Slashdot Mirror


Hektor: the Graffiti Robot

Lopex writes "Gizmodo has a story about Hektor, a graffiti robot. Apparently it is for the extremely geeky (or perhaps extremely lazy) tagger. Hektor.ch has photos, information (pdf), and a movie (15 Mb) of it in action."

222 comments

  1. time cop by selfabuse · · Score: 1

    I think the inventor of this has been watching Time Cop way way too much

    1. Re:time cop by selfabuse · · Score: 2, Informative

      er, demolition man, i mean.

    2. Re:time cop by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "er, demolition man, i mean."

      Doesn't sound like you've watched it too much.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:time cop by selfabuse · · Score: 0

      Once. That's waaay more then enough ;)

  2. Demolition Man by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1

    Another (awful) movie with graffiti robots.

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
  3. I saw this by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Informative

    Many moons ago (at least a couple of years I think) on the discovery channel, or similar. But they were showing it off as an abstract artist. I think the idea behind that is any monkey can construct a robot to "trace" a digital image. It would just be an oversized printer.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:I saw this by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To be honest, it looked like peanuts to me too.

  4. Dup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was covered months ago.

    1. Re:Dup! by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

      As I remember, this was covered here and everywhere else, then a week later resurfaced. It seems to be coming around for another go.

  5. Wow by flewp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hektor really needs to learn some can control. Look at that drip!

    He also lacks style, but at least it's not just giant bubble letters.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    1. Re:Wow by dAzED1 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I know you're just being silly, but it looked to me like the can was very controlled. There were fine details that lacked any drip. The drip that did exist looked pretty intentional.

      Look over the pictures again. Any picture that shows drip will show plenty of areas with none. There are also other pictures with no drip at all.

    2. Re:Wow by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Hektor really needs to learn some can control. Look at that drip!"

      There are a lot of women out there who just don't understand how challenging that really is.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Wow by lhand · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about RTFpdf? The drips were actually painted, they're not drips at all. Although they did get drips on some of their testing, the big "drips" in that image were purely intentional.

      I want one.

    4. Re:Wow by flewp · · Score: 1

      How about GAFSOH (get a fucking sense of humor)?

      On a side note, I was going to try and bring a Simpsons reference into it from the episode where they goto Shelbyville to get the lemon tree and the Shelbyville kids comment on Bart's excellent can control, but I couldn't figure out a way to make it both funny and have people catch the reference.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    5. Re:Wow by lhand · · Score: 1

      Yah, downside to writing in this format. No one can see you smile. Next time I'll add a smiley. I added the comment because *I* didn't realize the drips were intentional until I read the article. I'm still impressed by the control and overall quality they are able to get out of a spray can. It's way better than I can do.

      The Simpsons reference might have helped but yeah, I'd have missed it anyway.

  6. Well hes gone.. by willie3204 · · Score: 0, Funny

    Hektor is probably on the way to graffiti /. for taking his site down..

  7. 15MBLink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    on front page. The Hektor.ch server is wiping tears right now!

  8. OK, that's pretty damn cool... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simple, elegant and with the right planning and execution some pretty decent murals could be done. I think there's a real market for it, even for commercial advertising. Give something like this more colors and even graphitti artists will begin to wonder why they put up with the freezing cold, cops, etc. when they could just hook up one of these and lurk in the shadows until it's done. No more lugging around twenty cans of spraypaint.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:OK, that's pretty damn cool... by m3djack · · Score: 5, Funny

      and even graphitti artists will begin to wonder why they put up with the freezing cold, cops, etc. when they could just hook up one of these and lurk in the shadows until it's done. No more lugging around twenty cans of spraypaint.

      Right, now they just have to lug around twenty cans of spraypaint, one hundred feet of rope, a level, a ladder, something to attach the rope to the side of the building with, a laptop, data cable, and a robot.

      Then, if the cops haven't come after someone complained of the racket of ladders hitting the sides of buildings and boltguns bolting the rope onto the side of a brick building, they may do all the lurking in the shadows they wish while the robot spends a half an hour drawing a landscape.

    2. Re:OK, that's pretty damn cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      !!!!!!

      no offense, but how fucking removed from actual human society can you get?
      let's not forget -
      a) the enjoyment of actually making art with your own two hands
      b) that your average tagger doesn't have a couple of grand lying around to build a robot
      c) that your sure to get loads of respect on the street from your daring pressing of a button on a machine (not)

      i mean ffs, why have sex when you could just have it all taken care of with a few test tubes.
      no more having to pay for dinner/movies right?

      please do yourself a favor and actually go outside today, believe it or not there's a whole world out there

    3. Re:OK, that's pretty damn cool... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Right, now they just have to lug around twenty cans of spraypaint, one hundred feet of rope, a level, a ladder, something to attach the rope to the side of the building with, a laptop, data cable, and a robot.

      While you were typing this cynical view, I was considering what I'd have to do to pull off something. What modifications/enhancements I'd need to go 4 color, how to get away from paint cans. A bit of engineering and a decent exercise, but I think it could be done. Honestly, it's already been done, but not portably, afaik, for a small unit. I'm just curious how much propellant would be needed to spray like an airbrush. If CO2 could be used, how much would be needed, how to keep it from freezing up, etc.

      More practical applications keep occuring to me as I think about it. Why not make these or lease them out to do painting in difficult or hazardous locations (i.e. underside of bridges.) Looking for a new way to make a living? Seems like opportunity for some bright minds to pool and do this commercially.

      After the last time I put up with the aggrevation of using a Wagner Powerpainter to stain the side of a house, this seems like a dream come true. Just screw in a couple hooks and set something like this up to do most of the work.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:OK, that's pretty damn cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I have been thinking is if you have to leave the scene, what will it cost you?

      You'd want to have wireless communication between the laptop and the robot. If the cops come and you have to leave, the laptop will probably be your greatest expense and would probably hold evidence of who you are.

      Better yet, use a cheap microcontroller of some sort that simply holds the entire of sequences of moves the robot is to do, so you can leave the scene and not lose too much money.

      Or program the robot to leave the scene itself :)
      Either once its done or if it sees trouble.

      For some reason, I am recalling Short Circuit 2...

    5. Re:OK, that's pretty damn cool... by big+tex · · Score: 1

      Paint under bridges with this? No.

      Bridges are very complicated shapes, and you'd still need to sandblast :)

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
  9. Hooray by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A variation of an XY plotter, hanging from cables, gravity pulls it in the Y direction.

    A friend and I did something practically identical years ago for a tech shop project in high school, though we werent allowed to use spraypaint, so we had it draw on walls with magic markers, like a giant hanging etch-a-sketch. Worked pretty well, and really wasnt that complicated to build (QBasic "driver" software included)

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  10. another possibility by Nathan+Brazil · · Score: 1

    Geeky... lazy... or perfectionist. Look at those serifs!

    --
    echo Prpv a\'rfg cnf har cvcr | tr Pacfghnrvp Cnpstuaeic
    1. Re:another possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the heck did they get antialiasing so nice? Must be that bluecurve ive heard about?

  11. couldn't resist... by webtre · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think this story is a dupe. Didn't they send two of these to Mars?

    --
    litigious bastards
    suck it sco!
    1. Re:couldn't resist... by dan_linder · · Score: 1

      Maybe NASA could get some cash by selling "Martian Graffiti" by the letter. The person/company with the highest bid gets to have their name/logo written in the dust by the wheels of the Rovers as they go about their business... :)

      Dan

  12. slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hektor.ch hasphotos, information (pdf), and a movie (15 Mb) of it in action."
    not anymore it doesnt

  13. Kind of neat, but not new. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    It looks like it's basically a large plotter. This is the simplest form of printer, except that pens or wax is traditionally used instead of spray cans.

    1. Re:Kind of neat, but not new. by queen+of+everything · · Score: 1

      And most plotters plot in multiple colors, this appears to just use 1. It seems like this would take a long time if you wanted to do something in more than 1 color. What would you use this for?

      --
      "Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the life-long attempt to acquire it." -Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Kind of neat, but not new. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      You could do with multible attempts.
      Do all the blue, pop out the can, put in red, do the red part, pop out the can, put in the green can, ect...

    3. Re:Kind of neat, but not new. by queen+of+everything · · Score: 1

      Right, but that would take a really, really long time...

      --
      "Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the life-long attempt to acquire it." -Albert Einstein
    4. Re:Kind of neat, but not new. by thedillybar · · Score: 1
      Definitely not new. Reminds me of a lot of things...

      I STILL CAN'T FIND A LINUX DRIVER!

  14. Bleah.. by JayPee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whatever.. until he goes all-city, he gets no respect. I'd also like to see him hit freights. As soon as he got set up, ZOOOM. Away goes the train, with Hektor hanging on for dear life..

  15. Quick, take down the post! by SilverGiant · · Score: 1

    .

    Now you people at the JPL, don't go getting any ideas from this...

    1. Re:Quick, take down the post! by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Funny

      "all your mars are belong to us" tagged across the red planet?

      rule.

  16. You'd think... by Keitero-sama · · Score: 1

    ... with all that time spent on inventing that robot and getting it to work, they could have tagged so many things.... not that I am promoting tagging....

    --
    -Kids in the back seat causes accidents.- -Accidents in the back seat causes kids.-
  17. Just a matter of time... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 2, Funny
    before this starts popping up everywhere:
    h3k70R iZ 7H3 L337357!!1
  18. Art? by s0l0m0n · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Where's the art? I'm sure that there are lots of people who would argue that graffiti is not art, but I feel that it's a valid form of subversive social commentary.

    Most of the Graffiti kids I have known tag for a bunch of reasons..

    Reasons like the art of it (I've seen some fantastic tags), but mostly the challenge of getting to a spot where you have time to throw a good tag. I mean, half of what people graffiti is their own name, or TAG, mostly on the biggest, most difficult thing to get to that they can find.

    It's about the art, and about the challenge. Using a robot seems like mere automated vandalism.

    1. Re:Art? by shaka999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Using a robot seems like mere automated vandalism"

      As opposed to good old fashioned manual vandalism? Yeah, there is a lot of art and challenge in putting up a gang name on every friggin corner.

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    2. Re:Art? by jbrader · · Score: 1

      I think that's a little like saying an Ansel Adams isn't art because the camera did all the work.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    3. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      wow, you're a dumbass

      way to generalize, stereotype and hate what you don't understand

      plenty of taggers are both better technical artists than you will ever even dream of being, and also have nothing to do with gangs at all

      for such an 'educated' site, /. has some of the most blatant reactionary tunnel vision to be found on the planet

    4. Re:Art? by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      It's not always like that.

      Most of the people I've known who have done graffiti weren't gang members, and if you know what you are looking at, you can tell the difference.

      I don't really want to condone graffiti, but I've been pretty impressed by some of it.

    5. Re:Art? by Mateito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Where's the art?

      In response to another followup - Art (like beauty) is in the eye of the beholder.

      There are peeps who say that all graffiti is vandalism, and others that all graffiti is art.

      Like any good fence sitter: I've seen some amazing renditions done with spray cans over "public" walls. These to me are art. Amazing use of colour, form. Many with a social message.

      "Tagging", which if interpret it correctly, means basically signing your name on every exposed surface you can find, to me is vandalism. I've seen "taggers" scrawl stupid looking black squiggles that even a demented three year-old wouldn't bother producing scrawled on such creative places such as the sides of trains, bus-shelters and toilet doors.

      My pet hate is when they paint right over the top of more elaborate and creative works. Its almost as if "I couldn't do something like that, so I'm going to fuck it up".

      There is middle ground, but most graffiti I've seen falls into one of these two camps.

    6. Re:Art? by centralizati0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who said they would be doing it to vandalize? I'm sure that some company would want these people to do something like the Che art, except in their company logo or something similar. Obviously, the driver system they are using (check out the fonts) is advanced enough that they can create almost anything in B&W that they want.

    7. Re:Art? by quietlysubversive · · Score: 1

      You don't think it was challenging to develop this automated system?

      --
      ----(o)----
    8. Re:Art? by warpedrive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Graffiti tagging is not art. It's someone who damages the works of engineers, city planners, other muralists and artists. In as far as I can see it's a far cry between making a building, a train, or a bus stop, and 'signing' your name on it.. Just because you don't put the effort in to do something really constructive, doesn't mean that writing your name on everything you see makes you creative.

      It's somewhat equivalent to scrawling you name over top of a Renoir, and saying you've created a new work of art. It's obvious you haven't - you've simply defaced another's work.

    9. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that which expert art critics call art.

    10. Re:Art? by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      The art is in the engineering. Duh.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    11. Re:Art? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen lots of graffiti...some of it looks really good, some of it is just there for vandalism purposes. The former I'd call art, regardless of the surface it's on.

      But hey...art or not, IT'S NOT YOUR FSCKING WALL!!! Buy a goddamn canvas or get someone's permission before you paint their building. This is a simple case of "your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins."

    12. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Not the other poster...)
      What are your thoughts on the "technical artists" who vandalize property?

    13. Re:Art? by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I haven't read their 37 page PDF about how the robot works, but I did watch the video. If your argument is that the art is in the challenge, then I think the challenge aspect here is huge. Having time to mount the two stepper motors, calibrate the cable lengths (though this may be automated - the can was pulled to either side at the beginning of the video, maybe letting the robot figure out the length of the cables?), and have enough time for the robot to do it's thing seems rather challenging to me.

      Not to mention before hand they'd have to get the image into a format they can use (again, I didn't read if the creaters have a program that can take any vector based graphic or what). Add in that to get beyond black and white (not even grey tones as the robot doesn't feather the paint or anything), you'd have to overlay multiple layers of color, the challenge goes up, and if you had to create a separate image for each layer and figure out how they'd overlay/interact, then I'd say the challenges are quite significant indeed.

      Granted, most of this art is going to be more like logos since you can't do shading to achieve the familiar bubble letters you see, but I'd say it's still art . . .

    14. Re:Art? by s0l0m0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So some one like Michelangelo who paints on a building with permission is an artist, but some one who paints on a building without is merely defacing a building?

      That's an awfully black and white view of the world.

      I suppose that all of those cave paintings were some punk kid throwing up gang signs for the bison gang.

      You wanna roll with the bison, fool?

    15. Re:Art? by EddydaSquige · · Score: 1

      You've got it wrong, the output is not the art here. The art is Hector, watch, these guy's will get quiet a bit of exposure, and then grants funding for more projects. The field for technology in the arts is wide open right now, lots of crap out there, this will be considered innovative by gallery owners in NYC.

    16. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is actually about 200-300 feet of wall in Gainesville, FL where people are legally allowed to paint whatever they want on it. You see people out there spraypainting all the time. Its constantly changing. There's been some cool stuff out there.

    17. Re:Art? by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's a shame how black and white people tend to be. When someone lends something to me it's borrowing, but when I steal it, that makes it wrong.
      In my mind that is a decent analogy, one case you have permission and are not violating anyone else's rights, in the other you are violating their rights to do what they will with their property. I like art as much as the next guy, but there are days I wished I had time to sit in my bushes and wait for vandals so I can catch them and hand them over to the police.

    18. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are part of the reaction against corporate culture. In any other time frame, they would've been welcome to paint their murals on city walls. I see what they are doing as civil disobedience. After all, they do sign their work.

    19. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but 99.95% of it is ugly stupid crap done by the frats/sororities.

    20. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oog, oog! Canvas? Me spray WALL! Tag WALL! :-P

    21. Re:Art? by NixLuver · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah it's a shame how black and white people tend to be. When someone lends something to me it's borrowing, but when I steal it, that makes it wrong.

      Except for the fact that you completely miss the entire point; if you 'steal' my car, I no longer have any use of it; painting a pretty picture (I've seen everything from Marylin Monroe to "I Rok" tagged onto things) on the side of a train or a bus may annoy someone, but it doesn't keep the object form serving its purpose - i.e., the bus can still pick people up and deliver them to their stops, and people can still go into the county courthouse and pay their taxes.

      The other thing that you've left out is that, in the case of a 'public' building or other property, the person doing the 'tagging' is at least nominally a part-owner in that public property; Again, perhaps annoying, but not completely irrelevant.

    22. Re:Art? by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      Hear hear!

      As someone who periodically has to repaint his property because of the little assh*les, I second the "BUY A DANG CANVAS!!!" movement.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    23. Re:Art? by NixLuver · · Score: 1

      Lots of people have tried to define art; in the end, I think it becomes obvious that anything anyone creates and calls art is art... All I can do is decide whether or not I like it.

    24. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing gang tags, which are used to mark gang territory, with tagger graffiti, which are the more artistically done pieces of art that you see in hard to get to areas.

    25. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, all these tagging examples are just kids who want to claim fame to creating the beautiful brick walls the graffiti was painted on.

      http://www.bronxview.com/graffiti/whatisgraffiti .h tml

    26. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where is your car parked?

    27. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BWAAAAHAHAHAHAH!

      Have you considered writing for indymedia.org?

      Fuckwit.

    28. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thus spake the 15 year old.

    29. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have a right to control their property. If you want to tag something, get a job and buy the building yourself.

      BTW: What do they get from writing their name on buildings or toilet walls? Do you really think the persons taking a leak on a public toilet gives a shit?

    30. Re:Art? by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Where's the art? I'm sure that there are lots of people who would argue that graffiti is not art...

      I'm one of them. Let's see what tune you are whistling when someone tags your HOUSE.

      ... but I feel that it's a valid form of subversive social commentary.

      Where's the "social commentary" in writing your name on something? It still sounds like hooliganism to me.

      Why isn't smashing windows or slashing tires valid social commentary too?

    31. Re:Art? by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      I've seen better commentary on a stall wall..

    32. Re:Art? by s88 · · Score: 1

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=conceptua l%20art

    33. Re:Art? by lpret · · Score: 1

      When I was visiting a friend in Sweden, we took the train from Stockholm to Uppsala, and in Uppsala there is graffiti that is actually advertisements as you're pulling in to Uppsala. Seems like a pretty cool way to embrace a new artform.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    34. Re:Art? by Antipop · · Score: 1

      Marcel Duchamp took a urinal and signed the name "R. Mutt" on it.

      It now sits in a museum in Europe somewhere.

      I'm sure a google for "dada" will give you plenty of reasons on why this work was important.

      Just because you have a narrow view of what constitutes art does not mean that something like graffiti is not art.

    35. Re:Art? by max2kone · · Score: 2, Informative

      With graffiti writing you have to take 2 things into account:

      1. What is the location of the writing? Is it an appropriate location (i.e. no personal property i.e. houses, small businesses; not on a cultural monument or other work of art; nature is another big no) Is the work appropriate for the location? (does it work off the environment around it to assimilate itself into the general experience of its location?)

      2. What is the substance of the writing? Any 12 year old with a spraycan can write his name wierd, but it takes years of practice and dedication to achieve the skill level of some writers. Also, anyone can rip off someone else's style; is the work original?

      If a piece of graffiti writing is appropriate for its environment and well excecuted, it can be a significant improvement over what previously occupied the space.

      A good work of graffiti will be well excecuted and appropriate for its location.

      Now we arrive at the question of legality. Much graffiti is done on or in abandoned buildings, alleyways, secluded rooftops, and on billboards. Many, if not most, of these spaces are essentially abandoned before graffiti writers come and mark their surfaces. In fact, graffiti is often done on top of other graffiti- there are legal walls with up to a 6 inch thick layer of paint on them.

      Graffiti does not structurally harm buildings and can usually be painted over quickly and cheaply (glass etch tags are a very notable exception, it can cost thousands of dollars to replace a marred window pane and many writers decry the use of such wantonly destructive implements). It actually keeps plenty of kids out of gangs and drugs and provides an outlet for young peoples' creativity that isn't found elsewhere, and can be a very constructive and positive thing. On the other hand, graffiti can deface community murals and private homes (fortunately, this sort of writing is frowned upon).

      Links:

      www.greatbates.com
      www.graffiti.org
      www.dare.c h
      www.12ozprophet.com
      www.theartwheredreamscomet rue.com
      www.graphotism.com
      www.nicekidnice.com

    36. Re:Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a question if it is "art" or not.

      If it is done on property that the soi disant "artist" does not own, then it's vandalism.

      I don't care if you are Leonardo DeFucking Vinci, you do not have the right to paint on structures that are not yours.

  19. Billboard Appliations? by danaan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This just makes me wonder why similar technology hasn't been used for the giant advertisements that cover the entire side of buildings. From what I've seen, these are all done by living human artists, who do a remarkable job in most cases. But it would seem very realistic, and I'd think cheaper to use some kind of robotic painter that could replicate art on anything. Have I just missed the news, or is it Clear Channel holding back the progress of technology?

    1. Re:Billboard Appliations? by jbrader · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was going to say. And if one were to replac Hector's rattle can with a real spray rig (or with 3 if you want color) it would be no sweat to implement world class murals very quickly and easily.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  20. Uh.. by Pingular · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Quite old.

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
  21. This has been posted on /. before by bat2k · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    My other sig is a Porsche.
    1. Re:This has been posted on /. before by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      I just read the story summary and was thinking the same thing.

      But somehow, if you dare question why we're getting so still getting dupes, inaccurate stories and old "news", then you're shot down as flamebait: must be nice having unlimited moderation so you can silence anyone who dares ask anything you don't want to answer.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  22. Just what every city needs by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Funny

    As if those no-talent taggers aren't enough, now we can look forward to them automating the process.

    Proof-positive tagging isn't art.

    *puts on flame retardant underpants*

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    1. Re:Just what every city needs by bennomatic · · Score: 1
      Apparently now Apple is making a product called iTag. It's part of the $49.00 iLife bundle and includes 1000 graphiti clip-art items that auto-taggers can include in their "artwork".

      Tagging just isn't the same as it was when I was a kid.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:Just what every city needs by el_gregorio · · Score: 1
      oh no...

      skr1pt taggerz!

      --
      "You want a toe? I can get you a toe by three o'clock... with nail polish."
  23. Been there, done that. by L.+VeGas · · Score: 3, Funny

    We already have robots that make bad art. They're called "network executives".

  24. Name change request by ByteSlicer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I propose we rename it from Hector into Turk 182 2nd Edition...

  25. Still got nothin' on Ol' Bender by LeiGong · · Score: 1

    A graffiti robot is cool...but it just doesn't have the attitude of a bending robot! Let me know when this thing can drink booz, pick up hookers, pimp and crush humans all before 11am. Maybe then I'll be impressed.

    Bender: Hmm, looks like my antenna's in the wrong place... let me just adjust it...
    Fry: Bender, no! You'll make baby jesus cry!

  26. Are they mad?! by DarkHand · · Score: 5, Funny

    A direct link to a 15MB .mov file on the front page of slashdot? Does someone REALLY not like the people who run that server or something?

    1. Re:Are they mad?! by iamthemoog · · Score: 1

      Nah - it's only 15Mb according to the story.... 8 times less.... Their movie server's still on fire though.

      Nice pictures, but not sure I'm particularly keen on their multiple popup stuff.

      I wonder how the system copes if there's a gale blowing & you're trying to graffiti a motorway bridge...

      --
      No Norm, those are your safety glasses; I'll wear my own thanks...
    2. Re:Are they mad?! by Talinom · · Score: 1

      A direct link to a 15MB .mov file on the front page of slashdot? Does someone REALLY not like the people who run that server or something?

      Yeah. They tagged his office, now he's DDOSing their server in retribution. The punks.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    3. Re:Are they mad?! by bluewee · · Score: 1

      right now I seem to still be getting some serious download off their server 200kb+ so they seem to be ok...

      --
      [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    4. Re:Are they mad?! by the+bluebrain · · Score: 1

      It's hosted at the ETH - the federal institute of technology in Switzerland. Say if you saw something hosted at "mit.edu", you wouldn't worry about it either, right? :)

      --
      yes, we have no bananas
  27. I'd be more impressed... by SkArcher · · Score: 1

    ...if it could do this.

    as it is... it's impressive, but it isn't the graffiti 'Birth of Venus'

    --

    An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
  28. Drip is IN by SPYvSPY · · Score: 1

    In case you don't follow these things.

    1. Re:Drip is IN by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 0
      Guess it's a natural progression from wearing pants around you knees.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  29. This thing is really quite an engineering feat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I saw this yesterday on Gizmodo, and was tremendously impressed with not only the quality of workmanship, but also the terrific software design - these guys created a custom program to take input from Adobe Illustrator, and create paths upon which Hektor can travel easily. See Scriptographer.com for the plugin. Really tremendous product, and the results are amazing (check out the portrait of Che Guevara in the PDF!)

  30. Danger Will Robinson, Danger! Annoying Javascript by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Funny
    photos

    Yeah, a nice bit of javascript that opens over a half dozen windows in rapid-fire order, ordered a CD from Amazon using my account, sent a flaming email to GWB, redirected me to the goat-whatever guy, played the Dean Scream, and then crashed Mozilla. Well, ok, only the bit about opening up a bunch of photos.

    [RANT]Folks- popup windoid things as part of your website are like talking appliances. Every so often, designers get it in their heads that it's a Hot Idea, and then everyone drags them out into the street and demonstrates how the current generation of designers got their new jobs. If I want to open something on your site in a new window, I'll goddamn hold down the modifier key and THEN click the link, thanks much.[/RANT]

  31. Taggers SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Taggers SUCK.

    It's ugly, it's destructive, and it sure ain't art.

    You might as well just smear a public place with your own feces. Same effect.

    1. Re:Taggers SUCK by darth_MALL · · Score: 0

      Don't hold back from saying what you really think...

    2. Re:Taggers SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      You might as well just smear a public place with your own feces.

      So you're the one! Ooo, I'm gonna get you...

    3. Re:Taggers SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know nothing.

    4. Re:Taggers SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Contemporary architecture, or lack thereof SUCKS !

      You notice you never see "great buildings" graffittooed. It's always some godawful concrete and sheetmetal monstrosity like a Walmart.

      True, graffitti artists are basically animals marking their territory, but they're instinctually responding to the drab sameness of our brutalitarian urban landscape driven by the all mighty bottom line.

    5. Re:Taggers SUCK by CaptainMurphy · · Score: 0
      its ugly-
      thats your opinion, while stupid, its your own

      its destructive-
      it can be, but not always, says somebody puts graffiti up in a museum, is it destructive then? i don't think so

      it ain't art-
      who defines what art is? isn't it just expression? who gives you the right to say one person's expression is art and another's isn't?

    6. Re:Taggers SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      experts define what art is, or at least what good art is. what is math? once again, consult the experts. what qualifies as a good journal article in biochemistry. it's not the lay people deciding is it? art's the same, there is an objective truth to what is good or not, and it is defined by those who know the most about it. if you think different, you're blinding yourself. now fuck off.

    7. Re:Taggers SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not art when you deface somebody else's property.

      It's not art when you assault some poor innocent rock, tree, phonebooth, sign, or whatever vertical surface stands still long enough to serve as a target for flung feces.

      If you want to build your own goddamn wall and spray paint it, knock yourself out - but there is NO justification for defacing property you do not own.

    8. Re:Taggers SUCK by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know what I see at least, and I also agree it looks like shit. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    9. Re:Taggers SUCK by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      There are no experts in art, only failed artists.

      The only reason for projecting objectivity onto a subjective phenomenon is human insecurity. The Tipherian so caught up in the worship of his own flawed mind he takes death over reality. The mindless chauvinism of elevating artifacts of thought to the level of mathematics reveals the absurdity of the whole exercise.

      Besides, you're not really and expert on something until you can explain it to roadkill.

    10. Re:Taggers SUCK by edrain · · Score: 1

      I think most people would make a distinction between taggers and those who paint murals. Sort of a hacker / cracker thing. Lately, murals are often solicited by the owner of a building or even a municpal government whereas tags are largely, as you said, vandalism. That isn't to say that murals aren't painted illegally, but, really, does it ugly up that freight or subway car very much? I mean, how much uglier could a big brown metal box with 'Louisiana Pacific' on it get?

      Also, and I'll admit I have less ground to stand on here, dismissing the entire form could tend to marginalize the culture from which it stems. Just as saying 'Rap sucks' could come off as a bit, well, culturally elitist.

    11. Re:Taggers SUCK by iocat · · Score: 1
      [S]aying 'Rap sucks' could come off as a bit, well, culturally elitist.

      Yeah it could, but that wouldn't neccessarily make it untrue, would it?

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    12. Re:Taggers SUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can an opinion be true or untrue? It's an opinion.

  32. Yay! by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

    Mayors all over the world rejoice!

  33. How is this "graffiti"? by cubyrop · · Score: 1


    This is a printer/plotter. Moves on wires. Makes marks. Hooray.

    --
    If I could make this sig kill you, I would.
    1. Re:How is this "graffiti"? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      apparently, spraypaint on wall == graffiti

      I thought the same thing when I looked at the pictures.

      I suppose it's all in what you program this plotter to draw and where you set it up to draw that would make it 'graffiti'.


      n. pl. graffiti (-t)
      A drawing or inscription made on a wall or other surface, usually so as to be seen by the public. Often used in the plural.


      From the summary, I was half-expecting this to be some robotic arm deal, but this implementation to hang it from wires on the surface of the wall seems kind of interesting.

      Could you really use a system like this to tag a subway train? Probably not.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  34. Dang by MattTC · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was hoping for a robot that would enter data into my Palm Pilot for me.

    --
    --"You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think."
  35. Super large ink-jet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who ever said it beforeis right, it's just a really big printer, but what they don't tell you is that it's priced way below manufactuing value. However, replacment spray cans are $40 and only approved company made spay cans should be used, that's were they get ya.

  36. Robot by Rupert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Definitions of robot vary, of course, but I feel that something that has to be attached by a human to the object on which it works does not meet mine.

    A real graffiti robot would have suckers, or crampons, or a big extending ladder, not rely on someone else placing pulleys for it.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
    1. Re:Robot by SummerMan · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that in addition to movement, any real definition of a cool robot includes weapons. Spinning blades or flamethrowers would be a welcome -- and necessary -- addition.

  37. short circuit by crumshot · · Score: 1

    how rad would that be if johnny five could have done this?

  38. Art? by SPYvSPY · · Score: 1

    Before we get into a discussion about whether or not this is 'art', please provide us with your definition of 'art'....

  39. That ain't no taggin' robot!!! by gothrus · · Score: 1

    Now this is a taggin' robot!!!

    Check out the GraffitiWriter at Applied Autonomy.

  40. Cool by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    This is very cool, however I don't understand why the paint can appears to "hover" around the start point for drawing.

    Had I written the algorithm, I would have just made it move directly to the point and then start drawing - but this looks like it goes to the start point, waves around the immediate area for a bit and then starts.

    (Answer may be in PDF, I can't open it though)

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Cool by DarkHand · · Score: 1

      If you watch the 'robot' throughout the entire video, it seems to be very particular about getting the can moving in the right direction before it stats spraying. Almost att the sprays, for whatever reason, seem to go from lower right to upper left. The 'hovering' is the robot positioning the can for the proper spray direction. As to WHY the robot sprays like that, I have no idea. :)

  41. holy pop ups batman! by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Informative

    if you click on the jpg link... consider yourself warned

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  42. It's all about Scalability! by Flat+Feet+Pete · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, so one guy can paint a shed, but to paint the side of a tower block, you need scaffolds or a lift and time. Lots of money.

    With this thing you just need a longer piece of rope and two mount points. Bigger building? longer rope. Switch the paint nozzle by radio. Even bigger building, just a longer rope.

    1. Re:It's all about Scalability! by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even bigger building, just a longer rope

      This would work up to a point, but it wouldn't scale well for big structures. Rope stretches, even static ropes not designed for climbing still stretch a little. The longer the rope gets the heavier it is so the more it stretches. Unless you account for this when working out the position of the sprayer your pictures are going to be distorted.

      You might be able to solve it using steel cables instead of rope which would stop the stretching problem but you might have trouble with their stiffness.

    2. Re:It's all about Scalability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a hose for constant paint supply!

      Kyle: So, Cartman, you had to suck it out of a hose ?!?
      Cartman: Yes, Kyle, out of a hose, now shut up.

    3. Re:It's all about Scalability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the winds ofcourse. Even a slight wind could move the can considarebly. No way you could solve that.

    4. Re:It's all about Scalability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the video it looks like they use chains and sprockets to make it work. They would be much less likely to stretch. Also the larger the subject to be painted the more error that it could deal with and still look good. Stretching of even a few feet would not be very noticable when view at a few hundred feet to see the whole composition. Then of course the software could be programmed to account for the elastic co-efficient and the distance of the lines released at each level on the building. Also notice that the first thing it did on the video was to calibrate itself by finding the top corners. It could find the stretching/distance curve it it also found the bottom corners and maybe some control points in between.

    5. Re:It's all about Scalability! by unperson · · Score: 1

      I would think an even bigger problem would be general stability. Sure, you can theoretically control an object skeetering along a wall with two adjustable ropes (like the jpgs seem to indicate Hektor does), but what about factoring in wind...not only with the hektor device, but concerning the paint its spraying too.

      I'm sure there's a pretty viable mathematical formula which could express the position of the robot as a function of rope lengths, even when taking into account stretch induced by the ropes own tension. However, to conteract wind gusts blowing the paint off target and making a sloppy mess, you would probably need some serious "on the fly" computing.

    6. Re:It's all about Scalability! by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      However, to conteract wind gusts blowing the paint off target and making a sloppy mess, you would probably need some serious "on the fly" computing.

      Wind could probably be stopped from affecting the nozzle just by having a screen around it to stop wind blowing in from the side.

      You could probably reduce the wind moving the robot by using 4 ropes (2 anchored at the top, 2 at the bottom) instead of 2 so it is held in position more firmly.

    7. Re:It's all about Scalability! by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Four cables. Two on top, two on the bottom. Won't solve the wind problem completely, but it'll make it slightly less catostrophic.

    8. Re:It's all about Scalability! by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 0
      'You might be able to solve it using steel cables instead of rope which would stop the stretching problem but you might have trouble with their stiffness.'

      Not to mention the constant replacing of that lil spraycan ;)

    9. Re:It's all about Scalability! by adamdeprince · · Score: 1

      Rapelling, arboring, glacering, big wall climbing nuts all disagree with your assesment of static rope. Sure, a fall on static can be akin to suicide and a less pleasent death than cratering, but it has its uses.

      I'd use a solid core steel wire. Don't bother spooling, just let it dangle below to reduce bending fatigue. This eliminates the trouble of dealing with the unpredictable width of a spool and saves the energy of actually hauling the cable spool ends up and down. Remember to use big enough drive wheels to keep the bend radii withing spec (and consider your big wheels in your design.)

      You can provide power and signal over the hoist cables themselves, just pull the ends away with something elastic so they don't tangle and short.

    10. Re:It's all about Scalability! by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Thats what I love about /. there are so many readers it only takes one or two layman opinions before someone who knows their stuff shows up to tell us how its really done. There should be an 'expert opinion' mod category.

  43. Not really... by klocwerk · · Score: 1

    I'm grabbing it with 60 comments already, and I'm getting 182 KB/s

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  44. Cleanbots too by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    First they should be forced to build a graffity-cleaning bot. Many find graffity ugly and that it lowers property resale values.

    1. Re:Cleanbots too by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Yes and if you design a new paint brush you should have to make a cleaning cloth too. It is only called a graffiti robot because it paints designs on walls. I doubt they are planning to take it round town to tag bus shelters.

      Actual uses would be numerous, interior design being an obvious one. Want a mural on your wall but can't paint, hire one of these from your local interior design place and put any design/picture you want on your walls. It could also be used for repainting billboards, no more sending a guy with to paste up huge strips of an advert. All the boards could have small sprayer robots which can be sent the new ad remotely.

  45. Mirror by ripleymj · · Score: 5, Informative

    Video available here

    PDF available here

  46. Re:Art? Sadly, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Most of the Graffiti kids I have known tag for a bunch of reasons...

    They tag for the same reason (and the same mentality) as a dog peeing on fire hydrants. To mark "their" territory.

  47. MPH = Mobile Print Head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the mid 80's a geeky friend and I came up with a project called MPH.. The Mobile Print Head.

    This was essentially a larger version of a dot matrix print head.. Mounted under a vehicle, it could spray text on a road using a series of spray nozzles controlled by simple electric air valves.

    A small wheel with a sensor follows along the ground and provides data on vehicle speed.

    We always thought it would be very interesting to build and use... Especially for good social change.. BUT... We just weren't the sort of people who go around spraying graffiti. So we never built it.

    (and yes, we definitely were capable of building it and writing the driver software).

  48. Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't remember the last time we had a server come by that could put out 500 kB/sec under a slashdot.

  49. Apparently... by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    ...the picture the robot draws in the video is a self-portrait of the peanut gallery who kept commenting throughout the entire movie.

    <rimshot> Be sure to tip your waitress, I'll be here all week!
    *duck and cover*

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  50. Ohhh, so you're a tagger then, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    oooooo, what's the matter kiddie? Don't like me trashing your precious, media-manufactured world-view?

    Tagging isn't "cool". It's not "hip", "extreme", "3l3373", or any other bullshit. It's pure and simple vandalism.

    You rank amongst people who litter and piss on the sidewalk.

    Nobody admires your "mad tagging sKiLLz" except your own tiny, pathetic clique of mouthbreathing feces-smearers. The rest of the world properly sees you as just another form of vermin, and your "artwork" is greeted with the same enthusiasm as a fresh, steaming rat turd in one's oatmeal.

    You have as much claim to "artwork" as a pigeon does to a rain-streaked pile of pigeon droppings on the top of a statue. Same asthetic.

    Here's a clue: humanity grew out of marking our territory with ugly messes about 3 million years ago. How about growing the fuck up and joining the rest of us in civilization?

    1. Re:Ohhh, so you're a tagger then, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooh, angry! maybe you should go jerk off.

  51. I saw something similar, yet different by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    once i think it was in Adbuster

    basically, someone had modified a R/C car to hold a rack of spray paint cans and some additional hardware, to form a kind of dot matrix printer which was used to paint slogans on the pavement.

    i also vaguely remember something about some people doing the same thing on a larger scale, using a passenger van and painting long messages on road surfaces.

  52. extremely lazy tagger by sulli · · Score: 1

    since when are taggers not lazy?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:extremely lazy tagger by Garridan · · Score: 1

      That's easy. Lazy criminals get caught. Not all taggers are criminals, of course, but tagging illegally can require some pretty careful planning. I dunno where you live, but in most major cities I've been in, taggers find all kinds of crazy places to paint; which often require pretty good climbing skills.

  53. It is possible he uses Macs by Kplusplus · · Score: 1

    From visiting the site, I'm gonna go out on a limg here and say this guy uses a mac. Im just guessing tho.

    --
    -"I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system"
  54. Dupe! by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    Already covered on July 7th, 2003.

    If you didn't see it then, the BBC News story linked in the July posting still works.

    ~Philly

  55. WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The walls had built-in grafitti removing sprinklerish zappers.

    1. Re:WRONG! by Geekwad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, and to beat the wall-mounted zappers, they used robotic pods that popped out of the ground and spraypainted the whole wall in two seconds.

      --

      - http://pakman.sytes.net/
    2. Re:WRONG! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I liked the Naked Gun 2 1/2, where the walls sprayed back.

  56. Don't try this at home! by lcsjk · · Score: 1

    My first thought was that the pattern looked a lot like the random pattern of one of those automatic floor vacuum cleaners - with a paint can strapped to it just before you let it go. - Have your friend try it at their house first. Momma might not be too happy!

    1. Re:Don't try this at home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now just teach it to paint the Eurion "do not copy" symbol!

  57. It's a tool, not an artist. by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    And I'm sorry, but if you don't think graffiti is a valid art form, you're a fucking idiot. I was going to find you some examples online, but I'm not going to waste my time.

    There's a difference between tagging and graffiti or aerosol art. If you're unable to make that distinction, I feel sorry for you.

    1. Re:It's a tool, not an artist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Distinguishing between artists with spray cans and taggers is kinda like telling the difference between hackers and script kiddies...

      I think the readers of this site have some awareness as to the difficulty of getting people to recognize this type of difference.

      -cmh

  58. He should patent this idea before it is stolen by by Jerry · · Score: 1

    some slimy patent lawyer who probably doesn't even know how spray cans work.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  59. You suck by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    There are valid forums for this art form, the Qtopia Event Center in Hollywood has graffiti art exhibitions on their own property frequently. And then there are assholes who vandalize others' property.

    Just like there are people who drive cars to work, and there are people who run over their spouse because they're fucked up in the head. There's a difference.

  60. found it! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    the Graffiti Writer (R/C car)
    http://www.appliedautonomy.com/gw.html

    1. Re:found it! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      the Street Writer van

      http://www.appliedautonomy.com/streetwriter/

  61. Anyone else think... by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

    That we'll never-ever be rid of the 5 inch floppy cachunk-cachunk noise if people start making these things en masse?

  62. Robot != Autonomous Robot by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    Enough said.

  63. interesting.... by modpod · · Score: 1

    now what's the point? it looks kind of flimsy to me..

  64. Graffiti isn't art? by g33kgirl · · Score: 1

    If you think that graffiti isn't art, check out some of these pictures. These are from Paint Louis 2000, a now-defunct graffiti art event in St. Louis. Graffiti artists from around the world would gather in St. Louis over the Labor Day weekend to paint a one-mile stretch of flood wall by the Mississippi River.

    True, not all graffiti is art. Some of it is downright ugly. But some of it is beautiful, imaginative, and awe-inspiring.

    --
    You don't have to be the person you've become.
    1. Re:Graffiti isn't art? by TCaM · · Score: 1

      Some graffiti 'artists' produce very nice work, some produce eyesores. Anyone who places either on property that they dont have permission to do so on is a vandal regardless.

  65. I wonder... by OrthodonticJake · · Score: 1

    ...if Hector could teach me how to draw straight lines? I always have problems with those. I was hoping for a solution that didn't involve myself being suspended by two wires, though.

    --
    I regularly report MSN spam to the Hotmail admins.
  66. Think about the children! by pavon · · Score: 2, Funny

    What will our children do when these grafitti robots come and replace them? They will have nothing to do but wander the streets and vandalise things ... oh wait nevermind.

  67. Re:Danger Will Robinson, Danger! Annoying Javascri by glpierce · · Score: 1

    Popups are tolerable, so long as there's only ONE AT A TIME. Having 7 windows open up like that is not only annoying (maybe I don't want to close 7 windows or maybe I don't want to see more than one picture), but also a waste of resources (maybe I don't want to dedicate that much bandwidth). In addition, it requires a webmaster with no foresight, as the massive bandwidth and data transfer amounts are otherwise completely avoidable .

    Personally, the second all of those opened I closed them, and didn't give a second thought to exploring the site. I consider it equivalent to a virus, worm, or hack-job. If an outside source causes my computer to do something I didn't want it to, it's hijacking, no matter their intent.

    --
    G
  68. Surprising by Srividya · · Score: 1

    Where do you find the time to be building robots to deface your buildings? These students who built this robot go to "Carnegie Mellon University" which also has done accrediation for my firm! Life in America must be very different as people do not seem to be concerned with producing value but with producing... I must call it a value destroyer! I have much to learn I suppose.

  69. Not really by extremesanity · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't think the rope stretching would be a problem.

    If you were going to paint a picture on a large building you would start by dropping a rope down and anchoring it at the bottom as tight as you could. From that point forward the rope would not stretch anymore. The robot would be able to tell its position by how far it travelled on the rope, not how long the actual rope is.

    I would think the wind would be a much bigger problem with doing something like this.

    1. Re:Not really by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Did you not look at the pictures and video? The robot is suspended from two fixed pullies, the amount of rope reeled in and out controls its position. If the rope stretches it will alter the position causing the picture to be distorted.(See wasn't that more polite than just saying RTFA!)

      Your second point is true though wind would be hard to compensate for.

  70. Painting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While these guys may know something about making a robot they know nothing about tagging. The spraycan was using standard tips.

    1. Re:Painting by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Umm... really? Check out the PDF. They tested a variety of tips.

  71. ...and about wind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wind is only a facter if the bug, (turtle), whatever they call it is very light. And at a distance of a hundred feet you wouldn't notice if the wind blew the bug or the paint a few inches.

  72. toy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a toy!

  73. I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wow. Amazing comeback there child.

    Why am I not suprised that the best you can do is make a masterbation reference?

    Probably because you operate at the mental level of a primate anyway - so all you can can handle is shit-slinging and self-manipulation. As evidenced by your chosen "hobby" which amounts to public self-gratification anyway.

    Guess what? We don't want to see you playing with your pathetically tiny penis. Have the good sense to do that in private instead.

    1. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet you resort to a masturbation reference. How clever of you to rip on him for doing the same thing you do at the end of your post! YOU'RE SO FUCKING COOL AND CLEVER!

    2. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see you recognise it.

      It was, unfortunately, necessary to speak the same language as the subject. Taggers only understand poop-slinging and masturbation, so it was important for communication purposes to put it into terms that monkey boy would understand.

      Nice to see you understand that.

      Your turn: fuck off.

    3. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you ever talked to a girl?

    4. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I talked to your mother this morning - right after I fucked her.

      Next?

    5. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      congratulations, you win the Most Predictable Response award.

    6. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom fucks so many people that it's easily predictable?

      No wonder you're a tagger shithead then.

    7. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the mom joke. so fresh and inventive. you've got a great career in network comedy writing ahead of you, once you get out of middle school.

    8. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to see talent appreciated.

      And while I have a glorious career in network comedy writing ahead of me, you are still a shithead tagger ; a vandal, pretending to be an artist.

      Pathetic.

    9. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually i'm not. i just let you go along with your tirade because your post made you look like a bitter little dick, and i enjoyed letting you reinforce that impression. once again: i'm not a tagger. idiot.

    10. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then, you're just a moron then.

      Good job.

    11. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. i agree. it was a great job. not only was it a very successful troll, but you revealed yourself to be precisely the kind of person i believed you to be. (a bitter, arrogant dick, that is.)

      since i am finished, i'll take a moment to decipher your original, misguided (and screamingly idiotic) reply.

      oooooo, what's the matter kiddie?

      translation: by comparing you to a child, i am building myself up in the eyes of an imagined crowd of onlookers. my pretensions of comparative maturity, however, will quickly be counterevidenced by this and my following comments.

      Don't like me trashing your precious, media-manufactured world-view?

      translation: MTV makes me inexplicably angry. i am unable to attain the luxury items and attractive members of the same/opposite sex which i see on television. my way of masking my envy is to make arrogant remarks that attempt to place me firmly above such a lifestyle.

      Tagging isn't "cool". It's not "hip", "extreme", "3l3373", or any other bullshit.

      translation: see above. in my mind, i have created an image of you as the embodiment of the things i can't have and therefore hate. i highlight this faux detachment by the ironic quotating of terms which i believe are used by those like you and are thus, again, below me. i fail to realize that i thus reveal myself to be deeply influenced by the very media i earlier disparaged, because in real life, not very many people actually talk like that - such speech patterns occur mainly on television.

      It's pure and simple vandalism. ... You rank amongst people who litter and piss on the sidewalk.

      translation: my opinion of what is and is not art, regardless of my obvious lack of education, should take precedence over yours and anyone else's. also, i am bewildered by those persons who will not follow the unwritten rules of society by urinating in a designated urination zone. i go pee in my potty.

      Nobody admires your "mad tagging sKiLLz" (already covered) except your own tiny, pathetic clique of mouthbreathing feces-smearers.

      translation: i want those who read this to believe that i, as contrasted to you, enjoy a large, impressive entourage of people who, aside from breathing through their noses, (which is of course, the only proper way to breathe) defecate in toilets, thereafter hastily flushing away their unsightly waste, vigorously scrubbing their hands with antibacterial soap and briskly walking away, their buttocks tightly clenched.

      The rest of the world properly sees you as just another form of vermin, and your "artwork" is greeted with the same enthusiasm as a fresh, steaming rat turd in one's oatmeal.

      translation: i will now attempt to make you feel outnumbered by an imaginary number consisting of myself and those who think like me. it does not occur to me that this is a typically primate behavior mode and thus casts a somewhat ironic light on my continued attempts to compare you to a primate.

      You have as much claim to "artwork" as a pigeon does to a rain-streaked pile of pigeon droppings on the top of a statue. Same asthetic (sic).

      translation: notwithstanding the total lack of your claim to be either an artist or a tagger, let alone a synthesis of the two, i feel it necessary to restate my belief that MY concept of art is the only proper one.

      Here's a clue: humanity grew out of marking our territory with ugly messes about 3 million years ago.

      translation (ignoring the facts that humanity, as it were, did not exist 3 million years ago, and that the Neandertal (~60,000 years ago) and much more recent hominids did indeed mark their territory): i am a throughly modern human. i retain no trace of my ancestry, whose customs i now ridicule. in my belief, the primatoid traits i h

    12. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lecture ME about social allies, when your uber-k00l, 313373 social-revolutionary-hobby is defacing and vandalizing property that is not yours?

      You're the one who's fucked up, vermin-brain.

      You want to talk art, go spatter your paint on something you OWN, or something you have permission to work on, not other people's property - and then we'll talk art.

      Who knows, maybe even a destructive little pus-monkey like yourself might maybe even have some talent.

      But as soon as you choose to leave your droppings on property that is not yours, you abandon all pretentions toward "art", and become Yet Another Vandal, in the same company as rats, pigeons, and litters.

      Deal With It.

      Oh, and FWIW, I'm happily married, and get laid all the time - which means I'm at least 3 up on you.

    13. Re:I cower in the face of your awesome intellect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pardon me for overestimating your intelligence. because, see, i thought i had explained that i'm not a tagger. oh, and say hi to your wife. i'm sure she's a beaut. if her ass is anywhere near as tight as yours, the sex should be great.

  74. Hello? by virid · · Score: 1

    Ummm...Hello? This is a science project...This wasn't made by X graffitti artist to ease his spray-finger. It's a science project done with the purpose to create something scientific. If you want to call the creating process art, then fine. Art means to be art and science means to be science. Sometimes scientific things can be creative and artistic and vice-versa, but nevertheless lets, please, maintain our perspectives.

    Plus...Hektor is obviously a robot replica of Andy Warhol.

    --
    "The world only exists in your eyes. You can make it as big or as small as you want." - F Scott Fitzgerald
  75. This is true, by 2names · · Score: 1

    but I think it would be a good starting point for creating one to paint on 3D surfaces. Imagine if you could hang this wire around your house and have all the trim done in a couple of hours...

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  76. Re:Cool - you can't push a rope to stop it by SgtSnorkel · · Score: 1


    I'm just guessing, but it seems the software wants to spray the dot from right to left.

    As for just going to the start point and spraying: The rest of the wandering around is probably due to the positioning system having to accelerate and decelerate the "rope" (or cable or whatever). Since it's not a solid bar, the system has to allow for the compliance and zero-in on the commanded position.

  77. Communication by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    You know, you're cool and sucky at the same time.

    You're cool because you say the right thing.

    You're sucky because you couch it in verbiage that hides your point in art-fag language.

    All you had to say was "The reason there's no objective definition of "good" art is because nothing is so good that someone, somewhere, won't hate it. Isn't it nice that the most social of things gets a free pass on criteria it can't help to meet overall?"

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  78. This reminds me... by shiwala · · Score: 1

    Kinda reminds me of my old ass video card trying to render some of today's games.

  79. Interesting choice of names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was picking a common hispanic name for this robot just a coincidence? Just curious.

  80. Call me.. by 68Mustang · · Score: 1

    ... .... when someone shows me using that robot inscribing: "I work for Microsoft, see how advanced I am." on the front of Gates' pristine chapel walls - THEN I'll be impressed.

  81. My idea with a twist... by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

    I was gonna make one of these!! Well, I don't have a school grant so I didn't, but mine was going to drive itself along sidewalks and use multi-colored spray chalk. Cool high-dpi sidewalk murals and the like, you know? I'd roll along on two robot controlled wheels and the print head would scoot left and right.

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    1. Re:My idea with a twist... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      hmm, Its been done. Im looking for it on google -- cant find it.

      An geeky 'artists' collective got a grant to do just that. They put spray paint on the back of a remote control monster-truck. 4-5 cans of different colours were lined up in the back... as the truck moved, it would spray various dots and write slogans.

      What you described is mentioned on this geek's website.

      AH! Here it is! have a look at the GraffitiWriter and Streetwriter projects from left menu. These two projects seem more fitting for a sneak-up and tag scenario, though they do it underfoot with less visibility.

      Look

  82. GraffitiBot? What's next StreetPerformerBot? by poopie · · Score: 1

    Like we need more graffiti.

    Imagine all of the great things we could automate with robots:

    GraffitiBot - tags all clean walls with cool phrases like "i Ownz j00", "H4x0R", and "Linux Rules"

    ThiefBot - hangs out in front of convenience stores and steals hot dogs and candy bars

    CoffeeBot - Orders one regular coffee and sits in small groups at Starbucks all day long holding a section of newspaper

    BeggarBot - Identifies high traffic sidewalk areas, holds out sign, and pokes at passers by asking for handouts

    RecyclerBot - collects recyclables and fends off attacks from humans attempting to steal valuable cardboard, aluminum, and glass (hey, that's actually a good idea! (c) 2004 me)

  83. Is this really the place to disuss tagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like this is the place to discuss the nerdier elements of their robot... But discussing tagging vs. "art" with the pocket-protector crowd seems about as useful as discussing cold fusion with Jessica Simpson. These aren't the people you want to talk to about art... move along.

    1. Re:Is this really the place to disuss tagging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A conversation about the artistic merits of tagging is about as useful as discussing the artistic merits of the shitstains surrounding the walls around the monkey cage at the zoo.

      Who cares if it's "art" or not? It's destructive vandalism, and the people carrying it out have as much merit as pigeons or rats.

      If you want to talk about the artistic quality of spray-painted murals done with the permission of the property owner on who's property the mural is painted - hey, knock yourself out. But that's not tagging.

  84. Re:Danger Will Robinson, Danger! Annoying Javascri by bitrott · · Score: 1

    The internet. A hotbed of self expression... so long as you're expressing it the way *WE* prefer it be expressed. Get off it. Th guy thought it a fun way to do it, and I can't say it wasn't. Window.open is hardly a "Hot Idea" anyway. He's not selling a product and isn't necessarily interested in W3C compliance. Who the fuck is it really *really* hurting if the guy want's some Js practice/fun/whateverhismotive.

  85. Not a great flick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overall, Style Wars was a better movie.
    This robot can't compete with Kase or Cap in the personality department.
    And it's available on DVD.

    http://www.stylewars.com

  86. Using this for good? by bagel2ooo · · Score: 1

    How difficult would it be to keep say a device such as this with the necessary equipment in it's own "secure" storage place by the sides of freeways or other places where tagging is eminent and have it go over the graphitti during peak times where people are likely to not make an attempt to vandalize due to the amount of public who would likely take note and alert authorities?

    --
    ( o ) one could say I'm rather baked
  87. Judge Dredd by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    There was a Judge Dredd where the judges seeked a master tager capable of tagging in inverosimile places that

    SPOILER ALERT

    ends up discovered to be a robot bored with its job.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  88. And I've never even been to art school! by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    I actually lifted 90% of that from Cat and Girl as an excuse to link to a funny picture of Joseph Beuys, but it's nice to know how good I am at this pseudo-coherent art-babble stuff. They tell me my philosophy student impression's pretty good too.

    Anyway, hate is a subjective qantity. What is hate? Are we using hate in the metaphysical sense? In that case, assuming even so much as to say that mankind is even capable of true hate is patently ridiculous. Even if we stick to common usage, hate would have to change depending on it's source. The hate a peaceful man might have for someone tagging his house is an entirely different thing from the hate of someone who's already hate-filled at the outset. Can you really compare the two in any real sense?

  89. Similar devices? by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1
    This reminds me of a tickling machine I saw a while ago in PopSci. You can't see from the article, but the tickler-thingy is suspended and controlled by four wires. First it maps out your back, then it starts tickling.

    Any others?

  90. Introductions by barcarolle · · Score: 0

    Hektor the Graffiti Robot, meet Linguo the Grammar Robot!

  91. More useful perhaps by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

    Would be an mobile graffiti removing bot - a mobile bot, able to cope with urban landscapes, and with a long telescoping arm.
    When instructed to remove graffiti from a wall - it will either try and use water/sand or detergent cannons to blast it off(paint remover?). Or the other possibility is to paint over it.

    If the robot is painting over it, the robot could either be supplied with the right paint, or given the primaries, plus black and white, and use a color sensor to determine a pantone for the colors and mix the paint accordingly.

    Later on this evening - I will add a report on this artical on OrionRobots with details on basic colour sensing gear...

    --
    OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  92. HECTOR by SilverMike · · Score: 1

    I think I will dig out that old HP Large Format CAD pen plotter from the Garage and with a few modifications try this .... cool. Great for an election year think of all those slogans on the wall. Real fast. Kilroy for President.

  93. couldn't resist either... by tasinet · · Score: 1

    yes, i think microsoft sent two of those to Mars! "This planet is copyrighted by Microsoft (C)(R)(TM)1985-2003 inc. Ltd. By landing on "accept" you agree to the Terms And Conditions