Slashdot Mirror


The Internet At 35

Anonymous writes "CNN has a story on the 35th anniversary of the Internet, overviewing its past and the future. According to the article the history began on 'September 2, 1969, as bits of meaningless test data flowed silently between the two computers.' So, happy birthday, the Internet!"

321 comments

  1. editors? by ack154 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So which is it? 25? or 35? Come on... :p

    1. Re:editors? by Whyte · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real news is that this is actually the year 1994!

      --
      -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
    2. Re:editors? by Quasar1999 · · Score: 5, Funny

      1969... it's 2004... math... err... ummm... hold on, let me get a calculator for you... err... let's see... what's the thingy I gotta do? Add??? No... subtract... ah... there we go... 25!!!

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    3. Re:editors? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's actually 1994 and the editors are using a brand-spanking-new Intel Pentium (ding-ding ding-DING!) chip to do their math. Oh, wait...

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    4. Re:editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I submitted a note to the editors about this before the article was posted. Nice to know they ignore their emails to on duty editors.

    5. Re:editors? by deathcloset · · Score: 1

      To clarify. I think the poster is a Wired editor.

      He's talking about the internet being 35.
      the Internet, however, is 25.

    6. Re:editors? by nkh · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's a good thing we have Google now: 2004 - 1969 = 35

    7. Re:editors? by UserGoogol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the Internet is 21. That's when The Network was officially switched over to TCP/IP.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    8. Re:editors? by tunabomber · · Score: 5, Funny

      C'mon- give the Internet a break- it's just going through a little bit of denial.

      Don't worry, the Internet, it's OK to be 35- you're a hot technology trend! You know what they say about the lifetime of those! The Internet, why are you sobbing? Come back!

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    9. Re:editors? by suwain_2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I come up with -35.

      Seems like a substantial difference. Maybe it's just round-off errors or something.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    10. Re:editors? by grolschie · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Some internet trivia for ya's: In what year did Al Gore invent the internet?

    11. Re:editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some internet trivia for ya's: In what year did Al Gore invent the internet?

      I'll bet none of you saw the above super-redundant post coming. The "joke" is so last millennium.

    12. Re:editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying "so last millennium" is so last millennium.

    13. Re:editors? by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      I'll drink to that..

      --
      peculiarmethod

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    14. Re:editors? by suwain_2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does that mean the Internet can drink now?

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    15. Re:editors? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Notice that was off too from the article?

    16. Re:editors? by Epistax · · Score: 1

      At the websites I look at it doesn't look a day over 18.

    17. Re:editors? by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 3, Funny

      Really? I came up with 65,501.

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    18. Re:editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets go with an average of the two then.

    19. Re:editors? by mewphobia · · Score: 1

      all that matters is that she's legal.

    20. Re:editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to 1984.

    21. Re:editors? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What did it use before that?

    22. Re:editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is time we let the word 'actually' retire. She seems kind of worn.

    23. Re:editors? by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative
      What did it use before that?

      Can't remember the exact details, but there were special computers designed to handle the networking, called Interface Message Processors (IMPs). So you had the actual ARPAnet host, IMP machine, more than some dedicated cabling between them, another IMP, and another host.

      TCP/IP, as far as I remember, was more like formal spec of what was going on between IMPs, and hosts and IMPs - adapted so that the actual networking hardware didn't matter that much.

    24. Re:editors? by CyborgWarrior · · Score: 1

      Come on now, everyone knows that its really the year 2050 and these so called "internet users" are just blobs of flesh to power computers!

      --
      If you can't say something nice, make sure you have something heavy to throw.
    25. Re:editors? by Penguin2212 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      But it's only been like 10 years since Al Gore invented it.

    26. Re:editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither can be right. Al Gore was too young.

    27. Re:editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be using an error free open source calculator.
      I spent good money for my tape display calculator and it says 2004 - 1969 = 35.
      Glad you enlightened me to the fact that my bank balance is off you fucking morron.

  2. 25?? by Zorilla · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The Internet at 25. (1969)

    Nice math there. It's 35.

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    1. Re:25?? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Nice math there. It's 35. "

      It's a dupe, duh!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  3. 25...35.... Its not us trying to hit on girls.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I usually round down when I'm hitting on girls, not whel I'm talking about geek crap..

  4. Haha by pHatidic · · Score: 5, Funny

    35 Years Ago Today: Frist PSOT!!!1

    1. Re:Haha by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, things were a lot more civilized on the internet back then... it went more like

      Geek 1: Pip, pip! I do believe I have the first post!
      Geek 2: Oh drat! You beat me to it, ol' chap!
      Geek 1: Cheerio!

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    2. Re:Haha by dozer · · Score: 1
      "from hell's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee" -Khan

      You should at least mention Ahab or Herman Melville. This is from Ahab's last confrontation with the whale in Moby Dick: "Towards thee I roll, thou all-destroying but unconquering whale; to the last I grapple with thee; from hell's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee. Sink all coffins and hearses to one common pool! ... Thus, I give up the spear!"

      Mods: yes, this is offtopic. Please ignore. I just wanted to set the record stright.

  5. So how was it ten years ago? by SoTuA · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You know, the internet at 25?

    1. Re:So how was it ten years ago? by madprof · · Score: 1

      Guaranateed, in an hour or so your comment will look very very odd.

    2. Re:So how was it ten years ago? by SoTuA · · Score: 1
      Well, come to think of it, mine is about the only one of the dozens that make fun of the "25" thing, that will still make sense when they fix it (although it will be offtopic :)

      Redundant... is one of the worst mods. There were zero comments when I hit reply, got one 503 and then when I got to post my comment it was tenth, and of course all of them were "ROFL 25 or 35 d00d!".

  6. Over the hill by cloudscout · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The Internet At 25"... but it started in 1969. I think this "Internet" is a lot like some 35 year old guys I've seen in various chatrooms trying to convince all of the co-eds that they're really 25.

    1. Re:Over the hill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd have much better luck if they just said they were 35 and used the experience card.

      Stupid fuckwads.

    2. Re:Over the hill by orthogonal · · Score: 0, Troll
      "The Internet At 25"... but it started in 1969. I think this "Internet" is a lot like some 35 year old guys I've seen in various chatrooms trying to convince all of the co-eds that they're really 25.


      They'd have much better luck if they just said they were 35 and used the experience card.

      Since you mentioned it's about picking up women in chatrooms, which specific expereince card would you recommend?

      MasterCard or Visa?

      P.S. My name is Sexy Tiffeni2762 ! Come see my FREE personal webcam <a href="WeLikeBigLosersWithBigWallets"> HERE! <a> Only $6.99 per half-minute!
    3. Re:Over the hill by nyseal · · Score: 1

      Hey...take that back!!! Damn 'yungins

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
  7. I motion that... by EmperorKagato · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the delay in final submission for articles should be moved from 10 minutes to 20 minutes. I submit the mistakes to the editor on duty, but unfortunately, I was too late. :(

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
    1. Re:I motion that... by zdzichu · · Score: 5, Funny

      What you are talking about? Increasing delay? There is already 10 years delay on this article!

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:I motion that... by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why? So Taco can make extra-sure that the story he's posting is, in fact, a dupe?

      (What, you honestly think they were all accidental?)

  8. Memories.... by JoeLinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Ah yes, the internet. Putting porn and pipebomb instructions in the hands of 13-year olds since September 3rd, 1969...

    1. Re:Memories.... by pHatidic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remember ten years ago when the porno used to load line by line? I remember being 13ish when my friend linked me to some surprise.jpg and it loaded line by line for like 5 minutes and then at the bottom the girl had a penis. What the fuck. I should really sue AOL for scarring me for life.

    2. Re:Memories.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A small penis if there was only a line or two of it before you noticed.

      Here I type a story in the 1 minute 30 seconds I have before I can submit this comment.

      Once upon a time there was a little greeb. It lived in the river. It was a happy greeb, but it didn't like grubs. One day it found another greeb and was very happy. However some time later the little greeb found out that the other greeb was actually a grub disguised as a greeb, and was destroyed for life that it had trusted and loved this imposter greeb.

      The greeb took out a contract on the grub's life.

    3. Re:Memories.... by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes the internet has been around since the early 70s. Yet, the internet did not become to popular until the early to mid 90s (Columbine, Kids blowing up mailboxes etc..) thus allowing children to do such things very easily.

      --
      ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
    4. Re:Memories.... by emc · · Score: 5, Funny

      What the fuck. I should really sue AOL for scarring me for life.

      I have always thought that all non-AOL users should get to sue AOL for bringing all of these 'users' onto the Internet in the first place.

    5. Re:Memories.... by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but back then "porn" consisted of ASCII printouts of Snoopy getting whacked off by Peppermint Patty.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    6. Re:Memories.... by crmartin · · Score: 1

      Cool. I never saw that one. Have you got a copy?

    7. Re:Memories.... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, that brings back memories. For us, the hard part was getting fake accounts on the local adult BBSes, when they all required validation calls. I figured out a social engineering solution to that problem - just put down a totally unpronounceable foreign name, and the sysops would never call to validate for fear of mispronouncing the user's name.

      Then it was just a matter of dialing up at 2400 baud and batch downloading everything we could find. Of course, this was using Telix in DOS, so to actually see anything in real-time we'd use a TSR program (ShowGIF?) that'd decode the image as it was written to disk. We'd stare at the image as it came across line by line, and try to figure out what body parts we were looking at.

      "Is that an elbow?" "No, I think it's a knee." "No, no, it's the back of someone's neck..." "No it's not, it's a... oh, God! Cancel!! Hit cancel!! My eyes!"

      Great fun, and really challenging when you've got four or more people in an unusual configuration in the picture.

      Of course, the 40 meg hard drive didn't leave much room for pr0n archives. We had to start offloading it to 200 meg QIC tapes at some point. Ah, the good old days.

    8. Re:Memories.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In my younger years not many of my friends had modems so my friends and I used to pass around floppy disks containing porn in the Amiga IFF-ILBM format. Although they loaded a lot faster than over a 2400 baud modem, squinting was often required to interpret the photographic images dithered down to only distinct 32 colors.

      Also, these disks would normally come with a viewer program so that they could be just booted and cycle through the images, but some of the viewer utilities were over-complicated and required the use of pull-down menus that you couldn't see because the palette of the image put all of the dark shades down at the start of the palette and the Amiga's interface used palette entries 0 and 1 to draw the widgets.

      Operating pull-down menus blind and one-handed isn't easy, I'll have you know.

    9. Re:Memories.... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      " Remember ten years ago when the porno used to load line by line?"

      That was on a 14.4 with VGA graphics. But immediately before that I had a 2400 with EGA, so any pics that weren't ASCII art really just weren't worth the download.

      Dirty text files, on the other hand... :)

    10. Re:Memories.... by Rellik66 · · Score: 1

      Good thing Goatse didn't exist then.

      --

      Too many zeros, not enough ones

    11. Re:Memories.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      We'd stare at the image as it came across line by line, and try to figure out what body parts we were looking at.

      Those were the days when porn was fun. Now that I can see thousands of pictures in an hour it's kind of boring. Either that that thing about marriage killing your sex drive is true. Hmm.

    12. Re:Memories.... by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 5, Funny

      You young whipper-snappers had it easy. I used to have to spend 3 hours feeding punched cards into the mainframe just to get the front panel LEDs to light up in the shape of a nekkid lady.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    13. Re:Memories.... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      You know, I've never seen punch card porn, but I did come across a reel of 5-bit Baudot tape for an ancient teletype that printed out as a three-page picture (ASCII art style) of a naked woman with her foot on a stool. Totally pre-computer. I hate to think how much time it took to create originally.

    14. Re:Memories.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was stupid, seeing as for still pictures the Amiga had a 4096 colour mode called "HAM". This was a strange mode, since the color of each pixel depended on the pixel to the left of it, but there were plenty of tools to take a photo and reduce it to HAM mode.

    15. Re:Memories.... by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Just a short explanation of 'HAM' mode.

      HAM stands for 'Hold And Modify'.

      The idea is as follows: for each pixel, you have 3 'virtual' planes (red, green and blue) with 4 bits of color resolution, resulting in a total of 2^12 = 4096 colors.

      The picture itself however is compposed of a sequence of 8 bit 'values', where each value consists of 2 parts, the first part tells the system how to interpret the 2nd part, either as a direct color value, a red 'offset', a green 'offset' or a blue 'offset'.

      So for each pixel, you can either pick one of the 'base' colors or have a change of either red blue or green relative to the previous pixel.

      Converting a picture into this format and gettign a good 'on-screen' result was not completely trivial, tho tools to do it with acceptable results existed since almost the dawn of the Amiga era.

    16. Re:Memories.... by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I have seen an IBM system 36 print somethign very similar (in the late 70s).. it came from one of the attached disk units but the original might well have been on punch cards or tape (seeign how the particular machien happened to have both)

  9. Interweb of Youth Discovered! by rf600r · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I hope, when I'm 35, I'm 25 again! w00.

  10. Its 35, not 25. by boulat · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In 35 years of internet posting.. there are still acquisition erorrs

  11. First Data Transmitted on the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) 1 x 1 pixel of goatse.cx 2) Two sentence SPAM email trying to get investors into something called TCP/IP 3) The famous "Nixon" worm of '69. Crippled 3 machines.

  12. wtf by pbjones · · Score: 0

    data between to computers? you could have given a few more general details, it sounds just like any serial link.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:wtf by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      so what is the medium was serial? tcp/ip is what makes the internet.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  13. I get the feeling... by msgregory@earthlink. · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that the largest discussion of the difference between 25 and 35 in the history of the internet is about to ensue.

    1. Re:I get the feeling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to bet?

      I'll put a stop to it, never fear.

      Nazi!!!!

      (waits in silence for the Godwin Followers to come out en masse).

    2. Re:I get the feeling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? 10 is all it is.

    3. Re:I get the feeling... by Chris_Mir · · Score: 1

      Ah well.. it all depends on the format of the number.

      If say, 25 was written in ninetet(?) and 35 in sixtet, then yes, 25 == 35

    4. Re:I get the feeling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Quoth the Godwin's Law Faq:
      6. "Hitler!" Ha! The thread is over!

      Nope, doesn't work that way. Not only is it wrong to say that a thread is over when Godwin's Law is invoked anyway (Usenet threads virtually always outlive their usefulness), but long ago a corollary to the Law was proposed and accepted by Taki "Quirk" Kogama (quirk@swcp.com):
      Quirk's Exception: Intentional invocation of this so-called "Nazi Clause" is ineffectual.
      natalie portman naked and petrified imagine a beowulf cluster of hot grits in soviet russia but does it run linux i for one welcome our new goatse overlords 2.??? 3.profit! karma whore the mods are on crack microsoft sux where's the cowboyneal option you insensitive clod rtfa the article is a dupe the study was funded by microsoft gnu/linux is an operating system linux is just the kernel tubgirl it's german for "the gates the" ninjas are the real ultimate power bsd is dead dreamcast lives amiga could do that ten years before your wintel box complain about macintosh and get modded down fp you fail it you have been trolled please try to keep first posts on frostiness try to reply to other people's flamebait instead of starting new trolls read other peoples redundant posts before posting your own to duplicate what has already been said stupid lameness filter use the preview button you are not logged in

      Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

  14. Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As of today, 25 == 35. Please rewrite all of your programs to handle this new math. Thank you.

  15. Re:Weee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, but that post is about posts that are about the title.

  16. The Internet... by kjones692 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah, the Internet. Designed so that even in the event of nuclear war, our military leaders would still be able to access pornography.

    --

    Love the Third Amendment?
    1. Re:The Internet... by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'd say it's been a catastrophic success!

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    2. Re:The Internet... by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      Hey look everybody, it's Wes Borg. Or at least his joke.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  17. 35 years going on 25 by Aexia · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is the Internet going through a mid-life crisis or something? First it found it out that Al Gore wasn't his real father; it was actually adopted by the US government. Then everyone blamed it for the tanking economy.

    And now it's just bought a Porsche and is going in for botox treatments.

    1. Re:35 years going on 25 by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      It is FUNNY that Al Gore claimed that he "took the initiative in creating the Internet" ... the video is there if you watch & listen to the entire interview at time stamp ~ 0:50
      " I took the initiative in creating the Internet," Al Gore preposterously claimed (time stamp ~ 0:50) on the March 9, 1999 Late Edition/PrimeTime, but that didn't faze CNN's Wolf Blitzer who just kept tossing softball questions.
      --

      I believe Juanita

  18. Silly Mainstream News... by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The focus of the article seems to be security issues of the Internet. Talk of virusses, spam and whatnot. They even qute a guy saying he wishes security had been a priority when it was first invented. Shouldn't it be noted these issues are in software, not the hardware infastructure or protocal of the Internet?

    1. Re:Silly Mainstream News... by 3l1za · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The hardware infrastructure != the protocol of the Internet. The protocol of the internet is very much implemented in software. And, yes, the ease in ability of spoofing an Internet Protocol address is a security issue with the protocol, not just with a particular software implementation of that protocol.

      Ditto there are issues with the various routing protocols, which are issues not just with any particular implementation of that protocol but with the protocol itself.

    2. Re:Silly Mainstream News... by 3l1za · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To say nothing of weaknesses in ICMP, TCP, etc...

      Ever hear of the TCP slow start attack?

      Wonder why ping flooding is possible (hint ICMP goes directly over IP not via TCP which would prohibit this particular attack in its most common form)?

      They shouldn't beat themselves up too hard, though; heck, even SSL v 1.0 was a total and complete mess (but nothing compared to some other modern-day-designed doozies) and that was designed much later than the initial Internet was... and hence with a much greater understanding of the adversarial nature of it.

    3. Re:Silly Mainstream News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Wonder why ping flooding is possible (hint ICMP goes directly over IP not via TCP which would prohibit this particular attack in its most common form)?

      Except that to indicate problems with a TCP stream, you send an ICMP packet. See the problem? (One of the many problems with your suggestion.)

      Really, you should learn a bit about the infrastructure before criticizing it.

    4. Re:Silly Mainstream News... by 3l1za · · Score: 1

      Except that when initial 3-way connection is set up, a window size is established (max # of bytes of un-ACKed packets that can exist from one party to the other at any given time).

      So the victim machine is able to negotiate a reasonable window size (or refuse the connection). So if a particular IP + port is misbehaving and sending more packets, then it's greylisted -- this can be done quickly in hardware to drop the packet after investing minimal processing in it -- and the the TCP connection is reset.

      Problem solved; of course we know that there are other difficulties with TCP, possibilities for abuse.

      If you had read even a little of the context, you should have been able to easily see that the comments I made on this were in response to original poster's attempt to refute what Cerf et al said which was and is patently obvious: when IP etc. were designed, they weren't designed with security in mind.

      If this is news for you, ...

  19. If the internet was a girl. by eBayDoug · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would forever be 29 years old.

    --
    Learn About Outsourcing. http://www.pioutsource.com
    1. Re:If the internet was a girl. by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

      And will spend millions of dollars on "age defying switches"

  20. Lighten up by outriding9800 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the editors are under enough stress. I mean they first have to make sure the article wasnt posted 3 times before and do a spell check. Now you all want them to check basic math. gessh give them a break

    1. Re:Lighten up by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

      I agree with outriding9800. The editors do go through enough stress as it is. It also makes me wonder what process they use to check to see if the article wasn't posted 3 times before. Maybe giving them a bigger window before an article's final submission would help?

      --
      ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
    2. Re:Lighten up by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      make sure the article wasnt posted 3 times before

      You mean they actually do that?

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  21. The ARPAnet, not quite the Internet by isdnip · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, let's not let the title get too carried away on accuracy, even disregarding its subtraction error. In 1969, the prototype ARPAnet started up. It used NCP (TCP/IP came later). It didn't become the "Internet" until there were multiple interconnected networks, and that was not until the early 1980s, after the TCP/IP transition (which was completed in 1983). There were multiple networks once the more production-oriented MILNET split off of the more research-y ARPAnet. And after that came CSnet and all sorts of others.

    But yes, it was in many ways better in the early days (pre-1993), because there was no spam, or for that matter any other advertising. Although Google and the like do sort of make up for it.

    1. Re:The ARPAnet, not quite the Internet by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know I cant be the only one that misses dialing into a local BBS to check FidoNET, play some door games, chat with locals in the message boards. And whenever I had a problem I could actually ring the SysOp and actually break into chat with a real human. Those were the days. I used to pick up the local BBS newsletter for free at the supermarket. The coolest BBSs were multi node and you could "chat" with other users. It was like TTY on unix but with beautiful ANSI art. Some of the ASCII and ANSI art the came out of the BBS scene was truly beautiful. Its amazing what one can do with 255 characters and 16 colors.

      Then one day one of the bigger BBSs in town, a 10 node WildCat board got Lynx and things started to change.

      I remember getting "online" in '94, hitting lycos to see what the fuss was about and feeling totally alone, like a little kid in a huge subway terminal full of hundreds of people, yet no one talking. And by then USENET was already just a place to get binaries.

      Well, at least theres a community on slashdot, where else am I going to get my 1. Nat Portman 2. Hot Gritz 3. in Soviet Russia 4. BSD Dieing 5. Profit fix?

      My how its changed, I miss 120 pixel wide, 16 color animated gif DMCAless banners.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    2. Re:The ARPAnet, not quite the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MILFNET would be sweet!

    3. Re:The ARPAnet, not quite the Internet by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

      Well, at least theres a community on slashdot, where else am I going to get my 1. Nat Portman 2. Hot Gritz 3. in Soviet Russia 4. BSD Dieing 5. Profit fix?

      You forgot about imagining a beowulf cluster. Otherwise -- good list.

    4. Re:The ARPAnet, not quite the Internet by jburroug · · Score: 1

      Yeah I hear ya. I remember logging into a local BBS (in Anchorage) named the "MailMan" to play Baron Realms Elite against other boards over FidoNET and read the FidoNET version of Usenet (actually it may have a regular usenet feed delivered over FidoNET for all I know) this was back around 91-95 or so. I had about two dozen or so boards I dialed into on a weekly basis for email, chat (which of course led to local get togethers) door games, warez and of course pr0n.

      Matter of fact, a couple of friends of mine actually ran their own BBS's, on cnet for the Amiga. One of 'em even hacked one of the door games to give wizard characters an unfair advantage, like a +50 backstab or something similar that was unlikely to be discovered unless you knew about it already. I kinda miss those days too.

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
    5. Re:The ARPAnet, not quite the Internet by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Enjoy your memories.

      All the fun of BBS textfiles without the modem.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    6. Re:The ARPAnet, not quite the Internet by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Well I don't miss the £200 a month phone bills!

    7. Re:The ARPAnet, not quite the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran one, I missing running a dialup bbs. That was a time, most everyone that called a local BBS lived in the area, there was always some type of LORD party or something where you could actually meet other users. It was great, more of a community feel, getting laid in LORD, posting messages, sharing files and ideas. ANSI graphics, BBS Modding groups and ANSI/ASCII groups. Most of this is gone, it's really a shame, but I guess it could be called "progress"

    8. Re:The ARPAnet, not quite the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I miss LORD. Heard its online now but it cant be the same. Also miss the ANSI groups as well. Leet skill those artists had. Man what I'd give to be 11 with a 2400 baud again... oh, and a tip on buying amazon and ebay stock :)

  22. The mystery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it 25 or 35? And is today really Sept. 2nd?

  23. Holy mother of Christ on a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got to go through high school and university again? Bum

    This time I won't do computer science.

    1. Re:Holy mother of Christ on a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This time I won't do computer science.

      y?

    2. Re:Holy mother of Christ on a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      y?

      z!

    3. Re:Holy mother of Christ on a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there aren't any women, that's y.

    4. Re:Holy mother of Christ on a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dang right, this time round i'm gonna be a lawyer and earn money doing dumb shit

  24. dunno about the Internet but by dsanfte · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not sure about this Internet thing, but I heard about the IntarWeb from a friend and gave it a shot. It's great! There's free Britney pics, lots of this "pr0n" stuff at various sites starting with the word goat, and forums full of all kinds of wonderful religious fanatics, ready to convert me to their cult. I love it!

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    1. Re:dunno about the Internet but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      i think i've heard of one of the cults that you're talking about...something like the cult of lienooks...

  25. Karma killer by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow, the Slashdot editors must really have a grudge against the masses today. I figured this would be the best way to justify killing everybody's karma through redundant mods.

    Also, who would even be surprised anymore if they didn't even see as much as an acknowledgement of the mistake being corrected, just a quick change from "25" to "35"?

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    1. Re:Karma killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and surprise, it just got changed to 35 a couple minutes ago without even an "[edited]" comment. At least the Gabe Newell hoax got some recognition.

    2. Re:Karma killer by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Must've just been a temporary glitch in the matrix.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  26. What progress by Alcimedes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Initially, the internet was bits of meaningless data between two computers.

    Today? Bits of meaningless data between millions of computers.

    All joking aside though, I have no idea how people got anything done before the internet.

    Need to fix something around the house? Check the 'net.

    Need to figure out where the hell a business/friend is? Check the 'net.

    Have some jackass who insists they're right about some obscure factoid, and want to make them admit they're full of crap now, before they can deny it ever happened? Good 'ol internet.

    Between wireless, high-speed access, and laptops within an arm's reach, the average person now has access to information that used to be obscure and almost impossible to come by at a moments notice.

    In 35 years, the internet has probably done more to change the way people live than any other invention. (at least in the last 100 years or so) That dude who discovered fire and the wheel did pretty well for humanity.

    1. Re:What progress by Inthewire · · Score: 5, Informative

      Air conditioning.
      Polio vaccine.
      Traffic lights.
      Frozen food.
      Television.
      Large-scale farming.
      Credit cards.
      Flouride.

      There have been dozens if not hundreds of things invented in the past 100 years that have changed lifestyles more than the internet.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    2. Re:What progress by nuclear305 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "All joking aside though, I have no idea how people got anything done before the internet."

      That was back when people still left their houses to find their friends, and read books to research those obscure factoids :)

    3. Re:What progress by toxcspdrmn · · Score: 4, Funny
      That dude who discovered fire and the wheel did pretty well for humanity
      That was the same guy both times? Cool.
      --
      "E pur si muove!" - attributed to Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642
    4. Re:What progress by thefirelane · · Score: 1

      Have some jackass who insists they're right about some obscure factoid, and want to make them admit they're full of crap now, before they can deny it ever happened?

      This is how the Guinness Book of World Records began,... no really


      ---Lane

    5. Re:What progress by Zarf · · Score: 1

      Initially, the internet was bits of meaningless data between two computers.
      Today? Bits of meaningless data between millions of computers.


      Dude, data is always meaningless... meaning happens between the ears of fuzzy-headed monkeys.

      --
      [signature]
    6. Re:What progress by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      All joking aside though, I have no idea how people got anything done before the internet.

      Need to fix something around the house? Check the 'net.

      Need to figure out where the hell a business/friend is? Check the 'net.

      Have some jackass who insists they're right about some obscure factoid, and want to make them admit they're full of crap now, before they can deny it ever happened? Good 'ol internet.


      Oh come on. The internet certainly makes these tasks more convenient, but haven't you ever heard of a LIBRARY?

      That does require that one leaves one's house though, which may be an insurmountable obstacle for many /.'ers (I kid, I kid... sorta).

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:What progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Between wireless, high-speed access, and laptops within an arm's reach, the average person now has access to information that used to be obscure and almost impossible to come by at a moments notice.

      I think youre mistaking google for the internet
      Try finding all these infos without a good search engine

    8. Re:What progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ok, I'll bite (after reading many posts of this type of -- crap). How did people find this stuff out? They didn't. They either knew someone who did or dealt without. I'll agree a few people did goto the library, for example, to research some obsure factoid, however the vast majority did not, otherwise we would be allot smarter. Most people are flat out lazy, simple as that. I, for one, would not goto a library to research some stupid factoid nor would I write it down for research further on down the road. I would probably forget it. I must admit, I would be at a deficit if i didn't have the internet, as it is now.

    9. Re:What progress by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "There have been dozens if not hundreds of things invented in the past 100 years that have changed lifestyles more than the internet."

      Television is the only thing I see on that list that could qualify with your statement. Everything else, though significant, is not in the same league. There are a LOT of people on this planet that if you were to send them back 100 years in the past, the net would be the thing they most ache for. (Unless they had polio :P)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:What progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In 35 years, the internet has probably done more to change the way people live than any other invention. (at least in the last 100 years or so) That dude who discovered fire and the wheel did pretty well for humanity.

      I don't know about the internet, but this porn dispenser I'm using is better than sliced bread!

    11. Re:What progress by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      TV certainly has had a huge impact on our society, but the internet beats the rest, IMHO.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    12. Re:What progress by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe YOUR lifestyle. If so, hand over your geek license.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    13. Re:What progress by 0racle · · Score: 1

      I'm bald you insensitive clod.

      First time cliche user.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    14. Re:What progress by abborren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Visiting the library once in a while is useful. It is quite a mistake to believe that the internet is a good source for all information you need. Sure, it can provide a lot of useful information but often in low quantities and very spread out (and what about peer-review?).

      Finding good and useful information in a library is way more efficient than searching the web, if you compare time spend vs. amount of found (and good) information, IMHO.

      --
      ><////>
    15. Re:What progress by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      Initially, the internet was bits of meaningless data between two computers.
      Today? Bits of meaningless data between millions of computers.

      Waitaminnit, you're being unfair. Things haven't just stayed the same. Today, I get 2000 spams a week, and I can't stop them from coming. In 1969, I would have yelled across the room and said, "Hey, that's enough --- will you please shut off the meaningless data now?"

    16. Re:What progress by shird · · Score: 1

      Air conditioning. -- Fans
      Polio vaccine. -- Dont have polio
      Traffic lights. -- round a bouts
      Frozen food. -- fresh food, canned food
      Television. -- radio, (internet)
      Large-scale farming. -- an invention? or just bigger small scale farming?
      Credit cards. -- cash, eftpos
      Flouride. -- soap?

      Well, basically what im saying is that stuff is hardly life changing, and barely affects me. Only TV comes close, and to be honest id trade TV for the Internet anyday - the only difference is the faster streaming of content. And I certainly use it a lot more than TV.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    17. Re:What progress by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      Large-scale farming. -- an invention? or just bigger small scale farming?

      That's a bit like saying vertebrates are just bigger protozoa. Large-scale farming as it is now practiced was made possible by a host of technological innovations, and bears little semblance to the small-scale subsistence farming which was the primary occupation of the vast majority of Americans in the nineteenth century. The development of large-scale farming contributed to the urbanization of America and the shift from an agrarian economy to a much more industrialized economy, which in turn rapidly accelerated our technological progress. It created modern consumer culture-- the move away from subsistence farming left more people with more disposable income, and created a market for more and more interesting gadgets to spend it on. In short, large-scale farming has changed our civilization to a much greater degree than all the dot-com bazillionaires put together.

      You might think this shift in agricultural practices barely affects you because you don't live on a farm. Fact is, that shift is the main reason why you don't live on a farm.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    18. Re:What progress by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Air conditioning. -- Fans

      Which are severely limited. Think more than human comfort... also consider that AC and refrigeration are exactly the same technology, and don't even pretend that refrigeration technology has never effected the way you live.

      Polio vaccine. -- Dont have polio

      Probably because they used the vaccine to all but elimintate it.

      Traffic lights. -- round a bouts

      Right, because nobody EVER gets into an accident on those. Also not very convienient for urban settings that have been adopted from century-old horse-cart traffic, unless you like demolishing buildings.

      Frozen food. -- fresh food, canned food

      Very short shelf life and limited usability, respectively. See comment on AC/refrigeration.

      Television. -- radio, (internet)

      Yes, all of which radically increased the speed at which information spread through society. Or would you rather write a letter to the fire station when your house is burning down? Would you go buy a newspaper every few hours to see if that hurricane is headed your way?

      Large-scale farming. -- an invention? or just bigger small scale farming?

      Maybe not a speccific invention, but a conglomeration of many smaller innovations that make it possible. Either way, it definately had a impact on society and has effected the way you live.

      Credit cards. -- cash, eftpos

      I'd like to see you carry around $50K in cash, or pay over the phone/internet with cash. And do you realize that EFT is essentially the exact same thing as a credit card? Only difference is who's account it comes out of at first... yours or your credit company's.

      Flouride. -- soap?

      Eeh... do you even know what flouride is used for? Have you ever brushed your teeth?

      You, sir, seem amazingly shortsighted in terms of what actually has effected the way you live. For shame!
      =Smidge=

    19. Re:What progress by Celsius10 · · Score: 1

      Admit it, you compiled your list from the internet.

      --
      "Little things hitting each other. THAT'S WHAT I LIKE!" - Time Bandits
    20. Re:What progress by Celsius10 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget they also made their own Pron.

      --
      "Little things hitting each other. THAT'S WHAT I LIKE!" - Time Bandits
    21. Re:What progress by SagSaw · · Score: 1

      Television is the only thing I see on that list that could qualify with your statement.

      Actually, I'd say large-scale farming. Think about it: When was the last time you worried that there might not be enough food to last through the winter? I'm not talking about not being able to afford food (that's another issue), but whether or not enough food exists for everybody in your area to survive the winter. I'm betting never. Large-scale farming allows us to produce plently of food to feed an population which is much larger than 100 year ago on much less land.

      Note that I'm talking more about mechanization than the trend to corporate vs. family operations.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    22. Re:What progress by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      Television is the only thing I see on that list that could qualify with your statement. Everything else, though significant, is not in the same league. There are a LOT of people on this planet that if you were to send them back 100 years in the past, the net would be the thing they most ache for. (Unless they had polio :P)

      I think what your are missing here is that the Internet is still primarily the playground of an elite part of the world population. The list certainly is flawed in many respects, air conditioning for example was developed in the 19th century. However, I would argue that widespread refrigeration has had a huge impact transforming the market of agriculture on a global scale.

      The polio vaccine on its own is not very impressive, but when you consider the polio vaccine as part of a scientific war on disease, you come up with something that is quite a bit more transformative than the internet. Several of the deadliest killers of the last century are now either extinct in the wild or controlled leading to increased lifespans, decreased infant mortality and massive demographic shifts around the world.

      The green revolution of the 50s, 60s and 70s fundamentally transformed how food is produced and distributed in ways that affect a majority of the people on this planet.

      Think about it this way, how many people do you know who don't use the internet on a regular basis? Now how many people do you know that have never had an antibiotic, never had a vaccination, don't buy fresh tomatoes in Feburary, don't use products that were packaged in plastic (another invention more revolutionary than the internet to date), don't use anything that includes a transistor.

    23. Re:What progress by bl1st3r · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the question really is, did all the small-scale farmers start suing the large scale farmers claiming that it infringed on their right to have a job? ;)

      -E

      --
      hrrm.
    24. Re:What progress by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Okay, I accept that. When we weren't dependent on providing our own means of food, it definitely changed our world. I have a quesiton about that, though: Isn't it fair to say that it's a natural evolution of our life-style as opposed to something sudden that impacted our lives? If so, and this is the real quesiton, would that bump it off the list?

      I guess maybe not, but I figure it's worth mentioning that I was imagining sudden and unexpected. Maybe I needta tweak my views a bit.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    25. Re:What progress by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Now how many people do you know that have never had an antibiotic, never had a vaccination,"

      That's a strong and interesting point. I have to ask, though, did it really change our lifestyle more than the internet? In the space of 10 years, I've witnessed a very strong change in how we live our lives. (At least where I lived, I happily concede I don't have a strong global perspective, as such I'm open to reason.) Yes, the fight against disease is very important and has had an effect on our lives. But, from my limited views, it means less fear of getting sick. It seems pale in comparison to how much each individual networks to talk with others, and in how we get information. I mean, the very fact we're having this discussion on Slashdot. Who'd have expected that 10 years ago? Anybody outside a university?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    26. Re:What progress by jesser · · Score: 2, Funny

      All joking aside though, I have no idea how people got anything done before the internet.

      Why don't you search Google and find out?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    27. Re:What progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public Sanitation, my friend, should have been on that list. Without Joseph Lister we'd be reading on the internet all about the glorious ways our neighbors are dying this week.

    28. Re:What progress by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1
      Finding good and useful information in a library is way more efficient than searching the web

      That depends on your query of course. Libraries tend to be great sources of information about all things old, but I dare say I would never go to a library to look up anything about computers, certainly not this error message I keep getting in my mail logs.

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
    29. Re:What progress by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      It's obscure, but your list probably should have included dwarf wheat. It was developed in the late 60's by, among others, an Iowan named Norman Borlaug. It's credited with saving the lives of a billion people in India alone, and defusing the "population bomb" everybody used to talk about.

      If Norman Borlaug hadn't invented dwarf wheat in the 1960's, the 1980's would have been a time of global famine with a death toll in the billions.

      And yet hardly anybody has heard of him.

      --

      I write in my journal
    30. Re:What progress by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      That's a strong and interesting point. I have to ask, though, did it really change our lifestyle more than the internet? In the space of 10 years, I've witnessed a very strong change in how we live our lives. (At least where I lived, I happily concede I don't have a strong global perspective, as such I'm open to reason.) Yes, the fight against disease is very important and has had an effect on our lives. But, from my limited views, it means less fear of getting sick. It seems pale in comparison to how much each individual networks to talk with others, and in how we get information. I mean, the very fact we're having this discussion on Slashdot. Who'd have expected that 10 years ago? Anybody outside a university?

      I would argue that yes, advances in medicine over the 20th century is the innovation that has had the single biggest impact on our lives so far, and will be a driving factor behind politics and public policy that makes the stuff we talk about here on slashdot look trivial in comparison. I mean think about it:

      50 years ago, retirement age, pensions and social security were based on assumptions about lifespan and productivity after the age of 65. Now we are looking at a population in America and Europe that can expect to live 20, 30, 40 years after quitting the work force.

      The bad side is that Western countries are facing a crisis in their social support networks. People who currently collect pensions or government support make up a sizable voting block that will get even larger over the next 10 years.

      The good side is that we have greater potential for tapping into human expertise and extended intellectual productivity.

      More that just not being woried about getting sick, it means that children of the 20th century are much less likely to have seen a sibling or parent die than any generation in history. We are talking basic demographics here.

      Actually, there is considerable evidence that the internet is an evolutionary change rather than a revolutionary one. The same dynamics of gender, ethnicity, class and power are played out in chatrooms and bulletin boards that were already played out in breakrooms and diners. I really don't consider myself more informed in 2004 than I was as a newspaper addict in 1984. In a large part, the internet just fills in a social networking gap that was created by car culture.

    31. Re:What progress by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Hell with all that - I just thought of a biggie: Oral contraceptives.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    32. Re:What progress by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Hell with all that - I just thought of a biggie: Oral contraceptives"

      I think those came too late to affect your lifestyle a whole heck of a lot. ;)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    33. Re:What progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All joking aside though, I have no idea how people got anything done before the internet.

      Libaries and librarians and the phone.

    34. Re:What progress by goodydot · · Score: 1

      how do you think he got to the fire in time?

    35. Re:What progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wud fe iferesfed in herrin mo fout tat foride. wus ih fo?

    36. Re:What progress by jc42 · · Score: 1

      TV certainly has had a huge impact on our society ...

      I'd disagree. TV is almost entirely an entertainment medium. It has increased the quantity of available entertainment, but not the quality, nor even the range, really. This hardly qualifies as a huge impact.

      Some people might object that it provided news. But TV news has always been trivial compared to even a mediocre newspaper. Newspapers and other printed news sources have always been widely available.

      The Internet beats both TV and print media all to hell. Entertainment? You can easily pick up entertainment from all parts of the world, of sorts that have never been available in your home country. News? TV news has always been controlled by a few corporations that have rarely presented anything more than highly-filtered headlines (plus pictures). The print media has usually been controlled in most of the world by local authorities, and it has been extremely difficult to get anything past the censors. Yes, even in the US, where subscribing to foreign periodicals has typically put you on government lists. (There have been repeated reports of mathematicians having their journals intercepted by government agents who couldn't understand the text and concluded it had to be subversive because of its origin. ;-) Now it's trivial to find foreign news on the Internet, and while you'll still probably end up on the government lists, those lists contain so many millions of people that they are all but useless. And even the most oppressive governments are finding it fiendishly difficult to block it all without cutting off access entirely and killing their own economy in the process.

      Even 10 years ago, it was next to impossible to get information like you can find on english.aljazeera.com; now it's easy, so we have no excuse for our ignorance (other than those 24 hours in a day, something that is really overdue for an upgrade). One of the problems the US's religious-right administration is that when they told us how evil all Muslims are, several million of us just hit the Internet, and quickly learned a lot of history (and religious doctrine) that a decade ago would have taken a lifetime to learn. So we know they were just lying to us. And our counterparts in the Muslim societies are rapidly learning to use the Internet, and are finding out that our society is just as much a mixed bag of good and evil as is theirs. (But we have a bigger middle class - so far. ;-)

      Of course, we still have the problem of the large part of the population that doesn't want to learn anything. But they don't have the excuses they once had. The data is there now, and much more accessible than it ever was in the past. They can't lie to us nearly as easily now.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    37. Re:What progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, he did win the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 for this, so he hasn't been completely ignored...

    38. Re:What progress by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't arguing for TV as only a positive impact. I'ts arguable that TV has made us fatter, with short attention spans, and played a part in the 'dumbing down' of society. It's also exposed us to other views and ideas that we might not have seen otherwise. Oh, and the Simpsons.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    39. Re:What progress by craXORjack · · Score: 1

      Yes but do you remember who developed the super wheat called Quatrotriticale and the other famous Iowan who allowed the quatrotriticale to be eaten by tribbles when it was desperately needed on Sherman's Planet?

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    40. Re:What progress by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Seriously thought, it took a long time to find that information. To long to just look things up casually.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    41. Re:What progress by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Yes. The same guy made fire, the wheel and the internet...

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  27. And in this time of Celebration let us not forget by INeededALogin · · Score: 1, Funny

    Al Gore

  28. September by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not even September yet...the internet is still 34 for a few more days.

  29. Re:Yay! by nkh · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope you don't live in the USA or you are in serious trouble for copyright infrigement on the "Happy Birthday" song!

  30. Re:And in this time of Celebration let us not forg by sqrt(2) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Remember America, I gave you the Internet, and I can take it back! Think about it."

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  31. Internet Day - Sept 2 by Ravensign · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sept 2 should be a national holiday.

    What are you getting for Internet Day?

    Why a new Cisco 7x00 series router!

    Thank you Linus Claus!

    --
    "Sig free in '03!"
    1. Re:Internet Day - Sept 2 by Wild+Bill+TX · · Score: 1

      Just don't be naughty, lest you receive a beowulf cluster of lumps of coal.

    2. Re:Internet Day - Sept 2 by bobbozzo · · Score: 1
      Sept 2 should be a national holiday

      It is, in the US. It's celebrated on the first Monday in September.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  32. ...I blame Y2K. by Behrooz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I blame Y2K. Anyway, is it 1994 or not? I need to know if they'll let me into the bar tonight.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  33. It's Metric Years by Alien54 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just like they use at Nasa

    No, Really.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:It's Metric Years by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      25 years = 35 metric years is +3 Insightful? Hope it's a Funny w/karma style moderation.

      I did, however, find this, which compares Julian years (365.25 days) in relation to different physical references of a year (time between two winter soltices is different than the time between two vernal equinoxes). Someone want to calculate the Internet's age in anomalistic years? My head's spinning from all the 1 decimal values.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    2. Re:It's Metric Years by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      The original reference to Metric Years is a joke, in reference to the NASA mars probe fiasco a few years back which went off course due to a miscalculation in units of conversion. Thus the implied reference to NASA's habit of miscalculations, as cross-linked to the Internet via ArpaNet, etc.

      Don't you hate having to explain a joke?

      That said, there really is a MetricYears.com, which is a bit daffy in it's own right. If you don't like that, you could always go for Decimal Birthdays, which is amusing in its own special way.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  34. Well, 35 years was a good run. by e9th · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I knew back in '73 when we got our IMP that no good would come of it.

  35. Re:Sweetie pie, I just want you to be the best you by eBayDoug · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thanks you! I dunut car if i spel write or aboot my tenseses, thanks fore tha suggestcion!

    --
    Learn About Outsourcing. http://www.pioutsource.com
  36. Too bad you can't buy intelligence, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I understand why you paid $115 for your current user ID, dolo666.

    1. Re:Too bad you can't buy intelligence, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pwn3d!!!! you rock Anonymous You

  37. It is 20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the time, still doesn't help if no one is around to actually check the mail. Some editors are better than others, Hemos actually responds!

  38. Redundant, LOL by Whyte · · Score: 1

    Moderators really need to learn how to read the timestamp on these posts.

    Although since our editors can't figure out simple math, I suppose it should be expected around here.

    --
    -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
    1. Re:Redundant, LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would have never modded that as redundant.

      +1, Funny, is how that should read.

      /me keeps an eye out for it in mm.

  39. First Spam by TheFairElf · · Score: 4, Funny
    "...as bits of meaningless test data flowed silently between the two computers"

    So they first tested Internet with spam? With that kind of a start no wonder we're in the current mess!

    1. Re:First Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they tested it with a nerd newsgroup...

  40. Who would have guessed by dev32810 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    that in the summer of 1969 the just completed moon landing would have almost no impact to our lives 35 years later, but these bits between two computers would change the face of the world. Weird...

    1. Re:Who would have guessed by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, that's not right. The moon landing, along with the rest of the Mercury and Apollo missions, had a profound and lasting impact on the world. Yes, we're not all flitting from one planet to the next in our own personal rocket ships, but we think about ourselves and our place in the universe differently now. If you think the moon landings have had no impact on your life, it's most likely that you've never lived in a world without space travel.

      The Internet happened in a very different way. Its inception was, at the time, incomprehensible to everyone but a few smartypants researchers. And even those scientists really had no idea how the net would grow to encompass so much of our lives. Even fifteen years after its birth, very few people had any clue about the Internet. The Internet may have been technically born when the first two machines were plugged in, but it wasn't important until many years later, when it became a movement.

    2. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      the just completed moon landing would have almost no impact to our lives

      Hmm... maybe things like plastics, superlight metal alloys, scratch resistant coatings for lenses, Velcro, smoke detectors, cordless electric drills, solar power, programmable pacemakers, etc. have no impact on your life, but for the rest of us, GO SPACE!

    3. Re:Who would have guessed by syousef · · Score: 1

      Egads man! Have you not heard of TANG?

      Sheesh :-)

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:Who would have guessed by dev32810 · · Score: 1

      I mean no disrespect to the significance of July 1968 - as Arthur C. Clarke wrote, in 500 years the only thing people may remember about the Unites States will be that event.

      Space flight changed our view of the universe - no small thing but I think most people in 1969 (yep, me too as a boy) figured that event was the start of more than just a change in view, but a real opening of a frontier. At a nuts and bolts level, at 35 years in the future, the internet has changed more lives in the world. Just ask anyone from a third-world country who now has access to the world's information is a way almost unthinkable back then. The simple fact that me and you and a few hundred thousand of our closest friends from around the world are discussing this tonight is something that just amazes me when I think back on what people expected from their futures back then.

      It's just intereting to me that one of the historical quirks is that the two events were weeks apart...

    5. Re:Who would have guessed by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      So the moon landing was "profound" and made us "think differently about ourselves", while the Internet is right now changing the face of politics, commerce, social interaction, and society in general? I agree with the grandparent post. If every single Apollo had blown up halfway to the moon, the world as a whole wouldn't be much different today. Maybe manned space travel would have been nipped in the bud, and we woudln't have the space shuttle or the ISS. Maybe we'd "think differently about ourselves". If the Internet hadn't been invented, everyday life for about 12% of the world's population (69% of US population) would be directly affected, and many of the rest would feel the effects too. And we've only gotten started harnessing the Internet's power to change the world. The Internet is a more important development in human history than manned space travel, and it will remain so until the first real colonization of another planet, or the first huge project such as the proposed orbiting solar power stations or moon/asteroid mining stations. (I'm not holding my breath; it will likely be more than a hundred years before the first of these is even attempted).

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    6. Re:Who would have guessed by Proc6 · · Score: 1
      "And even those scientists really had no idea how the net would grow to encompass so much of our lives."

      Sort of makes you wonder what else is out there, just around the corner, maybe among us all, maybe just invented last night in someone's basement or down a few years that we can't even see coming that will have another profound impact on us all. The internet wasn't the first and definately won't be the last.

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    7. Re:Who would have guessed by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Of course, it was largely computer technology developed for the space program that allowed the Internet to grow into something more than an academic exercise. We wouldn't be having this conversation if it weren't for the Apollo missions.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    8. Re:Who would have guessed by corb00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry, but have to agree with previous post.
      Von Braun, father of APOLLO, predicted the following scenarios:

      1) all funds spent on accomplishing a manned landing on moon
      -> no further missions possible
      OR
      2) land unmanned and preserve budget for a better and gradual research

      we all know what happened ..

    9. Re:Who would have guessed by js7a · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but by the time the space program rolled around, most computer R&D funding was commercial. The Apollo computer was made from 5000 off-the-shelf integrated circuits and core memory.

    10. Re:Who would have guessed by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      I mean no disrespect to the significance of July 1968 - as Arthur C. Clarke wrote, in 500 years the only thing people may remember about the Unites States will be that event.

      Do many americans remember now that USSR was the first to launch man into space?

    11. Re:Who would have guessed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moon landing, along with the rest of the Mercury and Apollo missions, had a profound and lasting impact on the world.

      The view of Earth from space CREATED the "Save the planet" movement from numerous save my backyard movements. The idea that you could realisticly care about your corner of the world and safely ignore the rest died the instant the pictures came back from outer space of the beautiful blue and white sphere with pockets of green and brown and nary a hint of the lines drawn by blood and death seperating nations.

    12. Re:Who would have guessed by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      Well said, AC. Wish I could mod that comment up.

  41. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoosh!

  42. Seconded by toddhisattva · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All reporters should have a 3-day fact-checking period before they can print a story.

  43. VP Gore by netglen · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So Gore was VP in 1969? Now I'm throughly confused.

  44. hahah by Vlion · · Score: 2, Funny

    ooo look!
    25 is isomorphic to 35- it changes randomly.
    First 25, now 35, looky 25 is coming back soon!

    --
    /b
    |f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)
    /a
    1. Re:hahah by dlb · · Score: 1

      try decaf

  45. In the year 2014.... by monoqlith · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Internet suddenly has a mid-life crisis. Looking back on its life, it realizes its squandered its time on earth on porn, e-commerce, and petty IM conversations. . The Internet feels hollow and worthless. To console itself, it buys a Porsche from www.porsche.com, and takes it out on the road. Now feeling youthful and vibrant, the Internet uses the Porsche to woo a younger network. Soon enough, the Internet and the younger network are in the throes of a sultry affair. One night, the Internet's rubber breaks and he accidentally gets the younger network pregnant. Scared, the Internet runs away, and the younger network is left on its own to raise the Subnet. The Subnet grows into a full Class C and then into an Internet of its own.

  46. "Lets Do The Time Warp Again!" by Trikenstein · · Score: 1

    "It's just a jump to the left"...

  47. The internet is lots of girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And defying statistics, 99% of them just turned 18!

  48. I don't trust your math by tunabomber · · Score: 5, Funny

    And another thing- if the Internet really is 25 (or 35, whatever)- how come she has so many web sites that say she just turned 18?

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    1. Re:I don't trust your math by Fus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope not! If thats the case, I'm in really big trouble with the Feds. Honest, I didnt know she wasnt 18!!

      --
      _____^_-________ Fus Was Here
  49. And... by atomm1024 · · Score: 5, Funny
    The "meaningless test data," by the way, read thusly:
    g00b3r69: hey a/s/l?
    h0t_arpa_chik: 19/f/dc
    g00b3r69: kewl 20/m/dc wanna cyber?
    h0t_arpa_chik: k
    In other news, September 3 marks be the 35th anniversary of Goatse (and, additionally marking the birthday of leetspeak, we must remember that back then it was known only by its IP address -- 60.47.53.101).
    --
    Signature.
  50. language by 10000000000000000000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this type of thing always makes me wonder about all the other firsts out there.

    like the first word. What was the first word? it had to have happened somewhere at sometime, right?

    We are fortunate enough to actually know when the first bits flowed accross this leap in human communication we call the Internet (or internet for those that like to mux with things).

    But that first being on some ancient plain understanding the concept that she can convey an idea; that she has ideas, that she is something.

    Someone, at sometime, somewhere expressed to another entity a concept - and it was the first time.

    Mind blowing.

    on that day 35 years ago this same type of event was repeated in a new iteration.

    1. Re:language by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      Getting off-topic, but have you ever wondered how some of the more basic things were discovered?

      Who discovered smoking? What possessed them to rip plants up, set fire to them, and inhale the vapors?

      And how about sex? Falling in love might be a natural reaction, but how the hell did they figure that one out? What else went on?

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is probably impossible to say when the "first word" occurred.

      If you were able to see the "evolution" of speech that ended up with words, there was probably no point where you could say that the grunts stopped and words started. The difference at each change in vocalisation was probably so small so as to create a continuum. At no point would you be able to say this is clealy a grunt, while this next change is a word.

      At the same time you can clearly point to two remote points in the history and say "this is a grunt, while this is a word".

    3. Re:language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like the first word. What was the first word? it had to have happened somewhere at sometime, right?

      To answer your question the first word ever uttered was headache.

    4. Re:language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the first words happened when some caveman banged the crap out of his thumb while making a spear head. Loosely translated, they'd be "holy shit that hurts!"

    5. Re:language by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've wondered about that. Smoking? Maybe there was a fire and something smelled interesting and people tried to reproduce that, make it 'convenient'. Sex? Hm. Was it really ever necessary to "figure that one out"? All the other animals seem to just know, don't they? Our distant ancestors probably did as well. Once it left the realm of pure instinct, there likely was enough of it going on already to sorta remind them. Besides, human anatomy sort of suggests these parts fit into each other. Bread on the other hand ...

    6. Re:language by corb00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      what was the first word ?
      --- here is the answer from the author:
      http://www.lk.cs.ucla.edu/first_words.html

  51. ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by stanwirth · · Score: 2, Informative
    Change doesn't come easily, however. For instance, the IPv6 numbering system was deemed an Internet standard about five years ago, but the vast majority of software and hardware today still runs on the older IPv4, which is rapidly running out of room.

    Ipv4 running out of room is a bit of a myth -- there's still plenty of companies and uninversities with huge blocks of ipv4 address space that they have for historical reasons.

    Most ipv4 stacks run on top of an ipv6 stack now and have for several years. I don't see what hardware has to do with it, unless they mean those old routers on the backbone. Most peoples' desktop's and server's NICs can already handle ipv6, and there's nothing stopping them from writing and using ipv6-based applications (client and server). Gettiing ipv6 packets through an ipv4-only backbone segment is just a matter of setting up a tunnel.

    PS I think they meant internet turns 23 -- in hex

    1. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by suwain_2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ipv4 running out of room is a bit of a myth -- there's still plenty of companies and uninversities with huge blocks of ipv4 address space that they have for historical reasons.

      Rather than debunk the myth, you've proved it.

      The whole reason we're "running out of room" is that "old" companies have massive netblocks they're not even beginning to use.

      This is like saying, "There's still plenty of land left in the city. Big companies bought it all up to hold onto." There's plenty of unused IPs out there. The problem is that they'll probably never be assigned.

      I once wrote a script to do a whois on every Class A, and lump them into a text file. I was surprised to find that the United States Government owns something like 30 Class A's.

      It's not a lack of unused IPs. It's a lack of allocatable IPs.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by Feyr · · Score: 1

      you're right in that it's the core routers that needs to be upgraded. mostly in memory i'd think.

      imagine what going from ipv4 to ipv6 would do to the (already huge) routing tables (think BGP).-

      also the increased overhead put (yet again) a bit more load on the backbone links.

      off the top of my head of course. i'm sure there's more reasons

    3. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by stanwirth · · Score: 1

      Agreed!

      The article put down to technology a problem that should properly be lain at the feet of bureaucracy and politics.

      It's not the fault of the addressing protocol itself that its address space has been (in retrospect) misallocated.

      The historical reasons for the misallocation is a whole nother topic, and I suspect has less to do with greed than with institutional inertia.

    4. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by DrDebug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, one of the lesser known goals of IPv6 is to DECREASE the size of the routing tables. This happens because of better allocation of IP routes.

    5. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 1

      Here's a list of who owns all the Class A IP blocks

      http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space

      --
      No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
    6. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what happened was it was found that we would soon run out at the then current rates of alocation

      alocation procedures were changed drastically and we still have enough spare to go on for quite a while

      when it gets really tight no doubt the legacy /8 blocks will get repossessed and broken up or if icann refuses to do that a revoloution (ie a signifiant proportion of major isps decide fuck icann we are going to use this space anyway)

    7. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by mewphobia · · Score: 1
      PS I think they meant internet turns 23 -- in hex

      23h or 0x23 please.

    8. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "there's still plenty of companies and uninversities with huge blocks of ipv4 address space that they have for historical reasons. "

      Tell me about it. I work in a fortune-5 company that has a full class-A network. 16*million* addresses, for, ok, 250000+ employees. And yet, our developement network is on a /24 subnet (255 addresses) and me trying to get them to allocate a new /22 subnet (to get 1024 addresses) is like pulling teeth, because god only knows we can't spare subnets.

      Oh, should I mention, virtually *none* of the addresses are externally available? We could run the entire network on 10.x addressing, and keep even one /16 subnet of it (64K addresses would be *more* than enough for any external presence) and give back 15 million addresses. But, corporate politics being what it is, and nobody wants to rock the boat...

    9. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IPv4 is running out of room. You're taking the approach that I all too often see from users with old disks. "Well, it was 98% full, so I moved a few files I don't really need onto CDRs, and now it's back to 87% full. It'll be fine". Bzzt. Now you're wasting all your time managing a "finite" resource instead of just spending a little time to massively increase the available space.

      Allocated address space is very unlikely to be returned because IPv4 renumbering is painful. So unless a block is entirely idle (a handful of old class A blocks do fall into that category) it can't be returned without the current user incurring significant expenses. "Hey Boss, I was wondering if we could spend $500 000 next year to give back our convenient address hierarchy, it'll push back the need for IPv6 deployment by at least a month or two". Politically you're not going to make that happen.

      The problem, as you seem to have eventually figured out, is not desktop computers but routers. People tend to treat routers as black box magic, and even in the event that they bought a Cisco (rather than some no-name box which is now unsupported) and it's new enough that the router core is IPv6 capable (otherwise you savage the performance by doing IPv6 routing on the GPU) they'll probably resist installing the IPv6 capable image until there's absolutely no choice left. Because it's scary.

      However don't ignore the servers & desktops altogether. Yes, a brand new Win XP system has IPv6 installed, but it's not actually enabled, not even if you plug it into an IPv6-only test network. You have to RTFM, which less than 1% of the population is willing to do. Older Windows servers don't have any supported IPv6 solution (there's a stack available, but if it breaks you get to keep both halves, and it WILL break). People who wouldn't upgrade from Win98 are also not going to upgrade to IPv6.

      Outside the 95% Windows market things are both better and worse. OS X and say Fedora Core 2 ship with IPv6 ready to go, but on more obscure platforms (your AmigaOS, BeOS, RISCOS etc.) there simply isn't any IPv6 support whatsoever.

      And then there's all the cheap BSD or Linux boxes in people's homes, the MyFirstRouter and the BankruptCo BurningWall that they think is keeping out all the Outlook viruses. Some of those things could be upgraded, but the cost to do so is greater than the profit margin, so it's not going to happen any time soon.

      My money is on multicast to sort all this out. Deploying multicast means hop-by-hop upgrades, and people like Cisco are going to sell your ISP IPv6 when they try to do that anyway. The trouble is keeping the existing media monopolies from figuring out that multicast makes the VCR look like an insignificant technological change. One day everyone who wants one can have their own TV channel, and I don't mean "like TiVo" I mean "like CNN", multicast can do that, and I expect it will be IPv6 Multicast that delivers. So long as the existing monopolies don't pay politicians to ban it, tax it or restrict it to Indian reservations first.

    10. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by dago · · Score: 1

      next time, just go to IANA website.
      Now, there's about 38 class A network, 9 of those belongs to the US Govt (mainly military).

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    11. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by netrangerrr · · Score: 1

      The article was pretty lame, tech-lite piece which just referring to IPv6 as a "renumbering scheme." IPv6 is far more than a "renumbering scheme", it adds built in security mechanisms, better support for QOS via the flow label, route summarization, true end-to-end network connectivity, expanded multicast space, scoped multicast, simplified headers for faster processing, etc... Oh, and it has gajillions of addresses!

      --
      "As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
    12. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by dago · · Score: 1

      * built in security mechanisms : it's called IPSec and is available for IPv4 for years
      * better support for QoS, ... : better than what ? Nobody's using QoS on internet and I don't see that many use in internal network. Maybe the problem is not the technology.
      * true end-to-end network connectivity : mitigated by the fact that IPv4 will stay 20 more years, that all the actual NAT boxes are ok for 90% of users, ...
      * multicast : same question : who's using it ?
      * simplified headers for faster processing : again, I don't see the actual place where this IPv4 header processing bottleneck is ...
      * gajillions of addresses : routing tables ?

      well, not just CNN can make pretty light, tech-lite pieces, ...

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    13. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by netrangerrr · · Score: 1

      You obviously are still thinking "In the IPv4 Box" and don't realize how much the current NAT model is holding back the Internet evolution - that's why IETF engineers are behind the IPv6 evolution.

      *IPSEC-not deployed widely and not available in IPv4 stacks below a few application-specific instances. With IPv6 mandated universal IPSEC we could create firewall/VPNs at the host level, and create a defense in depth against insider and outsider attacks.

      *QOS-Needed to expand VOIP telephony and make it really useful. Also needed to converge multimedia onto cheaper packet switched networks. We don't have a way to do integrated services efficiently in IPv4 - thats why the IPv6 flow label was invented (read draft 6LSA)

      *E2E connectivity actually enables all the P2P apps we currently don't have because we have to use central servers to connect. NAT typically breaks E2E like IP telephony, chat, etc...

      *multicast - if we had IPv6 multicast address space and E2E connectivity we would have had extensive use of multicast already. Right now it is impractical to deploy multicast for multimedia distribution.

      *Simplified headers = cheaper routers especially on high speede backbones where processing the checksum in IPv4 is resource expensive.

      *Gajillions :) of addresses = really small routing tables if you RTFM and understand route summarization and the IPv6 header.

      If you need tech-heavy, read the RFCs and THINK about what you could do with the new v6 paradigm

      --
      "As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
    14. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by dago · · Score: 1

      * IPsec is widely available since Windows 2000. Why isn't it widely deployed/used ?

      * QoS : solution exist for years, but none is used, why would that change with a new technique ?

      * end-to-end : yep, no one ever chat or make phone calls trough a NAT

      * Multicast : see QoS, what change for multicast with IPv6 that will enable it in the routers ?

      * Simplifier headers : AFAIK, backbone routers aren't processing the IP headers.

      * Adreses/routing table : I tought that route summarization is also there for v4 ?

      So, now please tell me, what can I do with the new v6 paradigm that I can't now ?

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    15. Re:ipv6 vs ipv4 inaccuracy in CNN article by netrangerrr · · Score: 1

      * IPsec is widely available since Windows 2000. Why isn't it widely deployed/used ?
      -IPSEC is widely used in v4, but only at an application level since it isn't universally available on all IPv4 device stacks. With IPv6, IPSEC is mandated on all devices. All V6 capable devices must have a minimal level of IPSEC so we can achieve some interoperable, simple to implement security.

      "* QoS : solution exist for years, but none is used, why would that change with a new technique ?" We certainly use diffserv today, but it is more expensive and resource intensive to handle each packet seperately, where a flow label could be used for label switching paths similar (but with less overhead) to MPLS.

      "* end-to-end : yep, no one ever chat or make phone calls trough a NAT"
      No one can chat or make phone calls directly through a NAT - you generally must rely on some intermediate service to hook you up E2E. The infrastructure would be far cheaper and reliable without having to be logged in to a service. Wouldn't it be nice to make direct VOIP calls over your ISP's network without also paying some service provider for call setup?

      "* Multicast : see QoS, what change for multicast with IPv6 that will enable it in the routers ?" IPv6 lets you generate multicast streams with guaranteed globally unique addresses, in addition to addresses for a node, link, site, or organization. IPv6 makes extensive use of scoped multicast for efficient autoconfiguration and local service discovery. In IPv4 global multicast addresses had to be assigned from IANA while IPv6 has unicast-prefix-based IPv6 multicast addresses so any node can generate a globally routable, unique IPv6 multicast address based on it's unicast address assignement. The bottom line-this makes multicast cheaper and easier to use...

      "* Simplifier headers : AFAIK, backbone routers aren't processing the IP headers."
      A: Routing is done before entry in the backbone and labels are affixed according to the router's decision - then label switching is done in most high capacity optical backbones. Switching currently requires the extra overhead of adding MPLS labels since IPv4 headers don't support high-speed routing well or switching at all. The IPv6 flow label allows for switching of IP labels, and taking out the checksum allow for very high speed routing.

      "* Adreses/routing table : I tought that route summarization is also there for v4 ?"
      - - You refer to CIDR/supernetting, however for CIDR aggregation to work, the subnets involved must be contiguous (numerically adjacent) in the address space. The problem is that v4 address allocation was not always done contigously and is still a bit of a mess. Of course you could always call back all the v4 address space and reassign it properly (yeah right!) or move on to a fresh start (IPv6). IPv6 address space is large enough to leave large gaps between allocations so an entity can be assigned more space later if needed. This is called sparse allocation. Also, renumbering networks to achieve greater aggregation, if it became necessary, is far easier in IPv6 network auto-renembering.

      "What can I do with IPv6 I can't do with IPv4"
      How about:
      -Efficient low-level autoconfiguration and reconfiguration based on multicast messaging- great for P2P nets and simplified administration!
      -Really anonymous peer-to-peer applications using cypto-generated IPv6 addresses from RFC 3041 and a true E2E network (No NAT!)
      -Information distribution with global geographic multicast?
      -Information distribution via communities of interest based on multicast
      -Univeral host based security being built on IPSEC to prevent insider attacks and create a defense-in-depth
      -Mobile IP that actuall can work everywhere and is efficient
      -Flow label switching eliminating the need for adding extra labels to switched networks...
      -Did I mention no NAT?

      --
      "As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
  52. Happy Birthday Mr. President by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Al Gore.
    Al Gore: well this calls for celebration. *ceeeeeeeelebreate good times comon*
    Al Gore: I will

  53. Hmmm by oR3n · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Internet's 35, isn't it time it got married and had kids? I mean practically everyone knows the pressure put on getting married these days. ;-)

    1. Re:Hmmm by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1
      AOL is the internet's "special" child...somewhere, it was exposed to too much radiation, so mutant kids arose =p



      p.s. someone help me, please! I have 6 gmail invites and only need 5 people to complete an offer. sign up for netscape...no fees and you can cancel it in a week or so.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    2. Re:Hmmm by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      Based on some of the pictures I've found the Internet to have, I think the Internet's gay.

      The poor thing is probably trying to get married; it's just that it's not a legal resident of San Francisco or Massachusetts. Just give it some time, and maybe it'll be able to at least get a civil union.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    3. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet's 35, isn't it time it got married and had kids?

      Hmmm.... how to tell you? Recently the Internet was seen marching in Pride parades, and protesting outside of the Republican National Convention in NY.

      Something tells me it ain't getting married or having kids soon.

      (It still has to tell its parents as well, so please be a little understanding.)

  54. It's the Meaning, Stupid by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... bits of meaningless test data ...

    Meaningless? Meaningless?

    Those bits weren't "meaningless" -- they meant something very clear and important:

    Test successful.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:It's the Meaning, Stupid by grammar+nazi · · Score: 1

      Please, handy_vandal, allow the grammar nazi to clarify for you:

      The bits were indeed meaningless. They were random bits which represented nothing. The grammar nazi thinks you have mistaken useless for meaningless. The test was indeed useful, but the bits were still meaningless.

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    2. Re:It's the Meaning, Stupid by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Those bits weren't "meaningless" -- they meant something very clear and important:
      Ch3ap vi@.gra?

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  55. Re:And in this time of Celebration let us not forg by atomm1024 · · Score: 1

    Why is this modded +4 funny? Al Gore does deserve to be remembered for his involvement in the creation of what we now know as the Internet.

    --
    Signature.
  56. BBN & IMP at McClellan by chiph · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In 1986 I was stationed at McClellan AFB, and got to watch some contractors install about 4 racks of beige equipment called an "Interface Message Processor" from a company called BBN. I had no clue at the time it was part of the internet. About ten years later I realized what it was, and thought "Wow, I got to see an IMP in person!"

    Sorry, I don't have a photo (and couldn't find one via Google) -- cameras weren't allowed in the area. The very first IMPs looked like this, though.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:BBN & IMP at McClellan by netrangerrr · · Score: 1

      I work for SRI and picked up an IMP manual a few years ago when I saw it in a trash can during a lab cleanup. I wonder if anyone would like to buy an original IMP manual as an Internet artifact?

      --
      "As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
  57. Defending from private take-over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "And as security chairman for the Internet's key oversight body, he(Crocker) is trying to defend the core addressing system from outside threats, including an attempt last year by a private search engine to grab Web surfers who mistype addresses."

    Is it referring to Verisign (Net-Sol) or what?

    Most of the previous commentors, so it seems, did not even read the article. Yes, someone please welcome me. I am new to /..

  58. Was going so well by bigberk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So it started with technological innovation, and saw rapid development through the cooperation of governments and universities. It was refined and improved thanks to the effort of a bunch of awfully dedicated academics to the point where it could merge with mainstream technologies (talking PPP over analog phone modems). The new worldwide resource gave us the ability to communicate like never before.

    Things were going so well, until the marketers came on board and started flooding people with ads and junk whatever way they could find. Spam was funny at first; now it's a serious waste of bandwidth and resources, with business people resorting to purely criminal activities in order to flood their advertising and harm benevolent volunteer organizations. Thanks to dirty business the Internet has become a battle ground. Spyware and even viruses are directly linked to immoral advertising/spam.

    Now, I don't hate marketing people (I run a businses, and am a student in Management) but it's safe to say that immoral marketers are f*cking up the Internet.

  59. Re:And in this time of Celebration let us not forg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Al Gore did not create the internet! He coined the phrase "Information Highway", in a speach about the World Wide Web that was just starting to become available to public users.

  60. OSQ by Aggrazel · · Score: 4, Funny

    They have the internet on computers now?

  61. Already 35? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, is it already 35? I feel so old... I remember when back in the early 1970s I said to one of my friends that I don't know when, I don't know how, but I am sure that eventually one day someone will somehow use this new technology for pornography... In my sickest dreams I haven't imagined something on the scale of images.google.com, though. That having been said, happy birthday to Internet, the most important achievment of humanity since the printing press. It all began on "September 2, 1969, as bits of meaningless test data flowed silently between the two computers." Today, after only 35 years, the unbelievably obscene amount of meaningless data silently flowing between billions of computers in every second, makes me wonder: can the net amount of entropy of the universe be decreased? Will the Internet help us find any meaningful answer? In any case, I am sure that the Internet is something which our grandchildren and their grandchildren will learn at school about. September 2 is a very important day. There is even an article on Wikipedia about this very day. I believe every person who has ever published anything on the Internet should be proud, because this is something all of us has created, even if none of use has envisioned. Truly remarkable achievment. Happy birthday!

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  62. 35 and counting by yintercept · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...bits of meaningless test data flowed silently between the two computers

    What I am looking forward to the day when we finally get beyond the meaningless test data phase...uh, anyway, I looked at /. for the day and am off to the email account to perform a spam harvest.

  63. Dupe by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So which is it? 25? or 35? Come on... :p

    It's only a 10 years old dupe. You must be new here...

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  64. that reminds me of myself.... by LiquidMind · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    "....as bits of meaningless test data flowed silently between the two computers"

    that sounds a lot like the way i was made...well, let me rephrase that....

    "...as bits of meaningless biomass flowed silently between the two organs..."

    and out of all those semen, mine was the fastest ;)

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  65. Wait a sec... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    So the Internet is really 35 years old, or at least will be in September, which is before November...

    INTERNET FOR PRESIDENT!

  66. Re:OSQ (Part II) by DoktorSeven · · Score: 1

    The Internet? Is that thing still around?

    --
    This is a sig. Deal with it.
  67. 25 was right... by slashname3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    25 was right, that was when Al Gore invented the Internet. It was not those geeks in 1969 that did it. No no, not them. Al Gore did it. He said so. Remember, its not real until the legislature says so.

  68. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by tunabomber · · Score: 1

    record player: "Celebrate good times- COME ON!"
    Al Gore: [sitting motionless] "I will!"

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
  69. Thanks to the Cold War by KB1GHC · · Score: 0

    the internet was supposed to be a communcation system, that will operate even if a large part of it were knocked out because of nuclear war.

    check out:
    http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/experie nce/te chnology/internet.bomb/index.html
    for more information.

  70. Flouride? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who "invented" flouride? And why is this something that has changed the way we live?

    1. Re:Flouride? by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Many cities add it to the water supply on the theory that it prevents cavities in teeth.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    2. Re:Flouride? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And? It doesn't work, it doesn't even help. In fact some studies have shown the free radicals caused by fluoridation of drinking water breaks down the connective tissue between your teeth and gums. Its also been found to increase bone brittleness, and lead to more fractures, particularly hip fractures in osteoperosis patients. Its also linked to cancer.

      However, none of this really effects the way we live our lives does it? And it certainly wasn't invented.

    3. Re:Flouride? by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      That should read "Many commies add it to the water supply on the theory that it prevents American resistance to their scheming plots to conquer the world." That's why I only drink pure grain alcohol and rainwater. To preserve my Purity Of Essence.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    4. Re:Flouride? by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "It doesn't work, it doesn't even help."

      I didn't render my opinion on whether or not it did anything or improved the quality of life. I don't know enough about it to make that call; hence my post was worded precisely as it is. :)

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  71. Re:Yay! by justforaday · · Score: 1

    And guess who he'd have to pay to use it -- AOL/Time Warner... *shudder*

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  72. Houston we have a problem... by dfj225 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Working with NASA, Cerf is also trying to extend the network into outer space to better communicate with spacecraft."
    Astronaut: Houston, we have a problem...one of the display screens is reading "j00 R pAwned".

    --
    SIGFAULT
    1. Re:Houston we have a problem... by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Pawned to whom? The Martians?

  73. Happy Birthday Mr. Gore! by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 0, Troll

    After all, if it wasn't for him linventing the internet, we would have no reason to celebrate.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  74. 1969 Internet maps by oob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's a nice collection of Internet maps from September 1969 onwards, showing the network build out from UCLA to include Stanford, UCSB, Utah and so on.

  75. The Internet's Over 30? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe there will stop being so many liberals on it (you know - those over/under 30 who are liberal/conservative...). :p

  76. think of the good times interweb by soimless · · Score: 0

    just think of the good times. like the time you got finnish soldgers out of work becuse you got them attdicted to you. or that one time where you let pepole trade them mp3's over a thing called napster. or even now where a boy is typeing out a stupid responce on a news website

  77. Al Gore... by Zebra_X · · Score: 0, Troll

    must be so happy that his child has grown up to unite the people of the world.

    I wonder what the internet got al gore on fathers day?

    1. Re:Al Gore... by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Probably a DNA test.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  78. Please remove the link to CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You did not ask permission to link this article. Please remove it or we will take further action if necessary.

  79. Older than 35 really... by Hobadee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you define "Internet" as two or more computers communicating with each other, then it's been around for longer. Hackers at MIT way back when hooked together 2 computers (PDP-11 and PDP-7 I think) and told some professors they had created a chess program. They had one professor sit in one room at the terminal for one of the computers, and the other professor in the other room with the terminal for the other computer. The professors played each other for a while until one of them realized the responses were a bit slow, then saw/followed the wire into the next room where the other professor was sitting!

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    1. Re:Older than 35 really... by raygundan · · Score: 1

      The slowness gave it away? Really? Perhaps the PDP-11 was faster than I remember, or there was some really hairy "back when men were men, and programming was assembly" optimization going on.

      I remember waiting whole days for moves from the first computer chess game I had.

  80. the real first message transmitted by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    Hi! How are you?

    I send you this file in order to have your advice.

    See you later!

    Thanks

  81. What change? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    It says "35." It has always said "35." It has never said "25"; this is just a collective hallucination of slashdot readers. God will roast their stomachs in hell!

    --Information Commander Muhammed Saeed al-Taco

  82. Decimal Birthday by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    As far as the Internet Decimal Birthday goes:
    For the birthdate: Tuesday, September 02, 1969
    You are now 12781 days old.

    Your next Minor Decimal Birthday is
    your 12800th day on Friday, September 17, 2004

    Your next Major Decimal Birthday is
    your 13000th day on Tuesday, April 05, 2005
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  83. Meaningless vs. Useless by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    The bits were indeed meaningless. They were random bits which represented nothing. The grammar nazi thinks you have mistaken useless for meaningless. The test was indeed useful, but the bits were still meaningless.

    Hmm. I'm not sure I agree ... but I will say, I'm glad you're on the job, grammar nazi. That's exactly the kind of semantic nuance-manship I'd champion myself, were I sober ....

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Meaningless vs. Useless by khrtt · · Score: 1

      Excuses, excuses... *barfs on keyboard*

    2. Re:Meaningless vs. Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shutup you worthless faggot, you're the one being pedantic.

  84. Large Scale Farming/Frozen Food better than net by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    There are a LOT of people on this planet that if you were to send them back 100 years in the past, the net would be the thing they most ache for

    I call BS on that. Most folks today could not handle old school farming and raising and slaughtering their own animals. Even something simple like preparing a chicken would make modern folks miss frozen food far more than the net.

    Additionally, the old school farming lifestyle would not leave any free time for the net. What modern folks would miss most of all would be the 8 hour work day that leaves time for luxuries like the net.

  85. Not only is the Internet 35, but so is the WWW!!! by skintigh2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just ask the "tech" "reporter" at AP "news."

    Web Turns 35, but Still Work in Progress
    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=st ory&cid=52 8&e=1&u=/ap/20040829/ap_on_hi_te/internet_s_birthd ay

  86. Count with porn by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Funny

    The birth of the Internet should count when the first porn picture was published. Seriously, until it was made to the masses with a non-scientific use did it matter to the public.

    1. Re:Count with porn by CreatureComfort · · Score: 2, Funny


      You think it took until it was made open to the public for the first porn was available? You obviosly don't know how boring it could be sitting and feeding punch cards in... Go ASCII pr0n! Woohoo...

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    2. Re:Count with porn by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      That depends, are you talking about those ASCII p0rn pictures?

      How about the black and white p0rn pics using the Macintosh picture format that started circulating after the Macintosh was invented? I remember there was a DOS reader for those, so the Hercules and CGA displays could see them and scroll in them too. Nothing like seeing dithered p0rn pictures, and if you squinted, you just might see the colors if you also crossed your eyes. Then you also got fooled, like you might download a Nagel picture, or one that zonked you with a picture of a gorilla instead of p0rn. You didn't know until you downloaded it and looked at it.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:Count with porn by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      The birth of the Internet should count when the first porn picture was published.

      Okay, come back tomorrow and we'll celebrate THAT 35th anniversary.

  87. The actual message: by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    LO

    The word that the tester was trying to type was LOGIN. The system crashed before he could type the rest of it. Some things never change.

    Source: "Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Birth of the Internet."

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  88. So the internet's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A virgo?

  89. Where is my credit? by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0
    I invented this thing when i was 18!

    - Al Gore

  90. It is TRUE - Al Gore Was Responsible ;-);-);-) by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 1
    Balance Through HUMOR You Uptight Moderators

    It is FUNNY that Al Gore claimed that he "took the initiative in creating the Internet" ... the video is there if you watch & listen to the entire interview at time stamp ~ 0:50

    " I took the initiative in creating the Internet," Al Gore preposterously claimed (time stamp ~ 0:50) on the March 9, 1999 Late Edition/PrimeTime, but that didn't faze CNN's Wolf Blitzer who just kept tossing softball questions.
    --

    I believe Juanita

    1. Re:It is TRUE - Al Gore Was Responsible ;-);-);-) by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

      thanks for the support, it was a joke.

  91. EVIDENCE - Al Gore claiming credit by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Balance Through HUMOR You Uptight Moderators

    It is FUNNY that Al Gore claimed that he "took the initiative in creating the Internet" ... the video is there if you watch & listen to the entire interview at time stamp ~ 0:50

    " I took the initiative in creating the Internet," Al Gore preposterously claimed (time stamp ~ 0:50) on the March 9, 1999 Late Edition/PrimeTime, but that didn't faze CNN's Wolf Blitzer who just kept tossing softball questions.
    --

    I believe Juanita

  92. Original IMP by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I still remember seeing the original IMP at Case Tech, one of the first sixteen nodes. It was also the first to be removed. Case lost their R&D contract, which was to develop something like a VHDL compiler, decades too early. So DARPA took their IMP back.

    But nobody really cared at Case, because the emphasis there was on "high-capacity, fast-turnaround batch computing". They got really good at batch job processing. It was so cost-effective that Case stayed with it years after other schools went interactive.

  93. I'm 35 and I'm quite happy ... but I'm quite old. by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hello, Wow. I just posted and the Slashdot system just broke down... That makes me feel much much younger. I'm about as young as the relationship model of databases; or now I'm SRB young.... now I'm Hier....wait... I'm so young I'm network young....... Now I'm file system young...... Oh God! I'm File System young..... waaaaa! Waaaa!!!! No, stop... I'm a cobol baby.

  94. Re:I'm 35 and I'm quite happy ... but I'm quite ol by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yep,
    All f=d up.
    Bout time someone started a tech discussion on Slashdot. I thought that would get attention. My post was messed up, and now those in the know would jump in. I know zero about databases., but you all know. So, Discuss! Let's get it on with the object oriented and that all and such....

  95. So? by Sam+Jackson · · Score: 1

    Does this mean we can now start selling stupid CafePress t-shirt's???

    --
    --- hows it taste mother f$#@er!!!
  96. Uh! by gurry · · Score: 1

    happy birthday, the Internet!

    "Oh come 'ere the Internet. I can never stay mad at you. Now let's go kick Strong Sand in the shins."

  97. Sounds familiar by floki · · Score: 1

    .. he is trying to defend the core addressing system from outside threats, including an attempt last year by a private search engine to grab Web surfers who mistype addresses.

    Internet Explorer?

    --
    from the to-stupid-for-words dept.
    1. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verisign

      Sorry about the horrible site, but that's the first one I found on google that explains the situation (past).

    2. Re:Sounds familiar by floki · · Score: 1

      I know. I was just trying to karma whore for a "Funny" :-)

      --
      from the to-stupid-for-words dept.
  98. And the computers said ... by unsigned+integer · · Score: 1

    foo ----------------->
    <---------------- bar

    Meaningless test data, indeed.

  99. Hmmm... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...nerds with computers. Something tells me the Internet is 34 1/2 then ;)

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  100. cults? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    and forums full of all kinds of wonderful religious fanatics, ready to convert me to their cult. I love it!

    You mean like the Church of the Self-Important Annoying Athiest, often represented by the mysterious symbols "/."? ;)

    1. Re:cults? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, forgive us.

  101. Silently? by schmoo.me · · Score: 0

    "...bits of meaningless test data flowed silently between the two computers" Completely silently? ...with no noise at all? I would've thought, even if we couldn't hear it, some sound would be made.

  102. Internet 35 Forum @ UCLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    UCLA will host a forum for the 35th Anniversary of Internet on October 29th. http://www.internetanniversary.com

  103. Thanks by whackedoutgeek2004 · · Score: 1

    Thank you, Al. ;p

  104. legislative initiative in creating the Internet by brlewis · · Score: 1
    The "Internet" as we know it today is a network open to everybody, not just schools, military, government, and a few select companies. Al Gore did in fact show initiative in pushing legislation to create what we have today. Get the full story.

    However, you're right that the Al Gore joke is funny. Lies about drunk driving, legislation that was passed over your veto, and "compassionate conservatism" just don't have as much humor potential.

  105. to the masses by brlewis · · Score: 1
    Seriously, until it was made to the masses with a non-scientific use did it matter to the public.
    Be careful. That's the kind of mindset that made Al Gore the butt of jokes for years.
  106. Flouride destroys lifetsyles by celerityfm · · Score: 1

    http://thyroid.about.com/cs/toxicchemicalsan/a/flo uride.htm and seem to think Flouride is bad. I met a guy on an airplane whose life mission appeared seemed to be to get rid of Flouride forever.

    I stopped using a Flouride rinse my dentist sold me because of it. Seems kinda scary. Please someone rebut this.. I can't seem to find any good rebuttals.

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
    1. Re:Flouride destroys lifetsyles by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      I stopped using a Flouride rinse my dentist sold me because of it. Seems kinda scary. Please someone rebut this..

      This isn't a rebuttal per se, but you could start here...

      Flouride is one of those chemicals that has developed a mythical aura of "evil" surrounding it, even worse than Aspartame. The dark comedy "Dr. Strangelove" even made it a key plot point, having a crazy military officer blame flouridation on a Commuinst plot.

      The issue with chemicals like these is not that they are lethal in high doses; everything is lethal when taken excessively. It's a matter simply of dosage. The typical amount of flouride added to drinking supplies is just too small to cause the effects observed in lab rats.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  107. According to the U.S. Constitution... by Dr.+Brad · · Score: 1

    At 35, the Internet is now old enough to be President of the United States.

    Take care,
    brad

  108. technically, just the ArpaNet is 35 by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Until the mid-80s there were several national networks with various qualities of interconnectability-ArpaNet, MilNet, NSFNet, BitNet, etc. The "InterNet" agreed on standardized protocols and funded a trans-continental optical fiber backbone. AL Gore (really) is repsonsible for that legislation.

  109. See, its capitalized.. by Barryke · · Score: 1
    See, its capitalized :D

    "So, happy birthday, the Internet!"

    Check this previous /. article "It's Just the 'internet' Now?" .

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  110. drink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on this side of the ocean, the internet could be legaly drunk for many years already...

  111. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, interenet invents Al Gore!!!!