Slashdot Mirror


64 Bit Athlon Notebooks Hit the Market

Omega1045 writes "Our friends at News.com.com.com are reporting that one of the first notebooks powered by the 64 bit Athlon will be made by (drumroll, please) eMachines. Slashdot has mentioned eMachines venture into 64 bit Athlon technology before. You also might note from this past press release that eMachines claims to be the 3rd biggest PC maker in the US. Hopefully this will have the dual effect of pushing the new chip into the market, and keeping it afforable of laptop junkies like me."

399 comments

  1. Upon hitting the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The heat from the laptop caused the market to catch fire, which at this time is still burning.

    1. Re:Upon hitting the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's a joke, but I'd like to point out that Athlon 64's have the Cool'n'Quiet technology that will clock the chip down much more flexibly than Intel has ever been able to. It won't catch fire. Ever.

    2. Re:Upon hitting the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clown.

    3. Re:Upon hitting the market by ahdeoz · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine got a VPR Matrix just before I got my eMachines Athlon laptop. He's jealous. Not only does it look cooler to him, but it runs cooler too. Surprisingly cool for a laptop. And, of course, the reasons I got it are because it has better components and costs less. That's why my friend with the Thinkpad is jealous too. What I'd be jealous of is someone with a Crusoe, because mine's only got about 3 hours life. I'm guessing the monitor and the hard drive suck more power than the CPU, though.

    4. Re:Upon hitting the market by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      If the market doesn't catch fire, your desk or legs will...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    5. Re:Upon hitting the market by ruiner5000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps this would be funny if it was anyway true. G4 and P4 laptops generate far more heat than Athlon 64 laptops. And well, also Athlon 64 laptops have not just hit the market, they have been available for several months. This is only the first on available from a Tier 1 vendor, and also in Best Buy. Not to mention it was not CNet/ZDNet that broke this news. It was www.AMDZone.com.

      --
      ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
    6. Re:Upon hitting the market by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      Far more heat? Are you quite sure about this? My Powerbook G4 doesn't seem to generate very much heat at all. Certainly much less than the 1.4Ghz Mobile Athlon that I sold to fund its purchase. I can't speak for P4's, but then I'm sure if I was looking for a mobile Intel chip I'd pick a Pentium M anyway - battery life being an important consideration here.

  2. Re:I have one... by xankar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I dunno about you, but I'd prefer mine to not be broken.

    --
    ~To choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation. -Yann Martel
  3. good for everyone by ArgumentBoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't have much need for a 64 bit laptop, but I welcome this because it will naturally drive down the prices of what I might actually buy. Way to go, eMachines.

    1. Re:good for everyone by hendridm · · Score: 5, Informative

      > I don't have much need for a 64 bit laptop

      I think I could find something to do with it. 64-bit, 802.11g, USB2 and Firewire, vertical scroller (essential!), and my favorite: a built-in 6-in-1 media reader. The price is right too. Mmmmm... I don't like AMD stuff, but this thing could quickly make me a convert.

    2. Re:good for everyone by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It comes with Win XP...can XP do anything 64 bit??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:good for everyone by AssClown2520 · · Score: 1, Interesting
      The price is excellent I have to admit. But the specs seem lagging in areas that to me are just as important as the processor.

      A 15.4" display with 1280x800 resolution? Coupled with a ATI 9600 video card.

      512MB Memory - This is barely enough to run XP now days.

      AC/97 Audio - Actually the sound is the last frontier for all Laptops. I have yet to see a laptop that offers a high quality sound card. I go external.

      Anyway, I love seeing the 64-bit processor being put into laptops. But I will wait until I can get one with other high end components to go along with it... and yes, I know I will be paying more than $1500.00 for it.

    4. Re:good for everyone by lambent · · Score: 1

      While I will give you that 800 vertical resolution is pathetic ...

      Dude. 512MB is not enough for you? I'm running XP at work right now with 512, I've got a buttload of stuff open, Office (a dozen or so excel docs), Outlook (1 gig e-mail database, woohoo!) about 5 mozillas with approx 36 tabs between them, internet audio churning, blah blah blah, etc etc etc (I'm not trying to outgeek anyone here) and i've still got tons of mem to spare. Maybe it's the quality of ram that you're using that's bottle-necking you.

      And unless you plan to do professional level audio-editing on your lap (in which case, you probably do deserve the home sterilization kit), you don't need much more than AC97. The greatest limit to notebook quality are the speakers, not the sound card. You need better sound? Catch a pair of headphones (Sennheiser's got some pretty nice offerings this year)

      Remember ... laptops are about portability first, power second.

      You want to play movies with a bitchin ATI rig at HD quality? Host your own game servers and frag some lusers in Quake? DOS your cubicle neighbour? Stick to the desk.

      Don't buy that laptop unless you need the portability, and then understand that you'll have to make some sacrifices.

    5. Re:good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I for one welcome our 64 bit eMachines Laptop overlords.

      (Well, at least I didn't put a goatse link, claiming it to be a photo of of the new laptops being passed out as free "weekend loaners" by BestBuy.)

    6. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Informative

      15.4", 1280x800? You don't seem to understand that that is the industry standard for widescreen laptops.

      ATI Mobility Radeon 9600? The only thing higher than it in the Mobility line is one with twice the RAM, which gets the name Mobility Radeon 9600 Pro. (Voodoo didn't actually know WHAT a 9600 Pro was at the time that they called theirs a Pro - nobody did - but it is really the exact same thing as what's in this eMachines)

      512MB RAM? My school runs XP on 128, and it's still snappier than Damn Small Linux on 96. 512 is plenty for the average user.

      AC-97 Audio? Sure, it's only capable of 2.1 sound, but when a laptop only has 2.0, and those speakers suck (I've read that the m:855's speakers suck ass), do you really need a high end sound card?

      Paying more than $1550? Why? Voodoo's box has a pretty paint job, a DVD burner, and a 15" 1400x1050 (IMHO, that's painfully small) (on top of what the eMachines offers), for OVER $1000 more.

    7. Re:good for everyone by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps .... http://www.microsoft.com/WindowsXP/64bit/

    8. Re:good for everyone by AssClown2520 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My comment about 512 barely being enough for XP may have been a bit off, but I guess it depends upon your application. Try opening a large autocad drawing with 512MB of memory. As soon as your computer starts paging you may as well go get a cup of coffee cause your gonna be there a while. I have old P3 750s with 1GB of memory that still perform decently in Autocad. It is all about the memory.

      Second, the sound card in all laptops are pathetic. I do some basic MIDI and home studio stuff, but even for playback these cards don't give me what I want. I do have very nice headphones and I get okay quality with these.

      Finally, laptops are about whatever you want them to be. You want portability? Go get a Sony Viao. You want a desktop replacement? They are available for a price. I've had four laptops that are basic portable desktops. These are almost as powerful as any desktop at the time.

      Besides, this whole discussion is about putting a top of the line powerful 64-bit processor in a laptop and then shipping it with XP-home. What good are you getting out of that processor? Then they sorround it with mid-level components. It just doesn't make sense.

      Anyway, you make some good arguments. But I will take better sorrounding components than that 64-bit processor.

    9. Re:good for everyone by Eminence · · Score: 5, Funny

      It comes with Win XP...can XP do anything 64 bit??

      From their home page:

      • eMachines recommends Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP

      I guess it does. They wouldn't recommend it if it was a bunch of crap, wouldn't they?

    10. Re:good for everyone by addaon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think I could find something to do with it

      From linked site: Weighs 7.5 lbs/1.5" thin

      Me too. It would make a good foundation for a bird house.

      If you house albatross.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    11. Re:good for everyone by zurab · · Score: 1
      15.4", 1280x800? You don't seem to understand that that is the industry standard for widescreen laptops.


      What are these called then in the "industry standard" terms?
    12. Re:good for everyone by cwebster · · Score: 1

      >15.4", 1280x800? You don't seem to understand that that is the industry standard for widescreen laptops.

      thats the low end industry standard, WXGA. My laptop with a 15.4" uses the next up standard 1680x1050 WSXGA+ resolution, and theres yet a higher one, 1900x1600 WUXGA, in the same 15.4" lcd.

    13. Re:good for everyone by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Almost, for the last 4 years Microsoft have been porting the most common features of 32 bit windows to a 64 bit platform. The lastest beta of XP64 can BSOD at twice the speed

    14. Re:good for everyone by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually I'm holding out for IBM to make a nice PPC970 laptop with Linux pre-installed. That could be very nice indeed.

      Surely such a thing has to be coming - it would be the ultimate biochem/math/physics/engineer laptop, a community that already uses linux quite widely, and would actually appreciate and know what to 64bits.

      Jedidiah.

    15. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I meant most common of the industry standard 15.4" widescreens... I wouldn't be able to stand 1900x1600 on a 15.4" screen, BTW.

    16. Re:good for everyone by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not yet. But, the Athlon64 running in 32-bit mode is still faster than the fastest AthlonXP and gives the fastest P4 a run for its money.

      Plus, all it takes to gain full 64-bit support is a re-install with a 64-bit aware OS. Gotta love when updating a piece of software gives you access to even more of the hardware.

    17. Re:good for everyone by forgotmypassword · · Score: 1

      You can't scale the fonts and stuff up on your OS of choice?

      I honestly don't know.

    18. Re:good for everyone by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Man, it's pretty cheap! Kinda ironic that the maximum memory happens to be 2GB though :(

    19. Re:good for everyone by AssClown2520 · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't be able to stand 1900x1600 on a 15.4" screen, BTW.

      You haven't seen 1900x1600 on a 15.4" screen then. I run both Linux and Windows on a laptop with this configuration and I have never had a clearer display.

    20. Re:good for everyone by slaker · · Score: 1

      Windows XP for 64-bit Extended Editions is available in MSDN subscriber downloads.

      I (heart) my Action Pack subscription.

      But other than a different splash screen, XP64 isn't much different from the normal one.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    21. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It's not clarity that I'm worried about. It's that the print would be too damn small, and tweaking it often doesn't work (and if it does, it kills clarity).

    22. Re:good for everyone by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 1

      I don't know about XP but SuSE Linux 9.0 can be obtained as a 64bit edition. I wouldn't mind seeing benchmarks on 64bit usage between ExPee and Suse...

    23. Re:good for everyone by ahdeoz · · Score: 0

      So, if you have a database with more than a 4 gig file, you can run it on your laptop. Or I guess you could squeeze a little bit of speed out of your global warming or big bang "simulators" running on it.

    24. Re:good for everyone by ahdeoz · · Score: 0

      what do you gain if you scale up the fonts? Might as well use the smaller fonts with the smaller resolution

    25. Re:good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Use fonts that are scaled to the size of your display! If a font is supposed to be 12pt on 800x600 12" monitor, it can damn well still be 12pt on a 6400x5120 15" monitor, and it will be the same size. It only means that your display is sharper, and more detailed. Likewise with printers.

      And the problem was???

      The only real issue is that 800 pixels vertical a) dosen't allow for a whole lot of text to be displayed, and b) you're going to be using that scroll button a whole helluva lot. c) some web pages/programs like to assume certian resolutions will be used, and fuck it up for people who's machines don't quite meet those specs (which is a stupid, stupid thing to do)

    26. Re:good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe thats because Netcraft confirms that www.goatse.cx is teh dead?

    27. Re:good for everyone by fm6 · · Score: 1

      That's an Itanium OS. This is an Athlon system.

    28. Re:good for everyone by timeOday · · Score: 1
      It comes with Win XP...can XP do anything 64 bit??
      That does raise the issue of how to obtain one without paying the microsoft tax.

      Can anybody report on whether Linux on x86-64 is any good?

    29. Re:good for everyone by hayds · · Score: 1
      Youch, 7.5 pounds, and its pretty big too. Its a bit beefy for a laptop. Also, I cant imagine the battery life would be too good.

      I guess it depends what you do with your laptop. Sounds more like a 'mobile workstation' or something to me than a carry-it-around-with-you laptop.

    30. Re:good for everyone by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      That's unfortunate that you feel that way about AMD. I have been using a Compaq Presario laptop with an AMD Athlon XP 2400 at work (for 9 hours per day) and at home (mornings, evenings, and weekends) on a continual basis for over 8 months now with even one single problem. AMD has been more than a phenomenal chip and the entire laptop has proven priceless in reliablity and performance multiple times over.

      I am forever sold on AMD now.

    31. Re:good for everyone by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      Ooops, wrong button. I meant to write "without even one single problem"...my apologies.

    32. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      On clarity issues, I mean that if I take Opera up to, say, 150 or 175% zoom on the page on such a system, the images would look rather fuzzy in comparison to the text (which is as sharp as I'd expect it to be). Also, how hard is it to scale the GUI to these fonts, and get the images to scale with them? I'd like to know how to do this under the following desktop environments and operating systems:

      KDE
      GNOME
      Windows 2000
      Windows XP

    33. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Also, I normally use 768 pixels vertically. Right now I'm running this CRT at 1280x1024x16bx60Hz (I think - can't easily set the refresh rate on Damn Small Linux).

    34. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Especially when you consider that many programs are dependent on the default point size of something being, say, 10 point, and can't scale images, creating major havoc unless you use default settings. Opera can scale the images (and will actually listen to YOUR text size setting), but then it gets fuzzy, because the author didn't intend for the image to be blown up like that. Also, I wouldn't have a problem with that low of a res, considering it is better in both directions from what I normally run (1024x768 - although that's changing to 1280x1024). BTW, having used laptops with 15" 1400x1050 screens (and Mobility Radeon 7000s, and PIII-Ms, etc.), I must say that I prefer a lower resolution screen.

    35. Re:good for everyone by hendridm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My experiences have been different. I've owned roughly 5 Intel and 5 AMD systems in the past 12 years and have had nothing but trouble with the AMD systems. It started with the K6 and K6-2. Unstable and subpar performance. I moved on to the Athlon, at the time touted as the Pentium-killer. Constant system crashes and overheating with a board and chipset that got rave reviews on most of the hardware sites. Fed up, I vowed never to get AMD again. My next system was a Pentium 4, and it ran like clockwork. One day I decided to build a toolbox PC. I found the perfect board for the toolbox I was using, but unfortunately, it was an AMD board. I said, "what the hell" and bought an Athlon XP 2100+ (1.73GHz). I tried TWO different boards that were warranted for up to 2100+ processors and they both wouldn't clock higher than 1.33GHz. Waste of time, money, shipping, and grief. If I wanted a system that slow I would have gone with an Athlon 1500 or a Celeron 2.0GHz for the same price. TWO DIFFERENT BOARDS (one Biostar, one Shuttle) and my 2100+ wouldn't clock at higher than that of a 1500. So pretty much every AMD system I've ever owened was a spectacular failure.

      Before someone says, "you're either an idiot, or you buy shitty hardware! I'm using a system right now that has an uptime of 3446543215 days!" then I congratulate you on your luck. When I buy hardware, I generally read reviews (with the exception of the Toolbox PC, where I went for more modest parts). Perhaps I've read all the wrong reviews and took the wrong recommendations from colleagues, however, I use the same technique and criteria to choose my Intel systems and I have had nothing but excellent quality and performance with almost every Intel system I've owned (the one exception was a disasterous experiment with Intel's on-board choice of a SATA controller (Silicon Logic), but I won't go into that here. I had that board for about 3 days before returning it).

      YMMV, and it almost certainly will since it is one of the three things everyone raves about here on Slashdot - Linux, AMD, and OS X.

    36. Re:good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Can anybody report on whether Linux on x86-64 is any good?

      I can. It is fucking awesome. Totally stable afaict. Only one program so far was actually incompatable with the 64 bit processor and that was Abiword, which for some reason converts between void* and a UINT32 of some sort - which is just silly. I also had to add some code to guile to make it compile but it wasn't anything significant.

      There are some reviews that talk about trouble compiling X and other such things but I never ran into a single problem with that. I am using Linux64 right now and it has been up for weeks, like two or something...I only got it last month.

      NR

    37. Re:good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my 5680 a couple weeks ago. You should see how nice 1600x1200 is on these UXGA screens, but these emachines are damn cheap and powerful - add another 515 Meg of ram in there of course. And they also have the ATI Radeon 9600 Mobile in there too, which is very fast. You can run any game at 1280x1024 with highest settings - maybe even 1600x1200 too(probably quake3). i've been playing UT2003 and Neverwinter nights on very high settings. It looks great.

    38. Re:good for everyone by nsingapu · · Score: 1

      I would be the first to agree that soundcard selection is lacking at best...

      That said quality USB headsets seem to do wonders, the one I have is a plantronics DSP 500...has a built in soundcard (i think all usb headsets do), puts out nice bass if so desired, and is plug and play with hotplug under alsa.

      Any complaints I have about this model would be shared with analog headphones the same size...namely the footprint (large headset, six feet of cord), is excessive on the go.

    39. Re:good for everyone by mobets · · Score: 1

      There is an AMD64 version in beta. Of cource betas from microsoft arn't usualy a good idea...

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    40. Re:good for everyone by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      That would be cool as all heck, but if Apple was smart they'd have dibs on the G5 laptop market. It'll be written into an agreement somewhere.

      Besides, IBM did flirt with PPC notebooks years ago but gave it up. I doubt they'll return, unless it's to equip their employees when they've ditched Windows completely.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    41. Re:good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gotta love when updating a piece of software gives you access to even more of the hardware.

      That's why I still use my GeForce Ti4200 as a vga board, just to get the thrill of installing the nvidia driver one day...Brrrr, feels good inside when I think of it...
    42. Re:good for everyone by inquisitor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may have been forgetting something to do with that Athlon 2100+ - its bus speed, which in the case of the 2100+ is 133MHz. At least one Athlon board I've seen defaults to 100MHz bus speed (does *not* autodetect bus speed), and those are the speeds you've been seeing. Also, many older Athlon boards have 100/133+ speeds set using a jumper, which was usually shipped as default to 100 (this has mostly gone to software now, thankfully); further bus speed configurations could be done using the BIOS.

      You have to do this with Intel too whenever they bump the bus speed, unless they've changed the electrical connections on the socket or whatever as they usually do. Also, whenever you see random crashes, the first thing you think, always, is memory error; then you update board's BIOS, video, chipset drivers etc. I saw this recently on a board with a dodgy stick of RAM; causing very random crashes, despite the fact the dodgy RAM was >1GB.

      You're not making adequate comparisons, anyway (despite what you said). I mean, Biostar compared to an Intel OEM board? Come on. I buy MSI for AMD builds, and I've never seen a bad one. ASUS, ABIT, Gigabyte etc. AMD boards are generally fine too, and the low end MSI KT600 is actually surprisingly good (if, as said before, you have to manually enter the bus speed, at least in software.)

      In any case, Athlon 64 is a completetly different chip to AXP, so nothing from the past applies. It has a P4-style heat spreader. It's cheaper in the UK than the highest-end non-"extreme" P4 by about UKP100, it's about as fast, and according to the reviews I've read it actually produces less heat than its competitor, as have Athlon XPs since about the Thoroughbred (I've seen hot P4s c, 60C and cool Athlons c. 40C, both using the stock retail fan/compound. They're both quiet, too.) The cooling problem with AMD? No longer there, as long as you use an acceptable fan - and the retail one does come into that category.

      Besides, my overclocking-freak acquaintance swears by them; if the OCers like it, it's *got* to be fine for the normal person. Wouldn't it?

      Note: I do own Intel machines; my laptop is a P4-m, because at the time AMD laptops pretty much came with godawful integrated graphics. I think the situation is mostly the same today, unfortunately. My desktop is a fairly old Thunderbird Athlon 1GHz, and it works and always has worked fine. I have seen dodgy AMD machines from friends, but the main problem one was based on an ultradodgy PC Chips off-brand board that was unfortunately not the same as the Elite K7S5A, which can at least be made acceptable. It had the bus speed problem, too.

    43. Re:good for everyone by inquisitor · · Score: 1
      XP only (and it's one of only two good new features in XP, along with ClearType) -
      1. Right click on desktop.
      2. Select "properties".
      3. Click on the "Settings" tab.
      4. Click "Advanced".
      5. Select your dot per inch rating. I like 120dpi on my 1600x1200 screen.
      6. Click OK.
      7. Reboot.
      Also, whilst you're in Display Properties, select "Apperance", then from the settings screen turn ClearType font smoothing on. It really does make a big improvement.
    44. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Thanks for reminding me. Is XPs DPI setting freeform, or does it only provide a couple of steps (for example, Small Fonts, Normal, and Large Fonts)? If so, that feature has been around since Windows 95, come to think of it.

    45. Re:good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot "for one" and "overlords".

    46. Re:good for everyone by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      What are these called then in the "industry standard" terms?

      17" laptops? We call them boat anchors. They seem to appeal to people with too much money and not enough sense. When I buy a laptop I don't want a screen bigger than 12" and the machine shouldn't weigh more than 5lbs WITH a battery. If I need a bigger display I'll buy an external 17" monitor for a hundred bucks and keep it on my desk.

    47. Re:good for everyone by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      Gotta love when updating a piece of software gives you access to even more of the hardware.

      That's what happened to me when I bought an iBook G4 and installed Linux on it. cpufreq wasn't supported and the CPU was running at ~ 700MHz.
      A few weeks later BenH added cpufreq support for these laptops and the 200MHz speed bump felt good :)

      --
      blah
    48. Re:good for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Athlon 64s are backwards compatable between 32 and 64bit, and because Windows (R) XP is 32 bit, you're not using the chip to it's maximum potential, least not until XP-64 for AMD comes out... Which I hope is before XP Service Pack 2.

    49. Re:good for everyone by inquisitor · · Score: 1

      It is freeform; there is a custom setting function which allows you to set your own DPI number. It's actually a different thing to "Normal/Large Fonts", which are still available from the appearance tab.

    50. Re:good for everyone by mikis · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it does it read plain CDs? Read the product specs:

      Maximum CD-ROM Drive Speed: No CD-ROM drive
      Maximum DVD-ROM Drive Speed: 8x

      ;)

    51. Re:good for everyone by mikis · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if you were reading right reviews, you would never buy cheap mobo like Biostar or Shuttle. Next time, try something from Asus, Abit or Epox.

      And, as for the boards not supporting over 1.33GHz, they probably needed BIOS update.

    52. Re:good for everyone by mikis · · Score: 1
      A 15.4" display with 1280x800 resolution? Coupled with a ATI 9600 video card.
      9600 would come handy if you connect it to external monitor.
      512MB Memory - This is barely enough to run XP now days.
      Most of these cheap/generic notebooks use plain, cheap DIMMs, so that should not be a problem.
      AC/97 Audio - Actually the sound is the last frontier for all Laptops. I have yet to see a laptop that offers a high quality sound card. I go external.
      I asked a guy from Creative, why don't they make internal Live/Audigies for laptops? His answer: we tried, it can't fit.
    53. Re:good for everyone by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      You will have better luck with manufacturer's pre-built AMD systems. That has been my experience to date. Compaq computers with AMD Athlon XP's have been very stable, rock solid machines.

      I hope you have better luck with AMD based computers in the future.

    54. Re:good for everyone by zurab · · Score: 1
      ... When I buy a laptop I don't want a screen bigger than 12" ...


      What's right for you may not be right for everyone. One size does not fit all.
    55. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Go look at any random Socket 754 board on Newegg, and tell me how much RAM per socket is supported. Hint: 2 slots, 2GB RAM. 3 slots, 3GB RAM

      Also, any random new laptop will have 2 slots for RAM, as there's not room for three.

    56. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      AMD's estimate for systems built around the Mobile Athlon 64 is 3 hours. 7.5 pounds isn't beefy to me - my current laptop is a Hell Inspiron 1100, and tips the scales at some obscene number like 7.98 or something - why don't they just call it eight pounds? It's not that big unless subnotebooks are your thing - if you want to compare to a Dell, the 8600 is the most similar in size. There's also a category for these laptops - desktop replacement. If you want to see a mobile workstation (that most likely performs worse than the Sun Blade 1500), go here: http://www.tadpolecomputer.com/html/products/mobil e/sparcle/

      For $2995, here's what you get:

      440MHz UltraSparc IIe
      256MB PC133 ECC SDRAM (up to 1.0GB)
      20GB ATA-66 HDD
      24x CD-ROM
      14.1" XGA
      Sun PGX24 equivalent

      My advice? Get the eMachines for $1500 less, and blow the SPARCLE away. I mean, look at it:

      Mobile Athlon 64 3?00+ (Best Buy says 3000+, but the Mobile 3000 is 1.8GHz, and they say 2.0GHz, which would be 3200+)
      512MB PC2700 DDR SDRAM (up to 2.0GB)
      60GB (my guess is ATA-100)
      8x24x24x24x DVD/CD-RW

    57. Re:good for everyone by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Also, it has a 15.4" 1280x800 (WUXGA?) display.

    58. Re:good for everyone by timeOday · · Score: 1

      None of which changes the simple fact that this new 64 bit laptop has the same RAM capacity as any standard 32 bit laptop.

    59. Re:good for everyone by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      Neither does it change the simple fact that the processor has twice as many architected registers, and so will likely show a substantial performance boost from a simple recompile (assuming the code is 64-bit clean).

      Point taken though.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    60. Re:good for everyone by forgotmypassword · · Score: 1

      what do you gain if you scale up the fonts?

      It's easier on my eyes. I can read the monitor alot longer without eye strain and head ache if I am at a high resolution.

      I don't run at anything under 1600x1200 and I have no problems with naughty applications or websites.

  4. Re:I have one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it fell of a truck

    Too bad. I have a working one.

  5. Re:I have one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats how emachines got them

  6. Anyone comment on linux support? by Frequanaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For the k8t800m chipset or ati mobility 9600 on said laptop???

    I've got about $1500 and an urge to upgrade.

    1. Re:Anyone comment on linux support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1500? You can get a good field hand for that price.

    2. Re:Anyone comment on linux support? by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      I think XFree86 4.4 will support the new Mobility Radeons - I'm not sure about the ATi drivers. As for the chipset itself, as long as it has a VIA VT8235/VT8237 southbridge, it will be supported IDE/SATA/AGP-wise by the latest 2.6 kernels. I doubt you'd have any problems loading a 2.6-enabled distro onto that machine.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
  7. price by rogabean · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Quote:
    "Hopefully this will have the dual effect of pushing the new chip into the market, and keeping it afforable of laptop junkies like me."

    This is the only part I can see as a plus to this. However I would take a guess that it will do little to the latter, in that most companies know E-Machines general reputation with the people who would be first in line to buy a 64 bit laptop, so I don't forsee that they will try to compete with E-Machines in the price category for some time.

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    1. Re:price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apparently you remember the eMachines of 3 years ago, not the one of today. Amazing that a company does so much to change their business model, yet some look blindly at the past and presume they still do something else...

      So will the G5 PowerBook (if and when it comes) from Apple errantly claim the same thing the G5 PowerMac did?

    2. Re:price by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know, for all the bad things that I hear about e-machines I can't find a single problem with the one I have been using since 11/2002. It has been up, without fail, running Linux since that day (only down for routine kernel upgrades).

      Sure it was cheap, came with a bunch of crap I didn't really need, but it was a gift and it works fine.

      The people who are going to be first in line to purchase a 64bit laptop are going to purchase an e-machine because that's who's offering it currently. I don't see Dell coming out saying they are, do you? In fact, I have better success with my e-machine than I did with my Dell laptop. After dealing with Dell for that particular machine I will *never* *ever* buy from them again.

      I would go with the e-machine without a hesitation.

    3. Re:price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way. I just looked at bestbuy.com and found that the 64bit e-machine (priced at $1550) is only on the third page of at least 5.

      I'd pay for the 2ghz 64bit e-machine before I'd go and pay even MORE for a lowly 32bit machine ;)

    4. Re:price by rogabean · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True E-Machines have tried in the past few years to change. They have restructured their business model, but the stigma of 3+ years ago still sticks with them. I just was pointing out my opinion that the other leading OEM's will use this to their advantage to keep prices up as long as they can. The same way they use anything else to keep prices up.

      How many people on here would really fork over the cash to give E-Machines another chance? I know would not, no matter what they do.

      (yes this is an opinion, but if 1 person thinks this way, how many others do.)

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    5. Re:price by AssClown2520 · · Score: 1
      Just like Chevy vs. Ford it all comes down to personal experience with a product. One bad experience is enough to drive consumers away.

      Contrary to your bad experience (and many others from what I have read) with Dell, I have bought quite a few machines from Dell. I have found there support and offerings quite good for my business.

    6. Re:price by rogabean · · Score: 1

      There's part of my point: YOU would never buy a Dell again. The same way I would never buy an E-Machine again.

      The original article on here was implying that E-Machines releasing this 64 bit laptop would aid in keeping prices down as other companies put out their 64 bit offerings. I simply don't think this will be the case.

      No matter what E-Machines has done to fix their reputation, they are still the "bastard child".

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    7. Re:price by rogabean · · Score: 1

      I would like to however, make a comment to add to post.

      "IF" E-Machines early adopters of this 64 bit offering are given a good impression, this may be the product they needed to rebuild their still tarnished reputation.

      I don't want to discredit them totally, after all this may end up being one hell of a laptop. I look forward to seeing the reviews from actual buyers as they come in.

      This would alter my original assessment.

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    8. Re:price by cymen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right now eMachines is just like Hyundai was a year or two ago--new products, better quality, etc. but with a poor reputation due to their past. eMachines went through a drastic change in management. Their machines today are much better than what they used to sell.

      At least that's the buzz...

    9. Re:price by municio · · Score: 1

      I have bought quite a few machines from Dell. I have found there support and offerings quite good for my business

      The key word in your phrase is "business".
      If you are a business you probably will have a decent support from Dell. They figure that if you have good service you will be buying many more systems.

      If you are a simple consumer they don't care. My personal experience with my laptop, (the last I will ever buy from them), is that they will try to avoid at all cost to do expensive repairs. Mine needed the LCD replaced, and I had to send it 4 times. After the 3rd time of not replacing the screen and blaming it on some mysterious driver, the "senior dude" was telling me that they where not taking my laptop anymore because they did not believe it was a hardware issue. Finally, they cave in because I called in daily. I guess they figured that it was cheaper to loose me as a customer that replace the LCD. In all it cost me almost 9 month with a defective laptop and more than 10 hours of effort.

      The problem with Dell is that no customer sees you complaining in the store when you have problems.

    10. Re:price by ortholattice · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here's my experience.

      My company bought an eMachines 333cs from 1999. It was cheap, $400. It came with W98, and when we put NT on it locked up every few days for no good reason. Later I heard this was a frequent problem, and this is probably one of the reasons the machine was considered crap. Anyway around 2001(? or whenever 7.1 came out) I put RH7.1 on it (stripped down to bare bones for security), rebuilt the kernel to 2.4 so I could do iptables and iproute2, and configured it to be an ARP proxy transparent firewall/router for our office, which it still is and will continue to be for the foreseeable future.

      I remember when Code Red came out I ssh'ed in from home (actually to an internal Linux machine, then to the firewall - the firewall has all ports blocked to the outside) and blocked it. Remote admin is good.

      The power supply fan died twice (once burned out, once frozen) and the CPU fan froze once. I now have a couple of spares of these fans for a few years to come. I have a streamer on the power supply fan to show me it's working. Except for turning it off to replace the fans, the uptime has been continuous, about 1.5 years until the first fan problem.

    11. Re:price by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No...Dell sucks with businesses too. I had a whole bunch of Dell computers shipped to my firm to replace the older computers. Then I got the paperwork and they were charging us twice the amount that it should have been! Needless to say many eyebrows rose when they got wind of this. I called Dell and they realized that it was a problem on their end, they said they fixed it. Then a month later we received another invoice from them stating our overdue balance. The crazy thing is that we didn't have a balance and were told to disregard them and that it was noted in their system. We had payed for the computers in one lump sum to avoid things like this but we kept getting invoices for about 4 more months. Whether its still on our credit report I'm not sure, but it was stating that we owed Dell money (and alot of it) which is Not a Good Thing (tm). Moral of the story: I only order from Gateway now for business and Emachines for home.
      Regards,
      Steve

    12. Re:price by Bombcar · · Score: 5, Funny
      Just like Chevy vs. Ford it all comes down to personal experience with a product.


      Yup, and in both cases the right choice is neither.

      MOPAR FOREVER, DOOD! and MACS RULE, d00d!

      Mod me, I've karma to burn!
    13. Re:price by ahdeoz · · Score: 0

      Chevy and Ford sell better cars than Volkswagon for half the price. PS. A Jetta is a girl's car.

    14. Re:price by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Yeah I was about to say..I just finished Frankensteining a working Emachines tower from 2 bad ones. One had a dead power supply, the other had a bad motherboard. After swapping parts back and forth I came up with one that works just fine.

      The power supplies and fans are the biggest liability on the older ones, and sometimes the newest ones. Google Emachines power supply just for fun.

    15. Re:price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are dumb. Mopar = Chrysler.

    16. Re:price by dbIII · · Score: 1
      After dealing with Dell for that particular machine I will *never* *ever* buy from them again.
      Come on, give Dell employees enough carbon paper and fax machines and they can do thier jobs. It's amazing how techno-phobic a computer company can be, and it's amazing that I didn't think of communicating with them by actual physical mail with a stamp for a couple of months.

      The good thing about Dell machines - even laptops, is that you can get the parts from other suppliers.

    17. Re:price by parksie · · Score: 1

      Didn't Dell have that issue with nonstandard ATX PSUs? PSU info

    18. Re:price by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Didn't Dell have that issue with nonstandard ATX PSUs?
      Yes, but there are enough third party suppliers living that have taken advantage of Dell's lack of speed (just in time inventory systems only work if you CAN do things in time - the third party suppliers have a huge advantage over Dell by actually keeping Dell parts in stock) that you can get Dell parts - no matter how non-standard they are. It's like the bad old days of Microsoft - you buy the product, and if you have problems you pay someone other than Microsoft to fix it for you.
  8. Hurray by Sarojin · · Score: 5, Funny

    for 30 minutes of 64 bit computing

    --
    HOW'S MY POSTING? CALL 1-800-POSTING
    1. Re:Hurray by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

      and a toasty warm genital region.

    2. Re:Hurray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and a toasty warm genital region.


      I don't think toasty warm is an acccurate description. These are AMD chips were talking about. I would say flame-broiled genital region.
    3. Re:Hurray by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      and a toasty warm genital region.

      Well, be thankful that's all. Who knows, maybe your grandchildren will be getting STDs from their computers someday.

    4. Re:Hurray by JonTurner · · Score: 5, Funny

      >>and a toasty warm genital region.

      "There's been some misunderstanding," said the man at the return counter. "I said I wanted a computer with a compact DISK burner."

      ba-da ching! Thankyouverymuch.

    5. Re:Hurray by mobiux · · Score: 1

      No kidding,
      my pentium 266 laptop has a lot of crotch warming power. I couldn't imagine this this.

      Comes with a special heat shield for your lap.

    6. Re:Hurray by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

      Didn't I see you on the Powerbook forum?

    7. Re:Hurray by rogabean · · Score: 1

      Yes but can I warm up my pizza on the top of this laptop? That might up the value for me a little ;)

      I like dual-functional :)

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    8. Re:Hurray by Darken_Everseek · · Score: 2

      *catches his breath* thanks; that's the best pun I've seen in months.

    9. Re:Hurray by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Athlon XPs, 64s, FX-51/Opterons, mobile XPs, and mobile 64s are cooler than a desktop P4, and I have a desktop P4 laptop. Toasty warm is an accurate description for THAT laptop. Able to feel that it is putting out heat is an accurate description for a mobile 64 laptop. Then again, flame-broiled is an accurate description for my P75 laptop, but that's the battery.

    10. Re:Hurray by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Probably. I'm a multi-Mac-platrom user.

    11. Re:Hurray by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      Ah man, that's funny. Thanks. Most +5 Funny stuff on /. doesn't even make me crack a smile. That was great.

    12. Re:Hurray by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      >> Mac OS X: A server strength operating system that your granny could install and use.

      from beyond the grave? You insesitive clod!
      now that's an OS...

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
  9. Re:I have one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um, pretty sure they come in boxes anyway... you know, with styrofoam?

  10. I think eMachines gets a bad rap by ilsie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only experience I've ever had with eMachines are two systems- one was my sisters' old P-166 machine- it lasted for 3 years without a hitch, till I blew it up by trying to put Win98 onto it (long time ago :)

    The other one is one of those widescreen eMachines Athlon laptops- my friend bought it a while back- it's a really solidly made machine that has had no problems so far. YMMV

    1. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by qw(name) · · Score: 1

      I haven't known anyone that was happy with their eMachine purchase. The keyboard, case, memory sticks, et al, were all cheap. They seem to cut a lot of corners.

      As the old saying goes: You get what you pay for!

    2. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by cobe98 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Seriously, how can you blow up a piece of hardware by loading windows....are you retarded or something??

    3. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      Seriously, how can you blow up a piece of hardware by loading windows....are you retarded or something??

      I don't even think a retard has that kind of power. Maybe some autistic guy somewhere I guess.. they have some pretty cool powers sometimes.

    4. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by cobe98 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Naah he probably blew it up will looking at http://www.goatse.cx and jacking off

    5. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by Lotech-nor · · Score: 0

      The box probebly self-destructed when it was exposed to the crapy M$ software. Sounds like a good feature.... :)

    6. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by Wehesheit · · Score: 0

      Goatse is down bitch

      --
      This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
    7. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by SacredNaCl · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've had good experiences with them as far as reliability. I still have a 500is that runs fine, it's been abused in nearly every way possible and upgraded as much as it can possibly be upgraded without throwing in a powerleap kit. Many of the upgrades were listed as not possible in the service manual, but http://e4all.info/ has more information (on older ones) and the upgraders forum has a lot of people that have tried everything they can to make them still useable beyond their years. Most of the older ones can at least be upgraded to 512MB with very careful ram selection. That has kept the old 500is useable, even if it is slow. It's perfectly fine as another box to have up to surf the web and what-not. I have some even slower hardware taking care of other task as well.;-)

      There are many things that were cheap in a lot of their older (and still in their present) models. (A lot of them are the typical things that the big makers skimp on. Severely under rated power supplies, proprietary power supplies, POS modems that have no excuse for existing in any machine, if they come with a network card replace it with something else, ram modules that may or may not be worth keeping [though they seem to be getting away from the awful ram they were putting in a few years ago]... These are not severe issues in most of them, but the proprietary power supplies in them are a pain to work around if you are going to cram a mess of drives in them. Don't expect Emachines to give you a pin out for the power supply either.) I've not known anyone who had one of their laptops though.
      The biggest disppointment with Emachines is *support*. The one thing that you may have trouble with is getting support for new OS's that comes out down the road. Emachines is somewhat unreliable about supporting their hardware beyond the OS it was shipped with. This can be very bad news in a laptop, and it can be awful news if you ever have to have your laptop worked on for warranty work.

      I haven't heard the kind of horror stories I've heard about Compaq laptops in terms of getting them worked on, but based on my experiences with them ...it's still a gamble on future OS's.

      It's very hard to top Compaq for the worst possible hardware, worst possible support, worst ownership experience, worst batch of proprietary hardware...in "consumer grade" products. Emachines is well above that fold for the price range they are in. Even with the corners they cut, it's never going to be as unpleasant as that to own one. For the price range they are in, they are decent enough.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    8. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by wfberg · · Score: 1

      It's very hard to top Compaq for the worst possible hardware, worst possible support, worst ownership experience, worst batch of proprietary hardware...in "consumer grade" products.

      Amen to that, brother.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    9. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by ShadowDrake · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What about Packard Bell, from their first trip around before they had to flee the US market with their tail pulled?

      I had a P100 tower. It had a 2.1G hard disc. Sorta. It had a 1.2G unit chained to an 850M unit with some firmware taping it together. All I knew is that not only was the whole unit bad when I replaced it, and the units seperately were bad.

      I tried a little video benchmark.

      No L2 cache.

      You had to invert the box to remove the sides and access cards.

      The board weirded out-- BIOS was always bad but it ran fine. Fortunately, by that time, a K6/225 and proper mobo were entering the upgrade-spares queue.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    10. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll have to agree that installing Windows 98 would, in itself, not do anything to a box to harm it. Millions (untold millions, as it were, since Microsoft didn't set Win98 up like XP to install on only one box) have Win98 installed, I know I have a bunch. I always run Win98 with _several_ versions of Linux, all the way from GCL 3, to Mandrake 8. I prefer both Debian and SuSE, too. By running them all on the same box, comparisons are made. Windows 98 runs well with the best of them, and they don't deserve the bad rap they get. Slackware, to me is tops, BTW.

      I have at least one old HDD that cannot run Windows, gets into trouble when Scandisk is run, so I put SuSE on it, and have no problems at all. Windows does require a fairly decent HDD, as does MS-DOS. SuSE get high marks for going ahead with a drive like that, and doing a wonderful, stable job of it all.

      Maybe that's what happened to the Windows 98 installation, it ran into a HDD that's not up to par. Makes it seem like Windows 98 "blew up the box". It depends, on the exact condition of the HDD.

    11. Re:I think eMachines gets a bad rap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a Packard Bell P75(originally)running a K3+450 chip at 400mhz...not bad for a socket 5.
      Never say never,except if it's a Compaq!

  11. Regarding "desktop-replacement" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Okay; there are big advantages to a "desktop-replacement" laptop over an actual desktop; I now have my second desktop-replacement laptop and I doubt I will ever buy a desktop again.

    First of all, a laptop doesn't take as much space as a desktop; just try to fit a desktop computer into a dining room or a living room, or even a bedroom, it's just damn unsightly and unweilding, let alone unportable, a laptop will fit into these with no trouble at all, and if you wish to you can unplug it in throw it into the drawer.

    A laptop can easily become a portable DVD player. My Sony Vaio has TV out, so I can plug it into the scart to watch movies on the TV. Or, if I watch those foreign or independent movies that no one else wants to see, I switch off the lights, lie comfortable on my side or back, and either unfold the laptop and rest it on its side so it has an angle that'll keep it up, or rest it on my stomach with an empty A4 sized folder attached to it with a thick rubber band, amazingly they're exactly the same width, and the folder both gives it a good angle and sheild the heat from my stomach, and it weighs almost nothing. From this close distance, it feels so much like watching a movie in the cinema, sizewise!!! Now try watching a movie on a desktop... argh, it's an ordeal.

    Then, you can take a laptop to work or with you to a hotel room.

    As for ergonomics, the full-size screen of a sony vaio is immensely comfortable, and a 15" screen is quite generous.

    Any modern laptop will have a processing power that'll last for years. I've upgraded my memory to 400mb. As for upgradeability, I have a Belkin 7-port USB hub, and i can daisy chain that to have 127 USB ports if i want to. I'm quite happy with this combo, the memory upgrade and the USB 7 port hub completely transformed my usage. I downloaded a virtual desktop utility from sourceforge, and now i keep my commonly used Apps running at startup, and my cybershot cam and clie handheld, and wireless gamepad, always plugged into the USB hub.

    What more is there to ask for.

    1. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by W32.Klez.A · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This comment is a direct repost of this one.

    2. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Yet for all those "advantages" there are just as many disadvantages. Ever try typing a *lot* of information on a laptop? They are just not typically ergonomic enough for extended typing use. At least not compared to a "natural-type" keyboard. Then there is screen size. Call me insane, but I happen to like my 21" of crisp CRT goodness. No 15" LCD is going to quite match it. The list can go on.

      The point being, yes, for some a laptop can replace a desktop, but not so for others. Almost all the reasons you gave could be an argument for *both* a desktop and a laptop (with wireless card.)

    3. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by edalytical · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounded like a advertisement to me. I wonder if he gets paid or not.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    4. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 2, Informative

      While I hold the same preferences as you, this is a dumb argument against laptops.
      You can plug in a keyboard, mouse and monitor to any laptop available.

      Most laptops also have docking station accessories that can maintain the key/mouse/monitor/power connections so you don't have a bunch of cables laying around.

      Personally, I'd like a desktop replacement laptop that I could plug into my 22" of crisp CRT goodness and ergo keyboard. I'm more concerned about heat, vid memory and battery life for this particular laptop.

      --
      Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
    5. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by josh_freeman · · Score: 1

      The only reason I am still using a tower instead of a laptop at work is that I have yet to find one that can handle a dual-head video card. Granted, there are docking stations that will take a PCI card, and one of them could probably be made to work. I actually hadn't thought of that until now. (must try this. . .) I've gotten so used to Xinerama that I can't do my work with only one monitor.

    6. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      Most laptops will drive both an external monitor and the onboard LCD... I use that to get a dual monitor setup @ work. And w/the larger screens that they have on laptops nowadays, you don't lose much real estate w/the LCD as you used to..

      YMMV

      (but just for the record, I like a desktop as my primary and a laptop as secondary or auxilliary..)

      --

      Place sig here.
    7. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by otprof · · Score: 1

      I've been using laptops for so long (in graduate school) that now that I have a job with an office and a computer I can't type on this "real" keyboard worth a shit. My advice is if you ever want to be able to use an extra keyboard don't ever get used to a laptop keyboard. It's kinda weird actually. My laptop keyboards have all been full size, but I can't find a keyboard that duplicates the tactile feel I've grown used to.

      Actually it's more complicated than this... I'm trying to get a new laptop with an acceptable keyboard and most of them are either too squishy or too clicky. Maybe I'm just too sensitive, or obsessing about the keyboard just so I don't have to actually do any work on it!

    8. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ever try typing a *lot* of information on a laptop?

      In fact, I wrote my PhD dissertation on a sony 505tr, with smaller-than-standard key pitch, tiny screen, etc. I loved it; for me the convenience of being able to have it with me all the time was well worth slightly slower words-per-minute (it's thinking up the damned words that's the bottleneck anyway).

    9. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >lie comfortable on my side or back, ...
      >or rest it on my stomach

      That sounds unconfortable. How do you prop up your head to face directly at the screen? Is your head and back at 90 degress to each other? Or am I missing something.

      >Now try watching a movie on a desktop... argh, it's an ordeal.

      People usually set up their desktop so they can type/surf/IM for long periods of time. Watching a movie is no different.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    10. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by expro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My 12" powerbook has an amazing keyboard.

      But when I buy a laptop, I want portability, a small display, etc., and I fail to see the point of laptops with huge power requirements, displays, etc.

      For a desktop I will buy a flat pannel if that is what I want for a non-portable solution -- rather than a 21" CRT, I would double-head with two 19" CRTs for even better resolution at lower cost.

      A "desktop replacement" is a laptop that does not make good laptop in my book, but it is not uncommon to see them in the stores either bought by users who don't need good portability or don't know the difference.

    11. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Once you plug everything into a laptop its taking up as much or more space then a small desktop.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    12. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by be-fan · · Score: 1

      After using my Dell's 15" UXGA LCD, I can't go back to CRT's. With virtual desktops, I don't mind the loss in screen realestate, and I absolutely could not do without the super-sharp text 133dpi buys you. Now, if only desktop LCDs went that high!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by zoloto · · Score: 1

      [snip] ...and i can daisy chain that to have 127 USB ports if i want to...

      what more is there to ask for?


      127 USB ports!!!
    14. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not that I'm sold on "desktop-replacement," being that I am still a gamer... but I only really count my "desktop" as my actual box and the components inside. Extern stuff such as a keyboard, mouse, and CRT can still be added to a laptop. Best with a good wireless keyboard/mouse, and you save on storage space.

      So yes, you can still use your 21" CRT, but the 15" LCD attached to the laptop is much more convenient when travelling... the CRT tends to be a bit heavy on one's lap.

    15. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I have TWO 21" monitors at work, hooked up to a Matrox-something-or-other on a Linux box. What do I use? I use VNC to the Linux box so I can use the 15" 1024x768 laptop LCD! I don't get any headaches. If they'd just spring for FP2200's for everyone...

    16. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you assume people get laptops to save space on their desks? How about that it is portable when they need it to be? Seems like a much more common reason to get one. Since when is desk space a premium for most people, buy a new fucking desk, it's not like it's a new house.

    17. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You didn't upgrade your modern laptop to 400mb of ram. No such combination is possible with memory made in the last 4 years.

      You are full of shit.

    18. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Yes, but at the end of the day, you pop it out of the dock and take it with you.

      My whole department does that. It sure is easier to support a system from home at 2 in the morning when you are on the exact same system you had that day at work. Especially if you use hibernate.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    19. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by aussersterne · · Score: 0

      Ever try typing a *lot* of information on a laptop?

      I wrote three books (1800+ pages) on IBM ThinkPad keyboards, not to mention making my way through university on them.

      Call me insane, but I happen to like my 21" of crisp CRT goodness. No 15" LCD is going to quite match it.

      Heh... You are insane. There's no way I will ever go back to CRTs after the clarity of LCD displays with subpixel AA. There's just no comparison; even a 21" CRT now makes me think that the world has "gone blurry."

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    20. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 1

      I'm still failing to see how it's a "disadvantage".
      If you have a small desktop it still takes up the space of a small desktop...
      Besides you can always hide the docking station and use a USB hub or something.

      I'm not saying there aren't any valid arguments against "desktop replacement" laptops, I'm just saying that pluging in accessories and space aren't valid arguments.

      --
      Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
    21. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by isorox · · Score: 1

      I'm looking at buying a laptop to replace my thinkpad 166/80MB/3GB. I don't care much about battery life, an hour or two is fine. Trains have power sockets, and I rarely fly for more then 3 hours. What I do care about is being able to have a computer at whatever hotel I go to, or have the ability to lie on my bed and IRC. I'm loking at the G40, 2.6GHz, 40GB, 256MB, DVD/cdrw, 15" screen, for 1000. It weighs about 10lb with the PSU, and claims a 110 minute battery, but it's easy to carry arround, does everything I want, plays the latest games (my desktop's a measly 600MHz/250GB), has usb, firewire, wifi, network, everything I need.

    22. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by watchmaker1 · · Score: 1

      > Ever try typing a *lot* of information on a laptop? Why, yes, yes I have. All day, every day, for the last four years. Code, email, IM, IRC, sysadmin, and the first four chapters of a book. I have no problems with any RSI, I never notice the laptop keyboard at all. In this timespan there have been an IBM Thinkpad 600, two Dell Lattitudes, and an iBook 14". I liked the iBook best because it didn't include that abominable little nubby mouse stick in the middle of my keyboard. As long as it's not a subnotebook with micro sized keys, your average notebook has spacing that's just fine for me, and I've never cared much about key throw.

    23. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by aldoman · · Score: 1
      First of all, a laptop doesn't take as much space as a desktop; just try to fit a desktop computer into a dining room or a living room, or even a bedroom, it's just damn unsightly and unweilding, let alone unportable, a laptop will fit into these with no trouble at all, and if you wish to you can unplug it in throw it into the drawer.

      Well I can fit my midi case and my TFT monitor in just fine to most desk areas... also, all I need is a lead to my monitor, keyboard, mouse (both of these could be done via Bluetooth) and speakers and I'm set. A 802.11g PCI card handles networking.

      The best thing that has happened is stuff being integrated properly into motherboards. Most motherboards now have a good sound card, networking and modem built right in them... most people I've built computers for only have the AGP slot used up in them, and the nForce 2 with it's built in Geforce4 MX can handle 2D and some 3D work well...

    24. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by hamtux6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I second that. My 12" PB is fantastic. I was about to reply to the parent telling him how great my keyboard is. Doesn't match the Logitech that I'm typing this from, but it comes damned close. The small size has relegated this machine to my portable (and for the week, my main machine on my desk) as opposed to my Dell Inspiron 8200, which is huge and heavy and doesn't get nearly the battery life.

    25. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

      Why would you assume people get laptops to save space on their desks? Since when is desk space a premium for most people, buy a new fucking desk, it's not like it's a new house.

      If desk space wasn't a premium, people wouldn't be willing to shell out big money for LCD displays.

      Ever set up a desktop in the dining room and know you are going to have to move it whenever you want to use it or have company over? Not every living space has the luxury of unlimited room. Laptops solve those kinds of problems very handily.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    26. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by X · · Score: 1

      When you talk about "crisp" displays you should not think of CRT's. By their very nature, their pixels are fuzzy as compared to an LCD. I've had this experience myself, where eyestrain is much less of a problem with an LCD.

      If you get an nice 15" LCD with 1600x1200, you'd be amazed at how sharp it is. If you don't care for sharp you can turn on sub-pixel anti-aliasing and you'll find the most increadibly clean characters on your screen. I have one along with a 21" CRT display at work, and I can tell you the LCD is much easier to read on.

      --
      sigs are a waste of space
    27. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by v01d · · Score: 1

      Heh... You are insane. There's no way I will ever go back to CRTs after the clarity of LCD displays with subpixel AA. There's just no comparison; even a 21" CRT now makes me think that the world has "gone blurry."

      Why are so few people able to admit their personal preference is a personal preference? You like LCDs. Fine. I like CRTs. I hate every AA I've seen, and I have seen quite a lot. Maybe I am insane, but it's not my monitor preference that makes it so.

    28. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by cobe98 · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of an external keyboard?

    29. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by benwaggoner · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe Wintel laptops don't have great keyboards, but I've written thousands of pages, including a complete published book, on various PowerBooks over the years. They've always had nice keyboards. I also have a 12" Vaio, and the keyboard is almost unusable, what with the weird shift key, and just a lousy feel.

      Heck, I even won the original Unreal on a PowerBook G3 400, using the trackpad instead of a mouse. In retrospect, that was probably silly :).

    30. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      First of all, a laptop doesn't take as much space as a desktop; just try to fit a desktop computer into a dining room or a living room, or even a bedroom, it's just damn unsightly and unweilding, let alone unportable, a laptop will fit into these with no trouble at all, and if you wish to you can unplug it in throw it into the drawer.

      I don't think many people would try to put a computer in a dining room. I don't see a problem with putting it in a den (for Chrissake, we're talking about two feet by eight inches or something like that of desk space. It's not *that* bad).

      The real benefits I see of a desktop replacement laptop (and I still prefer the real thing to a "desktop replacement"):

      * The battery acts as a built-in UPS.

      * You can move to a different room for one reason or another.

      The drawbacks:

      * All the crap in laptop BIOSes and stuff associated with power management. Laptops just plain do weird things occasionally. Too much custom stuff, not enough commodity.

      * Most OSes other than Windows have pretty incomplete power-saving support. Even good ol' Linux.

      * Prices. Laptops are still more expensive.

      * Modularity. Desktops consist of all standard parts that I can cannibalize for other machines, swap out if something goes wrong, or can upgrade piecemeal. I can grab another motherboard or video card. Laptop manufacturers, in a desperate bid to keep their market from becoming a commodity, have avoided modularity and standardization of parts like the plague.

    31. Re:Regarding "desktop-replacement" by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      can't find a keyboard that duplicates the tactile feel I've grown used to.

      Get one of the older Apple USB keyboards -- the half sized ones with the small arrow keys. The key action is very, very similar to a laptop. And most people don't like them, so they're really cheap on eBay.

      --saint

  12. Laptop for college by 3V1LDaemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a good sign. I have to get a laptop for college next year, and i want to get a decent laptop for a good price. This will hopefully drive down the prices of the other notebooks. Anyone headed for college or forced to get a laptop for work will see this as a blessing.

    1. Re:Laptop for college by El · · Score: 1

      Laptops are much easier to steal, I'd go with a good cable lock. You would be suprised how many people can get access to your dorm room!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:Laptop for college by 3V1LDaemon · · Score: 1

      That's one of the reasons my parents don't want to get me a laptop. It doesn't seem to matter whether I tell them I'll lock it, though.

      I'm planning on having a desktop, too, but the laptop will allow more flexibility to take it around campus. Also, the desktop is probably only going to be a PIII 450 w/ Slack for word processing and whatnot (the basics). The laptop would be for everything else.

    3. Re:Laptop for college by Oddster · · Score: 1

      I'm a student and work at the help desk at my school, and let me recommend two things:
      1) Do not buy a laptop
      2) If you ignore 1, get a Mac laptop

      My main reason against laptops is that you'll rarely ever actually make use of the portability, unless you *really* like to work in libraries, or if your campus has a really good wireless network and has year-round warm weather. At my school, most of my friends with laptops leave it in their room 99.9% of the time.

      As for recommending Macs, I'm not a Mac person, but my experience working at our help desk has shown that PC laptops are all garbage. They break far more easily than they should, hardware almost as much as software (so many hard drive crashes I've seen).

      A laptop might also be a better idea if you don't live within driving distance of your school.

      Add this to conventional desktop vs. laptop wisdom, and you'll (hopefully) come out with the right choice.

    4. Re:Laptop for college by pooman · · Score: 0

      I was thinking about getting a laptop and how it would be great for college. I was going to get a Sony Z1, which is very expensive. Now I'm just going to wait for a Sony Z2.

    5. Re:Laptop for college by Kneht · · Score: 1
      I'm in college, using a laptop, and I love it.

      In every class, it is a definite edge. In statistics, it seems blatantly unfair.

      A lot would depend on whether you can use it during class.

      --
      "Are you on some kind of medication?"
      "No"
      "Well, you should be."

      --Bean

    6. Re:Laptop for college by tho+1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, the trend for laptops is that they simply stop selling old models, rather than drop the price. With today's Just In Time business model, most manufacturers simply mantain the prices and bump up the specs slightly, rather than making a big price cut.

      Laptops rarely drop in price by more than $200-300 over their lives, unless you're lucky enough to find one on clearance or pick up a used one. For example, a P3 ~1 ghz laptop would probably be enough for most people, but good luck finding anything less than 2ghz these days.

      That said, the last year has seen all laptop prices drop drastically from the levels they were at for the last 10 years or so, most likely due to the drop in the prices of the LCD's, so many good laptops are in the $1500 range now. ( 2 years ago, you could only get the crappiest entry level celeron/duron laptops for that price)

    7. Re:Laptop for college by Kneht · · Score: 2, Informative
      1 word: overstock.com

      or is that two words?

      I've never used them, but I know they carry older machines for low prices. They also carry not so old machines for not so great prices.

      --
      "Are you on some kind of medication?"
      "No"
      "Well, you should be."

      --Bean

    8. Re:Laptop for college by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      As an earlier post noted, if you use the laptop for class, go for it -- otherwise, you're better off with a desktop.

      Mac laptops are nice, and I've admired those owned by friends. While I've heard plenty of horror stories about Dell and HP portables, the IBM Thinkpad I use has been a rock, as have the two Thinkpads used by my parents. Not all PC laptops are crap.

      Still, I forsee Apple hardware at some point in my not-to-distant future...

    9. Re:Laptop for college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      overstock dot com

      Three words.

  13. Good. by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I'm glad to see some OEMs going away from the relatively expensive, and in the case of the Celeron, weak Intel architecture. You can build a heck of a General-Purpose / Gaming / Development machine based on AMD CPUs for next to nothing. You can easily put together an AMD64 3000+ / Radeon 9600 / 19" monitor system for under a grand.

    I hope to see more PC makers go this route. Diversity is good. Now, if they would start considering alternate OSes as well...

    1. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Sheesh, if this isn't offtopic, not to mention baseless, I don't know what is. Such posts prove to me that the mod system is pretty incorrect. How much cheaper can you possibly build such a system on AMD than on Intel?

    2. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For shit's sake, moron, try going to www.pricewach.com and checking out their prices. Most Intel CPUs are twice that of the equivalent AMDs.

    3. Re:Good. by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Looks like going with an Athlon will save you ~$40. The athlon 64 3000 is going for ~$210 with the P4 3.06 going for ~$250.

      I'm not seeing where the Intel CPUs are twice that of AMDs. The CPU price is only a small part of building a system anymore anyways. The graphics card, monitor, and RAM is where most of your money will (and should) go.

  14. Re:I have one... by pantycrickets · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I dunno about you, but I'd prefer mine to not be broken.

    It's an eMachine, you don't have much choice.

  15. emachines are crap by Reivec · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would never buy an emachine. I love AMD and all, but back when I was in high school my school bought several hundred emachines and about 35% of them were DOA due to faulty power supplies. You would think with a percentage that high emachines would be aware of this problem, yet they were selling them anyway. Pretty bad business if you ask me.

    1. Re:emachines are crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that was the point - they were the cheapest thing going, so naturally they had to cut corners somewhere.

      Search /.'s archives; there was a link recently to an interview with eMachines' new CEO (as of 2001), who spent time in the tech support trenches, and vowed to improve quality (so at least they can reduce returns, etc).

    2. Re:emachines are crap by viniosity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then get one of these . Voodoo has had a 64 bit AMD laptop for quite a while now.

    3. Re:emachines are crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing this was a couple of years ago when they used to use processor speed as the model number. Like 533a, for a 533 celery. Yeah, we have/had a few of those at work. And yes, there was a huge problem with power supplies. I recall replacing almost all of them. But in the past 3-4 years, we have continued to buy emachines at work, and have had no problem at all with them. (Except for the fact that they like to sell base systems with 128MB of ram, but that can be upgraded.)

      You have to realize, 99% of PC manufactures buy the same god damn parts, and just make a prettier or shiney case.

      If you buy two base model computers: an emachines celeron 2.2GHz and a Dell 2.2 cerleron (i think 2600 model) they have almost the same stuff in them: Broadcom 4400 NIC, Intel i845 graphics, SAME CPU, etc. etc. etc.

      If you are moved enough to complain about how well a computer manufacturer makes a computer, you shouldnt buy a pre-built one. Learn to build one yourself.

      Pricewatch even used to sell barebone laptops.

    4. Re:emachines are crap by cflorio · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the emachines are a good $1000 less. Are those Voodoo machines actually $1000 better?

    5. Re:emachines are crap by Reivec · · Score: 1

      I have 3 computers, all of which I built myself. I don't believe I ever complained about a manufacturer *I* had ever bought from, nor did I EVER say I owned a pre-built system.

  16. Too bad by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    It will feel like a 386 with all the spyware, adware, and fun animated cursors.

    eMachines: When 300 services battle over your network connection just isn't enough.

    1. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It will feel like a 386 with all the spyware, adware, and fun animated cursors."

      And what have you been smoking lately? The last eMachine I bought, 2 months ago, with an athlon, came bare. Windows only, no extra software not one little extra program anywhere...

    2. Re:Too bad by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Because, you know, people who are shopping for 64-bit laptops aren't capable of reinstalling whatever OS comes with the laptop. I'm guessing XP Home? I would imagine most users who would buy such a thing are "Power Users" and would wipe the machine for XP Pro or Linux anyway.

      Oh and my first computer (as in one I purchased for myself) was an emachines 366id. Its still working perfectly in the room next door for my father's business. It didn't have any spyware on it when it came .... it had ME but well thats another story. My brother and sister both have emachines and they're both still going as well.

    3. Re:Too bad by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      I have to tell you, I was using an eMachines recently and didn't have this trouble at all. Debian doesn't install any of that shit.

      What prevents you from just reinstalling the OS as soon as you get it? Perhaps more of a hassle than most people want, but certainly not that big a deal, either. I do it with all of my machines.

      Not trying to be one of those self-righteous Linux users, but seriously, it's not THAT big a deal.

    4. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought an emachines laptop and it came with nothing like gthat installed... even had winamp 2.8+ as the default media player...
      It is very responsive and the widescren rocks for having trillian open to the sideof a webpage or work!

    5. Re:Too bad by standsolid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Idiot,

      I work as a best buy tech and see hundreds of eMachines go out of my store.

      eMachines do the best job of not screwing up Windows. A hell of a lot better than HP or COMPAQ.

      If you could only see a Pentium 4 HP/Compaq (stock XP install) vs an eMachine (again, stock XP install) with nearly identical specs, you would be BLOWN AWAY by how much quicker the eMachines is.

      Know before you speak, n00b

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    6. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A Best Buy tech calling someone else a n00b. Oh the humanity.

    7. Re:Too bad by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      You work as a Best Buy tech and are calling me an idiot? meh. Perhaps you are the smart one that stays in the back.

      I'll grant you, I haven't looked at buying a PC since I bought my Mac, and I won't be - so perhaps my info is out of date.

      But I'm no n00b - I was selling 486s when Pentium was still vaporware.

    8. Re:Too bad by tho+1234 · · Score: 1

      Really?

      My compaq evo (corporate model) didn't have any 3rd party software on it in the default install. Just windows XP pro, the online user manual/compaq config program, and the drivers for all the hardware.

      Everything else (win DVD, CD burning software, office, antivirus, etc) came on seperate CD's, and the user can choose whether to install it. Those come preinstalled on the notebook (but not if you restore the computer from the backup discs) but there's still not a single piece of bloatware/3rd party software. Memory usage was less than 100 megs on XP on the brand new computer!

      Maybe the crap they sell at best buy is different, but you're making the same blanket statements as the original poster

    9. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it didn't come with any 3rd party crap because it was the corporate model.

    10. Re:Too bad by standsolid · · Score: 1

      I mean n00b as a general insult, not just calling you "new" or "fresh".

      Yes, I am a best buy tech, but don't let that fool you -- I actuality know a thing or two about computers, thank you.

      As to the "smart one who stays in the back" comment -- you could say that. I am that one tech that the gremlins come to for the "hard stuff" that needs to be worked on (You know, like when DDR ram won't fit into the SDRAM slot or When you need to use multimeter). I'm not just some moron that best buy tends to pick up off the street that just says "Your computer is slow? You need more ram!" to every customer, please.

      Don't judge me because my kind (best buy techs) are always looked upon as idiots. Although, I honestly would tend to agree with that fact. Most best buy techs are idiots. I do know more than the average "upgrade bench" technician needs to know. I am actuality a technician, not a salesperson. I write tools that I need to my job.

      In any case, eMachines makes computers that out-of-the-box are a hell of a lot better than most any other brand we carry (in terms of windows setup)

      thanks for your consideration :)

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    11. Re:Too bad by standsolid · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am calling someone else a n00b, n00b.

      Besides, even if I was an incompetent technician, noticing diffferences in speeds of computers does not take a genius to see "well gosh, after clicking this button, this computer takes longer to load my Interweb on this one!"

      Show your face A/C! SHOW IT!

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    12. Re:Too bad by standsolid · · Score: 1

      Blanket statements? I'm sorry if I confused you, but I came out and said I was speaking of computers that leave my store. If it was taken any other way, I offer my humble apologies.

      But joe schmoe will not buy an EVO from Compaq. They buy a Presario from Best Buy, Frys, CompUSA, etc. The Compaq EVOs are kick-ass computers. If only we sold those in retail, I would have less people coming back complaining.

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
  17. Battery by Mieckowski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It has a "high-capacity 8-cell LiIon battery." Still, no mention of batter life in the specs. Hmm, I wonder why?

    1. Re:Battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, no mention of batter life in the specs. Hmm, I wonder why?

      Not everybody's live revolves around baseball, kid.

    2. Re:Battery by phr1 · · Score: 1

      This is a desktop replacement machine. Most users will always run it on AC power. Batteries are an afterthought. They're useful if you need to power up the machine and check on something without messing with the AC adapter. If you want to watch DVD's through a cross country plane flight, you want a smaller machine that fits on the tray table anyway.

    3. Re:Battery by addaon · · Score: 1

      you want a smaller machine that fits on the tray table

      Or at least in the overhead bin! You see the weight of this thing?

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    4. Re:Battery by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Voodoo PC also makes a very similar laptop. I wouldn't be surprised if the weren't from the same OEM.

      They list battery life as 3+ Hours

      Even if it manages only HALF of that under normal usage, it's still better than most.

      This is most likely due to the power-saving technology present in the Athlon 64 (which, interestingly enough, is also present in the desktop versions of the chip, and is supported on virtually all motherboards). From what I understand of it, it's similar in concept to Intel Speedstep.

      Unfortunately, I couldn't test it out on my Athlon 64 desktop, because WinXP refuses to install a specialized processor driver on non-laptops.

      That being said, i'll stick with the same setup i've used for quite some time. AMD Desktop. Apple Notebook.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Battery by grocer · · Score: 1

      still better than most??? I get 4 hours out of my iBook (G3 900) My '98 vintage Toshiba 3110CT PII 300 manages 2 to 2 1/2 hours, depending on how much juice the LCD gets...my wife's P266 MMX 3015CT did 3 hours or so until the hard drive died...anything less than 2 1/2 hours is unacceptable to me...that was one of my big reasons for buying an iBook.

    6. Re:Battery by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I couldn't test it out on my Athlon 64 desktop, because WinXP refuses to install a specialized processor driver on non-laptops.

      Not true, but you may need a BIOS upgrade first. I had to upgrade my ASUS K8V from 1002 to 1004 before I could install the Cool and Quiet drivers. Now the ASUS power meter display shows I'm running 800MHz @ 1.275V.

      IIRC, the Voodoo laptop does have a bigger battery than the eMachines, but it's also a little heavier and way more expensive. If I were in the market for a laptop today I'd definitely buy the eMachines, preferably the M6807 model that has a DVD burner for +$100.

  18. What 64 bit OS??? by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    If you want to actually use 64 bit software on these processors, you currently need to run Linux. How are the Linux drivers for this flavor of ATI? Most new ATI hardware is not supported - never mind support via 64bit drivers. Need a AMD64/NVidia laptop.

    1. Re:What 64 bit OS??? by Chazmati · · Score: 1

      According to their web page "eMachines recommends Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP"

      Does Microsoft have anything 64-bit ready? Seems silly to recommend XP for this new 64-bit laptop.

    2. Re:What 64 bit OS??? by dexterpexter · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just bought an eMachines Widescreen Athalon Laptop with ATI, despite all of my geeky senses telling me not to. Many people have sucessfully gotten Linux running on this same model, including Slackware. You can download the drivers fairly easily (I had all of them--for Linux, XP, and 2000-- downloaded within twenty minutes)

      eMachines carries with it a very undeserved reputation and I feel bad for those gun shy folks who can't see that they really are putting out good, solid products now. This laptop is quieter than any of the models my friends bought, has an amazing 3.5 hour battery life (three hours if running my wireless network), and has supported everything that I have thrown at it. I am pleased because my laptop outperforms the laptops my colleagues have purchased, and mine cost about $400 less.

      And I agree, Linux is THE OS to test these processors out.

      --

      *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
      "We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms."
    3. Re:What 64 bit OS??? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I don't get why everyone mentions this. Yes, this CPU can support 64-bit operation, and no, there is no 64-bit Windows OS yet, but who cares? This CPU is also among the fastest 32-bit processors out there. It's not like you are "wasting" the 64-bit-ness by not using it. Those extra registers can't be used to feed the homeless or anything. So what? You buy a machine that very fast, and you get the "bonus" of being able to run future (or current) 64-bit OSes on it, one day. Why do you see the glass as half-empty? Why don't you see the 2 full glasses that are overflowing into the half-filled one?

    4. Re:What 64 bit OS??? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I believe Gentoo will run on this box...may have to do the 2.6 kernel...I was asking on the forums if there was support for this chip. The answer seemed to be yes...but, you had to jump through some hoops.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:What 64 bit OS??? by ironygranny · · Score: 1

      "Windows XP 64-Bit Edition" is available for download via MSDN. It was apparently posted on Sept. 18th of last year. I'm not sure if you can buy it retail yet or if you will ever be able to.

    6. Re:What 64 bit OS??? by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      How are the Linux drivers for this flavor of ATI? Most new ATI hardware is not supported - never mind support via 64bit drivers. Need a AMD64/NVidia laptop.

      I attempted to configure a friend's Gateway M505 for Redhat 9; this has the same Radeon 9600. The XFree86 ATI driver does not support this chipset; the closed-source ATI driver for the desktop 9600 didn't work too well - I guess we finally got it working with acceleration and antialiasing turned off. I've heard some people claim that ATI cards are better supported under Linux, but this has certainly never been my experience, especially where laptops are concerned. . .

    7. Re:What 64 bit OS??? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It's the 3000+, which is a stripped down 3200+ ((Dur|Celer)on-ized to half the cache). It performs almost as well, and the board would probably take a mobile 3400+, so you're talking about one sweet rig here. For $1550 with the 3000+.

    8. Re:What 64 bit OS??? by DShard · · Score: 1

      There is always the vesa driver which works pretty well sans acceleration. If your twitching for the speed, I know they have great w2k drivers. Since I dual boot, that's ok. If quake 3 on linux is an issue then look elsewhere.

    9. Re:What 64 bit OS??? by jkovach · · Score: 1

      If what you saw was called "Windows XP 64-Bit Edition", then it was for IA64 (Intel Itanium.) The version of Windows XP for AMD64 (AMD Opteron/Athlon 64) will be called "Windows XP 64-Bit Edition for 64-Bit Extended Systems" or "Windows Elements" depending on who you ask (Windows Elements is probably a codename...) Last I heard the AMD version is currently in beta testing, so it's probably on MSDN also. Maybe you did in fact see the Opteron version. However, you need to be careful not to get the versions mixed up or you'll end up with something that doesn't run on your system as AMD64 and IA64 are quite incompatible.

  19. If you think that's impressive... by invid · · Score: 2, Funny

    you should see my Lego version!

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
  20. Heat and power? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been working with 64-bit chips since 1998 (DEC ALPHA systems and now G5's) and there has always been problems with heat and power. What's the battery life going to be on one of these machine?

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:Heat and power? by Extreme+Unguent · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Both Alpha and IA64 were traditionally above 100W in power usage. Don't know about Athlon64 but I'm sure AMD has a white paper on it... can you imagine that kind of heat getting transferred to your lap by a heatpipe?

    2. Re:Heat and power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've seen the beginning of Saving Pvt. Ryan, right? About the same as a guy getting off a landing craft.

    3. Re:Heat and power? by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 1

      FWIW AMD lists the maximum power consumption of their Desktop Replacement Athlon64 at 81W, and the Mobile Athlon64 as 62W. Both are pretty high, though the Athlon64/Opteron core seems to have a pretty wide power range (ie typical power is quite a bit lower than the maximum power listed). I'm not sure whether this machine uses the Desktop Replacement Athlon64 or the Mobile Athlon64, but I believe that it's the latter (AMD only lists a 3200+ speed grade for the DTR chip, and the laptop comes with a 3000+ speed grade).

      Certainly not the sort of chip that you can stuff into a super-small laptop, but about the same as it's main competitor. Intel's Mobile P4 processors have a Thermal Design Power (almost-sorta-kinda maximum power) of up to 70W.

      In both cases these machines are really targetting the desktop repalcement crowd. They're designed for people who need to move their computer from one place to another every once in a while but rarely need to use them on the road.

    4. Re:Heat and power? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Of course, is it really a 3000+? Best Buy is claiming that it's a 3000+, and it's 2.0GHz with 1MB L2 cache. The only Mobile Athlon 64 that has those specs is the 3 2 00+.

      Also, eMachines now has the 6805 (and the DVD burning 6807) on their site (although not the T6000, their desktop A64), and they say the same thing. However, they're listing a $100 mail-in rebate, making it $1400 (Best Buy is selling it for $50 more than eMachines is), and they also say that Circuit City and CompUSA carry it (CC is also $50 higher than eM says, and CU doesn't claim to have ANY eM products).

      Does anyone know where you could buy the 6805 for $1500 before rebate, or is it really $1550 before rebate, and eM's site is wrong?

      BTW, there may be Linux compatibility issues with the 6-in-1 media card reader, as it does read Secure Digital. I don't know if having an empty SD reader on a system can cause Linux issues, but I know a filled one (AKA a Sandisk Cruzer flash drive) kernel panics Linux.

    5. Re:Heat and power? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      BTW, if your tax rate is 6.75% at the store where you purchase it, assuming you send and get the mail-in rebate, it'll be $1554.98 - tax is more than the rebate! Dealtime put my tax at 6.00%, but sales tax where I live is 7.00%.

  21. Re:I have one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    means it's hot, einstein.

  22. Laptops by PatrickThomson · · Score: 0

    Hurrah for burning trousers!

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  23. battery life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    does anybody know the (typical blah blah blah) battery life of this laptop?

    otherwise, it compares pretty favorably to my IBM R40e...

    adam

  24. Great, but should I wait before going 64 bit? by Wingit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I live in a Pentium 350 world and home and have been limping along, quite happily actually. I admin a Win2K network at work so keep one foot planted there, and have been learning and living on a steady diet of Linux the rest of the time. While eMachines don't thrill me, I am thinking more and more that I should postpone any upgrades until I can truly dive into the 64 bit world. I realize I will be stuck running plenty of 32 bit applications, but is my wait worthwhile? I am really getting the itch to get into serious gaming again but (obviously) my current system is not up to much more than the Ultima Online I played for 5 years. Perhaps this question fit better as an Ask Slashdot question, but I didn't feel it was worthy to stand on its own so I welcom your comments.

    --
    We win together or suffer without.
    1. Re:Great, but should I wait before going 64 bit? by Phoukka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you can always dual-boot a 32-bit Windows and a 64-bit Linux/BSD. Then you can enjoy 64-bit goodness whilst still dipping a toe into your favorite games. And the Mobility Radeon 9600 that's in this laptop should go a long way towards making this laptop suitable for gaming. The processor won't hurt, either... ;)

    2. Re:Great, but should I wait before going 64 bit? by trippinonbsd · · Score: 1

      Pentium 350!? You must be one 31337 overclocker!

    3. Re:Great, but should I wait before going 64 bit? by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      The price law I've seen:

      Laptop systems cost 2x as much as an evenly powered desktop. Keep that in mind when buying/upgrading your system.

      As far as 64 bit archetecture, the 64 bit part is not the big improvement. The extra registers are the huge improvement while the 64 bit part will become useful in memory addressing the in near future.

      The other part of Athlon 64 is that you can use your old 32 bit apps indefinitely. Most benchmarks show they are about the same (if not better) than the P4 in 32 bit mode.

      So you could install a 32 bit version of gaim running with a 64 bit kernel and 64 bit X-windows.

      Pretty nifty if you ask me.

      Upgrade now if you've got time, and build your own as you'll learn more.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  25. Put some sort of graphics replacement slot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...on one of these and you have a REAL desktop replacement unit. I know there are some of these in the pipeline. Maybe my next home unit will be a laptop if that happens. 9600 is cool, but I want 9800+ class.

  26. Athlon 64 in laptops by SoulVoid · · Score: 2, Informative

    VoodooPC has been selling 64-bit laptops for 2-3 months now with decent battery life for what your getting. Check out the M:855.

    http://www.voodoopc.com/systems/notebook.aspx

    1. Re:Athlon 64 in laptops by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      But, this one seems to be specced out similarly to the Voodoo Envy M:855:

      CPU:
      Voodoo: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ (2.0 GHz, 512KiB L2) (other configs available, but I am attempting to get it as close as possible)
      eMachines: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ (2.0GHz, 512KiB L2)

      GPU:
      Voodoo: Mobility Radeon 9600 Pro w/64MB RAM (technically, since it doesn't have 128MB or more RAM, it's not Pro)
      eMachines: Mobility Radeon 9600 w/64MB RAM

      HDD:
      Voodoo: 60GB Travelstar (optional - adds $93.27)
      eMachines: 60GB

      CD:
      Voodoo: 2x DVD(+/-?)R + 16X CD-RW
      eMachines: 8x DVD-ROM + 24x24x24x CD-RW

      Networking:
      Voodoo: 802.11g, 10/100, 56K
      eMachines: 802.11g, 10/100, 56K

      Display:
      Voodoo: 15" 1400x1050
      eMachines: 15.4" 1280x800

      RAM:
      Voodoo: 512MB "Low Latency"
      eMachines: 512MB PC2700

      Price:
      Voodoo: $2749.06
      eMachines: $1549.99

      Hmm, looks like the eM is a MUCH better deal, especially considering that they had a widescreen laptop with an AXP for $1500 before this... I know that the M:855 is the first. However, the eMachines 64-bit laptop is a LOT cheaper - must be the special case or something on the Voodoo.

    2. Re:Athlon 64 in laptops by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Update:

      It's confusing dealing with AMD Mobile CPUs, especially when the info a site posts is just plain wrong. It seems the Mobile 64 3000+ is a 1.8GHz CPU with 1MiB L2. I'd rather have the faster CPU, and less cache, as clockspeed is what really hits an AMD64 hard, not cache, and the cache takes power, as, unlike the Pentium M, it can't disable any of the cache to save power.

      IIRC, Voodoo said their CPU was a 1.8/1024, but Best Buy said that the eM CPU was a 2.0/1024. That begs the question: Is the eMachines really a 3200+? Someone needs to buy one, and try it out.

    3. Re:Athlon 64 in laptops by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      And I quote from Best Buy:

      "Mobile AMD Athlon(TM) 64 processor 3000+* with 64-bit platform for improved multitasking performance"

      "*3000+ processor operates at 2.0GHz"

      "Cache Memory: 1MB integrated on die Level 2" (slightly reformatted to display better)

      And now, AMDs Mobile AMD Athlon 64 product line list (heavily reformatted):

      Mobile AMD Athlon(TM) 64 Processor
      Model Number - Frequency - L2 Cache
      3200+ - 2.0 GHz - 1 MB
      3000+ - 1.8 GHz - 1 MB
      2800+ - 1.6 GHz - 1 MB

  27. Voila. by xankar · · Score: 1
    --
    ~To choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation. -Yann Martel
  28. 'been there, done that by dago · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yep, and my Tadpole is already 64bits for yeaaars (UltraSparc).

    Oh, and btw, in Europe, you can buy Packard Bell Athlon 64 based laptops ...

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
    1. Re:'been there, done that by ncr53c8xx · · Score: 1
      Yep, and my Tadpole is already 64bits for yeaaars (UltraSparc).

      And at $20,000 a pop I am sure very few organizations would consider buying one. But now with Sun supporting AMD64 who knows ...

    2. Re:'been there, done that by dago · · Score: 1

      well, ebay's there for that (it cost me around 300 4 years ago).

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  29. Old news.. by Snotboble_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A Danish company called Amitech has had an Athlon 64 powered notebook since August 13 2003.

    It does however suffer from the 90W power drain that the regular Athlon 64 imposes, so don't move too far away from that power outlet.

    --
    Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;umount;sleep
  30. Evesham already brought one out - ONE MONTH AGO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dumbasses.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/34562.ht ml

    -- CSLib Menace rules in 2k4

  31. eMachines laptop? gross! by Monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not everybody shopping for a 64 bit notebook would buy something cheesy like an eMachines laptop.
    VoodooPC has been selling their high end m:855 for some time now. Based on the Athlon 64, it also has ATI Mobility 9600 Graphics Pro chipset.

    1. Re:eMachines laptop? gross! by brulman · · Score: 2, Informative

      the VoodooPC is an extra $900 though.

      --
      "the best safety of the frontier...will be secured by total annihilation of the few remaining indians" L Frank Baum 1890
    2. Re:eMachines laptop? gross! by Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah but it has that cool graphic on the cover.

    3. Re:eMachines laptop? gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but it has that cool graphic on the cover.
      Sadly, I think you're serious.

    4. Re:eMachines laptop? gross! by rmarll · · Score: 1

      the VoodooPC is an extra $900 though.

      Nor is it available through a retail outlet.

    5. Re:eMachines laptop? gross! by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      And they name their color schemes after European GP race tracks. My vote for the Imola Organge!

  32. Not impressive by Mieckowski · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bah, I'm going to hold out for a dual 64 bit laptop. With a RAID array.

    1. Re:Not impressive by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      See my post here.

    2. Re:Not impressive by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, you could get the dual part if you cram a certain Mini-ITX board (VIA made one of a board for their next model of C3 that took TWO of them) in a laptop case, and someone makes a 12-pound P4 DTR that has a RAID array. However, if you've got a laptop that can take an extra HDD, CD-ROM, or extra battery in a bay, play with software RAID.

    3. Re:Not impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power on: Batery 100%
      Turn on devices: Battery 42%
      Loading OS: Battery 12%
      OS Loaded: Battery Dead!

    4. Re:Not impressive by stefanb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah, I'm going to hold out for a dual 64 bit laptop. With a RAID array. And hookers!

    5. Re:Not impressive by beerits · · Score: 1

      Bah, I'm going to hold out for a dual 64 bit laptop. With a RAID array. And hookers!

      In fact, forget the laptop!

    6. Re:Not impressive by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 0
      Bah, I'm going to hold out for a dual 64 bit laptop. With a RAID array.


      Including backpack :D
      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  33. Bum rap by SuDZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now I know the big deal is to hate Emachines but do many of you have experience with them? I knew a lot of people in my area were buying them because the price was low (friends and students) because that was all they could afford. At first I had the same feeling of "eek, I have heard bad things", but once they got them setup and running they really had no issues with them. I mean they were using them for what they were designed for. Things like email, IM, web browsing and minor games. These things lasted for a while, usually until it was time to upgrade or what not. A lot of people I know still have them.

    Based on what I saw they took the abuse of a home computer and ran fine with no problems outside or regular software issues. Why do they seem to get such a bum rap on here?

    SuDZ

    1. Re:Bum rap by dexterpexter · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. As I posted earlier, I bought an eMachines Widescreen laptop and have been completely satisfied by it. I had no problem finding the drivers for it, I found members of the Linux community who had successfully developed ATI support, and even better: it has a 3.5 hour battery life which is much greater than most of the laptops I have seen. Unlike some of the other AMD-powered laptops, mine does not overheat and it has handled everything that I have thrown at it beautifully. I take that back: it choked when I was doing some 3D rendering on it, but I think that was a function of the OS and not and hardware or driver concerns.

      The laptop is very rugged. The speakers are the highest quality I have ever heard. Also, despite rumors that they are noisy, it is by far the quietist laptop I have seen.

      My friends bought laptops and none of their offers the same battery life, many of them overheat, and they all have noisy fans.

      I understand that eMachines has had a shifty background, but I think that it is time for people to throw down their gun shy attitudes and actually try the new products this company is putting out.

      These laptops were simply *MADE* for Linux.

      --

      *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
      "We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms."
    2. Re:Bum rap by supun · · Score: 1

      Not sure. I have an eMachine I use for a staging server, $400, which has work near perfect. The only problem I've had was after 1 year the power supply fan stop working. This machine takes abuse. It runs apache and mysql, plus has to handle my perl scripts which pegs the processor normally for 2 days straight. Most of the time it's hitting swap, since ( up to seven days ago ) it only had 128M of RAM. However it keeps chugging along. For a cheap server (non-HA) it's pretty good.

      They arn't the coolest looking machines, but their bang for a buck is hard to beat.

      --
      :w!
    3. Re:Bum rap by mrkurt · · Score: 1

      Let's put it this way: this post had my interest piqued until they mentioned the laptops were made by eMachines. Kiss of Death. If you are seriously looking, make sure you find out what the architecture really is like. This was the issue with eMachines desktop computers: they usually made small, mini-ATX machines whose power supply you could guarantee would burn out. Maybe things have changed, but I support our staff at church, and this is what they had on all their desktops until recently. They are older machines that have Win98. Wouldn't buy those computers again.

      --
      Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
    4. Re:Bum rap by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've been using one (T1100) here at work for over a year. The thing is a piece of crap. The processor, an AMD 1300 (i think), is ok but the hard drive is a cheap 6 gig 5400 rpm something or other that sounds like jet turbine and there's no space in the box for another one. Since I dual boot with linux, I quickly maxed that one out. When I went a got a newer hard drive, I discovered that in order to install it properly I would have to remove the other one (which works fine). That's because there's only ONE hard drive bay in this thing. I ended up just hooking it up and letting it rest on top of the floppy drive. No, there aren't any holes for a second drive there either. Due to some rather extreme software requirements, I didn't want to re-install windows and linux on the new drive because it would take three or four days.

      On top of all of that, the onboard sound has some sort of problem and plays static noise instead of whatever is sent to it. And then there's crap-for-performance video they put in it. The best it can manage is something like 1024x768 at 24bit in 2D.

      Finally, the case is crap too. Working inside one of these things is an excercise in frustration and frequently results in small cuts and much profanity.

      On the other hand though, it's well over a year old and it still runs. That's something I guess, but I still want to take a tazer to the mother board, set the whole thing on fire, put it out by peeing on it, and then run it over with my truck. Maybe I'll throw it off a cliff after that.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  34. WICKED ! Ive been waiting by MajorDick · · Score: 1

    Ive been waiting for one, looking everywhere, I just got my AMD 64 ref manulas last week :)
    Anyone wanna but a 2ghz P4 Toshiba cheap ?

    1. Re:WICKED ! Ive been waiting by cobe98 · · Score: 1

      I'll buy one for fifty dollars!

    2. Re:WICKED ! Ive been waiting by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Well, he did say cheap...

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  35. best buy link mentioned in article by ilsie · · Score: 1

    here

    Some highlights- 60GB hard drive, 512MB PC2700 RAM, Mobility Radeon 9600, 15" widescreen display

  36. VoodooPC already has one by obsid1an · · Score: 3, Informative

    VoodooPC has been doing this for over three months already.

    1. Re:VoodooPC already has one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the same thing. This eMachine uses the mobile version of the Athlon64 (which just became available), instead of the 90 Watt desktop version that people had to use last year.

    2. Re:VoodooPC already has one by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      They said on their site that it's also mobile. If not, it is at least the DTR (DeskTop Replacement) version of the A64. Lower power, a SpeedStep-like system, but still Socket 754.

    3. Re:VoodooPC already has one by djneko · · Score: 1

      Thank you sir, for your refreshing sanity check. I was hoping I wasn't the only one out there who knew what VoodooPC had been doing. I found out about their laptops the first day I heard about the A64s going on sale.

      --
      `/\/\
      (^.^)
      (")(")
      not quite an analog pussy, just a cat that plays with vinyl
  37. Hypersonic-PC as well by joebagodonuts · · Score: 1

    Check out the Aviator -AX6

    --
    "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
  38. hypersonic has been selling one as well for a whil by Siniset · · Score: 3, Informative

    hypersonic pc has been selling one for a while as well. They seem to be pretty decent machines, might by one with my tax refund. -siniset

  39. ATI does support linux by caino59 · · Score: 1

    Actually, take a look over at ATI's drivers' page

    They're for the entire Radeon line from everything from the 8500-9800

    But like you said, no 64bit drivers - I wonder if ATI and Emachines have soemthing worked out for this?

  40. hey...if it can be used to play games on by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    with the same experience as on an Alienware laptop, but comes in much cheaper, I will get one....

    Alienware laptops are cool, but damn...I can not justify 3500 for a laptop.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  41. What's the warranty? by phr1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Laptops, especially bleeding-edge ones that run hot, have a high failure rate. I've owned about 6 laptops in the post-Pentium era (earlier ones ran cooler and were more reliable) and four of them have needed warranty repair after more than a year of service. With a 1-year warranty I'd have been SOL. With a 3-year warranty, you're more covered, and the machine is almost obsolete after that long anyway, so it's time for an upgrade if it breaks. These days, only higher priced laptops tend to come with 3 year warranties any more, probably because the failure rate is known to be so high.

    I guess if this eMachines thing has a 1-year warranty you can get an "extended" warranty from Best Buy for a few hundred bucks more. I'd definitely advise doing that. But it means you have to figure it into the price of the machine.

    1. Re:What's the warranty? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      2 or 3 year warranty extension available from emachines
      --From the eMachines website

      2-Year Notebook ESP
      Upgrade to:
      2 years warranty on parts and labor
      2 years technical support*
      2 years of screen repair or replacement

      Only $109.00 (Plan must be purchased within 90 days of Notebook original purchase date)

      3-Year Notebook ESP
      Upgrade to:
      3 years warranty on parts and labor
      3 years technical support*
      3 years of screen repair or replacement

      Only $189.00 (Plan must be purchased within 90 days of Notebook original purchase date)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:What's the warranty? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      also there is a Lemon policy so if you need more than three repairs they will give you a new one instead

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:What's the warranty? by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I have experienced this as well.

      Every pentium laptop I have had fails after about 2-3 years.

      I still have my old Compaq Elte 4/50CX. Its a 486 DX/2 50mhz with 16 megs of ram. Got it the late 1994. over 9 years ago. Still works perfectly, but the battery has been dead for years.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    4. Re:What's the warranty? by ncr53c8xx · · Score: 1
      With a 1-year warranty I'd have been SOL.

      Do you know of any laptops that are robust? You are much better off buying a $800 laptop and throwing it away if it fails after one year.

    5. Re:What's the warranty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually the Athlon64 3000 has all kinds of power management stuff (such as reducing the speed from 1.8GHz to 800MHz and the voltage down in the 1.3v range which would put it down around the low voltage pentium-m and P3s) that and (someone correct me if im wrong) i believe the A64-M 3000 has 1MB L2 and runs at 1.8GHz (where as the desktop version has 512k L2 and runs at 2GHz) and the lower speed yet again reduces heat. Lest we forget, the Athlon64s max thermals are MUCH lower than the Pentium4's.

    6. Re:What's the warranty? by phr2 · · Score: 1
      I don't know of any laptops made today that I'd call robust. Laptops today are built for performance which means pushing their components to their limits, which means early failure. But $800 laptops tend to be pretty stripped down. So if you want a more capable model, the best way to deal with the failures is get one with a 3 year warranty, or buy an extended warranty.

      Thinkpads still seem to be about the best laptops out there, but they do fail if used heavily the way I use mine. I've had four of them and have had a 100% failure rate so far. I keep buying them though, because everything else seems even worse (i.e. fail even faster).

    7. Re:What's the warranty? by ncr53c8xx · · Score: 1
      I don't know of any laptops made today that I'd call robust. Laptops today are built for performance which means pushing their components to their limits, which means early failure.

      I found some companies which were selling mini-ITX based laptops, but they seem to have discontinued them. They should be pretty robust as they are desktop systems.

  42. Re:Mornington Crescent anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bethnal Green

  43. Reason by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    When they were doing the testing, nobody had an egg-timer on hand

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  44. I've said it before, I'll say it again by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    eMachines are just a crappy as Dells or Gateways but you avoid the brand tax with them. Unlike Dell and Gateway, eMachines doesn't pretend it's selling you some top of the line system but is honest about the fact that you're getting the house Chianti, as it were.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
  45. Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you twat.

  46. Dual proc laptop by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

    Speaking of Tadpole, I got an email from one of their sales guys (standard pricing email for Q1 2004), and they say they'll have a dual processor laptop called the "Bullfrog" out by June, 2004. They don't say what processor it'll have, but they claim it'll be available with up to 8GB RAM, have a 17" 1400x1050 display, and a "massive HDD."

    Right on.

  47. M6805??? by pesc · · Score: 1

    How can they call the notebook M6805? What a strange misleading name! Are everyone too young to remember the Motorola 6805 microprocessor? Are they sure the notebook uses a 64-bit microprocessor?

    --

    )9TSS
    1. Re:M6805??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember them? Hell, they are still being used in automotive electronics.

      Doorlock modules, keyless entry, general electonic modules (interior light dimmers, security systems, etc.)

      Your vehicle has a complex computer network made up of these simple controllers.

      8-bit micros never died -- they are, even today, a huge part of the embedded market.

  48. Why bother with batteries at this point? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

    Why not just make it a desktop in laptop form? Save $$$ on hardware and you get the smaller form factor. Sure you can't take it with you, but that's what custom welded racks of battery backups on a large diesel-powered cart are for.

    1. Re:Why bother with batteries at this point? by Kref1 · · Score: 1

      They have been doing that for awhile (not with the 64bits though). Desknotes, a laptop without a battery (or a small desktop with a build in LCD) i-buddy. Personally, I dont see the point but there is someone out there who will buy anything.

    2. Re:Why bother with batteries at this point? by x136 · · Score: 1
      Why not just make it a desktop in laptop form? Save $$$ on hardware and you get the smaller form factor.
      Don't think of them as batteries, think of it as a built-in UPS! It's a feature! :)
      --
      SIGFEH
  49. Just in time... by stubear · · Score: 1

    I'm sure myself and many other New Englanders welcome these smaller, yet powerful, space heaters given the subzero temperatures we're having to endure.

  50. Out my nose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coke (the drink) almost came out my nose because I laughed so hard when I read "eMachines."

  51. Bundled with.... by CowardAnonymous · · Score: 1

    ...a free vasectomy! Just leave it on your lap...

  52. 1280x800 ... WHY?! by tugrul · · Score: 1

    The one thing I hate about my Powerbook is its 1280x854 LCD resolution. I want to squeeze as many lines as possible in my terminals, and these shallow "widescreen" displays suck at it.

    With this eMachine, I lose another 54 pixels, ugh. I want my 1280x1024 or 1600x1200 like Dell's UXGAs.

    1. Re:1280x800 ... WHY?! by addaon · · Score: 1

      I want my 1280x1024 or 1600x1200 like Dell's UXGAs

      Call me naive but, if that's what you want, why not buy a dell?

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    2. Re:1280x800 ... WHY?! by tugrul · · Score: 3, Funny

      Call me naive but, if that's what you want, why not buy a dell?

      I have one. Its 2.5 years old with a 1600x1200 LCD. Its shoddy build quality has put it out of service though. I need to summon the energy to get it through tech support's head that the note to "update my video drivers" from the last time I sent it in has nothing to do with the laptop not turning on.

      No more Dell.

    3. Re:1280x800 ... WHY?! by Zzootnik · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay Naive...Because even if you go Dell, you still pay an arm and a leg for that premium UXGA display. Although they do look quite nice.

      I picked up one of those vpr matrix notebooks (That also has a 1280 x 864 display) on the cheap and haven't had any problems at all to date. Personally, I think it looks great compared to all the other 1024x768 screens you see on laptops these days...And it's amazing how fast the pre-install of XP Home can vanish into thin air...All you need is a linux install cd..

      --
      Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    4. Re:1280x800 ... WHY?! by Green+Light · · Score: 1

      Actually, I rather like my 17" "widescreen" display that does 1440x900 resolution (HP Pavilion ZD7000 series "desknote"). It is nice to be able to stretch things out horizontally. To each his own, I guess.

      --
      "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
    5. Re:1280x800 ... WHY?! by criordan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Dude, you're getting a Dell!!!

      --
      http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
    6. Re:1280x800 ... WHY?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my Sager 5680 a couple weeks ago. You should see how nice 1600x1200 is on these UXGA screens, but these emachines are damn cheap and powerful - add another 515 Meg of ram in there of course. And they also have the ATI Radeon 9600 Mobile in there(not sure if it's the pro or not, which mine has too).

    7. Re:1280x800 ... WHY?! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      The ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 chip is the same as the ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 Pro, except AFAIK the standard 9600 can have on-chip DDR. What defines a Pro is 128MB or more DDR, and what defines a non-Pro is less than 128MB. Technically, when Voodoo advertises their box as having a 9600 Pro, they lie... (actually, when they were deciding what to do, they didn't have the info from ATI about what a 9600 Pro actually was - ATI told nobody until people started reviewing the m:855, and AnandTech said that it was OK, because Voodoo didn't know at the time)

    8. Re:1280x800 ... WHY?! by scottj · · Score: 1

      Dude, you shouldn't have bought a Dell.

      I have a 2.5 year old IBM Thinkpad A30p. 1600x1200 and probably a lot brighter than the screen on your Dell. Still rock solid today. I won't need to upgrade until I decide that I can't live without built-in 802.11i/n/whatever.

      --
      .-.--
  53. Re:Mornington Crescent anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parsons Green

  54. Rendering And 3D Gaming by PRES_00 · · Score: 1

    Big and powerful ol' processors are usually used for rendering purposes (aspect in which intel leads) or 3D gaming.

    A laptop isn't suitable for any of that because of the depletion of batteries. I don't think the processor features downclocking of cpu speed when batteries are in use (and full speed when connected to a power jack).

    The most noticable factor which affects laptop performance is the hard drive. They should find something for that rather than the usual megahertz.

    Who in their right mind would use their laptop as a server. The smaller pc components inside probably wear out a lot quicker than desktops. Keeping a laptop on for such extended periods of time would lower its life considerably.

    I like the fact that AMD is pioneering (albeit in the market, not research) the cpu demand for pc's. This gives me a warm feeling, like the one I had when I bought my 1ghz athlon. Anyway, Go AMD!

    1. Re:Rendering And 3D Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you LAN party, you're looking for something that can play a game decently, and is portable. Power isn't as much an issue. The point is that you can throw it in a backpack with a mouse and the power cord and go LAN. Any LAN game I participate in is hosted at my place because my case weighs ~50 lbs and my monitor weighs ~80 lbs. An 8 pound laptop would be happiness.

      And my work laptop (Dell Inspiron 5000e) has been on and running distributed.net since last April. It gets pretty hot, but placing it on a metal shelf helps dissipate the heat. The only downside is that my battery life is down to about 45 minutes from the constant charging. When not running dnet, it's used for the occasional machine firmware upgrade.

      -- synapsis... who posts so little he forgot his password

    2. Re:Rendering And 3D Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the processor features downclocking of cpu speed when batteries are in use (and full speed when connected to a power jack).

      My dell C400 does exactly what I tell it to.
      downcloacked from 1200 to 800 with or without battery.

      Who in their right mind would use their laptop as a server.

      Well, it just so happents that you had a backup of the website/databases on your laptop (for devel. reasons) and the company's webserver dies (insert infinite string of possible reasons); one ifconfig on your laptop later and the company is back in business. You've just saved lots of money and you can get a new [insert your favourite hardware].

      ~omi

  55. What's the point, laptops need portability, right? by expro · · Score: 1
    Perhaps for some people, a laptop is just another way to buy a flat screen to use in the home near an outlet, but a 64-bit CPU sounds to me like it is for a server, so what am I missing?

    This Athalon 64 (especially CISC) laptop sounds like it will be a power hog among other things, making the laptop not portable enough to be worthwhile. It doesn't sound like one I want on my lap. Not only should it be small and light, but the battery has to last a few hours to be worth the trouble.

  56. Re:Mornington Crescent anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Angel

  57. Heat by savagedome · · Score: 1

    IIRC, we've had cases of notebooks heating up in people's laps already. Do these new 64bit notebooks have any protection built in to balance the extra heat...

    1. Re:Heat by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      However, Athlon XPs, 64s, FXs, and Opterons run much cooler than Pentium 4s, and my desktop P4 laptop isn't that much of a lapburner.

  58. Want portable 64 bit computing? Try Shuttle... by n9fzx · · Score: 1

    Shuttle already has an Athlon 64 Cube, which is cheaper, more rugged, and has a heatpipe...

    --
    ...-.-
  59. Bah, What about FreeBSD support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, anyone know if it works with FreeBSD?

    And, does it come without the crappy Microsoft XP software?

  60. So where are these 64 bit machines on their site? by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When the first story about the 64 bit desktop machine from eMachines broke, I looked on their website and it was noticeably absent from the products section. It is still not there and neither is this new laptop. I'm guessing I'm just stupid and missed where it said that they're only selling these models through Best Buy or something like that. It just makes me wonder about the quality if they won't even show them on their website. I'm having trouble coming up with a similar occurrence anywhere else. For a company that does all sales through retail outlets such as Best Buy and Circuit City, it seems odd that they would not mention their flagship products on their own site. I don't think this is a conspiracy, I just can't understand the reasoning here. I have an email out to them seeking some sort of answer, but hopefully someone here will have some insight.

    --
    I am feeling fat and sassy
  61. Ati drivers by irokitt · · Score: 2, Informative

    The ATI integrated drivers, which include the Mobility 9600, play very well with Linux. Certainly a switch from the past ATI driver issues.

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  62. Just fixed someone's eMachine: PSU died. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a Celeron 800 rig, and the PSU finally died. Unfortunately, the drop-in PSU replacement is this smallish form factor that costs $50+, so I just threw the guts into a full ATX case, which was cheaper.

    1. Re:Just fixed someone's eMachine: PSU died. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      What, Micro ATX? Tiger Direct has a 200W (I think) uATX PSU for eMachines, HP, Compaq, and Micro ATX cases for $20 or $25. I'm going to buy one to get more PSU in my HP box when I upgrade it to the point that the only stock or genuine replacement components are the case, an identical to stock FDD (the one in it now is shot), and the front panel (with power switch).

  63. Athlon cache by abertoll · · Score: 1

    I did a quick look and saw that Athlon has a 1 MB cache. Is this enough? Maybe cache is expensive, but I have a feeling performance of these chips could be greatly enchanced with more cache... I only say this because of the Centrino "chip/chipset/network card" thing that has come out. Apparently the centrino chip is a pentium running at about 600 MHz that performs as a 1.2 GHz chip because they have 1 MB cache.

    So for a 64-bit, 2+ GHz processor, is 1 MB enough?

    --
    "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
    1. Re:Athlon cache by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 1

      Apparently it is enough because many of these chips only have 512k and that is how it is going to be with the majority of the new Athlon 64s sold in the future, I suspect. There is a lot of information available at Anandtech, as mentioned previously on Slashdot.

      --
      I am feeling fat and sassy
    2. Re:Athlon cache by Zebra_X · · Score: 0

      Yes. There is very little difference between the 3000+ model (512kb) and the 3200+ model (1MB) in almost all real world gaming benchmarks both chips take the p4 3.0 and 3.2 to school.

    3. Re:Athlon cache by KrispyKringle · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't know how a 600MHz with a 1MB cache would perform like a 1.2GHz. It's like saying that a Civic with good braking performs as well as a Porsche.

      First, the Centrinos really do run at whatever speed they're rated at (but they have SpeedStep, which allows them to run at a slower speed as well to save power). Centrino just means a Pentium M with a Intel-branded WiFi transciever. So a 1.4GHz Centrino is just a 1.4GHz Pentium M.

      Second, the cache doesn't really boost performance in the same way as a faster processor. The cache is good for speeding up memory access on applications that are easily cached (i.e., the pattern of memory access benefits from spatial or temporal locality; elements near accessed elements are likely to be accessed as well, or elements frequently access are likely to be accessed more). Look at it this way; the DRAM used in caches is accessible in maybe 1/10th the time of the SDRAM used in system memory. But at the same time, it's far more expensive.

      The gains from having way more cache than needed (which really depends on the application; desktop processing or gaming, which doesn't involve extended periods of data processing, woudln't benefit a whole lot, though perhaps rendering or video processing would) aren't worth the great cost of DRAM.

      And the speed of the processor doesn't have a lot to do with how much cache is useful, I don't think (perhaps one could argue that a faster processor goes through the cached data faster than more can be cached to replace it, but I don't think the difference in needed cache between a 600MHz and a 2GHz would be all that great, either).

      More cache is better, up to the point that it can't be used any greater, but it's not at all the same as a faster processor.

    4. Re:Athlon cache by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

      It doesn't perform as a 1.2GHz chip because of the cache (mainly) - it's a different architecture. Closer to the PIII core - it has a higher IPC.

      Not that a higher IPC is better or worse - performance is what counts. But a chip with a good IPC, low clock speed, and good performance makes sense for a laptop.

    5. Re:Athlon cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as cache size goes... I would think that if you had a big enough cache, you could possibly cache several processes' data, and not have to clear the cache on a context switch. It may be the case that processors are already like this, I don't really care enough to check.

  64. OLD NEWS Many AMD64 laptops out, and CHEAP too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.amdboard.com/athlon_64_notebook.html

    MANY amd64 laptops have been around for a while now, some starting as low as $1099 (w/o anything).

  65. I'm still waiting... by incom · · Score: 1

    For a major manufacturer to sell a laptop without the MS tax. I want a linux laptop, but refuse to pay a premium for it at a smaller manufacturer(I can't afford the premium) , especially since I should be saving money by not paying for windows. I also want fully compatable hardware in my laptop, no windows only wireless, no non-standard power features(or at least release the specs so linux drivers can be made), and a video chipset/card that has quality linux drivers(like nvidia). Whats so hard about not forcing me to buy certain software with my hardware? I can already find laptops with nvidia GFX and other linux compatible parts, but they always require the MS tax, and I can find laptops without the MS tax, but not with linux compatible parts, or you have to pay extra, it's a clearly abusive monopoly in the laptop market today. Until then I think my money will go towards a zaurus and desktop PC components.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  66. Houston, we have a problem: XP Home? by jerkychew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looks like this laptop comes with XP Home installed. Now, I'm no expert, but does XP Home even support a 64-bit proc? I know it'll at least run in 32-bit mode, but what's the point? If your OS can't deal with the newer instructions, why not just get a 32-bit Athlon at a higher clock speed?

    I looked on MS's XP Home system requirements page, and it makes no mention of 64-bit support - XP 64-bit version looks like a totally different product.

    1. Re:Houston, we have a problem: XP Home? by Zebra_X · · Score: 2, Informative

      The AMD64 chips aren't just "64-bit" they run significantly faster than the 32-bit AMD counter parts and Intel friends. Even as we speak, the 3400+ which is about $380 USD is as fast as the $700 p4 3.2 EE. One of the areas that the chip shines is gaming as well. There is a 64-bit version of XP Pro in the works. The one featured on their site is a different product built for the Itanium architecture.

  67. Re:Want portable 64 bit computing? Try Shuttle... by jabberjaw · · Score: 1

    And I suppose I can take the Shuttle on an airplane, or to my favorite local coffee house? Laptops do have their advantages.

  68. But for you and I by phorm · · Score: 1

    If you wanted to take advantage of the 64-bit CPU why would you be running windows anyways? I think to most people here it is a consideration for running linux.

    I'll wait for somebody else to buy though, as I want to hear on the compatability of various components first.

  69. Gives new meaning to... by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 1


    Chestnuts roasting on an open fire...

    My nutz are roasting under a 64bit AMD laptop...

    Call the fire department!

    --
    Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
  70. Its been on by cryptogryphon · · Score: 1

    www.evesham.com for a few days

  71. Re:Want portable 64 bit computing? Try Shuttle... by n9fzx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    True enough, but you don't need a 64 bit machine to surf the web and read your email, and given the power consumption of the Athlon 64, you probably want an outlet nearby.

    The best cases for 64 bit computing are generally text string database operations, server side encryption, and error control codes, not to mention heavy floating point apps like finite element analysis -- none of which I do anywhere near Starcruds.

    --
    ...-.-
  72. I am very happy with my VoodooPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have it for over a month.
    It is painted over Mitac 8355 and the paint job makes it a real head turner ;-)
    It is little on a heavy side so I dont recommend lugging it around (I have Portege3480/Gentoo for that) but it is a great workstation that I can use both and work and home or carry it to the lab or meeting.

    It is very fast: has 1.8GHz Athlon 64 - single channel memory,512KB L2 cache, 1GB of RAM, Radeon Mobility 9600/64MB, 60GB HDD, all format DVD burner. Battery life seems to be quite decent, it can last about 3 hours of web browsing, text editing and occasional compiles.

    I dont know about Linux compatibility because I need to run Windows for work stuff on it. But on the bright side, because of this laptop, my desktop at home is being converted from dualboot to Gentoo only. Most components should be quite compatible though it has:
    VIA chipset
    MSI-6820 MiniPCI wifi card (broadcom BCM94306) so you will need ndiswrapper or linuxant driver loader
    VIA VT3065 fast ethernet
    VIA VT82C686 modem ac97 codec
    VIA audio AC97 codec

    VoodooPC sales people are very nice.

  73. Nothing new here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amitech.dk has been selling 64bit laptops for a while now.. Isn't there a company called voodooPC too?

  74. Re:Want portable 64 bit computing? Try Shuttle... by jabberjaw · · Score: 1

    True, I am thinking that currently most (not all...) will purchase this laptop simply to have the "my dick is bigger than yours..." argument. However, one never knows when I might feel the urge to do some computational physics etc... ok... well it is nice to know that if I wanted to I could.

  75. emachines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an emachines laptop in december (what I'm typing on now). And I LOVE it. widescreen, verticlescrollbar touchpad.. 802.11g. DVD player 60 gig hd, and 512mb RAM.. all for $1000...

    So far the machine has been a dream.. far better than my last Dell (actually my last 3 dells :)

    Emachines has done something right!

    -=A

  76. Forum by cflorio · · Score: 2, Informative
    Don't forget to check out this emachines forum where this has been a top of interest.

    I have the current version of the laptop, the M5312 and have had no major problems. The screen is the best part, really nice.

    1. Re:Forum by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      And so the obvious question: does it run Linux?

  77. I much prefer light... :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh, I much prefer light and small notebooks.

    On that topic: Has anyone seen a test of the new ASUS S5200? It's one of the few light (1,3kg, 3lbs) notebooks that are actually afordable, but I hesitate to buy without anyone telling me it's actually any good...

  78. Can I have 8 GB of RAM in one? by VojakSvejk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OK, I've burned my karma squawking aobut this relative to G5's and 32-bit OSX, but
    let my try again anyway:

    There's not much reason to go to a 64-bit chip unless either

    1) You are going to use more than 4 GB of RAM in a single process (actually, more than
    2 GB tends to be a pain on a typical 32-bit system, but let's say 4). I don't think you
    can have that much in one of these.

    2) You do a lot of stuff with files over 2 GB (yes, 32-bit OSes handle more than this all the
    time, but it's more likely everything works on a 64-bit sys).

    Really, (1) is the only reason these days, but I threw (2) in for fun.

    64-bit doesn't make it faster; the chip might be, but it's not a direct result of 64 bitness.
    Usually, if there's a 32-bit compatibility mode, it runs faster. 64 bit is just useful for memory.

    These observations are based on 10 years of experience with MIPS, POWER, alpha, and now
    opteron systems. I'd buy an opteron/athlon64, but not to use it with less than 4 GB of RAM.

    1. Re:Can I have 8 GB of RAM in one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the ability to access over 4GB of RAM is definitely a benfit of a 64-bit machine, I believe you are leaving out some rather important facts about the X86-64 architecture. First off, not only have the registers been extended to 64-bit, the amount of general purpose registers has doubled, and if I'm not mistaken some of the multimedia specific registers have been added to as well. Another factor to consider is that Streaming SIMD Extensions V2 are included in the instruction set. Also, there is a full duplex system bus operating at up to 1600MHZ. And lets not forget the integrated DDR 400 memory controller. While not all of these tidbits pertain directly to 64-"Bitness", they are not all available in the 32-bit market and as such make a strong argument for a machine based on this technology.

  79. Re:Dell by va3atc · · Score: 1

    After dealing with Dell for that particular machine I will *never* *ever* buy from them again.


    I'll second that, from my previous post on dell:

    I bought a Dell Dimensions 2350 (Pentium 4) came with integraded graphics.

    I wanted to upgrade (add video card) to find out they ripped out the AGP port (like wtf??)

    So really, I don't think Dell gives a damn about the future

    --
    Candle burns its brightest in the dark
  80. Re:So where are these 64 bit machines on their sit by Bad+Boy+Marty · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh, come on! Would it have killed you to type "M6805" in the SEARCH box?

    --
    RHCE; are you certified? Karma: ambiguous.
  81. Re:What's the point, laptops need portability, rig by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    Actually, any 6th generation CPU (NexGen 5x86, AMD K6/K7(Athlon/XP/Duron)/K8(A64/FX/Opteron), Pentium Pro/II/III/4/M/Celeron, Transmeta, etc., etc. is internally RISC. It translates the x86 code into RISC code (in the case of the AMD and NexGen CPUs, it's RISC86), and executes that.

  82. 64-bits = bad by Arcanix · · Score: 1

    We don't need 64-bit computers, every few years they come out and double the damn bits, and every year without a doubt computers get harder and harder to use. Sure, I have a CS degree but how will I ever figure out 64-bit Windows when I can't even understand 32-bit Windows. I say we go back to 16-bit, Windows 3.1 was the pinnacle of the series.

  83. Re:So where are these 64 bit machines on their sit by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 1

    What search box?

    --
    I am feeling fat and sassy
  84. Typing on a laptop by PCM2 · · Score: 1
    Ever try typing a *lot* of information on a laptop? They are just not typically ergonomic enough for extended typing use.
    I type for a living, and I've never had a particular problem with a laptop keyboard. They do tend to have less key travel distance than your average keyboard, but in some ways, that's good. They cater to a lighter touch.

    More importantly, the one thing people don't seem to understand about ergonomics is that it's all about movement. The point of an adjustable chair isn't to find the One True Position that will prevent you from ever having repeat stress problems. The point of an adjustable chair is that, when you start feeling fatigued, you can adjust it, moving to a different position that will give your other muscle groups a rest. The more you can re-adjust your furniture, the better.

    So what's more adjustable than a laptop? Instead of cramping yourself into a desk in the corner in the same position all day, every day, you can move your laptop around anywhere you want. Move to the other side of the room. Work at your kitchen table. Take it down to the coffee shop with you. Lie on the couch with a bunch of pillows behind you. Whatever feels good.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  85. Re:What's the point, laptops need portability, rig by expro · · Score: 1

    I am aware that his is true of high-performance CPUs stuck with CISC instruction sets. I guess the VAX CPUs that did that many (15, if memory serves me) years ago lead the 6th generation on that feature.

    But I don't, in my limited understanding, believe that interpretation of CISC instructions with all the interdependencies, even if translated to RISC, is as efficient or power-efficient as RISC running RISC programs, which was why I said especially CISC. There are too many wasted interdependent side effects.

    Perhaps I am wrong, but DEC and others have reached the point where they dumped such technology in favor of RISC running programs native to the instruction set.

  86. Carried away.com.com.com.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, its news.com.com, not news.com.com.com!

  87. Clock Throttling by charnov · · Score: 1

    Yes the Mobile Athlon 64 has clock throttling. It will modify clock and power draw in respect to both heat and if the processor is idle or not.

    PowerNow

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
  88. Athlon 64 power lower than P4, desktop or mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
    I'm pretty sure the power envelope in better on the Athlon 64 than the P4, both desktop and mobile.

    Sure it runs all the existing 32-bit apps and OSes, it's just that you *can* run the 64-bit ones too.

  89. I have an EMachines laptop.... by tinrobot · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think it's the M305 or something. It was the first one they offered. Bought it at Best Buy for about $1000. Had better graphics and more memory than the others in the price range, which is why I bought it in the first place.

    So far, it's been a trooper. It's rock solid and reliable, battery life is good. It's also fairly thin and easy to handle. I like the widescreen a lot, as it makes the whole laptop less deep (every inch counts when you fly coach.)

    I love it. If this one ever gives out, I'd buy the 64 bit one in a second.

  90. 4 years ago by HermesHuang · · Score: 1

    I got an emachine PII-500 about 4 years ago. It was wonderful. It was actually cheaper then if I had built it myself, and had everything I wanted (along with the usual batch of extra useless software those things come with). To this day, it is still the primary computer at use at home. [my parents are its only users now, since I'm at college - so it's only in use about an hour a day or so] Only upgrade I've done to it was add more RAM before I upgraded to windows XP, and adding a CD-RW drive. Other then that, it's all original equipment and has not had any problems. Yes, I was a bit skeptical when I bought it. But I decided to take the risk and try it, since it would be cheaper even then building one myself (and I didn't have very much money around, and really needed an upgrade from the Packard Bell P100 which was dying in a very ugly way) Personally, I really like emachines.

  91. Try a G4 powerbook by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    The G5 should be ready later this year.

  92. WTF is Sun waiting for? by haggar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see more and more systems with Opterons and Athlon 64s coming to the market. And all that while, Sun, who would have all the best interest to make some Opteron systems available ASAP, are dragging their feet.

    Sun really needs to get these low and midrange Opteron servers out as soon as they possibly can, while HP is in the Itanium mess! HP was hoping for the Itanium to hit the mass-market and be real cheap to manufacture. Instead, they have by their hands a CPU that's even more expensive than the PA-RISC. If Sun had a shred of strategic insight, they'd be selling cheap 4 and 8 way Opteron servers with Solaris x86-64 right about now.

    I am a huge Sun fan, actually, but some of their management moves seem to be ridicolous (Cobalt aquisition anyone?).

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:WTF is Sun waiting for? by puto · · Score: 1

      Well,

      As someone who doesn't work with Sun, but sells sun stuff. :) I can say that Sun is all about the Opteron. But due to the the Utter Crap the original Sun Cobalt Raqs with crippled linux etc. They are making sure it runs right.

      And they are sweet boxes. They are just making sure the kick ass.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    2. Re:WTF is Sun waiting for? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Hey!

      I made a ton of money of cobalt boxes. If Sun had sat down and said, "yes, we already have server and linux solutions, but what cobalt is doing -- marketting Linux based machines to Windows users replacing their Windows based servers in the process -- is completely different, and an essential niche," then i'd still be making money off of them. Instead I've got to do it all myself *sigh* and it has proved a tad more daunting.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:WTF is Sun waiting for? by haggar · · Score: 1

      Look, I didn't mean to say that the Cobalt equipment had no potential, because obviously it did have a niche, but that was nothing in comparison to the price tag that Sun paid for them ($2 billion+). Let's be honest here, shall we? Sun had enough internal resources to develop their own Cobalt-like kit, don't you agree? They could have done with the fraction of that money.

      --
      Sigged!
    4. Re:WTF is Sun waiting for? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      And they are sweet boxes. They are just making sure the kick ass.

      Knowing Sun they'll release a single processor 1GHz Opteron system in a dual processor motherboard for $7995 and then have the balls to charge you an extra fee for Solaris because it's "dual processor capable". Asshats.

  93. Dell -- it is all about the warranty by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    eMachines are just a crappy as Dells or Gateways but you avoid the brand tax with them.

    With Dell you get a three year 24 hour warranty. While Dell has never serviced my laptop warranty claims within 24 hours, they often get them within 48. And they will replace parts until the machine works.

    1. Re:Dell -- it is all about the warranty by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With Dell you get a three year 24 hour warranty. While Dell has never serviced my laptop warranty claims within 24 hours, they often get them within 48.

      So Dell promises, but it can't deliver. Interesting.

    2. Re:Dell -- it is all about the warranty by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      It's like car warranties. "3 years or 50,000km whichever comes first". Only here it's "3 years or 24 hours, whichever comes first."

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    3. Re:Dell -- it is all about the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With Dell you get a three year 24 hour warranty. While Dell has never serviced my laptop warranty claims within 24 hours, they often get them within 48.

      So Dell promises, but it can't deliver. Interesting.

      To be fair, appleLaserWriter implied that they did fix his machine rather than just blowing him off, they just couldn't do it within 24 hrs. I could deal with that.

    4. Re:Dell -- it is all about the warranty by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting
      With Dell you get a three year 24 hour warranty.
      Yes, but you use up that 24 hours on hold will Dell support in a lot less than three years. I've spent six hours on hold over various calls spread over weeks and talked to people on three continents just trying to buy a spare loptop battery - I wouldn't have perservered so much, but I'd made the mistake of giving them my own credit card number, they charged up front - and I wasn't goping to let go until either the battery came through or I got my money back (which happened two months later). A local supplier, in a two minute call, apologised that it wouldn't be available until the following morning. I picked it up about ten hours later.
      So Dell promises, but it can't deliver
      Sometimes quite literally.
    5. Re:Dell -- it is all about the warranty by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

      Only here it's "3 years or 24 hours, whichever comes first."

      Well, not quite. Dell is supposed to provide service within 24 hours, but in my experience they only deliver within this period for server products. It is actually dell that is at risk, not the consumer. IANAL, but htis might be an opportunity for a class action suit.

  94. Re:Want portable 64 bit computing? Try Shuttle... by haggar · · Score: 1

    Well duh, no wonde it's cheaper: no battery, no TFT screen, no PCMCIA port...

    --
    Sigged!
  95. Parse Error by jsindell · · Score: 1

    My parser broke on the last sentence of the post:

    keeping it afforable of laptop junkies like me

  96. computer term nazi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its compact disc

  97. My disgust compels me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    To everyone of you who bashes eMachines, let me tell you what you've been missing. Every component in an eMachine laptop is brand-name. The only thing that isn't, is the outer case and eMachine logos that emblazen it.

    The M5312 has a 15.4" Widescreen TFT LCD WXGA panel, which is made by LG. It comes with Windows XP Home Edition, which finally gives you a real product activation code, instead of that one you'v ebeen using from the Blue Group's keygen ;). Windows XP 64-bit edition for Intel Itaniums has been available for more than a year, so it's not that far fetched to believe that an AMD 64-bit chip compatible edition would be available at this time as well. You get at Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+ Processor (with core clock speed of 1.8 GHz) [266 MHz Front Side Bus and 512K L2 Cache].

    It comes with 512 MB DDR SODIMM (PC 2100) memory, 60 GB harddrive, and a DVD/CD-RW Combo Drive (24x10x24 CD-RW; 8x Max. DVD-ROM). The combo drive is made by Toshiba. The harddrive is probably a Maxtor (face it, they crank out a lot of drives these days). The RAM, I'm not sure about.

    You get an ATI Mobility RADEON chip, that can use up to 64 MB of your 512 MB DDR system memory. I've given mine all the 64 MB it can handle, and I've never been happier. It's got a low-end sound chip, but it's a laptop. If you're serious about sound on a laptop, use a SoundBlaster Extigy for cryin' out loud! The 56K ITU V.92 Fax/Modem has a Connexant/Rockwell chip in it. The Integrated 802.11g Wireless LAN (up to 54Mbps); 10/100Mbps built-in Ethernet is hardware made by Broadcom, and works like a charm.

    The Touchpad with Vertical Scroll Zone is made by Synaptics, which almost every laptop maker uses on their own models. The 8-cell Lithium-ion battery is made in China -- it hasn't blown up yet. It's only 1.36"h x 14.0"w x 10.0"d (which is damn thin for a non-Apple laptop) and weighs only 6.6 lbs.

    You also get 3 USB 2.0 ports, 1 IEEE 1394, 1 VGA External Connector, 1 S-Video Out, 1 Parallel, Microphone In, Headphone/Audio Out, 1 PCMCIA Slot (Card Bus type I or type II), not to mention a load of crappy software which you can just use for coasters.

    All of this for $1249.99. The S-Video out alone is enough to make you consider this laptop. USB 2.0 across all 3 ports? Slap a hub on one of those ports and you're golden.

    All of those parts are bought by eMachines, who puts them in their laptop shell. Try one, you just might like it!

    1. Re:My disgust compels me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a HUGE fan of the M53xx notebooks by Emachines. They ROCK! I bought a Compaq x1000 which I like but both of my sibilings have the Emachines (m5305 and m5310) and they are faster and very nice.

      Now with the m6805 Athlon64 I am totally thinking of selling my Centrino based laptop... although I think they should have stuck with the design on the m53xx series, they probably couldn't get it to fit into that thin of a laptop... 1.7" isn't too bad but I'll have to see it up close and personal first.

      Emachines are making some AWESOME laptops, check them out before you boo. (Or if you are a slashdotter just jeer and mock even though you don't know what you are talking about... )

      Don't believe me check out these happy users http://dexplor.com/phpBB2/ Unofficial Emachines forums.

  98. an idea.... by Alien_Phreak · · Score: 1

    Just an idea...

    but why not ship those 64-bit cpu machiens with Linux. They might even be able to lower their prices enough to put in some decent hardware in there... (and avoid their well earned reputation of being some incredibly crappy machines).

    Though I gotta say, these recent threads impress me. They should have some impressive hardware for the $$$, not sure how long they would last though.

    Alien.

  99. Re:Dell by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

    I imagine they did it to cut costs. If you would have done a little research on it before you plunked down the money, you could've found out about the missing agp port.

    It does suck to get ahold of a machine with no agp port though, I feel your pain. :)

  100. or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that these have been available for atleast a few months now: http://www.voodoopc.com/systems/m855.aspx

  101. Certainly not the "first" laptop with an Athlon64 by Sivar · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is not one of the first Athlon64 laptops. I have had an Athlon64 laptop for almost two months, and they have been available since late October/early November 2003.

    If the market doesn't catch fire, your desk or legs will...

    This is not true at all. The laptop runs at 800MHz 95% of the time (whenever the full 2GHz is not needed). At that speed, the CPU has a peak heat dissipation of 35W, and a typical output of 28W. This is well below Pentium IV laptops, and is below the peak output of most Pentium-M chips at their full speed.
    Even at 2GHz, it outputs at most around 85W (max theoretical heat output). Compare this to laptops with the Pentium IV Extreme Edition (available from many vendors), which has a typical heat output of over 100W--and that is at idle! Don't even ask about power usage when actually doing something.

    I get a good 3 1/2 hours of battery life on a single charge. That is pretty damn good for a laptop which is more powerful than 95% of the full desktop processors out there, including my own. When it runs at full speed all night, the mouse pad and right side of the keyboard get fairly warm, but not to a point that it makes the machine uncomfortable to use. Warmth is comparable to the Dell Latitude D800, which uses a Pentium-M.

    Unfortunately, it does not support dual batteries, and has no modular optical drive bay (the DVD drive is set when the machine is assembled), but these aren't major issues for most people. It also has a rather bulky power supply for the use of A/C power, complete with its own tiny cooling fan. This does not help the weight, which is already nearly 8lbs with battery. Ah well--it's more powerful than my desktop, reasonably light, and is MUCH smaller than certain 12-lb Pentium IV laptops. One often wonders if manufacturers have a different definition of "lap" than the rest of us.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  102. Laptop Sound by CaptBubba · · Score: 1
    If you want better sound from your laptop you may want to look into the Echo Indigo. I've never heard it myself, but I've been interested in it for a while.

    My biggest beef with laptop sound is the headphone jacks. I can somewhat understand the use of cheap opamps to drive the speakers and headphones (but better chips wouldn't cost more than a few dollars for each unit), but I cannot excuse the use of plastic jacks for the headphone output. For something that is going to be plugged into a great deal, a little bit higher quality would go a long way.

  103. old news... by mantera · · Score: 1

    Packard Bell (now an NEC company) has been offering athlon 64 laptops for quite a while now. I've had my eyes on one for possibly a couple of months now.

    http://www.packardbell.co.uk/products/node1601.a sp?partNumber=P900500201

  104. Bought one by TallGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought one of these on Thursday at Best Buy. Haven't had much time to play with it, but it seems like a very solid machine with a nice screen. Moving windows and resizing them is less responsive than on my 17" PowerBook, which is not a good sign, given the much higher Athlon64 clock speed. For the moment, I'll blame Windows.

    The machine has all the features I need, though I'd like Bluetooth. The 802.11 works great (I don't have a .11g base station, but the .11b mode is fine).

    I'm looking into 64-bit Linux distros to install to see how well that works...

    No idea about battery life yet, but it gets pretty warm on my lap!

    1. Re:Bought one by TallGeek · · Score: 1

      Just as a followup, I've had no luck getting Gentoo's AMD64 Linux install to work. It stalls right after the initrd load. I was able to get x86 Mandrake 9.2 to install, but the ethernet (Via Rhine II) doesn't work, not does X, though I presume both are fixable with enough effort.

  105. Re:What's the point, laptops need portability, rig by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 1

    Try to find a faster RISC chip with lower power consumption than an Athlon64 or P4? I'll give you a hint, you aren't likely to find one. DEC's old Alpha chips were faster than anything around in their day, but they also consumed more power (over 100W in some Alphas, and that was a few years back). IBM's Power4 is also up in the 100W+ range. Intel's VLIW Itanium consumes up to 107W.

    Heck, even the IBM PowerPC 970, that lots of people point to as being a cool-running chip in their Powermac G5s is in the same ballpark as AMD's Athlon64/Opteron. It's listed as 48W typical power consumption at 1.8GHz. Add about 10% to get the typical power consumption at 2.0GHz and another 20-40% to get maximum power consumption and it's right up there with the 60-80W maximum power of the P4 or the Athlon64.

    Honestly there really isn't a difference betwen RISC and CISC these days. CISC chips look like RISC chips on the inside and the instruction set of RISC chips has mostly become more complicated. All of the chips read instructions from memory and execute different operations on the inside, just like how it's done on x86 chips. The biggest remaining difference is that x86 chips have only 8 visible general purpose registers (16 GPRs in the case of AMD64 chips) while most RISC chips have 32 GPRs and VLIW chips like Itanium have a whole lot. Of course, once you factor in rename registers, even that difference isn't all that huge.

  106. Re:Dell by nsingapu · · Score: 1

    I had a similar expirience to grandparent not two months back:
    I bought four almost identical dell machines (for business use), two with floppy drives, two without. Some weeks after they shipped I noticed that those which were ordered without the drives had the smaller drive bay case part completely omitted! Now generally I could care less about the omission of a $1 piece of metal, the thing is that the chasis are not standard pick it up at frys replacable, there proprietary funny keyed ones which seem to take funny keyed floppy drives. Appearently Dell decided that tetris players who were not familiar with innovations such as the screwdriver were their target market.

    In any case on the subject of laptops (and specifically my laptop, damnit), I have found Dell to be a nightmareish entity. My machine literally has racked up over a month of downtime in less then six months, has been replaced twice, has had motherboard changed out once, and has had various other parts replaced. Needless to say I am a bit less then satisfied with the machine and desired a full refund. After exhausting their corperate options I took the step of contacting the BBB as well as filing a complaint with California Dept of Consumer Affairs (BEAR, which handles computer repair complaints, is a department of the CDCA hence this complaint).
    The most recent replacement machine arrived a week ago today, it was shipped ground about a week after they promised 24hr processing. This week they have contacted me twice by mail and once by phone requesting the status of the broken machine...its on my goddamn floor and thats where it will stay till I feel like shipping it

  107. FAQ by Gherald · · Score: 1

    Here is an interesting FAQ about the new Mobile Athlon 64 processor.

    Personally, I am waiting for some vendors other than emachines to release a notebook with this chip.

    I am hoping for a configuration like this:

    Athlon 64 3000 or 3200
    Mobility Radeon 9600 128 MB
    60-80 GB 7200 RPM HD
    512 MB ram single stick or a full 1024 MB
    1280x???? display

  108. Re:Mornington Crescent anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    White City

  109. 64 bits. by torpor · · Score: 1

    man, i can't wait to find out what 64-bits is going to mean to my hash tables.

    its fun to think that here we are today, about to get into 64-bit computing with massive memory architectures. 8gigs in a laptop? 64-bits?

    this is going to make for some very fun software.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  110. RMA rates....? by crimson30 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well spoken. It's nice to see some clear examples instead of "AMD sucks".

    But, being the AMD fan I am, I must say that perhaps your problems are more due to bad luck than anything, since RMA rates for motherboards are significantly higher than other components.

    And so this brings me to a question... is there a site that gives statistics on RMA rates?

    - - - - - - - - - -

    P.S. - The following riposte is a cut and paste of a previous slashdot post:

    Pentium Floating-point division bug [ku.edu] (it's close enough, isn't it?)
    Invalid Operand Instruction crashes original Pentiums [iss.net] Pentium crash codes
    Pentium Pro/II still having problems with floats [ddj.com] Unable to convert to int
    Pentium III can't even start up [bbc.co.uk] You went faster with an 8088
    SSE is great for when you want your PIII to crash [zdnet.co.uk] Pretty blue screens abound.
    PIII Xeon, quality you can count on, except at high CPU usage [macworld.com] Watch the task manager, Phil.
    Yay, PIII MTH crashes! [com.com] Does MTH stand for Meth?
    Total Recall 2: PIII@1.13GHz [com.com] Fastest crashes ever.
    Total Recall 3: PIII Xeons@800/900Mhz [com.com] More Xeon quality in a box.
    Total Recall 4: CC820 [techweb.com] How many defects? Can't recall...
    Pentium 4 overwriting data [zdnet.co.uk] Hope it wasn't something important.
    Pentium 4 chipset bug [com.com] Fast video performance? Naaa.
    P4 Oracle/Sun problems [indiana.edu] More workarounds than work
    Itanium shipments halted [theinquirer.net] That's an expensive oops.

    Just so nobody gets any ideas that Intel is perfect...

  111. Nevertheless by drsmithy · · Score: 1

    When Apple releases the Powerbook G5 it will be sold as "the first 64 bit personal laptop".

  112. As much as I love AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope their 64 bit cpu flops so the x86 can finally be put to rest.

  113. Can this be true? by rixstep · · Score: 1

    I thought Steve Jobs and Apple were always first at everything!

  114. Note sure I'd pick it up... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    After all, if you find a nugget of gold on the ground, and it's wrapped in dog shit, would you pick it up?

    Tough call, isn't it?

  115. Linux Installation Reports for 64bit CPU Laptops by wehe · · Score: 1

    You may find Linux installation reports for 64bit CPU laptops at TuxMobil - Linux On Mobile Computers.