Slashdot Mirror


Still No Contact from Beagle 2

Many of you have submitted this, so this will be a condensing of the relevant information. WebfishUK writes: "The BBC has just released this story which announces the failure of the latest and possibly best chance to contact the British built Mars probe, Beagle 2. Given that Mars Express was designed to communicate with Beagle (unlike the earlier attempts with NASA's Mars Odyssey), this may indicate that something catastrophic has happened to Beagle 2." From Bromrrrrr: "[The] ESA is reporting that the Mars Express, which everybody was hoping would be able to get through to the poor lost puppy, has failed its first attempt. 'We have not lost hope yet to contact Beagle 2, but we also know that it has landed on an unforgiving planet,' said David Southwood, ESA's Director of Science." and I-R-Baboon adds: "The Mars Express mothership from the EU passed 350 km over the intended landing site of the Beagle 2 hearing only silence. Although nothing was heard, hope has not been given up yet, as scientists will keep trying until February, with more passovers of the Beagle 2's landing site on January 8th, 9th, 10th, 12th, and 14th." Additional updates can be obtained from the Beagle 2 homepage as well as from the ESA's homepage for the Mars Express. Here's hoping that the lander is only down, and not out.

637 comments

  1. Calling it quits? by ActionPlant · · Score: 3, Funny

    So do they just give up, or hope Spirit can eventually find it and give it a doggie biscuit?

    Damon,

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
    1. Re:Calling it quits? by TehHustler · · Score: 5, Informative

      They're in completely different places, and each MER can move at 0.02 MPH, top ;) So, not a chance :(

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    2. Re:Calling it quits? by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

      But hey, the U.S. is big on mercy missions. Maybe if they just point it in the right direction and wait a few years...that's what we do with most of our probes anyway, right? What's the difference?

      Damon,

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    3. Re:Calling it quits? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      That's too bad. I was hoping that Spirit might be able to investigate Beagle when it's mission is over. Maybe even give beagle a nudge if it's upside down or something. Of course, any time taken to investigate the Beagle failure is that much less time devoted to science on Mars. And and doubt congress would appreciate NASAs use of the publics tax dollars in this manor either.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Calling it quits? by snake_dad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just in case you (or someone else) don't know: the solar panels degrade over time because of dust build up. So at some point it will just run out of juice...

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    5. Re:Calling it quits? by ActionPlant · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe they should have installed wipers...

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    6. Re:Calling it quits? by Jboy_24 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I second the motion, how stupid was it to provide no means of "dusting" the solar panels?

      Since it folded up its solar panels for flight is it possible to re fold them up and knock some dust off?

    7. Re:Calling it quits? by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excellent idea. We could build a dedicated Beagle-repair-bot and launch it and have it land on Mars, for somewhere around 1 billion dollars. Then it could land near Beagle and repair it, giving us 40 million dollars worth of scientific data from the Beagle site.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    8. Re:Calling it quits? by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

      Our margins have been worse. Those numbers look good to me!

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    9. Re:Calling it quits? by ActionPlant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps NASA was counting on the wind to keep it reasonably clean for an extended period of time.

      But I'm asking because I really don't know. Was this thing built to withstand a dust storm?

      Damon,

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    10. Re:Calling it quits? by uberdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always thought that they should use a roll of cellophane, like you'd find on an overhead projector. Once the cellophane is dusty, you just roll out a fresh section.

    11. Re:Calling it quits? by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You're calling the people who built, launched and sent a semi-autonomous probe through space and landed it on another planet stupid?

      What is your definition of smart, then?

      Oh, and I'll give kudos to the scientists... they clearly deserve it. But I can't rehire them. I'd like to know what politicians funded this so I can make sure they get hired again (or at least cast my vote). Anybody know?

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    12. Re:Calling it quits? by Eccles · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're calling the people who built, launched and sent a semi-autonomous probe through space and landed it on another planet stupid?

      Hey, it's not rocket sci -- er, um, never mind.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    13. Re:Calling it quits? by dotwaffle · · Score: 1

      hang on... 0.02MPH... How long would that take... Can't take too long... Maybe we ought to encourage George Bush to invade Mars, as they have WMD and as an aside, they can go locate it for us! Oh wait, you DON'T care about the British...

    14. Re:Calling it quits? by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds to me like Martian wind is more likely to blow dust onto the solar panels, killing them prematurely, rather than blowing them off and saving them.

      Besides, windshield wipers would have been infeasible; where on Mars would they buy Wiper fluid from when they run out? ;)

    15. Re:Calling it quits? by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 3, Informative

      The panels did fold up, but they were held by pyrotechnic fasteners. When the rover unfolds, the pyros blow and the panels drop by gravity. There's no way to fold them up again.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    16. Re:Calling it quits? by flewp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Erm, if someone on Slashdot (or any normal person) thought of this idea, do you really think they DIDN'T consider it?

      I mean for the love of god, as someone already said, how can you call people who sent a semi-autonomous robot through space to land on another planet stupid? (Which might I add, entails strapping a machine with sensitive equipment onto a massive, giant, firework. It then has to survive extremely violent vibrations during launch, which involves igniting thousands and thousands of pounds of propellant. Then it needs to survive radation and other nasties out in space. Then it has to go through an atmosphere (a weaker one than ours, but an atmosphere nonetheless) and survive extreme heat buildup, only to have a parachute be released which produces a short burst of extreme G's (or whatever you'd get from a quick, violent slowdown, and I could be wrong, I just assume it would be pretty violent), and then, on top of all that, it could bounce on inflated airbags for miles until it finally comes to a rest near, if not on the target zone, unfolds, and then sends pictures and other data back to Earth? Yeah, they're stupid allright.)

      Perhaps wipers would have scratched dust or the equivelant of sand across the solar panels worse than just the wind. Or maybe the wind is enough to keep them operating until other parts of the machine fail.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    17. Re:Calling it quits? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      The TV cameras on NASCAR cars have a cool cleaning thing in front of the lens.

      -B

    18. Re:Calling it quits? by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

      Target?

      --
      http://actionPlant.com
    19. Re:Calling it quits? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not a matter of the cleanliness of the panels, but of the damage the dust causes them. IF it was merely about the presence of the dust, then the first gust of wind would fix the problem. The problem is that the dust scratches the panels when it blows across them.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    20. Re:Calling it quits? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      What cool thing? How does it work?

    21. Re:Calling it quits? by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're calling the people who built, launched and sent a semi-autonomous probe through space and landed it on another planet stupid?

      On the surface, they would appear to be equally as smart as the people who built, launched, and sent a semi-autonomous probe through space, but failed to get it into orbit around Mars because of a mid-flight command error that most people would call stupid. I don't believe either team is stupid, but both teams are equally prone to honest mistakes. There are sometimes glaring design optimizations that could have been made, but somehow just were not thought about for whatever reason.

      I don't think that's likely the case here, but just because they're rocket scientists, it doesn't magically mean they've become infallible.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    22. Re:Calling it quits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's dead, Jim.

    23. Re:Calling it quits? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well this is the same org that wasted 300+ million dollars because the couldn't do metric/english conversion correctly...

    24. Re:Calling it quits? by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There are sometimes glaring design optimizations that could have been made, but somehow just were not thought about for whatever reason.

      Ask 'em. Most people at NASA are happy to talk about their work. It's not generally classified, and there's no NDA. When the really obvious or cool stuff is prefaced with "Why didn't you..." the response is almost always "We thought about that, but we didn't have the -foo- budget". Where foo is time, money, materials, weight or space. Often there are lots of cool ideas and the end result is much more simple and less featureful... but the remaining features are rock solid and tested 20 times to Sunday.

      Some features are also dropped because a team (sometimes in an outside company) couldn't deliver their package on deadline and fully tested. Each payload tends to have a couple dozen little projects each provided by some university. Sometimes when one project is trimmed, for structural or other reasons, a perfectly good project is also cut.

      So there's lots of thought into these probes. An amazing amount. Pretty much anything that you think is stupid has been done for a reason, and the ultimate reason is "we didn't want the whole probe to fail, so we simplified it". It's a very expensive shot, and if the solar panels don't deploy because the mechanism was over-engineered and got brittle in space (cold + radiation), the whole project is dead.

      Depending on where you live, NASA and JPL has a pretty good lecture circuit going, and they have speakers that really know their stuff... even the astronauts. They are incredibly conservative engineers, and it seems to me that they should be - even with very conservative engineering, keeping everything as simple and as tested as possible, they run into problems. On a shakedown cruise of a new battleship, they can dock back again if there's a problem... or just fix it at sea. NASA is using up massively complex systems that have to work the first time they are tested. And then the design is thrown away because tech (materials, computer and science knowledge) has advanced by the next time they shoot. Plus they are an open organization that works with hundreds of companies and universities and has to QA everything.

      If it sounds like I'm awestruck by them, it's for a simple reason. Everytime I have ever talked to somebody from NASA or JPL about the details of space I have always been totally impressed by their operation.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    25. Re:Calling it quits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that NASA's Mars Climate Orbiter Mission?

      Just a hunch

      y

    26. Re:Calling it quits? by FarmerDave · · Score: 1

      I was hoping that they could send the Spirit to find the Beagle (yes, I *know* it would take a gazillion years), where it would whip out its spinning blades, and.... Battlebots: Mars! My only question is who would run the obstacles - the Chinese?

      --

      THINK
    27. Re:Calling it quits? by hplasm · · Score: 1
      Ha! Spirit ran Beagle over when it ran out from behind a rock and tried to bite it's wheels.

      antipedant> Yes, I Know That They Are 000's Of Miles Apart... /antipedant>

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    28. Re:Calling it quits? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Ask 'em. Most people at NASA are happy to talk about their work. It's not generally classified, and there's no NDA. When the really obvious or cool stuff is prefaced with "Why didn't you..." the response is almost always "We thought about that, but we didn't have the -foo- budget". Where foo is time, money, materials, weight or space. Often there are lots of cool ideas and the end result is much more simple and less featureful... but the remaining features are rock solid and tested 20 times to Sunday.

      I have the privilege of counting as a friend an ex-Marshall Space Flight Center engineer that has some of his hardware on the way to Saturn at present, my ex-girlfriend's sister works at JPL (Opportunity is her team's baby), and my late uncle did quite a bit of work with the Saturn group out at the Cape, so I know of which you speak. From talking to them, I also know that things don't always go 100% according to plan, sometimes because the plan itself wasn't 100%. :-) It wasn't my intention to lessen any of the achievements that have come from any of these remarkable engineering teams, just to point out that people can and do make mistakes, regardless of their abilities. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    29. Re:Calling it quits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the "Hubble Wars", the ultimate look at big
      science and engineering fubar. Then tell us how
      impressed you are with the Nasa process.

    30. Re:Calling it quits? by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

      It work like an automated version of motocross blades. the lens has a plastic cover over it. When oil or road crap get on it, two spindles wind to "advance the roll to a cleaner part". Kind of like the never ending circular bathroom towel or some winding overhead projectors, just motorized.

      Motocross and paintball goggles have covers that you just pull off when they get dirty. Unfortunately there is no one in the car to pull them off the camera in NASCAR, just like there is no one on Mars to pull solar panel grit covers off

      Probably they didn't do this becuasd those covers are really cheap (and thus not totally transparent). This would mean less solar energy in the long run, plus scratches from dust that got under the cover when the mechanism winds (i.e. if it's going to get scratched anyway, why do it?).

      --
      - Sig
    31. Re:Calling it quits? by Jboy_24 · · Score: 1

      While I'm sure the engineers aren't stupid, the idea that the main reason the probe will cease operation is the acumilation of dust on the solar panels seems really really stupid.

      To me, it would be like creating a extremely complicated and great program that would die in 90 days becuase its logs would fill up the Hard Drive.

    32. Re:Calling it quits? by Jboy_24 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I call designing such an incredible machine that does all that you described, yet dies because of dust acumuliation stupid.

      If I designed an incredbile software program that died 90 days after completion because the logs filled up the hard drives, no one would be calling me smart.

    33. Re:Calling it quits? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Accumulation of dust or pitting due to dust damage? I have yet to see that anywhere but here. I'm not saying that it's not true, but AFAIK, the source is one /. poster. I couldn't find a reference on NASA's site.

      Even if it is true, a solar panel wiping system would be complex, and NASA is big on the KISS principle. Better three months of working than a potential year's lifespan and a probe that dosen't work. Plus, what's the lifespan of the other parts? They are incredibly conservative, as they can't kick it with the toe of their shoe if something doesn't unfold right or it gets caught on something. They are taking nine days to even drive off the platform (in case it pitches down facefirst they still get nine days worth of data).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  2. martians! by XO · · Score: 3, Funny

    Damn, those martians shot down another one of our probes!

    They have much better aim than, say, Saddam Hussein's SCUD missle launchers!

    Hey, maybe Saddam hid his better weapons of mass destruction ON MARS!!!!!!!!!!!

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    1. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless you want Bush to invade mars, I suggest you keep quiet.

    2. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how a pre-emptive strike would work out with an alien race and us.

    3. Re:martians! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Troll

      Who mods this crap as funny? Do you really think this is funny? Did you laugh at this comment even a little? Yeah, I thought not.

    4. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly where the US military belongs.

    5. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonder about first contact first

    6. Re:martians! by efaust93 · · Score: 1

      Funny, you had to submit your anti-Bush comments as an Anonymous COWARD!

      --
      e. Faust
    7. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immigration to the USA in 2002 was 1.4 million - a new record. Even the Arab population increased. So much for hating us.

    8. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Untill you need us to save your worthless skin again!

    9. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because the AC is not protected by the US Constitution! No 1st Amendment out there!

    10. Re:martians! by Avihson · · Score: 1

      Envy...Hate... Such similar emotions!

      Everyone hates us, but everyone tries to emulate us or immigrate to join us.

    11. Re:martians! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Nope.... Who would want to even go on holiday to a country that acted on the assumpion that you are a terrorist before your plane lands? And when it does you have to had in your fingerprints and personal details or it's straight to guatanamo bay, do not pass go, do no collect $200.

      No way. I'll stay in the free world thanks.

    12. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your loss

    13. Re:martians! by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Sheesh.

      ? And when it does you have to had in your fingerprints and personal details or it's straight to guatanamo bay, do not pass go, do no collect $200.

      Did you perhaps miss the reason that the tropical paradise that is Guatanamo Bay was chosen instead of, oh, one of those despicable, desolate deserts where we put our own Jappanese citizens?

      Because if they were on US soil, they'd be protected by hordes of US laws.

      Oh, sure, you have to get fingerprinted and tell us why you're here--but, really, once you're in, we don't much care what you do until it's time for you to leave.

    14. Re:martians! by tealover · · Score: 1

      I guess you won't be traveling to any country that requires fingerprinting for visas.

      Have a nice, provincial life.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    15. Re:martians! by darxyde · · Score: 0

      From what? An anal raping by culture fuckers like the US? Gimme a break. The world would survive quite happily without 'yall'.

      --
      Hey relax fella, you need a rest, guy.
    16. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read: Never ever

    17. Re:martians! by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 0

      Damn right we shot it down. The infidel spacecraft was destroyed at the gates of Mars. And if you want to see the wreckage, I will take you there in ONE HOUR.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    18. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They mod themselves, in case you haven't figured it out yet.

    19. Re:martians! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Oh, go pound sand you hater. Looks like you forgot to post AC this time.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    20. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Howard Dean nabs the Democratic nomination, our nation will be condemned to another four years of darkness and cruelty. Please, folks. Have some common sense.

    21. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of pathetic wrecks on the world so desperate they may move even into US.

      It doesn't mean they don't hate you. They just hate wherever they were before more, and haven't heard of better.

      Anyway, good they're swarming you, we wouldn't want that human waste here anyway, keep on attracting the trash so the gap to rest of the civilized world comes even wider!

    22. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would want to even go on holiday to a country that acted on the assumpion that you are a terrorist before your plane lands?

      I don't think its them acting on assumption that you are a terrorist, moreso not assuming that you aren't.

    23. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what? An anal raping by culture fuckers like the US? Gimme a break. The world would survive quite happily without 'yall'.

      I'm sure Hitlers regime would have agreed with you.

    24. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, it's the same reason why Nazi concentration camps were erected in Poland and not in Germany. Heil Bush.

    25. Re:martians! by jmertic · · Score: 1

      Damn, those martians shot down another one of our probes!

      The queers. They're in it with the aliens. They're build landing strips for gay martians. I swear to God!

    26. Re:martians! by XO · · Score: 1

      Are they gay nigger aliens from outer space? *boggle*

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    27. Re:martians! by darxyde · · Score: 0

      If Hitler were alive today, he'd be a proud American.

      --
      Hey relax fella, you need a rest, guy.
    28. Re:martians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sand niggers shouldn't be allowed on here.

  3. This calls for a ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haw-haw!

  4. next time by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why dont they include some sort of near-indestructible beacon that will send a signal in case of crash, so that orbiting probes can locate and photograph the crash site??

    1. Re:next time by TehHustler · · Score: 1

      Thats a very good idea, kind of like an aircraft black box? it should be located in the middle of the craft to have maximum protection from crash landings and the friction as it passes through the atmosphere.

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    2. Re:next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you expect to see? As I understand it, the Beagle 2 is about the size of one pixel of the highest resolution camera in orbit around Mars (1 meter).

    3. Re:next time by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      You've basically described the entire purpose of the lander probe itself. Land while avoiding destruction, transmit signal.

      --
      ...
    4. Re:next time by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 0

      the distances involved are so great that directional communication is the norm. if you cant guarantee a particular orientation (in the case of a crash, for instance) then it is highly unlikely that this would help at all. if its operation were made to be omnidirectional then it wouldnt help in tracking it either, its not like there are ppl on the surface looking through rubble. the best way to spot wreckage would be the good old fashioned way: optically...and even then it would come down to pixels that don't seem quite right.

    5. Re:next time by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

      NASA's Spirit actually sent telemetry tones back to the Odyssey orbiter as it started decending through the martian atmosphere. They meant things like:

      - "I have entered atmosphere and everything seems to be in order"
      - "I have started to bounce on the martian surface"
      - "I have stopped bouncing on the surface and is still alive"
      etc...

      It might still not be able to easily pinpoint where it crashed if it had done so, but it would at least work like a primitive "black box" doing the best it can to tell what went wrong. Since this is obviously also good to know to learn from mistakes. :-)

      Read more here.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:next time by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's kind of like asking why they don't make the whole airplane the way they make the black box.

      How heavily armored do you think that radio would have to be to survive hitting the surface at 10,000 mph? Or even 500 mph, for that matter? Flight data recorders aren't designed to keep functioning after a crash - they're designed to preserve the recording.

      Here's a better idea for a cheap 'beacon' - fill a bladder with a bunch of flourescent dye, then when it disappears you look for the big splat.

    7. Re:next time by relrelrel · · Score: 1

      This was planned, if you see my other post which explains why this was planned, but left out because of design limitations of the Mars Express.

      --
      --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
    8. Re:next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Flight data recorders aren't designed to keep functioning after a crash - they're designed to preserve the recording.

      Actually, they are - at least in the context the parent poster meant. Blackbox recorders do, in fact, have a beacon signal that's emitted after a crash - so that the blackbox can be found. This is especially useful for crashes over water.
    9. Re:next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be fucking great. And why don't we construct the entire craft just like this beacon?

    10. Re:next time by snake_dad · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Colin Pillinger was asked that very question: "WHY didn't you include such a device?". The answer was clear: to do that within the very limited weight restrictions (that already had been halved) it would have meant giving up more science. 5 kilograms worth of science. That's about 15% of the lander weight (without heat shield and such).

      It all boils down to: you build the best spacecraft that you can within budget and weight restraints, and hope for the best. Even if you build in a lot of redundancy, there is still chance of failure. At some point you need to decide what to do: take a chance, or lose science. I guess in the end different people will come to different conclusions on how much of a chance you're willing to take.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    11. Re:next time by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly, these rocket scientists are stupider than a typical Slashdotter. Next time, they ought to just Ask Slashdot before sending a probe, so that smart people like you can come up with ideas that they never would have thought of.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    12. Re:next time by michrech · · Score: 1

      Here's a better idea for a cheap 'beacon' - fill a bladder with a bunch of flourescent dye, then when it disappears you look for the big splat.

      That's even more dumb than adding the 'black box'. For the amount of ink you'd need, it'd be heavier than the 'black box'.

      Add to that, if we can't even see the splat mark the lander could leave as it is now, what makes you think we'd be able to see the dye any better?

      Just my two cents..

      --
      bork bork bork!
    13. Re:next time by Azureash · · Score: 0

      Funny, my sarcasm detector was off the scale!

      --
      Look at my karma - I'm bad, just like Michael Jackson!
    14. Re:next time by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 1

      I have entered the atmosphere, surrounded by ionized gas which shields radio waves, and everything is OK. Hello, is this thing on????

      I have started bouncing. Good thing my radio is strong enough to not need a directional antenna, 'cos I'm obviously not about to deploy one while I'm bouncing

      I have stopped bouncing. Now all I have to do is deflate the airbags and hope they don't foul the various mechanisms (remember sojourner almost got stuck that way?) needed to deploy the antenna to send radio signals.

    15. Re:next time by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, actually having that "black box radio" would not really help anything in this situation. We'd be more sure if it crashed, and might have some data about why it crashed, or maybe not depending on what really happened. But the mission would still be lost.

    16. Re:next time by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a difference between transmitting a 20k photo of mars and a carrier wave which indicates that you're alive. Spirit basically transmitted a couple of simple modulated signals which indicated various states of the craft. Granted, during re-entry not much would get through, and it was hit and miss during much of the rest of the landing as well, but they did get some signals, which in the event of a failure would have helped them to isolate what went wrong and might have helped in designing the next probe (sure, they tested the design, but there is no better test for landing on mars than LANDING ON MARS).

      Very simple AM/FM tones don't require a directional antenna. Plus, you have the advantage of having other probes in orbit around Mars which presumably could have been listening for the signals.

      I don't think Spirit is the first craft to use this technique either. I don't remember where, but I think I saw a writeup on a previous space probe which could transmit simple signals simply to indicate that they were alive in in one of a few states when they were in a situation that precluded a directional link.

    17. Re:next time by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Before digital electronics became practical, many launch vehicles and spacecraft used analog FDM systems for telemetry. Each telemetry parameter is connected to a VCO (voltage controlled oscillator), the VCOs are multiplexed together and used to modulate the transmitter. On the ground, the receiver output is fed into a bank of FM discriminators. The discriminator outputs can be used to drive strip-chart recorders, and fed to an ADC for computer processing. I think they still use it on some price-sensitive applications like weather balloons.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    18. Re:next time by diverman · · Score: 1

      But there'd be some information to help ensure that next time the money spent on the project isn't flushed down the crater. The point of such a system isn't for recovery. It's to learn and correct mistakes for the future, based on what happened. The black box in an air plane isn't to bring back what was lost in a crash. It's to understand what went wrong, and make sure corrections are made for the future.

      -Alex

    19. Re:next time by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      "What would you expect to see? As I understand it, the Beagle 2 is about the size of one pixel of the highest resolution camera in orbit around Mars (1 meter)."

      Well for one thing, if a future probe has a big parachute, whether or not the parachute deployed.

      if it's fitted with huge airbags, whether or not the airbags inflated.

      besides, if we keep on sending probes and orbiters to Mars, I fully expect that space agencies will progressively fit higher resolution cameras on their successive probes/orbiters.

    20. Re:next time by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Thats a High School level software debugging trick. Use print statements to locate problems.

    21. Re:next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might see parachute, yes.

      Maybe even airbags.

      And few decades from now with uber-highres camera, you might actually see the probe.

      What good would any of this do? Ah, yes, that was it. Nothing.

    22. Re:next time by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Yes but that assumed there was something there listening. Mars Express wasn't in position to listen until a couple of days ago and the Odyssey/Beagle link had never been tested because of the lateness of development of Beagle and given the current record for the US picking standards contrary to the rest of the world it probably wouldn't have worked if they had tried ;-)

    23. Re:next time by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Interesting - but I would think that the more you modulate the signal, the more likely it is that noise will interfere with your ability to read it (just like with digital). Noise is probably a big problem when trying to send a signal from Mars to Earth using probably only a few milliwatts of power and a non-directional transmitter. A simple carrier wave would focus all your energy into a single frequency and would give you the greatest chance of rising out of the noise floor. Something like a broadband transmission would be the exact opposite - you'd probably never even realize that it was there since the signal would be so dispersed it would be entirely below the receiver's noise floor.

      Still - it's interesting to hear how telemetry can be transmitted on the cheap... Using technology like the one you pointed out would probably be particularly well suited to situations where all your equipment is already analog - which a weather balloon might qualify for.

    24. Re:next time by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1

      High School level debugging would have been more something like:

      - "hello"
      - "hello2"
      - "hello2"
      - "hello2"
      - "value of i is : " ... <core dump>

    25. Re:next time by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad we didn't receive the tones for:

      -"I have evaded a martian anti-air missile"
      -"I have crushed an innocent martian on hitting the ground"
      -"I can't do that, dave"

      --
      Signatures are supposed to be funny?
    26. Re:next time by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      > It's to understand what went wrong, and make sure
      > corrections are made for the future.

      Why don't they just make replicas of the lander and do the testing on earth after-the-fact. At least, they may get some idea of what happened on Mars.

      Maybe it landed upside down and couldn't open. Maybe it's sitting on a rock skewed sideways and can't open or if open, can't get the juice to transmit properly.

      Without extensive testing of usable designs/form-factors, we are going to be wasting alot of development money and alot of time. (Not that I think the Beagle2 design was fundamentaly flawed or anything.)

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    27. Re:next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and given the current record for the US picking standards contrary to the rest of the world it probably wouldn't have worked if they had tried"

      Did that have anything to do with anything?

      US bashing is easy and cool, but try to only do it when it could conceivably make a bit of sense.

    28. Re:next time by diverman · · Score: 1

      Right let's just build 10 multi-million dollar landers simply for the purpose of crashing into the earth in an approximation as to what happened 10's of millions of miles away on a planet with entirely different gravity, after traveling long distances bombarded by radiation.

      That will tell us exactly what might have happened!

      Don't you think they ran test scenarios on earth BEFORE launching? I agree testing on earth is good to work out what you can predict. The point of a black box is to capture real-world data in the event that something occurs that DIDN'T happen in tests and predictions.

      -Alex

  5. Correction by FrostedWheat · · Score: 3, Informative

    unlike the earlier attempts with NASA's Opportunity

    That would be the Mars Odyssey, not Opportunity.

    1. Re:Correction by Naffer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pinging beagle-2.co.uk with 32 bytes of data
      Request timed out.
      Request timed out.
      Request timed out.
      Request timed out.
      Ping statistics for beagle-2.co.uk:
      Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss)

    2. Re:Correction by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1

      Nope. Wrong. DNS is screwed up and can't resolve the adress. Darn... They should have remembered the IP.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    3. Re:Correction by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      bash-2.05b$ ping beagle-2.co.uk
      ping: cannot resolve beagle-2.co.uk: Unknown host

      (seriously; I actually typed that :)

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    4. Re:Correction by bendude · · Score: 1

      I used the timeout switch, but am still waiting for a reply

      dude@host ~
      $ ping -w 300000 beagle-2.co.uk

      Pinging beagle-2.co.uk [217.206.221.212] with 32 bytes of data:

      (Yes I use windowz @ work - but I get around that by running cygwin)

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  6. Alas by Jailbrekr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Their rover turned out to be a dog.....

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    1. Re:Alas by tealover · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I feel sorry for the ESA. This failed mission coupled with NASA's tremendous success has to gall the ESA and many Europeans. Whether they want to admit it or not, Europeans judge themselves by how they do in comparison to Americans. They failed in this endeavour.

      I believe we should have a World Space Agency but that won't happen until Europe and China and India to a lesser degree get a handle on their inferiority complexes and stop trying to prove they can do what the Americans can do and start working together in a cooperative manner.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    2. Re:Alas by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Cooperate?

      With Americans?

      In the same way that we cooperated with you after the war, you mean - you steal all our data, then our people, then our aircraft industry is fucked because you don't buy foreign 'planes anyway.

      That's cooperation American style.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Alas by jackalope · · Score: 1

      I think the idea of a World Space agency is a first-class bad idea. The only thing that is getting the U.S. interested in space again is competing with the Chinese. If we had a WSA then there would be no competition and we would end up with a big useless space station in low earth orbit with a slow leak.....oh we have that....basically because the U.S. had no incentive to be bold and reach for some distant goal, just to beat somebody to some cold dead rock.

    4. Re:Alas by Oper+Sorcerer · · Score: 0

      The beagle has landed ... Bwaa ha ha ha ha. That's too funny!

      --

      karma: Marianas Trench (mostly blub blub)
    5. Re:Alas by j-b0y · · Score: 1

      Beagle 2 wasn't an ESA mission; it was a U.K. mission piggy-backing on Mars Express, which _is_ an ESA mission. MArs Express is working fine, give or take a lower-than-designed power budget.

      --
      Please remain calm, there is no reason to pani... wait, where are you all going?
    6. Re:Alas by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      But the ESA mission, Mars Express, hasn't failed. The Beagle has failed sort of. I.e. the mission failed but the amount of information and knowledged gained by developing it is well worth the relative peanuts spent.

      As for cooperation, I seem to remember that just yesterday there was a thread on a new development in the US (HD Radio) which isn't being used anywhere else because the rest of the world already has had a standard for some years (DAB).

      The US is renowned (outside of the US) for going their own way and are only interested if it will benefit them financially. At least we haven't killed anyone yet with our incompetancies.

    7. Re:Alas by linuxcoder · · Score: 0

      If it's anything like my dog, it's probably just sleeping.

    8. Re:Alas by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      Beagle was British: we (or at least most of us) aren't obsessed by competition with the US. It might be different if England and Scotland had sent separate probes...

  7. I'm European by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...and I'm sad it is down...

    But it's down... and won't get up again. Let's just rejoice over the spirit pictures.... It is something, even if it wans't funded by our tax euros.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American engineering was never good. As clearly evidenced by tons of failed space missions, low quality cars and VCRs.

    2. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most engineers working at NASA are not americans, just people that went in the US to study, get some money and then leave.

      As soon as your country will become less attractive for them your country will loose this 'power'. Think about India and China, I bet the future is there, communism or not (for China).

    3. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its awful hard to fail space missions when you hardly do any frenchy!

    4. Re:I'm European by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought Beagle 2 was funded by the ESA once, but actually they only funded a minor part of it. Major funding came from the UK alone and private funders. Mars Express was basically funded solely by the ESA and it was a success, so there's where your euros went. :-) They just took the opportunity to piggy-back the Beagle with the Mars Express, and this unique method was also shown to work flawlessly.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:I'm European by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...and I'm sad it is down...

      cheer up, my european friend - afaik, the beagle part of the european mars mission makes up for only 20% - the rest of the mission, mars orbiter, probes the planet from a depth of several kilometers up to the rim of the atmosphere for signs of water and other characteristics. the mission alltogether is thus more likely to produce data thats more than a "pinpoint sample" as compared to the nasa mission ;)


      see the link above for an overview of the data the orbiter will gather and compare that to the fancy rubble images...

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    6. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ratio of failed versus successful space missions for Europe is better than for the US. Nuff said.

      And yes, Europe does do space missions.

    7. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of them didn't even study in the US. And those are probably the best of them, because they didn't have to pay ridiculous amounts of money just to get an inferior education from a university that's more into marketing their name than into creating good engineers.

    8. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA will be glad to take your money. Feel free to send a check.

    9. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I hear someone asking for Levitra?

      Talk to your doctor.

    10. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ratio's lie. By the same measure someone who's done 1 mission is better. Do the same missions and see where you end up. Nuff said.

    11. Re:I'm European by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Yes. Let me eat my own words, I've stated here before that Beagle 2 was privately funded. It was not. It was originally meant to be privately funded, but that's not how it turned out. Still, it was a very cheap mission, considering the possible return value. Here is some more info on the funding, just click ... "Funding" :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    12. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'd end up light years ahead of you, no doubt. Face it: your country always was better at marketing than at technology. No wonder you have to import so many brains from overseas.

    13. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll do as always... lose. Face it you'll always be the little puppy dog nipping at its master heals.

    14. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You should be thankful that we'll be supporting your currency soon to prevent it from collapsing. But face it: You'll always be an irrelevant pawn good for nothing more than watching Fox News and masturbating to Bush's speeches.

    15. Re:I'm European by CaptBubba · · Score: 4, Funny
      Hey, you should be proud. England's scientists and engineers have joined the exclusive club of people able to point at a hole on another planet and say "I did that."

      Just think about it, to get to Mars they had to get a spacecraft going faster than a bullet in just the right direction so that a few months in the future it would hit something that is little more than a red speck in the night sky.

    16. Re:I'm European by nbvb · · Score: 1

      Oh right, like the Jaguar and Triumph are such great automobiles.

      They drive really well, to and from the mechanic's.

      VCR's? Blame the Japanese for those. We don't even make TV's anymore ....

    17. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Triumph, but if you say that Jaguars are crap, you must be absolutely mental... (and obviously have never driven one yourself)

    18. Re:I'm European by chickenmilkbomb · · Score: 1

      Well, they aren't as crappy now that they are owned by ford!

      --
      He hates these cans!!!
    19. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Jaguars aren't crap, they're great. You just need 2 so that you have one to drive when the other is in the shop.

    20. Re:I'm European by tealover · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Europeans seem to be very jealous and bitter of America's successes. That's an indication of a failed society, I think. The amount of propoganda that comes out of Europe reminds me of Nazi Germany in many ways.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    21. Re:I'm European by BTWR · · Score: 1

      Watch out man! What are you thinking!?!?! You'll be modded down for pointing out a european habit of glee with AMERICAN failures!

      But don't worry, if you need to restore your karma afterwards, just make the 10,000th reply about Bush pronouncing the word "Nuke-u-lar," how NASA "is so dumb they can't tell the difference between metric and English units" or say "maybe we'll get to Mars sooner if we tell the Americans there are WMD there!" and get "+5 funny" within 2 minutes (I mean, check out the +4 and +5 funny comments over the last week)

    22. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be Nazi Germany,from which came the Nazi rocket scientists on which the US space program was initially started?

    23. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dolt Hash ?

    24. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought funny did not affect karma.

    25. Re:I'm European by Badboy+Recovered · · Score: 0

      Well at least when were done jerking off - we have something to show for it! OK maybe that wasnt nice. But seriously -- why dont the two of you knock it off! Im tired of this my country is better than your country crap.

    26. Re:I'm European by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      It would be the same Nazi German scientist who were bombing the rest of Europe until the Americans/Russians joined the war..

      --
    27. Re:I'm European by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think it is a bummer. Of the four packages sent to mars due to arrive this season, two of them failed, one of them appears to be working so far and another has yet to arrive. Here's to hoping a 0.500 average this time around.

      I wonder what is happening that Martian probes have such plain bad luck. The soviets had several failures, NASA had several, Japan's probe is DOA and it looks like Europe's latest example landed in the crater that it made.

    28. Re:I'm European by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      I wonder what is happening that Martian probes have such plain bad luck. The soviets had several failures, NASA had several, Japan's probe is DOA and it looks like Europe's latest example landed in the crater that it made.

      I thought about this the other day. Seems to me that Mars is the "Bermuda Triangle" of space exploration.

    29. Re:I'm European by spektr · · Score: 1

      Europeans seem to be very jealous and bitter of America's successes.

      A single european is hardly representative, but I wish the best luck to every peaceful space exploration project regardless of the country. Every setback (Space Shuttles, Hubble) made me feel sad, because I never saw these projects as exclusively American, but as humankind's first steps into space. Is this hard to believe for you?

      The amount of propoganda that comes out of Europe reminds me of Nazi Germany in many ways.

      This impression may have to do with the propaganda you receive yourself.
      Just a thought, I could be wrong.

    30. Re:I'm European by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how NASA "is so dumb they can't tell the difference between metric and English units"

      NASA was just the cultural victim of a country that still refuses to give up their inferior measurements. These units aren't exactly for rocket science...

    31. Re:I'm European by nbvb · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have driven them myself, and they are really nice cars...

      but their mechanical reputation precedes them.....

  8. Re:Still no luck by Doomrat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I can see a bastard!

  9. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    And second to get into space

    In Sovjet Russia... nah...

  10. Man, what a pain by Raul654 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Retrieving the black box is going to be a *bitch* :)

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Man, what a pain by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 0

      Stop with the puns, dog gone it!

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  11. What about the US? by Alan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How far away is the US probe from the beagle landing site? Could they send their own little explorer over to check out what happened?

    1. Re:What about the US? by Raleel · · Score: 3, Informative

      IIRC, from the pictures I saw, they are like 1/4 of the way around the planet from the beagle. Check the nasa mars site, they show the landing locations

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    2. Re:What about the US? by ceejayoz · · Score: 4, Informative

      1000 years at top speed, according to a site I read.

      Guess not, eh?

    3. Re:What about the US? by zulux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How far away is the US probe from the beagle landing site? Could they send their own little explorer over to check out what happened?



      At the rate that the US probe can travel - it would take *YEARS* to get the the Beagle 2's remains. (this is assuming that Mars is flat - it isen't, it has huge valleys and mountains.)

      Even then, it would be of no use - if the Beagle can't open itself, Sprit's arm woulden't have enought torque to help out. And beagle would be probably covered in dust.

      Plus! We don't even know where Beagle 2 is!!! It hasen't contacted us.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    4. Re:What about the US? by relrelrel · · Score: 1

      i think it's hundreds of miles away, either way it's been said that it isn't close enough to go look for it.

      --
      --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
    5. Re:What about the US? by mroch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Spirit is definitely too far away, but I wonder if they could alter Opportunity's course and put it down somewhere nearby. I'm sure NASA could even learn something about how to build better landing equipment looking at the (supposed) Beagle wreckage, to make it worth their while.

    6. Re:What about the US? by desto+'tel+horus · · Score: 3, Informative

      The robots of Spirit and Opportunity (The 2nd Mars expedition of NASA on the way to Mars) are only capable of moving 40m a Mars-day (24.6 hours earth time)

      according to NASA they shall be kept operational for at least 90 days ..
      thus minus the first 10 days without planned movement gives them a radius of about
      3,2 km ...

      no chance buddy ;)

    7. Re:What about the US? by Longbow · · Score: 1

      Well considering that the MER's are only designed to last 3-6 months at best due to the fact that they are solar powered, I doubt that its going to have enough time to find the Beagle.

      That does bring up an interesting point, why go through all the effort to land these wonderful robots on Mars if they are only going to last for half a year at most.

      Here's a clue: slap some nuclear (or as Homer would say "nucular") power plants on them and they would last for years. The Vikings both went for about 4 years if I recall.

    8. Re:What about the US? by plj · · Score: 1

      Even then, it would be of no use - if the Beagle can't open itself, Sprit's arm woulden't have enought torque to help out. And beagle would be probably covered in dust.

      Sure, but it could take close photographs, and NASA could send them to ESA, so that they would better understand what went wrong.

      But then again, as you said, It would probably be faster to send a manned mission to discover it...

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    9. Re:What about the US? by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Spirit is definitely too far away, but I wonder if they could alter Opportunity's course and put it down somewhere nearby. I'm sure NASA could even learn something about how to build better landing equipment looking at the (supposed) Beagle wreckage, to make it worth their while.

      I think they can do that just fine by dropping probes back here on Earth. I'm pretty sure that NASA is much more interested in examining terrain that hasn't been disturbed and contaminated.

      --
      ...
    10. Re:What about the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homer or Shrub, that is.

    11. Re:What about the US? by paul248 · · Score: 1

      The rover has a top speed of 5 cm/sec. In 1000 years, it could go about 1.5 million kilometers. That's a lot bigger than the circumference of Mars.

    12. Re:What about the US? by mijok · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not a chance. I followed the rover web pages long before the launch and they spent years deciding where to land them and the final locations were decided six months before the launch. It was a tricky balance between on the one hand finding spots of maximum research value and on the other hand being reasonably safe to land on. So they won't change it just like that. In addition to that - the speed with which the rovers move is so slow that even if they sent it to land at the same spot where Beagle 2 was supposed to the precision would be so bad that they could spend their entire 90 day mission searching the area without ever finding the probe. And even though it might be interesting to find out what happended to Beagle 2 there isn't much scientific value in trying to investigate what happened to an object sent from earth compared to surveying the planet itself. And the only investigation the rover could do is to take pictures since it's equipped to drill holes in rocks and analyse them. Not pick up pieces of a probe.

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    13. Re:What about the US? by mroch · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, then why did the Beagle crash? Seems to me like it would help future missions to know what strange thing Beagle landed in/on, since we obviously didn't predict it.

    14. Re:What about the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need Homer for "nucular". George W says it.

      I guess they don't want to litter Mars with expired nuclear-fuelled vehicles. They already did that to Earth's atmosphere and we have to keep Mars fresh for the evacuation :)

    15. Re:What about the US? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Sojourner was only designed to last 8 days, but they got 83 days out of it. I'm sure they'll get more than 3-6 months out of the MERs

    16. Re:What about the US? by snake_dad · · Score: 1
      the precision would be so bad that they could spend their entire 90 day mission searching the area without ever finding the probe

      Spirit landed 6 or 7 miles off the target point (IIRC), and that is considered hitting the bullseye on planetary missions. The rovers range is supposed to be about one mile max. And the Beagle 2 position is unknown. So, the chance of finding it would be very, very small indeed.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    17. Re:What about the US? by thelexx · · Score: 1

      If what another poster said is true about Spirit being roughly 1/4 of the circumference of Mars away, and given that Mars is ~13240 miles around and after converting to metric, it would take Spirit 3.378 years to reach Beagle at a speed of 5cm/s.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    18. Re:What about the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It crashed because it was a piece of junk. That is all.

    19. Re:What about the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because these robots only need to perform a certain amount of work. Once that work is done, there is no point in keeping them going. For the extra cost, you could analyze the data from the first craft and build a second craft to bring back even more data.

    20. Re:What about the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you include the time that spirit must be powered down at night? Just curious.

    21. Re:What about the US? by thelexx · · Score: 1

      No, nor the fact that there is very likely no way it could go the whole way flat-out at 5cm/s in a straight line either. It could easily take three or more times as long just due to that.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    22. Re:What about the US? by Silvers · · Score: 1

      It's the weakening batteries and changing position of the sun that makes it fail.

    23. Re:What about the US? by BTWR · · Score: 1

      As I said in a previous story, there was a desire to use nuclear power, but the Greens et al wouldn't allow it. (Sidenote: the Viking Landers used nuclear power and each worked for around half a decade)

    24. Re:What about the US? by brj · · Score: 1

      (this is assuming that Mars is flat - it isen't, it has huge valleys and mountains.)

      And its spherical , too!!

      (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)

    25. Re:What about the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a little patience! Jeez. Some people just can't wait!

    26. Re:What about the US? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      What about the other lander, the clone of spirit, scheduled to touch down on the opposite side of the planet soon. How close will it be?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    27. Re:What about the US? by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Nowhere near enough, most likely.

      It's a big planet, the rovers are exceedingly slow, and they're limited to a certain range from their base stations IIRC.

    28. Re: What about the US? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > And even though it might be interesting to find out what happended to Beagle 2 there isn't much scientific value in trying to investigate what happened to an object sent from earth compared to surveying the planet itself. And the only investigation the rover could do is to take pictures since it's equipped to drill holes in rocks and analyse them. Not pick up pieces of a probe.

      Maybe Beagle 2 already 'drilled' a nice big hole for it?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    29. Re:What about the US? by ItWorkedLastTime · · Score: 1
      The Vikings both went for about 4 years if I recall.

      The Viking 1 lander touched down on 20 July 1976 and operated until 13 November 1982 when "a faulty command sent by ground control resulted in loss of contact" (doh!).

      The Viking 2 lander touched down on 3 September 1976 and operated until 11 April 1980 when its batteries failed.

      Source: NSSDC Viking Mission to Mars pages

    30. Re:What about the US? by desto+'tel+horus · · Score: 1

      actually its more the dust on the solar panels that the engineers fear.

      it was said in an interview that such dust collects itself on the immobile beagle and thus leads to less to no sunlight reaching the solar cells anymore ..

      though this doesnt apply to the US probes its certainly a big - for the british one.

      Im also much into the idea that one might bring the safe parts of a nuclear cell into orbit, assemble it there and then build it into a satellite, because MY only fear is that something might go wrong with the start. Imagine a rocket exploding with some pounds of plutonium or uran inside .. (read dirty nuclear bomb) ..

      Summed up i think that at the time assembly of probes is shifted to earth orbit or moon theres a big probability of those probes being fitted out with more "dangerous" technology like nuclear cells and some experimental things.

      desto

  12. The Beagle 2 finally sent a reply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The 'Beagle 2' finally sent the first pictures and an explaination why it didn't sent earlier click here.

    1. Re:The Beagle 2 finally sent a reply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So their version of linux produces a windows BSoD.
      Er ... I think not.

    2. Re:The Beagle 2 finally sent a reply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Windows. Another example of fine American engineering.

    3. Re:The Beagle 2 finally sent a reply. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      The beagle doesn't run linux. The software to remote control it was linux based. The linux part was never employed because it's hard to control something that has created the deepest hole in the surface of mars!

  13. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Bowdie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dude, we're all humans, and we're all in this together. Your probe worked (wooyay), ours didn't. (doh)

    There is such a thing as a bad winner you know.

    --
    yes, www.dotcomforwardslash.com is my real URL.
  14. Nudging flipping? by JanMark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe the Rover can track the Beagle. Would it be able to do things like nudging or flipping the Beagle? Maybe it landed upside down, or on a slope.
    The solarpanels might generate energy after some handeling. But can the Rover do that?

    --
    -- (:> jms cs.vu.nl (_) --"---
    1. Re:Nudging flipping? by relrelrel · · Score: 1

      when you plan to drop a lump of metal from the sky on another planet you plan for the possibility of it landing upside down, most likely it's not responding because it is in a crater.

      --
      --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
    2. Re:Nudging flipping? by product+byproduct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have the choice between:

      (1) landing all the probes at the same location because of a slim chance that they can help each other, or
      (2) land them all across the planet so you can learn more.

      JanMark from slashdot would like (1), but it looks like the rockets scientists chose (2).

    3. Re:Nudging flipping? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      The currently landed rover is probably way too far from the Beagle. It can only move for around 100 m / day and has 90 days of expected life time. In time, enough dust will get on its solar panels so it can't get enough power from the sun.

      And B2 doesn't need to be just flipped over. Maybe the airbags didn't work properly and it's still very well encapsulated in loads of airbags that never deflated? Maybe it just formed a small crater on Mars?

      Too many maybe's for NASA to even think about trying to rescue it (a high chance they'll just find some debris or it's failing so badly that it's unusable even if flipped). I'd rather instead be sure that NASA completes their current missions instead of exchanging a mission for a Beagle rescue mission which is likely to be unsuccessful. Yeah, they probably need to exchange a mission too since the space funding is so low.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:Nudging flipping? by plj · · Score: 1
      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    5. Re:Nudging flipping? by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      most likely it's not responding because it is in a crater.

      Or maybe a man-made crater....

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    6. Re:Nudging flipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In time, enough dust will get on its solar panels so it can't get enough power from the sun

      $500b, and you can't afford windscreen wippers?

  15. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    do I detect an oxymoron?

  16. Sheila Jackson Lee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And on the way they can cruise by the flag the Apollo astronauts planted!

  17. Remembering Anno Domini 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We must report with a heavy heart that Beagle "I'm still dead" Two has gone on to join the "B" team in the land of Styx. As you all may know, BSD has been part of the "B" team for quite some time.

    The Year of Our Lord 2003 was a particularly bad year for the "B"s,

    • Bob Hope
    • Buddy Ebsen
    • Buddy Hackett
    • Barry White
    • Beagle 2
    • BSD
    This honored list of dead is but a small token of adieu from the many fans of the deceased.
    These dead were truly some important icons in their day. They will be missed.
    1. Re:Remembering Anno Domini 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Year of Our Lord 2003 was a particularly bad year for the "B"s,

      You're forgetting some of the B's that have done quite well this year. For example

      • Battle
      • Bullets
      • Bombs
      • Blood
      Okay, I must admit, that list is really from an old Mad Magazine strip where John Rambo is a guest on Sesame Street and teaches Bert and Ernie some words he can think of beginning with the letter B.
  18. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell is this news? Still not contact......what the fuck

    Hey, guess what all......force still equals mass times acceloration!!!

    In other news....objects still attracted to one another....scientists wonder when this menaceing "gravity" fad will fade...

  19. did it even get to mars? by Suppafly · · Score: 0

    Do they know if it even got to mars?

    1. Re:did it even get to mars? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. They had no telemetry, no radio signals, and gravity reversed itself at the last minute.

      Some of the questions on Slashdot are just scary.

    2. Re:did it even get to mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you, sir, are an idiot.

    3. Re:did it even get to mars? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yes, it did. They got signals indicated it descended through the atmosphere. Unfortunately, they don't exactly know what happened afterwards, if it was electronic malfunction, airbag problems, crater blocking signal, heat shield breaking apart, etc

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:did it even get to mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL! Luckily the reversed gravity pushed me back into my chair so I could post this reply.

    5. Re:did it even get to mars? by elFarto+the+2nd · · Score: 1

      Yep, It definetly landed on mars...

      ...although the exact amount of fragments it landed in is still unknown.

      Regards
      elFarto

  20. Re:Still no luck this is a dupe comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent down. look at previous beagle articles, and you'll see this comment there.

  21. Pitch Black by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    "we also know that it has landed on an unforgiving planet,' said David Southwood, ESA's Director of Science"

    Damnit, didn't he see Red Planet in time?!

    1. Re:Pitch Black by einTier · · Score: 1

      Or Mission to Mars? Maybe they flew Beagle too close that face looking thing? I mean, when all know what happens when you get too close to it and don't send back the right signals.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
  22. McCoy... by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 2, Funny

    He's dead, Jim!

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:McCoy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's impossible!

  23. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SORE LOSER frenchy?

  24. BBC's report by relrelrel · · Score: 1
    --
    --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
  25. Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Huge ambition packed into such a small volume (73kg) and the only test-landing failed miserably.

    Well, you never learn until you've tried and failed. Perhaps next time.

    What I do find disappointing is the first post above though. I'm obviously disappointed for us Brits that our first Mars probe has died a death, but I'm elated the US managed to get theirs to work perfectly. Pity the feelings aren't reciprocal :-( We are all in this together, remember ? Anyone still there ?

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2

      Gaaah well now that post has been moderated down. Perhaps there's some sympathy out there after all... It was the 'chalk one up to US spirit' (or something like that :-)

      [Grin] And given my nick, I find it amusing that /. says 'slow down Cowboy' when you post too quickly - or does it just take the last word in your name ?

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    2. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by stevesliva · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Pity the feelings aren't reciprocal
      We fight hubris with hubris.
      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    3. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by lemsip · · Score: 1

      Absolutely - and don't forget that numerous US Mars missions have failed in the past too.

      I'd be interested to hear the difference in budget between Beagle 2 and the successful US lander. The EU space budget is tiny in comparison to that of the US.

    4. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And given my nick, I find it amusing that /. says 'slow down Cowboy' when you post too quickly - or does it just take the last word in your name ?

      no it says that to everyone... you should probably go to bed too - you're sounding tired.

      See you soon, Space Cowboy.

    5. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by tobybuk · · Score: 1
      Well said. I'm just totally pissed off they way people slag other people off, just because they're from a different country.

      All that shit about freedom fries and 'cheese eating surrender monkeys' was the worst I've seen recently - it's just another form of racism.

      Grow up people. We're all from the same planet.

    6. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Well, when you have people submitting stories with "Seems that NASA has actually lost the edge in robotic space exploration" in the body there is bound to be some backlash. not to mention the general EU-US antagonism on this site, which is pretty sad since it is supposed to be about technology, not politics.

      I am certainly disappointed in any probe which fails. The more data the better.

      Slow down cowboy is a pretty common American saying.

      --
      Q.
    7. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We sure are, only some of us (Americans) are better at exploring other planets than others (Brits and all socialist Europeans in general). Face it schmucks, American ingenuity and know how backed by real capitalist efficiency and yes, freedom, have no equal on this planet.

    8. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, the point I was obviously struggling to make is that we shouldn't be *fighting* at all...

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    9. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by exhilaration · · Score: 1
      ...it's just another form of racism.

      Actually that would be nationalism.

    10. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "we shouldn't be *fighting* at all"

      Why not? Maybe we should fight more. Who decides? We've been so long without a war that we're strapped for resources in many places, due to people's survival.

    11. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by CrowScape · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey, there are plenty of Americans here who wish the Beagle 2 was happily yipping at the Mars Express about all the cool red stuff it found (I'm one of them). The problem, as you'll notice, is that whenever there can be considered any rivalry between the US and Europe, both sides go at it and will completely derail the topic. It gets very, very tiering and is easy to fall into.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    12. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can only agree. I'm feeling a great joy over the Spirit and was personally in the IRC chat with various JPL guys for the coming thriller with the Spirit touchdown. It was great. Now, what did I see afterwards? "Yeah, we did it!" "Woohoo, I can't wait for the images?"

      Noo, some americans can't do that. Many went:

      "USA 1 - ESA 0" (even if ESA barely funded Beagle, relatively speaking), "Take that, Beagle!", etc...

      I must say I left the channel with a bitter aftertaste. I wasn't really angry, but sad how we had such a great time before and how happy I were for the USA, and then get this thrown in my face. And now, yet again, by certain immature Slashdot visitors. I'm still amazed that USA has landed a vehicle on another world (even if it has happened before), but I just can't find words for the feelings some people have against the ESA and can't really understand why. Does everything have to be a competition? This isn't the cold war, NASA guys has personally expressed their concerns about the Beagle and tried to contact it, the B2 funders are friendly people struggling hard to rescue it... It just makes me sad that some people feel so strongly against other parts of the world.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    13. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Actually that would be nationalism.

      Not even close. Nationalism is being proud over your country. Not spitting at other countries.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    14. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We sure are, only some of us (Americans) are better at exploring other planets than others (Brits and all socialist Europeans in general). Face it schmucks, American ingenuity and know how backed by real capitalist efficiency and yes, freedom, have no equal on this planet.

      Did anyone say otherwise? Did anyone say you suck? Stop acting so aggressively. You ARE the leading space exploring nation in the world. I, as a swede, really like the US for still pushing the frontier further for every mission.

      I think the parent (and I) just don't see a reason for the same country to give sarcastic comments when this is all about science, not .. well, personal opinions in politics or whatever.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    15. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't be surprised when the earlier story started with "Seems that NASA has actually lost the edge in robotic space exploration" in the body... all with an huge influx of "USA-sucks hahaha EU ownz joo!". Don't dish it if you can't take it.

    16. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/1 9/138212&mode=thread&tid=134&tid=160

      "Seems that NASA has actually lost the edge in robotic space exploration."

      Followed my several threads gloating at the ESA's supremacy to the defunct NASA.

    17. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by nickos · · Score: 1, Troll

      We sure are, only some of us (Americans) are better at killing other people than others (Brits and all socialist Europeans in general). Face it schmucks, American aggression and blood lust backed by real crazy politicians and yes, increasing infringements on freedom, have no equal on this planet.

    18. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by HBI · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry, we're going to be sore over here for a while until we get over being called imperialists for wanting to fix a problem that cost us 2500 or so of our fellow citizens in one day, on our own soil. Blasting the shit out of the Arabian peninsula and the near environs is about the only choice short of rolling over and dying that we had left, but that doesn't seem real obvious to the critics in Europe, now, does it?

      I understand that Blair helped out and all, but we know the Brit public wasn't behind us, and the general xenophobia thus created is not going to be easy to shake. Don't expect much in the warm feelings department in the near term.

      Stop back in a decade, maybe we'll be better then. Then again, people like me haven't forgotten about France and those F-111s bombing Tripoli and overflight rights...

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    19. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is equally wrong. I doubt I gloated at ESA's supremacy there. But I'm pretty sure there were some equally immature fellas there doing a similar thing.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    20. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said. I felt the same way when reading some of the slashdot comments about this. It's amazing on one hand that we've progressed this far as a species, and sad on the other that in other ways we're moving so slowly. It's hard to believe we're exploring other plantets while at the same time beating our chests like a territorial primate about it.

    21. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude- you are getting trolled, and for some reason you just have to respond. Americans don't hate the ESU or UK- its just a troll. Leave him alone and he will go away.

    22. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by gangien · · Score: 5, Interesting

      since I made this comment that got modded to hell and flamed and whatever else, lemme repond.

      Every article on /. or much of anyplce i seem to go online, seems to be have a very anti-US flavo(u)r to it. Here we have a very good example of what the US does well. We have 2 of these things going to Mars, 1 has suceeded, one is due there later, we have that probe or whatever its called collect comet dust, then we have the ESA we a failed mission to Mars. So basically, we're not allowed to point out what we do well, even though everyone can point out all our failings?

      And also, what's wrong with competition? I like any type of game/sport whatever thats clean(where the rules are followed) and competitive. I think it's fun and I think the results are much better. Who do you play harder against, some stranger you've never met and will never see again, or your best friend whom will probably try and improve and beat you? Your best friend of course, because of competition, even if afterwards you go have a beer together and hardly think about it again. Personally, I'd love to see another space race minus the 10ks Nukes aimed at each other. Even though I'm sure every nuclear country has figured out how to nuke every other country.

      So my response, and I cannot speak for anyone other than myself, is more in retaliation against all the anti-us stuff than being anti-europe.

    23. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still pissed they were waving American flags outside your embassy?

    24. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by matfud · · Score: 1

      > Sorry, we're going to be sore over here for a
      > while until we get over being called
      > imperialists for wanting to fix a problem that
      > cost us 2500 or so of our fellow citizens in
      > one day, on our own soil. Blasting the shit out
      > of the Arabian peninsula and the near environs
      > is about the only choice short of rolling over
      > and dying that we had left, but that doesn't
      > seem real obvious to the critics in Europe,
      > now, does it?

      Many Europeans critisise the US cos we have no idea what "Blasting the shit out of the Arabian penisula" has to do with solving "your problem".
      So, no it is not real obvious.

      matfud

    25. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A little good natured ribbing between friends is all that. The pictures and the science were for the benefit of everyone, as it would be with any of the rovers.

      It's a little sad, because Beagle landed in a different chunk of mars and likely had different instruments, but that's the nature of great risks. If it doesn't go perfect all that's left is total failure. The British dared to dared, and invested much skill in Beagle, and no doubt are learning lessons from the attempt. Maybe it will increase the likelyhood of sending a permenant satallite, or even a small constalation, for sureveying and communications purposes. Through a little transatlantic cooperation.

      But the ribbing, it is all in jest, and we expect no less in return. It's not like the Europeans are really any different. Who hasn't seen a "Footbal vs Soccer vs American Football" spam-gasim?

      So buck up, stiff upper lip all that gov'na'. Or cowboy the fuck up you little bitch, if you prefer American english. This Beagle came so close to success, it's, dare I say, likely the next will certainly achive it. With new and improved instruments no doubt.

    26. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      "Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism is when hate for people other than your own comes first. "
      - Charles De Gaulle

    27. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1


      And also, what's wrong with competition? I like any type of game/sport whatever thats clean(where the rules are followed) and competitive. I think it's fun and I think the results are much better. Who do you play harder against, some stranger you've never met and will never see again, or your best friend whom will probably try and improve and beat you? Your best friend of course, because of competition, even if afterwards you go have a beer together and hardly think about it again. Personally, I'd love to see another space race minus the 10ks Nukes aimed at each other. Even though I'm sure every nuclear country has figured out how to nuke every other country.


      The only problem I have with this is that the americans that are praising Nasa and bashing ESA are only doing it now after their probe has been successful. Where was this rivalry before the probes landed ?, I never heard anyone go "dude our mars lander is going to totally own yours". What we have here is mindless, pointless and completely unconstructive patriotism. And I can't help thinking that most of the people making these comments aren't exactly rocket scientists ("would you like fries with that ?").

    28. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have 2 of these things going to Mars, 1 has suceeded, one is due there later, we have that probe or whatever its called collect comet dust, then we have the ESA we a failed mission to Mars.

      You also have a shipload of failed mars mission under your belt, not to mention the loss of a space shuttle with crew (again). Makes you think that you should have understood by now that space exploration is dangerous business and success depends on good engineering as well as that bit of good luck that lets all those things that still can go wrong in spite of all the planning simply not occur.

      ESA has taken their first shot at Mars, with the rover failed and the orbiter apparantly a complete success. Given that the orbiter, in budget as well as in expected scientific return, makes for about 75% of the mission, it's not such a failure as you'd like to make it out to be.

    29. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by BTWR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As an American who is hugely against what I precieve is enourmous anti-American sentiment in Europe today (which I feel is 95% scapegoat, 5% legitimate criticism), Jugalator, I am embarrassed by any fellow Americans who made such comments. Did Europeans make immature "Metric" jokes with Mars Climate Orbiter crashed? You bet - for 5 straight years. But it shows class when you don't stoop to youre antagonizer's level as well.

      Jugulator, although to be fair, you did take a crack at NASA with a Metric joke here. Hmmm... then again I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you were simply (correctly) pointing out that it was an embarrasing mistake, and not some blane us-bashing like we're too stupid or something.

    30. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      Then again, people like me haven't forgotten about France and those F-111s bombing Tripoli and overflight rights...

      I remember that too.

      I also remember learning after the fact that it was Syria that bombed the nightclub in Germany, not Libya. So France may have had a point.

      being called imperialists for wanting to fix a problem that cost us 2500 or so of our fellow citizens in one day

      It's the way we're trying (have always tried, as we did with Libya) to fix the problem. Most recently, convincing Congress (but not the world) that we needed to invade Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, on the false assertion that they were going to give us another 9/11, only this time with nuclear weapons that could be set up and launched at the east coast in 45 minutes. Then establishing a puppet regime in Iraq. How this strikes you as anything other than "Imperial" I would love to know.

      Remember how Iraq presented an imminent danger to U.S. interests in the region? Remember how easy the invasion was? It doesn't add up.

      By the way, 2500 citizens is a drop in the proverbial bucket. We lose orders of magnitude more to drunk driving, secondhand smoke, fatty foods, you name it. The very simple solution to 9/11-type attacks already exists, as demonstrated on 9/11 by the passengers of UAL Flight 93.

      Only when you can look past the gang colors of the American Flag will other human beings interact with you based on anything other than fear. We're all human, and killing X number of people because they killed Y number of people will just lead to more dead people, over and over again. Current U.S. foreign policy with regards to 9/11 amounts to a drive-by on an opposing gang members house, with plenty of stray bullets to go around, and sometimes we hit the wrong address.

    31. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fair enough. The world as a whole is in a bit of a snit about America these days, it is true.

      We're all feeling like George W. and his cronies want to make us their bitch, and nobody wants to bend down to get their soap just at the moment. People are in a pissy mood.

      That being said, many Americans are spectacularly oversensitive about criticism. Listen man, if I say I don't like the current US stance towards the UN, or on Kyoto, or whatever, that doesn't mean I hate America. Sheesh, people need to get a grip.

      We all felt disappointed at the loss of the Mars Polar Lander, saddened at Challenger and Columbia, and so on. All the same it's just so damn predictable that the moment another nation has a loss in space there will be some fucktard shrieking "USA! USA! Everybody who isn't from where I am sucks ass!" that when one actually sees it there's a tendency to just say "oh go to hell, yankee fuckwit", or something like that.

    32. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Yeah Americans are the only ones who have schadenfreude on Slashdot. Riiiiiiiiiiiight.

    33. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "So basically, we're not allowed to point out what we do well, even though everyone can point out all our failings?"

      Yes but you forget, it's usually Americans bitching about America the loudest. We generally feel our own country sucks and is a police state. Probably because IT IS a police state. We don't question whether or not our government is corrupt, instead we argue with each other about what degree of MASSIVE widespread corruption exists, and not what our leaders would stoop to, but rather how competent they are to manufacture good wool to pull over our eyes.

      Let's face it, the only time we get together and unite is in bitching about our own coutry and blaming the Canadians. This is of course all Canada's fault of course. And the EU's too.

    34. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by arevos · · Score: 1

      I haven't noticed any more anti-US comments then pro-US, myself. Perhaps USians notice the criticism leveled against the US more than the criticism leveled at other countries?

      Personally, I think the US has done quite well so far at getting mars landers to the surface. Here's the tally so far:

      The US: 4/5 landers succeeded. Yay!
      The USSR: 3/7 landers succeeded, though 2 of those that reached the surface sent back little data.
      Britain: 0/1. Oh well, better luck next time :)

      Of course, the budgets for the projects differed vastly. Beagle was a lightweight, and nearly, nearly, made it. Oh well, Mars has eaten more expensive probes before.

    35. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      And also, what's wrong with competition?

      Well, competition among geeks on Slashdot gets a bit weird when NASA and ESA are cooperating.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    36. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      So basically, we're not allowed to point out what we do well, even though everyone can point out all our failings?

      Of course you are! Why shouldn't you?! I'm also thinking you guys are doing a great job. But it's not that I'm talking about. I'm talking about all this anti-this and that country on Slashdot (goes to both immature US bashers and Europe bashers)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    37. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I only made that comment since I thought the parent made such an arrogant post. I must also say that I do believe using wrong units were a bit, well, sloppy, but that's not saying Europe hasn't had a similar problem. If you look further, I comment in another post about the idiocy of Europeans uploading the Ariane 4 software to the Ariane 5, causing the rocket to just become a damn expensive firework. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    38. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yeah Americans are the only ones who have schadenfreude on Slashdot. Riiiiiiiiiiiight.

      Why don't anyone get this through their heads?! This goes to both ways. I don't think too highly of posts like "HAHAHA I guess US is looking for their lost WMD on Mars now!!111" either...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    39. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by gangien · · Score: 1

      It's pretty hard to have a rivalry when you're not even in the game. it's also a little hard to bash someone else if you finish in a tie. So esa made an attempt and so did nasa, and nasa's was successful.

      What we have here is mindless, pointless and completely unconstructive patriotism. And I can't help thinking that most of the people making these comments aren't exactly rocket scientists ("would you like fries with that ?").

      It may very well be constructive, especially if Europe adopts the idea that it is gonna kick america's ass at space. And well, i'm a computer scientist, not a rocket scientist ;)

    40. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by gangien · · Score: 1

      I haven't noticed any more anti-US comments then pro-US, myself. Perhaps USians notice the criticism leveled against the US more than the criticism leveled at other countries?

      Honestly, I would say there are about the same amount of ocmments, both idiotic and insightful as far as anti/pro - us goes. My beef is that a lot of the mindless baseless blathering of anti-US crap is modded up.

    41. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I totally agree with this comment. The childishness
      of some posts on slashdot makes the posters look
      stupid, and is incongruent with any real interest
      in the *science* or the *exploration*. Are these
      people really happy to have lost the opportunity
      Beagle 2 would give, just so they can win some
      stupid nationalistic "contest"? I live in neither
      the US nor Europe, and am actually interested in
      the *science*. The bitching is contemptible.
    42. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-USA: Because the USA sucks. You live in a quasi-dictatorship police state that is trying to shove their brand of class-based social darwinism capitalism down the throats of everybody else. And if someone doesn't agree with the US of A, they get bombed.

      Don't believe me? Check the history books, if they haven't been censored yet where you live.

      Fuck America.

      BUT that still doesn't mean that we have to drag it down to something neutral like space probes.

      You just proved why it's right to be anti-american: You guys are too fucked-up, too stupid to know the difference between something that is a valid point (opposition against the US gov't) and total idiocy (the space probe stuff).

      In short, you are a fucking asshole moron.

    43. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Every article on /. or much of anyplce i seem to go online, seems to be have a very anti-US flavo(u)r to it.

      That's probably because online you get exposed to a wider variety of views than you do elsewhere. If you hear anti-US views, that's not so surprising because the US doesn't have many international friends at the moment.

      Conversely, online I find (pro-Bush, libertarian, anti-Kyoto) views expressed that I wouldn't hear otherwise. It's good that sometimes we get to see outside your comfortable little world.

      Hearing a diversity of views is a good thing. Just filter out the cheerleaders from all sides.

    44. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1
      So basically, we're not allowed to point out what we do well, even though everyone can point out all our failings?
      That wasn't the original poster's concern at all. There is a world of difference between pride and arrogance and if you genuinely see "Wooo, USA:1 - ESA:0" as people being proud of their accomplishments (rather than ignorant, arrogant, childish pricks, revelling in the failure of a mission that could have benefited all of mankind) then I pity you.
    45. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1
      Did Europeans make immature "Metric" jokes with Mars Climate Orbiter crashed? You bet - for 5 straight years.
      So did many Americans, all the complaints I saw were levelled at the techs though, not America. Therein lies the difference.
    46. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      I think it stems from the flood of anti-americanism on slashdot and in the world in general. If it was the other way around and Beagle had landed successfully, I'm sure the whole topic would be about how NASA sucks and how Europeans are so superior.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    47. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by solarlux · · Score: 1

      > The USSR: 3/7 landers succeeded, though 2 of those that reached the surface sent back little data.

      Considering those two probes were on the searing surface of Venus, the "little" amount of data sent is more of an accomplishment than a failure.

    48. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Sinterklaas · · Score: 1

      Since I made this comment that got modded to hell and flamed and whatever else...

      [The comment was: "Yeah, every day i log onto /. and read all this anti-america stuff. Well go ahead and continue cus we're still number 1."]


      That was rightly so. Making over the top comments that the US is number 1, God's own country or the best country in the world are prime examples of the chauvinism that so many detest. You aren't just saying that the US is a nice country, but you also imply that other countries are worse than the US and abandoned by God. Wouldn't you feel pissed if someone said that about your country?

      So basically, we're not allowed to point out what we do well, even though everyone can point out all our failings?

      Of course you are allowed, but in a respectful way. Saying: "I'm proud that the US/NASA managed to pull this off" is fine. On the other hand: "Smackdown", "US 1 - EU 0" and such are extremely childish. It's like cheering when someone has had an accident.

      And also, what's wrong with competition?

      The problem is that most US citizens seem to have a different idea of competition than the rest of the world. The difference is really startling if you look at international events held in the US vs EU (olympics for instance). In my experience, US supporters are usually extremely unsportive, they only pay attention and cheer for Americans. Now, I'm not saying that supporters in other countries are always good sports, but that kind of attitude doesn't make us eager to enter a space race or contest.

    49. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      As an American who is hugely against what I precieve is enourmous anti-American sentiment in Europe today

      It's not as enormous as you probably thinks it is. It's just that the anti-americans are loud and they are helped by media, such as the BBC, which has an inherent anti american bias. We love you really :-)

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    50. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by BTWR · · Score: 1

      that's very interesting. If that's true then I wish it was more apparent. But as you imply, anti-US demonstrations probably make better news in Europe...

    51. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by gangien · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Listen man, if I say I don't like the current US stance towards the UN, or on Kyoto, or whatever, that doesn't mean I hate America.

      I really didn't say anyone hated america. I just get tired of everything we do or don't do, being considered so wrong or abusing our power of whatever it is. And I think i've repeated myself a few times in other posts, but, my problem isn't so much with the people who are critical, it's that there is a lot ignorant, stupid remarks that other people seem to think are insightful or interesting or whatever. Like for instance comparing Hitler and Bush.

    52. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by tobybuk · · Score: 1
      nationalism

      A sense of national consciousness that exalts one nation above all others; one of the most divisive and destructive forces in history.

      And your point is???

    53. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by arevos · · Score: 1

      Considering those two probes were on the searing surface of Venus, the "little" amount of data sent is more of an accomplishment than a failure.

      Venus? I was talking specifically about Mars landers, ie. those that were meant to land on Mars, not Venus :). The two probes I was referring to were Mars 6 and Mars 7.

    54. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by arevos · · Score: 1

      Just because there are people who criticise the US, doesn't really make it right to be joyful over other people's failures. The Beagle 2 failure was just that, a failure. It can hardly be considered a success to anyone, not even NASA, as no-one gains from the disaster. However, everyone had a lot to gain from the mission. EU and US scientists have lost a lot of data that could have helped us understand whether we are alone in the Universe or not.

      So yep, the US is still number one, whatever that's worth, but we know less much about Mars then we would have done had Beagle succeeded in its aims. That doesn't sound like something anyone should be proud about.

    55. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every article on /. or much of anyplce i seem to go online, seems to be have a very anti-US flavo(u)r to it.

      Is it any wonder when people like you post crap like that? Every time I go online and see something even vaguely related to national pride, I get pro-America crap thrown in my face. Not simple pride, but xenophobic one-upmanship. You are making it worse. Feel free to continue, but don't expect sympathy when you whine about people disliking yank attitudes.

    56. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Why exactly is a comparison between Hitler and Bush stupid or ignorant?

      You seem to be saying ANY similarities between them is absolutely unthinkable.

      Nobody is accusing Bush of being a genocidal lunatic, but the Bush administration has done a very good job of suppressing liberties and grabbing power in the name of protection from foreign terrorism. (Did you know Germany's invasion of Poland was sold to the public as a "pre-emptive strike" to protect themselves from terrorists?) Bush also constantly appeals to emotion and nationalistic pride in his speeches. These things were hallmarks of Hitler's reign, and they are worth observation and discussion.

      If you have counter arguments, please present them. It's far more productive than telling people they're stupid or ignorant for even bringing them up.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    57. Re:Possibly should have been called Icarus :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but this anti-US sentiment comes from every continent, including North America, and not just Europe. So if you think being "anti-Europe" is a reasonable response to the situation, you're a fucking idiot.

  26. Good show. by jabberjaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although beagle failed, I would like to commend the ESA for attempting the mission on a shoe-string budget. Landing on Mars is no easy task as we have found through a few, shall we say mishaps. Also, let us not forget that Beagle 2 was only part of the mission. I do believe that Mars Express is operating as expected. So all and all, for a first mission on a tight budget and small timeframe, I think the ESA put on a good show and encourage them in their efforts to explore the universe.

    1. Re:Good show. by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      ... and encourage them in their efforts to explore the universe.

      Shouldn't that be: "trash the universe".

      Man are the martians going to be pissed.

      --
      Sig it.
    2. Re:Good show. by kindofblue · · Score: 1
      I was astonished with how low the budget was. I think some billionaries could easily be cajoled into funding some probes with their pocket change, to create perhaps, the Virgin MegaProbe, Trump Traveller, Oprah Orbiter, Google Globetrotter (whenever they go public)?

      Anyway, they could be guilted into doing some interesting science while engorging their egos.

    3. Re:Good show. by jabberjaw · · Score: 1

      I would very much like to see industry get more involved in the space programs of the world. I cannot speak for the ESA, but given NASA's current budget, outside investment appears to be the only way that we are going to see some advancements in the U.S. space program. Although in doing this we risk commercializing space, yet given the situation that is a risk I feel we must take.

    4. Re:Good show. by Penguinshit · · Score: 1



      Space is already commercialized... DirecTV alone has at least 4 birds in orbit. If someone wants to slap a logo on the side of a booster for $10,000,000.00, I say let them and be glad for the extra cash.

    5. Re:Good show. by matfud · · Score: 1

      The ESA is a pretty commercial operation. It gets a fair bit of its funds from commercial launches. It also undertakes a lot of governement funded research (and is heavily subsidised)

    6. Re:Good show. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately, there's a reason why these things cost a lot.

      it costs, because it's complex, and game over if something goes wrong (usually, that's what makes things like the apollo rescue so remarkable).

      Beagle shows why this is one case where doing something on the cheap turns out to be very very expensive.

  27. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Doomrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The US succeeded where the EU did not

    Yeah. Of course, it's totally unheard for an American space project to blow up, or fail completely because the scientists couldn't even manage to seperate metric measurements from imperial. Let's face it, the Beagle landed in a crater. Tragic, but it's not incompetence.

    Feeling the need to declare your nation's superiority on Slashdot is quite the sign of insecurity.

  28. If not contacted soon.... by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 1

    The US will launch a nuclear missile to destroy everything in the area to keep the Beagle from falling into enemy hands.

  29. Re:double standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's the slashbot mentallity. and by suggesting that america isn't the worst country in history you got modded down yourself. and so will i.

  30. going in circles by MonkeysKickAss · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe he just ran in circles chasing until he was so dizzy that he just fell of Mars

    --
    MonkeysKickAss
    1. Re:going in circles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't happen

      It landed on the northern Martian hemisphere. It would only fall off if it was South.

  31. Re:Still no luck by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I've been crossing my eyes at Nasa's Mars photos for half an hour and I still can't see a beagle!"

    Dupe.

    On the plus side, though, you're well on your way to becoming a Slashdot editor.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  32. Give it up, half the NASA engineers are foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Including a few instrument packages

  33. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by oblivionboy · · Score: 1, Troll

    But another way to look at Mars Express (even minus the Beagle) is as a successful cooperation between many different nations -- A skill the US sometimes does not appear to be able to foster amongst itself and it's so called "partners". And I think is loosing out because of it.

    While the US may be happy that it's "won" the race (for what, we're not sure. Everyone loses when only half of the planned scientific packages show up to do some previously undone exploring), I look at the internation space station, and the shuttle program, and think: gee, it's sure great that Russia still has those Proton boosters and Soyouzs blasting off from Siberia there. Otherwise what would happen to those poor Americans up there? We can't all do it alone, and even if we could, it's always easier if there are others around to help us. Especially when it comes to space exploration.

  34. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by pe1rxq · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I suppose you don't want to talk about that piece of quality american math that went to Mars a few years ago????

    And the Russions almost beat you to the Moon. (They did beat you to orbit, both unmanned, dogged(sp?) and manned)

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  35. Flyby Pictures? by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

    Can't any of the various orbiting probes (like the Mars Express for instance) take pictures of the area in which Beagle 2 was supposed to have landed?

    1. Re:Flyby Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It did. But the resolution of the orbiters' cameras isn't close enough to the 1 meter or so that would be needed. Maybe if we knew exactly where it crashed, but we don't even know that, apparently.

    2. Re:Flyby Pictures? by mijok · · Score: 1

      Nope. If Hasa has had spy satellite photo analyses performed on images taken over the spot where polar lander was supposed to land and are unsure whether it can be seen there's no chance of seeing Beagle 2 since it's a fraction of the size of polar lander.

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    3. Re:Flyby Pictures? by jrc313 · · Score: 1

      The Mars Express is intending to do just that with its twin high resolution cameras.

  36. Spirit's Inventory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I know why Spirit's Inventory included a Niner-Lima.

  37. A little bit wrong. by 911GT3 · · Score: 1

    The pro-US-Europeans failed (the UK). The nonpro-US-Europeans had success (the mothership Mars-Express is working fine). Well...

    1. Re:A little bit wrong. by relrelrel · · Score: 1

      It was the Mars Express inability to hold little more than 60kg that meant Beagle2 had to meet incredibly tough design rules to even get it on Mars Express.

      BBC:
      "The main constraint was mass - the mothership, Mars Express, could spare only 60 kg for its interplanetary passenger.

      That meant a compromise between scientific kit and landing gear. Retro-rockets were not an option. Nor was a transmitter that could have sent radio signals to Earth to give feedback on the landing.

      Spirit had both of these, lending high drama to its plunge through the Martian atmosphere.
      "

      --
      --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
    2. Re:A little bit wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Mars Express was inable to carry a huge load.

      Why? It was never meant or designed to do so. It's doing what it was meant to do just fine.

      If you want a spacecraft specifically built to deliver a lander, then go ahead and build one instead of whining and hitchiking on someone elses back.

  38. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " only country to attempt to go to the moon (russians never wanted to go, nor planned to go)"

    Russia never wanted to go to the moon because there was no military application for the technology, and therefore, of no use to the Russian collective, by the standards of their leaders.

  39. Well, That's It by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Time for the rescue mission. This is the perfect opportunity to launch mankind's first Mission to Mars.

    I mean, who wants to be the one responsible for leaving a beagle on Mars? Can you just imagine the commercials?

    "Lost: Puppy on Red Planet. Will accept offers to build a multi-billion dollar spacecraft to retrieve him. Answers to the name Beagle. Please help him come home with your donation."

    I'm telling you, if people fall for Nigerian and Viagra schemes, we can get them to finance this thing within 10 years. Maybe less, if we also target the people who buy penis enhancement pills.

    1. Re:Well, That's It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we want a bunch of pennyless people with big erect cocks on Mars?

  40. The US will nuke the entire site from orbit by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    to be sure the Beagle dosent fall in enemy hands.

    1. Re:The US will nuke the entire site from orbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... Gee wiz...

      I wonder how many times you're gonna post this...

      You're fucking worthless

  41. Who cares! Mars sucks ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pictures from the latest NASA probe confirm that Mars is a planetary corpse. If it did have life, it was a few billion years ago and not relevant for our future.

    Time to move on to greener pastures or in Solar System terms Europa

  42. If I were a martian... by Stradenko · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd be real pissed at you earthlings dumping all your cruddy robots on my planet.

    Mars is *not* a landfill!
    Ruining our ecosystem with your trash!

    Death to earth!
    Where's the ka-boom?

    1. Re:If I were a martian... by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      dumping all your cruddy robots

      More than just the robots. There are also parachutes, landing stages, wreckage, .....

      What we need are some Green Party people to go and picket NASA for off-earth environmentally unsafe acts.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  43. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Bowdie · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm English, but thanks for playing.

    --
    yes, www.dotcomforwardslash.com is my real URL.
  44. differences by relrelrel · · Score: 1

    Beagle2 is about the size of a bicycle wheel, it weights 60kg. NASA's six-wheeled robot is the size of a golf buggy and weights about 8 times more.

    Beagle was built at a cost of around 45m, whereas NASA spent 512m.

    --
    --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
    1. Re:differences by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      And the EU's was a complete waste of money, obviously. *grin*

    2. Re:differences by iCat · · Score: 1

      Beagle 2 cost 45 million dollars. Spirit cost 512 million dollars.
      Therefore, Europe could land 11 probes for each NASA probe. Considering 2/3 of all missions to Mars end in failure, dollar for dollar, EU has 3 successful missions, NASA has 1.

    3. Re:differences by iCat · · Score: 1

      ...NASA has 1

      Darn, /. doesn't like the less than sign, so:

      ...NASA has less than 1

    4. Re:differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol doesn't matter since the EU could have just flushed the 45m down the toliet. They got the same results.

    5. Re:differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you've proven that you get what you pay for.

    6. Re:differences by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Well that is an interesting, if not completely, loony way to look at it... you aren't using the same logical system the Europeans used to build Beagle are you? :)

    7. Re:differences by BlueEyes_Austin · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Beagle was built at a cost of around 45m, whereas NASA spent 512m." Total cost for TWO rovers and launch costs were around $850 M, so the figure above is impossible. In addition, the Beagle figure omits launch costs. The equivalent cost for one US rover would be around $375 M (assuming $100 M in launch costs).

    8. Re:differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, not dollars, pounds, idiot.

    9. Re:differences by kervel · · Score: 1

      ... apart from the fact that the mars express (or the fregat launcher, or ...) probably cannot carry 11 beagles to mars ... you would have other costs too

    10. Re:differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the EU's average success rate, they still have 0 successful missions, whereas the Americans, with their average success rate, have 1.

    11. Re:differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh now I get it...

      Beagle was accounted for in Pounds Sterling!

      It weighed too damm much!

      --

      2000 pounds sterling is a ton of money.

  45. Unforgiving planet? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but we also know that it has landed on an unforgiving planet
    Well now there's the problem -- next time we should just go to a forgiving planet instead. What were we thinking?

    1. Re:Unforgiving planet? by Dejohn · · Score: 1

      Hey, we could start landing rovers here on earth! Then if it doesn't respond to the communications, we can go and kick it a bit.

    2. Re:Unforgiving planet? by mlk · · Score: 1

      Grand idea.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:Unforgiving planet? by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      Well now there's the problem -- next time we should just go to a forgiving planet instead. What were we thinking?

      Unfortunately, it turns out that there's only one forgiving planet in the solar system, and so naturally it filled up with the kind of people who need to be forgiven a lot.

    4. Re:Unforgiving planet? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      Well now there's the problem -- next time we should just go to a forgiving planet instead. What were we thinking?

      Well, since "Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus," they probably thought Mars would tend to be more forgiving. They still might have made the best choice possible: if Mars is this unforgiving, you can only imagine how pissed off Venus is.

  46. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Science. What is it all about... is it good, or is it whack?

  47. likely failure modes by bani · · Score: 0, Redundant

    sadly the most likely failure mode is beagle 2 strewn in little pieces across the martian landscape. key systems in the lander went untested before launch, I guess they're tested now. :P

  48. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by t0qer · · Score: 1

    I suppose you don't want to talk about that piece of quality american math that went to Mars a few years ago????

    And the Russions almost beat you to the Moon. (They did beat you to orbit, both unmanned, dogged(sp?) and manned)


    A. I don't know what you're talking about. AND
    B. I didn't mention first to space for a reason, but if you want to call the russian k-9 experiments a great success don't forget there's a little dog skeleton floating around in a tin can out there in space.

  49. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's face it, the Beagle landed in a crater.

    So did Spirit.

  50. An important lesson learned by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    First of all, I am also sad to hear these news. Although the Beagle 2 wasn't primarly an ESA project, so the ESA itself should hopefully not be hurt too much, it is still a very unfortunate loss with all the high tech equipment on the B2, and a loss hurting particulary much for the UK. If successful, it could have broken new ground as the by far most advanced spacecraft launched, being partially privately funded.

    However, the lesson I think should be learnt is that in space, one often needs to be lucky for success as many factors plays a role. Even with a perfect craft, especially if you're trying to land on another planet. And if you are pushing this much needed luck to the extremes with such major time constraints, that you don't even have time to perform further tests on a failing airbag mechanism, fires a multi-million dollar craft into outer space while crossing your fingers and hoping it will work when landing on Mars, you will need an ENORMOUS amount of luck for success.

    I think it was unfortunately a much higher chance of failure for the Beagle 2 than a success because of the time and budget constraints.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:An important lesson learned by laertes · · Score: 1
      the by far most advanced spacecraft launched

      How so? IIRC, the Beagle2 had very limited scientific insturmentation.

      --

      Yes, I'm still a junky. Are you still a bitch?
    2. Re:An important lesson learned by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      First, you cut my quote. It should in its entirety say: "the by far most advanced spacecraft launched, being privately funded".

      Also I'm afraid you recall wrong...

      The B2 was equipped with: environmental sensors, dust sensors, oxidant sensors, UV sensors, pressure sensors, radiation sensors, temperature sensors, wind sensors, gas analysis equipment, stereo cams, microscope for inspecting soil and rocks, gamma-ray spectrometer to measure oxidation state in minerals, X-ray spectrometer to measure elemental composition of rocks and soil, rock corer/grinder, and even a self-burying mole with a soil collection device.

      Note how many equipment that won't be found on either of the MER's. This isn't to brag, but to tell that this was indeed a loss for the world (since either NASA or ESA might have to do extra missions now to achieve the same result). Much in the same way as the MER's were a success for space exploration to the world.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:An important lesson learned by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Correction: In last sentence, change "MER's" to "MER" since we don't know how the other will do yet. :) Can hope for the best though!

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:An important lesson learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "However, the lesson I think should be learnt is that in space, one often needs to be lucky for success as many factors plays a role."

      I don't think so. I think that the lesson is: look for your public relations. Everybody thinks now that the ESA mission have failed but this is not the case! ESA mission (the Mars Express) is totally successfully! But they failed in the relations public aspect when they leave the beagle to be part of that. The Beagle was (yes, was) an interesting project but it was not testing enough (by schedule problems).
      Now the people believe that it was not successful, the average European think in this way, and the European average is who fund the ESA.
      If the mission was only the Mars Express we would hear about the big exit.
      (Sorry by my terrible English).

  51. forgive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forgive my ignorance here but, since mars is "as close as it will be for many years" can't we try to locate it using a telescope or something?

    1. Re:forgive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You overestimate the state of the art in telescopes, significantly.

  52. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with the anti-french sentiments? I really don't get it. Don't forget that without the french you wouldn't have won the war of independence and you wouldn't have the statue of liberty.

    Mr Chiraq was the first to travel to the US after 11th Sep to give his condolences, just because they wouldn't join your "war" against iraq is no reason to deride them.

  53. You Can Always Spot the L00ZUR... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By his relentless quotation of Monty Python to prop up his own lack of imagination!

    1. Re:You Can Always Spot the L00ZUR... by djupedal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yep, too bad you didn't think of it first :) Better luck next time.

    2. Re:You Can Always Spot the L00ZUR... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The worst part is that it's a freakin' repost, too...

    3. Re:You Can Always Spot the L00ZUR... by djupedal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not possible, sorry. This one was written on the spot. Similar, maybe, but reposted, no way.

    4. Re:You Can Always Spot the L00ZUR... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's funny...laugh a little.

  54. Price Vs Performance by visionsofmcskill · · Score: 1, Troll

    Nasa Rover Missions : 400 Million a Piece
    1 succesfully landed
    2nd in route
    Beagle / Mars Express : 345 Million
    1 beagle missing In Action
    Mars Express working and in orbit


    Guess Research and Development Costs is actualy WORTHWHILE

    --
    --Idiots, Every single one of YOU, A flaming mass of conglomerated morons, hey wait a second, isnt that how RAID works?
    1. Re:Price Vs Performance by Best+ID+Ever! · · Score: 1

      Mars Polar Lander: $120 Million
      MIA
      Mars Climate Orbiter: $85 Million
      Crashed

      Does that count as R&D? ;)

    2. Re:Price Vs Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't write off the whole idea of budget development just because we lost one probe millions of miles away in very harsh conditions. There's *always* a chance something can go wrong, and under these conditions, it's pretty damn high.

      Sure, if it were a string of failures compared with a brilliant record from the more expensive methods, you could draw conclusions from that. But to have an "I told you so" attitude from a single failure makes _you_ look dumb.

    3. Re:Price Vs Performance by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Um... You're forgetting Sojourner.

    4. Re:Price Vs Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need a little research and development into the English language.

  55. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the Russions almost beat you to the Moon. (They did beat you to orbit, both unmanned, dogged(sp?) and manned)

    Yeah, and the Americunts even had Wernher von Braun, the Nazi rocket action superhero! See what losers they are!

  56. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the Beagle *made* a crater. Big difference. :P

  57. Can lost spacecraft ever be tracked? by l0wland · · Score: 1
    I dunno exactly which satellites are currently orbiting Mars, but is it possible for them to photograph the area where Beagle2 (and all the other lost spacecrafts) might have landed or crashed ? And if so, will it be visible on those images?

    Anyone? TIA!

    --

    "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
    1. Re:Can lost spacecraft ever be tracked? by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The impression I'm getting is that, while it should be possible to photograph the crash site, there is not sufficient telemetry data to locate the crashed lander. All that's known is that it's probably within a huge area.

      We have to keep in mind the scale. The landers are very small objects, compared to the angle and depth of focus of the cameras on the satellites, which are dealing with a *planetary* scale.

      If you drop your watch in the grand canyon, do you think you'd ever find it?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Can lost spacecraft ever be tracked? by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1
      If you drop your watch in the grand canyon, do you think you'd ever find it?
      Yeah, and pretty easily no less, because the alarm would go off. Of course, the probe's not making ANY sound (supposedly), which is of course the entire problem...
    3. Re:Can lost spacecraft ever be tracked? by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 0

      this may be possible, but i doubt it. notice that the fate of the polar lander is still being debated from images of the "maybe" crash site.

    4. Re:Can lost spacecraft ever be tracked? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Saying that the probe is "probably within a huge area" is like saying that my lost mittens are probably on earth somewhere. If I ever had mittens.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Can lost spacecraft ever be tracked? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >Saying that the probe is "probably within a huge
      >area" is like saying that my lost mittens are
      >probably on earth somewhere. If I ever had
      >mittens.

      That's rather my point. Except we're sure that we did have mittens. I think we have their location pinned down to 1/4 of the planet.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  58. I haven't held hope in quit awhile by Araxen · · Score: 1

    The airbags weren't properly tested and I'd bet the farm that is what made this mission fail. Beagle2 is in a millions pieces, imho.

  59. What about it's hat? by Thargok · · Score: 0

    They can't find the Beagle 2, but any word on Waldo or Osama? And I remember a statistic that 80% of computer problems are people forgeting to plug it in; so do you think they forgot the batteries or something? ALSO, Beagles have been traditionally hunting dogs; could they perhaps use Beagle 2 to 'find' the other probes?

  60. you'd expect to see... by bani · · Score: 1

    the parachute at least. probably the airbags, possibly the parachute lines, and the heat shield.

    1. Re:you'd expect to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The things you list are tiny compared to Mars. They don't have the bandwidth to send back spy satilite sytle images. There are so many limitations that most Slashdoters aren't aware of.

  61. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And picking apart pieces of a sentence irrelevant to the post's point is a sign of too much Slashdot.... Lets not even get into nationalist insecurity, we have a whole agency responsible for that.

  62. USSR & the moon by jabberjaw · · Score: 1

    The Soviet Union did indeed want to go to the moon.

  63. You figure it out by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was supposed to touch down in a certain area. A few minutes after it was supposed to touch down, they noticed a big, smoking crater. They're trying to figure out of the two are related.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  64. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    w00t go U.S.A.! First to the moon, first outside the solar system, first to discover life on mars.

    Second to send probe into space, second to send first man into space, first to fuck up a space telescope, first to spend $800M to fix the blooper ...

    Yay Americaca

  65. How can this be "interesting" ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean, do you think they intentionally build the signalling system to self-destruct on a crash landing, or what ?

    There's a 73 Kg limit (including all the airbags, entry heat-shield, and the actual payload) for the entire mission, and you want to put in armoured (read: heavy) modules for when it all goes wrong ?

    What purpose would this serve ? So we can now get a photo where the 6 white pixels (and I'm being *very* generous with the resolving power of the orbital cameras) are the lander. Whoosh. What now ? And to do that, we leave out the gas spectrometer, perhaps ?

    I'm sure you're a clever individual, but there are also very clever people at mission control. They will have forgotten more about sending probes on a journey through the Solar System than you or I will ever know, and I really was a rocket scientist, albeit only for a few years (it doesn't pay well...) Engage brain before fingers...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm sure you're a clever individual,"

      He's not. But I am. Frighteningly clever.

      "but there are also very clever people at mission control. "

      That has yet to be demonstrated.

    2. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for being an asshole. I guess not everyone has the insight you do. Now go continue pounding your pud in your parent's basement.

    3. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simon, can you say "Challenger"?
      I knew you couldn't.

    4. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't take insight, just a bit of thought before the OP posted ...

    5. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      Eloquent am I
      "Challenger" challenges neither my enunciation nor pronunciation.

      Can't really see the relevance though - there's a world of difference between a rocket blowing up on launch and one crash-landing. In this case, there's two worlds of difference, which sort of underlies the point, yes ?

      Sure, I probably could have been nicer about it. Put it down to the "US rulez, UK suckz" posts I read just before posting...

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    6. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There's a 73 Kg limit (including all the airbags, entry heat-shield, and the actual payload) for the entire mission, and you want to put in armoured (read: heavy) modules for when it all goes wrong ?"

      Clearly there would need to be research into a suitable, light weight, indestructable material. Once discovered, forget the beacon and build the lander out of it.

    7. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by BJZQ8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's use an indestructable shell around the entire unit, made of a couple of layers of Unobtanium! And also maybe some chocolate milkshakes.

    8. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Boawk · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're a clever individual, but there are also very clever people at mission control. They will have forgotten more about sending probes on a journey through the Solar System than you or I will ever know, and I really was a rocket scientist, albeit only for a few years (it doesn't pay well...) Engage brain before fingers...

      IIRC, they forgot the difference between yards and meters. Given that foible, I wouldn't be so quick to berate the parent post's question.

    9. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Avihson · · Score: 1

      I realize that the beagle had a shoestring budget compared to NASA, but I don't understand is why no testing of the reentry system?

      Yeah, they are rocket scientists, but they are not successfull rocket scientists yet. NASA, the USAF, the Soviets, and the Chinese had their share of tests that malfunctioned spectacularly, but they learned and continued on. They even had their share of missions that failed publicly.
      Why did the ESA decide to forego a re-entry to earth test? The Russians have so much experience in hard surface landings, why not ask them for help? I believe that the end of Mir was the only water landing in the history of the Russian program. They bring cosmonauts, astronauts, and millionaires safely back to hard earth via parachute. They should have some insight to share about how to put a probe on Mars.

      I doubt if the average Slashdotter can answer but maybe someone from the ESA lurks here.

    10. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Probably has something to do with Europeans thinking, "Hell, if the US and Russia can do it, we can too. We don't need no stinkin' help." Guess it's just not as easy as it looks on TV. :)

    11. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by lisany · · Score: 1

      You can't blame them when the majority of the civilized world used metric weights and measures.

      Then again, the majority of the civilized world thinks there is a god or gods... but I should digress here.

      In short, workers: please, read the nice specifications - or at the very least the page that said: "All measures are metric. Yes, this applies to you, Cleetus."

    12. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by juhaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I realize that the beagle had a shoestring budget compared to NASA, but I don't understand is why no testing of the reentry system?

      They just didn't have time.

      The Beagle was a very late add-on, and not only a shoestring budget but it was also built very fast, if they'd thoroughly tested every system they would not have finished it by the time launch window closed.

      Yeah, they are rocket scientists, but they are not successfull rocket scientists yet. NASA, the USAF, the Soviets, and the Chinese had their share of tests that malfunctioned spectacularly, but they learned and continued on.

      As for you implying that the others had few failed missions early on and then "learned" to make them never blow again, well, frankly, that's bollocks. I don't need to reminder you that the two last NASA Mars missions before the current ones failed.

      The Russians have a particularly earth (mars?)-shattering record of 14 failures to 16 missions, and even those two worked only partially and for a very short time.

      There are some things you can learn from, but right now, the success of a cheap Mars mission is just as much dependent on pure old fashined luck as it is from anything else. And the combined success rate is fifty-fifty, if even that!

      Continued on? Sure. What makes you think we don't continue on and try again?

      And they probably did consult with Russians. And everyone else.

    13. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who forgot the difference between yards and meters weren't in the mission control.

      They were at Lockheed-Martin.

    14. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, this is not NASA but ESA we're talking about, they're fine with meters, thank you. Ok, they blew the Beagle but Mars Express is on target anyway.

    15. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by rapiddescent · · Score: 1

      I was chatting to one of the software developers of the beagle2 who told me that they had tested the airbags but the test had been a failure because the airbags deflated on the first bounce. Due to the timescales - which were really really tight - they didn't test it again. My friend also told me that they did not have much redundancy built into the computer systems either. It was always going to be a miricle if it landed safely... rd

    16. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Let's use an indestructable shell around the entire unit, made of a couple of layers of Unobtanium!

      They did it wrong, they should have called it Robo-puppy and made it out of dolomite

    17. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by TheDude2084 · · Score: 1

      They will have forgotten more about sending probes on a journey through the Solar System than you or I will ever know

      I hope they wrote some of it down...

    18. Re:How can this be "interesting" ? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd be asking the Russians for advice on Mars landings. They've not had the best luck with their Mars landers. NASA's airbags may look dicey, but they do appear to work in practice.

      The problem is a tough one. You've got to launch a fragile probe at thousands of kilometers per hour, then manage to slow them down for a soft landing on a virtually unknown surface without operator intervention (due to the horrible communication delay).

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  66. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by D4MO · · Score: 1

    Like the England rugby team?

    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  67. Userfriendly said it by nocomment · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:Userfriendly said it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was...

      stupid

    2. Re:Userfriendly said it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid, unfunny shit.

  68. one victory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming after the Columbia space shuttle disaster and the loss of two Mars missions in 1999.

    1. Re:one victory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming after no European space shuttle and no successful European Mars missions.

  69. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah the Frogs keep "forgetting" about WWI and II so I'm supposed to remember the American Revolution?

  70. UGh! by coloclone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's with you people and your Beagle jokes. Why haven't people realized yet (After we've been talking about this for weeks) that the MER landing sites are very far away from Beagle and that nothing would be gained anyway from visiting the "crash" site. I still see /.ers think Beagle was a US venture or don't realize that MER is an international effort (Although NASA paid for most of it.)

    I thought ./ posters were informed... but I guess I am new here.

    1. Re:UGh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most of it" being 97%.
      MER's about as international as IHOP.

  71. Beagle 3 by anzha · · Score: 3, Informative

    Beyond Beagle

    Meanwhile, UK science minister, Lord Sainsbury, who was at a Beagle news conference in North London on Monday, gave the strongest indication yet that the British Government would help fund the European Space Agency's (Esa) Aurora programme.

    "We need to be working with Esa to ensure that, in some form, there is a Beagle 3 that takes forward this technology. I very much hope that the Aurora programme which is currently being developed by Esa will take forward this kind of exploration."

    The Aurora programme is Esa's bold vision to land probes, and perhaps eventually, astronauts on the Red Planet.

    From here.

    --
    Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
  72. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but if you want to call the russian k-9 experiments a great success don't forget there's a little dog skeleton floating around in a tin can out there in space.

    So what?

  73. well, it's happened to us before.... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    and I'm guessing you all know enough not to confuse metric and English units... Our space program hasn't exactly had a lot of success lately, so perhaps people get a little rowdy when something actually does go right - either that or someone's been reading too many articles about the righteousness of our foreign policy in Neocon Weekly.

    Considering the failure rate of space missions and the difficulty of correcting mistakes, I'm suprised that anyone actually goes into space.

  74. Hello Silence My Old Friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've come to talk with you again.

    1. Re:Hello Silence My Old Friend by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Are you quoting from "The Sound of Darkness"?

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    2. Re:Hello Silence My Old Friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silence you muppet, it's "The Sound of Silence"

    3. Re:Hello Silence My Old Friend by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      Isn't that off the "Tunnel Under Troubled Water" album?

    4. Re:Hello Silence My Old Friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Settle down, you obstreperous pup...I was quoting Simon & Garfunkel long before you were born...irony...look it up.

  75. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    only country to attempt to go to the moon (russians never wanted to go, nor planned to go) sending shit out the solar system is nothing, u just push it, first to discover life on mars? we'll see...

    The Russians planned and tried to go to the moon. But when we got there first, they gave out that story of "Nyah, we never wanted to go to that dirty ol' moon, anyhow!" (insert pout and kicking at the dirt). The soviet space program is well documented and the records have been declassified.

    Sending stuff out of the solar system is not nothing. I mean there is the matter of escaping the gravity well of the sun. It requires some interesting physics.

    Life on Mars, well, that is debatable. Scientists have claimed to find simple fossilized life in meteorites that were thought to have come from Mars, and there were I think at one time claims that there were were bacteria-like lifeforms on rocks that were brought back from Mars, but the jury is still out. ET has not shown up yet. Still these were NASA discoveries.

  76. Re:the Brits have finally learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are way better than them at most everything, including their own sports (soccer)

    Riiiiight...

    say - when is the USA going to go back to being an isolationist country? I can't wait for that day.

  77. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    What's with the anti-french sentiments?

    Know thy history:

    "You silly kniggit. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelled of elderberries. Now go away or I shall taunt you a second tahme."

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  78. MacDonalds Coffee Lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats the thing I really don't get about /.
    Everyone who defends the case/decision gets modded "informative" and "insightfull"
    Anyone opposed is a troll,flamebait or 0
    Is it that an evil corporation got reamed unfairly?

  79. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A skill the US sometimes does not appear to be able to foster amongst itself and it's so called "partners".

    It certainly would be able to. It just doesn't want to. Because pitting people off against each other is so much cooler.

  80. an excuse by relrelrel · · Score: 1

    It was the Mars Express inability to hold little more than 60kg that meant Beagle2 had to meet incredibly tough design rules to even get it on Mars Express.

    BBC:
    "The main constraint was mass - the mothership, Mars Express, could spare only 60 kg for its interplanetary passenger.

    That meant a compromise between scientific kit and landing gear. Retro-rockets were not an option. Nor was a transmitter that could have sent radio signals to Earth to give feedback on the landing.

    Spirit had both of these, lending high drama to its plunge through the Martian atmosphere. "


    Maybe more of an overall failure of ESA's Mars Express than Beagle2's build failure?

    --
    --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
    1. Re:an excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AHAHAHAHAHA! So, NOW it's ESA's mission again?!? This must be the most pathetic statement of all posted around here. And that does mean something!

    2. Re:an excuse by relrelrel · · Score: 1

      it was always an ESA mission . . .

      --
      --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
  81. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in most of life, almost doesn't count. It doesn't count for football, love, or coming up with an insightful post on slashdot.

  82. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's with the anti-french sentiments? I really don't get it. Don't forget that without the french you wouldn't have won the war of independence and you wouldn't have the statue of liberty.

    Yes, but after our war for independance France went into a serious decline. It got much much worse after Napoleon. WWII finished them off. Now they don't even fight their own battles anymore. There is not a lot to be proud of with respect to France these days. It is sad, but true.

  83. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

    The Russians did try to go to the moon but they had too many problems with the new rocket. They realized that they would lose the race to the moon and so they focused on space stations in LEO and claimed they never tried to go to the moon. Pride, and all that...

  84. NSFW by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

    Not Safe For Work!

    Well, I mean, unless you're on windows. Then I guess it's just redundant.

  85. Simple reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those damn Europeans don't wanna use Duracell.

    Don't they watch our commercials??

  86. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoken like a true sore loser. Typical socialist crap. Go back to bed, frenchy, there's nothing for you people up in space.

  87. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    So did Spirit.

    No, it landed in a lake and was intended to land in a lake, not a small crater (blocking radio signals) that B2 is thought of having unintentionally landed in. But it's just one theory, and it doesn't even matter... It was never a competition anyway.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  88. Sorry service not available by Swai · · Score: 0

    The robot you are trying to talk to is not available, maybe it is in an area out of reaching range, didn't pay it's bill or got eaten by an intergalactic being.

    Thanks for using BT Telecom..

  89. Maybe they by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    should change their method of contact.

    "Here Boy! Here Boy!", does not seem to be working anymore.

    --
    Sig it.
  90. They found it!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They named the new crater Beagle II.

  91. What was that about NASA losing its edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/1 9/138212&mode=thread&tid=134&tid=160

    "Seems that NASA has actually lost the edge in robotic space exploration."

    HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!

  92. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by CrowScape · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mod parent and everyone who participates in "Yeah!/Boo! America" in this thread down please.

    --
    common sense: noun
    What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  93. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    No, the Beagle *made* a crater. Big difference. :P

    So you're the single person on Earth knowing what actually happened to it and can exclude all other possibilities like a crater blocking its signal, airbags not deflating, electronics failing, etc.

    Hey, that's good to know. :-P

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  94. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B. I didn't mention first to space for a reason, but if you want to call the russian k-9 experiments a great success don't forget there's a little dog skeleton floating around in a tin can out there in space.

    If you want to play it like that : exploding space shuttles and the people who were on it. Next on oprah.

  95. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA! USA! USA! America uber alles!

  96. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there is absolutely nothing to be proud of with respect to the US, or is there?

  97. Re:Still no luck by tambo · · Score: 3, Funny
    Better still: I first read the title as "Still no contact from billg."

    Either my contact lens prescription is woefully out of date, or my brain has veered into wishful-thinking territory.

    - David Stein

    --
    Computer over. Virus = very yes.
  98. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah the Frogs keep "forgetting" about WWI and II so I'm supposed to remember the American Revolution?

    The french are your friends, and it's a friend's job to point out when their friends are acting stupid. There was no war in iraq, a war is when two armies fight each other. This was an invasion, and an illegal one at that. funny how the justifications for invasion kept changing as soon as they were disproved.

  99. Warn the Martians! by cflorio · · Score: 1

    We need to tell the martians to stay away from the Toxic Witch's Brew!!

  100. Re:Still no luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wanna be repetetive, be a troll, not some fuckin' fag.

  101. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That includes you I assume, fuckstick?

  102. *Beagle 2 is dying by networkGhettoWhore · · Score: 0, Troll

    It is official; NASA confirms: *Beagle 2 is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already discouraged and defeated European community when NASA confirmed that Beagle 2 has dropped yet again after Beagle 1 showed to be a miserable failure as well. Coming on the heels of a recent Gallop survey which plainly states that Britain and Europe as a whole has lost the peoples confidence in their ability to innovate and make progress, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. The European space program is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent International Standardized Aerospace Aptitude Test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin [amdest.com] to predict *Beagle 2's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *Beagle 2 faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *Beagle 2 because *Beagle 2 is dying. Things are looking very bad for *Beagle 2. As many of us are already aware, *Beagle 2 continues to lose contact. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    The British Space Program is the most endangered European Space Prgram of them all, having lost 93% of its core engineers. The sudden and unpleasant disapprovals of long time British visionaries Tony Blair and Princess Diana only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: The British Space Program is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    French Space Program leader Jacques states that there are 24 Space Program Engineers. How many German Space Engineers are there? Let's see. The number of French Space Engineers versus German Space Engineers completed space projects is roughly in ratio of 4 to 1. Therefore there are about 23/4 = 6 German Space Engineers. Italian Space Engineers are about half of the volume of German Space Engineers. Therefore there are about 3 Italian Space Engineers. A recent article put British Space Program at about 80 percent of the European Aerospace Industry development. Therefore there are (24+6+3)*4 = 134 British Space Engineers. This is consistent with the number of failed British Space prgrams to date.

    Due to the troubles of the European Union, abysmal technological and warfare innovations, and so on, the Beagle 2 has lost all contact with Earth and was shadowed over by the Spirit of the American Aeronautical Space Program. Now Beagle 2 is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that The *British Space Program has steadily declined in consumer confidence. The *British Space Program is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If The *British Space Program is to survive at all it will be among sci-fi dilettante dabblers. The *British Space Program continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, The British Space Program is dead.

    Fact: Beagle 2 is dying

    --
    Natural Selection: self-destruction of the poor and lazy
  103. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...first to discover life on mars.
    Possibly, but no chance that the US discover intelligent life - it takes one to know one ;)
    (yes, this is a joke!)

  104. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The good thing is that Bush would throw you in the furnace, too, if he could make a just penny off it. No matter how much you love him.

  105. No control between Dec 19th and Dec 25th by rufey · · Score: 4, Interesting
    When Mars Express released Beagle-2 back on December 19th, Beagle-2 had no means of attitude control to make any course corrections nor ensure it entered the Mars atmosphere with its heat sheild pointed in the right direction and at an acceptable angle, and no means for contacting Earth until it landed and opened up. Mars Express provided all of this up until the release.

    Beagle-2 then was in free-flight, from December 19th til December 25th. Thats 6 days of free flight with no way to really track Beagle-2 nor do anything about it if it were found to be off-course.

    Usually a space probe is tracked via the radio signals that are sent to Earth. Speed and location are usually derived from measuring the Doppler effect on the radio singls. I haven't read anything to date about any methods the ESA was able to use after December 19th to verify that Beagle-2 was in the correct position for landing and all. I kept reading stuff saying that "Beagle-2 and Mars Express are now XXX kilometers away from each other", but I'm not sure how they deduced this other than calculating it based on the path and inclination that Beagle-2 *should have* been on. What if it started in an unexpected slow spin after release? What if its angle of attack was over the engineering limit?

    Feel free to correct my knowledge if I am off-base here. I'm interested to know if/how ESA was able to contact Beagle-2 between Dec 19th and Dec 25th when it was in free flight.

    1. Re:No control between Dec 19th and Dec 25th by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that a small space rock the size of grain of rice could have smacked into the Beagle and start it rotating over 6 days until it was pointed backwards on entry.

      Well that sucks. I guess they won't ever find it if the Beagle 2 is technically now a gas.

    2. Re:No control between Dec 19th and Dec 25th by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is indeed a way to track the orientation of the spacecraft. The lander is ejected by the SUEM (spin-up eject mechanism) which, as you might guess, spins the lander. Spin stabilization is tried and true.

      If the spacecraft were tumbling, the strength of the signal would have varied in a regular way, and they would have detected that.

      Also, they were able to contact the lander while in free flight. The Earthside antennas that they used to try to get the signal on the 25th would also have been used to communicate with the spacecraft in free flight.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  106. Not much money wasted: 40mil. GBP by Burz · · Score: 1

    Contrast that to the Spirit mission at 800mil. USD.

    Europe thought they had a better angle on better, faster, cheaper. Thanks to the US and now Europe's attempts along these lines, we at least have a better idea of what is probably "too cheap for Mars".

  107. The new crater has been named "Doggie Bowl". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alas....EU will send Fire Hydrant as head stone.

  108. Lost Dog by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...but we also know that it has landed on an unforgiving planet...

    And by landed on we mean crashed into.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  109. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teh funnay!

  110. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I assume we also blame it on American quality that the US actually put a bunch of German (even ex-Nazi) engineers in charge of the moon program?

  111. TV Coverage by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't Henry Rollins be hosting coverage of this long distance robot war?

  112. MOD PARENT UP! by networkGhettoWhore · · Score: 0

    Its true. It is true indeed.

    --
    Natural Selection: self-destruction of the poor and lazy
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking douchebag.. you forgot to click the "[] Post Anonymously" button...

  113. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The X15 flew into space before the ruskies did

  114. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wernher von Braun got most of his rocket info from Robert Goddard. He even bought Goddard's patents for 10 cents a page.

    Goddard was the first to launch a rocket with a payload and first to build an inertial guidance system - in the 1930s.

  115. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the hijackers came through France.

  116. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, right. And everyone else bases his work on previous work done by other people. So?

    Von Braun was THE rocket guy in that time. Period.

    If Goddard was so hot, I don't understand why cruise missiles were only flying from Germany to it's enemies and not the other way around?

  117. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet they all came through the USA you fucking moron

  118. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 2, Informative
    cool down: who said that the mission fails when beagle fails?

    check ESA Mars Express Orbiter Details to see how much more scientific data the european mission will return, even though some 20% of the mission failed.

    - 3D imaging will reveal the topography of Mars in full colour

    - build up a map of surface composition in 100 m squares, also measure aspects of atmospheric composition

    - build up measurements of ozone and water vapour over the total surface of the planet for the different seasons

    - measure the vertical pressure and temperature profile of carbon dioxide which makes up 95% of the martian atmosphere, and look for minor constituents including water, carbon monoxide, methane and formaldehyde

    - measure ions, electrons and energetic neutral atoms in the outer atmosphere to reveal the numbers of oxygen and hydrogen atoms

    - probe the planet's ionosphere, atmosphere, surface and even the interior

    - map the sub-surface structure to a depth of a few kilometres

    a lander just creeps around, poking holes in things. orbiter looks closely at the whole planet.

    why not let the science results decide who succeeded.

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  119. I'd like to.. by MoronGames · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd like to commend the Martian defense personnel. They did an excellent job taking out Beagle 2, but it's too bad they were too "partied out" to get Spirit. Better luck to them next time!

    --
    hey!
    1. Re:I'd like to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the americans used "shock and awe" tactics to win. unfortunately, rumor has it that the general population on mars may rise up against their occupiers.

  120. I admit it. It is my fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I admit it.
    I (and my neocon buddies) work at a secret US Military base on Mars and I shoot down anything that comes near it.
    Probes that fall on the other side of the planet are allowed to live.

  121. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Vive la France, then!

  122. As an American with family in France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buried beneath little white crosses,from two fucking wars in the 20th century I am aware of our "friendship".
    And how did your family spend the second war?
    Grandmas enthusiastically on their knees and legs spread wide for Nazi soldiers?Grandpas tripping over each other to point out where the Jews were hiding?
    Nice fucking job you did with your former colony in IndoChina fortunately my family returned safely from that one.

    1. Re:As an American with family in France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandmas enthusiastically on their knees and legs spread wide for Nazi soldiers?

      So what? You bend over daily to let Bush fuck you in the ass and then wonder when it's full of cum.

  123. Message from Mars... by Synergy2k4 · · Score: 0

    To: ESA
    From: Martian Empire
    Subject: Beagle 2, et al.

    All your rovers are belong to us!

  124. ESA / NASA...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've read about the remarks about ESA and NASA.

    I would like to point out that one's bucks/euro's can go to something else then a governemental sponsored space-effort. For those that care, they can privately sponsor space-exploration with the planetary society, for instance. They are the only non-commercial, non-governmental origanisation that actually give a shot at spacetravel, that I know of.

    http://www.planetary.org/

  125. Re:the Brits have finally learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Europeans stop murdering tens of millions of people each century.

  126. someone will stumble over Beagle2 by theCat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...while playing a round of golf. Or hiking in a crater. Or retrieving a poorly aimed frisbee. Pausing, they'll see some badly eroded pile of something shiny, walk over to look at it closer, recall a paragraph from their early astrophysics lessons, and radio back to the colony base "Hey Rosco, wasn't it somewhere around here that Beagle2 was lost? Back in '03? Well it's not lost anymore."

    Yes, I'm talking about humans on Mars, being casual and knocking about the place, kicking over rocks on a lazy day, sometime in my lifetime. It could be my son or daughter grown up. Or your own, or even yourself if you are young now. Keep that in mind today, it helps to take the edge off this sort of temporary setback.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    1. Re:someone will stumble over Beagle2 by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing a picture in the late 70's somewhere of tourists visiting one of the Viking sites to view a perspex-enclosed lander.

      This was supposed to be by the end of the century.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:someone will stumble over Beagle2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know your post is mostly a joke, but understand the serious part. I think the first humans with free time on Mars will go looking for early space probes. Of course, if they can travel far they will play near home, but you have to understand how huge a place we are talking about. You don't just sumble on something like Beagle2.

    3. Re:someone will stumble over Beagle2 by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, once Governor Schwarzenegger passes the Emergency Alien Martian Atmosphere Reactivation Device To Protect Our Children And Keep America Strong Act.

    4. Re:someone will stumble over Beagle2 by multi+io · · Score: 1
      ...while playing a round of golf. Or hiking in a crater. Or retrieving a poorly aimed frisbee. Pausing, they'll see some badly eroded pile of something shiny, walk over to look at it closer,

      ...and see a touchscreen that reads:

      Deploy antenna? [Yes] [No] [Cancel]

    5. Re:someone will stumble over Beagle2 by Jagasian · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      We have to cut back on killing eachother and supressing eachother before we can colonize another planet.

    6. Re:someone will stumble over Beagle2 by mlk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why, when we have all new races out there to kill off?

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    7. Re:someone will stumble over Beagle2 by Speare · · Score: 1

      You know you're a political cynic when you read "Emergency Alien Martian Atmosphere Reactivation Device To Protect Our Children And Keep America Strong Act" and look at the initials to see if it has a contradictory or humourous backronym like "TOTAL RECALL Act."

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    8. Re:someone will stumble over Beagle2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we could keep the world's entire population fed, or we could blow it all on a few games of golf on Mars.

  127. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good show? I didn't even see the fireworks!

  128. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Nazadus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ok, how many people on /. declare US as inferior? Let's face it, we ALL have our faults. Man kind, nation, social, educational, everyone. Everytime I read on /. someone makes a comment about another country, this is starting to sound like children bickering. How about we ignore those post for a change, don't feed the fire? What we ought (is that even a word?) to be doing is asking what went wrong and given possibilities until we are able to narrow down what happened. Hmm, seems like that's already been done (for the most part). OK, what's next? We learn from that mistake. All space programs will learn from this. I could go on, but that would take this further off topic.

    --
    "Do or do not. There is no try." -- Master Yoda (Half man, half muppet)
  129. Can you hear us, Beagle 2 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mars express to beagle2
    mars express to beagle2
    Take your protein pills and put your helmet on

    Ten, Nine, Eight
    mars express to beagle2
    Seven, Six, Five
    Commencing countdown, engines on
    Four, Three, Two, One, Lift off
    Check ignition and may God's love be with you

    mars express to beagle2
    You've really made the grade
    And the papers want to know whose shirts you wear
    Now it's time to leave the capsule if you dare

    For here
    Am I sitting in a tin can
    Far above the world
    Planet earth is blue
    And there's nothing I can do

    mars express to beagle2
    Your circuit's dead, there's something wrong
    Can you hear us, Beagle 2 ?
    Can you hear us, Beagle 2 ?
    Can you hear us, Beagle 2 ?
    Can you.... "Here am I floating round my tin can
    Far above Mars"

    Planet earth is blue
    And there's nothing I can do." ..
    Sung to David Bowie's Major Tom.

  130. You seem to have mistaken me for yo' Momma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go blow Howard DEAN you Commie Faggot!

    1. Re:You seem to have mistaken me for yo' Momma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's up? Bush came in your mouth again without warning you?

  131. Don't forget Mars Express... by zeux · · Score: 3, Informative

    Beagle2 was only 'the lander' of Mars Express.

    On the website we can read:

    The Mars Express Orbiter will:
    image the entire surface at high resolution (10 m/pixel) and selected areas at super resolution (2 m/pixel)
    produce a map of the mineral composition of the surface at 100 m resolution
    map the composition of the atmosphere and determine its global circulation
    determine the structure of the sub-surface to a depth of a few kilometres
    determine the effect of the atmosphere on the surface
    determine the interaction of the atmosphere with the solar wind


    All of that sounds really cool.

    1. Re:Don't forget Mars Express... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      One of the aims of the Super high res mode of the camera is stated as:

      SRC Super Resolution Channel (2)

      This is the high resoluting channel with an resolution of down to 2.3 m per pixel. SRC images will provide detailed information about areas of special interest, e.g. for the examination of future landing sites.

      This camera looks phenominal, and theres going to be some smiles from the European scientists when that data starts coming through.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Don't forget Mars Express... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      oops - i forgot the link: here

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  132. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by CrowScape · · Score: 1

    Uh, where in my post did I participate in the American-European rivalry?

    --
    common sense: noun
    What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  133. Like an alarm clock that won't shutup... by jamesh · · Score: 1

    ... some martian has silenced Beagle with a large mallet.

    I bet it was playing Blur in cheap on-hold music style (think greensleeves). That would drive anyone crazy.

  134. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Russia did want to do a moon landing, but the US wouldn't let them use the sound stage.

  135. US patherfinder was photgraphed by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The base station of the US pathefinder was photographed by the high resolution orbiter. It only filled a few pixels, so you had to stretch your imagination to believe the black and white pixels matche the orientation of the airbags and base respectively.

    I think there was a weak attempt to locate the failed 1999 lander's parachute photographically. The high resolution camera can only see miniscule parts of the surface.

  136. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, there is absolutely nothing to be proud of with respect to the US, or is there?

    Sure there is. We have the strongest economy and the largest GNP in the world. We have the greatest technology (though I fear that may change if we do not shape up) in the world. We have the strongest military. We invented the computer you are using to connect to the website (also invented here) over the internet (invented here) using broadband (invented here) or the telephone (also invented here). Slashdot itself was invented here and is hosted here.

    Another thing to be proud of with respect to the US is that our citizens clearly do care about what happens in the rest of the world, as evidenced by our work as the global police. True, we get a lot of flak over it, but the US has endeavoured to do some very good things with its technology and powerful military. If teh US was really bent on world domination, it would be a dark dark world indeed. But Americans don't want to dominate the world, they want other people to live free like we do. Nothing illustrates this better than what happened in WWII, where every country occupied by the US ended up being a liberated democracy whereas the USSR enslaved as much of the world as it could as had their friends the Nazis.

    What confuses most people, Americans included, is the actions of our government in recent decades. There are clearly people in our government with Imperialist attitudes about things, and right now those people are more powerful than ever before, more popular, and more arrogant. So we have a serious chance of losing what makes us great right now. This is why ordinary Americans need to recall why we are proud to be Americans. Step up to the plate, speak out, and say no to those who seek to dominate other human beings.

  137. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really?

    I've never seen a post here about how everything
    !America is fantastic and everything America trash.

  138. Newsflash: Nothing Happening by thelizman · · Score: 1

    Strange day when the now 2 week old fact that Beagle 2 was a failure is still considered news to /. editors, but the successful Spirit probes impending rover deployment gets no mention, nor does the new high resolution stereograms.

  139. It's dead Jim! by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    It's not life as we know it.

  140. B II by coyotedata · · Score: 1

    Only the Brits could claim to hear silence.

  141. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by probbka · · Score: 1

    second to send first man into space

    So we were second to be first, eh? Well, that's quite an honor!

    --
    Only requirement for good karma: be pedantic as much and as often as possible.
  142. Re:Let me condense the relevant info further by BlueEyes_Austin · · Score: 1

    Hm. Seeing as the Germans, at least, are responsible for one of the science instruments on the MERs, you are wrong. And, by the way, having Beagle fail is not "success" in the way normal people define it.

  143. A) refers to Mars Explorer (sic).... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    A) refers to the failed Mars Explorer mission, where a lot of money and effort was wasted because someone forgot to check that the units in the design were written in English units rather than in metric (or vice versa). It wasn't exactly the high point in American space exploration (although it isn't the low point either). I think it happened in 1998.

    1. Re:A) refers to Mars Explorer (sic).... by BTWR · · Score: 1

      you mean Mars Climate Orbiter. Mars express is Europe's current orbiter around Mars.

  144. Good News! by Prince+Cyph0r · · Score: 0

    well, the ESA did save a lot of money on their car insurance by switching to Geico!

    *ducks*

  145. Road Trip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got Shotgun!

  146. OTOH Americunt crack-smoking program is successful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    melikesaystuff mystufisay realthoughts melikecokeisrealthing me wundarwhy orl wirldhate youesay? americunts heroes of arrogunce! usa numbr onne!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! youuessay! yooessay! youesay!

  147. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Very simple, the French owe the US their counrty after we beat the Germans for them in WWI & WWII. And, look how they repay us Anglophones:

    Desecration of a British war cemetery in France
    British war graves vandalised

    The French are NOT out friends. As Churchill said "They owe us too much to ever forgive us." Now the French are attempting to turn the EU into a Franco-Prussian alliance and win back what they lost at Waterloo.

  148. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by matfud · · Score: 2, Redundant

    >Sure there is. We have the strongest economy and
    >the largest GNP in the world. We have the
    >greatest technology (though I fear that may
    >change if we do not shape up) in the world. We
    >have the strongest military. We invented the
    >computer you are using to connect to the website
    >(also invented here) over the internet (invented
    >here) using broadband (invented here) or the
    >telephone (also invented here). Slashdot itself
    >was invented here and is hosted here.

    Thanks for that. America did not invent
    * the computer.
    * websites (or the WWW).
    * the telephone.
    * Broadband encompases many technologies, including 3G techs, not all of which can be claimed to be invented by america.

    Also, currently the EU has a larger GNP then America.

    I will give you the military though as you seem so proud of it.

  149. Unlikely in that short term by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    But wait 800-1000 years, by then the Red Planet may have been terraformed.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  150. Let me share something I've learned from movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just makes me sad

    There is no crying in space exploration.
    On Mars, no one can hear you sniffle.

    When Haley's comet comes back were going to all be slaughtered by zombies that live in a giant umbrella. Mostly because of horney americans, and impotent british.

  151. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by tengwar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course they did make several unmanned landings. What I hadn't realised was that in 1976 they also had a probe return samples to Earth.

  152. Re:Not much money wasted: 40mil. GBP by Joey7F · · Score: 1

    The scope of this mission is larger than for beagle is it not? Also it is 800 million for both Spirit AND Opportunity. If we find water and if we find there was/is life on mars, it will have been worth it and then some. Bill Nye the science guy defended the missions with a great analogy.

    Paraphrased Question: "Isn't that a lot of money that could go to better use?"

    Paraphrased Answer: "Not really, if you go to a fancy coffee store you will have spent your contribution towards the mission"

    I am a Republican, and as such I am selective about which government programs I endorse. This is one though for two reasons.

    One, privately there is little incentive to perform this type of science. Two research for these missions goes to help our military develop the next generation of equipment.

    A third less obvious (or less tangible) reason is to inspire a generation of kids to dream about the prospects of a future in science or engineering. If kids want to be astronauts instead of athletes, you will have most fail, but those that want to be astronauts will at least have a path laid for higher education.

    --Joey

  153. Leaked photo of Future Mission: Spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a link for one of the upcoming missions for Spirit.

    link

  154. Nothing wrong with competition... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... it is only that you guys take it to fanatical extremes.

    Excesses are generally bad on my book.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  155. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by bravehamster · · Score: 1

    whereas the USSR enslaved as much of the world as it could as had their friends the Nazis

    You make some good points, but you *really* ought to check yourself on this one. Try telling some old Soviet tank commander, or some little old babushka that the Nazis were their friends, and you'll be lucky if you walk away from the incident. A lot of Russians hate and distrust Germans in general, and Nazis in particular, with a passion that most people find hard to comprehend. Considering the nearly 40 million Russians/Soviets that died as the result of 2 German invasions, I can't say I blame them. The USSR did a lot of horrible things, but being friends of the Nazis? Never.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
  156. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1, Troll

    telephone (also invented here).

    No, invented here (Canada).

    Another thing to be proud of with respect to the US is that our citizens clearly do care about what happens in the rest of the world, as evidenced by our work as the global police.

    "We bomb you because we care!"

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  157. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    The Russians planned and tried to go to the moon. But when we got there first

    Their robots got there first...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  158. Agenda for second Manned Mars Mission by jafac · · Score: 1

    1. Recover bodies from first Manned Mars Mission.
    2. Recover Beagle 2
    3. Recover other failed Mars probe missions. . .
    4. Science

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  159. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by ad0gg · · Score: 1

    Its like discovering a cure for cancer, who cares who discovers it first as long as its discovered.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  160. risk management by bani · · Score: 1

    mars is high risk. they should have known better by now. there are enough data points to show they made they wrong decision even before they launched ...

  161. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    website : CERN (Switzerland)
    broadband : ??? ADSL - Alcatel (France)
    telephone : Bell (Canada)
    Big Mac : who gives a shit (USA)

    Just love those crappy posts who seem to score on Slashdot... you just have to wonder what they are smoking !

  162. Re:Not much money wasted: 40mil. GBP by madprof · · Score: 1

    The budget was not the only constraint - the Beagle probe was built in a staggeringly quick space of time.

  163. Water landing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be ironic if it landed in four feet of water and shorted out :0

  164. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by t0qer · · Score: 1

    Mod parent and everyone who participates in "Yeah!/Boo! America" in this thread down please.


    Personally I think I should be getting "Insightful" modpoints. Look at all the discussion my parent post has generated! I'm not kidding here!

    We've seen this discussion bounce through many facts about space travel, to say the least which have been on topic and on discussion with the original story section "space" We've examined which countries were first at what, and who were the men behind these achievements in space exploration.

    I think my original parent post was OK. It should at least get a +3 Funny

  165. I think it has not been damaged. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the batteries just fell.

    Oh, man, I'm feeling cruel tonight... 8-D

  166. Spirit Mission Changed To Search For WMDs! by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

    http://deadbrain.co.uk/news/article_2004_01_04_542 1.php

    --
    Nice Marmot
  167. my question by fredmosby · · Score: 1

    If the beagle had succeded and spirit had failed what would the Euroopeans be saying?

    1. Re:my question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the beagle had succeded and spirit had failed what would the Euroopeans be saying?

      "Hooray! Let us celebrate with tea and crumpets."

    2. Re:my question by mlk · · Score: 1

      Shit, I was looking forward to funky 3D pics.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  168. how about orbital pictures? by newsdee · · Score: 1

    I speak from complete ignorance and wishful thinking, but wouldn't it be possible to calculate the general area where the lander may have fallen and take pictures from orbit? Maybe the resolution of the cameras is not enough though... and the orbiters have probably better things to do than look for the Beagle2 like this.

    1. Re:how about orbital pictures? by jkcity · · Score: 1

      they are going to take pictures on the 9th january, maybe they'l release them hopefully, since the more eys that scan them the better since if ti shows it'll only be small.

  169. Our top story tonight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does this /. headline remind me of the old SNL Weekend Update headline (repeated weekly), "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead"?

  170. Re:Don't forget... by gnaasympathizer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda stepped off the bus and was led into the yard of the Michigan State Correctional
    Institute. He had been given ten years for participating in a stock fraud. Five with good behavior. Years
    spent basking in the glow of a CRT had been hard on him. His body was frail, his skin pallid. He knew he
    could never make it through ten years in the general population with his virginity intact. He had to get
    into solitary.
    As soon as the burly guard unshackled him he made his move. Exhaling a feminine "hmmph" he weakly slapped
    the guard. He was quickly taken to the ground, receiving a swift kick to the ribs before being
    restrained. As he was dragged to the solitary confinement cell he felt nothing but relief. "At least in
    solitary," he thought "I'll be safe." Unfortunately for CmdrTaco he had picked the wrong guard to mess
    with.

    The next few days were uneventful. The time in his cell he spent evenly between sleeping, reading a "Perl
    for Dummies" book he had gotten from the book cart, and masturbating furiously. His self-flagellation was
    interrupted on the fourth day. The burly guard he had attacked earlier stepped into his cell. The gleam
    in the guards eye and the mean grin on his face made CmdrTaco's pecker quickly shrivel in his hand. "You
    fucked with the wrong man when you fucked with Michael Simms," said the guard. "The inmates here call me
    The Asshole for a reason. Now come with me, punk."

    The guard led him down the hall to one of several empty shower stalls. He roughly threw CmdrTaco in the
    stall and locked the door. CmdrTaco was petrified. His mind raced as he imagined the myriad of different
    tortures that could be in store for him. His worst fears were confirmed when the guard returned. In his
    hands were a short black dress, black stilleto heels, and a curly blonde wig. "Strip down and put this
    on, bitch." CmdrTaco did as instructed and was pleased to notice that the dress fit well and the heels
    gave him a nice slimming effect. The burly guard admired the drag queen. "The GNAA is gonna love you!"

    The guard left the shower stall, only to return minutes later. He opened the door and led 20 large black
    men into the stall. "CmdrTaco, meet the Gay Nigger Association of America. GNAA, meet CmdrTaco. I'm sure
    you all will get along fine." With that the guard slammed the shower door closed and walked away
    laughing.

    The men approached CmdrTaco, backing him into a corner. The apparent leader stepped forward. "No matter
    what I'm gonna fuck that purdy lil' ass of yours. Now I can fuck it dry or you can lube it up for me."
    CmdrTaco knew he had no choice. He kneeled in front of the leader, who began to slap his face with his 10
    black inches. Puss from syphilictic sores quickly covered CmdrTaco's cheeks. When the leader was
    sufficiently aroused he placed his throbbing cock up to CmdrTaco's lips. As soon as CmdrTaco opened his
    mouth the leader violently shoved his manhood to the back of CmdrTaco's throat and exclaimed "Swallow my
    shit you cracker bitch!" CmdrTaco gagged as he was violently face fucked.

    Just when he was about to pass out the leader pulled out, turned him around and shoved his cock into
    CmdrTaco's ass. CmdrTaco began to scream in agony but his cries were quickly muffled by one of the other
    gang member's cocks. They rode him like that for the better part of an hour. When one man finished
    another quickly took his place. Just as CmdrTaco was getting used to the throbbing pain in his anus the
    men stopped. One man lay down on the floor and CmdrTaco was told to get on top of him and take his dick
    inside him. Exhausted and humiliated, CmdrTaco had no will left to fight. As soon as he inserted the
    penis another man came up behind him and began to force his cock into CmdrTaco's already filled anus.
    Again his screams of agony were muffled, this time by a smelly black anus.

    For another hour he was violated in this way. When the men were finished with him he couldn't wa

    --
    Help stamp out slashdot trolls--send $1 to GNAA PO Box 69 Key West, FL 32269-069
  171. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were going to let them rent it, but they realized they didn't have any actors that could match up to OJ and backed out of the project.

  172. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1
    We invented the computer you are using to connect to the website (also invented here) over the internet (invented here) using broadband (invented here) or the telephone (also invented here).
    America did not invent
    * the computer.
    * websites (or the WWW).
    * the telephone.

    I'm confused. I mean, I'll give you the Web, that was not invented by US citizens. The grandparent was wrong on that one. But computers and phones? Hmm. Looked up phones on the Web and it appears that Antonio Meucci really invented the phone, not Alexander Bell. OK. Computers? Doesn't this depend upon whether you view the z3 or ENIAC as the first "real" computer? They each have some concepts that resemble computers today, but also each do bits differently. The ENIAC was US. The z3 was German (I think, I can't recall). I don't know, maybe you're thinking of Turing or someone as the true father of computer. Whatever the case, while at least 2 of those items appear to be legitimately invented elsewhere, all 3 got 0wn3d by the USA. Perhaps it is more accurate to say that the USA was the center of power for adoption of those devices. I'm comfortable with that. For most US citizens, the source of pride isn't necessarily that we bred it, but that we fed it.

  173. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    ...rocks that were brought back from Mars...

    I didn't know that has ever happened. We've sent stuff there, starting in 1976, but are you sure we (i.e., Terrans) ever managed to bring samples back? And what mission was that?

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  174. I'll bet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll bet they didn't look close enough at problems on the orbiter, in that the beagle is communicating perfectly with the orbiter but the orbiter only sends home "no communication with beagle yet".

    Wouldn't that be a nasty software glitch. I would place money on it though if they were to see it the end as to what the real problem is.

  175. It's dead, Jim by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny


    The victim of lame slashdot humor. It never had a chance.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  176. radioactive material by BlueboyX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While the dye you mention is probably a joke, having a radioactive liquid that would spill on a catastrophic crash would be released. The dye would obviously not be visible at all, but we do have the technology to track radiation from quite a ways away...

    --
    "Never, never suspect the dreams within the dreams of dreaming children." ~The Amazon Quartet
    1. Re:radioactive material by shaitand · · Score: 1

      obviosly the real answer would be to land on the martian north pole and in place of some liquid simply detonate a nuclear explosion there upon failure. That way failure means a bold step in terraforming Mars, and the explosion would be reasonably detectable I suspect.

    2. Re:radioactive material by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      you only need something basic that will either emit a specific wavelength, or reflect a lot of something. Those colored flares that boats use make a lot of smoke for a tiny package. So thats all you need. Either both colored and reflective and/or radioactive to be detected by something. 10pixel = 10-20 meters so its hardly a large are.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    3. Re:radioactive material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Martian Dudes, we come in peace.
      P.S Hope you guys are wearing your radiation suits.

  177. What got the Grandparent's goat... by titzandkunt · · Score: 2, Informative


    ... was the "It isn't enough that I succeed: Someone else must fail" kind of mentality that underscored the IRC messages from JPL.

    If someone goes around shouting "We No.1, We No 1!", and they really are number one, fine. They're a bit OTT and demonstrative, but still, fine.

    It's when someone, anyone, goes around shouting "We No. 1 - you shit!", that patience wears a bit thin.

    Best,

    T&K.

    --
    Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    1. Re:What got the Grandparent's goat... by gangien · · Score: 1

      I can only speak for myself. But I think there is a lot of because of the way other people have reacted to the US. And of course a certain percentage of it, is just people being idiots for lack of anything better to do.

  178. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, [the telephone was] invented here (Canada).

    Canadians love to claim this, but it's basically untrue. Bell was born and educated in Scotland, then he moved to London in 1867 (at age 20). In 1870 he moved to canada, and then in 1872 (just two years in canada) he moved to the US. The telephone was officially unveiled in the US, four years later in 1876. The patents for the telephone are all filed in the US.

    One reason canada likes to claim the telephone as their own is because bell occasionally visited canada for long periods (as much as 6 months at a time) before he invented the telephone, and then continued to do this even after 1876. He also probably made some key discoveries in the 2 years he officially lived there. But, by this logic, scotland has more claim the telephone than canada, simply because he was there a lot more before the invention.

  179. Canucks invented the Telephone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahaha!

  180. Vyger by zCyl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn, those martians shot down another one of our probes!

    Perhaps someday a martian will stumble across it, fix it, make it intelligent, and Bagel will come back to us searching for its Creator.

    1. Re:Vyger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bagel, huh? So he's gonna invade bakeries across the US?

    2. Re:Vyger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because US is the center of the world and invented bagels among all other things.

    3. Re:Vyger by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      I dread the day that B'gle returns.

  181. WTF by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

    Bouston, this is Bission Bontrol: The Beagle has etcetera...

  182. Since the moon colonies did so well... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    "Yes, I'm talking about humans on Mars, being casual and knocking about the place, kicking over rocks on a lazy day, sometime in my lifetime. It could be my son or daughter grown up."

    Well, of course, it's the logical next place to colonize. All those cheaply-built colonies we tossed up on the moon in the 1970s are starting to show their age, and spacefare to the Lagrange-point stations is at an all time low, so anyone can afford to go! Pack the kids into your nuclear-powered flying cars and get to the local spaceport today, the martian homesteading rush is about to begin.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  183. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Also, currently the EU has a larger GNP then America.

    Wow... the EU (almost an entire continent) has a GNP larger than America (one country).

    NAFTA is still larger.. idiot

  184. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    whereas the USSR enslaved as much of the world as it could as had their friends the Nazis

    You make some good points, but you *really* ought to check yourself on this one. Try telling some old Soviet tank commander, or some little old babushka that the Nazis were their friends, and you'll be lucky if you walk away from the incident. A lot of Russians hate and distrust Germans in general, and Nazis in particular, with a passion that most people find hard to comprehend. Considering the nearly 40 million Russians/Soviets that died as the result of 2 German invasions, I can't say I blame them. The USSR did a lot of horrible things, but being friends of the Nazis? Never.

    The USSR was never friends with the Nazis? You do realize that had Stalin not allowed Hitler to build weapons in Soviet factories and train troops on Soviet soil that he was not supposed to have he would never have been ready to start WWII, don't you? Then there was that bit about the nonagression pact they had with one another. Oh, and there's also the fact the the USSR traded with Hitler providing much-needed petroleum products without which the war would have likewise not been possible.

    Though Hitler opposed Communism, both Stalin and Hitler ran similar regimes. They befriended one another in order to carve up Europe. Yes, it went sour for them, and I am sure the Soviet tank commanders did not like the Germans after that even if they had liked them before (hint, there are centuries at least of animosity between Russia, Ukraine, Poland, and Germany, and for good reason). But the USSR and the Nazi regime were indeed friends and helped one another enslave the people of Europe.

    When the allies defeated Hitler, Stalin made sure that he would not lose his gains. Eastern Europe was under Soviet domination. But wait, there is more. The Soviet states were actually under Russian domination the whole time, and the USSR gained several states.

    Speaking of which I think you will find that the majority of Soviet losses were in fact losses from nonRussian states, most of all from Ukraine. Ukraine fought on three sides at least in the war. There were Ukrainian SS troops fighting for the Germans, Ukrainian Red Army troops fighting for Stalin, and Ukrainian partisans fighting for Ukraine. It all added up to a lot of Ukrainians being killed in battle besides the massive civilian casualties. The civilians were starved and attacked by all sides.

    The tale in other Soviet states is very similar. In addition vast numbers of the native populations were deported to Siberia. As for the Red Army losses, these were exacerbated by Stalin's refusal to accept escaped POWs or any form of retreat. Sometimes the troops who were goading units into battle with orders to shoot any Red Army soldier who came back were better equipped than those who were fighting.

    Now that I think about it, it probably was disengenuous to say it the way I did because it might imply that the average Soviet citizen liked and approved of what was happening. That is certainly not the case. Stalin is the real culprit here. But that is just it. You get the US or you get Stalin. Personally I think the US way is better. And trust me, as much as I dislike Bush, I prefer him to Putin just as much as I would have FDR to Stalin.

  185. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    No, [the telephone was] invented here (Canada).

    Canadians love to claim this, but it's basically untrue. Bell was born and educated in Scotland, then he moved to London in 1867 (at age 20). In 1870 he moved to canada, and then in 1872 (just two years in canada) he moved to the US. The telephone was officially unveiled in the US, four years later in 1876. The patents for the telephone are all filed in the US.

    One reason canada likes to claim the telephone as their own is because bell occasionally visited canada for long periods (as much as 6 months at a time) before he invented the telephone, and then continued to do this even after 1876. He also probably made some key discoveries in the 2 years he officially lived there. But, by this logic, scotland has more claim the telephone than canada, simply because he was there a lot more before the invention.

    At any rate, he was an American citizen, and proud to be one at that.

  186. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually.. i take that back... the EU (450 million people) merely has a GNP similar to the US (280 million)...

    we both have a GNP of aprox 9 trillion (PPT doc.. dated sept 2003)

  187. So the answer is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're saying they're smart enough to figure out 9/10th's of the mission correct and missed that little piece.

    Hey, it happens to the smartest guys.

    Not me, of course, but people like you.

  188. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Also, currently the EU has a larger GNP then America.

    That's odd, I can only find GDP figures on the EU's web site, not GNP. Maybe that's because GDP is now the standard for comparison.
    The US does have a higher GDP than the EU, and a higher rate of growth.

    The invention of the computer is a bit fuzzier, you're probably referring to Babbage's machine. But we might as well go all the way back to the Abacus. If "computer" is a device based on a microprocessor, then that would be the Intel 8086 chip, invented in the US. If a "computer" is merely a device that uses electronic memory storage and switching mechanisms, then that would be ENIAC, built right here in the US.

    Let's see... WWW... CERN, check.
    Telephone: if I remember my geography, Boston MA is in America, where Alexander Bell created the first actual, working telephone, the design from which all wired telephones were descended.

    Broadband: I don't really see that as an "invention." Just doing something faster than before.

  189. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    website : CERN (Switzerland)
    broadband : ??? ADSL - Alcatel (France)
    telephone : Bell (Canada)
    Big Mac : who gives a shit (USA)

    Just love those crappy posts who seem to score on Slashdot... you just have to wonder what they are smoking !

    I'll give you the web. I was clearly wrong. I had conflated invention of the graphical web browser (US) with invention of the web.

    I was right about US companies (AT&T and Time-Warner) coming up with broadband, however. Likewise Alexander Graham Bell was a US citizen and a patriot, so you are wrong to attribute him to Canada. Someone else expounded on this better than I could in this thread.

    But hey, go invent something in your country and make them proud! That is what this is all about anyway.

  190. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that. America did not invent
    * the computer. ...

    Also, currently the EU has a larger GNP then America.

    I will give you the military though as you seem so proud of it.

    Actually I was pretty sure we did invent the computer. All the early computers, from Babbage's analytical engine to the ENIAC etc were designed in the USA. Nevertheless, I was directly referring to the personal computer which was invented by Steve Wozniac and Steve Jobs, two fine upstanding Americans.

    As for the EU, well, it's not a country now is it? I think that's eventually in the cards but adoption of the Euro will be important to that and there are some difficulties. Nevertheless, I think we should ramp up if Europe has somehow overtaken us as a collective in GNP. I mean after all if we are going to top them in defense spending then we should top GNP as well.

    As for the military, I am proud that that military has kept the world safe from dictators and bullies. By the way that includes keeping Europe safe after it was proven Europeans themselves could not do that. A lot of Europeans are proud of the grand social programs they have and the many investments in infrastructure their countries' governments have made. But I wonder if that would be possible if the Europeans had to even come close to paying their equal share for UN and NATO costs. You should think about that next time you want to complain about teh US being a global policeman.

  191. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    ..rocks that were brought back from Mars...

    I didn't know that has ever happened. We've sent stuff there, starting in 1976, but are you sure we (i.e., Terrans) ever managed to bring samples back? And what mission was that?

    Probably this was a case of the news reports being confusing. I remembered a lot of reports of "rocks from mars with life on them" which must have been the same story as the first one.

  192. well duh by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    "There's a 73 Kg limit (including all the airbags, entry heat-shield, and the actual payload) for the entire mission"

    there *was*

    obviously you cant go back in time to retrofit a beacon on Beagle 2.

    is the next beagle mission going to have a 73kg weight limit?

  193. Great Galactic Ghoul by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember when all the Mars missions were supposedly being "sabotaged" (read: stopped working) several decades ago, and NASA jokingly blamed it on the "Great Galactic Ghoul?"

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  194. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whenever I read obvious BS like this on /. I bookmark the post, wait until I get new mod points and mod it down once I do.

    We had your kind of patriotism in Germany too once you know? It's called fascism now.

    Well if you are truly German perhaps reports of superior German education are unfounded after all. Allow me to give you a demonstration in political science 101.

    What you are referring to in actually Nationalism. A firm belief that your country is the best. Nationalism gets a bad rap in part because of situations like Nazi Germany. But it is really not evil in itself to think your country is the best in the world. The trick is to work to make it so. If you do not have pride in your country, and do not work to make your country better, your civilization will ultimately fall.

    Besides, what is wrong with having pride in one's country? Someone said that the US had nothing to be proud of. I refuted them and gave some of the myriad reasons US citizens have to be proud. What is wrong with that?

    What would you say if I claimed Germany had nothing to be proud of? Would you not defend your country and speak of its rich cultural traditions, beautiful landscape (and women), beer and sausages, excellent automobiles, and kick-ass highway system? Is being proud of national achievements really fascist? Of course it isn't.

    Fascism is the belief that society should be strictly controlled by a strong leader. Examples of Fascism in action are Fascist Italy and Spain and Nazi Germany during and before WWII. I have never advocated fascism and I never will. I believe strongly in freedom, democracy, and self-reliance. These are, by the way the cornerstones of American (US) philosophy of which we are likewise very proud.

  195. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    Another thing to be proud of with respect to the US is that our citizens clearly do care about what happens in the rest of the world, as evidenced by our work as the global police.
    "We bomb you because we care!"

    Actually, here in the US there is a group called "Food not Bombs" who distribute food to the homeless. Now imagine their surprise when they found that we were dropping food and bombs simultaneously on Afghanistan. Well, at least we got it half right :P.

  196. hearing only silence by Dagrush · · Score: 0

    hearing onlysilence

    Although silence is "the loudest sound", you can't hear it.

    Might the submitter be a Simon & Garfunkle fan?

  197. Psst, Babbage was British and working in the UK! by Slashamatic · · Score: 4, Informative
    All the early computers, from Babbage's analytical engine to the ENIAC etc were designed in the USA

    The difference and analytical engines wew design by a Brit in the UK. The Z3 was German and the bombes and in particular, Colossus for code cracking were British, albeit the bombes had some Polish input. The first commercial electronic computer was built by a British company as was the first virtual memory computer. Essentially it wasn't until the superior buying power of major corporations and the US government spurred development over in the US. The European market was very fragmented then and without a large single domestic market, they fell behind.

  198. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I care who's first, because in the US and other backwards nations, someone could patent the cure, and charge a billion dollars a dose.

  199. Military vs Social Contributions by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
    The US led Marshall plan provided the groundwork for much of modern Europe. The reconstruction after WW2 Militarism in the former Axis countries was very actively discouraged, which is why Germany, for example is not big on military spending.

    You will find out that almost all EU countries contribute a much larger share of non-military foreign aid to the rest of the world. Although the military contributions are smaller, the social programmes make up for this. Unhappy people and unstable countries make poor neighbours and an effective recruiting ground for terrorists.

    Also you will find that unlike the US, the EU countries have been paying their share of the UN. The US has in the past refused to pay and they are only doing so now by renegotiating their contributions downwards.

    1. Re:Military vs Social Contributions by rifter · · Score: 1

      Also you will find that unlike the US, the EU countries have been paying their share of the UN. The US has in the past refused to pay and they are only doing so now by renegotiating their contributions downwards.

      This was because the US was pretty much paying the entire budget of the UN. No the EU countries were not paying their share. They did, however, dutifully pay their dues. I opposed the Republican plans to not pay our dues, but regardless of this fact, the dues for the US far outstripped those of the EU even as a collective. This was what precipitated the calls to drop out of the UN and/or stop paying, among other things.

    2. Re:Military vs Social Contributions by Slashamatic · · Score: 1

      The dues were based on a GDP formula and paid more than other individual countries. The US was most definitly not paying a lion's share compared to collections of countries (such as the EU, even just adding Germany's, the UK's and France's contributions together) - and in any case, they welched for party-political reasons.

    3. Re:Military vs Social Contributions by rifter · · Score: 1

      The dues were based on a GDP formula and paid more than other individual countries. The US was most definitly not paying a lion's share compared to collections of countries (such as the EU, even just adding Germany's, the UK's and France's contributions together) - and in any case, they welched for party-political reasons.

      Well, it looks like I was slightly wrong about this. The US pays 25% of the UN budget, which is certainly more than any other country, but certainly not what I woudl have thought given the Republican whining on this subject (I would have put the figure closer to 75%). However it is more than the UK France, and Germany put together. In fact if you throw in mighty Spain you are still short. You need Italy to get above the contribution of the US.

      Now, that is just the "union dues," as it were. When the UN needs to do something militarily, 9 times out of ten it means the lion's share of the work has to be done by US troops. UN adventures which do not feature US troops are unsuccessful almost without exception. Which goes back to the 300-500 billion dollars the US spends annually to keep the world safe.

      And again, the EU is not a country. To be a country, you need a common government and a common currency. The EU does not have either. A constitution was recently drafted, and there is the Euro, yes. And of course the UK, France, and Germany all use the.. oh that right, they DON'T use the euro and probably NEVER will.

      And by the way if you do live in Europe you had better pray that the EU never does become a country. Especially now that the originally democratic provisions of the EU were replaced so that it will in fact be a dictatorship. This is beside the fact that adoption of the Euro is likely to cause economic collapse. Estonians were recently quoted as saying that the EU is becoming the new Soviet Union. I hope that they are not right, or it does not work out, because living in Europe will be very bad otherwise.

      Now don't get me wrong. I am all for cooperation between countries. In fact I think that removing economic and immigration barriers between European countries will stimulate growth there and is therefore a healthy thing. I likewise think that the United States should work to improve the lot of all nations in the Western Hemisphere. NAFTA was supposed to do that, but apparently it did not work out that way. And there is the rub. Just as greedy corporate elitists took advantage of and subverted NAFTA, so greedy banking elitists will take over and subvert the EU systems.

    4. Re:Military vs Social Contributions by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
      Um there are two levels of assesment, one for normal members and one for permanent members of the security council, but the amount depends upon the GNP. Peace-keeping activities carried out on the UN's behalf are paid for by a special budget not by the individual members.

      It is true that the US spends a lot on the military, but one reason is that the US bases are seen as vote-winners by the congress and senate. The military need arms and equipment which need regular servicing and replacement. A cynic remarked after the Gulf War I that in about 10 years the cruise missiles would have to used or replaced. However, it should be added that the Iraqi conflict was not a UN action so it was up to the participants to pay for it.

      At no point did I say that the EU is a country. In your quote from my posting, I refer to it as a collection of countries, although an increasingly powerful one. The EU has a currency that most of its members have adopted and a directly elected parliament. The provisons in the new constitution that you refer to are for the representation on the council of Europe and essentially mean that the countries with the most people have the most votes. However it does lack a single foreign-policy (as in Powell's complaint of "Who do I call when I want to know Europe's opinion?"). The EU doesn't have its own joint defence force, this would be a problem because of NATO.

      However, the EU also runs its own aid programmes in addition to those performed by the member countries. Although some programmes are for the EU's own sake such as PHARE which provides transitional assistance for new members, others such as TACIS provide general assistance to the post Soviet Block. Others try to help people establish democracy in places like Palastine. In Israel, this was not particularly sucessful, but it has worked elsewhere. On the whole, this is just playing good neighbours and trying to reduce tension.

      Lastly, I don't really see banking elitists taking over. The ECB seems pretty powerful, but elite it isn't. Each EMU member has a vote running it. Outside of the UK, the banks really don't have that much power. There is more money in the funds management companies based out of St. James in London that all of Frankfurt, let alone the city. For the EU to coalesce into a single country is about as likely as a "North America". On the other hand confederation is a vague possibility.

      Lastly, I should return to topic and point out that that the ESA and similar organisations (like CERN) are not EU.

  200. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

    Indeed, and a rover, too. The first one of its kind I believe.

  201. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    whereas the USSR enslaved as much of the world as it could as had their friends the Nazis. - Like the man on /. used to say: if I ever meet you, I will kick your ass. Don't even reply to me, freaking fascist.

  202. Molotov-Ribbentrop by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
    It was called The Molotov-Ribbentrop Non-Aggression Pact. However, Stalin ended up fighting the Germans, but he wasn't particular, he distrusted and hated everyone: Germans, Jews, intellectuals and he was responsible for death of between 20 and 30 million people in the thirties.

    Some older Russians may distrust Germans, but the younger ones aren't bothered. The Germans had a history of working with the Russians dating back to Peter the Great. There was a large contingent of Russians of German ethnic origin (mostly descendents of farmers invited by Catherine the Great), although many have taken up their right to relocate to Germany. Catherine herself was born in Darmstadt, Germany.

  203. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Charles+E.+Hardwidge · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The Russians planned and tried to go to the moon. But when we got there first, they gave out that story of "Nyah, we never wanted to go to that dirty ol' moon, anyhow!"

    A little known fact is the Soviet Union did get to the moon first. The United States manned moon landing was made shortly afterwards. Another fact is that without British and continental European assistance the United States would have come second in the manned programme. Rather than dwell on the PR oversights that encouraged you to come to the conclusions you have, I'm pleased to see Europe, Russia, China, India, and Japan, have started producing PR that better reflects their own considerable achievements.

    I'm greatly encouraged by the enthusiasm with which many politicans and members of the public have shown towards Beagle. Putting technological achievements aside, this alone makes the project a success. Professor Pillinger is still of the belief that Beagle will bark, and isn't giving up hope until all possibilities have been exhausted. I share that belief. And that is probably the greatest triumph. Professor Pillinger has helped remind us what a sense of wonder and hope for a better world can achieve.

  204. Customs... by glenebob · · Score: 1

    It's probly just hung up in Martian Customs. The poor ole' Beagle might be undergoing a cavety search this very moment.

  205. Re: why not a flare by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Have a flare of some kind that spews out BLUE/GREEN smoke/crap that lands on the surface and stays there for years. and it about 100 feet long too, like powdered colored crap. use 4 of them in a cross config so you can work out where it is.

    Total weight, 1kg max.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  206. Re: launch 50 at once by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Time to build 50 of the damn beagles and launch them at once 73 * 50 = 3600kg, easily launched on a Titan5 or Ariane5. Sure it might cost $120m to launch, and be hard to fit 50 landers in one bigass probe, but hey, it would be the best result ever! with 20-50 locations being rovered at the same time.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  207. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans are not free. To be free you'd at least have to be able to support your self without the permission of others.

    Look at your basic needs: A house. May you cut down some trees and build one, where you see fit? No, you need permission(s).
    How about food? Well unless your a native (not including eskimos) you may only hunt/eat whatever your community tells you to.

    That's two major causes that makes me say that you are not free.
    America is not a free land, you must conform.

  208. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an idiot to admit that the US has programmed you into hating your own country. Let me tell you that as a fellow German.

    Es gibt keine Preise fuer Selbsthass, wann rafft ihr das endlich?

  209. My sources tell me. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    That the spate of 'lost' Mars exploration devices are working just fine.

    It's a matter of too much too soon.

    Give it a few years. The aliens will make their big poo-bah appearance soon enough. (They're already practically oozing out around the edges as it is!) Then the fan will really take a hit, all veils will burn away, etc.

    Personally, I think it'll be a challenge just to stay alive for the next five-eight years to see all this stuff go down. --What with the draft, economic collapses and military lock-downs coming, disease-cities becoming death traps with road blocks to prevent you from leaving, and such. Among other things.

    It's true that the future isn't set, but not enough people are working to act in favor of their future selves. (There really is a ton of things you can do. Stop eating all the amazing poisons put in your food, for a start. Clear your head. Soy is one such example, containing toxins which prevent mineral and protien uptake in your body. It's also filled with plant-based eostrogen, (yes guys, that would be 'Female Growth Hormones'. Why do you think Asians are so small? Hint: it's not the exuse you've been sold.) And best of all, soy has managed to creep into practically every foodstuff on the market. Look it up.)

    But really. . . At this point I've more or less given up on humanity as a whole. Mars probes be damned. Anybody who does enough digging will know more or less what is being seen on the red planet but not shared.

    Though, it's nice to see that so few people are calling me nuts these days. When I was warning everybody about this stuff back in 2001, the cat calls were just harsh.

    Fear is Food, so don't get spooked. Grow a spine, look reality dead on, and you'll win.


    -FL

  210. It's not really a failure for the Brits by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny
    We've done at least as well as the Roswell aliens did:

    Bravely navigate the endless black depths of space to a new and strange planet. Then crash.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  211. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Repran · · Score: 1
    You obviously have not lived in Germany. Raising a German national flag on a flag pole in your garden is enough to be called a Nazi pig. It was hotly publicly debated if one can actually claim 'I am proud to be a German!' (Ich bin stolz ein Deutscher zu sein!).

    And you know what? It is concensus that it is unacceptable to make such a statement. Do it and you will be denounced a frigging Nazi pig. It is fine to be 'thankfull' or 'gratefull'. But 'proud'? That would be too much. Don't belive me? Ask any of your German friends - should you have any.

    Maybe this give some of you an idea how your biased patriotism sounds in the ears of contemporary Germans who has been tought over and over again that 'patriotism' == 'fascism' == 'dead jews' == 'YOUR fault'.

    Just my 0.02 Euro.

    --

    -- Contradictions only exist in thought - not in reality.

  212. 2 all the superior ones (you know the individuals) by superhoe · · Score: 1
    I still keep wondering which REALLY touches a _common_ citizen more:

    - The fact that you now have some drone browsing some red planet's surface and others don't

    or

    - The fact that meanwhile you feel unearthly superiority over other earthlings and write about it to /. the FBI is browsing all your accounts and financial data without informing you - and it's perfectly legal. And much, much more.

    I just wonder if I really should feel that sad about all this Beagle ping timeout thing..

    I live a common life, therefore i prioritize

    --

    -el

  213. beagle found by Tom · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like they found the problem:

    crash image

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  214. In Related News by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

    ...The FAA reported that there was _still_ no contact from Amelia Earhart.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  215. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'patriotism' == 'fascism' == 'dead jews' == 'YOUR fault'

    If you choose to believe it -> your fault alone. If your friends call you a Nazi for being proud of Germany, you should probably get new friends. And while it is true that most people don't display their pride in public, you'd be surprised how many actually don't care at all for the Holocaust and fascism and feel proud anyway.

    -- A fellow German from Muenchen

  216. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by doublegauss · · Score: 1
    or the telephone (also invented here).

    Not quite. See here.

  217. Re:Chalk one up to American Obesity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardly suprising your probe is bigger and heavier!

  218. Smashed to bits? by BigBadBus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I reckon it was smashed to bits on landing. The Beagle 2 team had problems when testing one of the landing bags at a vacuum facility in the US; basically, the bags burst, and the team realised that they had to use a lower pressure and compromise on a few other items to save on weight. One compromise too far I think.

  219. Mars Express Camera by k2r · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    since Mars Express - which I'd consider to be the most important part of the project - is working perfectly, there will be a stereo-camera with a resolution of 2m (Meters) orbiting the planet.
    This might be enough to see what happened to the poor little doggie.

    There are a lot of great instruments aboard Mars Express, you can find all the information about them on The ESA Site

    k2r

    1. Re:Mars Express Camera by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know, but Beagle's not actually that big - it's about 2m across, fully expanded, according to what I've read. Even if the airbags are still attached and nicely spread out, I still think the camera hasn't much chance of picking out anything interesting.

      I said 6 pixels (and I still think I'm being generous). To put that into perspective, you have this entire page (I'm assuming you're at 1280x1024 or 1024x768) and somewhere there *might* be something like - on it, or maybe ; except the contrast will be nowhere near as good as on this page. Even shadows of rocks will have a more prominent signature on the image :-(

      You need a resolution of about 10cm, and the problem with that is that there's a lot of 10cm^2 patches on a planet :-((

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    2. Re:Mars Express Camera by k2r · · Score: 1

      Hi Simon,

      so with your guess our best chance to find beagle is spotting a crater on mars. Somebody should have raked the surface of Mars before landing a probe...

      k2r

    3. Re:Mars Express Camera by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      I guess all I'm really saying is that it's hopeless once the thing doesn't say "I'm OK". If it's not ok, then do all the regression analysis, try to figure out where it went wrong and try another probe... A shame, but true :-(

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  220. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Aussie · · Score: 1

    What you are referring to in actually Nationalism
    Besides, what is wrong with having pride in one's country?

    "Nationalism is an infantile sickness, it is the measles of the human race. Heroism on command, senseless violence, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism - how passionately I hate them!" Albert Einstein

  221. Re: launch 50 at once by juhaz · · Score: 1

    Would be nice, of course, but that kind of money will be daaaamn hard to come by these days.

    Maybe one day, but probably not before we have a big-ass camera on the orbit to point out truely safe landing sites and maybe even few human operators on that side of the solar system orchestrating the thing.

    Well, maybe the Chinese can get anyone else to crap their pants and kick-start western space exploration again...

  222. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We invented the computer you are using to connect to the website

    Er... invented during WW2 by the British at Bletchley Park...

  223. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or the telephone (also invented here)


    According the the US patent office, invented in Cuba by an Italian who later registered his invention on a time limited patent in the USA, which he couldn't afford to keep up the payments for. Later patented by Bell.


    Lots of countries didn't invent the things for which they are popularly attributed the inventions. E.g. UK - TV (actually invented by the French), Radar (Germans), jet engines (Romanians)

  224. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but bell didn't invent the telephone. It was Meucci (according to the US Patent Office, given that Meucci sought to patent it first). See http://www.popular-science.net/history/meucci_bell .html

  225. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism - how passionately I hate them!

    Well Einstein, you went to the right country then!

    Anyway: Nationalism is important. It isn't meant for the likes of Einstein, however. It's meant for the pawns who can't give their life a meaning themselves. You need to keep those idiots loyal and busy. That's what it's for.

  226. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I occassionally raise the Reichskriegsflagge (the WW1 one, mind you) in my garden, just to piss off my gartenzwerg-owning neighbours.

    Found that some actually like it. Even though they don't admit it.

    Yes, I come from a small village. ;-)

  227. Patriotism, Nationalism, Jingoism, Racism by upside · · Score: 1

    It's more subtle than your 101. Defining Fascism narrowly as a political belief misses some defining features: directing public opinion and support by playing up to people's nationalist passions and prejudices (demagoguery).

    This is exactly what a European sees in Bush. See how easily the US gov't has been able to manipulate public opinion and get support by bashing the French in the Iraq question rather than addressing the actual issues. He's ridden roughshod over democratic principles in domestic policy and is detaining civilian prisoners without access to a lawyer in Guantanamo, all in the name of "national security".

    You must realise that European history is really about nationalism and the hurt that has caused. People look at lessons from their own history when they interpret the present. Some Europeans look at America today and see the mistakes from their past: nationalism, jingoism, demagoguery, imperialism, colonialism, crusades, concentration camps and war. Europeans are very cautious, pessimistic and critical because of these lessons. They teach us that things are rarely simple, clear cut or 100% certain and that there is always another side to the story.

    Nothing wrong with being patriotic or being proud of your country as such. However, there's the issue of "we're best" being very close to "I'm better than you" and the implications that has. Jingoism and racism are the darker side of nationalism.

    Nationalism is a good motivator, but it can be dangerous as a political tool. It's also not a very clever way of dealing with people from other countries on a personal level when you have an attitude that says "we're better than you." Things work much smoother on all levels when you try to be respectful of their right to be who they are.

    I'm sure most Americans act in good faith. What were the lessons for the US from its history, for example WWII? How do they affect American thinking?

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    1. Re:Patriotism, Nationalism, Jingoism, Racism by rifter · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what a European sees in Bush. See how easily the US gov't has been able to manipulate public opinion and get support by bashing the French in the Iraq question rather than addressing the actual issues. He's ridden roughshod over democratic principles in domestic policy and is detaining civilian prisoners without access to a lawyer in Guantanamo, all in the name of "national security".

      Actually Bush is a fascist, but for the reasons I outlined. He does not care about freedom, democracy, or the will of the people. He gives it lip service bacsue admitting he wants to be a dictator publicly would go too far. BUt he acts autocratically. Congress these days is a rubber stamp, just as the Reichstag was in Nazi Germany. And that is even if they get to vote. A number of laws have been written by the Bush administration. Some of them are simply entered as decrees or "policy changes." Others are voted in without any debate or comment allowed, and as secretly as one can in this country (like the provisions of Patriot II that were slipped into a bill which, apparently, congressmen were not allowed to read for security reasons).

      But I am still glad to live in the US because there is still the possibility to be rid of Bush through democratic means. He has gotten away with a lot through fiat, and has certainly been given plenty of slack thanks to the actions of the mujahadeen his father funded and trained. But there are limits yet to his power, and alsthough he has done as much as he can to make it illegal to speak against him, he cannot overtly do so. He must at leats pretend he is a democratic leader because if he does not the gig is up.

      Hopefully we will soon get someone better in there. I think the damage from the events of recent years on our cherished freedoms will take a long time to heal. It will require, strangely enough, strong leadership, but strong leadership from someone who is NOT an autocrat like Bush and his pal Putin are.

      As for the lessons we learn from WWII, two things which are hammered into our heads in public schools are the trend of the US to reduce military spending after each war (in fact we practically dissolved our military after each of the first few wars). The other is the peril of nonintervention. Intervening in Germany's affairs before WWII woudl have saved a lot of lives.

      Personally I think the most important lesson of the WWII era is how quickly people will in general make that trade of liberty for safety our founding fathers warned us about. I see it happening now with Bush, and he is using a lot of the same tactics Hitler did when he was gaining power. But it is verboten to even dare compare Bush to Hitler, ostensibly because Bush has not built any concentration camps. But there was a time when Hitler had not built any either and was building support in the way Bush is now. That is a fair comparison, IMHO.

      As for jingoism and all that you mentioned, I look at it this way. I think it is wrong to treat people from other countries as inferior. But I think everyone should have pride in their country. Just think if everyone in Ethiopia banded together to make Ethiopia kick ass! Then Sally Struthers would be out of a job. As for ribbing the otehr team, well, that is the point. If you win a football match you don't tell people they suck necessarily, but you woudl rib them a bit. It's good clean fun.

      As for my comments about France, well, look. I did not cease liking France because of Bush. I always thought they were in decline like many former European powers. I think it is sad. They think they are hot, and they are not. French people should be proud of their country, mainly for its history, but they should recognize its problems. They are not a world superpower. They give themselves far too much credit and it is detrimental to fixing what is really wrong in France.

      As for France and Iraq, I opposed the war in Iraq because I felt Bush had the wrong motivations.

    2. Re:Patriotism, Nationalism, Jingoism, Racism by upside · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your reply. You're of course right about Britain and France. They haven't been (aren't) treating developing countries right in any strict terms.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
  228. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Another thing to be proud of with respect to the US is that our citizens clearly do care about what happens in the rest of the world

    call me cynical but from what i have seen the US only seems to care when there are US national interests at stake. there is nothing wrong with looking after ones own interest, but to claim you are doing things because you "care" about the rest of the world is another thing altogether, and the US has turned a blind eye to many things when it has been in a position to help.

  229. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1
    WWII finished them off. Now they don't even fight their own battles anymore.
    Umm, I'm assuming you're talking about Vietnam there, if so I'd suggest you read up on the conflict leading up to America's not-very-heroic-and-highly-embarassing involvement.

    That's not what that dig was about though, was it? Your problem is presumably not that France won't fight their own battles, but rather that they won't fight *yours*.
  230. UF by manon · · Score: 1

    I think Illiad has the best way of putting it: here

    --
    42 + 1 = 42
  231. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by upside · · Score: 1

    Germany has a humane society, wonderful arts, excellent science, a great economy and a good social system. I'd be proud to be German.

    It's all about how that reflects on how you relate to other people. You can be proud while holding people from less achieving nations as equals.

    It's also healthy to base your self esteem on other things than nationality. You shouldn't be ashamed or feel superior on a personal level. You're judged on who *you* are, what you are like and what you do, not what your grandparents did or what kinds of cars some factory churns out in some part of your country.

    -- A fellow European from Finland

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
  232. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see...If we are talking about exploration of the space...and you are all saying how proud you are of being american...why dont you say what country was the first to put up a space shuttle around the earth? or the first to take a human being on space? IT WAS NOT AMERICA. You seem to forget your errors and only put your success. That's the problem with americans, you are always saying that the world owes you everything, but you dont seem to accept that you have errors (Apolo I, Iraq, support for the dictators in latin america, support Bin Laden, Vietnam, etc). I'm sorry but I must hate you...my father was tortured and killed in Chile (a regime that you support) only because he traveled to the USSR and eastern europe. My kudos for been responsible of a massacre and actually feeling proud about it (we did it because the security of the world), I dont know how do you expect to not be hated by all the countries you destroyed, only because you tought that was the right thing to do. You are not angels, you are not saviors, you are not heros (nobody IS) trying to impose your LIBERTY by the force (or supporting a regime) is only making you worst that the regime that was before you.
    Same goes to the Spirit and Beagle2, I'm glad that you feel proud of having success, but remember to learn from errors or you will only have an awful revenge.
    Cheers.

  233. Competition is not allways the best way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you thinking competition is the best and only way to solve problems.

    There are a lot of projects out there which are based on cooperation and these projects are very successful. So for instance the gnome project, or kde or the linux-kernel. Some people think there is some sort of competition going on between gnome and kde. But this is just an illusion. As both teams are cooperating on may levels also, they follow different paradigmas.

    When I look on the mars missons from NASA and ESA.
    Both oragnisations work together. Not to mention the various national space agencies like the DLR of instance, which build one of the spectrometers mounted on Spirit and Odysse.

    But these are not the only shared missions. So have a look at the ISS, or that earth-cartography-project. They used an european and and us radar (with different jobs to achive) to get a new heightfield from earth.

    SO you can see cooperation is a good thing. In some cases. Because people could be motivated to do great things sometimes just without a "race".

  234. Re:Not much money wasted: 40mil. GBP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A third less obvious (or less tangible) reason is to inspire a generation of kids to dream about the prospects of a future in science or engineering. If kids want to be astronauts instead of athletes, you will have most fail, but those that want to be astronauts will at least have a path laid for higher education.

    Whereas democrats want to raise taxes on the parents of future scientists so that they can't afford to send their kids to universities. At the same time they redirect that tax money to welfare families so somebody can learn to bounce a ball better and get into the NBA. Our priorities are fucked up.

  235. the Beagle landed in a crater by HomerJayS · · Score: 1
    Let's face it, the Beagle landed in a crater. Tragic, but it's not incompetence.

    Yeah, the Beagle landed in a crater alright...

    The one it made itself when the rentry systems failed.

  236. Yes a design fault. by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Like maybe the Beagle was made by British Leyland & just can't cope with wet weather unless a rubber glove is tied arround it's dizzy, I mean its electronics, & it rained on launch day.

  237. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I don't think that ever happened. That would require landing on mars which we have all seen is difficult in itself but would also require taking back off from Mars. That would probably be more difficult then landing. It would require making it land with enough fuel to take off and get back to earth making it much more dangerous. It would also require more then twice the amount of fuel then a one way mission would. And if it costs near 100 million to take off from earth just think what it would cost to take off from mars.

    I seem to remember reports of fossilized bacteria found in meteorites or something like that. I really doubt that it was from mars.

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  238. Ahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bahahaha! Ahahaha!

  239. Alas, will we not see the headline ... by Zorlon · · Score: 1
    The Beagle Has Landed !!!
    --
    - Things are the way they are because they're coded that way -
  240. No, Really.. by Far_Memory · · Score: 1

    Try spirit.nasa.gov!

    Pinging spirit.nasa.gov with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from spirit.nasa.gov bytes =32 time<100ms TTL=128
    Reply from spirit.nasa.gov bytes =32 time<100ms TTL=128
    Reply from spirit.nasa.gov bytes =32 time<100ms TTL=128

    Ping statistics for spirit.nasa.gov: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
    Color photos = YES

    -A

  241. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Actually, here in the US there is a group called "Food not Bombs" who distribute food to the homeless. Now imagine their surprise when they found that we were dropping food and bombs simultaneously on Afghanistan. Well, at least we got it half right :P.

    And the "tamper-proof" bombs are the same colour as the food packages!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  242. Had a Beagle Once by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has owned a Beagle will tell you what a bad idea it was to name the probe "Beagle". Beagles don't come when called and they get on the trail of a critter and will walk 25 miles.

    I only wish you could have sent my beagle to mars instead of the probe...

    --
    -- $G
  243. Stupid moderators... by fmaxwell · · Score: 1
    The above comment was humorous and relevent. The moderators were simply too ignorant to understand it. From the Wikipedia entry:
    Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

    The death of Spanish dictator Francisco Franco during Saturday Night Live's first season in 1975 served as the source of one of the first catch phrases from SNL to enter the general populace.

    Franco lingered near death for weeks before dying. On slow news days, United States network television news casters sometimes noted that Franco was still alive, or not yet dead. The imminent death of Franco was the headline story on the NBC news for a number of weeks previous.

    After Franco's death, Chevy Chase, reader of the news on Saturday Night Live's comedic news segment, announced the fascist dictator's death and read a quote from Richard Nixon praising Franco as a good friend of the United States; as an ironic counterpoint to this, a picture was displayed behind Chase, showing Franco standing alongside Adolf Hitler.

    From that point on, Chase made it clear that SNL would get the last laugh at Franco's expense. "This breaking news just in", Chase would announce-- "Generalisimo Francisco Franco is still dead!" The top story of the news segment for several weeks running was that Generalisimo Francisco Franco was still dead. Chase would repeat the story at the end of the news segment, aided by Garrett Morris, "head of the New York School for the Hard of Hearing", whose "aid" in repeating the story involved cupping his hands around his mouth and shouting the headline.
    I was obviously comparing the continued news coverage about the silent Beagle 2 spacecraft to the aforementioned Saturday Night Live Weekend Update reports about Generalissimo Francisco Franco.

    Moral of the story for moderators: I you think something I've posted is off-topic, then do some research or ask a grown-up before moderating it down.
  244. Re: Beacon by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 1

    I sympathize with our Euro friends, and am one American who wishes them all well.

    But don't understand how a beacon could cost 2.5 kilos? All it would have to be is a pager-like device attached to the batteries, which pings until shut up by other (functioning) circuitry. It could even ping low if neighbor circuitry is dead; medium if it's upside-down; high, if it sees light. Hell, I could have made them one matchbox-size. I'm sure they were concentrating on science devices.

    Although, since the cause is really martians carrying the probes into their caves, it wouldn't have helped. (sigh)

    --
    Campaign finance reform is national security.
  245. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100% true. And what drives me (and probably others) into nationalism is not the fact that I define my value by what my ancestors did or the quality of the cars made in Germany. Even though I almost love my BMW more than my girlfriend. ;-)

    It's the stupidity and stubbornness displayed by [what I perceive as the majority of] Americans and other nations who seem to think they're God's gift to humanity. Sure, you can ignore it for a while. And it's somewhat childish not to. But there comes the point where I feel that I'm attacked personally and am forced to take sides.

    Anyway, good to see that there are still sane people in Europe.

  246. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1999 the EU had a population of 375 million.
    It won't have changed much since then, as the
    additional countries (Poland, etc) have not yet
    joined. I'm not sure if the USA or EU population figures include illegal immigrant numbers, though.

  247. Re:Europeans are fags, that's why by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

    Of course, in my post higher up this discussion I didn't include you, tosspot

    --
    No but, yeah but, no but...
  248. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had conflated invention of the graphical web browser (US)


    That was Sir Tim Berners-Lee again... http://www.w3.org/History/1994/WWW/Journals/CACM/s creensnap2_24c.gif

  249. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reportedly Meucci's first experiments into telephony (to communicate with his sick wife) took place in Cuba, but the later work prior to the patent caveat did take place in the USA. It's moot as to where you'd consider the actual invention of the telephone to have taken place - Cuba or the USA. What is clear is that Meucci is very likely to have been the true inventor of the telephone, not Bell.

  250. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. While it annoys me that inventions are sometimes wrongly claimed by nations other than those from whom the inventors hailed, really the classic inventions (phone, tv, etc) are products of individuals or small teams, so getting nationalistic about them is pointless; they are evidence of exceptional individuals. The other important thing is that we have access to these useful pieces of technology.

    Also I don't see the need to get nationalistic about space exploration or science, either. The pure science community should seek be international, and transcend national borders. If there is an endeavour which would naturally lend itself to such transcendtalism, surely it would be exploring other planets. With respect to the other planets our most notable characteristic is being from earth, not one country or another.

    When talking about applications of science in terms of creating technologies and products for use on earth where they affect the economic well being of a country, then perhaps the game is a bit different. But I think when NASA does something successfully, then the whole world should cheer. When something goes wrong for NASA, the whole world should commiserate. Ditto for ESA or any other space agency seeking to push back the frontiers of the universe. Noone has been enriched by the failure of Beagle 2, but we will be enriched by the success of the NASA missions, so I'm happy.

  251. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by matfud · · Score: 1

    > Wow... the EU (almost an entire continent) has
    > a GNP larger than America (one country).

    Most of the EU is on the Asian continent.
    Therefore the member countries (often called states) occupy only a small percentage of the continent.

    The USA is one country that covers about the same land area as all of the states that make up the EU put together. Like the states of the US the members of the EU have a common currency and shared central bank.

    > NAFTA is still larger.. idiot
    Why yes, you are an idiot.

  252. Re:Not much money wasted: 40mil. GBP by Joey7F · · Score: 1

    Whereas democrats want to raise taxes on the parents of future scientists so that they can't afford to send their kids to universities. At the same time they redirect that tax money to welfare families so somebody can learn to bounce a ball better and get into the NBA. Our priorities are fucked up.

    I wouldn't go THAT far, but there is some truth to what you are saying. Getting kids interested in science and engineering will likely provide them with higher salaries so that America and continue its fantastic tradition of a very large middle class.

    --Joey

  253. sorry - that's what the (sic) refers to by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    I wasn't certain if I had it right, and I didn't. Thank you

  254. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by matfud · · Score: 1

    The colossus mark 1 and mark 2 were both working in 1944. Eniac was not finished until 1945.

    Babbage was British (1791-1871) and made programmable mechanical computers that were used by the british and american governments.

    The EU is not a country but most of its member states share a common currency, have centralised banks, have common regulations regarding trade and migration and human rights. In many respects you could compare the EU now to the US a couple of hundred years ago.

    >I am proud that that military has kept the world safe from dictators and bullies
    There are an large number of dictator and bullies in the world today. Many of them supported by the US.

  255. Re: Beacon by snake_dad · · Score: 1

    I don't know either, just repeating what the head of the project said in one of his briefings.

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  256. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    You obviously have not lived in Germany. Raising a German national flag on a flag pole in your garden is enough to be called a Nazi pig. It was hotly publicly debated if one can actually claim 'I am proud to be a German!' (Ich bin stolz ein Deutscher zu sein!).

    And you know what? It is concensus that it is unacceptable to make such a statement. Do it and you will be denounced a frigging Nazi pig. It is fine to be 'thankfull' or 'gratefull'. But 'proud'? That would be too much. Don't belive me? Ask any of your German friends - should you have any.

    Maybe this give some of you an idea how your biased patriotism sounds in the ears of contemporary Germans who has been tought over and over again that 'patriotism' == 'fascism' == 'dead jews' == 'YOUR fault'.

    Just my 0.02 Euro.

    I am somewhat aware of the detrimental effects of overdoing denazification, but I did not know how far it had gone. That is sad. Germans have a lot of things of which to be proud. It is sad that Hitler took power and planned to destroy Germany, as well as the Jews, but he is dead now. Let us bury the Nazis, not praise them, but don't bury Germany with them.

    I have befriended a few Germans here and there and have found those I have met among the most conscientious, intelligent, and friendly people I have known. So be proud to be German. You have a rich history, a fair dinkum present, and a glorious future ahead.

  257. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    Let's see...If we are talking about exploration of the space...and you are all saying how proud you are of being american...why dont you say what country was the first to put up a space shuttle around the earth? or the first to take a human being on space? IT WAS NOT AMERICA. You seem to forget your errors and only put your success. That's the problem with americans, you are always saying that the world owes you everything, but you dont seem to accept that you have errors (Apolo I, Iraq, support for the dictators in latin america, support Bin Laden, Vietnam, etc). I'm sorry but I must hate you...my father was tortured and killed in Chile (a regime that you support) only because he traveled to the USSR and eastern europe. My kudos for been responsible of a massacre and actually feeling proud about it (we did it because the security of the world), I dont know how do you expect to not be hated by all the countries you destroyed, only because you tought that was the right thing to do. You are not angels, you are not saviors, you are not heros (nobody IS) trying to impose your LIBERTY by the force (or supporting a regime) is only making you worst that the regime that was before you.
    Same goes to the Spirit and Beagle2, I'm glad that you feel proud of having success, but remember to learn from errors or you will only have an awful revenge.
    Cheers.

    I did not list our numerous sins and errors specifically because I was replying to a post that asked of what Americans can be proud. If you read my other posts you will find I am often highly critical of the US and its leadership.

    There are few things in our history more shameful than our policy in Latin America. I think the main problem here was that our leaders were driven by capitalism rather than democracy. And it was a particularly insidious form of capitalism as well, in which only the very few gain anything at all, off the backs of the many workers. That was wrong, and if I ever attain political office, it will be something I will strive to correct. If I ever see anyone running for office who promises to change this I will vote for them.

    The average american is not a corporate CEO or a VP for United Fruit. The average american works hard for what they have and would like the rest of teh world to succeed and have freedom as well. Do not mistake the actions of a few for the will of America.

    Also it is a mistake to think of the US as a single ethnic background, and to a large extent it is different from most other countries in this way. All of the countries in the Western Hemisphere are made up mostly of immigrants, but of the countries in this hemisphere the US is the most desirable for immigration precisely because it offers unparalleled opportunities for immigrants. The best and the brightest from all over the world come to the US to live. This is, by the way, what Confucius said should be the goal of nations. You want to make your country the best place to live in in the world so that the best people will be falling over themselves to come there and make it even better.

    I have never supported any dictator, nor terrorist anywhere. My tax dollars probably did, but they were a drop in the bucket. So far as these things have ever been submitted for my review I have always opposed them. I think that is typical of most americans, which is why the support of dictators is generally secret. When americans learn that the CIA is helping dictator X oppress his people, or that the Army School of the Americas is churning out expert torturers, they cry for blood. There have been several cases where this goes into trial, like Iran-Contra. Granted, the ultimate response of the government is less than should be desired, but that is what happens when you elect elitists to run the country.

    I hope that by continuing to promote pride in the US we can make people proud enough to fight the elitists and antidemocratic forces. I pray that this leads to us helping our neighbours lead better lives without fear of reprisals. And I hope they can forgive the past when we have finally buried these demons.

  258. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks...thanks for actualy realize that you americans are as human beings (not super humans) as the black people in Angola.
    Sorry for my mistakes, english is not my native language and I dont speak it or write it very well.
    And, under your context, I will also feel pride about USA.
    Greets friend.

  259. ... and they've just LEFT the club by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

    ... of people who can point fingers at space failures and say "I could to that better".

    You know, like most of Slashdot ;)

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  260. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I don't think that ever happened. That would require landing on mars which we have all seen is difficult in itself but would also require taking back off from Mars. That would probably be more difficult then landing. It would require making it land with enough fuel to take off and get back to earth making it much more dangerous. It would also require more then twice the amount of fuel then a one way mission would. And if it costs near 100 million to take off from earth just think what it would cost to take off from mars.

    I seem to remember reports of fossilized bacteria found in meteorites or something like that. I really doubt that it was from mars.

    No, actually the scientists did think the meteorite was from Mars. Here is one story.

    And here is NASA's take on it. As I said, I was confused and after thinking about it a bit realized that this had to be the only instance of Mars rocks, for the reasons described. By the way, it would not take twice as much fuel to bring rocks back from Mars because Mars gravity is 0.11G. It's quite a bt tougher than bringing back moon rocks, but it could be done in theory. I had thought that perhaps we could send a probe to mars that was capable of taking off later, but we have not done that yet.

  261. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    Yes, but bell didn't invent the telephone. It was Meucci (according to the US Patent Office, given that Meucci sought to patent it first). See http://www.popular-science.net/history/meucci_bell .html

    Yes, yes. Antonio Meucci, a fine, upstanding, Italian-American. Don't you get it? This is the whole point. Einstein was born in Germany, but persecuted for his Jewish background, so he comes to the US. The best minds from all over the world come to the US. US superiority is not racist ethnic superiority. It is superiority granted by the fact that people like living here and come here from all over.

  262. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    or the telephone (also invented here)

    According the the US patent office, invented in Cuba by an Italian who later registered his invention on a time limited patent in the USA, which he couldn't afford to keep up the payments for. Later patented by Bell.

    Lots of countries didn't invent the things for which they are popularly attributed the inventions. E.g. UK - TV (actually invented by the French), Radar (Germans), jet engines (Romanians)

    As I pointed out earlier in this thread, Meucci immigrated to the US and in fact filed his patent there, not in Cuba. TV I had thought was invented in the US but we will give that one a pass for now. Radar and Jet Engines you have no excuse for. The fact the British had Radar before the Germans was a deciding factor in the Battle of Britain. The US also developed Radar, but I am reasonably certain that of the three it was the Brits who first deployed it correctly and who continued throughout the war to have the best radar equipment. (IIRC they came up with onboard radar for aircraft first as well).

    I never read anything about Romanians having anything to do with jet engines. The Germans had the most advanced jet engines and created the first functional jet aircraft, but the US and I think the British were working toward it. It was not until after the war that they got on this in earnest, however, using data from Germany.

    Speaking of not invented here.. I think it is exceedingly odd that France does not pasteurize their dairy products. I know that they are not alone in this and have even been told unpasteurized dairy is better. But still....

  263. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    Americans are not free. To be free you'd at least have to be able to support your self without the permission of others.

    Look at your basic needs: A house. May you cut down some trees and build one, where you see fit? No, you need permission(s).
    How about food? Well unless your a native (not including eskimos) you may only hunt/eat whatever your community tells you to.

    That's two major causes that makes me say that you are not free.
    America is not a free land, you must conform.

    Firstly, it is plainly understood that human society requires conformity to rules. This conformity is willingly undertaken because if we do not live according to agreed upon rules humans cannot occupy the same space peaceably.

    Secondly you can certainly support yourself in the USA without the permission of others. This is a basic tenet of our philosophy. You can also cut down trees on land you own. In some areas, like Alaska, you can still obtain a homestead and build your cabin there and live on it. Subsistence hunting is allowed (with a permit of course). But the rules that restrict this are there to protect the rights of the citizenry. I cannot come and chop down YOUR trees. I cannot take all the animals for myself and slaughter them wholesale. I have to share and that sharing occurrs according to previously agreed-upon rules. That does not mean we are not free.

  264. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    "whereas the USSR enslaved as much of the world as it could as had their friends the Nazis." - Like the man on /. used to say: if I ever meet you, I will kick your ass. Don't even reply to me, freaking fascist.

    Yes, it is obvious that my words were misunderstood. It is wrong to attribute the actions of a country, particularly a dictatorship like the USSR under Stalin, to the people in that country. That is not really what I meant by my statement, however. The USSR was essentially a Russian empire, and the Soviets did enslave the people both within the USSR and within the Soviet Bloc. Stalin was a power-hungry dictator who entered his pact with Hitler precisely in order to better extend his empire. He exploited the non-aggression pact for this purpose.

    When the USSR fought the Nazis, the end result was that even more of Europe was enslaved by Stalin than would have been had Hitler left the USSR alone. My point was taht whereas the USSR brought slavery and misery wherever it went, the US made people more free than before and gave them strong economies. It was a major philosophical difference.

    For the record, I am not a fascist. In fact I am vehemently antifascist. I am also not necessarily against communism as an idea. I do disagree with most implementations to date because they have all revolved around the removal of all freedom from the individual. For any nation, choking freedom is killing yourself.

    I think that for now Capitalism has the best chance of working, mainly because it uses both the best and worst aspects of human nature to survive. It works best when everyone has equal opportunity however, and gets damned ugly when they do not.

  265. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Firstly, it is plainly understood that human society requires conformity to rules. This conformity is willingly undertaken because if we do not live according to agreed upon rules humans cannot occupy the same space peaceably.

    A cynical view, that I question. Still I see no point to value "living peaceably with rules" higher then "living maybe not so peaceably without rules".

    The first option implies you to impose rules on your neighboor. Rules that govern how they should live, a way of life that you may think of as peaceful. Right?

    If you do this to your neighboor, it means, by its very nature, that you are restricting what he may do. You can not argue that this isn't restricting his freedom. It does.

    Peaceful, perhaps. Freedom, no.

  266. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by matfud · · Score: 1

    Radar was originally researched by a german scientist. The first usable radar for locating ships and planes was british
    http://inventors.about.com/library/invent ors/blrad ar.htm

    Jet engines are creditied to Whittle and Ohain (britain and germany) however there are a number of other claiments.
    http://www.aircraftenginedesign.com/hi story.html

    As for the telephone, well that is also a debated area.
    http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/200312 08/bell .html

    matfud

  267. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by rifter · · Score: 1

    > Firstly, it is plainly understood that human society requires conformity to rules. This conformity is willingly undertaken because if we do not live according to agreed upon rules humans cannot occupy the same space peaceably.

    A cynical view, that I question. Still I see no point to value "living peaceably with rules" higher then "living maybe not so peaceably without rules".

    The first option implies you to impose rules on your neighboor. Rules that govern how they should live, a way of life that you may think of as peaceful. Right?

    If you do this to your neighboor, it means, by its very nature, that you are restricting what he may do. You can not argue that this isn't restricting his freedom. It does.

    Peaceful, perhaps. Freedom, no.

    Actually they are always free to reject the rules. Anyone can do anything at any time. Other people may make consequences in addiotion to the natural consequences of these actions, but still the choice is there. In theory these rules are agreed upon by neighbours. Yes in practice democracy makes this law to a certain degree but stil has limitations. Despite this, I am still free to decide my own rules as are my neighbours. If we agree, and do not involve the authorities in any way, then in essence we have created a mini-anarchic state. This is more common in the US that you might think.

    It might be so minor as not calling the cops when yur neighbours have a loud party as you too have loud parties or do not care. Or not telling that they are drunk outside of the normal confines of law or god forbid using illegal intoxicants. It goes so far as to have entire communities which exist in the wilderness living according to their own definition of what is right, even if it involves such taboos as nudism or polygamy. This is the natural state of human beings which is normally invisible because there are so many enforcers for social mores and laws. Still it exists. Humans are free and are meant to be so by their creator. Our founding fathers understood this and when they created this nation they codified this idea into law. It is with this attitude that governments shoudl govern, if at all, that their power is derived from the people, and that the people agree to the laws they will obey. All else is folly.

  268. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charles Babbage was Scottish, you fucking jingoistic history-revising moron.

  269. Re:Chalk one up to American quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patriotism is essentially nationalism, which IS fascism and it is bad. And -- as the US is currently at war -- your timing of showing your blind-sighted love for your country appears to be particularly unwise.

    But your kind won't understand that until you've lost your war(s), and probably you won't understand afterwards either.

    --
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death -- G.W. Bush