Tech Support Levels Dropping
NeoPrime writes "USA Today is reporting on the growing concern of the language barrier, when it comes to tech support. It appears that each year it is becoming more compelling to companies to reconsider the use of overseas help desks. According to this story, based '[o]n a 10-point scale, the average level rated by desktop owners dropped from 7.0 in 2003 to 6.3 this year; notebooks fell from 7.2 to 6.1.'"
Wow! Could it be that Mr. Nickel is speaking with a forked tongue? I can't speak for Sony worldwide, but the domestic support organisation has an image which is somewhere between SCO and Rambus.
Case in point: A friend of mine bought a VAIO, which never really worked. After the third repair attempt he got it back with a hole in the case, requiring a nasty letter from his lawyer until they finally reimbursed him. That was after accusing him of breaking it himself.
Does Mr. Nickel mean they changed their service model from driving a screwdriver through the computer to let it splatter on concrete from the 5th floor or wot?
ich bin der musikant
mit taschenrechner in der hand
kraftwerk
The curse of free markets is that things like Out sourcing can happen, taking american jobs away. However, the market has ways of resolving things it self. You take a relatively minimaly skilled job like Tech support, ship it over seas to even cheaper labor and you get your ass bitten.
What has happened here is the market provided a cheaper means, but at a cost (Customer satisfication) so hopefully, companies will fix this problem by moving these jobs back to where ever they originally were.
--------========+++Dont Feed The Lab Techs+++========--------
Well, that is the way of the capitalism.
The money goes to whoever takes the job for a lesser amount of money.
The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
"Frank"
"OK, Frank, how do you spell that?"
Gah!
Too true - when the hardware support at my firm (UK) moved to Sri Lanka, everybody was advised to use the phonetic alphabet when making helpdesk calls - it really it a mess with these of-shore support desks for communication.
Spend like 10 minutes explaining who you are.
I'm guessing that the kind of people who read USA Today really *really* need manuals and tech support.
And illustrations.
And GUIs.
And they probably love Clippy, too.
"Ooh! Look! My little paperclip friend is back! Brandy, come look! Say 'hi', Clippy!"
"Oh, cuuuuuuute!"
to put some money into automation, which is probably where most tech support is going to be in 10 years anyway. Outsourcing "hid" the costs for a while, but as the service levels fall(the service was probably initially good because only the best were doing it, once everyone else jumped on the bandwagon, then it started to fall) and costs increase, companies are going to look to new ways to save money, and it probably won't be by hiring Americans.
Monstar L
Their techs are skilled, but I often call again, just so I can get a native english speaker. I don't mind working with heavily accented people, but when you have critical issues which can affect thousands of users, that small barrier becomes more than a nusance, it becomes dangerous.. /coward
the average person in the workforce is being required more and more to use computers (and similar technologies) in their work (students also). An earlier (down-modded as troll and rightly so) post said "don't buy software if you don't know how to use it." On the off chance that the poster was serious, please consider those who have little or no choice.
Back to me... I said I don't use tech support much, but my few experiences are mixed. On Aug 9, I wanted to know the exact date that I could expect XP SP2 to hit my lab PCs via AutoUpdates, so I called MS tech support. I talked to a lady who said (in a confident manner), "today!" Well, she was off by a couple of weeks. As usual with support issues, I found better information on the web.
You take a relatively minimaly skilled job like Tech support, ship it over seas to even cheaper labor and you get your ass bitten.
Eh, I worked in tech support. The English native speakers are equally as worthless as those that are ESL overseas workers. It's basically a trade off for the most part.
From my personal experience the ESL workers have more technical experience and end up being able to do something for you even if it takes longer for you to get your point across. The native English speakers suck at understanding your point AND they suck at the technical side of things.
$9.00/hr jobs with shitty benefits (if any at all) to put up w/raving assholes bitching at you because your Internet connection is down isn't worth it for most people that have a clue (unless they are college students that need a flexible schedule).
There's a cultural one too. Depending on the problem, users will expect empathy from the other side. With cultural differences, that gets harder. As a European, I've had to call a few US helpdesks in the past, and it's just not the same. You'd expect it to be ok, but i guess Americans just have a different method of social interaction than us Europeans.
"The only way to break through is to throw a tantrum and become an 'ugly American."
I couldn't agree more. I had problems with Earthlink a few months ago after a bad storm had gone through - our DSL was down for most of the day, but I couldn't get a tech to give me a straight answer to my simple question. Eventually, I argued my way to a manager, who still refused to give me a straight answer. By the time I was done, they had lost their "american" accents and were more angry with me than I was with them. We tried calling customer service to get a complaint filed, only to find that the techs I had spoken with never logged any of the calls like they were supposed to, so it was impossible to even attempt to get a free month out of them.
I find that a lot of problems stem from the fact that they refuse to deviate from the scripts that they're given - and won't believe you (with good reason - I know I don't usually believe the useres that I work with) that you've tried all of that already.
There's really two issues here, that are both somewhat addressed in the article:
1) Americans speak their own brand of English that's incomprehensible to most of the rest of the world, and vice versa. That goes double for anybody with a regional accent. If I can't understand Mississippian, what chance does somebody from India have?
2) There's a definite technical language gap, irrespective of dialect. Trying to figure out what's actually wrong is usually 90% of handling a call. Your typical electronics consumer only knows that this doohickey isn't doing what he wants it to do.
The dialect-related problems can be solved by having regional call centers, but the technical language gap is a bigger and longer-term problem. As the article says, "We're not going to give you a crash-course in Excel over the phone"... but if the consumer won't give it to himself, he's going to blame the product, the vendor, or the support staff when it doesn't do what he thinks it should.
I am in Pompey, England. I regularly deal with people in Montreal CA and East Hartford USA - big problem - with my English accent and the speed I speak, they just can't understand me - no matter how I try to speak.
The usual fix normally ends up as an E-Mail.
After listening to Apu on "The Simpsons" all these years, I don't have any problem understanding tech support.
Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
this article for those folks who think that people are "stealing" or "taking" jobs away from Americans?
Consumers expect top quality products, but are not willing to pay for it. As is commonly known, the margins for computers are razor thin. On top of this, when people want top notch service, how can the companies provide it? I am sorry, but the companies are not wrong to cut some costs where they can by using offshore support for a product with very little margins.
If you want service, buy a service contract from someone local. As in come to your home and fix it.
Seriously, can all these outsourced IT'ers make a living driving around town with an AD-aware CD in their back pocket? How much is the average user prepared to pay for saving his butt?
10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then
It is called colloquialism and every region, state has it. You can pick up some of it from tv (in exagerated form) but still you can get a taste for it. Just like in Texas where yall means you all.
Useless sig.
Tech support is expensive.
Users are getting dumber and calling tech support for things they shouldn't.
Ever hear of someone calling their ISP to help them clear disk space to install the ISP software?
They can just hang up (frustrated customer)
Or they can help the customer, this is expensive, so get a lower level cheaper tech to do it.
That being said I rarely call tech support for anything other then my ISP is broken. Even then I've just about given up, when I telnet to the smtp port on my mailserver and it replies with an error message, they want me to reboot my computer.
Given the headline "Tech Support Levels Dropping", I assumed it meant that companies were decreasing the level (that is, the amount) of staffing -- or at least decreasing staffing in the U.S.
But what the headline is really trying to cmmunicate is that satisfaction with tech support is dropping -- especially overseas tech support -- which might lead to more tech support staff being hired in the U.S.
So should I complain "Slashdot Headline Clarity Dropping", or should I just be grateful it's not a dupe?
Opinions on the Twiddler2 hand-held keyboard?
I think you are understating the differences in regional dialects and accents.
I live in Ireland a reletivly small country and I have sometimes have difficulty understanding people from different regions!
The company may be "saving money" by paying the people one fifth of what stateside would get, but I can say with confidence that the call took ten times longer than it would have if someone with competant computer knowledge was on the line. Rote reading from of a incomplete trouble shooting guide does not replace expert knowledge. The worse thing you can do to those folks is to follow there directions literally and exactly.
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
People who work at User Support, and especially people writing manuals should be FORCED to use software (general) in language version they support.
I got a CAM program with translation to English. The problem is the translator apparently never used any english program himself, learnt english at school and never had to use it really before the translation. Examples? (with my translations)
Secure Tool - save the tool set to a file.
Save Under
Programme End
Displace - move
Edit Row - (the only way to enter text into project)
Demark - unselect
Adjust position - move point
Size line - measure distance
Clearance - material to be removed by the CNC
No, the program is not an after-hours shareware. It's a multi-thousand-dollar commercial software, a flagship product of the company that makes it. And no, it's not really crappy. The backend is marvelous. It's the frontend and translations that really suck.
Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
I blame the vendors for cheaping-out on training and hiring qualified staff for tech support jobs. Of course, since tech support is considered the lowest point on the IT career totem pole, there aren't many qualified people out there to begin with... and those that are certainly don't want the piss-poor salaries paid to your typical phone jock.
you should always speak in the most clear and correct way when making a non-personal phone call, including additional redundancy e.g. "A for apple".
Uhhh, On Monday, I tried my best to speak with as little slang, and as little of an accent as I could, and I still couldn't make myself clear to Ghumpta in New Delhi, because that's where Dell happened to have moved their support to. It too me having to make Ghumpta repeat himself six times in order to make heads and tails of what he was trying to tell me.
It also took Herculean efforts on my part not to blow up on his sorry ass when he told me something that was clearly a lie.
Comanpies are seeing a fall in profits and interests in their products? Good! Put localized support that can speak basically the same language, instead of looking for the cheapest way to piss off your customer base.
"The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
> it'd be like someone from London speaking cockney rhyming slang and expecting that to be understood
/sound of quiet sobbing in the background.
Heh. Cockney rhyming tech support.
"What? No, no, I don't *have* a Mac, I have a PC! What? NO! I have *one* broken *Windows* computer! Why do you keep talking about Apples in pairs? And no, I do *not* think this should be lemon squeezy! Give me your manager! No, dammit! Not the *governor!* GAAAAAH!"
Its gotten so bad that I recommend people purchase generic computers rather than suffer the abuse of major name brand computers.
Seastead this.
What upsets me so much about this is not that Microsoft sucks at writing secure, reliable software but rather that there are so many people that are so willing to exploit it. Considering how many unique exploits there are on Windows XP, I feel that regardless of secure we think that Linux or BSD or Mac OS X may be, that if they had the dominant market share in their current state there would also be a large number of malware apps running wild on those platforms.
When you consider that it takes a significant amount of time to diagnose and resolve malware issues properly over the telephone, it immediately becomes impossible to offer good technical support. Sure, there are other key issues, such as outright hardware failure, but when malware is slowing down the machine average call time automatically increases. So unless your policy is to shaft users (and their data) and tell them to reformat/reinstall/use the restore CD right off the bat, or you are willing to pay what it really takes to have enough reps to help your customers, then there is absolutely no way to provide satisfactory technical support. Not in California, not in Canada, not in India.
I am feeling fat and sassy
I can't even BEGIN to explain how BAD HP customer support is. Sometimes you will start off with an American support agent, and as they pass you off to 'technical' people I always end up getting switched to some Indian guy in Bangalore. I don't know why, but I can NEVER understand these guys/gals. I work with people all over the world, Latin American, European, Asian, and I can understand their accents. But never Indian accents. Now when something goes wrong with an HP product I always debate voiding my warranty and fixing it myself rather than going through the hassle of calling their 'hell desk'.
Some problems I've had: Hard drive failure, HP Printer failure, Boot failure (required reinstall). On average, it takes me 4-5 phone calls with various people to get my case resolved. They never call you back, when they say they will. Their managers don't seem to care either. I can't understand how any business in the U.S. thinks this is good support.
I would like to condemn any CEO/CIO who supports Indian outsourcing of IT help desk operations to having to use it for themselves, personally, every time they have a question/issue/problem with their PC. I bet $5 they wise up and stop using outsourcing overseas.
Of course, that will never happen because the CEO/CIO always has their 'IT geek' in their pocket, who they can call at any time and they will personally show up and fix anything/everything that happens.
I guess this outsourcing of the help desk to other countries (mainly India) is just another way to 'screw the middle class'. Can't get your problem resolved? Are you 16 hours out of warranty? Buy a new PC/HardDrive/Printer... because the help desk won't help you.
Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
I can compete with foreign workers (i work my ass off), i just can't compete with the increasing industry-wide pay cut that has resulted where now I suddenly cannot afford to pay for existing debts that I could afford previously.
I'm already making plans for my girlfriend and I to move out of california now since it's just too expensive and there are increasingly less and less tech jobs here.
The division seems to be between people who own a home and those who don't. Everyone I see who doesn't own a home here already is struggling and the ones who do are taking vacations. I've pulled out my savings to go on 'vacation' to the east coast to look for work.
http://www.livejournal.com/users/cixel
I know we're talking PC's here, but I have to say, Apple has awesome technical support. Are their margins any better than the PC manufacturers? I would guess that they are, given the price point of their systems. Maybe these people should stop compaining and start replying with their pocket book. I've called Apple tech support on three occasions and always had an extremely knowledgable, english speaking individual answer my questions. The one time I was outside the area of expertise of the rep, he quickly transfered me to someone who knew the area better.
I'm guessing that the kind of people who read USA Today really *really* need manuals and tech support.
And illustrations.
And GUIs.
And they probably love Clippy, too.
"Ooh! Look! My little paperclip friend is back! Brandy, come look! Say 'hi', Clippy!"
"Oh, cuuuuuuute!"
I think it was Dave Barry who accused USA Today of being the direct descendant of Weekly Reader.
I agree that language differences can result in some problems. It is also the expectancy of the customer that has changed.
Where a few years ago people who needed help were willing to do something themselves and were helping to find the solution, now customers just want it fixed. I am not saying that that is a bad thing. It just is a fact.
Imagine when a few years ago someone called an ISP and said that his internet was not responding, you could ask to open a DOS window and do a ping and as a rep get the resukts in about a minute. Now you need to explain how to do that with the customer moaning that he does not understand it and that it should just work.
I live in Belgium and Belgiun being a country with three languages, we understand perfectly what the situation is with language barriers. The Belgian-French is not the same as the French-French and Flemish is not the same as Dutch. The dialects that are spoken especialy in Flanders can be so different that the people from one side do not understand the people from the other side.
The willingness of BOTH parties will result in a solution. If however one does not want to work with the other, you have just created a unsolvable situation. I have heard people who called in from France to the call center in Belgium and did not want any help from a Belgian rep. I have heard Belgians not wanting to be helped by Dutch reps.
Luckily I myself am able to get support in 4 languages within several dialects, so for me personally the situation is non-existing.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
Proponents of offshoring have propped it up as the new religion of business. Like the TQM or 6-Sigma of the past. Wildly irrational business decisions are being made by the groupthinkers who are today's and tomorrow's CEOs, because everyone else is doing it.
Most of my nontechnical acquaintances are savvy enough to select "help" from a menu or read the glossy "getting started" summary card packed at the top of the box. If Clippy has the answer for them, they don't call tech support.
The problem is not whether the person on the phone has a detectable accent or a professional demeanor. The problem is that for the last five years, tech support people, foreign or domestic have been human versions of Clippy. Only with fewer preprogrammed answers. The problem is that in so many cases they appear to be reading from a top forty FAQ sheet and cannot solve any problem that the average user can't solve themselves.
I'm happy with anyone who actually solves my problem, and I'll be most other customers are, too.
"How to Do Nothing," kids activities, back in print!
As an interesting aside, most call centres in the UK are in Scotland, because people perceive Scottish accents as educated and authoratative. English accents are, apparently, too annoying to be much good for call centres. Strange but true.
Piro: "I see the RAID controller got 'the screwdriver'."
Largo: "It was not l33t. It deserved d34th."
Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
I've called Apple tech support on three occasions and always had an extremely knowledgable...
Not to seem trollish but Apple also has a few advantages:
1. Less software means that there is less chances for a third party to screw over the PC.
2. Less virii/adware means less problems to contend with as well as a greater chance of a non-fouled system
3. Most of Apples hardware is from Apple. This also means not having to contend with third party problems
4. Most Apple owners seem to have a very specific use for the PC when they buy it. Joe Sixpack buys an E-Machine because it's cheap and it runs the best-known OS. Joe Sixpack is less likely to have as much experience as the Apple user. I doubt many people by an Apple as a first PC because most people either don't know what they want/need or they just want a general PC.
Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
To some extent I have to say - what do the eMachine-style budget PC users expect? They cost like $399 and come with more processing power, memory and hard disk space they could ever use. The savings have to come from somewhere.
I'm on about three hours sleep, beware.
Using [o]n would be due to the original passage having on at the start of a sentence - ie, "On a 10-point scale...". If I quoted that, and had on as the first word, no change, it was capitalised before, it would be capitalised now. If on was partway through a sentence, we'd make the O in On a lower-case o, then put brackets around it to indicate it's changed from the original source.
[T]he for the same reason - "I attacked the dog, which had a... " could be the original sentence. I could be quoting that in my own article, as eg "'[T]he dog, which had a...'". In the original the was not the start of the sentence, so it would be non-capitalised. Though in the article, the is changed to [T]he as a sentence must start with a capital letter.
In short, [o]n and [T]he and so forth are just an indication that the quoted passage has been changed slightly from the original due to positioning of the passage in a sentence, or due to the placement of the quote in a new passage.
Peculiarly enough, I've had the same experience with Non-Indian (read: American) tech support as well.
Besides being inexperienced, and unable to communicate very clearly, they're also largely obnoxious and condescending, something which I am yet to see from an Indian centre.
I don't know why, but I get this feeling that a large amount of tech support isn't bad because of it's ethnic background, but more because tech support workers are usually not trained much, except for a few days of "orientation" (which basically comes down to how to report, document and bill your calls. Not about the products you're supporting)
The kind of support I sometimes look for can only be given by the developers, but they wouldn't be developers if they spend their time answering calls, would they? Invariably, the people who do support are not those who develop their products, and this will remain. It's all fine and dandy to spew forth large dollops of righteous indignation at every mention of a lost job, but the facts might not (in fact, do not) corroborate what you choose to say.
This is not a troll, This is just information from my experience. Take it as you see fit.
Every day I am amazed at the lack of skill and knowledge in IT personnel. 9 out of 10 of them should never have been a sys admin, programmer or support person.
I think Microsoft is largely to blame. When people leaving school suddenly awakened to the fact that you don't just get handed a well paying job, Microsoft were pushing MSCE, etc. on the technically challenged masses.
In the end only Microsoft gained. The masses eventually got paid less because of the laws of supply and demand, but still companies felt that they were bestowed with armies of skilled people certified 'smart' by Microsoft.
Actually the armies of idiots might be the one thing that gives Microsoft staying power in companies. Migrate to Linux? Unless you re-hire your whole IT department you are in big troubles.
At least your department will be much smaller.
If you cannot even manage something you are certified for, what about something that actually requires a brain. Now make that idiot a manager and it becomes impossible.
I must apologize for using 'idiot', its a relative thing. I am smart in technology, but an idiot when it comes to stuff like financial investment, legal matters, fixing cars, etc. See, no harm done.
Now helpdesk personnel need to be patient. Thats where the Filipino's shine, pleasant and patient, but not very smart on the technical stuff no matter what they tell themselves.
I guess its a catch 22, very few tech savvy people will work in a helpdesk. Maybe it will be the first true mass market for good AI?
Had a similar Earthlink problem, & it WAS ELink's problem, and they LOST! Responses from the Hindu accented Tech Support: "We will have your DSL line reconnected in 5-7 days". "We will have your DSL line reconnected in 7-10 days". "We will have your DSL line reconnected in 28 days". "You wil have to contact your Phone Company". Their foreign TS crew is cluelesss on what to do, don't document it, and will plainly lie, just to get a customer off their back, and U.S. management doesn't have a clue as to what goes on. When I got mad and accused ELink TS of not knowing what to do and not being willing to give me to someone who could fix 'Their Problem' (how to keep their revenue stream coming in from me), there was silence. Technical incompetence is at the heart of Tech Service problems. It could be on the side of users, but I sure hear a lot of BS, in the very few times I call. The one place I do NOT get B.S. with Tech. Support on software is SolidWorks, but then I pay nearly $2000/yr for upgrades and phone support...out of Utah, in my case. So I cancelled my ELink service & asked to release the Elink hold on my Ph# and that resulted in "That will take 7-10 business days." which saved me $20/month. But, I had to cancel my existing phone # and get a new one, because Earthlink Tech Support couldn't execute for a customer that wants to leave their grasp. Earthlink is going to lose subscribers with the inept offshore Tech Suport. I doubt the Elink manager of TS has any clue of what is going on, as I doubt he shops his own system pretending to be a customer like me. JD Powers reports judging customer satisfaction in the first 60 days of owning a new car or an ISP service is a joke. Earthlink will also have no clue that I will no longer recommend them, which over time can have a large effect when "Word of Mouth" goes against you.
Companies sell stock.
Stockholders expect a healthy percentage return, better than the market average.
Company must make large profit to return value to shareholders.
Consumers demand cheap cheap cheap computers.
Company does whatever it takes to show large profit while still selling computer for ridiculously low price, including sending all manufacturing and tech support and accounting and so on to low labor cost foreign country.
Company upper management/shareholders rejoice at increased profitability.
Everyone else suffers.
The company I work for is in the process of relocating IT and accounting to a lower cost IT support center in Mexico (time zone restrictions prevented using India or Manila). Their stock is kicking butt because they've demonstrated all this efficiency and profitability. I have roughly 6 months before I know I'm out of a job. It's ugly, but that's how the whole thing works.
Incidentally, incompetence is running amuck in plenty of US based IT shops, too, just because first line tech support is probably the lowest paid job in the house, and you sometimes get what you pay for.
maybe one day i'll be smart enough to come up with a cool sig, too.
It should be noted that such a problem is not inherent to tech support centers overseas. A representative from Vermont may have just as much trouble understanding a caller from South Carolina as the representative in India. Thus this issue does not do much to support the racist/ethnocentric view that no one in California should go unemployed while people in India have work.
Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
Most people that speak UK English can probably make themselves understood to others than speak UK English. The same can be said about US English. On the other hand, if you get someone with a particularly harsh dialect of US English speaking to someone with a particularly harsh dialect of UK English (ie. someone from the back woods of the south and someone from the films Trainspotting or Snatch), it's quite possible that even when trying to be understood neither will have any idea what the other is saying, even without slang.
Personally, I couldn't understand what 90% of the people I met were saying for the first 2 months after I moved to Virginia, and this is about as far north as you can go before you are completely out of the south (and to those that contest that Virginia is in the south: where was the capital of the Confederacy?).
If a company doesn't provide tech support that can handle the calls it will receive, then they are very likely to lose business eventually.
-PainKilleR-[CE]
I really felt this article understaned how bad the situation has become. I'll describe my Dell "experience" below, but while this was for my home system, I also buy $500K+ per year for my company and am on a team that set policy for a $5 billion dollar company's purchases. Dell shouldn't assume that it is OK to send home users to India and keep corporate users in the US. many of us unimportant home users get to decide how oompany's spend their $$$.
I called Dell technical support. I initially had a terrible connection. One assumes the IP telephone technology wasn't working well at that point. Even when I tried back and went through all the menus again, the volume was low. I had to ask 3 times to get the person to speak up.
The next problem was that the people you get know very little. I'm a very expert computer user. The operator refused to listen to me when I described the problem and insisted on going through a checlkist of stuff about installing anti-virus, patches, etc. It was very aggrevating and they are not traied to recognize people who have expertise and not trivial problems.
The person's attitude was one of uncertainty and confusion at each step. They literally disappeared for 3-5 minutes at each step. I assume this was to read a document and then ask someone else what it meant. Very annoying. When I tried to discuss things they clearly could only reread the script. When I asked if there was someone more expert they said we had to go through the steps first.
I'm sure they were following procedure, but my problem was a hardware problem. I knew it and that was the issue that they agreed to after 30 minutes of wasting my time. I tried early in the call to just get to the hardware discussion, but had to give up and go through stupid questions and a variety of time wasting steps.
Finally, there was the launguage / accent problem. The person's English was passable and the accent was heavy and made udnerstanding difficult at times.
overall, I hated the experience. I will look for alternatives to Dell with US based support for my next purchases, including my $500K+ of corporate purchases.
The basic problem - the reason why tech support in general (especially from a large company) is almost certain to suck whether it's in India, Wales, the United States or even Texas - is that people who are clueful don't want to do technical support.
Tech support is generally a low-paid entry level job. Many people in tech support aren't there to make a career, they are there simply because they need some kind of job. (It always amused me when I was a teenager looking for entry-level jobs how it always said 'Why are you applying for a job at company X?' and you had to write some BS-filled 'go forward' corporate speak response on how the company is so wonderful, and how it'll be the start of a long career etc. when the genuine answer is simply 'because I need the money'.)
Generally, the people in tech support will not have a clue and don't care to have a clue; they just want to collect their paycheck. Those with a clue would never do tech support even if you doubled their salary because the job is utterly stultifying.
I have worked in a small call centre (12 positions). Fortunately, it *was not* tech support, but railway information. But even there we had the same problem: the job really demanded someone who knew geography well and had an interest in the railways, and the majority of people there just wanted a paycheck. Turnover was fast - it was rare that anyone stayed in the call centre for more than 6 months before leaving the company or finding a job somewhere else in the company. The trouble is there was quite a bit of knowledge you needed to do the job well thanks to the byzantine fare structure and the complex geography of the national railway network, and usually at 6 months the person was just getting competent and fast at doing the job - and they'd go and leave. I would imagine tech support isn't much different.
Oolite: Elite-like game. For Mac, Linux and Windows
Dell sells clones. They aren't truly any better than any other PC out there. They make some pretty nice cases though.
That said, the ONE thing that made Dell better than the rest was their support. It did't take long before they realized that it was a BAD BUSINESS DECISION to move their corporate support overseas. They moved it back to the U.S. pretty quickly when companies started dumping Dell.
That said, it proves they are aware of the problems it causes -- this is not a surprise to them in the least. The message I get from that fast? They prefer to abuse their users when they think they can get away with it. If you're not a corporate user, they don't care about you. Simple right? They might try to deny it, but their actions speak the loudest.
The idea of a "Free Market" and the economic system called Capitalism are not one and the same thing.
The United States of America is historically thought of as a having a Capitalist economy with equity markets playing a central position in its economy. But Capitalism, with its implication of a central role for equity markets, is much older than the US and is often thought to have emerged in its modern form in the city-state of Venice in the fifteenth century. The word "bourse" is a French coinage that refers to what Americans call a stock market.
On the other hand, this phrase "Free Market" is little more than an idealistic slogan. It's not too far removed from the term "socialism" in the sense that both merely refer to a general tendency that is never really expected to exist in the absolute sense and would require vastly different societies than the ones we have today even to begin to approach.
I just want to remind everyone of this fact because when someone starts a thread with the phrase "Free Market Capitalism" it really just leads to a lot of misunderstandings. It's not unlike the ETS writing question that asks students to give their opinion on whether artists or engineers contribute more to society. This is a misleading question because the disctinctions upon which the topic are premised are false.
Define "original English language".
American English differs quite a lot from English English but neither can claim to be the original. It's pretty clear that English has grown away from American English just as much as American English has grown away from English.
Everyone speaks a dialect.
John
Just because you can't understand someone on tech support doesn't necessarily mean they are an Indian, or other foreign-based call center. There are plenty of American Citizens with poor command of the English Language. I have had several people call me for various telemarketing reasons who could hardly read their script. I promptly laughed at them and hung up, but their accent was clearly an American one.
The problem has nothing to do with where call centers are located but rather who's doing the work on the phone with you. All good support personnel should be trained in "standard" American English to help avoid ambiguity, since everyone can understand the version of English you hear on the CNN or other standard media outlets, even if you dont' normally speak that way.
I myself work with customers on the phone and make a point of suppressing my slight New York accent and not using any slang that might not be clear.
It's difficult enough trying to bridge the gap between technical and non-technical people without a 2-way language barrier getting in the way. A support rep should be able to decipher people's accents, within reason and should be trained in speaking a relatively standard form of the language they are providing support in.
This doesn't just apply to English, but also Spanish. We have support rep where I work who is responsible for helping spanish speaking customers. When on the phone with a customer she speaks "standard" spanish that you would usually hear on Telemundo or Univision. There is a definite difference between the dialect she speaks on the phone and what she uses when she's on the phone with her husband for example.
Lahf is lahk a box a choc'lates, you nevva know whut you gonna git.
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
Funny story.
I inherited an "hINSPERON" laptop, and during the course of use ran across an odd LED error code. Found nothing about it online, had nothing better to do, so, what the hell, I called hell.
I have called hell many times in the past, but this was one of the longest waits I've ever had, raising the question of where all this money they're saving is going. Finally I get through to a support rep with an indian accent that was understandable, at least to me.
However, clearly she did not understand anything I was saying. I needed one piece of information, very specific (Middle LED Orange-Orange-Green repeating), which SHOULD have been available on their website. I asked the question, she put me on hold for ten minutes, came back and said, "It's not important".
"Maybe not," sez I, "but I still want to know."
Ten more minutes. "It's not important"
"Yes, you said that, and I said I still want to know."
Ten more minutes. "You don't need to know."
I DO need to know, to justify the last two hours of my life!"
Ten more minutes. "It's a battery code."
"No, really? The little battery ideogram next to the LED would never have given me that impression. what does it MEAN?"
Five more minutes, then I hung up. I've had many bad experiences with hell, but that was the worst in terms of sheer pointlessness.
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
Day ain't over yet.
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
I keep on hearing about how *insert big computer company*'s customer support is crap, but this doesn't seem to be affecting their profits any. Does bad customer support really affect the bysiness they get? If say Dell's customer support is crap, don't the customers just whine until their nearest geek friend/relative do the work for them free? The average buyer of computers relies on price and big numbers on the box (the MHz myth) and the ooh-shiny factor in terms of making purchasing decisions. Customer support is hardly ever considered (ditto with things like security for software purchases...). If the consumers don't care, why should the companies? If consumers want good customer support they should be willing to pay for it by making it part of their purchasing decisions eg. two identical systems from two computers, one with good customer support, one with not-so-good but the other one is cheaper, the vast majority of people will go for the cheaper one.
If customers don't vote with their wallets then why should Dell/Sony/HP et al. care about good customer support (from the POV of a business)? The idea of good customer support is to build loyalty but the average computer buyer doesn't consider support important at all when buying stuff as they will just get their nearest geek to fix it for them and they don't want to pay the extra money for good support as they want it as cheap as possible. Then from a financial POV to the business, it's just an annoying expense they have to have that doesn't add anything to the bottom line (since customers don't seem to be deserting them in droves or making purchasing decisions based on customer support reputation) and so it makes sense (from a financial POV) to do it as cheaply as possible even if it is crap.
The language and accent related issues are really just a natural consequence of offshoring. In the beginning most of the people working the call centers in India (for example) were probably among the best educated there. As demand grew, more call centers were opened and more people in India heard that this was a good way to make some money. Well, the proportion of well educated and talented people in India is probably no different than in the U.S., so it was inevitable that many of the people working in the call centers now are not among the best educated and most talented. Not that they're morons, just average folk. I mean really, how many of us could communicate fluently in a foreign language? I could communicate very very badly in two or three others. With a predetermined script I could do better, but that's about it. And forget about casual conversation!
While companies could try to better train their workers, I think that with respect to foreign language skills a limit is being reached. That is, even if the person in the call center understands English perfectly, they may still have an accent when speaking it that a U.S. customer will have a hard time with. I personally like accents, but Indian accented English is one of the most difficult for me to understand. I usually have to know the person for a while to fully understand what they are saying. Unfortunately, an already upset customer in the U.S. is not likely to have the patience for that.
To the making of books there is no end, so let's get started
Remember back in college when you had a TA -- or worse, a prof -- who could barely speak English, trying to teach you a subject you barely understood anyway? Remember how frustrating it was to have to simultaneously learn some extremely difficult subject and learn what sounded like something halfway between English and some other language?
/bitter
Well, lo and behold, computer companies are finally realizing that it's hard for people who may or may not be good at computers, to receive Tech support from someone who barely speaks English.
You'd think that fall into the realm of common sense, but then again, most universities don't care that their TA's hardly speak English, so why should computer companies care?
Completely agree with you on both points. I've been a tech manager for over 10 years and I always tell my staff, "we support people, not computers."
I managed a Computer Store for 3 years, and developed a reputation of being able to solve problems. This brought the customers in and kept them coming back, and telling friends that also came in. My business was selling parts, so I gave information away for free. This produced great sales and great rapport with the clients. Not for any reason other than the solutions were explained, the language was without accent(other than a Southern Drawl), and the recommended solutions WORKED. It increased sales because the clients understood that any problems would be resolved Fairly.
I left that position to work for a Software Company as the Technical Support Manager. This is when Problems became " Issues " and my team of techs also had to make Sales Calls, and after a time were instructed to SELL more than Fix. Time on the phone was rated, solutions were dropped down to quick fixes to get them off the line and get to the next person. Towards the end of my tenure a 900 help line was implemented, and the company went to EMAIL or 900 calls ONLY. They never understood why Technical Support costs them money, and couldn't MAKE money. No matter how many times I tried to explain that SUPPORT should be given freely, as the clients have already PAID for the product (At least for the version they bought). Soon it broke down to releases being rushed (almost a year before they were even ready) because the stock holders wanted to cash out. The Product and the company later went under, in part due to the Internet boom ("Everything on the Net Should be FREE!!") and partially due to no support being given to ANY product without a signed and paid contract.
Technical Support taught me more about human nature than I cared to know. It also taught me that when someone BUYS something, they should be able to call the manufacturer and get support when the product fails. These days it seems that it is easier and cheaper to just replace the product (meaning spending money for a replacement) Rather than fight through the Technical Support nightmare (Language barriers DO affect SALES. ) or the non-solutions provided because the person on the other end of the phone has no clue what it is you are talking about.
When I buy a car or a major appliance, and there is a recall or a problem, I take it back to the dealer where I purchased it to get it repaired. If I have a question on how something on that vehicle or appliance I call that same dealer. They sold it, they shoudl REPRESENT it, at least if they want me to buy from them again. I consider any purchase over $100 a MAJOR purchase. I shouldn't have to go through a translator to get an issue resolved. I shouldn't be talking to Hamir in India when I bought the product downtown at Sears or Best Buy. I should and EXPECT to get the problem solved ASAP rather than say "Oh, thats just how it works, and I have to live with it".
Computers are the ONLY industry where being treated properly (sure, its because of my ignorance I am asking a QUESTION) and with respect to being a CUSTOMER is not required. It has been this way for Years and is only getting worse. Companies in the Industry don't feel they OWE the customer anything, because we have become a Nation/World of consumers. THX1138 anyone? Its turned into a "Brave New World".
You keep going until you die..."Me".
I don't have any problem with any person in the world providing the support. I don't care what country they're from, really. But I do expect two things from them:
1. They should be proficient in the basic responsibilities of their job.
2. They should be understandable.
Unfortunately, finding a support rep that meets even one of those qualifications seems to be quite the accomplishment for most companies.
steve
Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.