Slashdot Mirror


DIY High-Quality XGA Projector for ~$300

ranrub writes "Tom's Hardware Guide posted a guide to building your own XGA LCD projector from parts costing under $300. Major components are an overhead projector and a used 15" LCD screen. They even have a movie of the whole project on site! It's quite bigger and noisier than a standard projector, but most of our living rooms look like electronic junkyards anyway, don't they?"

172 comments

  1. Funk that Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I'll spend the 300 hundreds and mod my PC case to dispense ice cold Bawls.

    1. Re:Funk that Jim by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      I think I'll spend the 300 hundreds and mod my PC case to dispense ice cold Bawls.

      This is not a bell/whistle.

      I've been waiting years for LCD display prices to come down to earth but they aren't. LCD technology isn't limited to the traditional 'boxy' dimensions that CRTs are, but manufacturers just insist on making them that way! There are many of us who'd love to see a 30" wide X 19" high display, but these screens are still selling at close to $1000. I even know a guy who bought two 19" LCD monitors and put them side-by-side so he can watch letterbox DVDs on his computer. I asked him about the small(sarcasm) problem of the 1"-thick black bar running down the center of the screen(from the edges of the two LCD monitors making contact in the center). He said that he actually enjoys the letterbox+full-size screen so much that he just forced himself to get used to the missing 1" center line.

      If that's not someone who's bending over backwards to get a widescreen LCD I don't know who is. Unfortunately since LCD/Plasma displays are still prohibitively expensive to those of us who want to watch movies and play wide-screen supported games on our PCs, there's only one realistic option, and that's projectors.

      I spent the last week checking ebay and other wholesale projector outlets only to be further frustrated by learning that these are also selling at the $1000 pricepoint. These guys are pricing out a huge demographic of people who want widescreen displays for home use. It's a shame, and it's frustrating for those of us who are living on planet earth and can't afford to drop $1000!

      When I saw this headline for a $300 solution my pulse rate doubled! I haven't been this excited to read a slashdot article in weeks. Well umm, time to read the article *cough*.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    2. Re:Funk that Jim by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Why not just buy a HD-TV widescreen, and connect that to the computer?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:Funk that Jim by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      Why not just buy a HD-TV widescreen, and connect that to the computer?

      Hadn't thought of that. Do they offer 27" models for less than $350?

      Most of the stuff I'm seeing is pretty expensive

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    4. Re:Funk that Jim by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I've seen in Poland, some around the cost of 400USD.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  2. TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure, its only $300 but let's look at the total cost of ownership here.

    Parts & Labor : $300
    Never getting laid again : Priceless

    I think I'll stick with something that doesnt alienate the dripping hot sluts always coming on to me here in my swinging bachelor pad.

    1. Re:TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well you mean:

      I think with something that doesn't alienate the mythical dripping hot sluts that I always pretend are coming on to me in my parents basement which I pretend is my swinging bachelor pad.

      Lets put it another way:

      Well a homemade projector isn't going to get you laid, but NOT having a homemade projector isn't going to get you laid either.

      Your screwed (not in a good way) either way.

    2. Re:TCO by mikael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Back in the days when there wasn't any video recorders, TiVO, home PC's or even console systems, the only form of home made video entertainment for our family and our friends was the home projector. During a party, the lights would be dimmed and everyone's favourite photographs were converted into slides and displayed. Anything and everything, from hiking trips across the mountains, sunsets, trips to national parks, the nightlife of the metro, would be displayed as a 10 foot high image on the nearest white wall. Panoramic views across valleys were my favourite, as you could walk right up to the wall and see the smallest detail - smoke rising up from the chimney of a cottage, miles away.

      It would be fun to do that with digital photographs or movies.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:TCO by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

      You really need a lesson in spin.

      My geekiness has gotten me laid on multiple occasions.

      Once you pass about 25 years old, women dig smart guys.

      I think I'll stick with something that doesnt alienate the dripping hot sluts always coming on to me here in my swinging bachelor pad.

      Dripping hot? Sluts?

      That's called "gonorrhea."

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:TCO by LordMyren · · Score: 0

      i found there was nothing that said sexxy like a overhead projector hanging on its side from my dorm room's sprinkler.

    5. Re:TCO by peculiarmethod · · Score: 2, Funny

      And somehow you managed to make this post even more boring in 1/100th the time it took those events to occur.

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    6. Re:TCO by zakezuke · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Back in the days when there wasn't any video recorders...

      You mean video tape recorders. 50 years ago was not so different than 2000, except you used film rather than magnetic tape.

      I had this dialog with a friend not too long ago. He was planning a presentation for his wedding and was considering renting a LCD projector. I highly recommended going slides due to its low cost high quality. Unfortunately he wanted to do a Power Point presentation, which would include silly animation. While one could convert Power Point to film using a good easel and movie camera 8mm isn't exactly decent quality, 16mm isn't made anymore, and 35mm would be cost prohibitive.

      In 50 years we've gained convenience of not having to pay to develop film, but we have lost a good deal of quality.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm... couldn't you fandangle the projector in some way to output from a vid camera? So that way instead of producing pictures of peoples vacations, you could project those hawt sluts on the wall... naked... and dripping...

    8. Re:TCO by sumdumass · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It is amazing that someone waisted a mod point on this and what is even more rediculous is it was modded flaimbait. At the least it should be funny but more likely it should be informative.

      You see sometime geeks do need a reminder of why it is so hard to get laid. Somethign like this is likley to impress here so much she would watch the movie instead of putting out. Of course this all rests on the asumption that he can actually get a chick into his pad without it being some kind of bird.

      I think it is a great mod and any girl that didn't recognize the cool factor in this project isn't worthy of my time. I'll take quality in a woman over quanity anyday.

    9. Re:TCO by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm. If I use a projector and walk up to the wall, all I see is a shadow.

      I keed! I keed!

    10. Re:TCO by colmore · · Score: 1

      I dunno, the nerd cred of the DIY project + projected DVDs could definitely be a plus if you're hanging out with the right women. It's a pretty good icebreaker "So last weekend I made this thing..." and a good excuse to invite someone back to your place.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    11. Re:TCO by Performaman · · Score: 0

      Three words: Wall-sized pr0n0

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    12. Re:TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With this technology you don't _need_ your imaginary sluts any more - you can have real, larger than life, high resolution P0RN on your bedroom wall! Don't you people ever THINK?!

    13. Re:TCO by Bill+Privatus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did this a few years ago, for a 40th anniversary for my in-laws. It was great to see a man in his 60s get all choked up from seeing the photos of their youth. This from a generation that believes "men don't cry" :-)

      My approach was thus: I created a presentation, using slides of about 80 photos, on a windoze computer with Lotus Freelance (better than Powerpoint, if you ask me, but either will work). The screen transitions were random, but I made sure they were fast. The photos were the show, not the transitions!

      I put this presentation on a box that had a TV-out card (ASUS TNT v3400), and ran that into a VCR, which recorded a 40-minute show.

      End result was a VHS tape that we could copy for relatives.

      I put the presentation, with the digital pix, on a CD-ROM. I could reproduce it, even today.

      Of course, if I were doing it today, it would be a DVD, not a tape. Perhaps that would get around the requirement that I set the screen resolution to something nasty like 800x480 (I don't remember the actual resolution) for the TV-out to work.

      Just another point of view...

      --
      Redundancy is good; triple redundancy is twice as good! - Me.
    14. Re:TCO by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      I have to dissagree about 16mm film not being made anymore. I think you'll find that it's used quite often in film schools and for independant films.

    15. Re:TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you people ever THINK?!

      I think that vagina is bigger then me! *Make it stop*

    16. Re:TCO by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      AFAIK all the current radeon cards with tv out allow any desktop resolution while doing tv out, though I think some of the older cards may limit the resolution choice if your outputting an exact copy of the monitors screen to the tv, the aiwradeon (original) would do any res even then, but one of the two images would be distorted looking (usually the monitor) because of differing aspect ratio's. Havent tried that particular scenario with my current card (AIWRadeon 9600).

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    17. Re:TCO by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My approach was thus: I created a presentation, using slides of about 80 photos, on a windoze computer with Lotus Freelance (better than Powerpoint, if you ask me, but either will work). The screen transitions were random, but I made sure they were fast. The photos were the show, not the transitions!

      I've done similar things using a camcorder + magnifying lens with ring light and tripod. I couldn't do any transitions that way, and as I didn't own an edit deck I had to time things by hand. Toss on some music, I believe Kingston Trio's Seasons in the Sun, and poof VHS slideshow. I also used this technique to copy photographs to negatives.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    18. Re:TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >16mm isn't made anymore

      Ummm. yeah tis: http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/16mm/index.jhtml

      Yeah, yeah, its off topic. Mod me down. But 16mm still rules.

  3. Not quite the same... by xchino · · Score: 5, Informative

    The image is a bit blurry and usually darker than those expensive multimedia projectors. But the bulbs are cheaper to replace, and it's suitable for watching movies with your friends on walls and such. I'd recommend forgoing the overhead lamp and getting yourself a much more high powered light source, and a top quality fresnel lense, it will still probably be cheaper than the overhead projector, and having a brighter light source means a bigger or brighter picture. Couple one of these with a low powered am/fm transmitter and you're ready to host a Guerilla Drive in

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    1. Re:Not quite the same... by sglane81 · · Score: 1

      After reading the article, I was left wondering. Why not use LEDs? They have a much better lumen/heat ratio than regular bulbs, from what I understand.

      --
      This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
    2. Re:Not quite the same... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 0, Troll

      Normal multimedia projectors are a LOT cheaper now and are quieter, smaller and likely accept a broader range of inputs. Mine can accept component video even at HD resolutions (it is downscaled to native though), RGB, newer ones accept DVI.

      You can get a decent XGA projector for around $1000 now.

      While overhead projectors have cheaper bulbs, IIRC, those bulbs die a lot quicker too. Some multimedia projectors have bulbs that go as many as 5000 hours, making the operational cost only around a dime per hour.

    3. Re:Not quite the same... by mikejz84 · · Score: 1

      I thought a lot about building one actually. There is a section of diyaudio.com dedicated to DIY projectors. I started out with taking my old pocket LCD TV and taking it apart and putting the panel into a slide projector--It actually worked rather well! The only problem was that the screen-door effect was massive, the pixels where the size of golf-balls. I kept planning on building my own projectors, until I got a few good deals on projectors. I started out with a 640x480 Telex P170v that I got on ebay for $170, then upgraded to a $600 Davis DL-450 DLP and spent a good amount of time and money modding it for a better picture. Finally, I got the offer I could not refuse. A Sony 1271q CRT projector with 650 hours for $500. It blows away any LCD or DLP out there and was a bargain. After a lot of talk on Diyaudio.com a general consensuses emerged, which was that buying a used CRT projector was often a better choice then building your own (many people have broken there LCD panels In the process of making there projectors) Quick note about lumens: The 3500 Lumens is the overhead rating, an LCD panel often reduces brightness by as much as 95%.

    4. Re:Not quite the same... by mOoZik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      White LEDs with high lumens ratings are pretty expensive. But why not use 10 or so 100 Watt incadescent bulbs with or without a diffuser? An extra fan or two should take care of the heat - if that - and replacement cost is next to nil.

    5. Re:Not quite the same... by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 1

      Yes the overhead projector's bulbs are cheaper but according to several sites, they seem to only last 50 hours vs several thousands for the multimedia projectors' bulbs.

      All in all, it seems that the price per hour remains very high...

    6. Re:Not quite the same... by arivanov · · Score: 1

      That is the smaller problem.

      Casual LCDs will survive under 300 hours while being illuminated at those intensities.

      Just ask IBM - there used to be Stinkpad models which could have their LCD detached to be used for this exact purpose. I cannot recall off the top of my head, but they were not the only ones to do so.

      No more. Guess why...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:Not quite the same... by CityZen · · Score: 1

      No, actually LEDs with that kind of lumen output from a point source are non-existent. Typical projector design requires the light source to be a point source.

    8. Re:Not quite the same... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Overhead projectors are usually not very even with regards to illumination or focus either. It's hard to see from those photos, but if you look closely, you'll find that the center of the image is sharper and brighter than the surrounding image.

      It's OK for watching DVDs (which are relatively low resolution anyway - just 720 x 480), but watching higher resolution sources like 1024x768 VGA computer displays just won't provide the same pixel-sharp accuracy of a true LCD or DLP projector.

      Decent DLP projectors can be had for under $800 now, and they're pretty decent investments. I purchased one a year ago and it's a great unit - much nicer than a clunky bigscreen or an expensive plasma that will grow dimmer as the years pass.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    9. Re:Not quite the same... by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 1

      (Score:0, Troll) ??? wtf ???

  4. Re:I want one! by golfsportila · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I can't afford 300 either :( I wish I had a little over 600 and I'd buy an infocus x1 projector though. -http://www.freestufftimes.com/

  5. Fun by xpurple · · Score: 5, Informative

    I did this years ago, and kept running into problems with cooling. Even with a fan in there the screen became washed out after a few hours of use.

    Part of this might have been due to the fact that I was using a DSTN screen.

    --
    http://www.xpurple.com
    1. Re:Fun by JVert · · Score: 1

      How was the noise? what I renember from these classic projectors the teacher had to talk really loud to be heard over the high speed turbine turbine cooling fans.

      Does anybody think there is a water cooling solution? If you can pipe that heat into the ceeling and cool it from there or if it sits on the ground just make the whole base a 5' cooling tower.

    2. Re:Fun by c0defiant · · Score: 1

      Fun indeed, sure does bring back some old memories...

      I remember building something similar on instructions off of the old Acidwarp eye candy. Maybe common stuff now but made for a great party prop at the time.

    3. Re:Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you are having heat problems you need to put a 45 deg cold mirror between the light source and the LCD panel. They are expensive but they allow you to greatly increase the lumens which you can thow out because there is less infrared heating of the LCD panel. http://www.edmundoptics.com/onlinecatalog/displayp roduct.cfm?productid=1900&CFID=3282620&CFTOKEN=dcc c6c4571313046-39113206-3048-41AD-84BFA8B603869B78

    4. Re:Fun by huie · · Score: 1

      I guess this idea is better/simpler/cheaper/safer than water cooling.

    5. Re:Fun by tigersha · · Score: 1

      It also reduces that "washed out" look!

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  6. JUNKyard? by xThinkx · · Score: 4, Funny
    JUNK!!!, I resent that! All of my scrap is functional.

    Now where'd I put that 486 laptop with the broken screen and half working keyboard

    --
    Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
    "
    1. Re:JUNKyard? by imthatguy · · Score: 0

      but most of our living rooms look like electronic junkyards anyway, don't they

      I'll have you know, Sir, that I resemble that remark!

      --
      Did you know you can be apathetic to apathy? Not that I give a shit...
    2. Re:JUNKyard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think my parent's basement is a retirement home (was about to say graveyard) for all the old now-useless crap we had. We had stuff exactly like you mentioned. We had a 386 B&W VGA laptop with a case that was cracked in several places, a 486 laptop (barely VGA) with a useless amount of HD space (about 100 MB) and a docking station that was bent to hell when we moved. We also have a P133 that basically works but won't boot into Windows (booting off of a HD from another computer screwed it up permanatly somehow). I believe my brother's old 486-DX2 133 MB that went with the aforementioned killer HD still works. The 386 case it was once in (was hard to find anything else in AT form factor even in '96) is probably still around and half-working even though it's also responsible for the death of a hand-me-down Pentium 200 I got due to a frayed live wire striking the motherboard.

      Oh well, I was able to bring my parents' P3-450 MB back to life when their Duron 800 died (something some crappy computer repair shop coaxed them into buying just because the offboard PCI Ultra66 drive controller on it died, it could have been easily removed and the HDs plugged into the MB's IDE controller)

    3. Re:JUNKyard? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Now where'd I put that 486 laptop with the broken screen and half working keyboard

      DNS for the LAN? Mines behind the TV.

    4. Re:JUNKyard? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Man, you're making me tempted to pull out my 486/50Mhz (170 meg hard drive, I think?) IBM Thinkpad with the cool "Butterfly" keyboard and see if it still works. :D

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  7. sony vs BYO by nxs212 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sony has a $70k projector that is PERFECT.
    But for those of us who cannot afford something like that or even $1k projector, this is perfect.
    Now what nerd doesn't have a stack of old laptops that couldn't be used for anything...until now.
    15" TFT LCD can be had for less than $300.
    keep checking slickdeals.net - they just had a 15" lcd for less than $200. Or check ebay.

  8. 3500 lumens? by vijayiyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They claim 3500 lumens, but later in the article, they mention that's the lamp spec. Looking at the picture, how much of that is actually projected onto the wall and how much is diffused away right at the projector?

    1. Re:3500 lumens? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      You have a very good point. IIRC, a lot of 10,000 lumen bulbs are used in multimedia projectors rated 1000 lumens or so, so the video projector manufacturers are at least being honest that the rated light is the output, and not the input. I would think that an overhead panel + overhead machine wouldn't get better efficiency.

    2. Re:3500 lumens? by superlime · · Score: 1

      I was looking into this for a few years and from what I found most LCDs block between 9/10 and 19/20 of the light coming through them.. So your 3500 lumen lamp is going to be at best a 350 lumen projected image. I was looking in to using a grow light (~140k lumens) to result in a whopping 14k lumen projected image. Never got around to it though.. I ended up just snagging a burly 3000 lumen 400:1 contrast ratio LCD projector on ebay for ~$1400.

  9. Re:I want one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Watching Empire Strikes Back)

    "Luke, I am-" *pop* Oops! Bulb went out!

    Hope you can afford $600 plus $300 plus $300 plus $300 plus $300...

  10. Would this mean that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    By a few modifications I could build my own Astral Projector?!

    (*ducks*)

  11. maybe yours does by ravenspear · · Score: 1

    most of our living rooms look like electronic junkyards anyway, don't they?

    Umm, no.

    1. Re:maybe yours does by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting
      most of our living rooms look like electronic junkyards anyway, don't they?

      Umm, no.


      I've gotta gree with you there. My AV components don't look like they've been cobbled together out of scrap pieces.

      More on-topic, can anyone chime in on the group of multi-media projectors and how they compare to 'real' projection TVs? I've noticed they've slipped to below $2K CDN and falling, which is less than a rear projection screen.

      Are the refresh rates and image quality of a DLP mult-media projector up to the task of DVD quality FMV display? Or is it more suitable for power-point presentations?

      I don't see HD being anything I need soon, since all of the programming I watch isn't available there yet anyway. However, a front projector that can do good video quality might be a good bridging technology.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:maybe yours does by leathered · · Score: 1

      You must live with a woman. Your geek license is revoked with immediate effect.

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    3. Re:maybe yours does by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      Mine DID. Then I started living with another human. She does not appreciate the electronic junkyard look. SO now its all condensed into the spare room. I know there's a bed under there somewhere...

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    4. Re:maybe yours does by SonicBurst · · Score: 1

      Well, if "immediate effect" = "getting laid" , then I'd say he did pretty well.

      --

      Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    5. Re:maybe yours does by miltimj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely... for $1000, I have an SVGA front projector (Infocus X1) hanging from my ceiling (between open living room and dining room), projecting on a blank, beige wall. We currently have HD programming through Comcast, and it's unbelievable.

      If you can get whatever room you're using to be very dark, it's definitely the route to go. My coworker has a $2000 34" HDTV, and my "screen" is 110" (about 10 times bigger) for half the cost.

      DVDs look great.. once you hit VGA (and using a progressive DVD player), you can't get much better -- the limiting factor in quality is the DVD itself.

      Bottom line -- if you can get your room dark, definitely worth getting a front projector. Another advantage is a projector on the ceiling takes up essentially no space, as a big TV would.

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
    6. Re:maybe yours does by dbIII · · Score: 1
      multi-media projectors and how they compare to 'real' projection TVs?
      Take a step beyond and compare them to three tube projectors with 1920 pixels of wide screen glory. I took a look at what they can do, and the pale and poorly illuminated imation produced by the top end of LCDs made me realise that it isn't worth bothering. I'll stick with a standard TV until the LCDs improve, or if the three tube projectors drop below the far side of crazy.
  12. It's been done by myov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before LCD projectors came out, a few companies made LCD panels designed to be placed on an overhead projector. You were stuck at 640, and the image quality was poor and dark.
    There's a reason why projector lamps are expensive (and bright!)

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    1. Re:It's been done by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      I remember my professor using something like that to project the screen of a TI-83 onto the wall. Memories!

    2. Re:It's been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine were using such a device last school year (last time I actually saw it used in class was about a year ago, so I suspect they're still using it when needed.

    3. Re:It's been done by wizatcomputer · · Score: 1

      Some teachers still do that today. It's great when half the class needs their hand held just to figure out how to do plot something. However, they seem to be poorly designed, as it alwasy smells like something is burning whenver the screen is in use.

      --
      What's the point of a sig?
    4. Re:It's been done by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      still used every day almost in my AP calc class.

      Thankfully it is MOSTLY used to display graphs rather than hold hands...but it still amazes me when people cant enter things into lists or find intersect points...

      It pays to learn how to use the calculator. It will speed up the process and will definately improve test scores when you understand what it can do for you.

      I cant wait until half the class is in awe when the teacher shows them that the calculator is capable of finding the derivative at any point...

      --
      Bottles.
    5. Re:It's been done by GiMP · · Score: 1

      I'm using one for my home theatre. The contrast could be better, but certainly acceptable for NTSC and watching DVDs.

  13. I have one... by lxt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Indeed, I have one lying around somewhere. It was a 640x480 LCD mounted in a metal casing about the size of an A4 sheet of paper, and around 3 inches thick. It would sit on top of the projector, but had a tendancy to overheat (the OHP light heating up everything inside the casing as well...).

  14. It's BIG by InternationalCow · · Score: 1

    Nice DYI stuff but it's a really big contraption isn't it? Our living room for instance is crammed with stuff including computers and toys. And while wall projection for us would be perfect (we have white walls in the living room) I don't think I would put up with such a HUGE projector. Might as well buy a nice and small Dell projector or some such. Costs more but the space savings more than make up for that IMHO (also ditched my hifi installation in favor of an iPod - small is beautiful :) ).

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
  15. Forget noise police, what about IP laws? by Nomihn0 · · Score: 1

    Can you legally show a film to a group without paying a licensing fee? I know that at universities, it is not permitted in classrooms because of the possible legal fallout. Moviehouses pay to show their films to large audiences. Why hasn't the MPAA cracked down on this? I'd have thought this would be a prime target, being a progressive group of people. *sarcasm*Who knows, maybe they're doing other terrible things to help their country!*/sarcasm* What's the scoop on this?

    1. Re:Forget noise police, what about IP laws? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I am sure that there are IP issues because outdoor presentations are likely to be classified as public, and not private. Fortunately for those that do guerilla drive-ins, they are still somewhat under the radar, filesharing is a bigger boogieman for the ??AAs.

    2. Re:Forget noise police, what about IP laws? by rolocroz · · Score: 0, Troll

      who gives a fuck

      --

      I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

    3. Re:Forget noise police, what about IP laws? by Temsi · · Score: 1

      If the film is being shown in class, as part of the class (meaning, it's not just entertainment, but actually pertains to the subject of the class) it's very much legal. It's called Fair Use.
      See this copy/paste from http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107:
      "the fair use of a copyrighted work, including ... for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright."

      Now, I'm sure overzealous legal eagles may try to weasel out of this one, and in fact, at least one part of this clause has already been made practically impossible legally by the DMCA, the "including multiple copies for classroom use" part.
      If a film school teacher wanted to copy a scene from a copyrighted film, and ask each student to re-edit the scene, they would have two choices.
      Either request the material from the copyright owner, which is hit or miss at best and can cost the school a fortune, as the copyright owner pretty much sets the price; or make a copy of the finished material.
      Prior to the DMCA that wasn't a big problem.
      Bypassing Macrovision was as simple as copying from VHS or DVD to a 3/4" tape and then making copies.
      Copying DVDs digitally for each student wasn't possible as decss hadn't been created yet.
      Today, if it wasn't for the DMCA, a teacher would be able to legally make copies of scenes from films, in the best quality available, directly from DVD. Thus, rights guaranteed a teacher before 1996 no longer apply, thanks to the DMCA.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    4. Re:Forget noise police, what about IP laws? by Nomihn0 · · Score: 1

      I am referring to a particular experience I had involving a certain popular university. The department refused to permit a professor I know to project a Pixar movie to a large class as part of the lesson. The movie was relevant and out on DVD but likely had not grossed itself out, so to speak. The issue was whether showing the movie in the equivalent of a movie theater, to a large audience of non MPAA and Pixar paying customers, would be illegal. Clearly, there were no good legal geeks on hand, and the EFF had far more important things to deal with. It's likely that the scare tactics used by our dearly loved RIAA scared the university out of dealing with movies either (there were discreet network crackdowns on music). I'm still not convinced that what you quoted applies to this situation in particular, but I thank you for the effort.

    5. Re:Forget noise police, what about IP laws? by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      Except for the provisions in section 110 (from your linked web site.

      (1) performance or display of a work by instructors or pupils in the course of face-to-face teaching activities of a nonprofit educational institution, in a classroom or similar place devoted to instruction, unless, in the case of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, the performance, or the display of individual images, is given by means of a copy that was not lawfully made under this title, and that the person responsible for the performance knew or had reason to believe was not lawfully made;

      So assuming you can get a legal copy and you are showing it to students of a specific class in a setting where the general public is not permitted while the showing is going on - as the parent states "in class, as part of the class" it would seem to be covered by Fair Use exclusions .

      There are a LOT of ifs, ands and buts included in section 110, including the requirement for maximum SqFt area of estabilshments (2000 not including parking area) for non-food or drinking establishments and using not more than 6 loudspeakers, with not more than 4 in any one room...

      Laws are complex, for actual legal advise, consult a shyster! (um, I mean a lawyer)

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
  16. Been there, done that by menscher · · Score: 1

    I was going to try it for a talk I was giving from my laptop, but didn't have the LCD projector. So I removed the LCD from my laptop and laid it down on an overhead projector. Problem is the image is rather dark. Basic problem of the way LCDs work: white is actually 50% gray due to the polarizing filters. And the overhead projectors just aren't bright enough. Might be ok in a very dark room, but otherwise I wouldn't recommend it.

    1. Re:Been there, done that by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      If you took the time to read the article, you'd have seen that it's still passable in light. :)

    2. Re:Been there, done that by menscher · · Score: 1
      Oh, sorry. I suppose now that some kid wrote an article on something I did a few years ago, I should throw out all my experience in favor of reading someone else's claims.

      Or not.

    3. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they just did it better than you. They ensured that the lamp they were using was very bright. It's something specifically mentioned in the article.

  17. Bulb Cost Still an Issue by DumbRedGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think these things are really cool, but what still stops me is the bulb cost.

    They say the bulbs cost $20-$30 and I can afford that, but how long do the bulbs last? When I searched for Overhead Projector replacement bulbs, I got figures from 30-75 hours. Best case, that's ($20/75hours)= $.26 per hour.

    The bulbs for the X1 projector are $299 and last for up to 4000 hours (http://members.shaw.ca/technut/x1faq/#8.2). That is like $.07 per hour.

    To me, this really doesn't seem any better off in the long run. Am I missing something?

    1. Re:Bulb Cost Still an Issue by mart459 · · Score: 1

      They misled you on the price - that $20 is list. I have been purchasing mine directly from a distributer and not through office supply store. My cost is under $7 - and I have had the bulbs last closer to 100 hours. I have not however gotten a decent overhead for $50 - more like $75.

      A setup like this is great for the kid's gamecube, and in my situation, for watching TV while swimming. I have one in the bomb shelter (nintendo) and one in the pool room so that we can watch TV and swim.

    2. Re:Bulb Cost Still an Issue by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      If you can afford to put up the money for the X1 projector, then no, you aren't missing anything. However, if you only have $300 to blow, then I would go with the overhead projector get-up.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:Bulb Cost Still an Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yaa you're missing something...the G (as in geek) factor. You can't wow your nerd friends and turn away women in disgust with a store bought projector.

    4. Re:Bulb Cost Still an Issue by Pfhor · · Score: 1

      What?

      Did you just say you watch tv while swimming? unless you project it on the bottom of your pool, i doubt you are doing more than "floating."

      And one for a bomb shelter?

      please tell me this is for real, or else I am smoking crack.

    5. Re:Bulb Cost Still an Issue by bogie · · Score: 1

      Not really. At least if my semi-retard math ability is correct. Say its 50hrs total per bulb and cost $20. A typical movie is 2hrs. That's 25 movies for $20 or $.80 a movie. That's really not much for what you get.
      Of course I'm looking at this as a use twice a weekend sort of deal, not something you use for watching TV or playing games. The thing is most people can't justify $1200 for a "real" projector. $250 in ghetto parts is affordable and something you can easily save for. I still need more info though before I start hunting for old LCDs.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    6. Re:Bulb Cost Still an Issue by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1


      have one in the bomb shelter (nintendo)


      Planning ahead for hose long boring nuclear winter nights when there's no tv (literally)?

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  18. Junkyard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    most of our living rooms look like electronic junkyards anyway, don't they?

    No, our girlfriends keep that from hap--

    Oh wait...

    1. Re:Junkyard by PeteABastard · · Score: 1

      No my girlfriend is just filling up my play areas with her knitting stuff. So now my carefully crafted electronic junkyard look is being polluted by spinning wheels and crap.

  19. I love this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I built one of these myself a few years ago an it's been running great ever since. I went for a bit sturdier construction so the thing would be portable and I've never had a single problem with it.

    more pictures

    The whole thing set me back $500 but I'll bet that's mainly due to higher prices back then.

    1. Re:I love this stuff by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Cool. It looks like you're just using a piece of regular fabric for a screen, though. Have you ever tried using it with regular screen material? It's much more reflective and would probably improve your image quality substantially.

      As a developer, I have to ask: it is really useful for editing code, or do you primarily use it just for movies? I've always wanted a wall-sized screen for working on projects (I once read a story that referred to a "mural graphics system") and still wonder if it would be usable or if I'm just dreaming.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:I love this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've never used an actual screen, but now days I just use a painted white wall and it's great. The bed sheet was a really bad idea, and if you looked behind it there was actually enough light passing through to put an image on the wall behind it. On my living room wall the picture does look much crisper.

      As for code editing, it's definitely a lot of fun but you MUST have a desk to set your keyboard and mouse on. Using the armrest on the couch as a mousepad and having the keyboard on your lap just doesn't cut it.

      BTW, for everyone wondering about bulb price and heat issues: bulbs are ~$12 each (@ 100hr life) and with the two PC fans blowing across the top there are no heat problems whatsoever.

  20. Re:Fun; Use cooler bulb? by UnapprovedThought · · Score: 1
    I did this years ago, and kept running into problems with cooling

    Maybe in order to get enough lumens you were using a halogen bulb, which runs really hot?

    Why not try something cooler? Specifically, has anyone tried using an LED bulb?

  21. Post-Box Office Movie Experience by LighthouseJ · · Score: 2, Informative

    I help my school show movies to the general public so I can authoritatively say No. Our school pays between $250 for well-out-of-box-office movies upwards to $800 for popular just-out-of-box-office movies. You pay for not only the right to show the movies publicly but also for to right to show the movie before it comes out on home video. For instance, our school is going to show Ray about a month before it comes out on video next semester and it'll cost us $800 but we don't charge at the door (money comes from students anyway but through the budget from tuition).

    There's actually a release timeline for movies and movie availability for us falls right after availability for airlines. We also only get movies in VHS format because we can't handle the 16mm or 35mm films, and they won't send us DVD's because of piracy. yeah, I know you can record off of VHS but it's cumbersome, plus the distributor inserts their tag in the movie.

    As for the MPAA, I figure it just hasn't become a "phenomena" yet. Also, when say a movie is shown like Team America: World Police that is out of theaters but not on video, people might see it for free but they don't get to walk away with a copy just by seeing it. However, seeing movies for free over the internet, the people do get to keep a copy because that's the method of distribution, making another copy, so they do perceive that as a loss of a sale. I guess they will get off their laurels when they claim they are losing billions to the guerilla drive-in's.

    1. Re:Post-Box Office Movie Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For instance, our school is going to show Ray about a month before it comes out on video next semester and it'll cost us $800 but we don't charge at the door (money comes from students anyway but through the budget from tuition).


      Let me get this straight. Your students pay lots of money for tuition, and you waste it on free movie showings?

    2. Re:Post-Box Office Movie Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, thats pretty typical for my state university. Meanwhile the football coach is flying in high school recruits on the university's private jet off of the school's general budget.

  22. Laptop monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know any limitions in trying to do this with a decent laptop display?

  23. Uhhh .. by Sonic+McTails · · Score: 1

    " It's quite bigger and noisier than a standard projector, but most of our living rooms look like electronic junkyards anyway, don't they?"

    I don't have a living room you insentive clod !

    --
    This signature was left intentionally blank.
  24. Honey, please stop posting here... by THESuperShawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    "but most of our living rooms look like electronic junkyards anyway, don't they?"

    We have been over this sooo many times. It's not "junk", it's my work, my life. How do you think we can afford the 75 pairs of shoes you have in the closet? What about the 17 gallons of makeup in the bathroom? I mean come-on, bathrooms are for manly noises and piles of out-dated Maxim-PC and Computer-Shopper. And I mean the real, phone book size Computer Shopper of yesteryear, not that wimpy little thing they print now. What's with that 1/2 film of hairspray all over the counter?

    Please, let me have my slashdot. You son't see me posting on your US Weekly forum do you?

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
  25. Everything old is new again by jridley · · Score: 1

    Laying an LCD panel on an overhead projector used to be the only way to do projection. Our company threw away a dozen or so 640x480 panels intended for use with an overhead, about 8 years ago.

  26. No no no no! by wiresquire · · Score: 1

    You've got it all wrong!

    Now if the bulb is included with the price of the projector due to a 'distribution' agreement, you don't have to pay for it at all!

    Another benefit is that you'll find that the up front costs of the bulb are far outweighed by the cheaper costs of the maintenance people you could hire to change that bulb. Forget the fact that having the projector burn out every week or so will leave you with nothing!

    What you are talking about is Total Cost of Ownership. This has proven to be irrelevant time and time again in corporations, so why would you worry about it?

    --

    So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

  27. carbon arc lamp by gantrep · · Score: 1

    Build a carbon arc lamp, fool!

    Talk about heat dispersal though....

  28. Did This Too - 2 Years Ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This was the rage a couple of years ago when 1000 lumen projectors were $2500. So I bought a flat screen monitor on sale at Best Buy, ripped it apart, got an overhead projector, set it all up and projected it on the whiteboard in my classroom. It works...but. Like previous posts, it's dark due to the LCD screens. I believe he has a 3500 lumen projector but the problem is you need that kind of brightness just to push through the LCD screen.

    I went so far as to purchase a metal-halide light with a 250w bulb (actually a parking lot security light!) to drive it, because I really wanted it to work. It worked too...but. The heat.

    Also not addressed in the article is the issue of the screen. You can't just use any ol' wall or whiteboard due to hot spots. So now you're out looking for a used Da-Lite screen or wallboard suitable for mounting.

    These projects have been out on ebay for a while and the net has a bunch of info on how to do it. The original DIY Forum for this makes for a pretty good geek fix.

    My students thought it was cool tho'. Right now, I use a 2000 lumen HP we got through a grant and project onto an 8' Da-Lite screen. Sweet. The wide-screen version of Blade Runner looks and sounds awesome especially with the Bose 151 outdoor speakers on either side of the screen.

  29. Saving up vs run out and get one by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    It's much easier to blow $20 every once in awhile than have to blow $300. That's nearly a car payment + insurance. You don't need to plan ahead for a $20 expense but you do have to plan ahead for a $300 expense.

    Ben

    1. Re:Saving up vs run out and get one by magefile · · Score: 1

      You don't need to plan ahead for a $20 expense but you do have to plan ahead for a $300 expense.

      Speak for your self. As long as I'm in college, that $300 might be easier. Christmas is coming, y'know.

    2. Re:Saving up vs run out and get one by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      So plan ahead for it. To take your own example above, why do you have a car and insurance if it only costs $12 to take a cab to work? I mean sure you have to pay for the cab more often and it costs more in the long run, but every day it's not $300 out of your pocket, right?

    3. Re:Saving up vs run out and get one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's nearly a car payment + insurance."
      Man, what the heck are you driving?
      That's not even a car payment MINUS insurance

  30. Riiiiight... by Nightreaver · · Score: 1

    The homemade projector can also be used for presentations; given the right settings, customers will be amazed!

    ... of your l33t junk assembling skills? Which company wouldn't?

  31. diy projectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most of the projector projects i've seen start here.. not all DIY projectors are as big as toms
    http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?s= 3548cff8095fb76feede9ad32dab91af&forumid=12

    also my own DIY projector, build with a 7 inch automotive roofmount LCD, its certainly not XGA, but it gets the job done
    http://members.rogers.com/machs_fuel/projector/
    probably cost around ~300 CND dollars

  32. The $100 question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can I use my old I-Opener lcd to do this project???

    Seriously....I am cheap and I want to know.

  33. Great by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

    I posted this story about a week ago to slashdot, back then only a german website was available. There goes my karma :-

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
  34. I can't wait to hook my GBA up to it! by THESuperShawn · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine using this for a GameBoy???? :P

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
    1. Re:I can't wait to hook my GBA up to it! by JimmehAH · · Score: 1

      Pixels as big as yer fist!

    2. Re:I can't wait to hook my GBA up to it! by THESuperShawn · · Score: 1

      You're right.

      But TETRIS sure will look trippy!!!!!

      --
      Repant. Thy end is sheer.
    3. Re:I can't wait to hook my GBA up to it! by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah - one GameCube + GBPlayer, connected to video input (or TV tuner card on PC)...

      I haven't done anything like that myself (mostly because I don't have GB Player), but I tried playing Gameboy Advance games once with a car stereo and portable-CD-to-cassette-player adapter thingy (you know, one that looks like a cassette but has a cable with headphone jack and some mysterious electronics that make the cassette player play whatever comes in the cable).

      Same old screen, but really damn good stereo sound =) I should try this sometime with my 4.1 computer speakers =)

    4. Re:I can't wait to hook my GBA up to it! by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      Trippy Tetris?
      You want TOD!

    5. Re:I can't wait to hook my GBA up to it! by stoborrobots · · Score: 1
      which, if you want a linux version, can be had ...

      Instructions for RH9 - should work anywhere...

      $ rpm -qa allegro*
      $ unzip -d tod wintod.zip
      $ cd tod
      $ gcc -Wall -O3 -ffast-math *.c `allegro-config --libs` -o linuxtod
      $ ./linuxtod

      The only dependency is on the allegro game library...

  35. 1750 lumens by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It looks like the 3500 lumens is part of the projector spec -- but they are still missing something major. LCDs use polarized light, so, at most, they'll transmit half of incoming (unpolarized) light. I'd rate this projector at 1750 lumens, max. That number puts it in the company of a lot of other projectors.

    1. Re:1750 lumens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also the liquid crystals only rotate the polarization of a small fraction of the light so it can get through the second polarizer. All told, about 5% of the incident light gets through. Also, laptops seem quite happy to use flourescent lights that are much more efficient. That would help with both the power consumption and cooling [and fan noise].

      Randy F.
      randy.f@earthlink.net

    2. Re:1750 lumens by CityZen · · Score: 1

      In addition, the red/green/blue filters cut out another 2/3's or so of the light (since through any given area, only a fraction of the color spectrum can get through).

      Then there's also the area for the TFT (thin-film transistor), plus any spacers or other non-transparent parts within the pixel grid.

      In short, LCDs cut out a huge fraction of the light passing through them.

    3. Re:1750 lumens by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Ah, good point! 500 lumens.

    4. Re:1750 lumens by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, but I wonder if companies which sell projectors use the before or after lumens when marketing them. I would have to hazard a guess that they rate them with the bulb strength before the LCD. If that's the case this DIY would still crank much more through the panel.

      --
      Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
    5. Re:1750 lumens by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      I'd really expect them to rate it on the actual output - otherwise it would be meaningless. LCDs have different fill factors, and other technologies (CRT, DLP, 3 LCDs, LCOS) have very different efficiencies.

      I'd also expect to be able to put a light meter on the screen and measure the cd/m^2 and get the same value as specified in the datasheet.

      I guess the only way to tell would be to put the two projectors side-by-side.

  36. Just get a used projector... by evilviper · · Score: 0, Troll

    Doing this project at the $300 price point, first off, requires you to be able to get this equipment cheaply.

    So, realistically, you would be better off just looking around for an older, used projector in the first place.

    Not only would you be able to get it nearly a cheaply, but you'd also have an actual projector, not some wired-together mess. Extra inputs, proper bulbs, etc.

    Fine for a project (assuming you have an LCD just lying around that you can destroy) if you want to build one yourself, but certainly not practical for those just looking to save some money.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  37. Old Slashdot article on same topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an old /. article, "Homebrewed LCD Projectors" from about 2-1/2 years ago. Of course, the prices have since come down, and the quality has gone up... but it looks like people have been doing this for a while now.

  38. this thing is about as rough as it gets by chadamir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suggest if anyone here is serious they check out www.lumenlab.com . Yeah the plans are a bit more than free on tomshardware, but really strapping an lcd panel to an ohp is not really brain surgery. If you want a better projector which includes plans for a 17 inch lcd for higher resolution and a 7" lcd for portability then check that site out. The irc and message board support are infinitely valuable as well.

    1. Re:this thing is about as rough as it gets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree.
      At Lumenlab.com you arent paying for the plans.
      Its the forum access, and the other DIYers that are willing to help you tweak your new setup to YOUR room. Lots of experience, lots of friendly folks. Well worth the money.

  39. Re:I want one! by Peale · · Score: 1

    Aw, come on, this isn't a troll. Technically, I *did* get first post. And my first comment is true! I don't have $300. If anything it should be rated offtopic, or overrated.

    Here's something on topic-ish: have a friend who did something similar, but instead of using a LCD monitor (which is an interesting hack) used one of those LCD overlays. Displays only @ 640x480, but that's a fine resolution for just watching TV and movies. Total cost was ~$75, including the projector.

  40. LCDs don't like heat by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Even with a fan in there the screen became washed out after a few hours of use.

    That's because the LCD panel overheats and stops functioning. Yes, even with the fan, the internal temperature of the LCD at the layer where all the magic happens gets too hot.

    I remember this was a problem with the LCD panels our teachers used with DOS PCs, Apple IIGS's, and very early Macintoshes...they'd have to be given a few minutes cool down time after just 15 minutes. Pretty sad considering they probably cost the schools a fortune at the time.

  41. Apple made one by jedkiwi · · Score: 1

    Heh, I remember how Apple made panels for overhead projectors once, back in like 1995. We had one at our school and I got to use it several times. Great display back then, I could only wonder how good it is now.

    1. Re:Apple made one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no they didn't. Go ahead, find a link. I dare you.

    2. Re:Apple made one by jedkiwi · · Score: 1

      /me sighs Notice how I am a member and he is an Anonymous Coward? I USED ONE with my OWN HANDS. I SAW with my OWN EYES it working.

  42. Or get an old Thinkpad... by stungod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to have an IBM 755CD laptop (P75, baby!) that had a removable back on the LCD screen. It was made so you could set the laptop on an overhead projector and use it for presentations. It was a nice concept, but a practical nightmare. The image was dark, it was hard to focus, and the screen was only 640X480. The biggest problem was that if you wanted to center the screen on the projector the body of the laptop hung over the edge and would fall off unless you supported it with something.

    As for the state of my living room, I've found that having a wife or GF kind of precludes the mess. I can have all the technology I want in the living room, but it's either hidden in a cupboard or made otherwise stealthy. It works for all concerned that way.

  43. 3500 overhead lumens != 3500 DIY lcd lumens by cpoch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The overhead projector they used in the article is 3500 lumens, but I can speak from their experience that their output isn't that high. LCD panels take a lot of light pushed through them to project a bright image, because the panel is relatively opaque. Overhead projectors are almost completely transparent, so take very little light to produce a bright image. I have a 1991 Proxima Ovation A822C 640x480 data + video LCD overhead projector panel and a 3500 lumen 3M 9200 overhead projector. Showing transparencies, the projector produces a nice bright white color, which looks about the same as a 3500 lumen LCD projector. Throw my LCD panel on it, and the light output drops to under half of the 650 lumen LCD projector that I frequently borrow. I'd guess that the OHP + LCD panel is about equivalent to a 250 lumen LCD projector.

    The projector they built looks a lot brighter than mine, probably due to a newer LCD, and not having two layers of protective glass over it, like my LCD panel. However, to make their panel look bright, they tweaked the driver settings. That just changes the color gradients, and doesn't actually make the projector brighter. Even with their tweaks, I doubt that their output breaks 1000 lumens. It would be interesting to get it measured and see what it actually produces. Maybe someone with a lumen meter can fill us all in.

  44. You need a point source.. by khrtt · · Score: 1

    ..to get a good focus. Single LEDs are just not powerfull enough for a projector. The reason is cooling - the LED chip melts at about above 100mA current, even when mounted in a specially designed case. 100mA x 3.6V = 360mW electrical power, which is, taking into account the LED's higher efficiency, equivalent to a 2W incandescent bulb at most. Or something. I'm sure I got the efficiency numbers wrong, please correct me if you would.

  45. Imagine a Beowolf cluster of these... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 1

    ...and Powerpoint presenters spontaneously combusting. *egrin*

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  46. Let's all look at the happy troller so he shuts up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent post was written by a career troller. Let's give him lots of attention, everybody. Ready? This is what he wants! Stare at him while he bangs his pots and pans!

  47. THE OFFFICIAL THREAD by LordMyren · · Score: 2, Informative

    THE OFFICIAL THREAD on Diy Projectors.

    I still love mine.

    1. Re:THE OFFFICIAL THREAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offical spin off site of offical thread.

      LUMENLAB.COM

      Great community of smart helpful poeple.

  48. Re:I want one! by mistermark · · Score: 1

    Well, I couldn't either (and/or wouldn't), so I got myself a EUR 50(about $55) Sony Projection System, and that included the screen. So, no DIY-ing (except the tuning)... what on earth can beat that?

    http://geektechnique.org/img/mediacenter-4.jpg

    http://geektechnique.org/projects/img/PConbeamer -4 .jpg

    http://geektechnique.org/img/bigassTV-2.jpg

    Only downside was tuning these:
    http://geektechnique.org/img/bigassTV-3.jp g ...but I actually enjoyed that(is that strange?) ;-)

  49. Re:I want one! by mistermark · · Score: 1

    again, the links (I'm sorry, I should've used the preview button, doh!)

    pic 1

    pic 2

    pic 3

    Only downside was tuning these:

    pic 4

    ...but I actually enjoyed that(is that odd?) ;-)

  50. Not the Same? by suwain_2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This project really held my interest. Not only could I get a great image for less than 1/3 of the price of a 'real' projector. And I could have more control over it anyway!

    It wasn't until the last picture on the last page that I started to lose interest. Notice how the center of the image is far brighter than the edges?

    That's entirely expected, if you think about how the overhead projector works. By comparison, I've never seen this on a 'real' projector. Still a nifty idea, but I think I'll splurge on a real one.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  51. Would a flood light get a brighter image? by phillip0101 · · Score: 1

    I have been reading about the probs with dim images on some site and wondered if you could just get an OHP and stick a massive flood light in the bottom? thats gotta give you a bright image right? has anyone tried this? Assume your gonna need some better cooling :o)

    1. Re:Would a flood light get a brighter image? by CityZen · · Score: 1

      The light source for a projector needs to be as close to a "point" source as possible. This is (part of) the reason that bulbs for modern projectors are so expensive; there's actually quite a bit of sophisticated engineering to make that much light come from so small a volume. The other reason is that Philips patented the technology (UHP), and they're currently the only manufacturer, I believe.

  52. if you want a real laugh by mart459 · · Score: 1

    I mentioned on a post elsewhere here that I had two similiar units in the house (bomb shelter for kid's nintendo, pool room to watch while swimming). But what I didn't post was that one of them is driven not only by a tuner, but by a hacked rca RD2780 - a PVP that is 1/100 the size of the combined panel & overhead. Makes for some interesting geek discussions when others see it.

  53. Re:I want one! by Ravenrage · · Score: 0

    Ya But where is the link to your buddy's project??

  54. Put it in a case! by Mortimus · · Score: 1

    I like the idea but it's really too bulky to fit in my living room. What would be interesting is to use a different bulb and lens arrangement and fit the whole projector in some sort of case (with a fan of course), making it more esthetic and some what portable. The right bulb/lens arrangement and a light diffusing material between the bulb and the screen to get a more evenly lit picture, to avoid the annoying affect of having darker edges. What would also be somewhat interesting would be to use it for a backlit projection display like a big screen projection TV; this would require a much larger case and a permanent screen of some sort. Has anybody tried any of these two ideas before?

  55. electricity costs still an issue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thing uses more than 2X the power of a comparable projector for the bulb alone. And if you really use an ATX power supply just to run that fan you can add another 15%.

    For me, this thing would cost me almost $0.05/hour just in electricity, $0.06 for that ATX power supply too. That's before the bulb costs.

  56. Just get a real DLP projector from Ebay... by neurocutie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Given that real, good LCD/DLP projectors are available on ebay for similar or slightly higher $$$, e.g.

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=41842&item=5133694753&rd=1

    (an Infocus LP330/335 for $450), I don't see the point of this project.

    For example the LP335 is a decent, 2000 real output lumen (not maybe 3500 lumen going into an LCD panel, who knows what comes out), with XGA resolution, fancy video processing that can accept NTCS, S-Video, DVI, VGA), with a built-in line doubler, ZOOM lens, HDTV compatibility, in a nice 6lb package. The DLP will have fairly decent contrast.

    The overhead+LCD will have numerous problems, like 1) huge light leakage, which will cut viewing contrast tremendously, 2) cannot be driven by NTCS/S-video without extra stuff and no linedoubler, 3) noisy fan on the overhead, 4) no zoom lens to match screen size/distance, 5) fragile "construction" in an unwieldy "package".

  57. Money, heat, noise, size... by LBt1st · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's just not worth it. I got a used NEC projector off ebay for $550 (inc. shipping). If your setting up home theater, do you really want to have a huge, loud and hot mess sitting behind your viewers?
    Pay a little more and get a nice ceiling mounted projector with all the inputs, remote control etc..

    Also, brightness isn't everything. You need to be concerned about contrast. Anyone can jam a 3000lu bulb into a box. But if you want image quality, well you get what you pay for.

  58. I built my own projector by strider3700 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wish I had seen this earlier. Anyways I've built my own projector out of a benq 567s V2 a 400W Bulb A big fan for cooling, some tempered glass and all the lenses as required.

    Over all the quality is great for something I build at home. I've not been able to get the alignment of everything perfect though, and this has resulted in a dark picture. Now it's easily watchable, and I've got lots of hours on mine but it doesn't compare to a good $1500 XGA projector. The good news is others have built the same thing using the same parts and easily beat the XGA projectors in quality, they have just spent more time on theirs. I also built a screen but thats pretty easy to get right once you know what to build it with.

    Now my complaints
    Mine wasn't $300 it was closer to $750 cdn.

    It's frigging huge, my measurements are something like 30"x 14" x 12"

    I added keystone correction and that works great but it doesn't have any form of zoom other then moving it closer or further back. You end up designing the room around the projector.

    The site I got the plans and info off of was excellect and the forums make paying for access completely worthwhile. www.lumenlab.com They also have pictures to show some peoples results. They have overcome the zoom and darkness issues with newer designs then I used. Price is still high but their top of the line is a fraction of what a professional projector would cost and they are comparable in quality.

  59. LED Bulbs? by bitspotter · · Score: 1

    What's the feasibility of producing an (much cooler and longer-life) LED bulb for these projectors?

    1. Re:LED Bulbs? by Misagon · · Score: 3, Informative
      I just looked this up.

      Luxeon Star/O produces 180 cd with color temperature 5500 K.
      I don't know much about optics, but I found a formula: lumens = cd * 4pi.
      So, 180 cd * 4pi ~= 2262 lumens.
      So, with four of these would yield 9048 lumens where as a typical projector bulb would produce 10'000 lumens. I don't know if this is correct. Someone with more knowledge of optics should correct me!

      The four LEDs would cost close to $100 + driver circuitry but they should last for at least five years.
      A problem, as mentioned before is that common projectors are based on a single light source. We would need additional lenses or diffusers or we could get a splotchy picture.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:LED Bulbs? by Misagon · · Score: 1

      I was wrong. The Luxeon V can only produce 120 lumens. Far from enough.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  60. What about Super Bright LEDs by matlantis · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you could use instead of the lamp on the projector, a panel of superbright LEDs. They seem pretty bright and are efficenet (low power/low heat)

    1. Re:What about Super Bright LEDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought about this too. Luxeon LEDS are the brightest I know of..

      http://www.lumileds.com/products/family.cfm?family Id=9 but I believe overhead projectors require (prefer?) point source light.

      even still, to get near the same level of lumens as a conventional bulb, one would need a large number of these stacked.

      The cost of these may well offset a "real" projector.

  61. Do It Themselves by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If DIY without economies of scale (except saving about $150 on the LCD itself) can do this for $300, why can't I get a PII/500/XGA TV projector from a major vendor? Are they really siphoning off $1000:unit for past losses/investments and future R&D, in addition to $500 (25%) profit per unit?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  62. Re:I want one! by Peale · · Score: 1

    They don't have a project page. But their site is: http://www.tardhaus.com

  63. Better Implementation by telstar · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this be better suited to project from a second room behind a screen if you have a house with that setup. You could cut down on the noise and the extra light from the ugly classroom projector. Not many people have the luxury of a projector room, but my next house will if I have anything to say about it.

  64. How does this compare to LumenLabs setup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this compare to a www.lumenlab.com setup? The LL method looks as if its more proper for intense and focused lighting, and adjustments, using dark black housing, fresnel lenses etc.

    Is the overhead a shortcut, or is it actually just doing the same thing? I would think the LL method, you can use lamps from hardware stores, plus paint it all black so light isn't spilled etc.

    Is the LL way technically more correct? Another thing, since this uses a 15" LCD, is it possible to use a smaller LCD that supports 1024x768? Do those exist and are they cheap too or is that getting to expensive?

  65. Ever wondered how they did this before LCDs..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Behold the mighty Eidophor - Cinema-sized video projection with not a semiconductor in sight...!

  66. just get an X1 by bobalu · · Score: 1

    Do yourself a favor, an X1 or similar is really nice and you can palm it and take it outside.

    I point it at a blank wall in the living room from 12' and get like 89" or something. The color is great. It sits on a bookshelf - try that with an overhead projector!

    In the summer I take it outside and shoot against a 9x12 dropcloth, about $30 at Home Depot. Add wireless speakers, and you have your own drive-in for about $349k less than a real one.

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  67. Custom projector for cheaper? by mldkfa · · Score: 1

    So I've seen 300 (1@ 6000 lumens http://ecom.mysylvania.com/sylvaniab2c/b2c/z_login .do;jsessionid=ID4002DB0.5994958202952388End;sapj2 ee_*=4002) and 500 watt double ended halogen bulbs for $5 at lowes and I'm wondering, what if you took 2 or 3 of these blubs and made your own housing for it with some mirrors and stuff like that. You would cut the cost of operating it like crazy and you'd have a really really bright light for it. Has anyone else thought of this and why didn't they? P.S. sorry about the link?

  68. Truly remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only $300, and just look at the elegant design and sturdy construction. $300 well-spent.

    *rolls eyes*

    Sometimes it's just better to buy things.

  69. Just pay the interest by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    You don't need to plan ahead for a $20 expense but you do have to plan ahead for a $300 expense.

    By that logic, you ought to just charge it and pay the $2/mo minimum interest payment on the credit card in perpetuity - heck, a soda can cost $2.

    Hint: save your money and pay for things you can afford when you can afford them.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  70. IBM Thinkpad by xixax · · Score: 1

    We had an IBM Thinkpad 486 where the back of the screen came off, and you could use an array of velrco straps to lash the sucker down to an overhead projector. We also had one of those LCD panels, and they were a bit underwhelming. I found ours when we moved last year, and didn't think much of turffing it in with all the other space-junk headed for disposal.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  71. My experience with DIY vrs Commercial DLP by Timtimes · · Score: 1

    I bought an OHP and a flat panel display off ebay. An Nview Spectra (640 x 480) an and Elmo portable OHP. Granted, the Nview was/is a slightly older technology, but it was made for this application. The main problem with these panels and I believe with the LCD monitors is their contrast ratio. The Spectra was 150:1, I think the LCD panels may be twice that, but blacks are still gray. Total cost: $200 My Benq 6200 is XGA DLP with 2000:1 contrast ratio. I bought this DLP without ever seeing ANY DLP in operation ($1150 after rebate). My wife was skeptical based on my DIY setup. Totally converted upon viewing the first DVD on it. My advice for those who want a CINEMA experience is to get a DLP. Enjoy.

    --
    This ain't no upwardly mobile freeway This is the road to hell
  72. Using a laptop screen... by M-G · · Score: 1

    THG's use of a flat panel display simplified things for connecting to a computer. As someone who has an older laptop with a dead backlight, I'd love to give it a shot with that display. Anyone know of any good references to tell me how to connect that panel to a PC's video card output?

  73. I now have a DIY XGA LCD Projection Panel. by phyrebyrd · · Score: 1

    To everyone who's been wondering if this could be made into a viable project that's a bit sturdier and easier to move around... the answer is yes. I spent a bit of $ on materials to do so, but, I'm satisfied with the results. I've got a 6000 lumen projector on the way... the projector I currently have is more than capable of giving me a 10 foot diagonal nighttime viewing with superb color and contrast.

    Here's a link to a picture of my projection panel, you'll have to forgive the location, it's the only hosting I have for this picture right now:

    http://www.skoolie.net/gallery/Odd_Projects/proj_p anel?full=1

    And to answer any questions about cooling, this setup keeps the panel at a "slightly warm to the touch" temperature with my current projector. It'll be interesting to see if cooling becomes an issue with the new projector when it arrives.

    -Kevin

    --
    "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." -Thom
  74. diyprojector by genesis1 · · Score: 1

    Its being done since about 4 years ago. built mine last march. Check out my site (use internet explorer only) http://www.diyprojectorphils.netfirms.com