Slashdot Mirror


Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Trailer

Rakkis writes "A new Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy trailer is available on the frontpage of Amazon.com. From IMDb: "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy follows the travels of Arthur Dent (Martin Freeman), who is saved from the demolition of the Earth by his pal Ford Prefect (Mos Def). Ford is really an alien doing research for an updated edition of the universe's ultimate travel companion, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." -- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy opens April 29th.""

63 of 773 comments (clear)

  1. Direct link to the movie by alanw · · Score: 4, Informative
    All I can see on the front page (Firefox 1.0) is the plain text
    Now Playing on Amazon.com: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Download the Flash Player.
    A quick look at the html with w3m shows the direct link to the flash movie
    1. Re:Direct link to the movie by Saeger · · Score: 4, Informative
      Worked fine for me in FireFox, but I did have to bypass two adfilters to see it. :)

      First, I had to click the FlashBlock icon to get it to play (since autostarting flash is a dumb idea when it's almost always an annoying ad). Second, my default Privoxy install helpfully blocked the flash movie from playing since there's a nasty "/ads/" redflag in the URL.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:Direct link to the movie by Begossi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Definitely a must see, the Artur Dent choice of actor couldn't have been better.

      It is still a bit disappointing that Zaphod does not have his 2nd head on the movie. It was the source of much humour. And Marvin looks like just a guy in a robot suit, Teletubbie-style. I thought the whole "brain the size of a planet" thing was more like a metaphor for his immense intellect, not just a huge head...

      --
      Friend of the Wise, Brother of the Brave.
    3. Re:Direct link to the movie by uhlume · · Score: 5, Informative

      ....Go back and rewatch the trailer. Zaphod distinctly sports not only a third arm, but what appears to be a second head -- although the glimpse of the head is so brief that I almost thought I imagined it the first couple of times through.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    4. Re:Direct link to the movie by HD+Webdev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "I thought the whole "brain the size of a planet" thing was more like a metaphor for his immense intellect, not just a huge head"

      When I first read the HGTTG stories, I thought the constant reminders that he had a brain that specific size would end up with a plot 'surprise' that Marvin was in fact the computer trying to figure out the question that results in the answer 42.

      After all, no other computers in the story were described as that size except for Earth itself.

      Another strange thing: Marvin in fact did know the Ultimate Question. He was brilliant enough to retrieve it from Arthur's brain but was completely ignored when he mentioned that fact.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    5. Re:Direct link to the movie by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It is still a bit disappointing that Zaphod does not have his 2nd head on the movie."

      After watching the BBC HitchHiker's Guide movie, I can forgive them for that.

      "And Marvin looks like just a guy in a robot suit, Teletubbie-style. I thought the whole "brain the size of a planet" thing was more like a metaphor for his immense intellect, not just a huge head..."

      Well.. I'm not sure what you're expecting, really. It's perfectly okay to have a guy in a 'robot suit'. Not sure if you're aware of this, but the actor who played Willow is inside that suit. I imagine once we see Marvin in relation to the characters, his dimensions will be a little more robote-esque. And, if that's not enough, eh well I just don't know what to tell ya. It's not like a real robot meant to interact with humans wouldn't look like somebody in a robot suit.

      As for his big head... Man this is a symptom of a bigger problem. Movies are a visual medium, books aren't. The movie has to QUICKLY sell the idea to the audience that Marvin has a big brain. But if he says it, and his head is normal sized, does that even work?

      I spotted something else with the trailer. Arther stuck his thumb out and a beam came from it. It didn't appear as though he was holding the special sub-etha device for that purpose. I was going to whine about it until I realized what that would look like on screen. It's one thing to say in a book "Thumb shaped device for Hitchhiking...", but then imagine the problem of communicating that exact same idea in a movie during a suspenseful event. I can see why they made that choice.

      I think we're going to run into a LOT of issues like this. My advice is: Don't let it bother you. I don't think these are the choices of blasphemers, but rather the choices of somebody trying to solve a really really tough problem. In other words, don't get your expectations high that you're going to see a scene-by-scene reenactment of the book.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  2. Direct link to SWF and a download? by vossman77 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Direct link to SWF and a download?

    AmazonFilms.swf


    broken link to mov file

  3. Humma Kavula by LittleGuernica · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where does this Humma Kavula charachter come from?, played by Malkovich.. Was it created especially for the movie? I like the trailer tho, I think Martin Freeman is great as Arthur, the look on his face when he hears that Zaphod and Prefect are related is brilliant.

    1. Re:Humma Kavula by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the IMDB entry for the movie, this character was added specifically for the movie by Adams, who has credits as the screenwriter. So, any changes to the story line are most likely of his own doing.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    2. Re:Humma Kavula by philbowman · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, the book (or radio series, or tv, or any combination of the above) says they're distant cousins, and IIRC share several of the same mothers...

      --
      Phil
    3. Re:Humma Kavula by mikey_boy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      this is actually one of those movies where trying to be a purist is going to be nigh on impossible - what do you consider to be the original source material, the books, or the radio plays?! Given that DNA is also credited with the bulk of what has made it into the movie, so I don't think it can be dismissed in the same way.

      and the trailer looks pretty damn cool ...

    4. Re:Humma Kavula by fetta · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also worth remembering that there are already different versions of the tale - the differences between the radio play scripts and the novel are fairly significant.

      --
      ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
  4. Leave it to Disney... by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    to screw the fans over by forcing a site like Aint-It-Cool to shut down their download of the trailer just so that Amazon can have non-downloadable, lower resolution, crappier version up "exclusively."

    Bite me, Eisner.

  5. Sheesh. by AltGrendel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Opening on April 1 would have been more appropriate.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Sheesh. by TimeZone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, opening on April 2 would have been more appropriate. (Think for a minute.)
      TZ

    2. Re:Sheesh. by tehshen · · Score: 5, Funny

      What about April 7th? "I could never get the hang of Thursdays"

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    3. Re:Sheesh. by TobascoKid · · Score: 4, Funny

      But that's the 4th of February.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
  6. Ford's Thumb? by teiresias · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have mixed feelings about this. I mean every new adaptation of DNA's work is open to interpretation but....

    when did Ford's thumb become a magic hitchhiking device?!?

    Beyond that, It's not as bad as I feared although not as good as I hoped. I think Marvin looks kinda neat, different from the comic book version. Arthur looks about right although Zaphod I think is gonna kill me. I think they're also gonna play up a Arthur, Trillian romance more which I think will hurt it.

    My bum will definitly be in a theater seat the moment this hits theaters though.

    --
    -Teiresias
    1. Re:Ford's Thumb? by anakin876 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it looks like the Thumb has become a ring on his finger. I don't think it was ever stated in the books that it was not a ring. I may be wrong though,

    2. Re:Ford's Thumb? by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I remember seeing something on the making of X-Men, and one of the designers said yellow spandex looks great in a comic book, but it looks stupid on screen.

      If you stick to the original at every instance, your final product might follow the rules perfectly, but not work as well. That's why they did the thumb thing... it looks good (IMO) and drives the story quickly. Anyone watching that will know that the thumb is a communication tool for hitchhicking, even if they don't know the books. It's an OK addition in my book.

      I await fanboy flames.

    3. Re:Ford's Thumb? by StrangeInterlude · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Adams wrote an earlier draft of the screenplay a couple of years before his death. The final shooting script was completed by another screenwriter, Karey Kirkpatrick (best known for his work on Chicken Run). Kirkpatrick has said on the official movie site that he mostly embroidered on Adams' draft, adding a bit here and subtracting a bit there while leaving the bulk of the script intact. Apparently, he even added a few things directly from the books that Adams had left out of the script. So really the screenplay is more of a collaboration between Adams (the text) and Kirkpatrick (the tweaking of said text). I'm curious to see how it turns out.

      --
      -- StrangeInterlude
    4. Re:Ford's Thumb? by patvan · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not Ford's thumb.

      Because of the crappy quality of the trailer, you can hardly see the electronic thumb he's wearing. Looks like a ring with an antenna.

      To see it clearly, look here: http://www.h2g2movie.com/pages/february04.html and scroll down to the picture of the survival kit (with Towel, Babel Fish and Thumb).

  7. Not till April? by philbowman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think you ought to know I'm feeling very depressed...

    --
    Phil
  8. Re:complete? by porcupine8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I sure hope not. Generally trying to force even one novel into a movie results in lots being cut (See also: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban), trying to fit a whole series would be disastrous.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  9. I find it slightly worrying... by al_fruitbat · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...That they appear to be running around a quarry. This has not yet proven successful for British SF ;-)

    1. Re:I find it slightly worrying... by ettlz · · Score: 3, Funny

      From what I can recall, the locations of choice always used to be a disused chemical plant (a remake of Blake's Seven, anyone?); a clearing somewhere in Bracknell Forest; and the car park at Shepherds Bush studios.

      And how come nowadays everything looks like Canadian tundra?!

  10. No sound at work.. by TrippTDF · · Score: 3, Funny

    without hearing anything, it looks great. If worse comes to worse, I can just go to see it with a good pair if earplugs in.

  11. Skip to the ending . . . by JJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Mostly harmless."

    "42"

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
  12. Researcher by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ford is really an alien doing research for an updated edition of the universe's ultimate travel companion, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy."

    Belgium, my cover's blown. That's it, I'm off home. Your planet sucked anyway, monkeymen!

    Except for the ale, of course. And the cheese biscuits, you know those octagonal ones with the sesame seeds on, they were quite nice too. Still, anyway, I'm back to Betelgeuse...

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  13. Bring a Towel by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I go to this film in the theater, and I see anyone sans towel, I'm going to be very depressed, and I will probably panic as a result.

    1. Re:Bring a Towel by asoap · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's funny, I plan to punch in the face anybody I see carrying a towel. God help me if I see anybody with a gold fish stuck in their ear.

      --
      Treat me like a marketing stat, and I'll treat your movie like a series of ones and zeros
    2. Re:Bring a Towel by gamgee5273 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Hmmm... bringing a towel.

      Do you think the theaters will allow towels with sections of pre-soaked popcorn butter, nacho cheese and salsa on them? Maybe some hot dog grease?

  14. Do they mention 42 in the movie? by nganju · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I'd hate to have our inside geek joke be revealed to the world. It's always been sort of a secret code, if you knew what it meant, then you belonged to the tribe. Now every avid moviegoer in the world will know what it means.

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    1. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by slim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd hate to have our inside geek joke be revealed to the world. It's always been sort of a secret code, if you knew what it meant, then you belonged to the tribe.

      Hmm, that may be true in the US. In Britain the TV series has been repeated so many times, and the books are so popular, I reckon at least 25% of people would know what The Answer is (which I'd consider high: something like 40% don't know what town Jesus was born in).

      Obviously, far fewer would know The Question...

    2. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by dreadpiratemark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might look at the time on Dent's alarm clock in the preview for an answer to your question...

      I suspect that won't be the only place you see 42.

    3. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by Feanturi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Erm, I've had '42' thrown at me by plenty of people who haven't read the books, don't actually know what they're referring to, just that it's got something to do with the meaning of life and they want to appear clever in a serious conversation when they have nothing to say. They piss me off. It's never been a 'secret code' as far as I've been aware.

    4. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by hollismb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but that's not the actual question, remember? Authur and Ford got shipped to earth 2 billion years in the past along with all those B-Class citizens from another planet, who subsequently, caused the actual earth-men to die out, which would have lost the question forever. When Aurthur and Ford conduct an experiment, which basically involved Arthur playing blindfolded scrabble, the question that came out was indeed "what's six times nine", but then again, Arthur wasn't technically descended from creatures created for the actual experiment, so it doesn't really count.



      Later, in Life, the Universe, and Everything, the come across Prak, who had too much truth serum and goes on to tell the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth, most of which has a lot to do with frogs. Later, when he stops laughing at Arthur enough to be able to answer a question, he notes that the answer and the question are mutually exclusive, in that no one person can know both the question and answer at the same time, and doing so would cause the universe to vanish and be replaced by something even stranger, if indeed it hadn't already happened.



      Just so happens, I read that part last night. Anyway, 'what's six times nine' is not the actual question.

  15. Movie wont be an adaption of books at all by Miaomiao · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a little hard to believe, but the movie is actually one of Douglous Adam's last works.

    One thing the movie wont be is an adaption of the books and radio play all over again, it's something fresh new and different in the Hitchhiker universe. I'm looking forward to it very much.

    If you're curious about what the plans for the movie were, and the process heading up to it you might want to check out "A Salmon of Doubt" which compiles Adam's final works, along with several letters and coorespondencies leading up to this movie amoung other things

    I'm going to be forever wondering what the story behind half a cat and the rhino will be though...

  16. Re:so far not good ... by philbowman · · Score: 3, Informative
    When Arthur met Trillian on Earth (Islington) before she went off with Zaphod, she was still called Trisha McMillan.

    I think Zaphod's second head is inside his nostril, or something like that.

    --
    Phil
  17. Mos Def by eseiat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mos Def is an extremely gifted musician and skilled actor. He was recently nominated for an Emmy as a lead actor in a mini-series for his work on Something the Lord Made on HBO. He has also been in numerous other films which you can look at here.

  18. Re:Erm by ptlis · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That trailer alone has put me off...
    I have to say the same - I know that the original Radioplay, Books, TV-series & now the film are all distint variations on the same plot but this does not seem to gel with the whole... It is, I hate to say it, painfully Americanised and looks to be heading towards being a Men In Black clone :(.
    --
    There's mischief and malarkies but no queers or yids or darkies within this bastard's carnival, this vicious cabaret.
  19. Straying too far from the path? by SethS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It looks like they're taking a LOT of creative liberties with the script. Too many perhaps?

    For instance... in the preview, they show Ford introducing Arthur to Zaphod. In the book, the whole comedy of the scene is that they both play it cool. Not so in the preview.

    It is my fear that Hollywood is going to ruin another perfectly good book. I'd like to go see it, but I'm going to be very sceptical.

    --
    If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention!
    1. Re:Straying too far from the path? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know it's going to be ruined, it's the Hollywood way. All the previews I've seen are just special effects and catchphrases in the voice-over.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    2. Re:Straying too far from the path? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Funny
      Advanced Adaptation Substitue. It is almost, but not entirely, unlike any of the other adaptations of the story.

      The hardest part I had was convincing the computer that I really wanted something that was printed using chared bits of coal smeared on mashed up, dried out bits of tree, held together by cow skin.

      Hopefully it will stop processing in time...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  20. A few thoughts by sprocketbox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Douglas Adams, on a number of occasions, said that he never intended the film to be a direct adaptation of the book. And, in the introduction of at least one of the books, he talked about how the books were different from the TV show which was different from the radio play. I wasn't all that impressed with the trailer. It looks like the story, which was always for me very cerebral, has been dumbed down into an action flick. I like action flicks as much as the next guy, but not every movie has to be one. The trailer does make it come across as very, MIBish. A fun movie, but nothing to write home about. Right now, I'm thinking that Sideways is going to turn out to be a lot funnier than Hitchhiker.

    1. Re:A few thoughts by Moofie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, a cerebral book with a sperm whale talking with a bowl of gladiolas (?) running into a planet.

      The books were FUNNY. If the movie is funny, it is good. If it's not, it's bad.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  21. I thought it was great... by Vthornheart · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Perhaps I'm jumping the gun, but it looks like Mos isn't going to be a horrible Ford as some of us feared.

    But what about the towel? I didn't see him using a towel to flag down the ship... towels, as everyone knows, are a very important thing. =)

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  22. Generic Fanboy Reaction by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blah blah blah - it's different from the book. I don't care if Douglas Adams himself penned the screenplay and intended all versions to be different. I'm going to bitch and moan about a scene taken out of context from the trailer without knowing how it fits into the story!

    This is a piece of entertainment from my childhood! I somehow believe that I have "rights" as a fan to influence creative decisions by the studio and that this version might erase all love I had for the original, because appearently I can't hold two things in my brain at once. Blah blah blah!

  23. MOD PARENT DOWN: UNTRUTH by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Adams himself wrote the screenplay. [..]
    Everything in the movie has Adams' sanction,


    NO HE DIDN'T! NO IT DOESN'T!

    Every fucking /. article about this movie has one of you out-of-the-loop guys repeating this and getting modded up.

    He wrote A screenplay, not this screenplay. He wrote what HE considered the final draft. And then, he died.
    He had been fighting the studio for years to have a screenplay that he liked, and he managed to finally write one that had compromises from both parties, then, he died. And THEN the studio had "changes" made. We can't know what those are, but wanna bet that their compromises suddenly went away?

    I'm so fucking tired of seeing your delusion about this being his words modded up. I used to reply with links to the statements of the parties invilved detailing the chronology of the rewrites, but my rebuttals went unnoticed and your wishfull thinking stays modded up. Shit!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  24. Re:Again, you miss the point. by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

    Disney should know this by now.

    You mean the Disney that closed down it's traditional animation studio? Disney has degenerated into a nightmare of suits and execs. I tell you: it's run by Vogons.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  25. Kill-O-Zap by zerocircle · · Score: 4, Funny
    When will you people give this damn thing a rest? It was a bad book and it will be a bad movie. I'm tired of hearing about it.

    I wonder how far down, theoretically, a post can be modded.

  26. His head is IN THE TRAILER by sterno · · Score: 4, Informative

    Go back and watch the trailer again. His second head appears briefly in like the last 10 seconds of the trailer, popping up from underneath his regular head.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  27. Re:Looks sucktastic- by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll bite, where in the book does it say what colour Ford Prefect is?

  28. NOT ADAM'S SCREENPLAY! by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Informative
    Everything in the movie has Adams' sanction

    For the zillionth time, no:
    10 September 2004 - Roger Birnbaum: Co-Chairman and CEO of Spyglass Films
    We worked with Douglas for a while in trying to get the script to a place where everyone was satisfied. I remember admiring Douglas' loyalty toward the fans and his total dedication to writing a movie that would live up to their expectations. It was tragic and heartbreaking when Douglas suddenly died. The movie came to an immediate standstill.

    It was well over a year after his passing that Douglas' widow, Jane Adams, encouraged us to move forward with the film as Douglas undoubtedly would have wanted. Karey Kirkpatrick, who had written the hugely successful "Chicken Run", was hired to complete the work Douglas had started on a film adaption of the book.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  29. Exaggerated exasperation by McSpew · · Score: 5, Informative

    He wrote A screenplay, not this screenplay. He wrote what HE considered the final draft. And then, he died.

    You should read the rather funny self-interview conducted by the guy who wrote the final screenplay. It's apparent from that interview--without being explicitly stated--that Adams's final draft was never going to be filmed without further modification. That's just the way the movie business works. Even the "final" approved script gets changed during filming because of (A) inspiration of the director to expand a scene, add a new scene, etc., or (B) the discovery that a scene that reads brilliantly on the page just doesn't work when filmed.

    Douglas Adams wrote a lot of great stuff, but he couldn't figure out how to structure it to make it work as brilliantly in movie form as it had in book and radio play form. The eventual screenplay consisted largely of reorganizing Adams's own material into a shootable script. Where changes deviating from Adams's own writings had to be made, they deferred to his intentions as much as possible, by referring to his notes, unfinished musings, half-written scenes, etc.

    Is there some stuff in the script that wasn't written by Douglas Adams himself? Definitely. Did they likely cut out stuff Adams would have kept? Probably. Did they put back in stuff that Adams had cut? Definitely.

    Unfortunately, due to his untimely death, we'll never know what Douglas Adams himself would have thought of this movie. If you'd asked me five years ago if a movie of HHGG could ever be anything other than horrible, I'd have answered with an unequivocal NO. But Peter Jackson's version of The Lord of the Rings has made me change my mind. I think it can be good. Will it? I don't know, but I'll withhold my judgement until I actually see it.

    1. Re:Exaggerated exasperation by Luigi30 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh... Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra?

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    2. Re:Exaggerated exasperation by biglig2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Director of the Incredibles was on the Radio last night and mentioned that the reason why animated films are often so good is because you can't muck about with the script after you've started because every frame is so expensive.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  30. Zaphod looks a lot like Richard Branson by yeddot · · Score: 5, Funny

    same beard, same color of hair....2 heads, 3 arms, yep!...the same

  31. Re:Excellent quality and speed from Apple by grahamlee · · Score: 3, Funny

    An adroit suggestion with just two small flaws. Firstly, that's not the right trailer and secondly, that's not the right trailer. I realise that technically this is just one flaw but I thought it important enough to mention twice.

  32. Recent DVD HHGTTG reveals insights into DNA by Gondola · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently purchased the DVD version of the BBC's television production of HHGTTG. I would say to anyone who loved the books and intends to see this new film, be prepared for changes. Adams liked to tweak things, and according to what I saw on the DVD, the books have been revised and changed over time as Adams fiddled with bits here and there to refine them.

    The background information about the making of the series, and about Douglas Adams is fascinating. It reveals some of Adams' manic-depressive personality. It talks about how Adams was not one to write a book and then want to translate that 100% to another format; he welcomed change and refinement with the TV series, and based on what I saw in the interviews, I think he enjoyed the opportunity to revise and rewrite HHGTTG yet again on the big screen.

    Adams' only problem, according to the interviews and behind the scenes information, was an awful writer's block at the start of any project. The infamous line about loving deadlines, especially the sound they make as they go whooshing by, was very true for Adams personally.

    Adams was a performer; he didn't really want to be a writer. He started out performing, acting, doing live comedy. At least with writing, his particular quirky sense of humor reached many thousands of people who revere him for what he accomplished, personal foibles aside.

    If you saw the BBC series, Adams was featured in two different spots. One, he was in a suit counting money while walking out of the bank. The other, he was throwing his money away and walking into the water naked.

  33. Dirk Gently by CyberDruid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always thought that although HHGTTG was a damned good series of books, the two Dirk Gently books were slightly more intelligent and more fun for grown-ups.

    It seems to me that "Dirk Gently's holistic detective agency" and "The long dark tea time of the soul" would be more suitable for a movie. More dialogue, less need for a narrator, better developed characters. Not a MIB-type Hollywood action movie, but a nice film nonetheless.

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  34. True direct link by Mr_Perl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here are two direct links,

    One to the HUGE trailer

    One to the SMALL trailer.

    Quicktime format. See the site for the in-between ones and read the source code on the pop-up.

    --

    My poetry site welcomes the unusual.