Slashdot Mirror


Ham Radio Served as Main Link to Disaster Area

SonicSpike writes "A University of Central Florida ham radio operator K4VUD (and founder of their film program) was caught in Port Blair during the earthquake and following tsunami! He and a team of other ham radio operators arrived in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands to setup the region's first ham station 2 weeks prior to the disaster. Once they realized what happened they immediately began transmitting for 20 straight hours using car batteries as a power source. Most cellular and land-line communication was down. His team became the main link to the rest of the world from the region."

380 comments

  1. That's life by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Opportunity knocks on people's door in the most bizarre way. Yesterday they are just some university radio folks, today they are globally recognized.

    1. Re:That's life by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Opportunity knocks on people's door in the most bizarre way

      Not as much as you may think. The media likes to discover a lot of things that were obvious for many years, especially if they can hang on to the disaster-happy public long enough to play one more commercial or display another banner. Ham and CB radio have served in just about every natural or man-made disaster since they have been in the hands of citizens.

      I feel sadness inside everytime it occurs to me people think the reason to buy a two-way radio is to chit-chat about BS over public air-waves. These are powerful tools, baby.

    2. Re:That's life by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've called my parents "news junkies" no less than 8 times this week.

      Try to explain to 50 yr olds that "oh, 120,000 dead in the tsunami? How many you think died in Iraq, Sudan, Africa and other countries last year?" As if this disaster [as bad as it is] is the ONLY place "bad things" are happening in the world.

      Not to mention the day to day deterioration of our civilization by those seeking material wealth. Little propatainment here, little get rich scam there, ...

      Yipee!

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:That's life by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not to mention the day to day deterioration of our civilization by those seeking material wealth. Little propatainment here, little get rich scam there, ...

      Yeah, that kind of goes both ways. With a partial consolidation of wealth, entities are able to compete against each other with greater resources and more people participating. For example, we would have not gotten to the moon without some level of greed and unity fueling us.

      The thing you have to watch out for are those who think Fox is a superior news outlet vs CNN. All you have to do is stick around for a commercial break on each station and you will see they are pitching to entirely different audiences. Here is what I find typical of both networks:

      Fox News - infomercial styled ads in 30-60 second blocks pitching worthless contraptions to uneducated masses. The kicker, people are buying this stuff they could have picked up at Linens 'n Things "As Seen on TV(tm)" discount asile for less. Everything is draped in red, white, and blue and there are lots of sound effects.

      CNN - The same three Lexus commercials where they do nothing but show some Guines-yuppy male with glasses who suprises his thick-waisted, loud, wife with a Lexus -- yet all she notices is the over-sized red bow. This bow is the focus of apparently all their ads now. Everything is neutral colors, much more focus on them stuffy europeans and how they do a bad job reporting "overlooked" issues yet never seem to make the simple transistion over to truely balanced news.

      Oh and check this! WTF happened to CNNi? Was international news that much of a danger to american eyes? I have no access to non-american news on the satellite anymore (one of my primary reasons for getting it to begin with!). :(

    4. Re:That's life by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      The media likes to discover a lot of things that were obvious for many years

      I have seen this countless times. Most of them go something like "According to reports recently brought to light by [insert reporter here]" when all said reporter did was cite a document available for years at a public archive or pull out some obvious fact from an interview with an expert that anyone who was informed on the subject would already know.

      I think this is because many times simply reporting news is too boring. If it doesn't involve controversy, scandal, or some time of politically charged topic, then such material has to be manufactured to keep the news entertaining and the advertising dollars flowing.

    5. Re:That's life by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think they're just covers.

      FOX does the "low brow" commercials for get rich quick etc. CNN does the "equitty insurance blah blah blah" investment group commercials.

      The net effect is the same thing. They're groups of advertisers who want you to part with your money. It's just the quality of the suit worn by the sales person on the other end of the phone as you sell over your life that differs.

      That and CNN is much more "funny" on how they can totally zoom in and micro-report stories then totally ignore the rest of the world/stories.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:That's life by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      I've called my parents "news junkies" no less than 8 times this week.

      My mother watches at least 2-3 hours of Fox News every day. Sad really.

    7. Re:That's life by HermanAB · · Score: 1
      Yeah, though killing 120,000 plus people in 5 minutes is rather more catastrophic than religious fanatics fighting each other in a desert for 2000 years...

      Why stop now, just when I'm hating it?

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    8. Re:That's life by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Well, at least that is better than: "Noah's Ark Discovered! Noah's Ark!!!"

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    9. Re:That's life by Hard_Code · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "For example, we would have not gotten to the moon without some level of greed and unity fueling us."

      Not to dispute your point, but the "space race" was a cold war pissing contest. Has getting to the moon really done much for us lately? Surely abstract technological progress has been made by funding space endeavors in general (and more specifically space probes and telescopes), and I'm not really knowledgeable enough to say whether it's worth the federal investment, but did we really need to send up some guys to put a flag in the dirt (aside from political motivations of course)?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    10. Re:That's life by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to dispute your point, but the "space race" was a cold war pissing contest.

      Right, but the nations are examples of this greed and a collective of resources. This was sort of my point.

      Has getting to the moon really done much for us lately? Surely abstract technological progress has been made by funding space endeavors in general (and more specifically space probes and telescopes), and I'm not really knowledgeable enough to say whether it's worth the federal investment, but did we really need to send up some guys to put a flag in the dirt (aside from political motivations of course)?

      Um, just about every electronic item you own, every "space-age" fabric you use, the technology used in your car, a better grasp of cheaper space travel, countless medical experiments with many positive results, etc. The list goes on and on. We have benefitted in many ways from this "pissing" contest. Yes, we paid great prices and it probably wasn't the best way, but it happened and we probably wouldn't have been so pressed to research and increase technology had there not been a foe there to incite us.

    11. Re:That's life by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Think there are support groups?

      I mean I watch the news but not for 8 hours a day like they are [during this "event"]. I feel like beating them with a clue stick but they might kick me out of the basement...

      arrg conflicts ;-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:That's life by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Prior to 1996, she could have only watched CNN or the big three, now she can choose between CNN, Fox, Bloomberg, MSNBC, CNBC, the big 3 and BBC in some places, whats the hell is your problem with people making a choice.

      Maybe she realized how left-biased CNN is and she's voting with her clicker. Other peoples choices in news programs does not take your right to see/hear news delivered by your talking head of choice, unless of course they only draw eight viewers and get canceled.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    13. Re:That's life by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Has getting to the moon really done much for us lately?

      Tang.

      NEVER forget the Tang!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:That's life by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But all the choices are shit.

    15. Re:That's life by iwrigley · · Score: 1
      I feel sadness inside everytime it occurs to me people think the reason to buy a two-way radio is to chit-chat about BS over public air-waves. These are powerful tools, baby.

      And yet, that's *exactly* why most people buy these radios. Are you really saying that everyone buys Amateur Radio (or "Ham", if you must) or CB radio gear just in case there's a major disaster?

      Yes, they're powerful tools. But that's really not the reason most people buy them.

    16. Re:That's life by harmgsn · · Score: 5, Informative

      I hate to have to ruin my karma like this, but please refrain from lumping "HAM" operators with the CB groups. We frankly don't like that. Although, most "HAM" (amateur) operators usually train for stuff like this just incase we actually are needed. They have quite a few groups/classes that you can do to help learn where you fit in the 'disaster' picture.

      Although, I must admit, you at least nailed the point on the head with your second thought you put down. Amateur Radio operators don't just get their license to chit-chat about stuff. Most of us are here for when we're needed.

      Case in point: The recent streak of Hurricanes out around Florida. The Amateur Radio community had spotters in the field the entire time relaying information to the National Weather Service and the Hurricane Watch Center.

      A good resource for those of you interested in getting your Amateur Radio Service license is:

      http://www.arrl.org (Amateur Radio Relay League)

      It's considered the "voice" of the community and has quite a bit of news on there.

      --
      Harm
    17. Re:That's life by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      That's what I was saying. I could really care less which news network someone watches for hours a day. The fact that they can stand any of them disturbs me.

    18. Re:That's life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure that the comparison of ads for Fox v CNN is an entirely fair one. I think that there is quite a lot of bias among the various ad agencies that handle large clients. Fox has had a much, much larger audience than CNN for quite some time, but only a couple of months ago did they finally surpass CNN in ad revenue.

      This can only happen if for some reason the market for Fox ads is somehow smaller than the market for CNN ads. The only feasible explanation that I can think of for this is that the "movers and shakers" in the ad world are just as biased toward Fox as some of the people posting here are.

      Personally, I do, in fact, find Fox to be the better network. There isn't a single story on CNN that can not be found on Fox, but there is, indeed, an abundance of news found on Fox that CNN simply will not cover.

      Are they bias? Of course, but CNN is more biased to the left than Fox is to the right. The primary difference is that Fox seems to have embraced the idea of wearing your biases on your sleeve... and the audience loves that sort of honesty. You may get a biased perspective, but you do get MORE THAN ONE perspective on Fox (love them or hate them) and you know where everyone there is coming from.

      The audience appreciates that sort of respect (instead of the snooty "we aren't biased... how DARE you silly peeon-consumers!" type attitude at other networks). That's why fox has absolutely CRUSHED everyone else in the ratings for quite some time.

    19. Re:That's life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Opportunity knocks on people's door in the most bizarre way. Yesterday they are just some university radio folks, today they are globally recognized."

      They've been globally recognized for a long time, they have written many articles and have visited many countries. If you would have read the websites you would have seen that.......

    20. Re:That's life by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

      I hate to have to ruin my karma like this, but please refrain from lumping "HAM" operators with the CB groups. We frankly don't like that.

      Yeah, I knew what I was doing. I grew up with a few ham-geek friends who'd get pretty sore about the comparison.

      About the only thing a CB radio user has to know is how to turn the mic on and to not joke about jihads on channel 9.

    21. Re:That's life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The media likes to discover a lot of things that were obvious for many years, especially if they can hang on to the disaster-happy public long enough to play one more commercial or display another banner.

      I find that news broadcasts about disasters are almost unwatchable, not for the disaster but for the reporter. They play the same footage over and over and over while pretending to sound sympathetic, while all they care about is getting their ratings and moving on to reporting the Peterson trial. The sickest thing is when they get really excited over the gory stuff, because of the shock and entertainment value--sure to get better ratings. I really think most ad-supported corporate-sponsored broadcast news could be phased out and the world would be better for it. I remember that bus that was hijacked in Greece recently, and Fox News wouldn't shut up about it. Other news sources gave it a mention, but went on to more important stories. It's just sick.

    22. Re:That's life by SunFan · · Score: 1


      What about The News Hour? They get "the real deals" (not ex-generals-on-payroll) into their studio, and moderate a debate between differing viewpoints without trying to make it entertainment. It's everything that Crossfire should be, but isn't.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    23. Re:That's life by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      How long each day to you sit in front of your monitor? Do you really click that many links that travel off the edge of 'mainstream'?

      Same as it ever was.

    24. Re:That's life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      OMG, the parent gets moderated negative for starting a thread of ~15 posts. Half of the nested are moderated positive.

      Does responding to an offtopic post make the original post relevant, or was the parent actually relevant and people just can not read?

      I will take "people can not read" for $500, Alex.

    25. Re:That's life by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Actually, it may have been the best way, since it turns out the planet wasn't blown up.

      It turned out pretty well.

      I mean, hell, I have a personal lab full of good solid 1960's-70's era electronics test equipment, which I only dreamed of having when I was a kid, and all because a bunch of it was made and it was well-made enough to go surplus and still work great.

      Someone overspent on all that stuff. Tektronix, Fluke, and H-P sure don't make it that way anymore...

    26. Re:That's life by Handpaper · · Score: 1
      Shoudn't that be TANJ?

    27. Re:That's life by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      The News Hour is quite good, but that's because I don't really consider PBS a "news network." I was referring to the cable news channels in that post.

    28. Re:That's life by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I hate to have to ruin my karma like this, but please refrain from lumping "HAM" operators with the CB groups. We frankly don't like that. Although, most "HAM" (amateur) operators usually train for stuff like this just incase we actually are needed. They have quite a few groups/classes that you can do to help learn where you fit in the 'disaster' picture."

      I really would like to see this post modded up.

      I got my HR license when I was 10 years old. After attaining that, I started attending the local Ham Radio meetings. Sadly, my memory of those meetings has faded, but one thing did burn into my mind: They urged people to use Ham radio for good. I remember we all stood to recognize a man who helped save somebody's life. A man suffered a heart attack. One person performed CPR while a Ham radio operator raised the paramedics. (Please bear in mind, this was long before cell phones were common everyday items.) They made a special point to draw attention to the good he did.

      I don't have my license any more, but I certainly respect Hams. Never have a I met a kinder more intelligent group of people.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    29. Re:That's life by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Personally, I do, in fact, find Fox to be the better network. There isn't a single story on CNN that can not be found on Fox, but there is, indeed, an abundance of news found on Fox that CNN simply will not cover.

      As a keen watcher of both networks, I disagree with your "fox covers more". Both networks have exclusive stories.

      Are they bias? Of course, but CNN is more biased to the left than Fox is to the right. The primary difference is that Fox seems to have embraced the idea of wearing your biases on your sleeve... and the audience loves that sort of honesty. You may get a biased perspective, but you do get MORE THAN ONE perspective on Fox (love them or hate them) and you know where everyone there is coming from.

      Not defending any intelligence that may appear on CNN, or lack thereof. But, Fox is tailor made for rightish conservatives. To even say CNN is "more left" than "Fox is right" is insane.

      For starters, CNN is not terribly left. The spinners did exactly what the government wanted to do during the buildup to the war. Also, according to my last roomie (who works for CNN), he says the guest selection for shows is carefully selected to give a 50/50 left/right view. This also goes for commentary.

      Then there is Fox. 18 hours of commentary. They can't even get a headline about a disater reported for more than 10 minutes without adding political commentary to the mix. Perhaps you are unaware, but take a look at the guests on Fox shows. The "liberal" will almost always be some kind of fuck up who puts up a weak fight in any arguement. Take Hannity and Colmes.. That Colmes guy is there for entertainment value only.. None of the remarks he makes really represents anything of value, all he does is take a position of whatever liberal guest is around at the moment. This is similar having a clown around to spray selzer water in its face for a quick laugh. While CNN has Crossfire, I consider that to be one for morons too. Both the left and right hosts just sit there and bark out a bunch of inciteful stuff, but this is only 45min a day and really the only hardcore stupid show they have in the lineup. Compare to Fox and their mountain of conservative talk and commentary.

      There is also the fact that Fox News is owned and managed by some of the most conservative people to have ever retired from public office.

      The audience appreciates that sort of respect (instead of the snooty "we aren't biased... how DARE you silly peeon-consumers!" type attitude at other networks). That's why fox has absolutely CRUSHED everyone else in the ratings for quite some time.

      If you really enjoy having your news handed to you, extra brown with a side of crap, all while being yelled at like you are at boot camp, then yet, Fox is for you.

      If european accents bother you, then yes. Fox all the way for you. We will make sure you get a white guy, or someone that "sounds white", to tell you your news in the most basic form of american english.

      Also, where are you getting the ratings data? Both networks claim to have the largest audience, but I noticed Fox specifies "american audience" when it touts how it "stomps" the competition.

    30. Re:That's life by my_fake_account · · Score: 1

      "Um, just about every electronic item you own, every "space-age" fabric you use, the technology used in your car, a better grasp of cheaper space travel, countless medical experiments with many positive results, etc. The list goes on and on. We have benefitted in many ways from this "pissing" contest. Yes, we paid great prices and it probably wasn't the best way, but it happened and we probably wouldn't have been so pressed to research and increase technology had there not been a foe there to incite us."

      I think this is a lie that you have bought into.

      Improvements are fueled by consumer goods, and they have been for quite some time. Velcro was developed in the The Integrated Circuit would have been discoverred regardless of Apollo, and it would have yielded Ipod regardless of the giant leap.

      Those "space-age" fabrics are the product of a huge huge huge chemical industry, of which the space industry is a teeny tiny consumer. Space age fabric development probably owes far more to lingerie than it does to space suits.

      Yeah, like if it weren't for astronauts, we would have no desire to improve medical care. Get real.

      NASA is mostly a waste of money. Admit it.

    31. Re:That's life by my_fake_account · · Score: 1

      "please refrain from lumping "HAM" operators with the CB groups."

      10-4 good buddy.

      Keep the shiny side up and the rubber side down.

    32. Re:That's life by Pooua · · Score: 1
      I feel sadness inside everytime it occurs to me people think the reason to buy a two-way radio is to chit-chat about BS over public air-waves. These are powerful tools, baby.

      Yeah, not like the Internet!

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    33. Re:That's life by Pooua · · Score: 1
      Improvements are fueled by consumer goods, and they have been for quite some time.

      Consumer goods are certainly an important market. So is military and government.

      Velcro was developed in the

      Oops, you left out a thought, there. Were you going to say that Velcro hooks and loops were patented in 1955? Nevertheless, NASA certainly provided a flashy market for the product.

      The Integrated Circuit would have been discoverred regardless of Apollo,

      I think you mean that it would have been invented, eventually, which is true but not very useful. Many inventions probably would have been invented, eventually, but that doesn't mean that we don't honor who, when and where they were invented.

      and it would have yielded Ipod regardless of the giant leap.

      Uh-huh. And who do you think were the largest customers of computational and control electronics in the 1950s to 1970s? Military projectiles drove the early computer industry, of which space travel is a branch.

      Fuel cells were invented back in the 19th Century, but they remained as little more than lab curiosities until NASA got ahold of them. Today, California gets several score megawatts of electric power from fuel cells. (Yes, I know that is hardly a drop in the bucket, but it is still a great increase in its usefulness over pre-NASA days. Besides, it probably beats out diesel for that application.)

      Those "space-age" fabrics are the product of a huge huge huge chemical industry, of which the space industry is a teeny tiny consumer. Space age fabric development probably owes far more to lingerie than it does to space suits.

      Oh, I don't know... Nylon was popular for so many reasons. It did not hurt that you could buy the same product that was sending astronauts into space.

      NASA is mostly a waste of money. Admit it.

      The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle programs may be mostly wastes of money, and they account for the majority of NASA's current budget. However, that is recent. Say what you like about inevitable progress, but we wouldn't have our large space satellite industry today without NASA's considerable investment. That means everything from communication satellites (including cell phone, pagers and Internet) to spy satellites to Gravity Probe B (and GP A, for that matter). NASA research has gone into a lot of other devices that we take for granted, too, besides some that are waiting to make their commercial debut (I am watching for that ultra-quiet helicopter blade that NASA developed).

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    34. Re:That's life by Engineering+Monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, this is not really media contrived or a matter of opportunity knocking. I am part of the University of central Florida Amateur Radio Club (The Moderator can verify this if desired, I do not feel like giving out my email address to thousands).

      Dr. Harpole (K4VUD) was actually part of what they called a DXpedition. Where he had gone , there had never in history been an officially sanctioned amateur radio station before. It was mere coincidence that he had been there 2 weeks prior that special permission had been granted for the radio operators to operate there. The ARRL has more on the DXpedition gone into emergency mode

      Also, It should be noted that Dr. Harpole was not the only radio operator there. We have been keeping a series of links on this, however, which are available on the UCF Amateur Radio Club's wiki.


      I would like to point out that I do not typically reply to Slashdot posts, however, this is actually something of which I am somewhat a part, and figure I should set things straight. (despite the fact people will still continute to put up off the wall posts on the subject anyway)

    35. Re:That's life by instanto · · Score: 1

      Thats why we watch the news and commentaries on BBC.

      --
      // instant - "I for one welcome our new Decaff Coffee-Flavoured-Coffee Overlords"
    36. Re:That's life by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1
      Shoudn't that be TANJ?

      Indeed, there isn't, sadly.

      If you so desire, may the spirit of RAH bless you (in whatever form *that* might take) :)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    37. Re:That's life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says you. I don't give a rat's petoot about your opinion as I can make my own decisions as to what is worthy of watching. I suspect they can too. Just because it isn't what YOU want to watch doesn't mean spit. It sounds like you're being as narrow minded as you suppose that those who watch those media channels are.

    38. Re:That's life by fshalor · · Score: 1

      I rescently got in a rather heated debate with a friend over a news article. Finally, after probably 10 vollies (on a forum board) I find out the article was from Fox news. He was using the text to support one point, but I was using the quotes in the text from two congressmen to support another.

      For some odd reason, the revelation explained it all. I nodded and moved on. :)

      Back on topic a bit, using car batteries sucks for this sort of mobile installation.

      And yes, I'm one of several hams who have batteries AND a 5 kW generator for doing mobile deployments. We're a lot more equiped than any CB'er.. (Consideing their legal limit is 5w and 11 m CB band isn't that good at talking between states. ) We can go to 1500 watts on most bands and have the option of using reliable bands in the UHF/VHF range for local communications and HF for longer range.

      I worked the state EOC ham station for a few shifts last few hurricanes that hit FL. Even with the hightenet communication abilities of the state, Ham's still probivide a vital link.

      Best,

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    39. Re:That's life by lyonsden · · Score: 1
      How many you think died in Iraq, Sudan, Africa and other countries last year?"

      • Iraq - ~16,000
      • Sudan - somewhere between 7,000 and 300,000 depending on who you ask
      Oh, Sudan is in Africa, so I'm not sure why you mentioned a country and it's continent.

      But, you know what? Death happens. Approximately 158,000 times a day.
    40. Re:That's life by colmore · · Score: 1

      the main technology developed by the lunar race was ICBMs. the space race was a proxy for scaring each other by flying missiles over each others airspaces.

      i've never liked the "think of all the tech developed" arguments for justifying the space race. so should we have more massive government programs to do research for private companies?

      it's certainly one of the coolest things the human race has ever done. but let's not kid ourselves. we don't like it because it made a better sneaker or for any other economic reason. we like it because it's cool. it's startrek in real life.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    41. Re:That's life by jackganssle · · Score: 1
      Try to explain to 50 yr olds that "oh, 120,000 dead in the tsunami? How many you think died in Iraq, Sudan, Africa and other countries last year?" As if this disaster [as bad as it is] is the ONLY place "bad things" are happening in the world.

      Try to explain to 20-somethings the nature of compassion, the ache of one's heart seeing parents losing their kids. Anyone callous about this event is sub-human.

      Not to mention the day to day deterioration of our civilization by those seeking material wealth. Little propatainment here, little get rich scam there, ...

      Yet we're reading ./, a veritable temple to consumption of electronics. Check out another ./ headline this morning: 2005 Looking Good for Gadgets.

    42. Re:That's life by 6800 · · Score: 1
      Ahh the arooooma of "fresh brown crap", that stale stuff at cnn is soooo boooooring.

      At least the bashing sessions of FOX are obviously commentary, on the order of a cheap editorial. The point that they cover many things not covered on cnn or the main stream media for that matter is valid.

    43. Re:That's life by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      If you have ever watched something "live via satellite" you've benefitted from the Cold War Pissing Contest that was the Space Race.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    44. Re:That's life by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      The "liberal" will almost always be some kind of fuck up who puts up a weak fight in any arguement.
      Yeah, he's a liberal. What's your point?

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    45. Re:That's life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello?? This is slashdot! Most 'regular' folks would consider this WAY off the mainstream.

    46. Re:That's life by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      I know. *sigh*

      I've been hanging out in 'online communities' since about 1987, so my vision is rather distorted.

      I mention stuff that passes as 'common knowledge' on slashdot at work, and people treat me like a nut.

    47. Re:That's life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I feel sadness inside everytime it occurs to me people think the reason to buy a two-way radio is to chit-chat about BS over public air-waves."

      Who is going to buy the expensive equipment just to have it sit around until an emergency happens, and then will it even work at the critical time when needed?

      No, the solution is what we have today, Hams chit-chatting for FUN until something happens. Then they are ready to use the equipment for that purpose. The chit-chat & fun is actually the best way to do continous training and equipment testing. It will also get more people interested in spending money on the equipment and keeping it at the ready.

      BPL, as tested so far (& I've done first hand testing) in the USA, will eliminate this emergency resource possibly worldwide. I'm not spending another penny on radio gear until I know BPL is dead.

    48. Re:That's life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say is true, but an honest review includes the double-edged recognition that in addition to the many positives you list must also be included so many dreadful and likely carcinogenic, mutagenic, and/or teratogenic pollutants such as PCB's, the increase in the use of all families of plastics and vinyl chloride,
      as well as the consumption of vast amounts of other pollutants produced as their byproducts.

      Add to this the pollution generated as a result of generating the power to produce these things as well as the concommitant requirement to nurture the sense of need for nearly immediate obsolescence wherein virtually everything has an extremely limited temporal usefulness and is designed to spend the vast majority of its years effecting our fragile ecology from the landfill where these things will soon be relocated.

      'Nuff said.

      Rick

    49. Re:That's life by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

      I think you just made my point. Thanks, dude. ;-)

    50. Re:That's life by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1
      Iraq - ~16,000

      Erm, I'm sorry, but it was a LOT more than that. First of all, IBQ only counts people that they can directly verify dead -- i.e. more people than that died. Estimates of the real total vary from ~30K - ~100K.

      The real biggie though is that they only count civilian deaths. i.e., people we WEREN'T shooting at. Think about how many people we killed that we were actually TRYING to kill. It's a lot more.
    51. Re:That's life by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

      Er, IBC. (Must not hit Submit quite so fast). Although IBQ sounds interesting. =3

  2. wifi enyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has been there any wifi atempt so far?

  3. Que the griping about data over powerlines: by glrotate · · Score: 1

    Here's your big chance.

    1. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Queue! Moron.

    2. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I don't think it really applies: They were usefull because the lines were down in the first place (car batteries).

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by kc8apf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right, but the side receiving the signals from those in the disaster area aren't in a disaster area. BPL noise interferes with the reception of the emergency traffic.

      --
      kc8apf
    4. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Right, but the side receiving the signals from those in the disaster area aren't in a disaster area. BPL noise interferes with the reception of the emergency traffic.

      DOH! Totally right.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet gravy, the word you are both groping towards in the dark is "cue", a signal to begin an action.

    6. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if there are enough gripes, you can line them up to process them in a queue.

    7. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by my_fake_account · · Score: 1

      I was hoping for "quit".

    8. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Which is why a satellite phone is more reliable than radio transmissions.

    9. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellite phones don't use radio? That explains all those little wires leading off into the sky.

    10. Re:Que the griping about data over powerlines: by bigredmed · · Score: 1

      Ham radio in the HF band, garage door openers, RC toys, and internet users themselves are going to get shafted by BPL.
      1. HAM: HF radio operates at the frequency band that BPL poisons most. These radios are costly (about a grand to get a new basic model) and the license to get an HF radio (General class) costs money, but more so time. Who would want to drop the money and time into radio if they only hear BPL noise? With the FCC mandated band-pass filters on the BPL equipment, its still noisy (big time). The mandated abatements have demonstrably failed to lower the noise on HF.
      Socially this is bad for two reasons. 1. No one will go into this as the costs versus expected benefit are not even close to breakeven. 2. When factored in that we still have some Hams that have the stuff, so we can get by with no new ones (for a short time), the Hams can't transmit out a signal strong enough to be heard over the background noise floor, so your emergency can't get handled as no one can hear what you are calling for.
      So next time you are in Florida digging yourself out from a hurricane, remember that you can't call for help as there wont be many hams around and those in other areas won't hear the signals that do get out.
      2. Garage door openers and RC toys. These things operate in spectrum that is near the BPL range and will be prone to interference due to image frequencies. So when its freezing cold, and you can't open the garage from your warm car, thank the FCC.
      3. Users of BPL. The receivers in the BPL circuit are sensitive as they are designed to pick up very low power signals. Assuming that a Ham is anywhere in your area, and that Ham does HF, and tried low power (QRP), only to fail to contact anyone due to the noise floor problem. He or she is going to buy an amp and a beam antenna to get past that. Can you say "service interruption"? When the beam turns on, your net connection goes away as the BPL receiver gets overloaded with the strong signal from the beam.
      The other way BPL users will get shafted is the shear cost of the system. (>$100/mo for internet?)

  4. Morse Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But did they use Morse Code?

    1. Re:Morse Code by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I believe so. At least some of the frequencies they're using are allocated for CW/RTTY. Luckily they were prepared for savage operating conditions even before the disaster. (QSO pileups on top of their DXpedition.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Morse Code by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      Depends on the restrictions on the band they were using.

      --
      To tap or not to tap, that is the question .-.-.-

    3. Re:Morse Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was my understanding they were using cw.

    4. Re:Morse Code by RealBeanDip · · Score: 2, Informative

      > But did they use Morse Code?

      I think you're a troll... but...

      I'm fairly certain that in an emergency you can use whatever mode of transmitting you like in any segment of the band. I'm not certain of this, but I'm sure someone here can tell us for sure.

      Regardless, I would think that CW would be the best mode of operation due to the fact that you could use less transmitting power (and conserve your battery) and still get through.

      --

      You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

    5. Re:Morse Code by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      The link above refers to US/ITU Region 2 allocations/band restrictions. The tsunami happened in ITU Region 3 which can have completely different allocations/band restrictions in the same frequency range. Because of this, the operators in other regions/countries can often use phone transmissions where US amateurs are restricted to Morse Code and data transmissions.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    6. Re:Morse Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're a troll... Yes, I am, but thanks for the reply anyway. :)

    7. Re:Morse Code by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      Yes, in an emergency anyone can use any portion of the band in any mode. Thus long before my wife got her license I had a radio in her car anyway.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    8. Re:Morse Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have used Morse, voice, and data modes. Voice is the most used, but Morse and very-narrow-band data modes are needed when signals are weak. The ARRL has details: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/12/29/100/?n c=1

  5. A very interesting article! by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow what a great article! It was nice to read more about HAM radio operators! This is a good way to bring HAM radio into the limelight again! I'm sure they saved many lives!

    (The submitter and I just had three shots of espresso!)

    See, if you take out the exclamation points, it doesn't sound so insincere.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  6. Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I guess this is an "I told you so" from those who opposed BPL for ham-interference reasons.
    What do you care more for ... being able to read slashdot faster on BroadBand, or the lives of innocent little children? Easy enough question, to those of you who aren't terminally selfish.
    I think the Hams win this one.

    1. Re:Broadband over power lines by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 0

      It depends, how much bandwidth?

    2. Re:Broadband over power lines by RileyLewis · · Score: 0

      Pencils haven't changed in the last 10 years either, but I don't recall any chapter in History 100 about the death of pencils.

    3. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the HAM radios are obviously of no use to the residents of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. They should use a more relevant technology to save lives.

    4. Re:Broadband over power lines by josecanuc · · Score: 4, Informative

      How likely is it that Joe Ham in some suburbs is going to be capable of talking to India? Even with perfect weather and a great rig, very unlikely. Even with repeaters, rather unlikely.

      Not all Ham radio is in the short-range VHF/UHF bands. HF bands in the 15 meter to 160 meter wavelength range can directly "reach" India from the U.S. There are thousands of Joe Hams in the suburbs with this kind of equipment.

    5. Re:Broadband over power lines by starman97 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hundreds of thousands...

      http://ah0a.org/FCC/Licenses.html\
      General, Advanced and Extra licensees have HF
      operating privileges.

      That's just in the US.
      There are several million Amateur Radio operators world wide.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    6. Re:Broadband over power lines by mvsopen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amateur rado "hasn't advanced" in the last 10 years? Sorry, but when I look at the new, yet afforable HF radios with dual DSP, or send GPS data through a sat. link, bounce microwaves off mountain peaks, or use pure digital VHF communication (Which is now possible and commercially available), I can't help but think you haven't seen an issue of QST since 1995. The hobby has matured, and more than kept [ace with changing technology. Rich de KY6O

    7. Re:Broadband over power lines by tmasssey · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Wrong.

      A few years ago, a guy used a light bulb as an antenna and was able to work contacts on all 6 continents. There was an article in the ARRL magazine, but I can't seem to find it...

      You can easily work around the world with a 5w transceiver and a simple wire antenna. Does having 1500w running through a 100' tower help? Sure. Is it necessary? Not even close.

      A couple of hundred dollars of equipment could allow you to work even the most distant contacts under most circumstances. What did you spend on *game* software last year? Could someone else have chosen to spend the same amount of money on something they consider a valuable public service?

      Here's one for you: *DID* a millitary fly in sat phones? If they did, would they be used by everyday people to let loved ones know they were still alive? No. So why do you assume it would happen tomorrow when it didn't happen today?

      As for it not having advanced in the last 10 years: how much more advanced is that land telephone in your house? That power outlet that you plug your computer to? Don't you hate the fact that the power company hasn't "innovated"? Sometimes dramatic innovation isn't necessary. Computers are at most 50 years old. Radio is *twice* that. Wouldn't you expect a slower rate of innovation? And by the way, search for PSK31: just because *you* haven't heard of the innovatins, doesn't mean they don't exist...

      Ham radio is not for everyone. It's not terribly exciting. But when there's a disaster, it's a community dedicated to serve. When was the last time you heard about those LAN network administrators who were instrumental in helping whole communities to communicate in the event of a disaster? No, that's right: They were too busy whining that their DSL was down...

    8. Re:Broadband over power lines by whodunnit · · Score: 1

      Not really,

      As all the articles said, power and phone lines were all down. Thus no BPL thus the ham operators would have still been able to do their thing during the emergency.

    9. Re:Broadband over power lines by tmasssey · · Score: 1

      Oh, and 73, KC8PWV :)

    10. Re:Broadband over power lines by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • What do you care more for ... being able to read slashdot faster on BroadBand, or the lives of innocent little children? Easy enough question, to those of you who aren't terminally selfish.
      You had a decent comment going until the bolded part. First of all the whole "it's for the children" argument's gotten pretty tainted in years past with Congress having used it to excuse how many different censorship acts in its name? At least two or three, all never got to take effect because of legal actions, all were ruled unconstitutional.

      Secondly a lot more people than just children died and were injured in this tragedy. Are we really supposed to ignore everyone who dies that's an adult simply because they're not a kid? That's a pretty weird set of standards if you think that way.

      Ultimately though, your quote sounds more like you're trolling for responses (of any kind) than like you really care about either issue. Considering the sheer enormity of lives lost so far, that says a lot of things about you, and they aren't terribly good things either.

    11. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with BPL is that because ham radio will be unusable most of the time, ham radio culture will die. By the time the power lines are down, there won't be any heroes of ham radio around to save the day ... they'll all have moved on to more feasible hobbies.

    12. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      muse yourself over to the ARRL site Bob, you are seriously underinformed. I have personally had over 700 QSO's (contacts) with stations in Asia/Europe/Africa within a 48hr period (Field Day) using nothing more than a 100W transceiver, a small gas generator and 20 meter dipole strung up in some trees. Multiply that by several thousand and you have an incredibly resilient comm infrastructure.

      WB2PFV

    13. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no. You just caught me using deliberately emotive language ... other people happen to *instinctively* care more for children, which is why people pleading for a cause, good or bad, will bring it up. Maybe it is overused, I don't know.
      I've also observed that on Slashdot, the term 'troll' is overused, and certainly misused; it seems mostly used for those who dare to disagree with the slashdot worldview ("Linux rocks!" "BPL rocks!" "Copyright is evil!"). There's a difference between being controversial, and being somebody who is trolling to stir up shit. But it's so much easier to scream "troll" than argue rationally :(

    14. Re:Broadband over power lines by dougmc · · Score: 3, Interesting
      A few years ago, a guy used a light bulb as an antenna and was able to work contacts on all 6 continents.
      I call shenanigans. Hams sometimes use light bulbs as dummy loads, but it's not really a good idea because the resistance changes too much with the temperature of the bulb.

      If a ham really did work (ignoring repeaters and things like echolink) six continents with his light bulb antenna, he probably did it via the transmission lines going to his light bulb (if you spread them out and/or make them uneven, they can make a nice antenna. In that case, the light bulb would just be a terminator, and not an antenna by itself.

      The antenna is the most important part of a rig used for DXing. If you put 1500 watts into it, I imagine you could get a few watts out of a light bulb as RF, but it wouldn't be able to pick up anything. I just don't buy it.

      You can easily work around the world with a 5w transceiver and a simple wire antenna.
      This is a bit more plausable, though it's certainly not easy to talk to somebody 12,000 miles away with only 5 watts and a simple dipole antenna.

      Oh, and I'm AD5RH.

    15. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 7 continents, stupid!

    16. Re:Broadband over power lines by tmasssey · · Score: 1
      You don't have to believe me. However, it was a *cover article* for QST magazine in the late '90's.

      There was a line on the cover: "Anything can be a radiator..." and it showed a picture of a rig, less than 10 feet of wire, and a light bulb in a ceramic holder on a fence post. The article was about the fact that while an ideal and monster antenna is nice, that you can truly work around the world with just about *anything*.

      In a couple of days, the guy had used the light bulb as an antenna. Someone noticed that he had worked, IIRC, everything but Africa for WAC, so he went ahead and found Africa (or whatever continent: it was just one he needed at that point).

      Now this *was* at the peak of the solar cycle. The point was, though, that even with something that Hams had used as a *dummy load* you could work far-flung contacts. You could use even far from optimal designs in far from optimal ways and still reach people. Could the transmission lines have acted as more of an antenna than the bulb itself? Sure. But that wasn't the point. I've searched both ARRL.org and Google and can't find this thing, but trust me: it did exist. Anyone else remember this?!?

    17. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What do you care more for ... [...] or the lives of innocent little children?

      It's about time these all-too-generic "think of the children" or "otherwise, the terrorists have already won" arguments get properly recognized by assigning them a (Usenet-)law, simlar to Godwin's.

      Any suggestions?

    18. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What do you care more for ... being able to read slashdot faster on BroadBand, or the lives of innocent little children?

      Being able to read slashdot faster on BroadBand?

    19. Re:Broadband over power lines by tmasssey · · Score: 3, Informative
      AHA!

      A link that pretty much backs up what I was saying. And it even mentions that the author used a balun to reduce feedline radiation!

      http://qrp.kd4ab.org/2000/000617/0033.html

      I really wish I could find the actual article, but this is close enough for me... Wrong on the year, though: it was mid-2000. Everything else is close enough.

    20. Re:Broadband over power lines by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it happened. I think it was in 96 on 97. But it DID happen. You don't need much to communicate world wide if you know what you are doing. 73 KL1SA

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    21. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest the Lovejoy law.

      From the Helen Lovejoy character from the Simpsons.
      "Will somebody PLEASE think of the children?"

    22. Re:Broadband over power lines by ReeprFlame · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How capable? Very. The HF band that they use [3-30MHz] allows radio to bounce off the Ionosphere and travel all over the world. That is why that is useful. Now as for the BPL, that is localized. Who cares anyway? I mean I am a HAM at 16, so it does still survive. But it also is useful. You don't seem to know enough about the situation of radio and therefore should not really mock it. BPL I could care less about and have no idea how this message brought it up. But anyway, satelite phones are something that amateurs can use themselves considering there are Amateur Satalites. Hell the International Space Stations talks to us every day! Talk about advantages. And on theses satellite uplinks, we do not pay the $5.00 per minute that most need to pay... So hah. Amateur Radio is useful, and does lead to alot of advances in radio. They will stay into ine future and they will help out in emergencies whenever possible.

    23. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are completely wrong....

    24. Re:Broadband over power lines by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I mostly operate mobile. After I got my extra class license my very first HF contact I ever made was to an operator in Japan on 10 meters who was hearing me just fine. This was while driving down the road on I-5. Now I may not be able to get out to india sure, but that operator in Japan could have relayed me the message I'm positive.

      Were in the 10 year low sure, and the muf has decreased, but I regularly talk to operators in Australia and Japan on 15 and 20. I'm not using any external amplifier (just 100 watts pep) and I'm not even using a gain antenna.

      Sat phones are common? How many people do you know who have one and regularly use them? How about someone living on the edge of life in a 2nd or 3rd world country? Often times in places like this radio is the only way to communicate.

      BPL is so senseless. It destroys a natural phenomenon that is not only precious to amateur radio operators, but also to commercial operators in the airline business (a lot of them live around 60m) and the mobile maritime radio networks who both use it on a daily basis.

    25. Re:Broadband over power lines by fatboy · · Score: 1

      This is a bit more plausable, though it's certainly not easy to talk to somebody 12,000 miles away with only 5 watts and a simple dipole antenna.

      I hold in my hand a QSL card from F5CWU (France) for a QSO on 10 Meters. My output was 5 watts, AM into a 10 meter J-Pole. My signal report was 58.

      --Terry
      KE4PJW

      --
      --fatboy
    26. Re:Broadband over power lines by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Which one of you is trolling the other? Or is this just the circle-jerk thread?

    27. Re:Broadband over power lines by n6mod · · Score: 3, Informative

      In 1985 I worked more than 200 Health and Welfare Querys an hour for most of a day, in and out of Mexico city after their earthquake.

      From a station in Suburbia. Palo Alto, to be precise.

      -Z

      PS: Repeaters are a VHF-and-up thing. Disaster work is usually HF. You know, the frequencies BPL wipes out.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    28. Re:Broadband over power lines by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      QRP rocks.

      It doesn't get much play on Slashdot, but the guys building transceivers into Altoids cans are doing neat things with tech.

      Good link to start with: http://www.njqrp.org/

    29. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As do techs with code.

    30. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Radio came along with Heinrich Hertz (who transmitted em waves before Marconi). Technically computers go back to the Abacus, so radio isn't necessarily older. Charles Babbage's analytical engine dates to the mid 1800s, and was digital, but not electrically operated, Vanauver Bush's was electric dating from the early 1930's, but not digital (an analog computer), but I suspect you want a stored program electrically operated digital computer, complete with shift registers, which takes us to colossus (a British made beast from 1943). It (very slightly) edged out machines made in America for much the same purpose (breaking a German Navy odometer-style rotating cypher 'Lorenz SZ 40/42" code named Enigma). 2005-1943=62 years. So, "Computers are at most 50 years old" is incorrect. Alan Turing and Clyde Shannon said a lot about them before that, so 62 years is being generous. As for sending data over power lines: The problems outweigh the benefits. Optical fibre along side power lines are a better way to go.

    31. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take a faster Slashdot any day.

      Children are replacable, and of dubious value.

      My time is not replaceable, and is quite valuable.

    32. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you care more for ... being able to read slashdot faster on BroadBand, or the lives of innocent little children? Easy enough question, to those of you who aren't terminally selfish.

      Disgusting troll. The reason those children died wasn't because of lack of ham radios but the fact that their parents didn't have a clue what was happening and simply stood gawking at the massive wave as it approached. Incidentally, why didn't the ham radio guys warn everybody that there had been an earthquake and get the hell inland?

    33. Re:Broadband over power lines by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      My late father (formerly GM0EXW) worked someone in London, more-or-less at the other end of the UK, using a homebrewed transmitter consisting of one transistor, one crystal, and a handful of passive components, running off a PP3 battery. Of course, having a decent antenna was important - a proper 80m dipole makes a big difference to getting yourself heard.

    34. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they just had to ruin an otherwise interesting thread. Such dickishness is pretty common, particularly from the "I told you we are still important!" types here.

    35. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a dissaster this size i'd say to hell with the kids.. they can make new ones. those societies needs adults to flourish again.

    36. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were too busy congratulating themeselves on their l33t keypad skilz...

    37. Re:Broadband over power lines by BrakesForElves · · Score: 1
      How likely is it that Joe Ham in some suburbs is going to be capable of talking to India?
      Uh, very likely indeed. I've been a ham since 1969, and with only modest, low-powered equipment and antennas, I've talked with people all over the world. We used to joke that the range of our gear was "exactly halfway around the world in any direction," but one night years ago, a friend and I proved that was wrong: I was chatting from Minnesota to Joe down at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, when he said it sounded like I had some kind of little echo or something. I turned my antenna around towards the North Pole, we continued chatting, and we realized that the signal path was better that evening going the long way around the Earth!

      And forget repeaters... they're neither needed nor legal on the frequencies that propagate that far. We're talking 14 or 21 MHz, not 144MHz and higher.
      --
      About the word "if": If bullfrogs had wings, they wouldn't bounce around on their little green butts.
    38. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article mentioned was written but Tom Shiller, N6BT, who runs Force 12 Antennas - published in the June 2000 QST titled "Everything Works."

      See:

      Force 12 Webpage

    39. Re:Broadband over power lines by tunakermit · · Score: 1
      Two points:

      First, the people on the receiving end of the communications probably had power. Even if an emergency knocks out the power in one area, the other areas that will provide relief will have power. That will interfere with the reception. If those in the middle of the affected area cannot be heard, what's the point?

      Second, the HF bands that are affected are used to communicate worldwide. I haven't heard of any particular caess yet, but it could be possible to cause worldwide interference using BPL. I'm not 100% sure on this point, so I may be wrong.

      JC

    40. Re:Broadband over power lines by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      VHF/UHF is very handy on the ground. After Izmit earthquake (1999) in Turkey, Hams were operating a mobile repeater in the disaster area in the first day, coordinating rescue operations. Also they were providing long distance contact with HF well before any mobile company could provide some cover. The rest of the mobile networks were swamped for a couple of days and weren't reliable. For rescue people, they were completely useless. I got licensed after (TA2MGW) the earthquake and missed the action.

    41. Re:Broadband over power lines by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      It's the bloody receiving (US/UK) end that's gonna get swamped by the interference, not the transmitting end. The disaster area might not have any BPL interference but what about the receiving end?

    42. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, packet radio is absolutely useless.

      Someone might (might!) argue for using radio for long-range voice communications, but rarely is there a need to transfer data over that link. If you have a computer in a remote location, you use satellite.

      Packet radio was a neat idea 10 years ago, when BBSes were popular. How many of those have survived?

    43. Re:Broadband over power lines by n6mod · · Score: 1

      Oh, no question about it.

      Most of my equipment and experience is in ARES work here in Northern California, where earthquakes are the most likely disaster.

      In '89 (Loma Prieta) there was a TON of coordination and communication work, and the landline and cellular systems were swamped beyond use.

      The thing that many folks miss about the amateur community is that we are "Professional Communicators".

      We train and drill to make the most of a communications medium, and can move much more information, quickly and efficiently, than folks who are trained to do something else, and happen to have a cell phone. In a crisis, this makes a difference.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    44. Re:Broadband over power lines by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

      Well, it's 20 years late, but thank you.

      Most of my neigboors (sp?) came from Mexico City, their eyes still get wet when they remember that day. I wish more people in this country could be as selfish as you

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    45. Re:Broadband over power lines by dougmc · · Score: 1
      This is a bit more plausable, though it's certainly not easy to talk to somebody 12,000 miles away with only 5 watts and a simple dipole antenna.

      I hold in my hand a QSL card from F5CWU (France) for a QSO on 10 Meters. My output was 5 watts, AM into a 10 meter J-Pole. My signal report was 58.

      I didn't say impossible. I said `not easy'. Also, Tennessee to France is not 12,000 miles. Probably closer to 4,500 miles.

      On the other hand, doing it with AM is a bit harder than SSB or CW ...

    46. Re:Broadband over power lines by dougmc · · Score: 1
      You don't have to believe me. However, it was a *cover article* for QST magazine in the late '90's.
      To be more specific, it's the July 2000 issue of QST. The author is N6BT.

      I don't have that issue of QST, and I can't find the article online, so I can't say what exactly is in it. I don't doubt that QSOs can be made on a dummy load -- no matter what you do, there's going to be some leakage. What I really doubt is that he worked six continents with this antenna.

      Ahh, found it. This link tells the story as you've heard it. I still have my doubts -- I'll bet the feed lines, coax and balun notwithstanding -- did more of the radiating and receiving than the bulb did itself.

      Were the bulb screwed directly into the antenna socket of the radio I'd be a lot more convinced.

    47. Re:Broadband over power lines by n6mod · · Score: 1

      You're most welcome. It was the best way I could think of to help, and I was fortunate to have the time and access to equipment.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    48. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the following on the ARRL site:

      Jul 2000 QST 47 Everything Works
      Keywords: ANTENNA ANALYSIS THEORY Schiller, Tom, N6BT
      Aug 2000 QST 76 Everything Works (July 2000 QST, pp 47-50)
      (Feedback)
      Keywords: ANTENNA ANALYSIS THEORY

      7 3
      KD5XB

    49. Re:Broadband over power lines by pyser · · Score: 1

      I've worked India from the US with 100 watts and a wire in the backyard, and so have countless other US hams.

    50. Re:Broadband over power lines by tmasssey · · Score: 1
      Who the heck brought up packet?

      I don't know why I'm wasting my time for someone who won't Google for it themselves, but PSK31 has nothing to do with packet...

    51. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      sat phones are common enough

      Ever try using a sat phone when you can't get a good view of the sky?

    52. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      >> A few years ago, a guy used a light bulb as an antenna and was able to work contacts on all 6 continents.

      I call shenanigans..... ....Oh, and I'm AD5RH.

      Um you can easily get a lightbulb to radiate RF, it's not like that filliment is sealed in a faraday cage... think about it, use some of that extra class training! ---a crappy antenna still radiates! You can even get some (very minor) radiation out of the best commercial dummy loads, why couldn't you get it out of a lightbulb?

    53. Re:Broadband over power lines by dougmc · · Score: 1
      A few years ago, a guy used a light bulb as an antenna and was able to work contacts on all 6 continents.
      Um you can easily get a lightbulb to radiate RF
      Well, duh. Every lightbulb in your house, if powered with AC power, radiates RF energy. No HF rig required.

      But can you get it to transmit and receive enough RF to talk to somebody on *every other continent* (except for Antarctica?) Sure, doing a QSO a few miles away, or even a few hundred miles away with this dummy load isn't hard. But talking to every single continent with it, that's not so easy.

      I haven't read the original article (don't have it), but I still suspect that the transmission line (and matching system and radio itself) did more radiating and receiving than the light bulb itself did. (Unless he picked some light bulb that's much longer than your standard 100 watt bulb, I guess.)

    54. Re:Broadband over power lines by hawk · · Score: 1

      Computers are at most 50 years olld.

      Not unless you only count those with microsoft software :) If you want to count Babbage & Lovelace, they predate radio.

      If you want electronic digital, 1939 (The ABC, ripped off by ENIAC a few years later). If you want electric or mechanical, a few years earlier.

      hawk

    55. Re:Broadband over power lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, third world country. How difficult is it to get a clear view.

      Hell, you can get a clear view anywhere in the US, just need to walk around a bit or go up a building to a window. If an emergency, there's a way.

      Think first, then type.

    56. Re:Broadband over power lines by tmasssey · · Score: 1
      Are you really trying to split hairs that finely?

      The original poster said that you need a massive antenna to reach India from the US. I said that I guy used a light bulb as an antenna and got WAC. Others have confirmed that what I said actually happened. And you're going to argue as to whether the light bulb or the very short feedline (even with a balun!) or the radio itself contriubted more to the process? And you think that "I didn't read the article" helps you, even when someone else gives you a link to the FA?

      Are you kidding me? Don't you have something better to argue about? Even Tastes Great/Less Filling is a more meaningful argument. Or are you just trying to cover up your embarassment at being flat out wrong?

    57. Re:Broadband over power lines by dougmc · · Score: 1
      And you're going to argue as to whether the light bulb or the very short feedline (even with a balun!) or the radio itself contriubted more to the process?
      Yes. I'm glad you finally understand my reservations. (Personally, I suspect that the balun probably improved the radiating efficiency of the entire arrangement rather helping to restrict it to the bulb. But as I've mentioned, details are scarce without the QST article.)

      That balun itself probably did more RF radiating than the bulb. (Unless it was, as I suggested, a very long bulb.)

      And you think that "I didn't read the article" helps you, even when someone else gives you a link to the FA?
      Um, that was me that gave me the link. To myself, apparantly. Except it wasn't to the QST article, but another, less reliable (i.e. few details), writeup.

      But please, do, give me a link to the QST article. I'd love to read it. Or if you have the magazine, copy the article and send me a copy. Or scan it and email the pages to me. I've already given you (or did I give it to myself? I get so confused) the exact issue and author.

      Or are you just trying to cover up your embarassment at being flat out wrong?
      I have no problems with admitting when I'm wrong. In this case, I have not been convinced that I am wrong. And I rarely find learning that I was wrong to be embarrassing -- it's usually more of a learning experience. But maybe that's just me.

      Sorry, but if you're claiming `WAC with a dummy load (light bulb)', I'll question the accuracy of your claim. If you don't like it, ignore me, that's fine, but you're not going to convince me until that light bulb is mounted to the back of your rig, minimal transmission line (i.e. one or two inches), and your rig (minus the antenna) is as fully shielded as is practical, that the bulb did most of the radiating and receiving. (Unless it's some wierd bulb that's a few feet long, of course.)

  7. Another good reason for BPL.... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Just another reminder (the World Trade Center should serve as another one in recent memory) that Amateur radio frequencies should be protected from spectrum auctions and Broadband over Power Lines (BPL).

    Sometimes just making money isn't the best thing.

    73 - KL1SA

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Ryan+Stortz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, because you know all those bastards using their high speed internet connections right next door is preventing you from contacting the civilized world.

      This would be one of the times when BPL would probably be either out or turned off.

      --
      Bugs are just features that have been fixed.
    2. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Geckoman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This would be one of the times when BPL would probably be either out or turned off.
      The problem isn't interference at the time of a disaster (which, as you pointed out, would likely disappear), the problem is interference with preparation, drills, and tests.

      Not to mention the deterrent effect that constant interference would have on amateurs beforehand. It may look like we're just "playing radio," but those are the activities that keep people interested and active in between disasters.

    3. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the power out anyway?

    4. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Imagine - you can't establish radio contact with anyone for 4 years due to BPL. Your HAM radio days are pretty much over. Suddenly, a disaster strikes in your area. Are you still going to have all that equipment that's been lying around useless in your basement for 4 years, or would you have sold it all off to other enthusiasts?

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    5. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Ryan+Stortz · · Score: 1

      Do you have flashlights in your house? Do you routinely practice with them just in case the power goes out? If the power hasn't gone out in monthes, are you going to get rid of them?

      --
      Bugs are just features that have been fixed.
    6. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by starman97 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really.. what BPL means is that
      people in the 1st world wont be able to recieve a weak signal from the other side of the world.

      Radio waves in the bands the BPL interferes with dont propagate uniformly in all directions.
      At certain times of the day and with seasonal variations there are preferred propagation paths.
      Sometimes those paths are to the US, sometimes to Europe. Widespread usage of BPL would drown out those faint faraway signals with a local interference noise.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    7. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by mvsopen · · Score: 5, Insightful
      BPL just might spell the death of Amateur Radio. Think about it, for most of us, the original purpose of obtaining an amateur radio license was to

      a) To talk to people in distant places

      b) Perform public service (RACES/ARES, etc)

      c) Be able to fix/build/repair your own radio gear.

      Now, let's see what happens today:

      a) Anyone can plug in a $4 mic, use VoIP, and "talk" to almost anywhere on Earth, no license or self-study required.

      b) Whip out your cell phone. That is unless a disaster hits, and all the cell sites are down, or your 40 min. battery dies. Also the "big news guys" literally take over a cell site. CNN's truck logs in via cell at every major story, and keeps an open line as a backup. If even 200 reporters did this, kiss off any chance of getting a cell signal, since the towers would be overloaded

      c) How many parts inside a modern radio are actually user-servicable? I mean, I *can* probably replace a blown out chip-capacitor, if I had to, but when it is smaller than a pencil point, and 5 seconds of extra heat would wipe out the printed circuit board by lifting the traces, is this something you would want to do to a $2000 piece of amateur radio? The new ICOM rig sells for more than $10,000! Who would ever want to "modify" something like that? Rich de KY6O (Extra class license holder. Proof that if I can do it, anyone can. For more info on obtaining a license, see http://www.arrl.org/ which is the official site of US amateur radio operations)

    8. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that matters little if there were no ham radio operators available because BPL killed their hobby (i.e., made it impossible for them to practice their hobby, gain new members, etc.).

    9. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by MonMotha · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's been said zillions of times before, but I'll say it again.

      Someone has to be able to hear you at the other end (where there is no disaster). If the local noise floor is S9+20, there's no way I'm going to be able to hear your little 100W call for help from hundreds of miles away. It just isn't going to be copyable above the noise.

    10. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by anagama · · Score: 1

      I don't do HAM radio, but this analogy seems pretty weak. A flashlight is basically the "hello world" of circuit design. Setting up a radio that can be used for long distance communication must be a bit more involved than clicking the "on" switch.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    11. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by calidoscope · · Score: 1
      what BPL means is that people in the 1st world wont be able to recieve a weak signal from the other side of the world.

      Excellent Point!!!

      What 90% of the folks posting don't get is that the problem with BPL is causing interference in areas untouched by disaster and blocking out the transmissions from areas that have been hit. The folks in the disaster area may be transmitting on limited power (e.g. car batteries) with makeshift antennas, so even a small amount of BPL interference can completely disrupt communications.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    12. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      My flashlights cost me tens of dollars, my radio collection cost me thousands of dollars. If you couldn't make us of the radios, would you keep them in the basement or sell them?

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    13. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Slayk · · Score: 1

      Flashlights are inexpensive, both in knowledge requirement and in a monitary sense.

      Ham equipment, on the other hand, takes knowledge obtained through practice, and a fair dime to buy. Were something disater to happen to me, I could use a flashlight. I wouldn't know what the hell to do with a HAM radio, on the other hand, because I've never used one. Therefore, it makes sense to maintian public ability and interest in shortwave all the time for the times when disaster brings need of their services.

    14. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by silentbozo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have flashlights in your house?

      Yes.

      Do you routinely practice with them just in case the power goes out?

      No, but I do use several of them on a daily basis, and I check the batteries and bulbs every couple of months. I recently had to overhaul 3 of my mini-maglites because I had let them sit for too long, and the batteries leaked, corroding the inner tubes of the flashlights, and jamming the batteries in place.

      If the power hasn't gone out in monthes, are you going to get rid of them?

      All of the flashlights that I own would barely fill half of my kitchen drawer. I doubt that the same holds true for the rigs (including the antenna and power supplies) that people have. Even then, you need to maintain and test equipment to ensure proper functioning. I left for a trip for about half a year, and when I came back, my stereo refused to work due to some dried out caps.

      You think batteries are going to charge and water themselves, if you have a backup power system, or even a car (I'm talking conventional/low-maint batteries). Try leaving your car in your garage for a year without exercising it. By then the gas will have turned to gunk, your tires would have gone flat, seals would have shrunk - about a weekend's worth of maintenance to get back on the road.

      Unless it's designed to sit there, or has been carefully stored away, most equipment requires maintenance. If it's equipment that requires skilled operation, then it's not just the equipment that requires maintenance, the operator needs practice to maintain their skill set as well.

    15. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, overhauling the maglights required using a pair of pliers to untwist the tail cap because the corrosion had fused the threads, full disassembly of the switch so I could use a stick to ram the batteries out. Then a nice long soak, followed by 20 min of scrubbing with a brillo brush to get the barrels to where they would accept new batteries...

    16. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes just making money isn't the best thing.

      I'm inclined to think you are a terrorist. We cannot have anticapitalist speak like this. Our president depends on the economy to hold this country together and your post is a blatant attempt to disrupt this.

    17. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by fatboy · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the power out anyway?

      Not in the places they were talking to.

      --
      --fatboy
    18. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by n6mod · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that if BPL were in operation today, it would be shut down in the US because of the Tsunami in the Indian Ocean?

      Didn't think so. But that's *exactly* what would need to happen.

      BPL will destroy the civilized world's ability to communicate with the disaster areas.

      In fact, it's worse to have interference at the "civilized" end, because the transmitter in the disaster area will likely be battery powered and portable, both of which tend to mean weaker signals.

      Sure, we can blast our way out, but it doesn't work if you can't hear.

      73 de N6MOD

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    19. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you have flashlights in your house?"

      Look that has to be the stupidest thing I have heard this week. Look the facts are

      A. Ham radio saves lives. Every year.
      B BPL is people pissing about being to download their porn faster.

      Reailty check JR. One of them is more important.
      It is not BPL. Ham channels have been protected for a long time now. You will get your broadband another way. Why should big companies be allowed once again to edge out a small group that provides a valuble service? Again....

      BAH I think I am going to put together a directional rig that will inturupt the service.
      I will make sure to key up every 5mn. With the correct cert this would even be leagle. It ain't like the money that people are paying are going to the utility. The large internet companys are the ones that get the money.

    20. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "73 - KL1SA"

      Ack, thoguht you were a chick for a moment. *Shudder*

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    21. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Just another reminder (the World Trade Center should serve as another one in recent memory) that Amateur radio frequencies should be protected from spectrum auctions and Broadband over Power Lines (BPL).

      That's right. All the interference from the dead power lines will get in the way in an emergency like this.

      Sometimes just making money isn't the best thing.

      Yeah, screw all the people that don't have broadband in their area. They shouldn't waste their time on that new fangled internet thingey, and should just buy a radio to pass the time. Maybe they'll get lucky and the person on the other end will have an Internet connection to run Google searches for them.

      You do realize that BPL is being touted as a way to get high-speed data to places that have no facilities for high-speed currently? It isn't just about giving people a 3rd choice of local delivery (Would you like DSL, cable, or BPL?). It is that there are many areas where there isn't any fiber and isn't sufficient copper to bring in anything other than very poor dial-up into a town and for distribution within the town (outside the more limited DSL range).

      So, in the choice between Internet access and toy radios, you pick the toys. If the carriers were to get their backups in place, then there wouldn't be a problem. If all the fiber and copper out of the state were cut and all the power in the state were out, I'd still have an Internet connection. If there was sufficient resiliency and redundancy in networks today, there would never be a need to fall back to old technology.

    22. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its rather hard to train and practice for real emergencies (you know, the ones that involve saving your ass by people who are far more technically comptetent than you) when you have a giant wall of noise interefering with your communication.

      Hams don't wait for disaters to practice life saving communication skills.

      I'm sure getting on the internet to download your latest goat fetish porn is far more important than disaster readiness training.

    23. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1
      Do you really think that if BPL were in operation today, it would be shut down in the US because of the Tsunami in the Indian Ocean?

      Didn't think so. But that's *exactly* what would need to happen.

      BPL will destroy the civilized world's ability to communicate with the disaster areas.

      BPL (or BOPL) *is* in operation today. Right here, right now, in my city. Cinergy (Cincinnati) BOPL (Pops)

      Now I admit I am not very active in the HAM community anymore, but from what I have heard it has not been much of an issue (yet) in the markets here that it is active in.

      YM(or Signal Strength)MV

      WD8VWZ

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    24. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that BPL is being touted as the "rural broadband savior" in order to convince congress that this is a good idea? I live in a rural area and I can tell you first hand that BPL will not be a viable option in the rural areas until the deployment costs can subsidized by build-outs in urban areas or rural service is mandated and subsidized by congress.

      For the rural areas wireless or satellite is by far the most cost effective option as proven by several local independent telcos in this area.

      I've been around this game long enough to watch the rural areas used as a techno-political football plenty of times. BPL as its being proposed is just another in this series of tech boondoggles.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    25. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by grumling · · Score: 1
      Do you realize that BPL is being touted as the "rural broadband savior" in order to convince congress that this is a good idea? I live in a rural area and I can tell you first hand that BPL will not be a viable option in the rural areas...

      Yep. I live in a rural area (Fraser, CO), and the only options available for our area are: dial-up (26.4kbps thanks to Quest), Verizon Wireless (140kbps), Wireless (1Mbps with a contract and site survey), Direct PC (1+Mbps), and cable modem (3Mbps).

      OK, me and the other tech who lives in the area are the only 2 cablemodem users right now, but Comcast is launching high speed internet in a few days. BPL is just another pipe. In time, the cable co's and phone co's will build out to those last few customers, if only because they have to continue to grow.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    26. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      Thanks for making my point. You have helped to prove that rural areas do have broadband options today/Real Soon Now and that BPL will just be another pipe (an RF noisy one at that). The problem as I see it is that BPL proponents are using emotion (we must do something for the poor rural areas, sob) and people are buying into the nonsense that no broadband options currently exist in rural areas.

      In fact, DSL was available to every customer in a rural area near here served by a progressive independent telco before it was available here in the county seat (population 3500 or so) from SBC. SBC has offered DSL for about a year, cable has offered broadband for several years and the same independent telco has offered wireless DSL here in town for at least two years. I'm scheduled to get hooked up with the wireless sometime this month. This same independent telco has offered wireless DSL for at least 18 months in the rural area around town as well (plans up to DS1 rate).

      There are a number of small towns in northeast Kansas who now have wireless DSL available where no other broadband options exist. BPL is a day late and a dollar short.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    27. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by belroth · · Score: 1

      Soaking in vinegar helps - the weak acid helps remove the corrosion.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    28. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by W2IRT · · Score: 1
      This would be one of the times when BPL would probably be either out or turned off.

      --snip--
      the problem is interference with preparation, drills, and tests. Not to mention the deterrent effect that constant interference would have on amateurs beforehand


      Respectfully, NO. These would be secondary or tertialy concernes. The real problem is that nobody in the US or other area where BPL is deployed will be able to hear the emergency, priority or health and welfare calls coming out of the stricken area.


      Imagine tuning around 14.191 if you're in range of the disaster comms in a non-BPL area, you may hear something like:


      (Received Signal as one might hear it in Anywhereville, USA, today): Please, can you arange to send us 500 doses of anti-malaria vaccine; we have 5 critical patients who need immediate treatment. Health and Welfare traffic: Please advise Mr. John Smith on Elm Street, Anywhereville, that his wife is safe in our shelter. Over.



      (Received Signal after BPL is deployed in Anywhereville, USA): BBZZRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTTTTPPPPPPPPPPPHHHHHHHHHHTPP PPPPPPPPPBBBBBBBBBBBSsssssssssssssssssszzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzztrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrtttttttttttt


      Get the picture?


      With luck, Amateur Radio will always be there as the last, best means to get a signal out when things are at their very worst. The question remains, though, will there be anybody here in the U.S. or Canada able to receive the pleas for assistance because their bands will have been torn asunder by pr0n-surfing mouth-breathers on their must-have BPL connections?

      Not to mention that the BPL signals themselves will be radiated into the ionosphere by the miles-long radiators that carry them (power lines act as great big multi-wavelength antennae) and propagated around the world so the stations in the afflicted areas will get some of it back along with their intended replies. Look at the thread above regarding working all continents with 5 Watts and a lightbulb. Imagine all theat BPL energy being radiated by miles of copper wire? Think that will be confined to within a few feet of the pole -- especially once solar cycle 24 peaks again in 2010 or 2011?


      At this juncture, I think the best we can hope for is that the cost of deployment will be so high, and the risk of interference complaints so strong that no utility will want to touch it.

      --
      Cheers, Peter, W2IRT
    29. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      How did you get a 2x2 call as a Tech? I understand the KL part.

      73,

      W7COM

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    30. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Its rather hard to train and practice for real emergencies (you know, the ones that involve saving your ass by people who are far more technically comptetent than you) when you have a giant wall of noise interefering with your communication.

      Well then, give your emergency responders a satellite phone.

    31. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      For the rural areas wireless or satellite is by far the most cost effective option as proven by several local independent telcos in this area.

      Yeah, satellite is cost effective. A T1 (not some crappy shared service like Starband) over satellite runs about $15,000 per month. I'm sure that a company wanting a T1 would think that is a cost effective solution. And I think you completely miss the point. Wireless is used for access, not backbone. BPL would not only be access, but backbone. What good does wireless do you if you have no connectivity from the city to any other?

      Oh, and since people are implying that I might not know much about rural areas, just take a guess where I live. I'll give you a little hint, the "AK" in my username stands for Alaska.

    32. Re:Another good reason for BPL.... by Mystic8277 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes just making money isn't the best thing

      Hmm...Oh, Welcome To America Baby!

  8. Link to South America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Two years ago, I was in Brazil when they had a huge flood. The only communication out was radio. Fortunately, I had my Icom 706 and was able to establish a CW link through an AO satellite.

    1. Re:Link to South America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBH.

  9. Rule #2 about Ham Radios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They are not kosher.

    1. Re:Rule #2 about Ham Radios by kngthdn · · Score: 1

      They are not kosher.

      I can't believe this is being modded informative! Hello, this was a *joke*. Get it? Ham, kosher? Ham...kosher? Maybe the FCC really does need to dumb their testing down.

      Seriously though, I suspect ham radio will be around for a long, long time. When something bad happens, the Internet isn't always going to be available, and cell phones often don't work. I'm glad I got my license, anyway. ; )

      TNX, 73.

    2. Re:Rule #2 about Ham Radios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the FCC really does need to dumb their testing down.

      Or get the rabbi in to bless the radios

    3. Re:Rule #2 about Ham Radios by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      They are not kosher.

      They could be kosher if they are turkey hams.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  10. Re:ugh by va3atc · · Score: 1

    These were students, not telecom employees.

    --
    Candle burns its brightest in the dark
  11. Re:What about the Muslims? by T3dB3rg · · Score: 0

    You do realize that you're going to the 7th layer of pun hell for that one, right?

  12. Re:ugh by Geckoman · · Score: 4, Interesting
    how about using said car batteries and other forms of power to power the damned cell sites
    The problem with that idea is that in lots of areas the connections between the cell sites and the main phone network is via landline. Contrary to popular belief, the cell network is auxiliary to the landline network, not independent of it.

    To my knowledge, amateur radio provides the only free-as-in-speech global communication network that can operate completely independent of any grid. You can even run computer networks on it, unlike the cell system.

  13. Re:ugh by Spetiam · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how much power cell sites require, but I would imagine you couldn't operate one for 20 hours on a couple car batteries. Cellular service always seems to be among the first services to go under in emergency situations, anyhow.

    They used their car batteries wisely.

  14. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay... ham radio... wow... we should all be impressed... how about using said car batteries and other forms of power to power the damned cell sites... much more useful... not everyone has a ham radio at their disposal... but I'm sure you'd find a cell phone, even in poverty stricken areas within a 5 kilometre radius...

    Let's see, maybe because:

    1. They actually *HAD* a ham radio, not a cellphone tower.

    2. I doubt if they had found a cellphone tower that they would just happen to have a power converter suitable to running it off of their car batteries. (And if they did, I doubt the batteries would last long supporting that dynamo.)

    3. A back up generator would have been much more suitable to running something like a cell tower.

    4. Can you say "cellular network"? Powering up one cell tower isn't going to do you diddly squat if the other cell towers and phonelines are down.

  15. Re:ugh by LinuxGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right.... Have you ever seen a backup power supply for a single cell tower? It is a lot more than a couple of car batteries. But assuming you had a powered cell tower, what then? No powered land lines to connect to just yet.

    When disaster strikes, ham radio is often the only reliable means of communication into and out of the affected area.

    LinuxGeek, KI4CJJ

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  16. Re:ugh by explorer · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's be a great idea, since cell-sites cover what, a couple of miles or so? And those lame-o HF radios they're using can only go the pathetic distance of 8000-12000 miles?

    Gee whiz, what were they thinking?

  17. The old story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ham radio was and is useful when natural disasters happens, this is something the rest of the people knows only when it's too late.

  18. Send them guys some Bawls by agtorange · · Score: 2, Funny

    20hrs stright thats nuts let all pitch in and get them some bawls so they can go another few days non-stop.

  19. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    how about using said car batteries and other forms of power to power the damned cell sites...

    And how, my friend, do you expect that cell tower to communicate with the rest of the world when the land lines are out? That said, do you have any idea how much power it would take to run an entire cell tower, off of car batteries? These cell towers don't run off of 12V DC, and even if they did, the power from one battery (or even 5) isn't gonna cut it. HAM radios (or any radio, for that matter) are still a very viable communication method when standard infrastructure goes the way of the shitter.

  20. Re:ugh by rpiotrow · · Score: 1

    *snip*
    "how about using said car batteries and other forms of power to power the damned cell sites... much more useful..."

    Maybe those car batteries would not power a cell station for long. How about the rest of the infrastructure. If you could power a single cell tower, would it do any good?
    Don't kick Grandma.

  21. Re:ugh by Geckoman · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    And I'm not just saying that because I'm a HAM. :-)

  22. Re:ugh by TrevorB · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, that's the beauty of ham radio. You can power one site and send messages thousands of miles away with a single tower and a car battery. To power all the cell towers, you'd need significantly more power, with significantly more towers and then you have to figure out how to send the signals off island. Plus you have to actually charge the cell phones. I don't think areas of Aceh had or are going to have electricity for a very, very long time.

    A family friend is a member of ARES, a network of ham radio operators who spring into action when the power goes off and cellular is a distant memory. These guys take their (volunteer) positions pretty seriously, and have acted a few times in the past decade to get news around quickly when more conventional methods aren't working.

    Also, this is the Andaman and Nicobar islands. Some of these islands are being protected by India because they have stone age cultures untouched by modern culture. I would think electricity is pretty sparse, let alone cell phones.

    So yes, Ham radio, Wow. Think of them as the Amish of 21th century communications. When the power grid collapses, they're the ones who will be there to save your ass.

    Many of these islands haven't been contacted yet, even one week later. This is an excellent scenario for Ham Radio use. Let's hope that along with new seismic bouys they can dot the Indian Ocean with emergency Ham Radio systems.

  23. Re:Why so slow to react? by Spectra72 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What? The world's pathetic reaction to Dafur and it's contemptible reaction to Rwanda wasn't enough to prove that point long before this?

    Just be thankful the world is reacting at all I say. If this had not have been a natural disaster, but rather another genocide or brutal regime killing people, the world would still be sitting on its collective hands watching the death toll rise. Natural disasters are easy to deal with. No messy issues with who is the "good guy" and who is the "bad guy", just throw money at it to prove how much you care.

  24. Other Ham Heroes by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sunday's Washington Post had an article on another Ham Radio operator (link - probably requires registration - sorry). A real life, very public example of why ham radio is important.

    --
    Sleep is for the Weak
    1. Re:Other Ham Heroes by Mr2cents · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is exactly why there are field days twice a year.. Ok, under normal circumstances it's just a contest, but it is meant to be an exercise to set up a working radio station without external support within a minimum of time. That includes setting up a power supply, transceiver system and an antenna. In case of a disaster, information about the needs is the first step towards help.

      Ham operators have proven time upon time that when disaster strikes, they are upon the first to establish communications.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    2. Re:Other Ham Heroes by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      (link [washingtonpost.com] - probably requires registration - sorry)

      If you spoof your browser id to be googlebot, it lets you in without registration. I tried it first as googlebot and it let me in, then as firefox and it redirected to the registration page instead. Lots of these registration-required and even some pay-required sites let you in if your browser-id is googlebot. I am constantly amazed at how stupid "professional" webmasters are.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  25. ok, but... by supernova87a · · Score: 3, Insightful

    well this is a feel good story and all, but I always wonder -- how exactly are these amateur radio operators helping in more than an anecdotal way during disasters? I mean, is it like they're ferrying critical rescue and operations traffic? I have a feeling not, because to do that, both they and the operators on the other side would have to be tied in to whatever government or agency is reaching out to help. And to have that be the case, there would have to be serious pre-disaster networks and agreements set up.

    I mean, this is similar to the relief organizations in the area now -- they keep telling regular people not to volunteer to fly to the region and help out, because what they really want are people who know what they're doing and part of the organization already, and can be deployed. A single ham radio operator on his/her own is not going to be that useful.

    So maybe I'm not really familiar with the true value of ham radio operators in situations like this -- can anyone give a more informed picture? Do they just serve to carry random individual messages of "I'm ok", until the military/relief authorities arrive and set up a real command communications network?

    thanks for the info.

    1. Re:ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was this post given such a low score? It's the most thoughtful and intelligent post in this thread.

    2. Re:ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You fail to appreciate the importance of the words "I'm OK"

      73,WB2PFV

    3. Re:ok, but... by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, idealy you would have hams already there, not flying in.

      Hams (at least those with interest) can be well trained in this area. They are trained to do everything from serve as simple phones for wellness traffic ("Hi mom, my house is gone but the dog is OK.") to assisting emergency relief personel (operating their radios for them to keep hands free, helping co-ordinate the operation by keeping information on everyone up to date on people's position, how many more people a relief station can handle so those in the field know where to take new ones, that there are X people with Y injuries that need to be medivaced, etc.)They are much more than normal people with "magic cell phones" that still work without the infrastructure.

      In the US you can find them doing ARES and RACES (I think those are the big two) which are disaster relief and such training to do the kind of things mentioned above. Not only do they do drills simulating traffic and operating without power and normal communications and stuff, the practice regularly by helping out with the running of parades and other public events to keep their skills sharp in doing that kind of thing.

      On my local repeater (RACES repeater, I think) every so often (Wed nights at some time) they practice carrying traffic between people. It's usually unimportant stuff (saying "hi" to friends, party invites, happy birthday, etc.) but they practice. Someone is incharge and they ask for messages and they go through them one by one. The guy with the message will say "this is ____ and I have a message for _____ in _____, can anyone carry it" (or something like that). Someone will volunteer (either they know the person or they will just call them or pass it on to the next 'net). The person sending the message and the person who volunteered will then chat (either there, or more frequently on a nearby empty frequency so things can keep moving along) and the message gets sent. It's all quite interesting actually.

      Hams do alot (besides just chat and also neat expirmatents trying to bounce signals off various layers of the atmosphere, the moon, mars, commets, asteroid showers, balloons, and anything else more than 5 feet in the air).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:ok, but... by kc8apf · · Score: 2, Informative

      In disaster situations, many different amateur radio groups become active. Most notable are ARES and RACES. Both of these are usually associated with major relief organizations (in the US, typically the Red Cross).

      While some of the traffic is just people saying that they are OK, lots of the traffic is critical emergency coordination traffic. This can be both ways as well. Incoming weather information and knowledge about what relief is coming can be very important.

      --
      kc8apf
    5. Re:ok, but... by jburgess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, we do much more than carry random individual messages of "I'm ok," although that is also an important part. The primary concern is health and welfare traffic. This means that we coordinate information between the disaster area and the relief organizations. You mentioned that there would have to be serious pre-disaster networks and agreements set up. There indeed are. The Red Cross is tied into the amateur radio world, and works very closely with us. We train regularly, through events and practice nets coordinated through the Amateur Radio Emergency Service (ARES), and the Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service (RACES). Just recently, the Simulated Emergency Test took place here in my county. We absolutely do ferry critical rescue and operations traffic, and we do have serious pre-disaster networks and training. You're right in that a single ham radio operator on his or her own is not going to be that useful, but when that operator is tied into the network of millions of hams across the globe (over 600,000 in the US alone), that one operator can be a powerful lifesaving force. And yes, once the highly important stuff is taken care of, we are still there to relay "I'm ok" messages from those stuck in disaster areas to those on the outside who are concerned, through the National Traffic System (NTS). I hope this gives you a better picture of the true value of ham radio in situations like this.

    6. Re:ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the parent message has an interesting point and should be modded up -- it seems to me that all the messages relayed by ham radio operators are time insensitive, as he says, they're "I'm ok" messages that could wait.

      I have never really heard of a ham sending urgent, essential traffic from a disaster zone that was used to save lives. Anyone?

    7. Re:ok, but... by MBCook · · Score: 1

      PS: I'm KC0QBP, although I haven't been on for quite a while and have never participated in RACES/ARES/etc.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    8. Re:ok, but... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      time insensitive, as he says, they're "I'm ok" messages that could wait.

      "I'm OK, as well as the 500 other people in this hotel" is a lot better than 500 missing persons.

    9. Re:ok, but... by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your assumptions are mostly correct.

      We train, practice and prepare to be useful at a moments notice. All on our own nickle.

      Arrangements do exist with many governemnts and agencies. In the US Amateur Radio Emergency Services (ARES - http://www.ares.org) and Radio Ameteur Civil Emergency System (RACES - http://www.races.net) are two common ones. The American Red Cross as well as The Salvation Army (SATERN - http://satern.org) have their own arrangements with hams.

      Traffic passed will be of "life and death" nature, until such traffic is either being carried by other chanels or is no longer there. Then "Health and Welfare" traffic can and will be passed - the "I'm OK" type messages to family and friends.

      We hams have a very LONG history of doing this type of work. Many would say it's one of the very reasons we exist. It is our 'public service' to justify our use of public air waves.(be nice if other services remembered that)

      You can learn a lot more with some basic research. http://www.arrl.org is a good start point. Look for such things as ARES, RACES and National Traffic System (NTS - http://pages.sbcglobal.net/k9jm/ntsguide.htm)

      --
      Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
    10. Re:ok, but... by Belegothmog · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So maybe I'm not really familiar with the true value of ham radio operators in situations like this -- can anyone give a more informed picture? Do they just serve to carry random individual messages of "I'm ok", until the military/relief authorities arrive and set up a real command communications network?


      This is a legitmate question, but the answer is in the article if you are familiar with ham radio "terms of art." In the article there are references to "helping to handle emergency traffic" and also "pitching in to handle emergency and health-and-welfare traffic." Emergency traffic and health-and-welfare traffic are terms describing two very different types of disaster communication.

      There are four general categories of disaster messages which have the following precedence:

      1. Emergency traffic. This includes messages relating to the immediate protection of life or propery. For example, coordinating the delivery of medical supplies or personnel; dispatching emergency services; relaying vital information for disaster response.

      2. Priority traffic. Generally not as time sensitive as emergency traffic.
      3. Health-and-welfare traffic is the type of messages which you reference where a survivor wants to get word out relatives that they are ok.

      4. Routine. Non-related communications


      So, the fact that the article specifies that they handled "emergency and health-and-welfare" means that they did more than handle "I'm ok" messages. There's an additional clue when the article says that "[o]ur control center was inside the prime minister's official house in his operational room." This indicates that it is very likely that they were handling critical messages until regular communications could be set up.


      Amateur Radio has similar roles around the U.S. and the world in official government emergency response plans. I am part of a volunteer emergency communications team for a major metropolitan area in the U.S. We have our own area and equipment in the city emergency operations center. In the event of a disaster, we become the relay through which all information/reports for 911-type dispatching will come. We form the link to the county and state emergency operations centers, and provide other radio-based services as well. We are offically affiliated with the police department. There are other groups affiliated with relief organizations like the Red Cross and the Salvation Army which provide more health-and-welfare type traffic than our group, but they also handle critical relief-related communications for their organizations. Ham radio is involved in all levels of disaster response communications from the most important to the least.

    11. Re:ok, but... by 40ohms · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Being one of those that has participated in communications for a disaster relief effort, I have seen some of the work hams do from being there. Some of the things they are doing are not done well by the military. The military has some communcations equipment, but they don't have the flexibility to communicate with many of the other law enforcement / relief groups. There are many efforts going on now on the ham bands to assist in the relief effort. One you might find interesting is a http://www.boatwatchnet.org/. If you want the spread sheet short story on the status of many of the boats in the area, you can find that from a link at http://www.winlink.org/ The hams had most of the status on those boats posted several days ago. Many hams were busy on the Winlink system passing various messages about the status of people and relief needs almost from the time the quake was felt. If you wonder what hams do in a disaster, ask someone that is a ham, or someone in the Red Cross that handles communications. You will find there is much more going on than is ever mentioned in the press.

    12. Re:ok, but... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That'll depend on the organizations in the area and what communications they have. A city with military and civil groups operating there will be different from an isolated location where there's little in place.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    13. Re:ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hi,

      "I mean, is it like they're ferrying critical rescue and operations traffic? I have a feeling not"

      I'm not sure about the US, but here in the UK there is an organisation known as RAYNET (http://www.raynet-uk.net/), the Radio Amateur's Emergency Network, which exists to react to disasters in just such a way.

      They are known to the emergency services, written into the emergency services disaster plans for callouts etc. They cover the entire country and can provide radio links over virtually any distance in a very short timescale. They get involved in things like the Lockerbie air crash as well as smaller scale events like missing person hunts. They are also called in to provide additional planned communications for large events such as the London marathon.

      The terms of all but the most basic UK amateur radio licenses allow message passing on behalf of various "entities" including emergency services, utility companies, Red Cross etc.

      I expect there are similar organisations in the US and many other countries.

      Anyway, just for info really.
      Best wishes from the UK
      Chris
    14. Re:ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreements? for waht? to help out

      you have never been in a disaster have you?

      agreements are meaningless when people are dead.

      when injured need help, a piece of paper that says we may assist doesnt mean jack shit.

      anyone who wants to and more importantly, can help. do help

    15. Re:ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > well this is a feel good story and all, but I
      > always wonder -- how exactly are these amateur
      > radio operators helping in more than an anecdotal
      > way during disasters?

      [SNIP]

      > Do they just serve to carry random individual
      > messages of "I'm ok", until the military/relief
      > authorities arrive and set up a real command
      > communications network?

      I feel sorry for your family if you think "I'm ok" messages are just anecdotal help till a real network is set up. See
      http://www.satern.org/response.html
      for information on what the SATERN radio team is doing. See
      http://thorntree.lonelyplanet.com/categories. cfm?c atid=68
      for what it's like not to know if people you care about are okay. See
      http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/12/28/1 00/?n c=1
      for an article on what "anecdotal help" is being provided in this disaster.

      It saddens me greatly to find that slashdotters have no clue what hams are doing in Oceania during this emergency.

      An issue you don't seem really familiar with is that no one has been able to get "real" networks set up on the ground and find out what relief is necessary in the remote hamlets in that region -- other than amateurs who are already there.

      For information on what amateur radio operators contributed after the attacks on September 11, see
      http://www.qsl.net/ka1ddb/9112001.html

      For information on how hams assisted in the investigation and recovery of debris and human remains after the Columbia broke up, see
      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3077583/

      There is, of course, a wealth of information on how amateur radio operators assisted authorities during the hurricanes of 2004, the fires in San Diego last year, tornadoes in the American Midwest just about every season, SkyWarn, and on and on. I'm glad, I suppose, that you've at least asked someone to bring you up to date (rather than finding it out for yourself).

      And for others on there being no power in affected areas which would interfere with transmissions -- the issue is that interference is with _reception_. The hams over there may be operating at low power to conserve battereries and fuel for generators, so hams in the US and elsewhere are attempting to make sense of their communications in the midst of noise. Having a BPL interference issue in the US may be the problem, not BPL where the transmission originates.

      Slashdot has some wonderfully bright readers, but they have limited themselves to a very small area of expertise. It's very disappointing to see how small an area it is.

  26. Re:Why so slow to react? by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

    It seems to me the response to this disaster by governments has been more about public opinion than the welfare of the people involved

    Why does that matter so much? Being a compulsive media watcher, I saw this whole ordeal unfold and it appears to have been meant to add some little sub-plot seeking to get folks to give up some money for a good cause. Since when has encouraging people to help been a bad thing? If stupid marketing sells more donations, then they should keep at it! Lives are saved regardless of the governments "feelings".. Last time I checked, the government was our citizens we elected to represent us. Sounds like they are doing their job here. For once!

  27. Re:Why so slow to react? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If they had communications from the disaster, why did it take the international community a week to react. Why did Australia just start sending its ships? Why did the USA helicopters just arrive in Sri Lanka today?

    Radio travels at the speed of light. Ships and helicopters travel at the speed of bureaucracy.

    Next question.

  28. Re:Why so slow to react? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. The full extent wasn't (and still isn't) known.
    2. Maybe the aussies actually had to load stuff on the ships. You know...stuff that people might need, like medical supplies, water, blankets. Does no good to send empty ships.
    3. It takes quite a while for a carrier battle group (the Abraham Lincoln) to steam several thousand miles. Unless you know of another way to get helicopters and 15,000 navy people across a few thousand miles of open ocean.

    It seems to me you're bitching just to be bitching.

  29. Re:Why so slow to react? by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they had communications from the disaster, why did it take the international community a week to react.

    You think there are cargo ships and helicopters loaded up 24/7 with crews, appropriate supplies and doctors just waiting for a disaster to strike?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  30. Early Warning by Yoweigh116 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if any of these operators were able to contact other costal cities before the wave hit there. I read somewhere that there was somehting like a 2 hour lag between the time the first and last places were hit. Think that would even be enough time to accomplish anything? -Yoweigh

    1. Re:Early Warning by MBCook · · Score: 1
      I think the lag was even longer than that. It would be interesting to find out.

      Personally, I doubt it. It would require (among other things) that people first hit had hams around (may or may not be true depending on how remote the area was), that the hams were prepaired to operate without power and such (may or may not be true depending on how reliable power is), and that their station stood up to the force of the tsunami. The ham would also have to operate that soon after a disaster (could you find all you equiptment, get things running, have checked who was still alive in their faimly/neighbords, etc. Past that, they would have to raise someone else in the path of the storm (let's assume not hard) and tell them. That would warn one person (plus whoever is listening). Then that person would have to get the word out (as the first ham continued to contact others). This would be slow (unless the second ham knew a radio DJ or something like that who could get the word out).

      All this assumes that the ham who was hit knew that the wave would continue and where it would hit. It is entirely possible that something like this DID take place, and the recieving ham said "oh that's too bad" and neither one realized that guy #2 was in danger.

      Would have been one HECK of a good PR moment for hams if that had happened and some tiny village was saved though, huh?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Early Warning by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2, Informative
      When the quake, and later, waves, hit Car Nicobar's Indian Air Force base, the people there immediately sent a wireless missive to their logistical HQ at Tambaram, Madras. The IAF folks at Madras informed their superiors in Delhi who in turn notified the Home Ministry. The trail got lethargic after that; there were apparently faxes, phone calls and such flying around, but little real action on the ground in the mainland, and definitely none to warn, mostly to mobilise aid to the Andaman Islands.

      Essentially, I doubt anyone in the Indian red tape ever imagined that the waves would end up hitting the mainland.

    3. Re:Early Warning by odano · · Score: 1

      I think the bigger problem is that so few people understand how a tsunami is created, so when one hits your island/nation, you aren't thinking that maybe another one went off in the other direction.

      And, even if you do understand that the tsunami is going off in all directions, you dont know exactly which direction it came from, so you don't exactly know who to warn.

      I think it would be much more effective to teach people what they look like when they are coming. For example, if the water near the beach is receding, get the hell out of there. If the islanders knew this, thousands of lives would have been saved.

    4. Re:Early Warning by fbform · · Score: 1

      Just a thought that occurred to me - what fraction of Indian Government officials dealing with disaster management have lived in a coastal area for at least a few years? If it turns out that most of the people in the NDM have never lived on the coast, that *may* be a weak spot to watch for when it comes to cyclones, tide surges and tsunamis.

      Of course, I don't know whether living in a coastal area really gives one practical experience in dealing with extreme coastal weather.

      On a different note, read the Indian Govt Situation Reports here. Here's the first, and here's the latest. Makes for some interesting reading (if you can tolerate the typos).

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    5. Re:Early Warning by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Interesting links, thanks for pointing out. Didn't know we had something like this on a governmental website (nor that there was an actual disaster management division in the Home Ministry).

      Reading through all the news pouring in from the region, seems to me that cyclones are, in a sense, cool; the eastern coast of India (particularly the state of Andhra Pradesh) has the second highest rate of cyclones per year in the world, so in a sense, the local government and the Met department is rather tuned to weather situations in the Bay of Bengal. Of course, better governance structures always help; ap.gov.in, for instance, has some redundant bandwidth on which they setup a video-conferencing link connecting all district hq's.

      In any case, on a quick glance, there are some holes to picked while working through this website; will post later on this. :-)

    6. Re:Early Warning by barath_s · · Score: 1

      Indira point, the southernmost tip of the nicobar islands was only 160 km from the epicenter (next closest after Aceh/sumatra-Indonesia). While the islands, are strung in a north-south chain, they are still much closer than thailand, sri lanka, mainland india, or some of the indonesian islands. I've heard that the time between earthquake and tsunami in some of these islands was only 3 minutes - not nearly enough to do anything before the tsunami hit.

  31. ugh-International Agreements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All true. The other thing for people to keep in mind is that international agreements is what makes all of this possible. This is just another demonstration of why societies have laws, even if they cause discomfort for some.

  32. Re:ugh by Spetiam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When disaster strikes, ham radio is often the only reliable means of communication into and out of the affected area.

    This fact came to mind when I was at school in DC and the Pentagon got hit and they told us not to use the phones unless we absolutely had to, and also when I was in Northern Ohio when that big power failure occurred. I've been meaning to get a ham radio operator's license, and in part it's these emergency situations that have made me decide to at least get licensed for 2 meter. (Not licensed yet, hopefully soon.)

  33. Orlando Sentinel article by FleaPlus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Coincidentally, when I was home for the holidays I saw an article about this in the Orlando Sentinel:

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/nationworld/ or l-asectsunamiham01010105jan01,1,2331864.story

    It needs a free reg, or bugmenot.com

    It's really amazing what they did. Here's a snippet from the article:

    And with most telephone lines down and cell phones scarce, the ham-radio club's efforts proved invaluable as the scope of the disaster increased day after day.

    The first messages were to let people on the Indian mainland know that those on the island were safe and unharmed.

    A young waiter at Harpole's hotel asked them to get word to his mother in Hyderabad, India, that he was alive and well.

    "We found a ham-radio operator on the mainland, gave the mother's telephone number," Harpole said. Within five minutes a ham operator in Hyderabad called the waiter's mother and relayed the message.

    "He told us the mother was crying with joy," he said.

    Harpole's group cheered and clapped. Word spread quickly across the island, and their work went on for hours and hours.

    When Indian government officials learned of the hamradio operators, they relayed messages for official requests for medicines, water and blankets. Several of the radio operators headed south to Nicobar.

  34. Re:Why so slow to react? by barista · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't speak about Australia, but for the US helicopters, they are based onboard ships. These ships were making port calls in various Pacific cities. IIRC, the ships were originally bound for the Persian Gulf, but the powers that be decied to send them on a huminatarian mission.

    The ships and helicopters are in the US Navy. They were geared up for a military mission. Once the White House decided to change their mission, they likely had to get provisions for the new mission. Tents, portable generators, etc.

    Also, ships are not planes. While they can sail 24/7, they can still only go about 30 knots per hour (approx.). This works out to 720 nautical miles per day. Not very far on a global scale.

    So, figure a day or two for the government to get it's head out, another day or to for reprovisioning, and a few more days sailing time, you get a week (approx).

    /former Seabee

  35. So many links by anagama · · Score: 0

    I'd like to RTFA, but which one??

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    1. Re:So many links by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Does the submission post really need to look like a Wikipedia article?

  36. wahooo by racerxroot · · Score: 1

    yay for ham! KB3HLJ :-D

    --
    --- Caffeine is directly responsible for some of my greatest ideas, and some of my most embarrassing moments...
    1. Re:wahooo by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      yay for ham! KB3HLJ :-D

      I'll join you with that cheer!!

      KD7ILU

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  37. What modes were used? by dogfart · · Score: 1
    The article doesn't say - so I'd have to assume voice via Single Sideband and morse code.

    There are some very good ham digital modes suited to the high-frequency bands where l;ong distance communication is possible via reflection from the ionosphere. PSK31 works well for keyboard-to-keyboard use. Of particular note here is a system known as winlink (yes it is windows based). It is specifically designed for text email communications to and from remote locations where other communciations infrastructure does not exist or is extremely expensive.

    A good reference to winlink is http://www.winlink.org/ . The status of winlink stations in tsunami affected areas is given at http://www.bur.st/~philsuth/tsunami_status.html

    --

    "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

    1. Re:What modes were used? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I would imagine simple high power transmissions would have the best chance of success.

      You are in an emergency situation.
      You want to use the best tool (and hence frequency, and language/mode) possible.
      You want to ensure contact with as many people as possible.

      Reserve the fancy tricks for when your safe and comfortable.

      (Applies to pretty much anything, not just radio)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  38. Why so slow to react?-Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It seems to me the response to this disaster by governments has been more about public opinion than the welfare of the people involved"

    You know what? I don't care. This could be one big exercise in penis-waving for all I care. The thing I do care is that people are going to be helped. That's what's important, and no one should ever forget that. So put away your political pitchforks, and focus on all those people out there who need our help. Not on petty bickering.

  39. Re:Why so slow to react? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they had communications from the disaster, why did it take the international community a week to react. Why did Australia just start sending its ships? Why did the USA helicopters just arrive in Sri Lanka today?

    Well do you suppose they just have big old ships full of disaster relief supplies sitting dockside in Australia? Or do you suppose that they have to be fueled, loaded up (once they figure out what types of supplies will be needed) and sent on the way?

    Does the United States have helicopters that can make trans-oceanic crossings? Or do you suppose that maybe they have to operate off some sort of vessel? Might that vessel have to travel close enough to where relief supplies are needed so that the helicopters can make round trips to deliver muliple loads of supplies? Or do you expect that just sending the helicopters on a one way trip with a single load of supplies would be sufficient?

    Have you stopped to consider that delivering relief supplies to disaster areas actually takes some thought and organization rather than being done in a chaotic, willy-nilly fashion?

    Were you aware that even though there has been a huge disaster there are still functioning bureaucracies in the affected areas? Bureaucracies that expect i's to be dotted, t's to be crossed and the proper clearances obtained and the correct forms filled out in triplicate? Were you aware that a licence is required to import medicines into India and that the requirement is not being waved even in light of the huge disaster?

    Apparently you haven't really considered these things or else you'd know that relief is actually being provided pretty damn fast on an international scale. If you want to offer any criticism on the tardiness of relief efforts then I suggest you look to the governments a little bit closer to the disaster areas as they are the ones who are properly positioned to provide immediate relief and are therefore the ones who are most responsible for doing so.

  40. flashlights vs radio by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    That's a terrible comparison. Flashlights have one operation: toggle off/on and are cheap both to buy and maintain. Radios are far more complicated and far more expensive to buy with some maintainence costs.

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
    1. Re:flashlights vs radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's a pretty valid point. Do you have supplies for you and your family? Food, water, batteries for your flashlights, etc? 'cause I can tell you, they're going to be far more useful than a radio

    2. Re:flashlights vs radio by belroth · · Score: 1
      Do you have supplies for you and your family? Food, water, batteries for your flashlights, etc? 'cause I can tell you, they're going to be far more useful than a radio
      Not necessarily - how am I going to receive signals from a disaster area with a flashlight? This isn't McGyver. The point is that there are two ends to most communications (ignoring broadcast), if no-one can hear you ask for help...
      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    3. Re:flashlights vs radio by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      I have a number of radios (a FT-101B, a FT-847, an IC-211E, a FT-200, a FT-11R, a FT-23R (yes, it's an almost yaesu shop), a Stormo 6000, a Standard C5800. The only expensive one (over a grand) was FT-847. The rest almost cost me nothing. What maintenance are you talking about? these things don't need any oil and water. They just run.

  41. Another good reason for BPL....Build It. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "c) How many parts inside a modern radio are actually user-servicable? "

    Try building your own. It's not that hard, and with modern components you can build a functional one.*

    Yes I'm an EE/ME :)

    1. Re:Another good reason for BPL....Build It. by mvsopen · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can't even get sub-standard parts from Radio Shack any longer, asthey no longer stock "hard to sell" items. Their new motto appears to be "You've got questions? We've got cell phones."

      I miss the smell of a hot soldering iron. And my 3 DSW & SmallWonder Lab radios all worked the first time. *

      Rich (* = But my degrees are in English Lit, Rhetoric, and Composition Theory ;)

    2. Re:Another good reason for BPL....Build It. by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      The key is to find a good small time electronics distributor in your area. If you're in a semi-major city there's probably one somewhere nearby. Indianapolis, for example, has MAI Prime Parts (don't be fooled by their website trying to sell you Monster Cable, they actually sell real stuff too, not to mention that the Monster Cable is actually at a reasonable price). They're not always easy to locate since they don't do business with the "general public" as it were, but only because that's not their target market. Most are perfectly happy to sell you a capacitor, a few resistors, or a premade inductor or coil-form. MAI is really like a EE candy store. There's a whole isle of just capacitors, for example.

      Yes, Radio Shack has certainly gone down hill. I've taken to calling them "cell-phone shack" recently, though they do still sell soldering irons. I should know, I just had to run out and get one to repair a blown keyboard fuse on a PC motherboard. Total cost for the soldering iron and solder (since I left mine at another location)? About $12.

    3. Re:Another good reason for BPL....Build It. by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      Another good thing to try is to get an older radio (yes, it will probably have tubes, the horror). I acquired a Heathkit DX-60B for $0. Yes, that's right, it was completely free (the person even dropped it off at the local club shack IIRC).

      When I got it, it did at least turn on, but it wouldn't tune up at all. The electrolytic caps, being ~40-50 years old, were completely shot. Replacing those has restored it to almost 100% working order. The bias on the oscillator tube is still off by a few 100 volts, but that's just because the bias network resistors (carbon composition, and 10% tolerance at that) have drifted with age as well. Replacing those should get me back in shape (and the newer metal type resistors last a lot better too).

      These rigs are quite user-servicable. They usually do require more maintaince than a newer rig may, but at least you can easily do it yourself using even the most crudely large of soldering guns.

  42. That sure beats... by h4ckintosh · · Score: 3, Funny

    my cell phone carrier

    --
    Oh well, what the hell
    1. Re:That sure beats... by Burlappin · · Score: 1

      Unless of course you have an Iridium Satellite phone.

    2. Re:That sure beats... by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

      And that phone is still dry and workling. I would rather rely on my fellow hams we know our stuff will still be working. If it isn't most of us can get it working unassisted pretty fast.

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  43. fix BPL before worldwide implimentation by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    If the "entire world" had BPL, then the noise levels from current technology (BPL) would have made it impossible to get these messages out. Current BPL technology pretty much kills a lot of the HF bands that are used for worldwide communication. I'm all for the advancement of anything that will allow better (cheaper) forms of broadband, but not at the cost of killing a form of communications that helps in time of need. Amateur radio ops are always having "training" sessions where they take everything required to carry out communications without any form power from a utility company. They use batteries, generators, solar power, home made antennas etc, to make sure they can do it, IF called upon.

    1. Re:fix BPL before worldwide implimentation by Barbarian · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The problem with BPL is that the noise will propagate around the entire world.

  44. powerful tools... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you listened to HAM radio?

    Sadly, I think those people are right. These powerful tools are primarily being used to chit-chat.

    Fine business old man.

    1. Re:powerful tools... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      Well, there isn't much in the way of major disasters all of the time. Gotta practice with the gear sometimes. Besides, what's wrong with chatting? Not everything has to be of the gravitis of Slasdot's discourse. With Ham radio you can even use your VOICE instead of a keyboard (and some people can go clickity-clack with morse - the only digital communication medium that can be read by both humans and computers.

      Besides, if you really listened to a lot of Ham radio (although if you do, you really need a pet or something else in your life to distract you occasionally), a fair amount of the traffic is "network" transmissions - and old and quaint way of relaying information that happens to beocome incredibly useful in ... disasters.

      These "nets" take quite of bit of coordination and practice. They just don't spring up out of the eather.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:powerful tools... by my_fake_account · · Score: 1

      "the only digital communication medium that can be read by both humans and computers."

      I don't know about you, but I can read ASCII.

    3. Re:powerful tools... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I thought ASCII had more than 2 letters.

    4. Re:powerful tools... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      OK, I'll bite.

      The only digital communication medium routinely read by both humans and computers. Yeah, at some point in time I could identify many ASCII codes but my point is that one typically doesn't send out native ASCII on the wire and read it directly - that's what a computer is for. :)( But lots of people hand key morse and others will use a computer to decode it, or vice versa.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  45. HAM Radio in disasters by kg4gyt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amateur radio has been used all over the world many many times during disaster. Hurricanes here in the states, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc. They usually go unnoticed, despite being the only source of communication at times. Severe storm warnings are usually issued after HAMs report, via radio, that there is in fact a severe storm (after undergoing training of course). Without us even knowing it they can be a huge part of our daily lives.

    Its good to see that such a useful, threatened hobby can show one of its many goodsides to the world by helping out.

    73 de kg4gyt
  46. Re:Why so slow to react? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You think there are cargo ships and helicopters loaded up 24/7 with crews, appropriate supplies and doctors just waiting for a disaster to strike?

    Actually, there are, sort of. The US military has pre-positioned equipment in key spots around the world so they just have to fly in personnel rather than spend weeks getting tanks and support equipment to every likely hotspot.

    --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

  47. Re:ugh by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    It's also important to note that just having that equipment on hand isn't enough in itself. You have to know how to use it, and know how to operate in an emergency. It's all about training. ARES is a good resource for this, though in some areas the politics involved can be a real turn-off.

    There's just no substitute for training and practice. The strength of ham radio in emergencies comes not from fancy equipment, but from the ability of operators to improvise and adapt.

    -N1VG

  48. Early Warning-Man's best friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here's the story of a dog Saving a life in the disaster

  49. Andaman and Nicobar were off limits for years by isdnip · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only reason the Andaman and Nicobar Islands were so familiar to me was because of ham radio. They're well known for being off limits to ham radio operators. I don't know why -- India's had lots of hams for years on the mainland, but they wouldn't let anyone do those islands. So they remained "rare ones" to the main DX award hunters. Hams have been going on "DXpeditions" to rare countries for years, sometimes financed by DXers looking for the contact and QSL card, and it was in the 1960s that I read some travelogues which mentioned trying and failing to get permission to go to "VU4". What's on those islands anyway? (Or what was?)

    It's a fortunate coincidence that Charly finally got permission to operate there only a short time before the tsunami!

    1. Re:Andaman and Nicobar were off limits for years by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some parts of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands are home to tribes that have had very little contact with the outside world and who have little or no natural immunity against the illnesses that most of the rest of us take for granted.

      They've had cases where vast swathes of these tribes have been wiped out by things like measles, influenza, etc, with recorded instances of deadly outbreaks as far back as the 18th and 19th centuries.

      Hence, for their own protection, access to those people has been limited. I guess it's easier to spot a fair-skinned Westerner as being an outsider and avoid them accordingly than it is to do the same with mainland Indians who share similar complexions. Even so, you need a permit to visit the islands, and that's why.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:Andaman and Nicobar were off limits for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India is a nuclear power. What do you suppose is there?

    3. Re:Andaman and Nicobar were off limits for years by barath_s · · Score: 1
      The Andaman and Nicobar islands are home to tribes which have had very little contact with civilization. Some of these tribes are hostile to all outsiders. They have had little chance to build up the normal immunities that we have. The islands themselves are relatively unspoiled and untouched by development. Partly, this may be because most modern necessities, and even foods are expensive and have to be imported by air and ship over 1000s of km. However, I felt when I visited, that the Govt of India had decided to go slow on development to keep it pristine (natural jungle, ecology, beaches, coral) and prevent further anthropological disasters

      Some info on the tribes post tsunami : http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/01-02-05.asp http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=05 /01/02/5354194

      Some boats have circled an island where the tribe had not previously allowed them to land, no evidence of the tribe was found post-tsunami from the boat or from air.

      Some tribes/people have fled into the inhospitable jungle; with little to eat and drink and fearing further tsunamis, and rocked by incessant aftershocks, information is slow to trickle out.

      There is also a major Indian military base on these islands, with the concomitant restrictions and secritiveness. The base is in a geographically and strategically sensitive location for India.

      Ironically, as most countries, including India are attempting to send the military to help those affected by the tsunami, the military base on Andaman and Nicobar itself was badly hit, with many/most air force buildings levelled

      With the closest point on the islands being only 160 km from the quake epicenter (next closest inhbited land mass after Aceh), there are reports of whole islands split, and of islands missing, swamped, after the tsunami. http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfi le=data/subcontinent/2004/December/subcontinent_De cember1047.xml&section=subcontinent

    4. Re:Andaman and Nicobar were off limits for years by joseph_dcruz · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've been working on a project in the A&N Islands the last couple of years so I know a bit about this: There are a couple of reasons the islands have been off-limits. The main one is defence security. If you look at a map of the Indian Ocean, the A&N Islands are at the opposite corner of the ocean from mainland India - much closer to Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia. As a result a significant chunk of India's navy and air force are stationed there - think forward positioning. One of the first major casualties of the tsunami was the Indian Air Force base on Car Nicobar islands in the extreme south, which was totally wiped out. Even now, foreigners are allowed to visit the northern Andamans, but are prevented from travelling to the southern Nicobars unless they have special permission. Protecting the native tribes is a much less significant concern. There are around 300-400k mainland Indians living in the Andamans now (plus a bunch of migrant Burmese and Bangladeshis) so preventing the transmission of diseases isn't really an issue anymore, with the possible exception of the 200-odd Sentinelese living on North Sentinel Island.

  50. field day by confusion · · Score: 1
    I can remember going to field days for many years setting up complete communications centers in the middle of nowhere. One thing I always realized about 99% of those into amatuer radio is that they were always ready, willing and prepared to get into the middle of things.
    As others have pointed out, HAMs have helped out in most every major disaster in recent history.

    Jerry KB8GIG
    http://www.syslog.org/

  51. Q: How likely?? by the_rajah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A: Very likely. Contrary to your belief, it does not require that Joe Ham have a lot of power or a huge antenna on a tower to communicate with the other side of the world. Nor does it require repeaters on the HF frequencies.

    I've been an FCC licensed Ham since 1958 at age 12 and operate only with low power (QRP to us hams) as a challenge precisely because making long distance contacts was too easy with even moderate power (say 100 watts) and modest wire antennas. I've communicated directly with Japan and New Zealand from my car in Illinois using a 4 watt transmitter and a 4 foot antenna on the trunk. If you get up to around 100 Watts and a reasonable wire antenna hung up in the trees in the back yard, you can very easily talk anywhere in the world, given reasonable conditions.

    What good is it from the other end? I was with Project Hope in Tunisia in 1969 and provided daily "phone-patched" phone call service to the staff of about 150 people so they could stay in touch with their families back home, without having to pay the $13.00 for the first 3 minutes that the landline cost. It made a huge difference to the people on the hospital ship. In disaster situations, it's orders of magnitude more important. Some of my fellow hams here in the states provided similar communications for military and Antarctic bases for years.

    To learn more about Amateur Radio, visit the ARRL website. ARRL Oh, and please, please, do not lump us in with CB folks, as nice as some of them are. Hams are tested and licensed to FCC standards prior to being allowed to put their transmitters on the air.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  52. Re:ugh by anagama · · Score: 2, Interesting

    • These cell towers don't run off of 12V DC, and even if they did, the power from one battery (or even 5) isn't gonna cut it.

    Here is an example of how completely innadequate car batteries would be. I have a kiln/studio that until recently, had no power. I used a 12v deep cycle battery to power an inverter, light bulb (high efficiency flourescent), and a mini-itx based computer. If I ran only the light, I would get about 12 hours usuage before my charge fell below 50%. - that's when running nothing but a 40 watt bulb! Turn on the computer and I'd be done in 6 hours.

    Electricity is like some magical mystical entity that never runs out as long as you are pulling it off a plug. But when you have to make your own, you realize just how precious it is. My battery must weigh about 50 pounds - lugging that home for charging made me very conservative about my power consumption.
    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  53. What's Truly Sad.. by Maestro4k · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Reading through the relatively few comments so far (especially few for a /. topic), it's really sad how many people are still trolling and/or taking time to trumpet things like how bad BPL (Broadband over PowerLines) is. Folks this is a tragedy that's so far killed more than 100,000 people. We still don't have enough knowledge of the areas hit to even know if that number represents a goodly portion of deaths, or if it's just the start of a number that will reach truly staggering proportions. I noticed in the article that the quake that started this has been reclassified as a 9 on the Richter scale, that's about as bad as a quake can get, the scale classifies 9 and greater as "rare greats", that occur roughly once in any 20 year period. It's only .5 below the worst quake on record, the Chilean Quake in 1960 and that one only killed 3000 people. This quake/tsunami combo's surpassed that by a VERY large margin already.

    And yes, BPL is bad, and can/will interfere with HAM, but there are better ways to point this out than to completely ignore both the tragedy and what good these students, and other amateur HAM operators have been able to do since the tragedy occured.

    So maybe my post is a bit off-topic, but I find it very disturbing that folks will focus on things like this when a tragedy occurs, especially the trolls. Think about what you're saying, and think about what it says about you before you click that submit button. (And yes, I know this is the Internet, and particularly /., but some of the trolls especially have managed to sink to new lows this time.)

    1. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buddy you are a fucking douche bag. Regardless of how tasteless some trolls may be, the fact that you thought you'd take a moment to hop on your soap box and evangelize in a pathetic attempt at karma whoring is the sad thing. Back away from the keyboard and keep your karma whoring to relieving the sexual impulses of rapists with your ass.

    2. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Buddy you are a fucking douche bag. Regardless of how tasteless some trolls may be, the fact that you thought you'd take a moment to hop on your soap box and evangelize in a pathetic attempt at karma whoring is the sad thing. Back away from the keyboard and keep your karma whoring to relieving the sexual impulses of rapists with your ass.

      Wow, did you ever prove his point for him. How do you live with yourself?

    3. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch. Oh, it hurts like a knife. Oh god I guess I'll have to look in the mirror and re-evaluate my life.

      I hate karma whores, especially the scumbag type that try to do so via the "high ground". If the cunt bag, you know-you, didn't like the trolls then fucking read at a higher score. Broadcasting trolling even louder by posting some karma whore retort is hardly beneficial.

    4. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      And yes, BPL is bad, and can/will interfere with HAM, but there are better ways to point this out than to completely ignore both the tragedy and what good these students, and other amateur HAM operators have been able to do since the tragedy occured.

      Do you also like to complain that cops write speeding tickets while there are still thousands of unsolved murders? Not all conversations have to default to the topic of greatest import, and I have no idea what made you think they did.

      Unless you're just karma whoring with a quick "think of the children"....

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 4, Informative

      One thing that you do NOT realize ... BPL *WILL* kill effective long range communication. Making it MUCH MORE difficult to help out in a situation like this. BPL raised the noise floor from being able to hear a weak signal (less than 5 watts) ... to not being able to hear a station booming out with 1500 watts and a highly directional beam. THIS is why its brought up ... to shed light and attention to it. Since the FCC has given BPL a green light, we'll have to see how effective Hams are in the future, hopefully, as in the past, Hams will push the technology forward and overcome this roadblock. PS, yes, I am a Ham ... and the above scenario is sensationalized ... but a possibility

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    6. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to seem cold, but it should be said anyway.

      Those people are ALREADY DEAD. People who complain about BPL are looking forward to the next big disaster, when they won't be able to use HF for long-distance communication (at least if BPL takes off). In other words, they are trying to prevent loss of life by facilitating communication in disaster zones. I think that is more appropriate than worrying about people who have already dead, don't you?

      But I guess that's just because I don't break down in tears when some people die. It's the way of the world, and crying about it never solved anything.

    7. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And did you actually READ what he said? He said "And yes, BPL is bad, and can/will interfere with HAM, but there are better ways to point this out than to completely ignore both the tragedy and what good these students, and other amateur HAM operators have been able to do since the tragedy occured."

      He agreed it's bad, but he pointed out that there are ways to point this out that don't completely ignore the tragedy that's gone on. Which part of THAT do you disagree with? Or does the fact that you're a HAM radio operator allow you to ignore such tragedies so you can complain about BPL? Bringing public attention to a problem does NOT involve jumping up and down in front of mass catastrophe while others around you try to help those affected by it. THAT seemed to be his point, and you thoroughly ignored it.

      Be sure to note how the poor guy got accused of karma-whoring for voicing an opinion, and even got modded as a troll! Way to prove his point for him there. I'd actually post this as myself, but then I'd get modded as a troll too for supporting an unpopular observation. I admire the guy for risking his karma (which seems to be so precious to slashdotters until they don't like what someone says) to point out the truth. And some of my coworkers ask me why I don't hang out on slashdot all day like they do.

      One free piece of advice for you and your fellow HAMs in fighting the problem of BPL. Think about how you go about it first, if you appear to be ignoring or taking advantage of catastrophies to make a point, you will completely lose the general public's support quickly. The news media LOVES this stuff, don't think for a minute that their next scoop won't be about a few HAM radio operators trying to cash in on all the carnage to bring attention to BPL, and it won't be about the problems of BPL. It'll be an expose to make HAM radio operators look like assholes, whether deserived or not, because that'll get them (the news media) more attention.

      Now if you do it in a manner that both shows concern for the victims of this catastrophy, and draws attention to BPL's problems, you may end up the media's darling. How about putting together a fund drive where you ask companies investing in BPL to donate money to help the victims of the earthquake/tsunami, and while you're at it, get a chance to ask them, on camera or in front of reporters, what they're doing to make sure that HAM radios would be able to function properly if a major catastrophy happened here. Then you're both a hero (for gathering collections to help those hurt), and you give the news media a nice juicy controversy to dig into, with the companies supporting BPL as the media victims.

    8. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I guess we can return to preaching to the choir on how this is a terrible tragedy. Or we can get our ham licenses and help out. I did the latter and now I'm an extra class licensee. Amateur radio isn't just about emergency communications - it can be fun as well to meet people all over the world.

      I don't see why we shouldn't point the BPL problem out. Here's a situation where nothing else worked except amateur radio and even then it wasn't nearly enough (ie more people need to take up the hobby world wide). I feel its our duty to point out that this wouldn't happen if BPL was deployed - it is after all the single most important band threat we've ever seen ever. I think the reason we do this is because there seem to be a lot of people on slashdot who support BPL for some reason and may not understand that their blind support for this terrible technology could have cost more human lives than it did. Communications saves lives because it helps direct much needed resources.

      Does that make sense?

    9. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the old cliche that is used time and time again throughout history.

      Disagree with the war? Then you must be unpatriotic and wanting the troops to die!

      Don't like the current state of spectrum regulations in the USA? Then obviously you don't care about your duty as a patriotic ham radio operator to care for those poor people who are struck by disater!

      Lame.

    10. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you also like to complain that cops write speeding tickets while there are still thousands of unsolved murders? Not all conversations have to default to the topic of greatest import, and I have no idea what made you think they did.

      I do. Ticket writing is largely a revenue generating function for local municipalities.

      Obviously a person who is going 10mph over the speed limit is danger to society, compared to the guy who is going the speed limit but is less alert (a practical example).

    11. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, those god damn karma whores. They're like the scumbag of the universe. They get on Slashdot, they talk about a relevant topic that people are legitimately interested in and then they get rewarded for their insight. We must put an end to people who do this!

    12. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're, uh, new here aren't you? Either that or you're enormously stupid.

      Karma whores are vacuous posts that say nothing, or are completely offtopic, but they post a large enough post full of enough superficially valuable information that every moderator - average assholes who want to dispense with their mod points as quickly as possible - gives it a point just for the hell of it. If you truly thing moderation is on a deserving basis, then you're as much of a fucktard as I thought you were.

    13. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by chamcham · · Score: 1, Informative
      Yes this is a huge tragedy and this may not be the _best_ forum for BPL. HOWEVER, do yourself a favor and educate yourself on what BPL will do on effective HF communications.

      1. find an area with active BPL.
      2. Listen for emergency traffic for the Maritime Mobile NET on 14.300 Mhz.
      3. Get frustrated on how far you have to drive to avoid the interference.
      The Maritime Mobile Net has been instrumental in accepting and relaying emergency traffic for ships in the affected tsunami area and it is just one of many services Amateur Radio is able to provide. Next time a disaster hits your area you should read what services your local ARES/RACES (www.arrl.org) chapter volunteered for.

      During the hurricanes this year the ARES/RACES chapters of Central Florida were instrumental in providing communications between all of the shelters that had been opened up. We were able to pass messages to the Emergency Operations Center even when the police band could not be used.

    14. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      BPL *WILL* kill effective long range communication.

      And how, exactly, will BPL keep Iridium (or other satellite communications) from working? Oh, it won't. BPL may kill Ham (still quite debatable, from what I've seen), but it certainly won't kill communications. If it didn't affect your hobby, but instead affected someone elses, I doubt you'd be here telling us how BPL will cause the end of the world. Now, take a deep breath, step back, and tell us again how Ham is the only global communication tool that works when power and phone lines are out.

      Oh, and if aliens come and disrupt satellite communications, then all bets are off.

    15. Re:What's Truly Sad.. by Bagazip · · Score: 1
      BPL may kill Ham (still quite debatable, from what I've seen), but it certainly won't kill communications.

      Actually, part of the worry for we net users should be the other way around.

      The Rochester (NY) Amateur Radio Club (RARC) has documented that ham radio operators, operating legally, took a local trial BPL system's TCP/Internet throughput to ZERO.

      The RARC group found that "...Low power transmissions on many of the HF ham bands significantly degraded BPL throughput. We even moved our mobile station two blocks away from the BPL test area and found that a 40 [meter] 25-watt signal still drove BPL throughput to zero."

      There has been discussion that even CB radios may be able to kill the throughput of a BPL system.

      Under FCC regulations, BPL must accept any interference from licensed users including radio amateurs. I don't know about you, but I don't want an internet connection that someone else can legally jam up, trash or kill my throughput.

  54. Building your own radio by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

    One word: Elecraft

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  55. Re:ugh by dougmc · · Score: 1
    To my knowledge, amateur radio provides the only free-as-in-speech global communication network that can operate completely independent of any grid
    Oh, that's hardly true. A shortwave radio station with a backup generator qualifies, does it not?

    Though I'm not sure what you mean by `free-as-in-speech' ... not many individuals own a shortwave station. Though I imagine a shortwave station might let people come by and say `hi' on the air. [Freedom of the press belongs to those who own the press.]

    AD5RH

  56. Re:ugh by dougmc · · Score: 1
    Not licensed yet, hopefully soon.
    Do it. The test is really easy, especially since you have access to every single question that could possibly be on the test, exactly like it will be on the test.

    Seriously, skimming over the test bank a few times, then taking a practice test, lather rinse repeat until you regularly score over 80% on that test is all it takes.

  57. Re:Why so slow to react? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In fact, a lot of that equipment is at Diego Garcia, right in the path of the tsunami. The base wasn't affected much, mostly due to the island topology. (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/d iego-garcia.htm)

    As you are probably aware, most of that equipment is military, and not that useful for a humanitarian mission. There is some overlap, but the 101st Airborne's TO&E isn't exactly the best fit.

  58. Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.qrz.com/detail/K4VUD

    That's the only thing I don't like about being a HAM, there isn't any privacy with your personal information.

    1. Re:Privacy by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks for that, now I can stalk that Ham I used to fancy...

  59. Ham Radio used often. by phlatulance · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From my experience, it is almost common for public service to ask the help of Ham radio operators in time of crisis. My local county and state OEM requires them for storm spotting. They might not be the first on the scene, but they will endure and are more flexable than any other form of communications. Talk to fire fighters, police, and other public service personel that served during the wildfires in the west, 9/11 in NYC, and various other disasters. Hams put their lives on hold to help others. The take thousands of dollars of their gear to remote location and provide a service free of charge. All they ask is some respect and bandwidth to "play radio." I think its more important than broadband to remote locations.

  60. This Leads to A Question... by Digitus1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What ever happened to the Emergency Broadcasting System during the attacks on September 11? Is it reserved for a tsunami (or other natural disaster)? We get bugged in the middle of all of our programs and yet when we need it it doesn't go off. PS. I happen to attend the University of Central Florida. Go Knights!

    1. Re:This Leads to A Question... by Secrity · · Score: 1

      Just be glad that the EBS hasn't needed to go off.

  61. Angel of the seas : Delhi Housewife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually before Charly came it was delhi housewife Bharati Prasad who landed in the island and established the first conenction. She has been since dubbed "Angel of the seas"

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4 18 61-2005Jan2.html

  62. Re:Why so slow to react? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Are we there yet?" "Are we there yet?" "Are we there yet?" "Are we there yet?" "Are we there yet?"

    *SLAP* STFU!

  63. ugh-School of hard proofs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Electricity is like some magical mystical entity that never runs out as long as you are pulling it off a plug. But when you have to make your own, you realize just how precious it is. My battery must weigh about 50 pounds - lugging that home for charging made me very conservative about my power consumption."

    That's not all it proves. It proves that intangiables have value, in a way not even the most hardened could dispute.

  64. That was in the original submission.... by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Actually - my original submission had linked to that article. The person who edits the submissions apparently decided to link to the ARRL article instead.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:That was in the original submission.... by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Hum. The ways of slashdot editors are mysterious indeed.

  65. Re:Why so slow to react? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What you'd want is some kind of fleet of aircraft/helicopters located at strategic points around the globe,

    This already exists, more or less. Most countries have their own military, with aircraft and helicopters. What you propose would have to be a fleet every 500 miles or so, all the way around the planet. Helicopters are notoriously shortlegged. And quite often, they are the only thing that can get to the affected area. No runways exist, or are left after the disaster.

    In this case, such a fleet would have been more useful for evacuation purposes. Seismographs recorded the earthquakes long before the tsunami hit populated areas.

    Radio and telephone are far faster. And efforts were made in this case, to little effect.

    No transport systems existed in those areas to get people out, but a first response system may have been able to get some out and deliver warnings to others. Enough that perhaps we'd be seeing death rates a tenth (or less) of those we actually have.

    How many people can you evacuate via helicopter? 20 each? How many helicopters to evacuate 100,000 people in an hour?

  66. Re:ugh by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    How many broadcasting stations are geared for two-way traffic?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  67. Another good reason for BPL....Build It-MAI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Indianapolis, for example, has MAI Prime Parts (don't be fooled by their website trying to sell you Monster Cable, they actually sell real stuff too, not to mention that the Monster Cable is actually at a reasonable price)."

    Damn. I thought they closed that place. They also (last I checked) had a whole bunch of older equipment in the back. Might have to run by sometime.

  68. Re:ugh by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Gee, because maybe Ham radio is still useful with world-wide range if you only have a few dozen watts available? (Especially with portable DXpedition QRP gear.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  69. Other Ham Heroes-Window of Opportunity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am constantly amazed at how stupid "professional" webmasters are."

    That's not stupid. How else are people are going to know about all those interesting stories on their site?

    1. Re:Other Ham Heroes-Window of Opportunity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      googlebot's source ip addresses are well known, they should filter by that not by the easily spoofed browser id.
      I am never surprised by how stupid anonymous cowards are.

  70. The Salvation Army's HAM Radio Involvement ... by REDSECTOR1 · · Score: 1

    http://satern.org/response.html

  71. Rule #2 about Ham Radios-Sandwich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They could be kosher if they are turkey hams."

    Could a cannibal have one on rye?

  72. NASA was a terrific investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There was a very well done [and non-gov't funded] study* done a few years ago that came to the conclusion that NASA - despite falling short of many of its goals - was an enormous boon to progress, abstract and otherwise. In terms of real-world results - improved plastics, ceramics, and other materials; electronics; even medicine - they came to the conclusion that for every dollar that had bent spent on NASA projects, five 'dollars worth' had come back out. That figure included catastrophic loses, failed projects, etc.

    Can you imagine a 500% return on your investment in the business world?

    *I'd very happily cite the study, but it is somewhere in The Stack(tm) of journals in my closet. I'm about as likely to start going through that mess as I am to spontaneously sprout wings. Sorry.

    1. Re:NASA was a terrific investment by my_fake_account · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Can you imagine a 500% return on your investment in the business world?"

      Yes, I can.

      Let's see, the space race heated up in what... 1957?

      And this study was done when? 1987? 1997?

      Did they go back even further to the WWII rocket research?

      500% over what time period?

  73. Ham Radio Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, bow to our new Ham Radio overlords

    Waa-ay!

  74. Salvation Army Team Emergency Radio Network by REDSECTOR1 · · Score: 2, Informative


    The Sally-Ann are there too ... and what would we ever do without them ...

    http://satern.org/response.html/

    Donate to them here:

    http://www.salvationarmy.org/

  75. Re:FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't that an Amiga video mode?

  76. Big Cloud of Smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fishermen in Asia reported seeing a Big cloud of smoke in the Sea. This could be an underground Volcano. Maybe a new Island is forming.

    1. Re:Big Cloud of Smoke by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      And I name this island.... Krakatoa II

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:Big Cloud of Smoke by Pooua · · Score: 1
      And I name this island.... Krakatoa II

      You can't. That name is already taken. Or, more precisely, the new cone is called, "Anak Krakatau" ("Child of Krakatoa").

      I am wondering when the next major eruption in the area will take place, particularly now that there has been a major seismic event.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  77. As the original submitter... by SonicSpike · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would like to mention several things:

    1) There is no better time to point out the effects of a technology than when it is being used during a crisis! In 5 years (assuming there isn't another crisis of this magnitude) people will largely forget about ham radio and its function especially as an emergency communications network. Now is a GREAT time to launch a PR campaign of awareness and information about the art and hobby of ham radio. (if you notice though I didn't mention BPL in my article because I didn't want it to be the main focus of things). I guarentee you that thousands, if not millions, are exceptionally appreciative of ham radio at the moment.

    2) A lot of /.'ers have already posted their sympathy and condolences about this tragic situation. Don't believe me?
    Read this:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/28 /012024 0&tid=99
    and this:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/31 /001620 6&tid=99

    3) This is /. We are about technology and technical things. Discussing communication technology, people who use it, methodology, functionality, and even the human side of it is perfectly within the realm of informative speech.

    4) I bet that the doctors and EMTs over in that area are discussing their professional and technical perspectives of the disaster among their collegues. Why? Because they want to learn and exchange information. So are the structual engineers, and the civil engineers, and city planners etc...

    No one is saying that this is not a very tragic situation. But with the free exchange of information and objective discussion perhaps better methods of communication or preperation could be devised to help save more lives or maybe to ease the burden next time.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:As the original submitter... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • 1) There is no better time to point out the effects of a technology than when it is being used during a crisis! In 5 years (assuming there isn't another crisis of this magnitude) people will largely forget about ham radio and its function especially as an emergency communications network. Now is a GREAT time to launch a PR campaign of awareness and information about the art and hobby of ham radio. (if you notice though I didn't mention BPL in my article because I didn't want it to be the main focus of things). I guarentee you that thousands, if not millions, are exceptionally appreciative of ham radio at the moment.

      And I agree, but as I said "And yes, BPL is bad, and can/will interfere with HAM, but there are better ways to point this out than to completely ignore both the tragedy and what good these students, and other amateur HAM operators have been able to do since the tragedy occured." A vastly different point than everyone seems to have taken it as, I did NOT say we shouldn't be discussing BPL's problems, I just said there were a lot of posters doing it in such a way as to detract from the article's main points (that HAM radio operators were doing a great service, especially the college kids who went there to help set up some stations and got caught in the middle, and that it was a horrible tragedy). From what you say above you agree with me, but apparently my writing skills suck since no one seems to be able to read that one damn sentence I wrote correctly. Pardon me if I'm peeved, but the accusations of karma-whoring and troll mods have really not gone over well, seeing as neither was anywhere near my intention and I feel that my intentions are actually clear when you take the time to read what I actually wrote.

      • 2) A lot of /.'ers have already posted their sympathy and condolences about this tragic situation. Don't believe me?

      I never said they hadn't, please feel free to point out where I did if you feel that I actually did so.

      • 3) This is /. We are about technology and technical things. Discussing communication technology, people who use it, methodology, functionality, and even the human side of it is perfectly within the realm of informative speech.

      And I don't disagree, I've read fascinating discussions about how nuclear bombs work, amoung other things on here. However most of the articles I'd just seen posted were of the "BPL's the spawn of satan, and this disaster proves that if we don't stop it all tomorrow the world will end" variety. OK, not exactly like that, but if you look through earlier posts (mostly buried in normal thread view now), that's a fairly decent summation of many of them. When you're talking about technology in the face of 100,000+ deaths, you should at least have some respect for the dead, something that was sorely lacking when I posted. The posts were coming across as less truly worried about the problems of BPL than as an excuse for the poster to complain about something they didn't like. Really I got the feeling from many posts that they really didn't care about BPL all that much either way, it was just a way to get an early post without actually saying "First Post!"

      And the trolls, well, frankly that pushed me over the top. Who in the hell thinks it's fun to troll in a topic discussing issues surrounding a tragedy that's killed 100,000 people and counting? I just, well I just can't understand nor handle that real well right now. It quite frankly makes me sick and ashamed of humanity and slashdot. I'll probably get over it in a few days, but right now it's rather overwhelming. I should note I'm no stranger to this stuff, having been online since 1992, but as I said, the trolls had managed to reach new lows.

      • 4) I bet that the doctors and EMTs over in that area are discussing their professional and technical perspectives of the disaster among their collegues. Why? Because they want to learn and exchange information. So are
  78. You are a bad person by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    You just want him to feel sadness.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  79. Telco astroturfing to hurt BPL using tsunami by Cryofan · · Score: 0

    I have to wonder if this is a part of the telco astroturfing campaign to hurt BPL by citing tsunami ham radio involvement. The telcos will lose billions in windfall profits if they cannot contain competition.

    Sorry, but I cannot advocate anything that might hurt the advent of lower priced broadband. Low priced broadband may be the only thing that can rein in rampant neoliberalism and turn the tide towards left anarchism. I see p2p video as the only way to break the de facto monopoly of the establishment media. Yes, of course Ham can help with relief efforts. Ham radio may have saved hundreds of lives during tsunami relief. But so what? There are billions of people on this planet who are losing years of their lives because of lack of idea-communication. Broadband p2p is likely the only way I see to attain grassroots video distribution. Our future is at stake. For that, I would fuck over ham radio in a New York microsecond.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Telco astroturfing to hurt BPL using tsunami by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      At least you're honest about your willingness to stomp all over all kinds of other people to champion your fringe ideology.

      Congrats, unless you were trolling, in which case I guess I'm now flipping around in the bottom of your boat..

    2. Re:Telco astroturfing to hurt BPL using tsunami by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      Sorry, bub. The amateur radio opposition toward BPL is most assuredly not a telco astroturf campaign. I could accuse you of being an astroturfer for BPL, but I shall refrain from doing so.

      BPL is poor technology and will not significantly factor into lowering the overall cost of broadband services or raising the general speed of such services. If the blackout of '03 demonstrated anything, it's that the power companies should focus on providing power not becoming a quasi ISP.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
  80. being a ham.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a ham myself we are always preparing for distaster and emergency operations. Once a year we have a day where we gather all the amateur operators via radio (2 mteters) in the area and ask them what they can contribute in case of an emergency.

    We are asked what type of secondary power we have (like car batteries), antenna type,type of radio and if we could be called on if an emergency took place.

    Furthermore, once a week we hold a traffic operators training net. Basically, if phones were to die and there was no power or any other form of communications we would relay important messages to other cities,counties or even other states.
    Because we have no emergencies, we usually relay non emergency traffic. Like last week, a couple of hams wanted to wish a ham in another state merry christmas, so it was relayed all the way from here in Ohio to Illinois. The person got the message and sent one back...of course it took a while...but it came back. All this happened without computers or the internet.

    Some of you people think cell phones are the greatest things in the world, but if there was a national disaster, you could easily lose cell phones,land line phones and everything else high tech. (even your l33t computer)

    Long live amateur radio, the daddy of cell phones and everything else wireless! :)

  81. Re: Pissing contest.... by Slur · · Score: 1

    Damn, that's exactly what I've been saying about the whole East India Company thing. Finally somebody who agrees with me it's a waste of time to compete for resources and real estate.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  82. Glad to see I made the right decision. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm studying for my Basic licence now. People have completely laughed at me for the attempt. Most people regard HAM stuff as dead technology.

    People keep telling me it's a waste of time and money.

    I'm glad it's not ture.

    1. Re:Glad to see I made the right decision. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its far from dead.....you all see all these kids building these coffee can antennas for their wireless network cards, and they think they are doing something that no one else has done before, but hams having been doing this stuff for almost a century. Hams will always be the pioneer of anything wireless.

  83. Re:What about the Muslims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guacamole?

  84. Only slightly off-topic... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On the topic of Ham radios during disasters, I would like to bring up something that annoys me to no end...

    Why in the hell is it that emergency services aren't equipt to handle anything but a normal day? When some idiots have assault weapons and body armor, police are practically helpless (they got lucky, actually). When there is anything larger than a house fire, firefighters don't have the equipment, training, numbers, etc. When there are real emergencies, police, firefigters and ambulance services don't have any working and practical communications equipment at all. It seems the more developed our country becomes, the more emergency services depend on the very infrastructure that will be first to fail when it's really needed...

    It's clear that local (city/county, sometimes state) governments are to blame. They cause flood damage by approving roads to be built, but don't account for drainage, and allow homes to be built in the obvious path of flood waters. In the worst areas, they may even build storm-drains, but do nothing to keep they clear, rending them completely useless wastes of money. Emergency services in flood-prone areas never seem to have the equipment that would make it easy to perform the necessary rescues, meaning people die, money is wasted, etc.

    They allow homes to be built near wooded areas, prone to major fires, and don't do the slightest bit of maintenance on those areas to prevent major fires. I've heard of only one city in Southern California that spends a small ammount of money to clear brush, why don't the rest? Firefighters are helpless against forrest-fires, and yet, the preventative controlled burns (the method previously used) have even been stopped.

    Hospitals are now (finally) required to have a generator, but only required to have enough capacity to stay up for a short time (a couple days IIRC) when blackouts can last far longer. Besides hospitals, emergency services depend greatly on the power grid, and rarely have the generators they need (typically short-term battery power) so they are the least able to handle emergencies, when they are needed THE MOST.

    The point of all of this is simple... What the hell is the good of having a local government, if they aren't taking care of the real necessities? Local governments are needed for the very things they are now neglecting to do, so why not get rid of them all-together? The basic things can be handled by the state government anyhow (police, fire, medical, schools, etc) so if we aren't going to be well-served by local governments, why keep them on as a leech, taking our tax dollars and spending them on trivial things few of us want, and most of us feel like we are getting ripped-off by?

    Personally, of course I would prefer if local governments would just start doing their jobs, but since that's not happing, I'd like to see them abolished, rather than keeping the status-quo. What good are they, as is?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by lydic · · Score: 1

      It's a simple matter of money. The local government will have anything you are willing to pay for. For the most part local governments look to get the most bang for the buck, and therefore police and emergency services plan and train for the most common incidents. If every fire station had HAZMAT equipment, communications equipment, etc. the cost would be prohibitive, and people like you would most likely complain about the expensive equipment that was sitting around and collecting dust. In our county the equipment and training for non-common incidents is maintained by the local county Emergency Management Agency who supplies services to something like 10 fire districts. Our local EMA has the equipment that is needed only on rare occasions for such things as HAZMAT, and communications when the infrastructure has failed. On top of that, most of our EMA members are volunteersm with many of us licensed Hams working with Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Services (RACES) and Amateur Radio Emergency Services (ARES). This volunteer activity in most places is called community service.

    2. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
      If every fire station had HAZMAT equipment, communications equipment, etc. the cost would be prohibitive

      Nice straw-man there.

      I've individually listed many things local governments should be doing... Some of which COST NOTHING, and most of which have a very minimal cost associated with them...

      How about not changing zoning to allow houses near a flood channel? How about not paying to install storm drains if you don't intend to keep them clear? How about spending a few hundred dollars ONCE to get a generator to power the central radio tower, or buying them radios powerful enough to communicate without needing the central tower? How about spending a minimal ammount of money on clearing brush in and around the forrests? How about just allowing fire departments to occasionally back-burn like they used-to?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      Of course! We should abolish local governments because state governments have such a track record of being SO competent. Local governments aren't prepared for this sort of thing because it's an emergency. An emergency, by definition is an unusal unexpected event. Keeping excessive capacity is expensive as are preventative measures that may or may not do any good. People get all excited about things when a major emergency happens, but a few years later the same people get upset because the government is "wasting" our money. You can only prepare so much, and then when a disaster does happen you do the best you can. local governments are important because they are much more reactive to the everyday local needs of the people then state or federal governments. The needs of people in a large metropolis and a remote urban area are very different, but almost all states have some of both. Should I have to travel to my state capital becasue I want a zoning change to let me build a tool shed on my property? Or because I want a stop light on my street? Right now, if my (theoretical) child has a problem at school, I can sit down with my school district member and get it fixed. If I disagree with an ordinance it is a simple matter to go before the city council or mayor and argue my case. Turning local government control over to the state just means all the current locally elected politician who pretty much have to listen to you (because at that level individual votes matter) with bureacrats chosen by someone half the state away.

    4. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Why dont hospitals have UPS type devices in every room for every major appliance? Then when power goes out, it will be better handled by the 5000 UPS boxes to take the load of the generator.

      Oh I forgot, logic doesnt exist in administrators, and only the next quarters profits are what counts, since Mr Big Shot manager could 'move on' to another job after he gets his 'deserved' bonuses, thereby raking up the bonus points.

      Sorry we dont have money for 5000 UPS machines, we spent $600,000 on a doctors conferences and $1.2m on the website via a over priced contractor.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    5. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron. I'm not going to comment any more.

    6. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by RealUlli · · Score: 1
      Why dont hospitals have UPS type devices in every room for every major appliance? Then when power goes out, it will be better handled by the 5000 UPS boxes to take the load of the generator.

      Because one big UPS in the basement is way more efficient and cost-effective than 5000 individual UPSs, which only last a couple of minutes, anyway.

      The big UPS in the basement is supposed to last until the main generator kicks in and takes over, which then lasts a couple of days until its fuel runs out. By the time the fuel for the generator runs out it should have been refueled by contractors with tank trucks full of gasoline and/or diesel fuel...

      BTW, I don't know about the US, but in Germany, UPSs have been a requirement for hospitals since at least the 1960s...

      Regards, Ulli

      --
      Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
    7. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
      Local governments aren't prepared for this sort of thing because it's an emergency. An emergency, by definition is an unusal unexpected event.

      Fine, then it's not an emergency, because the same "emergencies" happen every few years... Major floods, major fires, power outages, etc.

      Keeping excessive capacity is expensive as are preventative measures that may or may not do any good.

      You seem to be intentionally vague here. You think that not allowing homes to be built where there are regular floods/fires may not do any good? Come on now.

      People get all excited about things when a major emergency happens, but a few years later the same people get upset because the government is "wasting" our money.

      People rarely get upset about spending money on emergency services. Spending lots of money on trivial things is the problem.

      You can only prepare so much

      Absolutely right. And in everything I've seen, local governments aren't preparing AT ALL, so they're nowhere near reaching the edge of effectiveness.

      local governments are important because they are much more reactive to the everyday local needs of the people then state or federal governments.

      That is certainly their role, and I've tried to point out that they are being vastly unresponsive to the needs of the people. They SHOULD be doing things like making zoning ordanances that keep houses out of areas prone to flooding and fire, but they aren't. When they AREN'T doing a HUGE portion of what they SHOULD be doing, why keep them around?

      Should I have to travel to my state capital becasue I want a zoning change to let me build a tool shed on my property?

      No, you should send in letters instead.

      If I disagree with an ordinance it is a simple matter to go before the city council or mayor and argue my case.

      Have you ever had a need to do so? I've never been bothered by ordinances in the slightest. In fact, things which should only be handlede at the local level (like leash laws) are state laws here, so you would have to dispute pretty much anything important in the state capitol, anyhow.

      Besides, I'm not necessarily saying we should transfer everything over to the state. Perhaps just getting rid of city governments, and transfering control to counties would be good enough.

      Turning local government control over to the state just means all the current locally elected politician who pretty much have to listen to you (because at that level individual votes matter) with bureacrats chosen by someone half the state away.

      Yes, they aren't forced to listen to you, and they can't be pushed around by local companies either. Besides, what can your local government do for you? Put up some signs around town? They have very little control as it is, and they are doing that oh-so-poorly that I think the county or state level couldn't possibly do the job any worse.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
      By the time the fuel for the generator runs out it should have been refueled by contractors with tank trucks full of gasoline and/or diesel fuel...

      That's fine if it's a heavy-duty generator, but from what I've heard of hospitals and power failures, they buy units that actually can't handle more than a couple days of constant operation at they loads they require. ie. It's not a fuel issue.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That's fine if it's a heavy-duty generator, but from what I've heard of hospitals and power failures, they buy units that actually can't handle more than a couple days of constant operation at they loads they require. ie. It's not a fuel issue.

      Could you explain how a generator with sufficient fuel would only be able to run a day or two before failure? I have bought generators that could run an average hospital, and I've never heard of any such possibility. It either puts enough power out to run forever, or it doesn't. Feed it fuel and it wont' quit.

      Or are you saying that they are plugging in 150kVA into a 125kVA generator or some other such problem? Oh, and if that is the problem, putting desktop UPSs in every room will make the problem worse, not better. And if someone is plugging 150 kVA into a 125 kVA generator, then they are certainly violating local laws, and possibly some federal ones as well. It isn't just bad design, but quite unsafe and illegal. You'd be lucky to get a few minutes off a badly overloaded generator, not a matter of days. They'll usually blow quickly or last forever. I've not heard of them lasting more than a day but less than a week (unless something happened to the load in that time).

    10. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling people a moron is a great way to show us that you have the better argument.

      Loser.

    11. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Funny I live in CT were Ihave a good local Gov and a poor state one (we dont have county level gov for the most part it's just a state level orgizational unit) The town deals with the three big things schools, roads and parks well. Might be bacuse we have a civil engieer for a first selectment rather than a politician that all the civil things are done well. As to preparedness we do extreamly well with good radio communications (Nextel tower with gen backup behind the PD to suplement normal radio) and have excess fire engines in an ancilary building for our volenteer FD and enough people in the auxilery to man them an then some.

      Were not so great with zoning that is something that will get you fired people want to subdivide and have there property worth millions. We also dont have many forest fires or floods so it's not a big issue.

      I think your issue with local gov could be solved by electing people trainded to do the work insead of talking about it.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    12. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Not insightful really. It takes money, our tax money.

      Anyway, for more info see esca1.com.

      73,

      w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    13. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever read the fine print in your UPS manual. Because of liability issues, it will say something about NOT to be used with life saving/maintaining equipment. They would be required to use special equipment certified/approved for this type of use, in other words mucho $$$ more than a standard computer grade UPS. Besides a UPS would not take the load off the generator unless the circuit they were on was not fed by the generator. As soon as power was available from the gererator the UPS would want to recharge its battery along with supplying it's load. The amount of energy available from a UPS is VERY limited compared to that of a generator. If you leave the UPS supplied loads off the generator, when the UPS finally dies in an hour, so does the patient.

    14. Re:Only slightly off-topic... by myov · · Score: 1

      Why dont hospitals have UPS type devices in every room for every major appliance?

      Putting a large UPS in every room would be impractical, not to mention an inefficient use of resources (UPS in an empty room). You're much better off to run a separate network of backed up outlets.

      I recently worked in IT at a hospital. All of our servers were on UPS's, which were plugged into the generator powered outlets. (why both? The generator takes a few minutes to fire up).

      Then when power goes out, it will be better handled by the 5000 UPS boxes to take the load of the generator.

      Ever see the UPS's used in a data center? The batteries fill a room, and they still have a generator for long outages. My UPS (an APC 2200) can only run for a few hours, and that's at a reduced load. Not to mention, it's heavy enough that it takes two people to move.

      When the UPS runs out, then what? Hope AC is back then?
      With a generator, you simply find more diesel/gas/hamsters.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  85. An Incorrect Report by afarhan · · Score: 3, Informative
    The report that a US amateur was on the island is completely incorrect.

    The DXpedition was under the Aegis of National Institute of Amateur Radio (India) and it was lead by Ms. Bharati (VU2RBI), an Indian. I know this, because I saw them off to Nicobar islands a few weeks ago and I have been monitoring their traffic over the last week. They are due back on the mainland today sometime. Read the list of the the operators and the ARRL's version

    --
    The purpose of all philosophers was to impress women
    1. Re:An Incorrect Report by Pooua · · Score: 1

      I just want you to know that I read about Bharati Prasad several hours ago. According to the account I read, ham radio operators had not been allowed in the region until recently. Mrs. Prasad said that she had been trying for 18 years to return to the area, following her last broadcast in that region. The Indian government restricts movement by ham radio operators, too.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    2. Re:An Incorrect Report by chamcham · · Score: 0

      K4VUD was at his hotel in Sumatra when the quake hit.

  86. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1, No parachute. Jumps to bad conclusions.

  87. Wacky old technology that still gets the job Done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to listen to ham radio a lot. There is a lot of interesting international information still flowing (the internet goes international too, and a lot more people use it, but that doesn't mean that fewer people use ham radio). Also, radio amatuers have constantly upgraded their systems (morse code can still be heard, but fsk data packet transmissions are becoming more common). Imagine internet without needing an ISP and you get the idea. That they are sending data (voice, video, morse, etc) through all of the problems that have occurred shows the verstatility and reliability of the system. No satellites, no cell towers, no stable local power source, no problem. If the pesky CPU weren't so electrically noisy, I would tune in more often.

  88. Well then.... by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    I apologize if I misinterpeted your post - we probably mostly agree then. I guess the vibe coming from it was what made me feel the need to respond to it in the way that I did. I simply wanted to make a few points to ensure my ideas were crystal clear behind my reasoning of submission of this story.

    I was accused of karma-whoring in another topic tonight too ;-) Oh well.

    But seriously - enjoy your break and I hope things work out well with your deppression. I've had some of that myself here lately and it isn't fun. Be sure to seek help if you need it - there is never any reason not to get help. Lots of luck.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  89. Isn't this normal? by my_fake_account · · Score: 1

    Granted, I haven't done anything with the Red Cross since the mid 90s, but HAM was all that was ever taken for granted then-- everything was assumed to be down.

  90. Same happened in August 17,1999 Istanbul one by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, in fact its not Istanbul quake but known as that.

    We lost everything. Well, we have a very very good operator, Turkcell GSM but at one point, they were useless.

    TR ham radio guys showed up and practically handled all communications of disaster area.

    I think it must be same in USA etc, some major stations are assigned by goverment if some major disaster happens.

    For more info: http://www.amatortelsiz.com/english/engindex.html

  91. Re:Why so slow to react? by yppiz · · Score: 1

    Yes, I am aware that military pre-positioned caches aren't ideal for humanitarian relief, but certainly, they contain food and transportation, so would be useful without modification.

    Governments could recognize the humanitarian potential and create caches designed for relief work, prepositioning medical and engineering support equipment.

    --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

  92. Fix it or Build it. by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

    I have a HW101 and a 70's vintage Kenwood that I can repair if needed. They are not as easy as my IC-706 to run but they do work and I do use them. I also have 2 generators to run them if I need to. Most non Amateurs don't have a clue as to what is up as much of the trolling seen in HAM related ./ articles proves.

    I know zero people who will by dropping that 10,000 for that rig that do traffic handling or are part of emergency preparedness. I am on 75 meters every night at 7:00 for the net I am part of. We may seldom pass any real traffic but we are ready and cover as far east as Utah and from the mexican border to the Canadian border direct.

    Elecraft is a good kit radio. I have 2 friends who built them and they compare very well to comercial products. I like the open source nature of their code as well. After I replace my old IC 706 with a IC 706 MK II D I plan on building one too.

    --
    If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
    Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  93. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot - you have no idea what the extent of damage was or what disaster communications is all about do you? What the fuck are you doing reading slashdot anyway? Crawl right back under your stone.

  94. Re:That's two eductional institutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, a lame high school no one has heard about combined with a lame backwater state college no one has heard about with abosolutely zero prestige in academica.

    Yeah, something I sure wanna gloat about... Not.

  95. Re:UCF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, your lame backwater state college with abosloutely nothing academically prestigious to speak of gets mentioned on Slashdot for something totally unrealted to academics or research.

    Yeah, a great day indeed.

  96. Mmmmm by LuckyPhil · · Score: 1

    Mmmm HAM.......

  97. Kneejerk Simplistic Assertion by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Seeking wealth built and sustains civilization. The logic, such as it is, of your kneejerk assertion would have all of us living in a presumed fantasy as hunter-gatherers in a state of ethical perfection. Nothing could be further from the truth. Greed may provoke antisocial behavior today, but do you doubt your distant ancestors did whatever it took to get their share of the latest kill, including stealing or murdering for it?

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Kneejerk Simplistic Assertion by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      I see it differently - Greed is the primary motivator for followers, not leaders. A leader is motivated by something else - he has to be, because his job is to spend, not accrue. Kennedy decided to go to the moon "because it was hard", not to make a buck.

      Sometimes I think that the most important thing in our lives is purpose. True leaders give us purpose, then we give them resources which they use to accomplish the purpose.

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    2. Re:Kneejerk Simplistic Assertion by fitten · · Score: 1

      Kennedy decided to go to the moon "because it was hard", not to make a buck.

      He did it because he thought the Soviets were going to get there first otherwise. It was a race for national prestige (a moral boost for the USA and a downer for the Soviets).

    3. Re:Kneejerk Simplistic Assertion by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but that is a more visionary reason, and less of a "greedy" one. Kennedy didn't do it for the money. Humans need purpose, not money. Look back at past civilizations. The ones that stand out, that everyone knows about, accomplished something hard - Stonehenge, the Pyramids, the moon landing. None of these served a "useful" purpose, but they all served to inspire, elevate, and draw together a people (at least presumably).

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
  98. Umm its always like this by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This is one of the more typical uses of ham radio, and their operators.. in time of disaster.. Its always been like this.. Thats why they used to require learning code..

    It really wasnt 'news', but its nice to see them get some credit..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  99. HOLY SHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that's pretty fucked up. It's one thing if someone volunteered their info, but that site is categorizing it from (I guess) public records. That's like someone going through and posting the names and addresses of anyone employed by the RIAA/MPAA.

    Wow!

    That could get some results, you know?

  100. Re:ugh by Geckoman · · Score: 1

    By "free-as-in-speech" I simply meant that access to amateur communication isn't directly controlled by any governments or groups. Certainly there's regulation, but access is relatively open and cheap. For example, the transportation and commercial shipping industries, along with the military, have their own off-grid communication networks, but the barrier to entry is so high as to make those non-free.

  101. Re:Why so slow to react? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that stuff costs a fortune to stockpile. Most of it is perishable (guns, bullets, tanks, and gasoline are less so).

    While it is unfortunately, it is unlikely that countries will ever spend significant resournces stockpiling supplies that will only benefit people other than the ones paying for them. People will open their wallets when there is a disaster, but they generally won't do so beforehand.

    The US hardly stockpiles stuff like this for internal emergencies - let alone disasters half a world away...

  102. Re:Only slightly off-kilter... by b1scuit · · Score: 1
    Why in the hell is it that emergency services aren't equipt to handle anything but a normal day? When some idiots have assault weapons and body armor, police are practically helpless (they got lucky, actually). When there is anything larger than a house fire, firefighters don't have the equipment, training, numbers, etc. When there are real emergencies, police, firefigters and ambulance services don't have any working and practical communications equipment at all. It seems the more developed our country becomes, the infrastructure that will be first to fail when it's really needed...

    Because it's not sustainable. The manpower and equipment required to handle the really bad emergencies simply can not be maintained onsite everywhere at once. It takes time and people to review and respond to a situation. It takes equipment to mobilize them, to put out fires, to shoot bad guys, to do anything. It takes buildings to house them, people to maintain them, and all of this costs metric fucktons of money.

    It's clear that local (city/county, sometimes state) governments are to blame. They cause flood damage by approving roads to be built, but don't account for drainage, and allow homes to be built in the obvious path of flood waters. In the worst areas, they may even build storm-drains, but do nothing to keep they clear, rending them completely useless wastes of money. Emergency services in flood-prone areas never seem to have the equipment that would make it easy to perform the necessary rescues, meaning people die, money is wasted, etc.

    So if the local government weren't there, people wouldn't build homes in flood zones? Less pavement would be layed? And maybe I'm reading too deep here, but your approach seems to be "If we can't save everyone, then it's a waste of time. Let's get rid of the only helicopter we can afford, we'll never save everyone with it." This makes sense how?

    They allow homes to be built near wooded areas, prone to major fires, and don't do the slightest bit of maintenance on those areas to prevent major fires. I've heard of only one city in Southern California that spends a small ammount of money to clear brush, why don't the rest? Firefighters are helpless against forrest-fires, and yet, the preventative controlled burns (the method previously used) have even been stopped.

    Again, people would just not build homes in the path of forest fires? Did it ever occur to you that those areas are meant to catch on fire every now and then? Did it ever occur to you that maybe, just maybe, we're not important enough, not strong enough to try and fight these events, but we try to nudge nature back just a little bit to save the lives we can with the pithy resources we have on hand? Have you ever even been in a forest fire situation? Do you have ANY first hand experience with any of the things you're spouting off about? Stopping a forest that's on fire isn't a trivial task, so until you've tried, maybe you should ease off of a little.

    Hospitals are now (finally) required to have a generator, but only required to have enough capacity to stay up for a short time (a couple days IIRC) when blackouts can last far longer. Besides hospitals, emergency services depend greatly on the power grid, and rarely have the generators they need (typically short-term battery power) so they are the least able to handle emergencies, when they are needed THE MOST.

    A couple of days? Short time??? Do you have ay idea what kind of power it takes to run a hospital? I have no idea. But the building across the street from me is the size of a (large) city block. Running an 11 story air conditioned city block for a few days without a power grid is a pretty serious feat. And again, my ever present question... Would they be prepared for it if the local government wasn't watching over them? Would the federal govt be a better watchdog?

    The point of all of this is simple... What the hell is the good of having a local go

  103. Ha! Eat THAT one, Time Magazine! by KC7GR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An article on blogging, as contained in the Dec. 27th issue of 'Time' magazine, made a reference to ham radio as a "faintly embarassing" hobby.

    I wonder if the operators of that station find it so? Especially since they're providing a most valuable service that the (supposedly) much tougher public infrastructure failed to?

    The same thing happened with the Nisqually Quake in 2001. Within minutes after the shocks subsided, landline phones and cellphone networks alike were overwhelmed into non-functionality.

    Guess what stayed up and working through the whole affair? Yep. Ham radio VHF and UHF repeaters, and HF nets.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:Ha! Eat THAT one, Time Magazine! by jcgf · · Score: 1
      check out www.qrz.com for what hams think of that article and time magazine:

      Jared VE5JCF

  104. Re:Why so slow to react? by yppiz · · Score: 1

    The US hardly stockpiles stuff like this for internal emergencies - let alone disasters half a world away...

    During the Cold War, the US had many stockpiles across the country - major cities probably had hundreds. These Civil Defense bomb shelters contained food and medicine to keep people alive in the aftermath of a nuclear war. I imagine the stockpiles were also used during natural disasters.

    You can still see signs for these shelters on many civic buildings from this period.

    --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

  105. Re:That's life on Diego Garcia? by niittyniemi · · Score: 1

    > I am part of the University of central Florida Amateur Radio Club...

    Perhaps you could tell us what you know about Diego Garcia? The military have put up a BS report saying all is well due to a freak geological anomaly that protected the island and there was only a tidal surge of 6ft anyway.

    But DG is on average only 4ft above sea level.....so by my calculations they were on average covered in 2ft of water (assuming the BS report bares any resemblance to the truth), which doesn't quite equate with things being "alright".

    There was a bit of inconclusive chat on rec.radio.shortwave

    If you can't reply to this, I'd understand :)

    Me? I'll just sit and wait for the black helicopters to turn up....but somebody has to bear the bad news to the American people that their most important military asset (bar their carrier group - where was that?) in the Indian Ocean has been wiped out.

    After all, they have to pay for it to be repaired (or abandoned?). Do the right thing, abandon it and give it back to the Diego Garcians rather than using it to bomb foreigners from. The story of how the Diego Garcians were treated is shameful. (Somebody else can link to that).

    --
    The Machine stops.
  106. Once and for all... by brain1 · · Score: 1

    This should serve as proof that decimating the amateur radio frequencies (as well as others) with broadband over power lines is a very bad idea. Amateur Radio, despite the detractors, is still very much alive and an extremely valuable asset.

  107. Re:Why so slow to react? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "30 knots per hour" is redundant.

  108. Two big reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Money, lots of it

    Personnel, many of them Amateur radio is an unpaid volunteer service. We provide additional trained personnel and the necessary equipment without draining the governments' budgets. It would be financially impractical and politically impossible for government agencies to obtain enough equipment and personnel to handle the extremne demands of disasters. In many places (CA comes to mind), the agencies barely have the budget to meet their normal demands, let alone obtaining, maintaining, and regularly testing a back-up infrastructure. Employing a proven volunteer resource to meet inevitable emergency needs at little or no cost is sound government, not malfeasance. Yes, my town has a volunteer fire department too--a good one!

  109. Re:That's life on Diego Garcia? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    The military have put up a BS report saying all is well due to a freak geological anomaly that protected the island and there was only a tidal surge of 6ft anyway. But DG is on average only 4ft above sea level.....so by my calculations they were on average covered in 2ft of water (assuming the BS report bares any resemblance to the truth), which doesn't quite equate with things being "alright".

    A tidal surge of 6 feet doesn't mean that the entire ocean rose 6 feet all around the island. This surge is essentially a large swell coming from one direction. It the case of Diego Garcia, it came from the east. Most of the development on DG is on the west side. The tidal surge was essentially deflected/absorbed by the east side of the U shaped land mass (see map) and likely resulted in little more than a slight rise in water height in the central lagoon, and little if any flooding on the west side.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  110. Re:That's life?? by hel+shwarts · · Score: 1

    Opportunity knocks that's right. But we are not aware. We are just pretending to be immortal, hiding behind our importance & self pity. We live in the world where everything spins around the SELF & there's so many IMPORTANT things we worry about: bills, insurance, discounts, global warning, oil change, public opininon, discrimination, slim fast, profit, God's punishment ... & then a wave comes & f.. everything up. Everything exept of anymals, who senced the disaster & ran away. Cause they new they were not immortal & their time was limited & didn't have ridiculous concerns. But nobody even thinks about it, cause who are they, those anymals...they don't even have names!!! they are not as important as us..those green peice pets. & Of cause we didn't descend from a monkey, ape exuse me ! LOL LOL LOL ! WE STILL ARE APES ! Self important, "socialized", intellectual APES, who thinks of the universe they way it comforts them, they will never end or will go to heaven by a default... A rabbit-buddist is meditating : "I will not f.rt , I will not f.rt....upsss.... this was not me, this was not me"... A dude is sitting on a tree branch & cutting it off , an old man is passing by the trees, sees him & sais: don't u c that u are cutting off the same branch u are sitting on ??? u gonna fall down this way u fool !!!! but the dude keeps cutting it off, so the branch breaks, he falls down & says : it's all u'r f.. whitchcraft, d..n u !!!! ...BAD NEWS : THERE'S NO HEAVEN let's blame somebody.

  111. Re:Why so slow to react? by pyser · · Score: 1

    the response to this disaster by governments has been more about public opinion than the welfare of the people involved

    In the case of the US, true. France, that country we in the US were all expected to despise a couple years ago, was the first with the most aid.

  112. Yes, we do by LandGator · · Score: 1
    1. I'm K7AAY, BTW, and spend at least six hours a month, often more, on training, rehearsals and drills, like every other ham in ARES and sister organizations outside of the US.

    2. I got my license because of a bulletin from SANS in August, 2001 (note date) that warned disasters would likely down both landline and cellular lines and long distance trunks. Tne, 9/11 validated that; disaster workers had lousy comm in Manhattan, except for the pager nets and two-way radio.

    3.
    ...because to do that, both they and the operators on the other side would have to be tied in to whatever government or agency is reaching out to help. And to have that be the case, there would have to be serious pre-disaster networks and agreements set up.
    Memorandums of Understanding are the agreements governments use to prearrange working arrangements with ARES (Amateur Radio Emergency Services) units and other VOADs (Volunteer Orgainizations Active in Disaster). Here's the MOU between FEMA and the ARRL/ARES.

    4.
    A single ham radio operator on his/her own is not going to be that useful.
    As Sherman T. Potter said, Mulefeathers! Here's just one shining example which disproves your arguement.
    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  113. Design of Standby Generation Systems by N3Bruce · · Score: 1

    I have worked with emergency generating equipment, both directly as a generator tech, and indirectly at facilities that use them. It would not be surprising that many typical standby generators would be able to operate more than a couple of weeks without some type of failure or need downtime for urgent maintenance. The problem isn't really with the engines or generator units themselves. The diesel engines and generator units on typical commercial backup generators are pretty durable, a diesel engine these days can usually go 10,000 hours or more between overhauls with proper maintenance, and the generator's electric ends are at least as durable. Even gasoline powered generators, which are pretty rare these days in the size that a hospital would need are good for 3,000 hours or so before the motors would wear out. Medium sized generators based on gasoline engines are often converted to run on natural gas, and are based on heavy duty truck engines. Running an engine on natural gas will typically double the life expectancy of the motor as well.

    The problem with running a typical emergency generator is like owning a car for 10 or 20 years, just driving it to the grocery store once a week, then deciding to take a trip from Florida to Alaska and back. The car might have only 15,000 miles on it, but the belts, hoses, seals, tires and electrical wiring are all 20 years old, unless a lot of time and money has been spent to dilligently replace these types of parts as they deteriorate. 24/7 use after long periods of idleness, or perhaps only brief weekly or monthly excercise sessions will bring out many latent faults in the equipment. Rubber belts and hoses go bad, as do seals. Corrosion takes its toll on electical connections, cooling systems, and batteries as well. A generator in a hospital may run only briefly each week for a half hour, a couple of hours every few months for the typical thunderstorm type power failures, and perhaps a few hours a week in the summer to help with peak shaving, but after 20 years that same generator might suddenly be required to work at near capacity for days or weeks on end in a disaster. At the minimum it will need oil/air/filter changes on at least a biweekly basis. As with a car that sees little use, emergency equipment that might not ever get put into heavy-duty service often gets just prefunctory checkups, if any maintenance at all. Two weeks of 24/7 operation is the equivalent of driving a car 15,000 miles!

    Fuel Storage is another issue: Running at 2/3 load, you can figure that a typical 300KW generator will burn about 20 gallons of diesel per hour. That is 480 gallons a day, about 3,400 gallons a week. 2 weeks of operation would require the equivalent of a full 7,000 gallon tractor-trailer sized tanker's worth of fuel to be stored on site (about the size of truck that delivers fuel to a gas station). Fuel that isn't used or stabilized goes sour (gasoline), or can develop slime from bacteria (diesel). I once had the experience of helping my dad nurse a diesel engined boat down the Cheasapeake Bay after buying a load of diesel fuel that had been stored all winter in a marina without being stabilized. We had to change the filter every 15 miles or so, and we were reduced to rinsing our last filter out in the bay just to make it to Annapolis to buy more filters (it was either that or sit dead in the water in the ship channel on a foggy day). If heavy infrastructure is out (roads, railroads, fuel terminals) it will be next to impossible to resupply, so a large tank is a must.

    At most of my worksites (financial institution back offices) there are standby generators to keep the place going if the power fails, but they are only large enough to keep essential systems going. One of my prime sites has gone on "backup" twice in the last 10 years for several days to over a week during an extended period of bad weather, or when utility construction disrupted normal power. Outdoor lighting was extinguished, and interior lighting in all but critical areas was cut by about 2/3.

  114. Re:That's life on Diego Garcia? by niittyniemi · · Score: 1

    A tidal surge of 6 feet doesn't mean that the entire ocean rose 6 feet all around the island. This surge is essentially a large swell coming from one direction.

    The wave would have had a very long amplitude because of the deepwater to the east.

    It the case of Diego Garcia, it came from the east. Most of the development on DG is on the west side. The tidal surge was essentially deflected/absorbed by the east side of the U shaped land mass (see map [ntlworld.com]) and likely resulted in little more than a slight rise in water height in the central lagoon, and little if any flooding on the west side.

    I'll point you to a map of the Maldives.

    The Maldives are interesting because there was extensive damage, flooding & loss of life. Yet the islands of the Maldives are exactly what Diego Garcia are: coral atolls perched on the eastern edge of the Chagos plateau with deepwater to the east. In those circumstances my belief is that DG must have suffered extensive flooding (it wasn't just the eastern Maldives that copped the flooding E.g Look at Faafu - 18 boats lost on one atoll).

    I might have bought the story that there was only "some damage" but no damage? No loss of life? (Don't the servicemen go down to the beach?)

    BTW, my newspaper asserted shortly after the tsunami that Diego Garcia was "forewarned of the approaching tsunami" and hence spared....who told them that and why was it then after dropped?

    I'd also point out that the epicentre of the quake was north of east of DG.

    --
    The Machine stops.
  115. Port Blair... Blair Witch...hmmm.... by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else happen to notice that he was in Port Blair, and he was from UCF's film program which had a hand in the "Blair Witch" ??? Coincidence? ;-)

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  116. Re:ugh by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    Cell sites generally have a generator of either natural gas or Diesel to give them approximately 24 hours of backup time (had a project on this in school). After 24 hours, they figure either the power problem isn't going away and it will take them MUCH longer to fix the problem (at which point it would be uneconomical to have a power backup sollution in place for that unspecified period) or they will already have fixed the problem by then. This is one reason why I will always have a landline, even if I don't have a long distance carrier seperate from my cellphone.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars