Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Handwriting Analyzed

Kaal Alexander Rosser writes "The BBC is reporting that a doodle left behind at a Davos press conference given by Tony Blair, Bill Gates and Bono shows the writer to be: "an unstable man" amongst other things. The Gates Foundation has confirmed the doodle was left there by Bill Gates."

102 of 609 comments (clear)

  1. unstable by minus_273 · · Score: 5, Funny

    i dont know about gates, but his OS is damn unstable.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:unstable by davesplace1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      He may be unstable and we all know his OS is unstable, but his checking account is very stable.

    2. Re:unstable by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd say it's not stable... it should be more related to an endothermic reaction... it pulls all of the money everywhere else into itself...all that cool money definitely chills the bank a little ;-)

    3. Re:unstable by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny
      What the fuck is "davos"?
      Direct Access Virtual Operating System.

      Not to be confused with Domestos, a chemical for cleaning toilets or Bobby Davro who isn't used for cleaning toilets, more's the pity.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Speaking as a geek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd have to say, no surprise there. Anyone who is a geek knows were all at least a little unstable... You have to be to be attracted by Technology more than girls.

    1. Re:Speaking as a geek... by oliana · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe the correct sentiment is "more successful" with technology than girls.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, asses suck this joke.
    2. Re:Speaking as a geek... by Xilman · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Ahhh but Gates is not a geek. He is a business man. A cunning business man at that. He knows little about technology other than what most salesmen know. He doesnt' have a deep understanding of the "how" of computing, mostly just the "why".

      Wrong, wrong, wrong!

      Have you ever met Bill? I have. He most certainly has the geek nature. He most certainly does have a deep understanding of the "how" of technology and asks very penetrating questions if you're demonstrating something to him. He's a good business man too, but don't let that lead you into underestimating his technical abilities.

      Paul

      --
      Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
    3. Re:Speaking as a geek... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'd be suprised how successful you can be with girls when your pickup line is "Hey baby, I've got $50 billion worth of Microsoft stock!"

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Speaking as a geek... by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you get a chance to ask him what he runs at home? I bet he would have said Linux. Otherwise he isn't a geek. Only true geeks use Linux.

      *closes down IE*

    5. Re:Speaking as a geek... by Acer500 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Youre wrong about Gates not writing anything from scratch.

      He wrote most of the succesful software for the Altair, probably one of the first personal computers, including the boot sequence and a BASIC compiler.

      Its true that he probably hasnt written anything significant in decades, but thats what happens to programmers in management positions (see the thread about that here on /. )

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    6. Re:Speaking as a geek... by kevinx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not a geek? You my friend are in denial. You read slashdot and claim to have an understanding of ad,dns,dhcp,nfs,nis, and kerberos. You attempt to conceal your geeky-ness under the banner of artist.

      I'm sorry I have to break this to you, but you are a geek. I don't care how cool your friends are.

      And for the record, Geek != Loser.

    7. Re:Speaking as a geek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > What always amazes me is when I ask a geek how they got into computers and they DON'T tell me it was because of music.

      Interesting that you mention this. When I was in college one of my computer science profs told us that in the early days of the computing industry (1940s and 50s) there were no comp sci majors at schools.

      So when companies like IBM, DEC and Sperry wanted to hire new college grads they had to find them in other, more traditional departments. Of course they hit the math and science majors, but surprisingly a lot of early programmers came from music departments.

      The reason was that they had years of experience working with a symbolic language (sheet music), had to follow sequences, loops, timing, etc and also were used to thinking about the complex interactions among multiple instruments and multiple pieces of music.

    8. Re:Speaking as a geek... by bushidocoder · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Larry Osterman wrote an article once where he talked about a presentation he had with Bill about a portion of the IPX stack in NT4. Bill wasn't familiar with the project prior to the meeting, so it started off with Larry just telling him what was supposed to be accomplished.

      After a couple minutes, they got into the technical part and after Bill had spent two or three minutes looking over stack trace information he abruptly starts screaming at the team about how the memory footprint was too large, and then stopped, thought a minute, and accounting for a dependant project off the top of his head, spit out what he thought was the appropriate memory size for the stack. Everyone in the room stared at him slack-jawed - he quoted a number that was too small by half. No one outside the marketing department would make up a number like that.

      But they had an explicit order from BillG to rewrite the stack to that size, so they went back to the drawing board and, after bringing in some more BSD hackers, realized that not only was his number achieveable, but he'd hit the number they could theoretically reach given the dependencies with other portions of the system right on the head. Although that section of NT has been revisitted in every version since NT4.0, no one has been able to improve on the memory footprint of that section of the kernel.

      That's not neccesarily the sign of a genius - I know people who can look at a database and give the same sort of summary judgements. But when a man can make realizations like that within 10 minutes of having learned about a technology, at a bare minimum you have to give him credit for being a geek.

    9. Re:Speaking as a geek... by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Larry walked by as I read that. Very strange. You know he just celebrated 20 years? He brought 20 dozen bouncy balls instead of 20 pounds of candy.

  3. Bill Gates doodles... by fitten · · Score: 5, Funny

    are probably nothing more than variations of the $ sign... =)

    1. Re:Bill Gates doodles... by sasquatch21 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bill uses Perl?

    2. Re:Bill Gates doodles... by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      are probably nothing more than variations of the $ sign... =)

      I heard there were drawings of some short squat bird and the words "die die die" over and over again...

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    3. Re:Bill Gates doodles... by IvoryRing · · Score: 2, Funny

      You really mean 'the Tux, the', surely.

    4. Re:Bill Gates doodles... by Doc+Ido · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, he uses Perl.NET.

  4. handwriting analysis? by tuxette · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Geez, what next? Are they going to do his star charts? or read the coffee grind remains in his mug?

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:handwriting analysis? by chris09876 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding... it's a bit drastic when they start to analyze peoples handwriting to develop a personality profile like that. I doubt there's anything accurate and important they can determine by looking at handwriting.

      It's easy to modify your handwriting style. It takes some time, but you can adjust your habits to write "in whatever font" you want. I don't understand how people can draw useful conclusions from it. ...especially if you scribble something down in a hurry.

    2. Re:handwriting analysis? by coyotecult · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The sad thing is they THOUGHT they were doing it on Tony Blair, and attributed all these not-so-hot characteristics dissing his leadership abilities. I'm still trying to figure out how they can determine all of that, and not realize that it's not even Blair's handwriting. Big gaffe. Serves them write. I'm so tired of pseudosciences -- especially ones that have been admitted in court as evidence.

    3. Re:handwriting analysis? by coyotecult · · Score: 2, Funny

      ....Serves them right? I swear I did not do that on purpose.

    4. Re:Handwriting analysis? by MerryGoByeBye · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is that why every major government intelligence house in the Western world devotes so many employees to it? Because oddly, I've never heard of a phrenologist working for the CIA and the astrologer/psychic they hired a few decades ago as a consultant was unceremoniously relieved of her duties after a string of nothing but failures, whereas the handwriting analysis unit is still around.

    5. Re:handwriting analysis? by tuxette · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not, except for entertainment. We have a few shows here that have used polygraphs as entertainment as well ;-)

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    6. Re:Handwriting analysis? by multiplexo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Is that why every major government intelligence house in the Western world devotes so many employees to it? Because oddly, I've never heard of a phrenologist working for the CIA and the astrologer/psychic they hired a few decades ago as a consultant was unceremoniously relieved of her duties after a string of nothing but failures, whereas the handwriting analysis unit is still around.

      Would these be the same Western intelligence agencies who for years overestimated the capabilities of the Soviet Union and were completely blindsided by 9/11? I'd hardly use the fact that the CIA, of all organizations, employs a group of graphologists as an endorsement of the validity of graphology. The fact that they had even hired a psychic/astrologer as a consultant explains a lot about why they're so fucked up, the fact that they apparently still have graphologists on staff just confirms this.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    7. Re:handwriting analysis? by Mister+Incognito · · Score: 2, Interesting

      FWIW. Years ago when I was still at school, I had an impacting experience over a weekend. I was at class, and when I switched "consciousness" on :) I was shocked at how different my handwriting had become since last friday.

      After that I decieded that hey, there may be a relation between personality and style. And that while it is true you might adopt a different style, who is to tell you that doing that won't affect your personality?

      Now.. thinking about the post above.. I may even point out that scribbing things in a hurry might also be relevant, if you think about it...

    8. Re:Handwriting analysis? by chman · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...only a little more authoritative than phrenology..."

      Of course you'd say that, you have the brainpan of a stagecoach tilter!

      --
      This comment was formatted for readability, but I forgot the line break tags
  5. Aha by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Funny

    The 'unstable man, unstable OS' jokes may begin ... now.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re: Aha by Cyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      such as 'struggling to concentrate[in bed]', 'not a natural leader[in bed]', 'struggling to keep control of a confusing world[in bed]' and 'an unstable man who is feeling under enormous pressure[in bed]', equally apply to Mr Gates.

      Apologies to Mr. Gates - it needed saying.

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
  6. Wow by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Really, handwriting analysis? This is the computer age... I don't even know how to write... I put an 'X' in the 'sign here' section... everything else I type... If they analysed my handwriting, well... they'd think I was a 2 year old with a crayon. ;)

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Wow by MPHellwig · · Score: 2, Funny

      "If they analysed my handwriting, well... they'd think I was a 2 year old with a crayon. ;)"

      Naah, much to easy this one ;-)

    2. Re:Wow by Foofoobar · · Score: 4, Funny
      If they analysed my handwriting, well... they'd think I was a 2 year old with a crayon


      I thought most Visual Basic users were. ;)
      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Wow by essreenim · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I found a great sight with downloadable hand writing sheets in my final CS year. It had a sentance fully in hand (thatch-writing), with lots of sentances below with dots, so you could practice again and again. It was really good as it calmed me for the exams. I felt like I was back in playschool writing my lovely curly and puposeful writing. I actually felt like taking up caligraphy. There is something spitiual about this writing, something we are sadly losing in the computer age. I did it to recontruct my ability to write in time for my exams as my writing was awful before. Afterwards, not only could I write better, I felt happier, like a return to serenity. Sounds gay? Yeah I was surprised too but I can't knock hand writing. We should all do it

  7. I first read that as by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    a "doodie".

    I thought, pity the lab technician who had to do this for media purposes.

  8. Speaking of doodles by savagedome · · Score: 3, Funny

    Paula: Can you grab my purse.
    George: Yeah.( reaches for the purse and finds a piece of paper . he looks annoyed.
    Monks , next day .George showing Jerry the piece of paper he picked up
    Jerry: Yeah! So
    George; Don't you see what this is?
    Jerry: Yeah! It's a doodle.
    George: Yeah!, a doodle of me...look at the size of the nose , the ears, all my features are distorted.
    Jerry: Oh!.It's an affectionate caricature.
    George: I'm grotesque . I look like a troll.
    Jerry: It's just a drawing.
    George: Don't you see what this says? How can you possibly like somebody ,if you think they look like this?

  9. Tony Blair, Bill Gates and Bono... by brian+ferullo · · Score: 4, Funny

    what bad joke is this setting up?

    1. Re:Tony Blair, Bill Gates and Bono... by 955301 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tony Blair, Bill Gates and Bono walk into a bar within 5 minutes of one another and sit down.

      With an obvious need to one up the other two egos in the room, Tony orders a kamikazi and says, "I know they say the three of us are quite unstable, but I believe I have you chaps beat, even on that front. I overthrew a country on the advice of a Texan." He passes a "one-free-knighting" coupon to the bartender for escro on his challenge.

      Gates, drinking a screwdriver and squiggling on a piece of paper, blurts out "It's not like Britain didn't do that to the same people before. Try dominating the world with a collection of buggy software and an army of marketroids. Allow the single most significant collaborative creation of the 20th century to be brought to its knees. Then get back to me". He passes a check totaling the GNP of a small country to the bartendar to see Blair's challenge.

      Bono, not even inclined to remove his sunglasses responds passes a black I-pod to the bartender. "You see that blonde, at the end of the bar? I'm going to eat her now." He downs his tequila, walks up the blonde, stabs her repeatedly, then eats her, and returns to the conversation.

      The bartender interjects and says to Bono "I don't think your instability counts... after all, you're on drugs, and that makes it artificial." Bono, looking puzzled because he hadn't taken a pill in at least three days says "Hell, I'm not on drugs". The bartender passes the pot to Gates, refills the men's drinks and replies, "of course you are, that was a bar-bitch-you-ate".

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  10. Handwriting analysis? by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 3, Informative

    and before anybody jumps on this bandwagon, let's remember that handwriting analysis is only a little more authoritative than phrenology or astrology

    --
    Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
  11. Hitting the Nail on the Head ! by bushboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, the poor guy has been hammered left right and center for years - can you blame him for being a bit troubled !

    I bet he draws penguins and apples and little tiny bugs and all sorts of odd things when he's bored !

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:Hitting the Nail on the Head ! by Xentor · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're not bugs. They're undocumented features

      --
      "The amount of intelligence on this planet is a constant. The population is growing." -Cole's Axiom
  12. See for yourself by SYFer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a look at the actual doodle .

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
  13. Want to see the doodle? by sebFlyte · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want to see the doodle in full, you can here.

    --
    "Nothing can shake my belief that this world is the fruit of a dark god whose shadow I extend." - Emil Michel Cioran
    1. Re:Want to see the doodle? by savagedome · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, George Bush's doodle was also found. You can see it here

  14. Bear in mind... by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of those assessments were made when the "graphologists" in question were under the belief the doodle was Blair's. So we should withhold judgement until we have second opinions from the Phrenologists, Dowsers and any other Pseudo-Scientific Charlatans who feel like chipping in with their worthless, substance less opinions...

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  15. Handwriting Analysis.... by big-giant-head · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right up there with reading tea leaves and goat entrails.

    Now analysis to verify for a court that this is the defendants handwriting yes or no,for example is a science.

    Tying some Psychological profile to someone's doodle is a joke......

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
  16. Him2? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Blair left his doodles behind for analysis, too. And so we can conclude from the absence of Bono's doodles, and consequent lack of analysis, that Bono is paranoid, justifiably.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Him2? by miseryinmotion · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bono happens to draw comic versions of himself and The Edge fighting evil across the galaxy, and always takes them home to ink and color.

  17. But how did they... by tod_miller · · Score: 4, Funny

    How did they crack the DRM on the doodles so they they could be analysed outside of Media Player?

    And why didn't the paper contain a little ticker that showed the time and date and author of the doodle?

    Anyone have a link the torrent? Oh man, I feel strange... it must be the /. effect.

    Did the doodles point to any new ideas in windows? Or was one of the doodles a strange on-flying bird like creature being beaten to death by office stationary (paperclips)

    Who knows? :-) Or was it a monkey screaming 'oooh ooh develoopers! developers developers! aaaargh!'

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  18. The real scoop by paranode · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For those of you who didn't bother to look at TFA:

    A spokesman said: "Following the press conference given by the prime minister, Bill Gates and Bono in Davos on Thursday, a number of newspapers printed stories claiming that a page of notes and doodles left behind on the platform belonged to Tony Blair, and provided an insight into the mind of the prime minister.

    "They were in fact doodles made by Bill Gates.

    "We look forward with amusement to explanations by a variety of psychologists and graphologists of how various characteristics ascribed to the prime minister on the basis of the doodles, such as 'struggling to concentrate', 'not a natural leader', 'struggling to keep control of a confusing world' and 'an unstable man who is feeling under enormous pressure', equally apply to Mr Gates.

    "We are astonished that no-one who ran the story thought to ask No 10 if the doodles were in fact Mr Blair's, particularly as it was obvious to anyone the handwriting was totally different."

    In other words, graphology is BS and the people who analyzed it already had a preconceived notion about whose it was and made the appropriate BS analyses.

    1. Re:The real scoop by mrseigen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm leaning towards "Really fucking bored". That's where all of my doodles come from.

    2. Re:The real scoop by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These remind me of lie detector tests. It's unfortunate that these ideas are given any credibility.

    3. Re:The real scoop by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > These remind me of lie detector tests. It's
      > unfortunate that these ideas are given any
      > credibility.

      Agreed. Polygraphs are so pathetically unreliable, but unfortunately if you refuse to take one (which I would seriously consider if I was charged with a serious crime) then somehow that makes you guilty; the classic "If you're innocent, you've got nothing to fear." Even the cops know that lie detectors are crapola, but it's a useful tool to smoke out a true believer who thinks the freakin' things can read minds.

      People seem to give a lot of credence to this pseudoscience, though to my mind this sort of handwriting analysis is no better than phrenology and astrology.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:The real scoop by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I hope this isn't getting too offtopic, but I remember that one of the big problems with polygraphs was the need for baseline values to determine truth and lying. Apart from the fact that you would respond differently when deliberately telling a lie because it is part of the procedure and when telling a lie to deceive, the baseline questions usually show the prejudices of the interrogator. For example, an interrogator will often ask "have you ever smoked before?" or "have you ever tried marijuana?" assuming, of course, that everyone has tried these. Therefore, if you say no, they assume that your response is the baseline for lying since obviously anyone who says they haven't is lying. And it is an unfalsifiable position.

      The human race would be so funny if they weren't so dangerous.

    5. Re:The real scoop by kannibal_klown · · Score: 3, Informative

      Process is one thing, but the people interpretting are another.

      I was taking a law / ethics class back in college (simple class, not the advanced stuff) and we went over a case that kind of freaked some of us out. It was about a man falsely imprisoned in Texas.

      The guy was brought in on bad evidence and testimony. That was bad enough, particularly the "witness" who never actually saw anything.

      While waiting for trial, the police sent in a psychologist. They didn't even inform the guy what was going on, they said they had to "check" something. So, they had him draw a picture, sign his name, try to draw a perfect circle and that was it.

      The trial comes, and the psychologist said he examined the defendant and based on his handwriting and drawings he was one of the most vile killers he'd ever seen. The shrink went on and on, and went on to pat himself on the back for helping catch such a dangerous killer..

      Remember, this was just from a circle, his name, and a picture of a house (or something similar) all done within like 5 minutes. This had nothing to do with the evidence, because there was no note or anything, it was supposedly a crime of opportunity.

      Years later, the real killer came forward. After re-investigating, they found the witness was a screwball AND didn't see anything, and a lot of other stuff that had gone wrong. They eventually let him go with no pay or anything. Meanwhile, the guy had spent like a decade in jail.

      You have to wonder about these supposed shrinks that analyze handwiriting and what-not. I'm not saying it doesn't work, but in this case I think a bunch of them were quacks that just wanted their name in teh paper.

    6. Re:The real scoop by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My understanding is that the problems with polygraphs are sufficiently numerous that they should be regarded as little more than mysticism. Cops use the excuse that they can feel out potential suspects, and providing that the potential suspects believe the test to be accurate, then I guess it may be just another tool like BSing a suspect about evidence, witnesses, etc. In other words, it's just a parlor trick to make a suspect screw up. So far as I'm aware no court in the US, Canada or Europe even allows polygraph "evidence" to be admitted.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:The real scoop by MirthScout · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You don't need to refuse to take a polygraph test.

      Always agree to take it. They will want you to sign a release form (they have no liability, blah, blah). Refuse to sign the release form. They will decide not to administer the polygraph test. Remind them that you are agreeing to take the polygraph test and it is they that are choosing not to administer it.

      I did this with an employer many years ago. It was very funny.

    8. Re:The real scoop by Dan+Ost · · Score: 2

      What does the release form cover?

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    9. Re:The real scoop by fraggirl13 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People seem to give a lot of credence to this pseudoscience, though to my mind this sort of handwriting analysis is no better than phrenology and astrology.

      I once met a guy that was a handwriting analyst. He said he could tell my personality by how I write. Everything he said was very vague and could be applied to anyone. Some of it wasn't even true. He also said that if I cross my t's higher I would be happier. Still waiting for that one to work.

      --
      But, this one goes to 11.
    10. Re:The real scoop by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't speak for Canada, Europe, or anywhere else, but in the United States, polygraphs are (sadly) admissable in most jurisdictions at the discretion of the judge. Of course, the other side can challenge the admission of a polygraph for various causes.

    11. Re:The real scoop by MirthScout · · Score: 5, Informative

      It was a long time ago so I can't quote it. As I recall, he release form I saw said that they could use the information in any way they deemed apropriate. That they would not disclose information from the test to anyone unless they determined the other party should have the information (basically that they could give the info to anyone they wanted). That they were not laible for any harm to me or my reputation.

      It was a page and a half saying they could do anything they wanted and I couldn't hold them liable.

      No way I'd sign that.

      The emplayer was a retailer you'd find a majority of malls in the US.

      To be fair, the man that was there to administer the polygraph was the president of his own company contracted by the retailer. He said the retailer's liability waiver was more extreme than most and showed me the standard one he uses for other clients. It still wasn't something I'd sign given how unreliable and subjective polygraphs are.

      He then asked if he could do a security interview. He explained that to be asking all the same questions but without the polygraph machine. I agreed to whichever he wanted to do. :)

  19. Bill's future. by adam31 · · Score: 4, Funny
    I saw Bill get a tarot card reading in Las Vegas a while back.

    I remember one card had a Skull...
    and the other had a Penguin.

  20. Analysis was of Blair by BlueThunderArmy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "unstable" and "unfit to lead" assessments were made when the doodle was assumed to have been made by Tony Blair. While you would think that the same conclusions would be drawn regardless of the identity of the scribbler, there is speculation that the original conclusions were politically motivated.

  21. In my expert analysis... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From reviewing the doodle, it's is my expert opinion that Bill Gates has the doodling skill of my five year old son!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  22. Next on Slashdot by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bill Gates' psychological analysis using the science of Numerology, his tea leaves from his last sushi dinner and a phrenologic reading of his cranium.

  23. This is juvenile by CaptainZapp · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Look, I like a good microsoft bashing, just as most of my fellow slashdooters, but don't you think that this is a very cheap shot?

    No doubt that Microsoft has some shady business tactics. There's no question that they provide shoddy products from a security perspective and then push responsibility for their goofs to on user community. There's the issue ,of corse, that they hound free software by the cheapest pr tricks in the book and the system Microsoft sucks shit! Well, hell! There's a lot of valid complaints when it comes to chastising Microsoft as a corporation

    I really don't want to ideolize Mr. Gates and he is often guilty of wrong speak; willingly or out of ignorance.

    But attempting a character analyses from a doodle he left at a conference (which potentially was boring) is just plain juvenile.

    Hold your ammunition for the real issues, slashdot, and retain your credibility in the bargain...

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

  24. handwriting analysis? by Cyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My analysis? He was practicing writing with his alternate hand - because he was bored. I tried this over the weekend, and my scrawl looked similar to this.

    I dunno - I don't consider myself all that anal, but my notes are generally a lot less flamboyant than that - a little more organized, legible, useful, etc.

    --
    cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
  25. Typo? by Ironsides · · Score: 4, Funny

    Excuse me while I go consult the "I Ching" to find out whether Microsoft intends to embed Internet Explorer in "Office 2007".

    Since this is Microsoft and Bill Gates we are talking about, shouldn't you consult "Ka Ching" instead?

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  26. Pseudo-science by Savant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is this newsworthy? Graphology is completely unsound from a scientific point of view, though it might interest students of the Forer effect. What next? Steve Ballmer's horoscope? What the tarot has to say about Larry Ellison's future? Crop circles resembling Linus' face? (All right, I reckon the last one could possibly be newsworthy. But, still, do we really want to go further in this direction?)

  27. Tony Blair, Bill Gates and Bono go into a bar... by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and the bar tender says, "We don't serve big wigs here like you.".

    Tony Blair says, "But can we at least vote on it?".

    The bartender says, "No!".

    Bill Gates says, "But we just need a place to crash.".

    The bartender felt betrayed because he expected support from Bill, and thus said, "You too??".

    Bono says, "Yes...".

  28. Handwriting analysis?!?!?!? for Jebus sakes by gwjc · · Score: 3, Funny

    I dislike micro$oft as much as the next slashdotter, BUT handwriting analysis! Why not check his bio-rhythmn and astrological correspondences while you're at it. I bet even Bill still has enough geek in his soul to laugh at the morons who think his handwriting revealed anything other than the colour of ink he was using.

  29. Take a pill by shallow+monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course, if he'd used a Tablet PC to doodle on, this whole hullabaloo would never have happened.... But then, that too is telling, that it's easier to doodle on paper than on a tablet pc.

  30. Tony Blair, Bill Gates, Bono and you are in a lift by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have a gun but only two bullets, who do you shoot?

  31. Handwriting experts = psychics? by ehiris · · Score: 2, Informative

    Psychologists and handwriting experts were drafted in by the press in the hope of getting a glimpse into the inner workings of the prime ministerial mind.

    Newspaper stories contained phrases such as "struggling to concentrate" and "not a natural leader".


    That's why the pshychologists and handwriting experts spend a lot of time analyzing a doodle while Bill Gates is very rich and leads a multi-billion dollar industry.

    It reminds me of someone who was explaining to me that there's no money in the cumputer business. He said that he was a business owner in an excellent industry. I later found out that he was the bathroom dude in a bar.

  32. Is this the Bill obesssion? by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As the parent notes the story isn't really about doodles by Bill Gates, but about doodles that aren't by Tony Blair. And the ensuing BS because people assumed they were. The only thing remarkable about Gate's involvement is that he's such a clear proof that the graphology is crap. Him being a genius and all.

    It's like when 2 students pass in the exact same assignment and get 2 vastly different marks.

    It's interesting but why does slashdot care about some doodles? I'm sure most of us don't. It has nothing to do with tech or tech-related news. If, however, there was an improved version of quick sort hidden in the doodles we should all sit up. Is there a way to mod the original articles down?

    1. Re:Is this the Bill obesssion? by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful
      No, it isn't proof that graphology is crap. It is just a reminder that ANY qualitative analysis will be influenced by your own preconceived notions.

      But you're right. It is like when two students hand in the same assignment and get two different marks. The professor reads the paper and assigns a grade based in part upon the quality of the paper, but in part on preconceived notions of that student's performance. It's human nature.

      Now if none of these people had the slightest idea that it was believed to be Mr. Blair's, then that would prove that either graphology is crap, those people din't know what they were doing, or Mr. Gates is unstable and not a natural leader. There's not enough evidence here to say more than that.

      From everything I've read, Mr. Gates got lucky by buying MS-DOS from someone who didn't know its value, then used that as a springboard to buy other technologies and hire other people. That's not leadership. It's business. There's a big difference. Only the people directly under him can truly speak for his leadership skills or his stability. I don't see any volunteers coming forward, though.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Is this the Bill obesssion? by nadadogg · · Score: 3, Funny

      With about 10 zeros.

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    3. Re:Is this the Bill obesssion? by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's not leadership. It's business.

      Dislike him all you want, but the lack of technical skills does not equate to a lack of leadership. As a businessman, he is one of the world's top leaders. Yes, he got a few lucky breaks and happened to be in a few right places at the right time. As the old saying goes, "when opportunity knocks, answer the door". Bill Gates is a leader because he answered the door, walked through it, and kept on going. How many of us would have bet our fledgling business in 1981 by buying a CPM/86 clone?

      Or to put it another way, you don't take a two man firm financed off your mother's credit cards and shape it into a monopoly with 90%+ marketshare by being a follower.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    4. Re:Is this the Bill obesssion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then you need to read more.

      Not to mention evaluate your own statements. Using the tech to springboard other technologies is smart. Hiring other people around you to support a moving product is smart. Mobilizing at the right time is smart. Amassing resources is smart. The middle two have factors indicating good leadership.

      Frankly, organizing people well despite your flaws indicates quite a deal of leadership.

      Heck, knowing a business opportunity and moving on it...yes, it includes luck, but also mobility in decision making. Yes, he has a rich father, yes, he was gifted with above average technical intelligence, but you still have to DO quite a number of things to amass the fortune and company he has. /. readers bash the rich for not doing anything with money; he did. He was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and still did something with his life. People bash the rich for not giving back; he did and does significantly through his foundation. /.ers frequently claim smarts is being underappreciated in the US; then why are you attacking him almost on those very lines?

      Yes, business tactics do not indicate leadership by themselves. However, forming a multi-billion dollar company needs luck, intelligence, and leadership. Frankly, he's been on the front lines with Microsoft and was more so in the past, and despite all the MS bashing, he did make it into a monopoly, which surprisingly was his true miscalculation and the success was used against him.

      iow, despite the millions of naysayers, the talk, the ability to mobilize as he did, the only way that he was was taken down was because he was too successful and manipulative of the power he had already amassed.

      Further, why is it any surprise that Gates has his flaws? Maybe you are lucky and fortunate to have surrounded yourself with good people. But looking at the average person, and a comparison of the extremes to that average, Gates has fewer mental flaws than the norm. You just know about them because you and others like to nitpick at every damn thing.

      Frankly, it's the /. bully tactics similar to those used against nerds in school--find someone you don't like, group together, and bash them for being successful, being smart, etc. You talk about leadership versus the business success as being different things.

      The /. editors have gone on a recent run of anti-Gates the person run; you dislike MS? Then target the operating system. Don't target the man for being a human being and, *gasp*, having flaws. If you allow this to continue, you have little reason to be pissed if someone says you shouldn't use GPL software because Stallman is a dick.

    5. Re:Is this the Bill obesssion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't see any volunteers coming forward, though.

      I'll come forward (and you thought your straw man was safe). I only worked for Microsoft for a year, but I was in a high-profile group, and had the opportunity to interact with Bill a few times. What I can gather from a few short interactions is that he has a prodigious ability to understand the heart of very diverse problems. At our first meeting with him, we demonstrated an extremely complicated system. After only 15 minutes, he had incredibly insightful, out-of-the-box commentary, and had picked up on a known weakness that we thought we'd hidden well.

      Hate him if you want to, but the Slashdot community does a disservice to itself by pretending that he's just business smart.

      As for his stability, I can't comment. Maybe you could ask his friends :-P

  33. Congrats, Einstein by gosand · · Score: 2, Funny
    In other words, graphology is BS and the people who analyzed it already had a preconceived notion about whose it was and made the appropriate BS analyses.


    And up until this point I thought it was all hard science. Next you are going to tell me that psychics and spoon-benders don't really have extraordinary powers.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Congrats, Einstein by Bachus9000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Next you are going to tell me that psychics and spoon-benders don't really have extraordinary powers.

      But there is no spoon!

      Couldn't resist. :)

    2. Re:Congrats, Einstein by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't decide whether to say "Get bent" or suggest this as a plot for Futurama...

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:Congrats, Einstein by drfireman · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can bend spoons. It's hard to explain to a lay-person, but it just takes a bit of ... I don't know how to describe it, call it "leverage." I would be the last to call my powers extraordinary, this is really a power that is latent in all of us, but usually suppressed due to a mental block I will call, in shorthand, "respect for silverware."

      Handwriting analysis is also not complete crap. The other day, my wife went shopping, and correctly bought an item that I had written down on our shopping list, even though I myself couldn't read my own handwriting.

  34. Re:Tony Blair, Bill Gates, Bono and you are in a l by JPDeckers · · Score: 4, Funny
    Tony Blair, twice.

    Oh, wait, this is slashdot, wrong answer:)

  35. typing this from linux. by xutopia · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I find this distasteful. Bill Gates probably has horrible hand writing but guess what? So do most people who type instead of handwrite. Heck I'm so used to my palm pilot as the only thing remotely ressembling hand writing that when I need to write using a real pen I laugh at myself making plenty of horrors.

    This is really of bad taste guys. As much as I think Bill G. is Napoleonic and demented I don't put that basis on his handwriting.

  36. Actually... it can be accurate. by oneiros27 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    They're not by any means 100% accurate, but my grandfather used to do contracting analysing handwriting of potential executive hires for a few companies.

    Now, he'll be the first to tell you that it's not a perfect science -- but if you see five different indicators that suggest the person is dishonest, there's a better chance that there's a correlation.

    Here are a few points that I remember from reading the manual that he had written --
    • Pressure of the writing is an indicator of the person's stress level. [how hard are they pushing the writing implement into the paper?].
    • A person who tends to come back and write back over the top of their words (not to make a correction -- writing over it twice or more) is a sign of dishonesty.
    • Your normal handwriting tells your personality; Your signature tells how you want people to think you are. (so a person whose signature is like their handwriting is more likely to be comfortable with themselves)
    • A person whose lines slope downwards as they write tend to be pessimists (if upward, optimists)
    There are things that can be infered from the angle the writing, the general shape of letters, how the person dots their i's, the width of the margins, how they place the addresses on the letters.

    I would relate handwriting analysis to be more like reading someone's mannerisms and how they dress -- it can be a good indicator, but isn't a perfect correlation. Whereas, astrology and the like are basically just cold reading (normally, based on the person's reactions, mannerisms, and how they dress), and not really on the stars.

    Now, that's not to say that someone can read something wrong -- I'm sure it happens all the time -- my grandfather has one indicator (the size of decenders) that he attributes to 'passion' -- someone may attribute it to sexuality, sports, or even as agression and a tendancy towards violance. You have to read it in combination with other indicators.
    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  37. They weren't describing Gates by badfish99 · · Score: 2, Informative
    The handwriting "experts" were told that the doodle was by Blair (the British prime minister). They thought they were describing him, not Gates.

    Moreover, they were employed by an anti-Blair newspaper, so their comments are likely to reflect what their employers wanted to hear, rather than the results of any genuine analysis.

  38. ... So, Bill seems to like ... by ninjagin · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... triangles and squares. It seems pretty harmless enjoyment of 2-D geometry to me. I didn't see any icky-faces or similarly juvenile imagery, just a bunch of triangles and squares and a bunch of bullet points.

    When I doodle, I end up with spheres and cubes and conic sections, not because I'm a great three-dimensional thinker, but because I like to practice light/shadows and foreshortening.

    Maybe Bill was practicing his triangles? Even if they were Tony's doodles, what's so wrong with Tony practicing triangles?

    What I get from it is this: Some of the most powerful people in the world have fun with triangles, so they must be okay to play with.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  39. Already enough evidence... by aclidiere · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is already enough evidence that Bill Gates doesn't have the qualities of a leader, and that he has few social abilities.

    For example, look at Microsoft's keynote at CES. (Click on 100K or 300K to watch the video.)
    • If you jump at 26'30 into the video, you will see Gates failing making a demo of Windows Media Center.
    • At 27'13, he shows no concern whatsoever of what is happening. As Conan O'Brien makes a joke about the situation, Gates is showing total weakness.
    • At 27'25, Gates finally understands it is his turn to speak. He makes a remark that shows a huge lack of social sophistication: "How to you like this camera?" (Pointing to a Nikon D70 on the table)


    There is no need for more evidence than watching any of Gates's public appearances to understand what kind of person he is.

    I don't see what we could learn more from a handwriting analysis. There already is enough information available that is more relevant than what is mentioned in the article.
  40. This reminds me of something I saw on art critics by i41Overlord · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw a show on the Discovery Channel a few years back that sort of discussed the same sort of thing- handwriting analysis, art critiquing, phychics, etc.

    They showed art critics discussing the art they were looking at and describing, in detail, the emotions and message that the artist was trying to convey.

    The show's host didn't believe any of that so he showed some "respected" art critics a piece of art, which looked like scribble to me- it was just random strokes of the brush in different colors. The critics all agreed with each other and explained what exactly the artist was thinking, and the raw emotion that went into the painting.

    Very impressive, I thought- and maybe I would have believed them had the artist not been AN ELEPHANT.

    Yes, an elephant painted the picture with its trunk. The "respected" art critics were really just good at winning popularity contests- in reality they had no clue what they were talking about. It's the same thing between a "good" phychic and a "bad" psychic- neither one knows what they're talking about, but one just seems "more believable" than the other.

  41. What a non story by olivercromwell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damn, must be a very slow news day. Come on, I know taking jabs at Bill is fun, but this one is downright stupid. Even if they are Bill's doodles and chicken scratches, anyone with half a brain knows that handwriting analysis is NOT considered a valid diagnostic tool. So called "graphologists" who say they can detect personality traits from handwriting are no more capable of doing so than someone with a crystal ball can tell me anything about me. This type of graphology has basically been discredited in legitimate diagnostic psychology, but obviously reporters could not care less.

  42. Handwriting analysis bug by flibuste · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Handwriting analysis is well known to be a non-science with non-facts based on non-events that produce non-results.

    It's also a non-brainer way for slashdotters to do some M$ bashing.

    Maybe it's time for /. to move on or for me to stop wasting my time. The quality of information on this site is degrading every day.

  43. analyzing bil's handwriting by wuice · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hate to say it, but nerds have finally gone too far. Do you guys have ANYTHING better to do than player hate all over Bill's doodles?!

  44. He's not unstable, he is bored by mark99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He has created one of the biggest companies of all time, and made it almost unassailable.

    There is nothing technical he can do that one (or a dozen) of his employees can't do 10 times better and faster.

    He has (probably) saved millions of lives through his malaria research.

    He has a nice wife and three kids. He has a really cool house.

    What else is there left to do?

    Maybe he could try being a Linux Kernel Hacker...

  45. Right up until you try a handicapped person's by crovira · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My handwriting is non-existant. My verticals go off in every direction and my line is uneven.

    Am I disorganized? An idiot?

    No. I have MS. To me the pen is an instrument of torture; my own.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  46. re: Back that up by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems like flamebait but I'll bite. How many BASIC compilers have you written in 2 months without touching the target hardware before you were 20? some bio page

  47. Re: Back that up by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wrote a forth compiler for the 6502 processor at the age of 17. A BASIC interpreter of the standard we're talking about back then was not as complex as you imagine. If I remember rightly, his was about 4K of object code. A couple of thousand lines of assembler. Big fucking deal. Impressive because he was the first to implement on a microprocessor, although there were minicomputer implementations for him to copy. But not a genius level accomplishment.

  48. I probably should have mentioned -- by oneiros27 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My grandfather is Carl Pacifico, and after being a chemical engineer, moved to management, and then, after selling his company, became a business consultant. (which is when he was doing handwriting analysis).

    He started studying human behavior, and from that, thinking in general, and now spends his time trying to further research into cognative neuropsychology.

    He's not some Miss Clio wanna-be trying to hawk his wares. I don't even know if he's done much with his handwriting analysis work in years, if not decades.

    From the times that I've tried analysing other people's (and my own) handwriting, it seems to compare well with what I knew of the people, but I haven't tried doing double blind studies or anything else that would provide statistical proof as to the accuracy of the studies.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  49. Amusing by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other words, graphology is BS and the people who analyzed it already had a preconceived notion about whose it was and made the appropriate BS analyses.

    Graphology is just as laughable as astrology, acupuncture or homeopathy. Here's a nice experiment for your amusement: when you meet a "graphologist" who'd like to demonstrate her amazing "skills" to you, be sure to make an experiment using text copied from some newspaper, the same text written by all of the tested people who had no contact with the graphologist before and during the handwriting examination at all. Observing the graphologist's face when she doesn't have "side channels data" and no interaction with people to play with "cold reading" is a trully hilarious experience.

    "This shape might sometimes mean that maybe some kind of a impatience... am I right?"
    "Just keep going, I don't want to disturb you!"

    And the most funny thing is that unlike psychics they can't just make up some dumb excuses that they feel some disturbance of Force or that the Angels are scared by the camera, because they are supposed to be scientists. Looking at someone's writing you can usually tell the gender and age--the same I can guess reading someone's palm... Or foot... Or arse! Does it make me an arsologist?

    For more interesting informations read: Wikipedia article on graphology, James Randi's comments on graphology (by The Amazing Randi of JREF who offers "a one-million-dollar prize to anyone who can show, under proper observing conditions, evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult power or event"), graphology in the Skeptic's Dictionary by Robert T. Carroll, PhD, and of course the excellent Quackwatch paper How Graphology Fools People by Barry L. Beyerstein, PhD. This is not the first time we can laugh at psedoscientific morons on Slashdot thanks to The Amazing Randi.

    And a comment to CmdrTaco: please add the Monty Python foot to the article because without it we look like a bunch of imbeciles. What next? Bill Gates tested by the lie detector and a story posted on science.slashdot.org? Please just add the foot. Thanks.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  50. Dudes! by Spackler · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I ever become rich and famous, I am going to leave doodles of boobies all over the place. They will think I am a sex obsessed pig.... Oh.

  51. Bill Gates , Davros ? by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read this automatically as being about Bill Gates at a Davros press conference. Immediate thought: Davros, inventor of the Daleks, and Bill Gates together. You just know it makes sense.

    Hmmm. Must . get . out . more.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.