after 1 yr retention, we would remove them and hand them over to a recycling company. Potential problems with the path the check took:

    After microfilming, they were bundled into archive boxes and handed over to us. We hated that duty. At the time when I was there, we transported the boxes either in the back of a pickup truck or in a van. More than once, a cover blew off and scattered canceled checks down the highway. Yes, we stopped and tried to pick up the ones that got loose...but you know they were'nt all retrieved. Also, more than once after reaching the storage facility, the boxes would sometimes get stacked to high on the carts and I saw at least twice bundles of checks scattered in the snow-ladden street. Those were all retrieved, but God help the poor sucker that needed the original check for court or something. Hope that microfilm was of good quality.

    During storage, access was restriced to Records dept. or Facilities...but if anyone in either dept wanted to go into the storage room, there was no checkin/checkout. Anyone that had a key had total unrestriced access to every box in there and the millions of canceled checks, account numbers, addresses, names, phone numbers, signature samples...you get the picture.

    Probably the most troublesome to me was after the year was up, we would turn the checks over to some very scary individuals that worked for the recycling company. More than once I saw checks fall out of the barrels and be left in the street for anyone to pickup.

    Now, before you all give me shit for not complaining...I did. I also tried my best to not let any of those things described above happen, but there's only so much I can do.

    Eventually, I got out of there, the S&L was bought out and security was tightned up.

    Don't EVEN ask about the executive area shredding we did (that we weren't supposed to do but the secretary was too lazy so she had us do it). I had access to the board of directors meetings as well as the hand written notes of the members. And I didn't even have to get dirty in a dumpster.

    No, I never used that info for stock trading, never disclosed that to anyone other than my wife, and I destroyed everything I was asked to....mostly. :-)

    --

    WTF? Over?

  132. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    That would be a sulution, yes.
    But also overkill :)
    And actually people start complaining if you create a miniature blast furnance in your backyard, you know :)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  133. Dumpster Diving by satanslackey · · Score: 1

    Probably this has been pointed out by others, but it seems the real problem is that credit card companies issue cards without effective identity verification; easy for them, and then the rest of us have to pay the price. Things have to change -- here's a suggestion. Why not require a credit card applicant to make an in-person appearance at the local Motor Vehicle Department (or a bank, or a police station, or whatever), to verify identity on the application (and require the credit card company to pay for the verification, of course, out of respect for their customers, heh, heh). What do the rest of you think?

  134. Supermail boxes by freeweed · · Score: 1

    They're called Supermail boxes. They're pretty handy from a security standpoint, but a real bitch if you live in the praries and have to go get your mail when it's -40 out :)

    However, at least in the West, you only see them in newer neighbourhoods (late 80's and newer). So most Canadians still have never used them, and fight against adoption strongly. The "to your door" service is something a lot of people don't want to live without.

    I've lived with both off and on, and honestly, when you're waiting for a new credit card to arrive, or something, it's VERY nice to have it locked up until you get it. What did suck though, was at first, the parcel compartments would often have more than one person's mail in them. You and others all got a "B" key, and you were only supposed to take what was yours. I don't know if this was a screw up, or actual policy at the time, but for at least a year back around 1989 I saw several hundred CDs, VHS tapes, and books that I could easily have swiped. I'm pretty sure they can't prove it was me based on "who else had the key", but who knows. Made me less excited about using mail order for a while, though.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  135. Tweakers vs. Shredders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    From the article... "Like many identity-theft rings in the United States, Massey and Melton's enterprise employed scores of petty criminals addicted to methamphetamine. "It's a very typical combination," Hoar, the federal prosecutor, explained. "The meth user tends to be more prone to this type of behavior than other drug users." To a person on meth, tasks that might otherwise seem boring -- like sorting thousands of tax forms or reconstructing shredded patient records -- are said to become oddly enthralling. Meth could turn slackers into hyperefficient paper pushers."

  136. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
    ... old badges, bernoulli disks, floppies, backup tapes, CD's, last year's Xmas fruitcake, whistleblowers, etc.

    Although it won't handle the entire list presented above, this shredder seems to do pretty well, and currently only costs $49.99.

    "Media Destroyer"

    --
    Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  137. hey.. by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    only reason I ever go dumpster diving is to get the computers.. and get linux on them asap.
    or keep them for parts, I dont give a fuck about someone else's info, honestly, I couldnt remember half of it anyways.
    I once found an old powermac in the trash, but I got beaten up for it on the way home by some kids...who ended up setting it on fire.. they just wanted something to set on fire... dumbasses.
    but anyways, my point is that I often see many computers with shit still on the hard dtives..
    these people need to grab a linux cd and run fdformat on their hard drives (it works btw)
    and then do cat /dev/null > /dev/hda
    and then just to make sure.. cat /dev/random > /dev/hda.. then ditch the computer.
    though I suggest doing all of them about 3 times just to make sure data is so lost it cant ever be recovered.

    1. Re:hey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If there is a sound card fitted, dd if=/dev/dsp of=/dev/hda will give it some real entropy from static and power hum.

      One overwrite is enough as long as the data is random. Not only can you not tell a 1 that used to be a 0 from a 1 that always was a 1, or a 0 that used to be a 1 from a 0 that was always a 0, but you don't know whether the 1 or 0 it used to have been got overwritten with a 1 or a 0. You might be able to tell something of past history by opening up the drive; but, as storage densities get higher and higher, there are fewer and fewer oxide molecules used to store each bit and so the chances of there being anything useful are diminishing.

      Also, credit card numbers are only valid for a few years, and some people change their card every 6 months or so to take advantage of an introductory offer ..... there are enough card companies that you can do the Grand Tour and the first company will have forgotten about you by the time you re-apply for a card with them.

  138. One word: Diapers by SEGV · · Score: 1

    Diapers do a nice job of it.

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
  139. Dangers involved by mummers · · Score: 1, Funny

    I know some people jump off cliffs to prove their manliness and others off of buildings for the sheer thrill of it. I cannot understand why someone would willingly dive into a dumpster to find their true self. And from what height are people diving? Serious injury or even death could result with an impact into solid material.

    Just consider what could happen if you dived into a seemingly benign dumpster only to encounter a used drug addicts needle. The number of possible infections you could catch just don't bear thinking about.

    I for one believe that this potentially lethal sport should be strictly regulated as soon as possible. Venues could be provided with deep dumpsters filled with sanitised foam cubes and safe diving platforms.

    Please people, if you feel the need to dive into a public dumpster, or even your own, to 'discover' your identity, stop and think. It's just not worth the potential damage you could cause yourself and the resulting heartache for your friends and relations.

    --
    --This isn't a man who is leaving with his head between his legs.
  140. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fully agree. I worked for a business that was victim of industrial spying before I got in.

    They had the best shredder I have ever seen. In 2 minutes I could shred 1 month of paper, including hand written notes, design/SPEC documents drafts, code listing (and I had a lot of these). I even started to put in all my old mail from home (bills, visa report, tax document, ...)

    At my last job they had the 30$ kind, I could not shred more than 1 sheet at a time; I had to shred my stack every 2-3 days at it was still a 10-15 minute job. After a month, like everyone else (including the VPs) I simply did not bother anymore and just use the garbage bin.

    If you are a business with more than 15 engineers (+finance, marketting, tech writers), the industrial shredder is well worth it.

  141. i think you're all forgetting something... by painehope · · Score: 3, Informative

    very important. Screw your home dumpster, screw your office. The most dangerous place for your credit cards is where you shop. It's a really bad idea to shop anywhere that prints out credit card receipts w/ full numbers, or takes ( shudder ) a direct print of your card.

    Want to know why? The manager that collects all those receipts might be honest enough, but do you know what a lot of those places do w/ their receipts? After anywhere from 1-3 years, a lot of them just throw boxes full of them in the dumpster. A college bookstore I worked at when I was starting college did just that. Literally thousands of credit card receipts w/ full pin numbers, signatures, and names in the bin. A lot places shred that receipts when they're done, but some don't. And think of the traffic a college bookstore generates.

    Before you say anything like "well, you didn't have an id, address, or a social or anything like that", imagine the damage I could have done had I been so inclined to steal some of those numbers and then used them where I had a friend on the inside. Or done the digging to find that person's SSN, address, or whatever.

    Trust me, I was so tempted to finance the rest of college education w/ a little bit of scamming. Thankfully, I had a hellish cunt of a girlfriend that ruined my life so badly that I dropped out of college and went to work in IT.

    Damn...now that I think about, maybe theft was the better option...

    --
    PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  142. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by doubleadesign · · Score: 1

    What about fax software? Easy faxing iis new for the OSX operating system and if i had to print everything to fax it i'd just save the time and paper by using the internal fax software which works great. I don't know what kind of computer your company makes you work with but, acording to all my PC loving friends, where there is a MAc version there are supposedly dozens of PC versions. So, I can only assume this would be a super easy solution. most computers have a built in modem and the software is most likely cheaper than a fax machine and you could be more productive. you could probably get paid to suft the net while switching to fax another document once in a while. I hope this spurs some ideas and makes your work day in the future a better, happier and healthier one.

  143. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have reference for the fact that data can be retrieved from the toner cartridges? I have a legitimate concern. I may not understand how the printer works, but it seems like the cartridge just spits out powder. What am I missing?

  144. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *shrug* So I noticed after posting. It makes my final statement doubly true ;)

  145. Re:do it yourself! by Technician · · Score: 1

    My favorite for expired credit cards after cutting them up is to enclose them in one of the grandchildren's soiled diapers. I don't think they get checked often for anything of value. It also relieves the burden of burning the plastic.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  146. Re:people with the resources by Technician · · Score: 1

    Sorry I don't have a link, but I remember something about scanning all the pieces on a flatbed scanner and having a computer program do a best fit with some human help to reassemble the document. I guess the computer was good at finding probable best fit pieces instead of fully doing the job manualy is a way to cut out a large part of the work.

    I prefer to mix several jobs together for dilution and then bin it for several pick-ups. The chance of getting a complete enough document to reconstruct becomes slim.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  147. Misses the real Problem by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
    They really Miss the real Problem, the real problem is that it requires to little in the way of info to identify yourself as who you are these days, here in Australia to talk to social security and id myself, all I need is my name in full (sort of usually dropping middle names), my address and my date of birth. Really how hard is it to know all that for people your aren't even close to???.

    If I'm asked for more then it'll be stuff like bank card, credit card, licence, Medicare card. non being totally secure, though that does improve it.

    how do we improve this hmmmm not easy, one thing I've noticed here in New South Wales (my state), is that my latest licence has not just the one photo in the usual place, but on the left under my licence number and date of birth is another copy of it in the background, thats good makes it that little bit more work to fake. Then they've got a scanned copy of my signature, which I had to give at the time, on the bottom of the background picture. They've also put my full name (plus both middles) above my address, and my full name again across the bottom of the traditional photo, (across the neck and shoulders), Finally they've got the water marking, right through the card, not just the background but since the photo is digital, right through both photos and everything else. So clearly someone in the Road Traffic Authority here has put some thought into this issue.

    But clearly this does not suffice, as this is only one step in the chain, and even all of this can be over come.

    The biometrics people will say they are the answer, well to a point they can help yes, finger print scanners if done under proper supervision to prevent exploits which are already know to exist might work; facial scanning, yeah right; Hand-print scanning, might be good, at least it would be hard to fake the general size and shape of your hand.

    In short there a no complete answers yet, especially when we factor in phone and internet identification, but hell we sure must find some better ones. Remembering of course that this whole issue is closely related to privacy, on one hand we don't necessarily want these organisations to know everything about us, on the other hand there can be very few if any violations of our privacy greater than having our identity stolen.

    NB: With the privacy issue we do we do well to remember:
    1. some information about us doesn't need to be private.
    2. The whole police state thing is a bit of a nonsense, a police state can come about just as easily without this, most of them did, and once established said police state, both can and will institute it's own far more extreme id system. so Good Id system != police state
    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  148. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    The "negative" of what you last printed remains on the drum. When you say that it just "spits out powder" you are correct - but it gets spit out into english. (or whatever kind of info.) I have only a basic knowledge of how they work, but I've seen it before when changing my own toner, and I have no reason to doubt this.

    --
    C|N>K
  149. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am the end of the line for the files. We scan them and store them for two years before the paper is destroyed.

    Due to high turn-over rate and moronic previous employees this is a sad truth that we must keep up.

  150. Re: First shred, then recycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    After the cross-cut and moistening, take it out back and mix it into the compost pile. Nothing like a bunch of manure and kitchen garbage to keep folks from trying to reassemble your data!


    This is for your "ornamental" compost only--don't put stuff of unknown formulation (toner, ink jet pigments, etc.) into compost used on edible plants.

  151. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by volpe · · Score: 1

    I'm now using a $30 shredder BEFORE I dump anything in our shred bins!

    I feel your pain. My wife makes me wash dishes before putting them in the dishwasher.

  152. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by timshea · · Score: 1

    PickOS on an ADDS mainframe.

  153. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by tswann01 · · Score: 1

    I just got a cheap cross-cut shredder from Staples for $27.94 plus, and there is an $8 mail-in rebate to boot. And yes, they have a nice little Prevent Identity Theft sign next to their shredders.

  154. Re:Shredding doesn't offer much protection either. by Eil · · Score: 1


    I have the second-cheapest cross-shredder I could buy from WallyWorld (Yeah, I know, evil, but show me a Mom&Pop that carries cross-shredders). For USD$25, I end up with 0.25" by 1.5" confetti. Good luck putting that back together.

    I believe I have the same paper cutter. On a whim, I once waited until the basket was full and then scooped out about 1/3 of the shreddings and spreaded them out on a table. I shredded nothing but plain white similar-looking documents. In about 45 minutes, I was able to piece 6 of them back together enough to get some useful information out of them. It would have been difficult, but not nearly impossible, for someone to piece *all* of the papers in the bin back together. If some of the pieces of paper were different color or had dinstinct patterns, it would be several orders of magnitude easier. And to think that they even have *software* these days that does this.

    Simply put, you are not safe until your paper is either pulpified or shredded into very very tiny pieces (about the size of a large grain of rice).