Slashdot Mirror


Listen to Internet Radio over Wifi

wildumut writes "There's an article on the Register about new WIFI radio tuners, worth a look. 'Wi-Fi is not only freeing up notebook and PDA users to connect to the Internet from anywhere in the home, it's also making Internet radio work (almost) like the real thing.'" The company website has some more information, but these aren't available for sale yet.

188 comments

  1. I've had it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've had wireless radio for years. It's called... erm... radio.

    1. Re:I've had it for years by summitraj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, you can listen from around the world with WLAN radio. To tune to stations other than commerical radios, try http://www.dxtuners.com You can even listen to amateur radio, air traffic control, police, and other frequencies from receivers kept around the world! I hope dxtuner can be tuned from WLAN radios too.

    2. Re:I've had it for years by dawg+ball · · Score: 1

      Yeah! A radio WITH wires would have been something new.

    3. Re:I've had it for years by timts · · Score: 0

      yeah, wifi only for very limited area, if you can get wifi access, better listen to real radio any way.

  2. Hell, I use it for video by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I support a football (soccer if you prefer :-) team that has a webcast of all the home matches. Since very few matches are televised per season, it's a good second-best, especially because I've got a nice fast broadband connection. Just take the portable into the front room, link it up to the projector using the VGA input, and watch the match with the video stream being served using WiFi from the router at the back of the house :-)

    The quality isn't as good as broadcast TV (!) but it's a damn sight better than radio :-)

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Hell, I use it for video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be a Manchester United fan.

  3. This sounds very scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doesn't this mean people will be able to drive around pulling radio broadcasts out of thin air? I don't want to live in a world like that.

    1. Re:This sounds very scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm wearing THREE pieces of tin foil today! One for AM, one for FM, and one for WiFi radio!

    2. Re:This sounds very scary by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the RIAA is gonna demand royalties for that technology...

    3. Re:This sounds very scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the blue tooth on my PPC2003 to talk with my Nokia 3650 which uses the built-in modem to connect to the Internet. I do this at 70+ MPH with now problem. I get about 56kbps which is enough for me to listen to di.fm passes through my car stereo. I love it and hope car stereo manufactures get blue tooth integrated soon.

  4. With all the Wi-Fi traffic... by dawg+ball · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... how long will it be before we can grill a chicken by hanging out the kitchen window on the end of a stick and cook it with RF?

    1. Re:With all the Wi-Fi traffic... by MemoryAid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Well, if a microwave oven is about 2000 watts, and a WiFi access point is about 1 watt, and it takes about 10 minutes to cook a chicken in a microwave (depending on size, of course), then it should take about 20,000 minutes to cook a chicken. Some adjustment needs to be made for the 'gain' of the microwave, because all the energy is trapped inside the box, and WiFi is radiated into free space. An additional adjustment needs to be made for proximity, because it is probably not convenient to have your access point close to your chicken.

      Well, I wouldn't try it after reviewing the (rough) numbers, because the chicken would definitely spoil before being cooked.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    2. Re:With all the Wi-Fi traffic... by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 2, Funny

      it is probably not convenient to have your access point close to your chicken.

      Am I the only one who thinks this sounds wonderfully dirty?

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    3. Re:With all the Wi-Fi traffic... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Some adjustment needs to be made for the 'gain' of the microwave, because all the energy is trapped inside the box, and WiFi is radiated into free space. An additional adjustment needs to be made for proximity, because it is probably not convenient to have your access point close to your chicken.

      A BIG adjustment. Remember the inverse square law.

      Unfortunately your chicken will cook sooner from the sunlight than from ambient microwave radiation. I'm a little more concerned about our brains, though, which don't need to be piping hot before serving.
      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    4. Re:With all the Wi-Fi traffic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are.

  5. Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Tune in later this year to hear "This is WIFI Radio, a Clear Channel Partner."

  6. It's global... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, but now you can get stations from all around the world where ever you are...

    I live in upstate new york, I am in a college town, so there is some decent radio, but when I want news from around the world, I want radio from around the world...

    I could read a lot of it on the internet, but that is hard to do while washing dished/making dinner/working on my bicycle...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:It's global... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So it's like shortwave radio?

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    2. Re:It's global... by sdmartin101 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Alas, shortwave is dead, or at least moribund. The BBC World Service stopped transmitting to North America a couple of years ago, arguing, in part, that their Internet streams served the NA market well enough.

    3. Re:It's global... by Ytsejam-03 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, but now you can get stations from all around the world where ever you are...
      Not only that, but get stations that don't just play the same five lousy songs over and over again.

      I've been listening to this station for several months now, and it beats the hell out of anything I've heard on the airwaves. Lots of indie bands, and yes, lots of bands that are not from the US.

      I look forward to the day when I can put one of these devices in my car and listen to internet radio as I drive around town. Of course, corporations like Clear Channel will use their money and political clout to prevent this from ever happening.
    4. Re:It's global... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prog rock? No shit that's not played on the radio anymore - everyone realized that Rush was crap.

    5. Re:It's global... by MyGirlFriendsBroken · · Score: 1

      The BBC World Service stopped transmitting to North America a couple of years ago, arguing, in part, that their Internet streams served the NA market well enough.

      To be fair that is probably a resonable move to make especially as the significant intended audience of the BBC World Service in all probability does not live in North America as Canada and the USA have had free press for a while.

      --
      If you read a speed reading book, does it take you less time to read the second half?
  7. Radical cheap solution by prostoalex · · Score: 3, Interesting


    At my house I have a small Wifi-enabled Avertec 3120 V plugged into the back of the stereo system. Had to set up Winamp for some easy key combination, like 'space' to start playing and N to stop.

    Then it's Internet Radio list in WinAmp, or Shoutcast.com, choose the one with the better bit rate and we're off with high quality Internet radio.

    Any cheap laptop with WiFi card or internal WiFi would work.

    1. Re:Radical cheap solution by Petronius · · Score: 1

      I have a similar setup at home. It's a godsend.

      --
      there's no place like ~
    2. Re:Radical cheap solution by prostoalex · · Score: 1


      A cool thing you can do (I've tried that at my girlfriend's house) is have the laptop connected to the back of the stereo system and TV as well through S-Video, and then with Win XP Professional (should work on Linux as well with some differences) do the remote desktop connection from your desktop PC.

      This way you can sit and read Slashdot, while having the laptop window open and change the music in the stereo system any time you please.

      I owned a ew5000 for 2 days, and returned it afterwards, couldn't take the clumsy setup. Even though it costs around $100, which is far below any decent laptop, it could only do MP3 shared through the wireless as well as JPEGs (on TV screen). Took the sucker back, had no streaming capabilities, the MP3s were decoded locally, so no OGG, AAC, Real, WMA support, and no radio, of course.

    3. Re:Radical cheap solution by Petronius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been considering a mini-itx box hooked up to the TV to replace my laptop... it would be very cool indeed.

      --
      there's no place like ~
  8. Radio on WiFi by sshtome · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let me just check.

    I can buy a radio, listen, enjoy.

    Or I can buy a computer, buy a wireless lan card, buy a wireless lan radio, configure everything, PAY for a reasonable intenet connection, listen, enjoy (within a small area around my hub)

    Ah that's real progress :)

    1. Re:Radio on WiFi by Petronius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can buy a radio, listen, enjoy.
      only what's available locally, i.e. your 5 ClearChannel stations.

      --
      there's no place like ~
    2. Re:Radio on WiFi by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you live, but here we have 2 or 3 Clearchannel stations, one or two from Viacom, a couple of college stations and SEVERAL independant (as in owned by small local companies) stations. My only conclusion is you've either bought into the FUD about media consolidation or you're trolling :-)

    3. Re:Radio on WiFi by Petronius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Upstate NY - most stations are now owned by ClearChannel except for NPR and a couple tiny independant stations. I give money to the small independent jazz station that can barely survive (WGMC). My point is that web radio offers a *vast* array of choices compared to what's available on the dial in most locales.
      You decide if I'm trolling.

      --
      there's no place like ~
    4. Re:Radio on WiFi by sshtome · · Score: 1

      Uh,
      Ok so most of you have the above list of stuff, in which case internet radio is just another service, but I have enough bother finding a good stations when there are about 20 (I live in Paris) good local radio stations.

      How do I decide what to listen to when there are 1000s of stations and most of them are in languages I don't understand?

      Isn't this really going to make it harder to find quality, even if there is quality out there (which there may not be)

    5. Re:Radio on WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that you can listen to specialized stations (which otherwise may not be broadcasted in your local listening area) ...

    6. Re:Radio on WiFi by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and if ClearChannel was broadcasting views that they agreed with it would be a good thing. Welcome to ./'s very special form of hypocrisy.

      Integrity means maintaining your views regardless.

    7. Re:Radio on WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You've got it backasswords. Try it this way:

      Let me just check.

      I can buy a radio license and transmitter for more than I make a decade.

      Or, I can set up my computer and existing hardware to broadcast my own radio free and legal.

      That's really is progress!

      Now it's true, if you want to listen to my station, you'll have to do more work. Maybe you don't mind that Clear Channel controls free speach in this country, but I'd like a little more freedom. I've been wanting to set up my own local TV station this way. BirdBathTV. I doubt anyone will watch though.

    8. Re:Radio on WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or I can buy a computer, buy a wireless lan card, buy a wireless lan radio, configure everything, PAY for a reasonable intenet connection, listen, enjoy (within a small area around my hub)

      What, are you at the public library and someone left the browser on Slashdot, so you decided to share your own bitter thoughts?

      It's news for nerds, not newbies. Why anyone without a computer would read Slashdot is beyond me.

    9. Re:Radio on WiFi by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      20 good local stations in Paris? Are you kidding? One of my favorite things about that city is the amazing fullness of the radio dial. You can go from one end of the dial to the other with very little dead space in between, certainly not much if you are tuning on the analog dial.

      And why does not understanding a language mean you can't listen to music broadcast in that language?

      (I'm not trying to attack, I'm seriously asking.)

    10. Re:Radio on WiFi by renehollan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can buy a radio, listen, enjoy.

      Or I can buy a computer, buy a wireless lan card, buy a wireless lan radio, configure everything, PAY for a reasonable intenet connection, listen, enjoy (within a small area around my hub)

      Point noted.

      But, you forget something: that computer, LAN card, (or hard-wired LAN), and internet connection has more uses than just serving as a home portal for "wireless internet radio". So, while the observation that the overhead of such a device is significant, one should really be amortizing it over all the useful functions it can perform:

      1. Web, email, and news: that's a no-brainer. Most people use a computer for just that. Anything else, therefore, is gravy. Though, it is true, that if you're serious about having a home media portal, you'd probably want a dedicated machine, and not one used for interactive purposes. On the plus side, it does not have to be particularly powerful, or have a fancy graphics card, but should have mondo storage (a Terabyte is not ultimately unreasonable, though you can do a lot with 100 GB, if you don''t need to rip too many DVDs.). Whether a dedicated machine, or not, the internet connection is still "justified" by the desire to browse and have email connectivity.

      2. Media storage. You can store local media on such a server: pictures, music, and videos.

      3. Fax server. you can receive faxes with either an email to fax gateway, or directly with a cheap fax modem.

      4. Application storage. A single repository for applications used in the home is handy.

      5. Personal data storage. Hello...? "mount -t nfs server:/home /home". 'Nuff said.

      6. Email server. (3) kinda makes this obvious, but I don't wanna make this first and renumber, so... If you have an "always on" connection, preferrably with a static IP, why not sink your own email, rather than POP or IMAP it from somewhere on a polling basis (except, of course, your backup MX). This does mean finding an ISP that's willing to let you open port 25 to the world, and like a good mail admin you don't act like an open relay, but, it's worth it.

      7. Voice Mail server. If you've got the FAX modem, you might as well get one that does voice as well. Turn the home media server into an answering machine, transcode, and forward messages to the MTA.

      8. Home automation control system.

      9. Home alarm monitoring system.

      10. VoiP gateway. A CISCO ATA-186 does wonders.

      When you add up all the possible uses of a home media server/control computer, it actually becomes a bargain. The trick is tying all those functions together. There is a bit more overhead to worry about if you get serious: a UPS is almost essential, and backup device strongly reccomended (though you could opt for RAID or a reciprocal remote rsync arrangement with a trusted friend).

      --
      You could've hired me.
    11. Re:Radio on WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The views sell because that's what most people want to listen to. Witness the quick demise that's happening to 'Air America'. People don't want to hear the liberal BS because most mainstream Americans are conservative. Slashdot is most certainly NOT a good representation of popular views.

    12. Re:Radio on WiFi by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      If mainstream american was conservative they would not be supporting Bush the way the currently are.

    13. Re:Radio on WiFi by MagnaMark · · Score: 1
      Why are people always presenting false choices?

      You have to choose regular old-fashioned-radio or WiFi radio

      You have to choose Windows or Linux

      You have to put your media player on shuffle or listen to one album at a time

      And the idea that someone would buy all that gear solely to listen to WiFi radio is hard to believe. People who already have wireless networks are going to be more likely to buy a standalone WiFi radio device.

    14. Re:Radio on WiFi by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I can buy a radio, listen, enjoy.

      Remember, a lot of Slashdot readers live in the USA, where this doesn't work.

      Come over here and spin the dial if you don't know what I mean.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    15. Re:Radio on WiFi by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Yep, wireless radio, streaming tv video and phones we can send written messages on. This truly is a golden age...

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    16. Re:Radio on WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True - but there's stuff that you can do with Internet radio that you can't do with broadcast because of the way that the bandwidth works. As an example, take "last.fm". One stream per listener - and your "taste" is used to preselect what you here. Sure, it's never going to scale to the 10s of millions of listeners that broadcast stations in the UK can get, but never mind the width, feel the quality!

    17. Re:Radio on WiFi by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 1

      I've been wanting to set up my own local TV station this way. BirdBathTV. I doubt anyone will watch though.

      Just make sure to use an appropriately descriptive tagline, like "Wet Naked Chicks in the Bath." I'm sure you'll have plenty of viewers in no time!

  9. Re:Ironic by javatips · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait - isn't there a serious lag and quality issue?

    Since when lag is an important thing for a one way transmission?

    As for quality, a 96Kbps MP3 stream sound a lot better than FM radio.

  10. (net) Radio Receivers by p00p+at+instable.net · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It'll be really neat to see Internet radio receivers with WiFi connectivity. I can picture these as part of stereo systems picking up Shoutcast (or other) radio stations. Unless the RIAA gets their way.

  11. Re:Ya know... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd still like to retrofit my house for wireless connectivity.

    I don't get it. Are your walls lined with lead or something that would hinder wireless connectivity? Go buy a router and a wireless NIC already. The future is now!

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  12. Re:Ironic by Rikus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On the other hand, internet 'radio' lets just about anyone broadcast audio to anyone willing to listen. I'd say that's a major advantage, even if the quality isn't as high as ordinary radio.
    I think mp3/ogg streams are especially nice for voice, since the quality only needs to be high enough to make it understandable, while music requires the listener to appreciate the actual sound.

  13. Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    I've had a wired radio (a Stereo) for even longer, not only does it have clearer connections, but the bandwidth is greater.

    Only problem is that damn 200 mile long cable that connects to my car

  14. Re:Ya know... by maxbang · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ugh - retrofitting my house for wireless connectivity was a royal pain in the ass, man. My heart goes out to you and the effort you'll be putting into this. Plugging in that Dlink wireless router and using the web interface to configure it nearly gave me a asthma attack.

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
  15. Why go digital? by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another way to do this on the cheap is to just plug in a standard analog wireless headphone or speaker transmitter into the back of your soundcard.

    900 Mhz is typically used for this application, so you can keep 2.4 GHz free for WiFi.

    1. Re:Why go digital? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Yea, I have to agree that would be the right tool for the job. That said this is slashdot, if there is a way to do it for twice the price, through expensive computer equipment they will find way, even if it works only half as well as the traditional solution.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Why go digital? by Cyberop5 · · Score: 1

      I've tried this before and I always get background noise and sound degredation. I also get better distance with my AP and digital cordless phones than I do with any short range analog radio transmitters (wireless headphones and radio transmitter)

      Digital devices compensate for any noise. The only downside is you may get packet-loss in a crowded, radio hostile enviroment.

      I'm going to try StereoAP->Internet radio as a cheap alternative

      --
      Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
      Jack: "Who doesn't??"
    3. Re:Why go digital? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      I can give a firm recommendation to the T80 model of Sennheisser wireless headphones. It has one feature that even other models in the Sennhisser line that look the same does not... it uses FM signals on the 900MHz rather than AM ones.

      When you compare broadcast transmissions, FM is always cleaner than AM on a level playing field, because it's much less at risk to picking up interference from other eletrical devices. FM is simply a better way to move sound over radio, but AM is more commonly used in consumer applications because the transmitter is cheaper to make.

    4. Re:Why go digital? by Cyberop5 · · Score: 1
      You've inspired me to use my aging PDA for Internet Radio. Go digital with parts from around the house ;).

      Thanks for the ideas!

      --
      Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
      Jack: "Who doesn't??"
  16. Eventually satellite radio will die by flinxmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and it will be because of the descendants of things like this.

    One day you'll be able to tune into a radio station based on URL, and it will be *the* true revolution for music delivery. Information may or may not want to be free...but it definitely hates coming from central sources.

    Newspaper cartoons are to Strongbad as top 40 is to the bands of the future.

    1. Re:Eventually satellite radio will die by Ytsejam-03 · · Score: 1

      IMHO, this is what the RIAA should really be worried about. Once an independent artist can gain exposure to a large mainstream audience with relatively little invetement, then what need is there for record companines? This will level the playing field for the litle guy.

      Once this happens, the many truly great independent artists out there will finally have their "fair shot" at the market. We might actually hear some diversity on the radio instead of the same old crap that the record companies think they can sell to the masses.

  17. Not for sale?? by johnkoer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but these aren't available for sale yet.

    It doesn't even look like they have made a prototype yet. The images on the website are all computer generated.

    1. Re:Not for sale?? by ThePretender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes, yet another piece of vaporware. but this one isn't even close to revolutionary.

    2. Re:Not for sale?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, sounds like they're trying to "do a Sendo".

      Hey, good luck to them if they can make it work at a price point that will sell (probably less than 50 quid I suspect).

  18. The future? by LithiumX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Radio revolutionized communications, especially as it became more available to smaller companies. It made a wider range of ideas, music, and personalities available to the common person. Radios eventually became omnipresent - a nearly free (minor cost for a radio and power/batteries) outlet for on-demand contact with the outside world.

    Radio's core problem, though, is that there is only a limited spectrum that's both electromagnetically effective and safe for human exposure at high power levels. Otherwise we'd be pulling power from the air instead of wire.

    It's still in it's infancy, but I wouldn't be at all suprised if today's clumsy fledgling attempts at digital network-based radio will later be seen as heralding the birth of a whole new medium - same concept as radio, but even more available.

    Cable tv, encrypted compressed signals over wire, made it possible to host hundreds (thousands?) of channels, and far cheaper to run them (no broadcasting, less infrastructure per station, etc). The end result: hundreds of channels of purile crap. And mixed in with all that crap are a good number of true gems that never would have seen the light of day in a world of pure airwave broadcasting. The public is now exposed to history, culture, technologies, and news that it never would have had access to before.

    I think wifi radio is just one more step in the direction of providing a denser and low-cost medium for propagation of signal. Satelite radio as well (I say let em target regions - even neighborhoods, and let Clear Channel and others be-damned).

    Any broadcast medium that brings down the cost of operation for the same general service is inherently a good thing - while it will introduce new content that isn't worth much, it will also allow a wider range of content, and make large-scale advertising income less of a driving survival requirement.

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled program. KORP radio: 30 minutes of continuous top 10 big-studio hits, every hour on the hour.

    --
    Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
  19. Maybe I'm Missing Something by value_added · · Score: 4, Funny

    Saying something like "In excess of ten thousand radio stations broadcast their programs on the Internet." is all well and good, but the thing has a knob, doesn't it? If it was A Really Big Knob, I imagine you could scan through a few hundred stations, but wouldn't it have to be A Really Really Awfully Big Knob to get through all of them?

    1. Re:Maybe I'm Missing Something by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Informative

      The knob is for volume control... you get to preset your 10 favorite streams, the other few thousand you'll have to type in or at least click on a hyperlink at a PC...

    2. Re:Maybe I'm Missing Something by tjansen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the site: it has 6 buttons for your favorite stations.
      Beside that, you do not use a Knob for internet radio, but URLs :)

    3. Re:Maybe I'm Missing Something by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      but wouldn't it have to be A Really Really Awfully Big Knob to get through all of them?

      Are you saying that when it comes to color choice, they'll only come black? (not meant to offend, only to jest)

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    4. Re:Maybe I'm Missing Something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a really really big knob right here! (sorry, it had to be said).

    5. Re:Maybe I'm Missing Something by DrLZRDMN · · Score: 0

      it dosent matter how big the knob is, a small knob can still tune to the same number of chanels
      thin about it

  20. Re:Ya know... by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

    How do you deal with glare on the screen? When I use my laptop outdoors, I need to sit under a roof, with my back to the house, so the light furing the day doesn't wash out the screen. I suppose that's laptop dependent, though....

    --
    Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  21. WIFI Radio? by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't want to hear about WIFI radio. Not until someone tells me how you install and configure PAM on a pam-less linux box (slackware originally).

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  22. Wow! by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow! Wireless radio, what will they think of next.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:wow! by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the flip side, maybe Air America will actually be able to stay on the air for a little while, with something like this.

  23. Regulating Data Processing by persaud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But your radio never performed encryption/decryption or balanced your checkbook. Nor was your computer regulated by the FCC. But now that your data processing device has become a communications device, the FCC (or non-US equivalent) has jurisdiction over your computer.

    This is why Wi-Fi should never be integrated with the motherboard chipset (a la Centrino). Keep it as an optional add-on. Let the FCC regulate a PC Card or USB device, not the entire computer.

    Down with non-optional bundling of law with convenience.

    1. Re:Regulating Data Processing by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With Quantum Entanglement communications beginning to become a reality, the future may hold wireless devices that communicate world-wide. Imagine if you could take your phone, internet, and radio along with you to the middle of the African plains! Or more close to home, you'll have crystal clear communications via a single device, no matter where in the country or world you travel. Just plug in your matching hub to your home internet connection, and you're set! Not to mention that security is built into the design. It would be literally impossible for hackers to penetrate the line of communications.

      It's a nice dream anyway. :-)

    2. Re:Regulating Data Processing by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 1

      This is why Wi-Fi should never be integrated with the motherboard chipset (a la Centrino). Keep it as an optional add-on.

      Wi-Fi is not integrated with the motherboard chipsed (a la Centrino). It is an optional add-on.

      All your base are belong to Intel's marketeers.

      --
      0xfeedface
    3. Re:Regulating Data Processing by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I thought the FCC regulated just about all electronics.

    4. Re:Regulating Data Processing by persaud · · Score: 1

      I was using the Centrino bundle as an example, but the criticism applies to any hardware bundling of Pentium M and "built in" Wi-Fi. The distinction is whether the user can remove all radio (communication) related components from the notebook.

      Can I use the mini-PCI slot for a device that is not Wi-Fi? Can I remove the antenna that is built into the laptop chassis? If not, it seems difficult to argue that my data processing device is not simultaneously a communications device, subject to FCC regulation.

      Note the difference with dialup modems, which become part of the POTS network while connected to a phone line. A wireless modem is under no such restriction.

    5. Re:Regulating Data Processing by persaud · · Score: 1

      The FCC regulates many devices for compliance with specific standards. Just about all electronics have to comply with RFI regulations that ensure non-interference with neighboring radio and television receivers. I believe this affects primarily the power supply.

      My (not very clear) point was that functionality creep is inevitably accompanied by regulatory creep. This thread is about the convenience of using a (historically data processing) computer as the functional equivalent of a global radio.

      While blurring the boundaries can be attractive from the user's point of view, we can make architectural choices that slow the encroachment of regulatory bodies. If we don't want to accept radio regulations all the time, let's ensure that the radio circuitry is removable from the data processing circuitry.

    6. Re:Regulating Data Processing by C_To · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. There are several other devices that can be attached to a mini-PCI slot, modem, network card, I believe there's others too (just do an ebay search for mini-PCI). The laptop I got had a Pentium M, but I can exchange or take out the wireless card, if needed, and replace it with something else. Even my older AMD one had a mini-PCI slot that didn't have wireless.

      AFAIK most main board manufacturers give the ability to add a wireless add-on card easily (like those AMR/CNR connectors), but due to costs, often offer the board in with and without wireless flavors.

    7. Re:Regulating Data Processing by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      your computer regulated by the FCC. But now that your data processing device has become a communications device, the FCC (or non-US equivalent) has jurisdiction over your computer.

      PC components have always required FCC certification in the USA, and CRTC certification in Canada. There's always something in your motherboard's doumentation that states that it's designed to comply with part 15 of the FCC rules. Basically, any computer emits RF interference by nature, and that interference must stay within allowable tolerances to not interfere with FCC-licensed RF operations, and also must continue to function no matter what RF signals are in the environment. In the unlikely event that your device somehow falls out of compliance with part 15 by putting too much interference onto any given band, you'll have to shut it down under the same laws that say a unlicensed pirate radio station on the FM band also has to go away, but you can hook up a device to your iPod that effectively turns it into a "flea power" FM station.

      More or less, part 15 of the FCC rules is also the section that you'll violate if you overpower your WiFi system with too much wattage. A Pringles can setup with a consumer device inside might even cross the line, if it's too sucessful at turning an omnidirectional signal directional, and the "ERP" or "effective radiated power" in its targeted direction becomes too strong.

      So actually, Centrino or no, the FCC already has jurisdiction over your CPU chip...

  24. What did Marconi call his invention? by djeaux · · Score: 0, Troll
    "Wireless," maybe?

    And what is wi-fi? Radio, maybe?

    The real question is whether you want to spend less than $10 on an AM/FM radio or you want to spend considerably more to do the same thing.

    Well, to each his (or her) own, I guess...

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  25. Sorta Related by jchawk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a treo 600 through sprint, with their unlimited data service package. With the latest pocket tunes software I can stream audio from the internet where ever I am. Generally if there is cell service, I can get a data connection. I know it's not traditional WIFI, but it's still really neat! :-)

    1. Re:Sorta Related by Emperor+Palpatine · · Score: 1

      do you have pocket tunes deluxe?

    2. Re:Sorta Related by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bet your network provider loves you!
      Do you not find that you are unable to get sufficient bandwidth at times?

    3. Re:Sorta Related by Admiral1973 · · Score: 1
      I've got a Treo 600 as well, but mine comes from AT&T, and I'm not paying $80/month for their unlimited data service. Maybe I'm old school, but I prefer listening to my MP3s via the SD card slot. It's no iPod, but I can fit 3-5 albums on a 256 MB SD card and I don't have to worry about losing my WiFi signal (and thus the music) when I ride the subway to work. Plus, the Internet radio stations I listen to at work play annoying ads or the same music clips instead of over-the-air ads. At work I don't mind dealing with them, but on my commute all I want is the music. Internet radio would be too much of a hassle for me, when MP3 support is practically built-in to the Treo (Pocket Tunes is a free download after you register your Treo 600 with Handspring, and it supports MP3, Ogg, streaming audio, etc.).

      --
      Lousy minor setbacks! This world sucks! -- Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Sorta Related by jchawk · · Score: 1

      Well sprints data service is built into my plan right now, if you break it down it's like $10 bucks a month for it and the picture service which is well worth it to me.

      And as far as choice, there are a million home brew shoutcast stations out there that play only music all the time. Check out http://www.shoutcast.com if you don't believe me. :-)

      If you're in a big city, you're probably not going to lose your data connection. Bitch at At&t and see if they'll cut you a deal on data service. The treo is all about connectivity, they know it and will probably work with you.

    5. Re:Sorta Related by blitziod · · Score: 1

      how much is that package and how well does it work? I have thought of the same thing.

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    6. Re:Sorta Related by blitziod · · Score: 1

      how much is that service and how well does it work?

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
  26. A lot of people are making jokes about this by rsborg · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...but it's not so funny, it's very cool. Local radio (NPR and some talk radio excepted) is very stale, and does not contain the music I want to hear. I listen to techno/downtempo/ambient, and my wife likes French radio.. no way we can reliably get that on local radio.

    I want to listen to what I want, when I want. and I want diversity. This company definitely has an interested customer in me.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:A lot of people are making jokes about this by jzuska · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Your wife likes french.... boooooo

      That's anti-american booooooo /drops nuke

    2. Re:A lot of people are making jokes about this by jCaT · · Score: 1

      You need to move to southern california, the NPR station here rocks.

      Barring that, you can also listen to it on your computer, or wifi device here:

      kcrw.org

      Some of the musical programming would be right up your alley, and you'd probably like the rest of it too.

  27. slightly off topic but by DrLZRDMN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    send radio with your computer this program sends AM signals through a CRT monitor

  28. And in other news: by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 0, Troll

    Rhino Gets Amorous With Car
    In all seriousness....how the hell is this news?
    This is brainless and lacks any substance suitable for the slashdot crowd.

  29. Anyone else remember Kerbango? by John_McKee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So sad to see the product killed by 3COM right before it's release (The product was actually completed and manufacture started when it was killed), but Kerbango was based on the exact same concept, except it actually existed beyond 3D models (Although never released to the public). I was really looking forward to it.

    http://www.gadgetcentral.com/kerbango_intro.html

    1. Re:Anyone else remember Kerbango? by mwronski · · Score: 1
      ...Kerbango was based on the exact same concept...

      And it will suffer from the same problems. Kerbango besides requiring a broadband connection that was not available in enough homes at the time to support the product, also relied on a top-level server to collect data about the possible streams and make them available as "tunable channels". When the UI is a simple knob, don't expect to be inserting the URL of your favorite steaming site from the device. Either an application on a nearby PC will have to make the translation or a top-level service provided by the equipment maker will do the work.

      I agree that it's a cool idea, and having been at 3Com during those years, the kerbango was cool, but these products may still need some maturing to be viable. Anything proprietary is bound to hamper their widespread acceptance..

    2. Re:Anyone else remember Kerbango? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      The problem I have with any of these devices is that even though there is a broad selection, I will always be at the mercy of the content provider, so I will never touch one. A better product would allow me to program the receiver to receive MP3 streams from any Internet site I choose to place in my playlist (2-way communication, like the cell-based IP service the other fellow mentioned). Then I could do things liks "broadcast" my own playlist from my network at home, and pick the sets I want to listen to. If the RIAA gets all pissy about copyrights, there could be authentication before the stream goes.

      This is so much better for the consumer, since cheapskates like me could pay only for the bandwidth, but newbies could also pay a company fees to access pre-assembled playlists (leaving room for advertisements too). Depending on the available bandwidth, it could be extremely flexible. You can stream damn near any type of video/audio data, so my home streaming server could do Vorbis, FLAC, MPEG-1 or what have you.

      In fact, my idea is so good, that I can be reasonably assured it will never happen.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    3. Re:Anyone else remember Kerbango? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isnt kerbango the drink they slopped around in that awfull movie battlefield earth?

    4. Re:Anyone else remember Kerbango? by rustman · · Score: 1

      Kerbango besides requiring a broadband connection that was not available in enough homes at the time to support the product, also relied on a top-level server to collect data about the possible streams and make them available as "tunable channels".

      Well, considering that Kerbango was killed by 3Com about 2 weeks before it was going to ship, of course it didn't make it into enough homes.

      Kerbango died because 3Com got nervous about all the diffferent areas they had gotten into,

      As for the central server for colelcting data about possible streams, that was the Kerbango Tuning Service which was licensed by Apple for the iTunes radio service. (In older versions of iTunes, you could see where it was connecting to kts.something.apple.com)

      The Kerbango Tuning Service was never automated, it was all run by a guy who was the "stream editor". (Who worked under cotnract to Apple until the end of 2003)

      Runor is that Apple is doing their own radio tuning service.

      The Shoutcast.com station directory is available to hardware manufacturers as well, and is an automated system.

    5. Re:Anyone else remember Kerbango? by mwronski · · Score: 1
      Not the kerbango that was unavailable in homes.. Broadband was unavailable.. The sucess of the device would have required more homes to have broadband.. At that time , the number was not huge and everyone was begining to realize that there was not going to be any exponential growth.


      I note about being kiilled. Rumor around the office has it that an entire warehouse full of Kerbangoes was sent to a shredder. What a shame. I am sure there was some hacking potential there.

  30. Exactally by Yohahn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In my opinion this is the populace "Routing around" the limited point of view that we receive on traditional radio.

    If this succeeds and people can run 802.11 "radio stations" for local areas it will prove that the FCC has long ago left the needs of the people.

    The reason I say this is the inconvenience needed to listen to this kind of radio. If it can succeed, imagine what would happen if we had that kind of diversity of regular radio.

    The FCC hasn't served the people with respect to radio for quite some time.

    1. Re:Exactally by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      The FCC hasn't served the people with respect to radio for quite some time.

      Sure they have. What you mean is that the FCC hasn't served YOU in some time.

    2. Re:Exactally by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      If the FCC servers the public, please explain their objection to lowerpower fm broadcasting.

    3. Re:Exactally by Yohahn · · Score: 1

      No, they haven't served the people. I say that because people, in my observation, are more diverse than the radio stations that I hear.

  31. Rebroadcasting by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the legal quagmire around rebroadcasting comes into play when you are effectively transmitting the net radio station on the air from your access point.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:Rebroadcasting by NineNine · · Score: 2, Informative

      Keep in mind that the FCC is owned by Clear Channel. The penalties will be severe, I'm sure.

    2. Re:Rebroadcasting by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the legal quagmire around rebroadcasting comes into play when you are effectively transmitting the net radio station on the air from your access point

      Consumer devices are by definition designed for home and office use, so they're not really "broadcasting" in that they don't reach far enough to distribute the signal to "the public". Sure, your neighbor might overhear such a signal, but it's not going to make it to the other side of town. Even if it could, it'd be blown out of the water by interference from all the other users of a "consumer band" between here and there.

  32. wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is great, I can now tune in to every right wing nazi nut with a radio show!

    now that's progress!

  33. Like e-mail only machines? Crippled laptop? by David+Hume · · Score: 1

    The ster article, "Firms prep Wi-Fi Internet radio tuners," states:

    Hutchison wouldn't say who he's been talking to, but he claimed to have received plenty of interest from ISPs looking to build products to sell on top of their broadband access offerings - particular those who want to target punters without a PC.


    Isn't this just a severely crippled laptop with a WiFi card or built-in WiFi? Isn't this like those e-mail only machines that were sold awhile back? (We all know how popular those proved to be.) What happens when one wants to do some Stream Ripping?

    Given these limitations, how much would you pay for something like this? At what point does it make more sense to simply by a laptop with a WiFi card or built in WiFi?

  34. Other options, & Broadband for PC-less custome by Kaimelar · · Score: 1
    Existing products already do this, though they have a PC requirement: in particluar, seeSlim Devices' offerings. Phillips has an Internet Radio device as well: the FW-i1000. I'm not seeing how these new devices bring much in the way of added value (especially comparted to the Squeezebox by Slim) but then again, having more choices is better. I love Webcasts, and the more ways I have to listen to it, the better. And the more listeners, the better -- I wish more people knew that there is a lot more to listen to than ClearChannel.

    BTW, did anyone else find this quote odd? "Hutchison wouldn't say who he's been talking to, but he claimed to have received plenty of interest from ISPs looking to build products to sell on top of their broadband access offerings - particular those who want to target punters without a PC."

    ISPs wanting to sell broadband to folks w/o a PC? Does this market really exist?

  35. radio from around the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but when I want news from around the world, I want radio from around the world...

    Ever heard of, umm...Shortwave?!

    It's been around a long time.

    In fact it's one of the best ways to get news from Cuba, which is usually given some ridiculous anti-communist spin by American or even BBC and made out to sound like some kind of crazy Island stronghold run by an insane dictator. Too bad that's just silly. It really makes American news services look like a freaking joke. I don't want a political spin just give me the last happenings in Havana ok...

    Anyways, shortwave has been doing what you say for a long time...

    1. Re:radio from around the world by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2

      So you settle for news with a pro-communist spin instead? I would certainly never claim that capitalist countries never lie or embellish things, but you must admit their track record for truth is quite a bit better than any communist country. Example, look at the situation in North Korea right now with the train wreck. The communist news agency wouldn't give any information at all other than to say there was 'an incident'.

    2. Re:radio from around the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well lot's of countries have called themselves communist over the years and they all do things a bit differently.

      To say Cuba and North Korea are the same since they both have 100% socialist economy doesn't mean they are the same.

      Cuba and Korea have completely different history and culture, as well as different relationship with the Soviet Union. North Korea was always very close to Stalin where as the Cuban revolution didn't even happen until after Stalin's death.

      You know that it is not Cuba who says people can't leave to the US? It is the US who won't give out Visas to Cubans! Cuba will let anyone leave! In fact they will train you as a doctor on the state's dime and all you have to do is some humanitarian service in Africa or Latin America and then you can leave and go make money somewhere else if you want.

      Also Americans are free to come visit Cuba and see it for themselves anytime they would like. It is the American government who blocks it's own citizens from travelling to Cuba.

      Cubans have a higher standard of living than any other country in that area. Maybe the US doesn't want you to see that.

    3. Re:radio from around the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right...

      That's why alot of Cubans are allowed to leave Cuba to go to any other part of the world.

      Boy, the Communists have really brainwashed you. Get a clue. Communism is really a failed idea. Just look at the combination of all communist countries GDP put together. It doesn't even come close to Japan (which is a country that we converted to democracy). Or how about Germany. East Germany was starving, while West Germany was a very strong moodern producer. Face it, its only a matter of time before democracy and capitalism finally come back to one of the last remaining communist countries in the world.

    4. Re:radio from around the world by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's the Totalitarianism that makes Communism suck so bad, not the Socialism.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  36. What if the chicken was you? by Sn_wC_t · · Score: 1

    All your chicken are mine.

  37. Uh, how many presets? by spamacon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like how it "can pick up many of the 10,000 or so stations broadcasting on the Net", but they only give you six (6) presets (in the reference design). How about a simplified favorites list or something? 6 seems a little small - I get 30-50 (whatever) stations on my FM car radio, and I have 12 presets, just under 25% of the available stations. With this thing, I get 0.12% of the available stations.
    Just my $0.0199.

    --

    - Do not paint -
  38. I'm doing it now... what's the big deal? by NineNine · · Score: 1

    I get my Net connection from a free public source, and I play streaming radio through my stereo. What's the big deal?

  39. Stupidity knows no bounds by spotteddog · · Score: 1
    You missed the best part of your quote:


    particular those who want to target punters without a PC


    If I didn't have a PC with a wireless lan card, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have a wireless access point. If I didn't have a computer, why would I have a broadband internet connection?

    --
    . there used to be a sig here.....
  40. You think that's FUNNY, BEEEOTCH?!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    errr, wait, yes it is...

    Zoo keeper mauled to death 'after defecating on tiger'

    A young Chinese tiger keeper has been mauled to death after apparently trying to defecate on one of his big cats.

    The 19-year-old appears to have climbed the railings of the Bengal tiger cage and pulled his trousers down.

    Evidence at the scene of the death at the Jinan animal park included toilet paper, excrement and a trouser belt.

    Zoo officials think Xu Xiaodong either slipped into the cage or was pulled in by one of the four angry tigers.

    According to the South China Morning Post, the man told a co-worker he needed to go to the toilet but police were called when he failed to return.

    They found his body lying on the ground surrounded by tigers. The teenager had reportedly been bitten in the neck and was covered in blood.

    Police believe Xu climbed the wall of a partially constructed building used to raise the tigers to relieve himself. They said the smell probably caused the tigers to pounce.

    You can see more stories about tigers and zoos on Ananova, or read our Animal attacks file.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  41. Re:Other options, & Broadband for PC-less cust by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    ISPs wanting to sell broadband to folks w/o a PC? Does this market really exist?

    Yes, and this market is growing quickly.

    I can think of about a half dozen personal friends with broadbands, but with no PCs.... Think XBox Live, PS2 Online.

    Last weekend I helped a friend network his XBox, PS2 and 20 dollar email station. (Network as in we bought a cheap home router and some cords).

    We'll see a lot more PC-less applications of the internet. A set top device that streams video over the 'net, 'net aware radios and boomboxes, VOIP boxes, etc, etc..

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  42. Already available by artemis67 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The HomePod from MacSense is already available, and best of all, it will stream music from any iTunes shares it finds.

    1. Re:Already available by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      Yup. And I believe the latest version of the GLOO software on it lets you read http:// from M3U files so that you can stream internet radio.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  43. Re:Like e-mail only machines? Crippled laptop? by tjansen · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just a severely crippled laptop with a WiFi card or built-in WiFi?

    Don't know the hardware, but I would bet on some cheap ARM CPU with wireless chipset and something for audio.

    Given these limitations, how much would you pay for something like this?

    ~200 EUR/USD probably

    At what point does it make more sense to simply by a laptop with a WiFi card or built in WiFi?

    Definitely not for the kitchen. It's exactly what I am currently looking for. Something with WLAN (so I don't need an ethernet cable), built-in speakers (it needs to be small, I dont want a full blown device in the kitchen) and easy to use. I don't want to boot a laptop or start an app when I want music in the kitchen. Turn the thing on, press on the button of the station and then I want to hear the music.

  44. Re:Ya know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll still have to retrofit if he's using DLink. I made the mistake of buying Dlink and had to return 2 APs, not to mention inummerable phone calls, emails, etc. Also, Dlink repeater I bought doesn't repeat, because it doesn't even receive as well from the Dlink AP as my Linksys 802.11b card (without an antenna). I didn't even bother trying to return this-just threw it away. I will never buy DLink again.

  45. Re:Other options, & Broadband for PC-less cust by tjansen · · Score: 1

    Existing products already do this, though they have a PC requirement: in particluar, seeSlim Devices' offerings.

    It has an integrated speaker, you do not need a remote control and I guess it can run with batteries. So it's a semi-portable device for the kitchen, the garden etc.

  46. Re:Ya know... by xs650 · · Score: 1

    Unless you are watching WiFi radio with subtitles, you don't need to see the screen.

  47. GSPlayer2 by Shimmer · · Score: 1

    I've been doing this for months using a little WinAmp knockoff called GSPlayer2 that runs on my Pocket PC and can handle any Shoutcast stream.

    I don't recall where I found GSPlayer2 -- it seems to be an orphan now that I'm searching for it with Google.

    --
    The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    1. Re:GSPlayer2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you didnt google hard enough....here

    2. Re:GSPlayer2 by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      That's not the one I use. The one I use is called GSPlayer2 and looks like a mini-Winamp.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  48. Great business idea by Sn_wC_t · · Score: 1

    I've got a great business idea... Make wireless access points in cars. Sell them as internet radio, and sell access to the grid. In big cities, the grid could be huge! From your home, you could have access to "the Auto Grid." Of course, this would probably have to be some sort of broadcast system, so bandwidth limitations might be an issue. But you could slap some smartness into it, and have a useable system I'm sure. I think there was an article on slashdot before about motorcycles using this concept in a 3rd world country, but I couldn't find it.

  49. Lack of security by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sadly most of these applications lacks any security. Some supports WEP, but none supports WPA, so most of the time if you want to connect other devices than your PC, you have to lower your security standards.
    As for the product we see here, I think it is a great concept but I was unable to determine if it supports any security at all.

  50. Re:SWEET JIGGLIN' JESUS!!! by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

    Amen, brother. Power to the people.

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  51. squeezebox by ignavusincognitus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A SqueezeBox can do that, no need for a WinXP box. The latest server software even has a module to let you browse ShoutCast with your remote.

    1. Re:squeezebox by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      A soft hacked XBOX could do the job for ony $150, plus the cost of a wireless-ethernet bridge. In fact, a soft hacked XBOX is the best way to stream media from your computer network to your entertainment system.

  52. Stupidity knows no bounds, or diabolically clever! by David+Hume · · Score: 1

    You missed the best part of your quote:

    particular those who want to target punters without a PC


    If I didn't have a PC with a wireless lan card, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have a wireless access point. If I didn't have a computer, why would I have a broadband internet connection?


    Yikes! You're right. How stupid (of me to have missed the obvious)!

    This is is really stupid... or diabolically clever! You ask, "If I didn't have a computer, why would I have a broadband internet connection?" Before, there was no good reason to have a broadband internet connection. (There probably still isn't.) But now there is at least one plausible reason -- Internet Radio! Don't own a computer? Don't know how to operate a computer? Can't afford a computer? NO PROBLEM! Just pay $XX per month and purchase our Internet Radio for $XXX (with low montly payments) and you can listen to radio stations in Hi Fidelity from around the world!

    Still there's MORE! For just $XXX for the Internet Television, enjoy streaming Internet Video (porn) from all around the world!

  53. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As for quality, a 96Kbps MP3 stream sound a lot better than FM radio.

    Get your ears checked, asswipe.

  54. The First 3 Minutes... by AvantLegion · · Score: 3, Funny

    ME: "Hey, this is great! I can listen to IDM and doom metal and prog-rock radio stations on the go!"

    RADIO: "Coming up next - King Crimson"

    ME: "Awesome! King Crimson on wifi internet radio!"

    RADIO: "Cat's foot - iron BUFFERING...."

    ME: "Iron "buffering"? That's not the right lyric"

    RADIO: "Politicians BUFFERING.... BUFFERING...."

    ME: "Screw this! Why did I sell my iPod for this??"

    1. Re:The First 3 Minutes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BUFFERING.... BUFFERING....

      Hand me the Bufferin.

      The rest of this post is drivel to get around the stupid "lameness filter" that prevents snappy replies...

  55. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, in Philadelphia, there was a pop station in the '70s whose call letters were WIFI.

  56. Re:Stupidity knows no bounds, or diabolically clev by spotteddog · · Score: 1

    But if you don't have a computer, how can you read all the SPAM???

    --
    . there used to be a sig here.....
  57. Small Motherboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone recommend a small MB to build something like this with off-the-shelf parts? I'm not fussy about the CPU, be it ARM, MIPS, PowerPC or x86, but it should work with passive cooling, run linux, and they should be available to a looser like me who just wants to buy a single board.

  58. Hey, good lookin! I'll be back..... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... too pick you up later!

    remember those hokie Mr. Microphones? I got one at a yard sale several years ago for 50 cents. I used to prop it up in front of my speakers, tune into a net radio station I couldn't get otherwise, and broadcast it out to me with my radio headphone set when working in the yard. Worked great, I just wish I could find the dang thing again, lost it in the move someplace. I *could* do it with one of my FRS radios, but that's pushing it and sorta illegal. Doing it with wifi is OK as a concept, but a 5$ regular radio is better, if it's possible where you are. I guess if you are already toting around a PDA or laptop every place and live in some city with overlapping wifi hotspots it makes more sense.

    Wonder who has the best deal on the low power FM transmitters? hmm, that Mr. Microphone was some AM freq I remember, but FM would be nicer, especially if they made a real cheap one. the ones I looked at were all over 100 clams, I need something that will do 1/4 to 1/2 mile and be *cheap* and have a clean adjustable signal so it can be adjusted to not interfere/slop over with a real station someplace.

  59. Home Media by TexVex · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just got through building a really nice home media system with WiFi.

    The centerpiece is a PC running SageTV. It uses a hardware mpeg encoder to capture video from my digital cable box and save it on a 250 GB hard drive. Encoding at the "DVD Standard Play" quality uses about 3 GB per hour of video and the quality is definitely acceptable. Also stored on the monster hard drive is my entire CD collection ripped to very high bitrate MP3. The hardware media card also includes a built-in radio tuner. The machine has a DVD burner in it as well, and SageTV glues it all together.

    Now, the really cool part of it is, I can access the mpeg video files and MP3s over my home network. With an mpeg video codec, I can use any of a variety of players to play my recorded television anywhere in my house on a laptop. SageTV also offers a separate piece of client software that allows you to remote-control the PVR from any networked computer and play any of its recorded media -- so, if I'm in the garage with my laptop, I can call up the current TV guide and select a program to record right there without having to directly interact with the media PC.

    The only thing I haven't messed around with yet is the radio part of it. Mainly, because radio sucks, and because I do have access to all of the music-only channels through the cable TV (and therefore the PVR) anyway.

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
  60. Wireless media player... better yet by CdaveC · · Score: 2, Informative

    These things all look really cool to me, I have been eyeing up Dlink's new media player, but I'm worried about it's reliance on windows. Sure soudns good though... http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=318

  61. range issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surley am/fm radio broadcasts for miles where as your lucky if you can manage 1 mile with wifi (using omni directional antennas). Its hardly going to replace your car stero unless we are going to place wifi masts every few hundred metres along every road. Running this over 3g/cdma/gprs etc might make more sense except you'd probably run the networks out of capacity very quickly if everyone did it.

  62. Wireless by thebra · · Score: 1

    head phones would be cheaper though you couldn't change stations.

  63. Configuration? by MrNonchalant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be real curious to see how this handles configuration. For instance, how do you change URLs? The interface I see picture doesn't look like it's up to the task. Howbout WEP? Non-broadcasting SSIDs? I can't find any of this on the company's site. If it doesn't handle this stuff graciously it's a big pretty looking doorstop as far as I'm concerned.

  64. Wardriving for Radio by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    There's an interesting concept, wardriving for radio.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  65. Wi-fi speakers by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

    Wi-Fi speakers! This is what we need! Then I can plug my speakers into the mains sockets on the other sides of the room and not trip up over the speaker cables when I go back to where I keep my PC! (okay..maybe bluetooth or wireless usb should also be considered)

  66. Wireless radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    --> Streaming in Shoutcast/or Whatever --> Headphones out to Sterio input on Sterio.
    Simple, effective... can even add bookmarks.

  67. a score of 5 for funny?!? by spamspam · · Score: 0

    about a score of 5 for dipshit obvious comment

  68. this thing isn't anywhere close by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 1

    (i) You're going to have to have a WiFi signal everywhere you'd like to listen to radio. In the middle of long deserted highway. Satellite radio covers the entire US, AFAIK.

    (ii) Lots of people, like myself, listen you satellite radio because they have no advertisements in the music channels. So We'd still have to pay for the premium channels; like Yahoo launch or something.

    (iii) I use Sirius radio with Audiovox Portable Boombox at home. I can take this thing anyway. Also have a tuner docking kit for the car; and Sirius radio comes with a streaming account at no additional charge for streaming radio of their website so I use that at work/school. All with a single account.

    Sorry, but I don't see this thing getting anywhere close to that level of availability.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  69. why WMA? by KungF00 · · Score: 1

    I can't figure out why it will support M$ format? Even if people do use windoze media player, they shouldn't proliferate the wma format. No good can come of it.

    --
    m@t
  70. What About a WiFi Transmitter by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I realized that I'd like to be able to broacast my TV signal to my laptop so I can use my laptop as a wireless TV (with cable connections for the "erm it's called TV" crowd)

    AIK

  71. Re:Ya know... by Eevee · · Score: 1

    Are your walls lined with lead or something

    Copper pipes, most likely, although I wouldn't discount ductwork for the heating/air conditioning. My dad had the same problem. His cable modem hookup was by the utility room--all the water pipes were just on the other side of the wall. It wasn't until we moved the wireless router away from that wall (about 2-3 meters) that he could get decent connectivity from his recliner. (After all, how else can you web surf while watching TV in comfort?)

  72. GPRS, Internet radio while driving by rprycem · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the coolest things I have done yet with my T-Mobile Pocket PC device with GPRS is listen to streaming talk radio stations while driving. At a max of 40k there really is not the bandwidth for quality music, but for talk nerds like myself it is awesome. Right now their all you can eat plan for wireless data is $19.95 and I am buying that for other uses anyway. Playing with buffers and what not yields a very reliable very high quality signal even with the frequent tower hopping that happens when driving. It is good for even the local stations which tend to be on the AM dial. A 20k steam sounds so much better then the wines and pops of AM radio, especially after dark when most stations have to turn their wattage down.
    The only issue I have is when I am traveling at a high rate of speed on the Interstate. Apparently the tower hopping at 70 - 80 MPH is a little too much to keep a steady enough connection. Averaging 40 - 50 MPH works very well, however.
    Who ever it is that takes smooth tower jumps and adds wifi speeds to it, they will be a very rich person.

  73. How to cook a chicken with WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download porn to cook your chicken!

  74. Re:Ya know... by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

    It wasn't until we moved the wireless router away from that wall (about 2-3 meters) that he could get decent connectivity from his recliner.

    Sounds like the pipes became part of the antenna. I've not had any such problems with 802.11 gear at work. In fact, we get way better coverage than we need, which makes me nervous about security.

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
  75. Re:It's global... WHAT'S the FREAKIN' playlistURL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you please post a link directly to the playlist/url so I can open it in WinAmp? I can't make heads nor tails of their site and the play button doesn't work. When I finally allowed popup windows I at least got a window that gave me a javascript popup saying, "You don't have VBScript enabled. Unable to continue media player setup."
    UGH.
    !#^T!#$^(!#$%^#!($#

  76. brainwashing by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    GDP is a very capitalist way to gage sucess...

    You could look at life expectancies, or some arbitrary happiness metric, or accomplishments.

    Life expectancies are best in socialist countrys in general, and happiness, well I don't know how to measure that... And accomplishments, The space race comes to mind, and the russians kicked our ass, we hold the moon up as a great accomplishment, but we were second in space, second in orbit, second in manned space, second in manned orbit. The moon was the only thing we were first in.

    I am not saying that I don't think capitalism is a better system. I am just saying that if you think GDP is THE metric for sucess, you have been brainwashed by the capitalists...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  77. Re:It's global... WHAT'S the FREAKIN' playlistURL? by Ytsejam-03 · · Score: 1
    Could you please post a link directly to the playlist/url so I can open it in WinAmp?
    You have to go through live365 and set up a free account with them to get the stream. You can then change the settings for your account to use an MP3 player like Winamp. I'm listening to this station through Winamp right now.

    The default player for live365 uses a browser popup window. If you try to listen using by clicking the link on proggedradio.com, this is what you will get. Very annoying.
  78. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure I'd entirely agree with the tone of the parent, but at 128kbps (and possibly 96) the quality of the kit plugged in starts becoming relevant.

    Crappy laptop plugged into aux jack on hifi - not good.

    Minitower with decent sound card and decent miniplug cables (or at least as least bad as you can get) - much better.

    Anthing from the BBC on their crappy realaudio streams - much, much worse!

  79. Re:Ironic by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    Not that it matters anyway because I can't stand listening to music from "normal" radio stations. All the ones I have heard has uses (forgot the right technical word) some form of limiter which evens out the signal so you can hear in pop or rock music at drumbeats, the rest of the music drops in strength. I guess it's to avoid bothering people with different sound levels and perhaps to deliver a signal that poor portable radios can play.

    That said, I have heard terrible internet streams at 128kbps also. I guess the admin people in the other end has not listened to their stream on other speakers than the ones on their computer.

  80. Re:Other options, & Broadband for PC-less cust by Ambush_Bug · · Score: 1

    Most people already have "broadband" -- cable TV

    It's probably the cable TV guys they're talking about here..... they'll probably go to
    TCP/IP based content on demand eventually or something like that anyway... so they add a cable modem extension to the box, charge a fraction of what "computer broadband" costs (even though you & i know it's the same damn thing)
    and presto! people without PCs have broad band.

    i can't image DSL providers being that intrested in something like this, but almost everybody has cable these days... it wouldn't take too much for a cable ISP to send you radio down your coax.

  81. Almost ready on the Palm, too by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    The latest version of mmplayer for connected PalmOS machines (the Tungsten C has built-in WiFi, as does the Sony UX50) now supports HTTP streaming over the wireless connection. Not just audio, but video as well.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  82. Home server/media center by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

    You sir, are the man. I have been planning a similar setup for quite some time now. Now all I have to do is find a quiet computer so it won't keep me up all night and I'll do all that!

    1. Re:Home server/media center by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Now all I have to do is find a quiet computer so it won't keep me up all night and I'll do all that!

      ...or simply put the home media server in an unobtrusive place, like the home office, or basement. When I lived in Allen, Texas, I had ours in the master bedroom closet (which, because the master bathroom was between it and the master bedroom, was far enough away that it didn't keep us up at night from the fan noise). Of course, if you do as I did, make sure you have a HVAC vent to that closet.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    2. Re:Home server/media center by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I have no power in my closet and it has no easily-extension-cord-able path. Otherwise I would have put one there a while ago. Now that I have net in the living room, it's too late to bother since I'm moving out in a month.

  83. Don't forget the Audiotron by rustman · · Score: 1

    I've had a Tutrle Beach audiotron for 2 years now, and it's great. While it requires a computer with a web browser for initial setup of the radio service, after that you don't need a computer.

    While it does rely on a runing server for initial sertup (called Turtle Radio) to pick your favorite channels and download the station list to the unit.

    The only drawback is that you can't enter a radio URL directly into the machine.

    However, I do the majority of my net radio listening on this device. And while it's only limited to MP3 streams, I don't find that much of a problem.