Slashdot Mirror


Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Trailer

Rakkis writes "A new Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy trailer is available on the frontpage of Amazon.com. From IMDb: "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy follows the travels of Arthur Dent (Martin Freeman), who is saved from the demolition of the Earth by his pal Ford Prefect (Mos Def). Ford is really an alien doing research for an updated edition of the universe's ultimate travel companion, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." -- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy opens April 29th.""

140 of 773 comments (clear)

  1. Direct link to the movie by alanw · · Score: 4, Informative
    All I can see on the front page (Firefox 1.0) is the plain text
    Now Playing on Amazon.com: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Download the Flash Player.
    A quick look at the html with w3m shows the direct link to the flash movie
    1. Re:Direct link to the movie by Folmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      It looks like my adblock filterset.G blocked it.
      Now when i have disabled adblock it plays, but at random places in the trailer it just stops playing. I can't remember when i last went to this much trouble to see a trailer, but i'm about to give up now...

    2. Re:Direct link to the movie by Jerdie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Worked fine for me in Mozilla.
      Of course, my flashblocker waited patiently for me to click it before allowing the flash to run. ;-)

      --
      Programming is simply the application of logic to creativity
    3. Re:Direct link to the movie by DanCentury · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have no problems viewing the trailer with Firefox 1.0. It might be your OS that's the problem.

    4. Re:Direct link to the movie by Saeger · · Score: 4, Informative
      Worked fine for me in FireFox, but I did have to bypass two adfilters to see it. :)

      First, I had to click the FlashBlock icon to get it to play (since autostarting flash is a dumb idea when it's almost always an annoying ad). Second, my default Privoxy install helpfully blocked the flash movie from playing since there's a nasty "/ads/" redflag in the URL.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    5. Re:Direct link to the movie by Begossi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Definitely a must see, the Artur Dent choice of actor couldn't have been better.

      It is still a bit disappointing that Zaphod does not have his 2nd head on the movie. It was the source of much humour. And Marvin looks like just a guy in a robot suit, Teletubbie-style. I thought the whole "brain the size of a planet" thing was more like a metaphor for his immense intellect, not just a huge head...

      --
      Friend of the Wise, Brother of the Brave.
    6. Re:Direct link to the movie by gmr2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had a (default?) filter in AdBlock set to block */ads/* which prevented it from being displayed.

    7. Re:Direct link to the movie by uhlume · · Score: 5, Informative

      ....Go back and rewatch the trailer. Zaphod distinctly sports not only a third arm, but what appears to be a second head -- although the glimpse of the head is so brief that I almost thought I imagined it the first couple of times through.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    8. Re:Direct link to the movie by HD+Webdev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "I thought the whole "brain the size of a planet" thing was more like a metaphor for his immense intellect, not just a huge head"

      When I first read the HGTTG stories, I thought the constant reminders that he had a brain that specific size would end up with a plot 'surprise' that Marvin was in fact the computer trying to figure out the question that results in the answer 42.

      After all, no other computers in the story were described as that size except for Earth itself.

      Another strange thing: Marvin in fact did know the Ultimate Question. He was brilliant enough to retrieve it from Arthur's brain but was completely ignored when he mentioned that fact.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    9. Re:Direct link to the movie by Pdj79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Their disinterest in Marvin's discovery wasn't really strange. I thought it was brilliant. When it came down to it, no one actually cared about the Ultimate Question being known, it was just an interesting story told to the group while they were on the hunt for Magrathea and all its "riches". In the end, no one cared about the reason why Earth was commissioned or what the final result of all its work was, especially Arthur. All anyone cared about was themselves. They were nothing but a bunch of self-absorbed wankers. Only Marvin owned up to this fact. But hey, loved the books and love this trailer...April 29th is gonna be a great day.

    10. Re:Direct link to the movie by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It is still a bit disappointing that Zaphod does not have his 2nd head on the movie."

      After watching the BBC HitchHiker's Guide movie, I can forgive them for that.

      "And Marvin looks like just a guy in a robot suit, Teletubbie-style. I thought the whole "brain the size of a planet" thing was more like a metaphor for his immense intellect, not just a huge head..."

      Well.. I'm not sure what you're expecting, really. It's perfectly okay to have a guy in a 'robot suit'. Not sure if you're aware of this, but the actor who played Willow is inside that suit. I imagine once we see Marvin in relation to the characters, his dimensions will be a little more robote-esque. And, if that's not enough, eh well I just don't know what to tell ya. It's not like a real robot meant to interact with humans wouldn't look like somebody in a robot suit.

      As for his big head... Man this is a symptom of a bigger problem. Movies are a visual medium, books aren't. The movie has to QUICKLY sell the idea to the audience that Marvin has a big brain. But if he says it, and his head is normal sized, does that even work?

      I spotted something else with the trailer. Arther stuck his thumb out and a beam came from it. It didn't appear as though he was holding the special sub-etha device for that purpose. I was going to whine about it until I realized what that would look like on screen. It's one thing to say in a book "Thumb shaped device for Hitchhiking...", but then imagine the problem of communicating that exact same idea in a movie during a suspenseful event. I can see why they made that choice.

      I think we're going to run into a LOT of issues like this. My advice is: Don't let it bother you. I don't think these are the choices of blasphemers, but rather the choices of somebody trying to solve a really really tough problem. In other words, don't get your expectations high that you're going to see a scene-by-scene reenactment of the book.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Direct link to the movie by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worked fine for me. I suppose that's because I have flash installed and not adblock ;)

    12. Re:Direct link to the movie by imr · · Score: 2, Informative

      He will lose those after a while in the movie.
      It is in one of the 2 reviews that were linked here, iirc, et which was quite dispointed by the movie. It was a preview not the final thing tho'.

    13. Re:Direct link to the movie by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was Ford who stuck out his thumb, and he had a glowing blue ring on it. So I guess they changed a thumb-shaped device into a thumb-mounted device.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    14. Re:Direct link to the movie by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And Marvin looks like just a guy in a robot suit, Teletubbie-style. I thought the whole "brain the size of a planet" thing was more like a metaphor for his immense intellect, not just a huge head...

      Eight words:

      Your Plastic Pal Who's Fun To Be With!

      Sirius Cybernetics would have built Marvin to look friendly, lovable, cute and Fisher-Pricey. Unfortunately, since their programming isn't as good as their marketing, Marvin, the doors, Eddie, the elevators, and in fact just about every Sirius Cybernetics product ever built had a thoroughly screwed-up personality.

      Personally, I think the movie's visual concept of Marvin is quite perfect.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    15. Re:Direct link to the movie by David+Gould · · Score: 2, Interesting


      The movie has to QUICKLY sell the idea to the audience that Marvin has a big brain. But if he says it, and his head is normal sized, does that even work?

      But some plot elements are supposed to be subtle. A bigger-than-normal-sized head is still nowhere near "the size of a planet", which makes Marvin's claim sound like incredibly dramatic exaggeration.

      But he keeps saying it, doesn't he? Does he maybe mean that he's actually connected via some sort of Sub-Etha link to a computer that really is, literally, "the size of a planet"? Then at some point maybe the reader notices: "Hey, isn't there another planet-sized computer in the story? Hmmm... Naahhhh..." Then there's the little scene where he claims to know The Ultimate Question (and of course, nobody pays any attention (okay, they get distracted and forget about it, but it amounts to the same thing)). Are these hints that Marvin's brain actually is the Earth? (Or conversely, that his body is its I/O terminal?)

      I haven't been on the H2G2 discussion boards or anything, and I don't know if Fandom has an answer (official or otherwise), but I've always assumed Adams' intent was to drop those vague hints, but leave it ambiguous, so we'd just have to keep wondering.

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    16. Re:Direct link to the movie by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Another strange thing: Marvin in fact did know the Ultimate Question. He was brilliant enough to retrieve it from Arthur's brain but was completely ignored when he mentioned that fact.

      In fact, Marvin is more than capable of doing the jobs of both Deep Thought and the Earth by himself in far less than millions of years. While sitting bored in the Krikkit command ship (coordinating the planetary war effort being a trivial task) he solves all the political, social, economic and personal problems of the entire Universe - except for his own - several times over purely as an intellectual exercise. He then proceeds to compose some rather dolorous little lullabies.

      If only he was prepared to talk... but of course if anyone had actually asked Marvin what the Question in Arthur's brain was, he wouldn't have given a straight answer, he'd have droned on about his diodes instead. In any case the version of the Question in Arthur's brain was corrupt, incorrect; it's Fenchurch's short-lived but dazzling insight into Life, the Universe and Everything that we really need to find.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  2. Direct link to SWF and a download? by vossman77 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Direct link to SWF and a download?

    AmazonFilms.swf


    broken link to mov file

    1. Re:Direct link to SWF and a download? by davron05 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://images.amazon.com/media/imdb/01/ads/hhgttg4 2/AmazonFilms.swf

    2. Re:Direct link to SWF and a download? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny
      broken link to mov file

      Damn Vogons. Well, time to update Earth's entry...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  3. complete? by moz25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cool. Does the final movie include the entire series?

    1. Re:complete? by porcupine8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I sure hope not. Generally trying to force even one novel into a movie results in lots being cut (See also: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban), trying to fit a whole series would be disastrous.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  4. Humma Kavula by LittleGuernica · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where does this Humma Kavula charachter come from?, played by Malkovich.. Was it created especially for the movie? I like the trailer tho, I think Martin Freeman is great as Arthur, the look on his face when he hears that Zaphod and Prefect are related is brilliant.

    1. Re:Humma Kavula by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the IMDB entry for the movie, this character was added specifically for the movie by Adams, who has credits as the screenwriter. So, any changes to the story line are most likely of his own doing.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    2. Re:Humma Kavula by philbowman · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, the book (or radio series, or tv, or any combination of the above) says they're distant cousins, and IIRC share several of the same mothers...

      --
      Phil
    3. Re:Humma Kavula by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    4. Re:Humma Kavula by mikey_boy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      this is actually one of those movies where trying to be a purist is going to be nigh on impossible - what do you consider to be the original source material, the books, or the radio plays?! Given that DNA is also credited with the bulk of what has made it into the movie, so I don't think it can be dismissed in the same way.

      and the trailer looks pretty damn cool ...

    5. Re:Humma Kavula by Wylfing · · Score: 2, Informative
      Where does this Humma Kavula charachter come from?, played by Malkovich.. Was it created especially for the movie?

      According to IMDB:

      John Malkovich's character, a religious leader, was created especially for the movie by Douglas Adams.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    6. Re:Humma Kavula by fetta · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also worth remembering that there are already different versions of the tale - the differences between the radio play scripts and the novel are fairly significant.

      --
      ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
    7. Re:Humma Kavula by jangobongo · · Score: 2, Interesting


      From watching the preview, my guess is that Humma Kavula/John Malkovich is the character sitting at the dining room table that stands up and has no body below the edge of the table, just a bunch of tiny little robot legs. It went by so quickly that I couldn't be sure that it was Malkovich, though.

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    8. Re:Humma Kavula by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Informative

      "No, the book (or radio series, or tv, or any combination of the above) says they're distant cousins, and IIRC share several of the same mothers..."

      I just read the book a week ago: Yes, these two are related. It's a very vague reference.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Humma Kavula by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it makes you feel better, I can confirm that it is a fact - Douglas told me and some colleagues about HK a few years ago. In fact, one of the purposes of HK was to solve a problem with Zaphod. Whether or not you believe me of course, is another matter.

      It is fun watching some of the other people here posting their "Oh no! Dinsey hacks have ruined teh Hitchhiker!" opinions though :)

  5. Leave it to Disney... by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    to screw the fans over by forcing a site like Aint-It-Cool to shut down their download of the trailer just so that Amazon can have non-downloadable, lower resolution, crappier version up "exclusively."

    Bite me, Eisner.

    1. Re:Leave it to Disney... by javaxman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      missing a visible second head is excusable.

      You really think so?? I guess it's a matter of personal opinion, but... it seems like rather a big deal to me.

      I seem to remember the fact that Zaphod had two heads being _very_ prominently noticable in Arthur's introduction to him ( Arthur couldn't focus on what he was saying, didn't know which head to look at, etc ). The shot I saw in the trailer, it looked like there was maybe a big head that flopped back to reveal an inner small one or something? Not anything like the book, anyway. You'd think with that nice special effects budget they could have done some good CGI or something, rather than rewriting the story.

      at least its not the crappy paper machet head that flopped around rediculously in the BBC series.

      What, you expect BBC shows to *not* be cheap?!? That's taxpayer money at work there! It was Dr. Who production values, just what you should expect! Besides, at least it was toung-in-cheek funny, like the books... most importantly, keeping to the story and not re-writing completely just because it's 'hard' to do a good job of having a two-headed Zaphod. I was going to go watch it up until I noticed the missing head...

  6. Sheesh. by AltGrendel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Opening on April 1 would have been more appropriate.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Sheesh. by TimeZone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, opening on April 2 would have been more appropriate. (Think for a minute.)
      TZ

    2. Re:Sheesh. by tehshen · · Score: 5, Funny

      What about April 7th? "I could never get the hang of Thursdays"

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    3. Re:Sheesh. by precize · · Score: 2, Informative

      4-2, obviously

    4. Re:Sheesh. by TobascoKid · · Score: 4, Funny

      But that's the 4th of February.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    5. Re:Sheesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Going from the smallest to the biggest number is NOT logical either, it's the complete opposite of numbers standards.

      dd-mm-yyyy and mm-dd-yyyy both suck (especially when you morons keep trunking the year to yy... Ever heard of Y2K? Let's see you not complain near 2038...)

      4096... 4 x 1000 + 0 x 100 + 9 x 10 + 6
      From biggest to smallest

      yyyy-mm-dd is the right way to write dates. And it's an ISO standard. Sync yourself with the rest of the planet, will ya?

      Oh, and drop your stupid 12-hours AM/PM crap too. There's 24 hours in a day, not two chunks of 12 hours (which only exists because of mechanical clocks limitations)

    6. Re:Sheesh. by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Adams was British, so that would mean the 4th of February to him. Already missed it!

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
    7. Re:Sheesh. by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...so April 2nd is 4-2 when using a Logically hierarchical date format.

      I think you meant 2nd April...


      There's two Aprils now!?

      God, why do Europeans have to make everything so confusing!

      (Insert rods-to-the-hogshead joke from the Simpsons here.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:Sheesh. by magefile · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm an American, but MMDDYY is *not* a logically hierarchal date format. YYYYMMDD, OTOH, is. Duh!

  7. Ford's Thumb? by teiresias · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have mixed feelings about this. I mean every new adaptation of DNA's work is open to interpretation but....

    when did Ford's thumb become a magic hitchhiking device?!?

    Beyond that, It's not as bad as I feared although not as good as I hoped. I think Marvin looks kinda neat, different from the comic book version. Arthur looks about right although Zaphod I think is gonna kill me. I think they're also gonna play up a Arthur, Trillian romance more which I think will hurt it.

    My bum will definitly be in a theater seat the moment this hits theaters though.

    --
    -Teiresias
    1. Re:Ford's Thumb? by anakin876 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it looks like the Thumb has become a ring on his finger. I don't think it was ever stated in the books that it was not a ring. I may be wrong though,

    2. Re:Ford's Thumb? by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I remember seeing something on the making of X-Men, and one of the designers said yellow spandex looks great in a comic book, but it looks stupid on screen.

      If you stick to the original at every instance, your final product might follow the rules perfectly, but not work as well. That's why they did the thumb thing... it looks good (IMO) and drives the story quickly. Anyone watching that will know that the thumb is a communication tool for hitchhicking, even if they don't know the books. It's an OK addition in my book.

      I await fanboy flames.

    3. Re:Ford's Thumb? by Allison+Geode · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually Alan Rickman is voicing Marvin. Warwick Davis is merely acting as the role of marvin, the man in the suit, so to speak. why they didn't just have a CG marvin is beyond me.

    4. Re:Ford's Thumb? by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ooooh that's great! I can so picture Marvin with Rickmans' voice - sorta like he played Metatron in "Dogma", if you have seen it.

      Thanks for the correction!

    5. Re:Ford's Thumb? by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally think it's great when people try to do things "the hard way". I mean, yeah LOTR with it's expensive special effects is great and all, but it's fun to occasionally pull out my bootleg DVD's of the original untouched Star Wars trilogy and see what a sci-fi movie made "the hard way" was like.

    6. Re:Ford's Thumb? by Criffer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the thumb is an electronic sub-etha signalling device and the roundabout is at Barnard's star....

    7. Re:Ford's Thumb? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It looks like the Thumb actually slips over Ford's real thumb, or it's a bionic addition. But, look at the trailer again - I thought I saw a metal band at the bottom of Ford's thumb.

    8. Re:Ford's Thumb? by StrangeInterlude · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Adams wrote an earlier draft of the screenplay a couple of years before his death. The final shooting script was completed by another screenwriter, Karey Kirkpatrick (best known for his work on Chicken Run). Kirkpatrick has said on the official movie site that he mostly embroidered on Adams' draft, adding a bit here and subtracting a bit there while leaving the bulk of the script intact. Apparently, he even added a few things directly from the books that Adams had left out of the script. So really the screenplay is more of a collaboration between Adams (the text) and Kirkpatrick (the tweaking of said text). I'm curious to see how it turns out.

      --
      -- StrangeInterlude
    9. Re:Ford's Thumb? by patvan · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not Ford's thumb.

      Because of the crappy quality of the trailer, you can hardly see the electronic thumb he's wearing. Looks like a ring with an antenna.

      To see it clearly, look here: http://www.h2g2movie.com/pages/february04.html and scroll down to the picture of the survival kit (with Towel, Babel Fish and Thumb).

  8. Not till April? by philbowman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think you ought to know I'm feeling very depressed...

    --
    Phil
    1. Re:Not till April? by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I feel obliged to say at this point that I've met the man Douglas Adams based Marvin on (allegedly - he definitely went to university with him). He trained as a lawyer, I think, but then he became a music teacher. He's very intelligent, talks quite slowly, and when he says "very good" in response to some work it sounds like he meant "I hate all these attempts. They're rubbish. But yours was slightly less awful than the others so I suppose I ought to say something encouraging, not that I like doing that sort of thing. Oh God, I'm so depressed..."

      So I believe it's true, anyway :)

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
  9. Accents by haluness · · Score: 2

    After watching the TV series, Mos Def as Ford Prefect is a bit wierd. From the few scenes in the trailer, Prefect seems a little too, ..., in focus. Whereas in the book and TV series, he also seemed a little out of it.

    But then I just saw 5 seconds of Prefect. Can't wait for the movie

  10. Arthur, Trillian romance could work in the film. by AltGrendel · · Score: 2, Funny

    As long as she continues to treat him as a twit, I think it could work.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  11. I find it slightly worrying... by al_fruitbat · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...That they appear to be running around a quarry. This has not yet proven successful for British SF ;-)

    1. Re:I find it slightly worrying... by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The vital question is, did they film in the same quarry as the BBC TV series?

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    2. Re:I find it slightly worrying... by ettlz · · Score: 3, Funny

      From what I can recall, the locations of choice always used to be a disused chemical plant (a remake of Blake's Seven, anyone?); a clearing somewhere in Bracknell Forest; and the car park at Shepherds Bush studios.

      And how come nowadays everything looks like Canadian tundra?!

    3. Re:I find it slightly worrying... by spongman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ford: Look, I can't help what you may personally be filming in, but...

      Zaphod: Computer!

      Zaphod: Oh, no!

      Computer: Hi there! This is Eddie your shipboard computer, and I'm feeling just great guys, and I know I'm just going to get a bundle of kicks out of any programme you care to run through me.

      Zaphod: Computer, tell us again where we're filming today.

      Computer: A real pleasure feller, we are currently in an old quarry on the legendary planet of Magrathea.

      Ford: Proving nothing, I wouldn't trust that computer to speak my weight.

  12. No sound at work.. by TrippTDF · · Score: 3, Funny

    without hearing anything, it looks great. If worse comes to worse, I can just go to see it with a good pair if earplugs in.

  13. Skip to the ending . . . by JJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Mostly harmless."

    "42"

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
    1. Re:Skip to the ending . . . by Wimmie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I must have an older edition...

      "Harmless"

  14. Researcher by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ford is really an alien doing research for an updated edition of the universe's ultimate travel companion, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy."

    Belgium, my cover's blown. That's it, I'm off home. Your planet sucked anyway, monkeymen!

    Except for the ale, of course. And the cheese biscuits, you know those octagonal ones with the sesame seeds on, they were quite nice too. Still, anyway, I'm back to Betelgeuse...

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  15. Bring a Towel by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I go to this film in the theater, and I see anyone sans towel, I'm going to be very depressed, and I will probably panic as a result.

    1. Re:Bring a Towel by asoap · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's funny, I plan to punch in the face anybody I see carrying a towel. God help me if I see anybody with a gold fish stuck in their ear.

      --
      Treat me like a marketing stat, and I'll treat your movie like a series of ones and zeros
    2. Re:Bring a Towel by gamgee5273 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Hmmm... bringing a towel.

      Do you think the theaters will allow towels with sections of pre-soaked popcorn butter, nacho cheese and salsa on them? Maybe some hot dog grease?

  16. Do they mention 42 in the movie? by nganju · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I'd hate to have our inside geek joke be revealed to the world. It's always been sort of a secret code, if you knew what it meant, then you belonged to the tribe. Now every avid moviegoer in the world will know what it means.

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    1. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by slim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd hate to have our inside geek joke be revealed to the world. It's always been sort of a secret code, if you knew what it meant, then you belonged to the tribe.

      Hmm, that may be true in the US. In Britain the TV series has been repeated so many times, and the books are so popular, I reckon at least 25% of people would know what The Answer is (which I'd consider high: something like 40% don't know what town Jesus was born in).

      Obviously, far fewer would know The Question...

    2. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by dreadpiratemark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might look at the time on Dent's alarm clock in the preview for an answer to your question...

      I suspect that won't be the only place you see 42.

    3. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by Feanturi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Erm, I've had '42' thrown at me by plenty of people who haven't read the books, don't actually know what they're referring to, just that it's got something to do with the meaning of life and they want to appear clever in a serious conversation when they have nothing to say. They piss me off. It's never been a 'secret code' as far as I've been aware.

    4. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by tc · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the other hand, the books were already made into a TV and radio show, so it's not much of a secret, is it?

      Actually, it was the original radio show which was later turned into a book, and thence a TV show.

    5. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by Serapth · · Score: 2, Funny

      which I'd consider high: something like 40% don't know what town Jesus was born in

      Come on! Since the movie came out, EVERYONE knows it was Montreal!

    6. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by hollismb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but that's not the actual question, remember? Authur and Ford got shipped to earth 2 billion years in the past along with all those B-Class citizens from another planet, who subsequently, caused the actual earth-men to die out, which would have lost the question forever. When Aurthur and Ford conduct an experiment, which basically involved Arthur playing blindfolded scrabble, the question that came out was indeed "what's six times nine", but then again, Arthur wasn't technically descended from creatures created for the actual experiment, so it doesn't really count.



      Later, in Life, the Universe, and Everything, the come across Prak, who had too much truth serum and goes on to tell the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth, most of which has a lot to do with frogs. Later, when he stops laughing at Arthur enough to be able to answer a question, he notes that the answer and the question are mutually exclusive, in that no one person can know both the question and answer at the same time, and doing so would cause the universe to vanish and be replaced by something even stranger, if indeed it hadn't already happened.



      Just so happens, I read that part last night. Anyway, 'what's six times nine' is not the actual question.

    7. Re:Do they mention 42 in the movie? by tweek · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know which is geekier -

      Modifying your email headers

      or

      Your friend READING the email headers

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  17. Movie wont be an adaption of books at all by Miaomiao · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a little hard to believe, but the movie is actually one of Douglous Adam's last works.

    One thing the movie wont be is an adaption of the books and radio play all over again, it's something fresh new and different in the Hitchhiker universe. I'm looking forward to it very much.

    If you're curious about what the plans for the movie were, and the process heading up to it you might want to check out "A Salmon of Doubt" which compiles Adam's final works, along with several letters and coorespondencies leading up to this movie amoung other things

    I'm going to be forever wondering what the story behind half a cat and the rhino will be though...

  18. Re:so far not good ... by philbowman · · Score: 3, Informative
    When Arthur met Trillian on Earth (Islington) before she went off with Zaphod, she was still called Trisha McMillan.

    I think Zaphod's second head is inside his nostril, or something like that.

    --
    Phil
  19. Mos Def by eseiat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mos Def is an extremely gifted musician and skilled actor. He was recently nominated for an Emmy as a lead actor in a mini-series for his work on Something the Lord Made on HBO. He has also been in numerous other films which you can look at here.

  20. Re:Erm by ptlis · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That trailer alone has put me off...
    I have to say the same - I know that the original Radioplay, Books, TV-series & now the film are all distint variations on the same plot but this does not seem to gel with the whole... It is, I hate to say it, painfully Americanised and looks to be heading towards being a Men In Black clone :(.
    --
    There's mischief and malarkies but no queers or yids or darkies within this bastard's carnival, this vicious cabaret.
  21. Re:Erm by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you see the same trailer? This one is new and does indeed show Vogon Constructor Ships.

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  22. Re:I like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, I've read the books to. But I don't remember the "Buffereing 20%" part from the books. This seems to be a prominent part of the trailer though.

  23. Re:Ford? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No but the book does describe ford as a misfit.. he never quite understood the earth - even his earth name shows some of that misunderstanding.

    A streetwise rapper just doesn't fit.

  24. Straying too far from the path? by SethS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It looks like they're taking a LOT of creative liberties with the script. Too many perhaps?

    For instance... in the preview, they show Ford introducing Arthur to Zaphod. In the book, the whole comedy of the scene is that they both play it cool. Not so in the preview.

    It is my fear that Hollywood is going to ruin another perfectly good book. I'd like to go see it, but I'm going to be very sceptical.

    --
    If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention!
    1. Re:Straying too far from the path? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know it's going to be ruined, it's the Hollywood way. All the previews I've seen are just special effects and catchphrases in the voice-over.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    2. Re:Straying too far from the path? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Funny
      Advanced Adaptation Substitue. It is almost, but not entirely, unlike any of the other adaptations of the story.

      The hardest part I had was convincing the computer that I really wanted something that was printed using chared bits of coal smeared on mashed up, dried out bits of tree, held together by cow skin.

      Hopefully it will stop processing in time...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  25. A few thoughts by sprocketbox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Douglas Adams, on a number of occasions, said that he never intended the film to be a direct adaptation of the book. And, in the introduction of at least one of the books, he talked about how the books were different from the TV show which was different from the radio play. I wasn't all that impressed with the trailer. It looks like the story, which was always for me very cerebral, has been dumbed down into an action flick. I like action flicks as much as the next guy, but not every movie has to be one. The trailer does make it come across as very, MIBish. A fun movie, but nothing to write home about. Right now, I'm thinking that Sideways is going to turn out to be a lot funnier than Hitchhiker.

    1. Re:A few thoughts by Moofie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, a cerebral book with a sperm whale talking with a bowl of gladiolas (?) running into a planet.

      The books were FUNNY. If the movie is funny, it is good. If it's not, it's bad.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:A few thoughts by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about (now, I know this is a crazy idea, but bear with me) we watch the movie before we assume that it sucks?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:A few thoughts by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay.

      So read a review written by somebody who's seen the movie.

      Or continue jumping to conclusions. Whatever floats your boat.

      "Ruined"? Did they come take your book away from you?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:A few thoughts by wintermute740 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The trailer does make it come across as very, MIBish."

      I keep hearing this from people who have seen the trailer as if it's a bad thing. DNA was upset when MIB came out because he felt they borrowed his ideas very heavily, while his movie was still being rejected by the studios.

  26. Re:so far not good ... by br0ck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Where the hell is Zaphod's second head????

    In the trailer, 1 minute in, when Zaphod throws ice into two martini glasses with two hands, it cuts away and then back to his head lifting up and a second head appearing underneath. I don't believe that in the book it ever said the heads were next to each other??

    (Note that I'm talking about the .mov version that somebody linked to halfway down the Fark discussion since the Amazon one wouldn't work for me.)

  27. Re:Mos Def and Martin Freeman? by jskiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, because that "Boyz in the Hood" movie with Ice Cube was just awful, wasn't it? . Just because someone is known for rapping doesn't mean that they can't act. Colors, 8 Mile, and the aforementioned Boyz in the Hood are proof of that.

    Or could it be, perhaps, that your virgin image of characters in books couldn't possibly adapt to having a black man, let alone a "street-wise" black man, in a leading role?

    --
    It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
  28. Re:so far not good ... by jpetts · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did they change Trillian's name to Trisha?

    Trillian's name is Tricia (sic):

    See here

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  29. Re:Mos Def and Martin Freeman? by thatshortkid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My god man. Anytime your comment makes sweeping assumptions and generalizations about somebody because of their other artistic endeavors you are an ass. Will be seeing this one on opening night.

    Rent The Italian Job by the way. And maybe actually listen to some Mos Def before you talk shit. Black on both sides, Black Star, and The New Danger (or any Soundbombing, for that matter) aren't your typical fare. Ass.

    --
    The IRS is the one organization that you don't want to fuck with. Remember, these are the guys who took down Al Capone.
  30. Awesome B-day present! by Azureflare · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sweet!! April 29th is my 22nd birthday!

    I couldn't ask for a better present. DNA is probably my favorite humorist, (followed closely by Terry Pratchett). I'm really looking forward to this film. This is going to be my birthday party... going to see DNA's imagination on the big screen!

  31. I thought it was great... by Vthornheart · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Perhaps I'm jumping the gun, but it looks like Mos isn't going to be a horrible Ford as some of us feared.

    But what about the towel? I didn't see him using a towel to flag down the ship... towels, as everyone knows, are a very important thing. =)

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  32. Glossary by rtv · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sass: know, be aware of, meet, have sex with
    Hoopy: really together guy
    Frood: really amazingly together guy

    Example usage: "Hey, you sass that hoopy Ford Prefect? There's a frood who really knows where his towel is."

  33. Generic Fanboy Reaction by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blah blah blah - it's different from the book. I don't care if Douglas Adams himself penned the screenplay and intended all versions to be different. I'm going to bitch and moan about a scene taken out of context from the trailer without knowing how it fits into the story!

    This is a piece of entertainment from my childhood! I somehow believe that I have "rights" as a fan to influence creative decisions by the studio and that this version might erase all love I had for the original, because appearently I can't hold two things in my brain at once. Blah blah blah!

    1. Re:Generic Fanboy Reaction by huge+colin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the problem that most "fanboys" have is that this is now a hollywood movie, so it needs to be hollywoodized -- you don't have the same creative freedoms that you do when publishing a book because it's simply not economically OK if the movie only appears to a niche crowd.

      Movies are produced to make a bunch of money, so the producers need to be sure that's going to actually happen.

    2. Re:Generic Fanboy Reaction by Auckerman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your joking aside, what's really interesting is the book wasn't first. Here's a nice timeline:

      March 78 BBC Radio Show
      Dec 78 Christmas special
      May 79 Stage play in london
      Oct 79 The book is published

      It goes on and on, with TV shows, more Radio shows, the classic text adverture game, up to Adams himself writing the draft screenplay a selling movie rights to Disney. It's been in his hands the whole time. A living breathing story, something that in this day and age of keeping perfect records (as we like to think) is getting more and more rare.

      I've got copies of two of the BBC radio shows, I've seen TV adaptations. I'm looking forward to the movie, I'm sure Adams will continue with his great tradition even after death.

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
  34. Re:so far not good ... by bonch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think Zaphod's second head is inside his nostril, or something like that.

    That was a silly web rumor that everyone decided to believe and spread around for no reason. Zaphod's second head simply hasn't been created in CG yet. Several interviews have come out in the past few months explaining all about this movie, but unfortunately, Slashdot seems to have rejected all those submissions!

  35. first trailer by supersuckers · · Score: 2, Informative

    for those that haven't already seen it, the first trailer is here http://www.apple.com/trailers/touchstone/hitchhike rsguidetothegalaxy/

  36. MOD PARENT DOWN: UNTRUTH by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Adams himself wrote the screenplay. [..]
    Everything in the movie has Adams' sanction,


    NO HE DIDN'T! NO IT DOESN'T!

    Every fucking /. article about this movie has one of you out-of-the-loop guys repeating this and getting modded up.

    He wrote A screenplay, not this screenplay. He wrote what HE considered the final draft. And then, he died.
    He had been fighting the studio for years to have a screenplay that he liked, and he managed to finally write one that had compromises from both parties, then, he died. And THEN the studio had "changes" made. We can't know what those are, but wanna bet that their compromises suddenly went away?

    I'm so fucking tired of seeing your delusion about this being his words modded up. I used to reply with links to the statements of the parties invilved detailing the chronology of the rewrites, but my rebuttals went unnoticed and your wishfull thinking stays modded up. Shit!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN: UNTRUTH by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are wound way too tight to enjoy this movie.

      Please, for all our sakes, indulge in your muscle relaxant of choice and chill the hell out.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  37. Re:so far not good ... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, except that there's a moment in the trailer where something is going on with this neck. His head tilts back, and another face pops up from underneath. I suspect that's where his second head comes into play. If they just hadn't done the CGI yet, they wouldn't put shots of him in the trailer (besides, it'd be late in the game to not have any CGI shots of him completed).

  38. Re:Again, you miss the point. by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

    Disney should know this by now.

    You mean the Disney that closed down it's traditional animation studio? Disney has degenerated into a nightmare of suits and execs. I tell you: it's run by Vogons.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  39. 7:42!! by chinard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just noticed that the time arthur woke up was 7:42..

    Surprised it was an alarm clock and not his digital watch..

  40. Kill-O-Zap by zerocircle · · Score: 4, Funny
    When will you people give this damn thing a rest? It was a bad book and it will be a bad movie. I'm tired of hearing about it.

    I wonder how far down, theoretically, a post can be modded.

  41. His head is IN THE TRAILER by sterno · · Score: 4, Informative

    Go back and watch the trailer again. His second head appears briefly in like the last 10 seconds of the trailer, popping up from underneath his regular head.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  42. Re:Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster... by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Years ago a friend and I tried to work this out. Specifcally, we tried to find a non-toxic occilating reaction that would sequence thru several colors and repeat. We eventually settled on two colors, repeating, but failed to find the non-toxic reaction.

    Oh well. Nanotechnology anyone?

  43. Re:Looks sucktastic- by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll bite, where in the book does it say what colour Ford Prefect is?

  44. Theme Music by BBrown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me or does the theme music sound very much like the music in Men in Black?

    Joby Talbot is clearly stealing from Danny Elfman.

    1. Re:Theme Music by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is extremely common. I remember the first time I noticed it, in a trailer for (I think) Pitch Black. They were using the music from Stargate.

      My brother is actually in the film scoring business, and this is the normal state of affairs. Once the real score is finished they'll start using it. The music hasn't been "stolen," but fairly licensed.

  45. NOT ADAM'S SCREENPLAY! by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Informative
    Everything in the movie has Adams' sanction

    For the zillionth time, no:
    10 September 2004 - Roger Birnbaum: Co-Chairman and CEO of Spyglass Films
    We worked with Douglas for a while in trying to get the script to a place where everyone was satisfied. I remember admiring Douglas' loyalty toward the fans and his total dedication to writing a movie that would live up to their expectations. It was tragic and heartbreaking when Douglas suddenly died. The movie came to an immediate standstill.

    It was well over a year after his passing that Douglas' widow, Jane Adams, encouraged us to move forward with the film as Douglas undoubtedly would have wanted. Karey Kirkpatrick, who had written the hugely successful "Chicken Run", was hired to complete the work Douglas had started on a film adaption of the book.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  46. Exaggerated exasperation by McSpew · · Score: 5, Informative

    He wrote A screenplay, not this screenplay. He wrote what HE considered the final draft. And then, he died.

    You should read the rather funny self-interview conducted by the guy who wrote the final screenplay. It's apparent from that interview--without being explicitly stated--that Adams's final draft was never going to be filmed without further modification. That's just the way the movie business works. Even the "final" approved script gets changed during filming because of (A) inspiration of the director to expand a scene, add a new scene, etc., or (B) the discovery that a scene that reads brilliantly on the page just doesn't work when filmed.

    Douglas Adams wrote a lot of great stuff, but he couldn't figure out how to structure it to make it work as brilliantly in movie form as it had in book and radio play form. The eventual screenplay consisted largely of reorganizing Adams's own material into a shootable script. Where changes deviating from Adams's own writings had to be made, they deferred to his intentions as much as possible, by referring to his notes, unfinished musings, half-written scenes, etc.

    Is there some stuff in the script that wasn't written by Douglas Adams himself? Definitely. Did they likely cut out stuff Adams would have kept? Probably. Did they put back in stuff that Adams had cut? Definitely.

    Unfortunately, due to his untimely death, we'll never know what Douglas Adams himself would have thought of this movie. If you'd asked me five years ago if a movie of HHGG could ever be anything other than horrible, I'd have answered with an unequivocal NO. But Peter Jackson's version of The Lord of the Rings has made me change my mind. I think it can be good. Will it? I don't know, but I'll withhold my judgement until I actually see it.

    1. Re:Exaggerated exasperation by Luigi30 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh... Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra?

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    2. Re:Exaggerated exasperation by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh... Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra?

      No, but kudos for out-geeking me. ;^)

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    3. Re:Exaggerated exasperation by biglig2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Director of the Incredibles was on the Radio last night and mentioned that the reason why animated films are often so good is because you can't muck about with the script after you've started because every frame is so expensive.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    4. Re:Exaggerated exasperation by atomic_toaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even the "final" approved script gets changed during filming because of (A) inspiration of the director to expand a scene, add a new scene, etc., or (B) the discovery that a scene that reads brilliantly on the page just doesn't work when filmed.

      As someone who works in the film/television industry, I can tell you with 100% certainty that even if Adams wrote the final screenplay that was approved by all and sundry, and even if none of the above is true (which all of it is), there is no way that Adams' screenplay would have made it to the big screen totally unmodified. Actors mess up/change their lines on a daily basis. Scenes/lines get left on the cutting room floor because they just don't work well in the final cut, or because they don't fit in an AA (vs. R) rating, or because there was dirt in the lens that screwed up the shot and it's not worth stretching the budget to have it digitally cleaned up. Something unexpected happens, which influences the budget, which means that some of the effects that people consider so necessary these days cannot be paid for.

      For all of you purists out there, there is NO SUCH THING as a film going from script to screen without being changed somewhat. Even if the author of the original novel wrote the script, directed the film AND supervised every single frame of editing, life's little practicalities get in the way. I mean, look at Interview With The Vampire, where both the original novel and the screenplay were written by Anne Rice -- and still the movie was not entirely accurate to the book.

      I get really tired of people complaining that movies based on novels/comic books are not completely accurate to the original source. It's not like it is impossible to enjoy a movie for itself without comparing it to the book. It's as if the works of their favorite authors didn't go through upteen revisions to satisfy the author, the editor, and the publisher before the final product was delivered. The medium and the intended market do influence the story, that is true, but it is just as true for paper as it is for moving pictures. Compromises between budget, time, and accuracy have to be made when bringing something to the big screen. Yet I don't hear anyone complaining that the sales of their favorite book/comic book/whatever went through the roof once the movie came out, enabling the author to gain the popularity and the finances necessary to produce more work.

      Sorry for the rant, but I do have to work in this business, and hence every single complaint from the people I know (with the exception of the people I work with) about this kind of thing gets funneled my way. Kind of like how every teacher out there has got to be tired of hearing people complain about the education system, or people working in the government is tired of hearing people complain about beaurocratic red tape.

  47. Re:God damn people by Darthmalt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hello and let me be the first to welcome you to Karma Hell. Please buckle your seatbelt and return your tray to the full and upright position as a new mod option -42 heretic (who is so unhip it's a wonder his bum doesn't fall off) is added especially for you.

  48. Wooo Coool by whitetiger0990 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I plan on watching it the day it comes out.... Maybe twice.

    Anyone else notice what time he woke up?
    7:42

    Or maybe 4/29/2005 but maybe that's just pushing it....

    --
    You have been warned.
  49. Zaphod looks a lot like Richard Branson by yeddot · · Score: 5, Funny

    same beard, same color of hair....2 heads, 3 arms, yep!...the same

  50. Re:Excellent quality and speed from Apple by grahamlee · · Score: 3, Funny

    An adroit suggestion with just two small flaws. Firstly, that's not the right trailer and secondly, that's not the right trailer. I realise that technically this is just one flaw but I thought it important enough to mention twice.

  51. Re:Erm by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

    you know with DNA doing the script before he died and them not changing a thing about it since then and all.

    10 September 2004 - Roger Birnbaum: Co-Chairman and CEO of Spyglass Films
    We worked with Douglas for a while in trying to get the script to a place where everyone was satisfied. I remember admiring Douglas' loyalty toward the fans and his total dedication to writing a movie that would live up to their expectations. It was tragic and heartbreaking when Douglas suddenly died. The movie came to an immediate standstill.

    It was well over a year after his passing that Douglas' widow, Jane Adams, encouraged us to move forward with the film as Douglas undoubtedly would have wanted. Karey Kirkpatrick, who had written the hugely successful "Chicken Run", was hired to complete the work Douglas had started on a film adaption of the book.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  52. Recent DVD HHGTTG reveals insights into DNA by Gondola · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently purchased the DVD version of the BBC's television production of HHGTTG. I would say to anyone who loved the books and intends to see this new film, be prepared for changes. Adams liked to tweak things, and according to what I saw on the DVD, the books have been revised and changed over time as Adams fiddled with bits here and there to refine them.

    The background information about the making of the series, and about Douglas Adams is fascinating. It reveals some of Adams' manic-depressive personality. It talks about how Adams was not one to write a book and then want to translate that 100% to another format; he welcomed change and refinement with the TV series, and based on what I saw in the interviews, I think he enjoyed the opportunity to revise and rewrite HHGTTG yet again on the big screen.

    Adams' only problem, according to the interviews and behind the scenes information, was an awful writer's block at the start of any project. The infamous line about loving deadlines, especially the sound they make as they go whooshing by, was very true for Adams personally.

    Adams was a performer; he didn't really want to be a writer. He started out performing, acting, doing live comedy. At least with writing, his particular quirky sense of humor reached many thousands of people who revere him for what he accomplished, personal foibles aside.

    If you saw the BBC series, Adams was featured in two different spots. One, he was in a suit counting money while walking out of the bank. The other, he was throwing his money away and walking into the water naked.

  53. The trailer raised my hopes by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll bite, where in the book does it say what colour Ford Prefect is?

    I have, for reasons I can't fanthom, misplaced that book (I have the other 4, where the helll id no1 go?), so I can't quote.

    But I seem to remember a mention of his skin turning black when he becomes a penguin while onboard the Heart Of Gold. Maybe it was a comment from Arthur in the TV show or the radio series...

    Anyway: Did he sound like an American rapper in the original radio show? No.
    What did he look like in the TV series? It's not as though there is no source material for his appearance that was created with the direct involvment of the author.

    Hey, maybe Mos Def is gonna do a kick-ass job. One thing is clear: Casting a black guy for that role is a deviation from the established appearance of the character. No matter how unable you are to recall a specific mention of skin tone in the book.

    P.S. I've been defending the choice of Michael Clark Duncan for King Pin in Daredevil on the basis that the definening visual characteristics for Kingpin are size and baldness. I can't think of one actor with a better morphology for that role than Duncan, therefore the change in skin colour is unimportant. But for Ford: It's not as though they're running out of gangly, wild eyed actors. Casting him is a CLEAR case of tokenism, make no mistake about it. When you release a movie in the states, you HAVE to have a black actor, otherwise, you're a racist! The irony of this escapes most people, but that is usually the case.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  54. Re:Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster... by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2, Funny

    oh yes, Nanotechnology is well known for being completely safe and non-toxic. Go right ahead.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  55. Dirk Gently by CyberDruid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always thought that although HHGTTG was a damned good series of books, the two Dirk Gently books were slightly more intelligent and more fun for grown-ups.

    It seems to me that "Dirk Gently's holistic detective agency" and "The long dark tea time of the soul" would be more suitable for a movie. More dialogue, less need for a narrator, better developed characters. Not a MIB-type Hollywood action movie, but a nice film nonetheless.

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  56. Link to avi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  57. True direct link by Mr_Perl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here are two direct links,

    One to the HUGE trailer

    One to the SMALL trailer.

    Quicktime format. See the site for the in-between ones and read the source code on the pop-up.

    --

    My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
  58. Re:True direct link (correction) by Mr_Perl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note that these are the older trailers, if you want the newest ones you gotta use the flash...

    --

    My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
  59. Re:so far not good ... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Informative
    But just to clarify, they have revealed his second head in the trailer, but it's hidden most of the time. Therefore, the reason for the one-headed Zaphod was not that the CGI hadn't been finished yet, but because his second head is under his first head, and therefore hidden by his shirt.

    In this sense, when asked, "Where the hell is Zaphod's second head????", the answer, "I think Zaphod's second head is inside his nostril, or something like that," is true enough. His head isn't hidden in his nostril, but it's "something like that". In other words, yes, Zaphod has a second head, but no, it's not visible under most circumstances.

  60. Re:Again, you miss the point. by enosys · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you look at the source of the relevant part of the Amazon web page you can find the URL of an XML file which gives you the URL for the trailer. However, it is an rtmp:// URL, and I don't know of any program that can download that.

    RTMP (Real-Time Messaging Protocol) is a proprietary protocol used for streaming media to a flash applet. There is also a totally unrelated RTMP (Routing Table Maintenance Protocol) in AppleTalk.

  61. My take on it... by biglig2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... is that, while it has probably been bastardized a bit, I am intending to go see it.

    This is praise indeed, because there are an enormous lot of films about that recycle stuff I am very fond of, and few of them have been able to persuade me that I should see them.

    Both versions of the Punisher fail to grasp the basic concept that Frank is a soldier. I expect this sort of sloppy behaviour in a Dolph movie, but John, what were you thinking?

    I went to see Ep I, and it is only watchable because there is 5 minutes in it where you see a Sith/Jedi who isn't old/disabled/old and disabled.

    Electra is clearly a steaming pile of crap.

    Constantine is apparently so bad that Neo's acting is one of it's few redeeming features (?!?!?)

    LoEG has had Tom Sayer forced up it's arse in order to make USAians go see it.

    FF doesn't do Ben with CGI.

    In the Avengers, in the scene introducing Steed, when the orignal theme played, all I could think of was how incredibly cool Patrick MacNee is. Luckily I was quicky distracted by how fucking ridiculous that bowler hat looked. Also: Uma, my dear, you are very very hot indeed, but nobody in the world is as hot as Diana Rigg was in the 60s. I mean, I must (reluctantly) admit that I think that Cher is not a bad singer, but when she did a Roy Orbison cover it was just embarassing. Know your limits!

    Thunderbirds did the ships OK, maybe I should watch it and put a bag over my head during the character bits.

    I am thankful that I have bought every Flaming Carrot comic I have ever seen, and so was absolved from having to see Mysterymen because I've already paid my dues to Bob Burden.

    The Magic Roundabout will be cited in my defence when I am charged with burning my local cinema down.

    I all of this, I can only give praise to one:

    Hellboy was quite good.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  62. Meta post by kreyg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You know, it's rather astonishing how many whiny "purists" have been posting about "inconsistencies," even though most of them have mis-quoted or mis-remembered most of what they are complaining about. Even more ironic is that one of the hallmarks of the series is how inconsistent it is between different media, and there is no "one holy version."

    Really, I would have expected that Battlestar Galactica would have demonstrated that changing things can be good. On one hand, everyone seems jaded with the lack of originality in media, but on the other raise a fuss when someone tries something different.

    If it's even remotely good, enjoy it. If not, shrug, and life will go on.

    --
    sig fault
  63. Man, people are DENSE by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you just one of those people who refuses to ever concede *anything*?

    No, you are, because FORD WASN'T BLACK BEFORE! Sheesh, stop trying to nitpick your way into justifying the absurb possibility that they had miscast him the first time around.

    He was a caucasian-looking alien from a small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Beetlegeuse, now he's a black/african-american/negroid/whateverthefuckyouw anttocallMosDef'srace-looking alien from a small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Beetlegeuse.

    You have people upset at this because it's an unnecessary change to a well known and visually documented story whom the producers of the big-screen adaptation refer to as being followed as closely as possible, you have others who don't like it because they don't like rappers, and others because they simply don't like black people.
    I point out the unnecessary change, I get fucktards and loosers calling "teh rac1st!1!!". Which is an easy troll, therefore to be expected.

    There are others somehow desperate to DEFEND the change by pretending that it isn't a change at all, which is dumb.

    You want to start on the penguin thing? Ok: Arthur faces Ford turning into a penguin, he mentions a colour change. Penguins are black and white, their ventral feathers being the white ones. Since he's facing Arthur, a colour change that would be most noticeable would be the sudden apparation of a snow-white patch, not the slight darkening of his skin. I get some delusional person going "but penguin black is blacker than human black", and frankly, that's wanker talk.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  64. I For One: by Upaut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Welcome our new hoopy frood overlords. (It had to be done, sorry)

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
  65. Re:Excellent quality and speed from Apple by Pseudonym · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hook, line, sinker and copy of Angling Times.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});