Slashdot Mirror


The Power of Sewage

Eridanis writes ""The waste you flush down the toilet could one day power the lights in your home. So say researchers at Pennsylvania State University who last week revealed they have developed an electricity generator fuelled by sewage." Hey, it seems that EA will have to create a new building for Simcity!"

305 comments

  1. Just doin' my part.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Let me at it after a night of Fort Garry Dark Ale and I'll power a city of 50,000 for 2 full days.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Just doin' my part.. by filekutter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I"m off to White Castle... soon I will be holding a city hostage!!!! Bwahahahaha!

      --
      I call computer-illiteracy job security
    2. Re:Just doin' my part.. by psichaotic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man, sewerage is bad enough... Whats leftover from the waste? Super waste? and maybe you could do something with that... and then have super duper waste? So that eventually a leak in the pipes can wipe out half the city? Does this mean we will have to equip each house with high powered turd cannons to shoot last nights dinner into the sun?

    3. Re:Just doin' my part.. by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, are they going to wire the toilets to the power meter and reduce your rate accordingly?

    4. Re:Just doin' my part.. by worst_name_ever · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dude, I was going to mod you Offtopic, but then I realized that Turd Cannons would be an excellent name for a band.

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    5. Re:Just doin' my part.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, my fellow moderators felt that you were offtoppic (sic) for posting something quite funny and ontoppic (sic me)!

    6. Re:Just doin' my part.. by RLW · · Score: 5, Funny

      The FDA needs to get with the Energy Department and add labeling that indicates the average Kw out put per serving on your favorite foods.

      Eventually 'Power Diets' (copyrighted by me here and now :-) will arrive; these will be geared toward symbiotic foods stuffs that eaten (and crapped) together produce the best power for you home. Yeah!

      Electric Bran Flakes! - the cereal that makes you regular and powers your day!

    7. Re:Just doin' my part.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's some good sh!t

    8. Re:Just doin' my part.. by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative
      As yet his design is only producing a tenth of what he calculates its potential power output could be. Even so, if scaled up, this system would produce 51 kilowatts on the waste from 100,000 people, Logan says. He hopes to be able to boost its efficiency by increasing the surface area of the anodes or by finding more efficient anode material.

      Hmm... that works out to about 0.51 watts per person. If he attains his promised tenfold increase it's a whole 5.10 watts -- or just about enough to charge my cell phone.

      Not saying it isn't cool but where's the value in this? To quote another line from the article:

      Many developing countries urgently need sewage processing plants, for example, but they are prohibitively expensive, largely because they use so much power. Offsetting this cost by producing electricity at the same time could make all the difference, says Bruce Logan, who led the development team at Penn State.

      Do they really think producing a whole 5.10 watts from one person's output is going to do anything? True it'd be neat to see that electric folded back into the grid (that's 5.10 watts that doesn't have be generated by burning coal or gas) but is this really going to pay for itself? I'm willing to bet that most sewage treatment plants use more then 5.10 watts per person's amount of waste.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Just doin' my part.. by ElizabethP · · Score: 1
      Eventually 'Power Diets' (copyrighted by me here and now :-) will arrive; these will be geared toward symbiotic foods stuffs that eaten (and crapped) together produce the best power for you home. Yeah!

      Two words: refried beans.

    10. Re:Just doin' my part.. by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1
      Man, sewerage is bad enough... Whats leftover from the waste? Super waste?

      RTFA, the sewage is actually cleaner when it comes out the other end. A lot of the organic matter has been broken down by bacteria. The same process is used at sewage treatment plants, just without the collecting of the liberated electrons.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    11. Re:Just doin' my part.. by intertwingled · · Score: 1

      I suppose that eventually you would end up with pure, unadulterated, evil.

      --
      -- SKYKING, SKYKING, DO NOT ANSWER.
    12. Re:Just doin' my part.. by deathazre · · Score: 1

      wondering, is that kw*h, or kilowatts constantly throughout the day? if that's 51 or even 510kw*h for one day's waste, that's pretty shitty. (no pun intended), I could make a better profit selling it on ebay.

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
  2. well that's a first. by iibbmm · · Score: 0

    an actual funny comment contained in the original post. RE: simcity

    1. Re:well that's a first. by Jailbrekr · · Score: 1

      So dude, you finally find a site that you can troll without being banned?

      --
      Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    2. Re:well that's a first. by statusbar · · Score: 1

      I thought the reference to simcity was 'product placement'!

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
  3. America.. by msimm · · Score: 5, Funny

    The most powerful country ever!

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:America.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Yeah...we have been 'full of it' lately...

    2. Re:America.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      "My opinion is subject to change without warning."

      Sen. Kerry? Is that you??

    3. Re:America.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's the combined spirit of the ghosts of Polititians Past, Present and Future.

      Besides, anyone who can't change their mind after being presented with new information has no place in office.

    4. Re:America.. by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 1
      I'd watch china if i were you.. or maybe not, considering what were talking about. The population of china is more than 4 times that of the US.

      United States: 287,419,405

      India: 1,045,120,633

      China: 1,318,767,223

    5. Re:America.. by CHaN_316 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      " ...this system would produce 51 kilowatts on the waste from 100,000 people"

      United States 146,583.9 kilowatts
      India 533,011.5 kilowatts
      China 672,571.3 kilowatts

      Clearly, China is the all powerful nation :D

      Ha ha, Amerika, your spacious country is dangerously underpopulated! j/k.

      --
      "There is no spoon." - The Matrix
    6. Re:America.. by inteller · · Score: 5, Funny

      yes, but big fat americans can crap out bigger turds faster, so 1 american is equal to about 4 chinese.

    7. Re:America.. by then,+it+was+nigh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "My opinion is subject to change without warning."

      Sen. Kerry? Is that you??

      No, it's George Bush.

      --
      sed 's/In Soviet Russia/In NSA America/g' < yakov-smirnoff-jokes.txt
    8. Re:America.. by rsborg · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      "My opinion is subject to change without warning."
      --Sen. Kerry? Is that you??

      Just for good measure, I'd rather have a flip-flopper in office than a proven promise breaker.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    9. Re:America.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course! With a flip-flopper you can have a broken promise and a promise at the same time. NO ONE LOOSES!

    10. Re:America.. by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That isn't actually as much as it sounds. 51kW for 100k people is only 510mW per person. Yeah, just over half a watt. Now if a person eats 2000 calories a day, that's 8320 kJ in 86400 seconds, or about 96 watts. Which gives us an efficiency of about half a percent.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    11. Re:America.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit, where's the "Troll, but funny as hell" category when I need it?

    12. Re:America.. by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Exactly! So quit electing them!

    13. Re:America.. by aastanna · · Score: 1

      And, it means our body has an efficiency of 99.5%. That's quite good.

    14. Re:America.. by msimm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It looks like more people took offense to this then I'd imagined. I was joking, but think about it a little. Americans may not 'all be full of shit' but as a wealthy consumer nation I think it would be hard to argue that we don't produce a good deal of solid waste.

      Moderation +1
      60% Funny
      20% Overrated
      10% Flamebait
      Extra 'Funny' Modifier 0

      My extra karma modifier didn't even bother to take effect! You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. ;-)

      --
      Quack, quack.
  4. I'm cheap... by loserbert · · Score: 2, Funny

    but eating all those eggs and onions to power the house just isn't worth the stomach aches.

    1. Re:I'm cheap... by slim+hades · · Score: 1, Funny

      So your just doing your part now to waste our resources by devouring all those eggs and oninons for nothing, eh?

      I personally one day envision labels on food at the grocery store: "1.2 killawats per serving,
      (fine prints: exceeding 10 killawats may induce scary explosive disharge,..."

  5. Well THAT explains... by goldspider · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...why the campus always smelled like shit!

    Seriously, I went to school there. I thought it was all of the surrounding farmland that contributed to the odor, but this is indeed news to me!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Well THAT explains... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Is that why Penn State always won home games? Their opponents couldn't concentrate?

      Come to think of it, could the students concentrate?

    2. Re:Well THAT explains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Is that why Penn State always won home games?"

      What Penn State team have you been watching over the past three seasons? :(

    3. Re:Well THAT explains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None, actually. I don't really follow sports.

    4. Re:Well THAT explains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, that's not right.

      I heard their chess club managed to do alright. :)

    5. Re:Well THAT explains... by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Yeah, especially after a rain. The odor would come down from North-east of East Halls and flood the campus. Good to know OPP will be able to put that all to good use heh.

    6. Re:Well THAT explains... by qtp · · Score: 1

      Actually you were smelling the sewage treatment plant across University Drive from the campus.

      Either that or the Burger King next door to it.

      Never did find out who thought that was a good location for a fast food joint.

      --
      Read, L
  6. This is just the first step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... in a total Matrix conversion. A poop to power machine, how wonderful!

  7. The Aroma by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 1

    Yes, engineers and technicians will be chomping at the bit to have an opportunity to work at a plant that will smell as good as these will.

    1. Re:The Aroma by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would still smell better than a rendering plant...or this one UNIX admin I worked with...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:The Aroma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just ONE Unix admin? Most of the ones I've worked with tend to be semi-retired hippys, and smell like their still full time.

    3. Re:The Aroma by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      It was a small office, we could only afford the one. Windows admins, on the other hand, tend to smell like too much old spice.

      Of course, Linux is too ubiquitous an OS to attract a single smell from its admins, whose odors range from a slight tinge of Vap-o-rub to a beer fart in an abbatroir.

      (not really, of course, I just like to use the word "abbatroir" wherever possible)

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  8. What if.. by Trystansr · · Score: 5, Funny

    you go on vacation or something? Would you have to pay someone to come over and use your bathroom to keep the fridge running?

    1. Re:What if.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      That would depend on how bad the room would smell afterwards. If it were some of my relatives, I'd pay for juice right off the main lines.

    2. Re:What if.. by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just want something I can shove up my ass to keep my laptop running...

    3. Re:What if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's going to make you really popular at lanparties!

  9. Management by CycleMan · · Score: 1

    Great... as if management didn't give me enough sh*t when they're trying to "enlighten" me, now someone had to go invent a machine to help them.

  10. Well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'd better hurry and trademark the Mr. Fusion(R) name!!!

  11. Nice sig by Gothmolly · · Score: 0
    Considering the line between troll and flamer is blurry. I'm calling your post flamebait, but others will bite, thus giving it troll-like qualities as well.
    How about:


    -1, Asshat?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Nice sig by msimm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lighten up, you'll live longer. ;-)

      --
      Quack, quack.
    2. Re:Nice sig by d'fim · · Score: 1

      I don't know.....I can imagine quite a bit!.....

      --
      Adherence to the truth is a form of disloyalty.
  12. EA, eh? by Apostata · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quote: "Hey, it seems that EA will have to create a new building for Simcity!"

    Or at least have the raw materials for another of their games...

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
    1. Re:EA, eh? by goldspider · · Score: 1
      "Or at least have the raw materials for another of their games..."

      Raw material? I thought the shit was EA's finished product.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:EA, eh? by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      It just means the infrastructure will be available to power the 3 TeraHertz processors needed to run SimCity 5 at a reasonable framerate.

  13. So much for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..."clean" energy sources.

  14. slightly different approach.... by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am aware of Bio-Gas plants which are used in villages in India. The Animal waste is dumped into the "pit" Methane is released and it is used for cooking. But I guess this method is more efficent.
    Good for farms where lot of animal waste is there

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:slightly different approach.... by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Until I read the article (yes, I did!), I thought they were probably re-hashing the old biogas angle (which still has very good possibilities, mind you). This is more of a direct-to-electricity approach that looks promising. I think I'll post a link to here and the article on my favorite renewable energy discussion board (see my sig).

    2. Re:slightly different approach.... by Tymbrymi · · Score: 1

      The article states 51kW from 100,000 people. That could probably supply one or two houses with electricity if they didn't use electric heaters.

      Would be nice for those farms though, lots of animals, but not as much demand. This probably won't go as mainstream as the article suggests though

      Anybody have any numbers for the Bio-Gas plants?

    3. Re:slightly different approach.... by javatips · · Score: 1

      You telling us that, after stealing jobs, they steal ideas from Mad Max!

      We're doomed!

    4. Re:slightly different approach.... by robslimo · · Score: 1

      On second thought, this guy's only able to get 51kW per 100,000 people. It wouldn't take too many small -scale wind generators to produce the same. Heck, I bet the few guys who hang out at fieldlines.com who've made their own wind gens collectively produce more electricity than that. I also bet biogas from the same source would produce more engery.

      Not so impressed now.

    5. Re:slightly different approach.... by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      Really? Do you use 25kW heaters in your house?

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    6. Re:slightly different approach.... by robslimo · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have an all electric house (many do) then your central heat and air or baseboard heaters would get pretty close to that range. Add in hot water heaters and electric ranges, then YES, it's very easy to hit that kind of usage.

    7. Re:slightly different approach.... by genericacct · · Score: 1

      No, and we don't have 100,000 people living with us.

      51Kw/100000 =~ half a watt per person. That doesn't seem right...

    8. Re:slightly different approach.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      That's not entirely fair. My house used a lot of air conditioning and we averaged 2kW last year (1500kWh/month).

      Of course the power generated here would probably be used to run the treatment plant itself. As the article says, may people can't afford the power to run such a plant, so a self powered one could really help.

    9. Re:slightly different approach.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that but it will take some energy to get the waste wherever it needs to go and be processed.

      It makes so little energy that it would probably use more energy just to move the waste around.

      ie: Dumb idea

    10. Re:slightly different approach.... by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      Only if you turn everything on, everywhere, all the time.

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    11. Re:slightly different approach.... by mahbidness · · Score: 1

      Something similar here in the states is an Anaerobic Digester. This is what I first thought of when I saw this article, although I believe the technologies employed are different.

      --

      "It is a solemn thought: dead, the noblest man's meat is inferior to pork."

    12. Re:slightly different approach.... by qtp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Locate the plant where the waste is being treated, like they do already in Lithuania Germany and Oregon.

      You are already moving the sewage around as it is, so that expense is already there. The waste output of the biogas fermener is much safer than the sludge that existing sewage plants produce, and it can be further composted to produce safe, high quality, organic fertilizer.

      There are also existing farm waste facilities (as was previously discussed here on /.) and existing technology to tap land fills in the same manner. It's energy that can be easily converted to a usable, transportable form (electricity) that wopuld otherwise go to waste. The gasses that are being converted are greenhouse gasses (mostly methane) that are not readily sinkable, and the waste products from the fuel cell are only (easily sinkable) CO2 and water.

      The other implication of this technology that is less spoken about is that it decentralizes the source of energy away from the fossil fuel companies and spreads the profits closer to the community where the energy is being produced, either through lower costs for waste treatment, or through direct profit from the sale of the electricity if the facility is privately owned. This means lower costs for energy and lower trade deficit.

      It's a winning situation for those who live in communities that take advantage of this, and the only people who lose out are the energy companies.

      --
      Read, L
    13. Re:slightly different approach.... by mangu · · Score: 1
      it can be further composted to produce safe, high quality, organic fertilizer.


      "Safe" and "high quality" are relative. Any fertilizer is bad for the environment, if it's used incorrectly. It will run off to rivers and lakes and cause algal growth. As for high quality, it depends. Does it have the specific components the land needs, in the right proportions? Probably not. Speaking as someone who lived in a farm as a kid, the safest, highest quality, and cheapest fertilizer is fertilizer applied in the exact proportions needed by the land. It doesn't matter where it came from, an atom of N, P, or K, is an atom. It's the incorrect amount of each in the land that causes loss of plant growth or water pollution.

    14. Re:slightly different approach.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a new system. 10 to 15 years ago I was working on a sewage plant for the City of New York. The digesters were able to provide about 1/2 of the power to run the plant (over 10 MW!) however, the poster above is wrong, the sludge isn't completly safe. Seems there are heavy metals disolved in the sludge, so it can't be used for fertilizer on food crops. Most homes have copper piping with tin/lead solder. a little disolves into the water. That's why the government used to deccomend running the faucet 20 seconds or so before getting a drink of water. The lead levels are above the EPA accepted levels. There are other metals in there too. It's a good system, but not perfect.

    15. Re:slightly different approach.... by qtp · · Score: 1

      The difference is how atom of N, P, or K is delivered, as in what compound that atom is delivered in. Many chemical fertilizers, as well as raw, unprocessed animal waste and sewage sludge, has a tendancy to "burn" or over fertilize due to the nutrients being part of a less stable compound that releases the active materiakls too quickly. The bacteria that are essential to the secondary, aerobic composting "fix" the nitrogen into a usable form, while the inclusion of a carbon source, such as corn stalks, hay, sawdust, or wood chips, will buffer the mix so as to prevent overferilization. Atmospheric nitrogen is fixed into the soil in very high concentrations when you grow alfalfa or clover as a fallow crop.

      I'm not going to claim that it is impossible (or uncommon) for organic fertilizers to "burn" a feild when there's too little rain, or for them to contribute to the polluting of our waterways when there's too much (I grew up in farm country, but in the east where there's sometimes, but not often, years that are "too wet").

      But organic fertilizers are less soluble than chemical preparations, and tend to stay put where you place them rather than wash out in a heavy rain. Plus, the plants have a harder time breaking down the larger compounds that make up composted natural fertilizers, causing a slower release of the nutrients that last for a greater portion of the growing season. Sometimes this makes it difficult for the plants to make use of the phosphate (P) and potassium (K), so the composted natural fertilizers are sometimes innoculated with mycorrhizal funguses that are necessary for some plants to make use of these fertilizers.

      Yes, all fertilizers can be damaging to both crops and the environment when applied at the wrong time or in the wrong amounts, but properly prepared composted natural fertilizers (PSU's AG department has some good materials here) are a much safer alternative than most chemically prepared solutions. All the crap from the "Organic Produce" lobby has given natural fertilizers the appeaerance of some sort of hippy shit, but they've been used sustainably for a thousands of years, and our grandparents knew that there was more to taking care of the soil than chemical powders and sprays were capable of doing. There's something to be said for farmers that see the land as being part of their life and their family instead of simply the investment the banks and the agribusinesses tell us it is.

      --
      Read, L
    16. Re:slightly different approach.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That depends on the method used for cooking with electricity. If it is more wasteful (though I very much doubt anyone will be arc-searing their dinner anyway) than cooking over a flame, and depending on the amount of energy released from the process in time, then it will be a loss. Cooking over a flame and heating with gas or fuel oil (kerosene) has generally seemed to be cheaper than electricity, but perhaps that's not so, I haven't done any kind of scientific comparison. Certainly if you want to get light without too much heat electricity is your only reasonable option.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:slightly different approach.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bio-gas is used in the US.

      Also, the article says:

      His design is only producing a tenth of what he calculates its potential power output could be.

      and

      ... 51 kilowatts on the waste from 100,000 people

      So...does that mean he'll get half a megawatt from the crap of 100,000 people after it's perfected?

    18. Re:slightly different approach.... by mangu · · Score: 1
      All you say is very true, and I would add that organic matter is useful not only in the chemical buffering you mention, but also as a mechanical conditioner. Without some porous material, soil compacts into a solid mass, too hard for plants to grow and unable to hold water.


      However, the point I wanted to make was that it's very hard to gauge correctly the amount of fertilizer when it's in organic form. The beauty of chemical fertilizers is that one can analyze the soil and calculate the exact amount of each substance that is needed. If you go to any supermarket that has both "organic" and "chemical" grown vegetables, you'll see that the organic ones are more irregular in size and appearance. The downside is that chemical fertilizers are so cheap that farmers often use more than is needed in order to gain some marginal profit.

  15. Yes but... by paul_pick1 · · Score: 5, Funny
    The waste you flush down the toilet could one day power the lights in your home.

    Well, yes, but it would be pretty shitty lighting, wouldn't it?

    --
    http://www.switch2firefox.com/
  16. It seems Tom Lehrer was right... by Rexz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Life is like a sewer: what you get out of it depends on what you put into it.

  17. Electricity from Waste by eples · · Score: 5, Informative

    Something similar has been around since the 50's called "digesters" that use natural waste and the methane byproduct to power generators. It may have been invented at Penn State as well, but they are expensive so there are only about 20 of them around the country.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
    1. Re:Electricity from Waste by ross.w · · Score: 5, Informative

      IAAWWE (I am a wastewater Engineer)

      Actually most sewage plants have a digester in them (or several).

      Most Sewage Treatment Plants that have anaerobic digesters (the kind that produce methane) simply flare the gas off, because the quantity of gas produced doesn't warrant the expense of setting up to re-use it.

      Seafield Sewage Works in Edinburgh, Scotland does though. It was completed in 2000. If you fly into Edinburgh airport over the Firth of Forth, you can see a row of six large pink tanks near the docks. These are the digesters at Seafield. (The reasons why they are pink are complex and architectural, not functional).

      Bondi STP in Sydney used to re-use methane for generating power the 1960s, but the the technology was primitive, and the sulphides in the gas made the engines expensive to maintain and they were abandoned.

      Now in Australia, with green energy credits on offer, many water authorities are having another look at making use of their methane.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    2. Re:Electricity from Waste by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 2, Funny

      "IAAWWE (I am a wastewater Engineer)"

      I wish I was too, that is a great pick up line

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    3. Re:Electricity from Waste by ross.w · · Score: 4, Funny

      You have no idea how descriptions of my work can kill dinnertime conversation.

      I have often found myself having business lunches and having to change the subject, having realised what we were loudly discussing in a crowded restaurant.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    4. Re:Electricity from Waste by Screamingliner · · Score: 1

      Last week in Wired News.

    5. Re:Electricity from Waste by kfg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Digesters have been around for about 100 years. During WWII with gas rationing they became quite common, one version even coming on a trailer you could pull behind your car while collecting manure, and then run your car from.

      During the gas crunch of the 70s digesters popped up all over the place and there was hardly an issue of Mother Earth News that didn't have some new design/application of a digester featured in it showing how you could power your farm/homestead on shitty methane.

      There are still thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of digesters scattered across Americas rural areas. Virtually all of them are built by the owners out of scrap materials for nearly nothing.

      Perhaps there are only 20 of this expensive commercial variety. A lot of companies like to make money by taking old ideas that people in general have forgotten about, plate them in chrome, and sell them as the latest technology for a premium price.

      Go to the library. See if they've got back issues of Mother Earth News from the 70s and 80s. Lots of good digesters ideas in there, although often a bit crudely implimented.

      The mere idea of excrement for fuel energy goes back to God only knows how long. It's certainly prehistoric. The Plains Indian relied on Buffalo Chips for fuel, and the Indian Indian still does today.

      Latrine Officer was one of the most important posts in Napoleon's army. His job? To retrieve human excrement. It was too valuable an energy source to waste. They used it to be able to make their own gunpowder as they traveled, which is one of the reasons that Napoleon's armies seemed to be able to pull off almost magical feats of translating themselves from one location to another and arrive ready to fight.

      Shit is energy. We know that. We've always known that. We've known that that energy can be extracted as natural gases and used to run combustion engines and turn electric generators for over a century. It's news so old it's boring.

      It's even a reasonably viable way to go about making energy, if you live on a small farm with lots and lots of animals producing lots and lots of shit you need to do something with.

      For city dwelling humans, well, it will never be anything more than a suppliment to other forms of energy. Something you can use because it's there, but nothing to be relied upon.

      Why? Well, how much did you shit today? Does that amount of shit convert into the electricity you used?

      Not even close.

      You'll need a lot of other animals who don't watch TV shitting for you as well. Like on a farm, say.

      And nevermind the fact that most of the shit (including human) is more valuable as a fertilizer (which is where much of the treated sewage is going right now) than it is as a fuel, so you're invoking the whole food for fuel argument. It may be better to burn that fuel we can't eat, or use for food production, and eat the fuel we can.

      KFG

    6. Re:Electricity from Waste by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      if they were smart, they would sell the rights to the Gas to a power company who can then set up a collection building.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:Electricity from Waste by MachDelta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I can really see that one working on the ladies.

      "Hey baby... EEYYAAAAAWWEEEEHHEEEEE!!"

    8. Re:Electricity from Waste by WareW01f · · Score: 1

      Food VS Fuel? Does that mean we should stop doing this?

      For the lazy clickers:
      "The preeminent source of nitrogen fertilizer is synthesis of ammonia from the hydrogen of natural gas and the nitrogen of the atmosphere, a source without obvious limit."

      Of course if you believe the 'without obvious limit' part than this might sober ya up. Seems like we're already wasting fuel on food.

    9. Re:Electricity from Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IAAWWE (I am a wastewater Engineer)

      Man, I love slashdot. An expert in every pot.

    10. Re:Electricity from Waste by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Another British first was the in-house system described in this show (episode 5)

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    11. Re:Electricity from Waste by qtp · · Score: 2, Informative

      And nevermind the fact that most of the shit (including human) is more valuable as a fertilizer

      The biogas fermenters produce fertilizer as well as gas, and it's much higher in nitrogen content than if it had not been reduced in the fermener.

      It's not an either-or proposition.

      The using the fuel cells to convert the energy is far more efficeint than burning natural gas. Even the most efficient gas burning plants (gas turbine engines driving alternators for generation) are only 40%-45% efficient (at most 45% of the energy contained in the natural gas is converted to electricity) while fuel cells currently available are capable of converting 85% of the energy available in natural gas to electricity, and the rest is converted into heat, some of which can be used to accelerate the fermentation process, or to heat the facility.

      Why? Well, how much did you shit today? Does that amount of shit convert into the electricity you used?

      So maybe I only shit out about half a watt today, but over the years that adds up, and in total, the city I live in shit about 773,000 watts, in a year that's 282,145,000 watts that might just keep my sewer bill from rising.

      It may be better to burn that fuel we can't eat,

      As I noted above, burning is a very inefficient method of converting chemically stored energy to a useful, transportable form. Fuel cells are far better at generating electricity than the power plants we now rely on, which first need generate heat (and lose a fair portion of it up the flue), then pressure, which is redirected into torque, which moves an alternator. Every step of the process loses energy either through conduction or to friction (or both, steam has friction too). Fuel cells are able to be more efficient due to a more direct path by which the energy is converted directly from chemical energy to usable electricity.

      and eat the fuel we can.

      Use the compost produced by the fermenter to fertilize the fields (after first using the excess heat produced by the fuel cell to accelerate a secondary aerobic decomposition at 145 degrees F). It will be a highly efficient fertilizer due to the removal of much of the carbon during fermentation, leaving behind readily available "fixed" nitrogen that plants can use. Reduced dependance on chemical fertilizers and safer fertilizer than is currently produced from sewage sludge.

      These ideas bring the community (and man) back to being a part of the environment in which he exists, a part of nature as opposed to battling against it. If we can reduce our impact on the environment and get it to pay for itself, then this is a winning proposition.

      --
      Read, L
    12. Re:Electricity from Waste by njh · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine works in the fuel cell industry and he said that sulphuric acid fuel cells are better for waste-water methane -> electricity conversion as the very fine silca that gets into the sewers from cosmetics tends to erode moving parts quite quickly.

    13. Re:Electricity from Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it happens, I am a Pretreatment Controller. I regulate what industiral users can put into the sanitary sewers in a City of about 90k people in the SE USA.

      The silica in cosmetics is trivial compared to the sand in the normal sewage. Also, a major cause of erosion of pumps is cavitation as bubbles collapse.

      Contrary to what pipingguy said, anaerobic digestors once purged produce biogas (mostly CH4, CO2 some H2S and a bit of N2.) at a rate such that there is too little O2 to sustain a flame.

      One normally burns the biogas to provide heat to keep the digestors at the proper temp to keep thermophyllic anaerobic bacteria happy.

      Also, biogas can be cleaned up and injected into the natural gas system. It also can be used to run internal combustion engines, micro turbines or even fuel cells. The real deciding issue is how much gas you have. This is all about economies of scale. If you don't have much gas, it is not worth the capital expense to do much more than burn it off.

    14. Re:Electricity from Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The mere idea of excrement for fuel energy goes back to God only knows how long.


      "And you shall eat it as a barley cake, having baked it in their sight over human dung."

      Ezekiel 4:12
    15. Re:Electricity from Waste by kfg · · Score: 1

      Then he said to me,"Look, I have given you cow's dung for human dung, and you shall prepare your bread with that."

      Ezekiel 4:15

      God also knew which was the better excrement for fuel. :)

      KFG

    16. Re:Electricity from Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have ever been to Los Angeles, the Wastewater treatment plant by LAX has a huge power plant right next to it. This is run by the methane from the digesters there. I guess that it powers a good part of the treatment plant, but not all of it.

    17. Re:Electricity from Waste by njh · · Score: 1

      I thought it was not the volume, but the fineness - comestic silca is very fine and can lift from the surface of bubbling liquids. These particles are too fine to easily separate, but they don't affect the operation of an H2SO4 fuel cell. Normal sand can be separated out using gravity.

    18. Re:Electricity from Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cosmetic silica probabally is as fine as you indicate. I've never seen it mentioned in any of the discussions in professional fora. I suspect that save for wastewater treatment plants with cosmetic manufacturers, there isn't much of it.
      Pretreatment controller here. I have a NIC but forgot what it and password are long ago...

      Also, cosmetics tend to have lots of fats/oils/and grease (FOG). FOG is a real problem because it clogs sewer lines just like it does kitchen drains. We regulate FOG and the same treatment that tends to take it out will help with other suspended solids.

      As to the normal sand etc, you have everything from colloidal silica (so small that Brownian motion will keep it suspended basicly forever) on up.

    19. Re:Electricity from Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit that's funny... good one.

  18. In Related News by MooseByte · · Score: 2, Funny


    SCO stock skyrockets.

    1. Re:In Related News by jorgen · · Score: 1
      SCO stock skyrockets.

      Just imagine the day when Darl realizes that his intellectual property helps powering everybodys houses...

    2. Re:In Related News by MooseByte · · Score: 1

      "Just imagine the day when Darl realizes that his intellectual property helps powering everybodys houses..."

      One word... Caligula.

  19. Yeah but.. by JayPee · · Score: 0

    Will it be as cool as the pigshit powered system in Bartertown? And if I can acquire a home version, will I be supplied with a mentaly disabled giant so I can ride him and be refered to as "Master Blaster"?

  20. bright idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    light comes on unexpectedly...okay, who farted?

  21. BOFH by dJCL · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, I guess the Bastard will have to see about suing some more people. I may have to see about a lawsuit myself....

    Enjoy!

    --
    On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
  22. Not with my excrement... by dj245 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they try this with my excrement without a proper licence, I'll sue! Licences for my intellectual property can be bought for just $699. Sure, its shit, but its my shit. I thought about it, and my efforts went into creating it. Bofh Link

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Not with my excrement... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      As an artist (sculptor in this case) you have a right to be compensated for your efforts. Preach on brother!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:Not with my excrement... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The question you will have to argue in court is that the toilet and the plumbing in your house are crucial devices utilized in the sculpting process.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  23. Eat your bean! by RDosage · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Dear, break out the refried beans, the lights are flickering again!"

  24. Oh, great.... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now we're going to have a war to liberate the sewers....

    1. Re:Oh, great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an interesting political statement. Too bad some moderator didn't get it.

    2. Re:Oh, great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was obviously trolling for karma, which is precisely why he wasn't moderated. While it may have been amusing 1 year ago, there have been so many similar jokes over the last year, it's just stupid now.

  25. Shit Happens, but .... by BrownDwarf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .... so do lots of other things. What happens when someone flushes a pint of paint thinner or weed killer or heavy metal organic compound down the old toilet?

  26. Out to make a buck by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 3, Funny

    This reeks of profiteering. We're to be overcome by the stench of people out to make a buck. We work our asses off while fat cats, flush with our hard-earned money, sit on their thrones and pooh-pooh the more environmentally sound ideas. I won't let them dump my money into their porcelain ideas.

    1. Re:Out to make a buck by DonServo · · Score: 1

      It certainly reeks of something...

  27. License fees? by kefoo · · Score: 1

    Hope nobody tries something like this

    1. Re:License fees? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I hope somebody does. It's a perfect way to demonstrate the absurdity of it all. I wonder if people would start slant drilling into their neighbor's septic tank.

      --
      What?
  28. Reminds me of an article in Discover by MrPoopyPants · · Score: 5, Informative
    This article got me pretty excited about the future of waste/energy. I'd love to see those piles and piles of junk and biowaste turned into useful energy.

    The conspiracy theorist within me fears that these types of technologies will not take off because oil companies have so much power.

    1. Re:Reminds me of an article in Discover by teeker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah it was the thermal depolymerization (TDP) process...supposedly perfected by some company called Changing World Technologies...

      I thought that plant next to the turkey-processing place was supposed to be running by now..has anybody heard any follow up on that? You'd think it would be bigger news if it was operating as well as they said it would...

      --
      teeker
    2. Re:Reminds me of an article in Discover by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Informative

      yeah, it was mentioned on Fox news by some Democrats complaining about how money was being "wasted" to turn Turkey parts into energy.

      AFAIK it works, and it works even better for stuf like oil sand, allowing the processing of the petrolium products from the sand which was never possable before.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  29. Plumber = Electrician? by mighty_mallards · · Score: 2

    So what happens when the toilet backs up?

    :)

    --
    You find this humorous, centurion?
  30. Biomass by apoplectic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Biomass technology (energy produced from waste) has been around since the 70's. Though more specific and more refined than its predecessors, there's nothing revolutionary about this.

    1. Re:Biomass by greenstork · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except up until this time, it took more energy to process waste than you got out of it.

  31. Bio Plants in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't ask me why I remember this but I can remember a peice on the local news about this a couple of weeks ago, apparently the output (as in eletrical) from the bio-gas is only used to power the rest of the 'farm' and pumping as it stands, but it's hope they could make a contribution to the National Grid eventually.

    Somehow I don't think this will replace the >25% of output we currently get from nuclear plants set to expire over the next decade.

    If only we could shit uranium.

    1. Re:Bio Plants in the UK by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      did you read the article?

      it does not use gas...it uses the processing of the waste itself to make the electricity.

      the bacteria produce an electron when they "eat" a waste molecule...they are taking that electron and putting it to use.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  32. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When my Microwave power plant's particle beam misses the target and breaks the Sewage plant open, which Sims am I going to call, Fire, Police, Military?

    Probably military, since I don't like 'em

  33. Atomation Killing Good Jobs! by pavon · · Score: 2, Funny

    So what does this mean for the job security of this guy ?

    1. Re:Atomation Killing Good Jobs! by jeabus · · Score: 1

      Now Poopsmith = Power Engineer!

      --

      Save me Jeabus!

    2. Re:Atomation Killing Good Jobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a "brown out"...

  34. Another amazing invention.... by Teechur007 · · Score: 1

    ...straight out of Back to the Future II. Anyone remember the mini-fusion generator that powered the Delorean? Now, if we could only get hoverboards , we'd be set...

    1. Re:Another amazing invention.... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Anyone remember the mini-fusion generator that powered the Delorean?

      You mean Mr. Fusion?

  35. stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said!

  36. What the hell? by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    I didn't know we ran out of oil already!

    1. Re:What the hell? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      No, we have plenty of oil. It's just that no one can afford it anymore.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  37. I'll sue. by SubconsciousSeraphim · · Score: 1, Redundant

    My bodily waste is not public domain.

    I expect to be compensated for my hard work.

    1. Re:I'll sue. by MrPoopyPants · · Score: 1

      I realize you were joking, but...

      I would hope that we would all be compensated with lower energy costs and a cleaner environment. I'd gladly donate my "processed food" for that...

    2. Re:I'll sue. by SubconsciousSeraphim · · Score: 1

      Agreed. That's in an ideal situation, where the companies, after recuperating their expenses and overhead, give back to the consumer. Assuming anything ever comes of this, we'll see.

  38. So... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Some day in the future someone will talk about his "Shitty" Electric Service and be 100% correct.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  39. Off topic, but needs to be said... by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else losing their appetite while reading this thread? Damn...

  40. Biogas by GillBates0 · · Score: 3, Informative
    India's been using cow dung and other cattle waste to make biogas for a while now. The greatest benefit is that it's clean and a renewable energy resource.

    Biomass Energy is produced by burning the solid Biomass fuels (green plants, agricultural residues, carbonaceous waste, wood etc). Direct burning of Biomass in an efficient manner causes the energy loss. But through Gasification programme , Biomass is converted in to high quality of gaseous fuel through Gasifier power plants. In the Biomass Gasifier , Biomass (a solid fuel) is converted into gaseous fuel, called producer gas formed through a series of thermo chemical process. The producer gas mainly consists of carbon-monoxide, hydrogen and nitrogen gas. The gaseous fuel energy is used in several applications.

    Another reason not to eat beef! Let 'em live and generate shit...err energy.(Just kidding, it's a joke, laugh).

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Biogas by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Another reason not to eat beef! Let 'em live and generate shit...err energy.(Just kidding, it's a joke, laugh).

      All kidding aside, that has to be about the least efficient way of converting biomass to electricity. But I will grant you that it has the added bonus of using an awful lot of water, too.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  41. Article is based on a false premise by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2, Informative

    The permise is that sewage treatment plants need external power to run the aeriation blowers. The reality is that many plants use methane from the digesters to fuel engines that run the blowers. Old, simple technology that's relatively cheap and bulletproof.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Article is based on a false premise by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

      huh? it is not running off any premis except that it is digesting the materials like the processing plant, but rather than letting that electron rejoin its friends when it is released, they create an anerobic environmnet which allows them to capture it, which creates a voltage diffrence in the anode, which they can use to make power....the methane gas can still be used to power the other processes in a treatment plant as they are already.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  42. I don't think this is any new. by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    Bio-gas (methane out of sewage) is well known source of renewable energy. From house sewage it isn't very effective, but applied to farms with lots of organic waste, profit goes into serious numbers. So far methane was used simply for heating houses, heating water and such, but using it to produce electricity seems like a simple and logical step forward.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:I don't think this is any new. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Informative
      The local wastewater treatment plant has generators to produce electricity from the gas they collect. But, as I was informed while on a tour of the facility, they don't use them. It is actually cheaper for them to buy electricity from the power company than to use these generators which they already have in place.

      This says something about the cost-effectiveness of current electricity solutions.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:I don't think this is any new. by anto · · Score: 1

      I used to work at a treatment plant that supplied a nice large powerstation that was *definatly* part of the grid - from memory it was in the region of 50-100MW (so not huge but big enough) sadly having our own power station within walking distance didn't guarentee wonderful power as they would occasionally pull the station offline for some reason & managed to loose our feed from/to the grid at least once.

      The smell of the old uncovered ponds was a different matter altogether (a cheap diet system though)

    3. Re:I don't think this is any new. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      THEY ARE NOT USING THE METHANE MORON.

      they are using the electrons generated by the bacteria to create a voltage diffrence on an anode!!!!!

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  43. High tech solution to a low tech problem by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

    This is completely stupid. We can already use anaerobic digesters and produce methane from sewage. But why don't we buy these guys Porsches for a while, first?

    "One way to think of this technology is that it is currently at the state of development that solar power was 20 to 30 years ago - the principle has been shown, but there is a lot of work to do before this is widely used."

    In other words, in 30 years it will still not be practical, so let's spend some more money on it.

  44. Old News for those in rural areas by backtick · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.energy.state.or.us/biomass/digester/dig estech.htm

    Lots of places have these; I see someone say "There are only a few in production" fairly often, but this is incorrect; there are more and more every year. Dairy farms are using them in large numbers, but the city of portland has a fairly large one (see http://www.energy.state.or.us/biomass/fuelcell.htm )
    that processes the residue from 82 million gallons of wastewater a day.

    As an example of the economics, see:
    http://www.eco-farm.org/sa/sa_dairy_synopsis _diges ter.html#eco

    Payback in 6 years. Not bad, considering lots of places give grants, as these help cut down on groundwater pollution. You can have payback in 3 years, and then start making money on the juice you sell.

    1. Re:Old News for those in rural areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right!

      About 10 years ago there aws a pig farm just down the road from my grandmother's farm. He ran all the pigshit into a "shit converter" and generated enough methane to run a 10 Kwatt generator that pretty much ran the entire farm. He was still connected to the grid for emergencies and peak demand.

      Interestingly enough, anaerobic digestion gets you methane; aerobic digetsion gets you methyl alcohol. So he ran two converters; one supported aerobic digestion so that he could get methyl alcohol to run his tractors. Whatever solids were left went onto the fields that grew the food that he fed to pigs that generated shit... nice closed system.

      Disclaimer: I am not a chemist; all of this came from about a 2 hour talk with him about how his farm worked.

    2. Re:Old News for those in rural areas by vanyel · · Score: 1

      At only 51KW per 100,000 people, I don't think this is going to be practical without some major improvements. Even the Portland system (which I didn't know about, and I *live* here!) only puts out 170KW for $1.3million capital costs, not counting operational costs. At $60K savings per year, that's over 20 years to pay back, and I have a suspicion that the $60K "savings" are more than eaten up in operating costs. No wonder I haven't heard about it...

      It makes a lot more sense for dairies, which have a tremendous waste problem (BTW, there's a space in that URL you need to get rid of to make the link work, between the s and t in "digester").

  45. Don't you worry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oil lobby that was behind conquering Iraq will take care it will never leave project desks.

  46. Free.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I get a free IPee address then? I hope it is not static!

  47. Another Version of This Concept by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We discussed a similar high temperature conversion in the past. This alternative process uses high temperature/high pressure water to crack a wide range of complex molecules into simpler stuff. It can convert sewage, toxic waste, and animal byproducts into a mix of combustible hydrocarbons, salts, and water.

    The new Microbial Fuel Cell method sounds interesting, but I bet it fails in the field. I'd bet that nasty substances (the odd pulse of heavy metals, detergents, or drain cleaner) would poison the microbial catalysts in this new fuel cell.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Another Version of This Concept by mangu · · Score: 1
      I'd bet that nasty substances (the odd pulse of heavy metals, detergents, or drain cleaner) would poison the microbial catalysts in this new fuel cell.


      My thoughts, exactly. Think about all those disinfectants that people use around home. There seems to be only one thing that's sure to decompose any and all sewage: heat.

    2. Re:Another Version of This Concept by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'd bet that nasty substances (the odd pulse of heavy metals, detergents, or drain cleaner)
      It's simple, like the current methods it will not be a one step process. Floculation and gravity seperation can get rid of heavy metals, and high concentrations of petroleum products or detergents can be dealt with too.

      Some oil companies use various bacteria to deal with their waste water, and they have methods to stop spills into their waste water system from killing all their bacteria.

  48. Reminds me of an article in Discover-Oh Poo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry "MrPoopyPants" you will have plenty of power, and a handy container to keep the leftovers in.

  49. Good old PS-U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...or maybe just P-U for short.

  50. Mixing Stories by 1WingedAngel · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, if I they use my waste to power the "broadband over power lines", I can get bandwidth for shit?

    1. Re:Mixing Stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Only for companies that have bandwidth coming out of their ass.

    2. Re:Mixing Stories by SB9876 · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, most Slashdot posters should be set for life.

  51. Master Blaster Run Barter Town! by enrico_suave · · Score: 4, Funny

    heh... Mad Max 7 Way Beyond Thunderdome

    e,.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  52. Just ask the neighbors... by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    "Hi, can I borrow a cup of human waste?"

  53. Power quality.. by hesiod · · Score: 1

    Man, and here I thought the quality of the electricity around here was crap now...

  54. Hey friend! by Tagren · · Score: 1

    Your lightsystem realy is crap.
    ---

  55. Nice and all, but by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    These ideas are nice and all, but when are some of them going to be implemented? I'm fortunate enough right now to live in an area with cheap, abundant hydroelectric power, but that's not possible in a lot of places. Reading about these kinds of developments is cool, but I just wish we could actually hear about them being widely deployed.

    Seriously, I can't wait for the day when every home has a circady daffodil and a couple of wind turbines on the roof, and a geothermal heat pump in the basement alongside the sewage-power-generator.

    It would be great -- the utility companies primary responsibilities would be to store excess power generated by people's homes, supply industrial power, and make up for shortfalls.

  56. SCO's lights must be *REALLY* bright these days... by Vexler · · Score: 1

    ...at least until the verdict is announced and the last toilet is flushed at Lindon, Utah.

  57. DILBERT was a prophet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Combine this with Broadband over Power Lines technology, and Dilbert's Dream of passing IP packets via the sewer system will finally be true!!!

    1. Re:DILBERT was a prophet by Webmoth · · Score: 3, Funny

      "...Dilbert's Dream of passing IP packets via the sewer system..."

      Wouldn't that be IPoo packets?

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  58. Duh by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    Why do you think Dr. Evil, kept Fat Bastard around? To power his "Frickin Laser Beam".

    --
    Sig it.
  59. I guess saying I have a shitty power company by dcocos · · Score: 1

    will be more true than even

  60. What about Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will all the sewage that get's spewed from Slashbots and the "editorializing" from the "editors" get converted to energy too? Or would that overload the powergrid?

    1. Re:What about Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great! Now the /. effect backs-up the sewer system and floods the neighborhood!

  61. Great! by travdaddy · · Score: 1

    Now we can all help get the lights back on during a blackout!

    --
    Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
  62. Late Breaking News, Kerry voted to Kill SENATORS! by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "Two witnesses have placed John Kerry at a Kansas City meeting of the hierarchy of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War in November of 1971. At that meeting, they actually took a vote about assassinating United States senators. It was called "The Phoenix Project" and was the brainchild of Scott Camil. The two witnesses who place Kerry at the meeting are Terry Du-Bose and Randy Barnes. What is very interesting is that Barnes is a big Kerry supporter and the head of Missouri Vets for Kerry."

    http://daily.nysun.com/Repository/getFiles.asp?Sty le=OliveXLib:ArticleToMail&Type=text/html&Path=NYS /2004/03/12&ID=Ar00100

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  63. No way! by Tom7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, this is like when they tell us to drink our own purified urine.

    I, for one, will not use electricity with poo in it!

  64. RTA by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    It bypasses the methane part, producing electricity straight from the anaerobic reaction.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  65. Uh. by bad+enema · · Score: 5, Funny

    That idea sounds pretty shitty if you ask me.

  66. Do the math: by wowbagger · · Score: 1
    As yet his design is only producing a tenth of what he calculates its potential power output could be. Even so, if scaled up, this system would produce 51 kilowatts on the waste from 100,000 people, Logan says.


    So, as it is now, it can generate one-half watt per person using it. If it reaches theoretical performance, it would generate 5 watts per person.

    Not exactly a lot of power.

    Now, perhaps if this were used to process the lagoons near a hog farm or near a cattle feedlot...
  67. bad idea by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 2, Funny

    this makes me think back to when I was young and my parents took me on a tour of a nearby dam where our electricity was generated. I thought it was a lot of fun. I shudder to think of the psychological effects of taking a small child on a tour of these power plants of the future.

    --
    Obama is a twitter sock puppet
  68. Old hat by Alioth · · Score: 1

    This is possibly old hat. Back in the 1960s, when my Dad was just a kid, he and his classmates went on a tour of a sewage plant in Worcestershire, England.

    The methane they cracked off the sewage plant was used to heat the local swimming pool.

  69. Simcity's new building??? by sonofuse · · Score: 1

    "Hey, it seems that EA will have to create a new building for Simcity!"

    I have a suggestion for the name of that new "house"....

  70. this has great potential by dustmote · · Score: 1

    The sustainable architecture movement will be happy about that. Especially the Earthship folks.

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
  71. The state of our (US) Govrnment.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Nuff said.

  72. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gives a whole new meaning to the term "Electrical Brown out".

  73. Why EA? by BigZaphod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shouldn't Maxis be the ones adding stuff to their games?

  74. Finally! by prostoalex · · Score: 1

    Diarrhea pays off!

  75. Not Clean Power by StrandedOrg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think this qualifies as "clean power".

  76. What's this got to do with SimCity? by Webmoth · · Score: 1

    I guess they'll have to rename it SimS*itty.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  77. Slashdot: The most powerfull website in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The admins of Slashdot should look into this as there is no site in the world capable of spewing more crap out over the internet.

  78. Did Kerry vote Yea or Nay? to Kill SENATORS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is the question, maybe He is not a total asshole just a total gold digger

  79. Well, when they hook up SCO's toliets... by Sonic+McTails · · Score: 1

    ..They shoot enough BS out there asses to end any world power problems !

    --
    This signature was left intentionally blank.
  80. I work in the sewage industry and this is old news by Phelan · · Score: 3, Informative

    We have been making power with sewage for a very long time, methane harvesting to run generators has been around for years, plants can power their equipment plus sell some surplus...
    or with our product they can do it at a rate that is up to 60% more efficent...
    Shameless plug: Premier Agritech, Inc.

    --
    "Nimis exaltatus rex sedet in vertice - caveat ruinam!"
  81. Who runs Bartertown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Master-Blaster runs Bartertown!

  82. In Related News ... by Mordack · · Score: 1

    In related news, the US Government urges its citizens to consume more beans. "Not only do beans provide excellent nutritional value but they help us generate additional electricity", says Keester Izore, Deputy Assistant to the US Surgeon General.

    The President added this comment in the Rose Garden to reportes this morning. "In these times of war, its good for the American people to help keep our industries fully powered to build all the stuff we need to fight evil."

    Environmentalists groups such as the Earth Liberation Front have already claimed that additional bean consumption may destroy the ozone. While the recent torching of 6,750 acres of beans in the midwest has not been officially linked to the ELF, it is widely believed that the terrorist group is responsible.

    --
    I don't need no stinkin' sig!
    1. Re:In Related News ... by Mordack · · Score: 1

      The President later admitted that he had not actually read the article and "had no knowledge of how this [human waste] power thing" worked. Aides to the President were quick to point out that the word "[human waste]" is used frequently on the President's ranch and not considered to be in poor taste.

      --
      I don't need no stinkin' sig!
  83. Free Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put this in series with SCO......

  84. If only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your comment got more attention... or .. if my fellow Americans understood what you're saying...I think I'll emergrate to Switzerland....or...Austria...Ooooo yeah, hot blond babes!!! No fat chicks!!

  85. Damn! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I knew this country was going into the toilet!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  86. A miniature Von Roll fluidized bed by og_sh0x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Von Roll has a similar technology called a fluidized bed incinerator which is used to incinerate all sorts of waste, including human waste that is up to 70% water. This is currently being built at the Metropolitan Wastewater Plant in St. Paul, Minnesota, and is already in use in many other places to process organic wastes such as from corn and turkey processing byproducts.

    The system essentially works by heating up tons of sand being blown around in a large cyclone tower, and injecting the fluid waste into the whirling vortex. A lot of energy is required to heat up the sand to start the process, but after which the system generates enough power to power the entire treatment plant, and sometimes then some. More info in the white paper.

  87. man what shitty news... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well this is the shittiest story i've ever seen, however it somehow seems to have brightened my day up.

  88. CIA bombs Madrid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, the spanish authorities say eta or al-qaeda, but given the american CIA's history, it's at least as likely they did it!

  89. Portable possibilities!!! by rayde · · Score: 1

    No longer will you have to recharge your laptop battery while on a long trip! Low Power warning? No problem! Just bring your laptop back with you to the "refueling station" (as bathrooms will hence be called) and you'll be back in business in no time. Well, maybe in 15-20.

  90. RTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are the one who needs to read more carefully. The comment said, "Something similar". Similar means not the same. It's obvious he knows they are different.

  91. Sewage Eh? by vivin · · Score: 1

    Muhaha! While all of you are sitting here talking about the Power of Sewage, I am secretly developing the Sewage Of Power!! HAHAHA! The world shall be MINE!

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
  92. This reminds me of a recent BOFH by Sparhawk420 · · Score: 1

    When I saw this I immediately thought of a BOFH article I read recently.

    BOFH: Protecting bodily waste in the public domain

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/36116.html
  93. Reality check by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 4, Insightful
    51 KW from 100,000 people = 0.51 W/capita.

    You're not going to run even one room light from this. You could use it to keep your cell phone and PDA charged, but you could probably do that just as well with generators in the soles of your shoes and gain mobility in the bargain.

    (Yeah, I know everyone's playing this for yucks. You can see me as a wet blanket or a straight man, your choice.)

    1. Re:Reality check by p4ul13 · · Score: 1
      "You can see me as a wet blanket or a straight man, your choice."

      With those clothes and That hair?! Baby, I don't think anybody will think of you as a straight man.

      Kidding kidding, I'm kidding.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    2. Re:Reality check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With that shirt and those shoes? Darling, I don't see how anyone could see you as anything but a straight man.

  94. What? by iantri · · Score: 1
    Electricity from sewage?

    What a load of horse shit!

  95. Conflict scenario... by moviepig.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Sewage power!"

    "Wind turbines!"

    "Sewage power!!!"

    "Wind turbines!!!"

    . . . - The Day the Shit Hit the Fan...

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  96. So all a terrorist would need to do... by blamanj · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to shut down a city would be to flush a bunch of antibiotics down the toilet.

  97. Now this BOFH article... by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

    Now this BOFH article takes a serious note: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/36116.html

  98. So what happens... by ANTRat · · Score: 0

    ...if someone cant shit for a couple days?

  99. Nothing new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is nothing new. Here in City of Calgary, at the Bonnybrook Wastewater Treatment Plant, the power requirement can be entirely self-sufficient.

    All of the solids from the sewage is pumped into a digester, where anaerobic bacterias break down the solid and produces methane, which is burnt to produce power. All UPenn does is prouduce energy on a larger scale.

  100. Biogas is tripleplus good by Jeremiah+Blatz · · Score: 3, Informative

    First of all, it converts waste product into electricity. But secondly, instead of sewage decomposing into methane, it decomposes into C02, which is a much less effective greenhouse gas. Additionally, the resulting by-products make a good, smell-free compost.

    Here's a blurb about a biogas plant in Oregon

    1. Re:Biogas is tripleplus good by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      One thing I've haven't seen done yet, is to use the surplus CO2 from those plants to supply greenhouses growing food (which also use the sewage). I suspect it's probably been done before on small scales, but I'd like to see it done more often - it could hugely increase food production during the winter seasons. So far I haven't seen anything indicating it's being done on a large scale tho.

      It'd also be experience that would be needed in building closed systems like what we'll need for offplanet colonies.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  101. bah. by kguilber · · Score: 1, Funny

    this idea is a load of crap.

  102. There is no Maxis by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just like there's no Bullfrog or Origin.

    EA has eaten them all.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  103. closed circuit TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this means you could hook up the video out from your TV to one of these generators?
    Then: electricity runs the TV -- this produces the normal sewage out of the TV -- thus producing more electricity (to run the TV more I guess ... )

  104. Decentralize the power grid and generate your own by kenjib · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would like to see all kinds of technologies that allow private parties to generate electricity become more prevalent. You can decentralize the power grid and open it up as a peer to peer trading network. It's the logic of the internet applied to the outdated logic of the power grid.

    Put solar, wind, sewage treatment, and other types of generators in your house. Use what you need and trade what you don't. If you've got a shortage then buy back what you need. In January, south africans can sell solar generated energy to russia. In june, russians can sell it back. Private and commercial ventures alike can create power in large amounts by any means and then sell it in the free market directly to end users and other public entities with large energy demands that are all then free to buy from the lowest cost sources.

    Hydrogen fuel cells will also help enable this by allowing the banking of energy for later use and/or trade. Superconductors can improve the efficiency of the whole system and help the private sector economics reach critical mass. Are all of these kinds of technologies going to inevitably converge toward an energy revolution? Between all the bits and pieces it really looks like something is going to come together...

  105. power creation or distribution? by eagl · · Score: 1

    The question is if it takes more power to create the converter than you get back out. If it takes more power to make one of these devices than they can get back out, then it becomes little more than a battery or power distribution device.

    It's sort of like hydrogen powercells... They don't actually "make" electricity because it takes more electricity to crack the hydrogen from water than you get from the cell, plus it takes energy to make the cell in the first place.

    If this power from waste converter/cell actually generates more power than it took to make, it could be a big deal but otherwise it's just another way to get power from one place (the manufacturing plant) to another (the site where it's set up).

    1. Re:power creation or distribution? by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

      You can get more power out.

      There are many farmers - typically hog farmers - who use methane digesters to power their farms.

  106. The U.S. could eliminate foriegn oil imports... by MonkeyGone2Heaven · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    by simply harnessing all the crap being put out by the U.S. Government!!!

  107. OT question: Why not dual flush toilets in USA? by tetranz · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my former part of the world, nearly all toilets in homes are dual flush to save water. They have two buttons, one gives a half flush, the other a full flush. Its not rocket science to figure out when you need which. An american visitor had not seen this before.

    Now that I live in the US, I wonder why such technology doesn't exist here. It seems like a much better way to save water than the problematic 'low flush' toilets common the US.

    1. Re:OT question: Why not dual flush toilets in USA? by taped2thedesk · · Score: 1

      I can see it now... [walking into the bathroom] "What is that SMELL? Dammit, who half-flushed? Sick..."

  108. Don't See Why This Wouldn't Work by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

    I don't see why this wouldn't work, after all crap has been used to power an Internet website for years now.

    Somebody had to say it . . .

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  109. Half a Watt Per Person?!?!?!? by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    "...if scaled up, this system would produce 51 kilowatts on the waste from 100,000 people, Logan says." Hello. That's half a watt per person. I could produce half a watt by looking at something hard.

    I must be missing something. I'm not an engineer. Please tell me why something that gets back this little energy is valuable at ALL?

  110. Interesting by pclminion · · Score: 1
    It's interesting to see how much energy actually still remains in human waste products. It demonstrates just how inefficient our bodies are at extracting all the energy from the food we eat.

    If we were 100% efficient, all that would come out the other end would be something resembling ash, I would think.

  111. Not a completely new idea by Stonent1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was a kid, my dad worked as a mechanic at a sewage treatment plant. After the sewage comes in, it passes through a system called a digester where it sat. The fumes which were collected were mostly methane gas, that was pumped into giant diesel engines that ran generators that ran the digestion system that ran the engines that ran the... Oh dear I've gone cross-eyed. There was still some solid waste left behind however. It was loaded into large spreaders and spread out on large fields and then flattened out to dry. Though about 90% of the stink had gone local residents still complained. So they came up with an industrial perfume called Roto-ban that was sprayed on top to cover up the smell. Shortly after more people complained about the smell from the perfume than the waste, so they stopped using it. What was left over was collected and sold as industrial fertilizer. You could not legally (in the US) use it to fertilize vegitation used for human consumption, but you could use it to fertilize food used for animal consumption (and then they could legally sell the animals as food). So basically HAHAHA (pointing) You eat turds!

    1. Re:Not a completely new idea by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      That's how Milorganite (TM) is made - from "activated sludge". Still commonly spread on golf courses see http://www.milorganite.com/

    2. Re:Not a completely new idea by Bodhammer · · Score: 1
      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  112. " EA will have to create a new building..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "EA will have to create a new building..." When I started to read that sentence I thought it was going to say "EA will have to release better games in the future or risk being classified as a powerplant".

    (Because all they seem to produce is shit)

  113. Phewey Lewis and the News: the Power of Sludge by goodmanj · · Score: 2, Funny

    The power of sludge is a curious thing
    Make one man reek, and another man stink
    But take some sewage, just a little bit o' fudge
    More than a nuisance, that's the power of sludge

    You don't need diesel, don't take methane
    Don't need plutonium to run this train.
    It smells and it's nasty and it's rude sometimes
    but it might just turn on your lights
    That's the power of sludge
    That's the power of sludge

  114. Once again... by TheTranceFan · · Score: 1

    Those who have the most shit have the most power.

  115. Anybody read the latest BOFH by MrIrwin · · Score: 1

    You may have legal rights on all that shit.....go see http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/36116.html

    --

    And if you thought that was boring you obviously havn't read my Journal ;-)

  116. New Ad Slogans by felonious · · Score: 2, Funny

    Homeless - Will release methane for food

    When you shit you save lives.

    Give shit a chance

    Beans power the world

    Where do you want to shit today?

    We bring your shit to life

    We've Got the Time, You've Got the Shit.

    Where's The Shit?

    Do the shit

    Smart. Beautiful. Shit.

    Ok since I'm appealing to the lowest commmon denominator I have to add one more hilarious dung related item....

    Watch the movie Trainspotting with subtitles on and particularly the scene "The Worst Toilet in Scotland". When Mark Renton is on the toilet pay special attention to the words being subtitled and hilarity insues. One of the funniest things I've ever seen!

    --
    You aren't free to do anything, until you've lost everything.
  117. Nature is Pissed by AgentPhunk · · Score: 1

    Maybe now nature won't be pissed.

    Check out this link, halfway down is a T-shirt of an Angry Daisy t-shirt that pretty much sums it up.

    Note: I am in no way affiliated with this guys site, but I DO agree with a lot that he has to say.

  118. Yes Finally by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    Finally I can have a computer lab with all my PCs and monitors on 24x7 powered by shit.

    Halaluya!!!

  119. Won't work if people use powerful cleaners by willy_me · · Score: 1

    As anyone with a septic tank / field knows, powerful cleaners have a nasty tendency to kill bacteria - like those that this device uses to help generate electricity. So if this is going to work, people will have to stop using a lot of the popular cleaners out there.

    William

  120. Hasn't it been done already? by pmbuko · · Score: 1

    I can swear that I've seen a waste-powered DeLorean somewhere before...

  121. BOFH: Protecting bodily waste in the public domain by psuedo_samurai · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/36116.html

  122. But.. by patrick.whitlock · · Score: 1

    I already have shitty power at my house

  123. It's not a digester, people by lesterhv · · Score: 2, Informative

    To everyone who keeps saying digesters are nothing new; my greatgrandfather pooped into a digester and heated his house, etc. RTFA!

    The article is talking about a microbial fuel cell (MFC) that directly converts the energy to electricity.

    It is a first, since previous ones ran on glucose.

  124. So that's where it goes... by uberdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, I've always figured there was a problem with all those calorie counting books. A single chocolate doughnut takes a half hour of aerobics to burn off. Riiight! Sure it does. Calories in=Calories out sure. The books all assume calories out=background metabolism+exercise. However, calories out=background metabolism +exercise+waste. They miss this third component.

    1. Re:So that's where it goes... by kfg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, there is something woefully wrong with those books. They are oversimplified for their ignorant target market, oftentimes by members of that target market themselves who have no deep understanding whatsoever and are merely cribbing from other such books with no deep understanding.

      They do ignore waste, such as that found in excrement and the the heat put off by the body, but that's because that waste is of no interest to them.

      Nontheless they do manage to get some of the crude details right. Those charts ignore waste, but not by not taking it into account, rather by simply ignoring those calories not actually consumed by the body in producing useful energy.

      Yes, I can can power myself on my bicycle for half an hour at 15 mph or so on the fuel contained in a single chocolate donut. Three chocolate donuts will drive me at 25 mph for an hour or so. Substitute about three large bananas for each donut if you like. This is one of the reasons I prefer to bicycle rather than drive.

      The human body is an astoundingly wonderous device for turning hydrocarbons into mechanical energy. Just how wonderous can be seen from your own observation, a good deal of the chocolate donut ends up as waste in the urine and excrement, and yet I still drive my bicycle with what I've absorbed for half an hour.

      Pay no attention to those stupid calorie counting books. If you want to the know the real deal, explained in hard scientific fact, but written for the intelligent layman, go to your library where almost certainly find these works:

      Aerobics. The groundbreaking work itself, based on Dr. Kenneth Cooper's work with training in the military.

      Move on immediately to Covert Bailey's Fit or Fat . Covert is formerly a professional sports bum, and currently a Doctor of Exercise Physiology, with an absolutely wonderful way of expressing his knowledge for popular consumption. He's the Carl Sagan of exercise and diet. Read the book, but if your library has his tape series, watch them. If they don't, request them.

      From there go to the bicycling science books of Dr. Edmund Burke (also a Doctor of Exercise Physiology), the record holder for bicycling from Buffalo to Albany, NY (14 hours and some minutes. 320 or so miles). These are bit more hard core, but still intended for popular reading.

      Supplement with MIT Press's Bicycling Science and Engineering. This is a general lay scientific work on human power generation and the bicycle, the most efficient means of harnessing such power.

      If your interest is, or becomes, more in depth than these books cover they are full of references to the orginal studies they are based on.

      Then go buy yourself a bicycle, a treadle sewing machine, a wind up radio and a shakable flashlight. These are the most wonderous of all of man's creations so far. People are lazy, so they have spent most of their time developing technologies to avoid using their muscles, but if you combine high tech with muscle power you can accomplish amazing things, and all without foreign oil.

      Not to mention the benefits to strength, health, and general fitness.

      KFG

    2. Re:So that's where it goes... by Arcaeris · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand the fundamental premise of what a Calorie is and why it is a measure of metabolism.

      A Calorie is a measure of energy. One Calorie is 1000 calories. A calorie is the amount of energy required to raise one mL of water 1 degree celsius. A donut is a certain number of calories because in the process of breaking down the donut, that much energy will be produced. Calories are "burned off" as heat released as a byproduct of metabolism. So a half hour of exercise (or many hours of sitting on your ass) will use that same amount of energy and release that heat.

      The waste products are already factored into the chemical equations of the metabolic breakdown. Your formula should be: calories burned = rate of metabolism * time. Increasing the rate of metabolism (exercise) lowers the amount of time necessary to burn off the same number of calories. This whole "+waste" idea is nonsense.

      One counts their calories because eating excess food and taking on excess energy (so to speak) will cause you to gain weight as that energy is stored as fat. If you have enough muscle to satisfy yourself and are the shape you want to be in, the ideal would be to eat exactly as many calories as you use in a day. Many people count calories so that they eat less than they use in a day in the hopes of losing fat, but this is not the best method to do such a thing. That's a whole different post.

    3. Re:So that's where it goes... by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1
      Then go buy yourself a bicycle, a treadle sewing machine, a wind up radio and a shakable flashlight... if you combine high tech with muscle power you can accomplish amazing things, and all without foreign oil.

      For the most part yes, you're not required to use oil (foriegn or otherwise) to use and reuse these things (though the bicycle will need to be greased from time to time), but much oil is used to make them. Remember, plastic is created directly from oil, and the machines that build bicycles, radios, sewing machines, etc need oil. For that matter our old sewing machine needs oiling from time to time too.

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
    4. Re:So that's where it goes... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Note that I did not say "without oil." I know perfectly well where my bicycle tires, and the plastic shell of my bicycle saddle, come from, as well as the energy burned to create the high quality steel tubing from which it is made, and to deliver that tubing from Italy or England to my home in America.

      However, the amount of oil used to lubricate your sewing machine for hundreds of years is expended in a single automobile oil change, and easily derived from locally produced vegetable sources. One ear of corn a year ought to do it.

      My bicycle saddle is a nonconsubable. I will be able to hand it down to my kids in 30 years, and I've already used it for 30. The amount of rubber in my bicycle tires is about that in a couple of tread blocks of an automobile tire, much of the rubber, and its entire carcass, are from natural sources (latex and silk/cotton). I use about 3 oz. of grease in my bicycle every 10 years or so, and I'm the sort that completely strips it down and rebuilds it four or five times a year, seeing as how I travel about 10k mile/yr in all weather. Nevermind what I save in oil compared to casting and machining a single automobile's engine block.

      About 20 gallons worth of gasoline covers my bicycle oil usage for life.

      My treadle sewing machine is over 100 years old. thus its manufacture does not go against my personal consumption of oil. It works as well today as it did 99 years ago. Again, I'll hand it down to my kids. The only thing I've ever had to replace is the leather belt. If I were to design a new one I'd probably use a toothed rubber belt though, that requires oil to manufacture. It's a better sewing machine for patchwork and fine tailoring than any electric machine I've ever used, and I've used just about all of them ( I was a sewing machine salesman for a few years).

      Again, I didn't say anything about not using oil. I said foreign oil. Nor does much of that oil need to come from petroleum stocks, so little of it is used directly, and much of that is in the form of nonconsumables.

      Oil was used to make them. Oil is needed to use them. But no. not much oil. As much oil as is needed to make 22 pounds of machine, in the case of my bicycle, as oppossed to 22 hundred pounds of (oil consuming) machine in the case of a crackerbox Hyundai. As much oil was consumed in shipping its bits to me as is consumed in shipping 30 pounds, not 30 hundreds of pounds.

      And my bicycle even provides some of my electric power. When I'm riding a stationary trainer, why use a wasteful source of resistence when I can use a generator just as easily?

      Not to mention the fact that what I save in liablilty costs alone in a few years pays for all of my human powered devices for the rest of my life. Which means I don't have to work at all to make that money if I don't choose, which means I don't have to do the oil burning commuting to do the work either.

      Tell ya what. I propose a race. From LA to NYC. We each start with 500 gallons of refined oil. You use yours to make a car and drive it to NYC. I'll use mine to make a bicycle and ride it to NYC.

      I figure I'll be sipping a latte in Tavern on the Green while you're pushing your, whatever it is you manage to whip up vaguely resembling a car, through Pasadena.

      Good luck with the Rockies.

      Yes, I'll use oil. But not much. I'll have some left over on account.

      Since we live in an oil economy we could even translate this into purely monatary terms, since each dollar represents a certain amount of energy. Thousand bucks apeice (roughly analogous to 500 gallons of refined oil). Ah, seems like you're stuck in LA. You're a little short on your oil budget. And there I am, in Tavern on the Green, sipping my latte, although I did have to subsist on rice and lentils to fit the entire trip into budget. That's ok. I like rice and lentils.

      Look, I have nothing against cars, per se. The first thing anybody is prone to think when they first enter my house is

    5. Re:So that's where it goes... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      The caloric content of food is measured by burning it and seeing how much heat it gives off. This produces an inflated value because it counts the energy in those parts of the food that the human body is unable to metabolize, cellulose for example. The very fact that one can extract usable energy from waste means that we only use a fraction of the food energy we consume. Excess food energy is not all converted into fat. Some of it gets dumped overboard.

    6. Re:So that's where it goes... by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1
      ...if you combine high tech with muscle power you can accomplish amazing things, and all without foreign oil.

      And by exercising, you're actually PURIFYING your Bodily Fluids!

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  125. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about time we put that shit to good use!

  126. Something back is better than nothing back by ciphertext · · Score: 2, Informative

    The average person defecates how many times per day? I didn't see it in the article, so I'm assuming that this was the projected measurement of 1 defecation per person. That means you get .51 watts from 100,000 feces. Assume that upon average, those 100,000 people defecate once per day. It is possible that some people defecate less than once per day and others defecate more than once per day. You basically get 2.04 Mw a day for a city of 4 million. That would be electricity bought and paid for by the sewer system that could be used to assist in the operation of the treatment facilities. Perhaps the savings would get passed on to the home as a reduced sewage handling fee.

    --
    To know is to have knowledge....to understand is to be enlightened.
  127. numerical adjustment. by ciphertext · · Score: 1

    I inadvertantly pressed "submit" instead of "preview". The post should read as "you get .51 watts per feces" instead of "you get .51 watts per 100,000 feces".

    --
    To know is to have knowledge....to understand is to be enlightened.
  128. Scary thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see, it seems we occationally wage war now over oil. What does that say about what will happen once sewage, not oil, is the predominant method of generating power?

    Will we wind up in 2030 with the President trying to launch a specious invasion against China, and college students running around chanting "NO BLOOD FOR POO"?

  129. It's being done already by st1nky187 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last summer I went on a field trip to a sewage treatment plant. The power to run the plant comes solely from the methane they harvest. I asked about whether they sent any of the power back out to the grid and the guide said that they didn't generate nearly enough to do that. So, unless suburban New Yorkers have a lower methane output than everyone else I'm pretty skeptical that this would be really feasible.

  130. no they don't need a new building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't they already have the waste to energy plant in sim city?

  131. Perpetual Motions by Linker3000 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hey, I've also discovered that if I give myself a large electric shock I crap myself - what goes around comes around.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  132. earth closets vs water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article suggests that the by-product of methane-electricty might justify the cost of a western style sewage system to 3rd world countries. But surely given the scarcity of water in so many countries of the world water-wasteful sewage systems shouldn't be adopted where no system exists but rather earth closets, which, as the name suggests don't require water and are cheap to boot!

    1. Re:earth closets vs water by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Do you mean an outhouse?

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  133. More Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Place this centrally in a Marketing Department, and our energy needs are solved!

  134. Well I've certainly learned by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
    lets see ...
    • MFC is something to do with shit, ... oh ok, no change there.
    • flashlights will be replaced with flushlights, or was it craplights?? hmmm.
    • from now on you're craphouse will be you're powerhouse.
    • I've run out of dunny(toilet) humor, (are you kidding, never, not while I have breath in my body).
    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  135. Then don't! by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    Already digested waste could not possibly be more potent as a fuel than undigested food. For example, corn oil could be used to power motors, if it was thinned a little (there was even an article on /. about a diesel engine modification that allowed it to burn corn oil)

    There is so much unused food out there in the United States that could be used for fuel purposes, and it would produce much more than the pitiful 50KW/h per 10,000 of this system. Of course, many would argue that this food could be used overseas to feed the hungry nations out there, but really, that's all a myth, because if you give them food, local farmers suffer, governments lower subsidies, and they get screwed over even more.

  136. Man by geekoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    that's the shit!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  137. Someone needs to do the MATH! by bradbury · · Score: 1
    Human beings are essentially 100W (or 100 Joules/sec) machines. A recent home electric bill suggests that my home consumes ~1000 kWh/month. That seems to work out to ~280 Joules/sec.

    So even if humans are leaving behind perhaps 10% of their energy intake in their waste products it would appear that you are going to need something like the waste of 10 humans to power even a single 100W light bulb *if* you can get 100% conversion efficiencies (doubtful). It would seem that you would need a houseful of people lined up outside the bathrooms if you wanted to power the house using human waste products. Of course it would be nice to see a detailed thermodynamic analysis of these topics but that doesn't appear to be forthcoming from the popular press.

    This seems to be a case of "hype" over "substance".

  138. 1MW Fuel Cell plant about to go online by lofter59 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here:

    http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wtd/fuelcell/fuelcellcam. ht m

  139. It's been done for decades by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The main sewerage treatment plant in the city I live in burns methane to generate electricity, and generates more electricity than it consumes. The plant was built some time proir to 1980.

  140. Battery recharger? by mangu · · Score: 3, Funny

    If there was a battery you shoved up your ass for recharging, it would come in several sizes: A, AA, AAA, and AAAAAARGH!

  141. Shit recycling has already been going on... by localhost00 · · Score: 1

    It's called E-Mail Spam.

    --

    Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

  142. What will animal rights activists think...... by XSASpartanII · · Score: 1

    ...when they find out that this device 'wrests' electrons from bacteria? Do bacteria have human rights too? Hope activists don't get 'The Matrix' idea (we're just going to make copper-tops out of these poor defenseless microorganisms)....

  143. NAWA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nother Another Windows Article...

  144. I think you meant: by ruhk · · Score: 1

    "Hey, it seems that EA will have to create a new building for Simcity!" I think you meant: "Hey, now we'll have something to do with the next crop of EA games!"

    --



    404 Error: .sig not found.
  145. From the title by stuffedmonkey · · Score: 1

    ...I thought it was going to be another SCO article...

  146. Storage Tank Colours by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    ...you can see a row of six large pink tanks near the docks. These are the digesters at Seafield. (The reasons why they are pink are complex and architectural, not functional.

    Not functional? Most bulk storage tanks for fuels are painted white since it reflects sunlight. Explosive offgases tend to build up in these tanks and you don't need extra heat buildup in there (a friend of mine was killed in an explosion some years back due to this). One safety measure is to positively pressurize the tanks' vapour space with GN2.

    Co-gen is big business these days.

    1. Re:Storage Tank Colours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say about gas tanks is correct, but
      digesters usually need to be heated to keep the biological activity going. (Ideal temperature is around 35degC I think) Normally they are plain concrete, or at best some sort of brick, but in cold climates, they are clad with insulating material.

      I was actually involved in the construction of this facility, and after the initial design was submitted for comment, there was controversy about the lack of aesthetic consideration in the design. The plant is clearly visible from the air on approach to Edinburgh airport, from Edinburgh Castle and from the water on the Firth of Forth, so the appearance was more important than is usual for a sewage works.

      Some local consultants were engaged to improve the aesthetics, and they had the cladding on the digesters provided in lilac, to echo the supposed flame that they thought would be visible from the nearby gas flare.

      They were expecting a kind of blue flame like a gas stove, and they chose the lilac to go with this. Unfortunately, the gas flares for waste methane typically have a clear flame that is shielded anyway, so the effect was lost, but the digesters stayed lilac. I think they look OK.

  147. Processing Solid (and Liquid?) Animal Waste by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    You can have payback in 3 years, and then start making money on the juice you sell.

    So THAT's where Budweiser comes from.

  148. Los Angeles does this by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Hyperion Sewage Treatment facility, down over Dockweiler Beach, dumps out sewage-related gasses to the Scattergood Power Station.

    The best document I can find online today suggests that Scattergood generates 50 Megawatts. I seem to recall having seen other online documents that provided a lot more detail -- it's possible that those documents have been taken down for "security" reasons.

    In any case, it's converting one set of pollutants (sewer gas, methane, etc) into another (CO2, NOx), and generating power in the meantime.
    Without knowing all the details, it seems like a pretty good idea to me; there are probably aspects that I don't understand that might change my views.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  149. so... by malkman · · Score: 1

    Energy happens.

    --

    Robort knows all.
  150. Re:Just doin' my part..--Your math is not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At 5.1 watts output per person in a 110 volt system thats works out to 21 amps. Thats one breaker in your your breaker box of your home.

  151. If life gives you poop... by PHPhD2B · · Score: 1

    So somebody DID follow the wise words of Bug-eyed Earl: "If life gives you poop, make poop-juice."

    --
    --I am Sun Tzu of the Borg. Resistance is feudal.
  152. We are going to do this in NYC by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    Here in New York City the DEP Is going to install generators at its Redhook plant in the Brooklyn Navy Yard. The idea is to cut down on the shitty oders while cutting the plants need for energy. A friend of my fathers is a machinist at the plant near JFK airport (used to be in Redhook too)and he said it won't make much of a difference since most of the motors there are huge and have horse power ratings as high as 1000(745.7kW). Also allot of very large plant pumps run on large diesel engines. But it is a step in the right direction and it certainly will help all those poor people who practically live near the plants.

  153. Re:Decentralize the power grid and generate your o by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting


    This isn't a new idea - there are rural homeowners who do it. Micro-turbine hydro seems to be the most popular tech for it now, probably because it has the highest return on investment.

    Go find some issues of Mother Earth News, Countryside & Small Stock Journal, or Backwoods Home. There have been literally hundreds of articles over the last twenty years.

    Fuel Cells (and you don't necessarily need hydrogen, there are FC's that can utilize methane, natgas, LP...) are really going to revolutionize small projects like this, once the bugs in the FC tech get ironed out and it gets into mass production.

    What we really need right now to make this all take off in a huge way is better battery technology. Right now electrical storage efficiency sucks. If someone could come up with a really efficient way to store electricity, we could practically eliminate oil usage for energy production in a couple of generations.

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  154. Cool by thegreat682 · · Score: 1

    That is some cool shit.

    --
    Hard Hat Area: Sig Construction Zone
  155. Poo Power by CPlusPlusOwnsYou · · Score: 0

    This sounds like a good idea to me.

    The way I figure it, if 1 million people were regular (once a day) in a city, that would produce 5.1 million watts per day.

    What about china with 1 billion people, say they were all regular aswell. Thats 1 billion watts per day to add onto your power grid.

    What about non-human waste aswell? Cows, pigs, etc.. Surely you can produce energy out of that aswell?

    --
    "Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
  156. Mibrag by LoudChris · · Score: 1

    A german company Mibrag is doing simillar things. Mixing sewage with coal.

    http://www.mibrag.de/

  157. we have a lot of ... by _Qiang_ · · Score: 0
    we have the biggest amount of waste .. here in China. er.. ;)

    anyway, are we talking about firedamp here ?

    the small village where my grandma lives in china was doing that 6 or 7 years ago.
    though it's not everywhere but it's definitely being used. to power the eletricity etc.

  158. Old news by benh999 · · Score: 1

    This kind of crap (pun intended) has been around for some time.

  159. Re:Just doin' my part..--Your math is not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, that's P = I*V
    Power (watts) = Current (amps) * Volts (volts)

    5.1W = 110V * I

    I = 5.1 / 110

    I = 0.046 amps

    DO THE MATH RIGHT!

  160. Hey SCO ought to fit right in... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    After all they're full of crap and they're continually spewing out more all the time!

    1. Re:Hey SCO ought to fit right in... by m1chael · · Score: 0

      Dr Evil: Now all you need to do is strap one of those generators onto ********'s mouth. I will call this, Project McBridle! Muahaha Muahaha Muhahaha...

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  161. another perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cow's fart is more powerful than human turd.

  162. This sounds familiar... by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Mad Max!

    All those piggies in the underground slop center producing methane for those wacky demo derby racers!

    Oooh...I can see the future now...

  163. Pollution by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 0

    I suspect that environmental regulations don't allow them to simply dump raw methane (with other nasty gases) straight into the atmosphere from the waste plant, however. Considering the BIG PIPE sewer project in Portland has a pricetage of $300 million just for the West side, $1.3 million is a bargain to get some (basically) free electricity without building another damn or something.

  164. Slogans by T-Kir · · Score: 1

    Sewage power!

    ...Crikey, going OT a bit but I immediately though of the Spice Girls!

    Well, if you mix their Girl Power slogan and the fact that they were shit, then voila... "Sewage Power".

    :)

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
  165. We already been sorta doing it for years... by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    I know of at least one power plant in northern CA that uses a combination of natural gas and sewage gas. The gas turbines used in a lot of power plants now are quite capable of running on different kinds of fuel without running like crap.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  166. Hey pinheads!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a class you bickering pissants! It's RESEARCH. Take a look at the ENIAC or the first transitor...better yet, finish off that GED you've been working on.

  167. This explains alien abductions by WeaverBen · · Score: 1

    If you can get power out of poop with a suitable electrode, the space aliens abducting folks and using alien probes must just be recharging their batteries.

  168. Any Modern Sewage treatment facility by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    uses the Methane from digester's to power the pumps and for internal electrical production usualy there is a small surplus. Wheeling charges usualy make it uneconimical to sell it

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers