Slashdot Mirror


"Buffalo Spammer" Gets 3.5 to 7 Years

jfruhlinger writes "Howard Carmak, aka the 'Buffalo spammer,' has been sentenced to jail time for his spamming activities. Interestingly, the conviction was not for spamming per se, but rather stealing someone's identity, which he then used to launch his spam messages."

84 of 671 comments (clear)

  1. 3.5-7 Seems a little light by KoriaDesevis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

    The jail sentence is the maximum allowed under the law, due to Carmack's prior felony conviction for fraud in a federal case involving fake money orders, McCarthy said.

    7 years is the maximum for identity theft? That actually seems a little light. I would think they'd lock him away for 15-20 for something like that. Theft + potentially ruining someone else's credit and/or reputation.

    1. Re:3.5-7 Seems a little light by nharmon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think 7 years is light for an identity theft case. I do think 7 years is light for a repeat offendor though.

    2. Re:3.5-7 Seems a little light by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't agree. Following my policy of having the punishment fit the crime, the ends were financial. The heaviness of the punishment imposed on Carmack should have been the fines, not years of his life.

      Don't get me wrong; the man's a scumsac and a general nutcocker. But even so, he's a person with irreplaceable years of life, who can reform as we should hope anyone can. Financial judgments against him could have chased him for decades, which seems sufficient punishment.

      Italy is seeking to jail MP3 traders, and we are jailing a con artist. Both crimes are relatively innocuous compared to years of jailing. I can only urge others to keep a sense of perspective about such things.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    3. Re:3.5-7 Seems a little light by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's funny....

      Judge: "I hereby sentence you to no credit. From now on you can only use cash."

      Criminal: "But judge, I already have no credit except for yours and I can steal somethin' if I want cash."

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    4. Re:3.5-7 Seems a little light by Kombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real answer is to deny the criminal any credit for the rest of his life.

      This is extremely ignorant. The guy is an identity theif. How in the hell is denying him credit going to encourage him to stop using fraudulent identification?

      "You won't give me a credit card? Fine. I have tons of experience acquiring them from people who already have them."

      Great solution.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    5. Re:3.5-7 Seems a little light by geoffspear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bah. I'm very much opposed to lengthy jail sentences for nonviolent victimless crimes, but when it comes to fraud and identity theft in the service of a money-making scheme, I think jail time is an appropriate deterrent. If you just fine people for stuff like this, they'll keep doing it as long as the amount of the fine and their perceived likelihood of getting caught are offset by the profits they're making, just as many corporations see government fines for their illegal actions as part of the cost of doing business. If anything, jail time is much more of a deterrent for the types of crimes perpetrated by weasily fraudulent types than it is for tough violent offenders.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    6. Re:3.5-7 Seems a little light by thedillybar · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The New York State case followed a civil suit against Carmack by EarthLink that resulted in a US$16 million award against Carmack in May, 2003.

      It looks like he got fined as well as jailtime. Good thing, because he probably made enough to live the rest of his life on.

      1. Spam.
      2. Profit.
      3. If you're unlucky (probably less than 1% of spammers), get locked up for 4 years.
      4. Retire to a mansion on the beach.

      Sounds like a good deal to me.

  2. It serves him right.... by millahtime · · Score: 5, Funny

    It serves him right for stealing identities. I am still in counseling for getting that email from my grandma telling me to enlarge my penis.

  3. Hurrah for Erie County! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 3, Informative
    The jail sentence is the maximum allowed under the law, due to Carmack's prior felony conviction for fraud in a federal case involving fake money orders, McCarthy said.

    And from another article ...

    Carmack is accused of stealing credit cards and identities to fraudulently buy 343 EarthLink accounts to send shady and unwanted e-mail for such things as herbal therapy. Prosecutors said they do not yet know how he acquired the credit card information. He is also accused of banking fraud and other illegal activities arising from his spam operation, which authorities believe he operated on his own.

    But your honor, I was trying to run an HONEST business of stealing peopele's time and identitiy! Now I'll have to go back to mail fraud!

    I hope he enjoys his term in state pound-me-up-the-ass prison. This is the only thing that will curtail the (domestic) spam problem. Harsh, painful prison sentences.

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
  4. shall we start taking in a collection? by tuxette · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He'll surely need a large amount of cigarettes and contraband as dowry for his marriage to Big Bubba.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:shall we start taking in a collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Serious question: why do Americans think prison rape is amusing? Whenever there's a story about someone or other going to prison there's always a comment to be found making light of this; and it's always modded up.

      Are you people seriously telling me, that a suitable punishment for spamming is being fucked up the arse?

    2. Re:shall we start taking in a collection? by chamblah · · Score: 2
      Are you people seriously telling me, that a suitable punishment for spamming is being fucked up the arse?

      No, but it sure is a good start.

    3. Re:shall we start taking in a collection? by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you people seriously telling me, that a suitable punishment for spamming is being fucked up the arse?

      No. Not unless it's with a red-hot steel rod lined with sharp barbs.

    4. Re:shall we start taking in a collection? by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Serious question: why do Americans think prison rape is amusing?

      I'm with you. I don't think it's funny and I don't think anyone deserves that.

      Even if you do think that some criminals deserve it, what about the tens of thousands of innocent people who were wrongly convicted and ended up in prison?

    5. Re:shall we start taking in a collection? by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you people seriously telling me, that a suitable punishment for spamming is being fucked up the arse?

      He can always tell his cellmate that he wants to "opt out".

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    6. Re:shall we start taking in a collection? by berzerke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...Are you people seriously telling me, that a suitable punishment for spamming is being fucked up the arse?

      A lot of that talk is frustration. Our constitution forbids cruel and unusual punishment. Unfortunately, many judges have interpreted that as forbiding any real punishment. Why else do so many keep going back to jail again and again?

      China has a much lower prison population than the US, both in total number and in prisoners per 100,000 people (China: 119/100K, US: 701/100K; figures from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/rel/icps/worldbrief/wo rld_brief.html). The China numbers include the so-called "political prisoners", so the number of true criminals is probably much lower.

      While there are numerous reasons, one of them is life in a Chinese prison is bad. China has few repeat offenders (ok, partially because repeat offenders tend to get executed). While in the US, working is optional, yet you still get decent food, clothing, medical, and shelter. Convicted murderers have a better health care plan that I do! Many US criminals spend their time learning from others how to be better criminals.

      If it wasn't for abuse by other prisoners, a lot more people (in the US) wouldn't care if they went to jail. It's the only real punishment some criminals get. Getting seriously abused is a powerful message not to screw up again.

      My mother used to teach at an inner city school where her students getting sent to juv hall was a regular occurance. They would tell her that they didn't mind because it was better than their home life. When a 12 year old (repeat offender) pulls up to cop in a stolen car and asks him if he wants to drag race, it should tell you how much they care about being caught.

      The talk you are referring to is just people wanting some punishment that make the offender (and others) not be a repeat offender. If it takes making the spammer someone's girlfriend to get the message across, then so be it.

    7. Re:shall we start taking in a collection? by berzerke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...prison isn't enough a deterrant to keep people from comitting crimes, therefore crimes that occur within the prison against individuals are permittable in lieu of government sactioned punishment. (Correct me if I'm wrong but that seems to be what you're saying)...

      No, that's not what I'm saying. A crime is still a crime, even if occurs within a prison. However, if that's the best justice a victim can hope for, many will take it happily. Hence the posts. In a perfect world, this wouldn't be needed, but then in a perfect world, prisons wouldn't be needed either.

      ...those acts which are deemed to be unacceptable should be unacceptable across the board...

      Not necessarily. It all depends on the circumstances. I could give lots of examples, but I won't. Instead, think about the various *criminal* classifications for killing someone. There's first degree murder (aka capital murder in some states), second degree murder, and manslaughter (some states have variations on this). It all depends on the circumstances.

      ...I include capital punishment as an unacceptable government sanction activity..

      Many would disagree with you, including myself. Sometimes one must be sacrificed for the good of the group. Sucks if you are the one, but in this case, these people had a choice. They chose murder(s). They had more rights than they gave their victim(s).

      ...I see this as an argument to make society better...

      No argument here.

  5. Will be spamming his appeal... by Omega · · Score: 4, Funny

    He also announced he planned to spam his appeal to every court in the country.

  6. Good... by hookedup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The old cop trick, cant get em for what the biggest problem is, get them for what you can.

    Should be this way more often, arrest spammers for using machines they have no proper access to, not for just for spamming.

    1. Re:Good... by greendoggg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I'm of the opinion that identity theft is a more important issue than spam. Don't get me wrong, I think spam is a big issue, but spam (usually) doesn't mess up a person's life completely, whereas identity theft can really leave someone in a world of hurt. But either way, since this guy was guilty of both, I'm glad to see he got some jail time.

    2. Re:Good... by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Informative

      Very similar to Al Capone. For all of his rumrunning, racketeering, murder and other activities, he was only successfully prosecuted for tax evasion.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Good... by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember that some early breakers in to mainframes were charged with stealing (some very small amount of) electricity because there was no law covering the offense explicitly.

      --
      Squirrel!
  7. Bye bye, Howard, it's been fun reading about you. by The+I+Shing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everybody, sing along, loud enough so that Howard can hear you all the way over in the Erie County Holding Center!

    Nah nah... nah nah nah nah... hey hey hey... good-BYE!

    When I read that Howard Carmack told Earthlink, "Nothing is in my name, so you'll never catch me," all I could think was, you arrogant, silly man. These are government agents and corporate attorneys that you're up against. You're an overweight criminal in his mid-30s who lives in a shack in Buffalo. I think they're gonna catch you, and right quick.

    Sure enough, they did. In addition to his prison time, Carmack has a multi-million-dollar judgment against him from Earthlink for his misuse of their network.

    Have fun in prison, Howard!

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  8. Finally he'll stop sending... by Begemot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..."enlarge your ... today", 'cause he's not gonna like it.

  9. That reminds me... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2

    ...of an old case I read about in Cliff Stoll's The Cuckoo's Egg.

    A cracker was convicted in Canada in the 80s of "stealing electricity" instead of breaking into a computer.

  10. conviction time by Kallahar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The jail sentence is the maximum allowed under the law, due to Carmack's prior felony conviction for fraud in a federal case involving fake money orders, McCarthy said."

    Hopefully this implies that the government is realizing that most spammers are already criminals, email is just a new venue to commit the fraud.

  11. nice precedent by wmeyer · · Score: 2

    The sentence is unfortunately light, but the precedent is nice to see.

    --
    --- Bill
  12. Whatever it takes... by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Capone went to prison (Alcatraz) on tax evasion. I'd love to see the IRS audit all spammers they can get ahold of. It might drive them offshore, but then we might have a chance at the ISP level to blacklist IP ranges for SMTP traffic.

    SPF is a good idea, I get tired of that checklist that says why your idea won't work. It's pedantic and discourages good ideas from being discussed.

    If SPAM is allowed to thrive offshore, I see a time when service providers like AT&T are asked to track SMTP and provide governments the figures for - you guessed it - tariffs.

  13. Cellmate by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's hoping that his cellmate took a steady supply of penis enlargement pills and herbal viagra.

    1. Re:Cellmate by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even funnier if his celly makes him take those breast enlargement pills!

      --

      Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
  14. Shouldn't they have... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shouldn't they have executed him like they do virus writers?

  15. Bravo everyone! We all had a part in this. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These days, it's a truth that most spammers have to break other laws to try to get their spam out. It's not like the old days of open relays and a trusting email network. Now, we have worm exploits, stolen identities, account phishing, hacked boxes...the list goes on and on.

    We can pat ourselves on the back here, I think. Now that we're as a community becoming aware of the spam problem and doing something about it (like closing down open relays and blocking those who don't), spammers now have to break other laws to get their crap through.

    And that makes them targets for prosecution. So, let's all give ourselves a round of applause here. If you closed an open relay, or wiped out a worm, you contributed to this!

    Let's all keep up the good work.

    Weaselmancer

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  16. Good by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Burn the jerk.

    But I have mixed feelings on this. If it was 3.5-7 for spamming, I would certainly say that is appropriate, but for identity theft? This is something that RUINS peoples lives. In a lot of cases, the vitims propogate their anguish to loved ones etc... and some even go as far as committing suicide. Actually, it stinks of the same horror as rape... you come out the other side ruined and broken... and 7 years isnt sufficient.

    I personally believe we need to get things back in perspective. If you destroy someones life, whether physically, or otherwise, you should lose yours. You arent fit for our society. BURN.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  17. Some of the longest sentences in history... by TheTranceFan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Some of the longest jail sentences in US history were the result of convictions for stealing US mail: one year per piece of mail stolen.

    It's a good thing for this guy that sentencing for spam doesn't work like that: he supposedly sent 800 million emails using the two identities he stole.

    Then again, it wasn't a spam law under which he was convicted and sentenced. But put a few spammers away for 800 million years, and it might help in the neverending fight.

    /"You get out of jail about when the Sun has expanded to the size of Mars' orbit."

  18. Glad he was caught, and for the right reasons by dirk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am glad this guy was caught and convicted, and I'm glad it wasn't for spamming. It always amazes me how people want new laws targetting spam, but most of what the worst spammers do is already against the law and they can be targetted for that. Advertising fraudulent products is against the law. Pyramid schemes are against the law. Hacking someone's system and sending email from there is illegal. I have no problem with spam that doesn't the law in the sending. If you have a legitmate email account and send email from it, and don't make false claims, then you are using the email system as intended.

    If you want to go after spammers, there are plenty you can go after suing existing laws. We don't need new laws specifically for spam anymore than we need new laws specifically for music sharers. Use the existing laws.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
  19. Identity theft by jroop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It certainly would appear that identity theft is perhaps the best way to prosecute these spammers. If they are not using their own address, then they are stealing the use of someone elses. If they can successfully prosecute a series of these cases, spammers may be forced to use their real addresses. At least the ethical ones... hahahahah.. sorry

    For what its worth, MD just increased the penalties for spammers.

    jr

  20. Another example of old laws still relevant today by hpulley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Often here we see that new technology doesn't necessarily require new laws. Arresting and charging a spammer using someone else's identity to avoid being caught and held responsible is a good way to round these people up. It avoids the free speech issues completely.

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
  21. Earthlink by squidfrog · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's the original Earthlink case.

  22. Yay! by Ratfactor · · Score: 2, Funny


    Anytime, anywhere, when a spammer gets jail time, a death sentence, raped, shot, stabbed, beaten, pursued by goblins, eaten by robot men or robot dogs, burned, molested by snakes, bitten by wolves, dipped in acid, exsanguinated, trampled by cattle, or lost at sea...

    ...Ratfactor smiles!

  23. How he got caught. by Valejo · · Score: 5, Informative
  24. Only 3.5-7 years? by KenBot_314 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would think he should get longer... I mean.. if for nothing else, just for principle!

  25. Fantasy scene... by Shoten · · Score: 4, Funny

    Carmak, in his jail cell for the first night of his long sentence, with "Tyree," or "Bubba," or whoever; specifics are not important, just that the individual is large, mean, and notoriously maladjusted. It is now lights-out, and quiet falls over the prison.

    As Carmak cowers under the covers of the lower bunk...

    "I bet you don't want ME to have a bigger penis now, do you, boy?"

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  26. Spam and fake money orders by Lord+Zerrr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems he also had prior felony for fake money orders.

    "The jail sentence is the maximum allowed under the law, due to Carmack's prior felony conviction for fraud in a federal case involving fake money orders, McCarthy said."

    --
    "If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." -Albert Einstein
    Karma? There's a serial modder out there.
  27. al capone don't want me for a sunbeam by thuh+Freak · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Interestingly, the conviction was not for spamming per se, but rather stealing someone's indentity, which he then used to launch his spam messages."

    cool beans either way, so long as this guy can't continue his evil ways. capone was thrown in jail for taxes, but it kept him from mafia'ing.

    --
    I wish that I was a catfish.
  28. Free as in speach... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "Interestingly, the conviction was not for spamming per se, but rather stealing someone's indentity, which he then used to launch his spam messages."

    That's because as of yet there are no laws against sending email. One person's spam is another's free speach.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  29. Meanwhile in Jail by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile in Jail, inmates have added him to their "My new Bitch" list. Carmak has complained repeatedly that their unsubscribe feature is both inhumane and doesn't work, which has led to arthritis in his right hand.

  30. this is a little by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    excessive.
    Yas I read the article. He has a prior felonies, and he stole 2 people's identity.
    from the article, it seems like he used the identites to send spam. Not exactly devastating. If he had used thoose ID's to charge credit cards, buy a car, etc.. then a couple of years in prison would be adequate.

    Considering how full our prisons are, and how tight state budgets are, perhaps there could be better solutions? Community service springs to mind.
    He should also be responsible for undoing harm to the people whose identities he stole. We all know what a pain it is to call the credit card companies, and find out what we need to do to prove it wasn't us and get any marks removed from are credit history.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. One down... by PoisonousPhat · · Score: 5, Interesting
    200+ to go:

    "The Register of Known Spam Operations (ROKSO) database collates information and evidence on known hard-line spam operations that have been terminated by a minimum of 3 consecutive Service Providers for serious spam offenses.

    200 Known Spam Operations responsible for 90% of your spam.

    90% of spam received by Internet users in North America and Europe can be traced via redirects, hosting locations of web sites, domains and aliases, to a hard-core group of around 200 known spam operations, almost all of whom are listed in the ROKSO database. These spam operations consist of an estimated 500-600 professional spammers loosely grouped into gangs ("spam gangs"), the vast majority of whom are operating illegally, and who move from network to network seeking out Internet Service Providers ("ISPs") known for lax enforcing of anti-spam policies."

    --
    Losers choose to abuse the use of "loose".
  32. It's kind of... by neiffer · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...like getting the mob with tax fraud, right?

  33. Identity theft, huh? by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 2, Funny

    including charges that he stole the identity of two Buffalo-area residents, which he then used to send out more than 800 million spam messages

    Who would've thought there were two Buffalo-area residents with the names "Big R. Schlong" and "Haute Yung Bebes"

  34. nabbing the scum bag by malia8888 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Carmack was found guilty in April by a jury in Erie County, New York, on 14 counts, including charges that he stole the identity of two Buffalo-area residents, which he then used to send out more than 800 million spam messages, the attorney general's office said.

    This announcement does my heart good. Howard Carmak got his due for his actions though not directly just like Al Capone received a sentence for U.S. tax evasion instead of murder, racketeering etc.

    When a person is a scum bag in one area this trait seems to wash over into other facets of their lives.

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
  35. As Long As We're At It... by WombatControl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can we please execute him too?

    In all seriousness, we need to have some sort of crackdown on spam. The levels of pure crap are increasing faster than even a combination of SpamAssassin and Thunderbird's Bayesian filtering can catch up with.

    Throwing slimebags like Carmak and Alan Ralsky in jail for a few years might help reduce the spam levels. While the servers may be in China, the ones running these large spam operations are right here in the US. It won't stop spam, but it will at least reduce the flow.

  36. 3.5 to 7 years? by jlowery · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is he serving time in the Heisenberg Uncertainty Corrections Center?

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  37. I wonder what are the consequences by marika · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does it mean that if I spam under my real name I am free to do it?

    --
    This is totally insecure, but very convenient.
  38. nerd crime by lawngnome · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bet those murderers and thugs in jail will love this guy...
    spammer guy: b-b-but Im a marketer!
    thug #1: shuddup you in my world tubby!
    thug #2: whoo! fresh meat!

  39. Setting a precident? by deputydink · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This act, more than any other piece of targeted legislation at spamming may help stem the flow of spam.


    While the crime is not entirely related to spamming, it shows that local law enforcement is getting "clever" with its prosecution, in the same way federal authorities, when unable to get felony convictions like murder against organized crime bosses turned to tax evasion and fraud.


    Interesting.

  40. Here's Hoping... by bcolflesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...his cellmates introduce the "Buffalo Spammer" to the "Cleveland Steamer".

  41. Hmmmm.... identity theft... by FlyingOrca · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So here's the question. I RTFA, and there are no details on the "identity theft" thing. Does 0wn1ng someone's underdefended box count as "identity theft", and if so, is that what they got this guy for?

    And - more to the point - if not, could the law be construed that way? In other words, can we prosecute spammers for impersonating customers of fooISP by using their zombied boxes to spam?

    Just a thought.

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
  42. Yes, it should by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Commercial speech should absolutely be as protected as other speech.

    What people tend to do, and Americans in particular, is to confuse "freedom of speech" with "guaranteed right to an audience". Preferably on somebody else's bill.

    And THAT particular bird is not going to fly.

    You have the right to say whatever you want to say (well, almost, nowadays). You do not have the right to force me to listen to any of it. You do not have the right to force somebody else to carry your message.

    1. Re:Yes, it should by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Commercial speech should absolutely be as protected as other speech.
      When the first amendment was written, I really doubt that they had corporations in mind. The first amendment is all about INDIVIDUAL free speech.

      I don t believe corporations have the right to say whatever they feel like saying. They are, after all, a group of people who may or may not be working together for a common cause (a day in any large corporation would reveal that the latter is probably more common).

    2. Re:Yes, it should by sfjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Commercial speech should absolutely be as protected as other speech.

      Absolutely not!! A corporation exists solely to generate a profit. It has no morals, no ethics and cannot be deprived of its life or liberty for its crimes. Freedom of speech is a human condition intended for humans. When humans can hide behind a corporation, they can not be held accountalbe for their actions or speech. For example, Dow Chemical murdered 800 people in Bhopal India. Was it forced to cease existing? Of course not. Any entity which has no compulsion to behave with human responsibilities has no expectation of human rights.
      It has long been accepted that not ALL speech is free. You cannot shout "fire" in a crowded theatre and you cannot expect unbridled rights to make commercial claims.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  43. Re:Good by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Didn't we just go through this? All this macho GW Bush "Bring it on" wannabe talk isn't going to do anything but get people killed.

    If the death penalty applies to spam, and someone might get caught for spamming, then they may as well just go kill someone while they are at it. Maybe kill the witnesses. It can't increase the severity of the penalty, so why not?

    Part of justice is appropriate punishments. Walking with a swagger and carrying a noose might impress people who failed to graduate high school, but it doesn't make us any safer, or freer.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  44. Re:Bye bye, Howard, it's been fun reading about yo by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Funny

    A nerdy overweight white guy in his thirties going to the can? He should tatoo tits on his back now and get it over with.

    -B

  45. They actually don't need to be that harsh by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They just need to be there. SPAM is so popular because, until now, it was a more or less no risk bussiness both finincally and legally. It cost very little to get in to and you weren't going to get in trouble for what you were doing. To lessen the amout of spammers, we just need to make it unattractive. Doesn't mean we need to lock them up for life (appealing though that may sound), just a reasonable prison sentence combine with seizing all their ill gotten gains.

    Most spammers will then quit. These aren't hardened, fear nothing, criminals we are talking about, they are sleazy bussiness men that see this as an easy, low risk way to make a buck. Show them it's not low risk, most of them will knock it off.

    There will still be some, of course, there is always somebody stupid enough to try something, but I think it can be kept to a minimum, in the US at least (which is where the majority of it starts anyhow).

  46. since you asked... by tuxette · · Score: 5, Funny
    Are you people seriously telling me, that a suitable punishment for spamming is being fucked up the arse?

    Why, yes.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:since you asked... by Greedo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet he's hoping that his 6'4", 235 lb cell mate didn't get his penis enlarged.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  47. Re:Sounds to me a little excessive by chromatic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Think of it as a deterrent. "Not only are murder, theft, and rape wrong, but if you're caught, you might have to share a cell with a spammer!"

  48. Sentencing suggestion by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 5, Funny

    >7 years is the maximum for identity theft? That actually seems a little light.

    How about seven years and the victims get to pick his cellmate?
    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:Sentencing suggestion by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > > 7 years is the maximum for identity theft? That actually seems a little light.
      >
      > How about seven years and the victims get to pick his cellmate?

      How about three years... but he has to opt out of every ass-raping.

      Of course, if he gets out in three years and claims that it wasn't rape, his cellmates can claim that he opted in anyways, and just forgot about it.

  49. They also need to prosecute... by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...the actual manufacturers of bogus penis enlargement pills, quasi-legal drug sales of Viagra, and other such snake oil companies. The actual spamming agencies are half the problem - the other half are the scumbags who hire them and turn a blind eye to their practices.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:They also need to prosecute... by epcraig · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Get Pfizer to sue spammers for trademark infringement on Viagra.

      Hell, let Bayer sue spammers for infingement on Cialis.

      I think that inaction on the spammer trademark front shows which corporate interests are behind at least part of our spam and virus/worm problems.

      --
      Ed Craig "Who cares what you think?" George W. Bush, 4th of July 2001
  50. Buff-alo Spa1mme&r, in_crease your anus now!#G by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just commit massive credit card fraud! Your cellmate will do the rest. :)

  51. Put him in isolation. by dhalsim2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    His only human contact should be via electronic messages with each message sent to him being among 10,000 unfiltered spam messages. Let him waste his life sorting through messages just as he's done to so many others.

  52. Re:I wish I could sneek money into the prison, by William+G.+Davis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Violent prison rape is *funny*?

  53. Re:This just in... by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
    > His cellmate is "in" for killing a spammer.
    >
    > Hmmm.

    "Hmmm", indeed.

    How the fuck would a prosecutor find a jury that would convict?

  54. Pound-me-in-the-ass prison is Cruel and Unusual by zifferent · · Score: 2, Informative

    You shouldn't be applauding prison rape. I don't care what a person did, they don't deserve to be ass raped till they bleed, or become Bubba's for protection.

    In particular spam is annoying but does getting ass raped really fit the crime? Put yourself in their shoes, your a small geeky guy faced with 5 to 7 and your choice is hook up with someone and get it up the ass by one person, or not and the whole prison will gang-rape you. Phsycologically, you've lost all control in your life and you begin to despair and lose hope. If you're lucky your suicide attempt succeeds, because if the prison guards suspect that you attempted suicide to get away from the general population, they will throw you back to wolves, where you can die a slow painfull, tortured death from the nightly ass-poundings you receive.

    That's not even funny.

    It's a serious issue.

    To learn more:
    http://www.spr.org

    --
    cat sig > /dev/null
    1. Re:Pound-me-in-the-ass prison is Cruel and Unusual by UnrepentantHarlequin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When women who have done nothing wrong can live their lives without fear of being raped, then we can turn our attention to safeguarding criminals from other criminals. If we don't have enough resources to protect innocent people, then where are we going to find the resources to protect criminals?

  55. Re:Victimless Crime? by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a crime because the government defines it as a crime. Examples include drug possession and sodomy.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  56. Aggregate costs by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    he's a person with irreplaceable years of life

    It is nice to meet a compassionate individual here on slashdot but keep in mind how many aggregate "irreplaceable years of life" this scumbag cost others in filling up people's inbox with junk or having to spend time setting up filters, etc. !

    1. Re:Aggregate costs by Elminst · · Score: 2, Informative

      how many aggregate "irreplaceable years of life" this scumbag cost others

      According to my spiffy SpamNet statistics window; the collective community (~970K) would have lost a combined 8200 days (since the program began) dealing with spam ourselves.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  57. Re:Victimless Crime? by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Victimless crime.. explain to me how something can be a victimless crime, or, if some action really is victimless, why it's a crime.

    Let's say two gay men have anal sex. Where's the victim? Yet, untill recently, that was illegal in Texas. Many states have had anti-masterbation laws in the past as well. Where's the victim there?

    People just like screwing up other people's lives for the hell of it.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  58. He should be happy about this... by Rai · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now he can get some hands-on experience helping men enlarge their penises.

  59. So it would seem fair... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...to lock him up for 8020 days, tripled for punitive damages, which makes...

    ... about 66 years...
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  60. Worse than that, you don't get writedowns... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...for tools-of-trade, fuel bought for the getaway car, things like that.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing