Slashdot Mirror


What A Portable Media Center Might Look Like

An anonymous reader writes "From the Redmond's answer to iPOD dept... While wandering the exhibitor aisles at Embedded DevCon, we were drawn to this slick looking reference design board in the Freescale (formerly Motorola Semiconductor) booth. The Portable Media Player Reference Design, a.k.a. "Jazz", is based on a Freescale i.MX21 embedded processor, runs Windows CE, and is compliant with Microsoft's Portable Media Center (PMC) standard. PMCs, Microsoft's answer to the iPOD, will initially support digital music and videos, digitally recorded television shows, and digital photos."

143 comments

  1. Not an iPod killer by StraightTalkExpress · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are several reasons this is not an iPod killer per se. Mostly because it does not beat the iPod in any of the areas in which the iPod excels: being a very small, very light, fairly durable, tightly enclosed music device with good battery life and a nice interface. MS's stuff is going to be necessarily larger, necesarily heavier, necesarily more precarious unless they ruggedize the HELL out of those LCDs and reinforce the plastic grating over the speaker. Battery life will probably be about the same as a portable DVD player, and if the interface is anything like Pocket Media Player, it's got NOTHING on the iPod.

    In short: this looks like it has exactly the same features and price point as the device I traded in for my iPod, a Toshiba PocketPC. And just like the PocketPC, it'll have limited appeal which becomes even MORE limited when Joe Q. Fancydevice realizes how hard it is to get first run movies onto it...i mean, how fast can the processor be in these things and still keep battery life?

    Still, competition is good for the industry. The market pressure will force Apple to make iTunes even better (and there's room for that). But I don't think they have too much to worry about...a bigass laptop wannabe is NOT in the same league as a tiny little music device.

    1. Re:Not an iPod killer by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I dont think this is designed to complete with the iPod at all. Looks like they are trying to create a whole new device market here.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Not an iPod killer by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's funny. Looks to me like they're trying to bulid competition for the Playstation portable. Seems like an ages old market...

    3. Re:Not an iPod killer by 0racle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would a media player from MS be "necessarily larger, necessarily heavier, necessarily more precarious." All you'd have to do is buy a iPod and look at it and you'd have an idea what has to be done. The iPod was cool, but its not like you have to be a rocket scientist to understand it.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:Not an iPod killer by kevlar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This isn't supposed to compete with the iPod. The LCD screen alone is the size of a PocketPC screen, but has incredible resolution, so much to the point where you look at it and you FEEL like you're looking at a much larger high-res screen. (I am speaking from personal experience).

      Yes it plays MP3's, VCD's, etc etc and uses hard drives for storage (they might have a CF version, I don't recall), but its definately not an iPod competitor based on its dimensions alone. It is still _VERY_ cool, and I wonder if their intention is to turn this into some sort of Game Boy Advanced device a-la XBox Embedded or something to that effect. That would be pretty cool....

    5. Re:Not an iPod killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful here--the article states the Jazz only " is compliant with Microsoft's Portable Media Center (PMC) standard." The Jazz itself is made by Freescale solely as a demonstration of the i.MX21 processor. In other words, you won't find the Jazz in any store.

    6. Re:Not an iPod killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err, 320x240 is the resolution of most PocketPC devices. Except for the groovy ones like the Zaurus SL6000 which has 640x480 in the same form factor.

    7. Re:Not an iPod killer by mr.+roboto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      MS has decided to build a video player with a big, color LCD screen. This is what makes the larger size and weight necessary, while simultaneously making the device more fragile and limiting battery life.

    8. Re:Not an iPod killer by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Now that I didn't see. It also means this isn't really positioned against the iPod.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    9. Re:Not an iPod killer by pherris · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There are several reasons this is not an iPod killer per se.

      I'll bet that Apple already has an answer to that thing anyways. Somewhere deep in their R&D department has to been an iPod with a color screen that plays Quicktime video files. It wouldn't surprise me if Jobs hasn't already started talking to video production companies asking them for the rights to distribute their shows. Want a copy of Frontline, Simpsons or "Good Eats"? It will cost you a $.99 for a 30 day copy. Remember, DRM can be added to the QT format.

      As you know (and as do most people that read /.) Apple has been two steps ahead of everyone else since the early '80s. They should turn out something by the end of next year and IMO it'll be worth the wait.

      --
      "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    10. Re:Not an iPod killer by HybridJeff · · Score: 1

      Im thinking you're alot clser to the mark than the parent. Although to be truthfull, PSP isnt out yet, and the market for this device hasnt really been defined yet (for the media aspects anyway, im not sure if this windows thing will have console-esque gamers) so theres still alot of freedom there. Looks to me like the perfect type of thing to take on long bus/train/plane rides.

    11. Re:Not an iPod killer by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      the day i accept 320 x 240 as a) high resolution b) good enough - REGARDLESS of SIZE - is the day you can put a bullet in my head.

      not. good. enough.

    12. Re:Not an iPod killer by naily · · Score: 1
      Hands up: who wants to watch movies on a pocket PC/Palm/Mobile phone/iPod-sized screen??

      This would not be a mass market product, it would be a tech-heads bragging product.

      The perfection of the ipod is as much in what it doesn't try to be: a pda, a phone, a movie machine, a games machine. It's just a music player, and a damn good one. The rest is incidental.

      --
      We all live in a state of ambitious poverty. -- Decimus Junius Juvenalis
    13. Re:Not an iPod killer by kevlar · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the 320x240 screen resolution figure from article is wrong.

    14. Re:Not an iPod killer by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      If that were true they never would have come out with the Watchman 20+ years ago.

    15. Re:Not an iPod killer by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      --
      The perfection of the ipod is as much in what it doesn't try to be: a pda, a phone, a movie machine, a games machine. It's just a music player, and a damn good one. The rest is incidental.
      --

      It's not incidental if you want more than just a music player and you wind up hanging single-purposed hardware off your body like christmas tree ornaments.

  2. Not widescreen by YetAnotherName · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nice looking board, no doubt about it, but to really make a splash they ought've made it 16:9 instead of 4:3. Just like the old car commercial says, "Wider is better."

    1. Re:Not widescreen by skermit · · Score: 1
      --
      -Christopher Wu
      http://www.christopherwu.net/
    2. Re:Not widescreen by TommydCat · · Score: 1

      This seems aimed at us tech weenies and up to this point I still see more pr0n in the 4:3 format.

      --
      This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
  3. I've got a Portable Media Center right HERE! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...it starts with an 'i' and is about the size of a 'note'book. Highly portable, 4 hour battery life, runs OS X, and can even interface with the Internet and an iPod! Screw Microsoft. What more could you want out of a PMC?

    1. Re:I've got a Portable Media Center right HERE! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Geez, I wasn't trolling. My point is that a laptop makes an effective Portable Media Center. No need for a specialized device.

  4. Ogg support anyone? by John+the+Kiwi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone know if this will support Ogg? I'm still regretting putting my whole music collection into OGG format. IRiver is still a little expensive for me.

    1. Re:Ogg support anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it will, but someone will probably hack it, and a processor fast enough to play video will be able to decode Ogg fine.

    2. Re:Ogg support anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      iRiver's PMP-140 runs Ogg, Divx, and MPEG-4, and... it's based on Linux :). Coming soon, already on my wishlist ..

      http://www.iriverswitzerland.com/product/pmp140. ht ml

    3. Re:Ogg support anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No offence, but that's the price you pay for using a fringe format. I mean if you want something supported by everyone use mp3. I fell in love with ogg vorbis early on. No matter what quality I used in mp3 the trebble always had problems. So I went to ogg vorbis and was very happy with the result. I also had to accept the fact that hacking ogg vorbis into my iBook was less than ideal, and I would probably never get support on most devices - but I still like ogg vorbis better.

    4. Re:Ogg support anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just a hardware reference design. Ogg support would likely be done in software. So that kind of detail is pretty much up in the air at this point. To early to say.

    5. Re:Ogg support anyone? by maxbang · · Score: 4, Informative

      Get the Neuros. It supports ogg, has open source software, and is fairly inexpensive.

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    6. Re:Ogg support anyone? by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

      Well, *I'm* glad I put my entire collection into Windows Media Format! (Seriously!)

    7. Re:Ogg support anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ordered a Neuros. When I received it, it was DOA. Neuros Audio would not pay for shipping it back to get it replaced.

      Instead, I opted to get a refund (which took 3 weeks). They did not refund any shipping cost. Trying the neuros cost me $15 and some frustration.

      The iRiver iHP-140 looks like a better choice from my perspective.

    8. Re:Ogg support anyone? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      What about video? :-/

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    9. Re:Ogg support anyone? by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      Hmm, nice. Shame it doesn't seem to be available in the UK :(

      Plus, of course, I'd want to be able to play stuff from ITMS (although I guess just supporting non-Fairplayed files would suffice *cough*)

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  5. Re:No one can beat iPod by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    iPod is #1 because of marketing, pure and simple. They're selling a branded lifestyle, not electronics.

    Designer jeans don't cost so much more because they're necessarily better, or of a higher quality construction, etc..

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  6. Video Screens by blankinthefill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Until the size, weight, and power consumption of screens that display video and photos are both reduced, and show an increase in quality, I don't believe that a device such as this will win out over the Ipod. It will be either too bulky, or it's screen will be too small for any real use, or the batteries won't last an acceptable amount of time, or a million other problems. Sometimes it's better just to do one thing, and do it well, than to try to do many things, and do all poorly.

    1. Re:Video Screens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think any device that can play movies is not even in the same class as the iPod. Disagree? Show me how your iPod plays movies and I will show you how my banana is better than your apple.

  7. "feature" by dirtmerchant · · Score: 4, Funny

    The reason for the largish size:

    When the weight of the stack of EULAs equals that of the product, Microsoft releases.

    1. Re:"feature" by strictnein · · Score: 2, Funny

      speaking of size... What are the dimensions on this thing? For all we know it's about 2ft X 4ft (or .6096m x 1.2192m for the metric among us (they're everywhere!))

  8. Pre-emptive?? by bairy · · Score: 3, Funny
    Real-time, pre-emptive multi-tasking kernel

    What the hell is pre-emptive in this case.. it does something before you tell it to? That's not so much clever as scary

    Also, "Real-time".. er, isn't it supposed to be realtime? Would be a tad annoying if it did it 5 mins after (aka Windows ME)

    Lastly, just cos everyone else has and I want a go...:
    Yes, but does it run linux?

    --


    Get paid to search..It's geniune and
    1. Re:Pre-emptive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you don't know what preemptive multitasking is, please stop reading slashdot.

      There are plenty of sites geared towards computing newbies and wannabe's.

      Thanks.

      Oh, btw, real-time is more correct than "realtime" which isn't even a word. "Real time" would be preferable.

    2. Re:Pre-emptive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "real time" is two words, and there are no two word adjectives in the English language. Even "realtime" is better than "real time".

    3. Re:Pre-emptive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Real time" isn't an adjective, it was just misused in the story. It should have read "preemptive kernel which operates in real time". Real is an adjective, time is a noun.

    4. Re:Pre-emptive?? by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      What the hell is pre-emptive in this case.. it does something before you tell it to?

      How about a pre-emptive DRM that works in real time? It pre-empts you from doing something before you do it.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    5. Re:Pre-emptive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      To answer your question, read this In a nutshell, pre-emptive multitasking is where the OS decides how much processor time programs have to complete their work, in contrast to co-operative multitasking where a program has to relinquish the use of the processor.

    6. Re:Pre-emptive?? by bairy · · Score: 1
      Ahh. Now I see where it got the name, thanks.

      I wonder how much processor time is given to deciding how much processor time should be given to each process? (note: this is a joke, not a serious question)

      --


      Get paid to search..It's geniune and
    7. Re:Pre-emptive?? by quasipunk+guy · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure pre-emptive in this context means that the kernel is capable of pre-empting certain tasks in order to maintain the proper performance level for more important commands.

  9. Put Linux, XINE, and MAME on this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Before everyone gets in an uproar over the word 'Microsoft', remember that this device simply follows the standard Microsoft created.

    It's based on an ARM processor, so should this device ever take off, the ARM Linux port could easily be customized to take advantage of all the features.

    This could also be used as a MP3/video player for your living room stereo and TV, connected to the server via the built in ethernet.

    Also, if you look carefully at this larger view, notice the device could make a really cool portable gaming device. Imagine running MAME on this...

    Of course, if Linux were loaded on the device we would not need to worry about silly things such as DRM (included in the Microsoft specification.)

    1. Re:Put Linux, XINE, and MAME on this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I forgot to mention--this is just a development board! You won't find a commercial product exactly like this. We'll just have to wait for a vendor to come up with a product using this chip (hopefully including all the important features).

    2. Re:Put Linux, XINE, and MAME on this... by beboploco · · Score: 1
      It's based on an ARM processor, so should this device ever take off, the ARM Linux port could easily be customized to take advantage of all the features.

      And at least some of the onboard devices will also be supported in Linux. A port of the i.MX21 ADS board is in the works, which has a fair amount of overlap with the Jazz board.

  10. Freescale vs Mot. semi by csirac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a bitter experience with Motorola's 9S12DP 1K79X defects (SCI interrupts, PLL registers, BDM bugs, CAN freakiness, etc).

    Does anyone know what the roadmap is for their 16bit MCU lines? Perhaps I should be using Renesas or go 8bit AVR...

    1. Re:Freescale vs Mot. semi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps I should be using Renesas or go 8bit AVR...

      I think you should try to get out more.

  11. Some missing features... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the screenshot:
    My Music
    My Movies
    My TV Shows
    My Pictures
    Settings

    They forgot to include :
    My MPAA lawsuits
    My RIAA lawsuits
    My upcoming jail terms
    DirectPay (TM) money transfer

    It's about time somebody came up with a Personal Lawsuit Origanizer.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Some missing features... by eofpi · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's about time somebody came up with a Personal Lawsuit Origanizer.
      Nah, then the lawyers would sue for interference with their business model....
      --
      Y'know, you blow up one sun and suddenly everyone expects you to walk on water.
    2. Re:Some missing features... by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey I NEED those folders. Back when those folders didn't exist, I would just randomly throw music anywhere. I had 302 mp3's on my desktop at one time. Thank god microsoft stepped in with this innovation.

      And Settings? Who needs to adjust settings? What are you? Some terrorist trying to run "linux"?

    3. Re:Some missing features... by haystor · · Score: 1

      I used to keep things directories like C:\downloads or C:\pictures.

      I've finally given up and moved those directories into My Documents since all the dialogs keep resetting to look under My Documents first.

      I suppose the real problem is a lack of symbolic links.

      --
      t
    4. Re:Some missing features... by tsumbaga · · Score: 0

      From the screenshot:
      My Music
      My Movies
      My TV Shows
      My Pictures
      Settings

      Great. So I'm all in favor of taking my own pictures and loading them on this to view. Fine, fine, fine. But writing and recording my own music and filming my own movies and TV shows sounds like way too much work. Bah.

      My potential, their passion indeed.

    5. Re:Some missing features... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      I've finally given up and moved those directories into My Documents since all the dialogs keep resetting to look under My Documents first.

      God, that's annoying!!! I suppose there must be a registry hack for this, but I haven't really bothered to look for it. I simply gave up and now use My Documents, as well.

      --
      No sig
    6. Re:Some missing features... by potmos · · Score: 0

      Wow, this looks like my Netgear router with a LCD glued on it.

  12. better name.... by drtomaso · · Score: 2, Funny

    It needs a better name. One that characterizes its functionality, and portability.

    Let me be the first to suggest "omni-pr0n-sent."

  13. More of a PVR by jzilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well unlike an ipod it plays video as well and audio. I personally can't wait until these type of devices become affordable to people like me. My personal favorite of this type is the Archos 400 which can also record video as well.

    1. Re:More of a PVR by coolsva · · Score: 1
      Question is, do I want to watch videos on a 2-4" screen?. If you say, I can connect it to a big tv, I can do the same with my dvd player, kind of defeats the whole purpose, doesnt it.

      Once a small video player comes with an equivalent to headphones for sound (goggles?), it may be practical. Im not holding my breath!

    2. Re:More of a PVR by jzilla · · Score: 1

      If you download lots of media, you can carry it around and show your friends. Also you can connect it to your friends tv in a snap. Yeah you could burn it to a dvd and use a dvd player, but that requires rencoding with a motly collection of software and a lot of cpu time. These things are better than dvds because they can play a wide variety of formats (which are upgradable), plus they are portable.

    3. Re:More of a PVR by really? · · Score: 1

      What if you are busy but like to watch certain TV shows? This would allow you to watch yor stuff during your commute, if you commute by train/bus/some_kind_of_public_transportation, that is. No?

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    4. Re:More of a PVR by sokoban · · Score: 2, Funny

      Little bit of a niche market there. I'd say it appeals more to the 18-35 still living at home guys who need a portable device for all their pr0n viewing needs. In other words, the /. crowd.

      Come on, can't you nerds take a joke? :-P

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  14. Ahh yes, that "old" saying.... (?) by gosand · · Score: 4, Funny
    Nice looking board, no doubt about it, but to really make a splash they ought've made it 16:9 instead of 4:3. Just like the old car commercial says, "Wider is better."

    Windows CE - The Pontiac of Operating Systems.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Ahh yes, that "old" saying.... (?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

    2. Re:Ahh yes, that "old" saying.... (?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows CE-the Chevy Nova of OSs

    3. Re:Ahh yes, that "old" saying.... (?) by mblase · · Score: 2, Funny

      Windows CE - The Pontiac of Operating Systems

      It's a curious coincidence that that acronym "P.O.S." stands for something else Windows CE is often called.

  15. Not impressed by A.+Pizmo+Clam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems to me that this has got to be an all time low point for announcements of innovation in consumer electronics. Why? Maybe its because of the down turn in the tech-market means new products are not being developed. Another possibility is that microsoft's moves into hardware production(x box,phones) and Hardware specification (palladium, watches, media player, smartScreens) is having a chilling effect on the electronics industry. Recently they (allegedly) tried bankrupt a phone maker and move his technology to a competitor. Shades of Stacker and all the other software companies microsoft co-opted, ruined then bought their technology.

    There is little doubt that MS stifled innovation in software. Just the fact that jobs could tweak an open source project to tripple the speed of a web browser over IE, when IE has had a clear field to innovate for five years or more, speaks volumes about the MS innovation stifle field. How could apple even dream they could technologically beat MS in the Power point market, but they did.

    Does anyone else find these MS offerings utterly tepid compared to Apple innovation the day before?

    M$ gates announces a recylced idea for a portable that shows sport scores, headlines, and plays RIAA/MPAA approved media. The debut the smartScreen, a 1500$ screen-only that hooks to your compute by wi-fi but cant play movies or mp3s, then they announce that anyone who already bought was is out of luck since that they will be changing the specs to use 802.11a to get better bandwidth for movies. then an oversized so-called "video" ipod that also cant show DVD movies, for more bucks than a ipod.

    The only thing I thought was interesting was that they decided to switch to 802.11a for the smartScreens and not 802.11g. I dont know much about these standards except what Jobs said. 802.11a is dead, because it is not backwards compatible with 802.11b hotspots whereas 802.11g is.

    How is it possible that one company can lead the entire market year after year going back all the way to the taming of dynamic memory. While the other company can lead the bussiness world and innovate nothing.

    --

    Thank you for your support.
    1. Re:Not impressed by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Does anyone else find these MS offerings utterly tepid compared to Apple innovation the day before?"

      Usually when I do, it's not because the product sounds stupid, it's because of my attitude about Microsoft. It's hard to give them the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Not impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I dont know much about these standards except what Jobs said. 802.11a is dead, because it is not backwards compatible with 802.11b hotspots whereas 802.11g is.
      With 802.11g, you only have three usable radio channels for adjacent access points -- same as with 802.11b. Yes, there are 11 channels, but you've got to use 5-channel separation -- 1, 6, 11 -- to minimize interference.

      With 802.11a, all of the channels are usable. Several PC vendors have tri-mode (a/b/g) client cards that can associate with any of the three types of AP radios (one at a time). This means you can have 802.11a in the office or at home, and still have 802.11b for mobile hot spots.

      Too bad that you can't get an "a/b/g" card (or even a "b/g" card) to fit into the AirPort slots of various Apple desktops and laptops. I have a (low-end, home-class) "b/g" router, but the only thing that Apple sells for the proprietary AirPort slot in my original iMac G4 is a "b" card.

  16. Digtal music is not the only selling point by arieswind · · Score: 1

    If they can get good battery life and video quality, they can sell on the digital video part

    Or maybe, just think, Jerry Springer on the run?

    Maybe they can make it interface with camera phones, and store them and stuff on a bigger screen than a phone

  17. Pocket PC by mschoolbus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My Pocket PC can play video and audio files, play emulated NES games, browse the web, and a whole lot more...

    You need to re-encode your mpegs or avis to a PPC friendly bitrate, but its not that tough.

    1. Re:Pocket PC by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      My laptop does all that and more, but it's also a lot more expensive than these things plan to be...

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Pocket PC by Kenja · · Score: 1

      My PocketPC plays Divx and Xvid encoded video files at full FPS on its 640x480 screen. (shrug) There are enough VGA PocketPC devices out there at this point, and PocketPC 2003se looks very nice at that res.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  18. Right approach by coolsva · · Score: 5, Insightful
    iPod isn't popular because it can do a lot, rather, because it is simple to use and very limited in what it can do. But what I can do, it does it very well. I don't need 3 rocking buttons, 5 regular silver buttons, one jog dial having a zillion functions to play my music.
    Walkman, before this, was popular not because it offered equalizer (it didnt), radio (initially, it didnt), multiple headphone jacks etc. It was popular because it was simple.

    If you want to make a iPod killer, make a device that is simple to use, good 'OS' (that has AI like remember my favorites and gives them priority in random mode), practical capacity (not insane sizes like 40GB, who has or wants 10,000 songs on their palm?).

    Oh, it also has to look cool and not be a commodity. And, did I say, no DRM?

    1. Re:Right approach by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why's everything need to be an "iPod killer"?

      I don't want an "iPod killer". To me, iPod was stillborn. I can get an mp3 cd player for 20 bucks with all the simplicity you crave, and capacity I need.

      A portable audio/video media player is a wholly new market, and something I may actually be interested in. It's "something I don't already have", as opposed to "something that does exactly what the thing you already have does, but just a bit different, and for 15x the price".

      The potential hackability of this platform has my interest piqued as well. What are you going to hack an iPod to do? Play another format of music... oh woooooowee I just split my pants.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Right approach by Klanglor · · Score: 1

      this seems like a side story to the PALM vs PocketPC.

      In the begining, one offered stability and simplicity, and the other features and integration.

      At very first, the features and integration is not reliable, expensive and bulky. But as technology improves, price drops, and becoming more and more reliable: useres are willing to adop these extra benefits for a small premium. The leader of the race is soon getting caugthup by the the bulky and slow turtle.

      however, unlike the PDA war, raging in both the business and consumer fields. This battle is on for consumer side, where MS is know to Suck! (ie: Windows XP Home, Windows 9x/ME... ..BOB!)

    3. Re:Right approach by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      The iPod actually did have some advantages over an MP3 CD player... Not the least of which was that it was a 20 GB FireWire hard drive in the palm of your hand. For me, it was always rather incidental that it played music.

      But, I think I agree with you that personal, portable media players will become an important mainstream piece of technology. Everything I've seen so far is trying to be an iPod. That's just silly. Nobody wants to hold Battlestar galactica at arm's length. Its a PITA. I think Head Mounted displays will suddenly, instantly become mainstream when somebody releases a lightweight, convenient, hackable video player with a nice HMD no heavier than a pair of featherweight glasses. Until then, I just don't see it as a convenience.

      Of course, god help us when some moron decided to watch porn on his HMD while driving and talking on his cell phone.

      When you are dealing with video, capacity is a much bigger deal than with audio... Think about having all seasons of all Star Treks, Simpons, Family guy, Futurama, the LOTR trilogy, the past week of your favorite news programs (automatically encoded by your PVR for synching, so you can watch last nights episodes of News of E! News Live...)

      Actually, that's a nother important thing -- downloading video off the internet is okay, but having your PVR integrated for synching is a big deal -- it becomes just an extension of the PVR.

    4. Re:Right approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason that the iPod and Walkman are popular is that you can use them on the move without bumping into things. What's the point of a portable media centre that you can't use in a portable way?

  19. Re:No one can beat iPod by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    You might find this to be an appropriate web comic. Although when you think about it, it's all about whether a device is "designer" or not. Laptops can do everything a PDA, MP3, etc. can do. So why have smaller devices? Because sometimes they meet a real need. In the case of the iPod, it was a good mix of a sound player with high capacity storage. It hit the very edge of that "sweet spot" in which pocket devices are allowed to live. I think Microsoft's problem here is that these devices go beyond that "sweet spot" and start competing directly with Laptop type devices.

  20. They'll cross it with a Cell Phone too. by kabocox · · Score: 1

    You know that they'd have to cross the thing with a Cell Phone. In theory, a device that I can carry around 4-5 movies, 20-30 hours of music, and huge amounts of pdf, html, and docs would be great. The down side, it will be nearly output only and battery life will be short. I don't think a full Windows platform should be needed for this too work. I think that the electronics folks could most of it in hardware.

    My thing is some one needs to get personnal mobile input down and quick. Entering any data on a cell phone is a PTA. Entering PDA data isn't much better. At a desktop, keyboards and mice work well for input devices. We need a device that we can wear 24x7 and use as effortlessly as current desktop keyboards and optical wheel mice. Until then, our dreams of the ultimate mobile PC will be stalled until input catches up with output.

  21. Did they offer it to you for 50 bucks? by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    That's what it's meant to cost, isn't it?!

    By the way, for the funky Apple capitalization impaired, it's:

    iPod, iTunes, and iMac.

    Not iPOD, Ipod, or IPod.

    1. Re:Did they offer it to you for 50 bucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget iFruit.

    2. Re:Did they offer it to you for 50 bucks? by CygnusXII · · Score: 1

      Try this on for size.
      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewIt em&cate gory=15062&item=5706593317&rd=1&ssPageName=WDV W

      it's alittle more like $550

      --
      My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    3. Re:Did they offer it to you for 50 bucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention iSuck, the title to be given to someone who runs any of these devices.

  22. Re:No one can beat iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did this get modded (Score:1, Troll)??? This comment makes an excellent point--just look at Apple's advertising!

    And before you start talking about high quality construction, remember the rechargeable battery issue!

  23. OK... by fozzmeister · · Score: 1

    ... Features are gr8 but look at the MMC card in the pics, this thing is HUGE. saying that maybe they could quite easily just shrink all the circuitary? isn't the iPod basically the size of the HDD inside it?

    1. Re:OK... by Anonym1ty · · Score: 0, Troll
      isn't the iPod basically the size of the HDD inside it?

      Um think about what you just said. If the iPod were the size of the hard drive in it, the hard drive would have to be on the outside. The iPod is nearly as small as the hard drive, not the same size.

  24. Having "JAZZ!" attached as Device Name by CygnusXII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You think, they would do some additional market research to possible, names. JAZZ, is so closely associated with iOmegas' Jazz Drive, and their infamy is well, known. I wouldn't want to be even remotely associated to that company.

    Some kind of Name a little more media savy or Market Targetable.

    --
    My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    1. Re:Having "JAZZ!" attached as Device Name by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Huh? This is a reference platform, not a consumer level product. The only people interested in this are the ones who will use it to develop said consumer products, and they know what it is. You could call it a VIC-20 if you want.

      At any rate, when IOMega's Jaz drive (only one z) came out, I immediately thought of the "Jazz 16" soundblaster clone I had in my computer at the time. My sound card was robust and stable and never gave me any problems.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Having "JAZZ!" attached as Device Name by Meowing · · Score: 1

      The first thing I thought about was Lotus Jazz, especially with the Moto angle.

  25. Sony U50 / U70 ? by Tensor · · Score: 3, Informative

    This functionality exists in these two devices. They are small, portable (0.5 kg) with a decent battery life (2.5~3hrs watching divx) have MStick and CF interfaces, USB 2.0 and touch screen, 256 (u50) or 512 (u70).

    True they are expensive at USD 1,500 and USD 1,700

    But they are a full-blown computer with a Celery M 900 o Centrino 1Ghz.

    I'd rather buy one of these.

    1. Re:Sony U50 / U70 ? by Tensor · · Score: 1

      Sorry forgot the most important part!!

      And a GLORIOUS 800x600 32bit Bright LCD. not a puny, crappy 16bit 320x240 4 year old screen.

  26. Funny paraphrasing brough to mind... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The last sentence of your post:

    How is it possible that one company can lead the entire market year after year going back all the way to the taming of dynamic memory. While the other company can lead the bussiness world and innovate nothing.

    Caused a funny paraphrasing to pop into my head...

    "If Apple did not exist, it would be nessecary for Microsoft to create them"

    (apologies to Voltaire)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  27. PSP anyone? by beeglebug · · Score: 1

    While obviously it's hard to get excited about a screen and a bit of green circuit board, I still came away from that thinking "Why? When I could just get a PSP..."

    It's going to play movies, it will handle music, and it can play PS2 quality games (on a 16:9 screen), the only downside is it has no hard drive, but the UMD discs have a decent enough capacity for my portable media needs, and besides it looks sexy as hell!

  28. Resolution's Too Low - 320x240 + LDTV by billstewart · · Score: 1

    320x240 is great if you're comparing it to a PalmPilot. It's not enough to play TV on the LCD. And it's certainly not enough to run much text on, and it sounds like it can't drive a TV at good enough rates to use that as a monitor either - plus it doesn't say anything about driving HDTV so I assume it can't do that either.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Resolution's Too Low - 320x240 + LDTV by kevlar · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what that article says, I think these devices have higher resolutions that 320x240. 320x240 is the standard PocketPC screen resolution and this thing had FAAAR greater resolution than a PocketPC. I've seen it with my own eyes. I could have been looking at a version 2 device though...

    2. Re:Resolution's Too Low - 320x240 + LDTV by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      320x240 is great if you're comparing it to a PalmPilot.

      Half the resolution is "great"?

    3. Re:Resolution's Too Low - 320x240 + LDTV by Bander · · Score: 1

      320x240 is great if you're comparing it to a PalmPilot.

      Most PalmOS devices these days run at 320x320 or 320x480. Just thought you might like to know.

      Bander

  29. Sorry, I don't have 20/10 vision. by zeitgeist_chaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does it come with a magnifying lens so I can see what's happening when I play my TV shows and videos? Maybe it's just me, but I find that any video screen smaller than about 10" is completely unwatchable. To make matters worse, mobile video is even more difficult to see on the go because of the variations in ambient light intensity and the jostling motion of walking/commuting/etc.

    These mini-video players look like a poor solution to a non-problem.

    --
    While thinking philosophically, we see problems in places where there are none. -Wittgenstein
  30. Name problems? by Doomrat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Jazz is also a MIDI sequencer. Naming issues?

  31. Archos av400 comes to mind... by Szentigrade · · Score: 0

    Its definatly not an ipod killer but with the included fm tuner and decoder it definatly beats the new archos those was on /. today.

    --
    When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up... reading.-Henny Youngman
  32. Re:No one can beat iPod by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

    Yes, true, the ipod has very good marketing. But it is also a great product. None of the other music players out there even approach the itunes/ipod solution. It is just so easy, so seamless and so powerful. No one else has made a comperable product, that's why it is the most succesful. Its not the construction its the interface and the integrated music "solution".

    --
    Sig removed because it was obnoxious
  33. Old news by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This entire article should be modded -1, redundant. Several Portable Media Center devices were shown months ago, e.g. Creative and Samsung.

  34. forget CE let's make a instant boot windows device by timts · · Score: 1

    I am tired of using "ported" version on any portable device, cant we just make them windows device, (well, linux fans can install linux) and make it portable?

  35. Forget MSPMC, buy a MEC Station Deluxe by skermit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MEC Station Deluxe

    6.5" 16:9 Aspect Ratio Screen
    20gb, 40gb, 80gb, flavors ($599, $699, $799)
    Compact flash support (so you can dump pics from a digicam card STRAIGHT onto the MEC, i.e. if you're on a vacation and need a lot of pic space but only have one card)
    TV-out
    ~4.5 hour battery life

    and for the supported media formats...

    MPG-1, MPG-2, MPG-4 (DiVX, XViD, RM), JPG, GIF, BMP, WAV, MP3

    and in the future...

    TXT, OGG

    Plus it runs embedded linux variant (not sure which one).

    I have one, and it's out NOW.
    It rocks. It rocks...

    --
    -Christopher Wu
    http://www.christopherwu.net/
    1. Re:Forget MSPMC, buy a MEC Station Deluxe by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

      See, now that's what I'm talking about! Yeah!

  36. PSP might be the answer by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    If the Sony PSP lives up to the hype. It will be able to play movies and a whole lot more.

    I don't think any company apple, dell, M$ has ever come close to the success Sony has had with handheld devices. All the way back from the walkman in the 80s. Sony dominated.

  37. Agree, this looks like a PSP ripoff. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    The PSP is being marketed as a multimedia device anyways. I don't see how anyone can get all excited over this mock up board and not already know about the PSP which will be out early next year. As far as no hard drive, dont count that out - Sony is planning on releasing many add-ons and types of the PSP for various needs. It does also have the mini discs as well for movies and such that will start coming bundled with Sonys DVD movies. I am unsure if there will ever be writers for this for the public, but if there were, it would be pretty slick. It also has true 16:9 widescreen.

  38. your vision sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have you ever watched movies on a portable dvd player or on an airplane with a personal screen? they are good enough for airplanes and great for portable use such as on car/train trips.

    1. Re:your vision sucks. by zeitgeist_chaser · · Score: 1

      There are several differences between the video players you described and this reference board with the 3.5" screen. First of all, all of the items you mention have bigger screens. Second, the airplane and car DVD players have a power supply to draw from and can therefore afford to produce a brighter picture than a battery powered player. Third, the positioning of the screens on planes and in cars (usually attached to the roof) generally prevents the screen from being exposed to too much glare. Fourth, I have used portable DVD players and they suck. I think their overall lack of sales and most people's preference for viewing DVDs on laptop computers supports my point. Fifth, you are a troll.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      While thinking philosophically, we see problems in places where there are none. -Wittgenstein
  39. iMovie movie store on the horizen? by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 1

    Steve once said that there wouldnt be a video ipod because video is too compliucated and he wanted a simple user experiance, but what if he does the same thing he did with online music, a downloadable music service. there are already others so its feasably, and apple seems to have a strong relationships with ip powerhouses. also, if you look on the tiger preview for the looking glass preview, when steve searches for pixar, it looks like he has movies, not onyl trailers, I'm probably wrong about that I ddint look too carefully.

    1. Re:iMovie movie store on the horizen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Music on the go has been popular since god knows when.

      The soundtrack for life.

      In the car, on the bus, jogging, at a party etc.

      But video on the go? Nah you can keep it, if it's not installed on the back of a headrest on an airplane then I'm just not interested.

  40. Lots of MS vanity as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey there! You're using the latest MS powered device blah blah.

    MY Music
    MY etc.

    Thats where they keep going wrong especially with personnel devices like music players.
    You just don't need eye candy for that stuff.
    Consumers just don't care, as long as it looks good and works like a charm.

    Keep it clean and simple.

  41. Re:No one can beat iPod by linuxelf · · Score: 1

    I'll admit that the iRiver h120 isn't as convenient as the iPod with the iTunes Music Store (I have to convert all of my iTunes music to mp3 before putting them on mine), but the device itself is extremely nice. It is only slightly larger than the iPod, considerably cheaper, and lighter. It comes with the carrying case, a built in mp3 encoder, optical audio in and out, and a built in FM Tuner. It plays mp3, ogg, or wma, and is firmware upgradable to play new technologies as they emerge. Battery life is right at 16hrs. It's not marketed as highly as iPod, but I vastly prefer it.

    --
    - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
  42. customizing file open dlg by Mr+44 · · Score: 1

    If you want to change where your mydocs folder points to (a network share, or just a shorter folder path), just right-click on it and pick properties, and its staring you in the face.

    If you want to actually customize the places bar, download the tweakui powertoy, and go to "common dialogs"->"places bar", and enter your own folders. (if you don't want to download anything, just add Place0, ... PlaceN entries under HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Pol icies\comdlg32\PlacesBar)

    1. Re:customizing file open dlg by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      If you want to change where your mydocs folder points to (a network share, or just a shorter folder path), just right-click on it and pick properties, and its staring you in the face.

      Except that it's amazing how many applications break or fail to install if "My Documents" isn't on the C: in the standard location. (I used to point MyDocs at a server share point so that all of the PCs that I use had a common MyDoc folder.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  43. This will be great... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    ... when something like iTunes for video becomes available. I have some extra $$$ in my pocket, and I've been eyeballing the Archos Jukebox thingamabob. Unfortunately, I'm having real serious trouble thinking of a good way to get content to it. My ReplayTV might be the answer, but .. well it's hooked up to my TV! Heh.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  44. Anybody else see what I see? by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    Harddisk, SD ram slot, 64mb ram, color screen....aside for the ARM processor, this thing's a portable xbox.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  45. what crack are they smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the hell is the point of a small portable movie player? I would never want to watch a movie on a tiny screen like that. I would play games, but I'd much rather get a GBA instead. that thing is too damn huge and ugly. No thanks, I'll pass on that ugly piece of junk.

  46. Re:No one can beat iPod by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

    What I like about the ipod is that you don't put things on it, per se. It IS itunes, just it goes with you. And when you connect the ipod they sync and all your playlists and everything else goes with you. And then, when you listen to the ipod your play counts sync back up with itunes. That, for me, is what makes it great.

    --
    Sig removed because it was obnoxious
  47. iRiver has one that runs linux by ff3j · · Score: 1

    the PMP-120 They call is a "Portable Media Player"...20 GB, runs linux, looks pretty cool. There's no price listed yet but I imagine that it's going to be pretty expensive.

  48. Re:No one can beat iPod by linuxelf · · Score: 1

    There is no denying, the iPod is a wonderful piece of hardware. Playlist management is definitely lacking in the iRiver. WinAmp play lists work on the iRiver, but it's not the same thing. Play count really isn't important to me, so that's a feature I don't miss. I like being able to record several hours of audio. I'm taking a night class right now, and it's nice to be able to carry it in and record the lectures and such.

    --
    - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
  49. What? by karniv0re · · Score: 1

    ...compliant...Microsoft...standard...

    Did you just those three words in the same sentence?

  50. BSA by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "BullShit Acronym": PMC. I expect the M$ spec will revolutionize mobile media consumption the way their Multimedia Personal Computer (MPC) reference spec revolutionized desktops: not at all. As usual, it will be Apple which turns on masses of consumers to mobile media with a right way to do it, even if they wind up buying an inferior product from M$ instead.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  51. All I have to say... by Alsee · · Score: 1

    More fucking DRM crippled crap I'll never buy.
    (Except maybe a used/broken one, specificly to crack the DRM).

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  52. Can't boot any other operating system. by torpor · · Score: 1


    Anyone else notice the lack of ability to boot another operating system on these devices?

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  53. Security Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This means heavy, heavy DRM.

    If content is so valuable, how can it be given to consumers hands in the first place??

  54. Give us what we want! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    I'd buy one of it could play Divx movies. But we know that'll never happen. The funny thing about DRM is that for the first time in history manufacturers are bending over backwards to NOT sell us the products we want!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  55. Re:No one can beat iPod by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

    It has good marketing now, but wouldn't it have been a success anyway? I remember seeing the first announcement of the iPod and thinking how much I wanted one - I'd have happily bought a Mac if that was the only way to get one to work.

    The difference I see between this and the iPod is that people want, and are used to having, music while on the move. I play my iPod everywhere. I can listen to music when I'm doing pretty much anything, but I can't watch movies in anywhere near so many situations. Portable movie players do nothing for me at all. I think it's catering to a market that doesn't exist.

  56. Actually, I see the point in iPods by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Disclosure: I do _not_ own an iPod, and I'm _not_ an Apple fan.

    Yet I think the iPod probably won on its own merits, not just marketting.

    At one point, I actually went looking for an MP3 player. Let me tell you, the impression I was left with was that all the iPod competitors sucked. They sucked like an industrial vacuum cleaner. They sucked like an expensive hooker. That kind of suckage.

    The hard drive based ones were larger than a brick. Most still are. (*Cough* Archos.) Looks like everyone just put the cheapest desktop HDD in there, and presumably half a car battery. The think which you'd need custom made pants if you wanted to put them in a pocket, and presumably a new set of suspenders too.

    But were they at least cheaper, to justify carrying a huge brick around? Well, no. About half were only marginally cheaper. Definitely not the kind of price difference to justify carrying a brick around. The rest were actually _more_ expensive than the iPod. Sad but true.

    Now I can understand going for a niche. Stuff like "we'll offer an inferior product, but far cheaper. For people who can't afford the original." Nothing wrong with that. Both AMD and Intel went for that market too. (The Celeron for example.)

    But this was not the case. It was a big heavy brick and no price incentive to buy that one instead of an iPod. What the heck did their PHBs and marketroids think?

    The other option were Flash based MP3 players/memory sticks. Except for a long time that meant 64 MB or 128 MB. The problem is: depending on the songs, 64 MB might even hold only 3 of my MP3 files. Or a maximum of 6. Hardly an improvement over the portable CD player I already had.

    The iPod fit a nice convenience niche. It had as much capacity as the huge bricks everyone else was selling, but in a much more compact size. While larger than a memory stick player, it could still fit in a pocket just as well.

    Then there were other convenience factors, like the fact that they have a display which can actually show a damn playlist. Others, like Creative, _still_ seem to think that a super-tiny two line by 16 characters (or so) display counts as all the screen space one would ever need.

    In the end, I ended up sticking to a CD based player. (Hey, at least that one _is_ cheaper.) I also ended up with the idea that _if_ I were to buy a smaller player, and iPod would be it. Not because of Apple's hype, but because Apple's competition is only now starting to wake up and get its head out of its ass.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  57. PMC'05 = Newton '94 ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well... at least Redmond hasn't lost ground, they are still the same 11 (eleven) years behind Apple, remember Win'95 = MacOS '84 ? :-D

    That's great, in about 8 years, M$ will come with a real iPod competitor. Still makes me wonder where WE Apple users will be by then... "Scotty, do your thing!" jajaja it's actually FUN looking at the whole industry trying to come with ANY device that can compete with the iPod... Last year there were about 6 gadgets that tried to do that and totally FAILED, this year there are like 20 waiting their turn... the iPod is the Jesse James of the portable music players :-D

  58. Media Center by meehawl · · Score: 1

    This will be great when something like iTunes for video becomes available.

    "iTunes for Video" has been available for many years and it's called Media Center. Version 10 these days. Plays well with ArchosAV and ReplayTV. You can even get an iTunes/iPod maxi/mini skin to make you feel right at home...

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Media Center by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Does Media Center have a service where I can buy content? That's what I was referring to.

      Anyway, not trying to shoot you down here, I'm very glad you pointed these out. I appreciate it. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  59. Come Again? by meehawl · · Score: 1

    good battery life

    You're kidding, right?

    --

    Da Blog
  60. Size Counts by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Most still are. (*Cough* Archos.)

    The larger Archos uses 2.5" HDs so that sets a minimum limit on their size. But the V2 with the lithium cells are much slimmer than before - they fit in my pocket just fine. Then again, I wear combats with plenty of capacious pockets!

    One major benefit of 2.5" is the cost - I got my 20GB Archos for $70 after rebate at Amazon. That's pretty amazing. And considering I can expand it to 80GB for around $80 that's compelling. I await the first 100GB 2.5" drives with great interest. I suspect, however, that the Archos disk interface craps out at the 48-bit LBA boundary...

    There are the smaller media card reading Archos handhelds that probably use 1.8" HDs. I don't know for sure, but they are the same size as the standard iPod and include media card readers so it seems likely.

    --

    Da Blog
  61. AllOfMP3.com by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Does Media Center have a service where I can buy content?

    Good point, Apple blurred the difference between packaged software and rented software (music) quite well with iTunes.

    Media Center plays AACs, but probably not Apple's DRMd AACs unless you use VideoLAN or Hymn to open them up. If I want to play licensed music I suppose I'd use AllOfMp3.com or similar. Let's hear it for global free trade!

    --

    Da Blog
  62. Portable Media Center is a bit different by mullahbill · · Score: 1

    I've had a Creative Zen for about a month now so it's the only one I can speak to. For one thing, it's pretty clear that Microsoft's stated intent it to create a new market - Marcus Ash the PM in charge of PMC has told me that repeatedly. It's true that they will compete to one degree or another b/c the market of people buying high end multimedia devices is only so large but that's ancilliary. If MS doesn't convince new people to buy that otherwise weren't interested, it won't be a winning proposition. As far as the unit itself - I think the Zen is pretty typical of the form factor they'll all have. Here's some pictures with actual size comparisons. It's just slightly larger than an average PDA. The interface is sweet and very easy to navigate. I also have an iMATE PocketPC Phone edition and this things blows it away in every category as far as multimedia goes. The only real shortcoming is the speaker volume is challenged. I think you're wrong about the battery life issue as well. If you are playing Video than it's reduced a bit, but as far as Audio goes, battery life virtually identical to that of an iPOD.