Slashdot Mirror


TiVo to Sell Your Fast-Forward Button

Thomas Hawk writes "PVRblog is reporting today that TiVo will begin to place banner advertisements on your screen when you are fast forwarding. As one of the whole points for people getting a TiVo is to remove obtrusive advertising, it seems like a really bad move to force advertising on people at the exact moment that they are using your technology to avoid advertising. This act points to the desperation of TiVo and their management team and although it might help them in the short run it will most certainly backfire in the long run." This is ironic for a company whose slogan used to be "TV Your Way," but not surprising, since its CEO says he wants to move to a largely advertiser-supported revenue stream. I've bought three TiVos in the past four years, but my next PVR will run MythTV -- unless HR2391 passes and makes me a criminal for skipping commercials.

135 of 777 comments (clear)

  1. I dont think its such a bad idea by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .... I mean, its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding, and "free tv" needs some sort of revenue.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I have cable -- my TV is not free!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that the TIVO is NOT free. You paid for that device, and you paid for that service. Getting ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer.

      Now if they wanted to provide a "free" version of the TIVO subscription that was advertiser supported, then I could see this working.

    3. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Sc00ter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you pay for cable you are not paying for the content on the TV (with the exception of premium channels) you are paying for the delivery of the channels.

    4. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by kb7oeb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thats not true, many of the channels charge the cable company per subscriber with ESPN and Disney being the most expensive

    5. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by MikeMacK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, people buy (or bought) TiVo's to avoid commercials. I don't think a business model that supplants their "own" commercials is going to work. Then again, I rarely watch TV anymore and then only PBS so I'm not really affected, unless they make it illegal to NOT watch TV. :-)

    6. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is this different than cable TV? You paid for the device (your television) and you paid for the service. They ram commercials down your throat just the same. If you don't like the terms, cancel your service.

    7. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well it depends. Will it be just a banner or will it have sound? Frankly I hate most commercials because they are just stupid. I have a suggestion to increase add revinue. Less ads. Do not show a block of four ads twice in an 30 minute show. Show only two 30 second spots in a 30 minute show AND charge more for them. I would be a lot less likly to surf to another channel or ff over one short ad than a two minute block of ads. Think of it like a magazine. I am more likly to see that full page ad than one of 6 ads cramed on a page. I will tend to skip over it. I might also be more likley to read a single 1/4 page ad in the middle of a page of text than a big block of ads.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, people buy (or bought) their TiVo to get to their desired content (ie the show) faster. If the time lag reduction remains the same, what's the damn problem?

      It's not the advertising itself, it's the time wasted with the advertising.

    9. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by hsteck_ylf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That would be lovely though, wouldn't it... we need someone to develope a cable service where we can just watch and pay for the shows we want to watch without having any commercials. too bad the business plan for that is a bad one :(

      --
      If you are expecting something here, I don't know what to tell you...
    10. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I disagree. I think, most people, bought Tivo for its timeshifting and season pass features. Are commercials really so bad?

      You people need to get a life. The Networks generate their revenue off of sponsorship (read: commercials). Commercials are how the networks pay for all these shows you're watching! What don't you understand?

      You pay your cable bill to cover the delievery of those channels. Yes, some of the cable networks (ESPN, for one) charge cable companies to carry them. But that's a supply and demand issue. People want ESPN. They are willing to pay for it. How many cable companies have to pay for Food Network, or Spike TV? Not many, I'd say. If those channels weren't available, most people wouldn't have a problem with it.

      So, until you're ready to pony up the dough and pay for every channel like you pay for HBO, Showtime, and Pay-per-view, quit your bitching, and watch some freakin commercials.

      People don't make TV shows (for the most part) out of the goodness of their heart. They do it for profit.

      --
      /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
    11. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2

      You're missing the point. People already bought it for its ability to remove commercials. Now TIVO will change that, and a lot of TIVO customers will have no way of recovering the cost of that purchase.

    12. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      See, if they did that, then they would have to produce shows worth watching ... that ain't gonna happen.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    13. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by stecoop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lets turn scenario in a way that benefits you:

      You're not really looking at anything useful while you're using the restroom - why not let some company come in and install ads there?
      Why not let the ads run on the TV while going for refreshment...

      And when you're lying in bed, getting ready to go to sleep (or just waking up), there's a perfect blank space on your ceiling for some more ads.
      Lets back load all adds from TIVO to certain hours of the day. My Tivo is never turned off but I turn off the TV and sleep. This is an optimal time for all commercials to run. Let the Tivo unit run commercials like a screen saver.

      And if you're taking a walk in the woods, hey, you've seen one tree, you've seen 'em all, right? Ads!
      Hmm I'm not sure where your going with this but if it's your land do with it as you legally please.

      Just because a space is empty does NOT mean it's OK to put ads there.
      Like I said try to twist everything to benefit you.

    14. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      How many cable companies have to pay for Food Network, or Spike TV? Not many, I'd say. If those channels weren't available, most people wouldn't have a problem with it.

      You can have my Emeril and ST:TNG reruns when you pry them from my cold dead hands!

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    15. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then why did my cable bill go up $3 a month when Steinbrenner's YES network was forced on me? It really irks this BoSox fan that part of my bill is paying Yankee salaries.

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    16. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but, I'm wondering if this 'new' advertising mode in the FF stage, will spell the end of the 30 second skip 'hack' you can do??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      >If you don't like the terms, cancel your service.

      Sure, fine -- except I bought a "lifetime" subscription.

      I started out paying month to month, but once I realized what a major convenience TiVo was (letting me save time by skipping commercials and making it easier for me to record and watch what I wanted in the little time I do have), I paid out a lifetime subscription.

      Now, I don't think I'll have a problem with banners poping up as I forward through commercials (or 30-sec skip?) as long as it doesn't interfere with what I'm trying to watch. I don't mind the spots that it downloads now (I either ignore them or, like the Corvette & GMC ads, watch them).

      If it does interfere, I don't really have any recourse. I've bought (and modded) the machine and pre-paid for the service. I've invested and taken the risk that TiVo service is going to be around. If they go under, well that's part of the risk I took. If they change their service where it becomes irritating to have to see popup ads, I guess that's also part of the risk. If it becomes unusable because of intrusive ads*, that's something I never anticipated. :(

      *I don't think it will:

      ...TiVo has done its homework and knows its customer, Kent says. The new ads intrigue viewers instead of annoy them. They pop up and disappear in a matter of seconds if the viewer isn't interested. "You'll never see TiVo roll out any kind of intrusive advertising," Kent says. "It's very core to our mission."

      I sure hope that's the case.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    18. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by arminw · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer...

      Many /.ers are probably to young to remember the days before cable tv existed. There was only broadcast over the air. At first, cable was touted to the consumer as a way to get commercial free tv and consistent high quality reception. It did not take long and there were lots of commercials on the "commercial free" cable channels. So now with Tivo it will be just a repeat performance of past history in a new technology.

      --
      All theory is gray
    19. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Robber+Baron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Getting ads you don't want is a betrayal of the customer.

      Exactly. Somebody needs to whack these morons with a cluestick. If I've gone to the trouble to avoid watching advertisments, you ramming them down my throat anyway is going to endear me to your company and make me want to buy your products...how exactly? Personally I will actually go out of my way to avoid purchasing stuff because the advertisments have pissed me off.

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    20. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by horrens · · Score: 2, Interesting

      here in estonia we already have this, a major broadband company is providing a service where you can watch shows and movies from the local tv stations, they will up your bandwith for the streaming and the charge will be added to your cable bill

    21. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm afraid I disagree with you. I have a TiVo, and the reason isn't so I can skip advertisements. Its a PVR, not a "fastforward through comercials for free" device. Sure, that's how many people view it, but that's not the purpose of it. Adding commercials doesn't betray the user, just annoys him. You had it good, but they aren't changing a fundamental point of TiVo... you can still record shows.. you can still save shows... you can still get season passes.

      Honestly, I'm all for it if it means they stay afloat longer.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    22. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by wibskey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      HBO is doing this. There are also cable companies that offer "on demand" services, that let you watch programs when you want, without commercials.

      While you're entitled to your opinion about what's "worth watching", there are millions of Americans willing to watch just about anything. The networks are still doing quite well with the quality of shows they are currently producing. Things are probably going to get worse before they get better.

    23. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      .... I mean, its not like you are looking at anything useful while you are fastforwarding, and "free tv" needs some sort of revenue.

      Where's your IANATO (I am not a TiVo owner)?

      Any legal thread quickly over flows with 'IANAL', any discussion of IP brings out the folks who don't know copyright form trademark, so why should this thread be any different?

      Yes, I use TiVo to skip over commercials. I also use FF for shows I can watch without sound and faster than real time. Will the service know if I'm FF over a commercial or for some other purpose?

      For example I can watch a 3-hour football match in about half the time. I don't need the analyst's inane chatter, and I can always go back to regular speed to catch a big play.

      In addition, this 'feature' contradicts TiVo's own marketing. There's no sound while a show is in FF, but one of TiVo's tips is to turn on the closed captions and read the dialogue while watching the show faster.

      How is TiVo "free tv"? TiVo gives NOTHING for free. I've already paid for the hardware and paid for the service, and I didn't whine about it. This is TiVo unilaterally changing the terms of the deal after they have my money. Would you applaud nVidia if they decided to display banner ads on every computer with their graphics cards? Listen, nVidia needs to make money, right?

    24. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "You people need to get a life. The Networks generate their revenue off of sponsorship (read: commercials). Commercials are how the networks pay for all these shows you're watching! What don't you understand?"

      Exactly ... A lot of the stupidities of television can be easily be explained once you realise that the product is YOU, the viewer, and you are being sold to the advertisers, who are the real customers.

      These shows that play on TV are just 'unfortunate necessities' of doing business.

      Again I am reminded why I almost never watch TV and instead just play my DVDs with no commercials.

    25. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I watch BOTH of those channels a lot!

      Rachael Ray is hot, and MXC is hilarious. :P

    26. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Cry me a friggn river. Oh no! They're going to show me non-invasive ads that in no way impeed my use of the product! Help me! Help me! The sky is falling!

      Would it be OK if graphics card or monitor companies decided to show you non-invasive ads while you used your computer? Those companies need to make money too, right?.

      Of course you assume there is such a thing as a non-invasive ad. If it's non-invasive, that means I won't see it. If I see it, then it's invasive. So how are they going to show me ads I don't see? Perhaps they'll be subliminabable.

    27. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Allow me to spell it out for you:

      You pay for cable to get a set of channels. You can pay a premium for channels that guarantee not to interrupt the programming with commercials (e.g. HBO, Cinemax, etc.)

      Similarly, people are paying a premium for TIVO services above and beyond regular TV service. One of the features they are paying for is to remove commercials from their programs. To forcefully add commercials back in is akin to HBO adding commercial breaks to their movies.

      Comprenda?

    28. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It really irks this BoSox fan that part of my bill is paying Yankee salaries.

      Someone has to pay the salaries of the players that play against your beloved BoSox. Else there would be no league, no games, and no reason for BoSox to exist.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    29. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by MaxPower2263 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're all missing the point. One of the pleasing features of TiVo is the ability to FF through commercials, should I want to do so. That's my right after buying the TV, buying the cable service, buying the Tivo and paying the monthly subscription cost. Just like I don't want popups on my computer, I don't want them on my TV. If TiVo follows through with this, they may lose me as a customer (which will be a very sad day for me).

      --
      -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
      MaxPower (2263)
      "I got it from a hair dryer."
    30. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not really, since they're adding commercials in to the time that you spend fast-forwarding through the recorded commercials. It doesn't add commercials in the middle of some show that you're watching where there were none before.

      Again, if you don't like the service, don't subscribe. The same could be said of HBO; if they decided to change the terms and add commercials, then you'd always have the option to cancel.

    31. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you can't figure out how the EULAs that have become ubiquitous recently differ from actual real contracts, then you are either in your teens or 20's, or stupid.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    32. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by dbc001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stop worrying. Grass-roots produced, bittorrent-distributed, creative commons licensed media will replace TV eventually. I have several friends who do pro-level video that have projects in the works. They will be free. If you don't believe me, check the new Wired magazine - Beastie Boys are putting out Creative Commons licensed tunes. Old school media conglomerates will wither and die. But we have to stop supporting them first.

    33. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cable companies aren't as bad as the satellite companies. They bombard my home and property with radiation 24 hours a day 7 days a week yet charge me for looking at it, and have made it illegal for me to do anything with it without giving them money.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    34. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Slime-dogg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm... no.

      Tivo doesn't make my reception any faster. That sounds very much like the Intel marketing that the Pentium 4 made the internet faster.

      Tivo lets me record a number of shows when I can't watch them, so that I may watch them later. Tivo also provides a service of providing my hardware with up-to-date listings, as well as recording shows that I might like to fill up the space that I don't use.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    35. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhh, they do. Every time I boot my system I get a Tyan motherboard advertisement, an AMD advertisement, then a quick Nvidia advertisement (actually I was able to turn this off with the NoLogo option), as it boots I get a grub advertisement, then a Linux kernel advertisement. Once I log in there is a big Debian advertisement. Hell sitting her at work there is a big DELL advertisement just below the screen on my monitor and another in the upper left section of my keyboard and another on my mouse. Even my stapler has a big Swingline written in a nice cursive font across the top. Sure these are non intrusive. During boot and Post it almost looks like it is part of what needs to be done.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    36. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by boog3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and watch some freakin commercials

      Just like I dislike commercials, I also dislike your opinion of commercials. I DO NOT want to watch them, and I am willing to pay not to have to.

      Just because you are accustomed to the subconscious gang-bang that is modern advertising culture, I will not condone my subjugation at the hands of your corporate masters.

      Our rights are abstract and fleeting, easily stolen when we lapse in fortitude and much costlier to regain than to sustain. Your willingness to give up yours not only drags the rest of us down with you, but makes it harder for others to support you in the future.

      I am not saying that Tivo is stripping our rights, I am saying that Tivo engendered a certain pioneering vision in the masses' fight that is now becoming corrupted. While this is not surpising, Tivo is corporate and is beholden to higher powers, it is another distressing example of the corporate advertising influence in society.

      I think advertising is the worst and most prevalent drug in our society and that people fail to realize the impact it has on their subconscious. Mass market advertising contributes to the mental enslavement of the world to corporate society.

      --
      signatures are for fools with hands
    37. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by stanmann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Time warner aka Roadrunner made it fairly easy as well calling it "antenna+ service" or something similar, However Cableone where I currently live has "basic service" for $45+ and when you ask for the minimum service, they don't know what you are talking about, their program is called "lifeline" and if you don't ask for it by name, the phone support employees play dumb.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    38. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by SoCalChris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Again, if you don't like the service, don't subscribe. The same could be said of HBO; if they decided to change the terms and add commercials, then you'd always have the option to cancel.

      Except I didn't have to spend $300 up front for HBO, on top of their monthly subscription. If I cancel HBO, I'm not losing anything. If I cancel the TiVo service, that $300 box just became a big paperweight.

    39. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by spectecjr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stop worrying. Grass-roots produced, bittorrent-distributed, creative commons licensed media will replace TV eventually. I have several friends who do pro-level video that have projects in the works. They will be free. If you don't believe me, check the new Wired magazine - Beastie Boys are putting out Creative Commons licensed tunes. Old school media conglomerates will wither and die. But we have to stop supporting them first.


      This was moderated insightful?

      Pro-level video projects cost money. You can't film everything on location. You can't get all locations for free. You have to pay actors and skilled crewmembers - after all, this is their DAY JOB. Not everyone works for free.

      This will be a small and tiny niche. It will not grow - because creating media costs more than the cost of a camera and a microphone.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    40. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by zymurgyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wish they'd give my $2 back and take it from some willing ESPN subscriber. It really irks me as a broadband Internet fan that part of my bill is paying for the continuation of pointless sporting events.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    41. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You people need to get a life. The Networks generate their revenue off of sponsorship (read: commercials). Commercials are how the networks pay for all these shows you're watching! What don't you understand?
      The Tarzan version: Me buy Tivo. Me pay Tivo. Tivo not network. Network business model separate from me and Tivo relationship, and not my problem.

      If the network goes under because people don't watch their ads . . . tough tootie. I'd be happy to pay for the one to three shows I watch every week, and if the vast sea of reality TV, sports, gameshows, and soap operas sinks beneath the waves it will only be good for the country and the world. Many of these so-called "actors," "writers," and other "talent" should be competing as baristas and shoe-store clerks anyway.

      As for getting a life, I can't think of much of a crusade to get people to watch commericals so the poor networks can make their nut. I mean, UNICEF can always use some help. Wouldn't your leverage be more helpful there?

    42. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by balloonpup · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I fast forward for more reasons than just skipping commercials. So in addition to adding ads to the ads, they're also adding ads to just general scanning of a program.

      As to the 'don't like it, don't subscribe', sure, that makes sense if you haven't bought a Tivo yet, but given the price for a Tivo (I paid $200 for mine), it goes a bit beyond that. In all honesty, I wouldn't have bought mine if I had known they were going to do this. It's been long enough that I can just eat the price, but if I had just bought one new, I'd be mighty pissed.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    43. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by farble1670 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the types of advertising that tivo is inserting are VERY different than a TV commercial. a TV commcercial forces me to sit there (or go away) for an amount of time that i do not control. if tivo inserts a banner when i am ff'ing, who cares? they are not causing me to spend any longer to ff through commercials, right? i am in complete control of when i stop ff'ing and therefore stop viewing their add.

      while i think we all find tv commercials annoying, i would say that the primary issue is not the content, but the delay in programming. ya ya the content is offensive and degrading, but that's the price of living in a society such as ours, so get used to it. tivo is not causing any delay in programming. i'm okay with that. compare this to web page advertising. while it might add minimal time to your browsing, in general it is palpable. if you want to make a comparison to tv commercials, that would be like if the browser locked me into an advertising-only page for a fixed amount of time. i think most folks would fine that unacceptable.

      when you buy tivo service, you are not paying for the right to ff through commericials. you are paying to get the program listing downloaded into your device. in fact you can certainly use your tivo without the monthly fee, you just need to program the record times and channels manually. tivo does not make money off of the device. your thinking of the manufacturers, like sony, and everyone else that produces tivo devices. tivo writes the software for the device, but it's done on a no-profit basis in order to get more tivo devices out there and therefore get more subscriptions to the listing service. tivo is not is a position to charge premiums to device manufacturers to use the tivo service.

    44. Re:I dont think its such a bad idea by Caseyscrib · · Score: 2, Informative
      I disagree. I think, most people, bought Tivo for its timeshifting and season pass features. Are commercials really so bad?

      Ya know, back several years ago there used to be limits on how many commercials were allowed to be on tv. It was something like 2 minutes for every half hour. Then the companies lobbied the FCC and said they would behave. For the first few years they did as they promised, and slowly started to get worse and worse. It has now gotten so out of hand there are nearly 8 minutes of commercials for every 30 minutes. If they could make money out of 2 minutes of air time, they can certainly make money out of 8. I don't think media executives are worrying about putting food on their plate.

  2. Get people hooked... by Chatmag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then hammer them with advertising. Its the american way :)

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  3. Get a ReplayTV by nwf · · Score: 3, Informative

    All the more reason to get a ReplayTV! I love mine, which I've had for a few years after upgrading the hard drive to a 250 GB model. And DVArchive rocks: download shows and save them for later! Store a whole seasons worth on your PC and access them over the network from your ReplayTV unit.

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
  4. This is really going to ruin the spice channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Suffering Viagra ads while I'm skipping to the money shot.

    1. Re:This is really going to ruin the spice channel by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Funny

      It'd be stupid to advertise Viagra to you anyway, since if you're fast-forwarding through porn you must have the opposite problem...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  5. that's fine with me by rtsai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real value-add from TiVo here (for me, anyway) is not so much avoiding commercials as it is saving time.

    If the banner-ad-while-fast-forwarding still allows me to skip 4 minutes of commercials in 5 seconds, that's fine with me, as long as the banner-ad goes away when I'm *not* fast-forwarding ...

    1. Re:that's fine with me by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not meaning to completely hijaack this thread but MythTV supports automatic commercial skip. It'll automagically jump past your commercials or you can skip them with the click of one button. Even 5 seconds is too long in MythTV land :)

      True that some ReplayTV series had a similar feature but that's been done away with.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  6. Questions by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First of all, HR 2391 doesn't make it criminal to "skip commercials".

    It's meant to disallow technologies that bypass commercial and advertising content explicitly (such as things like the commercial skip features of old which skipped all ads, regardless of length, and returned you to the programming, or features that simply delete or auto-skip ad content altogether), but it won't prevent good ol' "fast forward" and 30 second skip features from working, nor will it make their use, even for commercial content, "criminal".

    However, it's the implementation that is the concern. If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem. But that is NOT the intent nor the purpose.

    On the subject of TiVo and placing banner ads during fast forwarding, and the general idea of *automatic* ad content skipping/deletion:

    If the entire TV industry is predicated on advertising, and the idea of advertising is predicating on paying to have as many people see your ads as possible (and the payment is proportional to proven amounts of people who may be watching), if an increasing number of people (many in educated and financially stable demographics) have the capability to avoid ever seeing any advertising, what, exactly, makes it worthwhile for advertisers to continue paying for it, at least at the same levels? You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?

    Sure, your cable/satellite bill can, but only to a point. There are billions of dollars that come from advertising. Is there not that side to this story as well?

    What about newspapers? Sure, you can argue that newspaper ads aren't "intrusive", in a time-dependent way, but would a newspaper or its advertisers welcome a service that made it free or easy to eliminate all ads, and keep the other content, while still keeping the newspaper cost at 50 cents?

    Additionally, I've seen people here and elsewhere say they actually wouldn't mind "advertising" for products and services they're actually interested in - but at the same time, people argue against giving anyone the data needed to do exactly that kind of targeted advertising as a violation of privacy.

    So, my question is, what takes the place of the advertising revenue? How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?

    1. Re:Questions by realdpk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "However, it's the implementation that is the concern. If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem. But that is NOT the intent nor the purpose."

      In an age when we have so many thousands (millions?) of lawyers in the nation, I do not think you can separate intent or purpose from what is written and how it is interpreted. We can't afford to be writing laws that are vague, and we have the resources to ensure it does not happen, should we choose to use them.

      "Sure, your cable/satellite bill can, but only to a point. There are billions of dollars that come from advertising. Is there not that side to this story as well?"

      I'd pay more per channel for cable if it had no advertising, no problem. Note I say per channel -- as in a la carte. Since I watch 2 or 3 channels via my TiVo I would probably end up paying less overall, but the channels whose services I use would be getting more.

      "How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?"

      It's acceptable exactly up to the point that the consumers allow it to be. If the consumers revolt, spend extra money on a product and service that allows them to skip them, it's no longer acceptable to them.

    2. Re:Questions by Japong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Boy, you must really hate Firefox's Adblock and Flashblock features.

      As much as I'd like to preserve the old business model of being forced to look at ads for minutes at a time, it's time to rethink this strategy now that we have 21st century technology... simply giving them billions of dollars in revenue because the're accustomed to getting billions of dollars of revenue doesn't cut it anymore.

    3. Re:Questions by micromoog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sir, I want to buy your "Inagadadavida" ad-blocking system.

    4. Re:Questions by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nothing replaces the advertising revenue -- or, at least, nothing replaces it directly. Its value falls sharply. That, in turn, will lead to two classes of things: first, the amount on interstitial advertising on television will rise, and the amount of advertising woven into a show (e.g. as voice-throughs during dialog, as rolling bars at the bottom of the screen, or as product placements) will rise. The total amount of advertising-loaded time during each show will rise.

    5. Re:Questions by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How does this make it less wrong?

      The point is that if I want to attach a device to my television that translates every third word into Algonquin once the signal comes into my device it's none of their business. If I write a module for MythTV that allows me to change all the commercials in my LiveTV programming into mpegs of dancing midgets throwing pickles at a naked woman it's none of their business.

      Their revenue stream and rights to artistic integrity end when they reach the consumer. At that point it's my signal in my device and as long as I don't rebroadcast it they need to leave me the hell alone.

    6. Re:Questions by saintp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the same business tactic as the RIAA is using: if you refuse to evolve, legislate! Rather than adapt to a changing world, make new business models illegal. Sure, it may cripple you in the long run, but as long as we avoid that invisible hand and keep the stockholders happy, all is well. Right?

    7. Re:Questions by bigpat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "What about newspapers? Sure, you can argue that newspaper ads aren't "intrusive", in a time-dependent way, but would a newspaper or its advertisers welcome a service that made it free or easy to eliminate all ads, and keep the other content, while still keeping the newspaper cost at 50 cents?"

      The difference is that tv, especially broadcast television, is a much more limited resource than a newspaper. Anyone can start up a newspaper and start distributing it, it is not regulated in the least. Which is a very good thing, but also appropriate for the medium which allows for naturally unlimited competition. If you don't like the content or presentation of one newspaper, another could take its place without much trouble.

      Television, especially broadcast television is considered a public resource. So, we as individuals have every right to demand that the use of the airwaves meets our best interests and not solely those of the licensees. We can argue about the rightness of that approach, but until broadcasters stop using public airwaves and the public rights of way (cable) then I demand that I be able to view the content anyway I damn well choose.

    8. Re:Questions by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You are choosing to watch content whose creation and delivery is funded in large part by advertising revenues. What funds it if that model is completely broken?

      Well, economist Joseph Schumpeter came up with the theory of "creative destruction". In short, every now and then, a new innovation destroys the old economic model (think TiVo or, in the retail field, think Wal-Mart). The capitalist society comes up with a new way to respond to that innovation. In the case of TiVo, it appears that they will now have pop-up ads. In the case of Wal-Mart, you now see Sears and KMart merging. However, TiVo started the revolution, and now they are trying to take a step backwards. Unfortunately for them, there is a good chance the revolution is about to pass TiVo right by.

      What does that do for the Advertisers? Well, they better figure something out, otherwise, their economic model completely falls apart. In a capitalist society (which the US claims to be), it is up to the advertisers to figure their way out of this mess. If the advertisers don't figure it out, you'll see less money flowing to the TV networks and, a potential reduction in TV show budgets. Now, wouldn't THAT be a disaster! Those overpaid actors and network executives would start losing money. Oh well. If Hollywood isn't providing me with dumb entertainment, my entertainment dollar will go elsewhere.

      Creative Destruction. It's time that advertisers re-read their college economics textbooks. In short, I don't care about the advertisers, nor do I care about how the networks make money. In our economy, their problems are not my problems.

    9. Re:Questions by noscule · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand why they need advertising revenue anyway. I've just paid about £120 (roughly $200) annual fee for my TV Licence which pays for about five and half channels of excellent BBC television, about eight channels of radio (plus the world service and numbwerous local stations) and one of the world's finest web sites and information services. And the establishment of a creative commons-based archive. All of it without a single advertisement or commercial. I think that's excellent value for money and it proves that revenue from commercials isn't necessary. Pity it'll never happen in the U.S. - Andrew

    10. Re:Questions by igaborf · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the law is *interpreted* to mean that even things like fast forwarding through commercials are inappropriate, well, then we have a problem.

      I have a problem with it anyway. It's a law that says I can do a thing but I cannot have a machine that does that thing for me. WTF? It's as though they passed a law that says you cannot use an electric can opener because forcing people to open cans manually will keep the market for food contained in glass bottles competitive with cans.

      And make no mistake, the intent is to keep people watching commercials, whatever the mechanics of the process. If the law as written doesn't have that end result, it will be reinterpreted or a new law will be written to further restrict our options.

      How and when is it acceptable for products to be advertised?

      How about letting the market decide that? If the payback from advertising drops to the point where it can no longer support creation and delivery of programming, what then? Will the demand for programming go away? I sincerely doubt it. Other revenue models will emerge, including direct payment (subscription and pay-per-view). What's wrong with that?

    11. Re:Questions by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Advertising will continue to get more and more invasive until people finally have enough and actually revolt against it.

      With the rise of SSRIs, people won't get enough. They'll just go on with life and 'not worry' about their rights being taken away.

      These are scary times.

    12. Re:Questions by rmarll · · Score: 4, Funny

      Totally off topic...

      Funny that in blocking the ad's for "internet accelerator" I've accelerated my connection speed far more than their product ever will.

    13. Re:Questions by RalphSlate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point is that if I want to attach a device to my television that translates every third word into Algonquin once the signal comes into my device it's none of their business.

      This brings up an interesting legal point; would a company legally be able to design a TV set that replaced network commercials with its own commercials? It could conceivably give the TV sets away because it would make serious money on advertising.

      And could it use your very same argument that the user is choosing to replace the network ads with the alternative commercials?

    14. Re:Questions by ms139us · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their revenue stream and rights to artistic integrity end when they reach the consumer. At that point it's my signal in my device and as long as I don't rebroadcast it they need to leave me the hell alone.

      While IANAL, I suspect that if you engage in activity that breaks their business model, they are well within their rights to exclude you from their business.

      Movie theatres usually lose money on movie tickets and recover the money from the concession stand. Theatres can (and do) legally restrict patrons from bringing in their own food.

      Some websites (slashdot?) give away the web service and make money from advertising. Some websites can (and do) legally restrict bots from their site.

      The list goes on and on...

    15. Re:Questions by Le+Marteau · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With the rise of SSRIs, people won't get enough. They'll just go on with life and 'not worry' about their rights being taken away.

      I doubt it. I've been on Prozac for about a year, and I've never been more pleasantly furious about the state of society. Just look at my posting history ;^]

      SSRI's have enabled me to be HAPPY about being UNHAPPY with things. That sounds like a joke or a contradiction, but it's the truth. I now gleefully go about in iconoclastic, anti-social ways, happily slicing and dicing simpletons with my rapier wit, all the while singing a happy tune. I now can get all righteously indignant and enjoying it as if it were a walk in the park on a sunny day, rather than before, when I would find the whole thing, well, depressing.

      Contrary to what you imply, the drug has made me a happy, contented misfit and has helped kick me out of society's patterns. I am, at the same time, more discontented with society, more vocal, more active in political causes, more independent, and pleased as punch about the whole situation.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    16. Re:Questions by bnenning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The classic Slashdot argument. Just because somebody charges (either money or time) for something that you happen to want for free, you think you have the right to take it anyway and blame it on their "business model".

      Bull. Broadcasters are not charging me anything. They are *hoping* that I actually will watch the commercials, but their desire imposes no legal or moral obligation on me. Just like my credit card company hopes that I won't pay off my balance every month; I suppose I'm stealing from them when I do?

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  7. So Ridiculous by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next announcement: It will be a criminal act to get up and take a leak while the commercials are on.

    1. Re:So Ridiculous by Evangelion · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Well, the PS2 Eyetoy has show that it's possible for a small camera to track your head movements.

      So what could happen in the future is that the camera could be used to track whether or not you're actually watching the commercials or not, and charge you more for each commercial that you get up and take a piss during.

      If you don't want to use the camera at all, that's fine, but you'll spend more on your service compared to someone who watches all commercials.

      Just thinking out loud here. I'm sure someone will come up with this, and decide to offer it :)

  8. Make sure you don't cause a backlash by stecoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tivo should be careful. As I imagine more people will become interested in messing with the software in TIVO as it does run Linux. Example, on the major Tivo boards, they don't talk about subscription stealing because Tivo threatened legal litigation over such discussion - fair enough. But if Tivo Corp goes too far than there will be a backlash and people will go just as far. People would (and some do) install a larger drive, hack the advertisement feature, re-add 30 second skip and while messing with it mid as well get a free subscription to boot.

    I don't really want to see Tivo go down the tubes but I can imagine that the development community would pick up the charred remnants and actually produce a better product.

  9. Avoid ads or save time? by Covener · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd think most peoples' motivation is to save the time of viewing commercials, not because of some aversion to advertising.

    I'd think as long as the banners don't make the ffwd through commercial slower (by assuring they're on the screen for some specific time) people won't mind.

    Better for the marketing folks to pay tivos electric bills then us.

    1. Re:Avoid ads or save time? by fname · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I own 2 TiVos and I could not agree more. I fast forward through commercials to save time, nothing more nothing less. As long as I can still fast-forward through them, what's the big deal?

      The submitter's hysterical comments show an obvious distaste for this decision by TiVo, but his statement, "although it might help them in the short run it will most certainly backfire in the long run," displays a profound sense of arrogance; he knew about this for about 10 minutes before drawing a conclusion based on nothing more than gut, while TiVo Inc., has clearly thought about these issues and decided they were a net benenfit. I would like to know how the submitter became so "certain."

      This has nothing to do with your rights or online, or Your Rights Online, it's a business decision no worse than Apple papering NYC with iPod ads. Get over yourself.

      [good thing I have karma to burn]

  10. Finally, something the UK will be glad not to get by angusr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It looks like we've finally found the advantage to being stuck with Series 1 hardware and 2.5.5 software. Almost makes up for not getting Home Media Option and all the other additional features...

  11. Well, TiVo's owners like it by jfengel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TiVo stock was up 7% yesterday on no news whatsoever and another 4% today. (Where "no news whatsoever" means "already known through back channels to everybody on the rumor boards, as well as close personal friends of the executives.)

    So the people who own TiVo seem to think that this is a profitable idea. Not just "profitable" in the sense of "charging more" but profitable in the sense of "making more money total", i.e. revenue - customers lost - lawsuits.

  12. Everyone chill out! by Slider · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow, talk about overreacting.
    Do you really think Tivo is stupid enough to alienate its customers? If you read the article you'll see that this in no way interferes with skipping commercials. It basically expands the "press thumbs up for more info" tag that appears in the top right of the screen during some commercials and makes them more of a billboard size. This is actually a popular feature among Tivo users as you could say, get a brochure for the new Corvette sent to your home by simply pressing thumbs up during the Chevrolet commercial. I welcome this.

    1. Re:Everyone chill out! by SrJuanLobo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slider's totally right, CHILL OUT. 1. It's a great extension of an already implemented harmless feature. "Want more info? Press Thumbs Up?" 2. Tivo is just as much about time-shifting TV content, and buffering the live stream as it is about abbreviating commericals. 3. Even the most hardcore PVR user has on occasion, backed up to see a funny or compelling ad, so let's stop acting like commericial content is demon spawn that some in this group would imply.

    2. Re:Everyone chill out! by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is actually a popular feature among Tivo users as you could say, get a brochure for the new Corvette sent to your home by simply pressing thumbs up during the Chevrolet commercial. I welcome this.

      Perhaps your definition of popular is different than mine. The La Times article says

      Between 5% and 20% of TiVo viewers given the opportunity to "participate" in an ad -- either by clicking on a tag or by selecting a long-form commercial from a main menu -- take it.
      Put another way, 80 to 95% of the TIVO viewers don't care for the feature.

      In your dictionary, are "SPAM" and "popular" synonymous?

  13. Tivo - why did you bother? by Japong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know why anyone bothered with Tivo in the first place - the promise was of "TV Your Way", but TV my way has always been best served by Bit Torrent. It's quasi-legal to be sure, but I can get a 400 meg HDTV broadcast of one of the very few shows I do watch over TV, the commercials are nicely stripped (so I don't even have to fast forward them) and the service is fast and reliable, especially on third generation high-speed internet technology.

    If you're getting a TIVO, I'm assuming the moral issue of skipping the stations precious advertisements don't matter to you that much anyway, right?

    1. Re:Tivo - why did you bother? by drayath · · Score: 2

      Whatever you may think about the moral rights of downloading broadcast TV programs, i think you will find 'quasi-legal' is understatment. You are downloading copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright owner, which i think you will find is plain ilegal under US, Uk and probably all WTO signatury countries laws. (And no i doubt Betamax ruling to allow timeshifting would apply).

      Now if you think this should be permited, then start speaking to your political representative/Senetor/Mp etc. and convice them. Or even the tv people direct, particually for non-us residents there is probably quite a market willing to pay access to TV serises for P2P (for a reasonable sum) rather than never see them.

      I ts
      O bvious
      I m
      N ot
      A
      L aywer

  14. Agreed by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Allow me to begin by saying that I just purchased a TiVo less then a week ago. I actually netted it for a lousy $30 ($180 on Amazon - $50.00 promotional certificate - $100 mail-in rebate) figuring that I'd get the cheapest one and could always add a Hard Drive later (thanks to TiVo still being somewhat hacker-friendly).

    In one lousy week it has already changed the way I watch TV. Just the quick case in point: I didn't start watching Amazing Race until 9:45pm last night. By 11:30 I had seen both Amazing Race and Jon Stewart -- without watching a single commercial. That's 45 minutes of my life to do productive things (or surf Slashdot).

    Needless to say I will be the first one to cancel my service (after-all I only have a $30 investment) and stick pins into my TiVo voodoo dolls if they take the fast-forwarding away from me. What the heck would be the point of a DVR if they were to do that? I'd just go back to my VCR days.

    But if all they intend to do is place some advertisements on your screen while you are fast-forwarding then what exactly is the big deal? Did Jamie bother to RTFA before he went on his rant about switching to MythTV? To quote: "Kent says the advertising revenue will probably bring down the cost of TiVo to its 2 million subscribers -- currently $12.95 a month" So they sell some ad space (that I can just ignore for those 5-10 seconds I am FF'ing -- less if you use the 30 second hack) and my service becomes cheaper?

    Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:Agreed by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks.

      Let me be the first to welcome you to Slashdot.
      --


      --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
    2. Re:Agreed by Arhat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps we should adopt a wait-and-see approach before we break out the torches and pitchforks.

      Annoyed at changes in policy with your TiVo service. We here at the Torches and Pitchforks, Inc understand your pain, that's why right now we are offering a torch and pitchfork combo deal for only $19.95. That's right, $19.95 for two must have mob items. Act in the next 15 minutes and receive a free noose. Don't wait, these items are going fast.

  15. Series 1, oh yeah. by ayeco · · Score: 2, Informative

    I apologize for all my whining when I heard that TiVo was going to stop updating my Series 1 software. Now I'm glad I stuck with my old classic.

    Once again, our Series 1 value bounces back. I have a series 1 w/ network card, additional hdd, web interface, and lifetime service. You couldn't pay me to trade a series 2 for my series 1.

  16. Re:Actually, I think this is an EXCELLENT idea. by FroBugg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Listen, TiVo needs to make money. They're a company selling a product. Everyone seems to forget that and whine when they don't give you everything for free. I applaud them for coming up with a way to sell ad space without interfering with normal use of the product.

    Nobody's asking to get anything for free. TiVo already charges for the unit and you have to pay a monthly charge to just use the damn thing. If they want to add banner ads and give me the service free, that's great, but it's not what they're doing.

  17. Email Directv and Tivo by thealpha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let them know that you are not pleased. I just sent a message to directv and will follow through with cancellation if this becomes reality. I have a PVR just don't use it because the Tivo is easy for my wife and kids to use.

    Here is a link to the Directv Feedback page,
    http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/glb/Form_Feed back.ds p

    and a link to Tivo's contact page
    http://www.tivo.com/5.9.asp

  18. Skip it all by rickmellor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TV is a waste of time. The shows are glorified advertisements and the commercials are overwhelming. The best solution is to just skip the whole thing. Spend more time with your family.

  19. Re:How to irritate a TiVo owner by Gannoc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Okay then, why not use skip-ahead 30 seconds button or random-access? Oh, TiVo doesn't have that either.

    Wrong.

    During playback, on your remote, press:

    Select - Play - Select - 3 - 0 - Select

    and you'll have 30 second skip on your tivo until it loses power for whatever reason.

  20. My ReplayTV doesn't do this... by EvilMagnus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...yet.

    I still have 30-sec skip out of the box and the ability to download shows to my PC with free tools over the built in NIC. Sure, it may not run Linux, but it has 2 advantages over TiVO:

    1. It doesn't force me to watch commercials while fast forwarding.
    2. It doesn't assume I'm a gay octogenarian and record shows it thinks I'll love.

    --
    -EvilMagnus
  21. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by suso · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used that app for a while too. We didn't have TV for the last 6 months up until this fall. It was nice and my wife and I got a lot of other stuff done, including starting a business. Its amazing what TV sucks out of you. We turned it on again so that we didn't overwork ourselves. Its good to have a break now and again.

    I've been tempted to buy a Tivo, but I don't want to dedicate that much to watching TV.

  22. My Home Theater PC looks better and better by dragon_imp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Banner ads while fast-forwarding - what will they think of next?

    After hearing about and drooling over the TiVo boxes. I'm glad I built my own HTPC using SageTV and Hauppauge PVR-250 cards. I can record and encode three shows simultaneously while playing a fourth. I can also stream to a client version of the software on my notebook. RealVNC lets me have in-depth control of the HTPC via my notebook to take advantage of my 1680x1050 notebook resolution.

    I've got a writeup and pictures of my Home Theater PC setup on my website.

    Terry

  23. Press Release! by Phixxr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Tivo Corporate Headquaters, 11/17/2004 - Tivo plans to dramatically reduce customer base, at the same time driving themselves out of business. This news comes on the heels of the announcement of people liking the Tivo service. Tivo CEO states "We've become too popular in the past few years. We need to take drastic steps immediately to reduce that popularity, or we might actually be too profitable."

    -phixxr

    --
    ungggghhhh
  24. More targetted ads by mcraig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I actually wouldn't object to ads so much if they were more targetted. I couldn't care less about the latest grill or set of knives etc. However if your telling me about a new cheap plasma screen, ipod etc. then I don't mind so much.

    I still want to be able to skip ads, but you never know if they were more targetted perhaps I wouldn't skip them as much in the first place *shrugs*

  25. Improve your viewing pleasure too by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What would you do if you went to the cinema and every 30 minutes they showed you adverts? you'd be a bit miffed.

    Being able to skip the commercials is to me about not having my viewing pleasure interrupted by commercials for products I'm not going to buy. I don't need advertising to make an informed choice about buying a product.

  26. Good for TiVo. by Xibby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good for TiVo for using their technology for profit. Isn't that the point of going into business?

    Ideally (this is how I think it should work, I don't know exactly how it works...):
    Think of how many commercials are on the air. If advertisers are concerned about commercial skipping, they pay TiVo for the software needed to encode a billboard into their ad, similar to the "press thumbs up to record" or "press thumbs up for more info" that you see often on NBC.

    When TiVo is fast forwarding through the ad and sees the bill board encoded in the video stream, it displays the bill board.

    So:

    - TV stations are happy because advertisers want to buy longer ad slots in order to increase the time their bill board is on the screen during a TiVo fast forward.
    - Advertisers are happy because they have a captive audience for their ads. (you actually have to attentively watch the screen or you'll fast forward into your show)
    - TiVo is happy because they have another revenue source.
    - TiVo owners are still happy because they are still getting through commercials at the same rate as they did before TiVo added this feature.

    Who exactly is loosing?

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
  27. Tuner card, cable without cable box by sam_handelman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In order to use my PC as a PVR I need to be able to bypass my cable box; right now I can't do that, the internal tuner has to stay on channel 3. Does anyone know of software for the Radeon that will descramble the signal? I suppose it would be illegal here in the States?

    www.mythtv.org is slashdotted, if that's what it does.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  28. Cheese and Crackers!!! by barfy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, RTFA... This is not about putting banner ads during fast forward. It is about putting up interaction during ads. This has already been tested and is shown to work. (IE people respond to it).

    It is also an article showing that TiVo can provide advertisements that have better response rates than interstitial advertising provides.

    But this slashdot posting is editorializing from beginning to end. I can understand that *you* don't wnat to see any advertising ever... Good for you. (but look at the banners at the top and right of the the slashdot page you nit.) But you know nothing about why I or many people have TiVo! And for the most part all this editorializing is WRONG. The interstital is being replaced by the more attractive click-ins. The ads are better produced, more entertaining, more informative. And they are not being replaced by more intrusive advertising. It is being replaced by *less* intrusive and more interactive advertising. And you can still opt out of the data collection! Get a friggin grip.

  29. anyone reminded of...? by jxyama · · Score: 2, Insightful
    this reminds me of the whole caller-id, blocked-id fiasco with the telephone companies... a company in the middle, double-dipping...

    tivo can do this right by offering service credit to those willing to watch the ads while fast-forwarding. if they really mean "tv your way" then that's the right way. (the wrong way, like the caller-id crap, is to charge the customers to not watch ads during fast-forward.) if you respect the customers, tivo, then give them the choice.

  30. TiVo Commercial Skipping Trick by EricHsu · · Score: 3, Informative
    Select - Play - Select - 3 - 0 - Select

    Now your 'jump to index button' (the right arrow pointing at a pipe ->|) will jump 30 seconds if you are in play mode. You can change the 3 and 0 to suit your needs. The 'jump to index' still works as it used to if you are in rewind or fastforward mode.

  31. Re:I just paid for my latest new type magazine by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Big difference here. You paid for your magazine expecting ads. It's part of the package. Now if your magazine offered you a more expensive subscription that would give you a special edition without ads, how would you feel if they suddenly decided to place "a few" ads in your magazine?

    I know I'd be hopping mad.

  32. Enable the 30 second skip and don't worry about it by Luscious868 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just enable the 30 second skip and you'll never use fast forward to skip commercials again. When it's enabled, the -->| button becomes a 30 second skip button.

    To enable:

    1. Grab your TiVo remote.

    2. Bring up any recorded program. (You have to be watching a recorded program rather than "Live TV" in order to enable the feature.)

    3. On your TiVo remote, key in the following sequence:
    SELECT PLAY SELECT 30 SELECT

    4. If you've successfully entered the code, you should hear three "bings" in succession to inform you that you've successfully enabled the 30 second skip.

    The only down side is that any time your TiVo is rebooted (such as after a power outage or a software update) you'll have to re-enable this feature.

  33. Sad by xnot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The whole point of Cable TV when it was introduced is to offer people a scheme whereby they payed to NOT see commercials. Then execs realized they could make more money by forcing you to watch commercials in addition to paying for TV.

    Same thing with movies. For a while, the justification of higher movie ticket prices was the fact that you didn't have to see commercials before the movie. Now they brought that back, so you are once again paying for both content and commercials (typically I will be 10-15 minutes late to a movie so I don't have to sit through commercials.)

    Even websites are getting increasingly annoying. A web browser without a popup ad blocker is almost useless. Half the websites you go to, you have to register to view any content, so the company can spam your inbox with product ads. God forbid a person read any content without a million ads in their face.

    Now even TiVo has sadly succum to what seems to be a very bad trend in the US. TiVo was one of the few companies that seemed to understand that people DON'T want to constantly be smothered by rediculus ads. One of the few companies using a technology to give power back to the people. But it looks like it wasn't meant to last. Time to kiss that all goodby, and say hello to more pop up ads and spam.

    And execs wonder why people do things like pirate TV shows and movies? When you treat your customers like little babies, guess what? Eventually people get pissed off, and will go out of their way to find an alternative system that works for them. Even if it's illegal.

  34. The purpose of television shows... by BlueThunderArmy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... is to sell advertising. Although it runs contrary to how we as consumers think, the TV was invented as an advertising tool. How do you get people to watch commercials? Sandwich them between entertainment segments.

    The advent of TiVo undermined this quite a bit, of course, which is why there's a bit of backlash now. Again, I think more people are in it to save time (although there is that "skip annoying commercials" aspect to it...), but circumventing advertisements that pay for the shows you enjoy is a bit of a grey area.


    Also interesting is that TFA doesn't make it clear whether the banner ads will be equivalent to the commercial being skipped over, which would raise some issues if advertisers making payments to TiVo overruled those who had paid for a certain time slot. Even if the ads=the commercials, there is some question of who will end up profiting from the exposure-Should Tivo share its money with NBC because one of its banner ads was triggered by a commercial broadcast during one of NBC's programs?


    Thank Christ I'm not in advertising!

  35. What is this thing "fast forward" you speak of? by clmensch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I feel bad for Tivo owners. I love my ReplayTV 5000. It skips commercials automatically with surprisingly good accuracy. It rarely if ever incorrectly skips content...but sometimes it doesn't realize that a commercial break has begun. In any case, I can just instantly jump forward 30 seconds (or however far I want).

    Tivo is the AOL of PVR's.

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
  36. Do you really think advertising will go away? by Argyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean seriously folks.

    Advertising is here for good. It's a mainstay of our entire socio-economic model.

    Of course, as television changes, so will the way advertising works.

    For all of you that are 'shocked, shocked' that Tivo intends to get into the ad business, wake up and smell the coffee. Business is about money and ads are where the money lives.

    --
    nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
  37. Actually, I think this is a REALLY CRAPPY idea by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "When you fast-forward, the content isn't all that interesting anyhow." That's the assumption. Where's the support?

    Yes, I use TiVo to skip over commercials. I also use FF for shows I can watch without sound and faster than real time. Will the service know if I'm FF over a commercial or for some other purpose?

    For example I can watch a 3-hour football match in about half the time. I don't need the analyst's inane chatter, and I can always go back to regular speed to catch a big play.

    In addition, this 'feature' contradicts TiVo's own marketing. There's no sound while a show is in FF, but one of TiVo's tips is to turn on the closed captions and read the dialogue while watching the show faster.

    If the banner ad is anywhere on the screen where I can see it, then it is intrusive.

    "Listen, TiVo needs to make money. They're a company selling a product. Everyone seems to forget that and whine when they don't give you everything for free. I applaud them for coming up with a way to sell ad space without interfering with normal use of the product."

    That's just wrong. TiVo gives NOTHING for free. I've already paid for the hardware and paid for the service, and I didn't whine about it. This is TiVo unilaterally changing the terms of the deal after they have my money. Would you applaud nVidia if they decided to display banner ads on every computer with their graphics cards? Listen, nVidia needs to make money, right?

    "What would you rather have, no fast-forward, forcing you to watch commercials, or a fast-forward with a small screen overlay that you only have to look at for as long as you are fast-forwarding?"

    I'd rather have the service I paid for. But you're missing the real question, would you rather have FF with a small screen overlay, or a boat anchor that's useless if TiVo goes out of business and no other company picks up the service?

  38. Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Chatmag · · Score: 2, Informative

    Doing a bit of digging, I find that Tivo is a public company. Some information on them:

    Company Profile

    Company Two Year Stock Chart

    This move seems to be a result of the hard stock price drop which occurred between March and September of 2004. I've always thought of corporations as one of those huge Euclid off road dump trucks with the 12' tires, and no power steering.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    1. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Hassman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I actually own the TIVO stock.

      The price drop was due to the break in the relationship between TIVO and DirectTV.

      Investors didn't think TIVO could make it without being directly related to a service provider. The sentiment is slowly changing as more and more people suscribe to TIVO independent of DirectTV.

      I sure hope it comes back more. I lost my shirt. They had everything going for them until that announcement.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    2. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Tazzy531 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Been following them for the past year. They are facing a problem of becoming a commodity. Each independent cable/satellite company is rolling out their own home grown DVR box. DirectTV dropped them last March and divested from them quite a bit.
      the last big news was that Microsoft just signed a deal with Comcast to provide DVR service, which directly competes with TIVO.
      This ad-skipping commercial is good news for us shareholders. They need to prove that they have alternative revenues than just subscription.
      Now to put on my consumer/techy hat. Why would anyone have a problem of seeing a banner ad rather than a blank screen when they fast forward? It's not hurting you in any way. I understand that since you pay 12.95 a month you should get it ad-free. But why not make the same request to cable television? I'm paying $33/month for cable TV, should I have the same expectation that Comedy Central is ad-free?

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    3. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Politburo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I understand that since you pay 12.95 a month you should get it ad-free. But why not make the same request to cable television? I'm paying $33/month for cable TV, should I have the same expectation that Comedy Central is ad-free?

      No, you don't understand. It's completely different.

      If you were a new customer to cable, you would expect commercials on most channels. It would have been no surprise if you had done just a cursory amount of research on the service you were signing up for.

      If you saw TiVO at a friend's house and signed up for it, you would not have the expectation of any banner ads whatsoever, no matter how much research you did on the service (rumors aside). All of the sudden, you will now be getting ads.

      Bait and switch.

    4. Re:Tivo's revenue stream and stock price. by Hassman · · Score: 2, Informative

      No problem. Oh, I'm sure they are looking for other sources of revenue. I still think they are opperating in the red (though not by much, perhaps a little more this quarter due to a huge advertising push in some states). Generally this is a no-no when thinking about buying a stock.

      The reason I bought it is because they are on the verge of being so great. It is a bit of a risk, but I was hoping to jump in while the getting was good, before the stock took off. As it turns out I got in a litle too early, and have lost a bunch of money.

      I still think it is a good company that is ready to hit it big. The timing is the tricky part.

      Oh well. Good luck!

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  39. mythTV rocks by fulana_lover · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a mythTV with 500GB of attached storage and it just rocks... I originally owned a tivo (added 80GB to it), loved it, but didn't want yet-another-monthly-bill after that tivo died and wanted something where I can dump my DVD collection with either a DVD jukebox or massive storage. its absolutely brilliant, no monthly fees, I get CVS builds once every few weeks, I have a nice quiet Antec Sonata case hidden away, and I have over 200 DVDs I ripped using mythTV so I can watch them whenever I want, however I want. LOL i use mythTV more for the ripped DVDs than TV, I probably only watch 3-4 hours of recorded TV per week (daily show, 24, amazing race, will & grace). The only improvement to mythTV I hope to see is picture quality... imo the PVR-250/350s that most people use for recording isn't the highest quality, I think my Tivo had slightly better TV quality and much, much faster channel changing while watching live. Hopefully a next generation of HDTV PC cards will come out without silly cap'ing problems and we will all be happy :)

  40. Re:How do you separate the two? by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny
    "I defy you to deliver channels to me *without* the content."
    • Turn on UPN or the WB any day of the week...

  41. Let's put this another way... by Theovon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These days, companies are finding it harder and harder to stay in business. It's a bad economy. In a better economy, there would be more TiVo customers, and they would be able to make enough revenue, but unfortunately, every company, and TiVo is no exception, is finding it hard to make ends meet.

    We're used to hearing about how greedy companies are. And there are plenty of them, with Microsoft being their poster-boy. But when you're a company with real competition, then you're walking a fine line between making enough income and selling at a competitive price. It's hard to balance. Apple is one of the few companies that seems to be able to charge a premium with impunity.

    I'm not saying I know for SURE that TiVo is struggling financially, but given the statistics, they probably are. Making that assumption, they are faced with a choice between increasing what they charge customers or finding some OTHER way of increasing revenue. Selling banner ad space is just such an alternative.

    Frankly, I suspect that most people would prefer to see an unintrusive banner appear when fast-forwarding than to have to pay a higher monthly fee.

  42. Where does TiVo's consumers benefit? by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will I get cheaper monthly service fees for my Tivo because their costs will be offset by *shudder* these banner ads?

    Granted, if TiVo needs the ad revenue to stay solvent, I guess it's necessary (the TiVo is doorstop without the service, well sorta =))

    But they might be shrinking their market to tap these new ad based revenue streams, which will make the ad placements be worth less...

    Apparently it won't be cable companies clumsy DVR's, or even us diy PVR'ers (shameless plug), or dillution of "brand/identity" that kills TiVo... it will be TiVo killing TiVo with practices and commitments that aren't in their CONSUMERS best interest.

    Why would someone who buys a special box and pays a monthly (or lifetime) service fee to skip commercials put up with replacement commercials during the commercial skipping process?!?! Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!

    Furthermore what advertiser in their right mind would want to reach people that ADD and disposition makes them actively adverse to ads? And if tivo's DVR/PVR share decreases what will those banner ads be worth to the advertisers then?

    Will DirecTivo's be effected by this change? (and will this hasten DirecTV's dance away from TiVo specific DVRs?)

    *Shrug*

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  43. Re:people, get a clue by Ecks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Skipping the commercials in broadcast television is no more theft than eating from the sample tray at your grocery store. The broadcast company is gambling that as you watch their content you will be convinced to make a purchasing decision based on its the advertising portion. Just like your local grocer is gambling that you will may like the products that he has on his sample tray enough to buy them.

    The problem here is that this gamble hasn't been paying off lately and the advertising industry has been looking outward for someone to blame rather than looking inward and seeing how they are a large part of the problem. Our world is so filled with advertising now that it's impossible for any one spot stick out. The result is that none of the advertising is persuasive and the industry is losing its gamble wholesale. The broadcast industry is at risk that their clients will decide that this type of advertising doesn't work.

    If we are very very lucky this entire industry will collapse or explode and everyone will get up off of the couch and go running or read a book like you say.

    -- Ecks

  44. Agreed Reloaded by lastberserker · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That's 45 minutes of my life to do productive things (or surf Slashdot).
    Yeah, just like buying some $500 piece of crap you don't need for $100 saves you $400 off MSRP. Why not skip both Amazing Race and Jon Stewart and save 1:45 to do productive things (or surf Slashdot)? ;-)
    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
  45. Re:Good Point by willy134 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Been using mythTV for over a year now and commercials ARE that bad. My broadcast channels show commercials that are far worse than any commercials on my dishnetwork channels.

    Once you are used to watching commercial free and something happens (computer crash etc...) and you watch TV you feel assaulted after watching the commercials. I don't want to know (nor my kids to know) about the newest (fe)male enhancement drug.
    I don't care about the next episode of some stupid sitcom with low ratings.

    People say tv makes you dumber. I would have to say that commercials just add to that. Why waste 15 minutes watching an hour show when you can watch it later and in shorter time

    The only dissadvantage to not having commercials is trying to make time for a pee break(oh I guess that is what the pause button is for)

    --
    Can you ping me now?... Good!
  46. Skipping the commercials by wbtittle · · Score: 3, Funny

    This just in: "A new bill being lobby for in congress will make it illegal for you to leave your television off." Providers of entertainment, in desperate need of more money intend to enable police officers to detain you for not watching television.

    --
    God: "I don't leave footprints!"
  47. Cost will likely not go down by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I doubt they'll lower the cost; they'll just consider this a way to lower losses.

    I'd own a second (and possibly third) Tivo if I didn't have to buy subscriptions for all of them. That's just lunacy, especially when the two other units could just copy the data from one of the units, in effect costing Tivo zero in delivery costs.

    If the banner ads are a problem, I'll just keep using my 2nd gen standalone until it craps out and then rent (for $5 per month) a hidef PVR from the cable company. It'll suck more than the Tivo, but it'll record Hidef (satellite HDTivo isn't an option where I live) and I won't have any money sunk into the hardware.

    Among Tivo's many idiotic decisions are wasting too much development effort on non-core features (such as MP3s and photos), failure to deliver more core features (batch save/play), no cablecard-based unit on the horizon (HD recording, no IR blasting for digital cable channels), and little if any evolution of the hardware (firewire disk expansion and DVD-R add-ons).

    Adding banner ads is just another stupid decision on their part to cover up the other stupid decisions on their part.

  48. Time for cheap, generic PVRs by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's about time for the cheap, generic PVRs from China to start appearing. Pure product, no service, price around $79 and dropping.

  49. Re:Best way to avoid commercials by mavenguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just over four years here.

    Whenever I get stuck in the vicinity of a blaring TV set (e. g., waiting room) I become very uncomfortable; it feels to me as if I were being pounded on, the absolute worst being daytime shows like low brow talk shows featuring low class idiots and corresponding commercials (used cars, bad credit, shysters, plugs for other idiot shows, etc.)

    I bring something to read, but if I can't find a quiet place to sit, I might have to consider bringing earplugs.

  50. Re:people, get a clue by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Best troll I've read all week.

    Sigh. Trolls used to be a whole lot better. In the old days, someone would have argued that not watching advertising was equivalent to murder, or something.

  51. TV networks should sue TiVo by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TiVo is essentially capturing a TV signal, filtering out the original advertising, and replacing it with their own. If this isn't IP theft, I don't know what is. The TV networks and their advertisers should sue, and if they do, they should win.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  52. Will they remove 30-second skip? by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TiVos by default do not have any "quick jump" feature. You have to literally fast-forward through commercials. However, there's a widely-known code you type into the remote to turn on a 30-second instant skip feature. So when I skip commercials, I'm never fast-forwarding; I press the jump button 6 or 8 times and that's it. The whole thing takes like 3 seconds. As long as they don't remove that feature, super-anti-commercial people like me will still be happy.

  53. Make your TiVo "ReadOnly" by SurfTheWorld · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I own 3 TiVO's and have modified them with larger disks, network connectivity, and video extraction capability. I've been doing this since I bought my first TiVO in Fall 2000.

    One of the primary drawbacks to root'ing your TiVO was that the next time a software update was transmitted from the magic entertainment boob in the sky, all your hard work would be erased, as the update would wipe the OS install clean (usually).

    While my work in the TiVO community has dwindled significantly in the past months, I did happen to take note of a warning that said something to the effect of "Disable Remote Update". I'm not certain what this feature of the hack does, but it sounds (at least from the name) that it would not allow TiVO or DTV to upgrade your TiVO's OS from 3.1 to 3.x in the future.

    I'm going to go look into that option now. But I think that if you really feel strongly about TiVO and DTV whoring themselves to the ad-nipple in California, you might want to invest a Saturday afternoon in root'ing your TiVO so that you won't receive this unwanted feature.

    -c

    --
    Do it for da shorties
    1. Re:Make your TiVo "ReadOnly" by triffidsting · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I understand however, this only applies to Series 1 boxes. Series 2 box owners are SOL, as they are not as "friendly."

      --
      Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
  54. oh well. by DaveJay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once upon a time, I watched little to no TV -- and by that, I mean I watched a Simpson's episode once every few weeks, and that was it.

    Then TiVo came along (my wife, who watches TV, wanted it) and I was totally drawn in. Freed from having to pay attention to programming schedules and whatnot, and given the ability to pause live TV and skip commercials, I started watching more TV. Now, a weekly roster includes NASCAR racing, three or four programs from the Cartoon Network, the Daily Show, and other tidbits.

    Then, several months ago, TiVo tried a new kind of advertisement wherein an interstitial ad popped up when you tried to reach the main menu, asking you if you wanted to find out more, or continue on to the menu. It infuriated me (and others in public forums) because it put the advertising in the way of the menu I was trying to access, which was highly intrusive.

    I was ready to get rid of TiVo at that point, but evidentally the TiVo folks got a lot of flak for it, because the next ad showed up as a link in the main menu instead -- and I decided it was acceptable since I could safely ignore it.

    Well, my jury's still out on this one. If the ads are merely visual annoyances that can be ignored (I do, after all, watch NASCAR, so I'm used to it) I'll continue the service, but if the ads in any way interfere with the usability of the device, I think I'm done.

    And that, at the end of the day, would be a good thing. It's too easy to forget that TV is a toy, not a necessity.

  55. Skipping the commercials breaks TV revenue model by LordByronStyrofoam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Expecting something for nothing is not a new concept but doesn't scale well. Skipping commercials is a technological response to an economic problem, and won't legitimately work. If we want commercial-free programming, the money's gotta come from someone other than advertisers. While I'd like being able to skip the commercials, and could set up a MythTV box to do so, the economic model can't support everyone doing so.

    Until we adopt pay-tv like Great Britain, in the American model of TV economics it's those pesky commercials that pay for the non-premium programming.

    --
    Slashdot's name? When my compiler sees /. it generates a warning about a badly formed comment.
  56. TV shows are only a by-product by powdered+toast+dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It may surprise you to consider that producers of television entertainment are not in the business of delivering entertainment to consumers.

    They are in the business of delivering consumers to advertisers.

    Delivering entertainment to consumers is simply a side-effect of their reason for being in business -- it's just one means to achieve their purpose. As soon as it doesn't work, there's no reason for them to keep producing the side-effect (your shows) instead of looking for a better way to deliver your attention to advertisers.

    $0.02,
    ptd

    --
    I'm an animal lover -- they're delicious!
  57. Read the article please! by ibbey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, before you all go & cancel your subscriptions, you might want to READ THE DAMN ARTICLE. "TiVo viewers will see "billboards," or small logos, popping up over TV commercials as they fast-forward through them, offering contest entries, giveaways or links to other ads." Not quite the overwhelming barrage of advertising that some of you seem to be implying. Would I rather the ads weren't there? Sure. But I don't really care that they are.

    Contrary to what the post implies, people don't buy a Tivo to "avoid advertising". They buy it so they can watch shows how & when they want, and so that they can fast-forward through advertising. You can still fast-forward through the ads, you'll just be shown a logo on the screen during the ad you're fast-forwarding through. This will likely be no more intrusive then the "Record this program" logo that shows up one ads for certain TV programs already. Not the end of the world, really.

    Finally, I want to know, why is there such an overwhelming anti-Tivo sentiment on Slashdot? I understand the anti-Microsoft sentiment. But Microsoft is a company that makes frequently bad products, charges outrageous prices (that you really have no choice but to pay), offers lousy customer service, routinely violates anti-trust laws, Etc.. NONE of these really apply to Tivo. Some people object to their monthly fees, but if you don't like it you can feel free to build your MythTV box. But you'll probably end up spending considerably more in the long run, and be prepared for lot's more hassles, Oh, and your TV litings, though free, won't go as far in advance (last I checked xmltv only gave you one week of listings), and be prepared to upgrade xmltv at least every couple of months, sometimes twice a week (usually with no advance notice-- your listings just stop working).

    Tivo makes a solid, VERY well designed product. They sell it cheap, but charge a reasonable monthly fee to use the service. They're even reasonably supportive of the hacking community. Yes, they hope to make a profit in the process. What's really wrong with that?

  58. Re:How do you separate the two? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "I defy you to deliver channels to me *without* the content."


    Turn on UPN or the WB any day of the week...
    You obviously don't watch either WB or UPN on Tuesdays. 8pmET on WB is Gilmore Girls, 9pmET on WB is Veronica Mars -- which, along with Lost, is one of the two best new shows this season.
  59. TiVo Employee clarifies change (article misleads) by mkraft · · Score: 2, Informative
    From this post over at the TiVo Community TiVoPony (a TiVo Employee) states:
    I can tell you now - I expect you won't be bothered.

    The article mentions some improvements to our tagging capabilities. Nothing changes in terms of your ability to move through a show.

    The 'billboards', or new tags, can be interactive, just as Ipreview tags are today. While they can be larger than today's tags, you can always see what's going on. Your fast forwarding skills will not require revision.

    Ipreview tags have always displayed based on a 'tag' that is embedded into the broadcast signal, and this works the same way. No Pepsi billboards over Coke commercials. No spillovers into the program you're watching. It's all tied to tags built into, and timed to, the commercial being broadcast.

    And to state what's become old hat to many here - the article was very loose with it's description of TiVo and your privacy. TiVo does not know how many times *you* specifically watched Janet Jackson. We absolutely respect your privacy. Everything that is collected is both anonymous and aggregate. We know how many people watched a show, but not specifically which subscribers. The last quote in the article (just like the headline) made for a good soundbite...but is grossly misleading.

    Cheers, Pony
  60. What I want by wrook · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, executives are crazy. Why force people to watch something when you already *know* they will watch it if you give them access to it voluntarily?

    For example, commercials... Anyone ever heard of the endless commercial channel known as "The Shopping Channel"? Crap, I'm paying to get this thing in my cable setup. There are people who have this abomination hard wired into their TV so that they don't have to be subjected to any actual content in their viewing pleasure.

    Here's what I want from a PVR: When the commercials are coming up, instead of skipping them, give me a menu of all the commercials and allow me to choose to watch one if I want. Also give me a an option *not* to watch any. Give me the option to ban specific ads (for content inappropriate to my family) on my PVR too. Finally, give me a list of all the ads associated with a show and allow me to save the ads separately (in case it's a particularly good one and I want to show my friends).

    Let's face it. Some people don't want to see any ads. Showing them ads will just piss them off and make them *less* likely to buy your product. The *vast majority* of people actually want to see some ads and would choose to watch them at least once or twice if given the option.

    I don't see the point in forcing people to view an ad for a product that they don't want. In some cases (McCain's!!!!!) the ads themselves are so bad that some people (I won't mention any names) boycott the product just because of the ad.

  61. You Know What Would Be Fucking Cool? by sabat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here's a project that would really be good -- it's too bad I'm lame with hardware or I'd start it.

    What if you got MythTV working well on an X Box? Then you'd have a Tivo replacement that's about the same price as a Tivo, but (obviously) with all the advantages of open source.

    Linux already boots on XBox, so isn't it possible to make MythTV work? Am I the first to think of this?

    --
    I, for one, welcome our new Antichrist overlord.