Slashdot Mirror


Visiting Every Latitude and Longitude Intersection

Kevin A. Pieckiel writes "The Degree Confluence Project's goal is to visit every latitude and logitude degree integer intersection in the world and journal it on this web site. An excerpt: 'The project is an organized sampling of the world. There is a confluence within 49 miles (79 km) of you if you're on the surface of Earth. We've discounted confluences in the oceans and some near the poles, but there are still 12,889 to be found.' A neat project, indeed." As Timothy noted, I've posted before, and in Slashback form; a while back.

191 of 265 comments (clear)

  1. They should... by rokzy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...take loads of photos at each one to make a 360 degree photo. would be a nice way of seeing what the world is like.

    1. Re:They should... by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to buy me a GPS unit, I'll try it as I circle the world on a motorcycle. I've got a Canon A70 camera, so I'm part of the way there.

    2. Re:They should... by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny you should say that - I was talking to a friend just the other week about his new GPS toy, geocaching, and the Degree Confluence Project. I said it would be interesting to take panoramic pictures every 5 years or so, just to see how things change...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    3. Re:They should... by jnicholson · · Score: 1
      I just keep wondering if Elena has been a contributor.

      This project really grabs my imagination. I wish I had a GPS so I could visit some of the NZ ones.

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
    4. Re:They should... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      That turned out to be a hoax sayeth slashdot. The hoax announcement was up about uh... 4-6 weeks ago.

    5. Re:They should... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Elena faked her photos...she was with a guided tour the whole time.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:They should... by nursedave · · Score: 1
      What part of "well regulated" is so hard to understand?
      It meant, "well equipped."
      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    7. Re:They should... by davidtupper · · Score: 1

      Actually in the parlance of the day "well regulated" meant well practiced, that the group(s) had practiced together. Thus to correctly comply with the second amendment (and the fact that all able-bodied males between the ages of 17 and 45 are in the militia) we need similar weapons to those the organized milita (read as U.S Military) have, to practice with them on a regular basis.

      Works for me :)

    8. Re:They should... by shokk · · Score: 1

      Just from looking at the confluences around my home town, Hillsborough, NJ, USA (Lat: 40.48N, Lon: 74.63W - all four completed) I can see that within the boundaries of each confluence zone there is a huge variety. If this were to be a "way of seeing what the world is like" by just the four zones in my area of "Normandy Beach, Ocean, NJ", "Riverton, Burlington, NJ", "Old Tappan (near Westwood), Bergen, NJ", and "Blairstown, Warren, NJ", one would missing quite a lot of the world considering that this covers the Philadelphia-New York metropolitan area. Each tiny square is a whole different world in its own way. It would be interesting instead to see how similar each of these places are, especially those on the other side of the world. I think they could leverage more out of this database by including links to confluences of a matching square on the other side of the planet and a random square somewhere else in the world. Link it to the CIA factbook so that people can learn about their planetmates.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  2. "A neat project, indeed." ?! by nusratt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why?
    How is this project any more interesting or useful than a confluence of any other human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number?

    1. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by GoogolPlexPlex · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The concept is to produce a photographic record of the world, where the photographed locations are sampled evenly across the surface of the globe. (approximately - they are closer at the poles, but in those cases use only every second or third confluence). This is different to other outdoor photographic collections, where the images have an "artificial" grouping density around points of interest such as mountains, lakes etc. The idea is to produce a set of images where the ratio of "boring" to "beautiful" images approximates how the world is actually like, in terms of area.

    2. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because you are responding to a dumbass doesn't mean it is a good idea to act like a dumbass yourself.

    3. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by typhoonius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is this project any more interesting or useful than a confluence of any other human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number?

      Yes, it's arbitrary, but you're missing the point. The project's objective is to photograph every area of the world. Why not use latitude and longitude confluence? It's a universally understood metric, it gives a pretty diverse snapshot of the world (not too specific, not too broad), and it gives them an easily quantified goal.

    4. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Evenly sampled" is used loosely here. For example, the lucky stiff who gets assigned to one of the poles can take fill in 1/180 (360/64800) of all the data points without taking a step!

      A tessellated icosahedron would be better from the standpoint of even sampling, but the coordinate transformations from the GPS-ready latitude and longitude numbers would be prohibitive for most recreational gee-whiz participants.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    5. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by nusratt · · Score: 1

      Several responders missed my point, which is that arbitrary + rigid == uninteresting.

      I'll skip right over the AC flames and go to the worthwhile posts . . .

      "It's a universally understood metric, it gives a pretty diverse snapshot of the world (not too specific, not too broad), and it gives them an easily quantified goal."

      well, how about this alternate proposal? You and I will start at opposite ends of [throw a dart at a map], taking pictures of interesting stuff along the way, until we meet in the middle. Recruit enough people to do that, and your criteria have been met.

      "a set of images where the ratio of "boring" to "beautiful" images approximates how the world is actually like"

      and who defines "boring"? My ex-S.O. grew up in the desert and hates trees.
      De gustibus est non disputandam.

    6. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by d474 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is a sister site to this project. It takes a little while to load, but the global map allows you to move your mouse over tiny thumbnails and then a small pop-up of the location, well, pops up.

      I liked your retort, and thought this would help answer previous parent's comment that had asked "how is this project any more interesting..."

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    7. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by GoogolPlexPlex · · Score: 1

      I acknowledge that it's only approximate as an even samplying. I explained the workaround already, if you care to read my original post. The poles are only listed as a single confluence each, not 360 separate data points.

    8. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Toresica · · Score: 1

      "and who defines "boring"? My ex-S.O. grew up in the desert and hates trees"
      Regardless of what you consider interesting, there should still be "a set of images where the ratio of "boring" to "beautiful" images approximates how the world is actually like". It's still random.

    9. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by div_B · · Score: 1

      How is this project any more interesting or useful than a confluence of any other human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number?

      Visiting every confluence of degree lines is a bit silly, what with the degree being an angular measure only surpassed in idiocy by the gradian (for shame...)

      It would be of much more fundamental significance and a lot quicker just to visit the confluences of the 0 and pi radian latitudes and longitudes. Especially if you're going to disregard confluences that occur in the ocean and near the poles, because that would leave you with identically zero confluences to visit, so you can stay home and waste away reading /. YAY!

    10. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of some of the amateur radio awards: Worked All States, Worked All Counties, etc. There are people who drive out to activate obscure or remote/unpopulated grids and announce it in advance just so that people can try and add that to their QSL collection.

      Thus speaketh KB7UJR.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    11. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Did they not say that they would *NOT* be bothering with the ones on the oceans?

      Seems to me that this concept will produce the same sort of bias that you have pointed out photographic collections already do exhibit.

    12. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they just write a computer conversion program for the tessellated icosahedron?

      Also, I wouldn't necessarily call having to trek to the north or south pole "lucky!"

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by zijus · · Score: 1

      Why? How is this project any more interesting or useful than a confluence of any other human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number?

      How is [any human-specified arbitrary classification, e.g. visiting every peak who altitude in cubits is a prime number] any more interesting or useful than [this project]?

      Am afraid that comment was void. :-)

    14. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      it is fun to make a couple of sandwiches and a flask of coffee, get out of the house, get into the car, drive somewhere you've never been, play with the GPS for awhile, sit down, eat sandwiches, drink coffee, head back home.

      It's no more stupid than watching football (or soccer as Americans call it) or basketball or any other sporting event.

      You go out, walk a little bit, do some exercise. Foreign concepts to /. crowd. :)

      The grandparent justification is so lame. The main purpose is to have fun. Everyone has fun in their own way, these guys like to go around and hunt for some mathematical concepts.

    15. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      It is interesting you mention this because if you are competing in VHF, to maximise your squares you want to be as close as to where the squares meet AKA confluence. I don't have a GPS but I might take one of these guys' road maps for the next VHF contest. I operate on 6m, 2m and 70cm but never bothered to join a contest this way.

      One of the UK confluence points was wisited by a ham, he talks about this hobby more boring than growing tomatoes :-) At the end of is entry, he mentions he notified the VHF contesters that he was available via packet.

      I already have all the equipment to do such a portable work someday, I'm just too lazy. :)

    16. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Pi radians is 180 degrees. By visiting all the degree confluences you also visit all the interesting radian confluences.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    17. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Cragen · · Score: 1
      Your point, however, has no point. I have to agree with the your parent poster. This is a subject of interest only to those with the above interests. Like Pure Math. I don't see it as of interest to a majority or even a large minority of /.'ers/.

      Now, if you took a picture every day at the same time at each of the points, you are starting to build something that might be useful. The current goal is superfluous. It's like collecting data without a hypothesis. Actually, that's exactly what it is. Collecting, like in the hobby. It's a hobby, something I hope they sincerely enjoy.

    18. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by letxa2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've also thought this project is pretty neat and even considered helping out with some confluences that are in my area here in Mexico.

      My thought has always been that there aren't enough points to be collected. Sure, it's a better sample of what we have now, but considering the confluences can be dozens of miles apart you can end up skipping entire interesting areas--either interesting for their beauty or for their boringness.

      I personally think that they should at least have the option of submitting pictures for every tenth or twentieth of a degree. That way, with the exception of mountainous terrain, the picture from one confluence will include a distant view of surrounding confluences. You end up with a complete photo catalog of the world instead of a rather broken "representation" of the world.

      IMHO.

    19. Re:"A neat project, indeed." ?! by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      It's about a two-hundredth of a football field.

  3. Fun, but.. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of these are going to be on private property and restricted access (e.g. military) sites. A local GeoCache was on a confluence, but pulled because it was on private property. Probably best to ask permission before tresspassing, lest the intrepid explorer find their butt full of rocksalt or buckshot.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Fun, but.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can see it now...

      "I was unable to get to 70W by 45N, because there was an Army base there. Update: Someone's knocking on the door."

    2. Re:Fun, but.. by rolux · · Score: 1

      That why they have, on the project's website, letters to landowners, in Bahsa Indonesian, English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish.
      And, yes, someone even managed to get here...

      --
      My next comment will be ready soon, but moderators can beat the rush and mod it up early.
    3. Re:Fun, but.. by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      Score: -1 (I already have a mother, thanks)

    4. Re:Fun, but.. by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling that most of them will be on the site of a Starbucks.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    5. Re:Fun, but.. by Jetson · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the "49th Parallel" portion of the Canada/USA border is *NOT* exactly 49N (it's 49d00m07sN). Mind you, the USA 49N confluences are still close enough to the border that you're likely to end up playing 20 questions with the local DEA officer.

    6. Re:Fun, but.. by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1
      I can't get a link, thanks to slashdotting, but there was one like this in the UK. The confluence was in a restricted area of a munitions dump. The guy eventually got permission to enter, but not before sending Garmin's emissions data for his GPS unit, among other things. These guys sure do persevere!

      They have form letters to download on the site, in several languages, to be given to landowners, explaining what the project is about.

    7. Re:Fun, but.. by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Actually, the latitude of the "49th parallel" portion is not at *any* fixed latitude. The modern border is defined based on straight lines between fixed border markers, which were situated some time ago by a joint US/Canada survey. They were "close", but the border wanders both North and South of 49 degrees.

      All of these "49th parallel border" points have been visited -- I can't think of a single time that the visitor met up with anyone from the DEA. :)

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  4. I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    half way through this project this guys will wonder, "why are we doing this again?"

    1. Re:I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they should ask the guy who's visiting each Starbucks in the country before leaving?

  5. The definition of confluence by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    I think a Slashdotting counts as "two or more streams"...

    confluence n.

    1. A flowing together of two or more streams.
    2. The point of juncture of such streams.
    3. The combined stream formed by this juncture.


    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:The definition of confluence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't cross the streams!

  6. What if... by AnthonyPaulO · · Score: 1

    it intersects in the center of the White House?

    1. Re:What if... by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Then sign up for a tour, and go visit.

  7. The highest/lowest/coldest/hottest/.. intersection by otisg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be interesting to see a summary listing spots that are the most extreme in any way.

    --
    Simpy
  8. I dunno by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't mean to be overly-critical of this, but while I think this is a very interesting idea for a project, but I'm not sure the result is half as interesting as the idea. I think it would be a more interesting read if it were just one person or a small group of people visting all of these intersections.

    Actually, that's a lot to read, I think somebody should do the same type of thing, but with intersections of lines that are multiples of ten. I mean, you would still get a reasonably complete view of the world and all of the places in it.

    Another idea to make the product of this more interesting would be 360 degree panorama shots at each intersection. Again, this would be somehting more easily accomplished if it were just one person or a small group of people doing this.

    1. Re:I dunno by glwtta · · Score: 1
      I think somebody should do the same type of thing, but with intersections of lines that are multiples of ten. I mean, you would still get a reasonably complete view of the world and all of the places in it.

      They'll get much better coverage initially this way. More points to visit == more people sending in images. Sure it will take a lot longer for the project to be "complete," but with that many more points scattered around, the chances of someone who lives close by picking up a camera and going there are that much higher.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:I dunno by Toresica · · Score: 1

      "I think somebody should do the same type of thing, but with intersections of lines that are multiples of ten."
      Not all of the sites have been visited, though. At some latitudes there are probably about that ratio of sites that have been visited.

    3. Re:I dunno by Deagol · · Score: 1
      After getting my GPS in 1998, I was thinking of all kinds of things to try. I've done the geocaching thing (placed one, found a few), as well as a couple of confluences.

      When my kids are older (or gone) and I'm not working full-time, I'd like to visit the following points in all 48 mainland US states: point of highest elevation, point of lowest elevation, and point of geographical center. Certainly these are not original ideas, but the points are well documented and out there on the 'net.

      Ples... I'd do it all without using the interstate highways -- back roads are much more fun. :) I figure 6 months (perhaps March to September) would do the trick.

      Maybe there are other dumb statistical points of interest about the states which may be available? Point of population "center", point of economic "center". Odd stuff like that. I wonder if these kinds of stats are out there?

      But, the confluence project is pretty cool in its own right. What really freaks me out, though, is that most confluences (at least random ones I've plugged into M$ Streets) can be be approched by car except for maybe the last mile or two. Even out here in the West (I'm in Utah), where the road density if much less than the East or the coasts. It really makes you pause to consider just how much we've marked this land of ours.

  9. Re:Too Many Bored People by new+account+for+mod · · Score: 1, Informative

    And how does this qualify as newsworthy on Slashdot?

    News for NERDS!!!

  10. Re:Longitude... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Speaking of organized samplings... if these guys weren't total nerds, they could have a girlfriend at each confluence! Now *that's* a lot of longitude!

    Assuming the girls know about the extra relationships, and are ok with it, that's a lot of latitude!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. Puerto Rico by niktheslick · · Score: 1

    Random spam

    my bro and I got puerto rico... it was a good time.. Anmyone want'n to spend some quality time with a brother or father this is a great project.

  12. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Can we get celebrities to do the visiting?

    Methinks the shark /. jumped this morning just did its own jumping...

  13. Re:Too Many Bored People by dbc · · Score: 1

    I'd have more respect if they visited every White Castle

    OK, just don't make me eat there. eeuww.

  14. Neat use for your GPS by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    I might try this sometime- but I think 45N 121W is right smack dab in the middle of the Warm Springs Reservation....

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Neat use for your GPS by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Never mind- it's been visited, along with every other non-ocean Oregon confluence.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Neat use for your GPS by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I happen to have several friends among the Elder Council. They don't look too kindly on people hiking up the sacred hills. No, they won't shoot you with bows and arrows- but you might spend a night in tribal lockup before being exiled back to Oregon.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  15. Re:Too Many Bored People by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, if you live in the area and are looking for some place to hike, a Confluence is as good a goal as many other hiking locations.

    And it'll be off the beaten path.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  16. Oh perfect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Random pictures at arbitrary points on the planet.

    Sounds just like every other photo blog.

  17. I found them all! by Burdell · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but there are still 12,889 to be found.
    I found every single one of them. They're all right here on my globe.

    1. Re:I found them all! by Epistax · · Score: 1

      If superman visited each one of them, would time go backwards?

  18. Re:Too Many Bored People by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd have more respect if they visited every White Castle or all of the Ikea stores.

    Here's something close: Project Denny's

  19. [Will the] guys will wonder, "why are we doing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    [Will the] guys will wonder, "why are we doing this again?"

    Yep. Probably around 9 or 10 AM tomorrow when they sober up....

  20. Hmm... by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be curious about how many of these intersections lie inside of buildings or other private property. Has anyone found an intersection yet that could be unvisitable? You know, something like an intersection in the middle of a military complex or something?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Chuq · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.confluence.org/confluence.php?lat=-41&l on=147

      "We got within 1.5 km of this confluence before being asked to leave by the Army. As it turns out, the confluence is in the middle of a live firing range and it is not safe or legal to visit it without assistance from the Army."

      --
      - Chuq
    2. Re:Hmm... by Noren · · Score: 1
      Here's a map of the continental US The red squares(and triangles) represent successful visits, white represent documented unsuccessful attempts, and grey is the default for no documented attempts.

      As you can see, almost all of the area has been covered, in fact most of the points which haven't are in ocean or the Great Lakes (which was once not considered targets, then the parameters were redefined to be within sight of land.)

      I think there are five spots on land which have not been visited- out of approximately a thousand. Of these:

      One has been visited, but is listed as incomplete, possibly because the visit may not have been done legally;
      One is in an Indian reservation which now has permission granted for visit planned within a month
      One is in a large private ranch for which permission to go has not been granted and
      and Two are on federal government land used for nuclear-related purposes.

      Somewhat higher of a proportion of government land than I'd've expected, and no confluence which hasn't been visited because of terrain, which was quite surprising to me.

      This has gone on long enough that some places which are legally difficult to get to have been visited, such as this one on a federally protected watershed which was visited by a local water quality official who'd read about the site.

      Surprisingly few confluences are actually in cites. My personal favorite confluence is this one, which is in the middle of Washington State but happens to be in the middle of the Columbia River, more than 100m from either shore! (100m is the maximum distance for a visit to be considered successful.) The first attempt failed for lack of a boat, in the middle of a very dry region. I've most likely visited that confluence unknowingly- as a teenager I used to go waterskiing in that area.

  21. 37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Informative
    37N 116W

    Good luck, you'll need it!

    1. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by evule · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by Frostalicious · · Score: 1

      37N 116W Good luck, you'll need it!

      No problem. Of course I will shortly afterwards be visiting 40 48'N, 73 53'W

    3. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by rgmoore · · Score: 2, Informative

      Believe it or not, they do have an "incomplete" visit to the site here. The only reason that it's incomplete is that the visitor didn't take the requisite 6 photographs. He did include a picture of his GPS at that location, though. Another person has asked for permission to visit, which seems like a reasonable approach to the problem.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    4. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by strabo · · Score: 3, Informative
      37N 116W

      Good luck, you'll need it!

      Heh - looks like someone has already taken that dare.


      06-Jan-2004 -- Up front, I must admit that I did not visit this confluence personally. However, the friend of a friend of a ... who did visit asked me not to use his name.
    5. Re:37N 116W, I Double Dog Dare Ya! by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      A lot of brave men tried. Unfortunately they were eaten by the giant mutated jackalopes (is that one in the picture?) that are known to reside in the area.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  22. Idea for them by cr0y · · Score: 1

    They should put a mirror of the website at every point they visit to defend against the inevitable /.ing they are going to receive :o)

    --

    ItWasFree.com - Take the mystery
  23. I've heard that before by ElektroHolunder · · Score: 1

    Somehow, Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged comes to mind.

  24. What would be really cool . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    Set up a solar powered WiFi node and weather station with satellite uplink at every confluence!

    Stefan

  25. Hooter's! by sciop101 · · Score: 1

    Picture with waitress(es) at every Hooter's. Receipt for Beer and Hotwings optional.

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  26. Re:Too Many Bored People by typhoonius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, no one has a sense of wonder anymore.

    It sounds to me like a great way to use both the internet's worldwide reach and its ease of publishing to do something extrordinary: enable anyone to see any part of this big blue ball of ours. You can read about countries and landmarks in encyclopedias, but you really can't get any idea of just how gigantic and diverse our world is without a project like this.

  27. Re:Too Many Bored People by Tongo · · Score: 1

    hehe omg, "breakfast of boners and toast".

    I have to remember that one....

  28. Re:Too Many Bored People by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And how does this qualify as newsworthy on Slashdot?

    News for nerds. Stuff that matters.

    Finding Confluences is something that normally requires an understanding of maps, GPSs, or at least a desire to learn something about finding their location.

    Sounds geeky to me. Since you are so bored of learning about confluences maybe you should start reading more Slashdot.

  29. Excessively Redundant? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hasn't another project already acheived this and begun interpolation?

    And on top of that, we already have another project to visit all those locations, which have have been marked with a retail location by the previous project.

    So while some redundancy may be a good thing, this sounds like overkill.

    1. Re:Excessively Redundant? by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's ok, by the end of the decade there'll probably be a Starbucks at every degree confluence, so both projects can neatly overlap.

      --
      >;k
    2. Re:Excessively Redundant? by jaxle · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to look at a Starbucks? I think this project is far more interesting as you can look at pictures from all over the world that you normally would not see.

  30. Send me the money instead by penginkun · · Score: 1

    Hey, if you've got all this money burning a hole in your wallet, why not send some to me? I promise to use at least some of it to pay bills and thus get out of debt.

  31. Lost in flight by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I once worked with a fellow who wrote software for ICBM's and he commented that one of the worst places to be in the event of a nuclear exchange was at Lat 0, Long 0 because there where several possible failure modes where the missiles would try to find their way here

    1. Re:Lost in flight by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      At least it's a fair way offshore.

    2. Re:Lost in flight by Ian.Waring · · Score: 1

      If my memory serves me right (having seen where the pointer goes on a map when no GPS signal is arriving in a navigation unit), co-ordinates (0,0) is in the sea south of Nigeria.

    3. Re:Lost in flight by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "I once worked with a fellow who wrote software for ICBM's and he commented that one of the worst places to be in the event of a nuclear exchange was at Lat 0, Long 0 because there where several possible failure modes where the missiles would try to find their way here"

      As anyone who's forgotten to convert radians to degrees knows, the area within 3deg of (0,0) can be quite busy in some flight simulations...

    4. Re:Lost in flight by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      any idea what this is? Is that a buoy?

  32. Re:Too Many Bored People by switcha · · Score: 1
    There's no fun in visiting white castles or ikea stores, since common people can do that as well.

    And 'common' people can't visit lat/long intersections?

    The real difference is that WC or IKEA visits have a purpose, while visiting a coordinate in West Bumfuck, Indiana yields..well..not a whole hell of a lot. *camera click* Yay.

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  33. Land use & terrain documentation by wiggling · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is so wickedly cool! says the guy who knows the latitude and longitude of his home. :) I spend plane trips staring out the window studying the changing patterns of terrain and land use. Folks who snooze while passing over "fly-over land" can see what the rest of the country^Wworld look like and how it differs from place to place. It would be really interesting to come back in 100 years, do the same thing, and compare the pictures.

    People who cannot appreciate something like this cannot be real nerds!

    1. Re:Land use & terrain documentation by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      Right on - glad to hear I'm not the only one. I recently spent the entire 4.5 hours flying Vancouver-Toronto just staring at the terrain. Fascinating stuff - I'm sure I saw part of an astroblem on the praries, just a hint of an arc heading up to the north but contiguous over many miles. I fly a lot these days, but I don't think I'll ever get tired of watching the earth below.

  34. Humanity has no hope.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Informative

    .... with so many uber parochials as yourself.

    You can take your camera to Iran and Tibet, no problems.

    Even to North Korea, if you apply for the right permisions and follow the instructions of your guard.

    Turkmenistan is tough but not impossible.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  35. Arrrrr...Ye be leavin out good places by tpconcannon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a member of the Loyal Order of Shellbacks, I can attest that I and the crew of the good ship T.S. Enterprise crossed the equator at 85 degrees West , and 0 degrees North/South. There are many a mariner whom have completed this right of passage across the seven seas, none of whom will forget, either.

    --
    I found the "Any" key.
    1. Re:Arrrrr...Ye be leavin out good places by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      I'll never forget May 7, 1989, the day I was initiated by his Majesty Neptunus Rex, Ruler of the Raging Main, into the Solemn Mysteries of the Ancient Order of the Deep.

      But what you be doin', spilling the beans to these Polywog scum? His Majesty, Davy Jones, and the Royal Baby would have to put in overtime if they were slashdotted. There's not enough room on the forecastle for the lot of 'em and it would take years to get them all through the rebirthing chamber.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  36. Re:Too Many Bored People by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Normal people barely know that GPS exists, let alone how to turn off the map and read latitude and longitude- so how would they get there?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  37. Re:'Scuse me by strider44 · · Score: 1

    read it - it said INTEGER intersection in the article.

    You could at least take the time to copy and paste your quotes.

  38. Re:'Scuse me by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
    Isn't there an infinite number of these?
    Does it really matter if there is an infinite number?

    If you read the article, you would notice that they are only talking about integer degree intersections, not every single possible point on the Earth. Even if they did refer to every single one of those infinite points, it wouldn't make it impossible as humans make contact with a large number of such points at any given time (and as a result, it would just be gradually painting areas as visited.)

    (BTW, who modded Insightful? It definatly wasn't.)
  39. which lattitude/longitude? by PTBarnum · · Score: 1, Informative

    I looked at the site, and didn't see any indication of which version of lattitude/longitude they want people to use. There are several different models which can give slightly different coordinates for the same physical point (e.g. NAD 27, NAD 83, WGS 84).

    Admittedly, the confluences under each grid are almost always within 100 meters of each other, which is what the project organizers consider acceptable accuracy, but it is still suprising that they don't make it explicit.

    1. Re:which lattitude/longitude? by PTBarnum · · Score: 1

      Never mind, they say it's WGS84 in the very first paragraph of the information page. I'm just blind.

  40. It's the journey, stoopid! by wiggling · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In many cases, it's the journey, not the destination. Think of how much of this great globe they've seen while doing this, and how much of it far, far off the beaten path. Boy, I envy them!

    I took two days off work this week to travel from 37.6284 -92.3288 to 37.7503 -923973, spending the night at 37.6950 -92.3067. It was great!

    1. Re:It's the journey, stoopid! by plover · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the link. Topozone is a pretty nifty tool, but their topo maps are at least 20 years out of date for my quad.

      Oh, there we go. I found the details of the map. It's dated 1967. Yowch. A lot can change in 37 years.

      Strange, but the details on the map indicate it was produced in the early 1980's, even though the info says 1967. I guess I won't be subscribing to their pro service any time soon.

      --
      John
    2. Re:It's the journey, stoopid! by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      Topography doesn't change very much, and if your talking someplace like Nebraska, I can pretty much draw you a topo map without any work at all, A blank sheet of paper probably has all the info for most of Nebraska.

  41. Dude, try to learn a ltitle about the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    Excuse me?

    I'll agree with North Korea. But Exactly what is th eproblem with Tibet? A lot of tourists are travelling there, there is no problems going there. How do you think all those souvernir salesmen in Lhasa make their living?

    And Iran is, even though your president called it part of some fictious axes of evil, a very open and friendly place. In fact, it's probably the most "advanced" society in the middle east.

    Stop watching Fox News and switch to Discovery or something instead. Or even better, try to travel outside your continent.

    1. Re:Dude, try to learn a ltitle about the world by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      Yeah. You can find 2 visited, 2 incompleted spot over Xizang (Tibet).... The problem is a lot of places are not really accessible geologically. Even helicopter have difficulty to reach....

  42. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by Jardine · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even in places where you CAN go (politcally, legally) you still can't (logistically) like the whole north half of friggin Canada or Siberia.

    You do know that Canada isn't bone-chilling cold year round, right? People live in the Yukon, the Northwest Territories, and Nunavut. People hunt there, people mine there. There are few places that would be nearly impossible to get to.

  43. What is this, High School? by huskerdoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is it that when someone comes up with an idea/goal, the Slashdot crowd has to belittle the idea as insignificant? This reminds me of high school when anyone who acted a bit different was made fun of because they didn't go along with the status quo. Yawn.

    People, you are hackers/nerds! You are supposed to encourage each other to set goals and follow through on them.

    Yes, I am biased. I visited five confluences when I was in Australia. Because I had to change my travel plans for the first confulence visit, I ended up meeting a girl which I dated for a year.

    Life is short, go do something with your lives, don't tear down anyone who chooses to follow through on an idea, rather than just sit around and watch reruns of Friends.

    1. Re:What is this, High School? by jnicholson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Perhaps there is an increasing number of people who are here to mock the nerds, rather than revel in their own nerdness.

      This project is clearly an entirely appropriate use of resources, as is the idea of having a space program, if you're a genuine nerd.

      (BTW, unless she was a sheep, you probably should have said "whom I dated", not "which I dated". Was she a sheep?)

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
    2. Re:What is this, High School? by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, we also happen to be rather elitist.

    3. Re:What is this, High School? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I ended up meeting a girl which I dated for a year

      You should have tried a living girl. I hear they're better.

    4. Re:What is this, High School? by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Life is short, go do something with your lives, don't tear down anyone who chooses to follow through on an idea, rather than just sit around and watch reruns of Friends.

      Unless your goal is to watch every rerun of Friends. In that case, you can set up a website describing your experiences of watching Friends during all the different times it is shown. Then you can get Slashdotted.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    5. Re:What is this, High School? by starm_ · · Score: 1

      Exactly, most of what people do is pointless anyways when you look at it from the right angle. Sports is a good example. Most sports involve putting some randomly defined object in some randomly defined locations, removing it, then, trying to do it all over again. Sounds pointless doesn't it?

    6. Re:What is this, High School? by danila · · Score: 2, Informative

      May be he wasn't a native English speaker. Why is it necessary to mock him for poor grammar (or are you all just trying to prove his point?)? May be they speak like that in Australia, because you know, English is different. In Britain they would say "who I dated", may be in Australia "which" is a correct form.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    7. Re:What is this, High School? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      What could be really cool to do with this would be to make a futuristic globe, touch a spot on the globe, and it will show downloaded (to keep upto date and not need a hard drive) images (The interface would take some work, but what parent wouldn't get there kid one of these if they had broadband and wireless internet at home. This could be great for geography classes as well.

    8. Re:What is this, High School? by danila · · Score: 1

      Whom has been dying an agonizing death for decades...
      http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~brians/errors/who.html

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    9. Re:What is this, High School? by illtud · · Score: 1
      Whom has been dying an agonizing death for decades...

      ...regardless of which, it's still the correct UK English.

  44. I tried to do this once... by Ariane+6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a confluence about 20 miles southeast of my house. One night I convinced a friend of mine to help me go look for it, so we broke out the GPS and hit the road. After whacking our way through some overgrown forest, the place turned out to be in the middle of some farmer's paddock - I got to within ninteen feet, then cut and ran when an enormous black horse woke up and started stamping its feet at me.

    My friend thought I was completely insane, but I know better :)

    1. Re:I tried to do this once... by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1

      Oh - looks like someone else has done it, too!

      http://www.confluence.org/confluence.php?lat=40& lo n=-77

  45. 49 miles? by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Funny
    There is a confluence within 49 miles (79 km) of you if you're on the surface of Earth.
    I'm posting from Mars, you insensitive clod!

    The worst part is that it's almost impossible to get a first post from here...

    1. Re:49 miles? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "I'm posting from Mars, you insensitive clod!"

      Not only are the confluences nearer together where you are, but they're all on land, and nobody has visited any of them yet. I don't know if there's a section in DCP for other planets though...

    2. Re:49 miles? by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Not yet, though somehow I'd expect the Earth's moon to get confluence visits before Mars. :)

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  46. English Only? by kbogert · · Score: 1

    It is interesting that a site about going to all corners of the Earth trying to create an "Organized Sampling of the World" is available only in English.

    1. Re:English Only? by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Yes, we'd love to have the interface available in most major languages, but since we rely 100% on volunteer labor, and the volunteers are busy just keeping the place running, it hasn't gotten done. Would you like to volunteer? :)

      Of course, visit contents can be (and are) posted in pretty much any language you wish, though we also post an English translation, since that's the lingua franca of the Internet. If you wander around the site, you can find posts in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, German, French, etc...

      Several online sites also do dynamic webpage translation, though the results are often hilarious. :)

      Eric Lincoln (who only speaks English and Russian)
      Degree Confluence Project

  47. Can I get a grant for this? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

    It sounds like a great way to tour the world on somebody else's nickel. Maybe I can bring back a tacky souvenier (or at least a sample of the water) from each location.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  48. Been there, done that, great stuff! by RabidMonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've done one confluence (http://www.confluence.org/confluence.php?lat=46&l on=-79) in Ontario now, and attempted a few more. My brother-in-law and I like them because they give us somewhere to go and a reason to go there.

    In fact, I spent a week at the beginning of July trying to get some in Northern Ontario, but gave up. I never realized how swampy and densely tree'd the north is. It was really great to get out and see part of my country, as well as giving us a great appreciation for the people who first settled up there and the hardships they faced.

    I highly reccomend everyone pick a confluence and go for it, even if it's done. It's a great excuse to get out and see your country and meet people. All you need is a GPS and some boots. For even more fun, pick somewhere where you get to canoe or kayak, or ski or mountain bike. It's great exercise and can mesh nicely with Geocaching.

    Go, get some, and stop being so negative people ... people are saying it's a waste of time, that this isn't a good project. Whos to say that programming whatever application you're working on isn't the same waste because who cares, theres already 15 other mail clients out there, or 27 other people who have already ported X to Y system .. thats not the point. Stop being so narrow minded.

    --
    We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
  49. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by glwtta · · Score: 4, Interesting
    WTF? Inisghtful how?

    You do realize that there are, in fact, people already living in all those countries? And it's not all that strange to imagine that they might have cameras and an internet connection.

    Have you stopped to think that maybe the point of the project isn't to collect every last damn picture of frozen tundra, but rather to expand their (already absolutely amazing) collection of places that are accessible?

    The cynism boggles the mind - they've collected tens of thousnds of images from something like 150 countries, along with precise location and date information; giving you an instant overview of what THE ENTIRE FREAKING GLOBE looks like, and all you can come up with is "they won't be able to get all of Canada"?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  50. Re:Too Many Bored People by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The real difference is that WC or IKEA visits have a purpose, while visiting a coordinate in West Bumfuck, Indiana yields..well..not a whole hell of a lot. *camera click* Yay.

    It shows that, despite all the sprawl and overpopulation of the 20th century, most of the Earth is still not paved over with freeways, slums, or hamburger stands. Which is nice to know.

    --
    >;k
  51. Re:'Scuse me by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    Isn't there an infinite number of these?

    Not necessarily. Spacetime may be quantized at the Planck scale.

  52. OK, Math/Geo geeks... by sootman · · Score: 1

    How far apart are 1deg longitudianal lines at the equator? How far apart, say, 10 or 20 degrees south of the north pole?

    Also, I forget--do lines of latitude get closer together as you go closer to the poles, or are they all X miles apart?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Thanks. No, I wasn't trolling, just too lazy to search. Anyone else want to answer... in miles? Hell, I'll even accept answers in km.

      OK, I'll do the first... um, let's see, about 24,000 miles around at the equator, so (24,000/360)=~67 miles apart.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    2. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by Toresica · · Score: 1

      "Thanks. No, I wasn't trolling, just too lazy to search. Anyone else want to answer... in miles? Hell, I'll even accept answers in km"
      They all meet at the poles. So the answer would be 0, I believe, no matter what units you use. (Although I prefer km).

    3. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by kelk1 · · Score: 2, Informative
      do lines of latitude get closer together as you go closer to the poles..?
      Nope, still one degree.

      Which also defines 60 nautical miles. A nautical mile (a minute of latitude) is usually accepted to be constant at 1852 metres (or meters). But due to the flattening at the poles, I am pretty sure this is not true. So the answer is yes, they get closer from the equator to the pole.

      Doing the maths on a modern datum, I found 1854 m at the equator and 1850m at the poles.

      Anyone concur?

    4. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      How far apart are 1deg longitudianal lines at the equator? How far apart, say, 10 or 20 degrees south of the north pole?

      Assuming the Earth is a perfect sphere (which it isn't), longitudinal lines are 60*cos(latitude) nautical miles apart along latitudinal lines, or 60 * arccos(sin^2(latitude) + cos(1 degree)*cos^2(latitude)) (in degrees) nautical miles apart along a great circle. 60 nautical miles is approximately 69 miles or 111 km.

      Also, I forget--do lines of latitude get closer together as you go closer to the poles, or are they all X miles apart?

      They are all 60 nautical miles apart, or about 69 miles/111 km.

    5. Re:OK, Math/Geo geeks... by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need fancy math to answer the first question. There are 360 1-degree lines, therefore the distance between the lines at the equator is 1/360th of the circumference of the earth, i.e., 24900/360 = 69.16 miles.

  53. Right Technology? by d474 · · Score: 1

    The US government released rights recently to allow for satellite imaging of the earth down to 1/2 meter resolution. At that resolution, they'll be able to take photos of every (legal) spot on earth at a resolution that will show objects up to the size of medium shrubs and even animals. Small buildings, and cars will be recognizable on these photos. It's more comprehensive, more up-to-date than this time-consuming and incomplete method of physically getting people to all 12000+ locations. Although it isn't "the same" as having a person take a few photos of the area, it gives you a very good idea of what the terrain is like, anywhere, not just at confluence.

    Although this confluence project seems pretty cool, their execution of it doesn't seem very complete in the photo category. They go through all the trouble of getting to each location and just snap a couple pictures? They need a standard requirement of photos at each location in the same order so people can compare/contrast various locations. At least 8 photos taken to really "see" what the area looks like. Standard info about the temperature, time of year, possible changes to the environment at that point that might occur (construction, rivers, erosion...).

    Good idea, none-the-less.

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    1. Re:Right Technology? by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I can't entirely agree with you there. Yes, the resolution is impressive, but looking top-down is just not the same as doing a panorama from the same spot on the ground.

      Myself, if I do any of these, I'm planning on doing a complete panoramic series and photo-stitching them together.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    2. Re:Right Technology? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      The US government released rights recently to allow for satellite imaging of the earth down to 1/2 meter resolution.

      You write this ridiculous sentence so casually. No, the US cannot prevent anyone from launching a satellite and photographing any area of the planet they wish. Perhaps they can shoot down or destroy a satellite which is doing things they don't like, but that's just Might, it isn't Right. The depth of your delusion is sickening. The US does not rule the earth.

    3. Re:Right Technology? by d474 · · Score: 1

      ??? You seem to be arguing with some other post, yet you quoted mine. I don't understand where you get these ideas, because you didn't get them from me. Perhaps you are just frustrated. Well, I hope your day gets better.

      Read the articles my friend, you decide!

      Article 1
      Article 2

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  54. Kids these days by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

    "We've discounted confluences in the oceans and some near the poles"

    Sissies.

    --
    Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
  55. Well, it doesn't by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    The coordinates of the white house are
    38.8967 , -77.0365

    1. Re:Well, it doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks!

      - Osama

    2. Re:Well, it doesn't by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Oh thats right. No way Osama could access http://www.maporama.com/share/ from his cave and type in "1600 Pensylvania Avenue". Damn. George Bush's life may be in danger because of me!

      Hey wait. That probably makes me a patriot!

  56. It seems to be NTS by hawkstone · · Score: 1

    If you wait long enough, the page will appear. It appears to be NTS -- the DOE Nevada Test Site. It is the location of hundreds of nuclear weapons tests through 1992.

  57. Hey, with that kind of spread... by KC7GR · · Score: 1
    ...Just think of all the cool places or things that they may well find, but that were unknown up 'til now!

    --Jimmy Hoffa's tomb!

    --Bill Shatner's lost hairpiece!

    --The Lost City of Sitnalta!

    --The True Location of the Firesign Theater!

    --Osama!

    ...And MANY MORE!!!



    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  58. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by cosmol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It makes me sad to see all these negative comments about confluence.org. I've been watching the site since it was using all static html pages probably about 5 years ago, the exponential rate at which the US was lit up is absolutely amazing. I never expected the project to take off so fast.

  59. Radians by Kludge · · Score: 2, Funny

    This project would be a lot easier if they were working in the more natural units of radians rather than degrees. :)

  60. Re:This idea is all wet! by cicadia · · Score: 1
    Where did you get that number? Sounds like you took the 12,889 figure from the story, and multiplied by .75, as the rough proportion of the earth's surface which is water.

    Too bad that even the /. story mentions that they've already removed the oceanic points before giving you that number. It doesn't mention the 3000+ points which have already been recorded (though the first link in the story does), so there are actually some 16,000 points above sea level, which should represent a pretty wide range of scenery.

    --
    Living better through chemicals
  61. Beaten path?! by dexter+riley · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would hike there, but the path was already beaten, apparently into submission.

  62. Photo mapping by Trevor · · Score: 1

    If you want to build your own photo maps (on confluence points, or not) you could try the web photo map editor I just built: http://transmutable.com/93PhotoStreet/

  63. Nevada Test Site by crisco · · Score: 1

    Heres the only one in Nevada listed as unvisited, although there is a picture and a story...

    --

    Bleh!

  64. discounted confluences? by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

    We've discounted confluences in the oceans and some near the poles, but there are still 12,889 to be found.

    You damn sissy! If you're gonna do a project, why do it half-way?! What a damn bum..

    DOn't let the cold or the middle of the ocean stop ya'. Man has been to both poles. Man has covered the ocean. Why can't you do it now?

  65. Re:Think of the aliens by elincoln · · Score: 1

    Define "they". :)

    The visitors are individuals, acting on their own initiative. You can feel free to be part of "them" if you wish.

    By the way, there is no degree confluence in Area 51, although there is one in the equally controversial Yucca Mountain nuclear storage facility...

    Eric Lincoln
    Degree Confluence Project

  66. /.'ed by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    Hmm... apparently their SQL server got /.'ed. The error message is fairly humorous (Normal text with error message mixed in):

    The project is an organized sampling of the world. There is a confluence within 49 miles (79 km) of you if you're on the surface of Earth. We've discounted confluences in the oceans and some near the poles, but there are still
    Warning: mysql_connect(): Too many connections in /public/private/confluence/liveinc/inc_library.php on line 258
    0 to be found.

    Hehehe... "still...too many connections"

    (Warning: I'm easily ammused.)

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  67. Re:Too Many Bored People by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


    Visiting every White Castle location would probably result in a long, painful death from excessive razor-blade style flatulence... one would have to space it out some.

    Like once a lifetime. *shudders*

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  68. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by Toresica · · Score: 1

    Even in places where you CAN go (politcally, legally) you still can't (logistically) like the whole north half of friggin Canada or Siberia.
    Yep, that would be why everything south of about the 50th parallel in Ontario has been visited, and almost nothing north of there has.
    But people still live there, and eventually they'll get visited. (After all, the Earth'll be around to have it's picture taken for a couple billion more years)

  69. Four compass points, usually by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    People usually take pictures of the four compass points. Close enough, really.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  70. Re:wtf by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    why do they keep posting meaningless or nearly meaningless comments on slashdot considering that this comment was already posted before i really don't need to see it again

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  71. /.d by v1 · · Score: 1

    Server's finally dead. Took awhile too. Impressive.

    Too bad all the ones in my state are already visited. The "aerial visits disqualified" is going to make this more challenging for places that have to be visited by sea.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:/.d by pklong · · Score: 1

      Er sorry, my fault, I tried to download the huge map ;)

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

  72. MOD PARENT UP! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    Good point, AC, maybe you SHOULD get an account after all! ;-)

  73. Re:Too Many Bored People by typobox43 · · Score: 1

    Starbucks is better than White Castle.

  74. South East wrong? by Barumpus · · Score: 1

    no ill feelings towards the South Eastern US (I live in Fl) but some of these must be wrong. If you have ever driven through the southern states, you would agree with me when I say that at least 3 of these MUST be right in the middle of a WalMart or WinnDixie.

    1. Re:South East wrong? by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where in FL you are, but the ones closest to me area all off the coast, and somebody's already posted them. I have yet to see a floating Wal*Mart.

    2. Re:South East wrong? by mlk · · Score: 1

      But floating starbucks are 10 a penny.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:South East wrong? by Barumpus · · Score: 1

      I live in the NorthEast corner outside of Jacksonville. And by the way the WalMarts are popping up around here, I would say another few months and there will be one located in the Atlantic for cruise ships, fisherman, and refugees.

  75. Hey, man, I'm surprized noone has said this so far by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    ... but, did you take pictures OF THE GIRL??? ;-)
    On one of the confluences? Hmm, can you post them on the site? ;-)

    Yes, it is getting silly how all /. start complaining about pointless misuse of "effort and resources". Depressing. I would love to visit my own, but I bet all So. Cali. points are taken (back to checking if they are).

    Paul B.

  76. And lots of Vodka!!! by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    Take it from a Russian who drank (maybe a bit too much of) it with people who actually lived in similar parts! ;-) (they have some coal reserves nearby)

    Paul B.

  77. Work Smarter Not Harder by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you get down to it, angle measure in integers refers to radians. At 2 * pi radians all the way around the earth, there aren't *that* many intersections of integers.

    But do people living at an intersection even know that. It doesn't look like anyone makes a point of it.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  78. I've made contributions... by marioberges · · Score: 1

    I took pictures of 19N69W.

    I think it's also a chance for those of us who really don't get out as much and visit new places near home.

    What's the big deal, isn't the world full of other less meaningful projects? (http://www.uglypeople.com/, for example).

    http://www.confluence.org/confluence.php?lat=19&lo n=-69

  79. Re:Simply not doable - politically or logistically by Toresica · · Score: 1

    You do know that Canada isn't bone-chilling cold year round, right? People live in the Yukon, the Northwest Territories, and Nunavut. People hunt there, people mine there.

    Yes, but not very many people. And last I heard, it was pretty hard to get decent Internet access. (Granted, I'm from much further south in Canada, so things may have progressed since I last heard.)

    It is, however, still possible, and I can wait until the slashdot effect wears of and I can see how many of the places in Nunavut have been visited. :)

  80. Panoramas by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many contributors do this already. A few times they'll just submit all the individual images, and one of the coordinators will assemble them into a panorama.

    I've posted panos from most of the confluences I've personally visited: http://www.confluence.org/visitor.php?id=157

    Terje Mathisen
    Scandinavian Coordinator The Degree Confluence Project

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
  81. More photography project ideas by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

    - Take pictures of the sky above each point, so, you know, we can see what that looks like too.
    - Take pictures of every different snowflake on Earth.
    - Take a picture of every four-leaf clover on Earth.
    - Take pictures of the lint in my navel, in 1 degree intervals.

  82. Re:38N 122W got Slashdotted by billstewart · · Score: 1

    That and 37n122w are the closest to Silicon Valley.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  83. Next Project by Jump · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your next project will be to shake hands of everybody in the world in alphabetic order. Start with your own town as a pilot study.

    1. Re:Next Project by pklong · · Score: 1

      No, your next project will be to personally insult every person in the universe

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

  84. Funny you should mention this... by heldlik · · Score: 1

    Because I've been working on a similar project, doing every halfway confluence point, like 0.5N 0.5W and so on.

    Hope there's noone doing the quarters as well.

  85. Re:Too Many Bored People by Slur · · Score: 1

    But look again. Even though there aren't many signs of Human settlement you can see the influence of Humans in most of the images in the temperate zones. Particularly in the number of open agricultural fields.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  86. ...still 12,889 to be found. by nonregistered · · Score: 1

    There's an *odd* number of conflatulances?

  87. they need a dictionary by Maynard.Riley · · Score: 1

    Intersections are NOT confluences when each line continues on without merging, especially when they are square/normal to each other.

    But they probably understood that when they started, and maybe just figured that fabricating facts and distorting truth was an acceptable marketing practice for anybody if anybody.

    That said, a big globe to which are glued photos from those locations would be interesting, ... maybe, ... outside of the oceans and poles and forests and deserts, ... or not.

    1. Re:they need a dictionary by elincoln · · Score: 2, Informative

      "a coming or flowing together, meeting, or gathering at one point" -- www.m-w.com (Merriam-Webster)

      Nowhere does this definition appear to preclude the things which 'flow together', 'meet' or 'gather' from continuing separately. Nor is the square/normal nature of the meeting excluded by this definition.

      Out of curiosity, what dictionary did you consult?

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  88. Good for nerds by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    > would be a nice way of seeing what the world is like.

    Especially for those of us who telecommute and only leave home to buy food once a week. We'll finally know that there really is a world out there instead of asking "World? What world?"

  89. Military Base Confluence by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    I saw one like this somewhere in California. The closest they could get was to a road along the fenced area of the base, within several hundred meters of the confluence.

    They ended up taking pictures in the direction of the confluence and posted comments saying it was X hundred meters behind the fence.

  90. Private Property Confluence by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    There's a confluence in Germany that's in some farmer's back yard. The people taking the pictures explained what they were doing, and the farmer was totally cool with it. He had no idea there was such a spot near him. The people taking the pictures said he seemed to think that they were a bit eccentric, but amusing in a way.

    1. Re:Private Property Confluence by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      There's a confluence in Germany that's in some farmer's back yard. The people taking the pictures explained what they were doing, and the farmer was totally cool with it. He had no idea there was such a spot near him. The people taking the pictures said he seemed to think that they were a bit eccentric, but amusing in a way.

      Put yourself in his place, though. Usually the first visitor is mildly interesting, if not amusing. The 1000th visitor is curtly notified to bugger off.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Private Property Confluence by elincoln · · Score: 1

      The confluence with the most visits is in a golf course in California, USA. It has been visited 15 times in 5 years. At this rate, 1000 visits would take about 333 years. The average visited confluence has been visited about 1.3 times.

      Eric Lincoln
      Degree Confluence Project

  91. Strange Confluences by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    I noticed that there are a lot of visited confluences in the middle of the desert in Saudi Arabia. It turns out they are all taken by a soldier in the U.S. army station there, who goes on camping expeditions with his buddies in the desert.

    There's also some pretty remote ones in Siberia taken by a Russian guy, who I think works for some oil or gas company.

    It's interesting to read the comments about how someone got to these remote spots.

  92. Re:Hey, man, I'm surprized noone has said this so by huskerdoo · · Score: 1

    ah yes, I meant "whom", not "which", my fault.

    These are the five confluences I visited in Australia when I was biking around the continent. You'll have to look at the lunky.com site to find the girl pictures..

  93. Re:Once again... by elincoln · · Score: 1

    Thus far, posts have been made in 153 countries. These posts include posts in the Andes, the Sahara, Mongolia, Antarctica, and many, many other remote and interesting places...

    The "three or four other countries" presumably includes the 23 countries where every single degree confluence has been visited. The largest of these is Sweden, where all 84 degree confluences have been visited... Probably some of those qualify as hard and costly to visit...

    Eric Lincoln
    Degree Confluence Project

  94. 60 N or 60 S by SkiifGeek · · Score: 1

    Here is my contribution, all the confluences between 60 and 90 N and 60 and 90 S.

    .

    .

    Whew! That was a lot of effort. Damn dust spec on the lens.

    1. Re: 60 N or 60 S by elincoln · · Score: 1

      Odd, of the 7 completed visits from 60S to 90S, none look like your picture, and of the 295 completed visits from 60N to 90N, none look like your picture. :)

  95. Re:[Will the] guys will wonder, "why are we doing. by elincoln · · Score: 1

    The project is over 8 years old -- it may be a bit late to "wake up the next morning and sober up"...

    And yes, this means that the Degree Confluence Project (February 1996) is older than Slashdot (September 1997)... :)

    Eric Lincoln
    Degree Confluence Project

  96. At least 2 should be visible from each picture. by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 1

    Here in Alabamastan (likely the rest of the South East), you'd think that each picture should contain 2-3 of any of the following: On Land: Walmart Winn-Dixie Drunk Redneck Deer Hunter (all seasons) House Trailers as descibed by Jeff Foxworthy Farm Animals Empty Beer Cans Interstate or Highway: Farm Animals Drunk Redneck More Potholes than road Speed Trap On Water: Bass boat Inner-tube rider with beer Floating Beer Cans Both: Confederate Flag Some Moron with walking around a field with his Battery operated alarm clock saying: "Hey, I'm at 12 and 00!

    If you're from the South East and the above offended you, then lighten up.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  97. Natural Longitude Zero? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Western European capitals and observatories have established what we conventionally use as longitudinal merdians.

    But I have to wonder if there aren't any natural meridians that would be less politically or culturally oriended.

    For example, the peak of Everest/Chomolungma, the center of mass of the land masses, or even an extra-terrestrial marker in star constellations at a specific time?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."