Slashdot Mirror


Farscape Returns Sunday

jagilbertvt writes "I know a lot of Slashdot readers are Farscape fans, so here's some more fantastic news... Farscape returns Sunday October 17th at 9pm ET with the first of two episodes of Farscape: Peacekeeper Wars. WatchFarscape.com has more coverage of Farscape's return. A trailer is available at Apple's Movie Trailer site."

165 comments

  1. Foxtrot by Patik · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Interestingly enough, I first learned of this when I read this morning's Foxtrot comic.

    1. Re:Foxtrot by vasqzr · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Oddly enough, aren't comics drawn at least 1 month in advance?

    2. Re:Foxtrot by tuffy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Oddly enough, aren't comics drawn at least 1 month in advance?

      Typically yes. But it's been known for awhile when the new Farscape miniseries would air, so it'd be easy to draw that particular one well in advance. It's just like doing theme comics meant to run on holidays and so forth.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Foxtrot by cvn74lt · · Score: 1

      I saw that too and luckily it reminded me about it. I had just seen the TV guide with the blurb about Farscape on the cover too and had somehow already forgotten. Thank god for the comics.

    4. Re:Foxtrot by PreDefined · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you look at his FAQ:

      How far in advance do I draw my strips?

      Not very, unfortunately. I tend to procrastinate more than I should, so I often turn my strips in to my syndicate roughly two weeks before they run in newspapers. My syndicate would prefer it if I had a lead time of four to six weeks. Because color must be added, my Sunday strips get turned in six or seven weeks in advance.

      http://homepage.mac.com/billamend/faq.html

    5. Re:Foxtrot by ClubStew · · Score: 1

      It was announced sometime last spring. Sci-Fi has been airing commercials for a couple months now, at least.

  2. First of two??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this was planned to be a four episode mini-series. Did they back off from the original promise?

    1. Re:First of two??? by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative
      I thought this was planned to be a four episode mini-series.

      I don't know whether that's how it was shot or not, but it's being aired as two double length episodes of about 90 minutes each instead of four regular episodes.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:First of two??? by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      That is good to know. I heard the commercial saying it was two episodes, and wondered how much they could do in two hours minus commercials. It sounds like you mean four hours minus commercials, or three hours.

      I started watching Farscape recently. My wife has been watching it ever since we got married, and being a bored housewife, started channel surfing while I was at work. She has seen most of the episodes and is a fan (but not one of those scary fans that goes to conventions dressed up with Spock ears). Of course I started watching it as something [else] to do while sitting on the couch with her, and was intrigued. For being a relatively low budget production with actors I had never heard of before, it was very well done. I was sucked in, watching it whenever it was on and I was home, but I watched them all out of order. This made it difficult to follow.

      I know the episodes are out on DVD, and I am very interested in buying them. Maybe someone can help me. I see that Farscape is letterboxed, which leads me to believe it is filmed in 16:9 high definition. I know CSI is filmed that way, so it is not unreasonable to think Farscape is too. I have a 16:9 HDTV and Dolby Digital 5.1 and DTS sound system, will the Farscape DVDs take advantage of my home theater? Are they filmed in high definition? According to Best Buy there are a few DVDs. It looks like each season has six volumes, but then there are other DVDs labeled "Farscape 1" or "Farscape 2." What does this mean? As a Farscape newbie, could someone please explain this to me? Which ones do I need to buy?

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    3. Re:First of two??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Farscape 1, Farscape 2 was how they originally were selling the DVDs.

      The 1st season, when it came out a few years ago and I needed something to do while on a remote contract far from home, came as two episodes per box, one disc, and they released 11 of those.

      The rapidly realized that the value wasn't so good for this, so season 2 on came as 2 disc packs with 4 (or 5 sometimes, especially fitting around the 3 part episodes like Look At the Princess) episodes each. They eventually released season 1 this way too.

      And of course, when they finished a season they went back and released it as a boxed set of 5 DVD cases with 2 discs each for each season. At this point, these are what you want to buy.

      Sound is Dolby Digital, screen is 16:9 animorphic as I recall. Its digitally mastered, but probably not High Def mastered. Basically a pretty high quality package.

      The episodes are the European/Australian broadcasts, as I recall, which translates to 5 extra minutes or so an episode of cut scenes (from the US broadcast)... Apparently they sell less blocks of advertising there.

      Standard issue of extras: Cast Commentaries, interviews, Deleted scenes, production stills and designs, Farscape facts, and the occasional vignette. As a fan, I was entertained.

      Well, I sound like enough of an advertisement, so I'll stop now.

    4. Re:First of two??? by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      I looked at Best Buy (the store, not the web site) after posting my previous message. It looks like I can buy individual DVDs with two or three episodes in 16:9, or boxed sets in 4:3 but for less money per season. Sigh. I need widescreen. Hopefully there is another boxed set I can buy in 16:9. The good news is both versions have Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtracks.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    5. Re:First of two??? by epimorphism · · Score: 1

      The first 3 seasons were shot in 4:3, only the 4th season was shot in 16:9. You have a choice of buying boxed seasons, or individual collections of consecutive episodes. The individual collections were released first; the boxed season sets are relatively new. :)

  3. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'll sleep better tonight knowing that.

    1. Re:Great... by davesplace1 · · Score: 0

      We will all sleep better knowing the blue lady is back in the sky :)

  4. Sci-fi shows I like by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    I like shows where the producers have enough of a clue to make the web page work properly in Firefox.

    That and 24. That Jack Bauer is always in a heap of trouble!

  5. Wish Babylon5 were here ! by SlashingComments · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know this is offtopic but probably this is the best one I saw in recen times.

    --

    - People who believe other people have no right to live, got no right to live ...

    1. Re:Wish Babylon5 were here ! by v1 · · Score: 1

      With B5 being complete, the entire 5 season series is availalbe in 5 box set DVDs. ($65 ea if you look around, much cheaper than Farscape's DVDs) I'm waiting for some of the B5 movies to hit the stores. (not sure how many of them there were?)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Wish Babylon5 were here ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were released months ago, why are you waiting?

    3. Re:Wish Babylon5 were here ! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      With B5 being complete, the entire 5 season series is availalbe in 5 box set DVDs. ($65 ea if you look around,

      If you look in China or Hong Kong, $10 per series. Excellent quality. Now I've just got to find 100 hours to watch them.

    4. Re:Wish Babylon5 were here ! by Kamion · · Score: 1

      The B5 movies are available in a box set. I'm staring at the box set atm.

    5. Re:Wish Babylon5 were here ! by v1 · · Score: 1

      I checked reel.com and didn't see it - they usually have the latest B5 things - what's the title of your box set? I've got seasons 1-5 but haven't seen any movies anywhere...

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    6. Re:Wish Babylon5 were here ! by slarabee · · Score: 1
      I checked reel.com and didn't see it - they usually have the latest B5 things - what's the title of your box set? I've got seasons 1-5 but haven't seen any movies anywhere...

      Babylon 5 - The Movie Collection

      Amazon has it for $45. I picked it up for a few bucks more at Costco (club store with rotating merchandise and food in team-sized portions). Controlling impulses has never been one of my strong points.



      And to keep vaguely on the Farscape topic, where might be a good summary of events in the Farscape universe? I've seen many detailed episode guides, but do not need to read the nitty gritty on each for the next two hours.

  6. hmm.. by hookedup · · Score: 5, Funny

    family guy... farscape..let's see if we can get full house back on the air..

    1. Re:hmm.. by isorox · · Score: 1

      I'll settle with firefly back on

    2. Re:hmm.. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      We've already got Doctor Who and Hitchhiker's Guide reanimated this year. (And unfortunately, Battlestar Galactica.) Maybe we can pitch for The Lone Gunmen.

    3. Re:hmm.. by Capt.+Murphy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firefly is going to be a motion picture now. Called "Serenity" with possible sequels depending on how well it does.

    4. Re:hmm.. by Loren_Burlingame · · Score: 1

      Sadly I only became a fan of this show after it was already canceled. Here's hoping that Serenity drums up enough support that they revive this great series.

    5. Re:hmm.. by Shky · · Score: 1

      A better list is:
      Farscape
      Family Guy
      (both we got back, at least somewhat)
      Firefly (at least we're getting the movie)
      Futurama --- we still need to work on this one.

      --
      CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
    6. Re:hmm.. by Crimson+Midget · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Firefly!

    7. Re:hmm.. by SB5 · · Score: 1

      Its a conspiracy against the capital letter F.

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    8. Re:hmm.. by j14ast · · Score: 1

      must resist... damnit.
      Olson twins...
      hot grits...
      not jail-bait...

      oh hell I'm only 20 they're 18ish. Why do I feel so dirty?

      --
      Damn the man!
    9. Re:hmm.. by isorox · · Score: 1

      A 2 hour movie every couple of years? I'll take 25 40 minute episodes thanks. It looks like there's no chance of a TV series revival even if it tops $100million.

  7. This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by Pacifix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm still mourning Firefly. The movie's in production, but I don't want 10 episodes and a movie. I want 7 years of shows and 10 movies. And then many, many more spin offs. (Inara's brothel - a wacky situation comedy? Jayne and his cohorts, an A-Team for the 25th century?).

    1. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by doormat · · Score: 4, Funny

      I pity the foo' whos a [cursing in mandarin chinese]

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    2. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by thebdj · · Score: 1

      What you want is Star Trek? I mean seriously anyone who thinks that any sci-fi television show (or possibly any TV show) is going to create as much success as Star Trek needs to get their head examined. Firefly was not that good. The only Whedon show I liked was Angel.

      Back on topic to Farscape though, the show was actually fairly good early on, and then things got pretty weird, pretty fast and then the Sci-Fi channel found much better shows including the Stargates.

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    3. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by Chuckaluphagus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      See, I'll disagree with you on that: I think the show started off a little slow (not bad, just getting up to speed), and got better the further it went along. My favorite season was the third, but the fourth was still excellent. I'm a big fan of shows that have serial storylines, as opposed to being more episodic, and Farscape started off episodic and became more serial the longer it went on.

    4. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, have no taste.

      The only problem with the later Farscapes is that if you missed an episode, you were screwed.

      And you imply that Firefly is not as good as Star Trek. Die.

    5. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Stargate is definitely episodic. This is part of the reason why I like Farscape more. The characters in Farscape are also more realistic/human. They are not perfect logical beings always making the right decision at every moment. Most of the time, they don't know what the right decision is, so they just go with the flow and hope for the best. Contrast this with Stargate or Star Trek, where every move is perfect, everyone talks like they've got PhD's, and although mistakes can be made, they are always fixed by the end of the episode. Stargate is alright, just not in large doses.

    6. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by AlphaJoe · · Score: 1

      No doubt, Firefly was awesome. I am in hopes that the movie will spawn interest from tv execs, and maybe we will see firefly come back to TV with more episodes.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    7. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by AlphaJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you want is Star Trek? I mean seriously anyone who thinks that any sci-fi television show (or possibly any TV show) is going to create as much success as Star Trek needs to get their head examined.

      What the hell are you talking about? Who said anything about Star Trek? You are ripping on someone for something that was never said. Maybe you should take off the Klingon makeup and read the post again F I R E F L Y....one of the most innnovative sci-fi series in a while.

      Sheez.....You are as bad as the people who bash the new star wars movies because it is the hip thing to do...you make yourself look the fool...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    8. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Back on topic to Farscape though, the show was actually fairly good early on, and then things got pretty weird, pretty fast and then the Sci-Fi channel found much better shows including the Stargates.

      You've gotta be kidding. Grunts in Space is better? At least Farscape wasn't predictable. There was a plot and a continuing story line that was never completed because it was axed. If being different makes it weird, then I guess I like weird scifi. I just hope they finish the story this time, and I hope Aeryn and John and the baby are all together at the end. *sniffle*

    9. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      I dont get what people liked about Firefly... I saw it when it came out, and I found it very boring :/ maybe its just me, but enlighten me please.

    10. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by thebdj · · Score: 1

      ummm...7 yrs of TV Shows and 10 movies. He basically referenced Star Trek. Go back and read again.

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    11. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you flew off the handle, misunderstood the indirect reference, and basically demonstrated the emotional and comprehensive ability of a 6 year old.

      Now the rest of the internet knows you're a jackass AND a fool.

      Your work is done for the day.

      Or in the words of Nelson: HA HA.

    12. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      I'll disagree with you on the part about the characters in SG-1 being perfect.

      Granted, more often then not they take Jack's imperfection out to the extreme, but not everyone talks like they have PhD's. :)

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    13. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by cdipierr · · Score: 1

      Alas, the terms by which Universal picked up the movie rights from Fox prohibt them from making a TV show for a good long while. However, they have committed to making 2 more movies if the first one does well.

      The movie ("Serenity") is in post production, and will come out 4/22/2005. The decision by which Universal will judge success is primarily opening weekend box office numbers.

    14. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by ahknight · · Score: 1

      Star Trek had either significantly less or more than seven years if you want to get pedantic. Three for the first one or 24 if you put all four series together (3 TOS + 7 TNG + 7 DS9 + 7 VOY; 27 if you want to include the three years of the disaster-in-progress).

      Ten movies seems specifically Trek ... or Friday the 13th or Nightmare on Elm or, at the current rate, the Alien.* movies.

      Seems ambiguous after all, doesn't it? :) Seven years is the typical run for a decent series (if SG-1 wasn't such a cash-cow it would have also died in season 7; the writers expected as much when they killed off Frasier). So, the numbers are rather generic there.

    15. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by Pacifix · · Score: 1

      For the love of Kaylee, chill. I was indeed referencing Star Trek. My point was that if Star Trek and its recent mediocrity - I'm 25, so I'm a TNG man - gets all that airtime, how can a gem like Firefly get canned after only 8 episodes.

    16. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by ahknight · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's Slashdot. Useless pedanticness is encouraged, worshipped, adored.

      And if TNG was the only Trek in your mind well ... I'm so sorry it works that way.

    17. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by Y2 · · Score: 1
      Maybe you should take off the Klingon makeup and read the post again F I R E F L Y....one of the most innnovative sci-fi series in a while.
      Was that the show where the pilot involved a space ship flying over an old west train robbery? That lost me from the audience and I never heard anything that made me regret turning away.
      --
      "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
    18. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by tommyboyprime · · Score: 1

      I hope the movie and fan reaction (buying tickets) puts the idea in the heads of the money men. I didn't watch it much when it was on TV, but I bought the DVD collection and couldn't put it down.

      --
      This parrot has ceased to be!
    19. Re:This is good news, but I would prefer Firefly by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Buy the DVDs. There were 14 episodes of Firefly. The DVDs have 3 episodes they didn't show on TV (and those episodes were just as excellent as the rest of the series).

  8. Crackers DO matter! by loggia · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you mod this down, obviously you are NOT a Farscape fan!

    1. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad I canceled my cable television a year ago. The only show I watched was Farscape. No reason to keep paying $100+/mo for cable television for one show - especially when they cancel that one show.

      I'll wait a few days for it tos how up on a torrent.

    2. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Leto-II · · Score: 1

      I'll wait a few days for it tos how up on a torrent.

      You probably don't have to wait that long. Shows usually appear online after a few hours at most.

      --
      Do not anger the worm.
    3. Re:Crackers DO matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hope to God
      Smack me dead
      stick a lobster
      on my head.

  9. different circumstances by _defiant_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unlike Farscape, Babylon5 wasn't canceled. JMS planned for 5 seasons, and although it was rough at times, he got all of them. Everything was wrapped up; the show is done.

    I do think there is a movie in the works, but they had better hurry up. The actors keep dying.

    (yes, I love both B5 and Farscape... but probably B5 more)

    1. Re:different circumstances by Drakino · · Score: 2, Informative

      Babylon 5 almost did get cancelled early. There was enough information before the 4th season started that a fifth might not occur that JMS scrunched the plans for 4 and 5 togther. The Shadow war should have been all of season 4, and the fight towards Earth as the 5th season. This is why the Shadow War seems to end oddly, he rushed it to get more of the season dedicated to the more human aspect.

      TNT bought the rights for the show and gave life to the 5th season and the movies. JMS came up with a season wrapped around the stuff he has created after Earth was retaken. He also went to start a new series, Crusade, but TNT botched that to hell and both parties mutually ended it. TNT wouldn't even air the episodes in the proper order.

      JMS tried again with SciFi with The Legend of the Rangers. All of it had been planned out and an air date set. Then 9/11/01 occured, delaying the NFL season. This pushed a critical post game show onto the timespot of the new series movie, and SciFi refused to move it. Due to people watching the game, the show didn't get the raitings SciFi wanted to continue it on as a series. Even though on the west coast where it didn't compete with the game it rated higher then most of SciFi's other shows.

    2. Re:different circumstances by Trikenstein · · Score: 1

      Which actors have died?

    3. Re:different circumstances by decep · · Score: 1

      The only one I am aware of is Richard Biggs (the doctor).

  10. The Second Episode... by Myrmi · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Second episode is going to be aired on the Monday - i.e. the day after - and not in the same slot the following Sunday.

    --
    "I think everyone is an agnostic but just doesn't know" - Frazz
    1. Re:The Second Episode... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      So it's just the two parts? Part one on Sunday, part two on Monday? (Note: Get out blank tapes)

      Wish it were longer, but if it wraps up the series a bit better then the "last" episode, I'm all for it.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:The Second Episode... by Myrmi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but each part lasts two hours.

      --
      "I think everyone is an agnostic but just doesn't know" - Frazz
  11. A bit late... by cqnn · · Score: 1

    This topic is getting posted on the tail end of the 11 day farscape marathon that the
    Sci-Fi channel just finished. That was better news for me, as I was (mostly) able
    to catch up on the series by Tivo'ing the episodes.

    1. Re:A bit late... by tukkayoot · · Score: 1
      This topic is getting posted on the tail end of the 11 day farscape marathon that the Sci-Fi channel just finished. That was better news for me, as I was (mostly) able to catch up on the series by Tivo'ing the episodes.

      Oh, damn. That is painful to hear. I wish someone had told me. :( I still haven't seen all of the 3rd/4th season episodes, it would have been really nice to catch up on them before the miniseries. That sucks.

    2. Re:A bit late... by Sevn · · Score: 1

      http://69.50.170.99/sn/list_torrents/tvshows.html

      look for farscape. better hurry

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    3. Re:A bit late... by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      yeah seriously...the marathon was awesome and the commercials for this new mini-series have been on sci-fi for months...basically any geek who watches the sci-fi channel already knows (And probably anyone who cares about farscape does watch the sci-fi channel)

  12. Farscape is cool by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    I discovered this about three weeks ago.

    Oddly enough, I discovered how cool Stargate is just three months ago.

    1. Re:Farscape is cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto =) you might also want to look into Jeremiah... a lot of the actors from stargate, and a lot of the people behind the scenes are in it... its good =)

    2. Re:Farscape is cool by jagilbertvt · · Score: 1

      Jeremiah is a cool series, too bad it was basically cancelled halfway through the second season.

    3. Re:Farscape is cool by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Stargate is a bit of a sleeper. I had watched it off and on since the beginning, thought it was ok ... then after a few years, at some point I realised I got pissed off when a season ended and there was no Stargate on TV. Damn you, McGuyver, now I'm addicted!

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  13. UK TV?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok am i being stupid...?

    Is Sci-Fi channel the same for both Uk and US?

    Is this scehdule the same for UK? will i be smiling all tomorrow at last after months of waiting and feeling down?

    thanks!

    1. Re:UK TV?? by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Informative

      From SciFi UK's website, it doesn't look like they'll be playing the Farscape miniseries. Another brilliant move on their part. They obviously needed the money to finish up their next masterpiece, Avalanche: Nature Unleashed In the Form of a Steaming Pile of Shit.

    2. Re:UK TV?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww...that's too bad. We get them both. ANd what the hell is a super avalanche? All the snow on the mountain falls off? Joy.

    3. Re:UK TV?? by BaseLineNL · · Score: 1

      The BBC is currently reviewing a tape. Based on the results it will be announced if and when the mini will be shown.

  14. Chiana's Eyes - new contacts? by Kozz · · Score: 1

    Why in the world, after several seasons of having Chiana with "normal" eyes would they decide to give her contacts giving the appearance of "cat-like" vertical pupils? Anybody else notice this? I think it makes her look a bit more nefarious than she really is.

    Didn't see the cat-eyes? Check out the trailer (there's about a half-second where I saw it) or check the photos at scifi.com/farscape.

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    1. Re:Chiana's Eyes - new contacts? by azadam · · Score: 1

      I think that was 'cause she burned out her vision in the last (or near the last) episode doing her Madame Zolta psychic trick...

    2. Re:Chiana's Eyes - new contacts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cat eyes?

      Maybe you didn't pay attention to a good deal of the last season, or the final episode...

      You know, that whole 'I see the future/too much complex detail, and now I'm blind' thing.

    3. Re:Chiana's Eyes - new contacts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      She became blind in the last episode of S4 - 'Bad Timing'. The crew said the first thing they'd do was to visit a Surgeon. They probably do that in the mini.

    4. Re:Chiana's Eyes - new contacts? by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My guess is that she's blind, or had to have new eyes put in. Watch the last episode of Farscape.

    5. Re:Chiana's Eyes - new contacts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this might be related to her unfortunate condition. At the end of the last episode of the series Chiana was still blind - so I guess we might assume these were still the "blind chiana" contacts in that trailer.

      I hope the blindness is not permanent. I would like to see some of the good old seductive "I kick ass" Chi rather than blind, helpless and freaked out Chiana from the end of S4.

    6. Re:Chiana's Eyes - new contacts? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Damn, see, i'd nearly forgotten about that. I've got almost every single FS episode ripped to SVCD except for the final four episodes.

      Any idea where I can find a torrent for that final episode (4x22, "Bad Timing")? I've checked suprnova, tvtorrents, and googled for it. Even checked alt.binaries.tv.farscape (which is still loading all the thousands of headers, very slowly). :(

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    7. Re:Chiana's Eyes - new contacts? by gerddie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Look here, no torrent but better quality ;-)

    8. Re:Chiana's Eyes - new contacts? by downundarob · · Score: 1

      Can't say Ive ever looked at Chiana's eyes, cant say I care either, she's still a hottie.

      Natalie Portman loses out to Gigi Edgley any day of the week.

  15. Ben Browder by datadriven · · Score: 0

    was on the Screen Savers last week also.

    Too bad he got interviewed by Alex, who has a voice like a dog chew toy.

    1. Re:Ben Browder by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      He was supposed to be on Fox News as well, according to watchfarscape.com but they only ended up showing a plug for the new miniseries. Apparently, he was on the Late Late Show yesterday, though I missed it.

  16. other shows by aggieben · · Score: 0

    in related news...

    Stargate SG-1 has a new season underway and Stargate Atlantis is just getting started.

    (I prefer Starget to Farscape)

    --
    Don't become a regular here, you will become retarded. -- Yoda the Retard
    1. Re:other shows by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I think they're both on hiatus until January, though I could be wrong.

      I like the new show 'Lost' quite a bit, plus the Sigfried & Roy bits of 'Father of the Pride' are freaking brilliant at times (especially the 7-11 episode).

      "I want the 'Ahh'!"

    2. Re:other shows by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

      I think SG1 should have ended last season. The current eps are just kind.. there. The big fight at the end was a perfect ending point to the series. As for Atlantis, it's also just blah. Also the bigbads from that show kind of suck.. mostly because the concept of 'life force' is lame.

    3. Re:other shows by VikingBrad · · Score: 1
      Look out for Claudia Black who has a guest spot in an upcoming Stargate episode.

      Cheers
      VikingBrad

  17. Re:Foxtrot already announced that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only old news is your announcement that Fox Trot already announced it. Look at the top post.

  18. Futurama! by antdude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I want Futurama back! :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Futurama! by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      I'll second that... Gutted they killed it.

    2. Re:Futurama! by hookedup · · Score: 1

      yeah, i'll vote for that too, didnt even think of it..

      what a great show.

    3. Re:Futurama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so do I

  19. Who Cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Bring back Firefly!

  20. Um, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just watch Muppets in Space. It's the same thing.

    Farscape is teh sux0r.

    1. Re:Um, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol!! It's true!

  21. You don't necessarily need to catch up... by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From Brian Henson's statements here:

    "Our intention is that new audiences should be able to follow this, but they will have to concentrate hard."

    He also says that the miniseries will "bring Farscape to a place in the big story where we could now go in lots of different directions. We could make a movie, we could make a spin-off series, and I hope to do all of those things."

    This all depends on the success of the miniseries though, so even if you're new, even if you're a Trekkie, you should still tune in. Give SciFi a reason to stop making the sub-B garbage they're constantly spewing out and stick with what works.

    1. Re:You don't necessarily need to catch up... by xski · · Score: 1

      Give SciFi a reason to stop making the sub-B garbage they're constantly spewing out and stick with what works.

      What? You mean you don't like Tremors?

      Excuse me, I must vomit now.

  22. Direct File Link by juggy · · Score: 3, Informative
  23. About time too.. by Linker3000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I lent them that Sunday ages ago

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  24. Get It Over With by Space_Soldier · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oooh Farscape! Why doesn't John get married to that alien already so we can have the series end. They keep dragging it and dragging it. It's like a soap opera in space. It's freakin annoying. But I must admit, they do have some sexy Australian/New Zealand aliens on that show.

    1. Re:Get It Over With by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      In other news, Space Soldier seriously thinks he's gonna get a free ipod outta that bullshit scam.

    2. Re:Get It Over With by vsprintf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why doesn't John get married to that alien already so we can have the series end. They keep dragging it and dragging it. It's like a soap opera in space. It's freakin annoying.

      Well, if you'd actually watched it, you'd know that John was avoiding Aeryn because Scorpi was watching them, and John didn't want Scorpi to be able to use Aeryn and the coming baby as leverage against him. All scifi series are space soap operas. Farscape was the most innovative scifi around. Unfortunately, the TV channels, and most viewers, just want yet another Star Trek with a different cast.

  25. How are they going to handle... by anotherone · · Score: 2
    At the end of the very last episode, (and don't read any further if you haven't seen it already)

    John and Aeryn are melted into a billion M&Ms. How are they going to get around that? And I'm hoping it's not just "All a dream!"

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:How are they going to handle... by brian0918 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think they've ever done a "this is all a dream" type of episode. Several of them came close, but at the end it turns out to be part of the plot, and important.

      SPOILERS:

      My guess is either they were cloned at some point, or those laser blasters teleported them somewhere and left fake shells behind to be destroyed, so that everyone will think they're dead. It's also possible that the John and Aeryn you see at the end of the episode are actually those robotic replacements we've seen before (Aeryn, Stark).

    2. Re:How are they going to handle... by FroBugg · · Score: 1

      I figured that it wasn't a weapon designed to kill, but to subdue. A bounty hunter would love a gun that could break their quarry down into little Lego-sized bits as long as they've got a device that'll take all those bits and reassemble them later.

      The last episode wasn't intended to be the last, so of course they weren't supposed to actually die there. It was just a dramatic cliffhanger.

    3. Re:How are they going to handle... by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      The alien gunner at the end of the last episode was not a bounty hunter. The words from his controller were something like "Neutralize target to study later," so I'm subscribing to the theory that the weapon simply put them into some sort of suspended animation (ala the time John was supposed to be married to that princess and was turned into a statue, only more advanced).

      Anyway, both of them are in the trailers, so they aren't dead.

      --
      stuff
    4. Re:How are they going to handle... by the+gnat · · Score: 2, Informative

      One preview I read that had access to a few select scenes (shown at a geek convention, maybe) showed some clips, one of which is John and Aeryn apparently just having been re-assembled. First thing John asks D'Argo is "How long were we out?" You can also find still frames that show the same weird aliens whose faces come apart.

      There's nothing particularly significant about the supposed "death" at the end of the 4th season; they killed Aeryn in season 2 too, remember? (Of course, they killed off other main characters who didn't come back, which is part of what makes the series cool, but the season ender was meant to be a cliffhanger.)

    5. Re:How are they going to handle... by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      That's what I got out of the last episode also, that it was meant to be a cliff hanger.

      --
      stuff
    6. Re:How are they going to handle... by anotherone · · Score: 1

      they lost a bunch of the marbles over the side of the boat... so they're each going to be a few inches shorter.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
  26. w00t! by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

    Well frell me dead. Anyone knows if it'll be available to Canadian viewers (e.g. Space) ?

    --
    Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    1. Re:w00t! by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing sometime in December, although I can't back that up with any proof.

      Look at the Battlestar Galactica miniseries. We got it here a few months after the States.

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    2. Re:w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bit torrent?

  27. Muppets 0, Farscape 1 (slightly NSFW) by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sorry but the Muppets haven't got anything to compare with This!

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:Muppets 0, Farscape 1 (slightly NSFW) by MouseR · · Score: 1

      NOT WORK SAFE

      -1 Porn

    2. Re:Muppets 0, Farscape 1 (slightly NSFW) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want nudes of her in her makeup....

      mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
      *splat*

    3. Re:Muppets 0, Farscape 1 (slightly NSFW) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's a typical stuffy mainstream America attitude.. you should mean:
      +1 Erotica
      Of course, you'd probably also rate explicit violence something like:
      +1 Violence
      I will never understand the American lust for TV and film violence - coupled with the extreme fear of sexuality.
    4. Re:Muppets 0, Farscape 1 (slightly NSFW) by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Dear me, you have led a sheltered life if you think topless glamour shots are porn.

      I see a very attractive woman, no more - perhaps we have different standards, or your mind works at a differnt level.

      L3K

      PS: Go look up NSFW

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    5. Re:Muppets 0, Farscape 1 (slightly NSFW) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, she isn't that good looking. Maybe if you like young boys.

      Now show me some pics of that firey red chick that was on towards the last episodes. Man, now that would be hot!

  28. where?! by odyrithm · · Score: 1

    would it kill to mention where? the world != US, UK, etc the internet == world, tv != world.

    --
    moo
    1. Re:where?! by BaseLineNL · · Score: 1

      Sci-Fi Channel (United States)

    2. Re:where?! by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

      Yes but now because of the Internet the rest of the world will soon after it being aired in the states will be able to D/L them. This really highlights the need for more international release dates.

      SG-1 is strange one. It starts in the states 1st but they have a mid season break. In this time the airing on SKY in the UK catches and passes the US schedule.

  29. Waiting & hoping by mcubed · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm an atypical Farscape fan in that I'm not much of a television watcher, nor particularly a fan of sci-fi in general. I started watching Farscape intermittently during the first season, and found the show's atmosphere and look intriguing, its characters compelling, and its writing witty and sharp (for television, anyway). By the second season, I was hooked all the way through the third. It was space opera in all its glory -- unafraid to go for the grand gesture, to take its time to build to climaxes that were genuinely climactic because of it. Unlike on many shows ("Andromeda" for instance), characters didn't fall in love, get betrayed, and learn important life lessons all in the space of 43 minutes. And it wasn't, like so many shows, "something else" in space (Firefly="western in space," Stargate="F-Troop in space" -- yawn). And unlike Wheedon shows (particularly "Buffy") I've sampled, it didn't rely on cheesy pop music for emotional resonance it couldn't drum up on its own. (Though, in fairness to Wheedon, other shows and countless movies do this too. Queue: heartbreak; soundtrack: R.E.M., "Everything Hurts.")

    But then in the fourth season it ran out of ideas and began repeating itself, not to mention hitting an all-time low by using the Challenger disaster as a plot device. (To quote Lynne Cheney: "cheap and tawdry.") It makes me wonder if it is even possible to maintain the level of quality Farscape attained over multiple seasons. Maybe this is only because I'm not much of a television viewer, but I find that most TV shows are so mundane because they so often seem to be filling up airtime. A show like Farscape, I think, would be better suited to mini-series events like this one, although longer than four hours would be better. I'm psyched to watch this, and I hope it's good, and if it is, I hope there will be more -- six hours here, eight hours there, whatever the ideas the writers come up with can sustain. That kind of thing could work so much better for a show like Farcape than a "fifth season," I think, which is why, as much as I once liked the show, I could never really get behind a campaign like "Save Farscape."

    Michael

    --
    "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    1. Re:Waiting & hoping by discord5 · · Score: 1
      characters didn't fall in love, get betrayed, and learn important life lessons all in the space of 43 minutes

      No, they take 42 episodes to find out they don't hate eachother, then another 42 episodes to find out whose baby it really is, and they get shot down after proposal for marriage.

      And it wasn't, like so many shows, "something else" in space

      No, it's soap opera in space.

      I like farscape, but I'm not afraid to admit that it is a soap opera. The overly long drama between Aerin and Crighton gets old somewhere in season 3. The entire Scorpion joins them for 2 seasons only to be booted off the leviathan together with his limb-reattaching love slave and a nuclear bomb attached to his person was just overly dramatic. Never mind the fact that there's nympho on board ready to jump anything that even hints at being male, and occasionally female.

      Queue: heartbreak; soundtrack: R.E.M., "Everything Hurts."

      I believe that the songs name is "Everybody Hurts", and yes, it's the typical teeny-needs-a-good-cry-because-this-show-is-really -so-emotional song

      whatever the ideas the writers come up with can sustain

      I bet one of them is going "Oh, I know... Timetravel!!!" right now, provoking some sharks for when it's time to jump.

      I agree with you for the most part. I enjoyed season 1 and 2 greatly, and even season 3. But the entire wormhole thing is getting old, and if this miniseries doesn't give the show a new angle I'm afraid it's going to jump the proverbial shark.

    2. Re:Waiting & hoping by anotherone · · Score: 1

      They've DONE time travel, and if you ask me, they did it well.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    3. Re:Waiting & hoping by mlylecarlin · · Score: 1

      Michael? Michael Jackson?

  30. DITTO!!!! by danalien · · Score: 1
    2nd favorite show _ever_, since the simpsons....

    But, I can't help wonder if we the fans couldn't get it back - I don't mean on TV ... but try something totally 'of the future' ... where we the fans would finace it, pay 'them' (the artists and matt-of-the-simpsons... etc) to make them, and 'we the project' would take care of the distribution&the.small.payment to get/watch the show. I really do think that there are enough futurama fans around the world to sustain production of futurama ... and even enough that there would be same profits over for 'them'.

    Then again, we'd have to *litterally* start doing stuff (setting up a website, wake peoples attention, contact matt&who.ever.else ... etc) ... and not just spew 'idéas' here on slashdot.

    I'm in, I mean it, but I think there has to be others as well who'd be interested in helping getting the 'project' to overcome the initial inertia that is associated with such an undertaking :)

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  31. Definitely NSFW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need to get a job where you're working if that page is only slightly NSFW!

    Hell, considering the ads that sometimes appear on Robb's Celebrity OOps I wouldn't be surprised if that page might sometimes be NSFW at the Playboy offices!

    1. Re:Definitely NSFW! by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Benefits of an office at home!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  32. BTW, if anyone was wondering... by danalien · · Score: 1
    what the heck/hell I'm thinking/talking about

    Please read: This Thread I'm having with 'geg81' ... all the way to my last comment/reply: 'Global Digital Content Archive/With Variable PayPerView Content' - MultiCasting

    That ought to make clear xor clearer a few things, that someone might had been wondering ...

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
    1. Re:BTW, if anyone was wondering... by Zach+Garner · · Score: 1

      That ought to make clear xor clearer a few things

      Your logic is incorrect. You deliberately use exclusive or, indicating that what you linked to ought to make things either clear or clearer but not both. This effectively means that what you linked to will not make things clear, unless it was already clear to begin with (since moving from unclear to clear is the excluded 'clearer' action).

      You probably should stick with something like "that ought to make things clear, or at least clearer".

    2. Re:BTW, if anyone was wondering... by danalien · · Score: 1
      • >You deliberately use exclusive or, indicating that what you linked to ought to make things either clear or clearer but not both.
      Exactly, as it's defined: 0 XOR 0 = 0 0 XOR 1 = 1 1 XOR 0 = 1 1 XOR 1 = 0

      • >You probably should stick with something like "that ought to make things clear, or at least clearer".

        AND

        >Your logic is incorrect

      Em' no, I think my 'logic gate(s)' are in-check/just fine (look-up/at 'OR' and 'XOR' in the url) ...my 'kernel' couldn't cope with the statement where both 'clear' & 'clearer' would have been true at the same time... it would just have 'kernel panic'-ed in a atto second :-)
      --
      I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  33. Now This Is Being Mentioned? by nirvanagod · · Score: 1

    This series was being filmed at the end of last year, and annouced at the begining of this year. The trailer has been out for 2 months, and the series marathon started two weeks ago monday. Good to see the "net" folk are quick to keep up with the times. Anyways it's about time they put it back on the air even if it's only 4 hours. Good to see that Sci-Fi likes to be hypocritical with their standards. "Oh Farscape costs to much. Lets develop tremors the series (failed btw), and pump the money we save from dumping Farscape into that Stargate deal with that MacGuyver guy". Wonderful, dontcha think? I Liked MacGuyver, but Stargate sucks ****. So deal.

    1. Re:Now This Is Being Mentioned? by Gil-galad55 · · Score: 1

      You see, generally things get announced shortly before they happen so that people remember them. And Stargate rocks out, okay?

      --

      To follow knowledge like a sinking star, / Beyond the utmost bound of human thought. ("Ulysses", Tennyson)

    2. Re:Now This Is Being Mentioned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww, is there too little spaceship and too much thinking and logic involved in Stargate for your little brain?

  34. Sponcered by KFC by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is going to be the only time in my life that I'm ever going to buy a product based on what they sponcer. I have full plans on sunday to buy a bucket of chicken, cut it into post cards, and send a note to KFC thanking them for sponcering the mini series. This isn't my idea but never the less it's a good one.

    I would reccomend that anyone else do the same and send little postcards made from KFC buckets to the following addresses:

    Melanie Dyer
    Associate Media Manager
    Kentucky Fried Chicken
    1441 Gardiner Lane
    Louisville, KY 40213

    John Gilbert
    Chief Marketing Officer
    Kentucky Fried Chicken
    1441 Gardiner Lane
    Louisville, KY 40213


    If your a vegitarian... get potatos. It's time to get off our ez chairs and do something about this flood of reality TV and make it clear to the sponcers what we want them to support.
    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Sponcered by KFC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If your a vegitarian... get potatos"

      I liked DBZ too. But what if the person doesn't eat meat?

    2. Re:Sponcered by KFC by doormat · · Score: 1

      A couple KFCs in my city have been busted for cooking and selling green chicken to customers. Ick. No Thanks.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    3. Re:Sponcered by KFC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, I'm going to boycott KFC because they're just putting more crap on the tube. Idiots.

      BTW, u speel teh sux0r.

    4. Re:Sponcered by KFC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't chicken, it was Quatal molluscs. They're doing a farscape cross-promotion.

    5. Re:Sponcered by KFC by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      A couple KFCs in my city have been busted for cooking and selling green chicken to customers. Ick. No Thanks.

      Then by all means go buy anything, go in ask for a lid. Cut lid to the correct size and write in polite terms, "While I did not buy your product due to recently sited health code violations, I would like to take this time to say thank you for sponsoring Farscape". Or heck, pay the extra 12cents or so and mail them the lid.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  35. The Mini-Season 5 by Thedalek · · Score: 1

    So now all that needs to happen to completely round out season 5 is for SciFi to make 5 of these mini-series, with the 5th one lasting 3 nights instead of 2. That would give us a full 990 minutes, or the equivalent of 22 45-minute episodes.

    Unless they wimp out and try to completely wrap up the loose ends in tomorrow's show, which would be a mistake: It's probably going to have the highest ratings of anything SciFi will show for a good long time.

    Of course, that sort of depends on when the new SG-1 and Atlantis episodes start back up.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    1. Re:The Mini-Season 5 by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      From what Brian Henson said here, it doesn't sound like they're trying to wrap it up:

      "Part of the plan was to bring Farscape to a place in the big story where we could now go in lots of diffrent directions. We could make a movie, we could make a spin-off series, and I hope to do all of those things."

    2. Re:The Mini-Season 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, there was a rumor that the miniseries has series 4 production numbers: 423, 424, 425 and 426.

      So presumably the creators don't see these as being a full part of season 5, more like part 4-and-a-half.

  36. Farscape Ruins Sundays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sorry, in my half sleeping / almost reading slashdot state I read the tile as Farscape Ruins Sundays.

  37. Matt Roush's Preview by DeltaBlaster · · Score: 1

    Matt Roush at TVGuide posted an article about the mini series that made me want to wait for it even more. http://www.tvguide.com/tv/roush/dispatches/

    --
    (This Space For Rent) ....($50 A Month).... (Contact The Voices In Your Head)
  38. damnit, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, if you watch SciFi at all, you're already going to be WELL aware of this. After all, they play atleast 5 commercials for it every hour. If you don't watch SciFi, chances are you aren't going to care.

    So, just out of curiousity, why is there an ad for it here? SciFi has gotten abusive with their advertising, we don't need to reward them with more free advertising on a site like /. People NEED to be complaining to SciFi about the advertising practices.

    1. Re:damnit, why? by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

      I have to agree about the commercials on SciFi. Don't they realize that people get sick of seeing the same thing repeatedly, over months? I've been working out of town, and haven't watched much lately, but I remember reaching the point where I was sickened at the idea of watching something that had been advertised infinity-squared times. I'd change the station, turn off the TV, anything to stop the assault. I remember seeing the initial advertisement for the Farscape miniseries (Yeah!), then seeing that it was going to be some MONTHs away. Forget it, I can't maintain my anticipation that long.

      Just tease me, don't send a giant to tackle me.

    2. Re:damnit, why? by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that SciFi has determined that most of their audience doesn't spend most of the day watching only SciFi. People probably tune in for something they want to watch (such as Pythons 2, or the masterpiece Avalanche: Unleashed) then turn it off when the other garbage (Stargate, Farscape) is on. So, they're just trying to pull in everyone they can.

    3. Re:damnit, why? by Starsmore · · Score: 1

      Frighteningly enough, you just described the watching habits of every idiot with a Neilson box. :)

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    4. Re:damnit, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have cable TV - I can't stand the commercials. I've been watching Farscape on DVD.

      Without this Slashdot article, I would have had no knowledge of the miniseries airing this weekend. And I'll wait for it to come out on DVD before I see it anyway.

      I do wonder if the creators could manage to do a direct-to-DVD series like a lot of anime does in Japan - any and all Farscape would be a definite purchase for me. Actually, I'd most like to see a new TV content creation model. Some sort of direct-purchase system - content creators being paid directly by viewers for producing content that they want to see. With the internet as a subscription, billing and possibly also distribution method (although I think I'd like the option of being mailed a new DVD every few weeks) - this sort of thing would have been impossible in the past, but would be super-easy to do today.

      It takes about 2 weeks to make a complete TV episode of a series - you could even have people paying 2 weeks in advance, have the show delivered to them when they're finished. Advance orders determine the budget for a particular show and the show keeps pumping out episodes for as long as there are people willing to pay for them.

      It would sort of be like selling videogames online like Valve's Steam - but for movies / episodic shows. It would obsolete TV networks and finally make advertising leave television the hell alone.

      I'd pay $5 an episode for a 20-episode series of Farscape. If you can find 500,000 other people also willing to pay, you've got a budget of $2 million a pop (assuming it costs no more than $4 to print and mail a DVD to me with a batch of 4 episodes on it).

  39. Farscape Screensaver by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Informative

    KFC has released a new Farscape screensaver here

    Even if you don't plan on using the screensave, please fill out the form (bogus info if you want) and download it. Increase their download count so they know people are interested in the show. They've already contacted the likes of UPN to say that they would advertise on the network if they picked up Farscape.

    So, show them you care, even if you don't. The more money that goes to Farscape, the less that goes to SciFi's sub-B "Original" movies.

    1. Re:Farscape Screensaver by totoanihilation · · Score: 1

      I wanted to download the screensaver, but it asks for a birthdate. Entering ANY birthdate will give you a page telling you you're too young to visit that part of the site. I tried 1901 for a birth year and it STILL didn't work. And did you know there were only 13 days in the month of September of 1901?
      Is that an effect of slashdotting, or a really poorly designed site?

    2. Re:Farscape Screensaver by epimorphism · · Score: 1

      I entered my birthdate in August of 1982 and got to the download page alright. :/

  40. Farscape first-timer by kaptkudzoo · · Score: 1

    I've never watched Farscape, but the trailer looks interesting. How much of a continuation is it? Is it worth it to me to watch it?

  41. Four hour mini series on Sci Fi: by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1
    Will break down into:
    • 40 minutes of commercial solicitation
    • 5 minutes of station identification
    • Leaving 75 minutes of actual action, per night
    Which leads me to wish that they'd just gone straight to DVD release.
    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
  42. You don't need to see the whole series by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    As I stated in an above post:

    From Brian Henson's statements:

    "Our intention is that new audiences should be able to follow this, but they will have to concentrate hard."

    He also says that the miniseries will "bring Farscape to a place in the big story where we could now go in lots of different directions. We could make a movie, we could make a spin-off series, and I hope to do all of those things."

    This all depends on the success of the miniseries though, so even if you're new, even if you're a Trekkie, you should still tune in. Give SciFi a reason to stop making the sub-B garbage they're constantly spewing out and stick with what works.

  43. The big flick.... by Vash_066 · · Score: 1

    Well to anyone who can stomach watching the Screen Savers Ben Browder was on the other night and talked about the possibility of a motion picture depending on how well this does.