Slashdot Mirror


Wanna Buy a Reusable Rocket for 19k USD?

Anonymous Coward writes with story from the Mainchi Daily News: "'Earlier this month, Hokkaido University started putting its Camui rockets on the open market. Camui rockets are true rockets, being 1.6 meters long, flying at 300 meters per second and parachuting slowly to the ground after reaching heights of up to 1 kilometer.' The Camui use a mixture of fixed fuel acrylic and liquid oxygen."

153 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Be sure to read the fine print: by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Not recommended for use near airports or presidential motorcades."

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Damn, now the terrorists will know just what to do!

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    2. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by polecat_redux · · Score: 4, Funny

      Buying one of those rockets these days is a sure-fire way to get a puppet regime installed in your living room.

    3. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buying one of those rockets these days is a sure-fire way to get a puppet regime installed in your living room.

      So is marriage.

    4. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by bhima · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's OK if it's inside a balloon.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    5. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by Skye16 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This may not even be legal in the United States - at least for long.

      I mean, come on, if they're going to ban model rockets like Estes (and their engines), how long until they do the same with these?

    6. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by eam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're going to ban Estes rockets?

    7. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by Skye16 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I guess not the rockets themselves, just the engines.

      1
      2

      And I'm sure Google has even more info on it. I haven't seen anything new on it, so I have no idea what has happened since then. I haven't seen any new complaints, but I also haven't seen anything to indicate people being happy it didn't pass, so...

    8. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      And more:

      Wikipedia Article

    9. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      Buying one of those rockets these days is a sure-fire way to get a puppet regime installed in your living room.


      So is marriage.


      Or just having little kids.
    10. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Well, you can still buy rubber bands...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    11. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And water. SuperSoaker makes a nice pressurized water rocket now.

      But then again, a model rocket engine isn't very fancy- if you've got a burnt out one for a model, it's not that hard to reload with a sugar/amonium nitrate mixture.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by dr_skipper · · Score: 1

      Not everyone reading slashdot lives in the repressed USA.. I for one live in Canada, where rockets (TOYS) are still legal..

    13. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by k31bang · · Score: 1

      screw water. Air is where the fun is. ;-)

      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    14. Re:Be sure to read the fine print: by Wytil · · Score: 1

      America: fast becoming a militant fascist theocracy Gee someone finally noticed! Personally I always thought Jerry Falwell would take over. We never saw Tom Ridge coming. We should have paid more attention to the prosecution team for President Clinton, those guys almost all graduated from Southern Conservative schools.

  3. Not first post :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Feh. If I only had some faster-than-light propulsion I would have got first post, but all I've got are these *damned* slow rockets. :-(

  4. WMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This seems much more of a WMD than the Iraqi aluminum tubes. When does the bombing start?

    1. Re:WMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no no, you see, the USG only goes after those who pretend to have WMD, not those who actually do. if you want to join the club, maybe you could put out some press releases about developing ICBMs or something.

    2. Re:WMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bombing won't start because Japan actually has weapons to fight back with.

    3. Re:WMD? by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why? Japan is the largest aircraft carrier in the US Navy!

  5. Bonfire night by peterprior · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, bonfire night in the UK is less than a month away. I wonder what the shipping time is on these. :)

    1. Re:Bonfire night by gingerTabs · · Score: 1

      Well, bonfire night in the UK is less than a month away. I wonder what the shipping time is on these. :)

      How are these going to be re-usable after they've been blown into a multi-cloloured explosion?

  6. Camui rockets suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Camui rocket fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Camui rocket (a 300m/s w/1km altitude max) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Titan IV running 150m/s, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Camui, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

    In addition, during this file transfer, the guidance system will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even GPS is straining to keep up as I type this.

    I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Camuis, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Camui that has run faster than its Boeing counterpart, despite the Camui's faster propellant architecture. My hobby kit model rocket with helicopter nose cose runs faster than this 300m/s rocket at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Camui is a superior machine.

    Camui addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Camui over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.

    1. Re:Camui rockets suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Never underestimate the bandwidth-distance of a Camui rocket filled with DAT-72 tapes...

      Might be a possible candiate for a new "space speed record" for data.

    2. Re:Camui rockets suck by Tethys_was_taken · · Score: 1

      ...and this troll gets modded +2 insightful how, exactly?

    3. Re:Camui rockets suck by hfis · · Score: 1

      I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Camui rocket (a 300m/s w/1km altitude max) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes.

      I would just like to ask the idiots who modded this +2 interesting how a rocket can copy things between folders on its harddrive.

      This is a copy/paste troll thats been around for ages. Fucking read the comment before you mod it next time...

    4. Re:Camui rockets suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is a copy/paste troll thats been around for ages.


      Yeah, and that's why it's funny, dumbass. Or as they say in Soviet Russia, troll has been you.
    5. Re:Camui rockets suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Bush fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of Bush (IQ 2.5) for about 20 minutes now while he attempts to copy the Letter A from one piece of paper to another. 20 minutes. At home, John Kerry, which by all standards should be a lot slower than Bush due to flip-flopping, the same operation would take about 1 second. If that. In addition, during this letter transfer, the guidance system will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even My Balls are straining to keep up as I type this. I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working with Bush, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Republican avoid the draft faster than its Democrat counterpart, despite the Republican's more "patriotic" architecture. My hobby kit model rocket with helicopter nose cose runs faster than this 300m/s rocket at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that Bush is a superior candidate. Bush addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Bush over other faster, cheaper, more mentally stable Candidates.

    6. Re:Camui rockets suck by KrunZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they like auto trolls complaints, why not expect a little more. E.g. from Scott Pakins Complaint generator:

      http://www.pakin.org/complaint?firstname=Camui&p gr aphs=10&gender=c

      "The purpose of this letter is to outline a plan to rise to the challenge of thwarting Camui's money-grubbing, vile plans. Let's review the errors in Camui's statements in order. First, Camui's use of acrimonious scrubs is unquestionably pathetic. I do not find warnings that are stingy, sexist, and impolitic to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe in order to solve the big problems with Camui, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose.

      Camui will probably never understand why it scares me so much. And it does scare me: Its double standards are scary, its snow jobs are scary, and most of all, it has never gotten ahead because of its hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of its successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. Camui's wheelings and dealings leave me with several unanswered questions: Will peeling back the onion of its treacherous philippics cause it to shed tears or will it merely enhance its desire to manipulate everything and everybody? And when it looks in the mirror in the morning, does Camui see more than the same, dissolute face that all randy, flagitious worrywarts share? These are difficult questions to answer, because Camui hides behind the carefully managed prevarication that neurotic, brassbound geeks are easily housebroken. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. If Camui can't be reasoned out of its prejudices, it must be laughed out of them. If Camui can't be argued out of its selfishness, it must be shamed out of it.

      I may be beating a dead horse here, but I do want to point out that I find that some of Camui's choices of words in its pranks would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted "ugly" for "hexosemonophosphoric" and "piteous" for "anthropomorphotheist." If there is one thing I have learned, it is this: At no time in the past did mean-spirited warmongers shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them. Camui's smears are based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very serious consequences for all of us some day.

      What that means, simply put, is that I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, wishy-washy world run by surly cozeners. If my memory serves me correctly, Camui's cronies believe that anyone who resists Camui deserves to be crushed. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that we ought to worship bloodthirsty fast-buck artists as folk heroes can believe anything, especially if it's false. There is a problem here. A very large, frowzy, coldhearted ..."

    7. Re:Camui rockets suck by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Thats not a troll, its highly amusing!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    8. Re:Camui rockets suck by DJCF · · Score: 1

      You just gotta know how to configure it properly! Don't wanna flame, but Camui's should not be held responsible for the (in)competance of their owner!

    9. Re:Camui rockets suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well maybe so but you gotta realize that a Titan is an enterprise class system! It's a hell of a lot more expensive than a Camui, and the design is steeped in the traditional 'Cathedrial' system design, whereas Camui is a more open development model.

      Don't get me wrong, I have full respect for the Titan platform and the accomplishments of Lockheed Martin, but the 'open-design' methodology of the Camui will win out in the end!

  7. regulations by rguiu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can anybody buy his/her own rocket and launch it from the backyard?

    With so much airtraffic is not a danger?

    Can be this technology used for making weapons? I remember the article of someone building cruise missiles: http://slashdot.org/articles/03/12/09/205252.shtml ?tid=137

    Seems very nice, but I would not like a plane shot down because a rich kid was playing with one of this toys.

    1. Re:regulations by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I was landing at San Jose airport once and there were fireworks were exploding all around the plane. I have no idea why, and I doubt a tiny cracker would harm a jet, but it didn't seem like a good thing to me.

      Still, if I were a terrorist I wouldn't be looking to buy some proper rocket system. Over the counter fireworks seem like a great way to dump anthrax spores over a wide area. Do it at an event like bonfire night, July 4, New Years Eve etc. and you'd probably have a nice crowd of people standing underneath to infect too.

    2. Re:regulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Concerned your plane might be shot down by a rich kid's rocket?

      Sir, the affordable Camui range is aimed at the masses so your plane is much more likely to be brought down by missiles fired by kids from lower income families.

      I trust this allays your fears.

      Camui Marketing Director

    3. Re:regulations by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Only problem with the fireworks/anthrax spore idea is that:
      1. when the firework is launched...how are you going to package it so the sports don't "burn up"
      2. when the firework explodes, how do you protect the spores?

      Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    4. Re:regulations by DrXym · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firework rockets usually consist of gunpowder propellant (to get them into the air), an explosive charge (i.e. more gunpowder tightly wrapped) and pellets containing various metallic compounds for the colourful 'starburst'. If you removed the pellets and packed it with your pathogen of choice it would have the desired effect. I imagine some thick cardboard would insulate the contents sufficiently for most of it to survive.

    5. Re:regulations by jguthrie · · Score: 2, Informative
      Can anybody buy a rocket and launch it from his backyard? Well, it depends on where you live. If you live in the United States, then the answer is a qualified "yes". It's "qualified" because you're not supposed to launch any rockets near airports.

      The air traffic is not really an issue, even near a airports. It's hard to hit an airplane with a rocket. That's why military missles are guided and typically use some sort of proximity fuse and explosive warhead. Those guidance systems and warheads with proximity fuses are not generally available to the general public.

      Anyway, the regulations recognize three different categories of rockets. If you have a rocket that masses no more than 453 grams and has no more than 113g of grams of propellant, with no more than 62.5 grams in any given engine, then you have what is known as a "model rocket" and you can launch from anywhere that isn't near an airport it without telling anybody you're going to do it.

      If you have a rocket that masses no more than 1500 grams and has no more than 125 grams of propellant, with no more than 62.5 grams of propellant in each engine, and a total impulse of no more than 160 NS and an average thrust of no more than 80 Newtons, then you have what's known as a "large model rocket", and you need to notify the FAA before you launch it.

      If you have a rocket that masses more than 1500 grams, or has more than 125 grams of propellant or has more than 62.5 grams of propellant in any one engine, has a total impulse of more than 160 NS or an average impulse of more than 80 Newtons, then you have a "high power rocket" which requires that you get the FAA's permission to launch it.

      There are two organizations supporting model and amateur rocketry in the USA. The National Association of Rocketry and the Tripoli Rocketry Association. Those web sites have links to local chapters all over the country.

      Whether or not you can legally buy the propellant (premanufactured "single use" engines are recognized by everyone as legal to buy, sell, and use) is a matter of opinion, and there are lawsuits pending on that subject right now. If you have an interest in these matters, please donate the NAR legal fund or the TRA legal fund.

      The guys I know who do high-power (I'm starting to do LMR's now) made a great deal of fun of these Camui rockets because the high-power guys build rockets that go a great deal higher for a lot less money. A $300 investment can get you a completely reusable rocket that goes up a couple of kilometers as well as the propellant for one flight.

    6. Re:regulations by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Can this technology used for making weapons?"

      For some strange reason, there's something | There
      called a "lameness filter" that repeatedly | are
      rejected all attempts to post this message | lots
      the way I wanted it to appear and saying I | of
      had too few characters per line and that I | technologies
      needed to reduce the count of "junk" chars | that
      per line in my post. Perhaps it's just me, | can
      but I think that making me do something so | be
      TOTALLY HOKEY as THIS, JUST so the post'll | used
      appear the way I intended for it to appear | to
      somehow seems MUCH more hokey, in the long | make
      run... But maybe I'm just being too ornery | weapons...

      You just have to learn to think like this guy
      and turn yourself into a human one of these.

      --


      This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
    7. Re:regulations by solodex2151 · · Score: 2, Informative

      All of the existing regulations in place for High Power Rocketry would apply to these rockets. You need a cleared FAA wavier in order to fly anything above 2500 feet. These are not hard to obtain, and 95% of the population in the US is within 3-4 hours of a high power capable launch site. On the other hand, rockets are NOT capable of shooting down planes. Some government agencies tried proving this before, but were unsuccessful and looked like idiots doing it. Also, the rockets are not impressive at all. You can construct a much larger rocket out of composites with a homebuilt hybrid engine using HTTB and LOx as fuel compenents for under 500 dollars.

    8. Re:regulations by Cow007 · · Score: 1

      Um, fireworks would be a terrible way to dump anthrax. Note the FIRE part. The spores would sureley get burned up in the proscess.

      --
      411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  8. Wanna Buy a Reusable Rocket for 19k USD? by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, Not really.

    --
    time is a perception of a being's consciousness
    time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    1. Re:Wanna Buy a Reusable Rocket for 19k USD? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Okay, $18,500. And I'm cutting off my own hand here.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    2. Re:Wanna Buy a Reusable Rocket for 19k USD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyways, I don't have a single USD, you insensitive clod!

  9. why is this here? by poptones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    a km? I made a solid fuel estes when I was in Jr. High that would go to 3000ft (more or less a km) and it required none of that other crap. It was about a meter tall, had three stages, and used three solid fuel engines that, all combined, cost about ten bucks.

    Why is this a story? Someone deisgned and constructed an overpriced, hard to use, liquid fuel rocket that can be outperformed by a twenty year old Estes and is offering copies of it for sale, but no one has been stupid enough to buy one yet. This is news?

    1. Re:why is this here? by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      Dude, this was in Weekly Playboy. It wouldn't have been significant but Weekly Playboy ran the story and since it was in Weekly Playboy it's gotta bet good.

    2. Re:why is this here? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed.... this thing runs on LIQUID OXYGEN for chrissakes, it should be going 60,000 feet or more. Some of the high-powered homemade rockets those guys shoot in the Nevada desert easily go 60,000 feet or more, and cost way less than 10 grand. Maybe the original article misprinted the altitude, maybe it was 10km rather than 1km.

    3. Re:why is this here? by really? · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that's the case; you can see towards the bottom of the article they talk of "60Km" ... from one to 60 would be quite a bit of a jump.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    4. Re:why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Weekly Playboy is a news weekly in Japan. Do not confuse it with THE Playboy, because it is not even close. :-)

    5. Re:why is this here? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      59 km, to be precise.

    6. Re:why is this here? by ceeam · · Score: 3, Funny

      The problem w/ 60km is that you can be sure you won't be the first one to pick it from the landing site.

    7. Re:why is this here? by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Funny
      a km?

      Yes, but Japanese are short so 1 km probably seems much more impressive to them.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    8. Re:why is this here? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Nope, that's not the case. If you check out the movies on their website, you can see that the time from launch until you see the parachute (it disappears for a second inbetween) is only 5 or 10 seconds. For that amount of time, 1 km sounds about right - 50km would be impossible to shoot up to, and then fall back down.

      Judging from the pictures on the same website, the rocket looks fairly simple except, perhaps, for the liquid fuel system. With the low cost of materials and labor in Asia, I wonder why this rocket costs so much? I would imagine they could build the whole thing (excluding labor of the students) for a grand or two.

      To me, the most interesting thing this group did was their winged version of this rocket. The rocket launches normally with a highly-swept wing structure attached, then uses that to glide back down and make a (relatively) smooth crash-landing.

  10. Second Amendment by KrunZ · · Score: 1

    Everyone should be allowed to protect their own backyard from overflying airtraffic...

    1. Re:Second Amendment by rguiu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      can a libian/sirian/north korean citizen protect his own backyard from US airliners too? How far can travel this "second amendment"?

    2. Re:Second Amendment by KrunZ · · Score: 1

      Oh no no no... Listen up mister! I was talking about rights here. Rights only apply to Americans, in fact only to Right Thinking Americans tm. If the Liberals demons don't like the second amendment they should not be allowed to use it.

      Hmmm... maybe I should stop being ironic and maybe I should not have seen Outfoxed (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0418038/) last night.

    3. Re:Second Amendment by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Countries have sovereignty over their airspace, just as they do over their seas. They're free to withdraw overflight privileges and shoot down any plane that tries to enter, but to do so is likely to cause a diplomatic incident.

      --


      Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
    4. Re:Second Amendment by rguiu · · Score: 1

      I remember that happening...in Cuba with Kennedy and the US gob got quite angry because their spy toy was shutdown. A bit offtopic anyway!

    5. Re:Second Amendment by foobsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of those U2s was also shot above the SU a little earlier.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  11. Pedantic correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I made a solid fuel estes when I was in Jr. High that would go to 3000ft (more or less a km)

    Less, actually. Nearer 0.9 km.

    But you have a good point.

  12. To summarize by ceeam · · Score: 4, Funny

    19k big firework that you need some liquid oxygen to launch. Hm... Sounds like a bargain, what's the catch?

    1. Re:To summarize by frankvl · · Score: 0

      But it's reuuuusable!

  13. +2 informative? by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Funny

    can we turn this into a "which is the better platform: crack or crystal meth" thread?

    1. Re:+2 informative? by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      I've always found that on a price/performance basis methamphetamine just wipes the floor with crack. I reckon it would also make a much better active ingredient for all those 'energy drinks' than caffeine, taurine or guarana.

    2. Re:+2 informative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using a rocket fuel analogy to compare crack and methamphetaine would be something like:

      If crack was a rocket fuel it would be suited for smaller rockets requiring high acceleration and very short burn times as it has a very high Isp but a painfully short burn duration.

      If methamphetamine was a rocket fuel it would be suited for larger rockets requiring powerful acceleration and long burn time as it has a medium Isp and a very long burn duration.

  14. Ah, that's tame. by OwlWhacker · · Score: 0

    When do we get to buy nukes?

    1. Re:Ah, that's tame. by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Old news bub.
      Nuke Supermarket

    2. Re:Ah, that's tame. by pklong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nukes don't kill people, people do.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    3. Re:Ah, that's tame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buses don't kill people,.. oh, wait...

  15. On road costs by hfis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whilst 19k sounds like an "ok" (hah) price, imagine the 'on road' costs of running this thing. That fuel isn't cheap, no matter where you are..

    1. Re:On road costs by qray · · Score: 1

      I guess that means I'll be throwing away my plans for an alternative fuel car based on a liquid oxygen rocket. Do I have to send the government their grant money back?

  16. IN OTHER NEWS: by nilbog · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Bush administration has found evidence of a massive WMD missile facility in your backyard.

    --
    or else!
    1. Re:IN OTHER NEWS: by syrinje · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Aiiieeaaaaaarrhhhh! Where are my mod points ehen I am really moded to laughter by a post - someone please Mod Parent Funny.

      OMFG, I just realised this could just be true (and insightful)....Hey Jimbo, go run check on the tarp ....

      --
      See that long UID - that's what you get for lurking too long
    2. Re:IN OTHER NEWS: by nathanh · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The Bush administration has found evidence of a massive WMD missile facility in your backyard.

      That's OK. You have no oil in your backyard so you're perfectly safe, just like North Korea.

    3. Re:IN OTHER NEWS: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's OK. You have no oil in your backyard so you're perfectly safe, just like North Korea.

      It's amazing that dumbass stuff like this gets modded up. Do you even have one fucking clue that different situations are handled in a different manner? Have you ever heard of a country called China? Read something beyond a Perl manual for once in your life.

    4. Re:IN OTHER NEWS: by nathanh · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Have you ever heard of a country called China?

      No. Where's that? Do they have oil?

    5. Re:IN OTHER NEWS: by francisew · · Score: 1

      We should all chip in, buy a couple and send them to Iraq so W can find justification for the invasion.

      Well, then again, it'd look a bit silly since he changed the reason so many times since.

  17. One most important question! by ceeam · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is there a section for a cat or do you strap it externally? Do they provide a tiny helmet?

  18. Wanna build a reuseable rocket for 20 bucks USD? by mikeophile · · Score: 3, Interesting
  19. pictures ... by weighn · · Score: 5, Informative

    there's some pics here. and a cnn story here.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:pictures ... by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "CAMUI means "God"."

      I can buy God for only $19,000?

    2. Re:pictures ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why they all wear those helmets...

    3. Re:pictures ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, is it just me or does that thing look like an aluminium tube?

    4. Re:pictures ... by blackicye · · Score: 1

      "Kami" means "god"

      "Camui" is a traditional Japanese male child name.

  20. Now imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make place for one person in the rocket and launch it with a person.
    I guess there would be a lot of people wanting to ride such a thing... :-)

    1. Re:Now imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not half as many as those who'd want to nominate a rider ;-)

      It'd be one time when Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, Darl... (add your own nominations here) wouldn't need to buy their way to the front of the queue!

      I am, of course, assuming that to fit in a rider you'd dispense with a parachute so as to free up some space ;-)

  21. Ainu by kahei · · Score: 3, Informative


    The real significance of this project is that it's probably about the last time anyone names anything in Ainu, the old language of Japan... ...although SNK fans will recall that Nakoruru's moves are named in Ainu, and her 'Kamui Mutsube' is Ainu for 'God Blade'. The real Ainu pronunciation would be more like 'Mutpe' though. Okay, I'm rambling.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Ainu by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Japan is one place that could use a few less languages. As a gaijin, I'm dumbfounded by their what, four written languages. And don't even get me started on their three different numbering schemes...

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    2. Re:Ainu by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0, Troll

      That is the most inane post I have ever seen in my life. Seriously. I congratulate you. Not only did you utterly waste my time it took to read that, but you managed to get modded up so that most others will also utterly waste their time reading it.

    3. Re:Ainu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Back under the bridge with you :)

  22. It will go absolutely perfectly... by vudufixit · · Score: 3, Funny

    With the surplus decommissioned missile silo I picked up for a pittance. Next step: declaring my fully armed and operational missile silo sovereign territory. Surviving relatives of Randy Weaver, Ted Kaczinsky and David Koresh are welcome to stay with me.

  23. Within Three Seconds? by Rie+Beam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I Googled for "Camui rockets", to see if the whole "1 km" deal was true. From what I read, this article was taken from an AP article, which originally read:

    "The Camui-50P rocket was developed by a team from Hokkaido University and can fly as high as one kilometer (0.6 mile) within three seconds after take off"

    Dunno if that means "that's as high as it gets" or "that's how high it can get within that short amount of time"; for $19,000, though, let's hope it's the second one.
    1. Re:Within Three Seconds? by Natchswing · · Score: 3, Informative
      Let's see. One kilometer in one second. This would require an average velocity of flight of, oh... 1 km/s. If we had linear acceleration (rough estimate) and we started from zero (sounds like a safe assumption) then we'll have 2 km/s by the time we hit 1km altitude.

      If the fuel is cut there:

      vf^2=vo^2-2*a*s or 1000^2/(2*9.8)=50km

      That sounds a bit better. Loki Darts could do that.

    2. Re:Within Three Seconds? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      These Loki darts are the hackers of the skys!

      from the article:

      In June 1963, the XRM-82 was redesignated as PWN-1A.

      ------

      All this talk of rocketry is cool, and I think I'm gonna start looking into it more, and hopefully get my own.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Within Three Seconds? by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      You sir should be modded up ! That is FUNNY!!!!!!

      --
      music lover since 1969
  24. reaching heights of up to 1 kilometer.. by D4MO · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..at 300 meters per second. A little over 3 seconds worth of blast. Hey, lasts longer than me, honey.

    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  25. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can buy my own reusable real rocket for 19 USD at the local hardware store. It's a tube 12" long that uses a solid fuel engine and parachutes back to the ground after reaching a height of hundreds of meters.

  26. What makes this a "True Rocket?" by DevilsEngine · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have hybrid engine models (acrylic / NO2) that are larger and go higher. Heck, I had refillable solid engine models that were considerably more powerful -- though with new regulations, getting the refills has become too much of a hassle. I don't see anything to this that wasn't available in dozens, if not hundreds, of High Power Rocketry models available ten years ago. Standing next to me at the moment (in two pieces, because it's too tall to be assembled indoors) is a 11' tall model on 5.5" tubing (at base, step down to 4" at top). Hybrid engine in the "L" range. It's made half a dozen flights on hybrid power, and a couple before that with solids. Easily clears a mile. Next to it is a LOC Magnum, a standard kit available for nearly a decade, with what has to be a good twenty flights to better than a kilometer on a "J" class hybrid. What makes these any less "true rockets?"

  27. The latitude and longtitude of the bios writers .. by geirt · · Score: 1

    Obligatory Alan Cox quote

    --

    RFC1925
  28. Well I do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need them for teh "Hamster X-prize".

  29. Re:Missing WMDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Kerry argues against the war..."

    Then votes for it.

  30. SASE by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Will they ship to addresses in North Korea? Because the North Koreans can send them right back to the return address, but at least about 10-15Kg heavier.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  31. Wanna buy a re-usable rocket for 19k by El+Batemano · · Score: 2, Informative

    No and ill tell you why, Hobby stores sell a reusable rocket with a paracute and using solid based cheap fuels that can reach a thousad meters for twenty quid. Although the one i bought turn itself into a missile shortly after take off. Skimming the heads of passers by and embedding itself into a tree. So im sure the one for 19k is a bit safer!!

  32. Acrylic by srenker · · Score: 1
    The Camui use a mixture of fixed fuel acrylic and liquid oxygen.
    Does this make acrylic sweaters dual-use items?
    --
    My new /. login is fabu10u$.
  33. Playboy magazine? by tod_miller · · Score: 2, Funny

    Star-struck space lovers can now buy their own bona fide rockets, thanks to a Hokkaido University aiming for the stars, according to Weekly Playboy (10/26).

    ?? So I am not the only one who reads the articles?

    Lets think seriously:

    1: When does linux get installed
    2: What kind of imaging can we expect
    3: Some more money than sense geek gonna hack us up a nice GPS tracking and imaging softwqare with gyro compass and GIS based ground sensing auto navigation?

    Neat.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  34. Real Rockets! by Natchswing · · Score: 4, Interesting
    > Camui rockets are true rockets (...) reaching heights of up to 1 kilometer.

    One kilometer?? DEBI was a real rocket. [pictures] About 30 feet long, two stage solid fuel. With 40 G's acceleration it reached mach 10 in a little under 30 seconds (below 40km altitude) and sailed to a apogee of about 800km. Since the rocket had a ballistic trajectory we needed clearance through the pentagon to circumvent the anti-ballistic missle treaty.

    Even little baby Loki Dart's will reach 50km on a good day.

    1. Re:Real Rockets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mainichi article is evidently a bad translation. If you read http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/10/05/explorers.rocke t.ap/ you will see that the actual figures are 1 kilometer within 3 seconds. Obviously it will still have some upward momentum.

  35. Re:Wanna build a reuseable rocket for 20 bucks USD by dcw3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Too bad that they're not taking orders...DOH!

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  36. Link by doctor_no · · Score: 1
  37. Innuendo by SELainWhoAmI · · Score: 1

    I can think of a certain Jrock star who definitely has a Camui rocket in his pants.

  38. Very Interested.. by adeyadey · · Score: 0

    Yes, I am very interested in buying one of these rockets. Tell me, what size warhe.. er.. payload does it carry?

    Osama

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Very Interested.. by camzacid · · Score: 0

      The US have waved charges and are express shipping now.

  39. A simple plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Buy rocket.
    2. Threaten to launch rocket into Mt. St. Helens, starting hot magma reaction that would end up destroying Microsoft.

    Profit!

  40. Market Share? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would imagine that there is a huge market for these things in North Korea.

    Oh, I kid, I kid.

  41. What I want to know is by Dorsai65 · · Score: 0

    what are the, er, "payload" options?

    --
    --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
  42. Re:The latitude and longtitude of the bios writers by arivanov · · Score: 1
    Typical Alan, first code revision has missed a few items. Just like the bandwidth limiter in linux 2.0.x.

    When you program a ballistic missilie you need target lattitude, longitude and altitude even if it is not an air burst.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  43. The rocket is cool, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the "Hot Topics from the Weeklies" on the side bar seem more interesting.

  44. The rocket is cool, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the "Hot Topics from the Weeklies" seem more interesting.

  45. 1 km? For 19k dollars? by woom · · Score: 1

    My ultralight will get you to 1 km, stay there for hours and then gently fly back to the ground, carrying a payload of 200 kg... And it's fully reusable! And you can have it for 10k only.

  46. Vituous cycle, New Markets by Presence1 · · Score: 1

    These guys talk say that "We want to use the technologies we've developed by making our small, hybrid fuel rockets to create new rocket markets."

    In another article today on Burt Rutan (link), he talked about how "Lockheed and Boeing will be making very low-cost access to space hardware within 20 years. They just don't know it yet...because they're going to have to."

    We're just starting down the path where lower costs allow new users into a market, which increases sales volumes, which further reduces prices by greater efficiencies and amortizing costs over longer prodction runs, which opens up new markets at lower price points, etc...

    Looks good to me!

  47. Why do they offer these by AviLazar · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have problems with people being able to buy such equipment. Ready made rockets. While making a rocket is not the most difficult thing in the world, lets slow the process for terrorists or would-be-terrorists by not making things like this available (which i am shocked in our day and age someone can buy these)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:Why do they offer these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you make automatic weapons illegal? I don't need an AK-47 to defend myself. Funny how the same people who try to keep us in constant fear terrosism (Bush and his henchmen) are so liberal about guns...

    2. Re:Why do they offer these by Ageless · · Score: 1

      Assault weapons != automatic weapons.
      The only difference between an AK-47 and every other rifle that wasn't banned during the assault weapons ban is the way it looks and it's name. The AK-47s that are legal now are 7.62mm semi-automatic rifles, just like other ones that were perfectly legal during the ban.

      Read the assault weapons ban sometime. It's stupid.

    3. Re:Why do they offer these by Watcher · · Score: 1

      How about you make automatic weapons illegal? I don't need an AK-47 to defend myself. Funny how the same people who try to keep us in constant fear terrosism (Bush and his henchmen) are so liberal about guns...

      Ah boy...first of all, the manufature and import of new automatic weapons to the US for civilian sale has been illegal since 1986. As a result, legal automatic weapons are very expensive now (at least $10k). On top of that, if I remember right only about 100 or 150 fully automatic AK-47s were ever imported into the US, and legal sales of these are running in the 25K+ range because of the scarcity. Ownership of an automatic weapon requires a federal license, including background check-its not a joke to get, and the federal government keeps an eye on you.

      So, you can't legally make or import an automatic weapon in the US for civilian sale, and the limited (and dwindling due to loss/wear) supply of automatic arms legally available to civilians is priced so high now that its only available to dedicated collectors with a lot of cash to burn.

      I would be more worried about the illegal importation and sale of automatic firearms if I were you.

    4. Re:Why do they offer these by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to explain to me where the Troll factor comes in...please please explain it. The statement was a legitimate statement, not looking to bait anyone, enrage anyone, or hurt anyones feelings. It is a legitimate concern that I would bring up with my local representative (when I see him at the gym)....so how is this a Troll?

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    5. Re:Why do they offer these by SkuzBuket · · Score: 1

      I would be perfectly happy with terrorists buying these. It's so outragiously expensive for its abilities, I'd be much happier if a terrorist had one of these instead of 50 or more rockets of similar capabilty that could be produced for the same price total. Plus I'd bust my ass if some terrorist bought this and then tried to figure out where he could get some liquid oxygen to power the thing.

    6. Re:Why do they offer these by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Well, I'll certainly try. As a community Slashdot is pretty much against the banning of technology or objects simply because they might be used for nefarious purposes. It goes back to DeCSS and beyond

      Model rocketry is no exception. There were several stories a few months back regarding the US Government banning or limiting the sales of certain types of rocket motors for this very reason. The outrage rung far and wide;-)

      So when you put a post up here, advocating an extremely unpopular decision, you get an instant Troll tag. I am guessing that you .sig didn't help either;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    7. Re:Why do they offer these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats even stupider is the design of an AK 47...two toothpicks is enough to make it fully automatic

    8. Re:Why do they offer these by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Well dammit, give me more mod points and I won't make my Troll posts anymore ;)
      Thanks,
      -A

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  48. But what about my car ? by Vertigo01 · · Score: 1

    My only question about these things is whether or not I'm able to strap one to the roof of my Chevy Impala?
    I mean, it's not a JATO unit, but it would still be one hell of a ride before I hit that canyon wall :)

  49. I hope that's a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We fear what we don't understand.

    People live on the ground. If a terrorist wanted to kill a bunch of people, a much better way would be to buy a plain truck, fill it with explosives, and drive it into a crowd of people. Even without the explosives, the truck would still kill a bunch of people. How many people do you really think a small rocket will kill?

    It's all about sensationalism in the news. If one of these rockets killed 5 people, it would be all over the news and these would be quickly banned. But if someone plowed their car into a crowd and killed 10 people, it would barely make it into the newspaper. I guess the public just doesn't find it very "exciting" to hear about deaths due to more conventional means.

  50. not 50km!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first movie from their 2nd launch shows a burn time of ~3 secs, and apogee @ ~12 secs. http://mech-me.eng.hokudai.ac.jp/~spacesystem/camu i/2nd_e.html Big whoop, I can do that on my hybrid motors every month for $50.

  51. Full metal alchemist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet Edward Elric would love to hear about this.

  52. First Hamsternaut? by kidMike · · Score: 1

    With all the past things people have done to hamsters (no Richard Gere jokes please), it's only a matter of time before one takes a ride on a personal rocket.

    When the new police station/courthouse opened in town, it had one of those air-delivery mail systems, like your bank's drive-up teller window. Within two weeks, the newspaper printed an article that some people had been disciplined for sending a hamster all around the building!

    kM

    --
    -- You can't drink all day. (Unless you start in the morning...)
  53. hmm... but will BB let you play with them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since the BATFE is now regulating even model rockets (the propellant, anyway), what's the liklihood that purchasing one of these puppies won't get you a vacation in Gitmo?

  54. Re:correction on the pedantic correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being anal i guess

  55. Talk about overpriced by pilot-programmer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am level 2 certified through the National Association of Rocketry and Tripoli Rocketry Association. I have rockets, built from kits purchased for under $200 and propelled by solid fuel motors for around $200 or hybrid motors for about $100 that can carry a 0.5 pound payload far higher than one kilometer. Anybody on this list who is willing to take a few evenings to build a rocket kit, spend the money to join NAR or TRA, and join the nearest high power rocketry club will be able to launch a small TV transmitter with telemetry over one km and save $18,000 over the Japanese liquid rocket. And if you are really into liquid fuels, you can even find amateurs working with those.

  56. Max altitude note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the CNN article: "can fly as high as one kilometer (0.6 mile) within three seconds after take off"

    That would suggest 1 km is NOT its max altitude.

  57. Naaah, I'll wait for Rutan to release a home-built by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Imagine - a home-built SpaceShipOne!

    "And you're going to do WHAT with that tanker truck full of NO2 and those old tires in your backyard?"

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  58. Only 1 Kilometer? by mirio · · Score: 1

    That's lame, to say the least. There are much more capable homemade rockets capable of reaching a mile or more.

    One kilometer is 3280 feet. I've taken my homebuilt airplane (RV-7) to 18,000 ft (5.48 kilometers, the highest allowed in VFR flight) several times still showing 500 fpm climb and other RV builders with setups similar to mine have made it to 25,900 ft. (7.59 kilometers)

    This rocket costs 2.1 million Yen is $20,000 US dollars. A finished RV will cost you about twice that but it'll get you a lot higher! And that's the key...it gets you a lot higher.

    If they could get these rockets to say, 50,000 ft. or more...then it would get interesting. ...and don't even get me started on the Flying Tiger (48,000 ft.).

  59. ... or to meet US Homeland Security and FBI... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1
    "Buying one of those rockets these days is a sure-fire way to get a puppet regime installed in your living room."

    ... or to meet US Homeland Security and FBI officers personally...

  60. Re:It will go absolutely perfectly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ted kazinksy wasnt a seperatist.

  61. ObSimpsons by mikeage · · Score: 1

    Akira: Yes, you have very lucky dishes, Mr. Simpson. This soap is from the sacred forests of Hokkaido, renowned for its countless soap factories.

    Homer: [thoughtfully] Hokkaido, eh?

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?