Slashdot Mirror


Hotmail Blocks Gmail Emails (and Invites)

bonhomme_de_neige writes "Emails and invitations sent to Hotmail from Gmail accounts do not bounce, but nor do they arrive in the recipient's Inbox - they vanish mysteriously into the aether. Joel Johnson writes in his Gizmodo weblog that invitations he sent to a Hotmail address bounced (this even received coverage from ZDNet). Search Engine Roundtable writes that several ISPs are blocking Gmail. It's already well-documented that Yahoo moves Gmail invites into the Bulk Mail folder. I've personally confirmed the Hotmail and Yahoo blocking." Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.

149 of 894 comments (clear)

  1. Stunning by Marxist+Commentary · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mega-corporations don't play nice? Really? I'm absolutely flabbergasted!

    1. Re:Stunning by Bricklets · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mega-corporations don't play nice? Really? I'm absolutely flabbergasted!

      An email service blocking emails from a competing email service is surprising. Has this ever happened before? Is this even legal?

      --
      Little Bricklets
    2. Re:Stunning by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know if it's legal, but it's certainly unethical.

      I don't understand why ISPs would block gmail mail anyway. (I understand the invites, though.)

    3. Re:Stunning by gazbo · · Score: 3, Informative
      Rubbish. I use Hotmail, a friend of mine uses gmail. I've not had any problems getting his mails, and I've not even had to whitelist him for the spam filter.

      This story is the biggest pile of turd I've read on Slashdot - and I've read some pretty strong contenders.

    4. Re:Stunning by Bricklets · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't understand why ISPs would block gmail mail anyway. (I understand the invites, though.)

      Well, the articles mentions that some email providers are blocking GMail due to privacy concerns. Seems like a bunch of hogwash to me.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    5. Re:Stunning by sentientbeing · · Score: 2, Informative

      the guy didnt say it was blocking emails in general but gmail invitations specifically

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    6. Re:Stunning by Xformer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Overgeneralization has made it into /. stories before, or have you not been around that long? If you simply RTFA, you'll see that it's mainly just the invites that have gone missing.

      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
    7. Re:Stunning by 13Echo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I sent an invite to someone two days ago, and he still hasn't gotten it.

      I can vouch that this is certainly questionable.

    8. Re:Stunning by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 5, Informative
      I use Hotmail, a friend of mine uses gmail. I've not had any problems getting his mails

      Actually - it happened in this order. Test email sent to Hotmail, did not arrive. Story submitted to Slashdot. Email arrived in Hotmail account several hours later (after other emails I sent from my other accounts _after_ the one from gmail - which arrived almost instantly). I've read several reports of Hotmail both bouncing and vanishing Gmail email - I'm sure if you hunt around you can find even more. It may be that they are changing their behaviour as they realise it'd going to do them more harm then good.

      As for the Yahoo one, that is definitely true.

      --
      "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
      "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
    9. Re:Stunning by danielsfca2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > I don't understand why ISPs would block...

      Hotmail and Yahoo! are not ISPs. They're a couple of second-rate e-mail services. This is yet another reason everyone should steer clear of "free" e-mail altogether.

      Everyone has a real e-mail account available to them if they just pay enough attention to know who's offering it (real ISP, college, job) and learn how to set up a real e-mail client. Five minutes.

    10. Re:Stunning by cloudmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How does gmail's indexing of email stored on gmail servers affect mail coming in to an ISP? "Privacy" my arse. I trust google to tread my data properly more than I do most ISPs anyway. :)

    11. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because people should never need to switch ISP's, colleges, or jobs. I know when I pick a college, I'm there for the rest of my life.

    12. Re:Stunning by MarkPNeyer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean a company offering its services for free is putting restrictions on said services? *Gasp* Can 1984 be far behind? Surely this is the result of the eeeevil George W. Bush and his Patriot Act. Serioulsy, though. These companies are offering a free service. There's nothing unethical or illegal about making said service crappier. Even if you were paying for it, they've still got license to do whatever they want with the service (unless of course the TOS say that the TOS are never going to change...) Isn't this just like consoles all being proprietary, so that not just anyone can make games fro them?

      --

      My blog
    13. Re:Stunning by Errtu76 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      more likely is that they're blocking gmails because it might become more populair than their own services.

      If GMail is blocked by alot of providers, how many users will want to sign up?

    14. Re:Stunning by slimak · · Score: 5, Informative

      unless your ISP is SBC, then you get a Yahoo! account (even though its @sbcglobal.net).

    15. Re:Stunning by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone has a real e-mail account available to them if they just pay enough attention to know who's offering it (real ISP, college, job) and learn how to set up a real e-mail client. Five minutes.

      Real ISPs come and go, you are not in college forever, and you dont keep the same job forever. However, you CAN keep one of these "second-rate" email addresses indefinitely. I have had my yahoo account for years, while friends and colleagues change their "real" email accounts year after year, mine has always been the same. I have lost touch with many people because they changed email addresses and never told anyone.

      Thanks for the short-sighted answer.

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    16. Re:Stunning by mgrassi99 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have both a Yahoo and Hotmail account...someone email me an invite and I'll verify this post ;)

      mgrassi99@yahoo.com
      mikegrassi@hotmail.com

      -M

    17. Re:Stunning by It'sYerMam · · Score: 3, Informative
      The motto: huzzah for email forwarding.

      You get all the advantages of a real email address without the changiness.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    18. Re:Stunning by KingPrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yahoo is not a second-rate email service. It is the fastest and most reliable service I've found, and I've been on a dozen different ISPs and two different colleges. All of their email servers were come-and-go. Pop3 was hit or miss and the webmail was slow as molasses. Yahoo's webmail is snappy and has a clean interface. And their pop3 access (which I pay for) is reliable and fast.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    19. Re:Stunning by mdwh2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Everyone has a real e-mail account available to them if they just pay enough attention to know who's offering it (real ISP, college, job) and learn how to set up a real e-mail client. Five minutes.

      But paid-for doesn't always mean better. I'm on NTL, and in the last year the email service has become unuseable (emails sometimes take months to arrive, or sometimes disappear altogether; sometimes connecting to POP or SMTP is very difficult). Paid-for doesn't mean you have more of a position to complain, when your complaints are completely ignored. Whilst gmail blocking seems to be restricted to free email accounts, it is not inconceivable that paid for ISPs may try dirty tactics.

      Switching to a free email account (that I still use a "real email client" for) took five minutes, but switching entirely to a new cable ISP would take far longer.

    20. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Privacy concerns? That's such hogwash. GMail's server reads your email and offers syntactical ads. If it didn't offer the ads, GMail's server would still read your email. So would ever server between the sender AND GMail. Machines read your email all the time. If they didn't, you wouldn't be able to get it. You certainly wouldn't be able to have it checked for spam. Thinking your message is "private" just because the machines don't explicitly tell you they read it is very naive.

      Methinks ISPs are using "Privacy Concerns" as a way of keeping customers from leaving their quickly aging service. "Hey look, bearded technology pundits with nothing better to do are upset about ads in a radical new free email service. They're waving the privacy flag. We can wave the same flag and lock people in to viewing our contextually inaccurate ads a little bit longer!"

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    21. Re:Stunning by RichM · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hotmail and Yahoo! are not ISPs. They're a couple of second-rate e-mail services.
      MSN and Yahoo are ISPs.
    22. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the real solution is to take $50 or so and invest in your own domain name and domain based email hosting with a reputable company. By controlling the DOMAIN your email goes to, you have complete control over your email address. If your company goes under, you can move to another one in about 2 days. If your domain provider goes under, you can move your Domain to a new one in about a week. And best of all, you can offer free email accounts to all of your friends and family...free email accounts that you can vouch for, that don't pop up ads everywhere, and that you can control who reads/knows about their existance.

      I started my hosting company as a cooperative just so I could get rid of my favorite email "alias," dasmegabyte@mindless.com, which the company providing the alias had sold to spammers when I told them no, I won't give you $10 a month to forward my fucking email with ads at the bottom. Incidentally, I lost a job in 2001 because the hiring staff sent an email to dasmegabyte@mindless.com and I had already dropped that account -- there was too much spam to sort through.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    23. Re:Stunning by avgjoe62 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Machines read your email all the time. If they didn't, you wouldn't be able to get it. You certainly wouldn't be able to have it checked for spam. Thinking your message is "private" just because the machines don't explicitly tell you they read it is very naive.

      So very true. I remember back in the days when we were using MS Mail, I could watch the messages scroll on by the MS Mail Internet Connector, from the initial "Hello" to the text of the message. There never has been any privacy in email. Just read the terms of use of your corporate or college account.

      But is anyone reading /. really surprised to see the internet and inter-operability fracturing because corporate interests are squabbling? Or are we so quick to forget this recent example? I'm just wondering how long until this becomes a "feature" in Exchange Server...

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    24. Re:Stunning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have lost touch with many people because they changed email addresses and never told anyone.
      Oh, I doubt that they never told anyone. Likely they decided not to tell just you. Do you really believe that you lost touch with them by accident???

    25. Re:Stunning by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well not really! This is like the "No Solicitors" sign you see everywhere nowdays. I guess it's part of their right to block invitations, but blocking "customer service" because of ethnicity or origin that's unethical!

      Yes, but your city council does not put the "No Solicitors" sign on your door for you, and give you no option to remove it if you happen to enjoy solicitors.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    26. Re:Stunning by metamatic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or pay $12 a year for pobox.com redirection and spam filtering. No ads, and you can send the mail to whatever real e-mail account you like, and change it at a moment's notice (unlike personal domains).

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    27. Re:Stunning by mgrassi99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sweet! They both came through, the one sent to Yahoo was stuck in my Bulk folder, and the one to Hotmail was in my inbox (I use the "enhanced" junk mail filtering). This post is BUSTED. -Mike

    28. Re:Stunning by FlashBac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, fair enough. Yahoo etc are not the greatest.
      BUT I set up my yahoo account 10 years ago, and yes I had a college account, then I left college, had a differant work account, back to college, diff account, Job, diff account, and am now working as a postdoc with a differant account.
      My point is I still have the same yahoo account I had when I was 17. I used it in South America, in Germany, in the Port Authority in NYC, Stansted Airport and so on. So, if someone that i met 7 years ago wants to drop me a mail, and doesnt have my work/uni address, they use yahoo. (And I tell them to use my work address from then on.) But the contact is made. And, therefore they cannot be described as "second-rate e-mail services", because when you are in the back ends of the Andes they are the only thing available, and are pretty first rate in those instances. They are a differant type of account, and are useful.
      And I take offence at hotmail or anyone censoring my mails.

      --
      "Thats right buddy, the large print giveth, and the small print taketh away."
    29. Re:Stunning by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I have lost touch with many people because they changed email addresses and never told anyone."

      They told people, they just didn't tell you. Sorry to be the one to tell you that... ;)

    30. Re:Stunning by NerdSlayer · · Score: 3, Funny

      hmm... no gmail account for you, but I'm willing to bet some spam will be on its way...

    31. Re:Stunning by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What amuses me about all of this is that ISPs and stupid technology writers keep waving that flag, but it's not like Google is trying to be underhanded about how the service works. They seem to make it pretty clear what's going to happen when you sign up.

      Essentially, anyone who blocks Gmail invites would be saying "well, I understand that you agreed to what Google offered, but I feel as though I have more say in your decisions, so I'm rescinding your approval and issuing a denial on your behalf". How is THAT not an abuse of privacy? If they really felt that their customers' privacy was at risk, why wouldn't they just offer a warning? Blocking the e-mails is essentially saying that you have more say in your customer's decisions than they do online, PLUS it indicates that you were watching their mail in the first place!

      Do you I smell a pile of boving excrement wafting on the breeze from the direction of a few dirty ISPs and freemail providers?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    32. Re:Stunning by SpiritOfGrandeur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The spam filter on Outlook 2003 also kills all gmail messages as a default. I had three invites in my Junk Email Folder, and four from friends writing from the gmail account...

    33. Re:Stunning by stiffneck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not really. When you graduate from college, or change ISPs, or change companies, you'd be lucky if they'll let you keep your old email address, even if it just forwards all messages to your new address.

    34. Re:Stunning by joeljkp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't that what .name was created for? I haven't heard much out of them... is it still going strong? I wouldn't mind first@last.name.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    35. Re:Stunning by ryanwright · · Score: 2, Funny

      Real ISPs come and go, you are not in college forever, and you dont keep the same job forever. However, you CAN keep one of these "second-rate" email addresses indefinitely.

      Private domain: $8 a year.
      Virtual server on a high speed backbone: $20 a month.
      Having unlimited email addresses you can keep for the rest of your life: Priceless.

      But I charge mine to American Express.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    36. Re:Stunning by pvt_medic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes privacy, because yahoo on the bottom of there pages says it collects personal info, but they do it for a good reason i bet and google doesnt

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    37. Re:Stunning by wwaaves · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally have sent at least 8 invitations to people with hotmail accounts and 7 of them have signed up. If hotmail is blocking gmail then monkeys are lining up inside my ass and getting ready to fly.

    38. Re:Stunning by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Informative
      My only problem with that is if they start to use those keywords to profile me. I don't want google or any one for that mater knowing that I recieved 210 e-mails with the word f**k in them over the last two months.`

      If you don't want computerized algorithms running over your e-mail on a daily basis, there are two things you should do;

      1. Run your own e-mail server
      2. PGP-encrypt all outgoing / request (demand) all incoming mail be likewise encrypeted.

      Otherwise, I hate to say it, but your e-mail is analyzed by every server it passes through. As for profiling, well, that's the norm. But think of it this way - you're getting e-mail for free. What did you expect? They give you 1 gigabyte of free storage on a highly advanced, redundant, failure-resistant geographically diverse network for ... FREE. If they profile you, sorry, but you have no right to blow the "Privacy" trumpet. You get what you pay for.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    39. Re:Stunning by BlueJay465 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree with you. Back in the mid-late 90s yahoo, hotmail (pre-MS), and other providers were easily paying over $100 per gig of space. Why, back in day, 1995 I believe...

      I fondly remember those days installing those newfangled Western Digital 1.6 GB Caviar drives working at the Mom & Pop Computer Shop. Those puppies were selling like hotcakes for about $200, and I remember having to walk a mile to and from the bus stop where I had to ride for an half hour trip and hoof it for another mile, barefoot, in the snow, uphill both directions....with only 2400 baud.

      AND BY GOLLY WE LIKED IT!

      Almost 10 years later, you kids have it so easy these days. They keep making the drives bigger and faster and cheaper and smaller. These days a 160GB drive only goes for a measly 77 clams. Oh yeah, those guys over at Google were smart. Establish their presence first, and invest in ungodly amounts of hard drive space for dirt cheap. It's 2004, why on earth wouldn't those companies that did it in the 90s be pissed off about it.

      HEY, GET OFF MY LAWN YOU DAMN KIDS!

    40. Re:Stunning by h3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      BUT I set up my yahoo account 10 years ago, and yes I had a college account,

      Erm... Yahoo account 10 years ago? I'm pretty sure Yahoo was just a tilde account at stanford.edu 10 years ago, or just getting started at yahoo.com. I don't think they had "accounts" til much, much later.

      http://docs.yahoo.com/info/misc/history.html

      Just a little historical eyebrow-raise. Unless your name happens to be "Jerry Yang" or "David Filo", in which case, my apologies.

      -h3

    41. Re:Stunning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, for god's sake turn off your spam filter. Because that shit is reading your email and generating keyword lists etc. It's profiling your email! Why, the whitelist on your Bayesian filter is FULL of shit you like to talk about. Just think if the cops got ahold of that one!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  2. Unable to verify... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.

    But I won't let that stop me from posting it! ;)

    1. Re:Unable to verify... by tssm0n0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But this was such a well researched posting. I like how it contradicts itself:
      Emails and invitations sent to Hotmail from Gmail accounts do not bounce...invitations he sent to a Hotmail address bounced

    2. Re:Unable to verify... by hafree · · Score: 5, Informative

      I received a Gmail invite through my hotmail account just yesterday without any problems.

    3. Re:Unable to verify... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      Color me tinfoil, but it suspiciously looks like Hemos is fishing for a Gmail invite.

    4. Re:Unable to verify... by stevesliva · · Score: 4, Informative

      For what it's worth, I received a Gmail invite through my Hotmail account on Friday without any problems.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  3. MS & Google by mfh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would expect this from Microsoft. They can blame the spam filters, to try and save face, but the simple fact is, they are simply taking a page from their own rulebook; they don't want to lose advertising revenue from people switching to Gmail, so they are breaking the law and interfering with email. If Microsoft had successfully bought Google to trash it, Gmail would not have existed at all. For those of you just tuning in, Hotmail is owned and operated by Microsoft, after they bought the service in 1998. I was a Hotmail member prior to Microsoft being involved and the service has declined significantly since the old days. Although many of the features have improved since then, the bulk of the Hotmail service is becoming increasingly unreliable for email that just "has to get there".

    In other news, we've got lots of Gmail invites for military folks here, so if you want Gmail for large files and you are a soldier, or if you want to donate your invites to soldiers, check us out. This is not just for American military, but any democratic military, such as Canada or the UK.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:MS & Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Either that or the Gmail invite reads like:

      LIMITED TIME OFFER!

      NATURAL ENHANCEMENT!

      ABOUT YOUR EMAIL ACCOUNT

      FREE FREE FREE FREE

      SIGN UP NOW!

      http://gmail.com

      For more info, I send you this file in order to have your advice.

    2. Re:MS & Google by Tet · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Although many of the features have improved since then, the bulk of the Hotmail service is becoming increasingly unreliable for email that just "has to get there".

      If it "just has to get there", you wouldn't be using email in the first place. But even if you are using email, why on earth would you be using Hotmail? If it's that important, you should be using your own SMTP server over which you have control. Instead, you're relying on a third party, that you're not paying, and with whom you have no service level agreement. Not a smart move for data you care about...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    3. Re:MS & Google by DaHat · · Score: 4, Informative

      so they are breaking the law and interfering with email

      Do tell, what law are they breaking? I must have missed the one which says that ISP's and other electronic mail carriers must deliver all e-mails passing through their systems.

      Hotmail, like Gmail are run on private networks and anyone using said networks are bound by the whims of their owners and operators.

    4. Re:MS & Google by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just want to say that that is a VERY cool thing to do for the men and women who devote their lives to defending their countries. It's an often thankless job, and being away from loved ones with crappy communications makes it that much harder. Personally I think that the military needs to spend a little bit of cash on forward deployed servers so that things like that aren't needed. Why shouldn't soldiers away from home have unlimited size email boxes, if google can support it with ad revenue I think the military with their Billions and Billions can afford something that would significantly improve the moral and good will of the troops.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:MS & Google by dinivin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The act of arbitrary email delivery, to suit corporate needs over the needs of their clients, does transgress the law, one way or another.

      Then can you cite a legal case to back this statement up?

      Dinivin

    6. Re:MS & Google by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if you extend that law, you'll give protection to spammers as well. At that point, only client-side solutions would work.

    7. Re:MS & Google by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would expect this from Microsoft. They can blame the spam filters, to try and save face, but the simple fact is, they are simply taking a page from their own rulebook; they don't want to lose advertising revenue from people switching to Gmail, so they are breaking the law and interfering with email.

      That Microsoft would even consider doing any such thing.
      Consider how safe your data is in a Microsoft proprietary format.

    8. Re:MS & Google by runlvl0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      > so they are breaking the law and interfering with email

      Do tell, what law are they breaking? I must have missed the one which says that ISP's and other electronic mail carriers must deliver all e-mails passing through their systems.


      I think that you're right, but I think that the confusion exists because of existing laws concerning common carriers.

      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    9. Re:MS & Google by arakon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How do you suggest that they do this?

      I really wish they could do it, I'm in the military and am looking at one of those long stints away from loved ones soon... but the fact of the matter is, if it's not for official military use, it won't get funding. That and rolling cable in the desert just makes one more security issue to deal with which requires manpower we can't spare right now.

      Yeah yeah, but WIRELESS!.... is a security nightmare right now and lets face it, no matter how many times COMSEC and COMPUSEC are briefed there is always some nimrod on the network violating the security measures.

      War isn't about being comfortable, the military's primary concern is that we stay alive, not that we have email. They've actually gone to great lengths to set up call centers and email access as it is, but you could easily wait in line for 2 hours for your turn. But trust me when I tell you that those connections that are allowed are closely monitored (fewer connections mean fewer resources required to monitor them).

      Warfare is as much about information control as manpower these days.

      --
      "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    10. Re:MS & Google by kiskoa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Consider how safe your data is in a Microsoft proprietary format.

      It's the safest! No one ever can read it! ;]

      --
      If Yoda so strong in Force is, why words in right order he cannot put?
    11. Re:MS & Google by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, that's a great idea... if you want to completely destroy morale!

      Most of the soldiers I know are able to get through the day because they feel that they're fighting for something important to them: their friends and family. Take away that connection and you take away their reason for fighting, and suddenly you no longer have an effective fighting force (at best, at worst you create more traitors and the problem, rather than being solved, only gets bigger).

      Before you say they should use snail mail, would you? In a day when near instant communication is not only possible, but common in every home, restricting soldiers to doing things the old way just isn't acceptable. Never mind the fact that snail mail often ends up chasing a soldier around for weeks before finally catching up to them, and it's not uncommon for it to never catch up at all.

      FWIW my soldier friends who're deployed are pretty much restricted to using their .mil addresses, which I'm sure go through some sort of filtering before delivery. No sane military commander would restrict it much more than that except in the most extreme circumstances.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    12. Re:MS & Google by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Interesting
      War isn't about being comfortable, the military's primary concern is that we stay alive, not that we have email. They've actually gone to great lengths to set up call centers and email access as it is, but you could easily wait in line for 2 hours for your turn.
      What I find interesting is the assumption among many that since we have the capability to provide instant and continuous worldwide communications between individuals, that creates a right to unlimited acess to that ability. (You see the same assumption pop up in discussions here on slashdot about blocking cell phones in theatres etc..)

      <mode=geezer><veteran=on>At mumble feet under the North Atlantic there isn't room to form a two hour long line, let alone email or phone access to wait on. I envy you kids that, but I didn't have sand in my dinner at least. :) :)

    13. Re:MS & Google by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A third-party analyzed the spam-filter in Outlook 2003. He reverse-engineered the table of weights in the spam-filter engine by matching hashes of a standard English dictionary to values in the file. E-mails containing "Linux" was being marked as spam. I don't know about you, but I haven't gotten much spam pushing Linux porn or Linux enhancement lately. Perhaps the people at MS Outlook Central have a weird fetish?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  4. No world record there by Moblaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hotmail is still not as efficient at blocking Gmail as Internet Explorer is efficient at unblocking pop-ups.

  5. Mountains by Jhawkeye83 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mountains out of mole hiles. It's just a spam filter blocking bot mail.

    --
    Quality over Quantity.http://www.virusgaming.com/
    1. Re:Mountains by noone06 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I do not know if this is the exact case. I tried the test as described with Yahoo. I copied the entire body of the gmail invite and send that to my yahoo account with any subject, and it gets marked as spam. I can delete up to one word in the email, and it does not get marked as spam. It seems Yahoo is specifically looking for the whole body of the Gmail invite..

    2. Re:Mountains by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Insightful
      or, yahoo is specifically looking for the whole body of another email it's looked at too many times.

      it may not be that 'it's gmail invite' but that it's 'identicle to other mail'

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:Mountains by adpowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But not all Gmail invites are the same. Not only are the URLs different and the names listed in the e-mail different, but the first part of the invite is also customizable text from the user sending the invite.

      Andrew

    4. Re:Mountains by scottj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. I sent an invite to a Yahoo user last week. She contacted me today asking where her invite was. The invitation did contain a custom message from me. When I forwarded a copy of the invite back to her today, it went through just fine. I still haven't gotten a message on my hotmail account that I sent to myself from Gmail. I think the Hotmail block is in effect in full force.

      --
      .-.--
  6. I don't want to be nasty, but ... by ezzzD55J · · Score: 5, Funny
    Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.
    Did anyone expect you to ;) ?
  7. Dunno about you lot but... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just tested to three hotmail accounts, invites and standard emails get through fine. Not sure about yahoo tho.

    1. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by hottoh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hotmail is how my invite arrived.

      Is the article author positive they do not have one of hotmails spam filters turned on?

    2. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just received one on Yahoo, straight to the Inbox. Perhaps there's a country-specific issue? They may well use different filters. Or maybe some Bayesian thing where users have different criteria?

    3. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by orin · · Score: 3, Funny

      I tested this also. No problem. Gmail to Hotmail took the same time as my ISP to Hotmail.

      When this story was sitting in the queue, didn't is just sound a bit "too good to be true" (from the conspiracy side of things)?

      Finally - should we be getting a Gmail icon with all of these Gmail stories?

      1. Make Slashdot Joke.
      2. ?????
      3. Get Gmail Invite!!!!

    4. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by hendridm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, this is old news first reported the middle of last week. Perhaps they fixed it now and configured their spam filters to allow the Gmail invite.

    5. Re:Dunno about you lot but... by TheLinuxWarrior · · Score: 2, Funny
      You can send an invite to my yahoo account.

      Purely in the interest of "research" of course. ;)

  8. Really? by asveepay · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've invited two people on their Hotmail accounts, and both received the emails just fine.

    --
    "I'm not sure which is the bigger disappointment; my failure to formulate a unified field theory, or you."--Stephen Haw
  9. Honestly... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... if I were a spam filter, I would have seen the gmail email as spam too... I mean LOOK at it.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Honestly... by endx7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hotmail doesn't think most of the "Someone has a crush on you!" spams are spams anyway.

      The only way you win for that is by turning the "if not in address book it's spam" spam filter on.

  10. A New Era? by illuminata · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.

    Are the editors finally trying to verify things around here?

    If that's the case, I commend them.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  11. So thats why! by Braingoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    So thats why my G-mail invite never showed up!!

  12. Well gee, it works fine for me.... by arcite · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got an invite from my buddy, he even sent it to me using his gmail address. me thinks this story is FUD.

    1. Re:Well gee, it works fine for me.... by blowdart · · Score: 5, Informative

      Same here. A gmail invite sent to google arrived quite happily in my inbox, and I have hotmail's spam filter set to high. Test emails sent from my gmail account to hotmail did arrive.

      But hey, lets not let the facts get in way of a knee jerk reaction <g>

  13. testing 1,2,3 by jdallien · · Score: 3, Informative

    To test, I sent two messages from GMail: one directly to my Hotmail account and one which I only CC'ed to my Hotmail account. The CC'd message arrived immediately but the direct message (sent first) arrived about 5 minutes later.

  14. I did receive one by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have an hotmail account, and my cousin was able to send me a Gmail invite to that account a week ago. Perhaps the situation changed, I don't know.

    --
    Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
  15. Bullshit. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just sent my hotmail account a mail from my gmail account. The message didn't bounce and arrived in my hotmail account just fine.

    So at least hotmail isn't using dirty tactics.

  16. /dev/null by dimss · · Score: 2, Funny

    It looks like Hotmail staff finelly discovered procmail and /dev/null.

  17. Unfortunate legal names by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's possible that the blocking is happening because of some poor sap's unfortunate legal name. He might actually be named "Instant Winner", or "Free Vacation". Crazy hippies.

    --
    stuff |
  18. Well.. hold on... by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After reading most of these links (I know.. I actually RTFA), these blogs and other articles were posted months ago (back in April!). Perhaps they have since changed their ways after numerous postings about it?

    --
    Hmmm.
  19. Is this something new? by jrand · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I invited someone with a hotmail address about a week ago, and they accepted with no problem. So unless they've suddenly changed their policy after the first several thousand invites went out, this is an isolated email problem reported on one person's weblog. Spam filters moving the invite into a bulk mail folder is to be expected - it is an automatically generated email sent out in bulk, after all.

  20. Blog crap by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Informative

    So the core of this Slashdot "article" is some posting on one guy's blog about losing a invitation he sent to his girlfriend. And that's been extrapolated into "Hotmail blocks Gmail".

    If you read the blog article the writer blows all credibility when he reveals that someone just told him about the "Sent Folder":

    Update: Thanks to everyone telling me to check the Sent folder. I can at least retrieve the invites now.

    When are people going to realize that blogs are the equivalent of public urination on the web. People post stream of consciousness bullshit dressed up as "information" or even "facts" and because it's on a blog, well then, it must be true.

    John.

    1. Re:Blog crap by black+mariah · · Score: 4, Funny
      blogs are the equivalent of public urination on the web
      You've managed to put into words the things I've been feeling for years. *sniff* I love you, man! *CRIES*
      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    2. Re:Blog crap by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Funny

      When are people going to realize that blogs are the equivalent of public urination on the web.

      That would explain the spotty coverage.

    3. Re:Blog crap by Tom7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your mistake is believing that Slashdot posting the story somehow elevates its fact status. If blogs are public urination, Slashdot is public urination from a big, incontinent man with polyuria.

  21. Maybe, maybe not by cemaco · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not that I would put it beyond Microsoft to block a competitor, but if you RTFA you see that a possible reason for the invites being bounced is that they are being picked up by the spam filters.

    http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/is-hotmail-block in g-gmail-invitations-015942.php

  22. OMG CENSORSHIP! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry but this came right out the box of Microsoft's dirty tricks. If you can't get your e-mail then you can't switch services, microsoft already has to deal with Linux, why not shut out Gmail while we're at it? At least this time it won't cost a small company millions because Microsoft didn't like them. I just wonder how many people will sue when they lose money through Ebay when buying one and it never arriving.

    --
    I like muppets.
  23. My Gmail invite got put into my spam folder... by Phil+John · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...by spam bayes outlook plugin, almost missed the three week window too, so yeah, it does look very spammy.

    --
    I am NaN
  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Please note: I've not been able to verify this one by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or in other words, you are practicing the old time honoured passtime of spreading a rumour.

    Great work.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  26. Take off your tinfoil hats by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's already well-documented that Yahoo moves Gmail invites into the Bulk Mail folder. I've personally confirmed the Hotmail and Yahoo blocking.

    Much as I enjoy wearing my tinfoil hat, I think it can be dispensed with here.

    Both Hotmail and Yahoo mail have been plagued with spam, and with users demanding they do something about that spam. Indeed, that's one reason people are interested in GMail.

    Since almost all spam -- anything we think of spam, anyway -- arrives in mass quantities, and a logical way to reduce spam is simply to look for many addresses receiving the same email.

    So a decent first cut at filtering bulk spam (and recall that both Yahoo and Hotmail use "bulk mail" folders) would be to take an MD5 sum of each email (not including the "To" address header lines, of course), stick the sum in hash table or other database, and increment a counter for each email with that MD5 sum. Once the counter reached some arbitrary large-ish number, you'd mark all copies of that emails spam.

    Since the GMial invite varies slightly, it's clear that something fuzzier than an MD5 sum is being used, but the principle remains the same.

    The first N GMail invites weren't marked as "bulk email"; after the counter threshold was reached, all the rest have been.

    So all we've learned from this is that, even during this invite-only beta test, GMail must be sending out a hell of a lot of invites, and that, yes indeed, Hotmail and Yahoo customers demanded and got "bulk email" filtering.

    So take off the tinfoil hats -- you'll have a real reason to wear them soon enough.

    1. Re:Take off your tinfoil hats by illumin8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since almost all spam -- anything we think of spam, anyway -- arrives in mass quantities, and a logical way to reduce spam is simply to look for many addresses receiving the same email.

      This is true. But, what probably triggered it was this: A few users received Gmail invites and either didn't know what it was, or didn't recognize the person they received it from, saw it was offering another email service, then clicked the button that says "This is Spam". When Hotmail gets a few reports like that the message text gets added to their filters and everyone else's invites start going to the Spam folder.

      That's just standard operating procedure. If they didn't have that procedure in place we'd receive 50-100 spams a day in our Hotmail box.

      Of course, none of this would have been a problem if Hotmail hadn't sold all of their account lists to bulk emailers years ago. Hotmail is the only service that when I first created an account, instantly started sending me spam before I had even given my address out to anyone. The only way they could have gotten my address is if Hotmail sold it to bulk senders.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  27. my hotmail/gmail experiences by quintesson · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had an invite sent to my Hotmail address yesterday, and it arrived safely in my inbox within seconds. However, a message I sent from my Gmail account to somebody else's Hotmail went into their 'Junk Mail' folder.

    Either way, I'm sure Microsoft will rectify this situation, or risk losing customers.

  28. your own SMTP server? ha! by kalpol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I tried that. Yes, I have my own SMTP server. It was nice, fast, and super reliable until AOL/Comcast/Time Warner/pretty much everyone began blocking email from everyone except megacorp SMTP servers.

    --
    12:50 - press return.
    1. Re:your own SMTP server? ha! by soren42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had this same problem. The solution is to use your ISP's SMTP server as a relay host. For example, in my Postfix main.cf, I have the line:

      relayhost = smtp-server.carolina.rr.com

      That fixed my problems not being able to send to AOL, Time Warner, the Easter Bunny, and the Jehovah's Witnesses.

      And, with SquirrelMail (or any other free software webmail system) set up, I can check my mail from anywhere with a web browser.

      It beats using Hotmail any day of the week.

      --

      "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
  29. Gmail invite by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Informative

    A Gmail invite came to my Yahoo account just fine.

    Just so y'all know: I used http://www.gmailswap.com to get the invite. Thanks guys!

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  30. Email wars, probably predictable by sammyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Very funny in a warped sort of way. If email begins to fail regularly, this may be the straw that brings in full goverment regulation and all the blessings and other stuff that entails...

    Remember at the dawn of the electrical age there were competing companies with many different voltages, made for exciting interoperability issues. Goverment regulation could be a blessing.

  31. Outblaze by Phoinix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Other companies as Outblaze have similar practices. Recently, all emails from the un.org servers were BLOCKED. Outblaze claim that the sysadmin @ un.org blocked their servers for spam or other stuff (viruses, etc) and did not respond to their emails. What Outblaze did is the most stupid thing ever. I will not be renewing my subscription with them (www.operamail.com).
    I may nderstand if they decided to block an ISP server, but blocking servers of the United Nations is just MORONIC; I doubt this happens outside the US.

    Has anyone encountered similar stupid acts?

  32. Yep. It's true. by cherrycoke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bought a dirt-cheap account on Ebay on Saturday; the seller sent the link to my Hotmail account, and it never appeared in the inbox or the trash.

    Had him send it to my main email address after reading this article, and the link worked fine. Needless to say, I'll be ditching Hotmail within 24 hours. This makes me incredibly angry.

    --
    http://www.farmerbob.org
    1. Re:Yep. It's true. by randyest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm, yours is the only post I saw (I'm reading at +1) supporting the rumor. Yet I count 12 posts above yours claiming that invites made it to Hotmail (and the desired user) without problem. One of the 12 said the invite went to bulk mail due to the spam filter, but it didn't "disappear into the ether." All others claim that both emails from gmail accounts and invites were not blocked, lost, torn, mutilated, or otherwise hindered by Hotmail.

      So, that's interesting. Was it only the invite that was "lost" or regular emails from gmail users too?

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Yep. It's true. by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Funny
      Needless to say, I'll be ditching Hotmail within 24 hours. This makes me incredibly angry.

      HULK SMASH PUNY HOTMAIL ACCOUNT!!
      RAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!

      whatever...

  33. Re:MS & Google (and Quicktime and DR-DOS...) by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Microsoft has a long and rich history of crippling opposition products. Quicktime for Windows was flakey as hell in the early years, but far from that being Apple's fault it was alleged (convincingly) that Microsoft were deliberately making it unstable. DR-DOS is the subject of a long running lawsuit where it appears that some versions of Windows 3.x simply refused to install on it for no good reason and providing only confusing errors.

    However, I will not attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity. Hotmail has been so unreliable of late that at work we're close to the point where Hotmail addresses will not be accepted as a primary email address. Incredibly stupid filters tend to be at the root of the problems. If too many messages look the same Hotmail calls them spam and they vanish into a black hole. Meanwhile, actual spam fills many a Hotmail inbox.

  34. I have both a gmail and a yahoo... by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 2, Informative

    account and I am able to forward back and forth without problems. I'd like to see some independent verification of this.

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
  35. Not my experience. by EvilJohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I invited a friend to my gmail account, sending the invite to her hotmail account. It worked perfectly.

    --

    Less Talk, More Beer.
  36. I will test it if you send the invite by Linuxathome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quick, someone send me a gmail invite to my email at : gmailme ATT linuxathome DOTT c o m. I'll forward it to my yahoo and hotmail account and will post the results here. Okay, okay, this is a desperate attempt to get a gmail invite, but it's worth a try right?

  37. B-e-t-a by David+Thompson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did you every stop to think that non-delivery could be the result of an issue at the senders end? Just a thought but they are in beta.

  38. Clever ... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone has found a way to make lots of ./ers admit to using Hotmail.

  39. Just Tested It.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Works fine... Sent an email from my gmail.com account to my hotmail.com account. Went directly to the InBox. And I have my Junk Email Filter set to 'Enhanced'.

  40. Scanning Emails by csimpkins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And everyone was worried about GMAIL scanning/parsing emails... pffft!

  41. It worked as of last night by skermit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I set my father up with a Gmail invite to a Hotmail account as of last night 11pm EST. It doesn't mean that you can't send the invites as IMs to your webmail-restricted friends.

    --
    -Christopher Wu
    http://www.christopherwu.net/
  42. Re:Making a big deal out of nothing... by rnews · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait a minute. You said it was in your bulk folder. Then you start talking about spam. But Hotmail didn't call it spam.

    The invite was certainly bulk. It arrived as a part of a large number of substantively identical email messages. Like with posts to properly run mailing lists and other legitimate bulk email, your invite was solicited, so your copy wasn't spam.

    Note that bulkiness is measurable. Simply count messages that match fuzzy checksums.

    Spamminess, on the other hand, is far harder to measure, as it depends on the users' sometimes erroneous recollections of whether they solicited the bulk messages.

    But Hotmail didn't call it spam. They called it bulk. That sounds quite proper and accurate to me.

  43. Suddenly... by vinlud · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...half of Slashdots userbase appears to have a Hotmail address??

    --
    Repeat after me: We are all individuals
  44. A Workaround to this Problem by wrozmiarek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems like the majority of my invites never arrive in my friend's inboxes. To get around this, I send the invite then go into my "Sent Mail" folder to look for the "Sign-up" URL that was sent. I just create a new email and copy and paste the original URL. I haven't had one of these blocked (that I know of). Cheers!

    --
    -- http://GatheredTogether.org - Ministries Helping Ministries
  45. for the "me too" files.... by hymie3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a friend send me a Google Mail invite to a yahoo address. It never arrived.

    I'm certain that he used the correct address. I can understand "bulking" gmail invites (don't believe it's an honest mistake, but can understand it's possible) as I have had legitimate invites to mailing lists/web sites get placed into the bulk folder.

    I got nothing in my Yahoo account. I was very careful to check the bulk foldler, but nothing ever showed up. Lucky for me, I was able to get the URL for the invite from his sent folder and signed up that way.

  46. Working by PHanT0 · · Score: 2

    I've just gotten this to work...
    (slightly edited to conceal my secret identity)

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

    From : *
    Sent : June 21, 2004 10:47:09 AM
    To : *@hotmail.com
    Subject : tester

    Inbox
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Received: from mproxy.gmail.com ([216.239.56.245]) by mc5-f3.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:47:09 -0700
    Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so1741952cwc for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
    Received: by 10.11.118.20 with SMTP id q20mr562509cwc; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jH5i3J0rEhEWO2gbDf1/JE0
    Message-ID:
    Return-Path: *@gmail.com
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jun 2004 13:47:10.0033 (UTC) FILETIME=[3FCD0C10:01C45796]
    View E-mail Message Source

    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    did you block this?

  47. fwiw... this worked fine last week by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Informative

    I sent my wife a gmail invite to her hotmail account... and she accepted it/got the msg no problem...

    i just sent a message from gmail to my hotmail and it was recieved... ?

    I love a good conspiracy, but we might have rattled our tinfoil swords prematurely on this one...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  48. The problem is pipe by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    not servers. On one of my trips to the middle east a few years ago, we had about 5000 soldiers at our location, and about five 56k modems worth of bandwidth to serve them all. Yes, you read that correctly.

    Think the neighborhood node for your cable modem is slow in the evenings? Brother, you aint seen nothin'.... and to make matters worse, they also throttled that bandwidth down even more by port... 80 was always the slowest. Fortunately for me, ftp wasn't throttled... so my downloads from kernel.org took hours instead of days (hey, a geek's gotta do what a geek's gotta do).

    Increasing the pipe is only part of the issue; you have to filter all that traffic. If you don't control that information stream, classified information will leak, and viruses/worms will run riot. Even on a filtered system, one virus can really make your life miserable. I witnessed this on another delployment... the Anna Kournikova virus got loose in our network... it wrecked havoc for days before we got it under control (send a bunch of lonely, hormonally-poisoned, computer-equiped 19-year-olds a file purporting to be a picture of Anna Kournikova and see what happens... total chaos).

    Increasing services to the troops is good, but it has to be done right, or you might end up with more problems than you started with.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  49. Me Thinks He Wants An Invite... by pdxmac · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please note: I've not been able to verify this one way or another.

    Yeah, I think that's the crux of it.

    Actually, when a kind slashdotter sent me an invite, Yahoo didn't move it or block it...

  50. Confirmed: False. by Temporal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just sent a couple e-mails from my gmail account to my hotmail account. The first one was delayed a few minutes, but the second one went through instantaneously. My friend (who originally invited me) says she successfully invited someone using a hotmail address yesterday.

    So, yeah. I'm afraid this is... not true. At least as far as hotmail is concerned.

  51. But think financially... by FearTheFrail · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While it may bring universal (nationwide?) standards to e-mailing, you know that it will be seen as a potential source of revenue.

    Shortly thereafter, they'll set in place a registration system that wants you to put in a checking or credit card account with the rest of your information... ...and then they start taxing e-mails. A penny or two per e-mail is something the public could be cowed into, despire what we /.ers think about it, and by the time it can be adequately questioned, the public will be too accustomed to paying, the gov't too accustomed to collecting, and we'll be stuck.

    I think the continued deregulation is worth risking a GMail invite or two.

    --
    ___ In the words of Gen. Douglas McArthur: "I'll be right back."
  52. WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by lcsjk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry, but I seem to be on the trailing edge of technology today. What is this invite stuff? Seems I don't get invited to nothing anymore!

    1. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just watching all of the AC's reply to this with email addresses is hillarious. How many spmamers want to flood these accounts today? :-)

      --
      $ man woman *
      -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
    2. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Flagbrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      I got my invite fine at my hotmail address.

    3. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by Steeplerot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Send me a gmail invite plz cuz teh chixx0rz will waNt my pen0r then kthaNX steeplerot@yahoo.com

      --
      Vaughn "Its always darkest before it goes pitch black."
    4. Re:WHAT IS A GMAIL INVITE? by NemosomeN · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would like an invite, send it to nNOSPAMeNOSPAMmREMOVEoTAKE-OUTsDON'T-TYPE-THIS-PAR ToI-LIKE-CHEESEmFISHeHEADSn AT yTAKE-ME-OUTahoTO-THE-BALLGAMEo.com

      ------
      Note, taking out the bullshit won't get a real email address.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
  53. Orkut by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hotmail had this same problem with Orkut's invites a while back.

  54. My cousin works at Google: by purduephotog · · Score: 2

    And as such most of his relatives have gmail accounts. I just photographed his sister's wedding; we've been using the gmail to send the large images back and forth (about 4mb to 6mb each).

    Every email from gmail to me gets bounced or delayed for up to 4 days (gmail->hotmail). Any email from anyone else, goes in just fine.

    Any email from hotmail->gmail, delayed. Any email using a relay such as my rr.com one, goes in just fine.

    Conclusion: Hotmail is dicking with my emails and REALLY pissing me off.

  55. Hotmail works just fine. by kasek · · Score: 2

    I got my gmail account a few days ago, and the invite was sent to my hotmail account. No problems.

    I just now sent a message from my gmail account to my hotmail account, and it was received just fine.

  56. Faugh. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Maybe this was on Tuesday or Wedensday of last week, when there was akamai and hotmail issues? "Oh, he's not getting my email, so Hotmail must be blocking Gmail."

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  57. Hotmail generally sucking by phorm · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've actually had a lot of issues with hotmail in the last... 3-6 months? Email bounce with server errors (accounts aren't full so that's not the problem), or there's a lengthy delay between sending the email and it actually being received.

    So, this may not be so much indicative of a problem with hotmail and gmail as it is hotmail in general. Possibly they're lagged in processing the some bazillion spams that must pass through there, anyone have any stats on how much spam passes through hotmail daily?

  58. Yahoo blocks invites completely by Ingenium13 · · Score: 2

    I personally received a GMail invite. However, on my yahoo account I never received the invite. It was sent twice even! It didn't appear in my inbox OR bulk mail folder (I checked, double checked, and triple checked!). The only way I was able to receive it was the sender forwarded me a copy of the invite. Shame on Yahoo for this. I was going to just use the GMail account for novelty, but after a stunt like this I no longer trust Yahoo to be reliable and plan to switch 100% to my GMail address.

  59. confirmation by jasong911 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had 2 invites this morning on my Hotmail addy, the first I pounced on, the second I left in the Bulk folder. 2 hours later the second invite is gone from the Bulk folder. Very suspicious.

  60. Count Mozilla in on the anti-Gmail conspiracy... by JamieF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because I got an invite yesterday and Mozilla's Junk Mail filter tagged it as spam.

    SpamAssassin didn't, though, which proves that those scheming bastards obviously rigged Mozilla 1.7 so that it would filter gmail invitations. There's no other explanation, right?

    It couldn't be because the invitation email looks a lot like spam...?

    Nah.

  61. Privacy - yeah right by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As if hotmail and yahoo are in any position to point the finger at anyone for privacy issues!

    1. Re:Privacy - yeah right by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Bulk Mail filters *surely* don't read the content of any messages and aggregate the results for later analysis, right? ;)

  62. Re: For me??? by mindseye1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just to let you know, it was my birthday just a couple days ago. In case any of you had forgotten to get me something, I have a GOOD suggestion!
    It's cheap
    It's fun
    It's timeless
    It's a Gmail invitation!!! Yeah!

    ryankelley at comcast dot net
    if yer feelin generous!

  63. Care to cite? by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this is Slashdot, where random blog posts are submitted and become fact simply because they bash Microsoft in some way (even though it's turned out that it's completely false), but do you care to cite who this mysterious, unnamed "third-party" is?

    I get e-mail about Linux all the time, and it's never, ever sent to the Junk Mail folder. It's cool to pull random facts out of our asses, but perhaps we should take the time to step back and see how foolish it makes this community look? This article is completely false, and it's hilarious to see all the people giving their prepared lectures "Well, what would you expect from Microsoft? Blah blah blah."

  64. My Invite was blanked out today by redrumsquad · · Score: 2, Informative

    My brother sent me a g-mail invite this morning to my hotmail account. When sending an invite gmail prompts you for a personalized message. Well my brother called me on the phone to let me know he sent the invite. I found it in my bulk mail folder, with everything but his personal message blanked out. The invite was essentially deleted. He had to send it to my Rediff account (the original 1 gig free email). So it's not a BS story

  65. One little detail I haven't seen mentioned... by Lazyhound · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...e-mails sent to Hotmail accounts tend to "disappear" at the best of times. I work at a call center*, and I get frequent call-backs from people using Hotmail who never received e-mails sent to them, despite it being registered as sent in our systems; others have mentioned receiving mail 2+ hours after it was sent. I doubt this is anything more sinister than shoddy service on Microsoft's part.

    *Pity can be expressed with GMail invite to lazyhound2@hotmail.com.

  66. Embedded Images by Myrmi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing that GMail appears unable to do is to show images that are embedded into the email. That's a bit of a poor show, in my book :/. I'm not talking about remotely linked images, either (which you can show at the click of a link), but images that are sent in the email itself.

    --
    "I think everyone is an agnostic but just doesn't know" - Frazz
  67. For the record by maotx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've noticed a few other things weird about yahoo and its infamous bulk folder. For about a week and a half now my /. subscription has been placed their instead of my inbox. I had to use a filter to prevent its misdirection.

    --
    I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  68. Google blocking gmail? by Scryer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't been able to log into gmail for the last few hours (Server Error / The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your request. / Please try again in 30 seconds. ) and ordinarily this wouldn't set off any alarms. After all, it is a beta service.

    However, I checked in on Orkut, a Google-provided networking/community bulletin board site, and did a search in "Communities" for "gmail". Yesterday this returned dozens of groups, and at the moment it returns none. Other groups appear to be perfectly operational.

    Is it a coincidence that Orkut gmail-related communities disappeared at the same time as Gmail did?