Slashdot Mirror


India Woos Medical Tourists

aspelling writes "It's not only quality hardware and software that can be done in India for a fraction of the cost. BBC reports that India has a generation of world class doctors capable of doing joint replacement, heart, neuro and cancer surgery at their state-of-the-art facilities. Don't be surprised when your physician prescribes you a trip to Bombay. Indian officials are working hard with HMOs around the world to make this dream come true."

99 of 479 comments (clear)

  1. HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is an HMO? Isn't it a facet of the American private health care system? There are no HMOs in the country where I live (Canada).

    1. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In short, they're the people who, without having ever seen or met you, decide the course of your medical treatment based upon which is the most cost effective.

      Basically the opposite of a good doctor.

    2. Re:HMO? by shigelojoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      An HMO is kind of like the Black Knight from Monty Python, except that when *you* get both of your arms cut off, *they* say it's only a flesh wound.

    3. Re:HMO? by psicic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmmm....have to agree....HMOs are really just an American thing.

      The National Health Service in Britain(mentioned in the article) isn't an HMO - it's a...err...national health service.... you know...the idea that people without private health insurance have a right to treament.....

      Mind you, I'm Irish....so what we have doesn't even pass for a health service (HMO, nationalised or otherwise!) - in Ireland you won't be refused entry to a hospital based on your insurance plan...so you have the comfort of expiring on a trolley in some hallway after waiting six days for an examination!

      (Bombay is Mumbai? So is Bombay an archaic usage(like Bangkok is for the capital of Thailand) or is it just an Anglicised version of the word?)

      --
      Concrete analysis...
    4. Re:HMO? by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are no HMOs in the country where I live (Canada).

      Actually, yes there is... it's a big one too. It's the government. They determine where you can/cannot go for your healthcare needs, much like any HMO in the US.

    5. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They determine where you can/cannot go for your healthcare needs, much like any HMO in the US.

      that is so wrong.

      I have a broken leg, I walk into any hospital and they fix it.

      I need treatment for cancer, they send me to one of the hospitals which specialize in oncology, oh and I have a say in which one (an aunt just went through this, she was involved in the decision and what doctors she saw.)

      The "waiting lists" that the US Republicans like to spout aren't nearly as draconian as they would have you believe. If you're dying, you get in. If it's an operation on a hangnail, then you're in another line.

      Canada's life expectancy is higher than that of the US which lacks universal health care.

      You're just spewing Republican health care rhetoric.

    6. Re:HMO? by justpeace · · Score: 2, Funny

      It stands for Hey, MOe healthcare: If your foot hurts, they poke ya in the eye. Whoop whoop whoop.

      --
      mekkalekkahi-mekkahineyho
    7. Re:HMO? by addbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I come from Canada as well and I find it very interesting that not one person has actually stated what HMO stands for... Health Maintenance Organization...

      I also find it funny the American comments on the Canadian Health Care system... I actually work for the local Health and Social Services department... and while it's true there is a list of approved drugs (the drug formulary)... the doctor gets to ultimately recommend whatever they feel is in the best interest of the patient... because in many cases the doctors here are on salary and there isn't such a thing as HMO's (who because of the profit motive may give incentives to docs to prescribe the cheapest procedures and drugs... that may not be in the best interest of the patient)

      I do not believe we have a direct counter part here in Canada for HMO... you could argue the government... but then don't the US state governments also set drug formularies and such? (I mean you can't just approve any old drug... FDA process and all right?)

      So can anyone actually explain to this canuck what an HMO is? I have the impression it's an organization with a profit motive... and from what I recall what saves money is not necessarily in the best interest of the patient...

  2. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 4, Funny

    Free curry on your 3rd bypass.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:Hrmm by Chicane-UK · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you are on your 3rd bypass, i'd say you've had too many curries already ;)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  3. fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    which essentially means that people in developed countries just so much overpaid for what they do it is unbelievable!

    a cruel joke of the capitalist economy, as our socialist friends would say...

    1. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ya, I work 80 hours a week (legally that is, in reality I work much more than that but I'm technically limited to 80 hours per week), owe twice as much in student loans as the cost of my condo (condo about $82,000, you do the math) and make 40,000 a year. Sure I'm a resisdent still, but as a general practitioner I'll still work at least 60 hours a week, and oh ya, by the way, I won't be finished with training until I'm 30. I've sacrificed many of my hobbies and pleasures in life to do this. I spend much of my spare time reading to keep up with the lately studies. Do I complain about this? NO. Absolutely not, this is what I choose to do, but comments like this really get on my nerves.

      Also, I have to wonder what the legal environment is like in India? How much do these docs pay for legal insurance. Since some surgeons in the US can pay over 100,000/yr in insurance, I would suspect that might account for much of the cost.

    2. Re:fraction of cost... by TomV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I don't know. We British managed to exploit the massive resource that is India in the most disgustingly rapacious and murderous way for the better part of two hundred years, without planes and telephones. That's how Empires work - if the US is going to be an Empire it needs to get used to this.

    3. Re:fraction of cost... by Bull999999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But the liberals will never allow caps on malpractice suits. Republicans, insurance and doctors groups wanted to impose a cap but the Democrats and trial lawyers groups opposed them. I believe they had a show down in Florida last year.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    4. Re:fraction of cost... by Compuser · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ok, how is this: I am physics graduate student,
      won't get PhD until I am 29 an until then I earn
      less than 20K a year while working basically
      every waking moment (about 14 hrs a day/ 7 days a
      week). I will then be a postdoc for a few years
      earning about 40K and then hopefully a professor
      earning 70K or so. If all doctors worked as much as
      I do and had pay schedules as low I do we'd have
      more or less affordable healthcare.

    5. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do not pay 100,000 year for insurance and I will not in the foreseable future, I will do general practice most likely. I stated some surgeons pay that much, you could add OB docs to that list. My insurance will be in the range of 10 to 20K per year when I am done.

      The people in medicine whom make large sums of money are those than do procedures - dermatolgists, gastroenterologist (from colonoscopies and such), and surgeons for example.

      Surgeons, whom this article is really about because they would be the ones affected by this, pay very large sums of money in insurance. In the 80's I am aware of some that made tons of money as you suggest. At present, I am not aware of any that regularly make $400K (Unless they exclusively serve the rich, which is a rarity). That is certainly not that norm. 200K is more like it, and that is gross. After insurance and paying for office stuff, that number shrinks quickly.

      However, surgery has to among the hardest things a person can go into. The stress in enourmous, especially in residency. Lets just say,surgeons are not known for their great personalities and they put up with a lot shit from each other and their patients. The expectations placed on them by themselves and their patients is very high.

      As far as quotas, I cannot comment, I'm not sure how or why they number of surgeons is what it is. I can say, though, the number of residency spots for surgery (as well as many other medical specialties) is greater than the spots that are filled every year. That is, there are many unfilled spots every year in the united states.

      I might also suggest that it is limited because it does take quite a bit intelligence among other things to be a good physician. It was tough for me to get into a medical school at all and I virtually had all A's in college and had difficult majors - engineering and science.

      If you want high quality doctors, you have to expect to pay for it. We have very high expectations (rightfully so) from our patients and weeding out those unwilling to work hard to be good and talented enough to do so, I believe, is part of ensuring good quality.

      Anyway, most docs aren't out to rape their patients of money. Covering all our expenses is, well, expensive. If we did not we'd go broke. Pretty simple addition and subtraction to figure that out.

    6. Re:fraction of cost... by occamboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The US spends roughly 15% of GDP on healthcare, while the rest of the first world spends roughly 10%. Docs in the US get paid roughly twice what their counterparts are paid in the rest of the first world. The average doc in the US makes $150k+ per year - after malpractice premiums. In general, malpractice is not a big expense, except for OBs and neurosurgeons.

      For this, we get medical outcomes that are not demonstrably better than those in other first world countries. In fact, our outcomes are probably worse: in terms of life expectancy, we're 48th in the world, roughly the same as Cuba. That's sad, considering that our per capita healthcare spending is greater than Cuba's entire per-capita GDP.

    7. Re:fraction of cost... by asdf+101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're woefully wrong when you talk about a lack of accredited facilities in India. I'm sorry to say, but it's apparent that you speak out of an unfound prejudice that discounts the quality of Indian medical institutions.

      I've only recently returned from that country and how it is progressing. This Harvard Medical associated facility is just the first of many similarly affiliated facilites coming up all over the country. John Hopkins has associates in the Indian market too.. I just can't recall their names. And there may be so many more initiatives underway that I'm not even barely aware of.

      Agreed that even all this infrastructure available today doesn't amount to much, but it's more that a step in the right direction for that country.

      And more importantly, for those in developed countries that can't afford to pay the high-cost of private healthcare, India offers a teriffic option to get treatment at a fraction of that cost.

    8. Re:fraction of cost... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just love how capitalists love to equate capitalism with freedom. If the world wasn't controlled by capitalists, anyone using that argument would be discredited. Freedom has nothing to do with capitalism. Countries like Kuwait are more capitalist than even Canada (eg. markets more open; easier foreign investment; less taxes; etc). Yet, if you ignore US government propaganda, Kuwait is one of the most oppressive countries around. Similarly, Singapore is one of THE most capitalist countries IN THE WORLD! Yet it is totalitarian.

      Freedom will help but that's not the cause of prosperity (at all times). The US Constitution is not as "free" as you might think. Don't forget that women and non-whites were subordinates; don't forget that elites (similar to aristocrats) controlled everything early on (the vast majority of the Founding Fathers were extremely wealthy elites); many freedoms (such as freedom of the press) did not exist back then (at least in the form that it does now); and so forth.

      So freedom is not the answer to US prosperity. Instead, there are three reasons in my opinion:
      1. Mass Genocide: The settlers in USA basically slaughtered all the native Americans. You would automatically generate wealth by carrying out genocide. You are basically redistributing wealth in such a case. USA was easily able to capture land, resources, etc. USA "re-allocated" wealth from the natives to the settlers. This is just like how Germany prospered under Hitler because he started capturing other countries and stealing all the property from the inhabitants, Jews, and others.
      2. Capitalism: USA is the flag-bearer of capitalism. You can roughly say that USA popularized it. This essentially means that USA will have an advantage over other countries (this is generally true for any econopolitical system.) For instance, the economic policy in USA (by the Federal Reserve for example) pretty much sets everything else in the world. Other examples include the adoption of US dollar as world currency (this would not have happened if USA was not the key driver of capitalism.) Having said that, this comes with a price. Some leftists, like me, argue that a portion of US debt (possibly over a trillion dollars) is actually to prop up capitalism and prevent it from collapsing. According to my view, Americans are actually subsidizing capitalism (via entities like the IMF) whether they realize it or not. In this sense, it is disadvantageous to be the flag-bearer.
      3. Trade: Lastly, the most important reason why USA is prosperous: trade. By trade, I'm not talking about so-called free trade promoted by capitalists. I'm talking about trade of mutual benefit to both countries, where the benefits are shared. Modern "free trade" only benefits one party (usually the capitalists i.e. property owners.) It can be shown (in economics) that countries benefit from trade. I am not a capitalist and don't buy 90% of (capitalist) economics but this trade thing is a basic principle (has nothing to do with capitalism.) Two countries will ALWAYS benefit from trading--even if one country is worse at producing things than the other. If you want something more technical, look up 'absolute advantage' and 'comparative advantage' (basically first chapter of any economics book; easy to find online.) Ancient civilizations (like the Indians, Chinese, most Middle Eastern ones, and even Romans to some extent) became wealthy through trade. USA followed a similar path in the 1700's and 1800's. USA accumulated wealth by trading with Europe (mostly) in the 1800's. This is the main reason for the wealth of USA.


      Freedom would make little difference to some of these countries. Don't get me wrong: I FULLY support granting greater freedoms. However, people in countries like India are already somewhat free. It is a kleptocracy but it isn't a dictatorship or totalitarian.

      You can keep believing that capitalism is the path to freedom. But just know this: the day will come when your naive beliefs will fall apart. You will become a corporate slave under capitalism. Maybe you already are one... ;)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  4. oh great, first they outsource my job, then this . by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not to knock the healing hands in India, but I just can't snicker at the thought of my HMO telling me that they've outsourced my hip replacement to the cousin of the guy who replaced my job as a programmer.

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
  5. it would definetly lower costs. by epicstruggle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate to admit it, but they do have a point. Savings can be had by lower paying doctors, nurses, facility costs, you also get to eliminate malpractice suits. Real savings with the last one. Your real cost will be to ship the patient back and forth (around $800 to $1200).

    Hmm, Im torn between feeling bad for doctors/nurses, and happy that there will be less need for lawyers.

    later,
    epic

    --
    "Im drowning here, and you're describing the water!"
    1. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Less need for lawyers? The first time someone is maimed or dies under the knife when he was in India at the insistence of his/her HMO rather than in a stateside medical facility, there will be a lawsuit of SCO proportions against the HMO. Except the patient (or his/her heirs) have a good chance of winning.

      (While I'm sure HMO's will require signing of a waiver, I doubt the waiver will hold up when push comes to shove. IANAL, IANAD, and all that.)

    2. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by epicstruggle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes less need for lawyers, why? Because HMO's will offer you a plan stating that all non-emergency surgeries will be performed outside the US. IANAL, but it seems that if you agree to go out of the country for surgeries in exchange for lower cost health care, than all malpractice lawsuits should/would be handled in India. LOL, it just came to mind that we would also be outsourcing our lawyers to india.

      later,
      epic

      --
      "Im drowning here, and you're describing the water!"
    3. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by base3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh :). Unless the HMO becomes an India corporation, too, the lawsuits will be handled in the U.S. And you can be the insurance industry isn't going to let the profits go from Hartford to Bangalore. So the principals, if not the operation, remain stateside, and are sued right at home.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  6. had an experience with this by viniosity · · Score: 5, Interesting
    After seeing a number of doctors in SF regarding a kidney stone that just would not pass (over 1 month with the damn thing!), I had the fortune of being in Bombay. On a particularly hard day our local rep took me to see a doctor. While I wouldn't want to expose anyone to the conditions of this particular 'hospital', the doctor was very nice and actually took the time to explain what he was going to prescribe and what it would do. Within 24 hours my stone passed.

    This is in stark contrast to the jerk who 'helped' me in SF. "Yeah, drink a lot of water. That'll be $400"

    1. Re:had an experience with this by rsidd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm an Indian, so I know how good medical care is. Right now I'm in the US, but believe me, if I had a medical problem, I'd get it treated in India, and not just for cost reasons. They know their stuff and they don't treat their patients like idiots. (It's also true that I know who the good doctors are in India, and I don't know any here.) My relatives in Europe do the same: the alternative is go through the public-healthcare lottery in Europe (get assigned a doctor who may be good or may be awful), or pay through your nose for private healthcare.

    2. Re:had an experience with this by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Well good for you. I'm glad that Bombay worked out for you. You shouldn't complain about customer service. The reason that you wait to get a doctor in America is that so many people can actually freaking afford to go see a doctor. Bet you just couldn't see around that, could you? Those go-carts and bicycles say that surgery is a little out of their league.

      What about the people in Bombay that are starving on their feet? I bet there are a ton. I bet they would love to go see a doctor. I bet that doctor could see a lot more patients and make you wait if the people there could afford him.

      Face it, India is not great with this middle class thing, because there isn't any.
      Yes. India is a wonderful land of harmony. This "more for me, less for you" thing has been in their culture for so long, so many thousands of years, that they have freaking castes that you are born into. CASTES! The poor are so downtrodden, they have a cultural name, and belief system that doesn't allow them advancement! You are not allowed the benefits of personal merit, you are "low caste" and "high caste." What a crock of shit.

      I know a family from India that I am very tight with. The father left for America because he was the most brilliant man I have ever met, and India recognized that. He married above his caste, which was the poorest caste of them all, to one of the highest. His children are great. Brilliant and handsome and beautiful. Don't get me wrong, I believe in this country.

      However, I knew girls that were going to college in America from India that were great at tennis, and they hired boys to go chase tennis balls for food money. FOR FOOD MONEY. As many as they needed, to practice their swing.

      Yeah, India is the land of peace and good prosperity. Goody for your kidney stone. Not so hot for the walking starvers.

  7. ObSimpsons by eap · · Score: 4, Funny

    It didn't work so well for my friend Mr. McGregg, with a leg for an arm, and an arm for a leg.

  8. what about malpractice? by cabazorro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So you go to Bombay to get a kidney
    removed and they remove the healthy one.
    Can you sue them for malpractice a-la US?
    I'm afraid not.
    I read that some HMO's are sending xrays
    and cat-scans to india for diagnosis via
    internet.

    --
    - these are not the droids you are looking for -
    1. Re:what about malpractice? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Typical. You're more worried about who you'd be able to sue than the fact that you'd be left without a healthy kidney.

      Is it any wonder lawyers piss all over everyone in the US when there are people like you who worry more about litigation rights than their own health?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:what about malpractice? by JonTurner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>Typical. You're more worried about who you'd be able to sue than the fact that you'd be left without a healthy kidney.

      It's called "thinking ahead," numbskull! Choosing medical care is a cost/benefit/risk assessment. A botched kidney transplant isn't like a bad haircut which corrects itself after a time. Dialysis isn't free (in terms of money and time -- taking approximately half a day, twice a week) and there are substantial medical complications one can expect (including stoke, liver damage, infection, hemmorhage, toxemia, death) from long-term dialysis. If medical negligence causes harm (as per this example), the patient should not have to suffer the financial burden of these injuries as well. Therefore, it's appropriate to look beyond the surgery itself and weigh the risks of a poor outcome -- in the event of negligence, will the patient be able to seek legal recourse?

      But I suppose, in your eyes, it would be more noble for the person to just say "well, that's that... I'll go die now" and quietly go away?

  9. Have they been AIDS tested? by czcxmag · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After spending any time in India (for medical treatment especially), this is a must.

    --
    If you disagree post, don't moderate.
  10. In the West... by gustgr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    all parents tell they children that when they'll grow up they'll be doctors. Of course they say that thinking about how a doctor can make and not on how important and honorable (at least it was) to be a doctor.

    Several Med. freshman are not worried about saving lives and helping people, just to get out of the hospital with a Mercedez in the way to their house in the beach. Sometime they say that it is expensive because they had to study for 10 years to be a doctor ... give me a break ... Some people study during all their lifes and don't make the money some surgeons make in a couple of days.

    Some concepts must be reviwed.

    1. Re:In the West... by niko9 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not everyone who goes to medical school is in it for the money. Are there misguided fools who only dream of making quick cash? Sure there are, but you'll find that in any field.

      I have been researching a few medical schools as of late, because I wan't to get my DO (doctor of osteopathy) which is the same as an MD.

      I hear there has been a shift in the last 10 to 20 years as far as what medical schools are looking for from applicants. They want people who know exactly why they want to be physicians.

      I know several fellow paramedics who have just been accepted into medical school with average MCAT scores and are over the of 25.

      They understand that these individuals (not just medics, but nurses, EMT's, physican assistants, and people with MBA's who have something to do with medicine) know why they are going to saccrifice their time and effort.

      And there are plenty of doctors that I know that don't make that much money. A few general practitioners who work poor urban areas. They do see some patients for free; the equivalent of pro bono work I guess.

      As far as medicine being expensive in the West, there are alot more factors contributing to the expenses than a physician's salary.

    2. Re:In the West... by Cipster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think this is a uniquely western problem. I have several Indian and Asian friends and the pressure to become a doctor is even higher there.
      Heck a friend of mine has a PhD and works as a clinical psychologist yet his Indian parents still lament about how he should have become a "Real Doctor".

    3. Re:In the West... by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blame the AMA. They've been trying to keep the number of doctors down for years to keep salaries up. It's a shame, too, I think most doctors in your situation would prefer to make less money if it meant they could, you know, sleep sometimes.

    4. Re:In the West... by jcomand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people going to med school these days are NOT primarily concerning with getting out of the hospital with a Mercedes. I graduated from Harvard college in 1997, and my classmates who DID want a Mercedes went into management consulting and investment banking, and have been making 6 figure salaries for 7 years now. Some of them are millionaires.
      In contrast, your average medical student: lives in a tiny dorm/apartment throughout med school, takes out an average of $95,000 in loans, and when they finally graduate and do a residency, they make only $40,000 per year. (Subtract out loan payments.) When they do their fellowship to become a specialist, they will get paid about the same.
      You are wrong about the timing: it's more than 10 years to become a specialist- at a minimum: 4 college, 4 med school, 3 residency, 3 fellowship= 14 years with negative or small salary.
      And the training is grueling- if prisoners were forced to work as hard as residents, it would be ruled cruel and unusual. You can look at the new work-hour guidelines for residents that are supposed to IMPROVE the situation- 80 hours/week averaged over a month, work an average of 6 days a week, shifts can't be longer than 36 hours straight! Note that many programs are still working residents harder than that!
      Even after finishing training and starting a successful practice, would you want to continue to work 60-70 hours per week, plus be woken up receiving phone calls from patients all night for the rest of your adult life? How about regularly being woken up to go into the hospital in the middle of the night when one of your patients has a heart attack?
      Honestly, most doctors deserve to be paid more than what they are making. There are still a couple of specialties where doctors are RELATIVELY overpaid, but your average doctor deserves at least what he or she is making. There are plenty of valid criticisms of the medical profession, but doctors getting paid too much is not one of them. And to address the original topic, the contribution of doctor's fees to total healthcare expeditures in this country is miniscule. Some of it has do do with liability insurance and the high cost of hospitalizing patients with all of our expensive, modern technology.

    5. Re:In the West... by grigori · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, they need the $ because they have to pay off the med school $150K debt they have, and then they have to make crap $ while residents at 80 hours a week. When they sign at a hospital they have to pay a fee to be on staff, take night call and run in at 2am, take indigent patients who walk into ER with an aneurysm and get $0 for the work, and then pay $100K per year for malpractice insurance (even if theyve never been sued). And, the HMOs cut their rates for procedures every year. Give me a break yourself - you think it's easy, go get an MD, become board certified and try it yourself. Some people study english lit all their live and never have to hold somebody's blood vessels in their hands...

  11. A few questions... by czcxmag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you needed open heart surgery or a liver transplant, would you still go to India to do it because "it costs less money"?

    Are doctors in India "certified" by the government? do they get inspected regularly for standards of practice?

    I don't want to bash Indian doctors or criticise anyone's decision to valuate medical work purely based on its cost; I just feel the readers should be informed of the potential risks associated with getting major treatments done in other countries just because of financial reasons.

    What if I pick a bad doctor and he messes me up or whatever? Who can I sue? In all likelihood hed be gone after I left.

    --
    If you disagree post, don't moderate.
    1. Re:A few questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The choice should be left to the user and not the government.

      Compulsory certification adds costs to the process and creates a monopoly.

      • While the intentions are/were definitely laudable, in US the numbers of doctors and their salaries are kept artificially low by the medical association.
      • Requiring a doctor's prescription for medicine, adds so much more cost for even routine ailments. I know when I have throat infection and I also know what antibiotic to take for it. Instead of buying the medicine directly from the pharmacy I have to spend money to get prescription from a doctor.
      • Health Insurance. Health insurance for routine visits just does not make sense. If doctors gave a break for people paying cash it would lower their cost and my cost. Health insurance should be kept only for catastrophic events.
      • Less regulation on routine drugs.
      • I would not mind a reduced ability to sue if it reduced my costs.
      It is certainly easy to talk about good things that regulation brings you while enjoying health coverage. For people with no or marginal health coverage it is a matter of survival. As a self employed professional I pay a very high health insurance premium. My family does not go for dental exams anymore becase I do not have health coverage.

      I certainly would not mind lower health insurance premiums. It is tough making ends meet.

      My friends who are physicians make a whole lot more. I doubt that they put in more work or have more training than I have.

      Dictionary Definitions

    2. Re:A few questions... by r.muk · · Score: 5, Informative

      "What if I pick a bad doctor and he messes me up"

      In general the average India surgeon operates on many more patients than the US surgeon. It's simple, there are just that many more people in India, and far fewer surgeons. So the level of experience for common procedures is higher in India than in the US. If a medical procedure calls for a cyclotron and a super-computer - the Western countries are where THAT can be done. But a heart bypass - it's done routinely and successfully all the time.

      I live in India. My daughter's life has once been saved by the India public (read free) health system. So I'm prejudiced in its favour.

      Of course you can get excellent (if expensive) medical / surgical treatment in the US.

      And of course some India doctors are venal and money-focussed.

      But don't dismiss India doctors and India hospitals as a whole. On the whole they are very very good. And they are about as likely to skip legal consequences (if any) as a US doctor or hospital. Note - the judicial system in India does NOT have jury trials. So no little old ladies get awarded a hundred million when their nose jobs go awry. But there is adequate enforcement of accountability in medical practice.

      . . .

    3. Re:A few questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The worst thing that can happen is that you die. the hospital board circles the wagons and refuse to share any information regarding what went wrong, and trust me something went wrong.
      Now this can happen at any hospital located anywhere in the world and while the money from a lawsuit is never worth the price, stripping the doctors of all their material possecions and throwing them and their families to the street would give me some saisfaction, unfortunately the legal system here in India is a little odd. the odds of the truth ever coming out are minimal.
      guess im venting here, forgive me, lost a close relative recently, what makes it worse was that it was supposed to be an innocuos procedure that got bungled by negligence.

    4. Re:A few questions... by metlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but you miss the very concept of reservation.

      Indian schools have a category for people who have been supposedly been deprived of the facilities owing to their caste in the past. Hence there is the concept of reservation -- one where you are admitted if you belong to a supposedly lower caste merely because in the past your ancestors were discriminated against.

      These are called Scheduled Castes & Tribes and other backward communities.

      Now, tonnes of people in medical schools have far less than what it takes to legitimately get into medical school, and pass out of one. So, if you belong to whats construed as a "backward community", you are allowed to slack off, and thats a trump card that many use to get through school even though they do not deserve to be there.

      Tell me honestly, would you really like someone with inferior skills who passed out owing to his race of birth was allowed to pass out to work on you? I would not.

      And yeah, all the rich and the famous in India including the politicians themselves do not trust Indian medicos -- they goto US or UK (or Europe) for treatment. That in itself would say a lot.

      Not in my life would I trust my life with an Indian doctor. No sir.

  12. There isn't much that can't be outsourced by alien_blueprint · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just yesterday a friend of mine with an degree in economics was talking about the push in that field to move much of the work offshore.

    This applies to any profession - there is no "safe" field. Look at law - despite what television tells you, most people with law degrees aren't engaging in clever courtroom rhetoric all day, or even at all, but doing "back office" stuff. This, too, can be offshored in time.

    I'm not saying that this is a good or a bad thing, or that I have any answers, but it *is* obvious that saying "just get a new career in accounting/law/marketing/whatever!" is naive because there is no strictly "safe" field to start with, and never will be.

    1. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'm not saying that this is a good or a bad thing"

      Please. I'll say it for you - this is a very bad thing. I saw an economist on Lou Dobb's Friday program saying that with all the Tech and Services jobs going overseas, "...if our future isn't in Tech and Services, I don't know what it is in".

      Agreed.

      If these trade agreements aren't revisited and revisited damn soon, it IS going to plunge the company into a serious recession or depression. We're shipping an ungodly amount of our jobs, wealth, and future everywhere else but the USA.

      I'm sure it's easy for all of these other countries to have grossly better wages when they are: barely developed, have no labor laws, no environmental laws, etc.

      Kerry for President! Bush isn't doing a damn thing about it and his chief economic adviser things offshoring is a wonderful thing!

    2. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Do you honestly think that Kerry will be able to do anything about this?"

      Yes.

      "You're talking about fighting economic forces here. The only way to prevent this current outsourcing trend is to become totally isolationist, which two world wars tell us is totally wrong."

      Who said anything about being isolationist? I'm FOR trade. It's a wonderful thing. The problem with NAFTA and the WTO is that we gave away the farm. We didn't insist that other countries rise to our level (i.e., with labor standards, environmental standards, etc.) and as a result, we're grossly mismatched. You can't expect any part of our economy to compete with another country that doesn't have similar regulation. Just not going to happen.

      Kerry, or someone, needs to revisit the trade agreements until they are **fair**.

      "No, America's true skill is not in tech or medicine, but in creativity. Just wait. You'll see a new revolution in something, maybe nanotech, maybe biotech (here's hoping we can get cloning regulated, not banned), maybe something completely different, that will propel us into the future."

      Wow! The logic here just escapes me. We can offshore tech, legal jobs, radiology, but it's not going to be possible to offshort "...nanotech, maybe biotech"??? You're kidding yourself.

      "In the mean time, we're rich enough. Let the rest of the world have some for a change".

      The issue isn't "some", it's going to be "most". What part of the economy can we be competitive in with the current trade agreements. We have a 500 ***billion*** trade deficit right now!!!!!!

      "Hell, our unemployment rate currently is less than the average unemployment rate of the 1990's. We're doing OK."

      We are? The unemployment figures do not take into account workers who are discouraged and stopped looking. It takes 150,000 new jobs each month just to keep up with population growth. We've *yet* to have one month over 150,000 in the last 3 years.

      "I'm just as bitter about not being able to skim inflated wages anymore as you are, but soon, we'll start to at least make something fair. It'll just take some time. No matter who gets elected President."

      Rotsa luck dude. This isn't about a high paying job, it's about a future period.
      - We have yet to have one month in 3 years with over 150,000 new jobs just to keep up with population growth.
      - We have a 500 billion dollar trade deficit. 500 billion dollars!
      - Lou Dobb's program on Friday night showed a graph indicating that in Tech trade, we used to have a 30 billion dollar surplus. Now we have a 30 billion dollar deficit.

    3. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by BACPro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I repair *physical* things each day as do the 29 other (wo)men that I work with each day.

      You can't really ship a fridge or air conditioner to India, fix it, and ship it back.

    4. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure what to tell you. You're not paying attention. He screams about offshoring *daily* and says the trade agreements need to be revisited.

    5. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 2, Informative

      OK, there it is... I found it. He mentions something about ending special tax cuts for companies that outsource...

      but then again he also mentions about Bush providing too little in the form of homeland security, which is funny since I distinctly recall him screaming about how Bush is trying to make this all about homeland security and we need to not focus on that... Terrorism and security aren't the issue

      Uh, but your own material says it is.

      I can understand why he'd want it not to be the issue too. While he's carting around his "band of brothers" he was highly involved with war protests with the Vietnam Vets Against War and Jane Fonda. Many POW/MIA families are pissed at him for his time as the POW/MIA Chairman of the commitee on POW/MIA affairs. His behavior seemed to be more about normalization and less about saving any remaining POWs/MIAs. At the end of his term he simply declared that there were none left alive but didn't list nor look into how they died, who they were, where their remains are.

      My point in all of this is, if one misrepresents (read: lies) so freely on one thing (esp something he makes such a big deal about), he'll likely lie on others, and deserves some closer looks.

      But at least Kerry seems to read one part of his BS. OF COURSE Kerry screams about it daily. After that econimist's banter about outsourcing "in the long run *probably* being a good thing" with the Media and Dem leaders getting pissed and covering it. I don't think Kerry can do a thing to stop outsourcing, even with stopping the tax breaks.

      The funny thing: Clinton's Labor Sec (Robert Reich) said the same aprox the same thing if not worse: "Outsourcing does not reduce the total number of jobs in America," ... "If other countries can do something cheaper we ought to let them do it, and concentrate on what we can do best."

      Oh I forgot, this is slashdot, we love Clinton.

  13. Re:Lack of quality? or more of it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While, as an Indian, I am flattered by your opinion, your argument is flawed. I think that the Indians you've met are good at the math and sciences because their parents pushed their children to become engineers.

    Furthermore, almost every culture that has existed for thousands of years has had a few great scientists. Are the British inherently any smarter because Issac Newton was British, or the French any wiser because Pascal was French? Obviously not!

  14. So this is the world in 10 years' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    90% of the physical products you buy will be built in China, and possibly designed there too.

    90% of the services you use will be provided by India.

    It's ironic that the West leads in one main field, namely agriculture, which should have been outsourced a long time ago were it not for the farming lobbies.

    There is no moral to this story except that everything you use and buy - except food - will get cheaper and cheaper.

    1. Re:So this is the world in 10 years' time... by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no moral to this story except that everything you use and buy - except food - will get cheaper and cheaper.

      Actually, the moral seems to be government subsidies work.

  15. One step ahead of them! by graveyardduckx · · Score: 2, Funny

    The staff at my family doctor's office has already been replaced by immigrants from India! I guess that saves me a lot of money on a plane ticket! Wait a minute...

  16. Overpaid doctors by otter42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I personally welcome this. Maybe it's because of the bad taste left in my mouth by seeing the local orthodontist brag about how he only worked a couple hours a week, right before he jumped into his multi-million dollar Mitsubishi turbo-prop. My mom just paid several thousand dollars to have a root canal/tooth cap.

    Perhaps it's not the best bet for open heart, but for some of the more insanely priced operations like that I think it make senses.

    --
    www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
    1. Re:Overpaid doctors by wheresdrew · · Score: 3, Funny
      Maybe it's because of the bad taste left in my mouth by seeing the local orthodontist

      If you had a bad taste in your mouth after seeing the orthodontist, it makes me wonder what else went on besides dentistry while you were under the anesthesia.

  17. The article speaks for itself.... by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article...

    Contrary to the claims of the council, Dr Baru believes there will be no trickle down of money to the impoverished public health system, which currently receives just 0.9% of India's gross domestic product. The MTC's plans may well benefit the doctors and patients involved, but it is currently unclear how a country that still suffers from malaria and TB will reap the rewards of a new wave of medical tourists coming to India.

    India has a long way to go before Americans are going to accept their HMO's forcing them there.

    --
    What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  18. No way... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There is no way in hell that any HMO or insurance company should ever be allowed to tell a patient "we're gonna fly you half way around the world for this surgery". The HMO's are horrible as it is. They get doctors in their network and supply a doctors practice with nearly all his patients. Then they tell the doctor if any surgery, or very expensive treatment has to be performed, they must first call the HMO for approval first. Guess who makes the approval? Not a doctor at the HMO but a buisness manager. They even have incentives at HMO's to provide bonuses for those buisness managers that keep costs the lowest, and they fire the ones who spends more. If the doctor prescribes the treatment anyways, they can get dropped from the HMO and lose all the patients the insurance company provided.

    Laws need to be passed to protect the people. These insurance companies are evil. We would be better off with a state run health insurance system than the hyena's that currently run the insurance companies.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:No way... by martinX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They won't tell you thay you have to to go, they'll offer you a choice. Something like : "Go on a long waiting list (read: permanent waiting list) for a cheap doctor in the US, or have it done now in India." That way, the choice is yours.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  19. Better solution by bigattichouse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is more a problem of OUR system, than anything better about theirs. I've got a cheaper solution: Build a Cruise-Ship/Hospital and park it 4+ miles offshore, offer first class medical help without all the US bullshit... you could cruise up and down the shore and hit more locations.

    --
    meh
  20. Cost of Cardiosurgery by xmpcray · · Score: 5, Informative

    My mother went through angioplasty at the Escorts Heart Research Institute (New Delhi, India, http://www.ehirc.com/). Not only did the operation go smoothly, the total cost of the whole procedure (including stay, doctor's fee, consultations, actual procedure, angiography etc) came to under $4000. Out of this $2000 was for the medicated stent used, which is imported from the US.

    (PS: This particular hospital performs over 20 angioplasties and around 8 bypass surgeries daily)

    --

    --
    I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer.
  21. I ain't showing up in Bombay by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do I need to point out Bombay is called Mumbai? Sort of a Instanbul/Constantinople thing.

    See this page for information.

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    1. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I was referring to an obscure cultural reference.

      Istanbul (Not Constantinople) is a song by They Might be Giants which debates where you are gonna show up for your date if it was supposed to be in Constantinople.

      I didn't realize I was that obscure.

      --
      D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
  22. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People in the US sell their blood for personal profit. Or their babies. Or hire out their wombs. Selling parts of yourself for financial gain isn't exclusive to India, or even the developing world in general: it happens in the developed world too.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  23. more stuff to india? by snellgrove2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My goodness, sooner or later the whole world will end up in india! theres short term bonuses to be had at the moment, as its a poorer country, but surely if this keeps happening they'll eventually be as rich as the USA because of the amount of work and they'll want to outsource to here, as it'll be cheaper! ...maybe ;)

    1. Re:more stuff to india? by easter1916 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Given the performance of those in the US "capitol", sending it to India would be a public service. Sending US capital there, however, is not so good.

    2. Re:more stuff to india? by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For a relatively poor country they have a pretty decent education system; that's the key. Here in the U.S., the whole notion of broad public education has been under assault for the last couple of decades.

  24. Medical Tourists by Rhinobird · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Medical Tourists.
    It's official, we live in a wierd science fictional dystopian society. "Medical tourists", It sounds like a term akin to "Organ Leggers" from Niven's Known Space. Go back, oh, 20 years and speak the term "Medical Tourist" and people wouldv'e given you blank stares. Not to long from now they will say, "Had my hip done in India, and my plastic surgery in Mexico."

    Since we live in a sci-fi world, I can't wait to get fitted for my one piece jumpsuit, and eating my soma infused soylent big brother.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  25. Already happening in the UK. by pklong · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People are already being shipped abroad (not to india, but france the netherlands etc.) in Britain for treatment because the NHS cannot cope with the number of patients on the waiting lists. Also some are travelling to countries like Poland for cheap cosmetic surgery.

    Operations can and do go wrong and its not much good if your surgion is half way around the world when you get rushed into hospital. Also hospitals do plan for readmittance, which obviously they cannot do unless you are treated by them.

    Also I'm sure I don't need to spell out the problems that will be encountered if the patient needs ongoing treatment.

    In the UK when private operations go wrong the patient often gets dumped on the National Health Service.

    P.S. If you want my opinion, the US could do a lot worse than get itself a National Health Service. Access to healthcare should not be based on the ability to pay or what is covered on your insurance policy (if you can afford one.)

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

    1. Re:Already happening in the UK. by TomV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm in the UK, and in the last two years, my Mum has had a bunion removed in Krakow and a retinal examination in Turin. These were both provided on the NHS, though they could have been bought privately for a fraction of the UK cost - the main reason for going down this route was that the waiting lists for NHS treatment for these conditions, deemed non-essential though one stopped her from walking and the other stopped her from seeing, were well over a year.

      It's actually fairly unusual for a failed private op to be fixed by the NHS, becasue by and large the private sector refuses to get involved with the more risky procedures, prefferring to milk the cash-cow of routine tasks for which the NHS hasn't sufficient capacity. Bunion - private. Triple heart bypasses - NHS all the way.

  26. Re:it would definitely lower costs. by HawkinsD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Boy, the process just accelerates every day, doesn't it?

    Given that large multinational companies are now figuring out how to outsource pretty much everything that Americans make a middle-class living at... How does a geek plan for the future?

    Not to be Mr. Negative-Pants, but the future appears to be one where a thin layer of prosperity on the level of a Pakistani bricklayer is smeared around the globe.

    So... how do we plan for this? Any creative ideas out there?

    --
    Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
  27. Cost origins? by Epistax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a question that may look like a troll, but I'd like some real thoughts. I assume that hospital visits, operations, etc cost so much because of how much the hospitals must pay for their equipment. So, are there any ideas why hospital equipment costs so much? I thought I heard MRI's run in the hundreds of thousands. Heck, Maine has a mobile MRI bus.
    But even with this taken into consideration, hospital visits that don't touch any expensive machines are still very expensive. Is this to lower the cost of visits that do use expensive equipment? I still think this is explanation is on shaky ground as a $500,000 MRI might be used several thousand times. Does it really cost that much more for upkeep?

    Thanks for any info on this matter. It just doesn't seem correct.

    1. Re:Cost origins? by mritunjai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm forsaking moderating to reply!

      Background: I'm an Indian, I ride a bike and had a fall sometime ago going at 100+ kmph (ie 80+ MPH).

      The docs at Apollo Hospital (one of the best hospital chains in India) did MRI... total cost for MRI - Rs 6600! (that is around $330 for you).

      And all this after taking into consideration that the MRI equipment is IMPORTED... so they got to pay the shipping and excise/custom duties!!

      So, yeah, US docs are FLEECING you! Wake up.

      --
      - mritunjai
    2. Re:Cost origins? by mritunjai · · Score: 2, Informative
      total cost for MRI - Rs 6600! (that is around $330 for you).
      Sorry for wrong figures in USD. The total expenditure in USD for MRI was around $150. This includes cost of medicines used for taking MRI, abdominal MRI and radiologist's fees and doc's fees. PS: CT Scans cost roughly the same too. - Mritunjai
      --
      - mritunjai
  28. Maybe... but... how will they get to India? by ivi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which airlines will carry a person,
    who tells them - up-front - that
    they have a heart or other serious
    medical condition?

    (And any insurance may not cover
    them if they don't tell them...)

    1. Re:Maybe... but... how will they get to India? by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Which airlines will carry a person

      Umm..Air India? The nationally owned airline?

  29. The blame by rongage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real blame if something like this REALLY happens is the doctors themselves...

    Here in Detroit, the costs of medical care are completely outrageous.

    I have had the "opportunity" to have some relatively benign medical proceedures done and the costs of these proceedures was astronomical

    Proceedure 1: Partial removal of ingrown toenail. $778.00
    Proceedure 2: earwax removal: $190.00

    I personally know that the ear-wax removal can be done for $50.00 at a place about an hour away. When you consider that the proceedure consists of the doctor looking in your ear (yep, there is a lot of wax in there), dumping a few drops of a chemical into your ear canal, telling you to lay on your side for 10 minutes (doctor leaves the room at this time to do something else), doctor returns after 10 minutes and squirts a lot of very cold water in your ear canal and the wax is now gone. Total time: 20 minutes.

    It's no wonder that someone would consider it reasonable to send medical work off to india. With the amount of overcharging that is "the way things are done" here, it's only a matter of time before things get shaken up...

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
    1. Re:The blame by pchasco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is outlandishly expensive, but the answer isn't to offshore the medical field. The answer is to fix the healthcare system here in the US.

  30. Outsourcing is about sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    The USA has been an economic powerhouse for some time, and Americans don't realise how well they have it. Indians on the other hand have to survive with very little money, and it just isn't fair. We will reach an equilibrium over time, and have a prosperous USA and India, through job outsourcing.

    The problem is, India faces major food shortages right now. They can't wait for outsourcing to bring them the money they need. That is where my proposal comes in.

    If we ship overfed American women to India, and then import the unfortunate, thin, and quite lovely Indian women back to the USA, we will finally have achieved social justice. Thank You.

  31. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ummm, I think the difference in the things you listed is that they DO NOT REQUIRE YOU TO DIE, such as giving up your heart is wont to do.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  32. Dental care by aspelling · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Beleive me, Hungary, Poland, Ukraine and other East Europeans countries have much better dentinst then States. The quality of work is excellent (once American materials became available). Don't forget that these dentists are trained as full MD first and then spend three years specializing in dentistry.

  33. The futures not bright by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe everyone is scared that the entire western world is being undercut by a bunch of people in some country half-way around the world who will work 10 times harder than any of us, accept a fraction of the wages and probably even do the job better! i dont know about you guys but that thought scares the absolute shit out of me, i reckon its time to join the exploiters at the top of the corporations - you've gotta make the fast buck now and retire or your job is gonna go - its time to kick everyone else off the ladder and scurry up now.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  34. How to lower every costs in the US by mst76 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pay lawyer fees and awarded lawsuit damages in Indian Rupees.

  35. What about equipment issues / export controls? by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are certain pieces of medical equipment which cannot be exported outside of the US. Should doctors in India require these pieces of equipment for some ultramodern procedure, they may not be able to perform such procedures. I suppose this is what law makers and HMO execs would be chirping about when it comes around to this - Don't worry about these "low-level" jobs going offshore, we still have the "high-tech" stuff here to fill the niche!

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    1. Re:What about equipment issues / export controls? by Brahmastra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doubt that's a problem considering General Electric is designing a lot of their medical equipment such as CT scan machines, etc in Bangalore

  36. Medical outsourcing has already begun by JavaNPerl · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are US hospitals which send their MRI images electronically to Indian companies which have a 24/7 staff of radiologists to interpret the images and send back the results. It is supposedly cheaper and faster according to a television show I saw, can't recall the show, it may have been on Tech TV. I do believe medical regulatory boards consisting of US doctors are going to make decisions which benefit US doctors. If the outsourcing trend became a major threat, I believe US doctors would employ some type of regulatory action to justify halting the trend. Doctors have had positions of status and wealth in the US for a long time and I don't think they are going to allow that positions slip away without a hard fight.

  37. Central America by jwjcmw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My mom goes down to Nicaragua pretty regularly with a civic group...the last trip she had a filling replaced by a dentist down there. She said it was the most pleasant dental visit of her life, and it cost $25...so it's not just India where things are going to be exported to.

  38. please outsource the malpractice lawyers! by frankmu · · Score: 2, Funny

    as a practicing ob/gyn, i hope they outsource some lawyers. preferably to antartica.

    there are some things that can't be outsourced still. trauma surgery and the Burger King Drive-through, for example

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  39. So what kind of training have you had? by spineboy · · Score: 2, Informative
    A typical MD has had 4 years of college (most MDs have a GPA >3.5 so there's college and then there's college)

    4 "years" of Med school (typically 2-3x the work load of what most colleges will limit students)

    3-6 "years" of residency (again working 80-130 hrs/week - one-two days off a month so it's equivalent to 10-15 years job experience)

    Most surgeons I know work 80 hours/week(think of it as 2 jobs) and are on beeper call 24/7 to their patients, except on rare ocasions.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  40. The real american skill by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is playing third world countries off against each other to force ever lower salaries. The US is the greatest organization ever made. We made ourselves rich, and now the rest of the world wants a piece, so now, we get to play with our dough, doing nothing, while we say: "oh, Indian can do it for $10, but the Chinese can do it for $9, can you match!"

    After India has its little boom and starts to get pricey, then, we will start training computer programmers and doctors in Latin America and Africa.

    Hah! In the meantime, when you take my job as a programmer, just keep in mind that when I'm pumping gas I'll still be making more than you! And if you think you are going to get more, we Americans will replace you with people from Africa, then from Latin America, and then we will build robots, and then make robots to build our robots for us, and we won't need you any more.

    Your dream of becoming a first world nation based solely on exports is a false one.

    --
    This is my sig.
  41. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by tlongrie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Come on guy, get real! The few bucks they give out to entice people to give blood is hardly something that generates personal proffit. As a U.S. resident for the last 33 years I've yet to see these "baby stores" or "womb rentals" you speak of.

  42. Re:India hard work a myth by PaneerParantha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In my experience of working in three different countries, there are three kinds of people:
    1. People who work very hard and are heads and shoulders above others in productivity. There are very few such people.
    2. People who work hard and are productive.
    3. People who are seat-warmers. According to something I read yesterday, perhaps at slashdot, 71% of American workforce is like that, but I don't believe it.

    The above three kinds of people exist everywhere, irrespective of the country.

    That India didn't build up an infrastructure has nothing to do with lack of work or otherwise of Indians. It has something to do with bottled-up economy, the license-permit regime and several other factors. Now that this regime is in the process of being dismantled, infrastructure is being built rapidly.
    * See, for example, http://surajsphotos.fotopic.net/ for images of new roads and buildings being built in India.
    * Go to www.nhai.org, the website of National Highways authority of India to look at other projects.
    * Go to http://www.delhimetrorail.com/home/index.htm, to see how the Delhi Metro Rail project has made strides in the past years.
    * Here is some more about building of infrastructure in India:
    - AMP to raise $129m for India fund venture
    http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/09 /10761751 05694.html
    - http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2004/02/13/sto ries/2004021301210400.htm
    New Delhi , Feb. 12

    THE country is poised for a grey revolution with the construction sector entering a boom phase to meet the demand for new highways, ports and real estate, according to the Union Commerce and Industry Minister, Mr Arun Jaitley.
    ----
    If you are interested, I can give you more news about the boom in infrastructure development in India.

    If Indians weren't hard-working, why would this be occurring?

    If you pedal a bicycle rickshaw throughout a hot, dusty day ferrying passengers for a few cents, aren't you working hard?

    If you work in fields, sowing and harvesting while the temperatures rise to 50 degree celsius, isn't that hard work?

    If you hawk your wares on a bicycle or a cart amidst dense traffic, immense noise for a life time, isn't that hard work?

    If you sit by roadside breaking stones with primitive pickaxes day after day, isn't that hard work?

    And this is not specific to India, most developing countries have such work, and most developed countries too have the equivalent. Most humans are hard working.

  43. $50?! by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got ferrets. I'd be happy to let one help you eradicate that ear wax for $40! They seem to go for that sort of thing... They'll also clear out any boogers you have (This would make a great Dave Barry feature...)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  44. Very bad blood supply by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I would be very wary about getting surgery in India. My cousin went back to India to get a kidney transplant that his mother was donating. He ended up getting hepatitis during the operation.

    The quality of service from hospital to hospital varies dramatically. And the blood supply is not trustable.

  45. Pharmaceuticals lobby by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Speaking of costs and capitalism, there have been some nasty spats between India and US pharmaceuticals companies if I recall correctly. It's not difficult to recreate a drug - the only protection the US companies have is patent law. India baulked at the costs that were demanded, weighed up the choice of letting people die or violating copyright and (good for them) started knocking off the drugs themselves.

    What I'm interested in here however is, should more spats happen, will this weaken the pressure that the pharmaceuticals companies apply to doctors. I know that in Britain, GPs (General Practioners) are routinely courted with hotel stays, fancy meals and any other way they can get around the UK's laws on these issues; and from what I've heard they have much greater sway in the US.

    So are you less likely to be perscribed something you don't need in India? And if their healthcare is socialised, does that mean the doctor is more likely to have your interests at heart? It looks that way.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  46. New television show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Discovery channel now announce the latest program for the next season: "Iron Surgeons" where top surgeons compete against challengers to do complex operations in the least amount of time.

    1. Re:New television show by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, that show got cancelled. The new one is called "Trading Kidneys" where a US doctor and an Indian doctor need to transplant each others kidneys into themselves.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  47. What HMO Really is by Poligraf · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd consider your rant to be a typical one for clueless anticorporate types.

    HMO is a desperate (and failing) attempt to control skyrocketing medical costs. Traditional system includes the insurance company and doctors as separate entities with the doctor making any decisions they want and insurance just footing the bill.

    Unfortunately, newer expensive treatments ( http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=96859&cid=8283 832 ) and general health degradation in the US caused insurance to experience losses.

    So, they decided to hire their own doctors and put them through the cost-control through the approval of procedures.

    Eventually many other non-HMO companies followed suit. They now need to approve certain medical procedures beforehand, otherwise the doctor is not getting reimbursed.

    Even despite all of this crap, the costs for the customers (i.e., these who pay premiums for the healthcare) continue growing. Major cause: expensive drugs and more people requiring them permanently.

    To the contrary to the popular belief, lawsuits are not he culprit of the major cost rise at the medical insurance level, but they greatly affect doctors themselves and their malpractice insurance causing many doctors to drop out of practice in certain litigious areas.

    P.S. I used to contract at a small healthplan company.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  48. the flip side... by garbagedisposal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...whilst millions go begging for health care in India, wealthy foreigners can buy first calss care.

    The same thing is happening in Australia.
    Whiltst many young Australians miss a chance at a tertiary education every year, wealthy foreigners can buy a place in a degree course. Lower standards for fee paying students extend to 'no fail' policies.

    It is scandalous but still the government of the day sails on...

  49. allowing ordinary doctors do extraordinary things by goon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's probably not well known that people of Indian origin have a predisposition to heart problems. Last year on ABC's, Foreign correspondent, Domonique Schwartz did a story on Dr. Devi Prasad Shetty, Cardiologist/Heart surgeon, of Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospital in Bangalore.

    • ... 3 times more vulnerable than Australians, Americans or Europeans ... every minute on average four Indians have heart attacks ... 2.5 million people need to undergo heart operations and currently only about 50,000 people are undergoing the operation, only 50,000 ...

    In a country with such a distorted wealth distribution, telemedicine allows outlying areas to access to access western trained cardiac specialists to supply top level care that was not previously possible.

    Do not dismiss the expertise of these professionals. The products of top western hospital training in the UK, Australia and US, their expertise tempered by the shere number of operations they perform. The most salient point to consider is ....

    • A government hospital run by the government of India, about 85 to 90 percent of their budgetary allocation goes for salaries. In the Western countries, about 60 to 70 percent of the yearly expense goes for the salaries. In our hospital, it's 20 percent or 22 percent.
    [Foreign Correspondent, ABC, India a big Heart, aired: 18/02/2003]
    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup