Slashdot Mirror


Ars Reviews AirPort Express

ack154 writes "Ars Technica has a nice, comprehensive review of the new AirPort Express from Apple. There is a breakdown of each of the main features: music streaming, a mobile base station, a base station extender, and networking a printer. All features were tested from both Mac and Windows perspectives. Overall it got an 8/10 with points mainly lost for no means of remote control and no audio cable included in the package."

304 comments

  1. Audio Cable by toetagger1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Since when do Airports come with audio cables? That's like dodging points for a graphics card w/o a speaker.

    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
    1. Re:Audio Cable by goates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since the Airport Express can connect to stereo systems.

      goates

    2. Re:Audio Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough cough* RTFA

    3. Re:Audio Cable by grocer · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's marketed as a digital life device to allow iTunes to stream over the home stereo (source of criticism). However, it depends on what it's being plugged into...most stereos take RCA. 3.5mm line in is not typically. Apple sells a kit for 39 bucks for those not already equipped.

      Of course, I have the RCA -> 3.5mm male bit for hooking my iBook into the stereo plus a 3.5mm headphone extension so i have a 6' or so radius to put the iBook in a safe and accessible location.

    4. Re:Audio Cable by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 4, Insightful
      From the article:

      Also, to my dismay, the Express did not include any audio cables for hooking it up to a stereo. ... The AirPort Express Stereo Connection Kit with Monster Cables and an AC power cord is available separately from Apple for US$39.

      They offer it separately, and I think that's the point. The idea is to stream music wirelessly, and many people are going to buy it for that reason. If Apple adds the Connection Kit to the AirPort Express, the overall price goes up some, for an item I would guess most people do not need/want. If you absolutely have to have a wired connection, then hey, they have that accessory available as a separate product.

      --
      CT

    5. Re:Audio Cable by wolfbane01 · · Score: 0

      Since one of the major features of the Airport Express is it's ability to stream music from iTunes to a set of speakers via Airtunes [apple.com]

    6. Re:Audio Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, throwing in a 25 cent audio cable would really increase the cost.

    7. Re:Audio Cable by TTop · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can buy a mini-to-RCA plug at Radio Shack for less than $5. I think the kit has optical, "normal" and a power extension.

    8. Re:Audio Cable by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE hey AC - thanks for catching my mistake. Too bad you had to be rude and obnoxious. Looks like we have a "bastard of the day" winner, people!

      AC Shithead.

      --
      CT

    9. Re:Audio Cable by rickerbr · · Score: 5, Informative

      The airport express as shipped will need a 1/8" (3.5mm) to dual RCA or mini-Toslink optical cable to hook up to an audio device. Out of the box it can not do so. While radio shack has the cables necessary, it doesn't have the power cord which replaces the flip out plug in (ala iPod and power book adapters). I've had my AX up and running since last friday and finally got the connector kit yesterday.

    10. Re:Audio Cable by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1
      Ricker,

      Thank you for your informative reply. I've already had to deal with a Shithead AC, and your more tempered response is greatly appreciated.

      --
      CT

    11. Re:Audio Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought his reply was pretty fucking funny, actually :)

    12. Re:Audio Cable by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      it also has overpriced monster cable!

    13. Re:Audio Cable by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find the mini-->RCA adaptors to be less than completely reliable. A misaligned connection is rather annoying, particularly when the audio signal is encoded with dolby surround. The optical connection is a nice touch, though.

    14. Re:Audio Cable by Boone^ · · Score: 1

      That's all I use mine for, since the AirPort Extreme is plenty to reach all points of my house.

    15. Re:Audio Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW - its been almost 18 months since that quote in your sig and Apple still ain't using Intel, DUMASS.>

    16. Re:Audio Cable by pocomoonshiine · · Score: 1

      A 25 cent audio cable would just give every reviewer something to carp about. Some people want RCA, some optical. Optical cables ain't cheap. Some people think its gay as sunshine to sell matching sets of white cables, whereas one review I read was absolutely thrilled. Some peope think Monster cables are a complete waste, others swear by them. I sprung for the $39 cable kit and do not regret it. That Radio Shack crap I had was lame.

      Next they'll complain that it doesn't have a usb cable

      Then there's the whole issue with the multitude of power plugs used in this world... They chose wisely to skip past it all. Its a convenient luxury item. You want it, you pay. You don't - there's always duct tape.

    17. Re:Audio Cable by Squozen · · Score: 1

      How the hell did the parent get modded 'Insightful'? The poster evidentally didn't even read the post, much less the article.

    18. Re:Audio Cable by Squozen · · Score: 1

      *Evidently* my previous post was made from Windows, where I'm lacking the OS X spellchecker. :P

    19. Re:Audio Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA and you won't mkae such retarded mistakes. Really, you only have your own stupid self to blame.

      Go ACs!

    20. Re:Audio Cable by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The power cord is a standard 2-pin (no earth) connector found on a lot of radios and other devices. You can pick the up for next to nothing in any electrical hardware store (or just grab them from old broken radios). The official one comes with a retention clip, but this is not really required (the iBooks, which have the same design power block, do not include the retention clip).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. This is fine and well, but... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... Airport is not legal in some European countries, as it operates on military frequencies...

    1. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAH! Norwegia and Istanbul don't count! Gotcha! Now don't you feel silly?

    2. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny
      Airport is not legal in some European countries, as it operates on military frequencies

      Those are probably precisely the countries we want to jam.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    3. Re:This is fine and well, but... by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can that be correct? Doesn't it just operate on the same frequencies as any other Wi-fi device?

    4. Re:This is fine and well, but... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      The number of usable channels varies from country to country. That is why most drivers either ask you or query the OS to know what country they are in.

    5. Re:This is fine and well, but... by PaulusMagnus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean some European countries use the 802.11 2.4GHz frequency for military communications? Airport just sticks to the standards laid down in the IEEE standards. They didn't do a "Microsoft" and create their own standards.

      BTW Which European countries, as there are a lot of devices that use this band now?

    6. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Mono 1.0 or Perl 5.8.5 NOW! Just don't try python or ruby for they are evil and nothing good can come from them.

      That's more controversial than your last sig.

    7. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Ricwot · · Score: 1

      That's Norway and Turkey.

    8. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      as it operates on military frequencies...

      That's ok. Old Europe doesen't use it's military.

    9. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Apple.no is selling an illegal product?

    10. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norway? I'm using an Airport among the fjords right now, and WiFi is more popular here then anywhere else I know of in the world...

    11. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Those are probably precisely the countries we want to jam.

      LONESTAAAARRRRR!!!!!

    12. Re:This is fine and well, but... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Quick! Someone pull this article off of ./, since Frenchy here can't use WiFi.

      Or just ignore the fucking article if it doesn't apply to you. There's even an option on your user page so you won't have to engage your brain too frequently.

      -Peter

    13. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      No, its france , and its probably resolved now, since you can buy Airport Express from Apple.fr
      "Legal Issues

      The documentation included with AirPort hardware lists approval for use in the following countries:

      Australia
      Austria
      Belgium
      Canada
      Denmark
      Finland
      Germany
      Hong Kong
      Netherlands
      Norway
      Sweden
      United Kingdom
      United States

      Notably absent from this list is France. This is probably due to the conflict between frequencies used by AirPort and the French military. Apple has said it is negotiating to resolve this issue.

      Using AirPort in countries where it's not approved can be a serious crime, and it is illegal for passengers to use any radio broadcasting equipment on a plane. I strongly recommend disabling AirPort when traveling in countries not on this list or on an airplane. The AirPort control strip includes a "Turn AirPort Off" command. While it would seem that this feature was created for this particular need, I have not been able to find documented assurance that turning off AirPort inhibits all transmissions. For extra protection against inadvertently doing something that could land you in prison, remove the AirPort card."
    14. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame he already has. Run, the black helecopters are after your ass!

    15. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as I know, it's just France...

    16. Re:This is fine and well, but... by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, WiFi is developed for US open frequencies. That's why GSM phones don't work here and there unless they are special. The US reserves 800 MHz for GSM and 900 MHz for military communication. Europe does the opposite. I think both use 1900 MHz, but there could be issues there as well.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    17. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Ricwot · · Score: 1

      I was correcting the poster above me with his names of places which weren's actually countries. I was not making a difinitive legal statement.

    18. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Chep · · Score: 1

      ...indeed, the Army was using these frequencies when the IEEE felt like putting wifi there.
      <p>
      Since Wifi started getting popular, the Autorit\'e de R\'egulation des T\'el\'ecommunications worked with the Army to get them out of the spectrum, and 13-channel WiFi is legal here indoors. Outdoors (cantennas etc., not just leakage signal in your yard) there are still areas where you can't use it unless you declare it (basically so that the Army can tell you to not do this until they've replaced their nearby equipment). Oh, and there's a transmit power limit, which is obviously the case in most any place.
      <p>
      Not sure for 802.11a, but I saw plenty of 802.11a devices on sale, so I'm assuming it's clear too.
      <p>
      slashcode really, really sucks for banning &eacute;, dammit.

    19. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 0, Troll

      But if we block their military frequencies, how can they coordinate their total surrender?

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    20. Re:This is fine and well, but... by ack154 · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's only one man who would dare give me the raspberry: Lonestar!

    21. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Smurf · · Score: 1
      slashcode really, really sucks for banning é, dammit.

      áéíóú àèìòù âêîôû ñÑ çÇ

      Well, at least in the Preview everything seems to be working here, without the need of fancy HTML tags. A couple of years ago I emailed CmdrTaco regarding this, and he said that he would fix it if someone submitted a patch. Well, someone finally did it.

      I'm using a Mac but I'm quite sure it will also work using Windows' awful Alt-### combinations. Does anyone know how to type accented characters in Linux using an English keyboard?

      Oh, but even the "& eacute" text copied from your post renders correctly as an é! Weird.
    22. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Chep · · Score: 1

      Super weird. If I type a \'e, I get: this é; if I type é, well you see what I get.
      <p>
      Anyway, slashcode sucks for banning &euro; (and the GBP sign)

    23. Re:This is fine and well, but... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Wait for next few sigs ;->

    24. Re:This is fine and well, but... by hamisht · · Score: 1
      "The documentation included with AirPort hardware lists approval for use in the following countries: Australia Austria Belgium Canada Denmark Finland Germany Hong Kong Netherlands Norway Sweden United Kingdom United States Notably absent from this list is France."

      Also missing is New Zealand - Apple better fix this because I know of at least three people over here who want to buy one...

    25. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know how to type accented characters in Linux using an English keyboard?

      If you're using X, add a Compose key to your keyboard through remapping (Google for xmodmap compose). Then type Compose, Apostrophe, E (separately) to get an E with an acute accent, for example. Most other accents are pretty easy to guess, like ~n, `e, e-, i", o^, o/, ss, ??, etc. Others are not so obvious, like euro (E=), pound (L=), and yen (Y=).

      You could also map frequently used symbols directly to a key using xmodmap (or xkeycaps, which is a GUI for remapping).

    26. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Smurf · · Score: 1

      Oooh, that's so much more elegant than Windows' Alt+### combinations! (Although it does require some preconfiguration.)

      I still prefer MacOS/MacOS X method, (and anyway I don't use Linux that much now), but I have already copied this to my very short list of useful tips.

      Thanks!!

    27. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      France has the Mirage series if fighters and lots of other aircraft. I have a book outlining the airforces of many of the world's powers, and counted fourty different kinds of aircraft still in service.

      They build the Exocet missiles, the kind sold to Persian Gulf, such as the one that hit one of the U.S. navy ships in the 90's. They are a pretty big exporter of military technology, which I think is one of the reasons they objected to intervention with Iraq because their companies did a lot of business with the Hussein government and wanted their cozy business arrangements back.

      They also have nuclear weapons, and have tested them over the objections of Greenpeace.

      I think every EU nation with water borders has a navy.

    28. Re:This is fine and well, but... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Funny

      France has a military?

      Score: -5, Too Easy

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    29. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gyad

    30. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Microwave ovens are forbiden as well, since they operate om military frequencies? Cordless phones?

      Well, at least you can have 802.11a

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    31. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's ok. Old Europe doesen't use it's military.

      and modern americans don't use their heads ... fair trade, i guess

    32. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find some French soldiers in Africa right now doing some valuable peacekeeping.

      As for bashing the French soldier, as soon as we see prison pig-piles comitted by soldiers OTHER than Americans, it might be worth pursuing.

    33. Re:This is fine and well, but... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      You never heard of the French Foreign Leigon? An elite, feared fighting force.

      Oh, and none of them are French.

      -Peter

    34. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron.. EVERYONE in the world thought Iraq had WMD. Everyone. France, Russia, Germany, UK, Republicans, Democrats, EVERYONE. If he didn't have WMD why kick out the inspectors?

      Question: If EVERYONE thinks a crazy threatening guy has a gun in his pocket, and he refuses to take his hand out of his pocket and give it up, when he gets shot and it's proven that it was just a candy bar in his pocket, who is the liar?

      Answer: George W. Bush, because everything bad that ever happens in the world is his fault.

    35. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's ok. Old Europe doesen't use it's military.

      Here we go again... There is no "old Europe" or "new Europe" no matter what the monkey in whitehouse says!

    36. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They also have nuclear weapons, and have tested them over the objections of Greenpeace.

      Why point out that last bit? Every nation that has tested nuclear weapons has done so over the objections of GP.

    37. Re:This is fine and well, but... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the same military that rescued a bunch of American missionaries in some pisspot west-central African republic about a year back. The Congo or Liberia, somewhere like that.

    38. Re:This is fine and well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the USA did absolutely no business with Hussein, right?

  3. Reads like... by Wtcher · · Score: 1

    Off-topic, and unimportant, but that Apple description reads like one of those old 80's advertisements where they dream up scenarios for you.

    --
    ----- Wtcher Dragon, UDIC
    1. Re:Reads like... by repetty · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Off-topic, and unimportant, but that Apple description reads like one of those old 80's advertisements where they dream up scenarios for you."

      Like "us a mouse instead of keyboard to control your computer"?

      --Richard

    2. Re:Reads like... by ArsEric · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think the target market for the "fill your home with AirPort Expresses" pitch are people who used to be visited by Robin Leach "Is all this yours?"

  4. Big error: by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    Product: AirPort Express (product page)

    Goes to mircosoft.com on Office:Mac 2004. How could they possibly do that?

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:Big error: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine here...

      Is it clicking the link that is taking you there? Or is it redirecting?

    2. Re:Big error: by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      clicking the link takes me there

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    3. Re:Big error: by FredFnord · · Score: 1
      Goes to mircosoft.com on Office:Mac 2004. How could they possibly do that?
      Huh. When I go to mircosoft.com I don't get anything.

      -fred
      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  5. Interesting by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like one sweet piece of technology. I'd be interested to know it sends the audio or the file... I wonder how long until we see compatible technology - something else that will stream to an AirPort Express and something else that will show up on the pop-up in iTunes. I love iTunes, but it would be nice if other streaming hardware/software could be compatible.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have to use iTunes or AirTunes to stream music to your stereo system, or say, can you just stream any audio file (mp3, realaudio, ...) via any player (windows media, xmms, ...)?

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the article (page 5), it states that it streams it using Apple's lossless encoding.

    3. Re:Interesting by foidulus · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not in the article, but in the WWDC Jobs mentioned that, "It's encrypted, so the labels will like it". I don't know how it is encrypted(whether it uses WEP or a proprietary encryption algorithm), so they will have to do a lot of toying arond to come up with a compatible product.

    4. Re:Interesting by zsmooth · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd be interested to know it sends the audio or the file...

      It sends an RSA encrypted Apple Lossless stream over RTSP on ports 5000 and 6000.

    5. Re:Interesting by mliu · · Score: 1

      Anyone know if there is anything similar out there that can be used to send any audio, not just iTunes? I would love to have a wireless connect to my speakers, but iTunes only is a complete cop-out.

      So I can listen to my music wirelessly, assuming I'm running either Windows or have an Apple with iTunes, and when it's time to watch a movie, or anything else, the sound reverts to my laptop's internal speakers? Pretty weak.

    6. Re:Interesting by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      It's not in the article, but in the WWDC Jobs mentioned that, "It's encrypted, so the labels will like it".

      After reading the article, I'm under the impression that even as a wireless bridge it supports 128-bit WEP, and as a wireless access point is also supports WPA. That way, when I'm transferring all my illegit MP3's between my Mac and other people's laptops, they'll be encrypted so that no one else can unlawfully eavesdrop on our file transfer.

    7. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know they use RSA? Did you get your unit already and start analyzing it?

      My guess would have been AES since that's what their DRM uses.

      Is AES more CPU intensive than RSA?

    8. Re:Interesting by foidulus · · Score: 1

      It supports it, but it's not mandatory. I wonder if the RIAA "influenced" them to make encryption of songs mandatory.
      Hell, maybe this could create a new sport, instead of wardriving, you drive around till you find an Aiport Express house and change their Brittany to "The Chipmunks sing the Death Metal hits"

    9. Re:Interesting by oscast · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can run iTunes on Windows too you know...

    10. Re:Interesting by wfberg · · Score: 2, Informative


      Is AES more CPU intensive than RSA?


      AES is a symmetric (i.e. shared key) cipher, specifically designed with hardware design in mind, as well as with a mode for stream operation.

      RSA can only practically be used for key exchange because it's so slow.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    11. Re:Interesting by mliu · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      and I quote, "So I can listen to my music wirelessly, assuming I'm running either Windows or have an Apple with iTunes, and when it's time to watch a movie, or anything else, the sound reverts to my laptop's internal speakers?"

    12. Re:Interesting by Karpe · · Score: 1

      I understand that iTunes will send the ALC encrypted to the AirPort Express, so that the FairPlay protected AACs can be streamed to it in a way that pleases record labels, but I was wondering if the base itself would accept if a client streamed unencrypted content to it. That would really help Linux clients, for instance. Is it just do a netcat to ports 5000 and 6000 of an ALC stream? :)

    13. Re:Interesting by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, that's right. What did you expect? This is designed for use with "iTunes", not as wireless speaker system. Hence, it has the name of "AirTunes". Get it?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    14. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know they use RSA? Did you get your unit already and start analyzing it?

      Yes.

      There's a tag sent called rsaaeskey, so you're probably right about it being AES.

    15. Re:Interesting by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So I can listen to my music wirelessly, assuming I'm running either Windows or have an Apple with iTunes, and when it's time to watch a movie, or anything else, the sound reverts to my laptop's internal speakers? Pretty weak.

      It seems to me a lot of people are criticizing this device just because it doesn't do everything. 'No remote? No display on it? Doesn't work with [insert Linux technology here]? That's no good.'

      Well, this is Apple's first iteration of a new technology, and it'll take some time to develop. Apple will probably open some parts of this technology to 3rd party developers, and let them come up with things to do with it. I'd expect Apple has plans to do something neat to tie in this wireless-music-broadcast idea to an upcoming generation of the iPod. (broadcasting to your stereo from the iPod in your pocket might be kind of neat, right?)

      ...Or, you could look at it the other way, in that this isn't a new technology, but Apple added a really neat feature to a product that didn't need it at all. I think this would be a pretty neat little wireless access point on it's own, but add in the print-server and music streaming, and that's a pretty impressive piece of technology in a nice little package. No, it doesn't do everything... but not everyone needs everything. And how are you going to make a product that does everything?

      Apple tends to like to start small, introduce a product that only does what it does, but does it well, and without much hassle. Then they start evolving it, over years, by adding features individually, making sure that feature works right, and then looking at new features. The alternative would be to try to pack in as many features as possible, all at once, then spending years making all the features work right.

      I suspect the first generation of these will find a limited audience whose specific needs are met by the first generation. The second generation will do more, and therefore find a bigger audience, and so on.

      I also suspect that, no matter how much it does, there will people who will complain that it doesn't do things that it just wasn't designed to do. Are you going to complain that the iPod doesn't play CDs, or that your refridgerator doesn't have a built-in stove?

    16. Re:Interesting by afidel · · Score: 1

      Hmm, the transfer to the airport express uses the Apple lossless codec (so says the article), I wonder if they wrap it in a FairPlay style wrapper where it's encoded on the iTunes PC and sent to the Airport Express for decrypting and decompression, if that's it then that little bugger has quite a bit of CPU power for such a small device that also does wireless, DHCP, ethernet bridging, etc.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:Interesting by foidulus · · Score: 1

      The article does state that on a G4 powerbook, there is a slight, but noticible cpu spike when streaming audio.
      Might be a clue something a bit fancy is going on here....

    18. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering if the base itself would accept if a client streamed unencrypted content to it.

      Pick one up and give it a try!

    19. Re:Interesting by digitac · · Score: 1

      I hope that stream has the new cover sheet on it. They got the memo, right? ::Digitac

    20. Re:Interesting by eboot · · Score: 1

      I think I am right in saying that itunes essentially runs over the top of quicktime so surely it would be possible to watch quicktime movies with airport express sound? Or at least make a hack that could do it?

      --
      Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
    21. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, the moderators are on crack tonight.

    22. Re:Interesting by mliu · · Score: 1

      I hardly think my criticism is unreasonable.

      We have a device here that is capable of streaming audio to speakers wirelessly. The first questions that come to my mind are:
      Can it stream my music? Yes, with a caveat.
      Can it stream my music with any software besides iTunes? No.
      Can it stream my sound from movies using QuickTime? No.
      Can it stream my sound from movies or DVDs using any software? No.
      Can it stream my system sounds? No.

      I think these are pretty fair questions to ask of a device that allows wireless streaming of audio, and that it's pretty fair to wonder why so many of the answers are in the negative, when the hardware is clearly there.

      Now, without question, this is a nice device, and I'm not meaning to anger all your Apple supporters by questioning it, but with the answers to these questions as they are, the fact is that this device is of limited use to the majority of the population. It's nice that you can play your music over your hifi system, but it's of limited utility if you still need to drag out a wire everytime you want to watch a movie or listen to anything at all besides iTunes. Recognizing that this device failed to meet my needs, I asked the simple question, is there anything out there that would meet my needs? I hardly think that's unfair.

    23. Re:Interesting by mliu · · Score: 1

      Are you guys kidding me!?! Someone responds to my post by demonstrating they completely failed to read my post. They point out that iTunes can run on Windows, when this is a fact that I acknowledged in my original post. I respond by highlighting exactly where I acknowledged this in my original post, and I'm the flamebait and they're the informative? Are you guys joking?

    24. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know if there is anything similar out there that can be used to send any audio, not just iTunes? I would love to have a wireless connect to my speakers, but iTunes only is a complete cop-out.

      Wahhhh, wahhhhh, wahhhh... that's all I hear you saying. Why does every Apple product have to be all things to all people? Are you one of those guys who doesn't like the iPod because it doesn't have a huge color screen so you can watch movies on it, but if it did then you'd complain that it didn't fit in your pocket? I think you are.

      Why didn't you put the time you spent bitching about Apple's product to better use, like maybe Googling for what you want? Devices like what I linked to have been around for donkey's years and were hardly obscure-- the earliest one I remember was called the "VCR Rabbit" and must've first been sold about 20 years ago-- so you must not have wanted one badly enough to ever do any real looking.

    25. Re:Interesting by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      You can stream other sounds with Nicecast in conjunction with iTunes but the delay would be unacceptable for video. Even if your could do it without Nicecast, the delay would be unacceptable.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    26. Re:Interesting by mliu · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting point, something I hadn't considered.

      Now some other guy jumping all over me for speaking ill of an Apple product pointed out that there are wireless audio streamers that are out, like some product from Jensen. Now those aren't all digital, like the AX is, nor do they use my existing wifi instructure, but presumably those are fast enough for use with video? Does the use of wifi instead of some proprietary system really add so much overahead as that the delay would be unworkable you think?

    27. Re:Interesting by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
      I'd expect Apple has plans to do something neat to tie in this wireless-music-broadcast idea to an upcoming generation of the iPod. (broadcasting to your stereo from the iPod in your pocket might be kind of neat, right?)


      I'm pretty sure this is NOT what you had in mind, but you can already do this with you iPod and a Griffin iTrip. I'm sure you mean something "digital", and obviously this is analog.
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    28. Re:Interesting by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Nothing to stop you from developing your own device that meets all your needs or possibly developing software that satisfies your needs with the hardware. If you don't have the skills, hire someone.

      Your questions are valid and questions like these lead to innovation and possibley lots of money. However, they do sound a bit like complaining.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    29. Re:Interesting by rat_herder · · Score: 1

      If you are watching a movie, your picture has to be wired.. so why do you want wireless audio??

      I think the point of the itunes streaming is to be able to easily connect it to any stereo in the house, ie where it may not be practicle to have cables. My system sounds are fine out of the internal speaker, or the audio/vis setup next to my computer.

    30. Re:Interesting by greggman · · Score: 1
      You mean you didn't notice that other companies have been shipping networked audio and video products for a while now?

      Apple normally appears to get things right but this Airport BS is just a gimmick since without a remote it's functionally not very useful. I don't want to have to walk up a flight of stairs to change a tune or skip one I'm not in the mood to hear and given that there have been similar products on the market already from Sony, Toshiba and LinkSys and they they are all MORE functional this Airport should NOT be news.

    31. Re:Interesting by N0decam · · Score: 1

      This might seem silly, but have you looked into an FM transmitter card?

    32. Re:Interesting by nine-times · · Score: 1
      You mean you didn't notice that other companies have been shipping networked audio and video products for a while now?...this Airport should NOT be news.

      On the contrary, I think this should all be news. I fail to see your point. Why do people insist that a product isn't useful just because it doesn't fulfill their particular needs? Just because it's made by Apple? It's not useful to you... fine, don't buy it. Apple is developing a product that is, essentially, a wireless access point. They've added a number of features, including routing, authentication to an external server, a print server, and the ability to stream digital, lossless music over this accesspoint to a stereo.

      The product may not have all the features everyone wants. Some people who buy this product may not use all the features it has. That's true of a lot of products. That other companies are working on similar technologies does not, in itself, indicate that this product is useless. Neither does the fact that other companies developing similar technologies have chosen a different approach or feature set. Even if the product does not do what you, personally, need, and it is therefore 'useless' for you, does not necessarily make it 'useless'.

      To quote your article:

      'What was Sony's solution over two years ago? The PCNA-MR1. No, it's not a wireless hub. That's best left to a separate cheap wireless hub. What it is is a music AND VIDEO sharing device with remote control.'

      What is best left to a 'separate cheap wireless hub' is a matter of opinion, or at least a matter of situation. I could criticize this sony device for not being a wireless router just as easily as you can criticize the Airport Express for not being a set-top-box. But, I'm afraid, both complaints would be a little silly, since the PCNA-MR1 wasn't meant to be a wireless router any more than the Airport Express was meant to be a set-top-box. However, I would welcome wireless routing features built into set-top-boxes and digital-media features built into access points. New, neat, extra features are generally good, and if people are excited about them, I welcome hearing about it.

    33. Re:Interesting by nine-times · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure this is NOT what you had in mind, but you can already do this with you iPod and a Griffin iTrip. I'm sure you mean something "digital", and obviously this is analog.

      Actually, I didn't think of this, or I would have gone into more detail. I suspect the iPod will go WiFi, which, yes, could allow for wireless, digital, lossless transmission to your stereo, out of the box, with nothing attached to your iPod, and with greater range than most FM transmitters. However, a WiFi iPod has many more possibilities than this, especially in light of Apple adding digital media streaming to their access points.

      It might allow you to play songs on your iPod which haven't been copied to your iPod, but are on iTunes installed computers. This might also let you use the iPod as the 'remote' that everyone is asking for. Also, it could enable wireless iSync and file transfers. It seems that there might also be a variety of other clever applications, but these are some obvious possibilities.

  6. No Remote? by joeblakethesnake · · Score: 5, Informative

    Now, I haven't read the article yet, so I dont know the context, but isn't a computer running iTunes supposed to be the remote control?

    1. Re:No Remote? by ack154 · · Score: 1

      Technically sure...

      But say your stereo is in the living room and you're streaming the music to it from your PC in your bedroom... Do you want to leave your party in the living room to go change songs in the bedroom? Maybe you will if you have to, but wouldn't a remote be cool?

    2. Re:No Remote? by joeblakethesnake · · Score: 1

      yeah, I see your point. Nothing's perfect :) What I would do personally is setup a party mix and let it run. Of course if you have a laptop you could either remote into the machine playing to the express or you could share your iTunes, play them with iTunes on the laptop and stream from the laptop to the express. Whew. Or, they could come up with a PDA app for remote control. Hey, that'd be cool 8D

    3. Re:No Remote? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      I have a remote.... i don't know why everyone is griping...

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    4. Re:No Remote? by cbelt3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apple's solution to that is "Party Shuffle", a feature on the newer iTunes client (and iPod firmware). The idea is you set up your party list much like you used to have to 'mix' custom CD's for your party guests. Think of it as a replacement for feeding CDR's into your drive and burning mix copies for your 5 CD changer on your stereo. If you want to have a 'remote', well hell- just buy an iPod and plug it into the amp. Skip the whole streaming thing. This then becomes more like a 'portable party mix' issue, but with waaay more flexibility. The main thing to me is the portability of a wireless AP. The music is gravy.

    5. Re:No Remote? by foidulus · · Score: 1

      Well, if you have a laptop or any device that can connect to the internet, you can turn it into a remote. All you need to do is, if you run Apache on your main pc, you can write a quick web front end that calls some Apple Script(well, not exactly sure how you would do that on a windows machine) that can play, pause, next track etc.
      I would do it, cept I don't have $130 to blow on an Airport Express... I'm sure projects will appear on sourceforge shortly that accomplish the same goal.

    6. Re:No Remote? by trippy · · Score: 1

      Its called playlists. Apple has been pushing these since they developed the ipod. You make your playlist, then you let it run. Smart playlists make this even easier. If you have to skip songs in your playlist, you are not using them correctly.

      A remote would be annoying since a two way remote would cost quite a bit more and if they did not make it two way, you would constantly be hitting skip to find the right song..

    7. Re:No Remote? by javaxman · · Score: 1
      The reviewer wanted a way to control the playlist from the stereo which seems to be missing a point to me, but whatever, that's what they wanted. IMHO, hey, if that's what you want, set up the stream from your laptop, and use that as the 'remote', eh? Or, as Apple has already suggested, wait for someone to make one. It's coming.

      The reviewer said they had a hard time coming up with a score due to the fact that the Airport Extreme does at least 3 somewhat different things ( music streaming, 802.11g bridge, 803.11g USB print server ). Personally, I think they miss the point that the last two are common wifi device features, and the third is a cool innovation for something so cheap and includes actual Wifi features.

      I don't see a display making sense unless you're looking for a hard-drive-holding device that does everything music ( i.e. a true stereo component ), and as for a remote, while a good idea, would require IR reciever placement and protocols for controlling iTunes remotely, which are probably in the works, but won't be ready too soon... I'd certainly be willing to use my playlists ( especially with Party Shuffle ) and just chill with that. Do you really want to sit on your couch and interactively pick this tune or that tune? I just want nice music playing in the background, generally...

    8. Re:No Remote? by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1
      Or, as Apple has already suggested, wait for someone to make one. It's coming.

      I agree with you. Apple has a tendency to let third-party manufacturers come up with a number of the accessories. They tend to avoid accessories unless it's a quality/brand issue to them.

      --
      CT

    9. Re:No Remote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " The reviewer wanted a way to control the playlist from the stereo which seems to be missing a point to me, but whatever, that's what they wanted."

      I've always loved the defense that Apple users always use. Prerson A: but it doesn't do X which most other products do. Apple user: Of course not! It wasn't desgined to. Duh. j/k but still I have a point.

      " and the third is a cool innovation "

      Lastly, I just don't consider it that innovative. Wireless devices that let you play your music through your stereo have been around for ages. The fact that it doesn't let you control the music from your stereo or via remote etc if a huge flaw in this product. I could see how apple users who want to stay with apple will like the whole wireless music part but the rest of the world is vastly better off with somethint like X10's Lola which let's you easily control the music.

    10. Re:No Remote? by Cajal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right, which is why Airport Express isn't all that interesting - it's basically a fancy wireless speaker for your powerbook. The other big problem with Airport Express is that you can only play to one of them at a time. So if you have one AE in your kitchen, another in your living room and one in your bedroom, you can only play a song on one of them at a time. Something like the Roku SoundBridge/a would be a lot more useful, except that it can't play protected AAC files (and it's about twice the price of the Airport Express).

      I really wish Apple would license their FairPlay DRM scheme to other manufacturers. I can understand them not wanting to license it to Real, or to other portable mp3 player manufacturers, but they should license it to companies who make in-home music players. Off the top of my head, Tivo (with the Home Media Option), RokuLabs, and SlimDevices (the SqueezeBox) come to mind. Unfortunately, Apple considers the iTunes Music Store only as a way to sell more iPods.

    11. Re:No Remote? by Tanlis · · Score: 1

      You may be able to get around this, by using the Fast User Switching mode to have multiple copies of iTunes running.

      Kind of kludge if it works, but maybe that will be an update to iTunes if the Airport Express sells well.

    12. Re:No Remote? by Tanlis · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't have to do it with IR, could easily do it with Wi-Fi.

      Just an iPod looking device that uses the UI from the iPod and a 802.11b/g card inside it. Then something that listens on the machine running iTunes and sends iTunes any cmds.

    13. Re:No Remote? by joncrie · · Score: 1

      I've got my Airport Express hooked up to my stereo and use Salling Clicker to make my Ericsson phone the remote control. Using Applescript you can control all the functions of iTunes and even have iTunes send track, artist and playlist to the phone's display. This type of set up was one of the main reasons I got the Express and it works great.

    14. Re:No Remote? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      What kind of UI do you imagine on that remote? It has no idea about your songs/playlists. And even if it had (say firewire sync), wouldn't you rather go to bedroom than search for what you want with iPod-like interface?

      You would need a settop box connected to your TV and audio system and a wireless keyboard to have a usable remote interface to iTunes. Or, on a more practical note, an iBook.

    15. Re:No Remote? by Sick+Boy · · Score: 1

      iTunes stops playing when it's owner isn't logged in on my PowerBook, so that won't work. Not a bad idea, though, and if it's super important to you, you could run virtual OS's on your machine, each with iTunes playing. VirtualPC + Win32 iTunes?

      --
      Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
    16. Re:No Remote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not have your laptop, in the living room, communicate wirelessly back to the bedroom system to control it. There's at least one or two iTunes remote control apps available for OSX.

      The question is that will some clever third party come out with a 802.11-based remote that communicates with a piece of software running on your bedroom system?

      Personally, I think it depends on how well these things sell... and how they're actually used. The only person I know who's buying one is simply getting it as a "cheap" base station to extend his range into his garage (cinderblock wall cuts the signal there & can't move the old base without cutting range everywhere else).

    17. Re:No Remote? by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      The other big problem with Airport Express is that you can only play to one of them at a time.

      Not intended as a flame -- but really, how many people ever want or need to do this?

      I don't know about you, but typically I'm only in one room at a time anyhow :).

      Yaz.

    18. Re:No Remote? by Smurf · · Score: 1
      iTunes stops playing when it's owner isn't logged in on my PowerBook, so that won't work.

      No, no, that's why he mentioned Fast User Switching. He meant that both users would remain logged in.

      Since iTunes 4.5 several users can play songs at the same time. Without Airport Express that is completely useless, but I bet that with it you can direct the songs of each user to a different stereo or set of speakers, and another one can use the computer's sound hardware.
    19. Re:No Remote? by OmniVector · · Score: 1

      i have a free remote.

      --
      - tristan
    20. Re:No Remote? by ArsEric · · Score: 1

      That's a nice setup when your stereo and PC/Mac are in close enough proximity to one another.

    21. Re:No Remote? by Cajal · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more from a multi-user perspective. If I'm in the kitchen and want to listen to Song A, but my roommate is in the living room and wants to listen to Song B, where songs A and B are on the same mac, then there's no way to do this with Airport Express.

    22. Re:No Remote? by cvas · · Score: 1

      What device can do this? I looked at the Roku you linked to and didn't see any mention of this kind of feature. Also, wouldn't doing this mean that iTunes was playing 2 songs at once? Or you would have to run 2 instances of iTunes. I didn't think either of those was possible.

      You could always have a 2nd PC with iTunes, share your library from the main computer, and have the 2nd stream to the other Airport Express.

    23. Re:No Remote? by Cajal · · Score: 1

      Sorry, let me clarify.

      If you have 2 Airport Express units in your house, and 1 mac, then you can only play music to one of them, since the AE is basically a wireless speaker. But if you have 2 Rokus, they each connect to the mac and play different songs, because they use the iTunes Sharing protocol (DAAP). As far as iTunes is concerned, it's just two machines connected to it.

    24. Re:No Remote? by Sick+Boy · · Score: 1

      I should've been clearer, but that's what I meant- iTunes stops playing when the user who's running it isn't the user who has the focus of fast user switching (although the rest of the apps keep running, as designed). Therefore, it can't be done, at least with OS X 10.3.4 + FUS + iTunes 4.6.

      --
      Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
    25. Re:No Remote? by kerincosford · · Score: 1

      On the Mac side, you can use Salling Clicker in conjunction with your bluetooth phone or PDA. Salling Clicker has iTunes remote functionality, including playlist support, browse/find by artist, album, genre, etc.

    26. Re:No Remote? by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      With Bluetooth, even my ageing Sony Ericsson t68(i) is a remote control. In the situations where I'm so lazy that I don't even bother to step over to the laptop.

    27. Re:No Remote? by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      That's how I intend to use the airport that is winging it's way to our house. Except in my case it's a T610. I'm also considering doing some Java MIDP hacking and seeing whether I can do things like iTunes track listings on the phone and the like.

    28. Re:No Remote? by CAlworth1 · · Score: 1

      I suggest that you try a bit harder - I have had no problem having more than one copy of iTunes playing at a time through FUS. Get one user to play a song, then go to the login screen, and toling as another user. If it doesn't work, I suggest that you make sure you have the most recent iTunes, as well as all OS updates. Logging out of a user will stop it from playing, but FUS should allow the music to continue.

    29. Re:No Remote? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

      If roommate A has iTunes running under his account connected to his AE, and roommate B has iTunes running under his account connected to his AE, haven't we just accomplished what you wish?

      Of course the problem is, does multiple copies of iTunes run with FUS?

      Yes it does.

      Then the next problem: Will multiple copies of iTunes recognize different AE units?

      This indicates that multiple copies of iTunes WILL play different songs simultaneously... so the possibility definitely exists that multiple AE units can be supported on one machine.

    30. Re:No Remote? by Cajal · · Score: 1

      Well, I wasn't even speaking of 2 people with 2 accounts. If you wanted to have 2 people streaming music from the same account, with AE you're out of luck.

      None of this changes my original point - that Airport Express is a glorified wireless speaker. The point of control is still the computer, not the device itself. So unless you're in fromt of your machine, you can't do anything other than change the volume. With other devices (Tivo w/ HMO, Roku SoundBridge, etc), you can use a remote to control your music. There isn't much appeal in having to run over to my mac, FUS to my account and change playlists if I wanted to change a song.

    31. Re:No Remote? by Smurf · · Score: 2, Informative

      At this moment, my PowerBook has three users logged in. Each one is playing a different song through iTunes. It's so damned annoying! (Fortunately, I have earphones connected, so I'm barely listening to the nonsense humming beside me).

      I don't have an Airport Express so I can't verify if I can send the audio of just one of the iTunes instances to it, but I guess it will work. I bet you can actually do it with more than one Airport Express (each one receiving a stream from a different iTunes instance), and still listen to another instance locally.

      I'm also using MacOS X 10.3.4 and iTunes 4.6. Maybe something's wrong with your setup? Or maybe you are trying to play songs from a server and there is a brief network interruption during the switch.

    32. Re:No Remote? by Smurf · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think I may have found your problem:

      I was switching directly using the menu. But if you go through the login window (or if one of the users logs out, therefore sending you to the login window), the computer is automatically muted. All the iTunes instances (of the users who are still logged in, of course) continue playing, but you hear nothing.

      You can work around this by pressing the muting button (F3 on a PB) twice.

    33. Re:No Remote? by Smurf · · Score: 1

      Logging out of a user will stop it from playing,...

      It will stop it from sounding (as the computer will be muted automatically), but the remaining instances of iTunes continue playing. You can work around this simply by pressing the muting key twice.

    34. Re:No Remote? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always Bluetooth phones.

      Besides which, even without AE, you can't listen to two different songs at the same time.. it just sounds bad. So AE doesn't do any worse at least...

      I mean, how can one AE, hooked up to one sound system, receive two different streams of music and play them both without sounding horrible?

      If you want two streams streaming to two different AEs, well, that's possible as I just outlined.

    35. Re:No Remote? by Cajal · · Score: 1

      Not if you're using a wireless connection from the Mac, since OS X will disconnect your network connections when you FUS out.

    36. Re:No Remote? by grawk · · Score: 1

      You can stream from iTunes to Tivo HMO already.

  7. what I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I want Apple to allow sound from any source on the computer to play throught the airport express. I watch DVDs on my powerbook, and if I could stream from DVD player (obviously a trivial thing technically) I might actually get one.

    1. Re:what I want by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      The problem with that would be the audio would be out of sync with the video because of the time it would take to re-encode, encrypt, stream, decrypt and decode on the other end.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:what I want by aedan · · Score: 1

      > I watch DVDs on my powerbook, and if I could stream from DVD player (obviously a trivial thing technically) I might actually get one.

      You can use any sound source as a streaming mp3 using Nicecast from Rogue Amoeba then get iTunes to play that mp3 stream.

      http://www.rogueamoeba.com/nicecast//index.php

      aedan

    3. Re:what I want by kybred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it probably buffers a couple of seconds worth to help prevent dropouts due to network congestion.

    4. Re:what I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've been jonesing for a more advanced sound preference pane for a long time. Something that allowed you to specify by application where sound was directed would be ideal. Practical examples would be routing sound from video games, dvds, itunes, etc. to a stereo (possibly through an airport express) while routing system alerts, ichat, and screen savers to the built in speakers. I imagine this would be quite a boon to all the acoustic engineers, and musicians that use macs as well.

  8. About the audio jack... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Since a number of people missed this in some other forums: the audio jack supports both a headphone type connector and an optical connector, but not at the same time.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:About the audio jack... by proj_2501 · · Score: 4, Funny

      people get confused about that?

      like shoving two floppies into one drive?

    2. Re:About the audio jack... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Informative

      people get confused about that?

      They get confused by the fact that they only see one connector, especially when they are skimming the article for facts.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:About the audio jack... by bwy · · Score: 1

      I've never seen this kind of jack. It is a true analog, low power 1/8" mini plug (headphone style) and toslink style? (I understand, not at the same time of course)

      I don't get how you can have an electrical analog signal AND a beam of light shooting out of the same plug. One of my original concerns was that the optical wasn't a true digital out signal, but some type of mysterious unknown conversion was happening from analog to optical/digital?

    4. Re:About the audio jack... by Smurf · · Score: 1
      I don't get how you can have an electrical analog signal AND a beam of light shooting out of the same plug.

      Why not? The electric connectors would hug the sides of the tip of the mini plug (and sides of the plug itself, of course) if that is what is connected. After the "tip's" position you would have the led for the optical signal (remember that this is an ouput-only device).

      To get the optical signal, the only thing that you need is a fiber optic cable with a connector that has the same diameter and length of a mini plug and you are set.

      The device doesn't even need to know what kind of signal to produce: since they won't interfere with each other, and battery life is not an issue, it can produce both signals continuously.
    5. Re:About the audio jack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > like shoving two floppies into one drive?

      Everyone remember the original Macintosh? With the built in floppy that did a auto-move back and down motion when you put a disk in?

      A teacher at a school I was doing tech support for rammed a floppy in one of those.... backwards.

      Deciding that the disk didn't work... she tried another one. On top of the first. Still backwards!!

      It took an enormous amount of effort to explain to her what she'd done with out falling over laughing! :)

    6. Re:About the audio jack... by sarahemm · · Score: 1

      It's not terribly common, but the ports are used in some devices, for example the M-Audio Transit. The copper contacts are on the side of the jack, while the end of the jack has an LED to send out the optical signal. You can either use a cable that has a 3.5" connector on it, or an adapter like this to hook a regular Toslink cable up to it. I don't see any technical reason you couldn't use it for both analog and optical at the same time, if you could make a cable that made both fit into the jack at the same time.

    7. Re:About the audio jack... by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      do you know how many times I have to remove two or more floppies or CDs from a computer at work....

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    8. Re:About the audio jack... by douthat · · Score: 1

      Sony Minidisc Players use this type of jack (Picture here of the optical connector)

      While it's true the digital and analog outputs plug into the same hole, they get their signal from different parts of that hole. The optical cable receives light from the bottom of the jack, while, as usual, the analog signal comes from copper connections on the side of the jack.

      --
      She loves me: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 She loves me not: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688BF ...
  9. NYTimes Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The New York Times published a review today as well. (no reg)

  10. Gratuitous point loss by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe you could argue the lack of remote (or maybe not given this is first generation, and a remote function might have doubled the price... you don't just toss a remote function in there... that's hardware), but a point off for no audio cable is complete dump. Everyone's situation is going to be different. Do they put in a 3' cable? A 6' cable? A 9' cable? MonsterCable? Lamp cord? It's like dinging a mouse for not including the mouse pad. I have a box full of included cables I have never used.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Gratuitous point loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everyone's situation is going to be different. Do they put in a 3' cable? A 6' cable? A 9' cable? MonsterCable? Lamp cord? It's like dinging a mouse for not including the mouse pad.
      Nonsense. Including a standard mini-jack to RCA connector would have covered the need of 90% of the buyers. RCA is still the standard connector for home stereos. The AirPort Express is marketed as an easy way to stream music from the computer to the stereo. But as it is sold now it won't work OOTB fot this purpose for the majority of the buyers.
    2. Re:Gratuitous point loss by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

      That's just an adapter. They're, like, 89 cents at Radio Shack.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  11. Can it be used to share an *ethernet* printer? by sjonke · · Score: 1

    That's my question. A secondly, if it can, can it be used to share an ethernet printer and extend an existing wireless network at the same time?

    --
    --- What?
    1. Re:Can it be used to share an *ethernet* printer? by spirit_fingers · · Score: 1, Informative

      It can, either through Appletalk or Rendezvous, err, I mean OpenTalk. The Express supports both protocols, like the regular Airport Base Station.

    2. Re:Can it be used to share an *ethernet* printer? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Can it share an ethernet printer? That's a stupid question. What protocols does this printer speak? If it's an HP, it probably already speaks LPR, HP, and Appletalk protocols. If you can't make any given OS speak one of those protocols, you're not trying hard enough.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Can it be used to share an *ethernet* printer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a stupid question, actually. Everything I've read indicates that the device cannot be used as a wireless->wired bridge. It can do:

      - WAN client -> wireless AP
      - wireless client -> wireless AP (extend your network)
      - LAN Ethernet client -> wireless AP (same)

      But not wireless client -> Ethernet. So for the printer, you would be better off buying a wireless->wired bridge from a different manufacturer. That would be cheaper anyway.

    4. Re:Can it be used to share an *ethernet* printer? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's only a stupid question because it was a completely vague question. Can it speak to an ethernet printer? That doesn't mean anything.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Can it be used to share an *ethernet* printer? by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      That's my question. A secondly, if it can, can it be used to share an ethernet printer and extend an existing wireless network at the same time?

      Probably. There is a LAN port on the AX that you could plug that printer into. The AX acts as a hub when it's extending another network, so the printer should be acccessible.

      I can't think of any technical reason why they'd design the unit in such a way where this wouldn't be posssible. Mind you, while it's on my want list, I haven't bought an AX just yet, so I can't confirm this suspicion :).

      Yaz.

  12. Bluetooth remote? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps you could boost your phone's bluetooth and use SallingClicker...

  13. This came to my mind ... by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... while reading this sentence.

    After the welcome screen, the Assistant inquired politely as to whether I wished to set up my Express to create a new wireless network, or connect to my current wireless network.

    It's a nice bit of Journalism, which makes for a good read, but I couldn't help thinking it would next inquire politely ... "Would you like some coffee while you wait for the set up to finish"?

    --
    CT

    1. Re:This came to my mind ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article:

      Also, to my dismay, the Express did not include any audio cables for hooking it up to a stereo. ... The AirPort Express Stereo Connection Kit with Monster Cables and an AC power cord is available separately from Apple for US$39.

      They offer it separately, and I think that's the point. The idea is to stream music wirelessly, and many people are going to buy it for that reason. If Apple adds the Connection Kit to the AirPort Express, the overall price goes up some, for an item I would guess most people do not need/want. If you absolutely have to have a wired connection, then hey, they have that accessory available as a separate product.

  14. Third party firmware by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    I was wondering if there is third party firmware for my router (D-Link Wireless router, dunno the name, don't have access to it right now), so that I can get an airport express to act as a repeater with it? Is there 3rd party and/or linux based firmware for this that will support the standard that the airport express uses to act as a repeater?

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:Third party firmware by cheesy9999 · · Score: 1

      There is for the LinkSys WRT54G, as mentioned in TFA, not sure about D-Link, maybe if it supports WDS.

      --
      -tom
    2. Re:Third party firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a siemens 2623 802.11b. I'd rather not find out once I buy it, that it only supports bridging on apple WAP.

    3. Re:Third party firmware by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      Is WDS what is required to allow waps to act as repeaters? Is that what the apple one uses?

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
  15. Walt Mossberg Reviewed it Also by Meddel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Walt Mossberg reviewed it in today's Wall Street Journal, as well. You can find the article here. He mostly likes it, but wants to be able to play through multple outputs (either two Airport Expresses or an Airport Express and the local speakers). Also, the lack of remote control and display was a huge downside for him.

    --
    You just come along with me and have a good time. The Galaxy's a fun place. You'll need to have this fish in your ear.
    1. Re:Walt Mossberg Reviewed it Also by mblase · · Score: 1

      I found the multiple comments about a lack of remote interesting, since it never really occurred to me to use the thing on anything except a customized Party Shuffle. (I don't own one, mind you.) Interesting that Apple's dodging the issue.

      Anyone have any word on Belkin or Griffin working on a remote?

    2. Re:Walt Mossberg Reviewed it Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read his review also, and found it a bit weird that he didn't mention anything about the USB port, which allows you to to turn the Airport Express into a printer-sharing device.

    3. Re:Walt Mossberg Reviewed it Also by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Well, he could use saling clicker with a bluetooth phone or a Sony Clie. With the latter, you also get album art if your library has them.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    4. Re:Walt Mossberg Reviewed it Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I bet simultaneous output would be really hard. This is, after all, a network device, so there's going to be a large (I've heard about 1 second) and unpredictable latency (how fast can the computer reencode the audio to ALC, how fast is the network stack, how congested is the network, how often are packets lost due to intereference / bad reception, etc?). Since the latency is unpredictable, you'd have to synchronize the clocks on the computer and the airport express(es) and time stamp the audio to impose a known latency. In order for any delays to be inaudible, you would need to be able to sync the clocks to within a few hundredths of a second. Is NTP, or some other algorithm, up to that task?

  16. Linux? by nandhp · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't know about you, but I'd seriously consider buying one of these if only it suppoerted music streaming from Linux!

    1. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesn't - i guess the protocol is daap and thats not fully reverse engineered yet. currently only itunes can stream to the thing...

  17. Woohoo ... by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 2, Informative
    I use a Mac at home, but I purchased the Linksys WRT54G router for my wireless network instead of the Apple Airport Extreme. It was recommended by a Mac friend who has more experience with technology than myself. The following is great news ...

    Bridging and the Linksys WRT54G

    --
    CT

    1. Re:Woohoo ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a systems and network engineer - you are dumb - you made a mistake listening to some idiot who pretended to know better.

      Airport(extreme or express) is the best/simplest/smartest unit on the market today.

      I would only recommend Cisco's aironet higher.

  18. Dropping Bombs to the Velvet Fog by MooseByte · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Airport is not legal in some European countries, as it operates on military frequencies..."

    So they'll be able to groove to my Mel Torme collection while going head-to-head with the OpFor? Sweet.

  19. Device is as Apple described by amichalo · · Score: 1

    After reading the article, I see clearly that this device is exactly as Apple has described - it was almost like reading from Apple's own materials on Airport Express.

    Particularly interesting was how well it worked with both Windows and Apple environments.

    This review makes me keenly aware that this product is a 'must' have luxury' for the road warrior who needs a single, small, device to handle multiple calls of duty. Armed with this iPod sized device, a few cables, and the install CD (or access to the Interweb) a road warrior has a superior acessory for their PowerBook or Inspiron.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:Device is as Apple described by amichalo · · Score: 1

      The feature was called "Home on iPod" and was to be released in Panther. (more here or here)

      It woudl be the single biggest boon to a PDA type device in the history of PDAs so perhaps Apple pulled it from Panther to make it into their version of the Personal Digital Assistant ("Archive").

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  20. samba by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    Looking how easy it is to set up simple home networking makes me jealous. Configuring an smb.conf file is a bitch and always has trouble. That's not to say samba is bad since they started from nothing. In fact it's just another example of how apple can make a product very usable when they have control of a protocol and api.

    1. Re:samba by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Uh... you mean the 802.11b/g protocol? WDS? RTS? TCP/IP? All the protocols are non proprietary here.

    2. Re:samba by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that OS X uses Samba, right? They just have a sane config tool sitting on top of it.

    3. Re:samba by Onan · · Score: 1

      Most of the protocols involved are open, but there are a few very critical ones which aren't. Most notably FairPlay and daap. (There are some efforts to reverse-engineer or work around both of these, but that's substantially different from a genuinely open protocol.)

      Given the reference to smb, it's also possible that the grandparent was talking about afp, but that's getting pretty far afield from the article topic.

  21. Arse? by M51DPS · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else mis-read that as "Arse Review Airport Express"? I swear, for a second there....

    1. Re:Arse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I always mentally translate that name to 'Technical Arse' instead of 'Technical Arts', probably as a reaction to them having such a bloody pretentious name in the first place.

  22. Great idea, until wife/housekeeper kills WiFi by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great product, but I have this awful feeling that, if not properly situated in your domicile, this little doodad runs the risk of getting unplugged when the wife or housekeeper comes through to vacuum.

    Wait -- I don't have a housekeeper, and my wife makes me vacuum.

    Dammit. It's a moot point.

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:Great idea, until wife/housekeeper kills WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, this is Slashdot... we know you don't have a wife either.

    2. Re:Great idea, until wife/housekeeper kills WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but in his mind he rationalizes that he has a wife that tells him to vacuum. Maybe it makes him feel better to pretend someone is telling him what to do.

  23. audio through USB port ? by for_usenet · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have any idea if it would be possible to route the audio from the WiFi-interface to the USB port? I have a Yamaha cavit that my mac sees and can play to or record from over USB 1.1.

    Any chance that instead of going to the optical / analog audio port, that we can get the audio through the USB port ?

    1. Re:audio through USB port ? by tgibbs · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does anyone have any idea if it would be possible to route the audio from the WiFi-interface to the USB port?

      Apple emphasizes in its documentation that the USB port is for printers only.

    2. Re:audio through USB port ? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      doesn't the cavit have an optical input?

  24. Best line(s) of the article... by OECD · · Score: 1

    Does it work as well out-of-the-box whether you're a Mac or Windows user? The short answer is yes. The long answer is that Windows users will sometimes have to go through a few extra steps to achieve the same result as someone using Mac OS X.

    Whew! Good thing he gave us the short answer before we had to plow through the long answer!

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    1. Re:Best line(s) of the article... by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1
      LOL!

      Too bad I've already posted to this, cause I'd love to mod you up "Funny".
      You have to love one sentence "long answers"!

      --
      CT

  25. Follow the Mouse - Third Party Hardware by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    I just use my Remote Wonder to control iTunes. It has the added benefit of also controlling everything else on my mac; makes a perfect DVD remote, handles changing channels on my TV card, and can even be used to play games. Of course, the only things I use it for when not in the same room is iTunes and sleeping the computer.

  26. no remote... bah! by mr_burns · · Score: 1

    I think it's plainly obvious that apple plans to introduce an AirTunes enabled iPod.

    Toshiba delivered 60gb iPod drives around the same time that the price dropped 'Pods came out.

    Apple types have said that they're waiting for expess to be a bit more ubiquitous before they release some other stuff (roughtly paraphrased from foggy memory).

    You don't need a crayon to connect these dots.

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
    1. Re:no remote... bah! by mblase · · Score: 1

      I think it's plainly obvious that apple plans to introduce an AirTunes enabled iPod.

      Don't think that's too likely, myself. WiFi is ubiquitous, but by no means cheap or small to install. I can't imagine that a WiFi broadcaster would be gentle on an iPod's battery, either.

      Besides, all you'd really need to do is unplug the audio cable from your AirPort Express and stick it into your iPod instead. Why add WiFi to something that's already practically the definition of portability?

    2. Re:no remote... bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I think it's plainly obvious that apple plans to introduce an AirTunes enabled iPod.

      What's the point of an AirTunes enabled iPod? Wouldn't it be easier to just plug the iPod into the stereo?

    3. Re:no remote... bah! by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Its possible. Steve Jobs has repeatedly stated now that there is no 60 iPod in the release schedule (check the Newsweek article I think, but for sure its been mentioned on the news page over at ipodlounge.com).

      That said though, this could simply be them saying "there is no 60 gig ipod in the release schedule any time soon", leaving it open that the Keynote in January (where they announced the minipod this year) would include the announcement of a wifi-enabled 60 gig ipod.

      I have a 30 gig 3g, and while I wont be upgrading to either of the new 4gs, I'd certainly look at a wifi, 60 gig 4g.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    4. Re:no remote... bah! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      What would be the point? You'd have to plug in the iPod (WiFi is quite power hungry) if you wanted to use it for any length of time, and it's much simpler to just drop it in the dock, which has a line out port. When I get home, my iPod is removed from my belt clip and placed in the dock. It continues playing through my stereo and charges at the same time. I don't see what I would gain from WiFi other than a shorter battery life. Now a 20GB iPod mini with a 12 hour battery life, on the other hand...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  27. Ambiguity in article - additional AP required? by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    Wireless Internet access requires a wireless-enabled computer, a base station or other access point and Internet access (fees may apply). Some ISPs are not currently compatible with AirPort Express.

    Am I supposed to parse this as:

    "Wireless Internet access requires (a wireless-enabled computer, (a base station or other access point) and Internet access)"

    Or:

    "Wireless Internet access requires ((a wireless-enabled computer, a base station or other access point) and Internet access)"

    The former implies that I would need an additional access point, whereas the latter does not.

    -jim

    1. Re:Ambiguity in article - additional AP required? by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      I think they meant the latter. How do you have wireless internet access without having a wireless-enabled computer?

    2. Re:Ambiguity in article - additional AP required? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      The former. The standard Apple setup would be computer with Airport card, Airport base-station, and Internet connection plugged into the base-station.

  28. Ah, taste. by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    Sure, the Ronco Turnip Twaddler is advertised to slice, dice, mince, and julienne every root vegetable in your garden.

    Hardly surprising, but someone over at Ars has read their Bloom County...

  29. Re:couple of things by tgibbs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wish iTunes could let one stream audio to the Express and play music on the host simultaneously. I was surprised to learn that it can't do both.

    It's probably not as easy as it sounds. I imagine that automatically getting exact synchronization with different levels of network activity could be tricky. And if they were a bit off, it would sound pretty weird.

  30. Actually, it's not like that at all. by billybob · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's like dodging points for a graphics card w/o a speaker.

    Actually, it's not like that at all. See, one of the "big deals" of this product is that you can play your computer audio files on your stereo with little fuss. Not just your computer, but any computer on your network that has itunes installed.

    Not including an audio cable is stupid, in my book, because one of the biggest selling points of the product is NOT FUNCTIONAL without additional equipment. Sure, it's a cheap cable (3-5 bucks most places), but I imagine there are a number of people who don't have these handy. And if Apple bought these in bulk (which they obviously would), it would probably cost them 25 cents at the most to include this cable in the box.

    For me, playing mp3's or aac on my stereo isnt such a big deal, beacuse I've been doing it for years with a 25 foot audio cable going direct from my comp to my stereo. But for many, their stereos aren't so close to their computers. This product is a cool idea, but like I said, the (probaby) biggest selling point isnt functional without additional equipment. That's just lame. :P

    --
    Joseph?
    1. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by steadph · · Score: 1

      billybob,

      Could you kindly show your setup? i did it with my own system with a creative audigy 2 and onkyo system on 20 ft. of cable, and the interference was bad.

      thanks,
      steadph

    2. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Printers have been sold w/o a cable forever. And the computer that you would attach them too would also not have one. I also bet that the cassette deck that you bought in 1992 did not come with the necessary patch cord as well. Nor did the CD player that you replaced it with in 1995......

    3. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      None of the products you mentioned use the cord as the selling point. The whole point of the Apple setup is ease of use. Selling a product where one of the main features requires an additional part is bad business.

    4. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by Alcimedes · · Score: 1

      So which audio cable do you include?

      1/8" to RCA
      1/8" to 1/8"
      1/8" to 1/4"

      I'm sure there are a lot more options, but it's not necessarily straight forward which one to include.

    5. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by grouchomarxist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A 25 foot audio cable? That's exactly the sort of thing people want to avoid by using this product, having to run a cable around the house that people might trip over, etc.

    6. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by djtripp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Like the aforementioned printers, there became an option, USB or LPT. The manufactureres didn't want to include both to keep cost down, and i'm pretty sure people with USB didn't want another parallel cabel around, and the LPT people were trying to plug in both.

      Same with the AX, you have an option, mini plug or optical. Some people will use neither, some will go taos, some will go mini. Either way, leaving you with an extra cable. And added expense to the product. I do think however, Apple should have some sort of adapter available for people who already have an optical cable, to plug in the the AX. (sure that could add noise to the signal, but if you're complaining, you already think that a 300 mbs encoded file is lossy, so you wouldn't want streaming in the first place.)

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    7. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by thegooch49 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.....the last few USB printers I have purchased haven't included a USB cable. Should we rate those printers down as well?

    8. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by ffsnjb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A quick guess would be that you had your computer and stereo on different circuits, introducing a ground loop causing interference. Not much to go on, though. Try plugging your receiver into the same power strip your pc is on and see if the interference still exists.

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    9. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      I do think however, Apple should have some sort of adapter available for people who already have an optical cable, to plug in the the AX.

      My optical cable came with a little plastic adaptor that snaps onto a normal TOSLINK connector. It's shaped like a tiny funnel, and probably costs pennies to manufacture. I imagine that most optical cables already come with something similar.

      Including that sort of adaptor would serve little purpose other than to remind customers that Apple didn't see fit to include a proper cable...

    10. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by billybob · · Score: 1

      My setup isnt anything special... its a 25 foot 1/8" mini going out of my computer, which becomes an RCA Y cable (red/white) that plugs directly into my stereo's auxilary input. I've never had interference so I have no idea what would be causing that??? Although the other person above me posted an idea about the circuits... maybe give that a try? Sorry :)

      --
      Joseph?
    11. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by billybob · · Score: 1

      I never said it was an optimal solution :) But it works fine for me beacuse I have a throw-rug that the cable goes under so it's basically impossible to trip over it. I just added that in to say that I'm not too interested in this product because I already have the capability to play my mp3's on my stereo. At some point, when I join the 21st century and get some wireless action going on, this may be something I'll look at.

      --
      Joseph?
    12. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by edhall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've bought several cassette decks and CD players/changers over the years, and they all included cables. Granted, they usually weren't very high-quality cables, but I have a pile of about 15 stereo RCA/RCA patch cords stashed away in a box to show for it.

      Even the VCR/DVD unit I bought for the bedroom TV last month (we're not talking top-of-the-line here) had sufficent cables.

      I'm normally an Apple fan [pats powerbook], but I think they slipped up on this one.

      -Ed
    13. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by crackshoe · · Score: 0

      i hate apple. they left the stereo out of my itunes express. how am i going to play my music?

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    14. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by emorphien · · Score: 1

      Personally, yes. Why sell a product without the necessary accessories. It's hardly an accessory when you need it.

      --


      Presently here, but not there.
    15. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It goes like this:

      1. Get a life.
      2. Get a job.
      3. Buy a $3 patch cable.

    16. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Not including an audio cable is stupid, in my book, because one of the biggest selling points of the product is NOT FUNCTIONAL without additional equipment. Sure, it's a cheap cable (3-5 bucks most places), but I imagine there are a number of people who don't have these handy. And if Apple bought these in bulk (which they obviously would), it would probably cost them 25 cents at the most to include this cable in the box.

      Actually, the AirPort Express can take two diffferent types of audio cable -- a standard 3.5mm stereo analogue cable, or a mini-Toslink optical cable.

      So now Apple would have to ship two cables to satisfy everyone. And how long should it be? Some people may need a longer cable, and others may need a shorter cable.

      If it were something difficult to purchase elsewhere, I'd see a point -- but we're talking about an audio cable that is available everywhere. Chances are, Apple retailers will ask you if you want an audio cable at the time of purchase anyway.

      Seems like a complete non-issue to me.

      Yaz.

    17. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's not just for people who don't have a computer near their stereo, it's for people with laptops. Even though I'm in college, and a 10 foot cord would reach most of the way across my dorm room, this is useful just so that I can plug my iBook into one cable (the power cable) instead of many.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by irokitt · · Score: 1

      My printer came with two cables. Just a medium-quality inkjet, but it came with both parallel and USB cables.

      And I replaced the tape deck with a CD player well before 1995 ;)

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    19. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Printers have been sold w/o a cable forever. And the computer that you would attach them too would also not have one. I also bet that the cassette deck that you bought in 1992 did not come with the necessary patch cord as well. Nor did the CD player that you replaced it with in 1995......

      Just because other products have missed out one essential cable doesn't make it any less dumb.

      If your product can't be used out of the box because its missing one *standard* cable that only costs $5 (RRP) then it's still a dumb move.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    20. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      And what do they put on the other end of the analogue cable? A standard 3.5mm jack? A pair of RCA adaptors?

      These are the kind of cables that collect in the cupboards of anyone who's owned any kind of audio equipment. I don't really need Apple to supply any more of them, since I'm running out of space to store cables I'm probably never going to use.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Heck, the cable from my iMac to my stereo is only like three meters, and I want to replace it with an AirPort Express! Less cables looks better and makes cleaning easier.

      --
      Martin
    22. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The retailer will ask if you want a Monster cable which would cost another $20 or more. This generate additional demand for 3rd party products and revenue. Makes apple and their partners happy.

      -Bruce

    23. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 2 minidisc players, aggravatingly, didn't include any cable except an optical one. Who had those in 1999?

    24. Re:Actually, it's not like that at all. by eyver · · Score: 1

      Go to your local Radio Shack or other electronics parts store and purchase a ground loop isolator. Fixed my awful interference problems. It was about $15 at my local Radio Shack.

      Sorry, $15.99.

  31. Airport? Express? by lifebouy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Anyone who can use the words "airport" and "express" in the same sentence, obviously hasn't been to one in a few years.

    --
    Drop me a line at:
    Key ID: 0x54D1D809
    1. Re:Airport? Express? by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      Steve has his own Jet.

    2. Re:Airport? Express? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I was quite impressed the last time I was at Narita (Tokyo). I arrived about 20 minutes before my plane was scheduled to depart, and was rushed past the security to the check-in lounge.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  32. The military frequency hoax by ThufirHawat · · Score: 1

    No, the poster is obvious a time traveller from probably 10 years back in time.
    Then, the usage of this frequency was controlled in France, but that has no longer been the case for a number of years, now.
    The other similar hoax usually pulled is that you are supposed to undergo all sorts of testing before getting this class of devices approved for usage in Europe. This is also nonsense, as a mutual recognition agreement(MRA) is now in force between the USA and the European (dis)Union, so that each of the two commercial partners relies upon the certification of the other.
    In other words, if it is FCC approved, we'll believe them (as to the other way around, let's see...).

    --
    Thufir Hawat
    Part-time Mentat
  33. Streaming to two AE at once by chfriley · · Score: 1

    It would be nice to stream to all the AEs at once - I bought two for different rooms. I knew from the start that it would only stream to one at a time, but having it stream to all at once would be awesome.

    1. Re:Streaming to two AE at once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      log on as 2 users, use fast user switching. have itunes opened under both users and each itunes streaming to a different express station.

  34. Does your stereo have a remote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then use that!

    Why in the hell would you want a remote for the APE is beyond me...

    1. Re:Does your stereo have a remote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does your stereo's remote allow you to change songs when playing through an Airport Express? Oh, right. It doesn't.

  35. PDA? by CaptainPinko · · Score: 0

    are their wireless equipped PDAs? I assume you could cook up some j2me app to client to a j2sdk app on your mac/pc to control your iTunes through native calls. I'm sure apple must ahve released some api for iTunes plug-ins or something. That way you could always carry around your remote with you.. your PDA! that way your remote also has a screen and costs nothing extra. Or why not use your cell phone instead? Also has screen and controls and j2me. This may not be an answer to everyone as it requires already owning a device thats expensive but many people already own these and this could be a free (beer and speech) add-on that would be a welcome addition. Do I smell a SourceForge project in the making?

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  36. i don't get it by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

    no means of remote control
    what kind of remote controller is he looking for?
    i thought by definition, remote control refers to a program's or device's ability to control a computer system or another device from a remote location. don't you need a computer with wireless capabilities to setup this device?
    what kind of controller is he looking for?
    if he wants to control itunes remotely, changing songs and adjusting the volume, he can use a USB IR remote controller.

  37. bitch bitch bitch, get one for your computer then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a $130 portable wireless AP with a handy audio feature, not a damn $300 iTunes-omniscient deck unit.

    reminds me of the stupid-ass comment Taco made about the original iPod...

  38. No means of remote control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the only way you could control it is by remote... using a laptop or computer.... No means of remote control? How do you control it other than remotely? Does it have buttons on it to control it?

  39. What I want... by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Airport Express is cool. It's not priced too badly. But it's not really what I want.

    I don't need a wireless access point -- already got one of those. I don't need to share a printer -- already doing that, thank you.

    But I DO want to stream audio to my stereo! So why not just eliminate all the other crap and sell a simple box with ethernet in one side and audio out the other side? And since I'm just dreaming here... set the price at $49.95. Heck, I might even buy two!

    Now add the ability to control iTunes remotely (say from a Palm or PocketPC) and we've got a product.

    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    1. Re:What I want... by mister_tim · · Score: 1

      Now add the ability to control iTunes remotely (say from a Palm or PocketPC) and we've got a product.
      I think you should check out Salling Clicker

      As for the pricing and features list - yes, it's a shame that Apple makes a product with a feature set and at a price that sells well (80,000 pre-orders, apparently), but that you don't like. Maybe you should email Steve Jobs and see if he can create a different version and price it specially just for you.

    2. Re:What I want... by MattHaffner · · Score: 1

      Now add the ability to control iTunes remotely (say from a Palm or PocketPC) and we've got a product.

      Now, I haven't done this with my setup yet, but IIRC, there are at least a few share/freeware things floating out there that allow you to control iTunes from a web page (served from the same Mac). If your Palm or PocketPC has WiFi web access and said control page is simple enough to be used on such a device, you're golden.

      Sure it might be slick to have Apple package all that, but the tools are floating around already, I believe.

      Interestingly enough for me, my laptop is used more and is more portable typically than my iPod. So, although the Airport Express is a wickedly cool little toy, I've been pretty happy just hooking up my iPod to the stereo so far.

    3. Re:What I want... by chrisbw · · Score: 1
      The Airport Express is cool. It's not priced too badly. But it's not really what I want.
      I don't need a wireless access point -- already got one of those. I don't need to share a printer -- already doing that, thank you.
      But I DO want to stream audio to my stereo! So why not just eliminate all the other crap and sell a simple box with ethernet in one side and audio out the other side? And since I'm just dreaming here... set the price at $49.95. Heck, I might even buy two!

      Well, considering that if Apple did build such a music-only beast, it would definately have wireless capability, and most likely wired, too, so making it be able to act as an access point/bridge/repeater is just icicing on the cake as far as I'm concerned.

      In regards to the USB port, I would assume that Apple has done enough market research to learn that with their high percentage of laptop users, there is enough angst about having to get up and walk to the printer to plug in a USB cable to print, that this would be a desired feature.

      If I didn't use my Powermac as a print server, I would be running to hook one of these up to my printer. Instead, I have one connected to my stereo, and the other is with me on the road! As far as I'm concerened, Apple hit my needs square on the head, and priced it at a point that I find more than fair.

      Of course, it doesn't support Ogg, but then again, the people who are bitching and moaning about that wouldn't pay for it anyway, and would just boast that they built their own, so who really gives a rat's ass? :)

      --
      Chris -- http://www.bitter.net/
    4. Re:What I want... by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Since the purpose really mandates 802.11g (and for a certain segment, Ethernet, though with wireless being increasingly common and highly cost-effective...), it probably wasn't much trouble for Apple to add access point functionality, thus vastly increasing value for many people. Indeed, I imagine that many who are buying it are buying for the "wireless access point I can take with me to a hotel" or "WDS repeater with a printer port" side of things rather than for AirTunes.

      For those with computers near their stereos, the logical course of action is to just run a cable from the line-out, S/P-DIF, or whatever you use on the sound card to the stereo.

    5. Re:What I want... by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

      ...yes, it's a shame that Apple makes a product with a feature set and at a price that sells well (80,000 pre-orders, apparently), but that you don't like. Maybe you should email Steve Jobs and see if he can create a different version and price it specially just for you.

      Look, I said that it is a cool product (like most Apple products are). I was just expressing my opinion (I thought that was what the Slashdot Comments section was all about) on why I'm not going to buy one. You can agree or disagree with me as you please (or if you got mod points mod me as flamebait I guess).

      I also assume (correctly or not) that I am not unique and that there are others out there that are just interesting in streaming audio to various areas of their house.

      In any case, I'll be sure to make a little mental note... do make disparaging comments about Apple on Slashdot.

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
  40. Wireless bridge w/non apple base station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I nearly bought this the other day, but the apple store was out of stock. I wanted to use this primarily as a repeater to extend my wireless network, the audio and printer is an added bonus.

    I don't have a airport/extreme. I have a siemens SpeedStream 2623, a 802.11b base station.

    After reading the article, I realize I won't be able to use this with my 802.11b base station. I would've ended up buying a purty block that lets me play music remotely and print. There's got to be more leeway than that!

  41. Air Flow and Cooling by kooshvt · · Score: 1

    I hope this thing works better than the original Airport they designed with absolutely no airflow through the device. The things would eventually burn themseelves up in the heat. At an old job I had we actually had to occassionally put test unit in the fridge to cool it off enough for it to work for a couple more hours at a time.

    1. Re:Air Flow and Cooling by glennrrr · · Score: 1

      While they did get quite warm. I believe the orignal Airport hubs Achilles heel was a pair of substandard power capacitors which tended to fail within a couple of years. I've repaired a couple of them myself, and the repaired hubs have worked for 2 years with only the occassional restart.
      There was some talk this was the result of a shady parts manufacturer making cheap knock-off capacitors but not quite getting it right.

  42. If you don't care about AAC by version5 · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of other products that will pull mp3s from your computer and play them on your stereo in the living room. Most come with remotes! Here's a big-ass list.

    --

    "It's Dot Com!"

    1. Re:If you don't care about AAC by chrisbw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how many retail for $129? :) I spent $300 or whatever it was for my Audiotron, usually ended up controlling it with my laptop anyway (I found the remote control to be so ergonomically disgusting that it never left a drawer), and it couldn't play my protected AAC files. The Airport Express plays those, and I've got to say one of my favorite additions, it gives the nice smooth iTunes crossfades between tracks.

      --
      Chris -- http://www.bitter.net/
    2. Re:If you don't care about AAC by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      If you don't care about AAC and want to pull mp3s from your computer for only $129, there's also the Airport Express Base Station. Small surprise!

      Of course if you want a remote, you'll need a bluetooth capable cell phone... and a Mac, unless Windows supports bluetooth already?

  43. USB Drive support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised they didn't think enough to add external USB disk support. A similar product (though not nearly as nice of a form factor is the netgear Wireless Media Router: http://www.netgear.com/products/prod_details.php?p rodID=242 That's the killer app in my opionion (specially given the form factor). I could travel with just it and my USB disk and have a fileserver/router setup much like I do at home. And since its the same size as the original Ipod charger, why not set it up so it could charge the Ipod as well, thus eliminating the need to carry the Ipod charger (which is the same size). It'd be alot more functionality with virtually NO added space requirement in my travelpack. -a

  44. This is Apple, not HP or Epson by billybob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I understand what you're saying, but remember that this product is coming from Apple, not HP or Epson. Apple is typically the type of company that likes to make things as easy as possible for the end user, but not in an insulting way or anything. I would expect them to include everything you need to make a product work with all functionality out of the box.

    I think this is a lot different than a printer not coming with a USB cable. Although not including a USB cable is a pretty crappy thing as well these days, since I'd guess >90% of end users have USB ports on their computers.

    --
    Joseph?
    1. Re:This is Apple, not HP or Epson by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The iPod dock doesn't include any kind of audio cable, in spite of the fact that one of its selling points is the existence of a line out. I never thought of this as a problem, since I have a load of audio cables lying around.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  45. 1/8 to RCA by billybob · · Score: 1

    I've never seen a computer that doesnt have 1/8 out, and I've never seen a stereo that doesnt have RCA in (except for stereos that dont have input at all). Now that's not to say they don't exist, people with very high end equipment might not have one or the other, but....

    1/8 to RCA is by far the most common so thats what they should include. For the maybe 10% of the population that has optical only or a different type of input, they can supply their own cable. But a 1/8 to RCA would easily fit the bill for 90% of people, I'd wager.

    --
    Joseph?
  46. Anybody get it working with the linksys? by smartin · · Score: 1

    I followed the directions to the letter but when it says "Your WDS is now being configured..." it fails with "Base station error". Is there anymore info floating around out there on how to do this?

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  47. RTFA by GnomeAttic · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're interested to know whether it sends the audio or the file, see subject.

  48. forgot... by Chep · · Score: 1

    what encoding are you using?
    <p>
    (now trying again using UTF-8: &#233; &#128; )
    <p>
    I really don't understand what's going on. Gotta check my settings, maybe I ticked a "butcher my non-ASCII posts" box.

    1. Re:forgot... by Smurf · · Score: 1

      Apparently the problem is the encoding. Using Safari's "Default" encoding, the following line looks great, except for the Euro sign that should appear at the end:

      áéíóú àèìòù âêîôû äëïöü ñÑ çÇ £

      If I use Unicode (UTF-8), it renders like this:

      ÃéÃÃà ÃÃÃÃà ÃÃîÃà ÃÃÃÃÃ? ñÃ' Ãà £ â

      If I use Western (MacOS Roman), I get this:

      Z'--oe " "(TM)z S'sY - £ Û
      (hey, the GBP sign survives!)

      For your reference, the "default" seems to be Western (ISO Latin 1), and some other ISO Latin encodings (like Turkish and Western European) reproduce most/all of the characters correctly. No Euros, unfortunately.

      Now, using the "default",
      & #233; & #128;
      renders:
      é
      So the & #233 is OK, but the & #128 vanishes.

      Well, at least they tried.

  49. You want a remote? by mbourgon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The Salling Clicker, at least for Macs.

    And an interesting quote from Mossberg:
    "AirPort Express gives you no way to see what song, or play list, is currently playing, and no way to change the music.[...]Apple hints that it will be addressing this problem in a future version or via some kind of add-on product"

    Any bets? You could do a wi-fi remote (with LCD to see what's playing), but I'm hoping they'll use that USB port for something... like a video out.
    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  50. WDS / extending wifi network insecure? by pedx1ng · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I was considering getting an AirPort Basestation Extreme and Express together to extend the wireless network. But then I came across this note in the review:
    One note: when using the AirPort Express as a WDS, you are limited to either using 128-bit WEP or turning off security altogether. This was not mentioned on the AirPort Express pages on apple.com, although it is addressed in the manual. WPA is generally not supported over bridged connections on WiFi products due to the fact that WPA encrypts the MAC addresses which WDS relies on for communication. Keep this limitation in mind when using the Express as a bridge.
    Please enlighten me if I am incorrect, but I was under the impression that WEP was basically worthless as far as security is concerned, and that one should always use WPA.
    1. Re:WDS / extending wifi network insecure? by SiMac · · Score: 1

      WEP isn't completely worthless.

      A determined attacker can break your WEP network, but 128-bit WEP requires quite a few packets to break. It takes hours, even days. Someone driving by your house isn't going to have the time to do that; unless it's a member of covert ops, you'd see them before they got a chance to get onto your network.

      Nevertheless, WPA is a much better alternative, when it is possible.

    2. Re:WDS / extending wifi network insecure? by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      Another alternative, if you really care that much, is to set up a server on the other end of the wireless network as a VPN server.

      I did it just to see how well it would work, using my Mac OS X Server machine as the VPN server and my Airport-equipped laptop as the VPN client. It works just fine, and it only took about 5 minutes to set up. (But then, most of the rest (NOT all) of Mac OS X Server took about 20 minutes to set up in total, including installation, so that shouldn't be too surprising. The exception being the firewall, which has some profoundly looney defaults.)

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    3. Re:WDS / extending wifi network insecure? by Smurf · · Score: 1
      From the Airport Express Technology Overview (PDF link), in footnote 8:
      When joining an existing wireless network, AirPort Express supports only WPA Personal mode.

      I'm not sure if I'm misunderstanding something, but I think this implies that if you're using the Express for bridging, it will support WPA (although not Enterprise mode). But I wonder why the reviewer couldn't configure it, though.
  51. Oh-no!! by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

    Bad name strategy! Now people will confuse it with AirPort-X !!

  52. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does every Apple product make the /. front page. There are a lot of wireless routers. No one gives a shit about Apple except Apple users. Keep it on the Apple page, please.

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't like it, don't read it.

      FOAD

  53. Trade offs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People complains about the lack of remote control. Fine, suppose Apple includes a remote control. Of course, it's not free to manufacture, so Apple has to raise the price by say $50. Wanna bet that some reviewers take points off for being expensive? How many times we have seen the word "expensive" used without comparing features?

    1. Re:Trade offs by pocomoonshiine · · Score: 2, Funny

      and why doesn't the (nonexistent) remote work with my other obscure Ir devices? and why doesn't it work with POE? and why can't i plug it into my cigarette lighter and charge my iPod and sync my task list with my usb watch? For that mater, why doesn't it have built in speakers??? Huh?

      Here comes the WAAAAAAAAAmbulance!

  54. Amazing Fact! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    Other companies make cool 802.11 equipment, too, if you want something that has a display and/or a remote.

    You may even save a few $$$!

  55. Love & hate by Xenna · · Score: 1

    I love this product. It's an excellent idea to create a pocket sized Wifi access pont that I can just put in my laptop bag.

    It's great when I visit companies or friends who have a LAN or cable router but no wireless. I get to pre-configure my network name and WEP/WPA settings, so I just plug the thing in the network and work on it wirelessly.

    The audio part is unfortunately a prime example of why I don't love Apple. It would be great if they would ship this with an audio driver that could be used just like a regular audio interface so that you could play music or video soundtracks over Wifi.

    But they didn't. They made this yet another link in their iPod/iTunes/IMTS media lock-in scheme. You are only to use it with iTunes.

    Nevertheless, I immediately ordered one when it became available (3-4 weeks delivery) just for the access point functionality.

    For music I have a portable iRiver H140 HD player and several Squeezebox network players.

    No lock-in for me, thank you very much...

    1. Re:Love & hate by chrisbw · · Score: 1
      It's great when I visit companies or friends who have a LAN or cable router but no wireless.

      I can see this thing becoming a corporate IT security person's nightmare. Suddenly an end-user-friendly way to bring a network connection with you to the conference room! They already sweep my building (all 45 floors!) with Pocket PC's with WiFi cards looking for rogue WLAN's.

      --
      Chris -- http://www.bitter.net/
    2. Re:Love & hate by norkakn · · Score: 1

      I think you may be able to get around this with JACK, but I'm not sure as I don't have the hardware to test it. But, JACK seems to kick arse at rewiring audio between just about everything

    3. Re:Love & hate by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      But they didn't. They made this yet another link in their iPod/iTunes/IMTS media lock-in scheme. You are only to use it with iTunes.

      And why is this such a problem? Apple gives iTunes away for free for Macs and XP boxen and they do a pretty good job keeping it updated. You can use iTunes without ever going near the iTunes music store and downloading files with Apple's DRM. iTunes will take your CDs and make perfectly good MP3s out of them.

      OK, you're screwed if you use Linux and want to use this product, but personally I think using Linux for anything other than server apps is just too painful for words, so why bother? Oh, and it doesn't support Ogg, but who cares outside of the three guys without girlfriends who use Ogg? If you have a Macintosh this is a pretty good deal, if you need more features then the Squeezebox with the built-in 802.11 is the way to go.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    4. Re:Love & hate by Xenna · · Score: 1

      I don't want to use iTunes to play my music.
      I want to send other audio than just music to my AE.

      Apple ties the AE to iTunes which limits its usefulness.

      BTW: My brother in law who's a psychiatrist with a wife and kid, is a big Ogg fan ;-)

  56. Hanging offense in these parts. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    You mean it doesn't support Og? You go get the rope, I'll round up the other two guys.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    1. Re:Hanging offense in these parts. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Umm, where did you read that it doesn't support ogg? It will play anything that iTunes can play (iTunes recompresses on the fly to Apple Lossless). Since there is a QuickTime plugin for ogg vorbis, there is no reason why it wouldn't play them.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  57. LinkSys WRT54G, WDS, Airport Express, and AirTunes by gseidman · · Score: 1

    I can't quite figure out from either Apple's materials or the Ars review whether it will do what I want in my parents' house. There are two Macs (well, three, but the third is irrelevant): an iBook and a G4 tower. There is a LinkSys WRT54G which is physically connected to the G4 tower and is a WAP for the iBook. It sounds like it should be possible to install the open source firmware on the WRT54G and make it the primary WAP for the Airport Express to bridge with WDS. Great.

    One question, however, is whether the G4 tower will be able to use AirTunes to play music through the Airport Express, even though its only access to the Airport Express is through its physical connection to the WRT54G's network. It sounds like once the WDS bridge is in place it will just work, but I'm far from sure.

    Another question is whether the iBook could play a song over AirTunes that is being shared by iTunes on the G4 tower. Again, it seems like it should just work, but I'm not sure.

  58. Other uses for the USB port? by Swedentom · · Score: 1

    I guess its built-in USB port could be used for supplying power to any USB device, right? I know the AP only works with printers, but it should give power to any device, right? I have a camera that is charged over USB, and it would be cool to be able to charge it without a computer. :-)

    --
    Sig Nature
    1. Re:Other uses for the USB port? by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      I'm sitting here staring at a cute little thing I got for $8 at Radio Shack. It is a small black wall-wart (AC/DC adaptor, but this one is very, very light) with nothing but a little green light and a USB connector. It provides no-data powered USB for charging things.

      It came with a charger kit for cell phones.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  59. My only question... by aclarke · · Score: 1

    How exactly DOES one twaddle a turnip?

  60. It's astounding how many people are !clue by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    Okay, let's go through this one more time.

    You stream music from your computer through your wireless network to your Airport Express. Then the music has to have SOME WAY to get from the Express to your stereo. That way is (for the vast majority of people) a eighth-inch stereo to dual RCA cable, or (for a few people) an optical cable.

    I can see not including the optical cable, but a good 6 foot (or even 3-foot) eighth-inch to dual RCA cable, which couldn't cost Apple more than 15 cents, would have been a no-brainer. Everyone who uses this item as a music source for their stereo will need such a cable, except for those fussy few who have an optical in on their stereo. And probably even some of them will.

    Yes, some people already have one. Yes, the rest can run down to radio shack. But what if you buy it at 8:45 on a saturday night, bring it home, and unwrap the thing. It's not like Apple to not have everything you really need in the box, ready to go. It leaves a bad taste in the mouth of the person doing the buying if they are all psyched up to try the new toy and they have to go shopping. It's 'batteries not included' on Christmas morning. It's just not wise. It makes me wonder why they did it.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  61. Grr by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    It supports Ogg just fine. It can stream any format that QuickTime can read.

    Honestly. I'm all for little jokes, but don't let's be misinformed, shall we?

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  62. That's right... by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    Two electrolytic capacitors that dried out and went bad.

    Now, that said, I have the original Airport and it still works fine after, well, what, three or four years of use? (I think I got it sometime in 2000 but I don't recall for sure.)

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  63. DMZ on DHCP by Moduz · · Score: 1

    The only thing that I don't like about it, is that it will not allow me to assign a DMZ host while in DHCP mode. I realize that doing so could cause DMZ Host hopping but I really do not care. I want DHCP being used so that friends and whatnot can use my network without a whole lot of hassle... And at the same time I want to make my main machine a DMZ host so that I can send files without them being interfered with by the firewall.

    --
    -Moduz
  64. They don't have to be synchronized, really... by mbessey · · Score: 1

    The only time lack of synchronization would be a problem is if you were in a location where you could hear both sets of speakers at approximately equal volume. Then you'd hear some funky audio effects, I'm sure.

    Given how slow the speed of sound is, though, you'll have real problems with that anytime you have speakers that are more than a few meters apart, anyway - even if you're driving them from the same amplifier.

    -Mark

  65. Bought one this morning by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    Had it up and running within 5 minutes, streaming music to my living room stereo. It's a wireless client on my home network, which uses a 2Wire HomePortal wireless gateway/router/DSL modem supplied by SBC. Works like a charm, very easy to configure, and as usual the physical design is top class.