Slashdot Mirror


TiVo to Sell Your Fast-Forward Button

Thomas Hawk writes "PVRblog is reporting today that TiVo will begin to place banner advertisements on your screen when you are fast forwarding. As one of the whole points for people getting a TiVo is to remove obtrusive advertising, it seems like a really bad move to force advertising on people at the exact moment that they are using your technology to avoid advertising. This act points to the desperation of TiVo and their management team and although it might help them in the short run it will most certainly backfire in the long run." This is ironic for a company whose slogan used to be "TV Your Way," but not surprising, since its CEO says he wants to move to a largely advertiser-supported revenue stream. I've bought three TiVos in the past four years, but my next PVR will run MythTV -- unless HR2391 passes and makes me a criminal for skipping commercials.

62 of 777 comments (clear)

  1. I dont think its such a bad idea by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .... I mean, its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding, and "free tv" needs some sort of revenue.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I have cable -- my TV is not free!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that the TIVO is NOT free. You paid for that device, and you paid for that service. Getting ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer.

      Now if they wanted to provide a "free" version of the TIVO subscription that was advertiser supported, then I could see this working.

    3. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by kb7oeb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thats not true, many of the channels charge the cable company per subscriber with ESPN and Disney being the most expensive

    4. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by MikeMacK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, people buy (or bought) TiVo's to avoid commercials. I don't think a business model that supplants their "own" commercials is going to work. Then again, I rarely watch TV anymore and then only PBS so I'm not really affected, unless they make it illegal to NOT watch TV. :-)

    5. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, people buy (or bought) their TiVo to get to their desired content (ie the show) faster. If the time lag reduction remains the same, what's the damn problem?

      It's not the advertising itself, it's the time wasted with the advertising.

    6. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by hsteck_ylf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That would be lovely though, wouldn't it... we need someone to develope a cable service where we can just watch and pay for the shows we want to watch without having any commercials. too bad the business plan for that is a bad one :(

      --
      If you are expecting something here, I don't know what to tell you...
    7. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I disagree. I think, most people, bought Tivo for its timeshifting and season pass features. Are commercials really so bad?

      You people need to get a life. The Networks generate their revenue off of sponsorship (read: commercials). Commercials are how the networks pay for all these shows you're watching! What don't you understand?

      You pay your cable bill to cover the delievery of those channels. Yes, some of the cable networks (ESPN, for one) charge cable companies to carry them. But that's a supply and demand issue. People want ESPN. They are willing to pay for it. How many cable companies have to pay for Food Network, or Spike TV? Not many, I'd say. If those channels weren't available, most people wouldn't have a problem with it.

      So, until you're ready to pony up the dough and pay for every channel like you pay for HBO, Showtime, and Pay-per-view, quit your bitching, and watch some freakin commercials.

      People don't make TV shows (for the most part) out of the goodness of their heart. They do it for profit.

      --
      /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
    8. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      See, if they did that, then they would have to produce shows worth watching ... that ain't gonna happen.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    9. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      How many cable companies have to pay for Food Network, or Spike TV? Not many, I'd say. If those channels weren't available, most people wouldn't have a problem with it.

      You can have my Emeril and ST:TNG reruns when you pry them from my cold dead hands!

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then why did my cable bill go up $3 a month when Steinbrenner's YES network was forced on me? It really irks this BoSox fan that part of my bill is paying Yankee salaries.

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    11. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Robber+Baron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Getting ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer.

      Exactly. Somebody needs to whack these morons with a cluestick. If I've gone to the trouble to avoid watching advertisments, you ramming them down my throat anyway is going to endear me to your company and make me want to buy your products...how exactly? Personally I will actually go out of my way to avoid purchasing stuff because the advertisments have pissed me off.

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    12. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by wibskey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      HBO is doing this. There are also cable companies that offer "on demand" services, that let you watch programs when you want, without commercials.

      While you're entitled to your opinion about what's "worth watching", there are millions of Americans willing to watch just about anything. The networks are still doing quite well with the quality of shows they are currently producing. Things are probably going to get worse before they get better.

    13. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I watch BOTH of those channels a lot!

      Rachael Ray is hot, and MXC is hilarious. :P

    14. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Cry me a friggn river. Oh no! They're going to show me non-invasive ads that in no way impeed my use of the product! Help me! Help me! The sky is falling!

      Would it be OK if graphics card or monitor companies decided to show you non-invasive ads while you used your computer? Those companies need to make money too, right?.

      Of course you assume there is such a thing as a non-invasive ad. If it's non-invasive, that means I won't see it. If I see it, then it's invasive. So how are they going to show me ads I don't see? Perhaps they'll be subliminabable.

    15. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Allow me to spell it out for you:

      You pay for cable to get a set of channels. You can pay a premium for channels that guarantee not to interrupt the programming with commercials (e.g. HBO, Cinemax, etc.)

      Similarly, people are paying a premium for TIVO services above and beyond regular TV service. One of the features they are paying for is to remove commercials from their programs. To forcefully add commercials back in is akin to HBO adding commercial breaks to their movies.

      Comprenda?

    16. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by MaxPower2263 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're all missing the point. One of the pleasing features of TiVo is the ability to FF through commercials, should I want to do so. That's my right after buying the TV, buying the cable service, buying the Tivo and paying the monthly subscription cost. Just like I don't want popups on my computer, I don't want them on my TV. If TiVo follows through with this, they may lose me as a customer (which will be a very sad day for me).

      --
      -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
      MaxPower (2263)
      "I got it from a hair dryer."
    17. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by dbc001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stop worrying. Grass-roots produced, bittorrent-distributed, creative commons licensed media will replace TV eventually. I have several friends who do pro-level video that have projects in the works. They will be free. If you don't believe me, check the new Wired magazine - Beastie Boys are putting out Creative Commons licensed tunes. Old school media conglomerates will wither and die. But we have to stop supporting them first.

    18. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhh, they do. Every time I boot my system I get a Tyan motherboard advertisement, an AMD advertisement, then a quick Nvidia advertisement (actually I was able to turn this off with the NoLogo option), as it boots I get a grub advertisement, then a Linux kernel advertisement. Once I log in there is a big Debian advertisement. Hell sitting her at work there is a big DELL advertisement just below the screen on my monitor and another in the upper left section of my keyboard and another on my mouse. Even my stapler has a big Swingline written in a nice cursive font across the top. Sure these are non intrusive. During boot and Post it almost looks like it is part of what needs to be done.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    19. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by SoCalChris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Again, if you don't like the service, don't subscribe. The same could be said of HBO; if they decided to change the terms and add commercials, then you'd always have the option to cancel.

      Except I didn't have to spend $300 up front for HBO, on top of their monthly subscription. If I cancel HBO, I'm not losing anything. If I cancel the TiVo service, that $300 box just became a big paperweight.

    20. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by spectecjr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stop worrying. Grass-roots produced, bittorrent-distributed, creative commons licensed media will replace TV eventually. I have several friends who do pro-level video that have projects in the works. They will be free. If you don't believe me, check the new Wired magazine - Beastie Boys are putting out Creative Commons licensed tunes. Old school media conglomerates will wither and die. But we have to stop supporting them first.


      This was moderated insightful?

      Pro-level video projects cost money. You can't film everything on location. You can't get all locations for free. You have to pay actors and skilled crewmembers - after all, this is their DAY JOB. Not everyone works for free.

      This will be a small and tiny niche. It will not grow - because creating media costs more than the cost of a camera and a microphone.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  2. Get people hooked... by Chatmag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then hammer them with advertising. Its the american way :)

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  3. Get a ReplayTV by nwf · · Score: 3, Informative

    All the more reason to get a ReplayTV! I love mine, which I've had for a few years after upgrading the hard drive to a 250 GB model. And DVArchive rocks: download shows and save them for later! Store a whole seasons worth on your PC and access them over the network from your ReplayTV unit.

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
  4. This is really going to ruin the spice channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Suffering Viagra ads while I'm skipping to the money shot.

    1. Re:This is really going to ruin the spice channel by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Funny

      It'd be stupid to advertise Viagra to you anyway, since if you're fast-forwarding through porn you must have the opposite problem...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  5. that's fine with me by rtsai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real value-add from TiVo here (for me, anyway) is not so much avoiding commercials as it is saving time.

    If the banner-ad-while-fast-forwarding still allows me to skip 4 minutes of commercials in 5 seconds, that's fine with me, as long as the banner-ad goes away when I'm *not* fast-forwarding ...

  6. Questions by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First of all, HR 2391 doesn't make it criminal to "skip commercials".

    It's meant to disallow technologies that bypass commercial and advertising content explicitly (such as things like the commercial skip features of old which skipped all ads, regardless of length, and returned you to the programming, or features that simply delete or auto-skip ad content altogether), but it won't prevent good ol' "fast forward" and 30 second skip features from working, nor will it make their use, even for commercial content, "criminal".

    However, it's the implementation that is the concern. If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem. But that is NOT the intent nor the purpose.

    On the subject of TiVo and placing banner ads during fast forwarding, and the general idea of *automatic* ad content skipping/deletion:

    If the entire TV industry is predicated on advertising, and the idea of advertising is predicating on paying to have as many people see your ads as possible (and the payment is proportional to proven amounts of people who may be watching), if an increasing number of people (many in educated and financially stable demographics) have the capability to avoid ever seeing any advertising, what, exactly, makes it worthwhile for advertisers to continue paying for it, at least at the same levels? You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?

    Sure, your cable/satellite bill can, but only to a point. There are billions of dollars that come from advertising. Is there not that side to this story as well?

    What about newspapers? Sure, you can argue that newspaper ads aren't "intrusive", in a time-dependent way, but would a newspaper or its advertisers welcome a service that made it free or easy to eliminate all ads, and keep the other content, while still keeping the newspaper cost at 50 cents?

    Additionally, I've seen people here and elsewhere say they actually wouldn't mind "advertising" for products and services they're actually interested in - but at the same time, people argue against giving anyone the data needed to do exactly that kind of targeted advertising as a violation of privacy.

    So, my question is, what takes the place of the advertising revenue? How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?

    1. Re:Questions by realdpk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "However, it's the implementation that is the concern. If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem. But that is NOT the intent nor the purpose."

      In an age when we have so many thousands (millions?) of lawyers in the nation, I do not think you can separate intent or purpose from what is written and how it is interpreted. We can't afford to be writing laws that are vague, and we have the resources to ensure it does not happen, should we choose to use them.

      "Sure, your cable/satellite bill can, but only to a point. There are billions of dollars that come from advertising. Is there not that side to this story as well?"

      I'd pay more per channel for cable if it had no advertising, no problem. Note I say per channel -- as in a la carte. Since I watch 2 or 3 channels via my TiVo I would probably end up paying less overall, but the channels whose services I use would be getting more.

      "How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?"

      It's acceptable exactly up to the point that the consumers allow it to be. If the consumers revolt, spend extra money on a product and service that allows them to skip them, it's no longer acceptable to them.

    2. Re:Questions by Japong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Boy, you must really hate Firefox's Adblock and Flashblock features.

      As much as I'd like to preserve the old business model of being forced to look at ads for minutes at a time, it's time to rethink this strategy now that we have 21st century technology... simply giving them billions of dollars in revenue because the're accustomed to getting billions of dollars of revenue doesn't cut it anymore.

    3. Re:Questions by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How does this make it less wrong?

      The point is that if I want to attach a device to my television that translates every third word into Algonquin once the signal comes into my device it's none of their business. If I write a module for MythTV that allows me to change all the commercials in my LiveTV programming into mpegs of dancing midgets throwing pickles at a naked woman it's none of their business.

      Their revenue stream and rights to artistic integrity end when they reach the consumer. At that point it's my signal in my device and as long as I don't rebroadcast it they need to leave me the hell alone.

    4. Re:Questions by bigpat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "What about newspapers? Sure, you can argue that newspaper ads aren't "intrusive", in a time-dependent way, but would a newspaper or its advertisers welcome a service that made it free or easy to eliminate all ads, and keep the other content, while still keeping the newspaper cost at 50 cents?"

      The difference is that tv, especially broadcast television, is a much more limited resource than a newspaper. Anyone can start up a newspaper and start distributing it, it is not regulated in the least. Which is a very good thing, but also appropriate for the medium which allows for naturally unlimited competition. If you don't like the content or presentation of one newspaper, another could take its place without much trouble.

      Television, especially broadcast television is considered a public resource. So, we as individuals have every right to demand that the use of the airwaves meets our best interests and not solely those of the licensees. We can argue about the rightness of that approach, but until broadcasters stop using public airwaves and the public rights of way (cable) then I demand that I be able to view the content anyway I damn well choose.

    5. Re:Questions by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?

      Well, economist Joseph Schumpeter came up with the theory of "creative destruction". In short, every now and then, a new innovation destroys the old economic model (think TiVo or, in the retail field, think Wal-Mart). The capitalist society comes up with a new way to respond to that innovation. In the case of TiVo, it appears that they will now have pop-up ads. In the case of Wal-Mart, you now see Sears and KMart merging. However, TiVo started the revolution, and now they are trying to take a step backwards. Unfortunately for them, there is a good chance the revolution is about to pass TiVo right by.

      What does that do for the Advertisers? Well, they better figure something out, otherwise, their economic model completely falls apart. In a capitalist society (which the US claims to be), it is up to the advertisers to figure their way out of this mess. If the advertisers don't figure it out, you'll see less money flowing to the TV networks and, a potential reduction in TV show budgets. Now, wouldn't THAT be a disaster! Those overpaid actors and network executives would start losing money. Oh well. If Hollywood isn't providing me with dumb entertainment, my entertainment dollar will go elsewhere.

      Creative Destruction. It's time that advertisers re-read their college economics textbooks. In short, I don't care about the advertisers, nor do I care about how the networks make money. In our economy, their problems are not my problems.

    6. Re:Questions by igaborf · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem.

      I have a problem with it anyway. It's a law that says I can do a thing but I cannot have a machine that does that thing for me. WTF? It's as though they passed a law that says you cannot use an electric can opener because forcing people to open cans manually will keep the market for food contained in glass bottles competitive with cans.

      And make no mistake, the intent is to keep people watching commercials, whatever the mechanics of the process. If the law as written doesn't have that end result, it will be reinterpreted or a new law will be written to further restrict our options.

      How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?

      How about letting the market decide that? If the payback from advertising drops to the point where it can no longer support creation and delivery of programming, what then? Will the demand for programming go away? I sincerely doubt it. Other revenue models will emerge, including direct payment (subscription and pay-per-view). What's wrong with that?

    7. Re:Questions by rmarll · · Score: 4, Funny

      Totally off topic...

      Funny that in blocking the ad's for "internet accelerator" I've accelerated my connection speed far more than their product ever will.

  7. So Ridiculous by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next announcement: It will be a criminal act to get up and take a leak while the commercials are on.

  8. Avoid ads or save time? by Covener · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd think most peoples' motivation is to save the time of viewing commercials, not because of some aversion to advertising.

    I'd think as long as the banners don't make the ffwd through commercial slower (by assuring they're on the screen for some specific time) people won't mind.

    Better for the marketing folks to pay tivos electric bills then us.

    1. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by fname · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I own 2 TiVos and I could not agree more. I fast forward through commercials to save time, nothing more nothing less. As long as I can still fast-forward through them, what's the big deal?

      The submitter's hysterical comments show an obvious distaste for this decision by TiVo, but his statement, "although it might help them in the short run it will most certainly backfire in the long run," displays a profound sense of arrogance; he knew about this for about 10 minutes before drawing a conclusion based on nothing more than gut, while TiVo Inc., has clearly thought about these issues and decided they were a net benenfit. I would like to know how the submitter became so "certain."

      This has nothing to do with your rights or online, or Your Rights Online, it's a business decision no worse than Apple papering NYC with iPod ads. Get over yourself.

      [good thing I have karma to burn]

  9. Well, TiVo's owners like it by jfengel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TiVo stock was up 7% yesterday on no news whatsoever and another 4% today. (Where "no news whatsoever" means "already known through back channels to everybody on the rumor boards, as well as close personal friends of the executives.)

    So the people who own TiVo seem to think that this is a profitable idea. Not just "profitable" in the sense of "charging more" but profitable in the sense of "making more money total", i.e. revenue - customers lost - lawsuits.

  10. Everyone chill out! by Slider · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow, talk about overreacting.
    Do you really think Tivo is stupid enough to alienate its customers? If you read the article you'll see that this in no way interferes with skipping commercials. It basically expands the "press thumbs up for more info" tag that appears in the top right of the screen during some commercials and makes them more of a billboard size. This is actually a popular feature among Tivo users as you could say, get a brochure for the new Corvette sent to your home by simply pressing thumbs up during the Chevrolet commercial. I welcome this.

  11. Agreed by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Allow me to begin by saying that I just purchased a TiVo less then a week ago. I actually netted it for a lousy $30 ($180 on Amazon - $50.00 promotional certificate - $100 mail-in rebate) figuring that I'd get the cheapest one and could always add a Hard Drive later (thanks to TiVo still being somewhat hacker-friendly).

    In one lousy week it has already changed the way I watch TV. Just the quick case in point: I didn't start watching Amazing Race until 9:45pm last night. By 11:30 I had seen both Amazing Race and Jon Stewart -- without watching a single commercial. That's 45 minutes of my life to do productive things (or surf Slashdot).

    Needless to say I will be the first one to cancel my service (after-all I only have a $30 investment) and stick pins into my TiVo voodoo dolls if they take the fast-forwarding away from me. What the heck would be the point of a DVR if they were to do that? I'd just go back to my VCR days.

    But if all they intend to do is place some advertisements on your screen while you are fast-forwarding then what exactly is the big deal? Did Jamie bother to RTFA before he went on his rant about switching to MythTV? To quote: "Kent says the advertising revenue will probably bring down the cost of TiVo to its 2 million subscribers -- currently $12.95 a month" So they sell some ad space (that I can just ignore for those 5-10 seconds I am FF'ing -- less if you use the 30 second hack) and my service becomes cheaper?

    Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:Agreed by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks.

      Let me be the first to welcome you to Slashdot.
      --


      --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
    2. Re:Agreed by Arhat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks.

      Annoyed at changes in policy with your TiVo service. We here at the Torches and Pitchforks, Inc understand your pain, that's why right now we are offering a torch and pitchfork combo deal for only $19.95. That's right, $19.95 for two must have mob items. Act in the next 15 minutes and receive a free noose. Don't wait, these items are going fast.

  12. Re:Actually, I think this is an EXCELLENT idea. by FroBugg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Listen, TiVo needs to make money. They're a company selling a product. Everyone seems to forget that and whine when they don't give you everything for free. I applaud them for coming up with a way to sell ad space without interfering with normal use of the product.

    Nobody's asking to get anything for free. TiVo already charges for the unit and you have to pay a monthly charge to just use the damn thing. If they want to add banner ads and give me the service free, that's great, but it's not what they're doing.

  13. Email Directv and Tivo by thealpha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let them know that you are not pleased. I just sent a message to directv and will follow through with cancellation if this becomes reality. I have a PVR just don't use it because the Tivo is easy for my wife and kids to use.

    Here is a link to the Directv Feedback page,
    http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/glb/Form_Feed back.ds p

    and a link to Tivo's contact page
    http://www.tivo.com/5.9.asp

  14. My ReplayTV doesn't do this... by EvilMagnus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...yet.

    I still have 30-sec skip out of the box and the ability to download shows to my PC with free tools over the built in NIC. Sure, it may not run Linux, but it has 2 advantages over TiVO:

    1. It doesn't force me to watch commercials while fast forwarding.
    2. It doesn't assume I'm a gay octogenarian and record shows it thinks I'll love.

    --
    -EvilMagnus
  15. Good for TiVo. by Xibby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good for TiVo for using their technology for profit. Isn't that the point of going into business?

    Ideally (this is how I think it should work, I don't know exactly how it works...):
    Think of how many commercials are on the air. If advertisers are concerned about commercial skipping, they pay TiVo for the software needed to encode a billboard into their ad, similar to the "press thumbs up to record" or "press thumbs up for more info" that you see often on NBC.

    When TiVo is fast forwarding through the ad and sees the bill board encoded in the video stream, it displays the bill board.

    So:

    - TV stations are happy because advertisers want to buy longer ad slots in order to increase the time their bill board is on the screen during a TiVo fast forward.
    - Advertisers are happy because they have a captive audience for their ads. (you actually have to attentively watch the screen or you'll fast forward into your show)
    - TiVo is happy because they have another revenue source.
    - TiVo owners are still happy because they are still getting through commercials at the same rate as they did before TiVo added this feature.

    Who exactly is loosing?

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
  16. Cheese and Crackers!!! by barfy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, RTFA... This is not about putting banner ads during fast forward. It is about putting up interaction during ads. This has already been tested and is shown to work. (IE people respond to it).

    It is also an article showing that TiVo can provide advertisements that have better response rates than interstitial advertising provides.

    But this slashdot posting is editorializing from beginning to end. I can understand that *you* don't wnat to see any advertising ever... Good for you. (but look at the banners at the top and right of the the slashdot page you nit.) But you know nothing about why I or many people have TiVo! And for the most part all this editorializing is WRONG. The interstital is being replaced by the more attractive click-ins. The ads are better produced, more entertaining, more informative. And they are not being replaced by more intrusive advertising. It is being replaced by *less* intrusive and more interactive advertising. And you can still opt out of the data collection! Get a friggin grip.

  17. TiVo Commercial Skipping Trick by EricHsu · · Score: 3, Informative
    Select - Play - Select - 3 - 0 - Select

    Now your 'jump to index button' (the right arrow pointing at a pipe ->|) will jump 30 seconds if you are in play mode. You can change the 3 and 0 to suit your needs. The 'jump to index' still works as it used to if you are in rewind or fastforward mode.

  18. Enable the 30 second skip and don't worry about it by Luscious868 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just enable the 30 second skip and you'll never use fast forward to skip commercials again. When it's enabled, the -->| button becomes a 30 second skip button.

    To enable:

    1. Grab your TiVo remote.

    2. Bring up any recorded program. (You have to be watching a recorded program rather than "Live TV" in order to enable the feature.)

    3. On your TiVo remote, key in the following sequence:
    SELECT PLAY SELECT 30 SELECT

    4. If you've successfully entered the code, you should hear three "bings" in succession to inform you that you've successfully enabled the 30 second skip.

    The only down side is that any time your TiVo is rebooted (such as after a power outage or a software update) you'll have to re-enable this feature.

  19. Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "When you fast-forward, the content isn't all that interesting anyhow." That's the assumption. Where's the support?

    Yes, I use TiVo to skip over commercials. I also use FF for shows I can watch without sound and faster than real time. Will the service know if I'm FF over a commercial or for some other purpose?

    For example I can watch a 3-hour football match in about half the time. I don't need the analyst's inane chatter, and I can always go back to regular speed to catch a big play.

    In addition, this 'feature' contradicts TiVo's own marketing. There's no sound while a show is in FF, but one of TiVo's tips is to turn on the closed captions and read the dialogue while watching the show faster.

    If the banner ad is anywhere on the screen where I can see it, then it is intrusive.

    "Listen, TiVo needs to make money. They're a company selling a product. Everyone seems to forget that and whine when they don't give you everything for free. I applaud them for coming up with a way to sell ad space without interfering with normal use of the product."

    That's just wrong. TiVo gives NOTHING for free. I've already paid for the hardware and paid for the service, and I didn't whine about it. This is TiVo unilaterally changing the terms of the deal after they have my money. Would you applaud nVidia if they decided to display banner ads on every computer with their graphics cards? Listen, nVidia needs to make money, right?

    "What would you rather have, no fast-forward, forcing you to watch commercials, or a fast-forward with a small screen overlay that you only have to look at for as long as you are fast-forwarding?"

    I'd rather have the service I paid for. But you're missing the real question, would you rather have FF with a small screen overlay, or a boat anchor that's useless if TiVo goes out of business and no other company picks up the service?

  20. mythTV rocks by fulana_lover · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a mythTV with 500GB of attached storage and it just rocks... I originally owned a tivo (added 80GB to it), loved it, but didn't want yet-another-monthly-bill after that tivo died and wanted something where I can dump my DVD collection with either a DVD jukebox or massive storage. its absolutely brilliant, no monthly fees, I get CVS builds once every few weeks, I have a nice quiet Antec Sonata case hidden away, and I have over 200 DVDs I ripped using mythTV so I can watch them whenever I want, however I want. LOL i use mythTV more for the ripped DVDs than TV, I probably only watch 3-4 hours of recorded TV per week (daily show, 24, amazing race, will & grace). The only improvement to mythTV I hope to see is picture quality... imo the PVR-250/350s that most people use for recording isn't the highest quality, I think my Tivo had slightly better TV quality and much, much faster channel changing while watching live. Hopefully a next generation of HDTV PC cards will come out without silly cap'ing problems and we will all be happy :)

  21. Re:How do you separate the two? by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny
    "I defy you to deliver channels to me *without* the content."
    • Turn on UPN or the WB any day of the week...

  22. Let's put this another way... by Theovon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These days, companies are finding it harder and harder to stay in business. It's a bad economy. In a better economy, there would be more TiVo customers, and they would be able to make enough revenue, but unfortunately, every company, and TiVo is no exception, is finding it hard to make ends meet.

    We're used to hearing about how greedy companies are. And there are plenty of them, with Microsoft being their poster-boy. But when you're a company with real competition, then you're walking a fine line between making enough income and selling at a competitive price. It's hard to balance. Apple is one of the few companies that seems to be able to charge a premium with impunity.

    I'm not saying I know for SURE that TiVo is struggling financially, but given the statistics, they probably are. Making that assumption, they are faced with a choice between increasing what they charge customers or finding some OTHER way of increasing revenue. Selling banner ad space is just such an alternative.

    Frankly, I suspect that most people would prefer to see an unintrusive banner appear when fast-forwarding than to have to pay a higher monthly fee.

  23. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Hassman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I actually own the TIVO stock.

    The price drop was due to the break in the relationship between TIVO and DirectTV.

    Investors didn't think TIVO could make it without being directly related to a service provider. The sentiment is slowly changing as more and more people suscribe to TIVO independent of DirectTV.

    I sure hope it comes back more. I lost my shirt. They had everything going for them until that announcement.

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  24. Re:people, get a clue by Ecks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Skipping the commercials in broadcast television is no more theft than eating from the sample tray at your grocery store. The broadcast company is gambling that as you watch their content you will be convinced to make a purchasing decision based on its the advertising portion. Just like your local grocer is gambling that you will may like the products that he has on his sample tray enough to buy them.

    The problem here is that this gamble hasn't been paying off lately and the advertising industry has been looking outward for someone to blame rather than looking inward and seeing how they are a large part of the problem. Our world is so filled with advertising now that it's impossible for any one spot stick out. The result is that none of the advertising is persuasive and the industry is losing its gamble wholesale. The broadcast industry is at risk that their clients will decide that this type of advertising doesn't work.

    If we are very very lucky this entire industry will collapse or explode and everyone will get up off of the couch and go running or read a book like you say.

    -- Ecks

  25. Agreed Reloaded by lastberserker · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That's 45 minutes of my life to do productive things (or surf Slashdot).
    Yeah, just like buying some $500 piece of crap you don't need for $100 saves you $400 off MSRP. Why not skip both Amazing Race and Jon Stewart and save 1:45 to do productive things (or surf Slashdot)? ;-)
    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
  26. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Tazzy531 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Been following them for the past year. They are facing a problem of becoming a commodity. Each independent cable/satellite company is rolling out their own home grown DVR box. DirectTV dropped them last March and divested from them quite a bit.
    the last big news was that Microsoft just signed a deal with Comcast to provide DVR service, which directly competes with TIVO.
    This ad-skipping commercial is good news for us shareholders. They need to prove that they have alternative revenues than just subscription.
    Now to put on my consumer/techy hat. Why would anyone have a problem of seeing a banner ad rather than a blank screen when they fast forward? It's not hurting you in any way. I understand that since you pay 12.95 a month you should get it ad-free. But why not make the same request to cable television? I'm paying $33/month for cable TV, should I have the same expectation that Comedy Central is ad-free?

    --


    _______________________________
    "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  27. Re:Good Point by willy134 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Been using mythTV for over a year now and commercials ARE that bad. My broadcast channels show commercials that are far worse than any commercials on my dishnetwork channels.

    Once you are used to watching commercial free and something happens (computer crash etc...) and you watch TV you feel assaulted after watching the commercials. I don't want to know (nor my kids to know) about the newest (fe)male enhancement drug.
    I don't care about the next episode of some stupid sitcom with low ratings.

    People say tv makes you dumber. I would have to say that commercials just add to that. Why waste 15 minutes watching an hour show when you can watch it later and in shorter time

    The only dissadvantage to not having commercials is trying to make time for a pee break(oh I guess that is what the pause button is for)

    --
    Can you ping me now?... Good!
  28. Skipping the commercials by wbtittle · · Score: 3, Funny

    This just in: "A new bill being lobby for in congress will make it illegal for you to leave your television off." Providers of entertainment, in desperate need of more money intend to enable police officers to detain you for not watching television.

    --
    God: "I don't leave footprints!"
  29. Make your TiVo "ReadOnly" by SurfTheWorld · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I own 3 TiVO's and have modified them with larger disks, network connectivity, and video extraction capability. I've been doing this since I bought my first TiVO in Fall 2000.

    One of the primary drawbacks to root'ing your TiVO was that the next time a software update was transmitted from the magic entertainment boob in the sky, all your hard work would be erased, as the update would wipe the OS install clean (usually).

    While my work in the TiVO community has dwindled significantly in the past months, I did happen to take note of a warning that said something to the effect of "Disable Remote Update". I'm not certain what this feature of the hack does, but it sounds (at least from the name) that it would not allow TiVO or DTV to upgrade your TiVO's OS from 3.1 to 3.x in the future.

    I'm going to go look into that option now. But I think that if you really feel strongly about TiVO and DTV whoring themselves to the ad-nipple in California, you might want to invest a Saturday afternoon in root'ing your TiVO so that you won't receive this unwanted feature.

    -c

    --
    Do it for da shorties
  30. oh well. by DaveJay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once upon a time, I watched little to no TV -- and by that, I mean I watched a Simpson's episode once every few weeks, and that was it.

    Then TiVo came along (my wife, who watches TV, wanted it) and I was totally drawn in. Freed from having to pay attention to programming schedules and whatnot, and given the ability to pause live TV and skip commercials, I started watching more TV. Now, a weekly roster includes NASCAR racing, three or four programs from the Cartoon Network, the Daily Show, and other tidbits.

    Then, several months ago, TiVo tried a new kind of advertisement wherein an interstitial ad popped up when you tried to reach the main menu, asking you if you wanted to find out more, or continue on to the menu. It infuriated me (and others in public forums) because it put the advertising in the way of the menu I was trying to access, which was highly intrusive.

    I was ready to get rid of TiVo at that point, but evidentally the TiVo folks got a lot of flak for it, because the next ad showed up as a link in the main menu instead -- and I decided it was acceptable since I could safely ignore it.

    Well, my jury's still out on this one. If the ads are merely visual annoyances that can be ignored (I do, after all, watch NASCAR, so I'm used to it) I'll continue the service, but if the ads in any way interfere with the usability of the device, I think I'm done.

    And that, at the end of the day, would be a good thing. It's too easy to forget that TV is a toy, not a necessity.

  31. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Politburo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand that since you pay 12.95 a month you should get it ad-free. But why not make the same request to cable television? I'm paying $33/month for cable TV, should I have the same expectation that Comedy Central is ad-free?

    No, you don't understand. It's completely different.

    If you were a new customer to cable, you would expect commercials on most channels. It would have been no surprise if you had done just a cursory amount of research on the service you were signing up for.

    If you saw TiVO at a friend's house and signed up for it, you would not have the expectation of any banner ads whatsoever, no matter how much research you did on the service (rumors aside). All of the sudden, you will now be getting ads.

    Bait and switch.