Slashdot Mirror


US Company Buys Commodore Brand For $33 Million

inKubus writes "Tulip Computers International BV -- which has held the rights to Commodore since 1997 -- said Thursday it will sell the once-mighty Commodore computer brand to U.S.-based Yeahronimo Media Ventures Inc. for 24 million euros, or $33 million. A company spokesman said they would "take actions" against possible copyright infringements of the Commodore name in the United States as well as release a new MP3 player and rerelease classic games."

410 comments

  1. uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why? its kind of a waste.

    1. Re:uh? by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      yeah, and I don't see how Commodore is worth $33 million, maybe i'm missing something ...

    2. Re:uh? by shokk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember that little C64 in a joystick that they recently started hawking on QVC? I wonder how clean their implementation really is, and whether they are violating the brand name.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    3. Re:uh? by Rev+Wally · · Score: 2, Informative

      The C-64 DTV (the little joy-stick thing) was actually marketed by Tulip. The had info about it on the website commodoreworld.com.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:uh? by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

      Bring back the Amiga!

      --
      Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
    5. Re:uh? by Rev+Wally · · Score: 1

      If you can wrestle the IP from Gateway (I think they still own the Amiga name and IP), have at it.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  2. After all... by nharmon · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is a major problem with people swapping tape cartridges full of programs. Somebody needs to fight these pirates.

    1. Re:After all... by aeroelastic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and maybe the RIAA will come after me for the midi recording of "Hungry Like the Wolf" I have on a 5" floppy for my C64.

      --
      "It doesn't take a rocket scientist" -I guess I should leave then
    2. Re:After all... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      There is a major problem with people swapping tape cartridges full of programs. Somebody needs to fight these pirates.

      Good thing I got rid of all those 5.25" floppies, years ago ... well most of them anyway, but they won't find them under all the bodies.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:After all... by Attar81 · · Score: 3, Funny

      All you need is the secret password: Load"*",8,1

    4. Re:After all... by nocomment · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I think the business plan goes something like this...

      1>notice people making joysticks with built-in games that play commodore games
      2>buy commodore name to sue those companies
      3>...
      4>profit!

      Once that plan is complete maybe they will buy Amiga.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    5. Re:After all... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      You have no midi for the C64.

      What you have there is a genuine SIDplayer file.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:After all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know if you need to worry about the RIAA as much as the "bad taste police"

    7. Re:After all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His floppy disc also appears to be missing a quarter inch. I guess he shaved his.

    8. Re:After all... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Amiga is still manufacturing computers.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    9. Re:After all... by nocomment · · Score: 2, Funny

      they are? Where can you find one?

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    10. Re:After all... by StarWreck · · Score: 2, Informative
      1>notice people making joysticks with built-in games that play commodore games
      2>buy commodore name to sue those companies
      The company that made the joysticks with built-in games was Tulip Computers, the company that sold the Commodore Name to them...
      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    11. Re:After all... by myster0n · · Score: 2, Informative

      He might have had midi. I had a midi cartridge for the C64, together with the SFX sound expander and the full-size 60 key keyboard. In essence, my c64 became a mini Yamaha DX7 with sequencer. If you've never heard of the sound expander, you can see a picture of it here

      --
      Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
    12. Re:After all... by Tet · · Score: 2, Informative
      You have no midi for the C64. What you have there is a genuine SIDplayer file.

      Almost certainly, yes, but not necessarily. MIDI interfaces were available for the C64, and Commodore themselves even made a MIDI keyboard, the MK10. I still have one.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    13. Re:After all... by StarWreck · · Score: 4, Informative

      The company making the new Amiga hardware is Eyetech Group, Ltd.

      The company making the new Amiga Operating System is Hyperion Entertainment

      And an example of one of the dozen or so online stores that currently sell the new Amiga Hardware coupled with the new Amiga operating system as well as Classic Amiga Hardware and Software is Vesalia Online --- Thats right! You can already buy it!!!!

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    14. Re:After all... by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2, Funny

      So now the rmenants of Commodore are making joysticks, and the remnants of Amiga are making computers. Man bites dog...

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    15. Re:After all... by DJStealth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't that what Novell or SCO did with DR-DOS, to sue Microsoft for not allowing DR-DOS to run Windows 3.x?

    16. Re:After all... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Hey! Don't you laugh!
      You should know "Home Taping is Killing Gaming"!

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    17. Re:After all... by nocomment · · Score: 1

      I thought they looked kind of neat until I saw the $1000 tag for the motherboard...uhhhhm no. Hopefully freescale, will get the cost of these things down. I had been looking at Pegsos for awhile they look to be related (same thing?).

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    18. Re:After all... by cshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something like that.

      It's more like

      1>Notice a little too late in the game that the brand still has some tangible value.

      2>buy commodore name and threaten to sue those companies so you get media coverage.

      3>make games yourself, and use brand to market new hardware and devices of some sort. (still an iffy proposition, because the brand has no credibility other than nostalgia at this point).

      4>profit... if you're smart and reaallly lucky.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    19. Re:After all... by Audigy · · Score: 2, Informative

      They won't.

      Not unless the MIDI was included on a data CD packaged with one of Duran Duran's albums. MIDI files aren't recordings; they're re-interpretations, and I believe they're considered "fair use"

      --
      [an error occured while processing this directive]
    20. Re:After all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BLOCKQUOTE>Once that plan is complete maybe they will buy Amiga.

      At least then we won't have to worry about them then, they'll go out of business sooner or later...

    21. Re:After all... by Seehund · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amiga is still manufacturing computers.

      No, they aren't, and the Amiga computer died a decade ago.

      OTOH, what is happening is that Hyperion Entertainment are porting and updating AmigaOS to version 4 on licence from Amiga, Inc., a company formed in 2000 by a marketing exec from the previous Amiga-owners Gateway. AInc in turn has allegedly switched owners twice since then, during litigation.

      AmigaOS 4, and beyond, are meant to run on third party PowerPC hardware. Nobody is designing or even specifying standards for any hardware specifically for AmigaOS.

      One controversial decision that bothers many current and prospective AmigaOS users is that the hardware market will have to be separated from "the rest of the world". Despite the inexistence of any Amiga hardware and AInc's irrelevance to the hardware market, AmigaOS must only be sold bundled with hardware, and only from vendors who have acquired a licence from AInc. These hardware bundles must also provide some form of hardware/vendor-licence verification mechanism ("anti-piracy measures"), which currently is supposed to consist of added code to the firmware.

      The only licenced hardware today is sold by the single existing licensee, Eyetech, which is the same company that was "consulted" when these AmigaOS distribution policies were formed. Currently they sell Mai Logic Teron series motherboards, with their exclusively licensed (owned?) stickers saying "AmigaOne", plus a 60% heftier price tag.

      For more on this, please see my homepage.

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    22. Re:After all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I had been looking at Pegsos for awhile they look to be related (same thing?).

      Nope, not the same. They're both basically your run of the mill 1999 (Teron) - 2001 (Pegasos) era x86 PC mobos, but with PowerPC CPUs.

      The latest Pegasos model (Pegasos II) from Genesi has a Marvell northbridge (DDR266, GBit e-net...), the Terons from MAI have an ArticiaS northbridge (SDR133...), also from MAI.

      Some Terons are sold more expensively as "AmigaOnes" to a newly created pseudomarket of fanatics, which adds to the confusion.

    23. Re:After all... by harikiri · · Score: 1
      These hardware bundles must also provide some form of hardware/vendor-licence verification mechanism ("anti-piracy measures"), which currently is supposed to consist of added code to the firmware.

      This is stupid. It's an almost-dead market, and they place restrictions like this on the platform? AInc are stoopido.

      --
      Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
    24. Re:After all... by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Ooo, nice try but you fail. Device 8 is the disk drive and GP said tape drive.

    25. Re:After all... by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      The $1000 isn't quite as bad as it seems since it comes with a G4 CPU and the AmigaOS4 Operating System.

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    26. Re:After all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost never actually Laugh Out Loud while reading Slashdot, but thanks to your wit I'm now able to write this in sincerity:

      LOL.

      Mod parent up! You made the funniest post this year, Sir!

    27. Re:After all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there really enough money in doing this to justify $33 US? Surely they have other ideas for turning a profit...

    28. Re:After all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      load "*",7,1

    29. Re:After all... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to start the cracked version with "sys 64738" :)

    30. Re:After all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When accessing the tape drive you don't need to give parameters. The tape drive is device 1, anyway.

  3. There goes by temojen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another Canadian icon to the US attack-lawyers.

    1. Re:There goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The average Canadian is just too busy dogsledding to worry about the integrity of his company.

      Sincerely,
      Tucker Carlson
      CNN

    2. Re:There goes by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      +10 wearing clown bow-ties increases your journalistic integrity

    3. Re:There goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BWHAHAHAHHAHA.

      That was a perfect Tucker impression.

      God, what an ass he is.

    4. Re:There goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, sorry, but Irving Gould squandered what Jack Tramiel built (actually Irving Gould squandered what many others who replaced Jack Tramiel built as well). DEC died because it couldn't compete against intel, even with Alpha processors. The Blackberry is still doing well. Nortel is hosed until demand for big-broadband comes back (danmed data compression schemes). Gandalf died because I don't want to use analog modems anymore, I prefer ADSL or cable modems. 360 Networks had to leave to unload a mountain of debt. There are no other technology companies in Canada doing anything impressive enough to get written about in the paper. Use of Linux is limited to breaking the SARS genetic code, but Linux is non-Microsoft, so journalists refuse to print it. They just say 'supercomputer' and show pictures of PC's (which is still true, but with a bag of information about why it's true missing). The sorry situation is that Canadian companies are now ultra-conservative about technology (worse than before), banks are ultra-ultra conservative about it (worse than before). Canada ranks just behind Micronesia in use of supercomputers and computer innovation. (And no, I'm not an American).

    5. Re:There goes by runlvl0 · · Score: 1

      There goes another Canadian icon to the US...

      You mean Commodore or Shatner?

      --

      Carthago delenda est!
  4. Let Me Get This Straight... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let me get this straight...

    A group of investors actually wants the name associated with a company whose business strategy was best summed up as:

    Ready

    Fire!

    Aim

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      yeh - why would anyone want to be associated with the single-best-selling computer system, ever?

      they had a damn good business strategy, amazing engineers, good products.

      just an effing corrupt CEO.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    2. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by someonewhois · · Score: 1

      Wow, never thought of it that way. It reminds me of the Canadian Military now that you mention it!

    3. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      they had a damn good business strategy,

      I take it you never saw the Superbowl commercial for the Amiga.

      It was traumatic for those of us who were trying to get other to buy into it. I've still got my A2000 right here. Excellent product, but the marketing was horrendously inept.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Funny
      No, the Canadian military plan is:
      • Ready
      • Aim
      • Ask your target politely if you may fire on him
      --
      English is easier said than done.
    5. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the Canadian military plan is:

      Make others think you have no real army , it work for satan and the aliens , and it worked so far for us.

      Canada as the only army wich as never lost a war.

    6. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      i dont remember the amiga commercials, but i would posit that commodore had two huge problems:

      1) they had a sourcing problem, and never could deliver product on time, reliably.

      2) they had a corrupt CEO.
      ---
      maybe they had a marketting problem, but man, the 64 sold like hotcakes, and the 128 only less so, so i tend to think that marketting was ok on those two products.

      i think that the problem with the amiga was the time-to-market, and delivery problems.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    7. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never lost a boxing title fight either, but that doesn't make me the heavyweight champ.

    8. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by nocomment · · Score: 1

      I didn't. got a link? or can you describe it? What was wrong with it?

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    9. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nothing wrong with that strategy - I do it in counter strike all the time - especially with flash grenades. Makes for pretty blinding white light.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    10. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because they never fight doesn't mean they haven't lost. That recent purchase of outdated World War 2 submarines from England still makes me laugh. What did they plan to do with those diesel burning noisy pieces of scrap metal? If Canada plans to make war with 3rd world countries then the money would have been better spent on a Destroyer.

    11. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lyrics of _The War of 1812_ by the Arrogant Worms, excerpts:

      In 1812, Madison was mad,
      He was the president, you know
      He thought he'd tell the British where they ought to go
      He thought he'd invade Canada,
      He thought that he was tough
      Instead we went to Washington....
      And burned down all his stuff!

      ...

      And the White House burned, burned, burned,
      But the Americans won't admit it
      It burned, burned, burned,
      It burned and burned and burned
      It burned, burned, burned,
      Now, I bet that made them mad
      And the Americans ran and cried like a bunch of little babies
      Waa waa waah!
      In the War of 1812

    12. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've never lost a boxing title fight either"

      I dont think a men fighting against is women in a domestic situation constitute a boxing match.

      "but that doesn't make me the heavyweight champ"

      The thing wich you like to forget is whe have beaten the crap out of your armed force and self declared only remaining superpowers EVERY time you whent against us Its 8 and 0 for us so far.

      if your a superpower what are those who beat you at every time ?

    13. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by saforrest · · Score: 1

      That recent purchase of outdated World War 2 submarines from England still makes me laugh.

      The Upholder class subs were actually built in the 80's. They were retired a few years later only because Thatcher had decided to build a bunch of nuclear subs as well.

      See this CBC story.

    14. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There was basically no advertising for the Amiga and what there was, was uninspiring. The Amiga basically had to rely on word-of-mouth advertising over here in the US and that meant they couldn't sell enough units to make the piles of money necessary to keep abreast of the PC. Also, their choice of the MC68k architecture, a good idea at the time, ended up hurting them as PC processors rapidly outstripped them. Remember when that happened to the mac? PPC came too late to help Amiga, and almost too late to help the Macintosh, althogh Apple could certainly have gone to the 68060 and not been beaten so badly waiting for a new architecture, relying on no-faster-than 33MHz 68040 processors. (Then again, Apple never managed to even add support for the MMU into the OS back in those days, and ended up using MMU-less versions of the '040 in most quadras/centrises, so clearly they were just foolishly biding their time as the world passed them by.) The Amiga was killed first by C='s lack of marketing, and second by Motorola.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Quarters · · Score: 1
      How funny that EA.com's strategy was "Ready, Fire!, Aim." As a (now thankfully ex-)EA.com employee I even got a shirt that said that.

      brilliance, no?

    16. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Curtman · · Score: 2, Funny
      You forgot

      • Get killed by American friendly fire
    17. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian are the real American ... whe did not shoot ourself and the United States is known to always shoot there ally , it would be a big surprise if they didn't

    18. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      And if you think that was bad try being a Atari ST user. Was worst!

    19. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i'm referring to Gould, and Mehdi Ali.

      you know - the ones who destroyed commodore, but thanks for playing the anti-semite card.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    20. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I tried to convince my Atari ST-loving friends that [comparatively] the Amiga was The Future, but they were too pleased with STOS and MIDI Maze to get the message. I've never even used an ST but from the specs it seemed like an Amiga without the wow factor.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I didn't. got a link? or can you describe it? What was wrong with it?

      Dunno if it's on the web anywhere. I might have it on tape, but it would take weeks to find it.

      In a nutshell it was all conceptual. Some guy in a body suit walks through a shimmering hallway, up some stairs and places his hand on a keyboard and then there was some crap about the future of computing.

      This while IBM was hugely successful with their Charlie Chaplin look-alike 'Bubbles' looking all productive and getting things done. Commodore sunk millions into that one 30 second ad and if you asked anyone who didn't know what Amiga was, they'd shrug. Money and opportunity wasted.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    22. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Linux_n_JesusRule · · Score: 1

      You're probably thinking of the 68LC040 that had no FPU. They did indeed have an MMU, though granted it was rarely used in the older MacOSes. The Virtual Memory required it, however, as do Linux and BSD OSes for 68k Macs (this is why VM and non-MacOSes don't work on Basilisk II and other 68k Mac emus - no MMU support).

      Darn good chips for the era, it's an interesting What If if PCs had ended up with 68k procs.

    23. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      the problem was the push-out of tramiel. you could see that there were two completely different midsets pre- and post- tramiel.

      the marketting was spot-on when jack was there, and went to crap after jack left.

      also, the cirtual abandonment of MOS left commodore without the r&d advantage that carried them through for so long.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    24. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hrm yes, the FPU, not the MMU. Silly me. I remember hearing once (addressing your other point) that the PC got the intel chip instead of the motorola because some sales guy or something missed an appointment at IBM, but I've never heard anything to back it up since...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once saw a foreward to a PC programming book by one of the original IBM-PC team lead. He discussed the various processor choices, and why they weren't chosen.

      6502. Not chosen because both Apple and Atari had it. IBM wanted to be different.

      68000. Not chosen because a 32-bit processor would've been too expensive at the time (complicating PCB layout and whatnot).

      8088. The "other" name in town.

    26. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by cmallinson · · Score: 1
      That recent purchase of outdated World War 2 submarines from England still makes me laugh. What did they plan to do with those diesel burning noisy pieces of scrap metal?

      Those subs are the among the most advanced conventional subs in the world. They are loaded with the latest technology. Canada was not the only country after them. The bid was accepted because as a Commonwealth nation, Britain could sell the subs without removing top secret technology, and save some money. The subs are not out of date. Britain decided to go with a nuclear fleet, and did not need the conventional subs any longer. Not Nuclear != Not Advanced.

    27. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Richy_T · · Score: 1
      Nah, the Canadian Military plan is now in line with that of most countries around the world:
      1. Train
      2. Equip
      3. Enter the battlefield
      4. Get shot by Americans


      Rich

    28. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative
      The 68000 was externally a 16 bit chip. To complicate the argument further, the 8088 was externally an 8 bit chip with a 20 bit address bus, but Motorola made a direct equivalent, the 68008, which Sinclair used in the QL and ICL in the OPD (who they? Sinclair and ICL were both British, Sinclair on the consumer end, ICL in the business end. ICL was originally the result of a government attempt to nationalise the computer industry. I don't know where they are now.) Like the 8088, the 68008 was compatable with its bigger brother and sported an 8 bit external data bus and 20 bit external address bus.

      So I think, somewhere, that story is garbled. The reading I've always heard, including that article on IBM's site linked to from /. that was about important processors the other day, was that IBM had the right to produce 8088s.

      I suspect though the fact that the 808x series was source code compatable with the 8080, the then market leader and the only platform CP/M was available for, also played a part. Ironic really, considering CP/M then was dropped in favour of at-that-time vapourware from Microsoft.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    29. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by isecore · · Score: 1

      *imitates Ash from EvilDead/Army of Darkness*

      So, they had only two things. Jack and shit, and Jack left town.

      --
      I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
    30. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I thought the 8086 (used in the original PCs) had 16 address lines. The 8088 was the 8-bit external version that ended up in XTs.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    31. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian are the real American ... whe did not shoot ourself and the United States is known to always shoot there ally , it would be a big surprise if they didn't. And dont worry next time whe engage you in a real war whe will hand your your ass as usual.

    32. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you think about it, after the first time through that business strategy you will be accurate, because you aimed last, so your aim is steady for the next firing.

    33. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what lots of new players to fps and excessive rates of fire of some weapons cause them to do?

    34. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The 68k could have been as fast the the Intel chips if it had as much money thrown at it. The 68k family did not fall behind Intel until the 486 showed up and did not get beaten badly until the Pentium.
      No the Amiga died from a few mistakes and really bad marketing.
      The mistake was lack of Hard rive support in the 1000. And no support for memory protection. They should have used to 010 for in the first Amiga.
      The marketing was sooo bad.
      Reminders me of something that I read in Byte about AT&Ts marketing.
      If they owned Kentucky fried chicken they would rename it cold dead birds in a bucket.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    35. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by killjoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why would anybody want to harm Canadians? They are nice, funny, generous, kind people.

      I don't even think they need an army, everybody loves them.

      We OTOH need a massive army, nobody likes us, not even the canadians.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    36. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Sounds reminiscent of the Macintosh "Big Brother" commercial style of marketing. That particular commercial was a bit more effective.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    37. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by operagost · · Score: 1

      The 5150 PC used the same CPU. The XT only meant that it had a hard disk. There were "XT 286" models with a hard disk and, you guessed it, the 80286 CPU. The 8086 didn't appear in an IBM product until the PS/2.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    38. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Give the Yank a break, the damn Canuck was standing in the way!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    39. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      You make yourself look like a raving lunatic everytime you post a comment with "whe" in it.

      How about a visit to dictionary.com?

    40. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You probably know this already, but the PC-1 didn't even support a hard disk, and you had to upgrade the ROM (somehow) for it. I had such a machine long after it was useful, with 64k onboard, 384k on an AST board, and a 30MB quantum MFM disk on a Xebec controller.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    41. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      they had a damn good business strategy...

      Funny--nearly choked on my tea when I read that one. Maybe when Tramiel was around. What's the old joke? If Commodore bought the KFC company, they would advertise their product as "warm dead bird"? Even pre-Amiga they had their share of blunders--the B128 (the C128 too actually), the Plus/4, the C16...but in the last 10 years of the original company's existence their legendary blunders paled in comparison to even Atari's. ...amazing engineers...

      Like all the *EX-ATARI* people who designed the Amiga before Commodore bought it? They also had an amazing talent for completely avoiding backwards compatibility in their product line, even while using derivatives of the SAME CPU and other chips. Even when they came out with the C128 the C64-compatible mode disabled all of the C128's extra capabilities. They had some solid semiconductor engineers, but if you want "amazing engineers" on the system level you'd better take a closer look at Apple. ...good products.

      Like the C64 with a Bill-Gates-Reject BASIC that had no built-in commands to exploit the machines amazing sound and graphics capabilities? That machine that could not auto-boot and required most everything be loaded by typing something like LOAD "blahblah",8,1 and would overwrite your BASIC programme if you wanted to retrieve a list of files on your floppy? The floppy drive that loaded slower than Coleco's CASSETTE drive (I am not kidding--personal experience)?

      Well I guess they were reliable since less than half of them were DOA or failed within weeks when purchased new at my primary school years ago (35 to 40 percent failure rate isn't bad....is it?)

      I have to agree with you on one point...Gould was the king of corporate malfeasance.

    42. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I thought the 68000 was a 16 bit chip with a 24 bit address bus?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Indeed (externally), yeah I forgot to mention the address bus in that big description.

      Internally, the 68000 and 68008 were completely 32 bit for both data and addresses. A wonderful architecture, IBM needs a good kicking for not adopting it, but I don't think I'm the only person to say so.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    44. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and you had to upgrade the ROM (somehow)

      Option ROM on the disk adapter card? (basically the same way you do it today for SCSI)

    45. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, the BIOS (which, of course, was actually in a PROM...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The four soldiers who died and the 8 others that got injured, were exactly where they were supposed to be.

    47. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      ya know what.

      i work for emp.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    48. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's absolutely no such thing as 'friendly' fire.

    49. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by los+furtive · · Score: 1
      I have to agree. When running on batteries they happen to be quieter than any nuclear sub out there. The americans love 'em because they get to test a real challenge for the first time in years. They also happen to be able to monitor 100,000 km2 of ocean at a time, and although you don't hear about it, have been quite helpful at maintaining our sovereignty on the east (and now west) coasts. These are the most advanced diesel subs out there, any anyone who thinks they are WW2 subs doesn't know what they are talking about. And even with the accident after the refurbishing, they're still a damn good deal.

      And as far as end of shelf life, they actually haven't seen the half of it yet. They are slated for mods that would allow them to go under the ice caps, and another mod that would double (if I remember correctly) their under water time without snorkeling.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    50. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF else should it be called when friendlies fire at you?

    51. Re:Let Me Get This Straight... by myov · · Score: 1

      I had a conversation about Commodore once which went along the lines of:

      Commodore had poor marketing.
      They had marketing?

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  5. This is one of the reasons... by slakdrgn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...abandonware isn't really abandonware. Now, I'm wondering if they bought the name just so they could make money out of lawsuits. If they do, and it works, I wonder how many other companies will attempt to by rights to long and outdated software just to attempt to raise their bottom line by sueing everyone.

    1. Re:This is one of the reasons... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      33 million from lawsuits?

      I doubt that they are going to get that much from college kids.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pfft. college kids. Commodore was last useful in about 1988. They'll have to hunt down the elderly.

      There's an 'in korea only old people...' line in there somewhere.

    3. Re:This is one of the reasons... by DeVilla · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Now, I'm wondering if they bought the name just so they could make money out of lawsuits. If they do, and it works, I wonder how many other companies will attempt to by rights to long and outdated software just to attempt to raise their bottom line by sueing everyone.

      Hey! Don't knock it. I mean, look what's it's done for SCO, and they don't even have a case or own the copyrights in question. These guys will at least have the pretense of a broken leg to stand on.

    4. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Schnapple · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Thing is, when people pine for the Commodore 64 they're either nostalgic over the ancient implementations of things like word processors or databases, or nostalgic over games.

      No one is still insisting that Paperclip was better than Microsoft Word or OpenOffice.org Write (though I'm sure a few will as soon as I hit "submit"), so apps are out.

      As for games, people still love old C64 games. That Joystick on QVC with the games on it is selling enough to have its own hacking community and people are still psycho about games like M.U.L.E. (my Wife wants me to get one of those joysticks and hack Caveman Ughlympics on it - I'd prefer Fort Apocalypse myself).

      Thing is, Commodore themselves didn't write many games. M.U.L.E. was Electronic Arts of all things, Fort Apocalypse was Synapse Software (long dead of course).

      Just buying out the "Commodore" name won't allow them to sue abandonware sites. There *might* be something they can do to emulator authors, but that's doubtful.

      They bought the "Commodore" name since it's still a powerful brand in people's minds. They'll see Commodore MP3 players and Commodore 64 joysticks in stores and think "wow, Commodore is still around..." Look at the sheer number of people who think Atari is the same company with the same people. Heck, when I was working at Babbage's in 1999 when Hasbro had the new games under the Atari name (Windows CD-ROM's) I had people come up to me and ask if they "needed their old Atari" to play these games.

    5. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I was going to state the very same. The C64 was one of the most popular computers in history, and had a lot, A LOT, of software written for it, mostly games. But Commodore wrote little of those.

    6. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Funny

      If we're lucky, they might sue SCO.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    7. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thing is, Commodore themselves didn't write many games. M.U.L.E. was Electronic Arts of all things



      Ozark software wrote M.U.L.E., Electronic Arts was just the publisher.

    8. Re:This is one of the reasons... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      plus, if they start sueing all those websites that sell C64 t-shirts, you can bet your slashdot karma that there's gonna be a big FPP full of typos about it under YRO.

    9. Re:This is one of the reasons... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      They bought the "Commodore" name since it's still a powerful brand in people's minds. They'll see Commodore MP3 players and Commodore 64 joysticks in stores and think "wow, Commodore is still around..." Look at the sheer number of people who think Atari is the same company with the same people. Heck, when I was working at Babbage's in 1999 when Hasbro had the new games under the Atari name (Windows CD-ROM's) I had people come up to me and ask if they "needed their old Atari" to play these games.

      Is it? When I hear "Commodore" I think "ancient computer system." It's a similar problem that Atari ran into in your experience - people think of Atari as an old, mostly dead, company. The Atari brand is considered "retro." When the customer saw a box with Atari on it, they thought "old computer gaming system" and figured that it must be somehow related to that system. Because there was a long span when the brand wasn't really doing anything note-worthy, people have mostly forgotten about Atari or Commodore being technology companies and now think of them as things of the past.

      It's similar to the problem Netscape has as a brand name. If you ask people about Netscape, most will think of Netscape 4, as that old crappy browser that they were glad to ditch years ago. (Not to mention the efforts AOL is going through now to completely dissolve any recognition value the Netscape name had by making it an ISP, but that's another issue.)

      I really wonder if people will be willing to think of new Commodore-branded gadgets as "new" or if they'll instead be expecting them to be old "retro" computers like those joysticks companies are selling that come pre-loaded with a bunch of old games. I have a feeling that like Atari, most people will connect Commodore with "old" and will expect anything using that brand to deal with "retro" computing, or more likely, thanks to those joystick gadgets, retro-gaming.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    10. Re:This is one of the reasons... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "I'm wondering if they bought the name just so they could make money out of lawsuits"

      Maybe they can also solve blood shortages by getting it from stones and turnips.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:This is one of the reasons... by fluffywuffy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Obviously one of the reasons is to own the copyright on C64 games played on today's mobile phones.

    12. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Eric604 · · Score: 1
      Is it? When I hear "Commodore" I think "ancient computer system

      yes, i most certainly do.

      I really wonder if people will be willing to think of new Commodore-branded gadgets as "new" or if they'll instead be expecting them to be old "retro" computers like those joysticks companies are selling that come pre-loaded with a bunch of old games

      There is a difference between thinking and knowing. For example, if i would see a Commodore MP3 player, things like old/retro/failed go through my mind but i know it's "new" because... it's an MP3 player. Maybe I would buy it, can't go much wrong with a MP3 player. I would probably make fun of it like "look I got a commodore MP3 player, it has 64KB storage."

    13. Re:This is one of the reasons... by greed · · Score: 1
      Hah! I'm waiting for the Commodore 128 MP3 player, with the extra bank-switched RAM for longer playback time. AND it'll autoboot, so you won't have to type:
      LOAD"MP3PLAYER.PRG",8,1
      SYS 49152
      before you can listen to anything.
    14. Re:This is one of the reasons... by edp927 · · Score: 1

      I really wonder if people will be willing to think of new Commodore-branded gadgets as "new" or if they'll instead be expecting them to be old "retro" computers like those joysticks companies are selling that come pre-loaded with a bunch of old games.

      Don't you suppose this is their angle? Not just retro gaming though. I expect thay're trying to target a market that is increasingly fashion-based rather than capability-based (MP3 players and the like), and they're hoping to create a retro-chic brand for personal devices (think puma for electronics).

    15. Re:This is one of the reasons... by scribblej · · Score: 1

      When I was a youngster with dreams of growing up to be a great game programmer, I swore a solemn oath that I would release all my games with support for C-64. I suppose this was when I was starting to see some fun things that were only available for the Apple ][.

      Mod me off-topic, but I think that's got to make someone chuckle.

    16. Re:This is one of the reasons... by ymgve · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense. Owning the Commodore brand doesn't give them any right to sue people copying C64/Amiga games.

      They don't own the copyright to those games, only the hardware they were running on.

    17. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      abandonware isn't really abandonware. Now, I'm wondering if they bought the name just so they could make money out of lawsuits. If they do, and it works, I wonder how many other companies will attempt to by rights to long and outdated software just to attempt to raise their bottom line by sueing everyone.

      Good theory, but it has a minor flaw: most of the popular software now termed "abandonware" wasn't written by Commodore. Owning the Commodore name doesn't give them rights over all software that ran on the platform.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    18. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Obviously one of the reasons is to own the copyright on C64 games played on today's mobile phones.

      Those copyrights belong to the companies that wrote those games, not the manufacturer of the platform they ran on.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    19. Re:This is one of the reasons... by writermike · · Score: 1

      Just buying out the "Commodore" name won't allow them to sue abandonware sites. There *might* be something they can do to emulator authors, but that's doubtful.

      If recent history is any indication, a company doesn't necessary have to have a valid, proven, legal argument to come out on top of a lawsuit.

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    20. Re:This is one of the reasons... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Now that's an interesting idea that I hadn't thought of. That would make a kind of sense. Dunno how it would play out, but it's an interesting idea.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    21. Re:This is one of the reasons... by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
      That makes no sense. Owning the Commodore brand doesn't give them any right to sue people copying C64/Amiga games.

      They seem to try and use the trademark (which means that even without any copyright, they might have a case with respect to the firmware, operating system and other code supplied by the manufacturer at least) - and I really hate to see my predictions come true in a scenario like this...

    22. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No one is still insisting that Paperclip was better than Microsoft Word or OpenOffice.org Write (though I'm sure a few will as soon as I hit "submit"), so apps are out.

      Don't forget Geowrite, not only the Best word processor for the C64 & C128, but it was almost as good as the best WYSIWYG word processors that was for the PC and Mac. The only things that kept it down were the fact that it was slow "Not bad for a 1/2 MHz machine; of course, an REU would speed it up a bit " and no built in spell checking "But that was due to the fact of limited memory of the computers"

      Other than those drawbacks, GEOS had support for a wide range of printers, also had support for graphics, nothing else on the commodore had anything like that. Amazing what it could do with a 1 MHz Machine, 64K of ram, and Single Density Floppy Drive.

      The thing I don't understand is, why did Apple choose to sue Micro$oft over Windoze, GEOS was much closer in terms of look and feel to the Macintosh than Windoze. Windoze had it lame "MS-DOS Executive" and looked nothing like Mac-Os, GEOS had a wastebasket to delete files, Windoze didn't have a similar feature until 95.

      Just buying out the "Commodore" name won't allow them to sue abandonware sites. There *might* be something they can do to emulator authors, but that's doubtful.

      There is one way they could go after the emulator authors. *cough* DMCA. Yes, I know, no one is bypassing any DRM, but, remember, in the US, if you have Millions of dollars at your disposal, plus with the Tech-ignorant Judges, they can sue someone that is copying from a cassette to CD by using the DMCA as the basis. They could appeal, but, that can only occur if they have enough money to go through the appeal process, but most likely they would just settle out of court or abide by the C&D Letter. I doubt the Vice team would have any money to successfully defend themselves in court with representation let alone go through a lengthy appeal process.

      Although it's true that they can't sue the site for hosting Commodore software, they could turn whatever evidence they have over to the IDSA and the members themselves will sue the sites, including c64.com. Of course all of this will push the Commodore emulation scene underground.

      One other thing to consider, is there's a chance they might go after companies that still support the Commodore Computers like CmdrKey.comwhich is owned by Maurice Randall that not only sells equipment from when he took over Creative Micro Design, but also sells an Upgrade to GEOS 2.0 that he wrote that takes advantage of the hardware, due to the fact it "May confuse the consumers" into believing that the hardware and software will work with the junk that the company may put out. Remember, in the US, you can sue anyone over anything as long as you have a lot of money.

    23. Re:This is one of the reasons... by Calroth · · Score: 1

      No one is still insisting that Paperclip was better than Microsoft Word or OpenOffice.org Write (though I'm sure a few will as soon as I hit "submit")...

      Hmm, I'll bite.

      I submit that no big advances have been made to word processors in the last 10 years. (OK, this rules out Paperclip/GeoWrite/Superscript, but includes things like WriteNow, WordPerfect and MacWrite Pro.)

      Put another way, you could use a word processor from 1994 (or 1995, depending on when you read this) and get along fine.

      The most recent innovation at that time was the concept of style sheets. I don't think they've had any big innovations ever since. From memory, they had grammar checkers and squiggly red lines for misspellings at the time. What came after? Workflow features like tracking and revision control? Publishing to the Web? Nah, not significant.

      Maybe one day this will happen with web browsers or (insert application of choice here): it'll become so complete that it doesn't need any more evolution.

  6. Yet another one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    that buy's a company to go out and sue people using there name....

    1. Re:Yet another one... by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      First to get sued "The Commodores" Lionel Ritchie.

    2. Re:Yet another one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you for stealing my joke!

  7. Finally by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    some true innovation!

  8. Wow, by Megaweapon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    a 6502-based MP3 player! (Or is that 6210?) Whichever, the "Commodore name" to most people isn't a modern-centric concept. It's a historical relic (an important one, sure, but has no basis in modern computing).

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    1. Re:Wow, by mr_angry · · Score: 1

      It was the 6510. I don't know what the differences are with a regular 6502.

      --
      100% of statistics are wrong.
    2. Re:Wow, by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1

      Onboard serial port on the '10, which the 64 used for something or other (light pen input, maybe?)

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    3. Re:Wow, by nocomment · · Score: 1

      HAHA, I just had a vision of an iPod-like commercial of a guy dancing around to a SIDplayer (like midi) rendition of U2's "vertigo".

      picture it, it's funny. Maybe the black shadow man, would just stand there for a mintue and then walk away.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    4. Re:Wow, by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

      Also, the GTA:Vice City C64 retro-intro (if ported) would actually be running in real time. :)

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    5. Re:Wow, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "intelligent" serial port: disk drives. printers. etc.

      The 1541/1581 disk drives had their OWN 6510 procs and small RAM space on them. You could load programs into that RAM space from the c64, via the serial port, on the device and use it as well (which is what some "boot loaders" did)...

      Of course, this serial port was slower than cold molasses...

      I think the light pens worked on the joystick ports...

    6. Re:Wow, by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember the intelligent peripherals, I'm just not certain that the on-board port was the head end. Maybe it was -- it's been a good long time since I worked on 'em.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    7. Re:Wow, by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1
      Ah, there we go. It was a parallel port, and it controlled some cassette functions and bank-switching.

      That latter item is what I remember. When I did London Blitz for the 64 (not to be confused with the much-more-impressive L B for the VCS) I hid the reference map behind the BASIC ROM, swapping it back in when needed.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    8. Re:Wow, by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      WTF??? This was supposed to be FUNNY, slashbots. If you think the 6502 can decode MP3, the exit is on your left.

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  9. It's dead, Jim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "A company spokesman said they would "take actions" against possible copyright infringements of the Commodore name in the United States as well as release a new MP3 player and rerelease classic games."

    Seriously. Is Commodore really still popular?

    Isn't infringing on them, like infringing on a dead body?

    1. Re:It's dead, Jim. by malfunct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds fun, combating copyright infringement by releasing a device that will most likely play material that was obtained by infringing copyright :)

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    2. Re:It's dead, Jim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't infringing on them, like infringing on a dead body?>

      To the best of my understanding, infringing on a dead body is a serious crime.

    3. Re:It's dead, Jim. by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

      Like most dead bodies, this one has a relative.

      Unlike most dead bodies, this one's relative has
      WAY more than $33 million dollars and a whole
      fleet of lawyers...

    4. Re:It's dead, Jim. by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "Seriously. Is Commodore really still popular?"

      It depends on the scope of popularity you mean, but yeah. I still use a C64 in my keyboard rig, toghether with a Moog Song Producer, for sequenced SID output. Ok, I rarely actually use it, but it's still part of my setup, and I'd miss it.

      I'm also building a 4-SID midibox based on this design: http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_sid.html
      and that, itself, is quite popular.

      Since I have so much extra C64 crap accumulated in this endeavor, I also have a little shrine with a couple of old games and music tracks, along with a MAME box and a PC that's a jukebox and DVD player, and that's all in the livingroom by the TV, which is purely for the entertainment of others (I rarely ever turn it on.)

      It's popular with me because of the specific characteristics of the sound chip. It's popular with other people I know purely because it's a piece of history. I have no idea what these Yeronimo assclowns are thinking. Nobody whose into C64 retro stuff has two nickles to rub together, much less to be worth suing them.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:It's dead, Jim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infringing on dead bodies is illegal too, I do believe necrofilia is a form of sodomy.

    6. Re:It's dead, Jim. by generic-man · · Score: 1

      If the Packard Bell brand name can still sell computers, MP3 players, and televisions, anything is possible.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    7. Re:It's dead, Jim. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Does make we wonder what they plan. I mean the had to get 33 million from someplace and have got to have a plan to make that money back.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  10. Yeahronimo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeahronimo Media Ventures. Yes, this sounds like a reputable company. Seriously.

    1. Re:Yeahronimo! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeahronimo Media Ventures. Yes, this sounds like a reputable company. Seriously.

      It was all they could get... names already taken were:

      Geronimo

      Jironimo

      Ghironimo

      Geeronimo

      Goshronimo
      and

      Gollyronimo

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Yeahronimo! by Lispy · · Score: 1

      and of course Geronimmodore.

  11. Oh cool. by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    rerelease classic games."

    I wonder if this means we'll get C64 games on those little joystick-that-plugs-into-the-tv things that are so popular nowadays.

    1. Re:Oh cool. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this means we'll get C64 games on those little joystick-that-plugs-into-the-tv things that are so popular nowadays.

      They just did that a couple of weeks back. You search Slashdot for it; I'm too lazy :)

      Personally, I want an Atari 800/XL/XE version, preferably hackable (and certainly the 'real thing' from an end-user POV, none of that rewritten nonsense that the Intellivision device got slagged off for).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Oh cool. by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      That Jeri Ellsworth chick is already selling exactly such a device through the home shopping channel. It's got Impossible Mission and Summer Games and other old chestnuts built in, and looks quite hackable too.

      It was on slashdot a couple weeks ago.

      More likely, this Yeahanomorinono Media Venture Concern (is that REALLY a US company?!) will sue her ass into a hole.

      Anyone know whats up with her or Commodore One? Is she using the Commodore name legally?

      Too bad this company has no vision. To hell with mp3 players and re-selling old games, I'd love to see them update the Amiga, a la the G4 Mac and OS/X.

      That I'd pay for.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Oh cool. by Unoti · · Score: 1

      That already exists actually. Just as likely, this means that'll get sued out of existence!

    4. Re:Oh cool. by fr2asbury · · Score: 1
      I wasn't

      But searching for it meant I wasn't the first to reply. :-(

      There are other stories related to this device that the original poster can search for though.

    5. Re:Oh cool. by eyeball · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder if this means we'll get C64 games on those little joystick-that-plugs-into-the-tv things that are so popular nowadays.

      So here's what they're going to do -- sue as many of those small-time chinese c64 joystick manufacturers and sellers, online emulators, rom sites, etc.. then make their own just in time for the fad to be well over (I predict next xmas).

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    6. Re:Oh cool. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      No matter what it means my two favourite games from back then were busted for copyright infringement (of Super Mario Bros. and R-Type, respectively, can you guess the names?) anyway so the chance of them appearing on any recent collection is slim.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    7. Re:Oh cool. by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      They won't touch the Amiga. That's a separate brand under a separate ownership. And OS4 is still "coming"... :)

    8. Re:Oh cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say "Crush, Crumble, and Chomp"?

    9. Re:Oh cool. by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That Jeri Ellsworth chick is already selling exactly such a device through the home shopping channel

      From an earlier interview I believe she only acted as a consultant to the company that actually produces the device, so she should be rather safe from that perspective. The company that produces the device plus anybody using that Commodore name for profit will be sued into oblivion.

    10. Re:Oh cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Coming? It's not even breathing hard.

    11. Re:Oh cool. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I want twenty gigahertz by mid-may!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Oh cool. by MrLint · · Score: 1

      More likely, this Yeahanomorinono Media Venture Concern (is that REALLY a US company?!)

      I'd be more worried about Osaka orangeade concern

    13. Re:Oh cool. by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Tulip (the company that is selling the Commodore brand) is the company that makes the all-in-one joystick, so it is unlikely that they will get sued. I would guess that the group that is buying the brand plans to use the joystick as a platform for more all-in-one games. The only difficulty is tracking down who owns the rights to the non-EA games.

    14. Re:Oh cool. by Freddles · · Score: 1

      Actually, they reckon they got one comming out soon.

      Plus, they've got a couple of storage and MP3 devices which, bizarrely, co-opt the 'Pet' and 'Vic' product names from 20+ years ago. See here.

    15. Re:Oh cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Egads, man!

      Mentioning Jeri Ellsworth, 'hole', and 'ass' in the same sentence is enough to angry up the blood of many a Slashdotter.

      Inclusion of the word 'sue' will get the lawyer-geeks all moist too...

    16. Re:Oh cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else read that as "sue her into an asshole"?

    17. Re:Oh cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I start jokes about Jeri Ellsworth's ass now? :)

    18. Re:Oh cool. by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      That Jeri Ellsworth chick is already selling exactly such a device through the home shopping channel. It's got Impossible Mission and Summer Games and other old chestnuts built in, and looks quite hackable too.

      I think one thing almost nobody is paying attention to is that Commodore didn't own ANY of the titles that made the machine so popular.

      Commodore was their own worst enemy, and more importantly the worst enemy of their engineers. Commodore employed some really bright minds whose hands and feet were bound every inch of the way down the financial drain.

      Everything Commodore engineers ever did right was completely overturned by the suits, and every bit of income was pissed away giving bonuses and pay increases to company officials.

      This company purchasing the Commodore name is just getting a name. The technologies are obsolete. The engineers (both hardware and software) have moved on to bigger and better things. And the Amiga is no longer party of the Commodore family.

      The software that everyone remembers (and in some cases loved) never belonged to Commodore and the few bits that once did no longer do.

      Having said all that, what EXACTLY is it that this company wants to do with the name other than exploit it?

      If they plan on using it as a market label in the same way that Atari is being exploited, then maybe it's not an overall bad move as long as they have real marketable products to sell under that name. If not, then I suppose we'll just watch Commodore die again, won't we?

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    19. Re:Oh cool. by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      The fact that tulip computers was promoting it on their site, and the fact that the back of the device says commodore name used under license by (company name I don't know) I think she's safe.

  12. So... by Stick_Fig · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How much you want to bet that this corporation will pretty much do nothing but get pissy towards a bunch of emulator/C64-on-a-chip authors and not actually do anything with the company's legacy?

    I mean, really, it's pretty much been empty promises since about 1992 from the Commodore/Amiga crowd, and the Commodore kicked the bucket.

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
    1. Re:So... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Commodore and Amiga are now totally separate [non-]entities. I figure these guys will slap the C= logo and maybe apply a "retro" C64-esque look to some stuff, and maybe sell some C64 software or something - and that will be the end of it, and possibly them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. oh goody by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A company whose primary product seems (from their website) to be a DRM scheme is buying the commodore brand - remember, this is the company that gave out schematics with their computers. Doesn't sound like it makes sense to me. The only people who care about C= are geeks who will know better...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:oh goody by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      The only people who care about C= are geeks who will know better...

      Gee, didn't we just have an article about a joystick with about 30 games in it? Maybe they're thinking along the same lines. Get a bunch of the abandonware and buy cheep some of the titles which companies like EA might still be clinging to and re-market. Heck, many of us know the best games ever were back in the hey-day of the C64, everything else is pretty much the same with window dressing.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  14. It should be interesting to see... by Kobun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps they could release a kit commodore as well, it has been a long time since beginners to computing could sit down and build their own computer from the chips up. Be a great learning tool to see again... Or, I could take the 6502 and finish work that bending robot in the garage...

    1. Re:It should be interesting to see... by Sxooter · · Score: 1

      I've got an old empathy chip if you need one!

      --

      --- It is not the things we do which we regret the most, but the things which we don't do.
    2. Re:It should be interesting to see... by October_30th · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.. that is actually a project I'd love to do.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    3. Re:It should be interesting to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd, I have a wavy chip.

    4. Re:It should be interesting to see... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If they just made SID chips they could fulfill the world's desire for commodore hardware.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:It should be interesting to see... by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      Waldo has the burned and fried chip.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  15. What? Game news?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You won't see this on techtv, despite the fact that they are now a gaming channel. Why? They're reruns 23 hours a day now! And the screen savers is now a comedy show with no actual content.

  16. That is to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the 'Commodore Digital Media Player' _and its subscription service_, according to http://www.yeahronimo.com/corporate/

  17. This is good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I would really like to see a fully licensed Amiga 500/1000 emulator and for all the programs to be released in bundles.

    I can't imagine what the brand would have to do with me wanting to purchase an Mp3 player though. I suppose for some it might give some credibility to a product, but most Mp3 purchasers either look at the specs or are the types that are influenced by media and will not even have any exposure (in the US) to the brand.

    1. Re:This is good news by starbird · · Score: 1

      There is an officially liscenced amiga emulator package. For $30 you get a suite of emulators, a bunch of apps, and the AOS 1.3 and 3.1 roms.

      You can get it from http://amigaforever.com/.

  18. Commodore is dead by CharAznable · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Branding is such a scam... Like putting the name Commodore on any crap box is going to make it magically like a C64 or an Amiga.. People are not that stupid... Same goes for Napster. The old Napster is gone, forever. Using the name won't make it anything like the real thing.

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    1. Re:Commodore is dead by aeroelastic · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that, when I go to a game store and see a new game branded "Atari" it catches my attention. Besides, who has ever heard of "Yeahronimo Media Ventures"? Sounds pretty shady to me.

      --
      "It doesn't take a rocket scientist" -I guess I should leave then
    2. Re:Commodore is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car manufacturers do it all the time. Classic nameplates on new vehicles that have nothing in common with the originals.

      Chevrolet Impala
      Dodge Charger
      Hummer H2
      Hummer H3

    3. Re:Commodore is dead by Momoru · · Score: 1

      Yeah I would disagree, just because not everyone keeps up with the tech news and what not...so imagine you are a 30 year old guy and walk past a random display of Commodore products...wouldn't you first assume that the company had "came back from the dead and is making new stuff"?

    4. Re:Commodore is dead by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The question is, "would you care?"

      The people most likely to care are those who *know* the situation, your hypothetical 30-year old Joe Sixpack might get nostalgic about his old C64 or Amiga, but realistically, C= is a company from the past and doesn't have that much cachet nowadays.

      I don't think Commodore t-shirts will ever be fashionable in the way that Atari t-shirts became a couple of years back.

      Actually, the one thing that pisses me off about the Atari 'resurrection' is the gratuitous changing of the logo. The original was an absolute design classic; either the fuji on its own, or with the fuji and 'ATARI' name underneath.

      Hasbro did their own stupid variant when they owned it, now Infogrames have decided to alter the fuji itself (UGLY!), then stick it in the middle of the 'ATARI' name (where it loses impact, IMHO).

      The best reason I can think of for doing this is some tosser of a design consultant justifying his fee. Scum.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  19. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can tell this is just another company that bought the name so they can go around making $$$ suing people.

    The company who purchased the name is probably just a group of MBAs and lawyers - I bet there is not a single techie there. Any acutal product they sell will likely just be re-branded Chinese goods.

  20. 8 bit games by leoval · · Score: 1

    The market for retro video games must be really big right now. I have seen those little atari /arcade /namco controllers that plug on the TV to play our all time favorite 8 bit video games popping out on every single toy store.

    The question here is, how the emulation scene will be affected and more important when will the ready-for-TV-ZX Spectrum arrive.

    1. Re:8 bit games by Gax · · Score: 0

      Amstrad developed an email telephone a few years ago that allow you to download and play Spectrum games. Unfortunately you can only download games from their (extremely limited) catalogue and you have to play them on the built-in screen.

      It's a pity these machines do not have a small solid state drive. It would be great to transfer a few tape images to a TV console and start to play them as they were meant to be played. There are thousands of freely distributable games for the Spectrum and new games are being written.

  21. What's your opinion on the brand ? by mr_angry · · Score: 1

    I know many people remember the commodore brand, but what kind of opinion people have on the brand ? An old computer brand that went bankrupt ? Is it worth that much money ?

    I still love the old commodore computers but i doubt this is the general opinion about the brand.

    I still don't fully understand why infogrames revived the Atari brand since everyone constantly said that Atari sucked when Nintendo came on the gaming scene...

    Now is the time for me to start the new coleco brand. I'll bring out exciting products such as plastic pools and overpriced dolls.

    --
    100% of statistics are wrong.
  22. Going after infringers... by chiefnerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Commodore rocked back in the day. However, about this new company declaring it will "go after" infringers: the only reason anyone still knows about the Commodore brand is because of the dedication of those who could be considered infringers on the name. Great tactic - use the community to keep a brand name from totally dying out, then turn around and unleash the legal dogs on the very ones who kept it viable. Whatever...

    --
    SYS64738
  23. Is this a U.S. company by sellers · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is this really a US company ? Looks like a EU company or did I miss something ?

    Sports & Events
    E-mail: info@yeahronimo.com

    Yeahronimo Media Ventures Inc.
    Ms. Roxanne Pons
    Public Relations
    Tel: +31 35 543 05 07
    E-mail: press@yeahronimo.com

    Company Address Europe (Operational Offices)
    Hermesweg 15
    3741 GP BAARN
    The Netherlands

    Company Address USA
    Yeahronimo Media Ventures Inc
    433 N. Camden Dr., Suite 600
    Beverly Hills, Ca. 90210 USA
    Phone: +1 213 379 0540
    Fax: +1 310 362 8608

    1. Re:Is this a U.S. company by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      If it was a Dutch company, it would be Yeahronimo Media Ventures NV, not Yeahronimo Media Ventures Inc.

    2. Re:Is this a U.S. company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You always know when it's not a U.S. company, because they make a note to tell you it's a U.S.-based company (who would assume otherwise unless you told them or it sounded Asian?).

  24. I would have sold it to them for $33 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :-) 33 Million for a company name that has been dead for 20 years.

  25. More like Pirates! by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    http://arstechnica.com/reviews/games/pirates.ars It may be too much to hope for, but if they would release versions of the old games with improved graphics, I'd buy their stuff.

  26. This is one of the reasons...Outdated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If they do, and it works, I wonder how many other companies will attempt to by rights to long and outdated software just to attempt to raise their bottom line by sueing everyone."

    OK, so why's the software "outdated"? And isn't getting upset over the whole thing like getting upset over the design plans for the Edsel, or Yugo possibly being unavailable?

    1. Re:This is one of the reasons...Outdated. by slakdrgn · · Score: 1

      I'm not getting upset over the whole thing, infact, I think, if done right, it could be a good thing.

      I'm just wondering, if they do go that way, what the overall outcome would be. I find it more interesting than upsetting.

  27. What's the point? I mean really? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    As a former Commodore user (only got rid of my Amiga about a year ago) one really has to wonder what the point is?

    New Amigas? Kinda late for that don'tcha think?

    A shell for nothing but endless litigation? Maybe Darl can get a job there after SCO's shareholders call for his head. Even then sounds like Tulip pulled a coup actually getting a sucker to spend more than 2 cents for the name.

    Commodore is dead. They had sushi in the Amiga and they sold it as fish

    1. Re:What's the point? I mean really? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      New Amigas? Kinda late for that don'tcha think?

      When Jobs came back to Apple, people were saying "New Macs? Kinda late for that don'tcha think?"

      Not that that's going to happen here. They just want some trademarks to sue people over.

      Though I'd love to see the Amiga updated and rereleased, a la the newer Macs. One can dream.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:What's the point? I mean really? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Commodore is dead. They had sushi in the Amiga and they sold it as fish

      Commodore's dead? I think not. What about the "Commodore in a joystick" type of items. I'd be willing to shell out a few bucks to play a handful of C= classics.

      Retro rights alone will be worth some serious cash. Go to ebay and see the old Atari stuff that sells. Go check on how many people put out things with the Commodore logo attached... Maybe not a gold mine but if they get the rights to license these items and the old video games that were C= originals it could be fairly profitable. Not to mention some of the technology rights some would rather pay for from the bones of C= instead of doing their own R&D.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:What's the point? I mean really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off let me join the love fest my saying that I also love Amiga, and really wish someone would have carried through on the promise to release updated Amiga hardware with modern specs. They were truly great machines in their day. But the comparison to Apple when Jobs returned is poor. The situations are, pardon the phrase apples and oranges. Apple, while not in great shape, had still been designing, producing, and selling computers uninterrupted. Not that Apples fortunes were bright at the time of Jobs return, nor were its computers particularly exciting. But as a pure probability puzzle, the odds that Apple would be able to start producing new and interesting computers then is orders of magnitude larger then the odds that the Amiga platform (with as far as I know no significant development made in years) could produce a serious modern computer. Don't get me wrong, I haven't kept up on all things Amiga. Frankly I'd LOVE to learn that some independent people (possibly some of these infringers) had quietly been putting together an updated Amiga platform. But so far all I haven't seen it, and I doubt this will be the company to announce it.

  28. True Value by Luminous · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would the Commodore name have that value today if it wasn't for all the C-64/Amiga User Groups that kept the legacy alive for all these years? These are the same people that will get sued first, I'm willing to bet.

    --
    This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
    1. Re:True Value by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, it's because of me that the Commodore name has any value. Yeahronimo approached me about buying my slashdot userid first but I said no. So they grabbed "Commodore" instead, completely subsuming my identity. Bastards.

    2. Re:True Value by Luminous · · Score: 1

      You should have sold out. Only a handful would have blamed you but you would have been able to laugh at them as you lounged on your tropical island.

      --
      This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  29. MP3 Player by tyleroar · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to release an MP3 Player under the Commodore brand name? Was/is the Commodore really that popular of a brand name? Is it even popular at all among the crowd that would buy an MP3 Player?

    --
    Portland, North Dakota Puppies
    1. Re:MP3 Player by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Commodore 64 is still the best-selling personal computer in history (it's in Guinness), and Commodore invented multi-media (and coined the phrase multi-media) with the Amiga.

      In fact, every time some slashbot gushes about something Apple is doing, a part of me can't help thinking "Commodore wanna-bes".

      The name still carries some weight, and a fair bit of geek cred.

      I want my MP3 player to have a SID chip in it, so I can play back all those old SIDplayer files.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:MP3 Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would buy it, if it were exactly styled like a 1984 commodore 64, with the logo and everything. And it included like 100 games, with the EA, Broderbund, Capcom, and all the classics with a nice little tft screen.
      Yeah, that would be cool. Probably cooler would be an Amiga 1000 design with the same setup.

    3. Re:MP3 Player by tyleroar · · Score: 1

      But how many true geeks that really remember the Commodore 64 are going to be buying new Mp3 players? I would think an overwhelming majority of people buying MP3 Players are in the late teens early twenties and haven't heard of Commodore.

      --
      Portland, North Dakota Puppies
    4. Re:MP3 Player by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "I want my MP3 player to have a SID chip in it, so I can play back all those old SIDplayer files."

      I'd settle for nothing more than the 6581 going back into production. I've been building a synth based on 4 SID's, but it is rather upsetting to have to pull them out of C64s. But it costs $5 to get a C64, and to buy a SID chip costs $30-50, if you can find them.

      I really don't enjoy destroying breadboxes, but that's the bottom line :-(

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:MP3 Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, they should rerelease the old red segment LED display Commodore Watches and Pocket Calculators.

      Now *THAT* would be retro!

    6. Re:MP3 Player by cosinezero · · Score: 1

      Why build a synth to do that when there's always http://www.sidstation.com/ and http://www.hardsid.com/ ? I have a hardSID quattro and it's amazing.

    7. Re:MP3 Player by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      " Why build a synth to do that when there's always http://www.sidstation.com/ and http://www.hardsid.com/ "

      Actually, I'd like to have a hardsid too. But your question shows that you totally miss the point. If I bought a Quattro, I'd suddenly need 4 more 6581's. But I wouldn't stop building my synth!

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:MP3 Player by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      That's if you by a Quattro that doesn't include SID chips. :)
      The order page as of right now lists
      HardSID PCI:
      HardSID PCI without SID: 89 EUR
      HardSID PCI with SID chip (6581 or 8580): 109 EUR

      HardSID Quattro PCI:
      HardSID Quattro PCI without SID: 169 EUR (159 EUR for existing HardSID owners*)
      HardSID Quattro PCI with ONE SID chip: 189 EUR (179 EUR for existing HardSID owners*)
      HardSID Quattro PCI with two SIDs 6581+8580: 199 EUR (189 EUR for existing HardSID owners*)

  30. media distributers, to amiga set-tops? by jdog44 · · Score: 1

    Looks like they want to own content and push it to their own playback devices.

    from their site:

    Below, they reference their own media player (and compare it to the iPod), but the but the bulk of the wording talks about secure transmission and ownership of the entire chain....

    maybe they're looking at all the failed set-top box starts that Commodore did with the Amiga chipset, I wonder how far along their player *really* is or if that is why they bought Commodore....

    --
    viral games, contageous fun. http://www.DaddySculpin.com
    1. Re:media distributers, to amiga set-tops? by jdog44 · · Score: 1

      doh,

      my quoting refs got stripped by the slashcode.

      quote one:
      YMV makes it possible for customers quickly to find, whenever they want, their own favorite high-quality music, ring and real tones in any genre or from any record label to any device. In addition, YMV offers to these customers available high-quality visual entertainment from the media en entertainment industries, and allows them to not only to store and play the items of their choice on their own computer and/or portable digital media devices but also legally transfer them to portable multi-media players. All of this while offering security and flexibility in terms of payment methods.

      quote 2:
      As for our digital Multimedia Player/Viewer which is about to be launched, .....

      --
      viral games, contageous fun. http://www.DaddySculpin.com
  31. Imagine the leet speak by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If people with C64s could play MMOGS, those special characters would be making some wacked out letterings.

    And one of the funniest things to do on a c64 is make it acid trip. You do this: Randomize(some int), get 2 random numbers, poke one number into the other's address, loop it. So its one crazy poke fest. I've seen the screen split into 4 pieces change colors and scroll wildly. Its funny because your computer goes nuts. You can't do it on a PC because it might erase your harddrive or something serious. But C64 were like a sandbox who's OS wasn't succeptible to viruses or permanent damage.

    1. Re:Imagine the leet speak by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Kick it up a notch: Start making random SYS calls.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  32. not US based by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yeahronimo is not "a US based company", it's Dutch company. According to their web site, they are the first company to offer legal music download services in the Netherlands.

    Looks like the only thing they are interested in is making money with other people's creations, and sue the crap out of anyone who uses those creations without paying them money.

  33. TRADEMARK, not copyright by shimbee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Names can't be copyrighted...they'd be taking action against uses of the name under TRADEMARK law.

    There are a couple of issues they might run into:

    1) continuous use -- has the trademark been in continuous use over the years? They can't just abandon it and pick it back up

    2) passing off - if no one else is "passing themselves off" as the Commodore computer company, they probably don't have an action.

    overall, if their investment plan is litigation, i think they are in a craptacular situation

    1. Re:TRADEMARK, not copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and trademark, unlike copyright, is subject ot latches.. meaning if they don't use/enforce the trademark, they lose it.

    2. Re:TRADEMARK, not copyright by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Your craptacular situation can be altered by the use of a team of high priced attornies.

      In America, he with the deepest pockets wins.

      They'll be looking for cash settlements.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:TRADEMARK, not copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the issue of "sale in gross". Just what has Tulip computers sold besides the brand name? Has a Commodore line of business even existed in the recent past?

      For those not in the know: While trademark law protects a brand name, you cannot actually sell that trademarked brand name to others. Instead, you have to sell the line of business associated with the brand name. Now, that "line of business" is not the entire division or legal entity that holds the brand name, but it must include a non-trivial amount of equipment, records, etc...

  34. There goes-Self-wounding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Another Canadian icon to the US attack-lawyers."

    Uh huh. I can just see how they brutally savaged Corel.

  35. Is this about the C64 on a joystick.... by djplurvert · · Score: 1

    ...that QVC is selling? I remember reading in the artical on Slashdot about the "hot" girl who developed the design for that product that there was some question about licensing.

    In other words, I doubt there is much money in going after people writing C64 emulators, but there might be in chasing the company supplying QVC, or even QVC.

    Just curious and hoping some more knowledgele people will add real information to this.

  36. I love their company page/mission statement by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Yeahronimo's CLEAR Vision

    * Create new revenue streams
    * Leverage existing archives and libraries of content
    * Establish new customers
    * Achieve greater market share
    * Reduce distribution costs


    What could be clearer!

    Our mission statement: make money raping your childhood memories.

    Sigh. I wish they'd clone Jack Trameil so he could revive Commodore the way Jobs revived Apple.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:I love their company page/mission statement by dafoomie · · Score: 1

      Sigh. I wish they'd clone Jack Trameil so he could revive Commodore the way Jobs revived Apple

      Yeah, he really turned Atari into the powerhouse that it is today.

    2. Re:I love their company page/mission statement by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Actually all your childhood memories were created with the express purpose of making shit-loads of money. Milking them for all they are worth is the least any competent business person should do, however their marketing-speak mission statement sounds like it was stretched to 5 bullet points because that was how many were in the power-point template.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:I love their company page/mission statement by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      At least Atari was worth something when they sold it to Hasbro.

      Bushnell really fucked the Atari name up.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  37. for the perfectionists... by LiquidMind · · Score: 0

    24 million euros * 1.36 (US dollar rate) = $32.64 million

    yea, it's only off by ~1%, but still...36K is a lotta money to just be rounded off

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  38. Re:33 million from lawsuits: SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell SCO, who are still chugging away on nothing more than threats of lawsuits. Laws are made by lawyers, for lawyers.

  39. Marvelous. by sc0ttyb · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it'll take them to sue all the emulator writers, both entire machine and SID players? Will they take action against folks who enjoy the offerings of the HVSC and game archives?

    --
    "Apparently so, but suppose you throw a coin enough times. Suppose one day, it lands on its edge."
  40. I just can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to buy a legal copy of the Blue Meanies from Outer Space. The best game EVER on my VIC-20. Oh yeah... :)

    1. Re:I just can't wait by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better than GORF, Radar Rat Race, or Lock N Chase?

      How dare you.

      I remember when a bunch of my friends had Vic 20s, and I wished I had one.

      Then for christmas, lo and behold, there's what looks like a Vic 20! Hooray, I rushed over, red-cheeked with excitement. Commodore 64?! What the fuck is that! I had one from the very first shipment to Canada. There was nowhere to get software for it in my area.

      I was bummed, and all my friends mocked my useless PC.. Until a few months later my old man took me to the World of Commodore show, where I picked up a Choplifter! cartridge. Then it was: "WHOS LAUGHING NOW, BITCHES!".

      I swear I had like 20 kids coming to my house at a time to play it. It just blew away anything we'd seen before, back in the age of Atari's and Colecos.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:I just can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I swear I had like 20 kids coming to my house at a time

      Jakko, is that you?!
  41. Yes!!! by SmokeHalo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Soon I'll be able to clean up by selling my stash of 5.25" floppies! Sweet!

    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  42. Knowing that something like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...was going to happen, this is precisely why I ftp downloaded the net's largest archive of C=64 games a few months back. I'd post a link, but the last thing that this company needs is a target for their money-hungry ways.

    1. Re:Knowing that something like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did I. It's interesting to burn it all to a CD-R, hold it in your hand, and then look over at your messy stack of thousands of 5.25" disks. Then you wonder what you'll be recording tons of CD-R and DVD-R ISO images to in 2023.

  43. Commodore Brand Heating Units by Luminous · · Score: 1

    This could be a real market potential... turning those power supplies into home heating units.

    --
    This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  44. Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...?! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Branding is such a scam... Like putting the name Commodore on any crap box is going to make it magically like a C64 or an Amiga..

    Which begs the question; WTF is happening with the Amiga legacy at the moment?

    I stopped following Amiga developments circa 1995, when the new Amiga owners wanted to re-release the ageing A1200 for 100 pounds *more* than it had been selling for when C= went bankrupt. (Even then I knew the difference between trying to get the Amiga back into the mainstream, and squeezing the last drops of cash from the fanbase).

    From thereon, it seems the story gets very complicated, as the Amiga OS and hardware rights got sold off, split up, sold off again, and...

    Okay; back to what you said. What the *hell* does Amiga anywhere (seemingly a built-on-Java ME games environment, or something) have to do with the Amiga?!

    Quite frankly, it seems to me that people *will* buy because of the name; or at least some Amiga fans will (is this trying to con the hardcore, or going for the Amiga nostalgia market?).

    Another thing; what on earth is happening with Amiga OS 4.0? Version 3.0 came out in the early 1990s, version 4.0 has been gone on about for *ages*. I don't see how it can have any relevance now; things have changed too much in the intervening years, and it seems to be used to string die-hard Amiga fanatics along.

    BTW, I agree with you about Napster. It's just another paid service that happens to have the rights to that name, but the way it was reported in the news was some kind of corporate rebirth. Annoying...

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  45. And that's why I'm buying rights to the Odyssey!!! by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    I should be able to make a few bucks from all these infringers of "The Quest for the Rings"!

  46. Re:SID and Patent Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from http://www.emulationstation.com/systemlist.asp "The Commodore 64's sound is what really set it apart from other computers of the time. The system featured a Sound Interface Device called SID. The SID was a synthesizer chip capable of producing a wide variety of unique music and sound effects. It handled the sound output by itself, freeing up the CPU for other duties. The SID was the first dedicated sound chip to be used in a home computer." The settlements from patent infringement on this could be sizeable.

  47. Something or another... by aLe-ph-1(sh) · · Score: 1

    You know I always thought that things like commodore and mamiga shoulda been retransported to the solid realm again, the replay action is super. Tell another japanese element pixel drawn ga-ga go-go girl. Slam it thtoh another flick. Ok. Res-Trans The amiga had a lot of possibilities thaqt have only been relaised in the bedrooms of dreamers. Same for so many smaller and lesser known fruits... The OS you study mate, it's in there.

    --
    sig!wind down the juuice, let the tubes roar with the glow of alternative powers, not they that be." me, today...
    1. Re:Something or another... by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      Break the Pro-Zac in half next time.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
  48. The most importaint id by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will happen to the Open Source Emulator VICE? Everyone should download the latest version along with the source in the event they get a Cease and Desist letter.

  49. 33 million? by smug_lisp_weenie · · Score: 1

    ...if you create a MP3 player named "Commodore" instead of "rf32erf" or whatever, it isn't going to sell much more under the name "Commodore"- There is nothing about the "Commodore" brand name that would make the guy/gal on the street think it can make a good MP3 player, the way the "Apple" brand name did.

    ...the "classic Commodore" game business is pretty worthless, too: Can you name one IN-HOUSE Commodore game? Do you think "Aunt Tilley" can when she's looking for Christmas presents for her nephews? All the good games were written by EA or somesuch and not by Commodore directly.

    1. Re:33 million? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      30 million C64s were sold, and to me and many others Commodore holds much more geek cred than Apple ever will.

      I did shit with Amiga a decade ago that the "think different" Mac folks are just figuring out how to do. Anyone else remember Video Toaster?

      It seems to me, though, that this company just wants to use the name to sue other people using it, ie; a source of revenue via litigation. I don't see anything outside of the /. submission about a Commodore-branded anything.

      They probably just want to sue Jeri Ellsworths profits away from her.

      "Aunt Tilley" buys what she's told to, that is whatever the kid asked for verbatim.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:33 million? by Holi · · Score: 1

      They probably just want to sue Jeri Ellsworths profits away from her.

      Actually their just jealous of this guy.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:33 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did shit with Amiga a decade ago that the "think different" Mac folks are just figuring out how to do. Anyone else remember Video Toaster?


      of course, I still have my Video Toaster setup.

      Yes, you could do things the mac people couldn't, and the Mac people could do things that the Amiga couldn't. They were two entirely different approaches, for different reasons. They were merely different choices.

      I had to put an IBM bridgeboard in my Amiga, and hack together a dual OS system for generating postscript output from the Amiga's circuit design appliction, sending it to the IBM bridgeboard, and then using the IBM drivers to send it to my laser printer. Apple users at the time could simply plug their postcript laser printers in with no fuss. And had access to industry-standard professional software like Photoshop, and high-quality peripherals and hardware. Many aspects of the Amiga were quite "toy like" in comparison.

      There was also no professional publishing software for Amiga, little in professional image editing aside from 3D and video. There was nothing like Quicktime.

      I loved the Amiga, and thought they were better than Macs at the time, but Apple clearly had the longer-term vision, and the professional tools. the Amiga liked analogue video. In today's age, the Amiga way of doing things would have had to evolve, because these days we do hard-drived based DV editing. the Amiga was great at real-time processing of video, but these are two different tasks.

      It's not that Mac people "couldn't figure out" the stuff you were doing - maybe they just wanted to do different things than you?

  50. Commodore is so out of style by arodland · · Score: 1

    The real money is in Rear Admiral (lower half) Computers.

    1. Re:Commodore is so out of style by Drantin · · Score: 1

      While the title is officially 'Rear Admiral (lower half)' nowadays, they're used interchangably informally within the Navy...

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
  51. The most importaint question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn Slashdot for forcing me to post before previewing. ;)

  52. Re:What? Game news?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I think Sarah is on coke now.

  53. Bring back the VIC-20! by The+I+Shing · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bring back the VIC-20!
    I want my 1MHZ of screaming power, with 5K of RAM!

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Bring back the VIC-20! by spidergoat2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, William Shatner said the VIC-20 _is_ the computer for the 21st century. And beyond!

    2. Re:Bring back the VIC-20! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3583 Bytes Free
      Ready
      .

      Ahhhh...those were the days...

      .

    3. Re:Bring back the VIC-20! by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

      And you can watch the VIC-20 ad with Shatner right here: http://www.retrojunk.com/media/163/

      --
      You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    4. Re:Bring back the VIC-20! by dosius · · Score: 1

      I've written a few Commodore emulators myself (my VIC-20 emulator sucks as it can barely run BASIC in text mode, but it does run).

      A little toy I came up with while figuring out the CBM 3032

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    5. Re:Bring back the VIC-20! by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Go build yourself on on a FPGA.. under 100 bucks and a weekend of work.

      Fun Stuff

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    6. Re:Bring back the VIC-20! by BrianRoach · · Score: 1


      Talk about memories. I remember the day I got the 16K expansion catridge - I was a GOD!

      Had the vic modem as well ... anyone remember that one? You had to dial the phone, then unplug the cord from the handset and insert it into the modem.

      - Roach

    7. Re:Bring back the VIC-20! by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      And I was about to go to sleep. So much for that...

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  54. US or dutch? by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

    Is it really a US company? All the board members and the advisors have dutch names, and their pressroom sites a dutch press release on their intent to buy the Commodore brand from Tulip.

    I really wonder how this will affect the C64 DTV stick just released. I'm in Europe, so I still haven't been able to get one of these.

  55. Re:Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...? by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

    AmigaOS 4.0 is in public beta. Read http://www.amigaworld.net/

  56. Great strategy; alienate your clients right away. by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nothing like the promise of lawsuits to drum up business.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  57. what would SGI fetch - as a name.. by itomato · · Score: 1

    No kidding - I wonder what "Silicon Graphics" or "sgi" would fetch - for the name alone (no IP).

    Half that? :\

    What times we live in.

  58. New strategy by Phexro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sod the MP3 player. MP3 is dead. What they need is a portable SIDfile player.

    Though I'd probably get some strange looks as I rock out to the "Commando" theme on the bus.

    1. Re:New strategy by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      start off a new production line of SID chips ... now were talking !

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:New strategy by cosinezero · · Score: 1

      Hah... the SIDStation came out a few years before the iPod... http://www.sidstation.com/

  59. Re:SID and Patent Laws by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I don't see how. Synthesizers haven't been done in hardware for ages except for curiosities and by the people making sid-chip sound cards for PC - which use the actual SID.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  60. Emulators? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Do their plans to clamp down also include going after harmless emulators? Both software and in FPGA's ?

    Good thing i got my DTV already..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Emulators? by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1

      If they plan to recoup $33M somehow, I expect that'd be the way to do it.

    2. Re:Emulators? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Who would have imagined there would be someone coming after us for emulation of 20+ year old systems..

      Its unreal...

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  61. One more: by MsGeek · · Score: 1
    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:One more: by CharAznable · · Score: 1

      Leave it to Pontiac to take the GTO name and come up with something completely boring and undistinguished to go with it. At least the new Mustang looks like a Mustang.

      --
      The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    2. Re:One more: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, I forgot about the new Cavalier, er, I mean GTO. Good powertrain but boring styling.

    3. Re:One more: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The cavalier is the cavalier. THIS is the GM Monaro.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:One more: by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I forgot about the new Cavalier, er, I mean GTO. Good powertrain but boring styling.

      Actually the powertrain is crap compared to what they were selling. The last generation Trans Am's were getting over 300 hp in stock trim from their 5.7 LS-1 V8 and came with Tremec T-56 transmissions. They were that fastest production car under $30,000 in the US. Pontiac has managed to produce an uglier, slower, and more expensive car with the GTO.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  62. Umm ..We got one of them Now by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    But I'm assuming your post was sarcastic..

    However, many others wont know this ( which is apparent by you being modded as 'interesting', and not 'funny'.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  63. I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, I hope they're not going to make me take down my Commodore 64 "emulator" (actually, a 2-image GIF file)

    http://www.yeahblah.com/virtc64n.htm#c-64
    (work s best with Netscape/Mozilla/Firefox)

  64. Memory Banking by fwarren · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Commodor 64 had 64k of RAM. the 20K of system rom was "over" the last 20K of RAM, and the 16K of RAM before that could be banked out so a Cartridge ROM could reside there. The 6510 had the ability to look at several address in zero page memory and use that information to "bank" certain ROM and memory mampped I/O out so that the RAM underneith could be used.

    --
    vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    1. Re:Memory Banking by SMQ · · Score: 1
      The 6510 had the ability to look at several address in zero page memory and use that information to "bank" certain ROM and memory mampped I/O out so that the RAM underneith could be used.

      Er, Sort of. In the interest of accuracy, the 6510 had an 8-bit "I/O port", separate from the address and data bus. This port was controlled by reading/writing to addresses 0 and 1, where the bits in address 1 set the data direction (read or write) for each of the 8 I/O pins, and data was read or written to address 0.

      In the C64, some of the bits of this I/O port were connected to the MMU (if you can call it that, really just a handfull of logic gates controlling address select lines) which controlled whether data access went to RAM or to the usual ROM/memory-mapped I/O for each of the controllable address blocks ($8000-$9FFF, normally Game Cartridge ROM if present, $A000-$BFFF, normally BASIC ROM; $D000-$DFFF, normally memory-mapped I/O; $E000-$FFFF, normally KERNEL ROM). The Character Generator ROM, which normally didn't appear in the memory map, could be mapped in in a similar way.

      (Incidentally, two other pins of the 6510's I/O Port were connected directly to the cassette drive! One for data and one for motor control.)

      --
      SMQ 90AE4B2BC4F6BEAF7340F0B40BA2DEF7340F6BC2D0392
    2. Re:Memory Banking by greed · · Score: 1
      Pretty close.

      The main difference between the MOS 6510 and the original Rockwell 6502 was the 6510 had an on-chip I/O port at address 0 & 1. This sacrificed two bytes of RAM (data direction register & I/O register), but by wiring 3 lines of it you could turn on or off the BASIC, KERNAL or CHARGEN ROMs. (Cassette control was in there too.)

      The BASIC was 8k, and the "KERNAL" (yes, that's how they spelled it) another 8k. You could switch them on or off separately. A fun trick was, writes to a ROM address would actually go to the RAM at the same location, so you could copy BASIC to RAM, switch to the RAM bank, and then start modifying the BASIC interpreter. If you got this wrong from BASIC, you got to use the power switch. (STOP-RESET might not save you at this point.)

      Cartridges had access to the entire CPU bus, so could actually take over any section of memory. But ones that expected to co-exist with the system were required to use a paritcular 8k bank, just before the BASIC ROM.

    3. Re:Memory Banking by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Close, it was 6 pins on the chip, not 8.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    4. Re:Memory Banking by SMQ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had the direction register and the port addresses swapped, too. That's what I get for posting before checking the reference guide...

      --
      SMQ 90AE4B2BC4F6BEAF7340F0B40BA2DEF7340F6BC2D0392
    5. Re:Memory Banking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to use this memory bank switching to get "extra" RAM for my basic programs. Writes went to the RAM under the ROM and then I used a small assembly program to switch out the ROM and copy my data to a "safe" RAM spot, switched the ROM back in, and returned to BASIC which was non-the-wiser. I then PEEK'd my data from the "safe" RAM into BASIC variables.

      I actually just ran across my old Sam's C64 schematic that I had hanging up at my first job where I repaired C64s. If you had a C64 repaired at Comsoft Communications in Sun Valley, California - I was probably the one who did it :^)

      Fun stuff!

  65. Little Improvement In Video Games Since C64 Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There have been little improvement in video games since the c64 days. What's the different between skyfox on c64 and MS flight simulator 2003? graphics.. The gameplay is still the same. PS3/xb2/gc2 will have better graphics but not much else... there is no thinking outside of the box in the video game industry.. it's the same old same old recycling of ideas... the first first person shooter began with the stupid duck hunting game in nintendo in 86' and doom3 or hl2 is still same the same game play... lame. lame I tell you.

  66. So what their profit making plans are: by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Informative

    1) Buy old, fairly defunct company
    2) Decry copyright infringements about defunct company (that nobody knew existed anymore)
    3) Sue people
    4) Make Profit!!!

    Hey I was able to complete all the steps...sound's like a familiar tactic from our favorite companies.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  67. Since you want to be a perfectionist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    36K is a lotta money to just be rounded off

    33 million - 32.64 million = 360K, not 36K.

    1. Re:Since you want to be a perfectionist by LiquidMind · · Score: 0

      33 million - 32.64 million = 360K, not 36K.

      I meant for extremely large values of 36K of course.

      --
      This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  68. PC1 by Miamisky · · Score: 1

    Anyone here remember the PC1?

  69. Re:Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...? by Lispy · · Score: 1

    The problem is that the folks that buy brand names don't get what's it all about. I would buy an Amiga, even with a propriety OS if it would do what the Amiga did. Wich was from my definition:

    - look cool in my living room
    - have a slick gui with extreme ease of use
    - interoperate with my stereo and TV
    - run software that gets the job done
    - offer all this at an affordable price

    So far I could just get out and buy an iMac, but here's the hurdle:

    - be the perfect gameconsole, run every hot game out there AND is easy to use a "real" console.
    - Ah, and while you're at it, get rid of the Guru Meditation.

  70. Atari by smart.id · · Score: 1

    Didn't a similar situation happen to Atari?

    --
    blog & fiction: jd87
  71. Grand Theft Auto by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    It just occurred to me that they could sue Rockstar for their Commodore-like intro in GTAVC...

    I hope not though

  72. Re:SID and Patent Laws by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    "The settlements from patent infringement on this could be sizeable."

    What is the patent number that covers the MOS 6581?
    Nobody is producing this chip today, counterfeit or otherwise. I wish they were. I have to scavenge them from breadboxes, and I hate doing that. Yeah, I know where to buy them, not reliably, but I can always find C64s. Sometimes for free, and rarely for more than $5.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  73. Re:Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    With respect, is this intended as a serious commercial product, or is it just something for the hobbyists? If the former, *why* should the rest of us care about Amiga OS 4.0?

    (Yes; I know the Amiga OS beat the heck out of Windows/DOS in its day. I was one of those defending it. But now it's dissociated from the hardware, and OSs have changed a lot in the past 10 years.)

    The problem with the Amiga sites is that they all seem designed for people already familiar with the current situation- i.e. die-hard Amiga fans, and from the outside, all I'm seeing is a confusing mess of products, developments and intellectual property being shuffled around, appearing and disappearing.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  74. Re:Bring back the VIC-20! - by Graemee · · Score: 1

    Your must be in marketing right? It only had 3.5K for user storage.

  75. Re:Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    look cool in my living room

    IMHO, none of the Amigas ever *looked* cool. They all came in beige, which was boring even then (irony of ironies, the now 'anti-beige' Apple probably kick-started beige-fashion when they chose it as a sensible colour for their Apple II). Neither the pizza boxes nor the A500/A600/A1200 looked that good (*); the Atari ST (grey, angled function keys) looked better, IMHO, though it wasn't as good a machine.

    The 68000-based Amigas were great in their day, but they'd probably seem crude as hell if you fired them up now, and not all that slick.

    (*) Okay, the A600 was kind of cute. But it was still beige, and in every other sense, risible.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  76. No its about the Retro-industry by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It's not about the *smart* girl that produced the DTV's. ( some of us have repsect for Jeri )

    Jeri is a small fish. Its the fact the larger 'retro gaming' industry is starting to take off, and scum like these folks smell money.

    The first to come are always the lawyers. ( and the last to leave )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  77. Re:Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Getting rid of the guru meditation is the same thing as making the OS never crash - good luck. Of course, you could always do it the WinXP way, and just make the system reboot without warning... Or you could use GOMF which made most meditations recoverable enough to save your files before rebooting.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  78. Commodore by Danathar · · Score: 1

    It's not dead....it's undead

  79. Did anyone.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Anyone else read this as "We want the brand name and then we're going to sue people who play roms of games they owned 20 years ago, but can't find in their attics under the clutter"?

    The way they put that... it sounds so... slimey... oh well I own over 400 C64 games, if they wish to check which I own and which I illegally downloaded they can go through them, because I'm sure as hell not!

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Did anyone.. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Uh. How many of those games are from Commodore and not, say EA, Broderbund, Epyx, etc?

    2. Re:Did anyone.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would they be callled roms or disk images?

  80. Re:Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...? by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Ok, the A500 looked like a kitchen machine. But hey, I got a A1200 sitting right here on my desk and I think it looks cool in a StarWars-toy way, not in a "Phillip Starck bathroom" way...

    Of course it feels crude today, but still, it boots fast, it has a small laptop hardrive (it's really quiet), it's pretty fast at everything it does and it still works.

    And personally I think the A600s biggest strength was is cool design. Sooo much Computer in sooo little space. Cute. And it's not really beige, it USED to be a shade of white. ;-)

    I mean, those hard edges and everything, much cooler than todays biomorphic, ergonomic stuff. But maybe it's just me. I also like IBMs Desktopline...

    My point was I would buy an Amiga that lived up to the promise of yesterdays Amigas using modern technology. Maybe a Mini-ITX box with a custom Linux distribution, although this wouldn't solve the Games dillemma. Actually the iMac comes as close as it gets (it's white, too). And I would NEVER get one. I think an iMac is one ugly box of technology.

    Well, it's all a matter of taste.

  81. Spats by 602 · · Score: 1
    "To hell with [Commodore]. Take 50% of my money and put it in the blue chips: Transatlantic Zeppelin, Amalgamated Spats, Congraves' Inflammable Powders, U.S. Hay, and sink the rest into that up and coming Baltimore Opera Hat Company." (He actually said "IBM".)

    --C. Montgomery Burns in Simpsons 4F17

  82. Hey, where is my share of that? by suso · · Score: 1

    I once owned 400 shared of Commodore stock and still get sent a bank notice that it is worth something like 0.125 cents. Can I cash that in now?

  83. And Atari was only worth $5 million? by gozar · · Score: 1

    How can the Commodore brand be worth $33 million when Hasbro bought Atari for $5 million in 1998.

    --
    What, me worry?
  84. Re:There goes [OT!!1!!!] by bbagnall · · Score: 1

    Remember when there was a big Internet boom that turned out to be a bubble? Remember when the bubble popped and the nasdaq fell to one quarter of its value? Things like that tend to affect the dollar.

  85. Re:Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    And personally I think the A600s biggest strength was is cool design. Sooo much Computer in sooo little space. Cute. And it's not really beige, it USED to be a shade of white. ;-)

    Well, it came out five years after the A500; considering it was no better specced (okay; better in some areas, but poorer in others- balances out, but it should have had at *least* an A1200 spec to compete ('Red Queen' moving forward to stand still) and compensate for the fact that it wasn't too hardware-compatible with A500 stuff), they should have had no problems in fitting the technology in.

    And I'd forgotten about the colour; well, it *was* beige, just a lighter, more creamy shade than the greyish beige of the A500 (if it had actually been white in that type of moulded plastic, it would have looked incredibly nasty).

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  86. Wow! now the Commodore 64 will flourish!! by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 2, Informative

    Who the hell are they kidding? This thing is so dead. Stick a fork in it already. Or stop trying to sell it. The people that really want their C64's actually still have them. Give it up, call it quits!

  87. I own (a) Commodore, too by pjf(at)gna.org · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anybody wants to buy my Commodore? Is $1 Million ok?

    --
    echo "getuid(){return 0;}" > e.c; gcc -shared -o e.so e.c; LD_PRELOAD=./e.so sh
  88. Re:There goes [OT!!1!!!] by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

    It's called a cycle.

    Up. Down. Up. Down. Up. Down.

    Much like gas prices. Up. Down. Up. Down. Up. Down. (down now - I thought the Saudis were supposed to drive gas prices down before the election for their friend Bushitler, not after... strange)

  89. That should be the RIAA theme song! by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hungry like the wolf.... :P

  90. Re:There goes [OT!!1!!!] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, exactly

    People need to be a little less reactionary with these things. People went f'e crazy over the gas prices. Now they're going crazy over this. And when this reverses itself, they'll go crazy over something else.

    Really basic idea here: Dollar down - American goods cheaper abroad, foreign goods cheaper in America. More American goods sold, less foreign goods purchasec. Dollar goes back up and the trends reverse. I mean, come on people.

  91. Re:Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having sold more Amiga equipment than I care to remember, I can assure you that the A4000, A1200, and A600 were white.

  92. Has to be about IP. by blanks · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what type of copyrights Commodore might have had (or has) or what type of IP they may still own.

    It sounds like the standard business practice of buy a company, scrap everything besides IP, sue sue sue.

    I dont think we can really expect to see any new hardware or software (if they even do come out with an MP3 player it wont matter much, because it wont last long at all), so why else could they be buying the company.

    I know a name can go along way, but the only products I can see them selling would be focused on people that would know better.

  93. M.U.L.E by thegameiam · · Score: 1

    Ahh, MULE was one the best games I've ever played - I've bought a C64 emulator just for that purpose, but it's not the same :(

    Anyone want to write a new version of this game?

    (for that matter, Mail Order Monsters was fantastic too...)

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    1. Re:M.U.L.E by puppet10 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are three more recent clones:

      Traders

      TZ-Colony

      and

      Subtrade:Return to Irata

      They dont add much though.

      The original is still the best.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    2. Re:M.U.L.E by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      MULE is a classic, everyone's played it and many loved it... but the amazing thing is, it was a commercial failure. It was heavily pirated; there were probably more pirated copies than legitimate ones floating around.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    3. Re:M.U.L.E by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      A recent cloning attempt is Space HoRSE.

    4. Re:M.U.L.E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PROBABLY?!

      You could replace that with "definitely" and the statement would probably be true for over 90% of C=64 software titles.

  94. Better deal.... by THESuperShawn · · Score: 1

    I would have sold them mine for a lot less- AND I would have thrown in two 1541 disk drives and a lot of home-made double sided disks....including Raid on Moscow, one of the best games ever!!!! I think I even still have some carts and a modem!

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
  95. The reason behind an mp3 player?? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the reason they want to make Commodore branded mp3 player is that there are already fake Commodore mp3 players on the market?

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    1. Re:The reason behind an mp3 player?? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      i.e.
      1) Wait until someone who uses your logo is actually worth something.
      2) Take legal action
      3) Profit?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  96. General Motors is next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  97. Please note.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Euro doesn't have the plural

    http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/euro/f aq s/spelling_en.pdf

  98. We must protect Jeri! by Ghostgate · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh no! They aren't going to go after Jeri Ellsworth, are they? She can hide out at my place!

    Jeri! You read Slashdot, right? Send me a message. In the meantime, I'll go get our, uh.. I mean YOUR bed ready!

  99. Buggy Boy by elecngnr · · Score: 1

    I have been trying to find a reason to dig that old C-64 out of the closet and this just might do it. I hope they release a sequel to Buggy Boy. That is such an awesome game.

    Who owns the copyright to Pong...I think I might have a plan....mwhaaa-haaa-haa

    --
    Having done so much with so little for so long, I now can do anything with nothing at all.
    1. Re:Buggy Boy by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 1

      Someone actually has the copyright to Pong? I would never have guessed that.

      --
      All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
    2. Re:Buggy Boy by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      As late as 1999 whomever owned the rights to Atari owned the rights to Pong, as witnessed by the Hasbro Interactive title Pong: The Next Level . It's likely Infogrames/Atari still has it.

      Note that this refers to calling a specific game "Pong", as opposed to all the Pong-clones popular in the 80's, like "Video Tennis", etc.

    3. Re:Buggy Boy by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 1

      Humor is lost...

      --
      All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
  100. Re:There goes [OT!!1!!!] by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

    correction:

    "American goods cheaper abroad, foreign goods cheaper in America." ->
    "American goods cheaper abroad, foreign goods more expensive in America."

  101. Trogdor by rlp · · Score: 1

    Oh no - they're going to sue Strong Bad!

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  102. Yeahronimo by Arrawa · · Score: 1

    Actually, Yeahronimo is setup and owned by Dutch people. They only registered it in the US.

    It is a digital media company (look at their homepage which is at http://www.yeahronimo.com/) which sells digital music, but also have sold sports content.

    The foundation of this company was laid by people who where in the music branche forever. They are the owners of the famous Wisseloord Studios in Hilversum (in the Netherlands). In those studios not only Dutch artists recorded, but also famous international names like Elton John, Tina Turner, Mick Jagger, ELO, Simple Minds, The Police, The Cranberries, Stereophonics, Noa and Erykah Badu.

    They have been playing with the idea Yeahronimo since I think 1998 but had serious troubles to get the licenses and technique right.

    Them buying the Commodore brand might be actually a good thing. Don't forget Napster was dead too...

  103. Re:SID and Patent Laws by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    The settlements from patent infringement on this could be sizeable.
    Given the Commodore 64 was released in 1982, and patents last a maximum of 20 years, I think it's safe to say the settlements will be minimal, if there are any at all.

    Actually, I suspect Commodore doesn't have any valid patents today. Even Amiga Inc, a seperate entity with the rights to the Amiga IP, may have a handful, but the bulk of the cool stuff was done in 1985 with that. This year we can probably see AROS switch to using the Amiga's drop down menus instead of the context-menus they've been doing up until now.

    Commodore will have two collections of valid, useful, IP. One is the copyright of certain Commodore produced software. There isn't a lot of that, and little of it is in use today. There's the BASIC ROMs, I guess, but I suspect that Joystick-with-a-C64-in-it thing has licensed them anyway.

    The other is the Commodore brand. Fortunately for this company, Commodore didn't become generic in the time taken for Commodore to die, but there's a reason for that - nobody's using it. So it's highly unlikely to net much revenue.

    Despite the submitters comment about "copyrights", I suspect this operation will have very little to do unless they get off their arses and release actual products, cashing in on the Commodore brand name. And it remains to be seen how useful that will be.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  104. If they remanufactured the MOS6581 Synth Chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they started building more MOS6581 chips they could sell them to Elektron.se who makes the SidStation synth http://www.sidstation.com/

    Thier availability is limited by the amount of chips left out there in the wild they can get thier hands on. It's an awesome synth!

  105. Re:Talking of the Amiga, WTF is that all about...? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    I thoght the A1000 and A3000s were both very elegant for their time. There were a bunch of white Amigas too (the A1200 at the very least), and one black one (hello CDTV. God you're ugly.)

    Talking of the latter, wasn't the CD32 dark gray? I don't think it was beige.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  106. Happy End Proposal by karnat10 · · Score: 1

    The Commodore brand will now be squeezed out and discredited (come on, release a new MP3 player and rerelease classic games doesn't sound too innovative, more like cheap rebranded stuff) until nobody remembers what the name stood for originally.

    Nobody? Almost. But a handful of doters with long beards will remember their C-64 youth, invest their retirement pay into the (by then cheap) brand name, free it and release a linux-based open source console with true Commodore heritage.

    Or Yeah-row-nemo.com (or the like) could free the brand now. Maybe if we ask politely...?

  107. Maybe It's for Cellphones by lordDallan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you look at Yeahronimo's website, there's talk about selling ringtones and realtones (presumably for cellphones).

    Maybe they want to make a C64 emulator for cellphones and sell/rent old C64 games to cellphone customers.

    1. Re:Maybe It's for Cellphones by Calroth · · Score: 1

      If you look at Yeahronimo's website, there's talk about selling ringtones and realtones (presumably for cellphones).

      I've often wondered why mobile phones don't embed a SID chip for their ringtones... it's a step above what most phones have, and the SID is capable of some pretty amazing sound effects. The SID isn't exactly expensive, either. Plus, all those game tunes as your ringtone!

      Well, this would have been relevant back in 2003. Phones nowadays can play any arbitrary sampled sound (read: MP3) as a ringtone.

  108. Not just a lack of marketing... by Chordonblue · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was a lot of things.

    - It was a CEO making 10+ million a year when his company was going down the tube.

    - It was paying $800,000 a month for a huge factory building in West Chester, PA when most of manufacturing had long ago moved overseas.

    - It was C= snubbing of third parties like Newtek (Video Toaster guys), until it was WAY too late.

    - It was C= thinking they could sell crappy PC's under their name better than their own original product. They lost MILLIONS on those.

    The fact that they lost the MHz war meant little as the Amiga relied on co-processing for most everything PC's were using the main processor for. However, C= delayed the production of the AA and AAA graphic chipsets far too long. By the time the 1200/4000 series was released, it was already all but old.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Not just a lack of marketing... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The Amiga's co-processing is a boon to low-end machines but only gets in your way when you make a significant CPU upgrade... remember CPUblit? Without patchlists in the OS you'd never get any decent performance out of an accelerator at all. Commodore probably could have survived most of that other stuff (maybe not selling PCs) if they had managed to actually sell Amigas, as they would have had money.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  109. It's understandable... by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

    You'd buy the Commodore name too, if your name was Yeahronimo. What a bad name.

  110. Commodore 64 Whored Out Again by blacklily8 · · Score: 1

    Sigh. Here we go; now that Cloanto has done all they could to criminalize the Amiga emulation community, we need a company to do the same to Lemon and all the rest of the C-64 emulation sites. Value add? Zero. They serve a purely parasitical role and have NOTHING to do with the original development of the system. All they ask is that we now PAY for what we've been happy enough to enjoy and PROVIDE for FREE. Companies like this are the real pirates.

  111. More Commodores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company spokesman said they would "take actions" against possible copyright infringements of the Commodore name in the United States. What does Linel Ritchie have to say about that?

  112. OG Original Gamesystem by cosinezero · · Score: 1

    It's this retro thing... First there was C= then C+ then C++ then C# now C= again... ( And don't forget pacman - C... )

  113. Re-release Defender of the Crown and 3 Stooges by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    That's just my 2 cents.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  114. Tulip made a good deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A few millions for an empty and completely worthless brand name: kids are too young to know about it, young adults may have faded memories of something long gone, thirty-something knows it went belly-up a long time ago.

    Way to go, Tulip: keep selling things like this to suckers of the world and you'll end up with a nice profit. As for the suckers, good thing there's one born every minute!

  115. I just connected my A1200 to the TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is an off-white/creamy; not white. I have just broke out the 100's of games for the children 7 amd 10; they love it. Yes the games have faded some over the years, but they are still great fun to look at and hear like the Cinemaware titles, FA-18, Lemmings, and the tons of Demos.

    Please forgive the recollections of the past;

    The Amiga's biggest success was also it's ultimate failure. It had a powerful, but custom embedded chipset and therefore tied to resolution and features, it often could not be upgraded as easily as a board swap.

    Despite the naysayers, the 500 was even today advanced in almost every sense of the word; intelligent (or at least autonomous, interrupt driven) peripherals and chipsets, an AGP-style direct graphics bus(es) and autonomous chipset (take that Apple II and Mac of the era where the CPU had to do everything; "Toolbox"?) with extended video synchronization and manipulation down to less than a scan line; one of the early modes switched the color pallette at different scan lines, creating an extremely large color space for the time(16k colors?); PCs and Macs couldn't match it, digital VGA, fixed scan rates and the like.

    Oh, the 8 bit stereo sound (PCs were bleeping and blooping), the multitasking which really worked (keep your ideas about having an MMU to yourself; processes in Windows of the time could easily stomp on each other, futzing with an MMU slowed things down, and it worked well). The GUI; it worked very well; the Macs only had one submenu under a menu, and were only black and white IIRC., Windows couldn't achieve folders within folders.

    The architecture was good; almost all jump vectors; shared library system, relocatable code,and a FLAT memory space; the Intel guys choked on that; only years later did they figure that out. And, the PC has stubbornly fixed I/O addresses that we have to follow to this VERY day.
    The AmigaOS and hardware had the first PlugnPlay I ever heard of; the drivers could FIND their hardware (Sun guys were recompiling kernels). The AmigaOS had logical volumes; is that what udev is to Linux today?

    I had scabbed on almost every option on many machines; 500,1200, 2000, 2500?; more memory, SCSI controller, flickerfixer, etc.

    To me, as a long time Unix guy, Linux has only recently become my Amiga replacement; faster, quicker and not held back because of a company.

    1. Re:I just connected my A1200 to the TV... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Have to agree; the PC was pretty risible until Windows 95, and suffered from having to retain compatibility with a design originally based on a processor which had *already* been derived through several generations, and had stuff in common with the original 4004. Sheesh.

      Though, be fair to the Apple II; it came out in 1977, and it was the first *consumer* PC. I mean, I can cut it a lot of slack for that.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  116. Please, bring back the home computer! by master_p · · Score: 1

    How about a C64 on steroids for the new millenium? a home computer with an object-oriented Basic language booted from ROM that provides complete programmatic access to the underlying video and sound hardware! a hobbyist's dream!

    Please, bring back the home computer! and the back-bedroom programming...it is an untapped market with huge potential! don't they see how retro stuff sells wildly?

  117. MOD PARENT UP by johannesg · · Score: 1
    ...he's got it right. C= did lots of stupid things, managementwise. To add a few more: the a300 (oops, a600), AGA (when AAA could have been there a year earlier), snubbing Sun (when they wanted to use Amiga hardware for their UNIX workstations). I'm sure other people can think of other things too.

    Basically C= was stuck in a business model where you sold a product until it stopped selling, and _then_ you started looking for something new. Anything that looked like research and development was considered dangerous and subversive, and a threat to a model that has obviously worked out very well (not). Meanwhile the competition was going faster, bigger, better.

    Could C= have kept up had they invested in R&D? Some people said it was impossible, that no one manufacturer can possibly have the ability to have a superior video, audio, CPU, OS, etc. solution. However, consider that C= didn't make the CPU anyway, and NVidia now pretty much all other hardware to superior standards. And they already had a worldclass OS. In a nutshell, I believe under proper management C= could not only have kept up, but could in fact have been a leader.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      It was a direct consequence of Commodore's "budget" strategy -- The main reason the Amiga sold at all was because it was cheap, and because it was cheap, there was very little R&D investment. Compare that to Apple who had ridiculous margins and a ridiculous R&D budget to match (and even then fell behind.)

      Recall that their main experience was with the C64, a cheap piece of obsolete junk thrown onto the market with very little developer or hardware support but yet still made them a mint. As systems became more complex, they were still operating the same way.

      Plus, others have made the argument that it wasn't possible to siginificantly upgrade the Amiga hardware without breaking all the software. They may have realized this and just decided to let the Amiga wither while they moved into PC clones.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by johannesg · · Score: 1
      Plus, others have made the argument that it wasn't possible to siginificantly upgrade the Amiga hardware without breaking all the software. They may have realized this and just decided to let the Amiga wither while they moved into PC clones.

      I heard that, yes, but I'm not buying it. The Amiga had already lived through a number of compatibility-destroying events (1.x -> 2.x; RAM expansion above 512KB; 68000 -> 680x0), and in each case, survived. By the time of the A4000 there were machines on the market with a variety of OS versions, RAM configurations, and CPU speeds, and the worst compatibility problems were over. Hell, mine (still standing here besides me) has a non-native graphics card (Picasso IV), audio board (Concierto) and CPU board (PowerPC + 68060) - and the whole configuration works just fine with any software I care to throw at it.

      Long after C= was gone there were some mutterings by the people porting AmigaOS to new hardware that actually the OS wasn't so bad after all - it wasn't "completely tied to the custom hardware" as so many had claimed for so long. Not that it came as any surprise to anyone already using non-native hardware, like myself, but still...

      So a playstation-style solution would have been possible: shrink the old hardware into a corner of a single chip and make sure any new hardware isn't hit as badly as the old was, so the problem wouldn't repeat in the next generation. But that would have required R&D to take place, and that is difficult to afford when your $10M director wants to fly his company plane...

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      c= made obscene margins on the c64 - well over 50% gross margins.

      at the end of life for the c64, they had a $49 sourcing cost per c64, total.

      and they were still selling it for 199 retail.

      they had absolutely obscene margins on the product.

      the problem was that they werent sinking any significant r&d after tramiel left.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      I should have noted that IANAA(migan), so that was 3rd hand information.

      I can see how a "Amiga on a Chip" might have made sense down the road, but in the era when the Amiga was at it's peak it probably would have been too complex/expensive. Even so, they probably would have had to do an entirely NEW set of custom hardware in an era when it was clear that non-PC systems seemed to be going the way of the dodo.

      The "corrupt executives" argument has appeal to the screwed users, but I kinda doubt it really made a significant difference one way or another. The main problem was that they were idiots, not that they were overpaid.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    5. Re:MOD PARENT UP by johannesg · · Score: 1
      I can see how a "Amiga on a Chip" might have made sense down the road, but in the era when the Amiga was at it's peak it probably would have been too complex/expensive. Even so, they probably would have had to do an entirely NEW set of custom hardware in an era when it was clear that non-PC systems seemed to be going the way of the dodo.

      That's what I meant with my "NVidia can do it" argument. At the time of C='s demise, the prevalent argument was that a single company couldn't make all the parts needed for a computer; that specialized companies would be making each component (audio, video, network, whatever) to unbeatable standards. NVidia proves that this is simply not true: they _do_ make boards that have all the equivalents to the Amiga custom chips by themselves, and are apparently doing fine. C= could have done so too, had they invested in R&D.

      The "corrupt executives" argument has appeal to the screwed users, but I kinda doubt it really made a significant difference one way or another. The main problem was that they were idiots, not that they were overpaid.

      Idiocy is as bad as corruption, especially when you are being paid such an enormeous salary...

      Anyway, happy new year, and may this be the year of the new AmigaOS / Linux on the desktop / when a meteor strikes Redmond! ;-)

  118. How about a fully functional all-in-one handheld.. by borgheron · · Score: 1

    with a miniature LCD screen, a little chicklet kb and a 512MB memory card to store the entire library of C64 games and also allow you to enjoy the pleasures of V2 basic again in all it's glory. ;)

    I'm not talking about the joystick thing by undoubtedly talented Jeri Ellsworth, I'm talking about something ENTIRELY different.

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  119. sco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A company spokesman said they would "take actions" against possible copyright infringements of the Commodore name..."

    Why does the name SCO pop into my head when I read this?

  120. Yeah, piracy will kill the market! by aliquis · · Score: 1

    (C64 most sold system ever)

  121. Tulip still exists?!? by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

    Wow, and I thought the Commodore brand and Tulip both didn't exist anymore since Escom AG and later it's Dutch renamed-to-Commodore daughter company went belly up in like 1997 or so.

    Tulip used to be omnipresent in the Netherlands, but I don't see it anymore.

    --
    RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  122. Commodore's heritage by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Commodore was started in Canada, and stayed alive because of a Canadian investor, but a "Canadian Icon"? By the time it reached prominence in the PC industry with the VIC20 and C64 it was only Canadian in a nominal sense. Also something to keep in mind is that the corporate behaviour of some of the early Commodore bigwigs would make an Enron executive blush.

    Commodore was founded by Jack Tramiel, who was a Polish-born American citizen, established Commodore in Canada to circumvent stricter import/export regulations in the US (some of Commodore's early office products and parts were imported from eastern Europe and relations between US and nations within the Soviet sphere of influence were obviously cooling). Co-founder CP Morgan might've been Canadian but I'm not sure. In any case, CP Morgan's company went bankrupt and the SEC thoroughly investigated Morgan for less-than-honest conduct. Later, Canadian Irving Gould invested in Commodore and kept it alive, but he was ultimately responsible for ousting Jack in the 80s. Gould was also noted for his not-quite-honest business practises. If I recall, Commodore International was incorporated offshore to avoid taxation, although the physical offices were in Canada.

    So....the "Canadian Icon" Commodore was founded by an American Citizen (a remarkable one who survived Auchwitz and had quite an acumen for business, but not Canadian) and incorporated offshore. The early Canadian investor (Morgan) had a minority stake and went bankrupt and nearly pulled Tramiel into a legal quagmire with his corporate hanky-panky. The next Canadian that stepped into the picture (Gould) outed the founder and let Jack take some of Commodore's best people with him over to Atari, then subsequently squandered the prize they snatched from Jack at Atari (the Amiga--which was a fantastic machine that was mismanaged into the ground).

    Since the Bankruptcy, what was left of Commodore never came back to Canada--it existed solely in Europe.

    As a Canadian myself, I think I'd find another Icon to be proud of.

    1. Re:Commodore's heritage by 4vidar · · Score: 1

      And don't forget, your precious basketball was invented by... A Canadian....in Canada. We just don't care for the game all that much :-)

  123. Re:SID and Patent Laws by elecngnr · · Score: 1

    I could not imagine giving up my C64 for $5. We only do it every once in awhile anymore, but my wife and I will occasionally drag that thing out and play some of the games we have for it. They are so 1985, but that is just fine by me. They run pretty well and I do not have to load them on my hard drive. Sure, the graphics are not as cool as today's games, but I do not play games for the graphics.

    I remember something about them having a musical interface, but I was not into that at that time. Is that what you use the C64's for?

    Damn, I think I might have to drag that out this weekend.

    --
    Having done so much with so little for so long, I now can do anything with nothing at all.
  124. tshirts by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    They'll end up selling t-shirts with the logo, thats about it.

  125. A stake by hawk · · Score: 1

    Damnit.

    A stake, a stake! My kingdom for a stake!

    Die, damnit, die!

    And this time, stay dead.

    hawk, noting that Amiga has taken long to die than Apple has to go out of business . . .

  126. Other 8 Bitters might be next by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Bet Atari is on someones 'buy list' now too..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Other 8 Bitters might be next by Raijin+Z · · Score: 1

      Yeah, somebody like Infogrames. Oops, too late.

      --
      Change is good, but not in a wallet.
  127. Swapping cassettes? by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    Boy are you late to the game. Bill Gates was the pioneer in the fight against piracy.

    Forget about magnetic media...punched paper tape was the scourge of the software industry. You didn't even need a computer to copy it--just a pin and a lot of patience...har har! Bills' been on our A$$es about piracy for nearly 30 years now...talk about an innovative pioneer!

    Not sure if there is much money for the "new Commodore" in the SCO-like IP enforcement business though--and aside from the C64-in-a-joystick the rest of the product line as proposed doesn't seem to really fit with Commodore's heritage. Maybe if they went back to its roots and sold nifty calculators (give TI a run for its money) or office equipment (they made good typewriters and filing cabinets I tell ya). Or maybe if they made a PC geared toward high-end multimedia use in honour of the Amiga (oops...forgot...Amiga is a totally different company again).

  128. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  129. Re:SID and Patent Laws by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    "I remember something about them having a musical interface, but I was not into that at that time. Is that what you use the C64's for?"

    The sound chip on the C64 is a pretty damned good synthesizer, with a very good analog filter, and it's quite a unique sound generator.

    I'm too lame to have any samples of my own music, but check this out:

    Fusion of Two Dragons

    Yeah, I know the chip doesn't *really* do anything I can't come close to with a soft synth or one of my keyboards, but that's not the point. (Please don't press me about what IS the point, because I'm not sure I could formulate an answer that doesn't make me sound fanatical.)

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  130. copyright? by runderwo · · Score: 1
    A company spokesman said they would "take actions" against possible copyright infringements of the Commodore name in the United States
    Erm, don't they mean trademark infringements? I wonder if this executive is banking on the company being able to use the latest advances in federal copyright munitions, sponsored by the {MP|RI}AA...
  131. Photo of the MP3 player. by Stubtify · · Score: 1
    Well, dan over at www.dansdata.com reviewed the following over a year ago:

    Commodore mp3 player

    Mentioned in this review

    I assume that device was just a knockoff, but its still interesting to see the name being used. Here in the US there is such a demand for "retro" gear that such a player MIGHT just work. I see tons of 13-15 year olds with nintendo and atari gear, which they would never have even played before.

  132. New Commodore products by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    look I got a commodore MP3 player, it has 64KB storage.

    I'd be thinking:

    "half the RAM is probably used up by a BASIC interpreter as soon as you power it up"

    "if it has a data transfer rate anything like the 1541 drive it'll take a century to load songs into it"

    "I wonder if I'll have to key an arcane command into it to play songs"

    "I wonder if the next model will be almost totally incompatible with this one"

  133. correction of correction by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    The technical info is correct, but there is a minor point:

    The main difference between the MOS 6510 and the original Rockwell 6502

    MOS created the "original" 6502 design and licensed it to others--Rockwell probably being the biggest of those (I think they supplied Atari for a time? Cannot remember). The MOS6510 was harware enhanced, whereas the ROK6502 was software enhanced. The ROK6502 didn't have the I/O port, but Rockwell defined ALL the "undefined opcodes" in the base 6502 design.

    The "undefined opcodes" are binary numbers that do not represent an assembly-language operation and their behaviour is unpredictable and may change between chip revisions. The 6510 did not enhance the instruction set in any real way (and Commodore warned in its user manual ominously about "not being responsible for the use of undefined opcodes"). Some hackers found that the most popular 6502s had some opcodes that did neat things and ignored Commodore's advice. Rockwell officially "defined" some of those and added more opcodes (mostly to support a new addressing mode). Rockwell defined almost all 255 possible opcodes, andas such the ROK6502 has the largest instruction set of any 6502-variant ever produced.

    This was all amazing and cool stuff, until a sharp young high-school dropout put all of it in a single FPGA chip as a hobby and made some money selling it in a retro-looking joystick.

  134. YMV?! by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice the Yearanimo Multimedia Ventures can be abbreviated to YMV?

    Not isightful, just an insight

    --
    The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
    1. Re:YMV?! by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I don't get it (sorry)... what is the significance of the initials "YMV"?

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    2. Re:YMV?! by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

      Your Milage may Vary. Sort of.

      --
      The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  135. a 'real' commodore mp3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to just go ahead and do a real commodore/MOS 6502 based MP3 player.. Let a STA013 decoder do all the audio worke aand let the 6502 do the rest of the control BS. Maybe find a mini alphanumeric VFD that looks like the ones that came off an old commodore calculator or KIM-1, and put the whole thing in the commodore "shit brown" colored retro case?

    1. Re:a 'real' commodore mp3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think thats a great idea! Now if only I knew assembly code =)

    2. Re:a 'real' commodore mp3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to start a project wiki about this.

    3. Re:a 'real' commodore mp3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm supprised more people haven't posted comments about this.. Who wants to start a web page?

  136. C64 DTV on QVC - no lawsuit in sight by D4C5CE · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually I think the business plan goes something like this...

    1>notice people making joysticks with built-in games that play commodore games
    2>buy commodore name to sue those companies
    3>...
    4>profit!
    Could be the general idea, but not in the case you named:
    They can't "sue those people" because they are "those people".
  137. A fool and his money soon part by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I cannot comprehend the 'Commodore' brand being worth 24million euros. I'm a huge fan of retro computing, I have a subscription to a couple different retro related magazines. And even do a bit of retro development. But come on, it's not that big of an industry, it's not even an industry in fact.

    I could have started a pretty nice consulting company for 1/20th that amount of money. Or for the full wad, a game company.

    For $33m they get a brand name and some patent rights. How far can you get selling Commodore branded MP3 players. Would you buy a Commodore MP3 player over an Apple, Sony, Creative or Samsung?

    "Yeahronimo will use the Commodore name to increase awareness of its services and hopes to cash in on a recent renaissance of interest in vintage games and computers", Chief Executive Ben van Weijhe said in a telephone interview.

    You have to be pretty out there to think you're going to "cash in" on something like this. I'm sorry Mister Weijhe, but I think you're a nut.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  138. Re:There goes [OT!!1!!!] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got precious metals when people were buying pets.com. Certainly done better since then. Suffered a few sniggers at the time though. Oh well, rather have the hard and shiny that's worth a lot more now than then, dollars or Euros, then be concerned over some fools opinion on things who can't even look at a PE chart and understand it. "Irrational Exuberance" was a barely polite euphemism for "boneheaded greedy moronic economic retard" a few years back.

    Here's the next big one to go. Not advice,not licensed, just an observation, anyone may do with it what they will.

    Current scenario, some places worse than others, but over all it's reality. Hordes, legions, platoons, flocks, pods and bevys of real estate "investors" selling the same properties back and forth to each other, so they can all get rich using credit and ever expanding mortgage loans. Egged on by bankers large and small with nothing better to do because their business has become almost unnecessary in the digital age. All deluded this can go on forever and two days. No one has to work, just keep bidding up the same crap to absurd levels, and keep digitising more artifical "wealth" into creation, based on nothing more than crack fumes and alcoholic fantasies and delusions of potentate level grandeur.

    That's your next major bubble. It's already popped really, just the effects aren't being felt yet besides of this quiet desparation of the bigboys to try and fix it by slamming in planeloads of toilet paper dollars. That scam is about run it's course.

    If it was me stuck in that scenario and relying on currency exchanges that you have no control over, and based in that sector of "investments", I'd cash out now before the buck drop wipes it out, and before the herd moves to dump in a panic, take the money and run with it to something more worthwhile and tangible and priced more sanely. Tulip mania is still alive and well it appears. If you want back in, wait until it's a quarter on a dollar and the pickings are vast and cheap and the sellers are all desparate.

  139. Commodore name doesn't include many games by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    Commodore released some games for the C64 early on, but very few overall and certainly none of the big classics people are remembering. Just because someone owns the Commodore name doesn't mean they can re-release games owned by Electronic Arts and many other companies.

  140. whiney Canadians by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, Commodore was Canadian.

    <rant>

    I hate the way Canadians despise risk-takers, business men, and entrepreneurism. Then when someone with ambition heads south and makes good, Canadians embrace them and tout them as "icons".

    Steve Case (AOL) is Canadian, James Gosling (Java) is Canadian ... yet none of them had success IN CANADA. Why do you think that is? Because the people that do stay in Canada and make a success of themselves are usually berated for their ambition and because Canadian investors don't take risks. Canadian financiers don't know how to build anything, they study for a living rather than build things.

    I'd ask what technologies Canada has produced but some whiney Canuck will likley answer Avro Arrow (a state-of-the-art jet fighter project the people of Canada shut-down in the sixties) and the Canadarm (that space-shuttle claw NASA out-sourced to us 20 years ago). Wow, that's an impressive output for thirty years.

    </rant>

    Canadian Sam

    1. Re:whiney Canadians by methodfour · · Score: 1

      You call yourself a Canadian?? Then let me ask you where do you live? If you are still up here - then obviously you don't follow your own advice. If you have moved to the US - great!! Enjoy all the 'benefits' that you get down there but do everyone that is a PROUD Canadian a favor. Give up your citizenship, stay in the US (assuming you have anything to offer down there) and forget you were ever a Canadian. If you think that the only contributions Canadians have made is the ridiculous Avro Arrow and the Canadarm then either all you know anything about is aeronautics or you have been in the US too long. From trivial things (like Trivial Pursuit) to Nobel Prize Winners in Physics, Chemistry and Economics (which believe it or not - that work leads us to new inventions). The one lesson you should learn from Americans is their pride for where they are from - no matter what. You have none of it and real Canadians can do without your useless, irrelevant comments.

    2. Re:whiney Canadians by Moulinneuf · · Score: 1

      Calm down , its not the real American way to bash a real american aka a canadian , he his just ranting , show what you mean by example , he might not even know what you know. C ourageous A mericans N oble A merican D efender of A mericas Where not " of America" , where it ! Whe welcome with open arms any and all the whannabee American fleeing there republic whe offer freedom and democracy welcome to the #1 American country : Canada

      --
      I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    3. Re:whiney Canadians by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      What about the CANDU reactors? While I'm not very familiar with them, I'm under the impression that they're touted as being amongst the best and the safest in the world.

  141. White, schmite! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    You're right in the sense that most people would call it white (at least the A1200; the A600 looks more beige, though that could be the photo- I definitely remember it being much paler than the A500).

    I'd still say it was off-white (an AC elsewhere confirms this), because a totally 'white' plastic- as in, put a piece of white paper beside it, and it's the same colour- would look horrible.

    But... ah, what does it matter? :)

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  142. CD32? Eeeurgh! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    and one black one (hello CDTV. God you're ugly.)

    You thought the CDTV was ugly? Don't see that. Looked like a fairly standard piece of early-90s consumer electronics (black was the standard colour for consumer electronics until some point in the mid-to-late 1990s; personally, I like silver- although I'm bored of it- but a cheap silver finish looks *way* worse than black).

    As for the CD32, it was indeed dark grey. It was also fugly.

    I mean, it looked like a really cheap (and cheaply-made) knock-off of the Sega Mega-Drive/Genesis. That having been said, it was actually selling quite well (at least in the UK, and probably some other countries; can't see it being such a success in the US as the Amiga wasn't popular there circa 1993/94). Some people would claim that the CD32 was a failure because C= went bankrupt, but it was probably one of the few things they were getting right (even if it was just a repackaged A1200 cash-cow).

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  143. Probably not unusual... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    That doesn't sound too different than compiling processor-specific kernels for Linux. Even Windows has hacks for taking advantage of different features (X86-64 bits, the NX bit, PII multithread, Cyrix had some specific things added some years ago, etc.)

    I don't think you can really avoid software patching to take advantage of newer archs.

    No, I think what killed C= was the inept (and some would suggest, criminal) management. A lot of bad mistakes were made. They stopped listening to their customers. They they lost focus.

    EVERYONE (including the engineers), knew what what working and what wasn't and why. Everyone but management.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Probably not unusual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if all the engineers knew, then i have one question: did ed know?

  144. 6510 vs 6502 by EightBits · · Score: 1

    - The 6510 had one less power pin than the 6502
    - The 6510 required TWO clock signals at the same frequency offset from each other as input while the 6502 required only one and generated the offset clock signal on-chip. The 6510 did not. This means there is one less clock pin on the 6510.
    - The 6502 had a set overflow pin while the 6510 did not
    - The 6502 had 3 pins that were not connected, the 6510 used all 40 pins and was not pin compatible with the 6502
    - The 6510 did not support the 'sync' pin which was worthless in the design of the Commodore 8-bit computers

    In total this freed up 7 pins for the 6510. One was used as an Address Enable Control for implementation in multiprocessor systems to control memory sharing. While this was never done to my knowledge with multiple 6510s, this was used in conjunction with the VIC-II chip which accessed the same memory as the 6510 in the C64. The other 6 were used to implement peripheral I/O pins. These were essentailly just hardwired in-chip to addresse 0001 with directional control register for these pins mapped to 0001. Support circuitry connected to those pins could be controlled to do things. This circuitry was what handled the bank switching and datasette I/O you are all talking about. The 6510 chip didn't support these things on board. Basically, they had 6 pins doing nothing so they were made available to be used for whatever the support circuitry could do with 6 pins. This was nice because without doing this on chip, we would have had more complex circuitry on the PCB to map these hardware components to specific memory addresses. Excellent engineering as far as I'm concerned.

    Point of Interest: The 6510 was capable of running at 2MHz. Had Commodore been able to make this 2MHz setup work, the C64 would have had twice the CPU power and may have been able to do some quite amazing things beyond the amazing things we all know it did at 1MHz. I presonally think it could have been possible to make the C64 work at 2MHz with it's other support circuitry. I would have liked to have seen that computer. (And that computer was NOT the C128 even though it ran the CPU at 2MHz.)

    1. Re:6510 vs 6502 by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1
      Well, I went and looked this up here(because my copy of the ref card vanished years and years ago,) and it looks like you're partially correct.

      The I/O port was on pins 23-30, and was 8 bits wide, although two of those were, in the case of the 64, wired for the bank-switching, leaving only 6 for other purposes. No, I realize that the bank-switching wasn't on-board the MPU -- I suppose it must have sounded like I thought so.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  145. There's business logic to this by Daikiki · · Score: 1

    1. Poke 95830,1
    2. ?????
    3. Profit!

    It's somehow sad that a name that used to mean so much to me and my generation has become such a base commodity. Most brand names live on or fade into oblivion, but somebody keeps coming up with a reason to flog the dead C=. Having been a huge C= fanboi in the eighties, even I think it's time to just let it rest. Of course, whenever I read anything even vaguely Commodore related I get all nostalgic regardless. The Zzap 64 archive is often just the tonic I need at times like that.

    --
    I want the fire back.
  146. The name has immense recognition by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I hope they do something good with the trademark other than an MP3 player. I'd like to see C= branded PCs, personally - gamer-oriented ones. That would own.

    I can see the commercials now...

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:The name has immense recognition by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see them selling C= keys to replace the Windows keys on your keyboard...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  147. Real American are from Canada by Moulinneuf · · Score: 1

    - ATI #1 graphic card maker - Matrox #3 graphic card maker - Bombardier #1 Sea Doo , #1 Ski doo , best regionnal airjet #3 ATV maker - Weston - Intel Bania and Centrino - Rogers - Quebecor Media and Quebecor world - Rim ( BlackBerry ) - BMO - Desjardins etc ... Thats just from the top of my head , Canadian are the real american leaving the real american dream , whe are the Yoda of the world whe apear weak and easy to beat , but whe are the master of the jedi masters. Our armed force as never lost a war , our economy is 6 times those of the US when whe are 7 time less people ( in comparative size of population) ( as to do with the fact that whe do business with Russia and China and many others when the US dont or whont. And stop being negative young Padawan , the avrow arrow is the ancestor of all the aircraft companies today ( Boeing , Airbus , etc ... )which have many subsidiaries in Canada. And Nasa is manned at 45% by Canadian even do its not even our own project. Be a real American stop your whinning and get to work at fixing what you dont like and be a real Canadian help all your friends will doing so ;-)

    --
    I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    1. Re:Real American are from Canada by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      Since when is BMO something to be proud of? As a Canadian, I have to say that my experiences with BMO rank it up there right next to a steaming heap of cow shit in terms of quality.

  148. Frodo is already ported to Series 60 phones by Werrismys · · Score: 1
    E32frodo http://e32frodo.sourceforge.net/ already works quite fine. H.E.R.O, Boulder Dash and Blue Max work flawlessly, and are very suitable games for a handheld.

    The latest official version is over a year old, so try to get a newer beta somewhere (it has better sound support and turnable screen, so the funky aspect ratio is not a problem.

    Some games are a bit too slow for the ~100MHz phones like N-Gage QD... but I would assume the newer ~200MHz ones can run even those without any trickery like frameskip.

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  149. SID tunes on Series 60 by Werrismys · · Score: 1

    I would assume this works with any Series 60 phone that does not have MP3 decoder (like N-Gage QD). Just use sidplay to create 16kHz 8bit mono sound and convert it using sox and the -i -option (IMA_ADPCM).

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  150. Fanatical? by elecngnr · · Score: 1

    Don't worry about sounding fanatical. You are talking to a guy who owns two Macs. Admittedly, I did not join the Mac fan club until after OS-X, but now that I am there...wow. I get a great GUI and UNIX.....ahhh heck, I better not get started :)

    --
    Having done so much with so little for so long, I now can do anything with nothing at all.
  151. Wrong section by LocalH · · Score: 1

    Commodore made computers, not consoles, for the most part (they did make some early Pong clones, and also released a C64 without keyboard as a console, but it was still a C64). So why is this in games?

    --
    FC Closer
  152. Way too much money on this one by betterpc · · Score: 0

    What can someone possibly do with commodore brand? Seriously, how do they plan to make money out of this brand?