Slashdot Mirror


Virgin Atlantic Licensing SpaceShipOne

Tigerquoll writes "According to the Australian Broadcasting Commission, British airline magnate Richard Branson has announced a plan for the world's first commercial space flights and has signed a technology licensing deal with Mojave Aerospace Ventures - the US company behind SpaceShipOne. See scaled composites' media release and the Virgin Galactic website"

207 comments

  1. Branson? Makes sense by rde · · Score: 5, Funny

    As we all know, when you ride a Virgin you boldly go where no man has gone before.

    1. Re:Branson? Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it is Virgin trains then no man has got to the destination, that's for sure. Not on time anyway.

      I think Branson should concentrate on the 19th century technology of trains and get that right before moving into the 21st century.

    2. Re:Branson? Makes sense by Spudley · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is Vigin on the rediculous.

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    3. Re:Branson? Makes sense by epiphani · · Score: 0

      Like the website says:

      As you would expect from a Virgin company, the experience will be truly unforgettable...

      Also, in terms of the coolness factor, their initial ship is to be titled the "VSS Enterprise". It -almost- is starting to feel like a hoax, but if not, props to those virgin folks down under.

      --
      .
    4. Re:Branson? Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Down under ? Richard Branson is british.

    5. Re:Branson? Makes sense by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Virgin Atlantic Airways has an excellent reputation, though.

      Virgin Trains was, perhaps, not the best idea since the British government still handled the maintenance and still did a poor job as I recall.

      In this case, if you like the SpaceShipOne people, that's where most of the money's going to. Virgin is just the marketing company. They'll probably handle things like reservations just fine, and Branson's about the best promoter there is.

      I suspect the "low" price for space tourism is based on Mr Branson's finances and not ours, though :-(.

      You'll see him on the first flight.

      D

    6. Re:Branson? Makes sense by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      If I'm going to see sky rockets, I might take my chances with a Virgin. If I am going to be a sky rocket, I'd prefer a lady with a little more experience.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    7. Re:Branson? Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm... you prolly know already, but *preview* your posts before you commit them. Typos can really naff up a good joke.

      That said, you got enough letters in the right order to get my vote!! :D

  2. Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster says: by Brento · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Our press release was covered by Slashdot today! Perfect! Make sure our database guys delete all records received before October 1, because they're poor geeks who just want the brochure for free. Don't waste your phone calls on these freeloaders."

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  3. Space travel in my lifetime :-) by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I may never get onto the world's first commercial supersonic jet, now that it's been retired, but with an initial price of £115,000 I'll certainly hope that (after another 5 years or so, when the price has come down), I'll get into space. Cool. Really cool if it flies over my house :-))

    I'd always regretted not doing the quick flight to NY from London (not that I could afford it!), even with tiny seats. I'm told it was just about possible to pop over the pond, do your xmas shopping in a different continent, and pop back the next day (same day was possible but left little time for shopping...) Let's just hope that the space-flights stimulate some competition, unlike Concorde, because then the next goal would quickly become 'lunar city'...

    I think that 'Virgin Galactic' is hopelessly optimistic, though, given that it's sub-orbital. I'm guessing people won't really want the 'galactic' version, and a return ticket might be a bit superfluous...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by kryonD · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Let's just hope that the space-flights stimulate some competition, unlike Concorde, because then the next goal would quickly become 'lunar city'..."

      Fortunately for you, the Japanese have been eying this industry for quite some time. And quite frankly, I'm putting my money on the culture that presently makes: The world's fastest super computer, the most reliable cars, the most advanced communication technology, etc...

      These guys are in it to win and Virgin won't be able to charge $190K because the Japanese will be there offering $185K, or some other competitive number that would make it cheaper to fly vial JAL to Tokyo instead of Virgin to London.

      --
      I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
    2. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by JohnnyNoSPAM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hopelessly optimistic... perhaps. Still, even for the glimpse of our world from the perspective that thus far only a few have been able to see would be incredible. I don't have a few hundred thousand bucks sitting around to burn; maybe I never will. But, for those who do I'm sure that it will be the experience of a life time - even if they don't go to the moon or anything like that.

      In Thornton Wilder's play, Our Town, there is a memorable quote: "It takes life to love life." As an example, it's one thing to read about a roller coaster ride, to see the pictures, and to hear the tales of others who have experienced it. But, to be there yourself, to take that and to feel that energy and excitment for which no words or pictures can simulate - there is nothing that comes close to knowing for yourself.

      Commerical space flights might not be anything that would be anywhere nearly as affordable as commerical flights of today at least relatively speaking within my lifetime. I might end up being a very old man by the time that they do. Aside of the excite of seeing our planet from such an amazing view point, I am sure that the sheer speed of being able to get from one place to another will become yet another convenience - a luxury of future life. I just hope that there is competition so that the prices will be competitive and thus the flights will not remain an experience only for a priviledged few.

    3. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      Er, not sure if it was obvious or not, but when I said 'hopelessly optimistic', I was referring to the 'galactic' in the name rather than the idea itself. To call a service 'galactic' yet only get 100km away from terra firma seems ... well, hopelessly optimistic :-)

      Either that, or he's planning about 1000 years ahead...

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    4. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by JohnnyNoSPAM · · Score: 1

      Dammit, Jim! I'm a romantic - not a galactic engineer! :-P

      John

    5. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately for you, the Japanese have been eying this industry for quite some time. And quite frankly, I'm putting my money on the culture that presently makes: The world's fastest super computer, the most reliable cars, the most advanced communication technology, etc... Because we all know what happens when you combine computers and space ships... not a great success. I'm thinking of the number of times I saw shuttle launches cancelled because of 'computer errors' As I understand it, the key to safely doing this is to leave the complex stuff on the ground and keep everything in the air simple to use, understand and therefore far less prone to failuer.

    6. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by brarrr · · Score: 1

      Well, you can get onto the worlds first commercial supersonic jet... come to seattle to check out the museum of flight http://www.museumofflight.org/ where you can take a quick tour of a concord http://www.museumofflight.org/visit/concorde.html and the original air force one, and sit in the cockpit of an sr-71 (one of only two that allowed a drone to be attached) and and and plenty of other cool things. Having seen the smithsonian (before the new hangar was acquired) this mof blows that out of the water. Well worth a trip here just to visit the museum - as a geek, plan on taking two days to do it all, I live here and still haven't exhausted it.

      --
      to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
    7. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by bwy · · Score: 1

      And quite frankly, I'm putting my money on the culture that presently makes: The world's fastest super computer, the most reliable cars, the most advanced communication technology, etc...

      Ah, but have you ever flown Virgin? I've never been treated so well on an airline as a Virgin trans-atlantic. I'm sure there are anecdotal horror stories that folks will post as replies (unavoidable in the airline industry). So Virgin Galactic might get my money for a suborbital trip, if it mimics what you can expect on Virgin Atlantic. That is, of course, unless starts offering suborbital flights. Of course, I only fly Hooters Air for the...um... wings.

    8. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And quite frankly, I'm putting my money on the culture that presently makes: The world's fastest super computer, the most reliable cars, the most advanced communication technology, etc...

      At least someone's willing to buy American.

    9. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by schmaltz · · Score: 1

      Not to indulge over-generalisation, but:

      > The world's fastest super computer,

      That would be the Americans

      > the most reliable cars,

      Toss-up between Korea and Japan, next place the Europeans

      > the most advanced communication technology, etc...

      Again the Americans, though it depends on what you're referring to as "the most advanced," and also which communication technology industry you're focusing on, as there are many now! Israel has been doing interesting things lately.

      The foundations of much of today's global communications originated with American research. Japanese companies are great at optimising, but I don't see a lot of "first-of" tech coming from there.

      --
      Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
    10. Re:Space travel in my lifetime :-) by ces · · Score: 1

      There is a certain irony to your post as Branson was seriously trying to get Air France and British Airways to sell him the remaining Concordes. I don't remember if the problem was that AF and BA refused, or if they demanded more than Branson was willing to pay, or if British Aerospace/EADS refusing to supply parts was the problem.

      In any case even if Branson loses money on Virgin Glactic it will pay off for him and his companies in free advertising and PR. "Fly Virgin from London to New York and win a flight on the VSS Enterprise!"

      At worst Virgin Glactic is a continuation of Branson's yachting, powerboat racing, and balloon stunts. Who knows he might even end up financing the next step to orbital flight.

      Then again if anyone could make money on space tourism it would be Branson.

      Another thought occurs to me perhaps Branson will have Rutan design a new SST for Virgin to fly? That would be quite a coup for both Rutan and Branson.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  4. Insurance cost ? by mirko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How will be the insurance cost calculated ?
    I mean, there are stats which help defining the cost of a plane travel insurance but there ain't such stats concerning commercial flights...

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Insurance cost ? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Simple - have passengers sign a waver. Not responsible for death, injury, etc. etc. Done and done!

    2. Re:Insurance cost ? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      err - can I mod myself down? I meant to be funny, not informative. Obviously, insurance will be an issue for a commercial enterprise like this.

    3. Re:Insurance cost ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to read up on Business Law: a waiver does not a legal excuse make.

    4. Re:Insurance cost ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      see above...(was kidding)

    5. Re:Insurance cost ? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Have you ever done a bungiejump? You basically sign away all responsibility the bungiejump-organiser has towards you. So why would this have to be different?

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    6. Re:Insurance cost ? by TimothyTimothyTimoth · · Score: 1
      "...a waiver does not a legal excuse make."

      Is that the Yoda School of Business Law? :-D

      --
      It doesn't matter which ape activates the Monolith
    7. Re:Insurance cost ? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Even if you sign your life away, and fall and get hurt/die because the operator was negligent, you (or your family) can still sue the pants off of them. IANAL, but I know that kind of waiver is less enforcable than a pre-nup.

  5. Name of the new ship by JamesD_UK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you look at the BBC article, the Virgin spacecraft design is to be called the VSS Enterprise!

    1. Re:Name of the new ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait...I know of something else commonly abreviated to VSS and there is no way you'll get me flying on a SpaceShip that shares the same name with Visual SourceSafe! I might come back with parts of me corrupted!

    2. Re:Name of the new ship by kmmatthews · · Score: 1
      Yeargh, I hope it's a little better than the uber-nasty VSS Enterprise Edition... :)

      (Incidentally, we switching from that.. very shortly, thank $diety.)

      --
      feh. stuff.
    3. Re:Name of the new ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely that's thank $/diety?

      My coat's on the back of the chair. No, I'll get it...

    4. Re:Name of the new ship by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      ...irgin spacecraft design is to be called the VSS Enterprise!

      Appropriate that geeks will be able to go where no geek has gone before aboard the Virgin Space Ship Enterprise....

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:Name of the new ship by beeglebug · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or even deity? Unless i'm mistaken and you're talking about a weight loss plan...

  6. Quote from Burt Rutan by Woutepout · · Score: 1
    This is truly exciting! The signifigance of this I think is worded best by this quote from Burt Rutan himself (from the press release):

    "Apart from building SpaceShipOne for Paul and then watching it fly to space on June 21st this is one of the most exciting days of my life. Our June space flight was flown with several new technologies that address both the cost and safety of manned space flight. These, combined with the lessons learned from our SpaceShipOne research program, will enable us to develop the finest suborbital operational systems possible. I am looking forward to getting started on the development program and the opportunity to work with Virgin on taking Paul Allen's vision to the next stage."

    --
    "Some people have got a mental horizon of radius zero and call it their point of view." - David Hilbert
    1. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by R.Caley · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is truly exciting!

      Only if you are completely unfamiliar with the way the words `stunt' and `publicity' can be arranged into a well known phrase or saying.

      Beardie can't even run a worthwhile train company.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    2. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by Ariane+6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "It could cost us up to $100 million to invest," Branson told reporters. "We've done quite a lot of research; we think there are about 3,000 people out there who would want to do this," Sir Richard told the BBC.

      That's quite a bit for a one-off publicity stunt, entirely aside from the 14 Million Pounds already invested.

    3. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by R.Caley · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "It could cost us up to $100 million to invest,..."

      That's quite a bit for a one-off publicity stunt,

      `Could' is the important word here.

      entirely aside from the 14 Million Pounds already invested.

      Which 14 million?

      The licensing deal with M.A.V. could be worth up to £14 million ($21.5 million) over the next fifteen years depending on the number of spaceships built by Virgin.
      So they haven't actually committed to 14 million. Indeed the press release doesn't say how much they have comitted to, so we can assume it is not very much -- or MAV would be crowing about it.
      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    4. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Beardie can run a worthwhile passenger airline, however, while no-one can run a worthwhile train company in the UK under Railtrack and the pricing restrictions, but of those that try, Virgin is by far the best.

      Why do people say things like "he can't even run a train company" as if it's something really basic that any idiot should be able to get right?

    5. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by R.Caley · · Score: 2, Funny
      no-one can run a worthwhile train company in the UK under Railtrack and the pricing restrictions, but of those that try, Virgin is by far the best

      The hell it is. Try Virgin vs GNER for a Scotland to London trip. Virgin is slower, less reliable and the rolling stock is a joke. Last time I was stupid enough to travel on a Beardy train the mysery was only releaved by the entertainment of watching the staff using a huge metal spike to lever the toilet door open to let someone out.

      As for pricing restrictions, the train fair is already almost an order of magnitude greater than flying (80 quid Edinburgh to Nottingham return a few weeks ago, anywhere from 2.50 up for a single on EasyJet if I'd been organised enough to book, add in a local train journey from airport to Nottingham), so they are hardly having their prices nailed to the floor.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    6. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by poleydee · · Score: 1

      Apparently the trains were always on time under Mussolini...

    7. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can safely assume it's millions though, and even billionaires don't like throwing money away...

    8. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by mikeee · · Score: 1

      3000 people * $150k =

      $450 million dollars.

      So it's not inconceivable that he could clear a couple hundred million! Not chump change, even for a billionaire...

    9. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      Beardie can't even run a worthwhile train company.
      It's not his fault if the infrastructure is old, creaking and full of bottlenecks. his trains are second to none.
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    10. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      You can safely assume [the amount committed is] millions though

      Why? All they have signed is a licence agreement. I would expect the big expense at this point is the models and artists impressions and so on used in the publicity.

      and even billionaires don't like throwing money away...

      I never said anything had been thrown away. He has bought a hell of alot of publicity. He certainly got the BBC news Web front page yesterday, and I expect the BBC TV news (I didn't see it), he certainly got the TV news I did see yesterday.

      All this, by total conincidence, on the day of the first run of his new trains, when there were the expected breakdowns.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    11. Re:Quote from Burt Rutan by Sir+Runcible+Spoon · · Score: 1

      I don't think Mussolini operated trains under the Railtrack.

  7. Maybe wait a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The journey takes three hours, at about £33,000 an hour.

    At that rate, I hope they've included some process to permenantly keep your eyelids open to maximise the amount of view you get.

    1. Re:Maybe wait a few years by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      You also get 6 days of space-training, get to fly in the mothership and watch a launch from very close, fly a simulator, etc...

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
  8. foward planning! by welshwaterloo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    VIRGINGALACTIC.COM
    Created on..............: Wed, May 08, 2002

    Now there's some foward planning!

    1. Re:foward planning! by Col+Bat+Guano · · Score: 1
      ..and of course forward planning is -always- better than backward planning.

      Or do I have that backwards?

    2. Re:foward planning! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      2002 was the year Branson went and herded up all the unclaimed virgins in the world.

      the jammy Bastard!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:foward planning! by Epistax · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh yeah? www.virginspacehotel.com, registered Jun 17, 1999.

    4. Re:foward planning! by seanellis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Branson had been in talks with the now-defunct Rotary Rocket company (also based in Mojave) as long ago as 1999.

      http://www.forbes.com/forbes/1999/0705/6401140a.ht ml

    5. Re:foward planning! by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Why is this funny? Why is this overrated? That's a real link and I checked up on it.

  9. Don't forget the long term plans! by manavendra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    " If it is a success, we want to move into orbital flights and then, possibly, even get a hotel up there"
    -Sir Richard Branson

    From bbc

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by TintinX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " If it is a success, we want to move into orbital flights and then, possibly, even get a hotel up there"

      Am I a hopeless geek who needs therapy or does reading that quote from Branson bring a genuine tear of emotion to anyone else's eye?
      That such a thing has taken one very real step closer to realisation in my lifetime is - quite literally - awesome.

    2. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by Tikaro · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, does Sir Richard Branson have a plan to deal with the Vermicious Knids?

    3. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With some people, I'd have a similar response. However, with Branson, I'll remain skeptical for a bit longer...

    4. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by zedenne · · Score: 1
      makes me feel pretty excited.

      all i have to do now is find some sort of high paying job or spend the next 10 years saving the pennies (and convincing the wife that missing all other holidays until this one is worth it)!

    5. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, you're not the only one.

    6. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by nmfa · · Score: 1

      It's not even that. It's just poking the ship out of harbour and then turning tail back to port.

      But it is a start.

    7. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please, we've been hearing about the space hotel since at least the 60s and probably before. There was one in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), I think it was a Hilton.

      It's like those damned flying cars. Since the 40s, flying cars have been "5 years away!" You'll be able to buy one "5 years from now!" You can fly above the crowded freeways in luxury!

      No one tears up for flying cars... you know why? Because despite being promised every decade for the last 65 years, it's never happened. I've never been able to buy a flying car, and the FAA hasn't even bothered to consider licensing any.

      Cry about the space hotel WHEN IT EXISTS, not when some rich jerk promises it, or you'll be crying until you're dead.

      Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see it happen... but from my experience, most of these type of press releases are nothing but lies.

    8. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've never been able to buy a flying car, and the FAA hasn't even bothered to consider licensing any.

      You cannot blame the FCC for this. There are several homebuilt flying cars and I'm sure all of them are licensed or they wouldn't be allowed to use airports, which they do - they trailer the wings, fuselage, and tail section, which are attached at the airport.

      The sole reason that you don't have a flying car is that no one is selling one. It has nothing to do with the FAA. No one is selling one because it's difficult to do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, true, but I watch Moller (www.moller.com) which is low profile and slow slow, but he grinds and grinds away...he may do it.

    10. Re:Don't forget the long term plans! by pgptag · · Score: 1

      Then the moon, then the planets, then the stars as the name Virgin Galactic says. I still think that investing in space is mainly for the public sector at this time, but this will restimulate the interest of people in space and make it easier for space agencies to get the fund they need.

  10. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Our press release was covered by Slashdot today! Perfect!"
    Actually, you can stop there. Branson is a master of PR, and I wouldn't be remotely surprised if this venture gets quietly binned, once its provided its much needed channels to allow Branson time to plug his newly launched credit card.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  11. This is just great! by Ariane+6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the best news I've heard all year!

    Since 7 AM, I feel like I'm living a book by Arthur C. Clarke. I've been waiting for this since I was a kid. I've just been repeating the company name over and over in my head:

    Virgin Galactic Spacelines.

    Wow.

    Oh - and it seems they have a website...be sure to check it out!

    1. Re:This is just great! by pgptag · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is the right reaction to this announcement. Sense of wonder a la Sir Arthur Clarke, and let's go for the stars. I will start saving today. And Branson is a clever businessman to say the least, he would not have invested if he did not see a market. Since 1972 we have been waiting for governments to go back to the moon, perhaps Virgin galactic will get there first.

  12. Licensing seems inexpensive relative to other cost by erick99 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Given the costs and future revenue associated with the technology that is being licensed, I am surprised that the licensing deal is only worth appx. $21M:

    The licensing deal with M.A.V. could be worth up to £14 million ($21.5 million) over the next fifteen years depending on the number of spaceships built by Virgin.

    The development alone of the technology is predictably high:

    It is expected that around £60 million ($100 million) will be invested in developing the new generation of spaceships and ground infrastructure required to operate a sub orbital space tourism experience.

    The revenue for flights seems about what one would expect:

    Over five years Virgin expects to create around 3000 astronauts and the price per seat on each flight, which will include at least three days of pre-flight training, are expected to start at around £115,000 ($190,000).

    So, given all of these numbers, doesn't $21M for a license seem low?

    -erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  13. This is technological progress... by mikael · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After having spent 30 years of research in order to conquer the complexities of making
    train carriages tilt while travelling along a curve at 150 miles/hour, and taking 15 minutes off the travel time, it's only
    a small step to having reusable space craft running shuttle flights to and from Mars.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:This is technological progress... by gowen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the recent delay on the Pendolino is nothing to do with the trains, and everything to do with the fact that the West Coast Mainline tracks themselves hadn't been maintained sufficiently well to allow the trains to run on them.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:This is technological progress... by cruachan · · Score: 1

      That's not really fair. The ATP fiasco was all British Rail's own.

      During the 80's I worked as a programmer on RAVERS (Rail Vehicle Records) which was BR's system for logging its movable assets. Interestingly there was (if I remember correctly) four records for ATPs on the live system, despite the fact that only one or two prototypes had been officialy produced.

    3. Re:This is technological progress... by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      Actually its the "APT" (Advanced Passenger Train) i did a project at school about it when i was a little nipper.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    4. Re:This is technological progress... by cruachan · · Score: 1

      Ah, freudian slip there. Before being a coder I trained as a biochemist and ATP is a rather common abbreviation in that field!

    5. Re:This is technological progress... by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      as well as being "Adenosine Tri-Phosphate", ATP also crops up in the UK rail industry - "Automatic Train Protection", first successfully used in the UK on the Docklands Light Railway, although earlier versions were used on the London Undergorund Victoria Line and by the Great Western Railway.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
  14. so what? by nblender · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Once everyone who can reasonably afford to, has gone up in space, floated around the cabin a bit, and drunk their vodka-bubbles, what are they going to do for an encore? Take people to Mars? Once the novelty has worn off, people realize there's nowhere to go for your 10 day vacation because everything interesting is 3 generations away... Just a passing fad like radio, television, and spam.

    1. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You never know, maybe when we are tired of taking the vacation in the hotels on mars, some race might just pop out of nohwere and offer some jumpgate technologies... :)

    2. Re:so what? by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Funny
      there's nowhere to go for your 10 day vacation

      At that time, they will have accrued enough cash and guts to build a hotel in orbit. They'll advertise the scenic view, but hint at the zero-G beds. When that wears off, there's the moon. By the time we get to Mars, we'll probably have the technology to get there fast enough and then the solar system's in our back yard. But not Europa. We'll attempt no landings there.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    3. Re:so what? by zedenne · · Score: 1
      couldn't someone just dig up an mysterious artifact in a desert somewhere.

      sounds far more plausible.

    4. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once everyone who can reasonably afford to, has gone to this "new world", floated around the cabin a bit, and drunk their vodka-bubbles, what are they going to do for an encore? Take people to South America? Once the novelty has worn off, people realize there's nowhere to go for your 10 day vacation because everything interesting is 3 generations away... Just a passing fad like 3 things that are still in massive use today so I obviously have no idea what passing or fad means.

      Get a clue man. You are an idiot. Or you are so insanely jealous of not being the man to have thought of it earlier that you can find nothing better to do than rip into what could possibly by one of the watershed moments of the 21st century. Either way you are not insightful.

    5. Re:so what? by poleydee · · Score: 1

      They do say,... your life is never the same again after you see the earth from up there (buzz aldrin amongst others). Anyway, after the novelty has worn off for the few thousand Americans who get to go, there's always the other 559 and a half million to try it out on. Oh, and the rest of the world...

    6. Re:so what? by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Rest of the what? I'm an American and an insensitive clod, I have no knowledge of lands beyond our borders.

  15. Can't get to the hotel, yet by Rxke · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's cool, but nothing compared to ...

    'America Space Prize' $50 mil.

    http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0409/27bigel ow /

    for the first one that comes up with an orbital thingy to visit Bigelows ... SpaceHotels, Yeah!

  16. Australian Broadcasting Commission by the_bellman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "According to the Australian Broadcasting Commission," it's actually a corporation and hasnt been a commission for quite a while. Yes it is still government funded, but the C stands for corporation now-a-days.

    --
    -- robin.shannon.id.au This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Recombo Plus License.
    1. Re:Australian Broadcasting Commission by tigerquoll · · Score: 1

      Oh shit..! I'm showing my age. Of course they're a corporation. Maybe I can blame lack of sleep.

  17. Re:Licensing seems inexpensive relative to other c by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1, Interesting
    So, given all of these numbers, doesn't $21M for a license seem low?

    I think it is pretty inevitable that Virgin will have to go back to Scaled for engineering services. They will make a lot more money on that in the long run

  18. Forget tourism! by InternationalCow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The virgin galactic (which translates to Virgin Milky...) site gushes about the spiritual experience for rich tourists ("executive jets"..."dine with astronauts" yadda yadda) but the true opportunity for the foreseeable future will be IMHO in high speed intercontinental flight for those for whom it is really important. Let space tourism pave the way (like the rich did with the automobile) but let's not forget the ultimate goal. Then I can finally go to a conference in Australia without haveing to reserve two days for getting there!

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    1. Re:Forget tourism! by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1

      I think your trip to Austrailia might still be a ways away. Most of SS1's boost is concentrated in getting it UP, not OUT. A ballistic flight to Austrailia would require something rather near orbital velocity (not quite, but close) in order to remain outside the atmosphere for such a distance.

    2. Re:Forget tourism! by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      I think your trip to Austrailia might still be a ways away. Most of SS1's boost is concentrated in getting it UP, not OUT.

      You might be right, but I think the major advantage here would be fuel economy. I would imagine that if the craft were to operate in a similar fashion to ICBM's (roughly parabolic trajectory, with the apex being far into the upper atmosphere), the fuel efficiency might be somewhat better than a traditional aircraft since the re-entry leg of the trip is little more than a matter of gliding to the target.

      Though, admittedly, I really have no idea what it takes to get one of those things into space in the first place.

    3. Re:Forget tourism! by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1

      You might be right, but I think the major advantage here would be fuel economy.

      Well, look at the size of an ICBM (for example, the Titan II, which was also the launch vehicle for the Gemini capsules), and remember that the entire length of the thing with the exception of the capsule is essentially one big fuel tank.

      Then look at the size of the capsule, and all two of the passengers it carried.

    4. Re:Forget tourism! by poleydee · · Score: 1

      High speed intercontinental flights won't go into space though... not really anyway. They'll skip across the top of the atmosphere like a stone on a pond. You'd get black sky and all that, but no weightlessness and not the same view! You might as well teleport!... wait a minute, there's a useful invention...

  19. Re:Licensing seems inexpensive relative to other c by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you look at the total costs of SpaceShip One until now its not really low...
    And I suspect that they are counting on Virgin to come back and order increasingly more and larger spaceships.

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  20. Air Miles by payndz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Woohoo! *Finally* a use for all those damn Air Miles I've accumulated!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Air Miles by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only Part of the trip will be reimbursed After you leave the atmosphere your paying out of your pocket. Unless you have sky miles or something that could cover space flight.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Air Miles by lastninja · · Score: 1

      Damn, I misread that as Air Missiles. I was really worried for a while.

      --
      John Carmack fan, browsing at +5 since 1999.
    3. Re:Air Miles by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 1

      So do you think Virgin Galactic will have a codeshare with other airlines?

      Plus you won't receive that many miles for the trip. Don't you only go up a few miles and then back down? With Delta that would get your the minimum of 500 miles for the trip.

  21. What about the cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay as you Go service?

    Or Pay as you Glow if anything went wrong...

  22. Great new business model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Airlines don't have bad enough fuel economy. Let's start a business based on one of the worst fuel efficient means of transportation possible. If we're lucky, we can go bankrupt even before we IPO.

  23. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by Tet · · Score: 1
    I wouldn't be remotely surprised if this venture gets quietly binned, once its provided its much needed channels to allow Branson time to plug his newly launched credit card.

    I wouldn't call it newly launched. The Virgin card was launched in either late 2001 or early 2002, IIRC. My company was in discussions with Virgin and ANB to do the card, but in the end they went with one of our competitors.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  24. Better yet by Jesrad · · Score: 1

    ... you're actually living in a "You are the hero" book ;) There's nothing stopping anyone from participating in the uppcoming adventure of commercial space travel.

    This newly born industry needs talents to bloom. Ask yourself what you can do to help.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  25. Too expensize! by Space_Soldier · · Score: 0

    I heard that the ticket would be around $100,000. It is yet too expensive for the normal population.

  26. Vigin this, Vigin that... by Spudley · · Score: 1

    Catch the Virgin Train, and travel to airport.
    Stay at the Vigin hotel.
    Catch the Virgin Plane, and cross the Atlantic.
    All the while, drinking your Vigin cola and listening to Virgin music on the Vigin radio station.
    And then fly the Vigin spaceship. ...

    Are there any high-profile industries that Mr. Branson doesn't plan to get involved with?

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    1. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by mhollis · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Trump this, Trump that.

      At least Mr. Branson had the taste to come up with a company name that was not his own.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    2. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, software. Because even he couldn't stop the Microsoft Monster getting in on the act if he was any good at it.

      Yeah, I know - troll bait.

    3. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Atleast he makes condoms too..

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    4. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by polyp2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like Branson;

      I have always thought of Branson as a "Nice Guy" yes, he has his finger in a few pies. But it seems to me that when he takes on a loss making public service (british transport ) and makes a good stab at turning it around for the better of the people.... I Just get the impression that his heart is in the right place. I will never forgive the lottery commision in the UK for not awarding it to branson; who promised that all of the money made from ticket sales would go to deserving causes rather than the percentage (whatever that is) that Camelot give away.

      Nick ...

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    5. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually .. Im fairly sure Virgin has a Games (software) division...

    6. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by hplasm · · Score: 0
      Virgin Brothels?

      Nah, that wouldn't go....

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    7. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by shonagon53 · · Score: 1

      We called our son Virgin 1, our two daughters Virgin 2 and Virgin 3, I still call my wife Virgin Absolute, and our dog's called Virgin 4. (Sit! Virgin 4, sit!)

      We are a creative family. We are saving for a Virgin car because we know beardie's going to brand a sleek hydrogen car soon. We are going to call it our Virgin 5.

      We are a creative family. We considered to follow the "Easy" brand, but Virgin conveys a sense of purity. We are a pure family. We have values and such.

    8. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Yeah and British Airways refusing to sell him Concorde was really really annoying. I would have loved to have had him keep it flying.

    9. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by iwrigley · · Score: 1
      Yeah and British Airways refusing to sell him Concorde was really really annoying. I would have loved to have had him keep it flying.

      Except that, like many things with Branson, that was all PR and not a real desire on his part. It would have cost Virgin Atlantic far, *far* too much to maintain the Concorde(s); his whole reason for claiming to want to buy them was to get his company's name (and his) in the news. And I'm sure that's exactly what he's doing with this latest stunt.

      Likewise his upcoming TV program. Right now, it's all about getting the Virgin name as widely known in the US as possible, in advance of his new airline starting up over here. He's a master of PR, even if many of his ventures fail horribly. (You just don't hear much about them -- he's a master of spin control, too.)

    10. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "turning it around for the better of the people....
      You've never had to pay for a return train ticket London to Manchester out of your own wallet, have you? It's cheaper to fly return to any number of more attractive european cities located outside the UK. It's also quicker to get to those cities, and more fun when you get there. Small wonder brits all leave the country even for small weekend holidays when the fares are so inaccessible just to travel to a neighbouring city. If Branson is going to start with tourism for the sake of tourism. Hopefully someone will utilise the same technology for cheap sub-orbital commuter flights between NYC and LDN... which would be far more useful. Sub-60 couriers across the Atlantic. mmmmmmmmmmm.
    11. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      Yeah and British Airways refusing to sell him Concorde was really really annoying. I would have loved to have had him keep it flying.

      Except that, like many things with Branson, that was all PR and not a real desire on his part.


      Sad, but true. At some stage in the late 1960s, when costs of developing Concorde were spiralling out of control, the UK government effectively took a 49% share to the French govt's 51% share. This meant that the French were the Design Authority. After the accident at Paris, and despite the reworking of the fuel tanks by British Aerospace and Aerospatiale, Air France ( = the French Government) lost faith in the aircraft, probably because ticket sales never recovered the way they did for British Airways. Hence, Aerospatiale, as the Design Authority, announced the intention to cease to provide DA status. Without DA, there can be no Certificate of Airworthiness. If the UK had been the DA, then it is possible that BA would have kept it going, as, with all the development costs written off back in the early 1970s, it was actually making an operating profit for them.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    12. Re:Vigin this, Vigin that... by llansamlet · · Score: 1
      He must be cursing himself for taking on that train franchise, most if not all of the problems with the train network are outside his hands yet the bad publicity is going to reflect upon all his businesses.

      Many of the Branson announcements are just exercises in cheap (although clever) PR (Concorde and this space thing spring to mind). However aside from this, he has a wonderful business system set up that I envy him for no end. He probably has a few seriously profitable businesses that he uses the profits from as a sort of venture capital pool to fund all his crazy whims and ideas. Who knows how profitable most of these things are (probably not very), but many of them are ideas we all may dream up down the pub and would never have the means or funding to set them up.

  27. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by gowen · · Score: 1

    You're probably right. There has, however, been a fairly serious relaunch in progress, since April '04, when Branson's Virgin Group bought out Virgin Money, previously half owned by HHG.

    Theres a fairly high profile set of TV commercials in heavy rotation at the moment, too.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  28. Wow! by hartba · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Virgin Atlantic Licensing SpaceShipOne
    How long before I can download it off of Kazaa?

    --
    60 percent of the time, my comments are right everytime.
  29. Vaguely happy by DanielMarkham · · Score: 1

    This is good news, for sure, but so far it's all hype and little reality. I would want to see the marketing numbers that support the idea of such expensive and short-duration flights.

    I suppose that until somebody offers truely orbital flights of several hours or more -- then maybe somebody could drop the cost of a house to take a ride.

    Not that I'm complaining. If I won the lottery I'd take every ride like this I could buy. But if it looked like a few more years until I could go orbital, I might wait a bit.

  30. 3 Hours?? by Ionizer7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is barely enough time for the in flight movie (apollo 13 maybe?) and one trip from the beverage lady.

  31. Australian Broadcasting Commission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It became the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in 1983! get with the times!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Broadcas ti ng_Corporation

  32. For all the naysayers out there by HuguesT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The US went from suborbital unmanned flight to the Moon in almost exactly 10 years:

    Little Joe 1 - August 21, 1959 - test of launch escape system during flight, first flight of the Mercury program.

    Apollo 11 - July 20, 1969 - Landing on the Moon.

    One of the most incredible and awe-inspiring achievements of the XXth century, and I'm saying this when I'm not even American. If it were started from scratch today, everyone would think it would simply be impossible.

    You may say that a lot of resources were sunk into this, for sure. However large private interests have even more money than governments these days.

    If I had Bill Gates' fortune this is the thing I would do. Get back to the Moon, establish a small base, restart the Orion program from there, mine the outer planets for He3, go to the stars. Would $40B be enough? I don't know. It's the most responsible thing to do if we want to survive as a species.

    1. Re:For all the naysayers out there by b4jts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I had Bill Gates' fortune this is the thing I would do. Get back to the Moon, establish a small base, restart the Orion program from there, mine the outer planets for He3, go to the stars. Would $40B be enough? I don't know. It's the most responsible thing to do if we want to survive as a species. Yeah, and this Earth thing we have here is losing it's novelty after so many years. Let's get going!

    2. Re:For all the naysayers out there by sycophantia · · Score: 1

      wow, someone else thinks like me :) Read Stephen Baxters Manifold series? It's all beginning to work out..

    3. Re:For all the naysayers out there by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

      It's the most responsible thing to do if we want to survive as a species.

      Why do you have to leave the planet to survive? You have a much better chance if you stay here and fix the problems locally rather than running away. 'Cause you know... no matter where you go, there you are.

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    4. Re:For all the naysayers out there by Starwanderer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why do you have to leave the planet to survive? You have a much better chance if you stay here and fix the problems locally rather than running away.

      You're forgetting that the biggest threat to us as a species may not come from ourselves. A strike by a large asteroid or comet could easily doom humankind. If we're all sitting here on Earth, that's it. If we've left the cradle, some will survive. Remember it's not a question of if this will happen, it's simply a matter of when.

  33. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by jdreed1024 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Branson is a master of PR, and I wouldn't be remotely surprised if this venture gets quietly binned, once its provided its much needed channels to allow Branson time to plug his newly launched credit card.

    If so, he plans pretty far in advance:

    Domain Name: VIRGINGALACTIC.COM

    Created on..............: Wed, May 08, 2002
    Record last updated on..: Sat, Dec 06, 2003
    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
  34. I want a big space blimp hotel by shonagon53 · · Score: 1

    I hate the thought of spending US$ 200,000 for 3 minutes of weightlessness. I want a space blimp instead. I like it slow and big.

  35. Step 0 by blooba · · Score: 2, Interesting
    subject to all necessary government approvals

    the announcement is step 0. step 1 involves clearing all of the government obstacles. but according to popular /. opinion, that is the one thing that sir branson is obviously quite good at.

    if they succeed with step 1, then us geeks can get excited in earnest. step 2 will be development and testing. should be no problem given the monies involved. then of course, in step 3 we'll see many, very rich people fulfilling their lifelong dreams. the rest of us will watch with unbridled envy.

    but i fear that step 4 will be sudden bankruptcy, when they quickly exhaust the very small number of adventurers rich enough to afford the still hideously expensive ticket.

    1. Re:Step 0 by Ariane+6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but i fear that step 4 will be sudden bankruptcy, when they quickly exhaust the very small number of adventurers rich enough to afford the still hideously expensive ticket.

      This is indeed a possibility, and maybe even probable unless during the period of step 3, further development and testing is conducted to lower the cost of suborbital flights. If that occurs, then the rest of us may get suborbital for the cost of a car, while the super-rich get an orbiting hotel, and on from there.

      If anyone can do it, though, it's Rutan IMHO.

  36. Since no-one else has done this... by seanellis · · Score: 2, Funny

    "We apologise for the delay to the 11:20 Virgin Suborbital. This is due to... err... the wrong kind of space."

    1. Re:Since no-one else has done this... by eboot · · Score: 1

      (this is for people who have ever used a British train, Virgin or any other) We apologise for the delay to the 11:20 Virgin Suborbital. This is due to the fact that their are leaves on the launchpad. The suborbital will be delayed aproximately six weeks.

      --
      Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
  37. Don't do it!!! by CdBee · · Score: 1

    Virgins don't go all the way, and to grind to a stop in a vacuum would.. erm.. really suck.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Don't do it!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how exactly to people lose their virginity?

      Jeez, your parents never told you?

  38. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by nexu56 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Branson is a master of PR, and I wouldn't be remotely surprised if this venture gets quietly binned, once its provided its much needed channels to allow Branson time to plug his newly launched credit card

    He's also a successful entrepreneur to the tune of billions, so I wouldn't write him off that quickly. He must be doing something right.

    When he started an airline (Virgin Atlantic) people aired similar doubts. When British Airlines realised he was serious they threw every dirty trick in the book at him... but they got smacked down in the courts when Branson proved they were operating an effective monopoly (a situation close to slashdot readers' hearts).

    Despite extensive industrial sabotage, Virgin launched the worlds prototype discount airline, which to date has been massively successful. Virgin Blue, the australian arm of the business, has captured a third of the domestic market from Qantas within a few years. All the while Virgin has dominated another form of air travel with Virgin Balloons. But I'm sure that was a ploy to sell plastic credit too.

    Naive spin-master or visionary benefactor? I think Branson's record speaks for itself.

  39. I think that's the point by CdBee · · Score: 1

    A hypersonic "spacecraft" which blasts into low earth orbit can probably make a landing on a different continent after a pleasurable period in free-fall... somewhat faster than a Boeing jetliner flying in the stratosphere at 600mph.

    Virgin tend to show sound commercial sense, I suspect the tagline of pleasure flights to orbit is a cover for development of more efficient long-haul aircraft which travel outside the atmosphere

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  40. The Trekkie Factor? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    Nice choice of name for the space-ship (from the website)

    VSS Enterprice
    (Virgin Space Ship)

    Nick ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:The Trekkie Factor? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, looks like Star Trek has started a tradition whereby the first of each new kind of ship is named Enterprise.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    2. Re:The Trekkie Factor? by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...Now they'll have to change the opening credits to "Enterprise" again :P

  41. Astronaut wings by chiph · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The site says that after your flight, you'll have a dinner where you'll be presented with your astronaut wings. I can see some resentment from the established astronaut/cosmonaut/taikonaut corps to this.

    How much do you want to bet that the requirements for receiving your wings will be raised by 100km or so?

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Astronaut wings by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      I think 100 km would disqualify the current set of astro/cosmo/taiko-nauts.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    2. Re:Astronaut wings by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Nah, there are at least 22 astronauts that would still have their wings. (The 22 U.S. astronauts that went on the 8 lunar Apollo missions that left Earth orbit. (6 lunar landing missions, one aborted lunar landing that went around the moon, and one
      'practice' lunar orbit mission. Two astronauts went on two separate missions each, for a total of 24 man-trips outside Earth orbit.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  42. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by gowen · · Score: 1
    He's also a successful entrepreneur to the tune of billions, so I wouldn't write him off that quickly.
    I'm not writing him off... but... Branson's money has been made very shrewdly, and almost exclusively by entering mature markets and undercutting them. Good for him. I respect him : as beared twats go, he's one of my favourites. And his record label released some excellent prog rock in the 70s, and the Pistols after EMI dropped them, so respect is due.

    But this isn't like any of those other cases. This is not just a new market, and its not even a market thats going to be viable for a decade or longer. He's quite possibly interested in it, but why the widely reported press release now?

    Because he's a smart man, and he recognises a chance to leverage a relatively moderate investment into a massive PR and publicity coup.

    Naive spin-master or visionary benefactor? I think Branson's record speaks for itself.
    So do I. :)
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  43. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by nexu56 · · Score: 1

    Branson's money has been made very shrewdly, and almost exclusively by entering mature markets and undercutting them

    To enter a market with a lower price doesn't guarantee success, even with a strong brand like Virgin. Hence the failure of Virgin Cola(tm).

    I think the winning strategy here is he has deliberately targeted markets dominated by one or two corporate bohemoths who really need a kick in the ass in regards to competition, and shake things up a little. That's what they're doing now with space tourism. Competition is good for the consumer.

  44. Creating 3000 astronauts by QuasiRob · · Score: 1

    Does being strapped into a rocket actually make someone an astronaut?

    Taking a flight in an airliner doesnt make one a pilot, you are merely self loading cargo.

    --
    If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done?
    1. Re:Creating 3000 astronauts by poleydee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many of the 500 people who are currently called 'astronauts' actually piloted their rockets, and how many were simply strapped to them?!!

  45. For those who can't afford the $200,000 by apsmith · · Score: 1

    there's Zero-G, which is offering flights now for just under $3000 per person. Ok, so it's not exactly going to space - but you get real weightlessness for the price!

    --

    Energy: time to change the picture.

    1. Re:For those who can't afford the $200,000 by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      There's also stars stuck to the inside of the plane and they turn off the lights.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  46. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by gowen · · Score: 1
    he has deliberately targeted markets dominated by one or two corporate bohemoths who really need a kick in the ass
    That sounds like Coke and Pepsi to me, and doesn't sound like space/sub-orbital travel. Given there have only been a handful of space tourists, to which corporate behemoths are you referring here?
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  47. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by nexu56 · · Score: 1

    The Russian government would be happy to fly you into space, but I'm pretty certain the price would be beyond both our beer budgets for the next few years.

    I was really trying to argue that offering a lower price than your competitor isn't a magic beans recipe for success, even for bearded twats.

    What I'm pointing out is that Virgin will fly you to space for 10s of 1000s less than has been possible previously. Assuming that Virgin Galactic gets off the ground (groan).

  48. or on slashdot, a woman maybe? by fantomas · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..or with the slashdot readership, riding a Virgin is probably about going where no sane woman would consider going at all...

  49. How do they know tha they will be the first ... by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

    commercial space flight?

    I was wondering how they could know they would necessarily be the world's first commercial spaceflights? Although Rutan's ship has already made the flight and will almost undoubtedly take the X-prize there is another X-prize team who should soon be spaceworthy and have long been talking of turning their exploit into a commercial venture. I'm talking of the Canadian Arrow team who have, at the same time as they were getting their rocket ready for lauch been busy building a private astronaut training center, and they've also been thinking about space diving. There are also other X-prize teams looking for commercialization of space, although I don't know how close those are to launch.

    Although Virgin's vehicle will be the first out there, the business itself will undoubtedly take some time to launch. They might actually be beaten to the commercial punch by other teams which have been working on the business plan of putting people in space for a profit for a while now.

    --
    I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
  50. Pan Am Space Clipper Reservations ? by cbelt3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone else remember Pan Am taking advanced reservations on the "Space Clipper" as part of their 'product placement' in Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick's 2001 ? Someplace admidst the wreckage of my youth I have a certificate that Pan Am mailed to me certifying that I had a reservation when the "Space Clipper" flies. I wish I could find it. At least I have my Apollo 11 patch left over from a NASA visit in '70. If Virgin can actually make it happen, I say go for it ! Space travel has gotten too Governmental and has lost a ton of the adventure / romance that attracted me as a kid. If Branson can make it work, wahoo ! I just hope he registers through some country that doesn't allow lawyers in, otherwise the bastards will kill the love.

    1. Re:Pan Am Space Clipper Reservations ? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you can find that certificate, it might one day be worth some money. Who bought the pieces of Pan Am? :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Pan Am Space Clipper Reservations ? by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      Possibly this lot?

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
  51. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for Virgin, my team was responsible for Virgin's domain names. We used to buy hundreds of domain names related to the name "virgin", so I would not get to excited by the fact that this domain goes back 2 years.

  52. Paris Hilton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the first space hotel would be a Hilton (2001). I wonder if Paris Hilton will plan on sponsoring one as well (pink, of course).

  53. Concorde by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 2, Informative
    It really is unfortunate that Branson was not able to take over Concorde after BA and AF stopped supersonic passenger service.

    I think Sir Richard could have done a good job of restoring Concorde to its former glory. SpaceShipOne is just his latest go-fast toy.

    After all Branson speding a billion to play with his toys (SpaceShipOne, Concorde) is no different than any hobby we may have. Of course it is a billion, but overall it's a small percentage of his assets.

  54. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by poleydee · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing they don't quietly bin something they've already spent millions on...

  55. Huh? by valder · · Score: 1

    Betting on cultures? You indeed are mad. Certainly you don't speak poorly of the culture that used "slow" super computers, "poorly" educated engineers and drove their "unreliable" cars work and were the ones to actually create the means to make this possible.
    No, I know you wouldn't. Since I believe this is a misconception on your part I present the following link http://www.jdpower.com/news/releases/pressrelease. asp?ID=2004037 for your review. That pesky *censored* culture full of fat people seem to pull off remarkable things. Ohhh... bother.
    valder.

    1. Re:Huh? by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "the ones to actually create the means to make this possible"

      Are you kidding? There's little revolutionary about Rutan's design, apart from the fact that it was privately built. What's so special about polybutadine as a fuel? What's so special about nitrous as an oxidizer? What's so special about a launch-at-altitude? You might get some points for the shuttlecock wings, but that's about it.

      How much does Rutan's ship cost to operate? He adimantly refuses to say. They won't even say exactly how much investment has been put in! What makes you so confident that this is some sort of miraculous, megacheap craft (as far as *suborbital* flight goes)? The technology that they're utilizing certainly isn't that special.

      If you want to credit the *real* pioneers of spaceflight, you need to look to the USSR and Germany.

      --
      "TAMS shouldn't be destroyed. They should just tag us before releasing us into the wild." -- Maeglin
    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to credit the *real* pioneers of spaceflight, you need to look to the USSR and Germany.

      yes, because apparently the US never had any accomplishement worthy of note in that area...

      nothing may be "revolutionary" about the ship's design other than the fact that it was built and was the first privately funded spacecraft...but then again there is nothing revolutionary about that, so i guess that means he should have never even tried. does that seem a good way to make new accomplishments?

      you always miss 100% of the tries you don't take...

      everyone always seems to eager to belittle someone elses accomplishments.

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Offtopic by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    I used to work for the company providing support to Virgin Trains and our main source of humour on the long night shifts was people phoning up to tell us that "RAVERS had gone down" and we needed to do something to "bring the RAVERS up again." Our suggestions of "more ecstasy" didn't always go down well.

    This was almost as amusing as the system they have in Virgin music stores called "ELVIS" and we would be similarly amused to hear that "ELVIS had gone down".

    1. Re:Offtopic by cruachan · · Score: 1

      They had a bit of a thing about names. After RAVERS I went to work on LOVERS (I kid you not) which was Local Vehicle Records - a sort of smaller version of RAVERS that ran on a PC.

      BR was the strangest place to work, not least because half the staff seemed to be made up of train spotters. Mates of mine at the IT centre at Crewe had it particularly bad because the building was at the end of one of the platforms so those 'lucky' programmers with a window view could add to their tick list while 'working'. Indeed it was apparently something of a game among the more normal coders to shout 'there's a type 42x [or insert you engine type here] and watch the hordes run across to the windows tick books in hand.

      Saddest collory to the game was that to pull this off you had to know something about engines yourself as shouting out a non-existant type would lead to a chorus of disputation and a long drawn out explanation of your error.

      Myself, I servered my time for two years then went to work for a brewery.

  58. All these worlds are yours... by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    But not Europa. We'll attempt no landings there

    But then how will we get the mile-long diamonds?

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  59. Sex in Space by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    I think it will be a bit of status symbol, but I can forsee, just on SIS alone, a considerable number of flights per affording person. It will probably take several flights to acheive this status, and I forsee a line of couples heading to the bathrooms or other private areas as soon as they can.

    But that is just me, I think.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  60. What about the abnormal population? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    Will it be too expensize ( what is "expensize", anyway ) for us? Or will the tickets be the same price?

    ( relax, I'm just kidding ).

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  61. VSS Enterprise? by hacksoncode · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder whether they have a license from the Roddenberry estate...

    1. Re:VSS Enterprise? by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 2, Informative

      Errr, no.

    2. Re:VSS Enterprise? by Teancum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I'm sure if Paramount could if it were possible to formally trademark the phrase "U.S.S. Enterprise", since it is the name of an actual ship not owned by Paramount I think it would be more problematic for Paramount Pictures to be able to enforce that trademark.

      The name "USS Enterprise" has a long and distinguished history going all the way back to the administration of George Washington. There isn't going to be judge in the USA that will seriously recognise trademark usage except by the U.S. Navy for that term. I think Richard Branson is very safe by using that name.

      Being piloted by a Capt. James T. Kirk (or even Capt. Sulu) on the other hand....

  62. Re:OT: Your group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahh.. that explains why the bandwidth just dropped a wad...

    Nick ...

  63. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by Rei · · Score: 1

    First, your number "10s of 1000s" less is wrong. Tito - the very first (and probably most expensive) payed 20 mil. They're looking to charge over 200k here. So, at most, it's "100" times less. Furthermore, this is *suborbital*. If you wanted suborbital flight, there's a dozen countries that could hook you up for this cheap.

    --
    "TAMS shouldn't be destroyed. They should just tag us before releasing us into the wild." -- Maeglin
  64. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by gowen · · Score: 1

    Well, thats the headline figure. Something tells me the contract is long term, and more subtle than "here's a big pile of cash", giving all concerned plenty of wiggle room...

    Besides "millions" is not all that much to the Virgin Group. Branson probably spent than on his various aborted balloon trips.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  65. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by UnitTech · · Score: 1

    And somewhere on the Virgin Group website, he flat out states that he intends to do exactly this with the "Virgin Galactic" brand. It's been up there for a few years. I think he originally intended to use it to broker the Russian spaceflights, but this is better...

    --
    --- Posted by a random tech support monkey from Villanova University
  66. Only one minor problem here by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the period between 1959 and 1969 - money was no object. At that point, we were near the peak of the Cold War, and very few people in the American public minded spending exorbitant amounts of money on putting a person on the moon, because it meant beating the Russians.

    These days, there is no Enemy that we must race to space to beat, thus there isn't an incentive to spend exorbitant amounts of money. The recent efforts (X-Prize, etc.) have mainly been in the arena of taking spaceflight and bringing the cost down.

    IMO, we won't be seeing cheap Moon shots in only 10 years. But nonetheless, SpaceShipOne is an important first step to space.

    Space tourism is likely not going to pay the bills, but SpaceShipOne + White Knight is not far in configuration from what would be needed as a first (actually in this case first (WK) AND second (SSO) ) stage booster for a small rocket designed to insert small payloads into low-earth orbit.

    Then after we're slinging picosatellites into orbit dirt-cheap, the next step will be larger satellites. Then eventually, people. Then we'll leave low-earth.

    It's going to take a LOT longer than ten years for the Moon to become cheap to fly to. (IMO it won't happen until a compact fusion reactor exists, but the way fusion is being funded, we won't be seeing one of those for many, many decades.) But suborbital flight is an important first step.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  67. Well. by valder · · Score: 1

    It's not a question of what's "easier" or what's "superior" but the fact it's actually occuring. If this were because of how easy it was then there are any number of people that would have rocket ships in their backyards.
    The greatest thing we are not factoring into the equation isn't the sciences but the risk taking and entrepreneurial spirit that goes into an endeavor as we see here. Rutan and Branson are showing what it is to be a pioneer not cultural superiority or mathmatical acheivements -- however, both are a factor.
    Either way, it's capitalism all the way.
    valder.

  68. Aging Concordes were becoming deathtraps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a true-blue aviation fanatic, and hated to see the end of the Concorde as much as anyone, but after the deadly fuel tank rupture, fire and crash in Paris, the remaining aircraft were all carefully examined and there were numerous impending safety problems popping up all over these birds. Stuff you'll never read about in the laypersons' news media... stuff that's generally kept privy to only a close-knit community of folks who operate and maintain fast jets. The years of operational stress were taking a toll on the Concordes' airframes, and also more and more fundamental design issues were coming to light about the aircraft. The kind of stuff that's only learnable by the gathered experience of operating, maintaining and flying such aircraft for 3 decades can provide, and that only a substantial --and unfeasible-- complete re-design of major systems could even have begun to remedy. Not to mention the extreme operating cost and unprofitability of these birds helped to do them in too, that's the story given by the media, because it's most easily understood and accepted by the general public, but there were some dark mechanical secret problems too. It's best that these birds are retired from service and shall live on as grounded museum pieces now. One more tragedy would have absolutely ruined the romatic history of these aircraft. Now, with only one deadly accident in its history, the Concorde can still retire with much of its dignity still intact. Its better that way.

  69. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you wanted suborbital flight, there's a dozen countries that could hook you up for this cheap.

    Oh yeah, which ones?

    I can count the number of countries that have demonstrated, cheap suborbital capability today on my nose. It's one, the USA, and it only has this capability courtesy of Burt Rutan and his financial backer Paul Allen. The US otherwise currently has no manned launch capability at all, suborbital or otherwise. The X-15 would have been perfect for cheap suborbital flights, but I don't know if it ever could have been as cheap as SSO, and it's also been dead and gone for a long, long time. The only two countries that can currently put a person anywhere into space are Russia and China, and neither one has a suborbital system. Of course they can send you on a suborbital flight, but it'll be using orbital hardware, and so it won't be much cheaper.

    Maybe I'm totally missing something, but I don't believe your statement is correct.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  70. SF Parallel (was Re:Branson? Makes sense) by VoiceOfSanity · · Score: 1

    Pardon if the memory cells are a little dusty from Hurricane Ivan, but...

    Back when the SF Novel "Pegasus In Flight" (by Anne McCaffrey) came out, in the early part of the book was mentioned a businessman/entrepreneur who privately financed his own space program along with other businessmen. This person had his own airline already, and was looking for new horizons.

    Now, I'm fairly certain that this person (who I can't remember the name of) is based on Richard Branson. And equally interesting was the launch system is similar to the White Knight/SpaceShip One vehicle being used. Coincidence? Maybe. But I wouldn't put it past Mr. Branson that he hasn't read "Pegasus In Flight" and decided to try and make it real. Wouldn't be the first time.

  71. Commercial space flights are old by richmaine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There have been commercial space flights for... gee I don't want to waste the time to go figure out what would count as the first one, but it sure wasn't in this millenium, no matter how you count it. One could pretty easily argue for the 60's.

    Of course, one wouldn't expect press releases to worry too much about accuracy.

    PS. Perhaps they were referring to manned space flights. Now that would be quite different thing. Those of us that work in technical matters sometimes worry about actually saying what we mean.

    1. Re:Commercial space flights are old by poleydee · · Score: 1

      There haven't been any truly commercial spaceflights before these ones. All previous spaceflights have had government funding, even if their purpose was commercial e.g. putting a satellite into orbit. SS1's 21 june flight was the first 'private' manned space flight. i.e. no gov't funding, and certainly the first non-government trained (note I didn't say 'civilian') astronaut.

    2. Re:Commercial space flights are old by richmaine · · Score: 1

      In a word, bullpuckey.

      You must be reading too many press releases. I have no idea where else one would find such "facts". One can debate the fine print of which cases do and do not count as government funding, but there have been cases that are just undeniably non-governmental.

      The SS1 flight wasn't orbital, so we are obviously talking only about the >100 km definition of space flight. I thought I recalled a recent hobby launch that beat this mark...and a quick google on amateur space has no trouble in finding links.

      Take a gander at www.civilianspace.com. We aren't even talking commercial here; this is pure hobby stuff.

      Note that I didn't say anything about astronauts, my main point being that this was the important qualification that the current claim omitted to mention.

    3. Re:Commercial space flights are old by poleydee · · Score: 1

      Yes, fair point, they don't mention that other non government funded people have sent stuff into space; but this a very recent phenomenon. The site you sent through only made it into space this year; however, as you say, there are lots of civilians (probably) who have managed to put enough rocket booster into a tube and keep it stable enough to get 62 miles up... that's not really the point though.

      Anything that was capable of doing anything sensible, such as satellite launching, carrying people, etc. has historically had the support of the government. Whether that's direct or military. Even solely commercial ventures have been launched using the craft or technology developed by governments.

      I don't know the precise event that ended this monopoloy absolutely, but in terms of being able to carry people into space, I believe Burt Rutan ended that government monopoly on June 21st 2004.

      The cost per seat is the other interesting thing. In the history of space travel there have been about 500 astronauts (people who have gone into space - not pilots). The typical cost per astronaut is something like $50million.

      Why's that interesting or relevant to this thread? Well, when you get governments doing stuff,.. it's expensive. When you keep it simple and give it to private enterprise, it's relatively cheap and gives good value for money.

      So far.. space travel has been expensive because it was run by governments. Now that private enterprise has their hands on it, things like space tourism through Virgin Galactic (and others) and satellite launching through the likes of Canadian Arrow, become 'affordable'. Not to you and me maybe,.. but to go from $50m per seat to $200k is a step in the right direction.

      Last point,... interestingly NASA classify space as starting 50 miles up... but the X-Prize and others classify it as 62 miles... perhaps they really do want us mere mortals to get there without them!

      What exactly is bullpuckey anyway? :)

    4. Re:Commercial space flights are old by richmaine · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify one thing, by the way...

      I do think that Rutan does some really great work. I know lots of people here (a NASA site) who think similarly.

      In fact, I think Rutan's work is perhaps 1/4 as significant as Rutan likes to portray it. That means I think it is pretty darn significant. :-) And more significant than a lot of what NASA is doing today, but that's not nearly as high a bar as it ought to be, and is a different subject. :-(

      Rutan is even more a master of hype than he is of aero, which is not a denigration of his aero contributions at all.

    5. Re:Commercial space flights are old by poleydee · · Score: 1

      :-)

      Fair view on life!.. and so I guess by your definition Burt must be a REAL master of hype.

      Also, you can't be familiar with the Virgin group too much if you think that Burt is the hype master.

      ... however, this is a Virgin project that's not hype; even though half of slashdor seems to think it's a hoax! Only one way to find out.. and I'll bet even money that most of those who think it's a hoax still put their name down on the site!

  72. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll probably do both. Soyuz can get you into orbit but it will cost a lot. Spaceship One only gets you into space for a few minutes, but is orders of magnitude cheaper.

  73. Golden Pallace wasn't availalbe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard it was gonna be golden pallace, but apparently they had an exclusive with another spaceship comppaney.

  74. Virgin not the first by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Informative
    Virgin launched the worlds prototype discount airline
    Actually, it was Freddy Laker's 'Skytrain' launched in 1973 that was the first no-frills airline. You turned up at the airport like at a train station, no advance booking, food for sale on the plame if you want it, or bring your own fish & chips. Laker found himself falling victim to dirty tricks from BOAC, (a forerunner of British Airways) that put him out of business. I remember a documentary showing Branson talking to Laker years later when BA were up to their old tricks against Virgin and Laker's advice was straightforward. "Sue the b@$#@*&s!" he said. According to the Wikipedia article, "As a tribute to Laker Airways, Virgin Atlantic Airways later named one of its Boeing 747s The Spirit of Sir Freddie."
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  75. discount airline going to space? by opspin · · Score: 1

    Did anyone consider the concequences going into space with a discount airline?

    Yeah, this'll be great, get cramped in a seat with no legspace, being offered drinks for $4000 a piece and barfbags with cheap looking ads on them.

    Or maybe im thinking of Ryanair...

  76. mothership?! by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    From the website: You could possibly have the opportunity to ride in fast jets, to experience negative gravity in our executive jet and then watch as one of the other launches leaves earth for the near reaches of space; possibly you may even ride in the mother ship.

    Whatcha gonna do, George?! Put a glide in your stride, a dip in your hip, and come on down to the mothership!

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  77. RyanAir just tossed its hat into the ring too.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...However to keep the prices down there will be no peanuts, no movies, no pressurized cabins, and the heat shields will be made out of aluminium foil. On the plus side you can get to Rigel IV for only four pounds Sterling.

  78. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by mykdavies · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...Virgin launched the worlds prototype discount airline...

    Actually Virgin is not a discount airline, it's a traditional carrier with a simple network, and so greater control over its costs. As another poster has noted, Branson's competition is the entrenched large airlines such as BA and AA who had it their own way for too long.

    Having said that, he doesn't seem to want to compete *too* hard - I just had a look at a flight LHR(28th)->JFK, overnight stay, return next day, cheapest seats: BA £860, Virgin £855 (cf American at £947).

    --
    The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
  79. Australian Broadcasting Corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ABC is the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, not the "Australian Broadcasting Commission".

  80. Re:Meanwhile, at Virgin Atlantic, the webmaster sa by Sir+Runcible+Spoon · · Score: 1

    No. I'm pretty sure this is just another stunt of Richard's just to sell more copies of Tubular Bells

  81. Air Miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woohoo! *Finally* a use for all those damn Air Miles I've accumulated!

    Nope. Sorry to break it to you pal but there's no air in space. To all of people who back in 70s were complaining that 'Air Mile' was a stupid name and 'Fly Mile' should be used instead: WHO LAUGHS NOW?!