Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake 10.1 Community Released

MohammedSameer writes "Mandrakesoft released MandrakeLinux 10.1 Community, As usual it's only available first to the club members The new release features Kernel 2.6.8.1, Xorg-X11 6.7, KDE 3.2.3 with 3.3 as an install option,"

209 comments

  1. Does it matter? by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As usual it's only available first to the club members

    Does this actually matter? How many Madrake Users get their ISO's from Mandrake anyway? Torrents will probably have 10.1 within the day.

    1. Re:Does it matter? by Nos. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I guess the thing is, if you like Mandrake, then become a club member, not so much to get first dibs on the ISO's, but to support Mandrake itself.
      Personally I don't use Mandrake (nothing against them), but there could be other benefits to being in the club.

    2. Re:Does it matter? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I know a LOT of people that would like to become a member but can-not flit the bill for it because they REQUIRE a full year payment.

      Students, out of work LUG members, etc.. cant come up with that $100US+ for the absolute basic membership.

      People would love to join mandrake club at a monthly payment rate. but they just do not offer it. (Granted, membership will surge only on release date's but it's an influx of money that they would not get otherwise.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Does it matter? by arose · · Score: 1
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    4. Re:Does it matter? by hunte · · Score: 1

      You can get the 10.1 also if you have the cooker urpmi repository, with a simple urpmi --auto-select.

      or adding the new entry (10.1 community) repository...

      take a look at http://easyurpmi.zarb.org.nyud.net:8090/

      --
      about me A - B
    5. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that get's yuo absolutely nothing.

      you have to be a silver member to get the downloads that are any different from what a non-paying member get's.

      Silver is 110Euros yearly payment.

      They need to allow a $11.00 monthly subscription. then they would get more members and certianly a larger influx of cash.

      until then i'll happily give people what I download from my silver membership and offer them up on kazaa and edonky.

      I just want to find a like minded person that will offer up the DVD iso's and it's bullcrap they a silver member cant get them.

    6. Re:Does it matter? by AnnaSaru · · Score: 1

      How does this compare to RedHat - does RedHat provide free ISOs. ? I think SUSE does not. I did not see the free isos on Suse's ftp server. Correct me if I am wrong.

    7. Re:Does it matter? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Suse provides a free personal iso. This is enough to get a good stable system. You can then point YAST to suse's ftp site and download any additional packages you want and get the exact same offering you can buy in stores. You can also do a pure ftp install.

    8. Re:Does it matter? by opkool · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right now, Mandrake 10.1-Community is already out there for anyone to use it. Yes, you either need to do a network install or create your own ISOs.

      But in about a week (give/take a couple of days), ISOs (or an official .torrent) will be available at all official mirrors.

      So Club Members get a "download without slashdot effect" time, with noce download speeds using dedicated .torrents.

      Peace.

    9. Re:Does it matter? by chundo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you get access to some commercial and club-only software packages, and you can vote on which packages should go into the next release. Gives the user a nice say in what their distro becomes.

    10. Re:Does it matter? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Personally I don't use Mandrake (nothing against them), but there could be other benefits to being in the club.

      The Mandrake "club" is the very reason I switched my g/f over to Debian despite Mandrake's easy config tools. Unless you become a "premium" member you really don't get anything more, and their number of supported packages is dismal.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    11. Re:Does it matter? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      "Standard Member ($5.50 month/$66 year or 60 year)"

      Which gets you nothing but information anybody familiar with Google can find.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  2. Club membership by Zorilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My experience has been that you really need to be an enthusiast of this distro to bother installing the Community version of it. For some reason, I ended up with the Comminity version of 10.0 when downloading it via BitTorrent, and boy did it need some work. KDE crashing every ten seconds, weird bugs like the SDL segfault when the wacom tablet module (evdev) was loaded, etc.

    Point being, don't try this out as a stable release. Only try it if you have time to kill and really want to see what Mandrake has done with their release this far. Otherwise, wait for the Official ISOs when they become availible to the public.

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    1. Re:Club membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been running Mandrake 10 Community on a IBM Thinkpad and a desktop for quite a while... they are both stable as can be.

    2. Re:Club membership by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      I've been using Mandrake since the 7 days. Traditionally X.0 is buggy and the .1 and .2 releases are much much nicer. I wouldn't worry about it so much, just don't use it on anything royally important (which you shouldn't be doing anyway if you haven't tested it).

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    3. Re:Club membership by opkool · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've tried MDK-10.0-Community and several of MDK-10.1's Beta and Release Candidate.

      In my experience, even MDK-10.1-Beta-1 was more stable than MDK-10.0-Community .

      Peace

    4. Re:Club membership by Senjutsu · · Score: 1

      In my experience, even MDK-10.1-Beta-1 was more stable than MDK-10.0-Community .

      That good to hear, although I don't see how it could possibly have been worse. 10.0-Community, in what has to be the most spectacularly weird autoconfig bug I've ever seen in all my time with Linux, somehow managed to confuse my PC Speaker with my sound card, and proceeded to attempt to pipe all sound through it. It was the single most gawdawful noise I've ever experienced in my life.

    5. Re:Club membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use 10.0 community on my notebook (which I use more than any other machines) and had no problems and have since it's release. I did install 10.0 official on one of my regular desktops as well. Community runs nearly as well as official the only problem I found was that newer GTK depencies required me to URPMI to install some external programs I like.

    6. Re:Club membership by hfolkers · · Score: 1

      Never had a problem with such things. You are talking about the pre-release i think, i know some people using it with little problems, but normaly it works fine (2.6 kernel is not verry good in the pre-release).
      But the community release is the official release only earlyer released for paying customers. (and people smart enough for using bittorrent)

      #I now duch is the best language but sometimes its nice to use english

    7. Re:Club membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I update from the cooker rpms twice a week -- and KDE hasn't any problems for a long long time now (ie from the 9 series).

    8. Re:Club membership by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      I didn't notice any huge bugs with 10.0 Community, but I did have a hard time upgrading 10.0 Community to 10.0 Official once it was released. I did find these instructions with some googling. I agree with the parent too, wait for Official if you want a stable release.

  3. The Club by JSkills · · Score: 1

    Anyone here in the Club? Is it worth it? I ran Mandrake but have been debating the value of it. Thanks ...

    1. Re:The Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Been a silver member for better than two years, IMHO it is worth it.

    2. Re:The Club by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was in the Club as a basic member but forgot to renew my membership - I will though.

      Yes it's worth it, largely just to support Mandrakesoft though, I have used them since 7.0 when it was the only distro which recognised all my hardware. You also get to vote for various things you want packaged and access to rpm mirrors.

    3. Re:The Club by grunt107 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am a member and I like having the access to the Betas and early releases. I have a 'test' computer that I install various distros and see how they behave. My big server has MDK10 on it - no real reason. I also have the SuSe, Knoppix and MDKMove DoDs (Distro on Disk) that I pop in the laptop when I need to get 'Net.

    4. Re:The Club by rusty0101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It kind of depends upon whether you think supporting Mandrake is a good idea, and whether you think that the OS is worth paying someone to continue working on their favorite distribution.

      I have been a Club member in the past, and probably will be again. Asside from the default USB drivers not supporting the Via USB 2.0 chips, easily fixable by replacing the usb-uhci with huci-ohc (or something like that), I have had no significant problems with the 10.1rc1 package.

      If you think that it is worth purchasing, to the point where you would pick up a copy at your local computer superstore whenever they get around to carrying it, joining the club gets your money to the developers at a much higher percentage of what you spend.

      There are other advantages as well, which you can read on their web page if it really interests you. If not, then the above probably won't be of much interest either.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    5. Re:The Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely install Mandrake if you have a Sony laptop. They've included sonypi to use enable the sony wheel.

      Another benefit to being a member is you are getting updated packages saving yourself time to compile.

    6. Re:The Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "whether you think that the OS is worth paying
      someone to continue working on their favorite
      distribution"...

      Is it a good idea to pay someone to package free software in ways that makes it only work with a single distribution? While paying someone to develop new drivers, hardware autodetection, and program installers would make sense if they could be used by everyone, it seems to me that most of the work of building current distributions is going into packaging things specifically so they won't work in any other distribution. Why does anyone want that?

    7. Re:The Club by JSkills · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks dude. I've been going back and forth on Linux distros for a while now. I've found Mandrake to have some real merits, so if it's what I settle on I probably will follow your advice and do the Right Thing.

    8. Re:The Club by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      it seems to me that most of the work of building current distributions is going into packaging things specifically so they won't work in any other distribution. Why does anyone want that?

      For the same reason people give Apple money for Macs/Os X: because it just works on your system.

      Distro vendors are providing a service. They are saying "here are compiled/patched versions of the software you want that should just work if you are using our system. We provide ./configure && make && sudo make install so you don't have to!"

      Want to use apt-get? We have a distro for you. Want to use someting like YAST? We have a (couple) distro(s) fo you. Want to roll-your-own? We have a distro for you.

      People pay distro companies to provide that "distro for you."

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    9. Re:The Club by umrgregg · · Score: 1

      Is that why you posted anonymously?

      --
      NMG
    10. Re:The Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in the club last year. I personally had problems getting many of the user features of the club to work. Sometimes a promised download, such as Open Office, would not become available for months to the membership because Mandrake never got the mirroring issue worked out in time etc...

      So your milage may vary... I now just pay for the distro and forget the club membership. This way I support Mandrake without the frustration. Also - there is really no advantage to using a beta version of Mandrake. If I want to tinker with something I'll use Gentoo.

    11. Re:The Club by tuckerteeth · · Score: 0

      I have been a club member for 2 years now. I had been using Mandrake since 7.2 and knowing how much work can go into a fairly small application I decided a little bit of my hard-earned was worth spending. Mandrake's near demise also prompted me to think about the value in having many distros and not just two or three. It's true that the RPMs available to club members save alot of time when you wanna get something installed and early access to the latest release is a big bonus, the biggest help came when I bought an Acer 1700 laptop and needed the touchpad and power management working, I couldnt afford to spend ages getting this machine up and running and the club RPM repository was an indispensible time saver. Without it I might have been running XP.

  4. issues by humuhumunukunukuapu' · · Score: 1

    when i went from 10 - 10.1 i started having problems with my wireless card. about every other reboot it would not be recognized. at one point it was just totally gone so i did a reinstall. the problems started again. so i switched to suse 9.1, which is great. however i miss having the cooker urpmi stuff. apt will do.

    --
    i saw the baby, and the baby looked at me
    1. Re:issues by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      How would you compare SuSE to Mandrake performance?

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    2. Re:issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the parent of the post you replied too. But in my exp using both mandrake 10 and suse 9.1. I found about the same performance. When ever I clicked something, it poped up right away. The only problem I have is in launching non-kde apps. That always lags a bit to get going. I personally like suse better then mandrake because it required less work getting all my hardware to function.

    3. Re:issues by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      apt will do.

      Does Suse have apt now?

    4. Re:issues by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      Yes

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    5. Re:issues by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Sweet. I never really saw the value in apt, until I began to use it with Fedora. Between apt and yum, I haven't touched an RPM in months.

    6. Re:issues by humuhumunukunukuapu' · · Score: 1

      hmm. suse seems to be a bit quicker in general, but not a ton...it just looks cleaner so i think i like it better.

      --
      i saw the baby, and the baby looked at me
    7. Re:issues by Yusuf+Smith · · Score: 1

      Not officially, but there is third-party support for it and some repositories.

  5. I dont mind waitin... by Jimmy+The+Tulip · · Score: 0

    currently i am using mandrake 10, and I dont mind waiting for 10.1.Sure I wanna have kernel 2.6xxx. But I dont care about kde3.3.xx etc. I can feel good about new gnome/kde version by looking those fancy screenshots itself.

    But dont have enough time to kill, to compile/install it. its same as wasting time downloading 10.1 through torrents.

  6. Former MDK user... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I started with MDK with 6.0 (*after my time with Red Hat 5.0*) and really loved it. After years of playing with it on the desktop and using it for an MP3 FTP server, I got tired of the RPM depenancy hell and I made the jump to Slackware. A few years of playing in Debian and now Gentoo, I feel I've learned a ton more than I did before, and with YUM and apt-rpm I think it may be time to install/try out this latest version on a sandbox for desktop testing.

    I used to enjoy seeing what they 'smoothed out' over the prev release. The MDK Club turned me off as Deno started getting stinky about support for 'non-users' but I understand they're just trying to make a dollar (or euro in their case).

    Regardless, nice to see a major Linux Distro still in the running.

    CCBB

    1. Re:Former MDK user... by opkool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      RPM dependency hell?

      You obviously never used urpmi. Probably, that old Mandrake had no urpmi.

      Think of urpmi as apt-get. And you get GUI and text-based front-ends.

      urpmi is native to Mandrake, and this is a big reason to use Mandrake.

      See http://www.urpmi.org for more information.

      Also, MDK lately comes all compiled with the prelink option, and with i586 optimization.

      Peace!

  7. No longer a fan of 'traditional' distros by tod_miller · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would like to see a partial distro, a yoper like base, less packages, more configuration.

    Then a hole chunk (SuSE like) impors of packages. All required development for simple confmakemakeinstall's and perhaps simple walk throughs for these common actions. For newbies trying to get onto the bandwagon, this would be a diamond!

    What was the thing you got stuck on at first? write it down, and think how you could solve it for another newbie.

    Out of interest Moore's Law finally buried?

    Ok enough shameless plug, it was for a good cause.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    1. Re:No longer a fan of 'traditional' distros by Dunkelzahn · · Score: 1

      There is always Debian.

      Install an absolutely basic Debian distro, skip dselect and tasksel, and apt-get what you want and need for your basic distro, then build up from there. If you want to invest a lot of time in configuration, but build a system completely tailored to your wants and needs there's Gentoo and LFS - depends on how much support you want to find, how much time you wish to invest, and how much package management infrastructure you want.

      --
      .
    2. Re:No longer a fan of 'traditional' distros by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      What was the thing you got stuck on at first?

      The first thing I got stuck on was not reading the manual. So I guess I should write this up and put it in the manual, huh?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    3. Re:No longer a fan of 'traditional' distros by flushtwice · · Score: 1
      You know, I actually bought the LFS book, but thus far have been a little shy of actually going through with it. (It can be hard to find the time these days.)

      I'm happy with Mandrake, and currently have it on all of my machines, but I've got this sneaking suspicion that it's getting close to the time I need to be moving on to more "independent" forms of Linux... You know... GNU/Linux base, whichever X server is hated less at the time, a nice shiney KDE install, with whipped cream and cherry on top.

      How does LFS stack up against Gentoo? Which would be a better long term choice for an otherwise confirmed Mandrake user?

      Keep in mind, I'm not giving up Mandrake... 15-30 minute total install times with all hardware being detected are priceless!

    4. Re:No longer a fan of 'traditional' distros by Dunkelzahn · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I'd say Gentoo because it has the optimization and configurability advantages of LFS, yet is far easier to maintain and keep updated with portage.

      --
      .
    5. Re:No longer a fan of 'traditional' distros by tod_miller · · Score: 1

      actually debian would be my favoured, my amiable french amie's love to do a 1 disk boot and install from the net. Never tried it - and I am the first to admit I have limited package knowledge about making a neat and tidy well balanced system.

      --
      #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    6. Re:No longer a fan of 'traditional' distros by tod_miller · · Score: 1

      I wanted to say thanks, and I like the roll your own linux approach of LFS, and looked into it a while ago, but never saw benefits to me personally (I am a user, I develop, but since I am developing outside the space of the OS, I am still just a user)

      Still, I have gotten SuSE 9.1 installed in some pretty cool places, some schools and even a monastary!

      The only problem was, after a simple install, trying to do a confmakemakeinstall I realised SuSE doesn't install the 'bare bones' make system required to, basically, get new software from source.

      To thier credit most software is on the DVD's, but really, an install system should be priority one for linux right now.

      User should hit download.com, see 'most popular' click download, install to ~/bin or /usr/local/bin (depending on sys config) and be off and running before you can say go go gadget rpm manager.

      Even RPM's in SuSE can be a tad narky.

      Thanks again

      --
      #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  8. Re:Gentoo by kidgenius · · Score: 1

    Well, last time I checked, they are both Linux underneath.

  9. acpi support for laptops? by tongue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, I see that improved laptop support is one of the touted features here. My question is, how good is it?

    I just switched back to windows (rather painlessly, thanks to the excellent QtParted and, strangely enough, a windows ME boot disk [for an XP machine--needed to restore the MBR]). I can't tell you how greatly it pains me to do so--as far as i'm concerned, linux is ready for the desktop, and has been for some time. ACPI-based laptops though, are another story. I've been trying for weeks to get my battery life to come close to what's possible under windows, and while the Software suspend project seems to work for a lot of people, i could never get it to work on my laptop (or maybe just my kernel). I've tried various distributions, from suse to xandros to straight debian to knoppix and even the simpler ones such as DSL and none of them allow me to really use my laptop for more than about an hour (give or take a quarter) without plugging in, which is just unacceptable for my purposes.

    So i finally gave up and dropped the linux partitions and reinstalled the boot sector (oh how that final 'fdisk /mbr' pained me!) but at least i can spend three and a half hours at a coffee shop without needing an outlet. cygwin takes the edge off, but its a bit like methadone if you asked me.

    so anyway, for anyone who's tested and/or used the new version of MDK on a recent laptop, what's your experience with the ACPI support? Battery life? Suspend functionality? dare i ask--functional keys? (yes, i know that's not really related to acpi, but mandrake is generally pretty conscientious about things like that, i thought perhaps they might have integrated a solution.)

    1. Re:acpi support for laptops? by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fedora wasn't in your list. I've used it since FC1 on my laptop and its always worked great. If I were you though, its probably worth waiting a month for Core 3 to come out, alot of improved acpi stuff.
      Regards,
      Steve

    2. Re:acpi support for laptops? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      sure, laptop support is lagging for linux. but it does work.

      the only thing i haven't gotten yet to work on my laptop is the freaking via video driver. im using the vesa ok right now. no hopes of dri/drm at the moment.

      wireless works good using ndiswrapper, software suspend is actually quite old, i think it's in the main tree, at least it was in the kernel sources for my distro. now, swsusp2 (the maintained rewrite of software suspend i think) isn't in my distro's kernel, but patching it in wasn't too hard. i've found the latter to be very very nice to have. you can configure the system to do all the things you'd expect to happen that you just can't do with swsusp. for instance, you want your wifi card to be brought up again when you resume in case you're at a different location. you want usb to be brought up again, because you might have plugged in different devices since you were up last, etc, etc.

      i think HP is selling laptop's with SuSE pre installed, you'd think that it would all work nicely if they're doing that. ibm laptops had a good reputation for linux support, but it was always a little fruity from what i could tell.

      oh yeah, battery life. it seems to last just fine under linux when the machine is used for most general tasks. you start building kernels and such and that's going to eat power right up. my laptop uses the athlon-M processor i believe which has good support in the kernel. you can scale the processor frequency when it's on battery so that it conserves power.

    3. Re:acpi support for laptops? by tongue · · Score: 1

      thanks for the info... I haven't had any problems with the hardware for the most part, except as you noted, the 3d support for the video isn't really there (radeon) but i have read instructions on how to get it to work on xandros's forums, although i never tried it.

      i haven't used a redhat distro in years--does fedora have a livecd-style version?

      heavy processor use is obviously going to tax the kernel, but for average use i'd like to see at least 2.5 hours of battery life, preferably closer to the 3.5 i get out of windows. is that in line with what you're seeing? also, what kind of laptop are you using?

    4. Re:acpi support for laptops? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      10 is good on a laptop. I use it exclusively and with the right settings you get pretty darn close to full use out of the battery.

      now, it STILL depends on the laptop. My dell D800 does great and the Video card is supported as well as the wireless g built in. but my older dell use bizzare brand hardware and no linux on this planet works worth a damn on it.

      It depends lots on your laptop, if you buy a laptop with linux in mind it's painless (and if you got cash, get a powerbook. best linux support for a laptop anywhere.)

      It took me 3 months to find out what laptop to get after calling tech support people to find out EXACTLY what is in the things, for some reason laptop sellers think that what is inside is a secret that you should not know about.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:acpi support for laptops? by jrcamp · · Score: 1

      To extend battery life you need to use one of the CPUFreq modules to clock down your CPU and its voltage. For Intel these are the SpeedStep ones. AMD also has their own. Then install a simple power management daemon like powernowd which will upclock your processor only when it needs to. There are also the laptop-tools which will spin down your harddrive and keep Linux from flushing its buffers to it when it really doesn't have to.

      Neither of these things require ACPI support, I believe.

    6. Re:acpi support for laptops? by chundo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I've got Mandrake 9.2 running on my Dell Inspiron 8600. Works great. A couple things I had to tweak though:
      • It screwed up the acpi detection on install, so I had to manually add "acpi=on" to my lilo.conf
      • Installed acpid to capture events from my hardware buttons / functional keys. All buttons work for me.
      • Althought suspending to RAM (sleep mode 1) works, it didn't shutoff my screen or backlight before doing so. I had to write a custom script to do that.
      • Suspend to disk doesn't work for me. At all. Didn't spend much time on it though since it's not a big deal for me.
      • Installed cpudynd to manage CPU power consumption. My laptop easily lasts 3-4 hours on one battery, with WiFi.
    7. Re:acpi support for laptops? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      my laptop is an averatec 3225. i honestly haven't timed the battery life under either os. i'm using gentoo linux. i had a radeon 7000 video card on a desktop and it worked fine for 3d (quake3), though i think the rage 128 card i had in another machine got better framerates.

    8. Re:acpi support for laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My laptop easily lasts 3-4 hours on one battery, with WiFi."

      That is load of bullshit. inspiron-8600 does not last 4 hrs on one battery even in XP with all the power saving features on.

    9. Re:acpi support for laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not post your "custom script"?

  10. Also, let's not forget to thank Texstar... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the best resources in the Mandrake community has been an individual called Texstar who ran a Linux news site called www.pclinuxonline.com and also in his spare time created RPM packages for Mandrake systems. Texstar's packages became justly famous and were widely used. Thanks to his efforts, many reallly nice RPMs were made available to the MDK commmunity, and eventually went into 9 and 10 from what I've heard. This kind of 'community support' is what I'm most happy with.

    Thanks Texstar!

    CB@#$

    1. Re:Also, let's not forget to thank Texstar... by mrscorpio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Texstar has his own distro now :)

      http://www.pclinuxonline.com/pclos/index.html

    2. Re:Also, let's not forget to thank Texstar... by texroot · · Score: 1

      Texstar also created a new distro, based on Mandrake, which is here.I'm not sure how different from straight Mandrake it is, I've only played briefly with one of their live CDs. Might be worth a look for anyone who likes Mandrake, but isn't 100% satisfied with it. Personally, I've found Mandrake 10 good enough to stop installing new distros for now.

    3. Re:Also, let's not forget to thank Texstar... by texroot · · Score: 1

      Sorry, my link is the same as mrscorpio's. Should've reloaded before submitting comment. Probably worth checking out the link one time, though.

    4. Re:Also, let's not forget to thank Texstar... by Kevin108 · · Score: 0

      I currently run a dual-boot of PC Linux OS P7 and Windows XP. PC Linux OS has proven itself to be my favorite distro I've ever tried. Tex has crammed everything you need onto one Live CD with an easy HD Install option, out-of-the-box NVidia support, and he's never failed to chime in and help me out when I've posted a question on one of the PCLOS forums.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    5. Re:Also, let's not forget to thank Texstar... by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      I think it's vastly superior to Mandrake if starting with it from out-of-the-box, and Synaptic is pretty slick, at least as good as URPMI. However, if you've been running Mandrake for a while and have it tweaked to your liking, there's no reason to switch streams now unless having the latest and greatest versions of stuff from one consistent source ready-made for you is that important. Last I knew it was still on the 2.4 kernel series too, in the stable branch.

  11. Xorg-X11 6.7? by p0 · · Score: 1

    Xorg 6.8 has already been released with some interesting features and enhancements (including the drop shadow and translucency eye candy!). I wonder why it wasnt included.

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Xorg-X11 6.7? by rusty0101 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because it wasn't released until after the freeze on updates for this release of Mandrake perhaps?

      Just because something has a new version out doesn't mean that people putting together a distribution are going to alter the package contents to add it. Gnome 2.8 is out too. It's not in Mandrake 10.1 either. Why not? Because 2.8 was released yesterday (or this week) the freeze for 10.1 happened several weeks ago, about the time that 10.1Beta1 came out I am pretty sure.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    2. Re:Xorg-X11 6.7? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Xorg 6.8 has already been released with some interesting features and enhancements (including the drop shadow and translucency eye candy!). I wonder why it wasnt included.

      My guess would be because the ATI drivers don't support it (though I have yet to get them tow work with 6.7).

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    3. Re:Xorg-X11 6.7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times do people have to be told that ATI drivers suck. They've had shitty driver support FOREVER and will continue to have shitty driver support.

      I remember them promising 3D support for their drivers in Linux back in 1996. Back then it was the Rage Fury 3D Chipset.. The same exact nonsense from ATI. If you want proper driver support and a card that actually works with 3D applications get an Nvidia card and be done with it.

    4. Re:Xorg-X11 6.7? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Naturally, trollster, that's not the point here. The point is that if a thousand users had ATI cards, and Mandrake made the mistake of releasing Xorg 6.8, then those thousand users would all have been asking Mandrake why X is crashing, and blaming them. It's much easier to leave such updates for the future, when the drivers are actual stable, as they seem to be for 6.7.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    5. Re:Xorg-X11 6.7? by leadsling · · Score: 1

      The battle has been raging on what to include in 10.1. One of the hottest topics on Mandrakeclub's forums is people arguing to wait for KDE3.3, Gnome 2.8, Xorg-X11 6.8, so on and so on. Mandrake has a release schedule that from what I've read in the forums they are already behind on. To wait the extra time would hurt them from the investor standpoint. If you have $60 billion in the bank, you can screw around with and endlessly postpone your releases, but Mandrake, although in the black now, it only months removed from bankruptcy protection. These things can be updated easily enough from the cooker mirrors. It's more important to get on schedule.

  12. Community vs. Official by Linzer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been running the development version for a little time now, and AFAICS all show-stopper bugs have been properly squashed by now. It has been running quite smoothly for a few weeks now. However, as parent says: don't use it if you want something rock solid, wait for 10.1 Official. But if you want all the shiny brand new stuff, a streamlined install with an excellent hardware detection, and are not afraid of a few weird things happening now and then, then give it a try!

    --
    Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
    1. Re:Community vs. Official by Fortress · · Score: 1

      > But if you want all the shiny brand new stuff, a streamlined install
      > with an excellent hardware detection, and are not afraid of a few
      > weird things happening now and then, then give it a try!

      Wow, finally a Linux distro that can compete with Windows.

  13. Xorg 6.8? by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, it's easy to update to Xorg 6.8 for MDK users, and I think it's worth the trouble, especially to see those dropshadows. I'm somewhat surprised that MDK didn't wait for 6.8 to go into 10.1, but the dropshadow business isn't completely stable outside of GNOME, and they have to make a cut off soon.

    Regardless, MDK users can update rather easily, just update your YUM repository!

    CBV

    1. Re:Xorg 6.8? by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      Oh, sorry, perhaps I'm not as knowledgeable as I thought I was. I'm seeing 'yellow halos' around some windows after a time in XFCE, but not GNOME (yees, running Metacity). Maybe I need to recompile xcomp as I heard there are some new patches that give more realistic shadows.

      PCB$#@

  14. It has the potential to be THE distro for laptop by gsasha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If their claims hold water, that is...
    1. Centrino wireless support integrated, Wi-Fi roaming.
    2. ACPI support - finally! I'm sick with rebooting the laptop.
    But, good as it sounds, I'm still waiting for the Official.

  15. 2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by jlseagull · · Score: 5, Informative

    This problem is common with the 2.6 kernel and has been verified in Mandrake 10.0 Community, Red Hat FC1, Red Hat FC2, and others.

    Read about it here.

    Basically, if you touch the MBR with a 2.6 kernel bootloader, XP or Windows 2000 is gone, and can't be restored. So backup your MBR first by using

    "dd if=(input device) of=/(output dir)/hda-img.mbr bs=512 count=1"

    where if=(input device), should point to your first drive, eg. /dev/hda, and of=(output dir) should point to where you want to save the bootsector as a file. Restore the MBR by reversing the input and output.

    Even if you do this to restore, your Windows partition may still be toast, depending on how much you messed with the partition table.

    --
    'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    1. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is most definitely NOT a problem with the 2.6 kernel since things work fine on both gentoo and Suse with a 2.6 kernel. It is most likely a problem with the implementation of grub or lilo in these distros. And, in my opinion, it is totally unacceptable.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    2. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Haven't they fixed this YET???

      This was a problem in FC2 and MDK 10.0, and they STILL haven't fixed it? What are they doing with all the club money?

    3. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by h8macs · · Score: 1

      Not to start a flame war or anything but...

      IS this an RPM based distro problem?

      I've had no such issues, and I have several dual-boot Win2K/Slackware WinXP/Slackware boxes.

      They are all running the 2.6 kernel (2.6.3 thru 2.6.8.1) and I have not come upon this issue. GO SLACKWARE! ;-)

      BTW, the Mandrake bug report mentions "Fat32" NOT "ntfs" ..(as well as BIOS issues).. sooooo did you accidentally type the wrong FS type in your post?

      BTW, I have also had no issues with regards to the MBR and the bootloader when dual-booting Mandrake 10 "official" with WinXP (my laptop).

      Perhaps it is a grub issue, I always choose to use lilo.

      --
      :-( --- argh. Despair, I owe again. :-b
    4. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      You know what, you're right. A lot of people, including me, saw the same problem across 4 or 5 distros and assumed it was the kernel. However, it could be that they're using the same bootloader, which would also cause this problem. I'm not all that technical, so I don't know. I'm just going to stick with my 2.4 kernel (RH 8.0) until this problem is definitively solved.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    5. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      I've had the 2.6.x kernel install just fine on a dual boot setup (WinXP/Gentoo). The first time I installed Gentoo, I messed it up and the MBR got corrupted.... upon system boot up, after the initial RAM test and hard drive detection, I got something line 999999999999999999999999 IIRC and then it just locked up. However, I just booted up with a win98 boot disk and ran fdisk /MBR (I think that was the command) and XP's boot record was restored. It certainly can be restored.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    6. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by jlseagull · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have no idea whether this is an RPM based distro problem. That may be the case, as gentoo and Suse might not be tied into that, I don't know.

      I've tried Slack 10, and had the same issue. If LILO or GRUB were installed as the bootloader in the MBR, the NTFS filesystem dies.

      Yes, I'm sure that's the right filesystem. There are other associated BIOS issues (for example, Logical Block Addressing must be turned on), but they don't apply in the majority of cases.

      What FS is on your laptop?

      No flammage here, just trying to inform

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    7. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by egghat · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I understand things correctly, you shouldn't be hit by this bug any more especially with a new distro like the new Mandrake.

      Read more about this here, especially about resolving this when you have been hit (you won't lose any data):

      Fedora Mailing List post

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    8. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is SO FULL of bugs I just don't see why anyone actually trusts it for anything. It constatntly destroys it's own file system (Reiser too) let alone others. X won't stay running for a single day. CD Burning is on again off again with every release. WTH? And these are with "stable" release lines!

    9. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by GnuAge · · Score: 1

      It appears to be a disk geometry issue and effects mostly Fedora and Mandrake, from what I've read. There is a Slashdot thread (here) .

      I understand if you hand feed your kernel your disk geometry when you install you can overcome this problem, though I misremember exactly where I read this.

      I installed Fedora 2 to dual boot off a single drive and it wouldn't boot itself or W2K. The fdisk /mbr and the Windows recovery console commands fixmbr and fixboot didn't help boot Windows (I'd given up on Fedora). Then I noticed that the drive was booting as CHS, despite the BIOS being rigged to automatically detect the proper setting. I made the BIOS detect the drive as LBA only and Windows booted right up.

      Then I got a second hard drive, made the Windows disk the slave and installed Fedora to the master drive, which worked, sorta. I have to use the BIOS to boot whichever OS I choose rather than the a more convenient boot loader. Disks are cheap, but its a kludge.

    10. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by h8macs · · Score: 2, Informative

      The WinXP partition is using ntfs. Mandrake 10 official with lilo as the boot loader.

      That is a weird issue, it does not appear that the culprit has been identified on the Mandrake bug report, I would be interested to know what the cause is. As to the BIOS, since it is a Compaq laptop the BIOS is fairly limited, not much one can change. I do typically use LBA mode, so perhaps this is why I have not seen the issue!?

      Anyone have access to a better (more configurable) BIOS image for the presario laptops (1505us)...any compaq/HP guys on /.?

      hmmmm....

      Were you able to rebuild the MBR or was the partition table completely hosed?

      --
      :-( --- argh. Despair, I owe again. :-b
    11. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually grub and lilo work just fine, and as you stated the 2.6 kernel works fine in other distros. This appears to be a problem with the setup/partitioning program in some distros like Mandrake and Fedora. It also seems to be something to do with the BIOS in some machines. I'm wondering if these installers with the problem are sharing code or if they are both making the same mistakes.

    12. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by jlseagull · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's especially the new distros. Older versions of Red Hat and Suse have no problems. The Mandrake 10 Community installer goes in and puts the bootloader into the MBR without even prompting the user, thereby ensuring the system gets hosed.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    13. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1999 called, they want their distro back.

    14. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      Tried restoring using fdisk /mbr. No luck. Tried using a backup dd image of the MBR. No luck. Tried to use the Windows rescue CD. It wouldn't even see the drive. Lastly, I tried sfdisk to restore the drive geometry. At least then the XP recovery CD worked, though I had to reinstall XP.

      I think it has something to do with the XP NTLDR.COM. I personally think that it looks at MORE than the first 512 bytes, perhaps the first 540. If it doesn't like what it sees, it hangs.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    15. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by hitmark · · Score: 4, Informative

      oh man, not this old story again.

      what happend was that the bios didnt agree with itself if it should use chf or lba mode to set the gemoetry of the disk. windows relys on the bios info when it creates the partitions. then along comes the linux kernel, pokes the disk directly, finds that the geometry info used to create the partitions is wrong and goes about cleaning up. then windows comes back and finds non of the info it expects and in good old windows fashion trows its virtual arms in the air and gives up. the files are all there, the partitions are all there, its just that the partition table isnt of the type windows expects and therefor windows fails.

      its just like ripping a disk with win2k or later on and stick it into a diffrent computer. on boot you will most likely get a bluescreen with a error as windows rely on its old hardware list to boot drivers, and when said drivers fail there is no fallback. linux on the other hand build the list every time it boots and therefor will not have mutch of a problem with the move.

      complaining that this is a linux error is like complaining that there is something wrong with firefox when you try to access a page designed with ms frontpage. most likley a visit to the w3c validator will show so many error that you will be surprised that it renders at all.

      the problem is that windows have become so mutch a "standard" that when something goes wrong it have to be the odd boy out there is the problem, not the devil in drag down the road.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    16. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, just look the beautiful side of that bug : it forces me to fully switch to Linux, once my Win2k installation had been unbootable.

      Thanks, Mister Mandrake ! From that day, I have no more viruses or troyans.

    17. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not an kernel 2.6 issue, it's a grub issue. And since mandrake doesn't use grub as default (as fedora do) i don't think it's a large issue.

    18. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Kjyn · · Score: 1
      I would like to add that if you happen to lose your MBR, you can try gpart to recover it for you before you give it up as a loss. It scans the disks looking for partitions and assembles a MBR record based on it. I've used it to recover a few drives. The man pages are quite thorough.

      It is included with knoppix, last I checked.

    19. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) It IS a confirmed problem with the 2.6 kernel (actually an interaction with the kernel and some gnu tool)

      B) It doesn't affect all machines

      C) If your distro installs from a 2.4 kernel (Gentoo?) you won't have a problem.

    20. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by egghat · · Score: 1

      This thread is about Mandrake 10.1, not 10.0. 10.0 was affected, 10.1 isn't. SuSE 9.1 was affected, 9.2 won't.

      We often talk about OS being faster when fixes need to be done. And more than 4 months after the detection of this rather serious bug there simply won't be any new distro which still is affected.

      But you're correct, older distros (kernel 2.4 based) aren't affected as well.

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    21. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by h8macs · · Score: 1

      I can't leave this one alone it seems.

      When dual-booting (since 1998) I almost always advocate a second platter for linux. This is not always an available option such as on a laptop. In this case installing linux on a portion of the same disk is necessary.

      Did you use a partitioning tool? I have done this once and not had any issues however I have had friends who have had issues.

      I will generally use fdisk (on linux as windows fdisk is limited in comparison) to partition the drive in 2 halves (windows partition, and free space) prior to installation of windows.

      I load windows, then I load linux on the free space which I may partition in a number of ways depending on my use. I like to have a separate /boot, (though I use the mbr) I like to have an Ext2 partition for my kernels. All other partitions are Ext3 as I am more familiar with the Ext* FS than other journaled FS types.

      I am curious to know what your steps were when you originally partitioned and installed the 2 OS's.

      Sorry to beat a dead horse, but this topic is interesting. ;-)

      --
      :-( --- argh. Despair, I owe again. :-b
    22. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by jlseagull · · Score: 1

      The complete threads of people that have been responding to me is at Google Groups here.

      Basically, I have a laptop, and have tried three times to get it to work dual-booting to XP and Linux. I've blown my XP install away twice, and now Linux doesn't want to boot.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    23. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by h8macs · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ok. You have definitely been through the problem solving phase of things. Unless you already have....try this:

      1. Partition the drive "first", half for windows, half "empty"....do this with fdisk from a linux cd (knoppix, slax, slackware, whatever)

      2. Install windows to the primary partition (don't waste time updating yet, in case it blows up again)

      3. Install Linux (I prefer Mandrake over fedora on a laptop, servers I recommend slackware or debian)
      - Partition the disk:
      a. /boot (128MB, primary)
      b. swap (512MB, Primary)
      c. / (2048MB, primary)
      d. (all remaining, extended)
      e (all other partitions /usr /home /var ... on extended)

      * In a nutshell this is how I partition my laptop.

      4 Choose "lilo" for boot loader, install to MBR (this really should not be an issue and is generally the easiest boot)

      5 Make sure you "add" the windows OS in the bootloader configuration during the Mandrake installation. (going on memory here) If the install does not prompt you, then edit /etc/lilo.conf and add "windows" to it.

      Then run /sbin/lilo to update the boot loader.

      I hope this helps man, sorry you have had to go through so much trouble with this.

      --
      :-( --- argh. Despair, I owe again. :-b
    24. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      But then so will WinNT, Win2K and WinXP !!!
      It is also well documented :)

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  16. Re:mirror available! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Downmod please, they charge $6 for the download.

  17. download from mirrors please! by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 2, Informative

    pretty good mirror (speed wise)
    http://ftp.tuwien.ac.at/pub/linux/Mandrakel inux/de vel/iso/10.1/

    I'm going to see what new things are out on the Desktop.

    CB

    1. Re:download from mirrors please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      that mirror still has the public beta. not the club release.

  18. Re:Gentoo by avelldiroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those two are pretty different : Mandrake is designed for the newcommer or someone who want to install a system in less than 30 minutes without being bothered by hardware problems (autodetection wizard). The obtained system is quite rigid and require to enjoy GUI config tools (cause some of them cannot be bypassed). Gentoo is tailored by the user himself which results in a longer installation (can be up to 2 days) process, and a minimum of automatisation (some kind of autodetection but you are encouraged to avoid it), all this in order to get the system you want (ie most of the time faster than any precompiled distros). To compare distros with cars Mandrake would be an easy to drive automatic and Gentoo would be a custom car ...

    --
    *nix is userfriendly ... It's just selective about who is friends are ...
  19. I'm about to renew. by biendamon · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd say club membership is worth it, if you happen to prefer Mandrake as your primary distro. I appreciate the dedicated mirrors for club members quite a bit. Makes patch times much faster.

    I also like the repositories for software that are available to club members. I have yet to find a piece of software out there that someone didn't turn into a Mandrake RPM, and the club mirrors seem to have it all. Sure, you can find them other places, too, but all in all it's nice to have everything in one place.

  20. 2.6.8.1 you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll pass then. That was the worst (as in, least reliable) 2.6 kernel drop so far! They should have used 2.6.7 which is rock solid.

  21. YUM or apt-rpm? by kundor · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just use urpmi. Once you've setup your servers at http://easyurpmi.zarb.org/ it's a great solution, both the commandline version and the GUI tools.

    1. Re:YUM or apt-rpm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://easyurpmi.zarb.org/ [zarb.org] is worthless. Firstly, the typos (1 followed by 3!!). Then it only shows stuff for 10.0 even when I choose 9.2 !!

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Re:Gentoo by kundor · · Score: 1
    up to 2 days?

    If you have anything but the latest hardware Gentoo is likely to take a week to install. It took me two days on my fancy Athlon 64, and I know of people on old hardware (386's or something) taking weeks.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Re:What about the k3b burner detection issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then don't use a bleeding edge kernel, dipshit.

  26. Re:Face It by foxhound01 · · Score: 0, Funny

    You got that backwards, if they DO run on a distro out of the box, its not worth your time.

    --


    Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
  27. Financial situation? by infolib · · Score: 1

    Anyone know how Mdk's finances look right now? They've been in some trouble.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    1. Re:Financial situation? by waterwheel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mandrake seems to be pulling itself up by it's bootstraps financially. Which is great - because I think Mandrake is Linux's great hope to take on MS.

      And they're doing that by doing what MS does - but based on a stable OS. With Mandrake you can get install your desktop from a couple of CD's, with about as much tech knowhow as you need with windows. With Mandrake you get a nice looking desktop right out of the box. And now with Mandrake you can spend $25 a year and get a windoze like auto-security-update feature.

      Sure - you can get scatterings of that in other distro's - but not in a format that is good for non-tech loosers such as myself. Mandrake seems to be the last prominent distro that is really focussed on the desktop and doing it right (i.e. dumbed down, but still working.

      even their auto updating feature is a fabulous. Yes, we all know you can get that elsewhere - and for free - but by charging for it like MS would, there's a lot more going on. First loosers believe there likely to get a fully tested easy to use product (heck - I believe it myself, I'm just waiting for their server version - and if you think people won't buy the server version of this, then you don't understand why people by MS), and secondly it focusses attention on it - people will buy it just because it's offered and it's a good idea. Offer it for free and it's hard to see the value in it.

      And before the purists hack me to tiny little pieces, I'm speaking as a tech manager type who uses mandrake on their desktop. I'm the next wave of converts, and Mandrake is going to do the converting

    2. Re:Financial situation? by opkool · · Score: 3, Informative

      See the results for yourself here.

      In short: MandrakeSoft is out of "Chapter 11" (March 30th - 2004: Mandrakesoft Exits Bankruptcy). MandrakeSoft is back making profit. MandrakeSoft shares are back being actively traded.

      Quoting latest report:
      ----
      During the third quarter of 2003/2004, Mandrakesoft produced a consolidated revenue of 1.50 M and a gross margin of 1.25 M, a respective increase of 39.1% and 66.7% compared with the same period of the previous fiscal year. The gross margin is the highest on record, and quarter by quarter there is an acceleration in its rate of growth (Q1 +29.8%, Q2 47.7%, Q3 +66.7%)

      During the quarter, the company registered an operating income of 0.17 M (0.04 per share) compared to an operating loss of 0.47 M during the same period of the previous fiscal year. The net income increased to 0.19M (0.04 per share) compared to a net loss of 0.37 M during the previous fiscal year.
      ----

      So it's all good.

      Peace!

    3. Re:Financial situation? by optikSmoke · · Score: 1

      The update service costs money? I've been auto-updating my system for years with urpmi. And I thought that their GUI front-end was free too.

    4. Re:Financial situation? by jb_02_98 · · Score: 1

      There is an updating tool for free. There is also one that cots, but lets you manage updates remotely and has them automatically done. I'll just stick with the first though, as I'm broke.

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Re:mirror available! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Downmod please, they charge $6 for the download.


    Linux is free, right? If you got $6 and wanna support them, be my guest. But don't ask to censor people that offer a legitimate alternative.

  30. Re:What about the k3b burner detection issues? by Dunkelzahn · · Score: 1

    That memory leak is nasty. I had to roll back my install to 2.6.7 because of the way it would slow down my system to sub-Pentium levels if I left it up for more than a few hours. I was starting to wonder if my IDE bus was blowing up on me when I'd try to burn audio cd's, and then I read about that leak which explained the slowdowns. So I would have to concur with the parent. 2.6.7 works just fine, but 2.6.8 should be skipped.

    --
    .
  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. Only available to club members? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone explain how this is not a GPL violation? I assume that they will have source distributions available NOW!

    1. Re:Only available to club members? by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, children, the GPL says you have to release source code to your USERS when you distribute binary code. That's how this isn't a violation of any licenses.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    2. Re:Only available to club members? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also says that you cannot ask for any information or make people "sign" anything in order to get the code. This "club" sounds like something you have to sign up for...

    3. Re:Only available to club members? by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      It also says that you cannot ask for any information or make people "sign" anything in order to get the code.

      No, actually it doesn't say anything about not requiring someone to pay for the software. It says absolutely nothing about not requiring someone to "sign" anything. I suggest you READ THE F***ING LICENSE BEFORE you go off on a righteous hoot next time.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    4. Re:Only available to club members? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, dork-ball, you can still get all sources and even the RPMS from ANY OF THE MIRRORS. Of course, it's not in pretty install format, all packaged up. That is all. Please RTFM.

    5. Re:Only available to club members? by Hooded+One · · Score: 1

      You have to sign up to get the binaries. That is 100% allowed under the GPL. They then make the source available for anyone to whom they distributed the binaries.

      Now, it is also 100% allowed under the GPL for the Club members to redistribute binaries/source, but Mandrake is under no obligation to do so.

    6. Re:Only available to club members? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No see, you have to sign up to get the binarys, and they dont have to supply the source to you if you dont have the binarys. Just because you ask for the source doesn't mean they have to give it to you. You have to be a user/customer.

    7. Re:Only available to club members? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. I noticed that the RPM updates on the cooker mirrors stopped flowwing recently -- which means a final freeze before the CDs got spun. I haven't noticed any problems with this CR. Then again, I didn't use the CD installer.

    8. Re:Only available to club members? by thewally · · Score: 1

      Oh, you got it. That's true! The code should be for all!

  34. Re:What about the k3b burner detection issues? by Dunkelzahn · · Score: 1

    I have always used the plain vanilla kernel.org kernels, compiled to my needs, no matter what the distro. If I need to download one of their kernels as a dependency, I simply emerge the sources but never compile or install it. If you have an existing kernel install with a source tree in /usr/src/linux* - if the kernels are within a couple of releases of each other you can usually get away with copying the .config over to your new (old) kernel tree and skip the 'make config/menuconfig/xconfig' portion of the install.

    --
    .
  35. Re:What about the k3b burner detection issues? by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

    Just emerge a gentoo-dev-sources 2.6.7 kernel and boot with it until a fixed 2.6.9 one comes out. What is the problem?

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  36. How incredibly hypocritical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mandrakesoft released MandrakeLinux 10.1 Community, As usual it's only available first to the club members

    What an incredibly hypocritical position to take.

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Progonosis not good by Sits · · Score: 1

    ACPI works well on my desktop (as does software suspend, only one problem so far) but there are reports of laptops suffering beacuse of a lack of nolapic support. It's also worth noting that many machines come with poorly programmed BIOSes and need updates or extra code to have working ACPI. Why not try a LiveCD distro to test with until you find out you have support? It may also help if you pick a big vendor and report the issue to them so that they can track it and have you test fixes...

  39. Re:Gentoo by avelldiroll · · Score: 1

    There is a magic word : dcc Stand for "Distant C compiler" if I remember well This dcc interface itself with the portage system allowing to compile on several computer at the same time. It is also available on certain mod of knoppix and on the gentoo livecd. This is the perfect solution for old hardware.

    --
    *nix is userfriendly ... It's just selective about who is friends are ...
  40. all i want is kde 3.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've been running 10.0 official for some time now and dammit, kde 3.3 has been out for weeks now. where in the hell are the rpm's for mdk for kde 3.3???

  41. Re:Face It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gaming is a real waste of computer resources and a human brain. If you want a really nice Linux distro, Mandrakelinux is it. If you want games, get a PS2 or Xbox.

  42. Re:Gentoo by slide-rule · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [Mandrake] is quite rigid and require to enjoy GUI config tools (cause some of them cannot be bypassed).

    I'm curious what tools you're referring to. I'm far from any expert on any distro, but I've never had a problem dumping out to a console window, su'ing to root, and tweaking the odd config file by hand (mainly in that I still don't understand where some things are at in the mdk gui tools ; seems like I always have to hand-edit /etc/hosts for my 3-machine home LAN) ... and the systems I do this cover most of the common gamut a normal person would need to bother with.

  43. The issues have been fixed in the kernel by Sits · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a cooker mailing list post refering to the bug being resolved.

  44. Mandrake Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The first rule of Mandrake club is that you DO NOT TALK about Mandrake club.

    1. Re:Mandrake Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Because the people in FIGHT CLUB will beat you up

  45. Re:Gentoo by JollyRogerX · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't you be doing something else right now, Nick? Like studying??

  46. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  47. This is an outrage by twfry · · Score: 0, Troll
    How dare they release a product to premium customers first instead of everyone.

    Oh, this is Mandrake and not Microsoft. Sorry, forget about it.

    1. Re:This is an outrage by PianoComp81 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The premium customers get to test it out and find the bugs. The regular customers get it after the bugs are fixes. Sounds good to me ;)

      I'm more thinking of the LG CD-RW drive bug with 10.0 Community. There was a command in Mandrake's kernel that wiped out the firmware in some of LG's CD-RW drives. The people trying Community found the bug, had to go through some long process to get their CD-RW drives working again and then when 10.0 Official came out, those who downloaded it for free have no more bugs! So we can pay to test Mandrake!

    2. Re:This is an outrage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the LG Roms were at fault as the firmware they had wasn't complete, it had nothing to do with the distro.

  48. RedHat RedHat!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks Mandrake, I've used you before and I didn't like you. I'll keep using my Redhat ;)

  49. Re:Great! by kundor · · Score: 1

    Oh, c'mon, I'm a mandrake booster myself but that was funny.

  50. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. - um.. NO! by axis-techno-geek · · Score: 1, Informative
    Go back and RTFB.

    This is only an issue with a certain combination of BIOS and chipset (nForce2). I have both 2.6.x (x86) and 2.6.x (x86_64) set-up on my machine booting via GRUB and also loading Win2K on an NTFS partition.

    Stop the FUD.

    --
    This is not the sig line you are looking for... -- Old Jedi Sig Line Trick
  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. Re:Gentoo by avelldiroll · · Score: 1

    The tools I was referring to were parts of the Mandrake control center. What I wanted to say is that those tools do not cover all the options of the config files (/etc), they only propose "the most used one". The problem is that those tools often consider to be the only process to be allowed to edit those files and crash if they found out that the file was manually edited. What I think is that these GUIs are great as long as you use only them. But what i like in Linux is that you can fiddle everywhere so I prefere not using them. I remember a "samba configuration tool" which systematically destroyed any manual config done to /etc/samba/smb.conf and that was not allowing the a proper config ... as the computers were given to others to use these tools had to be disabled in order to avoid any : "oh what does this pretty icons do?" click "Answer : wreck havock in your network shares!" There were also some really funny (the 10 first times only) videocard detection tools that would keep on bringing back the options they wanted me to use (it was on a stereoscopic system and each time I was connecting a second display the detection system would remove the stereoscopic options ....)

    --
    *nix is userfriendly ... It's just selective about who is friends are ...
  53. This is the dumbest conversation I've ever heard.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "RPM-based distro problem"

    Jesus, if you're this clueless, don't say things out loud. Just think them to yourself and use Google. I'm embarrassed *for* you.

  54. Re:Gentoo by cos(0) · · Score: 1

    I believe you mean distcc -- distributed C compiler. It acts as a front-end for the local compiler which does load-sharing for compiling on multiple machines.

    Especially for Gentoo, it's invaluable.

  55. Re:I'm not in the mandrake club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehe, good job

  56. Re:What about the k3b burner detection issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just put

    >=sys-kernel/development-sources-2.6.8

    into your /etc/portage/package.mask file (if the directory doesn't exist just create it). Then emerge development-sources. The ebuild will download everything to /usr/src/linux-X.X.X, but you'll have to do a normal "make menuconfig ..." (unless you use genkernel).

  57. Re:What about the k3b burner detection issues? by Hooded+One · · Score: 1

    Well, the K3b news page says 0.11.5 (mostly) fixes writer detection in 2.6.9 and up, though I'm not sure why 2.6.8 isn't included there.

  58. Mandrake 10.1 Community Released? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I didn't know they were being held hostage.
    I blame Microsoft.

  59. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. - um.. NO! by ricotest · · Score: 1

    I have an nForce2, so that 'FUD' is accurate for me, and helpful information.

    It doesn't apply to everyone, but it's still a valid complaint and (as others have said) totally unacceptable.

  60. Did They Fix The Dell Issue by BladesP9 · · Score: 1

    Did they fix the problem with the Kernel that keeps it from recognizing the CD Rom drives in certain newer Dell servers? I had to dump my use of Mandrake because this bug. I was able to use Fedora's install just fine so I've since switched to it :-\

  61. All I want is a pony by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

    The rpms would be on your system, if you would get off your ass and make them, instead of whining on Slashdot.

    1. Re:All I want is a pony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh hoho...aren't you a clever twit.....maybe some folks have other shit to do like fucking HOMEWORK and a JOB instead of trying to dick around with learning how to fucking write goddamn fucking .spec files. and that being said, since i don't know fucking dick about building rpm's, there smartass, you think i'd wanna trust that to myself?? yeah...that's a brilliant fucking career move there , wiseass. perhaps maybe i'd rather let someone who knows WHAT THE FUCK THEY ARE DOING handle that so i don't go and fucking HOSE MY SYSTEM....

      now who's fucking smarter jackass??

    2. Re:All I want is a pony by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      More crying, "I want kde 3.3, but not enough to actually do the work myself."

      It's all about priorities. If homework and your job are more important to you than having kde 3.3, which they should be, then do your fucking homework and go to your fucking job.

      I concede, you're the smarter jackass.

  62. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. - um.. NO! by GnuAge · · Score: 1

    Beg to differ, it isn't limited to the Nforce2 chipset. My board is a VIA KT333.

  63. Huh? 10.0 CE? Is this a repost troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    you do realize 10 CE was released about half a year ago?

    This is old news, and has been fixed. This post smells strongly of a repost troll

  64. MOD PARENT DOWN --it links to goat.cx by KWTm · · Score: 1
    be 'very pporly *BSD has steadily oneR or the other

    Yeah, with a link to goat.cx . Someone mod this guy down. We do like to have our fun with newcomers to Slashdot but this isn't appropriate. (Yeah, yeah, I know it's not goatse.cx, it's goat.cx, probably because goatse.cx was unilaterally shut down.)

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  65. Mod parent down, it's basically spam. by biendamon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The site loadux.com is a pay service ($6.99) not actually associated with Mandrake. In other words, you pay them for something Mandrake will soon be releasing to everyone for free, and Mandrake gets nothing.

    You want the new Mandrake NOW NOW NOW? You've got six choices:

    1) Get a club membership. You get tons of apps prepackaged as Mandrake RPMs and dedicated mirrors, too.

    2) Make a friend with someone who already has a club membership. Nothing wrong with making copies of the CDs.

    3) Learn the art of patience, and wait for the general release.

    4) Download the current Cooker. It's gonna be essentially the same.

    5) Download the sources and compile it yourself. Pain in the butt, but no one ever said the GPL means they have to provide you binaries, only source.

    6) Pay these guys $6.99 to download the images from them. Please note: This option will automatically make you an asshat.

    1. Re:Mod parent down, it's basically spam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Get a club membership. You get tons of apps prepackaged as Mandrake RPMs and dedicated mirrors, too.

      so instead of forking out a paltry $6.99 I get to fork out $69.00????

      no thanks.

      if mandrake offere'd a month to month membership plan then i'd join.

      I'll just snag the ones on Kazaa.. hell the DVD iso is out there!

  66. I won't be wasting my time by onlyjoking · · Score: 1

    I used to be a loyal Mandrake fan up to the release of 9.2 but 10 destroyed every gain Mandrake ever made. Ethernet configuration and networking was broken at the most basic level with cards that worked with 9.2. It wasn't fixed and I gave up. Fedora has never given me such problems.

    1. Re:I won't be wasting my time by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      I gotta admit 10.0 community sucked ass that way, but offical was a entirely different kettle of fish

    2. Re:I won't be wasting my time by onlyjoking · · Score: 1

      I just don't get it. How can a company like Mandrake, which is on its knees financially, turn out a product which boasts the latest this-that-and-the-other without taking a look at whether basic networking is ****ed? I don't care if it's Community. It worked in the previous release so why is it now broken?

      The other issue I have with Mandrake is that I still can't get it to do 1152x864 with anything over 75hz vertical sync. This is 2004. It's madness. Fedora has no problem with this. Again, how can a distro claim to be a specialised desktop distro when such basic features are missing?

  67. Re:Gentoo by opkool · · Score: 3, Informative

    The obtained system is quite rigid and require to enjoy GUI config tools (cause some of them cannot be bypassed)

    This is a false statement.

    All GUI config tools ("wizzards") can be bypassed... modifying text config files.

    Also, most of GUI config tools have a text-version as well.

    MandrakeLinux is also a good Linux distribution for those Linux old dogs (like myself) that do not need to prove "31337ness". I already have succesfully installed and used LFS and Slackware (last century, when it came in floppies).

    I do not need to endure the pain anymore. My time is more valuable than to missuse it wasting time in a 2-day install and 10-day configure. I just need to use any Linux distribution.

    Peace

  68. Patch for Kernel 2.6.8 CD burner bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    just want my *&#%ing CD burner to work!

    You can get a patch from these guys

  69. Re:mirror available! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    It's 6 bucks for a mirror.

    You aren't supporting linux developers you are supporting the site for their use of bandwidth. Not exactly a non-profit endeavor.

    Donate to the projects you like and download for free or borrow a disc from a friend. Of course if you are going to pay, just buy from the distro creator.

    http://www.linuxiso.org/

  70. Re:2.6 kernel may blow away NTFS. - um.. NO! by lab16 · · Score: 1

    My board doesn't use nForce2, and yet I was affected.

    Sorry to tell you this, but you are wrong.

  71. Mandrake Club not worth it. by fr8_liner · · Score: 1

    I mainly paid for it to get support. But I never got a single question answered. I also agree that it is best to avoid the Community Editions. I had a lot of instability problems that went away with the stable 10.0 release. And that is available for free from a lot of sites that ain't French!

  72. is losetup -e AES fixed? by swm · · Score: 1

    losetup -e AES

    was broken in 10.0

    Chatter on the mailing lists refered to the 2.6 kernel not supporting the encryption modules--or something--I never really understood the issue.

    Neither could I figure out whether or not
    - it is fixed
    - they think it is fixed
    - they intend to fix it
    - they think it can be fixed

  73. Re:acpi support for laptops? (Aspire 2010..) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm running mdk 10.0 (I support them via the club) on an Acer Aspire 2010.

    I have to say, I managed to get "most" things working, but boy, it was not an easy process compared to Windows.

    My experiences:

    (1) Out of the box, it did not grok the widescreen format of the laptop display. Not too hard to fix - had to mess with XF86Config-4.

    (2) OOTB, power management support was almost nonexistant. I found some laptop-mode scripts, but even those didn't do what I wanted (such as stepping the CPU speed down). I managed, after a lot of hair pulling, to get this working tolerably by rewriting the laptop mode scripts. It involved a lot of playing around to see which processes were spinning up the disks, so I could stop those when going to AC power, fixing bits of the scripts that just didn't work, figuring out how to control the CPU speed via proc FS, and so forth. I must have spent a solid half a day on this. I almost gave up.

    (3) Sleep and suspend do not work at all, or rather, the laptop hangs when coming out of those modes. I believe the issue is actually that I use XFS for my filesystem, and it somehow doesn't work with sleep and suspend.

    (4) OOTB, I had no networking support at all. I found real Linux drivers for the ethernet card, which work fine. The only way I've got the wireless to work is by some ndiswrapper thing that wraps the Windows drivers, but if you use this for too long, the laptop hangs! Also it doesn't seem to support encryption, so my WAP is running wide open :-(

    It's been a long road, and Linux is definately not "ready for prime time" on the laptop, but on the plus side, after investing the time, I do have most things working in a tolerable way.

    Hope that helps answer your question. I'm a huge Linux fan and run it on all my systems, but boy, we have a LONG ways to go before Joe Public can just grab it and install it on his random laptop. (Well, you _can_ - it'll boot - as long as you don't care about details such as having networking and support for your widescreen LCD).

  74. Working...Re:acpi support for laptops? by AhaIndia · · Score: 1

    As most of the posters have already mentioned, ACPI, does not owrk perfectly in most of the distros.
    But it may not be complete fault of the distro. Your ACPI DSDT table might be broken (M$ compatible though!!! ) .... I was having the same problem as you mentioned in your post... I fixed my laptops DSDT by myself (detailed instructions and the fixed DSDT are at my LinuxPage)
    Though the web-page mentioned above only describes one Distro, I have used several distros after that and with a little effort, ACPI works on all of them.
    Also I made 3D acceleration work on S3 (now Via) savage card which has been listed as "not supporting 3D acceleration under Linux" (Detailed description at azeemarif.blogspot.com)

    --
    ~Aha~
  75. Re:What about the k3b burner detection issues? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    What's annoying is that 2.6.8.1 on Gentoo is unmasked and with no patch to fix the problem. The least the Gentooistas could have done to avoid this is to mask the package until a fix appeared.

    I wonder if gentoo-dev-sources is worth trying again... I've been on vanilla-sources since mm-sources crashed on boot in 2.6.7.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  76. Whole lotta formatin' goin' on! by wemgadge · · Score: 1
    I was so impressed with Mandrake 10 Official that I bought the powerpack.

    Upside? During install it autoloaded the Nvidia drivers with no configuration and the PC has been running smoothly since the last upgrade. All systems are go from DVD playback to CDr burning. It is my main desktop system and occasionally my wife uses it too.

    Downside? Everything is running so smoothly that I don't dare break anything.

    (sigh) At this point the only update I risk is KDE. I may upgrade to the KDE 3.3 MDK packages when they hit the kde.org download site (I'm running 3.2.3 and they are mostly stable) but I think I'll wait until Mandrake 11. It's too easy to get caught up in the frenzy. Linux can run for years without a restart, but I've yet to meet a linux geek who doesn't reformat and repartition his PC every two months. Mind you, with development in the F/OSS community constantly moving forward, and with nightly CVS snapshots, It's no wonder we have a whole lot of formating goin' on.

    On a side note. I did get hit by the MBR bug BUT I installed Linux on a completely separate drive than WinXP. The MBR on my slave drive is completely messed. I haven't gotten around to fixing it because I can still boot into WinXP with no problems whatsoever. Besides, I'm just plain lazy.

    --
    -- Cheers!
  77. Actually... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    5) Download the sources and compile it yourself. Pain in the butt, but no one ever said the GPL means they have to provide you binaries, only source.

    ..nobody said that they have to provide the source either, only to those that have recieved the binaries from them. And clearing up another misunderstanding, they can put whatever additional terms they want in the licence, as long as it doesn't restrict the rights granted by the GPL (including but not limited to, redistributing to all third parties under a pure GPL licence).

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  78. Re:It has the potential to be THE distro for lapto by jesuitninja · · Score: 1

    Not forgetting to mention other handy tools -- cpufreq, klaptop, etc.

  79. And the rest of the contributors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is so fast to "thank" Texstar, who just "goes it his own", whereas a lot of the packages he made available in the past were leeched from other sources, rebuilds from cooker, and about 20% of them his own packages.

    Maybe you should also consider the approximately 50 community members who together maintain about 5000 packages in the distribution and contrib, and take the responsibility of handling the bug reports and many other tasks.

    The only reason Texstar got noticed so much was because he didn't take official contributor status and instead does his own thing, even if it screws upgrades for people using his packages ....

  80. Re:Gentoo by MarkByers · · Score: 1

    If you do a GRP (Package) install, it takes about 3 hours. You can learn something from it too, so the extra hour or two it takes to install will be help you save an hour later.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  81. Re:Gentoo by harikiri · · Score: 1

    Perhaps stage1, but stage 3 won't take nearly that long.

    FYI - Stage 1 is the compile EVERYTHING from source, whereas Stage 3 starts with prebuilt packages targetted towards either i386/athlonxp/etc.

    I've always started with Stage 3, because I don't believe that the effort:performance-gain ratio is worth it.

    --
    Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
  82. Now publicly available by davidag · · Score: 1

    Mandrake says that now now the public may download 10.1 Community:

    http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ftp.php3

    1. Re:Now publicly available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And later later 10.1 Official will be available.