Slashdot Mirror


Hydra vs. Shredder

azaris writes "The powerful computer chess engine Hydra, running on a sixteen-way Linux cluster, is taking on the many times world champion engine Shredder in a match between the two chess super computers in Abu Dhabi, according to ChessBase.com. So far, Hydra is leading by two clear victories." S!: ChessBase also points to the announcement of a "64,000 square meter International Chess City" in Dubai, planned to cost US $2.6 billion, which "will feature 32 buildings designed to mirror the image of a traditional black and white game board."

167 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. Wow! by cytoman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder which will be the most costly squares... the "King" squares or the "Queen" squares :-D. The whole rows of "Pawn" squares will be selling cheap.

  2. Wow. by nuclear305 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a US $2.6 billion project that is expected to play host to (hold on to your hats) 60 million amateur and professional chess followers annually.

    That's a lot of chess players, considering some of the best known tourist attractions don't even get those kind of numbers annually. Do we even have that many chess players worldwide? :)

    1. Re:Wow. by cytoman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It doesn't have to be 60 million different chess players. Just like tourists are counted again if they return, the numbers don't mean they are unique. redundancy rules... like when McDonalds says "billions served".

    2. Re:Wow. by Fjornir · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...the numbers don't mean they are unique. redundancy rules... like when McDonalds says "billions served".

      McDonald's is counting _burgers_ not people. They had better be unique.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    3. Re:Wow. by FlutterVertigo(gmail · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There is always Kasparov to take another crack at it. If someone knew before some of his other matches he was going to try & "out-think"[1] the machines they could have warned him off of this line of thinking and he would have done better.


      [1]researching "weaknesses" machines supposedly had in specific stages of the game then attempt to exploit them.

    4. Re:Wow. by TheAdventurer · · Score: 1

      Isn't that like less than 1% of India's population? ;)

    5. Re:Wow. by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 1

      Their population is ~1 billion, so 60 million is ~6%.

    6. Re:Wow. by FlutterVertigo(gmail · · Score: 1

      There are two ways to recyle those hamburgers. It would simplify how many they had to fix.

    7. Re:Wow. by soimless · · Score: 1

      i think you may be able to cound IBM's big blue as a chess player. hell big blue can kick both Hydra and Shredder's asses robotic arm down.

    8. Re:Wow. by k8to · · Score: 1

      A modern deep blue with a modern evaluation function could, but it's quite questionable that the flawed but powerful deep blue could trounce the sigificantly advanced state of chess software that we have today, running on a significantly powerful cluster of off-the-shelf machines. Certainly years ago the inferior (to shredder) Fritz won a match against a single deep blue node (with a large number of position evaluator chips). This was an example of superior programming winning against vastly more poweful silicon, and the two systems were concurrent.

      --
      -josh
    9. Re:Wow. by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 1

      Were you in uprorious laughter from my post's parent before you read mine, and then you suddenly lost its humour? If not, you have no reason to be upset. I wasn't trying to be a know-it-all, nor was I refuting his post. I was making a relavent clarification. I think it's pretty hypocritical to complain about me spoiling the fun by being pedantic by telling me how I was supposed to respond. Feel free to reply citing my spelling or grammatical errors; I don't care. Get it?

    10. Re:Wow. by jasonjacks0n · · Score: 1
      McDonald's is counting _burgers_ not people. They had better be unique.
      But at McDonald's, it can occasionally be difficult to determine whether or not your food is .. uh, refurbished. :-\
      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  3. Looking forward to it by r.jimenezz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is going to be interesting. While Shredder is a software engine running on standard hardware, I recall reading in Chessbase sometime that Hydra is an FPG-based engine. So in a sense it is a return to the days of Deep Blue and it should be interesting to see how well it fares against the current crop of "standard" engines.

    --
    The revolution will not be televised.
    1. Re:Looking forward to it by nametaken · · Score: 1

      From the article...
      "The many-times world champion Shredder will take on Hydra, a Deep Blue style hardware program which was originally developed by ChessBase and is now being maintained by the Pal Group of Companies in Abu Dhabi."

      Is this what you meant? :)

    2. Re:Looking forward to it by r.jimenezz · · Score: 1
      Actually I was thinking of this :) Brutus is the predecessor of Hydra and is based on FPGAs. A card is inserted on a normal PC, but it is definitely custom-built chess hardware.

      Incidentally, I just learned that Hydra took a 2:0 lead over Shredder! http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=185 4

      --
      The revolution will not be televised.
  4. 64,000 square meter International Chess City... by Illissius · · Score: 1, Troll

    Codename: Deep Thought.

    --
    Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
  5. New York was considering a gaming plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...where they converted part of the island into a GTA level, but 9/11 came along and John Carpenter threatened to sue. I guess there's always Broadway.

  6. IBM computer? by cytoman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whatever happened to that IBM computer which competed against and defeated Gary Kasparov? And the other computers that IBM built specifically for playing chess?

    1. Re:IBM computer? by damiam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IBM dismantled it afterwards, possibly to avoid challenges from other GMs. Deep Blue was built specifically to play Kasparov; it would have performed much worse against Kramnik, Anand, or any other top-level player.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:IBM computer? by djkidroo · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're still working on improving it. http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblue/meet/html/d.3 .html

    3. Re:IBM computer? by ctid · · Score: 1

      No they are not still working on it. The page you cited is from a long time ago. They finished that project after the last, successful match against Kasparov.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    4. Re:IBM computer? by kasparov · · Score: 1

      Bah! The game was rigged, I tell you! Rigged!

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    5. Re:IBM computer? by foidulus · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was turned into a weather forecaster for the Atlanta Olympics. I dunno what happened to it after that.

  7. great ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Abu Dabi gets a multi billion dollar tacky las vegas style exhibit while millions in Sudan and Africa starve, imagine how many water pipes and medical supplies you could buy for 2.3 billion large

    oh well i guess we can dream and play chess while others worry about being pawns in someone elses game

    1. Re:great ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I thought helping out the Sudan and Africa was supposed to be the USA's job.

    2. Re:great ! by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 1

      And those damn cops should be catching terrorists instead of pulling over speeders.

      Oh, and I assume you donate all of your disposable income and all of your free time to charity.

      Sorry for feeding the trolls (we trolls need to stick together)

    3. Re:great ! by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "(Dubai) gets a multi billion dollar tacky las vegas style exhibit while millions in Sudan and Africa starve, imagine how many water pipes and medical supplies you could buy for 2.3 billion large"

      All the devout Muslims in Dubai are already tithing to charities as required by their faith. Just how much of their paychecks do you think they should be required to part with?

    4. Re:great ! by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Well, they pledged to give $500,000 to UNRWA in 2003. And 2002. And 2001.

      Considering that UNRWA deals with a problem much closer to home, and that they're spending 2.6 BILLION dollars on Chess City, I think its fair to expect a little bit more than a half-million for UNRWA.

      (The $27 million donation in 2002? Came from UAE Red Crescent, not from the UAE.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    5. Re:great ! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "(The $27 million donation in 2002? Came from UAE Red Crescent, not from the UAE.)"

      What part of "gives a part of their paycheck to charity" did you have the most trouble with?

      I mean, really! Not only should a government act as a charity with its compulsory "contributions" but it should also be the only entity that should be in charge of that distribution of money? What don't you want nationalized?

    6. Re:great ! by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      The 27 million donation was also a one-time thing. Hasn't been repeated.

      I was more making the point that its absurd that they spend that much money on Chess City, and that little on aid to their "palestinian brethren", and yet complain loudly about the conditions their palestinian brethren live in. Saudi Arabia is guilty of this too; in fact, all of the ME Arab states are.

      Compulsory contributions are crap, but the fact remains - oil production in the UAE *is* nationalized already, though the national government has partnered with foreign firms. It provides the majority of government revenue. It isn't tithed, because it goes straight to the government. So yes, my complaints are valid - the government is spending a metric ass-tonne on Chess City, money it made not from tithes but from oil, and yet doesn't support their own region's refugees. Far be it from me to suggest that before countries complain about the treatment of a refugee, they might wish to up their own

      Yes, they provide free health care to their citizens. And I'll give the UAE credit - Sheikh Zayed has proposed to establish Zayed City in Gaza, a 3600-apartment project, at $160 million, including infrastructure.

      But still. 500k while still mouthing support of an organization is hypocritical when you blow 2.6 billion on Chess City.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  8. The CHESS Buildings by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 2, Funny

    Any idea which style of architecture is the castle going to be built in?

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
    1. Re:The CHESS Buildings by kunudo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tudor of course.

    2. Re:The CHESS Buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      At least he didn't ask about 'the horsey'.

    3. Re:The CHESS Buildings by Ryan+Huddleston · · Score: 1

      At this nerdiness level, probably PowerPC :-)

    4. Re:The CHESS Buildings by Portfolio · · Score: 1

      Staunton, naturally.

  9. It'll never fly, by MrLint · · Score: 1

    Abu Dhabi isnt listed anywhere in that song from the musical chess. :)

    1. Re:It'll never fly, by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not supposed to fly. It's supposed to play chess. RTA.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  10. Easy by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the Teenage Mutant Nina Turtles can kick Shredder's ass between pizza binges, surely a Hydra should have no problem with it at all.

    1. Re:Easy by phyruxus · · Score: 1
      I like the comparison halfway down where they wonder aloud who will win. It's obvious, they say, given Shredder's history that it'll win. Then they off the other possibility to the 'obvious', and rattle Hydra's saber.

      Like our fat Zakdorn friend tells us, "how you perform in a "mismatch" is precisely what interests Starfleet. After all -- when one is in the superior position, one is expected to win."

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    2. Re:Easy by Dehumanizer · · Score: 1

      Ah, Stan Lee rules! :)

      --
      The Tlog - a technology blog
  11. Abu Dhabi Slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You may come for our chess cities, but our beheadings will make you stay.

    1. Re:Abu Dhabi Slogan by tarball_tinkerbell · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the record, the United Arab Emirates, the country that Abu Dhabi is the capital of, does not do beheadings. They have capital punishment, just like America, & they use a firing squad. So far this year they have not had a single execution, unlike the US. (Source: http://www.amnesty.org/resources/report04/stats-en g/text/06b.html )

      Sorry to feed a troll, but I had to do this.

  12. Never trust hardware you can't see... by stienman · · Score: 3, Funny

    The cluster resides in the server room of Pal Group of companies in Abu Dhabi. Author Chrilly Donninger will access it from the tournament hall using an Internet connection.

    I know what the script kiddies will be doing this week...

    -Adam

  13. The Futue by Hockney+Twang · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So this is the future of chess, and maybe even eventually all games requiring logic. We'll just pit computers against one another, and people won't even play anymore.

    1. Re:The Futue by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No we will just invent games that require intuition as well as logic

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:The Futue by updog · · Score: 1

      Well apparently Dubai is spending $2.6 billion thinking that people will still play chess. If you read the article, they expect over 60 million visitors per year.

    3. Re:The Futue by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >We'll just pit computers against one another, and people won't even play anymore.

      Why?

      Humans still compete with each other at lifting weights, moving fast, and throwing things. Machines have long since outclassed us at those activities but we still relish the challenge.

    4. Re:The Futue by jnana · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Silicon-based computers excel at logic. Carbon-based computors excel at pattern-recognition and that whole sphere of massively parallel modes of thinking that one might call intuition.

      The best carbon chess players are still about equal with the best silicon chess players, and they sure as hell are not doing that with silicon-type logic (evaluating billions of nodes in a search tree). That implies to me that there's a hell of a lot of intuition, for want of a better word, in chess.

    5. Re:The Futue by Threni · · Score: 1

      > No we will just invent games that require intuition as well as logic

      Frankly I'm happy with Sonic the Hedgehog and Asteroids.

    6. Re:The Futue by Lispy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well,it didn't work the first time when we invented VCRs to watch TV for us.

    7. Re:The Futue by ChiRaven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I think it was John Von Neumann, the father of game theory, who siad that chess was not really a game, in the strategic sense, but really just a computational problem. Enormously complex, but still just a computational problem

    8. Re:The Futue by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ..and ultimately what game would that be, or even _could_ be, that is turn based and about moving game pieces?

      intuition is just a nifty tool to help you make end up with a logical(working) solution faster.

      besides, somebody has to build these things anyways.

      by the way, has motorsports made sports like running irrelevant?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:The Futue by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 1

      I think John Nash is the father of game theory.

    10. Re:The Futue by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Like Go?

    11. Re:The Futue by Dehumanizer · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me, we are all individuals

      I'm not!!

      :)

      --
      The Tlog - a technology blog
  14. 64,000 square meter by dj245 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So the square will be 8 kilometers on one side? 4.8 miles? I hope a lot of it is courtyard between the buildings.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:64,000 square meter by Bender_ · · Score: 1


      No, its just 0.8km since sqrt(64000) = 800

    2. Re:64,000 square meter by figleaf · · Score: 2, Informative

      sqrt(64000) = 252.982 meters

    3. Re:64,000 square meter by dj245 · · Score: 1

      looks like several of us fudged the math. Guess thats why I don't play chess.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    4. Re:64,000 square meter by Bender_ · · Score: 1

      Ok, I change my estimate to sqrt(64000)~2^8

  15. GNU/Chess by vuvewux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone know how GNU/Chess stacks up in comparison to these?

    --

    Let's not forget that one can hate his government, but love his country.
    1. Re:GNU/Chess by ctid · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know if you are joking, but GNU/Chess is very badly outclassed by lots of amateur engines, let alone by these professionals.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    2. Re:GNU/Chess by UserGoogol · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Not so well, but if you want to talk about Go, (and of course you do) GnuGo is one of the better Go programs around.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    3. Re:GNU/Chess by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      GnuGO is still only around 10 kyu. Not bad, but a human should be able to do better after about a year of study.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    4. Re:GNU/Chess by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Yes, but all Go programs are in that area, so it's okay.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    5. Re:GNU/Chess by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i would say that an AI that can beat a human for their first year is pretty damned good.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:GNU/Chess by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      No, we mean like Windows and CP/M.

      Linux is back there with writing straight to the iron. (I kid, I kid... it's at least as good as DOS.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    7. Re:GNU/Chess by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 1

      I am roughly as strong as GNU/Chess. I suck. All the top programs (that does not include GNU Chess or Crafty) play at strong to super grandmaster strength (Crafty plays at IM or weak grandmaster strength), and the top 4 or 5 programs (which includes Shredder) all play at around World Champion strength.

    8. Re:GNU/Chess by andi75 · · Score: 1

      Heh, even I (lowly 2300 player) can beat up GNUchess running on an AMD Opteron even in Blitz games. Short: it sucks badly.

      - Andreas

    9. Re:GNU/Chess by Dehumanizer · · Score: 1

      So, Windows is GNU/Chess and CP/M is Hydra and Shredder, right?

      --
      The Tlog - a technology blog
    10. Re:GNU/Chess by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      You know, upon further re-reading, neither of our comments were even remotely funny.

      I met a COBOL programmer once. I immediately ran away, hoping not to be infected.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    11. Re:GNU/Chess by istewart · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      That says a lot about my skill level in chess.

      I'm going to go wallow in self-pity now.

    12. Re:GNU/Chess by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Hey you insensitive dork! Gnu Chess badly outclasses me! How am I supposed to feel now?

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  16. Chess icon? by dexter+riley · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think /. needs a chess icon; I can't be the only one who saw the headline and thought two machines were playing each other in a Tetris tournament.

    1. Re:Chess icon? by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I must have omitted the "Humor" tags from my HTML.

    2. Re:Chess icon? by jb_02_98 · · Score: 1

      It this doesn't bother me at all. It was meant as a joke (see the anonymous parent.)

      On a more serious note: The icons can be a bit misleading sometimes and I have to guess what they mean, but they do stick with me after I learn what they mean.

  17. Cowabunga, dudes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is commonly believed that when "the evil Shredder attacks, these turtle boys won't cut him no slack!"

    Teenage Mutant Ninja Hydra
    Teenage Mutant Ninja Hydra
    Heroes in a cluster
    Linux Power!

    1. Re:Cowabunga, dudes! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, we have to get a hold of Nick Fury and S.H.I.E.L.D. to take care of Hydra...

      "Hail Hydra! Immortal Hydra! Cut off a limb and two shall take its place!"

      Chris Mattern

  18. Mistake in caption... by EvilFrog · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not terribly familiar with the geography of the region, so I guess I could be reading the map wrong, but the article shows that the "Chess City" is being built in Dubai, not Abu Dhabi. The map in the article shows both places, and they appear to be nowhere near one another.

    1. Re:Mistake in caption... by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 2, Informative

      and they appear to be nowhere near one another.

      Random Trivia: They're about an hour apart by land, not counting the shitty traffic in Dubai.

    2. Re:Mistake in caption... by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      I see that they've changed the caption so it is now correct. Originally it said that both were occurring in Abu Dhabi.

      There are many ways that I could have gotten things wrong even after having read the map properly- sometimes multiple locations share names, and maps without scales can be misleading. If I wasn't pretty sure I was correct I wouldn't have said anything.

  19. Chess City will suck to live in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...if my experience in Tetris City is any guide. Getting a permit to build was a real bitch with the zoning changing so quickly. And they won't even consider a subdivision. Against the rules to change the shapes to fit.

    1. Re:Chess City will suck to live in... by UnholySauce · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention having to bulldoze a good ten buildings just because that row is full.

      --
      Cloud and Tree - not just an immature webcomic, but a VISION.
    2. Re:Chess City will suck to live in... by Lispy · · Score: 1

      You are welcome to join my SimCity: "Lispycity". They just built a statue because I am such a great major. I am currently planning on building an airport, and my unemployment is down to 5%.

      As long as you can take the annual watershortage during summertime you will be fine.

      (evilgrin)
      ...and in a few years you will all feel my rage when I destroy this place with a set of earthquakes and giant alien-monsters. MuahAHAHAH!!!
      (/evilgrin)

      Oh, I didn't just say that, did I? ;-)

  20. This is nothing! by ScottGant · · Score: 1, Funny

    There is now a Checker City being built in Berwin Illinois that will be 12 million cubic miles and cost 17 trillion billion gazillion dollars!

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
  21. Re:Abu Dhabi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought it was Nermal.

  22. Hydra vs. Shredder by ultranova · · Score: 1

    Of course. When a TMNT villain and terrorist group of old nazis from the Marvel universe meet, they'll sit down and have a game of chess. Perfectly logical.

    Come on now. We know this is going to turn into a guns vs. ninjitsu fight. So who do you think will win ?

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    1. Re:Hydra vs. Shredder by jbarket · · Score: 1

      3 Words: Real Ultimate Power.

      --

      -----
      jonathan barket
  23. Too much money by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 4, Funny

    2.6 billion making a chess board? Hmm, I wonder who's paying for that then.

    I know, it's all you SUV drivers.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Too much money by Rescate · · Score: 1

      At least $2.6 billion is less than the old chestnut of putting one cent on the first square, two on the second, four on the third... and continuing to double for all 64 squares.

      I guess that would be (2^64) - 1 cents, or $184,467,440,737,095,516.15.

      That's $184,467.4 billion.
      They are only paying $2.6 billion.
      So, that's a savings of $184,464.8 billion.

      What a bargain!

    2. Re:Too much money by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      And Wal-Mart Shoppers. (You know where plastic comes from, right?)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  24. many times world champion engine Shredder by trb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "many times world champion engine" Shredder, is not the current world champion engine. That would be Junior, which is programmed by Israeli Jews. You wouldn't want them in Abu Dhabi, would you?

    1. Re:many times world champion engine Shredder by cytoman · · Score: 2, Informative
      Like many others, you are mistaken in assuming that all Arab nations are anti-Jewish to the core. FYI, the UAE is much more cosmopolitan than Saudi Arabia or other such Islamic states. Here's a like to help you understand this region better : http://uaeinteract.com/government/.

      Just like IBM computers are not listed to be at this place, I'm sure that Junior is also bound by some issues such that it is not represented at Abu Dhabi.

    2. Re:many times world champion engine Shredder by trb · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm sure that Junior is also bound by some issues such that it is not represented at Abu Dhabi.

      You may be sure, I am not so sure. I don't mean to head off into troll territory, but you are saying that I'm making the mistaken assumption that all Arab nations are anti-Jewish, etc. I didn't say that, and I know that Jordan and Egypt have peace treaties with Israel, and that certain countries like Morocco and Turkey have more cordial relations with Israel.

      I'm sure that you are mistaken about Junior being bound by an issue that kept it out of Abu Dhabi, I'm sure that the Israelis would be happy to go there for friendly competition. As for the treatment of Jews by the UAE establishment, you can search the web for Jews and Abu Dhabi, and find stuff like this portrayal of PM Sharon drinking Arab blood on a popular show from Abu Dhabi TV.

      I agree that the UAE is relatively cosmopolitan, but that says more about the rest of the Arab world than it says about them being cosmopolitan or permississive of the west in any familiar sense.

      I do maintain that the UAE is part of the Arab community that avoids any interaction with Israel, and that's why their battle of the supercomputers does not involve the current champion.

    3. Re:many times world champion engine Shredder by trb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Blitz championships, in human chess, as in computer chess, are of minimal relevance (compared to chess at full time controls). I did not say that Shredder was not a good program, Shredder is a fine program. It is not, however, the champion program.

      As for being called an asshole by an anonymous coward, if I were an asshole, I would prefer that to being a coward.

    4. Re:many times world champion engine Shredder by wwwgregcom · · Score: 1

      I am a Jew who has recently visited Egypt and I can certianly say that just because they have a peace with Israel doesn't mean that they are not anti-Jewish. Anyone who has seen Cairo knows how much they celebrate the "October War", or the reactions of common people upon realizing there is a jew within their mist.

      --
      What signature defines me as a person?
  25. Your information is incorrect by jbellis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Deep blue was tuned to beat Kasparov, just like any human player adjusts his game depending on who he plays. But Deep Blue was built to win against anyone, and competed in many computer chess events during its development.

    1. Re:Your information is incorrect by damiam · · Score: 1

      We're both right. Deep Blue was tuned to play Kasparov. It would still play quite good chess against anyone else, but it wouldn't fair nearly as well against other top GMs as it did against Kasparov.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:Your information is incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're on crack and you don't know what you're talking about. Deep Blue would have done fine against any player.

    3. Re:Your information is incorrect by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was no specific action taken to specifically tune DB to Kasparov. Its tuning was primarily in the hands of feedback from a number of the top US players (probably none of which had ever played Kasparov) and the ingenuity of Feng Hsu, it primary designer.

      Kasparov doesn't have a style of play that you can just put your finger on and say "oh, I know how to counter that!". The closest anyone has come to doing that is when Vladimir Kramnik beat him in a World Championship match in 2000. And Kramnik did it in a style that no computer could ever hope to emulate.

      Deep Blue's primary "tuning" was directed at just making sure it played chess really really well. The VLSI doesn't have any specific "anti-Kasparov logic" in it at all. They used a combination of brute force and state of the art in heuristic evaluation of chess positions. Feng Hsu also revolutionized game tree search technology with a method he created called "singular extension", which I believe most chess programs now use in one form or another.

      They also let Kasparov psyche himself out and play in an extremely unusual style that he is not really known for. Commenting on the games from the audience Viswanathan Anand (currently second in the world) said basically he couldn't believe or understand the way Kasparov was playing.

      As to the whole dismantling thing, IBM actually had smaller versions of DB playing exhibition games against all comers for a little while after the match before shutting down the whole thing. An earlier version of DB called Deep Thought II, also entered the World Computer Chess Championships soon after, and lost the championship and its individual game to Fritz running on a single CPU PC.

    4. Re:Your information is incorrect by Isofarro · · Score: 1
      Kasparov doesn't have a style of play that you can just put your finger on and say "oh, I know how to counter that!". The closest anyone has come to doing that is when Vladimir Kramnik beat him in a World Championship match in 2000. And Kramnik did it in a style that no computer could ever hope to emulate.

      One of Kramnik's strengths during the match was he didn't _fear_ Kasparov. Anand and Short had that fear, which went a long way to Kasparov's comfortable margin of victory. One of the interviews given by Kramnik shortly after the 2000 Braingames match against Kasparov mentioned that it was that lack of fear that helped. He wasn't overawed by Kasparov, thus was able to play his normal game. Very computerlike - playing the board, not the man.

      Kramnik's main tactic was to be very solid as Black - hence the opening choice of the Berlin Defence of the Ruy Lopez. Kasparov eventually exhausted himself against such a solid brick wall. Then Kramnik was quite comfortable with the White pieces - effectively refuting Kasparov's openings. Grunfeld, Nimzo-Indian, and Queen's Gambit Accepted all gave Kramnik the better game chances, and of course Kasparov was reluctant to use the King's Indian Defence.

      Apart from Kramniks prodigious playing strength, the key element of his victory was his opening preparation - very much the same key as Deep Blue beating Kasparov. The last game of the Kasparov-Deep Blue match, Kasparov played the Caro-Kann and was slaughtered in the opening.

      As far as I know, a couple of GMs were closely involved in Deep Blue's opening book.

      Looking back, there are very interesting parallels between Kasparov-Deep Blue, and Kasparov-Kramnik.
      In fact enough to reasonably conclude that Kramnik emulated Deep Blue.
  26. The real questions is... by darin3200 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can they move the buildings?

    1. Re:The real questions is... by cytoman · · Score: 1

      This would be possible if they built such a city on floating docks... like the oil wells. They have the technology.

  27. Submission Checks by hoofie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do the submitters ever check what they type ?

    Its NOT Abu Dhabi, its Dubai - very close to each other, but seperate soverign states (although they are often described as Gulf Emirates).

    Dubai is in the midst of a massive tourism push, spending billions of pounds/dollars/whatever on tourism projects. They have some of the best hotels in the world there.

    I've been to Dubai and its a cracking place - all the mystic and personality of the Gulf Arab world, without too much(yet) of the raving fundamentalism. [For some who lived for 3 years in Saudi Arabia, Dubai was the promised land - the enjoyment of living in the gulf with legal booze !]

    1. Re:Submission Checks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The computer chess match is in Abu Dhabi, the "chess city" is in Dubai... which is as the story states (unless they have changed it since you posted).

  28. 64.000 square meters. by GooDieZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the playground will be like real chess board, with buildings like figures, can the buildings move like playing real chess?

    Let those aliens know we can play chess; with buildings.

    --
    Things in a rear mirror might be behind you
    1. Re:64.000 square meters. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      and even better, do they get removed when lost? perhaps battlechess-style?

      hmmmmmm.....chess with mechs, big mechs....really, really big mechs...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  29. Beowulf cluster is no more?? by marco0009 · · Score: 1

    Has the Beowulf cluster been replaced with the Hydra cluster? That's not nearly as catchy.

    --
    Physics makes the world go 'round.
    1. Re:Beowulf cluster is no more?? by mcovey · · Score: 2, Funny

      imagine a beowulf cluster of hydra clusters.

      --
      Amen.
  30. $2.6 billion? by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    People are starving, a major conflict is going on in the middle east, global warming might very well be leading to the end of the American way of life (mass consumption without pragmatic bounds), and 2.6 billion dollars is being sunk into an, "International Chess City?" I guess you have to do something with all that oil money. Doesn't the UAE have the highest per-capita GDP in the world?

    1. Re:$2.6 billion? by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Let's define fucktard, shall we?!

      Fucktard (n.) - You.

    2. Re:$2.6 billion? by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow I totally agree, this is stupid. We all know 2.6 Billion dollars can end world hunger, the conflict in the middle east AND global warming. Unfortunately before no one has EVER had this kind of money to spend, so now that we have a chance we should put this money into solving those problems right away!

      Do you realize how many billions of dollars are spent daily on stuff much MUCH less profitable and important than an international chess city? Do you realize 2.6 billion dollars isn't all that much money?

    3. Re:$2.6 billion? by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Do you realize I wasn't necesarily bashing them for doing this? I just find it interesting that in one of the riches countries in the world, they're planning to spend 2.6 billion dollars....on chess. That's it. I never said 2.6 billion would solve wold hunger, i never said it would stop the conflict in the middle east, nor global warming. However, on global warming, 2.6 billion bucks would go a LONG way as research grants for quite a few atmospheric scientists. There are just more important money sinks than a game. This just seems like a romantic waste of money.

    4. Re:$2.6 billion? by jnana · · Score: 1
      Nice logic. If I understand you correctly, you're saying that if this one guy wastes time on Slashdot, it's okay to waste money on frivolous activities when there are tons of really noble uses of money.

      Your argument, I guess, is that if somebody wastes something, then all waste is justified. I don't find this very compelling, but then what do I know?

      Or maybe you mean that because this guy wastes time on slashdot, he shouldn't complain about any other frivolous activities in the world? I totally agree, anybody who has ever done anything wrong should not be allowed to talk about other wrongs in the world. That damn Gandhi should have just shut up about oppression in South Africa, or colonialism in India, because I'm sure he did something wrong in his life, if not as colossolly wrong as wasting time on slashdot.

    5. Re:$2.6 billion? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. This guy is right. What great intelligence and insight are we going to gain from this. I'd much rather see this money go to feeding a starving child or even going to help rebuild a war torn country to sustain itself than freaking chess. Governments with money to burn have to get their priorities straight.

      Maybe I'm completely misinformed and naive, but as an American who see's part of his tax dollars go to help people starving in countries far away, it makes me feel good. The billions we spend on aid is justified when one person can live a better life. Now the (french?) trolls can bash me and call american's evil war mongers, but how much have other countries spent to help people in poor nations?

      There are rich nations and poor nations, and the rich nations should help the others build a society that is self sustainable and prosperous.

    6. Re:$2.6 billion? by devonbowen · · Score: 1
      Do you realize 2.6 billion dollars isn't all that much money?

      True. On the other hand, 20 billion is the number (estimated by the WHO) to solve half of the world's hunger problem. So while 2.6 billion isn't that much money, very little money is actually needed to solve some major world problems. What's lacking is the determination to do so, of course.

      Devon

    7. Re:$2.6 billion? by Mant · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather see this money go to feeding a starving child or even going to help rebuild a war torn country to sustain itself than freaking chess.

      Seems more likely to me it isn't about Chess as about tourism. It is an investment which will bring money into the country and create jobs. How equatably that wealth gets spread is a different issue.

      You can argue that any governemnt spending that isn't feeding starving people or healthcare could be better spent, but then you would have nothing spent on art, science (like space travel), economic development or anything. If citizens of a coutnry are starving, suffering from an epidemic or whatever, then of course it should be the governments top priority. If it doesn't have such problems though, why not invest in tourism and the economy? If the investment pans out it will be good for the coutry.

      Now the (french?) trolls can bash me and call american's evil war mongers, but how much have other countries spent to help people in poor nations?

      The following is from the book "Why do people hate America?", turned up through Google. Note, I don't hate America (I used to work there), but it may be instructive. OECD has a website you can vist.

      According to the OECD, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the US gave between $6 and $15 billion in foreign aid in the period between 1995 and 1999. In absolute terms, Japan gives more than the US, between $9 and $15 billion in the same period. But the absolute figures are less significant than the proportion of gross domestic product (GDP, or national wealth) that a country devotes to foreign aid. On that league table, the US ranks twenty-second of the 22 most developed nations. As former President Jimmy Carter commented: 'We are the stingiest nation of all'. Denmark is top of the table, giving 1.01% of GDP, while the US manages just 0.1%. The United Nations has long established the target of 0.7% GDP for development assistance, although only four countries actually achieve this: Denmark, 1.01%; Norway, 0.91%; the Netherlands, 0.79%; Sweden, 0.7%. Apart from being the least generous nation, the US is highly selective in who receives its aid. Over 50% of its aid budget is spent on middle-income countries in the Middle East, with Israel being the recipient of the largest single share.

    8. Re:$2.6 billion? by dabadab · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess preserving the "American Way of Life" is not the primary concern of the people of Dubai, but preserving the "Dubai Way of Life". And with oil running out in the foreseeable future they have to do something about it, like building a very strong industy on tourism - you know there is a reason that the world's only seven-star hotel is in Dubai.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    9. Re:$2.6 billion? by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps major in a field that tries to solve the world's problems and devote his/her life to research to try and figure out solutions to those problems, or even better the deeper problems behind the superficial problems at hand. Which is what i'm doing. Now go back to your silly little sys-admin job and bitch to your fat co-worker about how brainless your userbase is.

    10. Re:$2.6 billion? by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      That is a very good point, and I agree...but still man...chess?! And by the american way of life, i meant short-sighted and highly consumptive...i've never been to dubai so i can't speak for their way of life.

    11. Re:$2.6 billion? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Now the (french?) trolls can bash me and call american's evil war mongers, but how much have other countries spent to help people in poor nations?
      More than Americans. In 2003, those French donated $7bn for foreign aid, compared to our $15bn. And this is a country that has 1/5 as many people as we do. That means, per person, the French donated 2.5x as much as we did. In 2000, Japan, a country that has half our population, donated $3bn more than we did. Today, their foreign AID is less than ours, but mostly because of the weakening of the yen and our post-9/11 bribes* (eg: $600m to Pakistan). Of course, you have to take into account that much of our aid is self-serving. 1/3 of our aid budget this year consists of credits allowing foreign militaries to buy US hardware. Additionally, 1/3 (overlapping somewhat with the previous third), of our aid budget goes to propping up Israel and Egypt. Lastly, 70% of our aid budget is tied to the recipients buying services and goods from American companies.

      Ironically, Americans tend to think that the federal government spends too much on foreign aid! Polls show that people think that the government spends up to 20% of the budget on aid, and believe that a fairer number would be 5%. Most don't know that the real number is less than 1%, and that 70% of that money comes right back to American companies.

      See this very informative site for more information.

      Now, don't get me wrong. USAid does lots of good things. They are definitely making a difference in the world. It's just that they do a lot less compared to the size of our economy than the other developed nations of the world.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    12. Re:$2.6 billion? by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      You probably can't decide, but you can bitch about it. That's what slashdot is for, anyway - mindless bitchin!

  31. When I was a kid.... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 2, Funny
    I used to *love* speaking in Abu Dhabi. It was so easy to learn, and really through the parents off!

    And how the heck did Burnadette do that thing with her arms?

    1. Re:When I was a kid.... by swankypimp · · Score: 1

      As a kid, I knew quite a bit about geography and stuff. However, the only reason I knew Abu Dhabi even existed was from when Garfield would take Nermal on "field trips" to the UPS Store. "Cutest Kitten in the World" my butt!

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
  32. Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by D.+Book · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov has just unveiled a plan to build a new "chess city" in the Emirate of Dubai. It's a US $2.6 billion project that is expected to play host to (hold on to your hats) 60 million amateur and professional chess followers annually.

    This would be a monumental example of the one of the reasons (brutal repression being another) why the present leadership in Arab countries is so detested by their own Muslim populations and others of that faith around the world. Chess is considered undesirable in Islam, and many consider it Haraam (forbidden under Islamic law). The latter is the view held by the most respected Islamic scholars such as Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani.

    While I don't condone this aspect of Islam, in the same way I don't condone the Pope's view on condoms, one can't fail to recognise what a massive insult this is to their religion. If you don't, imagine if the American government allowed a $2.6 billion mosque complex to be constructed in the "bible belt", to be visited by 60 million Muslims each year. If that analogy does not suffice, imagine instead the reaction to a 64,000 square meter family-planning/abortion centre to cater for 60 million women from around the world, right in the middle of the Protestant heartland.

    1. Re:Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      This is insightful? That it would be better if chess were banned in these places because it offends some religious sensibilities? What a world. Should this person have been fired? I love the twisting of the 1st amendment in that one. Priceless.

      Should my daughter wear a burqa lest someone be offended? Or is it ok that she doesn't as long as I understand that she is inviting rape?

      Wouldn't it actually be better if "their own Muslim populations and others of that faith around the world" were more tolerant of others? I'm not holding my breath for that one.

    2. Re:Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by D.+Book · · Score: 1

      I chose not to post a qualifier even though I was on the verge of doing so seconds after I hit Send, but as more AC's may jump all over it if I don't, I was referring in my second analogy to the evangelical Protestants who give the bible belt its name.

    3. Re:Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 1

      This would be a monumental example of the one of the reasons (brutal repression being another) why the present leadership in Arab countries is so detested by their own Muslim populations and others of that faith around the world

      Maybe you need to do some more research before posting comments like this. The people in UAE absolutely adore their leaders. Dubai is a paradise on earth.
      Giant party town too. If you want a night of amazing eating and drinking, to pick up gorgeous women from all over the world then take them back to your lush room in a 7 (yes 7) star hotel, then Dubai is the place for you.

      Not quite the place you assume it is.

    4. Re:Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by Mubarmij · · Score: 5, Informative
      I am Muslim, Arab.. and from Dubai, too (:

      Islam does not forbid Chess. If Sistani does not like it, that is his problem. The confusion here stems from the medival era when many people in the Islamic/Arab world were so smitten by Chess that some scholars felt that it was a huge waste of time and said it was "Makrooh" (undesirable). I am not aware of any respected scholar who said it is Haraam (forbidden).

    5. Re:Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't chess condemned as idolatrous at various times?

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    6. Re:Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by jerde · · Score: 1

      > imagine if the American government allowed a $2.6 billion mosque complex to be constructed in the "bible belt"

      Um. How could the American government NOT allow it? Isn't there some cliché about it being a free country? ;)

      Now, if the US Government supported such a project, it might rightly anger some people, just as the National Endowment for the Arts is frequently criticized for its use of public funds. Governments have to be careful about what they build or support.

      But why should a government stop private enterprise from a building project like this?

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    7. Re:Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by McCrapDeluxe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your emoticon is RTL. That's pretty cool.

    8. Re:Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by mmport80 · · Score: 1

      Chess was also frowned upon in England around the 12th and 13th centuries by the Catholic church.

    9. Re:Chess, Islam, and Arab governments by Mubarmij · · Score: 1
      Not that I know of..

      This probably needs some explaining. As you may know, in Islam we are required to pray five times a day. So, with an addictive game like Chess, some people started to "forgot" about some prayers. This led some scholars to condemn Chess itself on the basis that "anything that leads to a bad act is bad".

      As for saying that Chess is "Haram" (forbidden), the forbidden things in Islam are well known and most of them are mentioned in Quran. No one can say at a whim that some other thing is Haram..

  33. Huh. by c0dedude · · Score: 2, Informative

    On the one hand, it's a city devoted to chess. On the other hand, it's in the UAE, which make it easy to build when you're playing with the oil money that should go back to the people. See here for the severe lack of democracy source.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
  34. Re:Wrong City Listed in Text by pladdtn82 · · Score: 1

    If you had spent *more* than just two seconds reading the article yourself, you would notice that both cities are named. The match between Hydra and Shredder is being held in Abu Dhabi. The propsed chess city in to be built in Dubai. The slashdot summary is consistant with this.

    --
    "What do you care what other people think?" -Richard Feynman
  35. Tourism by Chazmati · · Score: 4, Informative

    a "64,000 square meter International Chess City" in Dubai, planned to cost US $2.6 billion, which "will feature 32 buildings designed to mirror the image of a traditional black and white game board."

    Wow. Dubai is really ramping up the tourism hooks. I just saw an article in some boating magazine about the man-made islands they're building to increase their shoreline. I found a Google hit here.

  36. A US $2.6 billion "Chess City"? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 3, Funny

    And you thought Euro Disney was a flop...

  37. Re:Huh? 32 buildings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Duh. No buildings are necessary for the 32 empty squares.

  38. Comment Checks by EvanED · · Score: 1

    Do the comment submitters ever check what they type ?

    The tournament is in Abu Dhabi, as the summary says:

    "The powerful computer chess engine Hydra...is taking on the many times world champion engine Shredder in a match between the two chess super computers in Abu Dhabi"
    -/. Summary

    "The venue is Abu Dhabi or Abu Zaby"
    -First article

    What is occuring in Dubai is the construction of the Chess Palace.

    "ChessBase also points to the announcement of a "64,000 square meter International Chess City" in Dubai"
    -/. Summary

    "FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov has just unveiled a plan to build a new "chess city" in the Emirate of Dubai"
    -Second article

    1. Re:Comment Checks by hoofie · · Score: 1

      When I made my original post, the submission clearly stated 'Abu Dhabi' as the location for BOTH facilities - chess computer and chess center. [Other posters pointed this out]. My comment was based on the submission on the chess center being wrong at that time. Don't believe everything you read !

  39. +1 You Mad Me Sad (Re:great !) by ZackSchil · · Score: 1

    I have mod points but there was no "+1 you-made-me-sad-but-I-can't-possibly-be-mad-at-you -for-bringing-this-up" moderation option.

  40. Re:Huh? 32 buildings? by devphil · · Score: 1


    Starting positions only. After all, you want some spaces left to move around in. :-)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  41. Which will disappear? by ImEric12 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm placing my bet now that Hydra will win, become world champion, then disappear for 10 years, before being deported from Japan.

  42. Finally by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    A number of tournaments featuring the best chess programs had them running on laptops.

    Perhaps that's really a statement of the power of knowledge over the depth of search.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  43. You Do Know the Secret by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1
    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  44. Strategy Strategy Strategy by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    chess is about intelligence. It's worth investing in. Plus, good PR will bring investment dollars into surrounding countries

    These people are using tactics not just looking for the most obvious opening

    Chess would be about fun too but $2.6 * 10^9 will buy the solution. Chess will be as solved as the Rubik's cube and tic-tac-toe

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  45. What about Cobra or Spector? by Trikenstein · · Score: 1
    Hey!
    I didn't name this shit.
    I'm surprised the thread made it this far without this reference.

    And as long as I'm here...

    Yo! Joe!

  46. Your gas money at work... by geneing · · Score: 1

    Anyone who complains about high price of gasoline is invited to visit US $2.6 billion International Chess City. Just kidding. :)

  47. And the moves are? by tjlsmith · · Score: 1

    They've played two games now and I cannot find the moves ANYWHERE - anyone have any idea where they are?

    --
    Mumia Abu-Jamal is *laughably guilty*. Check the evidence.
  48. Hydra? Shredder? by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1
    Hydra vs. Shredder

    Godzilla has been named an alternate, should one of the computers malfunction.

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  49. Awesome by computerwizz · · Score: 1

    This awesome that slashdot is talking about chess news! And I was very surprised and happy what I saw! Keep up the great work slashdot!

  50. Re:Fatherhood by ChiRaven · · Score: 1

    Although Nash was prominent, the seminal work I believe was von Neumann and Morganstern's "Theory of Games and Economic Behavior". Nash's autobiography http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/1994/nash- autobio.html mentions that his interest in the field was stimulated by their work when he was a graduate student, although his Dissertation took a very different approach to the subject from what he calls the "party line" of the earlier studies. The question of "fatherhood", though, is fairly open to interpretation, and I would certainly have no arguement with anyone claiming that title for Nash, whose work is certainly very important.

  51. $2.6 billion by drphuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I the only one that thinks $2.6 billion could have been spent on something more important then chess? How about the cure for aids or helping starving people? $2.6 billion...I mean wow, those chess board buildings better be made of solid 24 carot gold...

    --
    "Software is like sex... it's better when it's free"
    1. Re:$2.6 billion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And just how much are the yankee imperialist bastards spending for their war on brown people? Couldn't they cure aids or develop Virtual Reality projects so that they can fuck with everyone else's self determination in a virtual world without making enemies of everyone in the real world?

    2. Re:$2.6 billion by Trejus · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have no idea why people keep modding this up. First off, most of the people who are starving in this world are doing so because they live under an oppressive regime that likes it that way. An army lives and dies on it's stomach, along with the fact that giving land to one's cronies helps keep one in power. This is most definetly the case in the Sudan and Zimbabwe.

      It is almost never for the lack of natural resources. Japan has almost none, yet they seem to be eating fine. Thirty years ago, Zimbabwe used to be the bread basket of Africa. Now they starve. Therefore, if you want to help feed the hungry, you have to take out the dictators, and we all know how well that went the last couple times we tried to do that. Plus that costs a whole lot more than 2.6 billion.

      On the other hand, very few of the gulf states have even tried to expand their economy beyond oil. Considering how unstable the region is now, imagine what it would be like when the money and world interest runs out. The world will eventually shift away from Mid-East oil, that is inevitable.

      Considering that, trying to reinvent U.A.E. as a tourist destination is a brilliant move. First it ensures that there will be some positive world attention given to the country. Secondly, it provides a more robust economy. Both are ultimatly good things that will lead to more jobs, which should help starving people feed themselves :)

      --
      "To save the planet, I had to go to the worst spot on Earth, and that was Philadelphia." -- Sun Ra
  52. PGN of games 1 and 2 by rayde · · Score: 3, Informative

    for those actually interested in the games themselves, here are games 1 and 2 in PGN. You can view them with winboard/xboard . Just paste them into a .pgn file.

    [Event "Match rapid 90 min"]
    [Site "Abu Dhabi"]
    [Date "2004.08.14"]
    [Round "1"]
    [White "Hydra"]
    [Black "Shredder"]
    [Result "1-0"]
    [ECO "B80"]
    [PlyCount "75"]
    [EventDate "2004.??.??"]

    1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e6 7. f3 b5 8. g4 h6
    9. Qd2 Nbd7 10. O-O-O Bb7 11. h4 d5 12. exd5 Nxd5 13. Nxd5 Bxd5 14. Bg2 Ne5 15.
    Qe2 Qa5 16. f4 Qxa2 17. Bxd5 Qa1+ 18. Kd2 Bb4+ 19. c3 Qxb2+ 20. Ke1 Bxc3+ 21.
    Kf1 exd5 22. fxe5 Qb4 23. Bf2 O-O 24. g5 Bxd4 25. Bxd4 h5 26. Kg2 Rac8 27. Rhf1
    Qe7 28. Qxh5 Rc2+ 29. Kg3 Rc6 30. Rd3 a5 31. Rdf3 Re6 32. Rf6 Rxe5 33. Bxe5
    Qxe5+ 34. R6f4 a4 35. Kg2 d4 36. Rxf7 Qd5+ 37. R7f3 Rc8 38. Re1 1-0

    [Event "Match rapid 90 min"]
    [Site "Abu Dhabi"]
    [Date "2004.08.15"]
    [Round "2"]
    [White "Shredder"]
    [Black "Hydra"]
    [Result "0-1"]
    [ECO "B97"]
    [PlyCount "102"]
    [EventDate "2004.??.??"]

    1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 e6 7. f4 Qb6 8. Nb3
    Be7 9. Qf3 Nbd7 10. O-O-O Qc7 11. Kb1 b5 12. Bd3 b4 13. Ne2 Bb7 14. Qh3 Nxe4
    15. Bxe7 Kxe7 16. Qh4+ Ndf6 17. Rhe1 h6 18. f5 e5 19. Nf4 Ng5 20. Nh5 Nxh5 21.
    Qxh5 Bxg2 22. Nd2 a5 23. h4 Nh7 24. Qe2 Bc6 25. Rg1 Rhg8 26. Ne4 Bxe4 27. Bxe4
    Rac8 28. Bd3 Qb6 29. Bb5 Nf6 30. Ba4 e4 31. Rde1 Qc5 32. Qa6 d5 33. Rd1 d4 34.
    Bb3 Rc6 35. Qe2 Kf8 36. Ba4 Rd6 37. Qf1 Rd8 38. Qa6 Qc7 39. Qb5 Rh8 40. Qf1 Rh7
    41. Bb3 h5 42. Ba4 e3 43. Qb5 Rh6 44. Rg2 Rd5 45. Qf1 Ng4 46. Bb3 Rd8 47. Ba4
    Rf6 48. Re1 g6 49. Rc1 Rxf5 50. Qe2 Qe7 51. Bb5 Qxh4 0-1

  53. Dr Freeze style (ot) by phyruxus · · Score: 1
    >>Any idea which style of architecture is the castle going to be built in?

    Maybe they'll get crazy and make it Turkmenistan style. Then again, maybe not.

    -9e99, Offtopic

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  54. Too late by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

    They've already named a chess-playing computer after the computer from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. I love Adams references as much as the next geek, but I think that once is enough.

  55. Let me add to that.. by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    The 16 way Linux Cluster uses the 3.06 Xeon processor for each node. Now, why didn't they use the Opteron? Has it got something to do with sponsorship? We know that the Opteron is faster than the Xeon and in chess, ANY additional processing power in an engine vs engine game is welcome.

    Also, if I have my basic concepts right, a cluster is a bunch of networked machines whose processing power is combined through software. So we need to add networking speeds into the mix here. I remember reading somewhere that the latest NVIDIA NForce3 motherboards achieve a consistently higher data throughput than say a PCI Gigabit network card. Wouldn't this have helped too?

    It would seem to me that they've just thrown away a lot of potential computing power that Hydra could have used.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    1. Re:Let me add to that.. by Ewan · · Score: 1

      More likely it's the compiler, I don't know what language the chess program is written in, but generally using the intel compilers for C or Fortran you can optimise the performance significantly . it might be in this case the gcc compiler wasn't fast enough.

  56. Machine vs machine... by dargaud · · Score: 1
    Watching a computer beat up another at chess is going to be just as interesting as watching the latest Alien vs Predator movie. If anyone cares to enlighten me on my I should care...
    "If you can't beat your computer at chess, do what I did -- try kick-boxing." --Matt Larson.
    "Chess is a foolish expedient for making idle people believe they are doing something very clever when they are only wasting their time." --George Bernard Shaw.
    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  57. Re: moving buildings... by Team_Peppy · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to see how they pull off a knight building over a line of pawns. Also, wouldn't it just be easier to get everyone online accounts and play over the internet? We could save them some money right there.

  58. Fraud Waist and Abuse by das3cr · · Score: 1

    A Chess City ? Why and what for? What a colossal waist of money. If the state I lived in proposed a tax payer funded chess city, at a cost of $2.6 billion, I would be hopping up and down mad. Clearly this would fall under the category of monumental fraud WAIST and abuse.

    Just my 2 worth

    --
    Hurricane Island Outward Bound
    OB
  59. I thought this was Slashdot by dynayellow · · Score: 1

    Isn't someone going to complain that FIDE should Open Source the rules to chess?

  60. 2.6 billion by sciencewhiz · · Score: 1

    What's that, 2 barrels of oil at the current prices?

  61. Re:Where do you think the money goes, silly? by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

    I never actually said the money would disappear. I said it's a hell of a way to sink a huge chunk of money that could be put to use that might actually benefit everyone, not just the local Dubaians...i'll give a simple economics-based answer to this..

    Hypothetically, Say a oil baron in Dubai since 2.6 billion dollars into a huge simulated chess board, made to attract chess officianados from around the world into Dubai. Each tourist will need the following:
    1) Transportation
    2) Shelter
    3) Food/Beverages
    4) Entertainment
    5) Souveniers

    Behind each of these services, people get paid, and those people buy what they need (transportation, shelter, food, clothing, entertainment, etc). After the innitial money gets invested into the attraction and the local area by the tourists, the majority of the money stays in Dubai, circulating through the local economy with the exception of people leaving dubai and spreading their money elsewhere.

    You have a moderate marginal monetary benefit for each of the workers, who are able to live another week until they get paid once more.

    On the other hand, break that 2.6 billion dollars into 2,600 separate 1 million dollar grants to various academic (to incerase the chance of published results, and not R&D for some random corporation) scientists for various projects. Assume 5% discover something ground breaking, say a definitive answer on the global warming question, a more efficient means for hydrogen power, or the jackpot - efficient cold-ish fusion power. Instead of the marginal benefit staying in a localized area, the entire scientific community benefits, engineering firms begin to churn out new products based on the discoveries, profits roll in from around the world - hell, maybe the cure for cancer is discovered. What I'm saying is basically that science is a much more effective way to stimulate the global economy and raise everyone's standard of living than a multi-billion dollar tourist trap. Instead of a moderate localize marginal benefit, you'll have a moderate global marginal benefit.