Slashdot Mirror


Visiting Every Latitude and Longitude Intersection

Kevin A. Pieckiel writes "The Degree Confluence Project's goal is to visit every latitude and logitude degree integer intersection in the world and journal it on this web site. An excerpt: 'The project is an organized sampling of the world. There is a confluence within 49 miles (79 km) of you if you're on the surface of Earth. We've discounted confluences in the oceans and some near the poles, but there are still 12,889 to be found.' A neat project, indeed." As Timothy noted, I've posted before, and in Slashback form; a while back.

265 comments

  1. Re:Longitude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Speaking of organized samplings... if these guys weren't total nerds, they could have a girlfriend at each confluence!
    The confluence at 69, 69 has been reserved specifically for this purpose. Blindfolds are suggested.
  2. Antofagasta, Chile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a real party confluence. I bet I know why there are no pictures available.

    1. Re:Antofagasta, Chile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's a real party confluence.
      I thought Antofagasta was the secret GNAA retreat!
  3. They should... by rokzy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...take loads of photos at each one to make a 360 degree photo. would be a nice way of seeing what the world is like.

    1. Re:They should... by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to buy me a GPS unit, I'll try it as I circle the world on a motorcycle. I've got a Canon A70 camera, so I'm part of the way there.

    2. Re:They should... by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny you should say that - I was talking to a friend just the other week about his new GPS toy, geocaching, and the Degree Confluence Project. I said it would be interesting to take panoramic pictures every 5 years or so, just to see how things change...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    3. Re:They should... by jnicholson · · Score: 1
      I just keep wondering if Elena has been a contributor.

      This project really grabs my imagination. I wish I had a GPS so I could visit some of the NZ ones.

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
    4. Re:They should... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      That turned out to be a hoax sayeth slashdot. The hoax announcement was up about uh... 4-6 weeks ago.

    5. Re:They should... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Elena faked her photos...she was with a guided tour the whole time.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:They should... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a statement is useless without listing trustworthy sources. And still, he could've faked the story, but not the photos - and the photos are what's striking there.

    7. Re:They should... by nursedave · · Score: 1
      What part of "well regulated" is so hard to understand?
      It meant, "well equipped."
      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    8. Re:They should... by davidtupper · · Score: 1

      Actually in the parlance of the day "well regulated" meant well practiced, that the group(s) had practiced together. Thus to correctly comply with the second amendment (and the fact that all able-bodied males between the ages of 17 and 45 are in the militia) we need similar weapons to those the organized milita (read as U.S Military) have, to practice with them on a regular basis.

      Works for me :)

    9. Re:They should... by shokk · · Score: 1

      Just from looking at the confluences around my home town, Hillsborough, NJ, USA (Lat: 40.48N, Lon: 74.63W - all four completed) I can see that within the boundaries of each confluence zone there is a huge variety. If this were to be a "way of seeing what the world is like" by just the four zones in my area of "Normandy Beach, Ocean, NJ", "Riverton, Burlington, NJ", "Old Tappan (near Westwood), Bergen, NJ", and "Blairstown, Warren, NJ", one would missing quite a lot of the world considering that this covers the Philadelphia-New York metropolitan area. Each tiny square is a whole different world in its own way. It would be interesting instead to see how similar each of these places are, especially those on the other side of the world. I think they could leverage more out of this database by including links to confluences of a matching square on the other side of the planet and a random square somewhere else in the world. Link it to the CIA factbook so that people can learn about their planetmates.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  4. "A neat project, indeed." ?! by nusratt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why?
    How is this project any more interesting or useful than a confluence of any other human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number?

    1. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because longitude and latitude have historical significance. let me guess... you're American?

    2. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me guess... you're American?

      exactly, who cares about the rest of the world

    3. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by GoogolPlexPlex · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The concept is to produce a photographic record of the world, where the photographed locations are sampled evenly across the surface of the globe. (approximately - they are closer at the poles, but in those cases use only every second or third confluence). This is different to other outdoor photographic collections, where the images have an "artificial" grouping density around points of interest such as mountains, lakes etc. The idea is to produce a set of images where the ratio of "boring" to "beautiful" images approximates how the world is actually like, in terms of area.

    4. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?
      How is this project any more interesting or useful than a confluence of any other human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number?


      Maybe because they have a nice distribution across the globe? It would be an extremely diverse adventure.

    5. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because you are responding to a dumbass doesn't mean it is a good idea to act like a dumbass yourself.

    6. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by typhoonius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is this project any more interesting or useful than a confluence of any other human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number?

      Yes, it's arbitrary, but you're missing the point. The project's objective is to photograph every area of the world. Why not use latitude and longitude confluence? It's a universally understood metric, it gives a pretty diverse snapshot of the world (not too specific, not too broad), and it gives them an easily quantified goal.

    7. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by i.r.id10t · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      What's a cubit?

      He did a good Gator Growl show...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    8. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Evenly sampled" is used loosely here. For example, the lucky stiff who gets assigned to one of the poles can take fill in 1/180 (360/64800) of all the data points without taking a step!

      A tessellated icosahedron would be better from the standpoint of even sampling, but the coordinate transformations from the GPS-ready latitude and longitude numbers would be prohibitive for most recreational gee-whiz participants.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    9. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by nusratt · · Score: 1

      Several responders missed my point, which is that arbitrary + rigid == uninteresting.

      I'll skip right over the AC flames and go to the worthwhile posts . . .

      "It's a universally understood metric, it gives a pretty diverse snapshot of the world (not too specific, not too broad), and it gives them an easily quantified goal."

      well, how about this alternate proposal? You and I will start at opposite ends of [throw a dart at a map], taking pictures of interesting stuff along the way, until we meet in the middle. Recruit enough people to do that, and your criteria have been met.

      "a set of images where the ratio of "boring" to "beautiful" images approximates how the world is actually like"

      and who defines "boring"? My ex-S.O. grew up in the desert and hates trees.
      De gustibus est non disputandam.

    10. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not use latitude and longitude confluence?

      Why? Well for starters, using longitude in the confluence points makes for lots of wasted detail in parts of the world you probably need it least (ie, arctic and antarctic, where confluence points are much closer together).

      Maybe longitude is good for navigation and time zones, but it sucks in where its matrix of information is most and least dense.

    11. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by d474 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is a sister site to this project. It takes a little while to load, but the global map allows you to move your mouse over tiny thumbnails and then a small pop-up of the location, well, pops up.

      I liked your retort, and thought this would help answer previous parent's comment that had asked "how is this project any more interesting..."

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    12. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by GoogolPlexPlex · · Score: 1

      I acknowledge that it's only approximate as an even samplying. I explained the workaround already, if you care to read my original post. The poles are only listed as a single confluence each, not 360 separate data points.

    13. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Toresica · · Score: 1

      "and who defines "boring"? My ex-S.O. grew up in the desert and hates trees"
      Regardless of what you consider interesting, there should still be "a set of images where the ratio of "boring" to "beautiful" images approximates how the world is actually like". It's still random.

    14. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by div_B · · Score: 1

      How is this project any more interesting or useful than a confluence of any other human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number?

      Visiting every confluence of degree lines is a bit silly, what with the degree being an angular measure only surpassed in idiocy by the gradian (for shame...)

      It would be of much more fundamental significance and a lot quicker just to visit the confluences of the 0 and pi radian latitudes and longitudes. Especially if you're going to disregard confluences that occur in the ocean and near the poles, because that would leave you with identically zero confluences to visit, so you can stay home and waste away reading /. YAY!

    15. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of some of the amateur radio awards: Worked All States, Worked All Counties, etc. There are people who drive out to activate obscure or remote/unpopulated grids and announce it in advance just so that people can try and add that to their QSL collection.

      Thus speaketh KB7UJR.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    16. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Did they not say that they would *NOT* be bothering with the ones on the oceans?

      Seems to me that this concept will produce the same sort of bias that you have pointed out photographic collections already do exhibit.

    17. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they just write a computer conversion program for the tessellated icosahedron?

      Also, I wouldn't necessarily call having to trek to the north or south pole "lucky!"

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by zijus · · Score: 1

      Why? How is this project any more interesting or useful than a confluence of any other human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number?

      How is [any human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number] any more interesting or useful than [this project]?

      Am afraid that comment was void. :-)

    19. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you are wrong....

      my globe here shows about a 300 mile diameter circle around the north pole where all lattitude and longitude lines stop and the gigantic words (c) 1994 RandmcNally Inc. would appear on the ground.

      Silly, and who has to do the points down the wrinkle that spans across the USSR and China? that is one hell of a mountian range! it's bump is taller than the bump on everest!

      They Might Be Giants got lost driving around....

    20. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      it is fun to make a couple of sandwiches and a flask of coffee, get out of the house, get into the car, drive somewhere you've never been, play with the GPS for awhile, sit down, eat sandwiches, drink coffee, head back home.

      It's no more stupid than watching football (or soccer as Americans call it) or basketball or any other sporting event.

      You go out, walk a little bit, do some exercise. Foreign concepts to /. crowd. :)

      The grandparent justification is so lame. The main purpose is to have fun. Everyone has fun in their own way, these guys like to go around and hunt for some mathematical concepts.

    21. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      It is interesting you mention this because if you are competing in VHF, to maximise your squares you want to be as close as to where the squares meet AKA confluence. I don't have a GPS but I might take one of these guys' road maps for the next VHF contest. I operate on 6m, 2m and 70cm but never bothered to join a contest this way.

      One of the UK confluence points was wisited by a ham, he talks about this hobby more boring than growing tomatoes :-) At the end of is entry, he mentions he notified the VHF contesters that he was available via packet.

      I already have all the equipment to do such a portable work someday, I'm just too lazy. :)

    22. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Pi radians is 180 degrees. By visiting all the degree confluences you also visit all the interesting radian confluences.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    23. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Cragen · · Score: 1
      Your point, however, has no point. I have to agree with the your parent poster. This is a subject of interest only to those with the above interests. Like Pure Math. I don't see it as of interest to a majority or even a large minority of /.'ers/.

      Now, if you took a picture every day at the same time at each of the points, you are starting to build something that might be useful. The current goal is superfluous. It's like collecting data without a hypothesis. Actually, that's exactly what it is. Collecting, like in the hobby. It's a hobby, something I hope they sincerely enjoy.

    24. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by letxa2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've also thought this project is pretty neat and even considered helping out with some confluences that are in my area here in Mexico.

      My thought has always been that there aren't enough points to be collected. Sure, it's a better sample of what we have now, but considering the confluences can be dozens of miles apart you can end up skipping entire interesting areas--either interesting for their beauty or for their boringness.

      I personally think that they should at least have the option of submitting pictures for every tenth or twentieth of a degree. That way, with the exception of mountainous terrain, the picture from one confluence will include a distant view of surrounding confluences. You end up with a complete photo catalog of the world instead of a rather broken "representation" of the world.

      IMHO.

    25. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they have two types of confluences. Primary and secondary. Primary are ones that are on land or can see land on a clear day. Secondary is everything else. They do state right on the website that if you visit a confluence out in the middle of the frickin' ocean and submit the info, they'll list it. So the matter of getting the ocean points on there are purely limitted by the willingness of participants to visit those locations.

    26. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      It's about a two-hundredth of a football field.

    27. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pi radians is 180 degrees.

      Yes, and the Napierian base raised to the power of i *pi (i being such that i^2 =-1) is equal to -1.

      Translation : No kidding buddy.

  5. Fun, but.. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of these are going to be on private property and restricted access (e.g. military) sites. A local GeoCache was on a confluence, but pulled because it was on private property. Probably best to ask permission before tresspassing, lest the intrepid explorer find their butt full of rocksalt or buckshot.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Fun, but.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can see it now...

      "I was unable to get to 70W by 45N, because there was an Army base there. Update: Someone's knocking on the door."

    2. Re:Fun, but.. by rolux · · Score: 1

      That why they have, on the project's website, letters to landowners, in Bahsa Indonesian, English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish.
      And, yes, someone even managed to get here...

      --
      My next comment will be ready soon, but moderators can beat the rush and mod it up early.
    3. Re:Fun, but.. by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      Score: -1 (I already have a mother, thanks)

    4. Re:Fun, but.. by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling that most of them will be on the site of a Starbucks.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    5. Re:Fun, but.. by Jetson · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the "49th Parallel" portion of the Canada/USA border is *NOT* exactly 49N (it's 49d00m07sN). Mind you, the USA 49N confluences are still close enough to the border that you're likely to end up playing 20 questions with the local DEA officer.

    6. Re:Fun, but.. by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1
      I can't get a link, thanks to slashdotting, but there was one like this in the UK. The confluence was in a restricted area of a munitions dump. The guy eventually got permission to enter, but not before sending Garmin's emissions data for his GPS unit, among other things. These guys sure do persevere!

      They have form letters to download on the site, in several languages, to be given to landowners, explaining what the project is about.

    7. Re:Fun, but.. by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Actually, the latitude of the "49th parallel" portion is not at *any* fixed latitude. The modern border is defined based on straight lines between fixed border markers, which were situated some time ago by a joint US/Canada survey. They were "close", but the border wanders both North and South of 49 degrees.

      All of these "49th parallel border" points have been visited -- I can't think of a single time that the visitor met up with anyone from the DEA. :)

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  6. I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    half way through this project this guys will wonder, "why are we doing this again?"

    1. Re:I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they should ask the guy who's visiting each Starbucks in the country before leaving?

  7. The definition of confluence by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    I think a Slashdotting counts as "two or more streams"...

    confluence n.

    1. A flowing together of two or more streams.
    2. The point of juncture of such streams.
    3. The combined stream formed by this juncture.


    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:The definition of confluence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't cross the streams!

    2. Re:The definition of confluence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but the definition includes "flowing together". HTTP streams are all separate from each other (unless you have a screwed-up transparent proxy, like we did a few years ago).

  8. What if... by AnthonyPaulO · · Score: 1

    it intersects in the center of the White House?

    1. Re:What if... by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Then sign up for a tour, and go visit.

  9. The highest/lowest/coldest/hottest/.. intersection by otisg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be interesting to see a summary listing spots that are the most extreme in any way.

    --
    Simpy
  10. I dunno by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't mean to be overly-critical of this, but while I think this is a very interesting idea for a project, but I'm not sure the result is half as interesting as the idea. I think it would be a more interesting read if it were just one person or a small group of people visting all of these intersections.

    Actually, that's a lot to read, I think somebody should do the same type of thing, but with intersections of lines that are multiples of ten. I mean, you would still get a reasonably complete view of the world and all of the places in it.

    Another idea to make the product of this more interesting would be 360 degree panorama shots at each intersection. Again, this would be somehting more easily accomplished if it were just one person or a small group of people doing this.

    1. Re:I dunno by glwtta · · Score: 1
      I think somebody should do the same type of thing, but with intersections of lines that are multiples of ten. I mean, you would still get a reasonably complete view of the world and all of the places in it.

      They'll get much better coverage initially this way. More points to visit == more people sending in images. Sure it will take a lot longer for the project to be "complete," but with that many more points scattered around, the chances of someone who lives close by picking up a camera and going there are that much higher.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:I dunno by Toresica · · Score: 1

      "I think somebody should do the same type of thing, but with intersections of lines that are multiples of ten."
      Not all of the sites have been visited, though. At some latitudes there are probably about that ratio of sites that have been visited.

    3. Re:I dunno by Deagol · · Score: 1
      After getting my GPS in 1998, I was thinking of all kinds of things to try. I've done the geocaching thing (placed one, found a few), as well as a couple of confluences.

      When my kids are older (or gone) and I'm not working full-time, I'd like to visit the following points in all 48 mainland US states: point of highest elevation, point of lowest elevation, and point of geographical center. Certainly these are not original ideas, but the points are well documented and out there on the 'net.

      Ples... I'd do it all without using the interstate highways -- back roads are much more fun. :) I figure 6 months (perhaps March to September) would do the trick.

      Maybe there are other dumb statistical points of interest about the states which may be available? Point of population "center", point of economic "center". Odd stuff like that. I wonder if these kinds of stats are out there?

      But, the confluence project is pretty cool in its own right. What really freaks me out, though, is that most confluences (at least random ones I've plugged into M$ Streets) can be be approched by car except for maybe the last mile or two. Even out here in the West (I'm in Utah), where the road density if much less than the East or the coasts. It really makes you pause to consider just how much we've marked this land of ours.

  11. Re:Too Many Bored People by new+account+for+mod · · Score: 1, Informative

    And how does this qualify as newsworthy on Slashdot?

    News for NERDS!!!

  12. wtf by fonzer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    why do they keep posting meaningless or nearly meaningless stories on slashdot considering that this story was already posted before i really don't need to see it again

    1. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do they keep posting meaningless or nearly meaningless stories on slashdot considering that this story was already posted before i really don't need to see it again

      You got pretty far into it for being so meaningless.

    2. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why don't you waste even more of your 'precious' time to winge about it?...

    3. Re:wtf by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      why do they keep posting meaningless or nearly meaningless comments on slashdot considering that this comment was already posted before i really don't need to see it again

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  13. Re:Longitude... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Speaking of organized samplings... if these guys weren't total nerds, they could have a girlfriend at each confluence! Now *that's* a lot of longitude!

    Assuming the girls know about the extra relationships, and are ok with it, that's a lot of latitude!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  14. Puerto Rico by niktheslick · · Score: 1

    Random spam

    my bro and I got puerto rico... it was a good time.. Anmyone want'n to spend some quality time with a brother or father this is a great project.

  15. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Can we get celebrities to do the visiting?

    Methinks the shark /. jumped this morning just did its own jumping...

  16. Re:Too Many Bored People by dbc · · Score: 1

    I'd have more respect if they visited every White Castle

    OK, just don't make me eat there. eeuww.

  17. Neat use for your GPS by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    I might try this sometime- but I think 45N 121W is right smack dab in the middle of the Warm Springs Reservation....

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Neat use for your GPS by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Never mind- it's been visited, along with every other non-ocean Oregon confluence.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Neat use for your GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think 45N 121W is right smack dab in the middle of the Warm Springs Reservation....

      What makes you think you can't go there? Highway 26 goes right through the middle of it. Warm Springs is just like any other area of Oregon, it just happens to not actually be Oregon :-) The natives won't shoot you with bows and arrows, I promise.

      If the intersection is on private land, figure out who to get the permission from and give it a shot...

    3. Re:Neat use for your GPS by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I happen to have several friends among the Elder Council. They don't look too kindly on people hiking up the sacred hills. No, they won't shoot you with bows and arrows- but you might spend a night in tribal lockup before being exiled back to Oregon.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  18. Re:Too Many Bored People by kusanagi374 · · Score: 0

    There's no fun in visiting white castles or ikea stores, since common people can do that as well. Stuff like this is that lets us brag about how "geek" we are.

  19. Re:Too Many Bored People by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, if you live in the area and are looking for some place to hike, a Confluence is as good a goal as many other hiking locations.

    And it'll be off the beaten path.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  20. Oh perfect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Random pictures at arbitrary points on the planet.

    Sounds just like every other photo blog.

  21. I found them all! by Burdell · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but there are still 12,889 to be found.
    I found every single one of them. They're all right here on my globe.

    1. Re:I found them all! by Epistax · · Score: 1

      If superman visited each one of them, would time go backwards?

  22. Re:Too Many Bored People by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd have more respect if they visited every White Castle or all of the Ikea stores.

    Here's something close: Project Denny's

  23. [Will the] guys will wonder, "why are we doing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    [Will the] guys will wonder, "why are we doing this again?"

    Yep. Probably around 9 or 10 AM tomorrow when they sober up....

  24. Hmm... by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be curious about how many of these intersections lie inside of buildings or other private property. Has anyone found an intersection yet that could be unvisitable? You know, something like an intersection in the middle of a military complex or something?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Chuq · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.confluence.org/confluence.php?lat=-41&l on=147

      "We got within 1.5 km of this confluence before being asked to leave by the Army. As it turns out, the confluence is in the middle of a live firing range and it is not safe or legal to visit it without assistance from the Army."

      --
      - Chuq
    2. Re:Hmm... by Noren · · Score: 1
      Here's a map of the continental US The red squares(and triangles) represent successful visits, white represent documented unsuccessful attempts, and grey is the default for no documented attempts.

      As you can see, almost all of the area has been covered, in fact most of the points which haven't are in ocean or the Great Lakes (which was once not considered targets, then the parameters were redefined to be within sight of land.)

      I think there are five spots on land which have not been visited- out of approximately a thousand. Of these:

      One has been visited, but is listed as incomplete, possibly because the visit may not have been done legally;
      One is in an Indian reservation which now has permission granted for visit planned within a month
      One is in a large private ranch for which permission to go has not been granted and
      and Two are on federal government land used for nuclear-related purposes.

      Somewhat higher of a proportion of government land than I'd've expected, and no confluence which hasn't been visited because of terrain, which was quite surprising to me.

      This has gone on long enough that some places which are legally difficult to get to have been visited, such as this one on a federally protected watershed which was visited by a local water quality official who'd read about the site.

      Surprisingly few confluences are actually in cites. My personal favorite confluence is this one, which is in the middle of Washington State but happens to be in the middle of the Columbia River, more than 100m from either shore! (100m is the maximum distance for a visit to be considered successful.) The first attempt failed for lack of a boat, in the middle of a very dry region. I've most likely visited that confluence unknowingly- as a teenager I used to go waterskiing in that area.

  25. 37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Informative
    37N 116W

    Good luck, you'll need it!

    1. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by evule · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by Frostalicious · · Score: 1

      37N 116W Good luck, you'll need it!

      No problem. Of course I will shortly afterwards be visiting 40 48'N, 73 53'W

    3. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by rgmoore · · Score: 2, Informative

      Believe it or not, they do have an "incomplete" visit to the site here. The only reason that it's incomplete is that the visitor didn't take the requisite 6 photographs. He did include a picture of his GPS at that location, though. Another person has asked for permission to visit, which seems like a reasonable approach to the problem.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    4. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by strabo · · Score: 3, Informative
      37N 116W

      Good luck, you'll need it!

      Heh - looks like someone has already taken that dare.


      06-Jan-2004 -- Up front, I must admit that I did not visit this confluence personally. However, the friend of a friend of a ... who did visit asked me not to use his name.
    5. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      A lot of brave men tried. Unfortunately they were eaten by the giant mutated jackalopes (is that one in the picture?) that are known to reside in the area.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  26. Re:Too Many Bored People by pinchhazard · · Score: 0

    You know, fuck you! This is hella neat. Why don't you go back to your breakfast of boners and toast?

    --
    Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
  27. Idea for them by cr0y · · Score: 1

    They should put a mirror of the website at every point they visit to defend against the inevitable /.ing they are going to receive :o)

    --

    ItWasFree.com - Take the mystery
  28. I've heard that before by ElektroHolunder · · Score: 1

    Somehow, Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged comes to mind.

  29. What would be really cool . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    Set up a solar powered WiFi node and weather station with satellite uplink at every confluence!

    Stefan

    1. Re:What would be really cool . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? maybe i'm missing something, but if you already have access to a satellite, wouldn't you already know the weather?

  30. "historical significance"?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And feet and miles and pounds didn't have historical significance?

    What about the constitution of the first French Republic? Or the Second? Or the Third?

    Heck, didn't last month's Italian government have some sort of "historical significance"?

    But no, you just jump on the "beat up on an American" bandwagon over some comment on the lack of significance of arbitrary locations?

  31. Hooter's! by sciop101 · · Score: 1

    Picture with waitress(es) at every Hooter's. Receipt for Beer and Hotwings optional.

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  32. Re:Too Many Bored People by typhoonius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, no one has a sense of wonder anymore.

    It sounds to me like a great way to use both the internet's worldwide reach and its ease of publishing to do something extrordinary: enable anyone to see any part of this big blue ball of ours. You can read about countries and landmarks in encyclopedias, but you really can't get any idea of just how gigantic and diverse our world is without a project like this.

  33. Re:Too Many Bored People by Tongo · · Score: 1

    hehe omg, "breakfast of boners and toast".

    I have to remember that one....

  34. Re:Too Many Bored People by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And how does this qualify as newsworthy on Slashdot?

    News for nerds. Stuff that matters.

    Finding Confluences is something that normally requires an understanding of maps, GPSs, or at least a desire to learn something about finding their location.

    Sounds geeky to me. Since you are so bored of learning about confluences maybe you should start reading more Slashdot.

  35. Re:Longitude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And fur coats. Honestly, that's in northern russia, and would be freezing cold. Hence, shared bodily warmth.

    Here's a mapquest link

  36. Excessively Redundant? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hasn't another project already acheived this and begun interpolation?

    And on top of that, we already have another project to visit all those locations, which have have been marked with a retail location by the previous project.

    So while some redundancy may be a good thing, this sounds like overkill.

    1. Re:Excessively Redundant? by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's ok, by the end of the decade there'll probably be a Starbucks at every degree confluence, so both projects can neatly overlap.

      --
      >;k
    2. Re:Excessively Redundant? by jaxle · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to look at a Starbucks? I think this project is far more interesting as you can look at pictures from all over the world that you normally would not see.

  37. You've got to be kidding me. by Isldeur · · Score: 0, Flamebait



    May I be the first to say (if not think):

    Get A Life!!

    Seriously though. All this effort. Can't you people donate this time and sweat to something that will help someone? Or do you really feel that you're helping people by picking your nose at every random spot here to timbucktoo?

    1. Re:You've got to be kidding me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah!! People should spend their time making disagreeable comments on Slashdot!!!

  38. 'Scuse me by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 0
    Visiting Every Latitude and Longitude Intersection
    Isn't there an infinite number of these?
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:'Scuse me by strider44 · · Score: 1

      read it - it said INTEGER intersection in the article.

      You could at least take the time to copy and paste your quotes.

    2. Re:'Scuse me by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      Isn't there an infinite number of these?
      Does it really matter if there is an infinite number?

      If you read the article, you would notice that they are only talking about integer degree intersections, not every single possible point on the Earth. Even if they did refer to every single one of those infinite points, it wouldn't make it impossible as humans make contact with a large number of such points at any given time (and as a result, it would just be gradually painting areas as visited.)

      (BTW, who modded Insightful? It definatly wasn't.)
    3. Re:'Scuse me by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Isn't there an infinite number of these?

      Not necessarily. Spacetime may be quantized at the Planck scale.

    4. Re:'Scuse me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. Sense of humour failure. Oh well.....

  39. "... to be found..." what bullshit by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 0

    I bet you these points have already been found, just nobody has made such a fuss about them and catalogued them. It's a bit like saying that Lewis and Clark discovered a route to the west or that Livingston (or was it Stanley) discovered Victoria Falls. The local folks have been there for ages.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  40. Send me the money instead by penginkun · · Score: 1

    Hey, if you've got all this money burning a hole in your wallet, why not send some to me? I promise to use at least some of it to pay bills and thus get out of debt.

  41. Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this what the US is doing on it's "war on terror"?

  42. Lost in flight by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I once worked with a fellow who wrote software for ICBM's and he commented that one of the worst places to be in the event of a nuclear exchange was at Lat 0, Long 0 because there where several possible failure modes where the missiles would try to find their way here

    1. Re:Lost in flight by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      At least it's a fair way offshore.

    2. Re:Lost in flight by Ian.Waring · · Score: 1

      If my memory serves me right (having seen where the pointer goes on a map when no GPS signal is arriving in a navigation unit), co-ordinates (0,0) is in the sea south of Nigeria.

    3. Re:Lost in flight by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "I once worked with a fellow who wrote software for ICBM's and he commented that one of the worst places to be in the event of a nuclear exchange was at Lat 0, Long 0 because there where several possible failure modes where the missiles would try to find their way here"

      As anyone who's forgotten to convert radians to degrees knows, the area within 3deg of (0,0) can be quite busy in some flight simulations...

    4. Re:Lost in flight by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      any idea what this is? Is that a buoy?

  43. Re:Too Many Bored People by switcha · · Score: 1
    There's no fun in visiting white castles or ikea stores, since common people can do that as well.

    And 'common' people can't visit lat/long intersections?

    The real difference is that WC or IKEA visits have a purpose, while visiting a coordinate in West Bumfuck, Indiana yields..well..not a whole hell of a lot. *camera click* Yay.

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  44. Simply not doable - politically or logistically by forgetmenot · · Score: 0

    Oooooookaayyyy..

    So how about the confluences in North Korea, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Iran, etc... to name but a few.
    These aren't places you can just "go to".
    Even in places where you CAN go (politcally, legally) you still can't (logistically) like the whole north half of friggin Canada or Siberia.

    Sounds like someone got drunk, had a brain fart and posted without thinking it through.

    1. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by Jardine · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even in places where you CAN go (politcally, legally) you still can't (logistically) like the whole north half of friggin Canada or Siberia.

      You do know that Canada isn't bone-chilling cold year round, right? People live in the Yukon, the Northwest Territories, and Nunavut. People hunt there, people mine there. There are few places that would be nearly impossible to get to.

    2. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by glwtta · · Score: 4, Interesting
      WTF? Inisghtful how?

      You do realize that there are, in fact, people already living in all those countries? And it's not all that strange to imagine that they might have cameras and an internet connection.

      Have you stopped to think that maybe the point of the project isn't to collect every last damn picture of frozen tundra, but rather to expand their (already absolutely amazing) collection of places that are accessible?

      The cynism boggles the mind - they've collected tens of thousnds of images from something like 150 countries, along with precise location and date information; giving you an instant overview of what THE ENTIRE FREAKING GLOBE looks like, and all you can come up with is "they won't be able to get all of Canada"?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by cosmol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It makes me sad to see all these negative comments about confluence.org. I've been watching the site since it was using all static html pages probably about 5 years ago, the exponential rate at which the US was lit up is absolutely amazing. I never expected the project to take off so fast.

    4. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by Toresica · · Score: 1

      Even in places where you CAN go (politcally, legally) you still can't (logistically) like the whole north half of friggin Canada or Siberia.
      Yep, that would be why everything south of about the 50th parallel in Ontario has been visited, and almost nothing north of there has.
      But people still live there, and eventually they'll get visited. (After all, the Earth'll be around to have it's picture taken for a couple billion more years)

    5. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by Toresica · · Score: 1

      You do know that Canada isn't bone-chilling cold year round, right? People live in the Yukon, the Northwest Territories, and Nunavut. People hunt there, people mine there.

      Yes, but not very many people. And last I heard, it was pretty hard to get decent Internet access. (Granted, I'm from much further south in Canada, so things may have progressed since I last heard.)

      It is, however, still possible, and I can wait until the slashdot effect wears of and I can see how many of the places in Nunavut have been visited. :)

  45. Re:The highest/lowest/coldest/hottest/.. intersect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that would be my desk I think.....

  46. This idea is all wet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm willing to bet the pictures from about 9,000 of these look pretty much all the same -- since they're all in the middle of the ocean!!!

    1. Re:This idea is all wet! by cicadia · · Score: 1
      Where did you get that number? Sounds like you took the 12,889 figure from the story, and multiplied by .75, as the rough proportion of the earth's surface which is water.

      Too bad that even the /. story mentions that they've already removed the oceanic points before giving you that number. It doesn't mention the 3000+ points which have already been recorded (though the first link in the story does), so there are actually some 16,000 points above sea level, which should represent a pretty wide range of scenery.

      --
      Living better through chemicals
  47. Re:37N 116W, I been there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's here
    Doesn't seem too bad, I was stuck in Beatty, NV for 6 weeks on a low-budget movie shoot, that's only 25 miles away.

  48. Area 51? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't get the site to come up, but 37N runs through Arizona. I can't think of anything worth double-dog-dare status in Arizona, so I'm going to hazard a guess that it's in neighboring Nevada, and those coords are for Area 51?

  49. Re:The highest/lowest/coldest/hottest/.. intersect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm... for some reason, the view from 90N 90W looks exactly like the view from 90N 90E...

  50. Land use & terrain documentation by wiggling · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is so wickedly cool! says the guy who knows the latitude and longitude of his home. :) I spend plane trips staring out the window studying the changing patterns of terrain and land use. Folks who snooze while passing over "fly-over land" can see what the rest of the country^Wworld look like and how it differs from place to place. It would be really interesting to come back in 100 years, do the same thing, and compare the pictures.

    People who cannot appreciate something like this cannot be real nerds!

    1. Re:Land use & terrain documentation by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      Right on - glad to hear I'm not the only one. I recently spent the entire 4.5 hours flying Vancouver-Toronto just staring at the terrain. Fascinating stuff - I'm sure I saw part of an astroblem on the praries, just a hint of an arc heading up to the north but contiguous over many miles. I fly a lot these days, but I don't think I'll ever get tired of watching the earth below.

  51. Humanity has no hope.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Informative

    .... with so many uber parochials as yourself.

    You can take your camera to Iran and Tibet, no problems.

    Even to North Korea, if you apply for the right permisions and follow the instructions of your guard.

    Turkmenistan is tough but not impossible.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  52. Arrrrr...Ye be leavin out good places by tpconcannon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a member of the Loyal Order of Shellbacks, I can attest that I and the crew of the good ship T.S. Enterprise crossed the equator at 85 degrees West , and 0 degrees North/South. There are many a mariner whom have completed this right of passage across the seven seas, none of whom will forget, either.

    --
    I found the "Any" key.
    1. Re:Arrrrr...Ye be leavin out good places by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      I'll never forget May 7, 1989, the day I was initiated by his Majesty Neptunus Rex, Ruler of the Raging Main, into the Solemn Mysteries of the Ancient Order of the Deep.

      But what you be doin', spilling the beans to these Polywog scum? His Majesty, Davy Jones, and the Royal Baby would have to put in overtime if they were slashdotted. There's not enough room on the forecastle for the lot of 'em and it would take years to get them all through the rebirthing chamber.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  53. Re:Too Many Bored People by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Normal people barely know that GPS exists, let alone how to turn off the map and read latitude and longitude- so how would they get there?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  54. which lattitude/longitude? by PTBarnum · · Score: 1, Informative

    I looked at the site, and didn't see any indication of which version of lattitude/longitude they want people to use. There are several different models which can give slightly different coordinates for the same physical point (e.g. NAD 27, NAD 83, WGS 84).

    Admittedly, the confluences under each grid are almost always within 100 meters of each other, which is what the project organizers consider acceptable accuracy, but it is still suprising that they don't make it explicit.

    1. Re:which lattitude/longitude? by PTBarnum · · Score: 1

      Never mind, they say it's WGS84 in the very first paragraph of the information page. I'm just blind.

    2. Re:which lattitude/longitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be WGS84, because that is what you get normally with a GPS handheld device. So there is no real choice.

  55. It's the journey, stoopid! by wiggling · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In many cases, it's the journey, not the destination. Think of how much of this great globe they've seen while doing this, and how much of it far, far off the beaten path. Boy, I envy them!

    I took two days off work this week to travel from 37.6284 -92.3288 to 37.7503 -923973, spending the night at 37.6950 -92.3067. It was great!

    1. Re:It's the journey, stoopid! by plover · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the link. Topozone is a pretty nifty tool, but their topo maps are at least 20 years out of date for my quad.

      Oh, there we go. I found the details of the map. It's dated 1967. Yowch. A lot can change in 37 years.

      Strange, but the details on the map indicate it was produced in the early 1980's, even though the info says 1967. I guess I won't be subscribing to their pro service any time soon.

      --
      John
    2. Re:It's the journey, stoopid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "their" maps, it's the USGS maps that they have data from that they render for you. I'm not sure of the details, but there are dates for when the original map was made and when updates where applied. Some updates are arial only w/o field checking -- those are in purple, IIRC. (Yes, they get out of date, but it's a pretty big job keeping up to date on every square inch of the country.)

    3. Re:It's the journey, stoopid! by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      Topography doesn't change very much, and if your talking someplace like Nebraska, I can pretty much draw you a topo map without any work at all, A blank sheet of paper probably has all the info for most of Nebraska.

  56. Dude, try to learn a ltitle about the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    Excuse me?

    I'll agree with North Korea. But Exactly what is th eproblem with Tibet? A lot of tourists are travelling there, there is no problems going there. How do you think all those souvernir salesmen in Lhasa make their living?

    And Iran is, even though your president called it part of some fictious axes of evil, a very open and friendly place. In fact, it's probably the most "advanced" society in the middle east.

    Stop watching Fox News and switch to Discovery or something instead. Or even better, try to travel outside your continent.

    1. Re:Dude, try to learn a ltitle about the world by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      Yeah. You can find 2 visited, 2 incompleted spot over Xizang (Tibet).... The problem is a lot of places are not really accessible geologically. Even helicopter have difficulty to reach....

    2. Re:Dude, try to learn a ltitle about the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Iran is, even though your president called it part of some fictious axes of evil, a very open and friendly place. In fact, it's probably the most "advanced" society in the middle east.

      Tell that to the families of the American and French soldiers who died in the barracks bombings. We are still waiting for an apology on that one. I won't even get into the Embassy killings...

      BTW, Iran is currently supporting Al-queda fighters who crossed the border from Afgahistan.

      Stop watching Al-Jazeera and pick up some history books - oh, wait, those are banned by the Islamic government.

    3. Re:Dude, try to learn a ltitle about the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't judge an entire people by the actions of a few.

      No need to even mention the fact that much of what why tout as truth is, in fact, unvalidated propaganda.

  57. Re:The highest/lowest/coldest/hottest/.. intersect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but what color was that bear?

  58. What is this, High School? by huskerdoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is it that when someone comes up with an idea/goal, the Slashdot crowd has to belittle the idea as insignificant? This reminds me of high school when anyone who acted a bit different was made fun of because they didn't go along with the status quo. Yawn.

    People, you are hackers/nerds! You are supposed to encourage each other to set goals and follow through on them.

    Yes, I am biased. I visited five confluences when I was in Australia. Because I had to change my travel plans for the first confulence visit, I ended up meeting a girl which I dated for a year.

    Life is short, go do something with your lives, don't tear down anyone who chooses to follow through on an idea, rather than just sit around and watch reruns of Friends.

    1. Re:What is this, High School? by jnicholson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Perhaps there is an increasing number of people who are here to mock the nerds, rather than revel in their own nerdness.

      This project is clearly an entirely appropriate use of resources, as is the idea of having a space program, if you're a genuine nerd.

      (BTW, unless she was a sheep, you probably should have said "whom I dated", not "which I dated". Was she a sheep?)

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
    2. Re:What is this, High School? by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, we also happen to be rather elitist.

    3. Re:What is this, High School? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I ended up meeting a girl which I dated for a year

      You should have tried a living girl. I hear they're better.

    4. Re:What is this, High School? by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Life is short, go do something with your lives, don't tear down anyone who chooses to follow through on an idea, rather than just sit around and watch reruns of Friends.

      Unless your goal is to watch every rerun of Friends. In that case, you can set up a website describing your experiences of watching Friends during all the different times it is shown. Then you can get Slashdotted.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    5. Re:What is this, High School? by starm_ · · Score: 1

      Exactly, most of what people do is pointless anyways when you look at it from the right angle. Sports is a good example. Most sports involve putting some randomly defined object in some randomly defined locations, removing it, then, trying to do it all over again. Sounds pointless doesn't it?

    6. Re:What is this, High School? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ended up meeting a girl which I dated for a year.

      But, alas, she dumped you because she didn't like being treated like a thing.

      Perhaps /. reminds you of high school because you still don't understand basic grammar. I'll bet that you were envious of the kids in high school whenever you rode by in the short bus on your way to your "special" school. It's OK - you're still special. And you're a winner!

      "Whom", Elvis. The word is "whom". And I'll happily tear you down because apparently the idea that you are choosing to follow through is the idea that it's OK to be some kind of self-righteous boob who can't use single syllable words correctly in a sentence. Sheesh. Climb back down into your mom's basement and don't come out until the pimples on your greasy face clear up.

    7. Re:What is this, High School? by danila · · Score: 2, Informative

      May be he wasn't a native English speaker. Why is it necessary to mock him for poor grammar (or are you all just trying to prove his point?)? May be they speak like that in Australia, because you know, English is different. In Britain they would say "who I dated", may be in Australia "which" is a correct form.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    8. Re:What is this, High School? by illtud · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In Britain they would say "who I dated"

      Erm, no they wouldn't, not if they wanted to be correct. "Whom I dated" is the correct form in British English as well.

    9. Re:What is this, High School? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People, you are hackers/nerds!
      Yeah right, the nerd to normal ratio on this site has been decreasing since day one. I thought it was obvious when 4 out of every 5 modded up comments is +whateve,Funny.

    10. Re:What is this, High School? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      What could be really cool to do with this would be to make a futuristic globe, touch a spot on the globe, and it will show downloaded (to keep upto date and not need a hard drive) images (The interface would take some work, but what parent wouldn't get there kid one of these if they had broadband and wireless internet at home. This could be great for geography classes as well.

    11. Re:What is this, High School? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't know, of course.

    12. Re:What is this, High School? by danila · · Score: 1

      Whom has been dying an agonizing death for decades...
      http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/who.html

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    13. Re:What is this, High School? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, unless she was a sheep, you probably should have said "whom I dated", not "which I dated". Was she a sheep?

      Well, she listened to Britney Aguilera and Five Neat Guys, so you tell me.

      *rimshot*

    14. Re:What is this, High School? by illtud · · Score: 1
      Whom has been dying an agonizing death for decades...

      ...regardless of which, it's still the correct UK English.

  59. I tried to do this once... by Ariane+6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a confluence about 20 miles southeast of my house. One night I convinced a friend of mine to help me go look for it, so we broke out the GPS and hit the road. After whacking our way through some overgrown forest, the place turned out to be in the middle of some farmer's paddock - I got to within ninteen feet, then cut and ran when an enormous black horse woke up and started stamping its feet at me.

    My friend thought I was completely insane, but I know better :)

    1. Re:I tried to do this once... by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1

      Oh - looks like someone else has done it, too!

      http://www.confluence.org/confluence.php?lat=40& lo n=-77

  60. 49 miles? by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Funny
    There is a confluence within 49 miles (79 km) of you if you're on the surface of Earth.
    I'm posting from Mars, you insensitive clod!

    The worst part is that it's almost impossible to get a first post from here...

    1. Re:49 miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you shouldn't complain, There's one thats closer than 49 miles. (26 miles if I have the proportion correct). But on Jupiter is a different story.

    2. Re:49 miles? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "I'm posting from Mars, you insensitive clod!"

      Not only are the confluences nearer together where you are, but they're all on land, and nobody has visited any of them yet. I don't know if there's a section in DCP for other planets though...

    3. Re:49 miles? by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Not yet, though somehow I'd expect the Earth's moon to get confluence visits before Mars. :)

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  61. English Only? by kbogert · · Score: 1

    It is interesting that a site about going to all corners of the Earth trying to create an "Organized Sampling of the World" is available only in English.

    1. Re:English Only? by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Yes, we'd love to have the interface available in most major languages, but since we rely 100% on volunteer labor, and the volunteers are busy just keeping the place running, it hasn't gotten done. Would you like to volunteer? :)

      Of course, visit contents can be (and are) posted in pretty much any language you wish, though we also post an English translation, since that's the lingua franca of the Internet. If you wander around the site, you can find posts in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, German, French, etc...

      Several online sites also do dynamic webpage translation, though the results are often hilarious. :)

      Eric Lincoln (who only speaks English and Russian)
      Degree Confluence Project

  62. Can I get a grant for this? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    It sounds like a great way to tour the world on somebody else's nickel. Maybe I can bring back a tacky souvenier (or at least a sample of the water) from each location.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  63. Been there, done that, great stuff! by RabidMonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've done one confluence (http://www.confluence.org/confluence.php?lat=46&l on=-79) in Ontario now, and attempted a few more. My brother-in-law and I like them because they give us somewhere to go and a reason to go there.

    In fact, I spent a week at the beginning of July trying to get some in Northern Ontario, but gave up. I never realized how swampy and densely tree'd the north is. It was really great to get out and see part of my country, as well as giving us a great appreciation for the people who first settled up there and the hardships they faced.

    I highly reccomend everyone pick a confluence and go for it, even if it's done. It's a great excuse to get out and see your country and meet people. All you need is a GPS and some boots. For even more fun, pick somewhere where you get to canoe or kayak, or ski or mountain bike. It's great exercise and can mesh nicely with Geocaching.

    Go, get some, and stop being so negative people ... people are saying it's a waste of time, that this isn't a good project. Whos to say that programming whatever application you're working on isn't the same waste because who cares, theres already 15 other mail clients out there, or 27 other people who have already ported X to Y system .. thats not the point. Stop being so narrow minded.

    --
    We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
  64. Re:Too Many Bored People by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The real difference is that WC or IKEA visits have a purpose, while visiting a coordinate in West Bumfuck, Indiana yields..well..not a whole hell of a lot. *camera click* Yay.

    It shows that, despite all the sprawl and overpopulation of the 20th century, most of the Earth is still not paved over with freeways, slums, or hamburger stands. Which is nice to know.

    --
    >;k
  65. Re:Too Many Bored People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it might encourage slashdotters to go outside and get some fresh air and exercise.

    This doesnt mean im volunteering..

  66. Think of the aliens by AllNicksWereTaken · · Score: 0

    Are they visiting Area51?

    1. Re:Think of the aliens by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Define "they". :)

      The visitors are individuals, acting on their own initiative. You can feel free to be part of "them" if you wish.

      By the way, there is no degree confluence in Area 51, although there is one in the equally controversial Yucca Mountain nuclear storage facility...

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  67. OK, Math/Geo geeks... by sootman · · Score: 1

    How far apart are 1deg longitudianal lines at the equator? How far apart, say, 10 or 20 degrees south of the north pole?

    Also, I forget--do lines of latitude get closer together as you go closer to the poles, or are they all X miles apart?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How far apart are 1deg longitudianal lines at the equator?

      They are one degree apart.

      How far apart, say, 10 or 20 degrees south of the north pole?

      Still one degree.

      do lines of latitude get closer together as you go closer to the poles..?

      Nope, still one degree.
      Thank you for trolling. Try again soon,

    2. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Thanks. No, I wasn't trolling, just too lazy to search. Anyone else want to answer... in miles? Hell, I'll even accept answers in km.

      OK, I'll do the first... um, let's see, about 24,000 miles around at the equator, so (24,000/360)=~67 miles apart.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by Toresica · · Score: 1

      "Thanks. No, I wasn't trolling, just too lazy to search. Anyone else want to answer... in miles? Hell, I'll even accept answers in km"
      They all meet at the poles. So the answer would be 0, I believe, no matter what units you use. (Although I prefer km).

    4. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by kelk1 · · Score: 2, Informative
      do lines of latitude get closer together as you go closer to the poles..?
      Nope, still one degree.

      Which also defines 60 nautical miles. A nautical mile (a minute of latitude) is usually accepted to be constant at 1852 metres (or meters). But due to the flattening at the poles, I am pretty sure this is not true. So the answer is yes, they get closer from the equator to the pole.

      Doing the maths on a modern datum, I found 1854 m at the equator and 1850m at the poles.

      Anyone concur?

    5. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      How far apart are 1deg longitudianal lines at the equator? How far apart, say, 10 or 20 degrees south of the north pole?

      Assuming the Earth is a perfect sphere (which it isn't), longitudinal lines are 60*cos(latitude) nautical miles apart along latitudinal lines, or 60 * arccos(sin^2(latitude) + cos(1 degree)*cos^2(latitude)) (in degrees) nautical miles apart along a great circle. 60 nautical miles is approximately 69 miles or 111 km.

      Also, I forget--do lines of latitude get closer together as you go closer to the poles, or are they all X miles apart?

      They are all 60 nautical miles apart, or about 69 miles/111 km.

    6. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need fancy math to answer the first question. There are 360 1-degree lines, therefore the distance between the lines at the equator is 1/360th of the circumference of the earth, i.e., 24900/360 = 69.16 miles.

  68. Right Technology? by d474 · · Score: 1

    The US government released rights recently to allow for satellite imaging of the earth down to 1/2 meter resolution. At that resolution, they'll be able to take photos of every (legal) spot on earth at a resolution that will show objects up to the size of medium shrubs and even animals. Small buildings, and cars will be recognizable on these photos. It's more comprehensive, more up-to-date than this time-consuming and incomplete method of physically getting people to all 12000+ locations. Although it isn't "the same" as having a person take a few photos of the area, it gives you a very good idea of what the terrain is like, anywhere, not just at confluence.

    Although this confluence project seems pretty cool, their execution of it doesn't seem very complete in the photo category. They go through all the trouble of getting to each location and just snap a couple pictures? They need a standard requirement of photos at each location in the same order so people can compare/contrast various locations. At least 8 photos taken to really "see" what the area looks like. Standard info about the temperature, time of year, possible changes to the environment at that point that might occur (construction, rivers, erosion...).

    Good idea, none-the-less.

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    1. Re:Right Technology? by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I can't entirely agree with you there. Yes, the resolution is impressive, but looking top-down is just not the same as doing a panorama from the same spot on the ground.

      Myself, if I do any of these, I'm planning on doing a complete panoramic series and photo-stitching them together.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    2. Re:Right Technology? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      The US government released rights recently to allow for satellite imaging of the earth down to 1/2 meter resolution.

      You write this ridiculous sentence so casually. No, the US cannot prevent anyone from launching a satellite and photographing any area of the planet they wish. Perhaps they can shoot down or destroy a satellite which is doing things they don't like, but that's just Might, it isn't Right. The depth of your delusion is sickening. The US does not rule the earth.

    3. Re:Right Technology? by d474 · · Score: 1

      ??? You seem to be arguing with some other post, yet you quoted mine. I don't understand where you get these ideas, because you didn't get them from me. Perhaps you are just frustrated. Well, I hope your day gets better.

      Read the articles my friend, you decide!

      Article 1
      Article 2

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  69. Visiting every intersection indeed... by t_allardyce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The Degree Confluence Project's goal is to visit every latitude and logitude degree integer intersection in the world and get laid! An excerpt: 'The project is a crazy pub-crawl road-trip of the bars and clubs of the world. There is a party within 49 miles (79 km) of you if you're on the surface of Earth. We've discounted anything in the oceans unless its some hot mermaid chicks, but there are still 12,889 buds to down!' A fucking bitching project, indeed." As Timothy noted, I've been smoking something strong lately.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  70. Kids these days by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

    "We've discounted confluences in the oceans and some near the poles"

    Sissies.

    --
    Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
  71. Well, it doesn't by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    The coordinates of the white house are
    38.8967 , -77.0365

    1. Re:Well, it doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks!

      - Osama

    2. Re:Well, it doesn't by golgotha007 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      white house = 38.8967 , -77.0365?

      cool, thanks!

      - Osama

    3. Re:Well, it doesn't by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Oh thats right. No way Osama could access http://www.maporama.com/share/ from his cave and type in "1600 Pensylvania Avenue". Damn. George Bush's life may be in danger because of me!

      Hey wait. That probably makes me a patriot!

  72. It seems to be NTS by hawkstone · · Score: 1

    If you wait long enough, the page will appear. It appears to be NTS -- the DOE Nevada Test Site. It is the location of hundreds of nuclear weapons tests through 1992.

  73. Hey, with that kind of spread... by KC7GR · · Score: 1
    ...Just think of all the cool places or things that they may well find, but that were unknown up 'til now!

    --Jimmy Hoffa's tomb!

    --Bill Shatner's lost hairpiece!

    --The Lost City of Sitnalta!

    --The True Location of the Firesign Theater!

    --Osama!

    ...And MANY MORE!!!



    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  74. Radians by Kludge · · Score: 2, Funny

    This project would be a lot easier if they were working in the more natural units of radians rather than degrees. :)

  75. Beaten path?! by dexter+riley · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would hike there, but the path was already beaten, apparently into submission.

  76. What the heck is a confluence anyway? by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 0, Troll

    "The Degree Confluence Project's goal is to visit every latitude and logitude degree integer intersection ..."

    Hey There ...

    As often happens I've come across a word I just don't understand.
    As often as this happens ...
    My wife seems to know what that word, does, infact, mean.

    Confluence, she says.
    I think that they mean intersection.

    "Clearly."
    (Smart. Yet obtuse.)

    I think confluence denotes a set of rivers or streams. Do they only mean to say intersections of waterways?

    "Clearly not."

    So I head over to dictionary.com.

    con.flu.ence (n.):
    1a) A flowing together of two or more streams.
    1b) The point of juncture of such streams.
    1c) The combined stream formed by this juncture.
    2) A gathering, flowing, or meeting together at one juncture or point:
    "A confluence of negative events conspired to bring down bond prices" (Michael Gonzalez).

    So I guess the question is:
    I can see the intent for the use of the word.
    But to me it seems like a bit of a stretch.
    More of a literary license.

    Yes. The question:
    Do I simply require access to a better dictionary?

    Cheers,
    --The Dude

  77. Photo mapping by Trevor · · Score: 1

    If you want to build your own photo maps (on confluence points, or not) you could try the web photo map editor I just built: http://transmutable.com/93PhotoStreet/

  78. Nevada Test Site by crisco · · Score: 1

    Heres the only one in Nevada listed as unvisited, although there is a picture and a story...

    --

    Bleh!

  79. discounted confluences? by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

    We've discounted confluences in the oceans and some near the poles, but there are still 12,889 to be found.

    You damn sissy! If you're gonna do a project, why do it half-way?! What a damn bum..

    DOn't let the cold or the middle of the ocean stop ya'. Man has been to both poles. Man has covered the ocean. Why can't you do it now?

  80. Try South Bumf*ck Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had reason to drive through southern Indiana twice earlier this summer, off the Interstates. It was beautiful. You really ought to see more of the world, and I don't mean through a tour agent.

  81. /.'ed by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    Hmm... apparently their SQL server got /.'ed. The error message is fairly humorous (Normal text with error message mixed in):

    The project is an organized sampling of the world. There is a confluence within 49 miles (79 km) of you if you're on the surface of Earth. We've discounted confluences in the oceans and some near the poles, but there are still
    Warning: mysql_connect(): Too many connections in /public/private/confluence/liveinc/inc_library.php on line 258
    0 to be found.

    Hehehe... "still...too many connections"

    (Warning: I'm easily ammused.)

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  82. Re:Too Many Bored People by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


    Visiting every White Castle location would probably result in a long, painful death from excessive razor-blade style flatulence... one would have to space it out some.

    Like once a lifetime. *shudders*

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  83. Four compass points, usually by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    People usually take pictures of the four compass points. Close enough, really.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  84. Is it just me or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...does this sound like a colossal waste of time & resources to anyone else?

  85. /.d by v1 · · Score: 1

    Server's finally dead. Took awhile too. Impressive.

    Too bad all the ones in my state are already visited. The "aerial visits disqualified" is going to make this more challenging for places that have to be visited by sea.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:/.d by pklong · · Score: 1

      Er sorry, my fault, I tried to download the huge map ;)

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

  86. MOD PARENT UP! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    Good point, AC, maybe you SHOULD get an account after all! ;-)

  87. Re:Too Many Bored People by typobox43 · · Score: 1

    Starbucks is better than White Castle.

  88. South East wrong? by Barumpus · · Score: 1

    no ill feelings towards the South Eastern US (I live in Fl) but some of these must be wrong. If you have ever driven through the southern states, you would agree with me when I say that at least 3 of these MUST be right in the middle of a WalMart or WinnDixie.

    1. Re:South East wrong? by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where in FL you are, but the ones closest to me area all off the coast, and somebody's already posted them. I have yet to see a floating Wal*Mart.

    2. Re:South East wrong? by mlk · · Score: 1

      But floating starbucks are 10 a penny.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:South East wrong? by Barumpus · · Score: 1

      I live in the NorthEast corner outside of Jacksonville. And by the way the WalMarts are popping up around here, I would say another few months and there will be one located in the Atlantic for cruise ships, fisherman, and refugees.

  89. Hey, man, I'm surprized noone has said this so far by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    ... but, did you take pictures OF THE GIRL??? ;-)
    On one of the confluences? Hmm, can you post them on the site? ;-)

    Yes, it is getting silly how all /. start complaining about pointless misuse of "effort and resources". Depressing. I would love to visit my own, but I bet all So. Cali. points are taken (back to checking if they are).

    Paul B.

  90. And lots of Vodka!!! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    Take it from a Russian who drank (maybe a bit too much of) it with people who actually lived in similar parts! ;-) (they have some coal reserves nearby)

    Paul B.

  91. Work Smarter Not Harder by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you get down to it, angle measure in integers refers to radians. At 2 * pi radians all the way around the earth, there aren't *that* many intersections of integers.

    But do people living at an intersection even know that. It doesn't look like anyone makes a point of it.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  92. I've made contributions... by marioberges · · Score: 1

    I took pictures of 19N69W.

    I think it's also a chance for those of us who really don't get out as much and visit new places near home.

    What's the big deal, isn't the world full of other less meaningful projects? (http://www.uglypeople.com/, for example).

    http://www.confluence.org/confluence.php?lat=19&lo n=-69

  93. Shit... damn units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was measuring in radians. And I thought I was almost done. =(

  94. Panoramas by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many contributors do this already. A few times they'll just submit all the individual images, and one of the coordinators will assemble them into a panorama.

    I've posted panos from most of the confluences I've personally visited: http://www.confluence.org/visitor.php?id=157

    Terje Mathisen
    Scandinavian Coordinator The Degree Confluence Project

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
  95. More photography project ideas by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

    - Take pictures of the sky above each point, so, you know, we can see what that looks like too.
    - Take pictures of every different snowflake on Earth.
    - Take a picture of every four-leaf clover on Earth.
    - Take pictures of the lint in my navel, in 1 degree intervals.

  96. Re:38N 122W got Slashdotted by billstewart · · Score: 1

    That and 37n122w are the closest to Silicon Valley.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  97. Next Project by Jump · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your next project will be to shake hands of everybody in the world in alphabetic order. Start with your own town as a pilot study.

    1. Re:Next Project by pklong · · Score: 1

      No, your next project will be to personally insult every person in the universe

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

  98. Funny you should mention this... by heldlik · · Score: 1

    Because I've been working on a similar project, doing every halfway confluence point, like 0.5N 0.5W and so on.

    Hope there's noone doing the quarters as well.

  99. Re:wasted money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it can't. Unfortunately wars and genocide are extremely expensive, and the guys running this project can't afford to conquer Sudan, let alone most of the Middle East. However, the most expensive part is manpower. Why don't you kill two birds with one stone by visiting a confluence over there and killing the bad guys while you're at it?

  100. Re:Too Many Bored People by Slur · · Score: 1

    But look again. Even though there aren't many signs of Human settlement you can see the influence of Humans in most of the images in the temperate zones. Particularly in the number of open agricultural fields.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  101. Amazing Opportunity !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    I am Prince Joe Eboh, the Chairman of the "Contact Award Committee", of the "Niger Delta Confluence Point Commission (NDCPC)", a subsidiary of the Nigerian National Geographic Corporation (NNGC).

    I came to know of you in my private search for a reliable and reputable person to handle the confidential transaction, which involves the transfer of a HUGE NUMBER of CONFLUENCE POINTS to a foreign database requiring maximum confidence. THE PROPOSITION: a foreigner, Engineer James Akmed, a Confluence Point Merchant/Contractor with the Federal Government of Nigeria, until his suspension three years ago, executed with us at NNGC, and had a total contract executed of 28,000 CP's (TWENTY EIGHT MILLION,SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND CONFLUENCE POINTS) which flows in the Corporation's suspense database.

    It is because of the allegation/petition leveled against him that he (Engr. James Akmed) who is a close friend to the late dictatorship General Sanni Abacha (formal Military President of Nigeria) who died in office in 1998 and during his tenure the country experienced various mismanagement and series of malpractices were carried out in collaboration with his foreign friends.

    However, a Panel were set up to investigate the issue, who found him (Engr. James Akmed) guilty and the present Democratic President of Nigeria Chief Olusegun Obasanjo suspended him from EXPORTING any CONFLUENCE POINTS from Nigeria with immediate effect and was asked to leave the country. However, these CONFLUENCE POINTS are "UNCLAIMABLE" which was only known to my colleagues and I. Fortunately, all the Contract document including the "CONFLUENCE POINT COMPLETION CERTIFICATE" are with me but the need for a very trustworthy foreign business man/woman whom I would present as the Foreign beneficiary to CLAIM them.

    Fortunately, all the CONFLUENCE POINTS including the " CONTRACT COMPLETION CERTIFICATE" are with me but the need for a very TRUSTWORTHY foreign business man/woman whom I would present as the Foreign beneficiary to CLAIM these CONFLUENCE POINTS. In order to achieve this development, some of my colleagues and I now seek your permission to have you stand as the FOREIGN CONTRACTOR so that the confluence points would be released to your database ...

  102. Hey, guys, drop in when you come by! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My missile address is 2059'59"E 500'0"N, a short walk from the rock that marks the intersection.

  103. ...still 12,889 to be found. by nonregistered · · Score: 1

    There's an *odd* number of conflatulances?

  104. they need a dictionary by Maynard.Riley · · Score: 1

    Intersections are NOT confluences when each line continues on without merging, especially when they are square/normal to each other.

    But they probably understood that when they started, and maybe just figured that fabricating facts and distorting truth was an acceptable marketing practice for anybody if anybody.

    That said, a big globe to which are glued photos from those locations would be interesting, ... maybe, ... outside of the oceans and poles and forests and deserts, ... or not.

    1. Re:they need a dictionary by elincoln · · Score: 2, Informative

      "a coming or flowing together, meeting, or gathering at one point" -- www.m-w.com (Merriam-Webster)

      Nowhere does this definition appear to preclude the things which 'flow together', 'meet' or 'gather' from continuing separately. Nor is the square/normal nature of the meeting excluded by this definition.

      Out of curiosity, what dictionary did you consult?

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  105. Is this... by wpiman · · Score: 0

    a family friendly project? What if one of the points is dead smack in the middle of Hedonism or some nude beach? Will those photos be posted?

  106. Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..."the world" means USA and, maybe, three or four other countries. Or, maybe, this is another trick from GW to find Osama...
    Seriously, it seems these people have never been in Los Andes, Sahara, or some other places, where nowadays it's probably possible to get there but somehow hard, and probably costly.

    1. Re:Once again... by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Thus far, posts have been made in 153 countries. These posts include posts in the Andes, the Sahara, Mongolia, Antarctica, and many, many other remote and interesting places...

      The "three or four other countries" presumably includes the 23 countries where every single degree confluence has been visited. The largest of these is Sweden, where all 84 degree confluences have been visited... Probably some of those qualify as hard and costly to visit...

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  107. Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...governments and corporations ALREADY have EVERY stinking meter photographed
    ...Lat/Lon is TOTALLY fsking arbitrary
    ...CONFLUENCE is NOT descriptive of the INTERSECTION of coordinates

  108. Good for nerds by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    > would be a nice way of seeing what the world is like.

    Especially for those of us who telecommute and only leave home to buy food once a week. We'll finally know that there really is a world out there instead of asking "World? What world?"

  109. Enquiring minds know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The sand hills of Nebraska are very interesting topologically, geologically, hydrologically, and historically. Then there are places like Chimney Rock. Your provincialism is showing.

    We drove across Kansas to get to Colorado a couple of years ago. We decided on a change of scenery on the return trip and took I-80 through Nebraska. It was a much prettier and more interesting drive, though we didn't pass any of the areas mentioned in the paragraph above -- the topography there was much like a sheet of paper. But as the highway follows the Platte River, where the water and therefore the farms and towns are, not to mention a few trees, it's a lot different than I-70 plowing straight across Kansas' arid western plains.

    The whole world is interesting if you've truly an inquisitive mind. Even southeast Missouri and northeast Arkansas, which is ___flat___ and empty, has the most interesting geology buried beneath the aluvium, and there are signs on the surface if you only know what to look for.

  110. Military Base Confluence by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    I saw one like this somewhere in California. The closest they could get was to a road along the fenced area of the base, within several hundred meters of the confluence.

    They ended up taking pictures in the direction of the confluence and posted comments saying it was X hundred meters behind the fence.

  111. Private Property Confluence by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    There's a confluence in Germany that's in some farmer's back yard. The people taking the pictures explained what they were doing, and the farmer was totally cool with it. He had no idea there was such a spot near him. The people taking the pictures said he seemed to think that they were a bit eccentric, but amusing in a way.

    1. Re:Private Property Confluence by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      There's a confluence in Germany that's in some farmer's back yard. The people taking the pictures explained what they were doing, and the farmer was totally cool with it. He had no idea there was such a spot near him. The people taking the pictures said he seemed to think that they were a bit eccentric, but amusing in a way.

      Put yourself in his place, though. Usually the first visitor is mildly interesting, if not amusing. The 1000th visitor is curtly notified to bugger off.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Private Property Confluence by elincoln · · Score: 1

      The confluence with the most visits is in a golf course in California, USA. It has been visited 15 times in 5 years. At this rate, 1000 visits would take about 333 years. The average visited confluence has been visited about 1.3 times.

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  112. Strange Confluences by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    I noticed that there are a lot of visited confluences in the middle of the desert in Saudi Arabia. It turns out they are all taken by a soldier in the U.S. army station there, who goes on camping expeditions with his buddies in the desert.

    There's also some pretty remote ones in Siberia taken by a Russian guy, who I think works for some oil or gas company.

    It's interesting to read the comments about how someone got to these remote spots.

  113. Re:Hey, man, I'm surprized noone has said this so by huskerdoo · · Score: 1

    ah yes, I meant "whom", not "which", my fault.

    These are the five confluences I visited in Australia when I was biking around the continent. You'll have to look at the lunky.com site to find the girl pictures..

  114. 60 N or 60 S by SkiifGeek · · Score: 1

    Here is my contribution, all the confluences between 60 and 90 N and 60 and 90 S.

    .

    .

    Whew! That was a lot of effort. Damn dust spec on the lens.

    1. Re: 60 N or 60 S by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Odd, of the 7 completed visits from 60S to 90S, none look like your picture, and of the 295 completed visits from 60N to 90N, none look like your picture. :)

  115. Re:[Will the] guys will wonder, "why are we doing. by elincoln · · Score: 1

    The project is over 8 years old -- it may be a bit late to "wake up the next morning and sober up"...

    And yes, this means that the Degree Confluence Project (February 1996) is older than Slashdot (September 1997)... :)

    Eric Lincoln
    Degree Confluence Project

  116. At least 2 should be visible from each picture. by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 1

    Here in Alabamastan (likely the rest of the South East), you'd think that each picture should contain 2-3 of any of the following: On Land: Walmart Winn-Dixie Drunk Redneck Deer Hunter (all seasons) House Trailers as descibed by Jeff Foxworthy Farm Animals Empty Beer Cans Interstate or Highway: Farm Animals Drunk Redneck More Potholes than road Speed Trap On Water: Bass boat Inner-tube rider with beer Floating Beer Cans Both: Confederate Flag Some Moron with walking around a field with his Battery operated alarm clock saying: "Hey, I'm at 12 and 00!

    If you're from the South East and the above offended you, then lighten up.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  117. Natural Longitude Zero? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Western European capitals and observatories have established what we conventionally use as longitudinal merdians.

    But I have to wonder if there aren't any natural meridians that would be less politically or culturally oriended.

    For example, the peak of Everest/Chomolungma, the center of mass of the land masses, or even an extra-terrestrial marker in star constellations at a specific time?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."