Slashdot Mirror


Linux for iPod Matures

elinenbe writes "The Linux on iPod Project has just crossed a milestone. Currently their firmware works on all ipod models other then the new mini. Sound plays and for many people it has more features then the original iPod firmware!"

100 of 469 comments (clear)

  1. There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by tcopeland · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...although, as the announcement says, "Most things seem to be working but there are still some problems with IDE & the framebuffer."

    Wired has an article on this, too.

    1. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by mikeee · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, other than the storage and display it's fine?

    2. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by loginx · · Score: 5, Funny

      There might also be a few problems with the audio not working...

      Everything else appears th be just fine though...

    3. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Funny
      And input is still glitchy....

      ...but other than that, we're aces all around.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by capmilk · · Score: 2, Funny
      > What would anybody want in a Linux system besides the BASH prompt??

      A tcsh prompt.

  2. Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone know enough about the IPOD architecture to say if it would be possible to fix up this linux to play OGGs? All I want for xmas is a cool MP3 player that plays mp3s and oggs :)

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll settle for Easter OGGs

    2. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by kinzillah · · Score: 3, Informative

      May I suggest the Rio Karma?

      --
      Douglas P. Price
    3. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by cujo_1111 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The OGG player runs at 80% of normal speed. So when you play rave music it sounds like house music, when you play speed metal music it sounds like metal music but when you play pop music it still sounds like crap.

      If only they could get the OGG player to play at 150% speed, then all music would be chipmunk music...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    4. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by BillyBlaze · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's hope for real-time playback, not just 80%. See here, someone is working on it again, and others think the hardware is sufficient.

    5. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Drakonian · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have *very* good reason to believe the iPod hardware is sufficient to play MP3s at real-time. ;)

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  3. Command line? by cujo_1111 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do you use a command line interface on an ipod?

    --
    If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    1. Re:Command line? by Nebu · · Score: 5, Informative

      How do you use a command line interface on an ipod?

      If you read the documentation, it says when the iPod boots the Linux kernel it will automatically configure its local ethernet device (ethernet over firewire/IEEE1394) and then starts inetd so that network connections via telnet may be made.

      The default configuration is for the iPod to use 192.10.1.2 and to allow telnet connections. The default address may be changed by editing the /etc/rc script.

    2. Re:Command line? by McCrapDeluxe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Scrollwheel moves through a list of letters. Middle button confirms selected letter.

    3. Re:Command line? by System.out.println() · · Score: 4, Funny

      The scroll/touch wheel wouldn't be too hard to turn into a keyboard. spinspinspin TAP spinspinspinspin TAP, you've got "ls".

    4. Re:Command line? by End11 · · Score: 2, Funny

      TELNET?? surely thats insecure!!
      i'll just have to wait untill they get openbsd running on it, with ssh

      --

      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
    5. Re:Command line? by Bilestoad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Generally I don't give a shit about desktop Linux because the UI is crap. I tend to think of Linux desktop users as people fighting against reality for idealogical reasons. However, when the UI is out of the picture it's great.

      I use Linux on a server for FLAC/MP3 serving with Slimserver from slim devices. The UI in that case is a simple web interface, no command line required. It does the job it's supposed to do, and I don't much have to care what else it does. Windows in that situation would be too complicated and perhaps not capable of the very long uptimes my Linux box gets.

      On the iPod, it's a lot like the Apple iPod UI - task oriented, simple functions that do one thing well - or at least it will be when it's polished. Which is fine, I don't much care if Apple patent or copyright or sue or whatever. As long as I get to have menu items like "Capture from CF" and "Record" without buying garbage like the Belkin accessories that enable those functions (the Belkin CF reader should NOT be sold. It is incomplete, useless with RAW images). To think that Linux is going to let me use my iPod in more useful ways is awesome.

      It's the first Linux project I've ever thought I could be interested in contributing to. Well done guys! (and let's not forget the ucLinux people, who have been working for quite some time to get where they are.)

  4. Just dandy... now I can...? by fname · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is great, now that Linux can run on the iPod I can.... play music? Pretty good stuff. Now I don't have to rely on Apple's crappy interface or poor integration with iTunes.

    Honestly, I know this projects are mostly for shits & giggles, but the iPod seems to be about the least-appropriate MP3 player to port Linux too. You're paying a premium for software design & integration with the iPod. Linux on the Dell version would seem to be a more natural fit.

    1. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by iabervon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're also paying a premium for hardware design. The sand-proof controls are a real win. I doubt it would be especially hard to implement the interface (although it was probably hard to design it the first time). As for why, you might want to play ogg files. I'm not entirely sure where the system is actually stored, but you might be able to take one of the minis, remove the hard drive (and sell it for more than the cost of the ipod), and put in a CF 802.11 card. Then you could stream music from your computer or over the internet while wearing it around the house.

    2. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

      I propose a theorum: It does not matter how expensive a device is, some nerd will castigate and cripple it for no readily explainable reason other than pure anarchic hubris.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by moxruby · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then you could stream music from your computer or over the internet while wearing it around the house.

      Back in my day, we had no fancy shmancy ipods to wear around the house. We just turned the volume on the stereo up.

  5. And with the AAC announcment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe apple really is an "open" company, they just didnt want anyone to know =)

  6. Sighs... by moosesocks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let me reiterate this for the last time.

    On an MP3 player, the ability to run EMACS is not a feature. The lack of music-playing ability also seems like a pitfall.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:Sighs... by leomekenkamp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not? I also use EMACS on my home machine to play music...

      (ducks)

      --
      Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    2. Re:Sighs... by magpie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your right, but the ability to run VI is an essential.

      *ducks*

  7. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by mister_tim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree, but the article FAQ says:

    "1.2 Why would you do that?
    A number of reasons, but mainly because its there."

    But I think you're right overall - this seems a mostly pointless exercise to me

  8. Re:Why?? by cujo_1111 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, you are wrong. Only *BSD is dying...

    --
    If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
  9. Say what? by numbski · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where are you getting "for many it has more features than the original firmware" from?

    Seems to me everything is very basic, unless you count the ability to browse by file a new feature, but the datbase accessibility of the original firmware is conspicuously missing.

    Still...I like it. The iPod has a usb bus. A firewire bus. Throughput is an issue, but I imagine some hotplug devices will get support. ;) How's about automount picking up on another iPod plugged into the firewire bus and mounting it fat32, access it's database, copy the files over and naming them logically based on either id3 tags or on the database, and then update the localhost database? >:)

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:Say what? by GoRK · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the USB in the ipod is not host mode, so you can't really attach something to it; but firewire is a different story.. In theory you could do all kinds of things with that.

    2. Re:Say what? by dave420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I already wrote one of those, but for Windows. It uses PHP to parse the iTunesDB file on the ipod, and it extracts the MP3s off the ipod to the disk, storing them in an artist > album > song directory structure, re-tagging the mp3s with the fields from the iTunesDB file. It even makes .m3u playlists from the playlists on the ipod... It can also update a MySQL database with the song details, which I use for powering my web-based ipod streaming software. I can listen to my ipod wherever I am. It even caches the mp3s on my work PC (I have a lot of hard disk space), so when the ipod's disconnected, the web-interface still works. I can sit at home listening to my ipod over an SSH tunnel and wireless access :-P That's as portable as I want my music :)

  10. Linux on an iPod? by Perdition · · Score: 5, Funny

    Begun the "KDE looks better on iPod than Gnome" war has.

    --
    Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
  11. Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't get me wrong, I love Linux (I manage an 80-node Linux Beowulf cluster at work) for the things that it's good it. But why would you take a working iPod and install Linux on it? It's not as if you get a discount on your iPod for running Linux. And it's not as if the Linux community has produced a wealth of iPod "killer apps." Straight out of the box, the iPod does what it's supposed to do. And until Linux has native support for some of the consumer technologies that make the iPod so cool (i.e., DirectX) what is the point of installing Linux on it? I realize that there's a certain "cool factor" involved with being able to run Linux on (insert consumer electronics device here), but at what point does one cross the line from usability over to zealotry? The fact that I can run Linux on my toaster isn't going to help me make bagels in the morning.

  12. try reading the FAQ by aaron+p.+matthews · · Score: 2, Informative

    3.3 Is there a OGG player
    The Tremor player is running at about 80% real-time. Apparently an update is on the way so hopefully that will provide some speed-up.

  13. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Nebu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why would one run linux on an ipod?

    So that you can put an OGG player on there and not have to convert your OGGs whenever you wanna listen to them on the go.

  14. Lots of possibilities by (exu)+$viality$ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even though many of you ask, "Why??" the news of a new OS for the iPod does present some interesting possibilities. iPods could be used as webservers (a webserver in the palm of your hand) or fileservers. Now that would be cool.

    --
    "I know kung-fu" -Neo, The Matrix
    1. Re:Lots of possibilities by cujo_1111 · · Score: 2, Funny

      a webserver in the palm of your hand

      You are gonna need one hell of an firewire extension cord when you are on the go...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    2. Re:Lots of possibilities by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, sure would. Except:

      1) The iPod does not have any networking capabilities. You'd have to plug it in to a slave device to get this functionality, and in doing so you'd still have little more than a hard drive.

      2) If you really want to waste your time making a palm sized file or webserver, you'd be much better off with a pocket PC or miniATX machine. Seeing as these already operate as a web/file server in the palm of your hand, really you add nothing by doing the same with an iPod.

      3) WTF do you want a portable file server for in the first place? File servers are supposed to be STATIONARY. That's why they're servers...so they can efficiently deliver you files without you having to get up! If the fucking thing is a portable hard drive already, you'd be much better off just copying files from it. The extra overhead and memory cost are just going to slow down the transfer, which would be inefficient to start with considering the kludges you'd have to pull to get the thing on the network (without slaving it to a PC).

      4) Anybody who thinks that an inefficient, clunky interface podged onto an MP3 devices just to make it a webserver is cool should really consider devoting some of their energy to real problems in computing.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:Lots of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You sound like an asshole. Are you an asshole? I'm just saying because you really sound like one, is all.

    4. Re:Lots of possibilities by Napoleon+Blownapart · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wrote a webserver that ran on a 3G mobile phone once. Is that cool?

  15. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by John+Miles · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Because the reverse-engineering effort needed to make it happen will yield other fruits.

    I'd like to know how to add a remote display and simple button-driven UI to an iPod, for instance. My old PC-based car MP3 player is too big and clunky to fit in my current daily driver, and I'd like to come up with a way to interface its LCD and track-selection buttons to an iPod, using a microcontroller to do the dirty work rather than a whole PC. I'm about to go surf their tech notes to see if they offer any clues, even though I have no intention of running Linux on the iPod (if I can help it).

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  16. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because one cannot leave well enough alone.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  17. Two Words - Stereo Recording by ericdano · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would happily put linux on my iPod if it would record stereo tracks. I hear it is technically possible, but.........no one has anything other than those crap voice recorders (mono).

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  18. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Nebu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Will it transparently sync with itunes or will it be syncable the hard way only ?

    Straight from the site's FAQ: Probably. At this point the software support is still very immature. I haven't tried any of the software available for accessing the iTunes database under Linux.

    If someone donates me an iPod, I'll gladly try it out and tell ya if it works. ;)

  19. Who put Tux into that little box? by Xilo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anybody know if he's claustrophobic? Such a little window, geez..

    Next generation power for iPods.. Tux running on an exercise wheel?

    --
    Read; Write; Execute
    1. Re:Who put Tux into that little box? by Damiano · · Score: 3, Funny

      Umm... Tux doesn't *need* Windows.

  20. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by djroute66 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember how Peter Jackson used an iPod as a storage method? This is an example of how an iPod can do more than just be an MP3 player. With a fully customizable operating system with the GNU tools you have no ends of the possibilities.

  21. Why not use these skills for something useful ? by jdifool · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I know the 'subject' seems flamebait, but let me explain.

    Linux on an Ipod is basically pointless. Especially on this very device, which is what hip people buy in the first place (don't get me wrong, I have one). That doesn't mean people can't tweak with it, but it's not that useful, since the geek population using iPods is outnumbered by the common consumers.

    On the other hand, what about making a file browser that allow you to go through the files you stored on your pod ? I usually store isos, books, games, and the like on my 30Gb, and I really would like to be able to rename, delete, transfer to my comp directly from the iPod...

    Of course, I could move my ass, but I'm not a techie. My 2 cents.

    Regards,
    jdif

    --
    Let's overcome our weakness.
  22. Obligatory Emacs Comment by Mr.G5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good thing they make a 40 gig iPod, you'll need it to fit on Emacs! :-)

  23. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought the iPod didn't have to horsepower to decode vorbis. IIRC most mp3 players have an actual hardware chip that decodes the files, and i also remember a story on here a few months back about the first ogg vorbis decoder chip. Coming soon to cereal boxes near you...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  24. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Bobdoer · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hey, you stupid kids, stop poking well enough and leave him alone!"

  25. it plays SOUND? .... wow, what's next? by iamhassi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "The Linux on iPod Project has just crossed a milestone. Currently their firmware works on all ipod models other then the new mini. Sound plays and for many people it has more features then the original iPod firmware!"

    don't even read this, just mod me flamebait, but isn't playing sound (perferably music) the entire purpose of a mp3 player? What exactly did the Linux on iPod do before? Display a cute penguin and nothing else? Forgive me if I don't consider playing sound a milestone.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  26. It may just be me... by Perdition · · Score: 5, Funny

    But if you could get that Beethoven conducted by a robot illegally downloaded onto your Beowulf cluster of Linux iPods and played it back through your sake-soaked wooden speakers as Cowboy Neal dances like an insensitive clod, I believe this site would somehow slashdot itself.

    --
    Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
  27. Re:Linux on something that small? by fpga_guy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Get ready for the embedded linux revolution!

    ipodLinux is based on uClinux, which is a version of Linux that runs on processors without an MMU (Memory Management Unit).

    The research group where I work is quite involved in embedded linux work. Last year I ported the Linux kernel to an FPGA-based processor called Microblaze. I'm now doing all sorts of fun stuff involving dynamically self-modifying hardware and other bizarro stuff. All good fun.

    uClinux is running in something like 20 million devices, ranging from DVD players to netowrking routers and embedded VPN servers.

    Give it a couple of years, and the embedded linux market will make the desktop look puny. The talk on slashdot is all about the Linux desktop, but Linux is already winning the real war, embedded systems.

  28. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by dpete4552 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not necessarily about being zealious or anything like that. It's just a hobby project for now. Some Linux coders got to gether and thought it might be fun to do just for the hell of it. Just something to tinker with. Then again that's how Linux itself started out so who knows. I think it really does have some potential once it matures a little.

    --
    http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
  29. Misdirection... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...while this is certainly a technical achievement, is it a useful one? Yeah, who am I to be the arbiter of that, but my mind is boggling.
    My microwave oven doesn't run linux yet; can someone get hacking on that?
    Seriously, with all of the real projects that need coders, this falls way off the map into the "There be Dragons" category.

    "Linux: We don't have a real UI yet, but it doesn't matter because your garage door opener doesn't need it."
    [shakes head sadly]

    1. Re:Misdirection... by moxruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, with all of the real projects that need coders, this falls way off the map into the "There be Dragons" category.

      You're right. Coders have an obligation to provide their skills free of charge to a project that "needs" it, rather than one they enjoy working on...

    2. Re:Misdirection... by mlk · · Score: 2

      (bye bye Karma)
      Who the fuck are you to choose what people spend their time on?

      You want a good UI, write one.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  30. Its all about aesthetics by gotr00t · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Though the Rio Karma has impressive specs for a lower price than the Apple iPod, it still sells far less than the iPod. The reason for this is all about aesthetics. I showed some people the iPod and the Karma at an electronics store, and all of them said that the iPod looked more attractive. Though many websites claim the Karma has a smaller footprint, they fail to point out that, like one person said, it was "thicker than a hockey puck."

    I guess Jobs was right in saying that Apple's competetiors don't "get it." The iPod Mini, for example, may seem like an absurdity to us /.ers because of its high price, low capacity, and low feature set. However, it was an instant bestseller, with so many preorders and subsequent purchases that supplies were exhausted in a matter of weeks. The truth is, the average person thinks differently from the average /.er.

    1. Re:Its all about aesthetics by ZeroLogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a typical slashdot type, hell, programming pays my bills, but i held out on buying an iPod UNTIL the mini came out.

      Why? Because I walk everywhere I go, and the mini is small enough that it fits (when clipped into my jean pocket) above my pager and cell phone. Plus, it's just damn cool. And 4 days of music is more than i need on me at any one time.

    2. Re:Its all about aesthetics by a+whoabot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's cause the iPod is just a sign for the average person to consume. They have it and for them it signifies: "Hey, look I'm hip." Even the songs they put on, just more signs. "Oh yeah, the Darkness, they rock. They're like Zeppelin."

      The iPod, like most things, is not priced based on it's use or exchange value, just it's sign exchange value.

      Look at the ads for the iPod. They're just a bunch of silhouettes of girls and guys with hip hair cuts holding their iPods over a background of nouveau-retro-colored designs. "Look how 'cool' our ad is! Don't you want to be cool?", is what it says. It's not a list of specs or prices. Or look at their ad-type deals with Value Village and its retro, "flower power" image. "It's cool to shop at Value Village. It's, like, retro, and lo-fi!" Just another sign. Watch the yuppies when someone says "nice shirt" to them, they're quick to jump in, "I got it at Value Village! It was used!" "Used" isn't good because it allows more practical pricing(if you look at Value Village pricing, it's still ridiculously high -- and you don't have to buy any clothes actually, except for perhaps socks and underwears, you can make by fine just with what you can get for free or find or what you already have), it's good because it's "cool": it has a high sign exchange value.

      Jobs displays his shallow yuppiness flagrantly when he says people don't "get it" about the Apple "hipness". Maybe some don't. But some do, but they also "get" a little more: that's it's just meaningless signs and false worth. So the ones who may not "get it", are not missing anything: what they don't "get" is absolutely nosense, and that's alright.

    3. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Basehart · · Score: 4, Funny

      Man, you just don't get it!

    4. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Drakonian · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Nice rant. But gimme a break. The iPod is extremely valuable. I think it's the coolest thing I've ever owned. Despite paying a lot of money for my 1st gen 5 GB iPod, it's well worth every penny. I use it all the time. It works perfectly. It is an absolute delight to use. It honestly improves my quality of life. Listening on the train, listening while walking home, listening while studying, etc.

      Oh, and even Joe Satriani digs that Darkness tune.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    5. Re:Its all about aesthetics by b17bmbr · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm a typical slashdot type, hell, programming pays my bills

      if programming actually pays your bills, you're not a typical /. type.

      (ducks)

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    6. Re:Its all about aesthetics by killjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You left out the biggest one of all.

      Harley Davidson.

      The CEO of harley davidson once said "we are not a motorcycle company, we are a fashion company". People don't buy harleys because they want a good bike they get one because they think it makes them cool and rebellious. This despite the fact 99% of harley owners are doctors, lawyers, assorted actors and politicians. What the heck put on a harley shirt, harley leathers, harley helmet, get on your harley and go to sturgis and hang out with all the other people wearing the exact same clothing and riding the same bikes to prove you are different and cool.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    7. Re:Its all about aesthetics by a+whoabot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not saying that it cannot be truly valuable to anyone. You seem to have use for it, that's good for you. I will give you, or anyone, "a break", for sure for sure. You need not reply if you feel authentic, I can't judge you from here. If you have no regard for the "signs" I describe, then you're obviously on the good side of my rant. And all of us are inauthentic to some extent of course: I, myself, don't feel like some sort symbolically-exuding philosopher-poet in that aspect, far from it, this is just kind of an area of interest for me, tis all.

      I've heard some Satch(at least, I have Live in San Fran buried somewhere, I think I've heard more), but he's hardly a true artist is the musical sense. He's more a guitar acrobat. Perhaps he makes an art out of his acrobatics(or some music-acobatic hybrid), but I wouldn't say he makes much of an art out the music itself. There's a world of difference in relation to the art of the actual music between someone like Mr. Satriani and, say, Pere Ubu. I would stress the difference between musicianship and musicality. And I've never heard the Darkness, actually.

    8. Re:Its all about aesthetics by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I forgot to mention the sound. It's the old "I am rebellius because I am rude" attitude.

      I figure these guys have to be all polite and ass kissing at work. On the weekends they get to shit on all the people in their neighborhood and that makes them feel better.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    9. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Espen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as Apple sells iPods as quickly as they are produced their price IS the market value (or below).

    10. Re:Its all about aesthetics by rishistar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Only Apple can sell consumer electronics at 135% of market value."

      But 'brand' and 'aesthetics' are part of what the market value is. Otherwise you'd be paying 10 bucks for Nike trainers, and be getting free bottles of Chanel thrown in for good measure.

      I'm not a fan of Apple and have no intention of buying any of their imac/powermac stuff on the basis that it is more expensive - so yeah on the home computer range they may well have messed up on price. Mac owners will no doubt argue - better components and OS which is fair enough. Maybe it is better...its just not better enough for me to spend and extra 500 pounds to get one.

      In a capitalist system 'market value' is what people will pay for the product - not what the cost of components + advertising/sales stuff + bit of profit is. So with the iPod and iPod mini they may have actually got the market value bang on the nose. Personally I don't like the all white iPod myself, but am sorely tempted by the minis.

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    11. Re:Its all about aesthetics by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

      People don't buy harleys because they want a good bike they get one because they think it makes them cool and rebellious.

      Fuck that belt-driven piece of shit. So much power loss, and it makes the single part that connects the engine to the drive wheel a regular maintenance replacement. Give me anything else, a chain, (preferably) a shaft, but not that belt. Harley owners are frequently proud of that belt. Can't figure out why, it's the single most annoying point of failure on those bikes.

      I can make any bike sound like a Harley, but I don't want *noise*. I want comfort and weight on my bike. I want to be able to cruise at 70 without having to bend over and put my forehead on the handle bars, and I don't want to be driven deaf by the exhaust noise to do it. Yeah, yeah, loud pipes save lives and all. Riding smart will do more for you than any pipe noise.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    12. Re:Its all about aesthetics by pyite · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just a question... have you met many bikers? Most of them are some of the nicest people I've ever met and have the utmost respect for life and property. Way to be prejudiced to a large lot based on the actions of a few. Also, typically on the roads, "real" bikers tend to be very conservative in their driving as opposed to the ricers who feel the need to weave between traffic at 100mph+.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    13. Re:Its all about aesthetics by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Two points:

      No, you can't make any bike sound like a Harley, unless you don't know what the Harley sound is. A big chunk of that sound is from the angle seperating the clinders, and the sound is copyrighted. You are breaking teh law if you ever sell that bike that you made to "sound like a harley", which probaly just means "loud" to the non-mechanic's ears (even a quiet Harley sounds like a Harley).

      Regarding the "belt-drive" - well, if you like a harsh ride on your "comfy cruiser" then sure, go with a chain or shaft-based final drive. If you're concerned about making your cruiser more comfortable, *quieter*, or otherwise more livable, stick with Harley's lifetime warranteed carbon-fiber belt-based final drive. Then, go get a service manual and learn how to adjust it properly. I've got several friends who are Harley riders (and Harley mechanics, in some cases). They ride a *lot*. The final drive gives no problems.

      Take a physics course some day. Note that the belt doesn't stretch and get hot, nor does it make any noise. Where's the "energy loss"? Now look at all of the pivot points in a chain. Then listen to the noise. *That* is power loss - power being converted to heat and noise. I don't know how many chains I've broken over the years on various chain-driven devices (several), but I've never broken a Harley drive belt...

      Eh, good troll, though. Most Slashdot readers have no mechanical ability whatsoever. :p

    14. Re:Its all about aesthetics by rethin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cloudmaster,

      You're right on all those technical points but...

      I'm sorry to say that the Harley Davidson company doesnot hold a copyright on the sound. They did try to Trademark it back in the 90's but gave up on that for two reasons.
      1. its pretty much impossible to trademark a sound
      2. The metric cruisers didn't really try to copy the sound (they produced engines than were in tune) and so lost the commercial incentive to protect the "sound".

      But right on abou the belt :-)

      Rethin

    15. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My iPod gives me an alarm clock, the ability to view text files, autosyncing with my address book and iCal, auto-syncing and charging over Firewire (or IEEE 1394 for those who don't get it), an alarm clock, a way to steal software from Macs at CompUSA, and a bootable backup drive in event of emergencies.

      And all without having to switch batteries or analog tapes.

      If cost was all anyone cared about, Mercedes would be out of business.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    16. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The CEO of harley davidson once said "we are not a motorcycle company, we are a fashion company". People don't buy harleys because they want a good bike they get one because they think it makes them cool and rebellious.

      Speaking as a biker, riding a Harley is a unique experience.
      Its powerfull, its loud, it shakes the earth.

      And people get out of your damn way.
      Now, if you don't ride, you can't understand the value of that, but normal bikes are ignored by cars, they change lanes to a lane where you are, they don't give you the right of way, etc.
      On a Harley, the rumbling makes them react as though you were an 18 wheeler or something.

      And as for the iPod, everything about coolness is true, BUT its also the best mp3 player there is. The interface is excellent, it holds a shitload of music, and the synching with iTunes makes it a breeze to manage.

      So sometimes something is cool because it deserves to be cool. Other times its simply marketing hype. But the iPod and Harley deserve their status.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    17. Re:Its all about aesthetics by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Powerful? You and I must have ridden a different harley. That twist grip on the right handlebar isn't a throttle my friend... it's a volume control.

  31. Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by smilinggoat · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have had 2 of the lovely little Karmas die on me. RMA'ed the first one after an HD failure only to have it replaced almost a month later by one that skips while playing most of my songs and has repeatedly required formatting just to get it to shut down.

    Once I RMA this sucker for the 3rd time I will sell it and pick up the iRiver iHP-120 20 gigs of OGG, WMA, MP3, WAV, plus a remote with LCD, FM radio tuner, and can record into WAV or MP3 in realtime from a built-in mic or stereo line-in. Pretty kickass. Sure the Karma is about $75 cheaper, but for a unit that WORKS, it's worth it.

    Plus, the Karma only has a 90 day warrantee. The iRiver has a 1-year warrantee.

    1. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by Fizgig · · Score: 4, Informative

      I second that. I had one power button failure and then one where the little wheel slipped out of place (if you read the forums, this is pretty common even if you take care of your karma).

      I just got back my third karma today, and it had a sticker saying, "We will respect your initial warranty, but this unit does not come with an additional warranty." Of course, by this point they've had my karma longer than I have (it took 1.5 months to get the second replacement), and the original warranty has expired. Plus, I think it's illegal not to give a warranty on RMA'd products.

      I like that the Karma supports oggs, and it's a fairly nice device, but it's pretty fragile (two external moving parts), and the RMA service is _horrible_!

  32. What happened to the NetBSD port to iPod? by gatesh8r · · Score: 2, Funny

    The last time I heard it was after the ENIAC port which is after the PDP-7 which is after...

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  33. Firmware replacements are the way to go by gotr00t · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Perhaps this sounds like a very insignificant step in the development process for the iPod Linux distro, however, don't forget that the whole point of making a firmware replacement is not for "coolness," but rather for adding in functionality that would not otherwise be there in the stock firmware. There are tons of features missing from Apple's firmware, such as a graphical equalizer, queues (no, that on-the-go thing will not do!), dynamic playlists, so on, so forth. And just to think, the iPod has enough resources, processing power, to run a good OS.

    For an example of what a replacement third party firmware can do for an audio player, check out RockBox. It turns the obsolete Archos Jukebox 6000 series models into machines capable of playing music much better than the stock firmware, and also capable of doing other stuff as well.

    The bottom line: iPodLinux is a work in development. When it reaches production quality, it WILL have more features than the stock firmware, and will support more formats as well. (ogg, anyone?)

  34. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by trans_err · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You missed the memo on playlists, right? Turns out that you can use them to create whole new methods of organizing your music... Neat, eh?

  35. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by CableModemSniper · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the site Tremor (the integer only implemnetation of ogg/vorbis) currently decodes at approx. 80% of real-time on the iPod.

    --
    Why not fork?
  36. Why It's Useful by obijywk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reason to have an alternative operating system for the iPod is to add new features! There are so many great things that can be done with the hardware in the iPod, that Apple is only beginning to scratch the surface of (or not even considering at all).

    • Using the iPod as a recording device (better then those little voice recorders can do)
    • OGG (and other formats as well) support
    • iPod-to-iPod music transfers (legally questionable but still a cool concept)

    Not to mention adding features to the 1G and 2G iPods that are only available on the 3G firmware... I would run Linux on my 2G iPod if it provided functionality similar to the On-The-Go playlists on the newer iPods. Open-source firmware could even improve on these features, such as having the ability to name and save a playlist you've made away from your computer.

    Finally, feature additions such as these might keep Apple on their toes - they couldn't let their own firmware become stale, because the alternative would always be improving. I think the Linux on iPod firmware is a great idea, and I wish the developers the best of luck.

  37. Limitless by Nikker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    For a bunch of nerd you disappoint me...
    • - How about pluging this thing via 1392 to an external CD-RW ???
    • - How about using the interface via WI-FI to do war driving / walking ;)
    • - How about using it to hold ISO's of your latest distro that you could use as a more direct form of data transfer .....
    Just to name a few ideas ......
    This can be alot cooler than some of you are even starting to scratch the surface
    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    1. Re:Limitless by pmjordan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assuming Firewire is like USB the IPod will only work as a client, the CDRW will be a client making this impossible
      You're making a false assumption. Firewire is a peer-to-peer bus, in theory, each device can talk to any other device on the bus. There is a root node, but that's elected on every bus reset ([un-]plugging of a device) as far as I know. So a CD-RW may well be possible. phil

  38. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by kidgenius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get an iRiver ihp-120. It plays OGG, lets you read text files on it, and stores files in folders. So your music is as nicely organized as it would be on your main box. I have one and I love it. They run just as much as an ipod for the same amounts of storage.

  39. iRiver? by Twintop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone heard of an effort to get Linux running on any of the iRiver series of MP3 players? I know they don't have as large of a hard drive (mine has 256 for storage, but they go up to 1GB I believe), but their firmware is just plain crappy. It might be interesting to see support for the FM Radio Tuner on it, too.

  40. More Features by Bruha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be cool to see a small 65k color touch screen that could be put into this unit also. Then maybe a media player could play small videos from the hard drive as well.

    I think the "Better features is a bust but the future holds promise"

    iPod meshing would be cool to tie into your buddies iPod and access his files and maybe someone could make aftermarket jackets that would let the usb port power a 1xRTT or 802.11x card which could turn the iPod into a digital media device over a network.

    With Linux the possibilities are endless!

  41. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There are tonnes of reasons! First, copy the Apple firmware look & feel as closely as possible. Then, add features and fix bugs. Here are a few ideas:

    • Fix the terrible lack of randomness in the shuffle
    • Implement cross fade
    • Implement on-the-go playlists for the people who originally clamoured for them - 1st gen owners
    • Implement a file browser
    --
    Random is the New Order.
  42. A mini Karma Review by ebbomega · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're having troubles.

    A lot of people are getting Hard Drive errors with their Karmas. I just got mine back from Warranty replacement (after a month-and-a-half wait and plenty of complaining). Mine broke after 2 weeks of use. Apparently, according to the folks at the Riovolution Forum a lot of people have had this problem (in the same time frame) and are currently going through Hell getting a replacement. I'm surprised I got mine so quickly.

    Aside from that, I'm liking the Karma a lot. I just hope my replacement doesn't crap out the same as the first one did. If it does I'm aiming for an iPod.

    Other than that, RMML (Rio Music Manager Lite) is a Java-based app that syncs up with the Karma over a dock that can be connected via ethernet. The coolness of this being that it's completely platform independent, and will run on any system that can run Java, including my fedora box. Its compatibility to be runnable on Linux is the main reason why I liked this. OGG and FLAC support are just extras. =)

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  43. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by mrklin · · Score: 2, Informative
    I see you have not used iTunes. Why not create a smart playlist that automatically grab all songs that got added to the library in the last x days?

    Oh right, you rather navigate through the nested folders to find your music!

    You are the perfect candidate for Linux on iPod that proudly proclaims it plays MP3.

  44. Re:Enough With The... + Some Ideas by EMIce · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is flamebait, and I should mod it as such, but I think it'll make more of a difference if I explain why I would.

    Who is going to go making playlists for every one of their folders and then update those playlists every time they add new folders? I see a problem here, one where the ipod playlists become a pain in the ass to keep up - why keep the same data in two places where they will surely fall out of sync without tedious manual synhronization?

    I also use folders to make a custom nested format which separates songs by language, style, and year. You can't do that with playlists. A final plus for me is that browsing by folder avoids using ID3 tags, many of which aren't present on the the thousands of foreign language mp3s I have. The original ipod firmware lists a lot of songs as Unknown for me - I have to play them to figure out what the songs are - how useful is that?

    The parent's response is similar to the many I saw on the ipodlounge forums. When people asked about browsing by folder, a bunch of apple zealots would shoot em down saying apple's way is better and that they should use it because it is easier. Well not in my case.

    -----Some Ideas for the Ipod Linux

    A neat thing that has been overlooked - wait till someone replaces the drive with a wireless CF card! We'll get an mp3 player that can be used anywhere around the house to stream music over the local network. We'll have to wait till the Linux firmware can actually play mp3s without skipping though, something the original article submission kinda implied could be done. It appears this is because they are relying on the processor to decode mp3s rather than whatever proprietary hardware mp3 decoder/encoder hardware is in there. Hopefully soon, if they do it at all, they will reverse engineer how to control the mp3 chip in there.

    Another idea - what about streaming HDTV over the network and through through the firewire port? A TV with firewire port can do the decoding! Streaming mpeg2 to a firewire equipped HDTV wouldn't require the ipod to do any decoding, so it appears there should be enough procesing power to do this. It'd be nice to see an ipod docked next to the HDTV, and able to play video content from the PC. Didn't Netflix just announce downloadable rentals? Write a program that transcodes the rental into mpeg2 in real time and streams it through the IPOD onto a big TV screen. Pretty neat.

  45. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by tkanerva · · Score: 3, Interesting

    let me add some more.

    * add SIDPLAY and MOD/XM support so that one can enjoy the full MOD galore without first going through the arduous task of converting them to AAC or MP#
    * implement a pitch control with the wheel (so I can do some actual dj'ing on the device, or, rather, on 2 devices :)

    what's more? there must be a lot more features I want to have. from file formats to fixing stupidities of the existing software :)

    --
    still running a x86? dinosaurs do exist!
  46. It does MP3, OGG, WAV and more by sagefire.org · · Score: 4, Informative
    Oh, if /.ers would RTFA...

    User Tools

    The full uClinux distribution contains many basic tools (including Busybox) already patched for use with uClinux.

    MAD is a MP3 player that does not require a FPU.

    Tremor is an OGG player that does not require a FPU.

    SoX is an audio processing application capable of playing a variety of music formats (.WAV is probably the most interesting here).

    Intel's IPP package and IPP MP3 Sample program. Intel's IPP is a highly optimised set of libraries that includes MP3 processing. The sample program seems to work fine under uClinux.

  47. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's not as if you get a discount on your iPod for running Linux.


    I for one am waiting for the protests and petitions demanding to be able to buy an iPod without an iPodOS tax...
  48. You know nothing, and presume everything. by mfh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's a suggestion: use the software you criticize, before you criticize it.

    iTunes' smart playlists are automatically synchronized with the iPod, and boast features that your "custom nested format" wouldn't ever dream of achieving.

    You can have:

    Normal, every-day playlists, with playback order sorted by name, artist, time, album, genre, last played, rating, or random.

    Or, you can have DYNAMIC, automatically synced playlists that update themselves based on any combination or exclusion of the following criteria:

    Album, artist, song BPM, bitrate, comment, compilation membership, composer, date added, modified, genre, grouping, kind, last played, my rating, play count, sample rate, size, song number, time, track number, year.

    That's a few more options than your "separates songs by language, style, and year" now isn't it?

    The grouping and contextual modifiers are the following: contains, does not contain, is, is not, starts with, ends with.

    This is presented as an arbitrary number and combination of graphical pull-down menus, easy enough for a novice user to use, yet powerful enough for someone versed in a language like SQL to understand and exploit to its fullest capabilities. What iTunes is doing is abstracting the presentation of your songs from the storage, which is what an mp3 player SHOULD do. The filesystem isn't smart, it isn't dynamic, and it isn't flexible. If you don't agree with this, then you're in denial. The very existence of playlists is proof positive that the abstraction is appropriate.

    Your "case" is a strawman argument. You made this wild scheme of organizing mp3s because your software had no decent way of organizing music and organizing your playlists. Now that you have this half-baked limp solution for organization, you don't realize that better functionality has been designed into other players from the beginning. You're in the dark, buddy. Step into the 21st century. You want to browse by folders? Browse the Library on disk and double click to play your selected mp3. You want it organized some other way? Use dynamic smart playlists.

    As far as ID3 tags go, it's nobody's fault but your own that your mp3s don't have that information in them. Another strawman argument. All of my mp3s have up-to-date ID3 information, either from CDDB or me typing in the info when I import something. Just because huge amounts of pirated mp3s don't contain correct information isn't a valid argument against the use of a useful technology like ID3.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  49. There's nothing ironical about it. by mfh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As long as we're talking about the original poster here, the original poster said iTunes' functionality lacked the ability to do things HE wanted.

    Except he was WRONG, it has the exact functionality he wanted, plus the functionality he said DIDN'T exist.

    Does this make any sense to you at all? My god. To recap:

    iTunes functionality includes his "custom" scheme of presentation, as well as MUCH MUCH more. He was complaining that iTunes' organizational functionality EXCLUDED the way he does things.

    Of course you can dream up of some inefficient, inflexible custom bullshit solution and complain that your solution doesn't exist in commercial software. That's the very definition of a strawman argument, which is what I'm trying to expose here.

    I'm not going to berate your old school ways of doing things (I wrote perl and bash scripts to parse and organize my mp3 library back in.. uhh, maybe 1998, but I've moved on from that morass of bullshit and settled down in the modern world now) but I _AM_ going to correct assumptions made that are totally wrong!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  50. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by tartanblue · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or you haven't heard of the Neuros: it has Ogg Vorbis, MP3, and WMA support.

    They've got a dedicated development team based in Chicago and they just shared the source to their syncing application.

    Disclaimer: I don't work for these guys, but I do own a Neuros 20GB and love the thing.

    Tartanblue

    --
    TartanBlue
  51. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So what do you have to smoke (and how much of it) before that sounds like it's playing at the correct speed?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  52. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Durandal64 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can already sort of do it with Griffin's media reader attachment. When your camera's memory card gets full, just take it out, plug it into the media reader, and all your pictures get stored on the iPod.

  53. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by hyperpixel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's an excellent exercise in porting Linux to new devices. We need people like this who are willing to flex their expertise and knowledge of embedded systems.