Slashdot Mirror


palmOne Announces Tungsten T5

btornado writes "palmOne has officially announced the Tungsten T5, which is due out in early November. It features 256 MB of flash memory, Palm OS Garnet 5.4 with a 320x480 display, and Bluetooth connectivity with support for the SDIO Wifi card. It is also the first device to support the Multi-connector, which allows you to trickle charge from the USB cable. You can also configure the T5 as a USB drive to transfer files."

200 comments

  1. New features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Charge from the USB connector?

    Oh my, that's what a two yeard old Zire does!

    1. Re:New features? by Tomahawk · · Score: 2, Informative

      So do my Tungsten-T and my m515 - but you have to use a Belkin USB cable to do it. The Palm cable doesn't charge from the USB port.

      T.

    2. Re:New features? by shellbeach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Charge from the USB connector?
      Oh my, that's what a two yeard old Zire does!


      And my Tungsten E. What's interesting to me is that in design this looks a lot more like an upgrade of the Tungsten E than the T3: no sliding thingy, the buttons and finish (oh no! you'd think Palm'd learn from their mistakes!) and form appear identical to the TE, and there's no voice recorder, the speaker's on the back, etc, etc.

      So I'm guessing that the T5 uses the same connector as the Zires and the TE. Which has always seemed a great idea to me (I love that the hotsync cable is just a mini-USB cable and I can charge from it), but will piss-off those who like their universal connector products ...

    3. Re:New features? by kaszeta · · Score: 1
      So do my Tungsten-T and my m515 - but you have to use a Belkin USB cable to do it. The Palm cable doesn't charge from the USB port.

      Odd, I must be imagining that my T3 has been charging from my Palm USB cable for over a year (I've never unpacked the cradle).

    4. Re:New features? by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      I have to agree .. this is an upgrade of the T|E, not the T3. I personally like the collapseable form factor and I refuse to give up my docks. The whole reason I bought a T3 and not an E was because I much prefer the dock instead of plugging in a cable and laying it down flat in a position that's not easily accessible.

      Also, the voice recorder on the T3 is outstanding.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    5. Re:New features? by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does, but it doesn't charge while the device is on. I believe the USB doesn't deliver enough juice to run the device and charge the batteries, but if the device is off it will charge the batteries. Perhaps the T5 uses less juice to run?

      I think when plugged in the car (12V adapter) it will run and charge.

      I was puzzled by this comment also.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    6. Re:New features? by kaszeta · · Score: 1
      It does, but it doesn't charge while the device is on. I believe the USB doesn't deliver enough juice to run the device and charge the batteries, but if the device is off it will charge the batteries.

      Mine does charge on USB, even when the device is on, but admittedly the charge rate isn't all that good. Perhaps they have tweaked this for the T5, as charging off of the USB port seems popular these days (for example, it's one of the highlighted features of the recent iPods). So I guess it's not a new feature, just an improved one.

    7. Re:New features? by Sancho · · Score: 2, Informative

      The T2/T3 had a very nasty hardware design (bug|feature). A large enough number of forum posts came across detailing the fact that after opening/closing the slider, the digitizer would be way, way off (meaning that taps would be offset). Recalibration every time this happened was the only solution other than sending the unit back and hoping for one that didn't have this problem. After the T2, I assumed they would find some way to correct the problem on the T3. Nope, it has the same issue.

      In that regard, the non-slider design of the T5 seems to be an upgrade. Hopefully it won't have the dreadful digitizer problems that the T2/T2 had, although the inability to reduce the size certainly is a drawback.

      What concerns me is the flash memory. Isn't this going to reduce the life of the handheld, as eventually it will become corrupt/unwritable?

    8. Re:New features? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1
      And my Tungsten E.

      This is only partially true. You only can charge from a USB 1.1 port, not USB 2.0. I think it has something to do with the fact that the extra pins are used for data xfer. Correct me if I am wrong...

    9. Re:New features? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Consider yourself corrected.
      I have a USB 2.0 "Hi Speed" (or whatever the 480mbps port is) port connected to the sync cable that came with my T|E. It trickle-charges just fine. I've only ever connected it to the power cable once, and that was when I was on a trip and didn't have my computer with me.

      Of course, it's entirely possible that some of the cables shipped with this line allowed for the charge and some didn't. I /do/ know that my cable syncs extremely slowly if I transfer large files (such as moving ogg files to the SD card in the T|E). Maybe if you have a USB2.0 cable it won't trickle-charge, but with a USB1.1 cable it will?

    10. Re:New features? by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      This is only partially true. You only can charge from a USB 1.1 port, not USB 2.0.

      Nope, mine charges from my USB 2.0 (high-speed) port just fine ... It's not something that I use much, mind you, but it's nice knowing that it's there :)

    11. Re:New features? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      You could be right. All I know is that when I attached my TE to the cable, it didnt show the charging icon, and didnt seem to charge. But maybe thats the way it is with a trickle charge. I just remember reading somewhere that the iPod couldnt charge off of USB 2.0 for some reason, and I was assuming the same was the case here.

    12. Re:New features? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I don't recall it showing the charging icon, but if you leave it plugged in to the USB overnight (with less than a full charge on the device) you should come back and see a mostly full charge.

  2. Wifi Support by Metatron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Support for a WiFi card ... why does it not have WiFi in it ?????

    1. Re:Wifi Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think about how how much wifi has changed over the last 3 years, then 5 years, and for a stretch over the last 10 years. Wifi changes will occur in the future therefore, the component shouild be user upgradable instead of hard built in.

    2. Re:Wifi Support by VinceWuzHere · · Score: 1

      Palm seems to prefer bluetooth IMHO. My T2 has bluetooth and I've only seen one older model with 802.11b built in (the C).

    3. Re:Wifi Support by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because Palm has this mad-on for Bluetooth for some reason. They've only had one model (Tungsten C) that has had built-in 802.11.

    4. Re:Wifi Support by BorgDrone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bluetooth and WiFi are not competitors, but aim at a completely different market.

      I'm very pleased with my TH-55, which has Bluetooth AND WiFi, both of which I use, bluetooth + my T610 on the road, WiFi @ the office.

      Oh, and the TH-55 has a voice recorder too, can't believe PalmOne left that one out of the T5.

      Too bad Sony stopped selling Clié's in US/europe.

    5. Re:Wifi Support by stecoop · · Score: 1

      By your logic, should every component be user-upgradable just because the technologies might change?

      Whaaa?? you dont like zif sockets nor PCI slots? So a componenet changes you should be able to simply remove the device and plug in a new one. What is wrong with having a component that is a little imature in the hands of the consumer for upgrades rather than a manufactuer? In your logic you would not use newer tire techology on your car because you should just by a new car when better material such as radial tires are introduced. Its good to be able to swap components and enhance current in hand hardware (even if its removing 5 lug nuts).

    6. Re:Wifi Support by kidlinux · · Score: 1

      Or.. OR! You could get wifi support built into this one, and when it DOES change, you can go buy a new SDIO card for the new standard.

      Now there's a concept, eh?

      --
      -kidlinux.
    7. Re:Wifi Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Um, you can't have it both ways. Do you want upgradability or not? Why must I have upgradable wireless (as if I will somehow need new fangled 500 megabit wireless, whenever it comes out, on my PDA) but not upgradable everything else?

      Your logic makes no sense.

    8. Re:Wifi Support by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Its good to be able to swap components and enhance current in hand hardware (even if its removing 5 lug nuts).

      Yeah but people don't ship cars without tires. Throw a WiFi card in there and make it user upgradeable. But don't ship it with an empty slot. That sucks.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    9. Re:Wifi Support by khrtt · · Score: 1

      The Palm device also should be upgradable. So why not have a build-in WiFi and upgrade both at the same time? Besides, most changes to WiFi over the years have been speed-related, and the little handheld device just can't use datastream wider than a good old 11Mbps 802.11B can provide. Unless you stream pr0n, that is.

    10. Re:Wifi Support by Metatron · · Score: 0

      I know, IMHO Sony pulled out of the market right after it had made (again IMHO) the best palm based PDA I had ever seen ... I guess thats what they call quitting while you're ahead ... :-(

    11. Re:Wifi Support by jht · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, WiFi is probably more of a niche for a PDA than Bluetooth for the most part. WiFi support (probably just 802.11b) will only get you networking over a short distance wherever a network is available, and it sucks power rather quickly. Odds are, though, that you're more likely to use WiFi with your laptop.

      A PDA, OTOH, needs mainly to talk to it's "mothership" desktop, or to a cell phone, or some other "personal" device. Right up Bluetooth's alley. In fact, probably the best way to think of Bluetooth on a PDA is as an expansion port that just happens to be wireless.

      I use Bluetooth to sync my Palm and my PowerBook, to connect my cell phone to my Jabra headset, to iSync everything, to connect my iMac to peripherals, and in a pinch I use Bluetooth to get GPRS internet access with my cell phone from my PowerBook when I don't have any other form of access available. I also have used my cell phone with the Palm (a Tungsten T) the same way.

      And though I don't use it as much, I have a Dell laptop with Bluetooth, and the cordless phone at my office uses it both to talk to the base station and to sync with a PC.

      OTOH I have a Pocket PC as well (an iPaq 1935), and I use a Sandisk SDIO WiFi card with it. Very rarely. There's just not much I'd do with it that isn't better served by the laptop, and the SDIO card sucks power so quickly you can practically see the power meter drop.

      Mind you, I'm not dumping on WiFi. It's great, and useful, but it's just good for one thing - networking. In PDA's that's enough of a niche compared to what you can do with Bluetooth that I'd rather have Bluetooth in my PDA given a choice of only one.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    12. Re:Wifi Support by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Subaru STi Ships without a Radio (wireless, heh) from the factory. It's a brand new top-of-the-line boy-racer mobile.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    13. Re:Wifi Support by stecoop · · Score: 1

      Well, actually the WiFi card isn't tied so directly to the PDA as tires are to a car. Shipping a car without tires would be more akin to shipping a pda without a screen. As shipping a car with something cheap, or not there, allowing the user to upgrade or modify for the intended use. Why should I buy something that I may not use or have to upgrade to WPA, 802.11[a-z] anyway?

    14. Re:Wifi Support by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0
      Yeah but people don't ship cars without tires. Throw a WiFi card in there and make it user upgradeable. But don't ship it with an empty slot. That sucks.
      Stupid analogy. A car cannot function without tyres. A PDA can function without a WiFi card. That leaves aside the cases of people who already have one, or who have a GPRS device, or who plain just don't want them. Bundled isn't the same as free (AIB). It just means it's a non-optional extra.

      Conclusion: parent is not insightful. Please meta-moderate accordingly.

      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    15. Re:Wifi Support by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

      The early palms (1000,5000,Personal, professional, some III models) had internal memory/upgrade slots, and they proved to be a sorce of continual headaches. Yes, your laptop's SODIMM memory dosen't flake out all the time, but how often have you dropped your laptop from waist height onto the floor?

      I'd like to see upgrade slots too, but I can understand why Palm's wary of them.

  3. USB Drive? by el_benito · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, I know that I can navigate to my iPaq's memory (or CF & SD cards) via explorer, but how easily can you access the Palm's memory? Is there any installation necessary on the local computer before you can access this? I'm going to bet that this is more of a marketing ploy than anything. Attach the latest buzz word and hope people snatch it up.

    --
    http://liquidben.com - Aspiring to an 'under construction' gif
    1. Re:USB Drive? by wizrd_nml · · Score: 5, Informative
      From the Brighthand Preview:

      What's most unique about the Tungsten T5 is it can be plugged into the USB port on almost any computer and the 160 MB segment of memory will appear on the computer as a removable drive. The Palm Desktop software doesn't have to be installed on the computer. What's more, if an SD card is inserted into the T5, it will also appear as a removable drive.
    2. Re:USB Drive? by Zugot · · Score: 3, Informative


      Use your handheld as a USB drive.2 When you're away from your own desktop, just turn on Drive Mode, plug the Tungsten T5 handheld into another computer and access your work.


      and


      With the new File Transfer application, you can actually drag-and-drop files and folders from your desktop to your handheld and back again. It couldn't be easier to transfer the files you need from home or your office and access them on the go.

      --
      -- Bryan
    3. Re:USB Drive? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      How about as a USB drive controller? It would be kind of nice to be able to shuffle files around between a PDA and those 1GB USB sticks as well as cameras without needing a laptop or desktop to do it.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:USB Drive? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Unique? The Zaurus C7x0, C8x0 and some of the 5x00 and 6x00 models have been doing this for a long time now.

      --
      Beep beep.
    5. Re:USB Drive? by paxil · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use card export on my original Tungsten T and it works great. Don't need to install anything on the windows computer and the palms card shows up as a drive in explorer.

    6. Re:USB Drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Softick Card Export II can do this for older palmOne devices (isn't free though, but it isn't expensive either).

  4. Where is OS6? by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember distinctly that palm OS5 was supposed to be a stopgap measure between the classic OS4 and the modern, BeOS based OS6... Essentially OS5 was OS4 with some badly needed modifications to make it run on faster hardware. And now that we're up to 5.4, the patches keep rolling in and in, as they add more ram and expand the featureset ever towards what OS 6 is supposed to contain, which is supposed to be in parallel development.

    When are we getting the real Palm OS 6, with such badly needed features as multiprocessing and a file system?

    1. Re:Where is OS6? by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      Here it is...

      http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04 /0 9/29/215205&tid=100&tid=215&tid=190&ti d=8

      Not available on Palm devices themselves, yet. Maybe there will be an upgrade available soon.

      T.

    2. Re:Where is OS6? by gareth6889 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      why is mp and a file system so badly needed?

      if its so badly needed is windows mobile (in your opinion) the best os then?

      my zire 71 is very nice. it does everything you'd expect in a pim (and exceptionally well). next you'll be saying palm handhelds is no good because it doesnt have a 3ghz processor, 4 gig of ram, a SATA hdd and an open source os that runs twelve desktop systems, is windows compatable, secure, fast, has a little jog button to easily switch shells and has a 500k footprint.

      wheres my pen and paper??? *wanders off*

    3. Re:Where is OS6? by Samus · · Score: 2

      Slashdot put spaces in your link. Use this one instead.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    4. Re:Where is OS6? by ceeam · · Score: 1
      When are we getting the real Palm OS 6, with such badly needed features as multiprocessing and a file system?

      Well, dare I ask who badly needs them? Not me. I don't like much this attitude: "look Windows has it! Copy it! Quick!". Really - what real use is there for threads on PDA? As for FS (in internal memory - there is FS support for SD cards of course)... Well, it could've been not bad to be able to put plain text ebooks (EG) into main memory, but really - running a converter to some PDB format or putting them onto card is nothing to talk much about.

      Simplicity is a more valuable feature.

    5. Re:Where is OS6? by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When are we getting the real Palm OS 6, with such badly needed features as multiprocessin

      Please explain why you think you need a multiprocessor PDA.

    6. Re:Where is OS6? by Bronster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Imagine a beowulf...

      No, don't. Just imagine running your mp3 player in the background while you actually do something else on the device - then go read up on the difference between multiprocessing and multiprocessor and be elightened.

      Sheesh. I guess IHBT.

    7. Re:Where is OS6? by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Well, what they probably really meant was multitasking (does OS 5 offer that? It's been a long time since I've used a Palm device, since 4). I've been using a Zaurus for a couple of years now and it wouldn't be nearly as useful to me if I couldn't have three-four apps open and running at once.

      I can see a filesystem being useful too., but again, that may be my bias towards the Zaurus talking.

    8. Re:Where is OS6? by Tomahawk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think he means running more than 1 application at a time, not multi-processors.

      I probably should have said 'proper multitasking'.

      The Palms can do that at the moment, but not very well. You can run an MP3 application, and leave it running in the background while you run something else. But that's about as far as it goes.

      Don't know if you really need a fully preemptive OS on the Palm, though. Like, if you really need a lot of power, bring a laptop with you. The Sony Clie ones are not really all that much bigger than a Palm, and run Windows or Linux...

      T.

    9. Re:Where is OS6? by MadChicken · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with multitasking/threading in a LIMITED way, but certainly not a file system. That's the stupidest contrived need for a PDA I've ever heard of. For those of you with Winboxes, open up your "Program Files" folder. You really want something like that on your limited memory PDA? Yikes. I used an iPaq for a year, and file systems... what a waste (Ever heard of a program called WIMR? Don't need one on Palms). The database idea Palm had 'way back was well ahead of its time... the only thing that was missing was being able to install generic files on that "file system"; like MP3s or DOC files. Nice if/when desktops catch up to that (WinFS?)

      As for Multitasking, again, CE machines are a nightmare of "wanna be a desktop" os overkill. This is a sweet and smart way to do it, instead of "Start | Settings | Memory | Running Applications | End Program" or loading a program to make the close button actually close something.

      My iPaq is now sitting in the cradle, and has been for about 3 months, untouched, while I carry my Tungsten E upstairs and downstairs just in case I need it.

      OK! Ignition started, pour on the kerosene!

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    10. Re:Where is OS6? by OlivierB · · Score: 1

      I think he meant multi-threading as you probably knew in the first place.

      For non palm users out there, one of the main critics in regard to Palm OS is the inability to run multiple programs simultaneously (as it can be done in PocketPC).

      --
      Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    11. Re:Where is OS6? by jasonshortphd · · Score: 1

      When are we getting the real Palm OS 6, with such badly needed features as multiprocessing and a file system?

      Multi processor? WHAT? On your Palm? Maybe you got this confused and want a laptop? Oh wait, that's right there are no multi processor laptops either!

      --

      Do not stare at the sun. It might hurt your eyes.
    12. Re:Where is OS6? by ceeam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Imagine MP3 player in the background? Well, I imagine I stretch my arm, pick my OS5 Palm and do it. What's the problem?

    13. Re:Where is OS6? by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      PalmOS needs some serious updating. The problem at present is that it doesn't provide many more facilities for applications than it did in the v3ish era.
      Because of this, every app has to implement functionality itself. Want a hierachical directory structure? An onscreen keyboard that works without a text control focused? A Save/Load dialog? A decent clipboard? A high performance 2D library?

      The answer is always the same - "implement it yourself"

      PalmOS 6 looks like it might solve some of these problems, but there aren't going to be any devices using that any time soon.

    14. Re:Where is OS6? by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1
      The Sony Clie ones...run Windows or Linux...

      I think you're thinking of the Sony VAIO TR series notebooks. They're really tiny laptops, with the low-voltage, 1 GHz Pentium-M. Combined with the small screen size (less backlight area), this gives it a 7-hour battery life. Another similar model is the Toshiba LifeBook P1000 (800 MHz TransMeta Crusoe, 8.9-inch touch screen, nine hour battery life). People tend to either love or hate these notebooks: you either hate the input system and thus don't care about the small size, long battery life, and other features, or you can tolerate a smaller keyboard and tiny (or no) touchpad and you value the other features enough to buy it.

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    15. Re:Where is OS6? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Just a minor nitpick ... Sony's Clie line are Palm based PDA.

      The ultra-slim/light paperback sized portables you're thinking of are their Viao line. As soon as I can afford one of them, they certainly look neat to tote around with you (and decent battery life it appears).

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    16. Re:Where is OS6? by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

      Er, yeah, that would be them. The Clie are the Palm devices (hence the mistake).

      Really nice little laptops. Expensive, though, IIRC.

      T.

    17. Re:Where is OS6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off-topic, I know, but this can be such a handy tool at times ...

    18. Re:Where is OS6? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      The database thing wasn't thought up by Palm, even remotely. The Newton had that whole database-as-filesystem before the Palm existed.

      Palm suck though, since they have no multitasking. It is the biggest thing that makes my Clie NX70V just an organizer and crappy camera always with me, rather than a computer I can fit in my pocket.

      I use a program like WIMR on my Palm, never did on PocketPC though. I use JackFlash, FileZ, CLIE Files and Super Utility. I seem to need them all to get full coverage for what should be simple- file management.

      To each his own.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    19. Re:Where is OS6? by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      ohhh... kay... so they didn't invent it... they still had (used) it way back when. Agreed?

      Yeah so Palms technically have no multitasking. It's also not a computer. It's not a washing machine either. Somehow I have been able to edit files, organize appointments, listen to music (in the background, BTW), keep, create, and edit all sorts of documents at my fingertips, even compile programs... Now let me list off the different things I do daily on my computer... Hm...

      I guess what you mean is, it's not a Windows computer, right? It can't play Doom 3 so it can't play games. It can't run OpenOffice, so it can't edit or view documents. It can't serve files so it has no storage. You don't have a 21" monitor so it has no display. It doesn't multitask like Windows, so you can't possibly do two things, ever, on it. Drat, I paid $300 for a block of wood!

      WIMR? Palm? You mean, like, "Applications | Info"? Oh or do you mean on the card? The little blue thing that happens to have a... file system? Hm...

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    20. Re:Where is OS6? by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah so Palms technically have no multitasking. It's also not a computer. It's not a washing machine either.

      I was talking about OS 6, which has a form of multiprocessing, though a limited one. But Palm OS 4 and 5 has had some multiprocessing as well, although it didn't come from PalmSource that way. Sony added it, both in Palm OS 4 and 5 for their own Clie line. Specifically, they added the functionality of having *one* background thread, in addition to the regular single process. They added this for playing music in the background, though that means piping the file to the MP3/ATRAC decoder chip, not doing decoding in software.

      Palm OS 6 (see subject- topic of discussion) has a little more in the way of multitasking, though not in the way most folks are accustomed to. It has the ability to have more than one background thread, though no additional full on processes. If a developer specifically writes an app to take advantage of the new POS 6 backgroudn thread API, it can use it- but if I want to put some random OS 4 or 5 app in the background, that is something I cannot do. Let's say I've got some cool IRC app (say, upirc), but they haven't done the substantial work of converting it to Palm OS 6 thread savvy. I don't want to have to reconnect every time I go back into IRC. That isn't that much to ask for, is it? Maybe after a few months, there'd be a version for OS 6 that kept the connection alive in the background, but even with every developer wanting to spend a lot of time any money retooling their apps, it still doesn't cover every contigency. As any power user knows, the original developer never thinks of everything the end user will want to do with their software, and unless they have thought of it in advance and made it so it could live in a thread, I'll be confined.

      I guess what you mean is, it's not a Windows computer, right? It can't play Doom 3 so it can't play games. It can't run OpenOffice, so it can't edit or view documents. It can't serve files so it has no storage. You don't have a 21" monitor so it has no display. It doesn't multitask like Windows, so you can't possibly do two things, ever, on it. Drat, I paid $300 for a block of wood!

      Who said anything about playing Doom or running OOo? One could say that the Newton OS didn't "multitask like Windows," but it still was powerful enough in the way of software and hardware to allow me to use it as a computer, not just a $300 organizer. I've no specific love for Windows CE or any desktop Windows, but since the Newton, there has not been any other real alternative for someone wanting to do more with their PDA. I don't pretend I'm not a minority- starting with my Newton MP2100 and more recently a Jornada 720 and Sigmarion 3, I've used my so-called PDA as my primary computer when at home. I've no need for a 21" monitor- most recently, my main computer at home has had a 5" 800x480 screen, which is more than I'm used to working with. This day in age, I'd prefer nothing under 640x480, though I'd settle for 480x320 (my Clie NX70V, Newton MP2100) if the rest of the device was right.

      It's not that I want Palm OS to have a POSIX-compatible API, so that I could port tons of *nix apps to it, like exists for Windows CE and Linux PDAs. But I do want multitasking, because it is something I need to do, but more importantly something I *want* to do. I don't need a C compiler for Palm OS, and I'm not asking for one- but as you say, there are languages on the Palm OS for which you can get an on-board compiler... Is it too much to ask for to be able to put that app in the background and do something else- play solitaire, read an ebook- while it compiles? You may be willing to put up with the additional work and time wasted of single-tasking, but why should your needs decide it for the rest of us?

      We're talking about 400 MHz CPUs here. Adding the ability to multitask to Palm OS is not going to "bog it down," or cause some 2000 lb. cancer of bloat to grow on the POS. If Palm OS is as efficient as f

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    21. Re:Where is OS6? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      With you on the file system...although FileZ has that pretty much hacked in. As for the multiprocessing: I can listen to mp3's while doing anything else I want on my T3...it's a PDA, what else do you want to multiprocess?

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    22. Re:Where is OS6? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but those Palm OS threads are limited to specific applications, like audio and notifications. You can't play a game while you're calculating Pi.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    23. Re:Where is OS6? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I should have used the term multitasking as well. It would be nice to flip back and forth between a chat app and the datebook, for example, or be downloading a PDF of the train schedule in the background while writing notes on what to do that day. Or grabbing an MP3 file from a server at home while showing off pictures from a trip. Network awareness in the Palm OS really needs to go up, and multitasking would go a long way towards that.

      Of course, if I really needed all of that I would buy a PDA and install linux on it. But while linux on the desktop is usable but with lots of the support beams and wires showing, desktop linux on a PDA is downright silly. The PalmOS is far more elegant and focused on doing what it needs to be doing. It would just be nice if it could do it better, and do more of it at once.

    24. Re:Where is OS6? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      The storage capacity of PDAs and other small devices is increasing all the time. Its time to grow up, move into this century and get a proper filesystem on anything with more than 64mb of storage on it.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    25. Re:Where is OS6? by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      Filesystems are so last century. Have you been paying attention? We desperately need metadata, indexing, searching, relations and cross-referencing in our filesystems. We need a database. Filesystems are ok for floppies but anything as big as even 64 MB needs something else.

      Palm has had a database ever since the start! Ok, so it was a simple database. Who cares? Mature the database instead of replacing it with something cheesy and outdated. I rarely if ever searched FOR a file on my palms, though I commonly searched IN my files... If there was a file system though, that would change for sure...

      Maybe you'd like file extensions too? yeah! Then we can have .vbs files wreaking havoc on our palms too!

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    26. Re:Where is OS6? by FluffyPanda · · Score: 1

      Is it really necessary to multitask though. Most of the time you don't actually want the second application you have open to be processing, just sitting there waiting for you to need it again.

      Since palm apps maintain their state when not in use you can flick between several apps and not notice that you don't have a multitasking os.

  5. As always, underwhelming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Palm's announcements are always underwhelming.

    The $400 sounds okay, until you realize it does not include built-in WiFi. The screen is half VGA.

    And it doesn't have the new version of the PalmOS. Instead we get 5.4, which as far as I'm concerned, the entire 4.x and 5.x OS's have been disappointments. The IP stack in the 5.x OS is what I'd consider unstable and unusable. Imagine that when networked apps crash, they actually crash inside the IP stack, not the application.

    Don't get me started on the lack of multitasking.

    Very disappointing.

    1. Re:As always, underwhelming by hattig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given the size of the screen, Half VGA is good.

      Much better than the Quarter VGA that was until recently the standard for PocketPC devices.

      Which in turn was a mile ahead of the old 1/12th VGA original PalmOS screen. Now *that* wasn't adequate, although a lot of the apps were designed carefully and the devices were worthwhile.

      As for PalmOS 6 ... I hope it will be shipping in devices soon. I've seen screenshots and it looks rather good.

    2. Re:As always, underwhelming by ceeam · · Score: 3, Informative
      Probably not, when you have a weighted checklist and put "It does what I need" on top. As for other people - there's always Microsoft.

      As for half VGA.. Do you realize that it has the same DPI as 15" panel capable of 1600x1200. Sure, you usually look at it at closer distance, but it's very, very crisp. Doubling its DPI would be an overkill.

    3. Re:As always, underwhelming by MacBorg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for that kind of money for a PDA I'd go for a Zaurus 6000

    4. Re:As always, underwhelming by yukonbob · · Score: 1

      The screen is half VGA.

      I didn't RTFA... what's the other half?

      -yb

    5. Re:As always, underwhelming by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Help me understand: why do people want multitasking on their PDAs? I have a PocketPC and yeah, it has multitasking, but find it usually pisses me off more than it helps (ie by default, clicking the close "X" just minimizes and leaves everything in RAM)

      The *one* thing I could think of is playing mp3s in the background.

      Other than that, as long as apps maintain a reasonable level of state when exiting, what more do you really need?

      I'm actually strongly thinking of ditching my PPC2003 device for a T3. I played with my brother's and the OS just seemed sooo much cleaner...

    6. Re:As always, underwhelming by dara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First of all, nobody is talking about doubling the existing DPI (dots per inch). Moving from 1/2 VGA to VGA is an increase in DPI of sqrt(2) not 2.

      Secondly, you said it yourself, you usually look a lot closer (from my rough estimate right now), about twice as close. I agree, 15" 1600x1200 (i.e., 133 DPI) looks pretty good from a 20" laptop viewing distance. Therefore 266 DPI is about what we need for a PDA viewing at 10". VGA has this DPI at a 3" diagonal which is pretty small, (the T5 has a 3.8" screen, so the DPI if it had VGA would only be 210). To really get the resolution of the monitor you suggest from twice as close on a 3.8" screen will require 800x600 (SVGA).

      We will definitely get PDA SVGA screens in the future, and we will probably have a lot more comments like yours that it is overkill. I may not need SVGA, but I'm looking forward to it. I do want VGA though, and I won't be getting a Palm T5 because it doesn't have it. (I can't get the Zaurus either since I want GPS software with voice instructions - I'll probably end up with an ASUS or Dell VGA PocketPC.)

      Dara

    7. Re:As always, underwhelming by aelfwyne · · Score: 1

      PalmOS already has a background mode for playing MP3's, even without full multitasking.

      --
      -- If it ain't broke - overclock it more.
  6. Rotate screen by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forget the arguments about processors, wireless connectivity and other technical issues, it's little things like this that make me want to buy a device.
    Simple but useful features, that's what makes a product stand out

    --
    Mod parent up!
    1. Re:Rotate screen by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      check out opie.handhelds.org linux has been doing it for a while now

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:Rotate screen by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

      Check out Handera - They were doing it on Palm several years ago.

  7. Zap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although the connector may be new, the charging feature is not. Palm's Tungsten E is also capable of trickle charging from its USB cable.

  8. What, you can't trickle-charge now? by Fencepost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's a heck of a surprise to me since I did just that on a recent trip.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
    1. Re:What, you can't trickle-charge now? by aelfwyne · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, the Tungstens that don't use a cradle (like the E, upon which the T5 appears to be based) don't charge off USB when using the factory USB cable.

      However, many people (myself included) use the Belkin cable that also plugs into the charge port. I suspect that the only improvement here is that the T5 either includes such a cable, or charges straight from the USB port itself rather than needing a splitter.

      --
      -- If it ain't broke - overclock it more.
  9. Power consumption... by blueZ3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WiFi sucks power like crazy. It reduces battery life by over 70% if the SDIO WiFi card is any indication.

    And, as another poster mentioned, WiFi seems to change about once a year - and I'd rather buy a new $100 SDIO card than a new $400 PDA.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Power consumption... by Triddle · · Score: 1

      So make the WiFI power down when not in use. As far as the standard changes in 802.11, they are backward compatible. Where's the problem?

    2. Re:Power consumption... by Googo · · Score: 1

      It's more of if you want a newer card for WIFI connection, then you won't be able to just swap out a component if it is hard built inside. Also, not all 802.11 is backwards compatible, only part of what we have seen so far.

    3. Re:Power consumption... by Metatron · · Score: 1

      'Cos you really need that kind of speed on a handheld ??. Hell the Wi-Fi in my Clie TG-55 is only 802.11b and for a handheld I find that more than enough (IMHO). Even if thats not enough I am sure they could put G in it. Considering its all backward compatible, I really don't see the issue. How long do expect you'll keep your PDA for anyway ? 5 years, 10 years ? I think you'll find that more than Wi-Fi gets superseeded in that time.

    4. Re:Power consumption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its kindof funny - you're going to pay ~$500 for a pda and if you expect to keep it for a year than your forking over a service payment of roughly $100 dollars a year for it. Even at 10 years thats 50 bucks a year. Anyone ever calculate how much a car cost per mile and no one would ever buy a car costing 50k+. As you can tell, I dont buy PDAs but they are neat toys for those that like them.

    5. Re:Power consumption... by hkb · · Score: 1

      You're on crack, the Tungsten C with built-in Wi-Fi has enormous battery life, and you can use it for hours and hours while connected to an AP.

      Wi-Fi doesn't change once a year. We've had the old trusty standard 11b for years and years, what "changes" have we had since then? Pretty much just 11g.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    6. Re:Power consumption... by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      WiFi might suck power like crazy, but it's an important feature these days. And to not have smacks of enormous oversite. Extraordinarily stupid in fact. At least it has bluetooth, but IMHO wi-fi is just as important and it strikes me as odd that they wouldn't include both.

      And I'm not some Pocket PC fanatic dissing Palm. I loved my Palm Vx, but it was the lack of wi-fi that made me choose an iPaq (although that sucks for other reasons). Being able to turn on a PDA and sync up or browse from anywhere is a very useful feature.

      Okay, so someone can buy an SD wireless card - if they like an expensive snappable thing protruding from the top of their device. But that ruins the looks of the device and is impractical anyway if like me you happen to use the SD for storage.

    7. Re:Power consumption... by timts · · Score: 1

      you can turn of built-in wifi and dell x30 with wifi and 624M is $267 after coupon instead of $400.

  10. T4 by AndyElf · · Score: 1

    There were massive rumors that (then called) a T4 (looks like palmOne decided on odd numbering of production models: T3, T5...) would have 2 SD slots -- this ould have allowed to use SD and SDIO cards at the same time (in particular, the just-released WiFi card). Does not look like this is what happened....

    This baby has got quite some storage, that is true -- this might compensate for the missing dual-slot option...

    Another rumor was that the next Tx were to use 6.x PalmOS, not the 5.x -- I guess another one not to come true.

    --

    --AP
    1. Re:T4 by Kazymyr · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is no T4 because the number 4 is considered bad luck in the Far East.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    2. Re:T4 by vjl · · Score: 1
      My Handera 330 has two memory slots - an SD and a CF. Very handy for doing wifi, GPS at the same time. The CF slot can use a Symbol Wifi card, and the old Palm III serial port can use the NAVman GPS unit. Combine that with a 128MB SD card full of GPS maps, and you've got a nice system that can browse a network at the same time it browses the earth. [and also record sound via the recorder button, use a high-res screen w/ virtual graffiti, and use the device one handed via a Sony-like thumbwheel]. Only features it lacks - color screen, fast CPU, and an SDIO slot. Man, I wish Handera was still around...

      /vjl/

    3. Re:T4 by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Got a link to verify that?
      I assumed they were ditching the T|E line and just keeping it with a numbering scheme. In that case, the T|5 would be the fifth Tungsten, although the T|3 is (I believe) the fourth.

    4. Re:T4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont know if the rumor is true but the number 4 sounds the same as the word for death in chinese

  11. Good things by MadChicken · · Score: 1

    Docs To Go in ROM is very nice, VersaMail too, Realplayer, though... that's a prime candidate for replacement if someone really uses their Palm for music...

    USB drive mode - very nice, and about time. Nice that http://www.softick.com/ took care of that a long time ago for everyone else...

    And I think the Tungsten E will do trickle charging from the USB cable... I'm not positive about that, I don't tend to leave mine lying around, tethered to a computer.

    --
    SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    1. Re:Good things by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Yep, the tungsten E charges off the USB cable.

    2. Re:Good things by Derang() · · Score: 1

      As does the Tungsten T3. Thats not a new feature.

    3. Re:Good things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's bring Slashdot out of 1996! Go Here [alistapart.com].

      For all the hubbub about flexibility in layout, all these CSS sites look remarkably the same. Sans-serif font, orangey mouseovers, header-body-sidebar-footer straightjacket -- You know what I mean.

    4. Re:Good things by GunR · · Score: 1

      > USB drive mode - very nice, and about time. Nice that http://www.softick.com/ took care of that a long time ago for everyone else...

      Really? So what you're saying is that everyone else is running Windows 2k/XP/Me?
      As CardExport does not(at present) support any other OS...

      (they are, however, working on it)

    5. Re:Good things by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      It works great on my Mac. Unless you're talking about Card Export v1 - I've only tried v2. Read the forums too, it seems to work on Linux already (they're working on support for it).

      I actually set up a folder action script to back up my card when I mount it to the desktop in OS X. Sweet.

      Man, I have to be a good boy now and go register that awesome program. My demo is running out soon I think.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    6. Re:Good things by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Pfft. I already have Docs To Go in ROM on my NX70V, though I had to put it there myself, using the bootiful JackFlash program. And PicselViewer. Very, very good.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  12. First to charge from USB? Nah! by ceeam · · Score: 1
    Well, for sure my modest T|E does it too. And so does - if I understand correctly - Zire 72.


    Oh, while talking about it: I read that the LiPol batteries have lifetimes measured mostly by number of charging cycles. Does trickle-charging count? Oh is it "healthier" to run the things until they start complaining and then fully charge them using charger? Not a 100% silly question (probably) since these Palms all have not normally replaceable battery.

  13. Arguments don't hold water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "It reduces battery life by over 70% if the SDIO WiFi card is any indication."

    On the Sony Clie, its probably about 50%, but its irrelevant. Give the user the ability to switch it off!

    "WiFi seems to change about once a year"

    New stardards are emerging yes, but they're all backwards compatible. Moreover, the PalmOS can't effectively use an 802.11b data rate, so this is good enough.

    "I'd rather buy a new $100 SDIO card than a new $400 PDA."

    With Palm devices, the changes of a new whizzy card working with a 2+ year old palm device approach zero. The SDIO card you spoke of was only compatible with 2 Palm devices, both of them current models. When the Palm T6 comes out, there will be no more support from Palm for the T5. They figure if you only spent $400, they're done with you.

    That's why you shouldn't buy the T5 hoping it will be compatible with PalmOS6 (if it ever comes out). Palm simply won't bother with it.

    Time to sit and wait for the T6, I guess.

  14. ...while officially dropping Mac support... by MurrayTodd · · Score: 0

    Looks like they'll be dropping Macintosh support completely. (Caveat: looks like there might be 3rd party support, but a friend of mine told me MarkSpace leaves something to be desired.)

    --
    Murray Todd Williams
    1. Re:...while officially dropping Mac support... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      (Caveat: looks like there might be 3rd party support, but a friend of mine told me MarkSpace leaves something to be desired.)

      Once Apple releases their iSync development kit I'm planning on writing the necessary jConduit(s) to synchronize the OS X calendar and address book via my Open Source jSyncManager.

      The jSyncManager already has an OS X disk image, but what's currently missing is the ability to connect to a USB port through Java on the Mac. Once javax.usb is ported to OS X, this limitation will be removed, and you'll be able to run the jSyncManager like any other OS X application.

      And with an iSync jConduit, the jSyncManager will be just as good as, if not better than, Palm's HotSync Manager for the Mac.

      Brad BARCLAY
      Lead Developer & Project Administrator,
      The jSyncManager Project.

  15. Win one for yourself in the wxPalmOS challenge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    wxWidgets has already thrown down the gauntlet for converting wxWidgets to the new PalmOS.

    http://www.wxwidgets.org/palmos.htm

    1. Re:Win one for yourself in the wxPalmOS challenge! by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Heh. That doesn't make any sense- they are talking about giving away a T5 running POS6. Were they just going on speculation that the T5 would come with OS 6, or do they have a developer model sitting around?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  16. With these specs.... by ShatteredDream · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why didn't they just modify BeIA so that it could run on their hardware? BeIA, the stripped down internet appliance version of BeOS, could easily run on their hardware now. I had BeOS running in half that memory on a PII 450 and it was FAST. Whoever made the decision to buy Be's IP and not fully exploit it at Palm should be shot.

    1. Re:With these specs.... by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 1

      Maybe because they wish to keep backwards compatibility with OS4/5 programs? :)

    2. Re:With these specs.... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you had less RAM, but you had a lot more than 32 MB of hard drive space, about what this has in equivalent ROM.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:With these specs.... by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      These processors are not compariable Mhz to Mhz to x 86s. A 412 Mhz XScale or any other arm processor is going to used exponentially less power and put off exponentially less heat, but that is because it is a RISC processor, and does not have all sorts of fancy things like MMX ect... I think that running any adapted desktop os on a StrongARM is asking for trouble. Just look at Windows CE. So careful what you wish for with beOS and Palm.

  17. I'm confused by djupedal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No Wi-Fi built-in... no microphone... no Cobalt...no sliding case - can support stereo speakers and portable file transfers, yet it is targetted at business users? RealPlayer required on it and your desktop machine (ouch).

    Why does it feel like PalmOne wants me to buy a product from another company to replace my m515?

    A review link... - And an accessory list link...

    1. Re:I'm confused by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...can support stereo speakers and portable file transfers, yet it is targetted at business users?

      This has been Palms biggest problem in recent years I think. They can't seem to decide if they're making Palms for business customers, or consumers, or both.

      Sony has (had) this great thing going making shit-hot Palms with all the latest features for bleeding-edge Palm junkies, while their lower models had all the cool new features (for their price range) for Joe Consumer. Palm has this "5x-m500" reputation of building nice, solid, business minded Palms, but since the majority of new features to come out on Palms the past couple years have been consumer-related (cameras, MP3, etc), Palm has been in an identity crisis.

    2. Re:I'm confused by ceeam · · Score: 1, Informative
      No Wi-Fi built-in...

      Not everyone wants it

      no microphone...

      Really? :-(

      no Cobalt...

      OTOH - far less Gremlins ;)

      no sliding case

      Yahooo!!! Finally!

      can support stereo speakers and portable file transfers, yet it is targetted at business users?

      Sure, no business user cares about files ;)

      RealPlayer required on it and your desktop machine (ouch).

      Actually, no.

      Why does it feel like PalmOne wants me to buy a product from another company to replace my m515?

      Grass is always greener... Same can be said about the new iPaq's line, not?

    3. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, no business user cares about files ;)

      $400 for portable flash media I don't want to loan out or leave behind? No thanks.

      RealPlayer required on it and your desktop machine (ouch).

      Actually, no.


      You're new here, right? Real sucks... No RealPlayer on your desktop machine...no RealPlayer on the T5... no songs on the T5. No choice. No sale.

    4. Re:I'm confused by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      One thing that gets me is the new "files" button. I thought Palm were supposed to make PDAs? Shouldn't PIM apps be priority? There's even less need for it since it now has a dedicated home button where you could easly get to the files app. Yeah, you can change it, but still.

      On 2nd thoughs, why not 6 buttons instead of 4? There's plenty of room if they re-designed it properly. Four app buttons (as it used to be), and then the home and menu buttons.

      Not to mention the design is hardly something to admire--recycling the fairly mediocre design of the Tungsten E.

      The only interesting thing coming out of PalmOne at the moment is the Treo.

  18. Cheaper T3 by TonyZahn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the real news here is that the price of the T3 has dropped to $350 with the releaase of the T5.
    Another $50 and I'll be all over it...

    --
    - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
  19. Needs to be a lot cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could have gotten refurb T3's for $300 for a couple months.

    Right now, I think a T3 is worth about $250 new, about $175 used. And I wouldn't buy it unless I had to have one this minute.

    1. Re:Needs to be a lot cheaper by PDA_Monkey · · Score: 1

      I got my refurb T3 nearly 6 months ago on eBay through CompUSA Auctions for $265 + SH.
      It's flawless and I love it!

      The T5 is kind of lackluster to me...
      And what about a T4? Somebody @ pa1mOne needs to watch more Sesame Street, particularly the Count.

      --
      Hallo, My name is Inigo Montoya. You kill -9 my parent process. Prepare to die!
  20. Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would only buy the T5 if PalmOS6 will work with it. And I won't take Palm's word for it either. I'll have to see it on a shipping machine.

  21. slashvertisement by spoonyfork · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article links only to the company's product page. This article is nothing but an advertisement. It has been deemed a slashvertisement.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  22. while officially dropping Mac support...not really by adzoox · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually ... no.

    The address book works with vcards and will still sync bluetooth.

    The unit itself can now just be mounted like a hard drive on the Mac desktop - so you just drag whatever straight into an appropriate place.

    Besides the palmone spec page says - full mac support

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  23. Development by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I would really like to see from Palm is a decent C++ API for their OS. Being stuck with a C API is so annoying for C++ development.
    In a C++ API you could just derive a subclass of a control and overload the parts you want to, just as KDE does with Qt.

    1. Re:Development by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only if their linker is good at striping out unused code. Modern OO languages tend to pull in everything at link time resulting in huge apps--which is still a problem on PDAs. (For the want of a nail, the kingdom was linked.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Development by argent · · Score: 1

      Um, unless they rewrote the GUI to be C++ that wouldn't give you any more capability than writing your own thin C++ wrapper around the API. And it wouldn't be any faster or anything, either.

    3. Re:Development by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      That was kind of what I meant.

    4. Re:Development by argent · · Score: 1

      Then you'll have to wait for Palm OS 6, with the BeOS code, like everyone else. I wish they'd stop farting around with OS 5 and get the new OS out.

      Personally, I would be happier if C++ had never caught on, but BeOS is a C++ based OS with a C++ based GUI, so it's likely OS 6 will have a more C++ oriented GUI.

  24. Re:palmOne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    With 256Mb, you should be able to store a lot of pr0n on it, and take it with you where ever you go.

    Basically pr0n in you pocket (that isn't just in your pants pocket).

  25. Nothing to see here. Move along.... by jbarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, this is really nothing more than a T3 that can't be "collapsed". It has some "extras" like more RAM, more Flash RAM, but everything else is just software addons that can be found for the T3 in one form or another.

    This certainly is not a revolutionary device, and the lack of WiFi is VERY disappointing. A colleague just bought one of the new HP ipaqs that has a FULL VGA screen and integrated WiFi, and it simply smokes anything Palm has put out. Yes, it was almost double the cost, but still, the T5 is a real disappontment.

    Now, if Sony would have released a UX-50 with either no camera or a removable camera (to comply with many business restrictions) it would be our device of choice...

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:Nothing to see here. Move along.... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Kinda funny really. You'd think that skipping a number would indicate that this was going to be revolutionary. Instead, what we have is a modifed Tungsten E.
      Tungsten 3.5 would have more appropriate, not T4, let alone T5!

  26. Yawn by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Charge from the USB connector? Tick.
    Use as a USB mass storage device? Tick.

    So where the the use USB devices (like keyboards etc) - any device with a Linux driver in fact, and the 640x480 screen? Then they will finally have caught up with the Zaurus.

    Even the Qtopia PIM apps are starting to catch up now, so why should I chose one of these things at all?

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Yawn by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Heh. The Zaurus is still very disapointing in a lot of ways, though mostly software. The C-series is very nice, although the lack of wifi or bluetooth for such an expensive PDA is a big disapointment. Heck, even a built-in camera might appease me.

      Though Linux and CE PDAs have a big heads up on any Palm OS device, even with the new OS 6: multitasking. The POS6 definition of multitasking- having a few threads, no concurrent apps- is sad, and it's what makes my Palm PDA just an organizer and crappy camera, not the handheld computer that CE and Linux devices are.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:Yawn by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but have you seen that Zaurus? It is over a pound, and about the size of a large paperback, whereas the Palm is several ounces and is about the size of a small bifold wallet. What would you use the extra resolution for? The thing already has an insanely high DPI, doubling the resolution would mean they would have to double the font size, button size, ect, making the resolution useless. The hi-res palms aleady use the same size font as those old monochrome 160x160 ones. They just made it sharper.

  27. It's still better than PPC by a_nonamiss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lord... The PalmOne crowd will never be happy... Frankly, I an kinda tired of reading people bashing P1 for this unit. Sure, it's not revolutionary, but it's an improvement, especially on battery life. I don't really think the T3 needed a whole lot of improvement, (again, battery life) and I don't think this was intended to "unseat" the T3. I'm in the (seeming) minority of people who don't need WiFi, don't want WiFi and frankly could care less if P1 ever makes a WiFi radio on their devices. I get along just fine with Bluetooth and my Motorola v710. I can browse the Internet, get my email, and do everything I want Internet-wise. I've never been sitting in an airport or coffee-house and said "Damn... if I only had WiFi! Now I'm ruined!"

    I'm willing to admit that Dell devices still may have higher tech specs, but honestly, until they can run PalmOS, I'm not the slightest bit interested. PPC sucks. It's not stable, it's a resource hog. It has more moving parts, and having supported both PPC and POS, can say without hesitation that in my opinion, POS is still far superior.

    In conclusion to my rant, I'm not going to say "Way to go PalmOne!" They made some mistakes. (Plastic case? Oops!) On the other hand, I don't think this is a miserable failure. It's an evolutionary device that is slightly better than the T3. I think that everyone's expectations were simply too high, and mostly unreasonable. If P1 had come out with a device with WiFi, people would complain about battery life. If it had a voice recorder, people would complain that it turned the device on in their pockets. I don't think that Palm could have satisfied people after having such a long break since their last release. And to those of you wondering, I don't work for Palm. Let's just hope that the long-term reliability of this unit is an improvement, because that's where P1 could go horribly wrong. My T3 had far too many hardware problems, and if the T5 exhibits the same problems, then P1 could really be in trouble.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    1. Re:It's still better than PPC by rice_web · · Score: 0, Troll

      "can say without hesitation that in my opinion, POS is still far superior."

      If it's so great, why do you keep calling it a piece of shit?

      --
      The Political Programmer
    2. Re:It's still better than PPC by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not stable, it's a resource hog. It has more moving parts, and having supported both PPC and POS, can say without hesitation that in my opinion, POS is still far superior.

      And that's just it- in your opinion. In my opinion, the Newton OS is still far superior to any other option out there, past or present. But, that being dead, the next best thing is Pocket PC. It has a number of things wrong with it, and I'd still rather use a vanilla WinCE.NET 4.2 machine over a PocketPC one, but unlike POS, it gets the job done for me.

      I have owned many, many PDAs. I liked my Sony NX70V enough that I kept it. But unlike even the older iPAQ 3650 I got from/for work, it lacks a lot of functionality... Stuff the Newton had 10 years ago that POS still doesn't have. Multitasking is a big one. A full-screen HWR system. A good note-taking app. While I've not found any notetaking app for any platform that is as nice as the built-in Newton OS 2 Notes app (except that wiki-like system for NOS 2 that sat on top of it), there's nothing on the POS that is even close to the one that comes with PocketPC (Notes) or older WinCE (InkWriter)! I'd love to be proven wrong- where can I find a notes app for the Palm that provides these very basic features:

      1. The ability to add typed notes, entered through Graf, Jot, or Decuma.
      2. The ability to draw notes and diagrams- within the same note, the same canvas- side by side along the text.
      3. Have an "unlimited" canvas, such that the notes page is always one page ahead of me in blank space. Naturally, nothing is unlimited, and this would be confined by the memory available to the device. Something even the first Newton, with a measley 640 KB of RAM had.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:It's still better than PPC by doublem · · Score: 1

      If it's so great, why do you keep calling it a piece of shit?

      He's not saying it's great, he's saying it's better.

      He's saying the Palm is a piece of Shit, bur the WINCE devices and their ilk are particularly smelly, vile, runny shit with chunks of corn.

      While Palm is merely offensive, PocketPC actually makes you vomit at a range of two yards.

      Palm: Pile of dry shit
      PocketPC: The Shit Demon from Dogma.

      All in all, the Palm is still shit.

      At least according to the post we're discussing.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    4. Re:It's still better than PPC by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Bought my T3 a couple of months back...not one problem with it except with the version of Documents to go which was preinstalled (it caused hard resets...which it didn't anymore when I installed the version which came on the installation cd). For the rest: the screws are still in, no humming screen, no loose case...I think only the first run of T3's had those problems...

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  28. Enough to get it? by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The differences are between this and Tungsten T3: * better file transfer * flash memory * favourites view * 102 more MB * USB device only 2 of those features would cause me to even consider upgrading from my Tungsten E, and I'd be more inclined to just get a USB stick. Are PDAs so good that no "wow" features exist for them? Cause they're all looking much the same to me (except for features such as built-in cameras, but that isn't so much PDAs getting advanced features as people trying to converge technologies).

  29. Bigger != better by srussell · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The last really good Palm was the Palm V. If I wanted to carry a brick around, I'd buy a Zaurus and get a real computer.

    Palm has forgotten the mantra of the original developers that made the Palm III such a success -- keep it small. The Tungsten T is just barely carryable, and the newer versions just keep getting bigger. Personally, I'd rather see Palm spend their energy reducing the size of the T series than increasing the features.

    1. Re:Bigger != better by JDevers · · Score: 1

      This looks the have the exact same form fact as the Tungsten E I carry every day in my wallet (well, I use an old Palm III leather case as my wallet...). It is far from large. It isn't quite as thin as a Palm V, but it isn't very large though. Definitely smaller than most competing PocketPC devices (then again, they aren't MEANT to be as small...).

    2. Re:Bigger != better by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      Palm has forgotten the mantra of the original developers that made the Palm III such a success

      Yes. The majority of Palms are still being used as PIM tools. Those users don't need cameras, WiFi or MP3 playing capability.

      It's a shame Handspring was bought out by PalmOne. I would've liked a replacement for my Treo 90. One that was roughly the same size, perhaps with a nicer screen or better battery life. Instead, the closest replacement is a bloated US$400 Tungsten C.

    3. Re:Bigger != better by emorphien · · Score: 1

      I agree, that's what has made Palm successful to this date, but they're losing it. They had smaller, efficient, longer running and easier to use devices that just worked. Now they're more complex and bigger although still efficient and stable.

      I'd love something like my old 505 with Wifi and some multitasking ability but I don't want to see it any bigger than my 505 was. That thing was great.

      --


      Presently here, but not there.
    4. Re:Bigger != better by gobbo · · Score: 2, Informative
      The last really good Palm was the Palm V.

      I guess you're right in the sense of form factor, but until they came out with the Vx (or IBM's rebranded C3), the V was too short on storage to run stuff like eReader and a collection of reference docs--unless that's all you wanted it for. I still use my (8MB) Vx... just wish I could set it up for wifi, surfing on a modem is so... 90's!

    5. Re:Bigger != better by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 1

      I believe the Tungsten E is of similar size and style to the Palm Vx (which was my favorite as well). Then again, the m500/505 series was basically a beefed up Palm V as well, and they were quite nice (except for poor battery life).

    6. Re:Bigger != better by steveha · · Score: 1

      Palm has forgotten the mantra of the original developers that made the Palm III such a success -- keep it small. The Tungsten T is just barely carryable

      Huh?

      The Tungsten T is much, much smaller than a Palm III. It's thinner too.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  30. 3 words by MadChicken · · Score: 1
    --
    SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
  31. $400! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But ... $400 buys me one with built-in WiFi from Dell!

    It's WinCE evilness of course, but I can't see how Palm is supposed to survive this way.

  32. "once a year"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What?? I've had my 802.11b PCMCIA card since 1999 and it wasn't even a new model back then! It works perfectly still and is what I would like to see in a PDA as well.

  33. Palm MP3 howto by ceeam · · Score: 1
    You're new here, right?

    I didn't steal my UIN ;)

    Real sucks...

    As for palm on PC - no arguing whatsoever. Palm app OTOH - is okish.

    No RealPlayer on your desktop machine...no RealPlayer on the T5... no songs on the T5. No choice. No sale.

    All wrong: (a) It is possible to have Real on Palm and not on PC, just put needed PRC's to hotsync queue, namely:

    RealLib.prc
    RealMP3Codec.prc
    RealMP3FF.prc
    Re alOne.prc
    RealOne_enUS.prc

    (b) To put MP3 files to card you can use a card reader (probably the way to go). Or you can use smth like CardExport, but it's kinda slow. Of course, in T5 this "card drive" functionality is built in.
    (c) And finally - there are several alternative MP3 players, even w/ equalizers and stuff.

    1. Re:Palm MP3 howto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      c) And finally - there are several alternative MP3 players, even w/ equalizers and stuff.
      For Cobalt, yes, but....you've used these 'several MP3 players' with Garnet? I didn't think so. RealPlayer is required or no play.

  34. Finally! by metamatic · · Score: 1
    No Wi-Fi built-in... no microphone... no Cobalt...no sliding case

    I don't care about the wi-fi thing if there's a working card for it. I don't care about the lack of microphone, I have a MD recorder. I don't care about Cobalt, I'd rather have the thing work with my Mac and my Linux boxes.

    And the lack of a sliding case is a huge plus. The stupid sliding design is the single thing that has kept me away from the Tungsten series so far.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there's a working card for it.
      $150.00 more, and it ties up your slot...how people see that as a good thing, I'll never understand.

      I have a MD recorder.
      And you admit in public to enjoying carrying both?

      And the lack of a sliding case is a huge plus
      That includes losing the ability to toggle to landscape mode, while promising you'll need to carry a cover or case, which most likely has to come off while in the cradle.

    2. Re:Finally! by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The T5 supports landscape mode, and I wouldn't carry a T3 caseless anyway.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  35. PEG-UX50 by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Well, there are people like me who hate the sliding design T series.

    The problem with the UX-50 is the eye-strainingly small screen. If they'd fix that it would, indeed, be perfect.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  36. Treo vs T5 by shancock · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why there is a need for a T5 now that the treo is established. Is there any advantage to a T5 over the Treo? The costs are about the same after rebates and now the Treo is getting high resolution a better camera and apparently bluetooth.

    Am I missing something here?

    1. Re:Treo vs T5 by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      Physical screen size is probably part of it, unless Treos have gotten bigger than the last time I looked at them.

      Some people don't want the phone integrated (I picked T3 over Treo when I purchased last). Work pays for the phone, the T3 is mine.

      No knock against the Treo's - I think they're nice devices and they do seem to do everything the Tungstens do, just a different form factor.

      Oh, and I still "Grafitti". I don't think Treo's do that, do they?

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    2. Re:Treo vs T5 by hey! · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a treo. I love it, but I'd never buy it for myself, because you can't get them serviced. Palm1 won't service them, and your carrier won't service them without a very expensive "protection plan".

      All in all, I'd skip the convergence thing for a better phone and a better, smaller PDA.

      Plus, I miss graffitti. The keyboard's OK, but cramped for my (large) hands.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Treo vs T5 by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      On the new Treo 650 you can use the full-screen Graffiti 2. It doesn't have the dedicated space like older Palms do, but like the newer ones, you can write anywhere on the screen as well... On the older ones, you could still use Jot and write anywhere on the screen.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  37. No, its because you're not looking at the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I think that everyone's expectations were simply too high, and mostly unreasonable."

    No, people are disappointed because palm isn't keeping up with the market. The Dell Axim X30 has wifi, BT, half VGA, lots of memory, and can be purchased for $250. HP has the same but include GSM phones, and tons of other devices. Do I need all of them? No, but it means the device truely is multi-purpose.

    So their reponse is a slight up grade to the T3, removing its best feature (the slide), no wifi, and crappy OS 5.x and for that we pay $400. Its a very slight change to the T3, and for tha we waited a year?

    Palm must be greatful to have people who are willing to be 18-24 months behind the curve, but frankly, these are nothing more than what palm should have put out.... A YEAR AGO.

  38. my big issue by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    my big issue with palm in general is that the systems are very closed. Unlike the ipaqs, you cant just flash the bootloader and dual boot, heck you cant even install your favorite os. Opie running on familiar linux is free comparable to the latest windows releases feature wise and also syncs nicely with linux, windows (outlook) and OSX. I love it. On top of that since it is open source, i dont have to worry about it abandoing my platform (h3100 ipaq) the way that windows did. As a long time Pocket pc user, i had to switch to linux when windows no longer supported monchrome ipaqs. Who cares if i have 206mhz arm and a huge hdd on my cf, windows wont support it. Now that i have opie, i'm not looking back.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  39. Why I've bought my last Palm by doublem · · Score: 1

    Let me be blunt, unless I get a working Wi-Fi card for my T2, that T2 will be my last Palm device.

    I'm really pissed that my only option for wireless turned out to be buying a more expensive Palm, or bluetooth.

    You ever try to set up a ZOOM bluetooth device on your PC so you could sync and surf on your Palm?

    I returned the damn Zoom product. The configuration wasn't even documented, and they didn't even have drivers on their website, so when I took the device to work, I had to wait until the next day to set it up, since I'd forgotten their damn CD at home.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Why I've bought my last Palm by emorphien · · Score: 1

      I got my tungsten C for free as a warranty replacement at best buy... I like it but won't buy another unless...

      They provide support for more regular file formats without haveing to deal with the database crap. Is it just me or is opening a jpeg on it overcomplicated?

      The Wifi on it is great though, as is having the thumb-board. I like that, but there's still other issues.

      You've got this efficient OS, and a CPU that's overkill for the Palm OS, and yet multitasking is practically nonexistant. I don't need to check my email, IM, browse 5 web pages, listen to music and watch a movie on it, but it'd be nice to jump back and forth between a couple tasks, like browsing the web and IMing without it having to reinitialize everything.

      I don't know if I'll buy another Palm if they don't start addressing these issues, maybe the new OS will address multitasking, but I'm amazed this new T5 doesn't have Wifi. I am considering buying an Axim X50 once they come out... I'll keep the palm because it's a great run around road warrior, but the X50 would be a fun thing to have an with Dells prices I could probably afford one without much trouble.

      --


      Presently here, but not there.
    2. Re:Why I've bought my last Palm by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      There is one more option for wireless- one of those Enfora cases. You can use it for getting online via wifi or cell.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:Why I've bought my last Palm by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      sorry for the dual-post, but check this for a a review of the wifi portfolio with a T3, should work with a T2 as well.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:Why I've bought my last Palm by doublem · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I didn't know such a device existed. The cost is about equal to that of a nice case and a wi-fi card, so the $170 price tag is about what could be expected.

      Anoyne that's owned one have something to say about it?

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    5. Re:Why I've bought my last Palm by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, not many people know about them. I've not seen them reviewed in most of the usual sites. They are pretty spendy, though- but if you like your PDA and do not want to upgrade, it is still a good option- esp before the Palm OS SD wifi card, when it was the only option. I originally found it when looking for the GRPS case- which looks way cool... One day I'll get it, for getting online w/o a phone.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  40. But is it still volatile memory? by mattr · · Score: 1

    I've developed for the Palm and have a bunch. But I've lost everything on my palm at least 3 times, when the batteries went dead, and losing my memos really, really sucked. I have a 64MB memory stick but there was no easy way to back up the Memo pad, that is you would have to search through zillions of files manually, and then decide whether to overwrite the older copy on your stick (did I back up after the last crash or before it). It was great having a vaio laptop with integral memory stick port, very easy to copy files back and forth. But when I spilled a latte on that (and pilot suddenly stopped working with RH9) I have somehow learned to deal without it. I will never go back to the Palm unless (1) it gets nonvolatile memory, and (2) it gets some faster input. I'm saving up for a linux Sharp zaurus, or maybe an OQO.

    1. Re:But is it still volatile memory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I spilled a latte on that

      You sir, are officially a yuppie tosser

    2. Re:But is it still volatile memory? by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      but there was no easy way to back up the Memo pad,

      How about Backup Buddy VFS? It comes free with the T3 and makes backing up and restoring as easy as hot-syncing (the preferred choice, of course).

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    3. Re:But is it still volatile memory? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      This memory is flash, non volatile.

      Like someone else said, there are plenty of ways just to backup your PIM apps to your memory card.

      One warning: if you're used to a Palm, make sure to try out a Zaurus before buying one. Look for the kind of apps you'd need, make sure you can download them, etc etc. A lot of folks who are used to the completeness, maturity and ease of use of a Palm or Pocket PC get burned when they get a Linux PDA. It's not the same situation as on the desktop: all the same software, but with a more robust OS. Just don't buy blind.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:But is it still volatile memory? by dreadlock9 · · Score: 1

      Uh, right on the product website it says it has built in flash RAM.

      from the site:

      215MB actual storage capacity (160MB internal flash drive; 55MB program memory for applications and data.)

      I don't know if it saves the memo data in the flash drive or not. If not, there is probably an easy way to backup your files into the flash drive. I'd expect someone to come up with an auto backup utility if there isn't one already.

      I am a Palm developer too. I had an m505 (before I lost it somewhere), and it lost all it's memory a couple times due to a hard crash. My Kyocera Smartphone is even worse. It seems like every time it crashes when it is online, it loses all its data.

  41. Zodiac Rules by computechnica · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Tapwave Zodiac is superior. It has a much nicer form factor, can use 2 SD cards at the same time, Nice loud stereo speakers, a real 3d GPU, and good battery life. It also has several good EMUs for just about every cartridge console system. made.:

    http://www.palmsource.com/interests/emulators/
    http://www.palmemu.com/
    http://www.kalemsoft.com/
    http://www.codejedi.com/

    1. Re:Zodiac Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a 2D GPU, not 3D.

  42. What Happened to COLBALT?!? Palm OS 6 by lnewton64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Palm source released Colbalt almost 10 months ago. I was expecting the T5 to have palm OS6, does anyone know what the scoop is?

    1. Re:What Happened to COLBALT?!? Palm OS 6 by jalilv · · Score: 1

      Cobalt is already in version 6.1!!! (yes, even before the first release of the new version!). Palm announced this last week at DevCon in Munich. It is being speculated that Treo 650, the new version of Treo, will be running Palm OS 6.1 but I will believe it when I see it ;-)

      - Jalil Vaidya

  43. C++ API? How about any decent API? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm just hoping and praying that with OS 6 they clean up the horrible accreted apology for an operating system that is OS 5. But chances are PalmOS 6 will just be the same mess as before with even more extra functions and layer after layer of backwards compatiblity functions and even more horribly it will be both little endian with big endian for the legacy functions and so on. Yeuch! Asking for a C++ API is like asking for sugar coating on a turd.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:C++ API? How about any decent API? by jalilv · · Score: 1

      Take a look at Object Library for Palm OS (POL). Its been available for a while and hopefully will be ported to PalmOS 6. I don't think a lot of work would be required to do this since the API for v.6 is same as previous versions with addition of some new ones. Codewarrior already includes POL in the package. On the side note, the new Palm OS Development Suite (PODS) from PalmSource is based on Eclipse and the new 1.1 release of PODS is awesome.

      - Jalil Vaidya

    2. Re:C++ API? How about any decent API? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      That looks pretty nice. Doesn't look like it makes things like wide screens and the DIA any easier though.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  44. Tops of the Line by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of having to choose between the latest T and Treo from Palm to get the features promised for both. If the Treo 650 ("Ace") slated for delivery this quarter can't drive an SDIO WiFi card, or doesn't come with integrated Bluetooth, Palm will have failed to operate as a serious company. Their engineers seem able to roll out the tech, so I'm guessing their marketdroids, as usual, need execution.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  45. Don't ship a car WITH car cover by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Shipping a PDA without WiFI is not like shipping without tires - it's like shipping without a car cover, a needles item I do NOT want to pay for.

    A lot of people have bluetooth phones now and that is a FAR more preferable way to get network connectivity, as the connection will go where I do and the battery will last MUCH longer.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  46. Neat, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have a keyboard yet?

  47. Flagship? by Ephboy · · Score: 1

    I think the problem is not that this will be a bad device, but rather that it has nothing that distinguishes it as the flagship of the palmone brand. The device doesn't have a cool slider, camera, wifi, or really anything to make it stand out in a crowd. Advertising "trickle charging" and "USB drive" don't make me think "Wow, palmOne has really neat things". I'll take a cheaper handheld and a jumpdrive. palmOne needed a device that calls people's attention back to them, especially since PPC devices are getting to be pretty darn cool. This is a better Tungsten E, but labeled as their flagship device. Is it really the best they can do?

  48. Sony Clié TH 55 is still the best Palm PDA by egghat · · Score: 1

    kind of sad that is not a player inthe Palm market any more. They offered good alternatives to the models offered by Palm themselves.

    When I look at the new Tungsten I don't find a superior to the TH55 from Sony despite the 256 Meg built in RAM.

    Palm: Please give me a TH55 without the f***ing Memory Stick and an SD-card slot instead. Would be everything I need.

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  49. Re:while officially dropping Mac support...not rea by hacker · · Score: 1
    "Besides the palmone spec page says - full mac support"

    We still support more platforms, Palm devices, and other things than Palm themselves supports. Sure, we can't afford to go out and buy every new device the day they're released, but we catch up fast.

    We're already significantly faster (20% to 60% in most cases) than Palm's own implementation on OSX and Linux and Unix (three platforms they don't support at all!).

    Contrary to what Palm states, they do not support Mac/OSX at all. Mark/Space (endorsed by Palm) does through their MissingSync product, but... Mark/Space's product relies on our code to function. How ironic is that ;)

  50. Add Biometric Security by jalilv · · Score: 1

    Now only if they can add biometric security to the PDAs. None of the Palm OS based PDAs have fingerprint scanners like a couple of IPaqs do. Fingerprint authentication on IPaq has proven to be very useful to some. It would be a great value addition to Palm PDAs.

    Just my $0.02 ;-)

    - Jalil Vaidya

  51. Re:Flagship? Try the Treo by ppp · · Score: 1

    I think with this model PalmOne has pretty much demonstrated that they're just not that committed to the conventional PDA business anymore. The real flagship and barometer of the company's future is the Treo 600. The 650 is in production now, with a high-rez screen and Bluetooth, a they have announced the intention of offering low-cost Treo's as well.

    The hard-core PDA users, who have been screeming for built-inWiFi, are a niche market, and are probably better off with Pocket PCs. Since the PDA market is just a (relatively) small side business for Dell and HP, they can continue to pursue this market. PalmOne is a relatively small company compared to those giants, and has been fighting for survival the last few years. They just cannot afford to cater to any market that's not profitable.

    I'll be all over the Treo 650 myself.

  52. Yes, Multiprocessing and a file system! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Contrary to what some users and hobbyists like you believe, there are other users with real needs out there that require these two functionality. I have developed several apps (not simple GUI forms apps) for Palm and can tell you the lack of these two things really hurt Palm in the business environment. I don't understand why some users get so religous over marketing hype created by a company. Palm's marketing department won you over with the keep it so simple as to be stupid mantra. However, the enterprise sees a definite use of PDAs for other tasks such as wireless communication to sync up remote apps with the server. Palm cannot do this very well. PocketPC and Symbian are definitely better alternatives to Palm in business environment.

    Please, if all you do is use email, calendar, play games, read pdfs, play music, and Palm 5.x is ok for YOU, don't spread your ignorance by disparaging the real benefits of the competition just because you currently don't have a use for them. Ken Olsen of DEC once ask why anyone would need a personal PC. Think about it!

    The right tool for the right job! Religion and discrimination need not apply.

  53. PalmOS, because tha's all there is at the moment.. by simp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Call me an old fart, but I liked the way my Psion 3 and Psion 5 worked. I've played with WinCE devices, had a Palm 3c and now a Sony TH55. The hardware is great: nice small package, good color screen, wifi & bluetooth. But the PalmOS is not my thing. What I hate is the way that all the information is scattered through the whole damn thing. I need to go to the addresbook to get some addresses, then browse to the memopad to find memo's, then browse to a spreadsheet to get some data.
    On an old Psion I could make a subdirectory for a project and gather all my address files/database files/spreadsheets/memo's for that project in 1 place. Just tap on the file and it opened. Brilliant concept. But maybe I'm just not getting the "Palm" way of thinking.

    But Palm is the only reasonably working PDA at the moment. Psion 5 is to old hardware-wise and the PocketPC2003 tries to hard to be a windows machine with a too small screen.

  54. End of UC? Bad by steveha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    PalmOne just abandoned the Universal Connector. This is mind-bogglingly stupid.

    Every time they change their connector, they kill all the accessories that work with that connector. I don't know why any third-party companies would ever make accessories for PalmOne PDA ever again.

    If I bought a T5, I wouldn't be able to use my folding keyboard with it, my modem, or my rechargeable battery pack. I guess I could buy new ones, but no thank you, since the ones I have work so well.

    I suppose they are doing this because the new connector costs them less money. The Universal Connector has both USB and a serial port, and a whole bunch of little pins. If I were in a good mood, I might say that a manufacturing company does need to keep an eye on their cost of goods.

    But Palm has changed their connector so many times now! The third-party accessory makers were unhappy when Palm adopted it, but Palm promised this was the last connector change, honest. Last for three years, I guess.

    And what kind of crack are they smoking... stereo out through the connector? Oh, I guess they weren't trying to keep an eye on costs after all. An iPod has stereo out through the connector, and that's valuable because you can have hours of music on one. A Palm PDA can play music, and that's valuable because you have it with you wherever you go, and you don't need to carry both a PDA and a music player. But how valuable is it to have a PDA that can play a couple of hours of music while it is in its cradle? How hard is it to plug speakers into the stereo headphones jack, anyway?

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  55. Re:End of UC? Bad by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Universal Connector has both USB and a serial port, and a whole bunch of little pins. ...And a lousy connection. The Palm UC was hardly the end all be all of connectors. It was a crappy interface, because it failed on the one primary function that connectors MUST succeed: connection.

    Trying to use a cable attached to the UC was/is an annoying task. The damn thing jsut doesn't stay connected. I say good bye and good riddance.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  56. Visor Edge by ruyon · · Score: 1

    Then the Visor Edge should have been sold like pancakes, but it didn't. Obviously, you (and I) are not mojority. |-(

  57. PalmOne's Declining Market Share by Mike+Rubits · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unfortunately (depending on who you ask - personally I'm a PocketPC fan) Palm-powerred devices are going down the drain in terms of market share. They made the right decision in splitting off their hardware and OS department. I'd expect to see PalmOS go into more appliances - the Tapwave Zodiac is a great example of this. One thing that's always irked me is the attitude of the Palm community in general with new features. It's basically "we don't need that!" when presented with a competing platform's feature, and lo and behold, 2-3 generations later, it's being touted as a huge feature, and people are clamoring over it! For reference's sake, I've used a PalmOS IIIxe, a iPaq H3600, H3900, and a Tapwave Zodiac. Carry the Zodiac, but primarily because of emulators.

    1. Re:PalmOne's Declining Market Share by lposeidon · · Score: 1

      i'll have to agree with you there... palm os is going down the drain. windows ce(and compatible) devices are tking over, so is linux. there is so much more versatility. it seems like palm is taking a step back, and it is already about 10 paces behind the rest of the PDA market. 256MB seems almost slim nowadays.

      --
      Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
  58. whoring mark space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how many posts did you whore this on?

    What Palm has essentially done is eliminating syncing - 10X faster and easier - no drivers no new software to learn or install.

  59. Palm needs to work on more than hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me a troll but, palm customer service sucks. My very under warranty T3 lost a screw from the slider so I though, no problem, I'll call and have a helpful rep. send a replacemnet. I get the customer service nightmare from a far away land on the line telling me sorry but the device falling apart is not covered under warranty (one wonders at this point what a warranty is). But, I can send it in for advance exchange for $150(don't remember exact amount). The device just needed a screw! Long story short - I got the screw from hobby supply store after the web sites palm reccomended did not have the right piece, and looked like they never did. Any company that makes customers hurt so much for a missing screw, I have to say good bye to. T5, T6, T7, etc.... adios.

  60. The bleeding edge... by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

    One thing that's always irked me is the attitude of the Palm community in general with new features. It's basically "we don't need that!" when presented with a competing platform's feature, and lo and behold, 2-3 generations later, it's being touted as a huge feature, and people are clamoring over it!

    And, of course, Palm affecianados are all identical and speak with one unified voice, like Slashdot.

    I think it's stupid that Palm has let the WinCE crowd goad them into a spiral of creeping featuritis - Until they make a color screen that has lower power draw than a B/W model, I'm still going to be in favor of B/W screens, to be honest - Having to lug a charger (Or even THINK about one) is a pain in the ass.

    By all means, keep your Game Platform/Movie Viewer/Radio receiver, and I wish you all the luck in the world with it - Just realize that it's not neo-ludditisim to not want to plow your fields with the wingtip of a jet fighter.

    (1000->PPPersonal->TRGPro->Handera330->Treo180-> Ha ndera330)