Slashdot Mirror
SCO Targets UK Firms
indierockboy writes "It seems that SCO is bringing its dodgy 'Linux licenses' over here to the UK. Vnunet.com reports that SCO's expansion of their 'Linux licensing programme' makes legal action against UK users 'imminent'. Does anyone know if the ongoing cases in the USA can be used as a defense? Since SCO has yet to prove anything..."
Seriously, this crap has been going on for an insane amount of time now. This announcment is quite clearly yet another attempt to manipulate stock prices.
Should be 'Linux licencing programme'
Since SCO has basically been told to put up or shut up, and has absolutely no proof whatsoever that anything in Linux contains their IP, because it doesn't, they're moving on to other countries. It's an act of desperation. Few in the U.S. bought it, and those that did I am sure feel like complete idiots now for wasting their $699. I expect the situation to be roughly the same in the U.K., except for the £ sign.
How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
UK Courts are quite fair really.
Plus British people are less in fear of these sorts of things.
AFAICT this isn't news. This is an old article that's surfaced again, possibly courtesy of Google News.
Belief is the currency of delusion.
UK Company: Good morning blah blah, how may I help you?
SCO: I was just looking on your website,
thats a nice computer system you've got there.
Wouldn't want anything to happen to it now would we?
A thing so precious would need protection.
We could offer that protection.
Because protection is good to have.
$699 per cpu per year to you.
UK Company: Martha, its another crank caller [click] beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep
liqbase
but I would imagine that SCO will have even less luck trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the British industries and government than they would in the US.
...is to see this headline:
SCO Files Chapter 11.
'same' article from 14 Jan 2004
Slashdot editors might want to remember that January comes first, so it's pretty much a year old.
Dear Mr. Mcbride,
It has come to my attention that you are attempting to use your phony IP claims as support for attempting legal action against our company. Unfortunately it has been revealed that your business model has some flaws which we can not overlook. At the present moment it seems that you are employing the following strategy in pursuing this threat against us:
1. Claim to own Linux
2. ???
3. Profit!
But, if I may point out sir, that particular strategy was shown to be ineffectual as a vehicle for revenue generation a while ago. Furthermore, and as Kyle pointed out, the particular Gnome who first came up with that strategy was not operating on all intellectual cylinders at the time. Consequently, I would advise you to reconsider the logic of continuing to pursue this plan of action in the future.
Sincerely yours,
Company X
P.S. If you still want to sue us, feel free to try because our legal department is quite bored right now and they could use an easy win. It seems they have not seen anywhere near as much action as our US subsidiary recently.
I have not even heard rumors of "Stolen Code" except for things like erno.h (I don't know how to spell). Last Janruary they were supposed to have been required to produce the code, they didn't. . .you know the story.
Here we are more than a year after the trial started and they haven't produced any evidence that they own anything, and they are threatening legal action on the basis of their no evidence. This is redundant, but why does anyone listen to them? Do they think the CIO's of companies will just pay without any evidence that they should?
If the average IT specialist in the UK looks like this handsome fellow, I think SCO won in advance, just because no judge wants to look at that for more than five minutes.
Knowing a lawyer, the legal system in the UK doesn't put up with the shit the American system does. It is possible for legal events in other countries to influence our law. My friend cited a case regarding a patent dispute where the patent had been filed in the EU and prior art was being shown to exist in the EU. However, they'd already filed a patent in the US convering that technology and that pre-dated the european prior art. They won the case.
Returning to topic, SCO have to tread really carefully here. Firstly, if the British courts find their claim to be baseless that surely more ammunition for a motion to have the cases in the States dismissed.
Secondly, we have some pretty strict rules about business practices. They could find themselves in hot water with the regulators if they're shown to be effectively extorting people.
Thirdly, they have the EU to deal with. Lots of EU countries are rolling linux out. For this reason, they automatically have many powerful enemies who will be looking for ways to silence SCO. Microsoft learned the EU has teeth. So will SCO.
Simon
Mike Davis, senior analyst at Butler Group, said SCO had not explained what users were licensing.
"What is SCO actually giving for the money? With a licensing agreement you'd expect Unix upgrades. So this is back to fear, uncertainty and doubt," he said.
So what's next? The "butler did it" excuse?
Oh Boies, how the greedy legal eagles fall...
Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?
I thought it was pretty obvious this isn't a troll. Silly mods.
Aren't slander/libel cases a LOT easier to win in the U.K.?
Mr. McBride better be careful what he says about Linux over there...
Irritable, left-wing and possibly humorous bumper stickers and t-shirts
Where he reiterates the same FUD. Heck, he only took an old story, modified it to look different, and posted it again.
Smells fishy to me, if you ask me.
I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
that's the big question.. have SCO learned anything from all the fun and games in the States? Are they going to try for a bit of cheap court-cred by going for someone small, or are they going to take on a titan again?
The biggest users of GNU/Linux must be the banks here, and the likes of RBOS/HBOS/HSBC are an obstacle on the same scale as IBM & Daimler-Chrysler.. Way, way deep pockets, and more lawyers than even SCO could possibly envision..
In fact, given how things have worked out so far, and given who they would be up against in that sort of case, they would have trouble finding a competent solicitor to represent them. When it comes to crushing upstarts, the banks have been doing this longer than anyone...
This is ridiculous moderation abuse. You don't have to think my joke is funny, but that doesn't mean it's a troll, for god's sake.
wget -q -O - "http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=licence" | sed -e "s/·//g" | grep -c licencing
What does this last sentence mean? It makes me wonder if entering into a contract with SCO could bring more trouble than protection. The lawsuit with IBM is really a contract dispute after all.
Mike
I thought it was pretty obvious this isn't a troll
It's a total troll... everyone knows the british drink more coffee than tea these days.
As others have pointed out, the Peter Williams article linked to in the article was actually written in January and it's just a vnunet.com fuckup that it's now showing with a December date.
If you want some fresh SCO info, here's the December 21 order that dismissed the remaining claim in SCO's complaint against DaimlerChrysler and thereby closed the case. Here's a write-up that includes information about some rules of Michigan's appeals court.
And a Merry Bloody Christmas to you too, Guv'nor!
You know it's trouble when they take the time to translate from American English into British English...
It seems the strategy is to try to scare foreign companies into paying for licenses so that they can continue the legal fight in the USA. SCO in this country (USA) is being driven back under the rock that from which they came and they know it. They also cannot continue paying their attorneys out of their own pockets because the corporate funds they can afford to use in the "Linux IP War" are almost exhausted. "Ding" a dim bulb turns on over their collective heads. "Let's shakedown foreign companies to get the cash needed to sue more organizations." I'm sure all the UK companies will love the idea of helping to pay SCO's attorneys. Of course, the reward for doing this will be the invasion of Europe by SCO legal dogs to maul those companies that dared to ignore SCO. This will happen unless the UK companies act like their American counterparts and wait until the SCO vs IBM, SCO vs Novell cases conclude. Depriving SCO of revenue is the surest way to limit SCO's legal delaying tactics which will allow the American court cases to finish sooner than later.
Dodge HEMIs Rule!
SCO can be found at the following address.
SCO
Croxley Business Park, Hatters Lane
Watford WD1 8YN
Not that I'm suggesting linux users should put dog-shit in their air-conditioning (which, as I scoped the building a while ago, is publicly accessible without much trouble)
Lets hope they bankcrupt themselves in legal bills. American culture is spreading to far, in the super market a few days ago, i couldnt get meat cut by the butcher because he said he wasnt insured.
but sure/yes, I do get your point. :-)
I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
That in the U.S. the burden of proof in a libel case falls on the person claiming libel to prove the claim unraesonable or untrue, whereas in the U.K. the burden of proof is on the accused to prove the claim true.
Irritable, left-wing and possibly humorous bumper stickers and t-shirts
As I recall, in the UK there is much less incentive to settle a legal argument (if you feel sure you are in the the right) because the loser of the court case pays the costs of both sides.
Even if you win you might end up out of pocket. I recall a case where a man sued for slander and actually won the action, but he was awarded two pence in damages and ordered to pay the costs of both sides. And lawyers in the UK are no cheaper than their US equivalents.
The UK courts (usually) have a good sense of fairness and even some measure of common sense, which seems remarkably uncommon in some courts. This cuts down immensely on frivolous law suits.
That depends. Is England's legal system a joke? Or can the U.K. bench recognize a ludicrous American con when they see it?
Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
I just got my Anti-SCO shirt today, you too can have one from thinkgeek!
Fighting ignorance with ignorance.
Like the US suits that have been imminient for years?
How many have they sued over Linux? Somewhere on the order of none
No, it can't be...Michael Sims didn't post this 'story'.
The moderator was English. :)
First you say that "the loser of the court case pays the costs of both sides" then "a man (...) won the action, but he was awarded two pence in damages and ordered to pay the costs of both sides."
Which is it, does the court decide or is there some automatic rule? Both things can't be right.
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
You know it's for the UK. They called it a "programme."
On the basis of a previous injunction, SCO Group GmbH were fined ($10,800) by a German court in May 2004 for not S'ingTFU about alledged IP violations and Linux. I have no firsthand experience of UK legal system and therefore have no appreciation as to the relevance of this. However I would imagine that it is still fresh in the minds of litigators over here. I could be wrong.
Every happiness to you and yours
Speaking of SCO and "IP", I've noticed that for the last couple of months EV1 Servers has been advertising in "Linux Journal". They have the gall to put a claim of being "IP Compliant" at the bottom...
Does EV1 really think it's a good idea to KEEP supporting SCO's FUD in front of a big audience of Linux people? Or do they figure that not many Linux people remember what was going on?
Before, I could have written them off as "suckers" for falling for SCO's claims. Now, though, I can only assume they're doing it on purpose...
Hacker Public Radio is our Friend
I'd have to go against that, and say "bring it on". They wouldn't last 5 minutes in a UK court.
If it weren't for the rocks in its bed, the stream would have no songs.
Doesn't SCO have some connections with Microsoft?
Microsoft doesn't exactly have a clean record when it comes to fighting fair.
I don't know about the US court cases, but the The 1994 USL-Regents of UCal Settlement Agreement might prove useful, especially section 3c.
.sig says what I am, so talk to one in your area, etc.
It basically says the USL (SCOX's claimed successor in interest) agrees to not sue anyone who is not a licensee who uses "methods and concepts" (i.e. non-literal copying), which is what SCOX's allegations against Linux are based on.
IANAL, and my
I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by
I have also seen those ads. Those disgusting fucktards are going to become my new punching bag after SCO dies from asphixiation.
This could be profitable for the UK companies if they can counter sue for misrepresentation or something when SCO is shown to be full of poo. I suppose that depends upon whether or not they figure there will be much of anything left. SCO seems to be quite adept at funneling as much money to the execs as possible. When SCO is finally shown to be a load of horse manure (finally? when? SOON?) the company will be dumped on bankruptcy insurance and then the insurance companies can raise our auto rates to cover their profit margin.
+++ATHZ 99:5:80
No, your attempt at humour failed miserably, it's a lot easier to recognise a joke when it's actually funny, otherwise it just looks like trolling. I get the tea drinking bit, but you lost me on the frock wearing.
It hasn't hurt their sales much...
The original saying is " you cock smoking tea baggers"
Frock rhymes with cock. The UK has a reputation of men dressing up as women both in entertainment (The Two Ronnies, Monty Python, etc) and in real life (conservative ministers found dead in women's underwear, etc).
I didn't think it was a troll either, just a joke that fell a bit flat.
Cheers
Stor
"Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
Go ahead and use Linux without fear of reprisal; SCO distributed Linux under the terms of the GPL in the UK. That means you are cleared to use it under the terms of the GPL.
SCO/MS will never make specific claims anyway, so who cares WHAT they say.
Seems like their WHOLE business model at this point is making noise.
Yeah, the buzz is growing, but it's called Linux!
I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
SCO's the corporate world's equivalent of those assholes you see with stretched earlobes, eight piercings in the bridge of their noses and tribal tattoos in place of their shaved eyebrows.
LK
"Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
Would you prefer a server that wasn't Internet Protocol compliant?
Except for some minor backlash at the time, it hasn't seemed to hurt their business since. They used to be the bargain in discout servers, but there are a lot of alternatives now, yet they seem to be chugging along. I guess most of their customers simply don't care. :(
...flips their entire network the bird.
Can they really be that stupid? I mean, won't that level of stupidity be actionable when the sky really does fall and penguin little guts himself laughing?
PS, how would they react to you running the C#/.net stuff up on Mono?
Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
Sorry, I guess it was too cerebral for the Slashdot audience. Next time I'll dispense with the subtlety for fear of being labelled a troll.
I'm not a lawyer, but Judge Chabot is, and she's the one who signed her name below the sentence "THIS ORDER DISPOSES OF THE LAST PENDING CLAIM AND CLOSES THIS CASE", so I think we can take her word for it that the case is "closed".
She only dismissed the last remaining claim in the case without prejudice. The bulk of SCO's complaint was dismissed with prejudice back in August.
That provision only pertains to legal costs incurred after August 9, and only to costs pertaining to the last remaining claim (the "timeliness" issue). It does not apply to the next likely step in the litigation, which is an appeal by SCO of the August order that dismissed the other issues.
This is all covered on the page I linked to.
There is a difference between subtlety and obscurity. Your reference was obscure to begin with, and lacked any contextual indication that it was anything other than a straight insult.
Also, jokes rarely work if they use more than two twists of logic. This has nothing to do with being cerebral, it has more to do with not having to explain the logical sequence behind the joke and thus lose it's punch (think about jokes like a car crash: the longer it takes to dissipate momentum, the less lethal the impact).
To summarise: the reference was obscure, the logic too convoluted. Fix these, and you may aspire to my levels of subtle humour.
PS Don't try irony in front of an American audience.
Demanding money with menaces in this country is an offence. SCO had better be careful, they haven't got the latitude they have in US courts to lie and slander with impunity.
Just as a point of information, people are writing as if there is one unified 'UK' legal system. There isn't. Scots law (in Scotland) is completely different from English law (England and Wales) - not even the same basic legal principles apply.
I think Northern Ireland is different again but I'm not certain of that. The Isle of Man certainly has a separate legal system, as do the Channel Islands and other bits and bats that people think of as part of the United Kingdom but which technically are not. Even within Scotland, Orkney and Shetland use old Norse ('Udal') law for some civil matters which is different from Scots law.
SCO are almost certainly talking about bringing action in the English courts against Linux users in England. But, as we've seen before many times, SCO talks a lot about bringing these actions. They don't actually do it. And given their 4th Quarter license revenues have dropped $10M to $120K over the past year, even the threats aren't working any more.
I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
As someone who works in the UK government I.T. industry (and is hence posting as a/c) I KNOW that the clueless, computer illiterate, buffoons who make the purchasing decisions for the UK government will buy shed loads of these.
And what's even worse is that they'll think it's something to do with Windoze.
All of your L33n00x are belong to us.
42.
Hasn't the German legal systems already put SCO
in a put up or shut up state? Quite some time ago
in fact.
IBM
'Cos I already have 3 e-mails in my outbox that have been sitting there waiting to go since SCO first announced their intentions. The first (in case SCO advertise their licences in the press) goes to the Advertising Satandards Authority. The ASA is an organisation whose remit is to ensure that printed advertisments are legal and honest. As SCO has no proof of ownership and hence no definite claim any ad they place would fail requiring them to pull it or face regulatory action.
The second is directed to the local (to SCO UK) police reporting an act of attempting to "obtain funds by deception". This law covers acts along the lines of falsley claiming ownership of something with a view to selling it. Until SCO prove a case one way or the other they have no such proof and no claim.
The third is to the Trading Standards Office complaing of false claims being made.
Between the three of them, it could get quite entertaining.
Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
PROOF. ;-)
And on huge volume. Although, I suspect that trade was bogus - done just for show. After that one trade, volume dropped off to nearly nothing.
But the brits are all going to pay, right?
Some there may find it interesting:
i nt .v4.html
http://users.rcn.com/srstites/jacuse/sec.compla
Agreed, I don't think it was meant to be a troll either, I was pointing out that it could easily be taken for one. As for the dressing up in frocks bit, I take your point, I once won a prize at a fancy dress party for 'having the cheek to turn up dressed like that'. I was wearing a pink tutu, Doc Martens, a curly wig and three days worth of stubble.
'Pay your $699 you red necked sister shaggers'
Would be in this context be a subtle and cerebral joke aimed at Americans? Somehow I don't think so.
But, since I'm not nearby and I of course will not advocate or participate in anything unlawful, I recommend zippered bags filled with warm water and fresh cat crap.
Squish it around till it's good and soft.
Then break open the capsule of baking soda you included in the bag, so that it swells up like a balloon.
Throw quickly, before it pops!
Changa hates change.
I suppose you think you're funny.
Still and all, the letter is quite compelling. I'm convinced that SCO is the devil.
http://users.rcn.com/srstites/jacuse/sec.complaint .v4.html
Changa hates change.
Since the US is larger than the UK, and we're looking for the UK spelling, the loser of the googlewar is the one we're looking for.