Slashdot Mirror


Logitech Gives A Mouse A Laser

Kaveh writes "Looks like Logitech has introduced a successor to its popular MX line of cordless mice. In addition to a more ergonomic design, lithium ion battery, tilt wheel (read horizontal scrolling), and battery indicating LEDs, this mouse introduces laser technology. According to the Logitech this allows the MX1000 to be 20x more precise than optical mice, not to mention work on any surface, including a mirror! Check out the 3DGPU forums for pics and more info."

117 of 511 comments (clear)

  1. LASER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With the Dr. Evil finger quotes: Cool, a mouse with a "LAAAASER!!"

    1. Re:LASER by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 4, Funny

      damnit, that was the first thing I thought of.... only...

      I want mice with a fricken laser attached to its head.

      but now for a real post:

      I really dig this idea. Being able to annihilate your roommates with your mouse? I've always had the need to take out the obnoxious kids I live with when they play their shit music.

      could this double as a laser pointer? Imagine a cordless laser-driven mouse that also had pointing capabilities for presentations and such. that'd be rad.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    2. Re:LASER by mkro · · Score: 4, Informative
      could this double as a laser pointer? Imagine a cordless laser-driven mouse that also had pointing capabilities for presentations and such. that'd be rad.
      No, it can't. The laser under the MX1000 has no visible light.
      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    3. Re:LASER by harrkev · · Score: 3, Interesting
      No, it can't. The laser under the MX1000 has no visible light.


      I did not see any mention of laser color in the article, but I doubt that they would use and IR laser.

      First, ALL laser products have those little yellow warning stickers on them. And the troulbe with infra-red lasers is that they can burn your eye without you even knowing it. With a visible (red) laser, at least you know when it is pointing at you.

      I can just imagine some kid holding the thing up to his eye. The ONLY way for this to use IR and still be safe is if the thing has an extremely low power, and uses a lens to spread out the beam.

      Does anybody know for sure what is going on here?
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  2. Oh, they mean computer mice by ndogg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really was hoping for mice with frickin' lasers on their headers. Darn.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by Laser+Lou · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really was hoping for mice with frickin' lasers on their headers. Darn.

      I'm glad they don't. My snakes wouldn't like it.

      --
      No data, no cry
    2. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 5, Funny

      On their headers?

      Man, you been coding too long. Go outside for a while.

    3. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by TheContact · · Score: 5, Funny

      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h" ...

      I hope I've made your day. :)

      --

      Yume ni ikiteiru.
    4. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by ndogg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got a new sig now. Thanks!

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    5. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Yellow face, it BURNSSSSS us!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by acariquara · · Score: 2, Funny
      My snakes wouldn't like it.

      Neither would my
      badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger...

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  3. A mirror? by Hawkxor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been waiting for this. On my table with a glass plate on top, I have to use a mouse pad for my optical mouse, but I don't need one for my regular mouse. This technology actually serves the purpose an optical mouse should.

    1. Re:A mirror? by peipas · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am holding the box for the MX1000 in front of me right now and it begs to differ in fine print after an asterisk:

      "The laser sensor will not work on surfaces that reflect, like mirrors or glass."

    2. Re:A mirror? by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the forum post linked in the article:

      "Already you might be surprised to know that this mouse has had no issues with any surface I have tried it on, including a mirror. It states that you shouldn't use it with reflective surfaces but I wanted to see what this thing could do."

    3. Re:A mirror? by mingot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I did was bought a big pack of black poster board and cut out mini mousepads. When they get a little dirty a cut out a new one. Better than a bulky mousepad, and very inexpensive.

    4. Re:A mirror? by gregh2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I currently own a MX1000, and I have tried it on a mirror, and my computer's monitor and neither of them work. I wonder if the mirror they used had a bunch of dust on it and it was tracking the dust, or what the deal is, but it doesn't work on mine.

    5. Re:A mirror? by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm guessing that there is a health danger with reflective surfaces. You probably don't want that shit reflecting onto your retina.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    6. Re:A mirror? by Fizzl · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just imagined myself using a laser mouse on a glass table. Damn that would be hilarious.

      I have a cat. It already goes wild with ordinary flashlight. With a tiny laser dot jumping under my desk a mayhem would ensue.

      Goodbye tangled cabling I have under my desk.

    7. Re:A mirror? by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't the mouse kind of get into the way ? Unless you have very long and thin optical pseudopods you can extend under it while it's working ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  4. my mouse already has a laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    how else am i able to blind my opponents

  5. Ya know... by psetzer · · Score: 2, Funny
    I always wanted to use some mirrored table as a mouse pad. Now I guess I'll have to get one of those mice.

    I might also want a mirrored table in the first place.

    --
    "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    1. Re:Ya know... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 4, Funny

      I might also want a mirrored table in the first place.

      damn cocaine addict!

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    2. Re:Ya know... by stromthurman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he just likes having sex on his ceiling?

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this margin is too small to contain.
  6. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can *really* blind someone with my optical mouse.

  7. "this mouse introduces laser technology." by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny
    For decades, science fiction writers and futurists alike have been predicting the day that laser technology would finally come to fruition. Who would have thought that it would be Logitech to at last bring laser technology to market, and that it would be a lowly mouse that would make it possible?

    With this breakthrough, Logitech truly enters the forefront of American innovation. We should all look to Logitech for inspiration.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  8. This is nice by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was actually considering going back to a 'ball' mouse, as my Logitech optical tends to be jumpy on some surfaces. I tend to use it outside a lot, and I think the sunshine affects the tracking.

    Precise, and wireless - this might be just the ticket.

    1. Re:This is nice by ThogScully · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My first optical mouse was an MS Intellimouse Explorer (the original, freaking huge one). I use that on my laptop, but got a wireless Logitech MX700 for my desktop.

      Honestly, I'm a bit disappointed in the Logitech because of exactly what you're talking about. My Intellimouse Explorer has no problem tracking on any surface or any fine control. The Logitech is a pain to use with graphics apps.

      I've always been a fan of MS's mic, but decided to try out Logitech because MS hadn't released a wireless optical yet. I wish I hadn't in retrospect. And this comes from a very anti-MS attitude regarding software.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    2. Re:This is nice by wolrahnaes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      re-read the post dumbshit. "MS hadn't released a wireless optical YET"

      meaning that at the time he purchased the mouse, that MS that you linked to WASN'T OUT YET!

      tard

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  9. Finally! by Piranhaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WOW! I've been waiting for this day for quite some time now. I knew lasers would soon enough be used in mice due to the surfaces optical mice couldn't work on (ie, glass, mirror, etc). This is definetly just a little step into laser mice, but I'm sure eventually they'll start turning to green or even blue lasers for mice. The only problem I see here is when little Jonny picks up his mouse and looks into the laser ... Could there be ways to stop this from happening?

    1. Re:Finally! by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only problem I see here is when little Jonny picks up his mouse and looks into the laser ... Could there be ways to stop this from happening?

      Yeah, just slip a MEMS accelerometer in there to determine if it's right side up or not. Turn the thing off if it's rotated too far from being the proper side down. No help if little Jonny sticks his head under the mouse but you can only do so much.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Finally! by knodi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      or a tilt switch. just because the mouse is high-tech doesn't mean you need to make it as complex as possible.

      --
      Austin is more fun than Dallas.
    3. Re:Finally! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      A tilt switch usually means either a switch with a weight meaning you need two of them to make it work to cover two axes, or a mercury switch which has the same problem plus the drawback that the contents can be toxic if they escape the switch in exchange for being more reliable than a mechanical tilt switch. A two-axis MEMS accelerometer is available quite cheaply from Analog Devices and is a quite small little part. I am sure they will become even cheaper and smaller in the future.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Finally! by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      or a tilt switch.

      Yes! Dangerous eye melting lasers combined with mercury! I like your style.

      Now let's just make it small enough to be a choking hazard.

    5. Re:Finally! by BillyBlaze · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lasers are absolutely not inherently more dangerous than any other form of light. The danger comes from the amplitude of light that enters your eye, which is a function of the power of the source, the distance, and the focusing. So assuming they focus the laser as diffusely as they focus the red light from current optical mice, it's no more dangerous.

    6. Re:Finally! by spectecjr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lasers are absolutely not inherently more dangerous than any other form of light. The danger comes from the amplitude of light that enters your eye, which is a function of the power of the source, the distance, and the focusing. So assuming they focus the laser as diffusely as they focus the red light from current optical mice, it's no more dangerous.

      1. In that case, why use a laser at all? Why not use an ultrabright red LED? To have any benefit in using a laser at all, they must be making use of interference effects, which means they need a coherent light source. Which meas that no, they won't diffusely focus the light at all.

      2. The danger comes from the fact that laser light is planar, and because of this not only will your eye will attempt to focus it, and will open the pupil wider in response to it at the same time, for maximum retinal damage.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  10. Hate to tell you this... by CdnZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but Logitech is Canadian. HQ is in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

    1. Re:Hate to tell you this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did I miss the part where Vancouver annexed Switzerland?

      http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/about/company/CA /EN,CRID=296

  11. Potential danger? by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dangerous! You know, the "I'll clean my mouse" routine... flip mouse toward face... arghhh! My eyes!

    Of course, if you`re lucky AND already have bad vision, you could just laser-correct your problem, i guess :) 2000$ saved, 50$ investment, Do It Yourself! Isn`t technology cool?

    1. Re:Potential danger? by Matrix9180 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You probably should have finished reading that post before adding your witty comment ;)

      --
      120chars for a sig is teh suck
  12. wireless + laser = short battery life? by sjalex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've heard people griping about the short battery life on the wireless mice they already have. Won't a laser exacerbate the problem?

    1. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by harikiri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have an MX700 from Logitech. The beauty of this device is that it comes with a stylish cradle, that serves both as the wireless base station for the mouse, along with being a recharger unit as well.

      I remember a few years back having an early Logitech wireless mouse/keyboard combo. Then, one late night while we were doing a change - the batteries died, and I had none spare. At that point I decided never to use a "wireless" keyboard or mouse till they came with a recharge unit. Thus, the MX700 was awesome for me.

      I would be very suprised if this new model didn't use the same system.

      --
      Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
  13. Text by McKinney83 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Main point: HIGH PERFORMANCE CORDLESS MOUSE WITH LASER TRACKING
    PI DATE : JULY 2004
    TECHNOLOGY : Fast RF cordless
    SYS REQS : IBM or compatible PC,
    Windows 98, 2000, Me or XP,
    Available USB or PS2 port, CD-ROM drive
    Macintosh system - Mac OS X+,
    Available USB port, CD-ROM drive
    FEATURES : * MX Laser Engine provides 20 x times the tracking power
    of optical
    * a built-in lithium-ion battery & rapid-charging base station
    * Fast RF cordless delivers cordless performance that equals USB corded connection
    * New thumb-button controls include universal page forward and back buttons and application switch to quickly move between open windows
    * Illuminated 4-level batt indicator precisely monitors batt strength
    * Wheel tilts for side-to-side scrolling, zoom with a click of the wheel
    * Cruise Control rocker for speed scrolling up and down
    * Deep-sculpted thumb support for incredible comfort, outside finger grips enhance control

    PACKAGE CONTENT :
    * Logitech MX-1000 Laser cordless mouse
    * Recharging base station,
    * CD-ROM with SetPoint SW
    * Installation guide,
    * PS2 to USB adapter

    --
    Winner of The Second Annual Montgomery Burns Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence.
  14. Does It Fix This Problem? by ArchAngel21x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it is more accurate. That is fine, but the optical mouse seems pretty accurate. The only thing I do not like is the weird quark all optical mice have. When you move the, mouse the cursor will go shooting off in the opposite direction. It is very annoying. It does not happen all the time, but it is still annoying.

    1. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only thing I do not like is the weird quark all optical mice have.

      Ahem.

      I think you meant strange quark .

      Sorry, correcting incorrect assumptions about physics is a strange quirk. of mine. :)

    2. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the so called "bouncing" problem, and it's specially noticeable on earlier, lower DPI optical mouses. Gamers particularly bitched on this - i know quite a few who brought the new Microsft Intellimouse just because it fixed the problem (or so they say).

      In my mouse (Genius Powerscroll EYE optical) it happens when you do an extreme move to one direction; the pointer jumps and "jitters" to the oposite for a second; i use high sensitivity so it never bothered me. Newer optical mouses have to be moved very, very (and i do mean very) fast in order for this to happen.

  15. 20x more precise by chrono325 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this really useful? I mean, I have never had a problem with my mouse not having the resolution to click the "submit" button. Seriously though, I think mouse (and keyboard) makers have run into a similar problem as sound card makers: our mice/soundcards are already good enough. I personally have a Logitech mx500 and love it to death, but I do not see any way the pointing function could be improved. Oh well, its a frickin laser.

    1. Re:20x more precise by Rew190 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Games, CAD, image-work, folks that use high resolution displays, etc....

    2. Re:20x more precise by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know and I agree. But.
      *sigh*
      I'm still gonna have to get one.

  16. Slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  17. I like my original title better... by kaveh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "World's 1st Laser Mouse! (Optical is obsolete)"

    Either way I'm hoping I can just swap this mouse in for my current MX700 in my logitech cordless keyboard/mouse set. That way I can use the same reciever that also connects the mouse. It is important to note that this mouse uses Fast RF technology like the MX700 and not Bluetooth like the MX900. Some gamers weren't happy with the performance of the Bluetooth model.

    1. Re:I like my original title better... by Roofus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah whatever! Next you'll probably tell me the 'L' in LASER stands for 'Light'. What, do you think I'm a sucker?

      KC2LJL

  18. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Give a mouse a shark, he'll want a pool.

    Give a mouse a pool, he'll want an underground labratory to put them all in.

    Give a mouse an underground lab, he'll want a laptop with wifi to take over the world.

    Give a mouse a laptop with wifi, he'll want a coffee table to set it on.

    Give a mouse a table to set it on, he'll want an optical mouse that works with the glass.

    Give a mouse the new Logitech.

    ???

    Profit.

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  19. Clickable like ;) by kunjan1029 · · Score: 4, Informative

    opps

    here's the clickable one

    Mirror

    Damn have to wait 2 minutes~

  20. Sounds pretty sweet... by gordlea · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As long as the battery life is decent, I want one. Screw the Starck mouse... This sounds like it should be great for games.

    Would there be much difference in power draw between an led and a laser? I realize they must have some pretty low power lasers (like in a discman); how powerful of a laser would you need to be able to track movement like this?

    --

    Choose yer poison: Prophets or Profits

  21. Mice and What They're Good For by captnitro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it ever make you wonder 'what if computing advanced like mice do'? In some ways, they do, but I mean, we have wireless mice, wireless optical and laser mice, wireless optical laser geneboosted mice that have nine buttons with integrated phone features, and they're all totally transparent, incredibly essential cruxes of the modern computing experience.

    can we get somebody from the mouse department over to the HD storage density department? Or the hardware installation department, because I still have to visit my grandfather every time he needs to install RAM. Perhaps, even, we should transfer the entire mouse department over to the user interface department, so they can explain to me why 'Exit' is for the love of god still after 20 years in the 'File' menu (Mac users, you're OK on this one). Those two, after all, have a lot to do with each other. Finally, they could stop over at the Windows dev group and explain to them that I should not have to notify Windows of my intention to disconnect my fully hotswappable device.

    I could go on, but I think you get the idea.

  22. Needed warning label by dougmc · · Score: 4, Funny
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye
    (No, it's not mine. And the laser isn't likely to have enough power to really hurt anybody's eye. But it still seems appropriate. :)
  23. Yeah I know, I'm using one by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And it's cool. Better than my optical mouse that got bumped down to my other computer? I don't really know. I'm still in that brief "getting used to a different mouse" phase so what I can tell you about it is limited.

    The one it replaced was a Logitech basic cordless optical It did it's job well but I've been using my second computer more lately and the mouse on it was a POS so I needed another. In terms of accuracy I'm sure the laser mouse is better (Logitech wouldn't lie about that would they?) but I doubt that it's going to be something that 90% of us would notice.

    Getting past the claims of improved accuracy that I can't really address it's a nice mouse. I'd have bought the Bluetooth model but this one was $20 cheaper and I liked the feel of it.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by jargonCCNA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it available in a lefthanded model? No?

      Then fuck you, Logitech.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    2. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you know why they don't make very many lefthanded mice? It's because left handed people DO NOT BUY THEM. If they did then Logitech would sell them, but they keep ending up with a lot of unsold lefthanded mice.

      It's a strict business decission, so blame the other lefties who use righthanded mice. ;->

    3. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, Logitech (and other companies) have made lefthanded mice and they didn't sell. I had the change to buy a large number of pallets worth and that excess invetory was a drain on their profits for a quarter.

      http://thelefthand.com/lefconmous.html

      Don't say your being persecuted when you are too fucking lazy to use google. The above URL was the FIRST google result for left handed mouse. ;->

    4. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by u01iz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use it on a mirror.

  24. Class of Laser? by Soldrinero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually read the article (I am new here) but didn't see anything mentioning what class of laser it uses. It does say that the manufacturer recommends not using it on mirrored surfaces. It's possible, though unlikely, for a class II laser (such as is found in a laser pointer) to cause eye damage. I've been in classrooms with optical mice invoerted and shining their light out at students. Is this something that we're going to have to worry about with a laser mouse? Of course, if it's a class I (such as is found in CD players) there's no concern at all. Does anybody have any information on this?

    --
    I would rather be killed by a terrorist than enslaved by my government.
    1. Re:Class of Laser? by grondin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The picture of the bottom of the mouse shows the laser label. "Class 1 laser device"

    2. Re:Class of Laser? by Technician · · Score: 5, Informative

      The picture of the bottom of the mouse shows the laser label. "Class 1 laser device"


      If memory serves me right, a class 1 LASER device has a totaly enclosed interlocked LASER system.

      This means no external radiation of LASER light unless the device is opened and interlocks are defeated. It's the same rating CD drives have. The drive must be opened (cover removed) and tricked into operation without a CD in place to turn on the LASER and cause any exposure.

      If it truly uses a LASER to track and is class 1, it must have another LED to sense the presence and movement of the target (table, pad, etc) before it will turn on the laser. Otherwise it would have a class 2 or 3b rating like a supermarket UPC scanner. They may have done this to save power when the mouse is not moving (low power LED when stationary or not on a surface) and to get the safer LASER class 1 rating.

      I imagine it will only kick on the LASER when the low power light detects movement and kicks on the LASER for the resolution.

      LASER is an acronym. I'm not shouting.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Class of Laser? by Pendersempai · · Score: 2, Informative

      'Laser' WAS an acronym. Now it's vernacular. Get over yourself. :)

  25. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by yetiman · · Score: 2, Informative

    uuhh...yes they do, and have for some time now...

    http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/products/detai ls /CA/EN,CRID=3,CONTENTID=7110

  26. Dear Logitech: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just wanted to drop you a note to remind you that some of the people in the world who want a fancy-schmancy, full-featured mouse are LEFT HANDED!

    I guess I'll just have to keep giving my money to the companies that want my business (i.e. make symmetrical mice with lots of bells and whistles).

    You had a clue once, even making lefty versions of your mice back in the day. What happened?

    Signed,

    Someone who can play first person shooters using the actual arrow keys, not that "WASD" shit.

    1. Re:Dear Logitech: by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 2, Informative

      You want the Logitech MX 310. It's totally symmetrical. 6 buttons, scroll wheel, optical. I use it on a Mac with USB overdrive, works fine, good for gaming.

      The left-side button takes a *little* practice to get right -- you have to sort of cock your hand sideways a little to get at it easily -- but it's like anything else, you get used to it.

      - Alaska Jack

  27. Wireless Lag by viggen9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have used some wireless mice in the past, and they always seem to have a slight delay between the time I move the mouse and the pointer on the screen actually moves. A 20X improvement in accuracy won't solve this problem, though, so will the difference really be noticeable? You will still be moving the mouse to a place where you expect the pointer to land a few moments later, then you will still probably have to correct the movement after the pointer catches up. I dunno...I'm not convinced. I guess I'll have to wait until a friend buys one and try it.

    1. Re:Wireless Lag by MJOverkill · · Score: 2, Informative

      You must be using an early generation wireless mouse then. I have been using an mx700 since they came out, and there is no delay between mouse movement and pointer movement. Since the mx1000 uses the same 'FastRF' communication the mx700 does, then it will have no delay either.

  28. Picking nits. by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just to be a dick, this isn't the first mouse that uses a laser. There were a few laser mice (pre "optical" mice) but they required a special pad so the advantages over a regular mouse were minimal (really just that you didn't have to clean them).

  29. Other Links by jaaron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a (currently) non-/.'ed image of the mouse:

    http://img16.exs.cx/img16/8692/mx-1000.jpg

    Another Forum Review on the Logitech MX1000

    If all else fails, check Google

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
  30. Power effeciency of lasers by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lasers actually don't take all that much power- they're highly efficient. Then again, the LED which they're replacing doesn't usually take too much power either. My guess is that it's not a significant change.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  31. Do not look into mouse laser.... by stox · · Score: 3, Funny

    with remaining eye.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  32. Punctuated equilibrium by Deep+Fried+Geekboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OK, the first thing you should know is that FPS gamers like me have a whole different take on the mouse thing. We want insanely high resolution, massless, frictionless mice with lots of buttons we can map to ordinance.

    You know, the thing about mice is that the technology advances in spurts. Optical was a big spurt, at least when the resolution started to improve. However, wireless was a big BACKWARDS spurt since the mice are now heavy as hell and gobble batteries at a ridiculous rate. I retired my wireless and went back to the wiry MX500 which is great.

    However it still requires an exotic mousepad (currently a large dinnermat from Habitat which my friend Rick discovered was the slickest and most trackable mousing surface ever invented). Continuing the culinary theme, my desk is an acid-etched glass dining table from Ikea (awsome desk, by the way -- and I use their kitchen cabinets as office storage) which would be a ROCKING mousepad if an optical mouse which actually track on it. But it won't.

    So, is this a dodo or a turkey vulture (very successful in these parts)? Only time and money will tell.

    --

    I'm not wrong. You haven't thought about it hard enough.

  33. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by Dizzle · · Score: 5, Funny

    INFORMATIVE!?

    --
    -Dizzle
    "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  34. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Informative

    FUNNY!? /sorry, couldn't resist //watch this get modded informative

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  35. Ergonomic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, what the hell is the deal with this "ergonomic" mice that have your hand all sideways and require you rest your entire palm on it, moving it with your arm? It's getting harder and harder to find good small mice that just fit under your fingers, allowing you to control them with your hand. In mice, "ergonomic" just means "really really big and sorta cool looking, but completely impractical."

    1. Re:Ergonomic by Tetrad69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree completely. Put the laser tracking engine inside of the MX300 shell and I'd buy it in a heartbeat.

  36. Re:hmmmm by paulthomas · · Score: 2

    Unlikely.

    The mouse will return x/y coordinates as well as click events. Typically input devices do the processing of light/dark, rolling, touch, etc. internally and then just send the info that the operating system wants to know.

  37. Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by cbreaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They make some nice mouse pads- I hate but bulky ones with the big gel-packs and crap, but I like the ones with a really nice surface like a velvet-like material I have on my main workstation.

    They help the mouse move smoother; if you have a hard surface they get "sticky" and make it difficult to make precise movements. The pads get dirty really fast without a mouse pad. AND, you can really screw up the surface of your desk if you use the mouse without a pad.

    Who wants a sticky mouse that grinds over dirt and wears out your desk? I'll take my nice comfortable mouse pad any day.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, me too. I do not use a mouse pad at work, but I could care less about scratching that desk.

      At home, I use some giant mousepad I found at CompUSA. Unfortunately, they do not list the product on their website. It is about 4x the size of a normal pad and is the old school fabric over foam type. It does great for FPS gaming, as I never run out of room.

      The ones with fabric/velvet do suck for ball mousing due to the amount of crud they tend to transfer to the ball over time, but seem to be the best thing for an optical.

      Another thing I have learned from using a mouse on a desktop surface for years is that the little feet on the bottom of the mouse wear out quicker, causing the mouse's action to not feel very smooth.

    2. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you can buy into the whole "performance mouse pad" thing (it took a lot of convincing from other people before I could), check out the func1030. It really is worth it, the surface is slicker than any desk or other mouse pad I have used and one side has more tack. For FPS games, I am superbly satisfied and the fact that my desk surface doesn't have a huge rubbed off spot on it makes me happy too.

      I've had mine for about a year now with no complaints. The pad is nice and large and comes with a silly gimmick that is actually handy for people w/ corded mice - a clip that keeps your cord from moving... Give it a little slack and you never have to worry about dragging that cord again.

    3. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by titzandkunt · · Score: 3, Funny


      "...At home, I use some giant mousepad I found at CompUSA. Unfortunately, they do not list the product on their website. It is about 4x the size of a normal pad and is the old school fabric over foam type. It does great for FPS gaming, as I never run out of room..."

      You must use Dogbert's technical support:

      Dogbert: Hello you've reached Dogbert's technical support, how may I abuse you?

      PHB: My cursor is in the middle of the screen and my mouse is stuck right at the edge of my mousemat.

      Dogbert: I see. Have you tried moving your desk to the left?

      PHB: Yup. No dice.

      Dogbert: In that case you're going to need our $800 mousemat upgrade...

      T&K.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    4. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by TargetBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe those things are actually made for printers.

    5. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by edremy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another thing I have learned from using a mouse on a desktop surface for years is that the little feet on the bottom of the mouse wear out quicker, causing the mouse's action to not feel very smooth.

      Scotch tape. Use the good stuff, not the cheap imitations. Just put fresh pieces over all the feet every day or so and it feels nice and smooth again. Eric

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  38. NewEgg is shipping them. That's great and all, but by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    does anyone know of some place in Canada that will ship them? NewEgg, in their infinite wisdom, doesn't ship to Canada.

    BTW, all you Americans, NewEgg is sold out, looks like we slashdotted their stock ;)

  39. What happend to their keyboards? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What happened to the Logitech 'natural' keyboards? I know they make the wireless ones, but what happend to the wired ones? I would love to buy one but they do not appear to make them anymore.

  40. Totally. by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Glad I'm not the only one. I, like the other replier to your post, also use an older first-gen Microsoft Optical mouse. Small, easy. And I like mouse pads for multiple reasons so being able to use the thing on a mirror doesn't mean crap to me.

    I'd like to have a mouse that had better tracking during moments of high movement (ie some games) but it works just fine.

    And I don't want a cordless mouse dammit. Who wants to worry about having your mouse die on you? Or having the batteries eventually not take a charge? Some people are hell bent on removing the cords from everything but for some things like the mouse, it just adds complexity where none is needed nor wanted.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  41. left handed by Lucia_Inverse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    right now im STILL stuck with a MSFT intellimouse optical (the first unihand 5 button optical mouse released) im SO SICK OF THIS i understand the need for a comfy right handed mouse for right handed people and i dont expect them to set up a production line for lefties but a slightly lower end (ie non ergo for right hand) corded or cordless ver would be great i want a new mouse why do they ignore 25% of us!

    1. Re:left handed by arexu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Feh. I'm a lefty who mouses right-handed, so that anywhere I go, I can get the job done. Left-handed mice are like left-handed monkey wrenches-- three of us will own them, and none of us will have them with us when we need them...

      --
      I'd love to help you out -- which way did you come in?
  42. Re:lasers, and bluetooth by simoncion · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nope, that's a red LED that you're seeing.

  43. Some pictures of the MX1000 by z3021017 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the site is /.ed:
    Picture One

    Picture Two

    --
    Bored? Visit my exciting counter page!
  44. Re:Some background on water and U.S. law by davidgay · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nothing like Slashdot for gross misinformation. From Logitech's web site:

    Founded
    1981 -- Apples, Switzerland

    (I found it pretty amusing when, years ago, I was using a mouse from "Apples" with an Apple IIe. It was a rather sucky mouse back then, mind you...)

    Of course, these days its a large multinational company, so claiming it for any particular country is just pointless nationalism.

  45. Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mechanical mouse with rubber ball that gets gummed up with dust and crud: $19.00

    Optical mouse that doesn't work well on many surfaces: $39.00

    Laser mouse that works on any surface and spawns lots of "frickin laser" jokes: Priceless.

    --
    Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    1. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Curtman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not going to mail order a mouse to save myself $3.50 and have to wait 3 days for it. Hrmm. $10 next day delivery, that sounds like a good deal....

      Wait a minute.

    2. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by dorsey · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Cease and Desist letter from Mastercard will be arriving in your mail shortly.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    3. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Nerull · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ive got a MX-700, and I didn't have to do anything to use those, the only ones that need work are the side buttons.

      You could try this:
      http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/wfsection/arti cle.php?articleid=46

      After glancing over your post again in preview, I think you mean remap them to do something else, which I don't think is possible. It looks as if those buttons send the same signal as the mouse wheel, so there is no way to remap them.

    4. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Ba3r · · Score: 2, Funny

      Decision to respond to a comment: 1ms
      Decision to do yet another 'Mastercard' post: 1ms
      Time spent writing the post: 360,000ms
      Satisfaction of having wasted another 360,002 ms: 100%

    5. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by mwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, good. Another "hardware" feature that's actually buried in the (useless) driver code.

      Maybe we need a law requiring vendors to clearly label which features are actually implemented in hardware (and will work anywhere) and which are faked in software (and thus only worth money if you run MS Windows).

    6. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by tgd · · Score: 2, Funny

      As well as a half dozen offers for low interest rate credit cards.

      Per week.

  46. Re:Microsoft's drivers are still better by z3021017 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The mouse drivers are fine, but the software is not. The drivers work as they are supposed to - they make the mouse work. However, it's the craptastic software that lets the drivers down.

    The MX series are considered the best mice for twitch gaming like First Person Shooters, yet the majority of these gamers don't use the Logitech software because it doesn't play nice with many games. To avoid all this nastiness with the mouse software, they instead use the generic Windows XP PS2 mouse driver, and then lose the ability of the topmost, 'task switch' button.

    There is a way to install the drivers without the software though:
    1. Download the Logitech Mouseware.
    2. Use WinZip to open up the install .exe file.
    3. Unzip to a temp directory
    4. Goto Control Panel -> Mouse
    5. Look for and install the mouse driver within the temp directory

    It doesn't really offer any advantages over the generic PS2 mouse driver (the topmost button still doesn't work), but at least you can say that you're using the correct drivers!

    --
    Bored? Visit my exciting counter page!
  47. Re: 2-axis mercury tilt switches by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Also, the toxicity of mercury is somewhat exaggerated.

    That's fine if you're making one or two of these. What about thousands? You know that the vast majority of them will go right in the trash when they break, right?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  48. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by ch3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, didn't knew that Slashdot moderation system was based on just asking for what you want.
    That will be insightful for me then, thanks.

  49. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Something actually informative for those who don't know what this is about...

    If you give a mouse a cookie...

  50. MX700 and paint problems anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd really like to buy this new mouse, but I'm having serious paint issues with my MX700, which I bought in a european store called BEEP.

    For the record, I haven't had issues with any other previous mouses.

  51. speaking of the intellimouse... by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Funny


    I was working on a virus the other day. I thought it would be cool to write a virus that would replace the Intellimouse USB driver with a full-blown scanner and OCR combination. I was going to have this virus then post any text the mouse was hovering over on peoples' desks to an IRC channel. You know, it would be interesting / valuable to see what documents people had laying on the surface of their desks.

    So I was disassembling the Intellimouse USB driver just to see if I would have to build mine from scratch or if I could patch into the existing binary.

    Well, to my extreme surprise, I was late to market with my innovation: Microsoft has already built this into their driver! Somewhere in Redmond, there's got to be a room with guys staring at screens going, "Goddamnit Cheney! Push the mouse a little more to the left! We still need three more digits of the nuclear launch codes!"
  52. Re:Some background on water and U.S. law by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Your comment got me thinking....

    My first IBM PC in the home was a 286/16, somewhere between '86 and '88 - I can't remember. It came with a Logitech 3 button mouse.

    That mouse was with all my machines until around '96 or '97. A roommate's cat gave it a bath by knocking it in a soda cup. Sadly enough, I remember how angry I got over that. :)

    Naturally, given the quality of the mouse I had, I figured I'd buy another logitech. That thing didn't last 2 weeks. At least I got my money back for that one.

    2-3 years down the road, I was in the market for yet another mouse, so I figured I'd get another Logitech - that thing lasted about 3 months.

    After going through tons of mice since around '96, I finally settled on something that I like: a shitty Microsoft Optical that cost me $20. Combine it with a nice $25 mouse pad and it plays better than or equal to your MX<insert number of the week here>. I have recieved several unsolicited comments about how smooth it works and how well it tracks.

    MX1000 sounds very neat but I'll be sure to wait for the corded version - I've done my tour with wireless mice and now the only thing that bothers me about them is that my wife complains because I pawned the $120 mouse off to her to take the $20 mouse I have now. :)

    What I don't get - when microsoft first started selling mice, you could look on the bottom of the mouse and it would say something to the effect of "manufacturered by logitech". If they can manage to make MS mice better than their own....sigh.

  53. Warning Sticker on mouse. by Nikkodemus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mouse user notices small sticker close to laser and puts mouse up to face to read it..
    (singe, crackle)
    **Do not look at underside of mouse with remaining eye!**

  54. The disposable mousepad by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having to share a computer at an office full of people with grungy hands led me to do two things:

    1. Demand (and get) a Dvorak keyboard. That cut down the popularity of my station considerably. :)

    2. Invent the disposable mouse pad.

    "What is this wonderful device?", you might wonder. Well here's how to make one.

    1. Take about 25 sheets of letter size paper and stack them neatly. It doesn't matter if they are laser-printed, but you probably don't want inkjet prints. You can do a lot more than 25 if you have a heavy-duty stapler handy, but this assumes you don't.

    2. Staple them together as many times as necessary along one edge.

    3. When the top page gets dirty, or when the shift changes, tear off the top page and throw it away. When you get down to the last 10 or so sheets, remove the staples, get another 15 sheets of paper, and re-staple. If you spill your drink on it, throw away the wet pages, or the whole thing if necessary.

    Think I can get a patent on this?

    The lazy can just get a notepad and flip the cover back (or tear it off), but doesn't that violate the whole "do it yourself" ethic?

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  55. Re:Some background on water and U.S. law by Tschaess · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apples is actually a village in the french speaking part of switzerland.

    The headquater for europe afrika and estern counries is still here (about 8km east of apples in Romanel-sur-Morges)

  56. Trackballs are the future! by Zobeid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If only the original Macintosh had come with a trackball 20 years ago, they might well be ubiquitous today and mice would be the niche product. Perhaps someday the masses will wake up and correct this mistake. (Yeah, right. . . Probably at the same time when we all switch to Dvorak keyboards.)

    I have a Logitech Marble Mouse USB, the older one with only two buttons. It's more efficient than a mouse: fingertip control, less movement, less effort, and takes less desk space. I have it configured so I can hold down my control key and scroll with the trackball.

    It works pretty well for me.

  57. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by big_groo · · Score: 3, Funny
    These moderators should lose their status. This is bullshit.

    I'm going to metamod for the next few days in the hopes that I get one of these comments. You should too.

  58. Looks like it's... by EvilNutSack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dangermouse! Now armed with a laser!

    --
    --
  59. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by MikeXpop · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dude, calm down.

    I remember I did something like this awhile ago. There was a comment that gave WAY too much information about that guy's life. The comment was meant to be funny, but in an attempt to be funny myself I modded him informative.

    I was metamodded unfair. It sucked. I mean, the guy already had perfect karma (as do I, and I believe the guy replying to me). I was just having a little fun. Where's the harm?

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  60. Lookout for you eyes by Gw33do · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I read this artical all I could think of was turning the mouse upside-down and firing the laser at somebody. McBain:THE GOGGLES THEY DO NOTHING ... Tod: My EYEBALL

  61. The Animal Arms Race by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you are going to give lasers to mice, don't be surprised when the cats decide to fight back.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.