Slashdot Mirror


That's Sir Tim to You

andrew_j_w writes "British born creator of the web Tim Berners-Lee has finally received his Knighthood from the Queen. It's nice to a pioneer, who certainly not a household name, get such a high honour from the establishment. Hopefully more people will now recognise the great work he did!"

249 comments

  1. The real test of a knight by Qinopio · · Score: 5, Funny

    But will he say "ni!"?

    --
    __________
    [Big Brick Wall]
    1. Re:The real test of a knight by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

      More likely:

      Queen Elizabeth: What manner of man are you that can summon up information with pictures and hyperlinks?

      Programmer: I...am a programmer.

      Queen Elizabeth: By what name are you known?

      Programmer: There are some who call me...Tim?

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:The real test of a knight by TheWizardTim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have been waiting for this topic for years now. About time.

      The Wizard Tim

      (mod me down if you like, this post is pointless)

    3. Re:The real test of a knight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think the odds are that he's now responsible for fighting all spam to enter the realm?

    4. Re:The real test of a knight by dbirchall · · Score: 1
      Queen Elizabeth: You know much that is hyperlinked, O Tim.

    5. Re:The real test of a knight by kerb · · Score: 1

      im from planet pluto and i didnt get the joke. can someone explain it to me? :) references pls.

    6. Re:The real test of a knight by bsartist · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Earth. Go rent this immediately. Failure to do so could result in your Geek License being revoked.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  2. Whats next? by arieswind · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whats next? Thats SIR Bill Gates to you!

    1. Re:Whats next? by d4v3c · · Score: 1

      That's SIR Al Gore to you.

    2. Re:Whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sir Bill Gates (sic) isn't British!

    3. Re:Whats next? by arieswind · · Score: 1

      that never stopped him from getting what he wanted before, im sure he could throw down a few billion to get knighted

    4. Re:Whats next? by lexsco · · Score: 4, Informative

      He is already Sir Bill

    5. Re:Whats next? by irokitt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bill Gates was already knighted. Makes sense if you look at it from the angle of his charitable contributions, since he (and his wife Melissa) send quite a bit of both software and money to schools/etc.

      As for his business contributions, well...

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    6. Re:Whats next? by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Ouch, just a minute apart, but you beat me to it;)

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    7. Re:Whats next? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Whats next? Thats SIR Bill Gates to you!

      Actually not, as a US citizen Bill Gates is not entitled to use the honorific, he is due to be knighted sometime later this year as shown in this BBC story

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    8. Re:Whats next? by eweu · · Score: 1

      What's NeXT? Why that's the computer and operating system that Sir Tim developed his little WWW.app on.

    9. Re:Whats next? by name773 · · Score: 1

      NeXT was (and is) amazing... object oriented code base and networking (10baseT at that) in 1986or7.. amazing

      take a look at windowmaker for a gnu clone of the gui (part of openstep)

    10. Re:Whats next? by dnahelix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Melinda

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    11. Re:Whats next? by name773 · · Score: 1

      err... part of gnustep which is a clone of openstep... sorry

    12. Re:Whats next? by droopus · · Score: 4, Informative

      The rule is as follows: anyone from any country can be knighted (also known as a KBE) and many have. This would enable you to be Cowboy Neal KBE, not Sir Cow.

      To be called "Sir " you must be a British subject. So, Bill Gates is indeed a Knight of th British Empire (KBE), but no amount of money will allow him to be called Sir Bill, unless he renounces his US Citzenship and becomes a British subject. Even then, I'm not sure naturalized Brits get the "Sir' privilege.

      Interestingly, for not a lot of green, you can buy a Lordship and be a real "Lord of the Manor." These are called Baronial Lordships and "Lord of the Manor" is about the equivalent of "homeowner" in the US.. Though bad etiquette, many Americans do buy Baronial Lordships and called themselves "Lord Finkelstein", though they are not true members of the peerage.

      Good FAQ about all this complicated feudal stuff here.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    13. Re:Whats next? by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      I bet they'd call you "Sir" if you bought England.

      How about it, Bill? "Sir Bill" has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?

    14. Re:Whats next? by haystor · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes. As a U.S. citizen he can claim any title he wants and we can call him by any title we please. Slashdot poll anyone?

      --
      t
    15. Re:Whats next? by wolfdvh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right of course, Americans do it all the time. Sir Charles of basketball, Queen Latifa, Prince...

    16. Re:Whats next? by lintux · · Score: 1

      Yep! Obviously they first give knighthood the person who destroyed the World Wide Web (or at least he does his very best to rename it to the Windows Wide Web), and now they finally give it to the person who created it. Seems logical to me. ;-)

    17. Re:Whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a chance in hell. Fortunatly he wasn't born in the UK so he'll never be a "Sir William". Best example I can think of is "Sir" Bob Geldof, as Bob was born in Ireland (not northen ireland) he is not entiteled to use the pre-fiix Sir, both he and Bill recieved an "honoury knighthood"

      The correct way to address Bill Gates is as Mr william H Gates III, the more correct way is as "you snivellingly ugly bastard of a geek"

    18. Re:Whats next? by jcr · · Score: 1

      He should have declined a knighthood, since we overthrew the king and all...

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    19. Re:Whats next? by jejones · · Score: 1

      OK...where can we find the blazon for his coat of arms? (If there's any justice, it ought to suggest a BSOD.)

    20. Re:Whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "To be called "Sir " you must be a British subject. So, Bill Gates is indeed a Knight of th British Empire (KBE), but no amount of money will allow him to be called Sir Bill, unless he renounces his US Citzenship and becomes a British subject. "
      That's not strickly true, any private US citizen can technically use the Sir prefix (assuming they've been knighted), nothing in their US citizenship actually forbids it, there's a clause in the constitution forbidding any US citizen in public office from using foreign honours, the reasoning being they're not meant to accept them for reasons of possible divided loyalities, especially in the days when the US could have fallen under the auspices of an Imperial Britain.

      So, one Sir George Bush would be a no-no in terms of the constitution however there's nothing preventing a Sir Bill Gates, except convention and the misreading of clauses in the constitution.
    21. Re:Whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naturalised British subjects can inded use the title.

      The best-known example is Yehudi Menuhin who was knighted years before he became a British citizen at which point he became Sir Yehudi - and later Lord M.

      This is an excellent rule: I know a lot of people who would choke over having to call Gates Sir William - or Ronald Reagan Sir Ronald.

    22. Re:Whats next? by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      The issue isn't whether US law would allow it. The issue is that only citizens of the Commonwealth are given the right to call themselves "Sir" when they recieve a knighthood from the Queen.

    23. Re:Whats next? by Isauq · · Score: 1

      If that actually happend, legitimate programmers would light themselve on fire in protest

      --
      RTFM
    24. Re:Whats next? by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "unless he renounces his US Citzenship"

      That is not possible for most Americans. Anyone born in the US is a US citizen. There is no provision to renounce this. At best, someone born in the US (Bill was born in the US, right?) can have a dual citizenship.

  3. From The Article... by Cavio · · Score: 5, Funny

    "He is now working on an idea called the "semantic web", which is about giving more meaning to what is on the web."

    I guess Slashdot might be described as anti-semantic.

    Braummph-Pumph Thanks! I'll be here all week

    --

    Please bid on this Karmann Ghia! Please pleas

    1. Re:From The Article... by Cavio · · Score: 1

      I've been accused of worse. Today. On Slashdot.

      --

      Please bid on this Karmann Ghia! Please pleas

    2. Re:From The Article... by LXAC08 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't get accused, I just get modded. I sometimes think it's a 1337/n00b thing, since other people post the same thing and get modded up for being funny or interesting or whatever

    3. Re:From The Article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think my nuts are on your eyelids

    4. Re:From The Article... by LXAC08 · · Score: 0

      Speaking of which, where are my -3 points? Someone must be shirking their duties

    5. Re:From The Article... by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You have to get a sig if you want to be modded up instead of down. That's how people know you're a genuine slashdotter and not just someone who walked in off the street. I don't make the rules, I'm just letting you know. Probably too late now you've got a karma penalty anyway. Set up a new account. Give it a sig "I used to get modded down so I got a sig", or something, and try again.

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    6. Re:From The Article... by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sometimes you can get away with having a really annoying handle instead of a sig.

    7. Re:From The Article... by LXAC08 · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Will do.

    8. Re:From The Article... by orcrist · · Score: 1

      You have to get a sig if you want to be modded up instead of down. That's how people know you're a genuine slashdotter and not just someone who walked in off the street.

      I don't think that's necessary. Having a 5 digit Slashdot ID tends to be pretty convincing, let alone the people who have 4 digits and down ;-)

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  4. Sir Tim by Eravau · · Score: 5, Funny
    So is he now part of the Knights of the Round <TABLE>?
    1. Re:Sir Tim by Darth+McBride · · Score: 1

      I believe that would be:

      Sir Tim

    2. Re:Sir Tim by Darth+McBride · · Score: 5, Funny
      I believe that would be:

      <TABLE class="Round">
      <KNIGHT>
      Sir Tim
      </KNIGHT>
      </TABLE>
    3. Re:Sir Tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he is part of the round table does that mean he...

      "eats ham and jam and" SPAMs-alot?

    4. Re:Sir Tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, there will be no (officially sanctioned) round tables until CSS3 hits recommendation. Until then, he is a knight of the CSS Table, except in IE where he is a replacment positioning hack.

  5. Wait... by Aadain2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought Al Gore created the internet/web?! :-P

    --
    Space for rent, inquire within
    1. Re:Wait... by strictnein · · Score: 3, Funny

      almost

      Gore created the Interweb.

    2. Re:Wait... by josh3736 · · Score: 4, Funny
      So NOW we know what really happened!

      Tim and Al were roommates back in college.

      Tim just stole the floppy from Al's computer while he was sleeping and took all the credit.

      Al won't rest until he makes the cover of Wired.

    3. Re:Wait... by Yosi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I tell people I work for the inventor of the Web, their first response is always,

      ``Didn't Al Gore invent that?''

      Then I have to go into a long tedious explanation about how Al Gore invented the Intenet, and the Web is only one application of it.

      I personally would prefer that Tim would keep on going on these long trips to get awards. Getting things done on Cwm without direction from Tim on what Cwm should actually do is getting hard. I've been spending more time at work on slashdot as result.

    4. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For the humor-challenged, it's a reference to (the remake of) The Italian Job.

      Lyle: And then he's just the media darling... He's on the cover of all the magazines, I should of been on the cover of Wired magazine. you know what he said? he said he named it Napster because it was his nickname because of the nappy hair under the hat. But he, It's because I was NAPPING when he STOLE it from me. He didn't even graduate.
    5. Re:Wait... by MoxCamel · · Score: 4, Informative
      I know your post is meant to be funny, but I'd like to point out that "Al Gore claimed to create the internet" is false. What he said was:

      During my service in the United States Congress I took the initiative in creating the Internet.

      Although you can argue semantics (okay yes, he literally said it.) What he meant, was that he was instrumental in the funding of ARPANET. So, in a sense, you can say that the internet probably wouldn't exist, or at least would have taken longer to come into existence, had it not been for Al Gore. I'm no Al Gore apologist (well, except here, I guess) but the guy does deserve some credit for having the foresight to help fund the project. (I don't for a moment believe he had the foresight to see what the internet would become, but then nobody else did either.)

    6. Re:Wait... by TheNME · · Score: 1

      As a second job, you could go around correcting the "bill gayts sed we only need 640k!" people.

      --
      Windows sux. Am I cool now?
    7. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir Al Gore?... Naw.. Lol

    8. Re:Wait... by maxpublic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What he meant, was that he was instrumental in the funding of ARPANET. So, in a sense, you can say that the internet probably wouldn't exist, or at least would have taken longer to come into existence, had it not been for Al Gore.

      Yeah, right. If not Arpanet it would've been something else, and we'd still have the internet today. Gore just happened to be in the right place at the right time, nothing more.

      And in any event, Gore's still an idiot for saying that in the first place. But then no one ever said the man lacked for ego.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    9. Re:Wait... by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I agree Gore got a bum deal, but he did try to word it to make it sound more important than it was. He deserved to get burned, just not nearly as badly as he did. What he should have said was:

      "During my service in the United States Congress I took the initiative in creating the Internet -- IN JAPAN!"

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    10. Re:Wait... by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      And even if you assume that is what he meant he was wrong. ARPANET came online in 1969 when Al Gore was 21. So in what sense was he instrumental in funding ARPANET?

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    11. Re:Wait... by maxhead · · Score: 1

      Gee, republican much? That was a pretty balanced parent post.

    12. Re:Wait... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Hey you...

      Yeah, you, congressman bigshot...

      Figure a way to get Wikimedia a billion dollars in no-strings-attached funding, and in ten years, you can claim... you know... Aw crap, I'm not going to spell it out for you, you're a politician, you can spin it like the best of us...

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    13. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ARPANET came online in 1969 when Al Gore was 21. So in what sense was he instrumental in funding ARPANET?

      He was instrumental, because while he was 21 and the ARPANET was expanding, he was in his dorm room downloading and whacking off to porn. This helped to create the Internet as we know it today.

    14. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Al Gore did support continued funding for DARPA projects like ARPANET, after they had already been started, and for that he would deserve some credit, if he hadn't tried to inflate his small contribution to the level of something critically important.

      Having said that, Al Gore was not in any way instrumental in initiating funding for the creation of ARPANET. According to this history of the Internet, the plans for ARPANET were published in 1966/67, and it was operational by 1969. During this time, Al Gore was still an undergraduate student, so not in any position to 'take the initiative' in funding creation of anything. Gore apparently finished law school in 1976, at which point he entered American politics as a member of congress.

    15. Re:Wait... by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      Yes however he didn't.

      At best he continued funding for a military project that had already been underway.

      As far as forsight, it's quite possable Al Gore did forsee all the Internet is today.
      Much of it already existed as BBSes,
      E-mail, message boards, online stores, file trading. What was missing was the sharing of information between computers. While FidoNet did this to some extent it wasn't as detailed as ArpaNet and to postdated ArpaNet.
      However so did Al Gores supposed "creating the Internet".

      Maybe he didn't intend to be taken for clamming to be the inventer but he didn't take any congressional hand in the project eather.
      It fell under the heading "military projects".
      While it would be itemised as "Creating a method of sharing information between military bases" Al Gore didn't do anything specal. He signed off on an existing project and he wasn't the first as it was ongoing.

      Fact being a lot of sentors signed off on the same project at the same time. It was probably the smallest item on the budget.
      During a time when people snuck million dollar toliets into the military budget I've no doupt this project slipped past them on both clost and obfuscation...

      Hells bells Al Gore may have had no more information than
      "Information resources"
      Would any sain person cut the military budget on THAT?

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    16. Re:Wait... by tmalone · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that he was in some way involved in the process of openning up the internet to the general public. I'm probably mistaken though.

    17. Re:Wait... by wolfdvh · · Score: 1
      What Gore (and the others in congress) did was allow the Internet to be commercialized!

      As the ancients among us will remember clearly, before about 10 years ago saying or doing anything that could be considered commercial was completely forbidden. It was also about the surest way to be flamed into oblivion.

      When congress changed that, the Internet became the crass commercial space we have today. So for better or worse, they're to blame.

    18. Re:Wait... by isorox · · Score: 1

      Al will make the cover of pretty much every newsmag out there when he becomes the first emperor of the moon

    19. Re:Wait... by isorox · · Score: 1

      Then I have to go into a long tedious explanation about how Al Gore invented the Intenet, and the Web is only one application of it.

      Insightful? More like Funny or Troll

    20. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And even if you assume that is what he meant he was wrong. ARPANET came online in 1969 when Al Gore was 21. So in what sense was he instrumental in funding ARPANET?

      In what speech did he mention ARPANET? He said "the INTERnet". I don't need to spoonfeed you links. Just google for "vint cerf al gore".

  6. He will by mfh · · Score: 4, Funny

    He will say NI all the way to the forrest where he must cut down the largest imaginable tree with...

    (wait for it)

    A HERRING!!!!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:He will by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only to bring it back and find out that they really wanted a Shrubbery.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  7. hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Banned from using university PC for hacking"

    Woah, never knew that. I guess this makes him cool? ;)

  8. But for how long? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:But for how long? by arieswind · · Score: 1

      well, he would only be demoted to a "companion of honour" so i guess it isnt all that bad

    2. Re:But for how long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "LONDON - If a British parliamentary committee gets its way, the country will no longer recognize outstanding achievement by making its brightest citizens knights and dames."

      The diaper committee? These whiny little piggeolits need a dammed good wacking.

  9. A real Sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhh someone that is *actually* deserving, not that the who;e system is a whole joke at any rate.

  10. Hey! He was in King Arthur! by writertype · · Score: 3, Funny

    He's the guy whose weapon was the slide rule, right?

    (Damn--what's a good Web designer combat weapon?)

    1. Re:Hey! He was in King Arthur! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Web Designer combat weapons:
      Flash
      "Bring in the GIMP!"
      Fireworks
      View The Source, Luke!

    2. Re:Hey! He was in King Arthur! by tunabomber · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Damn--what's a good Web designer combat weapon?)


      I warn thee to keep back, or I shall unsheath my IE-only htm file that's ridden with broken JavaScript, popup windows, Flash advertisements, and 500KB-gifs that were composed making excessive use of Kai's Power Tools!

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    3. Re:Hey! He was in King Arthur! by Mard · · Score: 1

      Ethernet cable whip.

      --
      DRM = Digitally Restricted Media. This is a viral sig, pass it on.
    4. Re:Hey! He was in King Arthur! by T-Kir · · Score: 1

      (Damn--what's a good Web designer combat weapon?)

      how about <hr /> (or <hr> for you non XHTML'ers)?

      --
      Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    5. Re:Hey! He was in King Arthur! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd keep quiet if I were you, or I'll get out a nice big hefty +1 cluebat!

    6. Re:Hey! He was in King Arthur! by madmancarman · · Score: 1
      I warn thee to keep back, or I shall unsheath my IE-only htm file that's ridden with broken JavaScript, popup windows, Flash advertisements, and 500KB-gifs that were composed making excessive use of Kai's Power Tools!

      So what you're saying is you're going to host it on Tripod? Or will you use Geocities instead?

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
  11. Shanghai Knight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to know we have a "Lee" in the knighthood now. Then again, what is it to be knighted nowadays? I'm sure the man is well respected and honored as it is...with the knighthood just sprinkles to the already well-topped ice cream of fame. Mmmmm, ice cream.

    As much as he revolutionized the Internet by creating the web standards, I also bet he didn't expect the deluge of Flash-animated sites, phishing scams using misleading URLs, and the general adware/spyware/crapware abuse that the world wide web has become.

    But that doesn't mean it's all bad. There's slashdot, after all. :)

  12. What's next? Sir Al Gore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course.

  13. must be depressing by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    what can you do after you invent the web? How can you top that?

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:must be depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Find a way to distribute even more porn?

    2. Re:must be depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arise, Sir Bram

    3. Re:must be depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet for one

    4. Re:must be depressing by Dickolas+Wang · · Score: 1

      Two chicks at the same time, man. Fuckin' eh.

  14. Free was key, says Lee by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's a story I submitted a few weeks back. I think it deserves visibility, and since I couldn't get /. to post it, a comment will have to do (Mods: not grousing about rejected stories, just trying to make myself heard)

    In this day and age of superfluous patents and frivolous lawsuits, Sir Tim Berners-Lee gently reminds us of the importance of free and selfless contribution for the betterment of humanity. Speaking at the ceremony for winning the Millennium Technology Prize (as reported earlier on Slashdot), he said that he would never have succeeded if he'd tried to charge money for his inventions. The prize committee agreed, citing the importance of Berners-Lee's decision never to commercialize or patent his contributions to the Internet technologies he had developed, and recognizing his revolutionary contribution to humanity's ability to communicate.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Free was key, says Lee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting that Berners-Lee's approach, to let everyone use his work, is much closer to the BSD/X11 philosophy of sharing technical progress than to the GNU/Linux philosophy of fighting a war against the hated 'closed-source' enemy.

      I'm glad Berners-Lee didn't try to commercialise his work, but I'm equally glad he didn't try, in the GNU fashion, to use it to push his political views (whatever they may be), nor to extend his own refusal to commercialise it by preventing anyone else commercialising proprietary software derived from it. In other words, I'm glad he took the BSD/X11 road rather than the GNU/Linux one.

      Berners-Lee, like many contributors to BSD and X11, may not have acquired the same level of fame as people like Linus Torvalds, but his work has arguably contributed much more to computer users (just like BSD and X11), in particular to the majority who use proprietary operating systems and proprietary web browser in conjunction with the majority of web servers that run open-source software (Apache).

      Open source browsers and client-side operating systems may catch on eventually. If they do, it will in no small part be because they're using the same open technology (BSD sockets, HTTP) as the proprietary software that currently dominates the market.

  15. Geat a load of the replacement titles. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the artilec in the parent post...

    Instead of acclaimed artists, musicians, writers, scientists, community volunteers and entrepreneurs taking the title Sir or Dame, they would become Companions of Honour.

    Who would want to be called a 'Companion of Honour'? It sounds like a fancy name for a pricy hooker.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Geat a load of the replacement titles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, maybe Tony Blair?

    2. Re:Geat a load of the replacement titles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's just a shit-eating whore.

  16. Knighted for Building on the Backs of Giants by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Anybody else remember Hypercard for the Mac? Fidonet? Or what was that funky mouse based terminal emulator called again?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Knighted for Building on the Backs of Giants by Angostura · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think he would deny it, in fact I'm sure he wouldn't. I heard him speaking many years ago (must be 10) and he made it very clear then that hypertext certainly wasn't novel and neither was networking,

      He said he believed that his main contribution (from my rusty memory) was implementing it in a mark-up language that was so simple that any layman could sling something together quickly (an attribute that has, perhaps been lost over the years) and also providing a simple way for a document on one machine to reference a document on a machine anywhere in the world - again simply.

      Of course, Sir Isaac Newton was also knighted for clambering up on tall people.

    2. Re:Knighted for Building on the Backs of Giants by applef00 · · Score: 1

      You make it sound like he's been trying to take credit for hypertext, etc. In fact, he's always been very humble and freely admits that the component ideas for the WWW had been around for years. All he did was to assemble them into one application.

    3. Re:Knighted for Building on the Backs of Giants by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      And if someone wants to argue after that point you simply shut them up with "Well then, why didn't YOU put it all together?" Most inventions are the result of someone taking preexisting elements and putting them together. It might be something that looks obvious after the fact, but it wasn't obvious BEFORE the fact.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    4. Re:Knighted for Building on the Backs of Giants by KjetilK · · Score: 1
      Yes, he says that very proudly, mind you. Sir Tim has always emphasized that the only way to build things is to build it on the Backs of Giants. In fact, I would more say it needs to be built on the back of huge piles of many small ideas. That's what's so wrong about software patents, it kills that process.

      Sir Tim is probably one of the people that say software patents are bad with most authority, in we should appreciate that.

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  17. A strange move by Albanach · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Isn't it a little strange that someone who pioneered the web - free of class distinctions, where every IP address and domain name ranks equal - would choose to take an honour from the monarch and with it endorse the class system?

    It's entirely reasonable that the creator of the web should be recognised by society, but the British Honours system is recognition by the establishment, not by society. Further to that, holding the second highest rank in the Order of the British Empire seems a lot less noble when we consider the persecution under which many countries within the empire existed.

    Just my 2p worth. Others may wish to stand up for the system. Personally I think it sucks.

    1. Re:A strange move by HBI · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure someone in your line of ancestry did something bad.

      Perhaps we should hold you accountable for that. It's about the same argument you are making here.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    2. Re:A strange move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, pal, if you don't like the good ol' US of A, feel free to pick some other country and move your commie ass on over th...

      Ah, erm, never mind. Carry on. ;)

    3. Re:A strange move by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a really tall horse you're sat atop!

    4. Re:A strange move by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      OT:

      You've never heard of reparations I take it?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    5. Re:A strange move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't hold current German citizens responsible for what occured in WWII so I don't think it really matters what the British Empire used to do.

      The facts remain, yes the British persecuted a lot of people but they were also the first to realise that you can't go around imposing your way of life on other nations. They kept a lot of local traditions alive when they ruled a country. They were also the first to abolish slavery and were the first to actively hunt down and hang people involved in the slave trade.

      Also, taking a British honour in no way makes you part of class system, because he is already British he would already be part of it. Plus, there's a class system in every part of the world, in the US it's based on how much money you have.

      Just my 2p.

    6. Re:A strange move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...pioneered the web - free of class distinctions, where IP and Domain Name ranks equal"
      What part of the Internet do you live in?
      It's far from equal, just try getting a /20 and tell us how EQUAL it is.
      P.S. You can have your 2p back.

    7. Re:A strange move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His second argument yes, but you don't negate the importance of his first argument. We're talking about a system that say 'this group of people' is better than 'that group of people'. For some reason, the Queen's life is more valuable then mine, not for anything she did, just because of who her parents were.

    8. Re:A strange move by HBI · · Score: 1

      I can't fathom that one myself, then again my country flipped the bird to George III about 225 years ago, so I don't have to deal with it. I'm sure the Brits could fix it if they chose to, collectively.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    9. Re:A strange move by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      The British Empire could have been a lot worse than it actually was.

      For the most part it was fairly benign to the conquered people - certainly in comparison to a lot of the alternatives (thinking of the Conquistadors etc). I think the worst thing that happened was dropping the ball over the bit of land between Canada and Mexico where the British lost control of the colonists who went on to murder a lot of the natives and continue to use slave labour for fifty years after the Brits recognised it to be abhorrent.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    10. Re:A strange move by eht · · Score: 1

      As soon as someone can convice England to pay reparations for slavery, I'll go along with it(they're the ones who set it up in the colonies long before the USA was a country).

      I like how that site you linked to mentions a bible quote "The Lord said to Moses: If anyone sins and is unfaithful to the Lord... about something...stolen... - when he thus sins, and becomes guilty, he must return what he has stolen or taken by extortion. He must make restitution in full, add a fifth of the value to it and give it all to the owner... Leviticus 6:1-5 (NIV)." and says this proves the bible supports reparations, but they completely fail to see the large sections of the bible where slavery is allowed and encouraged.

    11. Re:A strange move by Jodka · · Score: 1

      "...holding the second highest rank in the Order of the British Empire seems a lot less noble when we consider the persecution under which many countries within the empire existed."

      So you're from India, right ?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    12. Re:A strange move by pmsr · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but the British were not the first to abolish slavery, Sweden was, in 1335. Some American states did so starting at the year 1789, and Haiti did it in the year 1791. As far as i know, in the United Kingdom only in 1833 was slavery completely abolished.

      /Pedro

    13. Re:A strange move by rustl · · Score: 1

      I thought Al Gore abolished slavery!

    14. Re:A strange move by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      People quoting the bible are always myopic about it. They only quote the bits that support their current purpose. :-)

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    15. Re:A strange move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people are better than others though. Have I done as much for the world as E.g. Bob Geldof, or Tim Berners-Lee? No. So why shouldn't we recognise the fact that those people have, through their actions, proved themselves more important than others?

      Everyone needs to stop swallowing Blairs shit and pretending we're a Classless Society. One trip to a council estate, full of dirty fucking smack heads, will tell you that we very much are a class based society, and that some people very much are in lower classes.

    16. Re:A strange move by Rotten168 · · Score: 1
      I think the worst thing that happened
      ...was the massive inferiority complex that it gave the Brits after they fumbled there empire away (and almost lost a war to Argentina!). Bwahahaha.
    17. Re:A strange move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To have the people of today (who never persecuted or enslaved anyone) pay reparations to people who never were slaves or persecuted, is simply bizarre. It's as if I (a Swede) would pay reparations to our Norwegian friends because Sweden, 200 years ago, invaded and annexed their country and held it for 100 years. I had nothing to do with it, and I have never done anything like that today, and the people of Norway living today were never invaded. I also hope that we don't have to pay the English because of what the Vikings did to them. Or that the Italians must pay several European countries for what the Roman Empire did... etc.

  18. Nay. by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    He has to bring two shrubs (matching set for a nice lane) BEFORE he gets to cut down the tree.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
  19. He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by AzrealAO · · Score: 5, Informative

    Non-citizens of the British Commonwealth can be made Honourary members of the Order of the British Empire. This allows them to place the rank initials after their name; KBE (Knight of the British Empire) in Bill Gate's case, but they are not permitted to use the prefix Sir or Dame.

    1. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are not permitted to use the prefix Sir or Dame.

      What do you mean by "permitted"? What gets done to him if he does call himself "Sir"?

    2. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Well, they MIGHT take his knighthood away (meaning he could not without being a falsifier put it on his résumé), but he would certainly get a lot of laughs.

    3. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by loyalsonofrutgers · · Score: 1

      Can you provide sources or are you just repeating conventional wisdom? I'm not trolling, but I've heard this a lot, but I've never been able to find anything to back it up.

      For one thing, they're all "honorary." Tim Berner-Lee's knighthood isn't anymore real than anyone else's, these days. And for another, what's the logic in making someone a Knight of the British Empire, but being particular over a thing like whether they can use the title or not?

      The best explanation that I've read, by the BBC, traced the "US citizens can't use the title 'sir'" claim back to Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution.

    4. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by XryanX · · Score: 1

      From the article: "As an American citizen he cannot use the title "Sir" but will be entitled to put the letters KBE after his name."

    5. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is an honorary honor redundant?

    6. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by U96 · · Score: 1

      British Commonwealth is irrelevant. Canadians can be prevented from receiving knighthoods.

      --

      "I thought they were the dominant species..."
    7. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by loyalsonofrutgers · · Score: 1

      Yes, and no journalist has ever passed along conventional wisdom without a source to back it up.

      Like I've said, I've heard this alot (in every single article about an American being knighted) but have never found a real source (aristocracy-interest fluff pieces excluded).

    8. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by U96 · · Score: 1

      http://www.campusprogram.com/reference/en/wikipedi a/n/ni/nickle_resolution.html

      --

      "I thought they were the dominant species..."
    9. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by XryanX · · Score: 1

      Shrug.

      My only guess is that it's a mere matter of tradition, as opposed to written law?

    10. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by BCoates · · Score: 1

      The "title of nobility" clause only prevents the US government or a state from granting a title of nobility (cough drug tzar cough), and it also prevents government employees from accepting gifts or titles of any kind from foreign countries (without permission of congress), but it doesn't prevent US citizens from accepting titles or gifts.

      There was an attempt at amending the constitution to extend the restriction to all citizens, but hasn't been ratified by enough states.

    11. Re:He's already knighted, but can't use Sir... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. You really think the Queen would let a rogue colonist use the prefix "Sir"? :)

  20. In other news by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Al Gore has challenged Sir Tim to a joust to decide who is the true inventor if the internet.

    "Verily I do declare tis I am the inventor of ye internet" said Al as he went looking on ebay for jousting poles and suits of armour.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5, Funny?

      Are people really still laughing at Al Gore/internet jokes?

    2. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeech man...get a sense of humor, or at least sharpen what little humor you have!

    3. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beleive jousting poles can only be found in Poland...

  21. What not to email Tim Berners-Lee.. by x.Draino.x · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought this was funny, slightly paranoid?

    Email is safe unless it contains programs. (Data and documents are fine, programs are not). If you send me a program, I will not run it, as it could damage my system and could be a virus. Note: Documents for Microsoft word, Excel, and possibly other Office programs tend to execute programs (scripts) in what you would expect to be harmless documents. These can expose my machine to viruses, because these programs do not (it seems) prevent scripts from running within a document when it received by email. Please do not send me Microsoft Office documents. If you are sending text, please send it as plain text or HTML. If you use your favorite word process, slide tool, etc, and send it in that program's format, then you are forcing me install proprietary software on whatever machine I read them on. . If your email is sent from Microsoft Outlook, and contains an attachment, I will be more likely to discard it as I understand that a famous series of viruses in 2001 resulted from Outlook's tendency to execute scripts in email, and used up a huge amount of my and my colleague's time.

    I think it should just say if you've been recently exposed to any Microsoft product, do not email me.

    1. Re:What not to email Tim Berners-Lee.. by Banner · · Score: 1

      I don't blame him, I'm the same way with my email unless I know you really really well (and you personally told me what you were sending over, if it just has a note that says 'check this out' I assume a smart virus and nuke it). Word docs and programs sent in email contain viruses and trojans 99 percent of the time.

      Any email I get that isn't in plain text format goes in the trash with no response. Of course I use Pine on a Linux box as well, so that helps avoid viruses even more. But as over 90 percent of all viruses in the world today are aimed at Windows and MS products, being leary of them isn't paranoid - They really are out to get you! :-)

    2. Re:What not to email Tim Berners-Lee.. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      Seems perfectly reasonable to me.

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  22. Ob Monty Python quote by tdrury · · Score: 2, Funny
    "What is your name, oh mighty wizard?"
    "They call me 'Tim'"

    Of all the Monty Python movies, that is the only exchange that has ever annoyed the hell out of me. I don't know why.

    -tim

    1. Re:Ob Monty Python quote by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

      Because you're trying to work in the word Japan or maybe Belgium???

    2. Re:Ob Monty Python quote by vermicious · · Score: 1

      Not to be pendantic, but isnt it: "What is your name, oh mighty wizard?" "There are some who call me...." "...Tim?"

    3. Re:Ob Monty Python quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Of all the Monty Python movies, that is the only exchange that has ever annoyed the hell out of me. I don't know why.

      Get it right at least:

      ARTHUR: "What manner of man are you that can summon up fire without flint or tinder?"

      TIM: "I ... AM AN ENCHANTER!"

      ARTHUR: "By what name are you known?"

      TIM: "THERE ARE SOME WHO CALL ME ... Tim?"

      ARTHUR: "Greetings, Tim the Enchanter!"

      I find it annoying when it's overdone (much like the knights who say Ni). It was hilarious the first time.

  23. so what? how about Sir Alan? by darthtriad · · Score: 1

    Alan Kay...let's see...
    -the precursor to the internet
    -the mouse
    -windowing
    -object-oriented languages
    blah, blah, blah,

  24. TBL's Computer by CdBee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To anyone with an interest in the birth of the web, one of the CERN NeXT Cubes used by Lee can be viewed in the Science Museum in London.

    Anyone familiar with the NeXT machine and its current Mac descendents will doubtless find it quite an interesting exhibit.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:TBL's Computer by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      To anyone with an interest in the birth of the web, one of the CERN NeXT Cubes used by Lee can be viewed in the Science Museum in London.

      Any idea how they got hold of it? Tim had been asking CERN for it for several years. Last time I saw info.cern.ch it was sitting in an office with a note on it saying that Tim would really like to have it.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:TBL's Computer by CdBee · · Score: 1

      Not a clue, I'm afraid. It's been there at least a year, I can't speak for before that. And to be honest, although it has a faded CERN sticker on it, one NeXT cube looks very much like another....

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    3. Re:TBL's Computer by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Not a clue, I'm afraid. It's been there at least a year, I can't speak for before that. And to be honest, although it has a faded CERN sticker on it, one NeXT cube looks very much like another....

      It was the cube, not the pizza box? If so that would be the original programming machine.

      The whole Web thing was a plot to introduce next into cern...

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    4. Re:TBL's Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is indeed 'the one'. It used to be in a display cabinet here at CERN next to the Users' Office. Then for a while it was replaced by another (identical) cube with a card stating that the original was on loan to the Science Museum. The cabinet and duplicate cube disappeared a while ago and I haven't seen Tim's original machine here for quite some time. The last I heard of it was when he and Kofi Annan used it to send an e-mail at the UN WSIS Summit here in Geneva in December of last year.

    5. Re:TBL's Computer by CdBee · · Score: 1

      if it helps, I recall it had a sticker on one side saying something like "This machine is a server please don't turn it off"

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  25. Oh sweet god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a moment, I thought it was our Timothy. Phew. What a relief ;)

  26. Dear Sir Tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your new title sickens me.

    all hail

    Sir Tim

  27. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by CdBee · · Score: 1

    Sir Galahad
    Sir Lancelot
    Sir Bedevere
    Sir Mordred
    Sir Gawain
    Sir Walter Raleigh

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  28. Missing by Rexz · · Score: 4, Funny
    "It's nice to a pioneer, who certainly not a household name, get such a high honour from the establishment."

    Maybe he could now invent the verb.

  29. blah blah by XO · · Score: 1

    I think the distinction and honor should really go to the inventor of Gopher, or for that matter, even maybe Archie, as they could be descendents of each other.. archie -> gopher -> www

    On the other hand, me and my best friend in middle/high school invented and developed a system that was technologically far superior to the www, was able to seamlessly integrate content of virtually any type from virtually any source.. and had initial test versions developed and running under OS/2 and AmigaOS.. but those two operating systems had certain capabilities that we were using that would not be implemented into a common user's version of Windows until Win2k or XP eras.. and the development time needed for the two of us (especially as we knew ZERO about Windows API at the time) to re-create those functions would've been a probably very long time, since we were in school, had regular jobs.. so, we were screwed by the fact that we designed dependant upon functions we THOUGHT were going to be implemented in Win95 (as they had already been implemented in NT.. but in '95 NT had fewer users than OS/2 or Linux or AmigaOS, only to find out that Win95/98/ME only implemented STUBS of those functions, and they didn't actually work. ..the story of my life. screwed by Bill Gates..

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    1. Re:blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whin, whin, whin... go get a real OS.

  30. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    Sir Galahad
    Sir Lancelot
    Sir Bedevere
    Sir Mordred
    Sir Gawain
    Sir Walter Raleigh

    Sorry, I meant to specify "in this century".

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  31. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by alex_ware · · Score: 1

    yes
    1-Sir. Lancelot
    2-Sir. Galahad
    3-Sir. Gawain
    there you go three to start with

    --
    If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
  32. special reward for advancing globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Thank you, Tim. Globalization had been stagnating a bit, but thanks to you we are now moving ahead triple-time. A jolly good show."

    "You've done more to destroy the middle class than any man in the last 50 years."

    "Here is a piece of paper that shows our gratitude to you."

  33. ESL on Slashdot? by Cobblepop · · Score: 3, Funny

    > It's nice to a pioneer, who certainly not a household name,
    > get such a high honour from the establishment.

    Er..."Some people have a way with words. Others not have way." - Steve Martin.

  34. This is probably stupid... by DecayCell · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's kind of a dream of mine, to be knighted...
    First step: Britain, here I come!

  35. Isn't it the case with Knighthoods by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that even our American friends wouldn't mind one? Not having to tick the Mrs/Mr/Dr/Ms box is nice.

    But I worry about the whole honours system because it's outdated, outmoded and even unwanted in some cases.

    My wish for TBL is that he refuse the award. Seriously. Why accept an award from a monarch seeking justification for her burden on taxpayers? As long as she brings in more in tourism than she spends, then no problem, but don't legitimise her privilege by accepting token medals and titles from her.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    1. Re:Isn't it the case with Knighthoods by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the british empire one of the first modern countries to outlaw slavery?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Isn't it the case with Knighthoods by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Even Sean Connery, Mr. Scottish-Freedom himself, accepted his Knighthood.

      He showed up in a tartan kilt. Imagine, 007 wearing a skirt (although Lazenby did it in "On her Majesty's Secret Service").

      You call Sir Connery "Sir" not because he's a knight, but because it would suck to get your ass kicked by a 74-year-old...

  36. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    It's "recognition" in the sense of "being recognized for his accomplishments," not in the sense of "getting lots of PR." And believe it or not, to a lot of people the first is more important than the second.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  37. Not grammar so good by gregstumph · · Score: 1

    Would it kill the moderators to fix the grammar on some of these posts? That second sentence is almost un-parsable...

    1. Re:Not grammar so good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yoda one of moderators is, mmmm?

      (Editors or moderators is what you meant, mmmm?)

  38. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    It's "recognition" in the sense of "being recognized for his accomplishments," not in the sense of "getting lots of PR." And believe it or not, to a lot of people the first is more important than the second.

    Oh, I in no way meant to imply that being knighted is of no importance. It is indeed a great recognition. My issue was with the article submitter's speculation that being knighted might bring him any significantly wider recognition.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  39. Note: The Web is not The Internet. by Banner · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think you're a bit confused. He came up with the World Wide Web (WWW) he did not come up with the Internet or IP addresses or Domains or any of that stuff. All of that stuff existed and worked quite well before he came along and due to the work of other people (not him).

    All he did was take an existing markup language, make a few mods, and came up with a really neat idea and tool. The Web is not The Internet. The web -relies- on the Internet.

    (I'm not begrudging him his due either, though when the web first came along all of us 'net users were a bit ticked at the drops in our bandwidth until the backbones caught up).

    1. Re:Note: The Web is not The Internet. by Albanach · · Score: 1
      No, I'm not confused at all. My very point is that the World Wide Web is not the internet. It does not in itself discriminate thus every (routable) IP address and domain name on the web is indeed equal.

      In other words if you have an ip address you can have a web presence just like HP or Microsoft. Had the web been created by commercial interests that would have been a lot harder. Indeed today it is becoming more difficult thanks to the commercial interests, but that wasn't TBL's plan nor was it of his making.

    2. Re:Note: The Web is not The Internet. by code+addict · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, but having an ip address does NOT give you a web presence. Having an ip address AND a WEB server gives you a web presence. Simply having an ip address only qualifies for having an Internet presence.

  40. Poor Guy... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    From his site:
    "If your email is sent from Microsoft Outlook, and contains an attachment, I will be more likely to discard it as I understand that a famous series of viruses in 2001 resulted from Outlook's tendency to execute scripts in email, and used up a huge amount of my and my colleague's time."

    How sad, he should get a Mac!

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
    1. Re:Poor Guy... by bmsleight · · Score: 1
      How sad, he should get a Mac!
      From the same page you are quoting from ...

      If I use slides (I often do not) I use a laptop -- currently a Mac running OSX.

      Sad he is not, perhaps reading his HTML would be nice.

  41. What did he actually do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK he's a god, yes I worship him. No word of a lie, his invention has kept me in well-paid work for years.

    But he invented a way to allow physicists to communicate with one another. He didn't say to himself: "Hmmm, am bored. Will invent a way of computers to present information to one another, including e-commerce and CRM and online dating and fanastic pr0n." The great stuff came from years of nerds thinking: "I wonder who else likes Fleischmann model railways?" and such like.

    Tim, the God, was just lucky.

  42. A worthy Knighttte indeed - but? by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see the "Queens Honours" go to someone who did something practically useful (or even theoretically useful ), but I have to ask why everyone forgets Ted?? (Hey: I *KNOW* he was boring but he did invent hypertext (or not?))... Personally, I have fond memories of a G5 + 2 letter ham who got a KBE or was it a CBE? who did something secret (never explained) about Radar... Gosh. The web really is that important (marketting oinks nod in agreement...)>. But please explain to this dumb englishman how solves your everyday mondane petabyte online storage problem? Let alone visualizing that data in some yuk dimensional cube... Maybe someone should wake up RMS...There must be something we could do in LISP...

    1. Re:A worthy Knighttte indeed - but? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh yeah, totally.

      What are you talking about?

    2. Re:A worthy Knighttte indeed - but? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been reading your post for 5 mins now. I'm sorry, but I don't know what you're saying.

  43. Re:so what? how about Sir Alan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Sir Jef?

    (You know, Jef Raskin.)

  44. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

    Galahad, Lancelot, Mordred and Gawain, as well as the other Knights of the Round Table - assuming they aren't just myth - were never knighted by English royalty of any line.

    In case you missed the history lesson Arthur lived in the time of the Britons, who lost their fight against German invaders - Angles and Saxons - and were eventually destroyed. The Angles and Saxons had something of a reputation for genocide, and it's rather certain that if any Briton blood survives in the modern-day British people it's very, very weak indeed. The modern British are primarily descended from these German barbarians (hence the term 'anglosaxon'), along with a liberal dose of Norse (Norman) from 1066 on.

    Those knights you refer to would've been the enemies of the modern British and their royalty, not their lapdogs. If Arthur ever returned from the dead to lead his knights, as legend has it, he'd start by wiping out just about every Englishman living today, leaving only the northern Welsh (his closest relatives) to inherit the island.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  45. Is inventing the web that big a deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I don't want to criticize Tim B, but is inventing the web (assuming he did that) all that much of a landmark achievement? I mean it doesn't really compare to splitting the atom, inventing calculus, proving FLT, etc ....

    1. Re:Is inventing the web that big a deal? by siliconjunkie · · Score: 1

      Probably a good idea to post AC on that one.

      My mind is reeling at the thought that you *might* not be a troll (I have mod points right now and seriously had to restain myself from wasting a point on this), but just in case...

      You *DO* realize that the advent of the internet amounts to more than pr0n-on-demand and flash commercials, right? You *must* realize that the internet has done more to foster and empower human communication than any other invention (including cave paintings and the printing press, IMHO). You have got to see that the capabilities for communication that the internet provides yields the potential for *many* new ideas to come to fruition (including ideas that *may* be as much of a "landmark achievement" as splitting the atom, calculus, proving FLT).

      Either you are just not paying attention or you are trolling for fun and profit. I will assume the latter.

    2. Re:Is inventing the web that big a deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "small/easy things" are the harder to spot, and those are the ones wich we use most.

    3. Re:Is inventing the web that big a deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I was completely serious. I just don't see inventing the web as being up there with splitting the atom. The "web" that TBL invented is nothing more than a simple layer of abstraction on top of a tonne of stuff that was already there. Basically all TLB did to make the web was to add HTML to the pot, and stir. Now personally I think HTML is an abomination, totally the wrong approach (TLB's idea on the semantic web are much better). But even if I didn't think HTML was an abomination, inventing HTML is not exactly a huge accomplishment. Compare it to say the work of Alan Kay, or Allan Turing, or Alonzo Church, etc, etc.

    4. Re:Is inventing the web that big a deal? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, but unlike the other individuals you mentioned, Tim Berners-Lee is much more in the limelight than are Kay, Turing, Church or any of the myriad people that made technical contributions at least as great as HTML. Everyone that uses a browser can be convinced to feel grateful for his work. Not that I care one whit about whether he is knighted or not: given the fact that Mick Jagger was also recently given the same honor leads me to believe that the criteria for receiving a Knighthood are not as stringent as they used to be.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  46. Not lost! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    As long as the internet exists, so will pages like this - and this is indeed the beauty of the whole thing, how anyone really can (and does) create HTML.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not lost! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jokes on you. Not only will he be taking your job, but you will have to train him. Haha.

  47. Nominate The Bell Labs Team by defsdoor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was thinking about honours the other day - before the government raised their desire to rename them all.

    I was thinking that the orignal Bell Labs guys should be nominated - after all where would we all be today if it wasn't for Ritchie, Thompson, Korn etc... ?

    We all are truly standing on the shoulders of giants.

    1. Re:Nominate The Bell Labs Team by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Go back a little further ... how about Bardeen, Brattain and Shockley? In spite of the fact that Shockley is a flaming bigot, the invention of the point-contact transistor and the later development of the planar transistor from their work (and ultimately the integrated circuit) did spawn a wave of technological advancement greater than any in history. Hard to imagine anything like the modern Internet running on Eniac and its brethren.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  48. No accounting... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    As much as he revolutionized the Internet by creating the web standards, I also bet he didn't expect the deluge of .... phishing scams using misleading URLs, and the general adware/spyware/crapware abuse that the world wide web has become.

    Yes, I'm afraid there was no accounting for the possibility of Microsoft happening to us all.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  49. Oh Sure He's Knighted.... by DonElectron · · Score: 4, Funny

    But the man who invented duct tape lives in obscurity. The world is filled with insensitive clods.

    1. Re:Oh Sure He's Knighted.... by kryptkpr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your post actually prompted me to look up the history of duct tape, and find out just who did invent duct/duck tape..

      The readers digest version is that it was a faceless employee of Johnson&Johnson, and we'll never really know who to knight :)

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  50. congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    alright! it's about time the guy who created spiderman get some credit! what's that?

  51. Yes, I dreamed of something like it.... by hughk · · Score: 1
    A long time ago in the days of Digital and their internal network, we had manuals in electronic form which were marked up with something called Runoff and programs for browsing them. Hypercards existed and this used some of the concepts.

    Tim used a very simple markup language too, but it was easier to extend that many of the others floating around. For me, the beauty was the URL. You could link to almost anything and for me, this was the simple but revolutionary idea. When we had the Internet, we had Gopher, FTP and whatever but this brought it altogether.

    Sir Tim deserves every accolade and award that he gets now. As everyone said, the invention wasn't patented, copyrighted or whatver so everyone decided to join in and the web was born.

    For the institution too, CERN is one of the world's foremost particle physics laboratory, but I don't think they are ashamed that this is probably their single most important discovery for the ordinary person.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  52. Tim Lee Unrecognised... Millennium Prize Winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was just awarded the Millenium Prize, a brand spanking new Finnish bi-annual, IT oriented prize. Can't remember the sum, but big money anyway.

    Goes to show the Millennium Prize has something of a recognitions problem. (No mention on the Slashdot editorial.)

    IMO, serves them Finns right for the ghastly name for the price... (Then again, just as calculating as the whole prize thingy, so there.)

  53. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by Pikhq · · Score: 0

    Sir William Gates III (Commonly known as Bill Gates) The Knights of the Round Table.

    --
    echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
  54. At least he got it in time by twem2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What with the current move to try and get rid of knighthoods (why I can't understand, would the French get rid of the Legion D'Honour?)

  55. Did he get the sword on both shoulders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or was it a 'one-click' knighting?

  56. Dynabook (by Alan Kay) by ratboot · · Score: 1

    For your information, the World Wide Web browser was greatly inspired by the Dynabook (a concept from Alan Kay in the 60s).

    I got root with a noshell bug.

  57. JESUS!!! It's called Google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ok, look, I know you're lazy and the whole world centers around being at your beck and call, but please, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, try a Google search before you make yourself look even worse.

    In answer to your question, here's the Wikipedia entry that states that non-Commonwealth recipient cannot use "sir" or "dame". Here's the Royal Family's website to back it up. I will quote the relevant section, since you have already proven you have difficulty locating information:


    Foreign citizens occasionally receive honorary knighthoods; they are not dubbed, and they do not use the style 'Sir'.


    Ok, now please, to prevent this sort of waste of time in the future, check this site out. It's quite handy.
  58. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    Its also fairly well accepted that Lancelot was made up...by the French!

    --
    Why not fork?
  59. What about Al? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Tim gets a Knighthood for merely inventing the WWW, then what does Al Gore get for inventing the whole internet?

  60. In other news... by fsck! · · Score: 1

    Maybe now I'll stop hearing those stupid Al-Gore-invented-the-Internet commments since the guy who really invented (what most people consider the Internet) is getting recognition for it.

    1. Re:In other news... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe now I'll stop hearing those stupid Al-Gore-invented-the-Internet commments since the guy who really invented (what most people consider the Internet) is getting recognition for it.

      Um, he's the one who tried to take credit for it ... (and before you copy/paste, yes, I have read the "full quote").

    2. Re:In other news... by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      If you have the entire quote, then read it and stop doing what every right-winger in the world has done by trying to make it something it wasn't. Unless you have a quote of Gore stating explicitly that he invented the Internet, then you're spinning what was an admittedly awkwardly-phrased statement.

      Pick up a copy of Where Wizards Stay Up Late which retells the story about DARPA/ARPAnet and the evolution of the Internet. Turn back to the index and look up Al Gore. Notice that he's one of the few politicians invited to the 25 year reunion of the ARPA team. Why do you think they would make such a decision? No, he wasn't part of the team, but they clearly recognized that he was one of the few politicians to get the whole Internet concept and was one of the few politicians to fight for supporting it. The reunion wasn't open to the public. Further, it took place just before the explosion of popularity in the Internet (i.e., back when AOL had under 1M subscribers) so it wasn't a photo-op situation.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  61. The Millenium Prize *was* Mentioned on /. by Laebshade · · Score: 1
  62. Yes, but the 'report' has been roundly condemned by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The UK political system has 2 houses, the commons (to which I could aspire) and the lords (in which only the gentry may vote). This may (at first glance) look incredibly stupid - the establishment having a hereditary vote that can interrupt the process of democracy. In the traditional sense of UK government, this is of course not the case....

    The commons has to vote, and when a majority decision is reached, it goes to the Lords for ratification.

    The Lords act as the 'public conscience' (and hey, it actually does work like this). Despite their allegiance to any party, there are myriad examples of the Lords sending a bill back to the Commons saying 'it has to cope with X better', where X could be any under-privileged group you care to mention. The Lords are *not* elected, They have a duty of *moral* care - and frankly they do a good job, despite the privilege that the system inherently (no pun intended :-) gives them.

    In fact the Commons (the elected representatives) have the ability to over-rule the Lords if a bill goes back and forth 3 times. This is 'the voice of the people', but the Lords can raise an almighty stink (and have done), saying *why* they rejected the bill. This has been an unbelievable embarassment to governments in the past, and it takes a strong-willed government to push a bill through regardless. The last was Thatcher, and I think she paid a heavy price for not negotiating a compromise.

    The take-home message is simple - the UK has 2 houses. One is elected and needs to justify its existence. One is not, and acts for those who cannot speak out for themselves. At least that's the idea, and although it's not perfect, it does seem to work reasonably well when you couple it with an independent media, at least IMHO...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  63. The empire was a force for good as well as bad by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not often said, but the British Empire was one of the first to enshrine the rights of man on a global scale. Slavery and all its connotatations came late in the empire's history, and frankly stood against almost everything the empire originally stood for (but by this stage, the money-men had taken over :( There are no noble actions in the enslavement of continents, but let's be clear here - the UK sold slaves from Africa to the USA, nowhere else. To deride the 'empire' for it's failings is to deny the good whilst celebrating the bad about the political system of the time.

    The empire was a good thing during a time when war was commonplace, it brought stability to areas of conflict, it imposed Pax Britannia in the same way that the USA imposes Pax Americana today - the UK ruled through trade and prosperity within its territories, as opposed to the other colonial powers which tended to be more .. austere. Tell me the difference between what happened then and what happens now, As far as I can see, it boils down to 'the US allows countries their own government as long as it does not interfere with US foreign policy'. Not too different from 'The UK allows the locals to do their own thing, subject to overall control from the governer'

    If you look at the evolution of the colonies that the UK had, compared to those that the other world powers at the time had, I think you'll see a more liberative and free society within the ex-UK colonies than the others. Even those countries that were our competitors at the time must concede that the model of democratic and fair government by the people of the people has its roots in the UK's parliamentary system. If you doubt me, look it up. See how nepotism and favouritism were rife in the politics of the day. Like it or loathe it, the rule of law was a rule imposed on *all* British subjects, since the Magna Carta enshrined the right of the common man to be treated with the same dignity as the Lord.

    This is not to say that the British Empire was inherently good (or bad), you only have to look at 4th July to see most Americans attitude [grin], but consider what the situation would have been if the British sense of 'fair play', (and the system of law that it created), the English language, and the idea of Democracy as a fair form of government were never spread around the globe. This is the legacy of the Empire that you denigrate so tritely. Consider. Would you have done so well in different circumstances ? Consider that seriously for a moment.....

    To get back more to the parent post: we (the Brits) honour those who serve more than is typically asked. We give them a title, a mark of distinction, a way of marking them as 'better' than average. If you don't like that, well, that's your privilege. Personally, I think ole Tim deserves every honour he gets. It's a distinction that goes back several hundred years, and I think he stands tall in the company of his peers. Well done Sir Tim.

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:The empire was a force for good as well as bad by daina · · Score: 1
      There was nothing whatsoever good about the British Empire. Intending to do good does not necessarily imply that the outcome shall be good.

      The British Empire was built upon principles that were not shared by the subjugated peoples. The notion inherent in the establishment of the empire was that indigenous people could be 'civilized' - by converting them to Christianity, establishing infrastructure for transportation and communications, and setting up a 'fair' system of government. That these seem like good things is based chiefly upon the fact that they are our things. From the perspective of the indigenous people, these were not, and are not, good things.

      Take North America for example. There existed a large, thriving and well-organized society of indigenous people before the arrival of Europeans. They were considered sub-human not because they lived in misery, or were poor or had no government, but because they were different. Once the British (and others) were able to de-humanize the indigenous people, all manner of intercession could be justified on the basis that the motive was improvement.

      What followed was genocide.

      Whatever else you might say about it, the British monarchy propagates a system where one person is held to be intrinsically superior to another. This belief is absolutely fundamental to all of the ills that plague humanity, from race discrimination to runaway capitalism. Mr. Berners-Lee would have done better to reject an honour bestowed by such a system, for it is no honour at all: it is complicity in the greatest crime in human history.

    2. Re:The empire was a force for good as well as bad by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      You make some good points here but the Magna Carta didn't do much for the "common" man. It was more a restriction on the powers of the king over the nobility. The "common" man at teh time of the Magn Carta was a serf. i.e. He was practicalyy "owned" by the local Lord.

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    3. Re:The empire was a force for good as well as bad by karmatic · · Score: 1

      Completly and totally offtopic (hey, I've truly got karma to burn) -

      Is your email working, Simon - I had written in with a hostip contrib a couple days ago, and never got a response.

    4. Re:The empire was a force for good as well as bad by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      I don't believe the genocide of the Native American population (partial genocide, anyway) can be blamed on the British system of government. Perhaps more accurately, it could be blamed on the European strategy of commerce and exploration. If you remember, the Spanish were more effective in wiping out the lands they colonized further south. I'm sure the French and Portugese would have done the same if either had been the dominant force at the time.

      Perhaps better examples of how British politics affect a region could be found in India or South Africa. Unfortunately, I am not prepared to comment on either of those. Discuss among yourselves....

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  64. What are you on about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look in DeBretts like anyone else idiot. Whats wrong with you?

  65. Hes a hypocrite anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, hes a Scottish nationalist that neither lives nor pays taxes in Scotland. Yes he gives to charity, but its a small fraction of his tax liability for any given year.

  66. So does this mean he's allowed to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slay any spammers found on English soil?

  67. AL IS a Jousting Pole by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    But I thought that Al WAS a jousting pole!

  68. The United States Army by BaldRazor · · Score: 1

    Actually, you're "both" (meaning all) slightly off-center. A massive communications network was created by *DARPA* (not ARPA) - that is, the Defence Advanced Research Project Agency - so that in the event of, say, New York being nuked, a message from city A (east of NYC) could still get to city B (west of NYC) via city C (south of NYC). I'm oversimplifying, but we have to thank the military for advancing technology. Speaking of which, has anyone noticed tech advances faster (fastest?) during wartime? For anyone interested in more, and in fact for anyone in general, I highly recommend the book "Cyberpunk" - it details lives of the three greatest crackers known: Kevin Mitnick, rtm and Pengo. It's by Katie Hafner - www.amazon.com for $11.20 new - $0.97 used plus S+H. Cheers, Razor

    1. Re:The United States Army by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Certainly the military affects the pace of technological development. That's a perfectly natural consequence of a. needing to create an advantage over an enemy and b. being able to divert massive resources in order to accomplish that goal. That's been the case throughout history. In times of peace military spending is usually reduced, and the private sector can rarely command the same level of R&D spending that the military can.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  69. BTW, Steve Jobs invented the GUI by inkswamp · · Score: 1
    The article states: "Tim Berners-Lee, the British inventor of the world wide web, has received his knighthood from the Queen."

    I'm not trying to dispute Berner-Lee's brilliance in recognizing what could be done with the tools and resources available to him, but giving him credit for inventing the Web is a little like giving Steve Jobs credit for inventing the GUI. Both of them took great ideas around them, added their own touches and ideas and combined them in a way that made something greater than the sum of its parts. Credit is certainly due to Berner-Lee, but it's strange that I keep seeing him given credit for creating the Web.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:BTW, Steve Jobs invented the GUI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He literally created the web

      The protocols, the markups and all the trimmings

      the web is not the internet, or hypermedia or whatever and yes of course he did make use of prior inventions, but all modern inventions do

      Mr. Benz is credited for inventing the automobile, should we change that because there where horse driven craft and trains in existance before that ?

      Is Hr. Benz invetion invalidated by his use of wheels, an Otto motor, a steering column and all kinds of technology that he did not invent ?

      Edison shuld not get credit for the electric light bulb since there where electric lights in existance before his, even some based around the same basic priniple ?

      anal etc etc etc

    2. Re:BTW, Steve Jobs invented the GUI by (void*) · · Score: 1
      But he DID. He wrote the specs for HTML, wrote the first browser, sat on the W3 committee and all that.
      He was THE MAN.


      The Web is not the Internet, as Microsoft would like you to believe.

    3. Re:BTW, Steve Jobs invented the GUI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of tending to adgree with the OP. Go look around at comprehensive histories of how the WWW came into existence. Lots of stuff online (ironically). IMVHO, B-L deserves the admiration, but he gathered a lot of ideas and concepts from other sources and pre existing technology then applied those concepts to the Internet. Yep he wrote the specs and the first browser, but there were similar things prior to this. Hypertext was not his invention for example.

  70. Re:Yes, but the 'report' has been roundly condemne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Party right, partly wrong.

    The Lords isn't just restricted to the traditional gentry. Politicians, statesmen, judges etc are all appointed to the Lords, regardless of their family origin. Indeed, for many years, the House of Lords has been seen as a way for a government to "promote" a troublesome Cabinet Minister, flattering his (or her) ego, while reducing the potential for damage.

    Under the current system, the Lords can effectively delay a Bill's progress for a single year, after which, the Commons can drive it through using the Parliament Act. This doesn't happen very often, though. In situations where the Commons appears to have been trying to pass a piece of legislation for many years without success, the logical conclusion is that the Government does not actually want to pass the legislation. A good example of this would be the bill on foxhunting, which has been proposed pretty much every year since Labour came to power in 1997, but has been defeated in the Lords every year. One may suspect that Blair has no real interest in banning foxhunting (it is a bit of a non-issue, in all fairness, compared with much of the other business of government), but he finds it a useful rallying point on which to focus the rebellious left-wingers in his party each year.

    The Lords does actually work remarkably well in practice; far better than it really has any right to. It acts as a conservative (with a small "c") influence upon any government and is a useful check on hastily thought out populist and/or badly drafted legislation. It's been one of the most effective defenders of civil rights in the UK since Labour came to power.

    It's a good illustration of how counter-intuitive the British constitution can be. One of the other most effective checks upon governments who would go too far comes from the unelected, heriditary monarch. Her powers are, in reality, extremely limited, but as the current Queen is, contrary to the general public perception, a formidable expert on Britain's constitutional system, the moderating effect can be valuable.

  71. Not convincing enough story ... by ggvaidya · · Score: 0

    Me, I'd blame the tooth fairy ... :D

    Then again, it might also be Sir Darl of Blah :D :D

    (Please don't mod me "-1 Stupid". Somebody had to say it. I hear this sort of insider-knowledge joke is funny ... in Japan! *narf*)

    (I'm going to regret not posting this anonymously, aren't I?)

    1. Re:Not convincing enough story ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (I'm going to regret not posting this anonymously, aren't I?)

      Yep.

  72. It hasn't been lost by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    My homepage is written completely in vim (with sometimes a little help from php to do stuff like headers, etc.) Efficient, no. Fun, yes. Works, oh yeah, absolutely and like a charm on anything from lynx to firefox (and maybe even that other browser, the one with all the bugs? Oh yeah, Windows Update ...)

    By 1996, every school kid had his own webpage. Sure, very few - if any - of them changed the world, but back then, ALL webpages looked like they'd been written in notepad (ah, the days of my pre-unix youth!), but that was cool, because you could learn the tricks of the masters just by clicking View Source. Before long, it'd built up into such remarkable inventions as flash advertisements and the Bonzai Buddy, but under the surface, the WWW can still be written in the simplest of simple editors.

    It should also be pointed out that the idea of using tags is what gave rise to XML :D. Yay, TBL!

  73. I thought the Internet was created ... by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    by Microsoft? What, you sayin' it AIN'T the blue icon on my desktop??

    Seriously, you shouldn't confuse the issue further (like Sun hasn't tried hard enough). The Internet is the Internet (and AG helped fund it). The WWW is the WWW (and TBL invented it). And IE is junk :) (and will be, forever and ever, amen).

  74. FRS by midgley · · Score: 1

    Fellow of the Royal Society (refer to Neal Stephenson's recent novel for more detail) which he was elected to a year before the knighthood was probably a bigger accolade from his peer group.

    A "K" is from government, and more easily understandable by non-techies.

    While these relics of a largely vanished empire persist it is desirable that the architects of the technical infrastructure get a share. When we establish a republic or whatever we'll change the names.

    In Soviet Russia, you aspire to the Order of Lenin.

  75. He is not Sir Bill by EnglishTim · · Score: 3, Informative

    He has an honorary knighthood, which is bestowed upon non-British citizens.

    You are only get the honorific 'Sir' if you have a knighthood.

  76. Good advice by midgley · · Score: 1

    Crazy not to adopt that attitude.

  77. so come this was rejected when I submitted it? by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1


    Tim Berners-Lee Knighted, arise Sir Tim Friday July 16, @05:19PM Rejected

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
    1. Re:so come this was rejected when I submitted it? by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      Because the "editors" don't like you. No one said that Slashdot had to be a democracy

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    2. Re:so come this was rejected when I submitted it? by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

      Never thought it was a democracy, but lately forming the increasingly strong opinion that it is an oligarchy advertising itself as forum, wherein those in power parasite themselves upon the masses and claim commonly held ideas and submissions as their own.... .. ironic for such an allegedly pro open source ethos site.

      http://forums.anti-slash.org/viewforum.php?f=8 looks increasingly relevant...

      --
      http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  78. Re:so what? how about Sir Alan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mouse and windows existed in the early 60's, well before Kay started working on computers.

  79. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by Finuvir · · Score: 1

    You should be asking for people who you only heard of since they were knighted. They were likely somewhat famous beforehand and more famous afterwards. I'd wager that applies to most knights.

    --
    Why is anything anything?
  80. Re:so what? how about Sir Alan? by harmlessdrudge · · Score: 1

    The mouse was invented by Doug Engelbart (and called an X-Y position indicator)

  81. Re:Knighthood==recognition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    In case you missed the history lesson Arthur lived in the time of the Britons, who lost their fight against German invaders - Angles and Saxons - and were eventually destroyed.


    No, the Angles (Englar) and Saxons where lowland Germans, in other words Germanic, not German just as the French are largely Germanic but definetly not German.

    The Angles and Saxons had something of a reputation for genocide,


    Quite the opposite, they came to Britain fleeing genocide and they did not invade, it happened over a long period of time, much too long to be considered an invasion, it was just a migration of an ethnic group, something that has happened a thousands of times in Europe in the last couple of thousand years and is still happening, just too slowly for most people to take notice, take Kosovo for an example.

    Archealogy shows that families of Anglosaxon and British cultural heritage lived side by side in towns and villages for a long time before the 2 cultures fused.

    The "reputation for genocide" was awarded posthumously by politically motivated nationalistic Irish "Historians" and has no basis in contemporary writing, it should be taken as seriously as the assertion by the same group of people that an invasion of Ireland a German army lead by a Dutch/German individial is an "English invasion" etc.

    and it's rather certain that if any Briton blood survives in the modern-day British people it's very, very weak indeed. The modern British are primarily descended from these German barbarians (hence the term 'anglosaxon'), along with a liberal dose of Norse (Norman) from 1066 on.


    In fact modern genetic research has confirmed what has always been suspected, ie that the genetic legacy of the Normans, Vikings and Anglo Saxons in the current native British population is much smaller than that of the orignal(Keltic) Brits, it's in fact smaller than that of people of Medeterrian origin (Supr. a whopping 30% or more), which makes your above statement rather laughable.

    The fact that the common language spoken is a bastardisation of lowland and north germanic languages means nothing, plenty of ethnic groups all over the world nativly speak languages that are not their aborignal ones.
  82. Ted Nelson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't the person who dreamed up hypertext Ted Nelson? This guy just did the first implementation with an "image" tag. Or am I thinking of the wrong guy - in either case?

  83. Re:Yes, but the 'report' has been roundly condemne by u38cg · · Score: 1

    Before they kicked the majority of the hereditaries out the Lords, there was at least one petrol pump attendant there who attended regularly. How many do you think there are now?

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  84. Maybe do a little more research...? by cosmos4 · · Score: 1

    'INVENTING INVENTED THE INTERNET! No one said Boo about Gore's remark. Then,
    the RNC spin-points arrived:'
    http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh120302.shtml

    The Web is not the Internet,
    http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Internet/2002/ Web_vs_Internet.asp

    'Al Gore and the Internet', By Robert Kahn and Vinton Cerf
    http://www.spectacle.org/1100/gore.html

    Here's text of some of Gore's legislation...
    'High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 '
    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d102:s.002 72:

    'Information Infrastructure and Technology Act of 1992'
    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d102:s.029 37:

    For example, Gore's '91 Act funded Marc Andreesen's group... they developed the NCSA Mosaic browser.
    http://www.ibiblio.org/pioneers/andreesen.html
    http://www.totic.org/nscp/demodoc/demo.html

  85. Knighted for daylight robbery.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found it fascinating to watch the fawning in the wake of such 'charitable' contributions.

    It's spin worthy of the current UK Labour government (itself apparently not averse to some creative accounting): Gates gives the UK back some of the money it has ripped out of its school system and it has to be applauded (usual tactics: sell cheap to get them hooked, then raise the price. The first shot is always free).

    Sick, but consistent with the way this Government appears to treat education (until, of course, elections loom)

  86. Renounciation of Citizenship by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    It is possible to renounce U.S. citizenship. You have to renounce your citizenship in the presence of a U.S. consul.

    See this article.

    It's generally considered uncool to force someone to be a citizen of a country if they also possess a citizenship for another country. If you have one citizenship, you're probably stuck with it unless you acquire another one. If you have another one, however, most countries will allow you to renounce their citizenship. I hear, however, there are a few countries that will force citizenship upon people whose ancestors were from that country. I don't know of the top of my head which countries those are.

    It is possible to become citizenshipless, when a country decides to revoke a citizenship (see above article for reasons why the U.S. could do this), but it usually isn't possible for someone to become citizenshipless voluntarily.