Slashdot Mirror


PC Competition for the Mac mini?

Omega1045 asks: "When Apple announced their Mac mini last week for US$499, it caught my eye. Wanting to buy/build a small PC for my already cramped breakfast bar, I started pricing out similar PC hardware. The results startled me. It was very difficult to price a PC as small (6.5" x 6.5" x 2") as the Mac mini with comparable equipment cheaper than the Mac mini. Indeed, most of the configurations I found were more than the humble $499 of the Mac, often much more. To match price I often had to configure with a much bigger shuttle-style case. What computers are currently on the market to compete with this? When my wife asks for the 'cute little Mac', what PC can I buy instead that will take up as little space and do as much for the same price (or less)?" How long do you think it will take PC manufacturers to answer Apple's latest entry into the market?

97 of 603 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing by arson1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what PC can I buy instead that will take up as little space and do as much for the same price (or less)?

    Nothing comes to mind that can do as much for that price, but I'm sure someone will post all the components that they got for some price you'll never be able to find. They won't account for the OS price, the time spend building the computer, or the lack of any warranty.

    --


    --
    Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
    1. Re:Nothing by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know, seriously, all other things being equal I would always take a Mac over a PC. The only reason I don't own a Mac is because they cost too much (not so much the case with the mac-mini anymore).

      I mean really, unless you could get a comperable PC for less than the $500 price tag why would you even consider it?

      Don't like OSX (It takes some getting used to, but I think it probably has the best UI of any OS out there)? Run PPC Linux.

    2. Re:Nothing by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The hard part is the mini-ITX board. A mere PC with comparable software stats can be had from Great Wall Computers for $199 at any Fry's- but it's not cute and it's not small (mini tower case).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Nothing by DustMagnet · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm convinced that's Apple's strategy. They did it with the iMac. It's not really "dumping", since many businesses sell at a lose to get started. Obviously the first mini-mac sold will be at a huge lose. As they sell more and more they recover devel costs and the price for the whole sale hardware price falls, so profits grow faster and faster. That's how I saw the iMac and the iPod and I hope they have another success here.

      It sort of sounds like selling at a lose and making it up in volume.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    4. Re:Nothing by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if they're willing to use Linux, then the OS price is the cost of the CDs you burn the image(s) onto, and therefore negligible.

      Wrong. How long does it take to download? Time is money, don't think it ain't. That's not to say that the cost isn't far less; just don't pretend that because the software itself is free, that everything else about it is as well.
      One thing that bothers me about the geek community is that people seem to think that because they can and want to tinker with their computers that everyone else should as well. Well, guess what. You're wrong. Hell, I know how to change the oil, spark plugs, dist. cap, carb, fuel injector, radiator, timing belt/chain, axels, rear differential, starter, alternator, brake pads, shoes and calipers, and quite a few other items on your average vehicle. Does this mean I want to? Hell no! Thats what you pay a professional for. Same thing goes for meat. I could buy a side of beef, cut it into steaks, and freeze it myself. Do I? No, I stop by the butcher dept. of my local grocer. Most people don't want to tinker with their computers. They don't want to open it up and add RAM or a new vid or sound card, or upgrade the proc or mobo. They want to go to work and do a job, and pay someone else to do theirs. So, please, stop comparing Apples to PCs.

      FWIW, I'm downloading the Debian ISOs even as I type this- tried Knoppix earlier and I was impressed with the current state of KDE. Seemed very functional. I like Linux. Doesn't mean I want to compile my own kernel, though.

      (tig)
      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    5. Re:Nothing by Golias · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My suspicion is that we will not see a "mini-killer" from the PC world for about six months to a year, if at all.

      Apple thinks they are discovering a new market with the mini. If it turns out they are right, the Windows world will certainly rush to come up with something that reaches that market. Let's see what they could do:

      The mini looks very similar to the eMac mobo, or possibly more like the G4 mobo with a single DIMM slot replacing the two SO-DIMM slots. The idea is, it's a laptop-class system in an ultra-small desktop box.

      Now, Intel has been trying to find a way to compete with the lower heat and longer battery life of the iBook/Powerbook line for a long time, with very limited success, but they've recently gained a lot of traction with the new "Centrino" line of mobile processors.

      Now suppose TI or Intel or some other company who has the capacity to do motherboard design comes out with a 5" x 5" Centrino mobo which uses standard-size memory.

      They will probably use integrated video to save a few bucks, rather than patching on an ATI Mobility card the way Apple does, but nobody will care... this isn't a 1337 game system, it's an attempt at a mini killer. Integrated sound would also be likely.

      It would probably support USB2 and VGA, and even hang on to PS/2 keyboard and mouse ports, but scrap the parallel port and all but one serial port. Since they preserved the PS/2 Bus, it would cost almost nothing to bundle a keyboard and two-button mouse with it.

      It would probably work with a standard Targus laptop power supply, and probably ship with a generic version of the same thing.

      Instead of the laptop drive, make it a half-inch taller and put in a full-sized ATA HD.

      Total cost to buy one of these units from HP, eMachines, or some other low-end company would be $349 and include a default installation of Windows XP Home Edition.

      The problem is, hard-core PC users will have spent the better part of a year convincing themselves that such a design is strictly for those gay-ass Mac-heads, and spend their money on a conventional tower system.

      The lack of DVI would make it less suitable for the entertainment system (most of your better projectors and HDTV systems now support DVI inputs), and the lack of Firewire or 802.11g/Bluetooth antennas makes it actually harder to expand than the mini, which (let's face it) is not a particularly flexible machine by PC user standards.

      If they are really smart, they will spend the extra money to preserve that other staple of PC laptops: The PCMCIA slot. This will present the opportunity to add Firewire, wireless networking, and a few other things which mini users will already be taking for granted.

      But like I said, nothing like this is likely to happen until after the industry witnesses the Mac mini selling like hotcakes, and then they will need a couple months of R&D to react.

      There's actually a chance that the mini will turn out to be the "Mac cube" of 2005, in which case nobody will bother to copy it, and after it's discontinued used minis will sell for above the original retail price on eBay, just because it will become such a curious novelty of days gone by.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Nothing by Couldn'tCareLess · · Score: 2, Funny
      You mean loss. Not lose. Just like most people mean lose not loose. This whole cluster of words seems to present a particular problem to a great many people. I have no idea why. Perhaps the government should take action.

      This isn't intended as a personal slur (I agree with what you wrote), but you your new twist on the whole loose/lose issue really made me splutter... :-)

    7. Re:Nothing by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Cappuchino is pretty close in size to the mini Mac. I have one sitting here and it isn't that cute. However it is well thought out. It has the following ports on it: PS/2 keyboard and mouse, S-video out, RCA video out, VGA out, serial, parallel, modem, 2 usb ports, power in, audio out, audio in, and ethernet (I assume 10/100). It also has a CD drive, a volume dial, and an infra-red sensor. Of course it has ports or switches on five of its six sides, so it is a bit ugly.

      Looking at the ports, the designers seem to have had the media PC market in mind, though I've never tried to use it as such. It would probably make a nice MAME machine to sit under the TV.

    8. Re:Nothing by Golias · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As has been pointed out elsewhere, that system is not just "ugly" (as if most Slashdotters would care), it's also bigger, louder, slower, and more expensive than the Mac mini.

      For once, Apple has released the fastest & cheapest system available in its class.

      Yes, you can get a much faster & cheaper desktop system than the G5 iMac.

      You can probably also build a sweet AMD system for the price of the G5 tower.

      The iBook remains fairly competitive, but far from the cheapest laptop out there.

      However, if you are looking for a small & quiet media room brick, there is no comparison: Mac mini wins.

      This is even true if you completely ignore the advantages of OS X, and say you want a Debian Linux system. For this form factor (or anything close to it), the Mac mini is still the best deal out there.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    9. Re:Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just looked.

      First of all, it's a LOT bigger than the mini. It's basically a 3/4 sized pizza box which you are supposed to hide behind your LCD.

      No specs listed on if it's quieter, but I'm betting the fan is louder than 22 db when in operation.

      That said, going the cheaper "small business" route, I chose the slowest Celeron CPU offered, and spec'd one to match the base-model mini (256 MB, 40 GB HD, no frills...)

      In exchange for giving up Firewire, USB2, quiet operation, OS X (going with XP instead), I get a slightly slower computer for...

      $1137

      Wow. I could buy two minis at that price, and even bump one of them up to 512 MB with Apple's overpriced OEM memory.

      What a deal!

      This thing is not an expensive answer to the mini, it's a cheap-ish answer to the G5 iMac. (and a lame one, at that.)

    10. Re:Nothing by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always found it ironic that people who NEED a processor as powerful as the G5 are clapping their hands over the space saved by Mac mini. If you really NEED power, then space shouldn't be an issue. In that case, I'd buy a PC many times more powerful at the price of a G5.

    11. Re:Nothing by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think there's a bigger, more basic question here. If the Mac mini's specs are all things Omega1045 is looking for in the computer he intends to get (which I'm assuming is the case, since he's trying to spec out a PC that matches or beats the mini's features), and the mini is cheap enough for his budget ("... for the same price (or less)," he says he wants his PC to be), and (most importantly) his wife wants the mini, why doesn't he just get the mini?

      I'm asking this only partly from the perspective of wondering what's wrong with the Mac mini in his eyes (I accept there may be any number of legit reasons for wanting a PC instead, like wanting to use certain software, etc.). I'm asking largely because I wonder why he'd prefer to get something other than what the wife wants - not something specific, mind you, but just anything that's not the one thing she's suggesting, despite the fact that from his own query's wording it apparently features everything he wants in the new computer, and at a price he can't match with another system. It sounds a bit like he's just arbitrarily refusing to get the Mac mini to spite her, or something. I hope that's not the case (and I do apologize if I've mischaracterized his intent; I just don't understand what he's thinking)...

    12. Re:Nothing by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that system is not just "ugly" (as if most Slashdotters would care), it's also bigger, louder, slower, and more expensive than the Mac mini.

      Considerably so, if you attempt to match the specs (which you really can't, but still..)

      I went to their web site,and selected the top processor (P3, 1.26 Ghz, which isn't really comparable to a PPC at similar clock rates), 256Megs of RAM, added a CD writer/DVD player drive, and a 40 gig disk, and Windows XP home edition, and I came up with a price of $988.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    13. Re:Nothing by Luscious868 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My suspicion is that we will not see a "mini-killer" from the PC world for about six months to a year

      There's only one issue: the Mini killer would probably run Windows. The entire point of the Mini is to produce a more affordable Mac to appeal to those who want to try a Mac but used to bulk at the price. If a user was totally happy with his or her Windows based PC, they probably wouldn't be considering a Mac in the first place.

      I think I fit into the target demographic for the Mini. I ordered mine the first day it became available. I've been using a Windows based PC for years, and to be honest, I'm tired of the hassle. I want something that just works. I've always heard great things about Macs, especially since OS X came out, but I didn't want to shell out over a $1000 to try out a new platform that I wasn't sure I would ultimately end up liking. I downloaded iTunes when it was first released for Windows because I had heard such great things about it and my music collection was becoming unmanageable. The ease of use of iTunes combined with the great things I had heard about the iPod convinced me to shell out the money to get a 40 GB iPod. Needless to say, I fell in love with the iPod, iTunes and the iTMS. That pushed me even more toward purchasing a Mac, but the price tag still held me back. Then the Mac Mini appeared and it was a no brainier.

      If I enjoy the Mini as much as I think that I will, I'll start saving for a brand dual G5 system with a Cinema display. Not only that, but I'll whole heartedly recommend the Mini to friends and family who ask for my recommendation when looking to buy a new computer.

  2. I dunno Cliff by nocomment · · Score: 2, Funny

    How lond do you think it will take PC manufacturers to answer Apple's latest entry into the market?

    I don't think anyone really knows how lond ;-)

    omega1045: just buy the mini :-) why not? It's unix.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:I dunno Cliff by Omega1045 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did not submit the "lond" part. I am a terrible speller, but that is not my mistake.

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    2. Re:I dunno Cliff by Jord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny enough Safari comes with a built-in spell checker :)

    3. Re:I dunno Cliff by zsmooth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every text field in a Cocoa application gets spell checking "for free". Text fields in forms are no exception.

    4. Re:I dunno Cliff by PaulBu · · Score: 2, Funny

      You would thing Firefox would include a speller checker!

      Oh, well... ;-)

      Paul B.

    5. Re:I dunno Cliff by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firefox would include a speller checker

      I use a great Firefox extension called Spellbound.

    6. Re:I dunno Cliff by Jord · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Really. It is part of the cocoa framework so every Cocoa based application has spell checking built right in.

      While you are typing into, well, pretty much anything, if you misspell a word a squiggly red line appears under the work and you can control click it to select an alternate spelling.

    7. Re:I dunno Cliff by Smurf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not only does it work for html text boxes, but for virtually all Cocoa text boxes.

      Furthermore: it's a snap to switch to a different language (Cmd-shift-; and select the new language) in case you frequently use more than one.

      And since this works for all Cocoa applications, you also get it in Mail applications, word processors, and even graphics packages (because the developers get it for free).

  3. Mini copies on the way? by nekoniku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How lond do you think it will take PC manufacturers to answer Apple's latest entry into the market?

    If the Mini sells well, look for copies in less than a year; if it's not a big hit, the big guys (Dell, HP, et al) won't bother.

    --
    "It's a wonderful idea. But it doesn't work." -- Tad Danielewski
    1. Re:Mini copies on the way? by Jorkapp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why would the big guys bother anyway? Its practically win-win if it takes off. Their tech-support doesn't have to deal with as many computer illiterate people, and the big-company execs don't have to deal with as many tech-support people anymore (wink wink).

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
  4. Hey! My Mom Can Build One! by rueger · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before all of the do-it-yourself system builders leap in, check out this post from Yesterday's discussion:

    Leo McGarry said, and I can't think of a better summary,

    "Howzabout you buy a computer instead of hand-carving your own microchips?

    People love to talk about how you can build a top-flight desktop computer for $3.25 plus two subway tokens and some kind of weird-ass coin that you dug out of your sofa that's got "Røølï" written on it, but what they curiously omit is the fact that if you took all the time you'd spend gathering parts and assembling them and worked a minimum-wage job at some fast food place instead, you'd earn hundreds of dollars. So the real cost of this "It's Shake-n-Bake, and I helped!" special is, in fact, several times higher than the sum of the price tags on the hundreds of inscrutable parts that went into it.

    People who say "I can build that for less" are either not bothering to account for their time or just flat-out lying, because the plain truth of the matter is that if they could, somebody already would have, and you'd be able to just go out to a 7-11 and buy the damn thing for half off with the purchase of a medium or large fountain drink."

    1. Re:Hey! My Mom Can Build One! by Omega1045 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      For me building it can be fun and educational. It isn't all about the money.

      Also, I am wondering about the cost for local vendors trying to compete with the big guys. Can a local computer shop put one of these together to compete with the Mac? Even with a free (as in beer) OS?

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    2. Re:Hey! My Mom Can Build One! by jxyama · · Score: 4, Insightful
      >It isn't all about the money.

      it is when it's the dominant parameter being used to make comparisons.

    3. Re:Hey! My Mom Can Build One! by Juanvaldes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Come on I've built many computers and it usually takes less then an hour. Take on a few for pricing components/ Frys run for most of the people here it is a loss of $50 or so. As another poster already said it is fun and education. Worst case it costs a few more hours another 100 or so.

      When it comes to a 1500+ mac (ie Tower) I can see this argument and it's hard to claim they spend THAT many hours. Now with the mini I don't see it....

    4. Re:Hey! My Mom Can Build One! by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People who say "I can build that for less" are either not bothering to account for their time...

      If someone was doing this at work you would be correct. But last I checked I wasn't getting paid for stuff I do on my own time after I come home in the evenings. I am not getting paid for my time from six pm to eight am, so I'm in no way losing money by building something like this.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    5. Re:Hey! My Mom Can Build One! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

      >> My time right now is worth $9 an hour.

      I guess that would explain the length of your post there, Tolstoy.

    6. Re:Hey! My Mom Can Build One! by cosmo7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're forgetting the time spent filling out rebate cards. If you're building a PC from scratch you're going to spend a week clipping barcodes.

      Plus half of the rebates don't come through. Yes, Belkin, I'm talking about YOU. Bastards.

  5. Cappuccino by attaboy · · Score: 5, Informative


    I bought a fanless mini pc from CappuccinoPC. I don't see the exact model I purchased on their site, but it was close to this one:

    http://www.cappuccinopc.com/slimpro-sp300-fanless. asp

    1.65"H x 5.75"W x 9.84"D

    Slightly bigger than the mini-mac, and not as stylish.

    They have a variety of other systems, some with fans, some without. Some of them come in a brushed silver color.

    They have cases, barebones, and fully functional offerings. I bought a complete PC and it was under $600.

    --
    The facts have a liberal bias. --The Daily Show
    1. Re:Cappuccino by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I bought a fanless mini pc from CappuccinoPC.

      I looked this up and it is a pretty awesome box for an embedded app. For someone who just wants a computer, I think it's probably not worth the hassle.

      I get a total of $808 configured thus:

      Pentium mobile at 650Mhz (the fastest they'll install for you)

      PC133 256MB RAM

      40GB 4200 RPM drive

      Slot-loading combo drive

      DOS-formatted drive (add $159 for XP Pro)

      Integrated graphics, (no VRAM cited, so I assume this is shared.)

      it does have PS/2 and serial ports, but only USB1.1. It includes a firewire.

      I don't think this is the right machine for the application, and even though it is a much lesser machine than the Mini, it still is more expensive.

      Cool box, just waiting for hacking, but not for the punters.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    2. Re:Cappuccino by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Me again... a fairer comparison is a cappacino EZ3

      This combo is $1,042

      Intel Pentium III @1.26 GHz

      PC133 256MB RAM

      40GB 4200RPM HD

      Slot-loading DVD-CDR Combo drive

      XP Pro

      Intel integrated graphics

      No montior or keyboard

      PC people, no flame, but what makes this more expensive!?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    3. Re:Cappuccino by Temporal · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Mac mini comes with OSX, which is at least equivalent to XP Pro (certainly much better than XP Home). So, you can't blame the price difference on that.

  6. Provocation! by Gadzinka · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't answer him! It's a provocation by some apple zealot!

    Robert

    PS ;)

    --
    Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
  7. Think different. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What computers are currently on the market to compete with this? When my wife asks for the 'cute little Mac', what PC can I buy instead that will take up as little space and do as much for the same price (or less)?

    None, and you can't.

    You want something small and functional for your breakfast bar, right? Then just get the Mac Mini and be done with it. It'll play your music, browse the web, and read your email every bit as well as your Windows PC, so what's the problem? Are you planning to play Doom 3 over eggs and bacon?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Think different. by Temporal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you planning to play Doom 3 over eggs and bacon?

      Incidentally, with the Mac mini, he could.

    2. Re:Think different. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Actually, no he couldn't (click on "System Requirements" once that page has loaded.) The Mac Mini has only 32 MB of video RAM; Doom 3 wants 64 MB. The Mac Mini is up to 1.42 GHz; Doom 3 wants at least 1.5 GHz.

      Granted, the CPU is less likely to be a concern, but the video RAM is a definite problem. Doom 3 is likely to crawl on the Mini because of it.

    3. Re:Think different. by Temporal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Woops, guess you're right. Oh well. He could play Halo or UT2k4, though. I think it's worth noting that the Mac mini has a far better graphics chipset than just about any $500 PC.

    4. Re:Think different. by Nailer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really?

      I have a laptop PC with a 2.4Ghz processor and a Geforce 4 Ti Mobile GPu. Doom 3 runs like ass.

      I've ordered a Mac Mini tho (not to play doom on), and I'd very surprised and happy if it could play Doom 3. But if it can: why, on such low specs?

    5. Re:Think different. by martinX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Get her the damn Mac min! Then when you ask for sex or a blow-job you'll be more likely to get one.

      "She wanted a Mac mini and I told her I could build her a better PC myself. Now when I ask for sex, she hands me the baby oil and tells me to do it myself. My name is Wayne Kerr and I wish I was a Switcher."

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  8. The couch by hab136 · · Score: 5, Funny
    what PC can I buy instead that will take up as little space and do as much for the same price (or less)?

    My wife asked me for one thing, how can I give her something else entirely and act all pompous like I went out of my way for her? I like sleeping on the couch.

  9. Sorry, has to be said by captnitro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When my wife asks for the 'cute little Mac', what PC can I buy instead that will take up as little space and do as much for the same price (or less)?

    You could just buy the Mac Mini. I know it seems silly, but this is exactly what Apple is hoping you'll do. For iLife, a BSD userland, and some other fun stuff, how can you resist? I know you can, thank you peanut gallery.

    I tried pricing something similar a while ago -- look at OEM parts, and consider putting the whole thing into a cardboard box; you can do well with an Athlon 64, a couple hundred megs of memory, and a bulk HD. Size, however.. that's hard. MiniITX doesn't come cheap.

    1. Re:Sorry, has to be said by unclethursday · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I could, but I know jack and shiat about Mac OS.

      Not much to learn, really. Replance CTRL for Command (Apple key) for most functions, and then you know what to do if coming from a Windows world. CMD+C = copy, CMD+V = paste, etc.

      I got my first Mac in March of '04, and within a few hours of just fooling around, I was moving just as quickly as I do on Windows. Now, after using it lmost exclusively for the past 9 months, I do things much fater on it than I could on my Windows box.

      It's seriously easy as hell to learn, and plug in a USB multi-button mouse and work like you do on Windows for most things (only thing I miss is clicking the scroll wheel and moving up or down to quickly scroll through documents and such). Other than that, the OS is a snap to use.

    2. Re:Sorry, has to be said by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If OS X actually does scare away a smart guy like you, why not buy the Mac mini and then load Linux on it.

      Seriously. If a Linux box is what you want, and you want it as small and quiet as the mini, than a mini running Debian or YDL is hands-down the cheapest way to do it.

      However, before you reformat and pull out those Debian disks, I suggest you give OS X a brief trial.

      - It's pre-loaded with the only browser that compares favorably with Mozila's offerings, and Mozila runs fine in OS X if that's your preference.

      -Bring up the terminal window and you have access to a bash prompt.

      - It has a remarkably simple e-mail app with thread tracking and spam filtering, but feel free to run command-prompt mail programs if you are a hard-core Linux/BSD CLI guy.

      - It comes with Apache pre-installed. Launching httpd is as simple as clicking a box in the network preferences.

      - The remote desktop tool works great, and also comes pre-installed. ssh is loaded up and ready if you prefer.

      - The developer disk (which is not pre-loaded, but ships with every copy of OS X) contains an outstanding set of programming tools.

      - Aqua is a more consistent and functional GUI than anything the free *nix world has ever offered. The Finder window in 10.3 or later alone is worth the price of admission.

      - BBEdit, the preferred text editor of most Mac users who do dev work in text-based environments, is fairly cheap and far in advance of TextPad (the best inexpensive Windows-based text editor I've seen to date.) If you are a text-based programmer, start using BBEdit and you just might turn into a raving Mac Bigot. Plus, if you really love *nix tools, you can just run Emacs or vi.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Sorry, has to be said by elemental23 · · Score: 3, Informative

      BBEdit, the preferred text editor of most Mac users who do dev work in text-based environments, is fairly cheap

      One better: TextWranger -- basically BBEdit without a few things -- is now free.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  10. Buy her what she wants! by True+Freak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "When my wife asks for the 'cute little Mac', what PC can I buy instead"

    Why would you want a PC when a Mac can be had for that low price. What does the PC have that the Mac doesn't?

    --
    My comments may be crap...but they are my crap...and I am brave enough to stand by them...Never post as AC!
    1. Re:Buy her what she wants! by Refrag · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell, when he leaves the monstrosity on the bar, she'll be pissed!

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    2. Re:Buy her what she wants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What does the PC have that the Mac doesn't?"

      The ability to run all the software I already "own".
  11. Trying to buy a PC instead? Why? by Headius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you actually saying you'd prefer buying a PC over the Mac mini?

    As a long-time PC user who's wanted an OS X Mac for simply years, I must ask: Why?

    1. Re:Trying to buy a PC instead? Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have 3 Macs: an 8-year-old PowerMac, a 3-year-old PowerMac, and a 2-year-old iBook. The two PowerMacs have been rock solid from day one. Sorry, no breakage stories there.

      The iBook has had the famed logic board problem. Twice. Both times, took it to the nearest Apple Store (about 25 minutes away) and sent it in for repair. Back in a few days, with other, out-of-warranty items fixed too.

      The iBook's hard drive died recently, out of warranty. I looked on the web, found a great site with all the instructions you could possibly want, and replaced it myself. I recently dropped the iBook and busted the display housing. Opened it up and fixed that too.

      Wanna upgrade? Standard parts. Need to pop open your Mac mini? Check apple.slashdot.org, there's a new article with a link to a video. Sounds promising.

      Why the phobia about trying something new? You're a geek, aren't you? You should be salivating over the prospect of a new OS to explore. And really you'll find that it's a familiar friend (unix) with all kinds of crazy cool stuff on top.

      Plus - your wife is asking for it right? Why piss her off and get her something YOU wanted. Just get her what SHE wanted! You'll fall in love with it too. Sheesh.

    2. Re:Trying to buy a PC instead? Why? by identity0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your arguments are bull - notebooks are not user-servicable, period. Except for upgrading RAM (which is possible on Apples), you're supposed to send it in to the shop for any upgrades/repairs.

      And what are you going to do when your Cappuccino PC or other ultra-mini PC breaks? Those are typically made with proprietary components that are not user-servicable or replacable, and the Mac is not at a disadvantage there. Do you know if Shuttle or Cappuccino has support on the level of Apple? Because you sure as hell aren't going to fix it yourself.

      Face it, your arguments are just "Wah, I'm afraid of anything new and shiny" - I'm not even a Mac usre, and I find your attitude distasteful. Linux would not have gotten anywhere if everyone had the attitude of "I'm not familiar with it, so I'll avoid it".

      When my wife asks for the 'cute little Mac', what PC can I buy instead that will take...

      How about, "When your wife asks for something, get her what she asked for"? I hope you like sleeping with the dog, 'cuase you ain't getting any action tonight. "Look honey! I made a cubic Zirconium in my garage that's just as good as that diamond you asked for!"

  12. Mac mini has low-end specs; SFF low-end PC? by JayDiggity · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, the Mac mini is a small form factor, and that's part of what makes it so appealing. However, the specs are all far from top-of-the-line: an older processor, 256 MB RAM, 40 GB HD, etc. etc. This all helps keeps the cost down. Trying to build something specifications-equivalent in a PC involves buying a low-end processor and a small motherboard to match (not to mention the other components), and I don't know if it can be done. The integration that Apple can pull together with its hardware enables low-end but tightly integrated computers such as the Mac mini to exist. The componentization of the PC world does not lend itself to a build-it-yourself Mac mini equivalent.

  13. an obvious flame inducing topic... by jxyama · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but as a mac user, i wouldn't touch a PC even if it's $200 cheaper and smaller than mac mini for the simple reason it won't be running OS X.

    1. Re:an obvious flame inducing topic... by dn15 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      some apps are in /bin and some are /Applications
      Huh? The UNIX-ish stuff is in /bin and the like, yes. But the programs that normal humans use are in /Applications. The average Mac user doesn't know (and doesn't need to know) that /bin even exists. I don't understand how this is even a complaint worth making.
    2. Re:an obvious flame inducing topic... by penguinboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      OS X doesn't support virtual desktops out of the box, but there are plenty of utilities that do a great job. Desktop Manager is free and probably the best of the bunch.

      On the topic of little things OS X is missing, Quicksilver is a great application launcher that makes the dock all but obsolete.

    3. Re:an obvious flame inducing topic... by sedna · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Actually, most of these hacks only use the framework provided by Apple in a somewhat different manner. The windows mangager application was souped up in a couple of hours basically using functionality allready provided by the system. The main problem is when hacks are using undocumented functionality i nthe system. These tend to break when the system is upgraded but functions well in the version the were written for.

      The main reason for all these hacks in in my opinion that Apple is quite restricitve in new functionality of the UI. It is allways simplicity before choice. Most users stay in tis environment and it makes it very easy for newcommers. People who want more functionality can choose to install the particular functionality they want. If one become very popluar, it tend to be included in the next OS revision.

  14. Not gonna happen right now. by ayersrj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless you have a lot of time on your hands and some crazy Mini-ITX skills you're not going to find anything like that for awhile.

    Since the MacMini also has a video card that isn't integrated into the mother (logic) board. I have a feeling you're not going to find anything with the type of video processing power either. Decent video cards aren't very small these days.

  15. Get the mac by nickinho · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really don't think its hygeinic to have windows in the kitchen, all those viruses and worms

    ;-)

  16. dealing with the wife by jessecurry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    when your wife asks for the "cute little mac" just get it for her, trying to force your sense of what a good computer is on her is a little selfish.
    How would you feel if you asked for a nice BMW and she came home with a similar Toyota?

    --
    Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
  17. Old SGI Indy... by PaulBu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really, it is stylish (nice color, will look good on coffee table), it runs UNIX, can be gotten for cheap now, even included an IndyCam -- and form-factor is not too far from mini-mac.

    Only partially kidding!

    Paul B.

  18. Re:First thing that popped into my head... by Senjutsu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, when asked "When my wife asks for the 'cute little Mac', what PC can I buy instead that will take up as little space and do as much for the same price (or less)", your suggestion is a box that's significantly larger and heavier and costs nearly 4x as much?

  19. mac mini vs mini-itx by davez0r · · Score: 2, Informative

    in order to get something of the same size, you're going to have to go mini itx. the majority of the mobos in that form factor will be hovering at or below 1ghz.

    if you want something that will perform similarly, you'd have to go for something like this. that's $175 for the motherboard alone, and you're stuck with intel "extreme" gfx and the p4m processor that you'll have to buy separately.

    your best shot might be the pentium-m (not p4m) mini-itx combos. those are quite a bit more expensive though (i can't find it on froogle, but the company's site says 674 euros if you buy 100 of them).

    with the via mini-itx solutions, you'll get good price/size. with the p-m you'll get good performance/size. as far as i can tell, the mini is the only one where you'll get price/performance/size, which is why i pounced on it right as jobs announced it.

  20. PC System by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Informative

    "what PC can I buy instead that will take up as little space and do as much for the same price (or less)?"

    Mini-ITX is the way to go. You'll need a motherboard and CPU ($160), a good case and PSU ($70), a laptop HDD ($130 will get you a 60GB Seagate 5200rpm), an optical drive (DVD/CD-RW; $33) and some DDR ($80 for 512M).

    Total: $473.

    Compared to the Mac Mini:

    + More memory
    + Larger HDD
    + Twice as many USB ports
    + Parallel / Serial Ports
    + Free PCI Slot
    + Audio input
    + PS2 ports
    + Dual Ethernet

    - Slower CPU
    - Slightly Larger
    - No FireWire

    Add Linux or Windows.

    1. Re:PC System by jxyama · · Score: 2, Insightful
      >Add Linux or Windows.

      so it's not really comparable, is it? windows costs money. linux takes time to install/configure.

      then factor in iLife apps. and warranty.

      how about dvi out?

    2. Re:PC System by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What case with PSU are you using for your comparison?

    3. Re:PC System by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Add Linux or Windows.

      In either case you are still considerably short of what the Mac comes with in terms of software, and you didn't include a cost for Windows.

  21. Re: What does the PC have that the Mac doesn't? by Refrag · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe he's a big fan of spyware and would miss out on all of the "fun" if he got a Mac.

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  22. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Here's the quote that fortune spit out @ the bottom of this page:

    A friend of mine won't get a divorce, because he hates lawyers more than he hates his wife.



    Can you name a single man here on slashdot who wouldn't get hot @ the thought of his wife wanting to use a UNIX-based operating system?

    Get her the Mac Mini and get the AppleCare stuff so you won't have to worry about a damn thing in the event terrorists strike. And when she asks for help, you put one arm around her to work the keyboard, reach around her to grab the mouse, and whisper in her ear, "Oh no, baby, Safari is so much better than IE. Let me show you..."

    *cough*
    --
    [o]_O
  23. Re:What about an inexpensive... by parvenu74 · · Score: 2, Informative

    How about just installing the Windows Remote Desktop Client for Mac and remote onto your headless PC? I went tried this out at a local Mac store this past weekend -- the guy walking the floor did a double take when he saw that I had a full Windows desktop (my machine at home) running on a PowerBook... apparently he was not aware of this functionalilty.

  24. Re:The doghouse by aztektum · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What is wrong with people?

    Hubris. It's the same reason we can't stop and ask for directions.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  25. You've created more Questions than Answers... by Senjutsu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What case are you basing this on?

    Is it equivalent in size to the Mac Mini's?

    It is a reliable PSU, right? Not some $10 taiwanese job that's going to blow out and fry your mobo in 6 months?

    What processor and mobo?

    Are they as fast as the Mac Mini's?

    Does your hypothetical miniPC have a graphics card equivalent to the Mini's Radeon 9200, or is this some Intel Integrated piece of crap that leeches off of system RAM?

    Why do you consider a system that's $26 cheaper than the Mini but includes neither an operating system nor software equivalent to the iLife suite to be comparable to the Mini?

    And finally:

    Who are you trying to kid?

  26. There's more to the Mini than just small hardware! by Luscious868 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not only is it tough to find a PC with comparable hardware at a comparable size with a comparable price, but you've also got to factor in the software. The Mac Mini comes loaded with OS X, iLife, AppleWorks 6, Quicken 2005 and two games.

    There's actually a lot of value there for $499. If you're able to find comparably sized hardware at a comparable price, I'd be very surprised if it came with anything more than the OS already installed.

  27. They're not selling at a loss, trust me. by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jobs & co are already on record saying margins are similar to the eMac, and I can believe it, since the machine is actually priced quite similarly to an eMac without keyboard, mouse or monitor.

    D

  28. iLife by EuroChild · · Score: 2


    What I don't understand is the lack of emphasis on the bundled software that comes with the mac mini (the iLife suite in particular). While most of the talk around the mac mini seems to be on the hardware, 1.25 Ghz is more than enough to edit DV, create/burn DVDs etc. Sure it won't rip through it like a dual G5, but I use a 1Ghz eMac for editing/dvd creation and it's fantastic (admittedly, you will have to up the ram...) but the whole iLife suite is the best thing going for the mac mini. There are no programs that come close to iLife on a PC in terms of power to price ratio. This is where apple will convince 'switchers' to stay switched and should really focus their marketing attention...

    Well, that's my AU 2 cents... [US 0.0152 cents]

    --
    Does this make my brain look big?
  29. Mac mini is NOT low speced by Blamemyparents · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple systems are a bit different from Windows machines when it comes to megahertz. OS X (recent versions at least. anything 10.2 or later, with the Mac Mini shipping with 10.3) runs suprisingly well on 'older' hardware. OS X will run just fine on a 500mhz mac with 512mb of ram (128 is minimum, but bump it anyway, trust me). a 1ghz system with at least 512mb is a field day for OS X. My powerbook was top-of-the-line one and a half years ago, with 1 ghz G4, 1gig ram, and a 60 gig HD. That hardware is perfectly capable of doing some of those awesome tricks like having a bunch of hardcore apps running at a time. The final answer is just about any program you throw at it will run excellent, except 'pro' apps, where performance will be acceptable (not great, but if you want to, you can). Example: Video editing with iMovie is WELL within it's abilities, and the step-ups of Final Cut Pro and Final Cut Express should move along pretty quick too ...Assuming you do get a ram bump, which I HIGHLY recommend. Other than that, this looks to be a nonissue.

  30. Re:Not to Troll but... by Drakino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HP Recalls

    Dell Recalls

    Make sure never to buy from them either, since aparently a company admitting a problem and fixing it for free is too much for you to deal with. While your at it, make sure to sell any vehicle you own, as it is likely that company has also issued recall notices on some of their products. Next up, make sure to avoid the grocery stores. They have recall notices posted all the time too.

  31. Can't and won't bother. by catwh0re · · Score: 2
    The main ethic between Apple and the majority of PC makers is that the PC is still on large designed for people who want a really cheap computer. Such is the success of Dell.

    A PC maker would never create a mac mini clone, as the engineering efforts would outweigh their bottom line on the system. They would be able to make a slightly larger box, but the temptation to use things such as full sized hard drives is too great a temptation for them.

    The other problem is heat, the system will definitely be based around laptop technology for it's size and heat production, which is going to up the price even further.

    Ultimately when you work with PC's the Speed, Price, Design triangle applies, I.E in the PC world you can get any two of the three, always at the expense of the 3rd. It only takes an experienced electronics company that is used to making small(iPod, 1" Total thickness Powerbooks, ultra thin displays, sunflower iMac, flatpanel iMac, etc) devices to pull off a good price, reasonable speed and fine design balance.

    Another issue is that the moment you get some *useful* software for the low end PC the price bellows outward significantly and the result is that it will cost far in excess of the mac mini which ships with excellent(Award winning even) software, not trials/demos of paintshop pro and crippled OS's that don't let you connect to server volumes.
    So now you say, oh we'll just pirate all the software we need from our friend, which to any unscrupulous person is a good tactic to get around that price barrier. The problems don't end there though, the moment you want acceptable video in the unit you will be forking out for a separate video card, as on board video using shared memory is woeful to say the least. This is then going to be run on the cheapest architecture that the PC maker could phathom, so performance of that card is going to be cut up significantly. Finally there are numerous issued to do with your optical drives, for computer manufacturers combo drives work out to be more expensive than individual cd and dvd rom readers. Such as in the low end dell offering, you can't get a combo drive, instead you have to get two individual drives one for reading dvds and one for burning cd-r/rw.

    Anyway the point is made, for PC makers the numbers don't make sense, you'll get more cheap offerings, but as with the nature of going-on-the-cheap, the units will always be lack lustre.

  32. Impressive! by obeythefist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An impressive move by Apple.

    There is only one impressive thing about the Shuffle and the Mini-mac that highlights a new marketing move by Apple that might finally allow me to stop hating them - the price.

    Apple has always dressed up average, underpowered personal computer components, slapped a white case around them, dropped a proprietary OS on them and sold them at three times the price to people who'll gladly pay three times the price for a computer because it's from Apple and it's "Blueberry" or whatever fruit flavour is popular.

    I'd consider buying one of these newer, cheaper products because of the price and functionality. For a desktop PC I'd never own a Mac, simply because I'm a gamer, I need computational power and flexibility with my desktop (I want the choice between *nix and Windows, something an Apple can't provide). Not to mention the range of games available.

    Having said that, I think Apple has screwed up with the Mac mini. All they had to do was add a TOSLINK/spdif audio out + s-video for the hi-fi enthusiasts and they would *KILL* the home theatre market. Modded X-box? No. Shuttle IPC? No. Micro-ATX? Nowhere near. It's so small it would run perfectly in a hifi stack, and with the CPU apple put in it, it's only good for video playback or web browsing or little functions like that. Unfortunately, there might not be enough CPU for on the fly video encoding, and it could use an imbedded HDTV tuner.

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  33. Re:the answer is no by andreMA · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...do you really want to be nagged every time she cant use expose or a lickable UI?
    Besides, she inquired about the Mini. Getting that rather than something you consider equivalent would increase the odds of her doing an expose of her own and licking your UI.
  34. Don't forget what makes a computer worth using by amichalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It goes without saying but everyone is forgetting:

    It's the software stupid!

    The Mac mini is bundles with:
    - BSD OS that is VVF (virtually virus free)
    - Quicken '05
    - iTunes
    - iPhoto
    - iMovie
    - iDVD (if you opt for the Super Drive option)
    - Garage Band
    - Safari
    - iCal
    - Mail.app
    - Address Book
    - iSync

    Without the software, the hardware is just something to look at (in the case of the Mac mini) or hide (in the case of most PC cases).

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  35. Apple does pretty well, if it hits your niche... by jonadab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem you run into shopping for Apple hardware isn't that the Apple
    hardware is much more expensive than equivalent PC hardware -- it's generally
    comparable. The problem is that there's an entire very important class of
    system (namely, the expandable midrange system) that Apple never supplies.
    Their low-end systems, such as the new Mini, but also the iMac, eMac, and
    so on, all have pretty much zero capacity to be expanded, enhanced, or
    upgraded. *Maybe* you can add another stick of RAM (but not two or three
    more), and external peripherals, and that's just about it. If you want to
    add another drive or two or replace the graphics card, you're fresh out.
    For that kind of thing -- which is no problem with $400 PCs and is rather
    important for anyone with even mild computer-geek tendencies -- you have to
    go all the way to the PowerMac tower systems, which start at some thousand
    and a half smackers. Granted, they're much higher-end than the $400 PC
    and are probably worth what they cost, but that's small consolation if
    you don't need all those extra GHz but do need the ability to add an extra
    drive next year or an expansion card.

    In other words, Apple has to-date never tried to sell anything in the niche
    occupied by the Celeron-based mid-tower system.

    But in the niches they *do* try to compete in, they generally are fairly
    price competitive (all else being equal), and the new mini seems to be a
    hit in that regard. To keep myself from buying one, I keep reminding
    myself that four computers in my bedroom, three of which are turned on
    pretty much all the time, is *enough*, darnit. Also, the one that's not
    turned on most of the time is the one that's not x86-family, which is
    probably not a coincidence (although, it's a bit on the old side as well
    and doesn't have TCP/IP installed, so there are more reasons than just
    architecture).

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  36. easy, and have been around for years by kayen_telva · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://logisysus.com/catalog/default.php?cPath=74

    http://www.boldata.com/html/minipc.cfm

    http://www.cappuccinopc.com/default.asp

    those are from the first page of a google search

  37. Re:Heat is your enemy by cosmo7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Mac Mini has a switching PSU; 100-240VAC, 50-60Hz.

  38. Dear Slashdot by eadint · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am an MS shill who is shitting in his pants about the prospect of a highly afordable mac i dont really have a wife because i have an IQ of 40 im ugly as hell and i weigh 500lbs. In an attempt to please my evil satanic master (Monkey boy) i have concocted an imaginary story where my wife wants a mini mac ( see the part about not having a wife ) and how i am on this grand technical quest to find a pc for this imaginary wife so that i can get that for her instead. in this imaginary world my imaginary wife would have to have an IQ of 30 and therefore truely want a pc. My grand attempt at FUD for my master would work best on /.

    Dear MS Troll
    Please go back to your brige under the freeway and shoot yourselfe with a bazooka. cut off you balls so there is no chance that you could ever even accidentally procreate. idiots like you are wasting valuable air that other things could actually use ( gestating maggots come to mind ). i have a real wife and i bought her an ibook she loves it and uses it all the time. she is compleatly confident with it and she has never had a virus spyware or needed me to fix it. originally she wanted a PC laptop but i lent her my PB for a week and she decided she wanted a MAC to. i intend to either buy or convince all the members of my family to buy one of these so that i dont have to put up with repair calls. also i showed my wife that in order to do all of the things that you can do on a mac you would have to pay about 400$ more you would have to essentially find a free pc to campare the two. the new mac mini comes with

    no spyware
    no viri
    ilife
    iwork
    UNIX
    omnigraffle ect
    and 16 other professional grade applications and utilities.
    peace of mind

    there is no pc that can even come close to maching this deal.
    if you actually had a wife you would respect and honer her and get a mac. but please built this imaginary PC for your imaginary wife. and use it to get pr0n off the internet because that is the closest you will ever get to intimacy with a real woman.

  39. Re:OT: anymore by afroborg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From www.dictionary.com:
    anymore (n-môr, -mr)
    adv.

    Any longer; at the present: Do they make this model anymore?
    From now on: We promised not to quarrel anymore.
    Chiefly Midland U.S. Nowadays.

    Regional Note: In standard American English the word anymore is often found in negative sentences: They don't live here anymore. But anymore is widely used in regional American English in positive sentences with the meaning nowadays: We use a gas stove anymore (Oklahoma informant in DARE). Its use, which appears to be spreading, is centered in the South Midland and Midwestern states, as well as in the Western states that received settlers from those areas. The earliest recorded examples are from Northern Ireland, where the positive use of anymore still occurs.

    --
    my sig could kick your sig's arse...
  40. man oh man by zpok · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A geek is a geek is a geek is a hopeless non-empathic cheap bastard who doesn't know his luck.

    Your wife ASKS you to buy A SPECIFIC COMPUTER. And you think that's a problem. You're going to go to all the trouble to buy her something "better" - read: not what SHE asks but what YOU want to buy.

    Dude, you've got a problem, and it's not necessarily with computers.

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  41. Re:Apple does pretty well, if it hits your niche.. by HeghmoH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    [Expandability] is no problem with $400 PCs and is rather
    important for anyone with even mild computer-geek tendencies


    Careful there, "computer-geek" is a pretty general word.

    I make a living programming and I love to screw around with my computer, but I hate screwing around with hardware. I want a computer that Just Works so I can play with robots or writing a laser-pointer tracker or whatever I feel like doing this particular day of the week. I don't like fooling around with internal components and I don't like having to repair my OS. For this reason, I own a Mac.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  42. Re:on pros by tricolorkittie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok if your going get into Labor rates for car techs and not talk about computers you should get your info straight. 1. tech's don't make 80 an hour their company does they normally make from 15 to 30 an hour depending on the car line and their experence. Their company doesn't have a pure profit on the rest of the money they must also pay the service writer, the cashier, the porters and detailers + they have massive insurance, equipment, education/training and ult. cost. Most dealership shop barely break even or post a very very small profit. Car dealers make money selling cars not on their shops. 2. If you are a programmer making $15 - $30 you can pretty much bet your company is charging their customers quite a bit more for your time. 3. You get to work in a nice office, and i bet your not worrying about increased cancer/health risks found in mech. tech. due to their work environment.Your lose of hearing from impact tools and when was the last time you lost a finger due to kernal failure? Or just came home with your hands cut up by the dread blue screen of death. No? That hasn't happened, well techs burn, shock, bruise and cut themselves all the time, next time take a look at their hands - I think you'd perfer you small chance of corp. tunnel to their almost daily dose of abuse. 4. Ya on some jobs they might get the job done in under the standard time and make a little extra money but that's been going down for years and they don't get paid a cent for all the time their filling out paperwork or waiting for the parts guy to pull what they need. Also there are jobs that eat their ass where they get paid much less then they put in. Plus the real bitch is if their dealership doesn't bring in enough work - they're still required to put in their 8 - 10 hour days but they might just get paid 2 or 3 hours for that day. They also have some of the worst benifits and vacation policies. How would you like to spend 50 hours at work but come home with a check for 20 or 30, oh and one of the worst times of year is right before christmas. Anyway I know you guys aren't trying to put down techs really, it's just a sore place for me. Believe me techs don't have it easy - most customers really don't understand or appreciate their techs and think their just trying to screw them but most of them are really good people. Ya there are hacks but there are sucky people in every industry - I mean just look at M$. ;) Sorry to be off topic.

  43. please save yourself by rinoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't hassle dude. Just buy the Mac.

    What is more sexy?? A BSD based Mac Mini with bash, a fast processor, iLife, DVI out to RCA, real video card and more at 5.5x5.5 or a Win Longhorn Bathroom edition 6.5x7.5 with no DVI??

    Huh? Tell me! I mean really.

  44. Suck It Up by White+Roses · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When my wife asks for the 'cute little Mac', what PC can I buy instead that will take up as little space and do as much for the same price (or less)?

    [flamethrower on]
    How about sucking it up and getting her the Mac Mini? Afraid it won't integrate with your Windows XP Home network or something? Afraid you might like it better than your own machines? Afraid your wife might like it better than you? Get over it.

    If she does ask for a Mac, and you buy her a PC instead, it really won't matter what size it is, because it'll be sleeping in the bed with her, while you're sleeping in the garage. Think about all the other times she asked for a diamond and you bought her a bigger CZ instead.
    [/flamethrower off]

    --
    Do not touch -Willie
  45. Paul Thurrott strikes again by DavidLeblond · · Score: 2, Funny

    Paul Thurrott says that the Mini's competition is eMachines and Compaq and that both of them will squash Apple like a bug. Had a good laugh at that this morning.

  46. Re:Apple does pretty well, if it hits your niche.. by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Exactly. A lot of us geeks would rather express our geek sides by dicking around writing code and making our computers to *intersting* things -- not by shelling out bucks for the latest and greatest XYZ card to give me 64000 channel surround sound or whatever.

    Personally, I feel great pleasure in optimizing my code. Just this morning I've got my robotics simulator ( in this case doing quadruped simulation, with many motors, sensors and whatnot, but it can simulate just about anything you can describe to it ) running at 100 Hz physics and 30 fps using less than 10% CPU -- on my meager 12" powerbook. Now, *that* is being a geek. Soon I'll be able to simulate swarms of robotic spiders, each with its own brain and with all with realistic physics. And all for fun.

    I think a lot of people today mistake consumerism for geekery. A lot of people I hear being referred to as "experts" are really just people who know how to go to CompUSA or whatever and buy a card, stick it in, and run the windows installer for its driver. [sarcasm]Way to go. That's some HARD stuff. You must be really, really l33t[/sarcasm]

    Rant over.

    --

    lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
  47. what about software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The costs should include software - I think I'm right in saying that the mini comes with iLife, i.e. video editing, photo editing, iTunes and DVD authoring (with the superdrive). If you're into these consumer apps, neither Linux or Windows come anywhere close to their functionality, reliability and ease of use.

  48. Dang people can't Google by korbin_dallas · · Score: 2, Informative

    See here for a toaster sized box running Linux,
    http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS5621664618. html

    $160.

    geez. whiz.

    --
    They Live, We Sleep
  49. Windows mini Build Challenge Update by jsares · · Score: 2, Informative

    On my blog I have posted this:

    In my first Build Challenge I set forth a challenge to build a x86 PC to compete with the Mac mini. I didn't get any great systems listed but we did have a good laugh about how sexy Macs are.

    I've posted on other sites including The Tech Report and most of the responses tried to compare full sized x86 PC to the mini. I've said how this is crazy. I just want to compare the mini with SFF x86 systems.

    That begs the question just what is a SFF system? I can't find a good definition on the web so I'll set my own.

    SFF acronym for Small Form Factor: Computer system that is smaller than 925 cubic inches.

    SFF system range greatly in size from the Shuttle SB59P at 915 cubic inches to the Cappuccino EZ3 at 63 cubic inches. The Mac mini is on the smaller side at 84.5 cubic inches. The price range also varies greatly as do performance and style. Lets leave out performance since it isn't really an issue for most people in our post megahertz era.

    To narrow the challenge follow these criteria:
    Size: Must be under 925 cubic inches
    Price: Must be under $1200
    Style: Must not be ugly

    I guess we could argue that last one but I'll accept anything that at least tries to be attractive. Also it has to be ordered built and tested with Windows. Most people don't want to build their own systems and since you can't with the Mac mini it wouldn't be fair to compare it to bare bones systems. Also the systems should match the mini's configuration: 256MB RAM/40GB Hard Drive/Combo Drive.

    No single SFF x86 PC meets the mini on all the factors so I'll compare it to three:

    Cappuccino EZ3
    Size: 63 cubic inches
    Price: $823
    Style: 5 out 10

    Even smaller than the mini. But more expensive and close to ugly.

    Shuttle L 5600h
    Size: 680 cubic inches
    Price: $515
    Style: 7 out of 10

    Much bigger than the mini. But larger hard drive by default.

    Hush Mini ITX
    Size: 452 cubic inches
    Price: $1159
    Style: 9 out of 10

    Great looks. But still bigger and way more expensive.

    Compare these to the:

    Mac mini
    Size: 84.5 cubic inches
    Price $499
    Styles 9 out of 10

    And I hope you can see why the Mac mini is the best system overall and the only one that is more than the sum of it's parts. Now for some the fact that it doesn't run Windows means they would never choose it. For others the fact that these systems run Windows means they would never choose them. Let's not have any flame wars over the OS. And I'm leaving out the bundled software that comes with the mini as a factor in the price. But it is a nice plus that you get iLife, iWorks, and Appleworks.

    Please post any systems that are better than the three I've listed that meet my criteria.