Slashdot Mirror


AirPort Express Streaming Audio From Any Program

Foobaz writes "Until now, the only application that can play audio on Apple's AirPort Express has been Apple's own iTunes. But Rogue Amoeba, makers of Audio Hijack, just released Airfoil, a program that lets you redirect anything to your AirPort Express, like streaming audio from mplayer, RealPlayer, or VLC."

261 comments

  1. Tinfoil hats by boingyzain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do I need an airfoil hat to use this?

  2. Sync issues by KoopaTroopa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has anyone used this? Are there any sync issues if running audio from (as an example) VLC from a video file?

    --
    Sharpies don't just sniff themselves.
    1. Re:Sync issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If its from the same people as audio hijack, there shouldnt be any sync issues

    2. Re:Sync issues by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 5, Informative

      They answer that question in the FAQ. Yes, the audio will be out of sync. This can be solved with VLC or MPlayer by manually synchronizing the video and audio. This cannot be solved with DVD Player.app, RealPlayer, or anything else that won't let you decouple audio from video. There's probably nothing they can really do about this.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:Sync issues by KoopaTroopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I figure hopefully there's a kind of standard delay in the Airport Express decoding so, even if you have to manually sync, maybe it's not a trial-and-error process.

      Thanks for reading the FAQ for me (page didn't load for me, apparently it wasn't /.'d yet though.

      --
      Sharpies don't just sniff themselves.
    4. Re:Sync issues by JonGretar · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is a sync issue with this. It's got to do with the APEX standard and nothing the DEV's can do about it.

      However. This is not a problem since VLC and MPlayer can move the sound all around. So just watch your torrents with VLC(which I guess you do anyway) and make the sound be a few seconds early. Easy peasy.

      More info at http://www.rogueamoeba.com/forum/ubb/Forum7/HTML/0 00010.html

    5. Re:Sync issues by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      There's probably nothing they can really do about this.
      I said that, but it's not true. They could write software that would buffer everything coming out of the compositing engine, or perhaps just one window, and play it back a second or two later. Obviously this would be resource intensive and prone to annoyances, but it could work on big, burly machines.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:Sync issues by Menoyoda · · Score: 1

      There's gotta be some way to sync it up. If you play audio in iTunes over AirTunes and use the visualizer, the visualizer is always perfectly synced up from what I've seen.

    7. Re:Sync issues by pancakegeels · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Easy peasy? I can't get this to work from any command line app. Any ideas?

    8. Re:Sync issues by Carthag · · Score: 1

      With mplayerosx I can move the sound with the -/+ keys on the numpad (A/V Delay). I haven't figured out how to do it from the command line, but I haven't spent much time on it either.

    9. Re:Sync issues by netcrusher88 · · Score: 1
      it could work on big, burly machines.
      You mean like Macs? That's fine-Mac folks own the Airport thing anyway.
      --
      There's an old saying that says pretty much whatever you want it to.
  3. Crippleware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It emits noise after using for ten minutes, unless you purchase the "pro" version

    1. Re:Crippleware by amichalo · · Score: 5, Funny

      It emits noise after using for ten minutes, unless you purchase the "pro" version

      That's just your music. Try this site and see if it helps.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    2. Re:Crippleware by SlamMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      So? Its a demo. It it was fully functional, few people would buy it.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    3. Re:Crippleware by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      The advantage here is that, unlike Audio Hijack Pro, Airfoil has no free equvalent like Soundflower.

      --
      -mkb
    4. Re:Crippleware by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, after ten minutes it turns into steaming audio.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:Crippleware by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      what, does that mean that it plays raunchy pron over the wireless connection :-P?

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    6. Re:Crippleware by nacturation · · Score: 3, Funny

      what, does that mean that it plays raunchy pron over the wireless connection

      No, not origasmi. I was thinking more the kind your neighbor's dog carefully arranges on your lawn. Dogs certainly know their feng shuit.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Crippleware by SkipRosebaugh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure there is. It's called JustePort

    8. Re:Crippleware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is this?
      Someone wants to sell a product, so they let you try it out. But where they really get you is when it stops working and makes you pay for it.

      Can you believe that?!?

      They spent their time and resources bringing a unique application to market and they want to be paid for it?

      I smell Communism.

      Seriously, dude... sod off.

    9. Re:Crippleware by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      That's missing the component that captures audio, as far as I can tell. Close but not quite. With a little bit of work, you can probably get icecast and Soundflower to do the same thing (and work through iTunes, which is what Airfoil apparently does)

      I'd rather have something that hooks onto Soundflower and then uses Justeport to stream to the Airport Express.

      --
      -mkb
    10. Re:Crippleware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they want to use the public internet as a distriubtion channel for their commercial crippleware, and get all crying and upset when people crack it. Seriously, dude. Sod off.

    11. Re:Crippleware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, some apple "fan" will release a cracked warze version to all the other apple "supporters" soon enough.

    12. Re:Crippleware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They spent their time and resources bringing a unique application to market and they want to be paid for it?

      More like: They spent their time and resources ripping of someone else's work and then they have the gall to pretend that they're first.

      I smell Communism.

      Ripping off other people's work is good old American capitalism.
    13. Re:Crippleware by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Difference is, JustePort only sends MPEG4

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    14. Re:Crippleware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather have software that is built around an open TCP/IP streaming standard, instead of having to use Apple's crippled, proprietary version of the same basic idea. The only reason that people are using AirTunes is because it has support of the mainstream software provider, in this case Apple.

    15. Re:Crippleware by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Me too, but the reality is that it isn't going to happen. It's like waiting for open-source linux drivers from nvidia

      --
      -mkb
  4. Still not the only feature I want by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I want to be able to use my computer as an AirTunes sink, not a source. I'm not about to buy an Airport Express, but I'd like to be able to pipe audio from my girlfriend's iBook to my desktop's speakers.

    Then yeah, I'd like to be able to do it with DVD Player.app as well as iTunes.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:Still not the only feature I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I'd like to be able to pipe audio from my girlfriend's iBook to my desktop's speakers

      Yeah, and I'd like to pipe your girlfriend's box, but will Apple help? Nooooo. "We aren't really in that business." Pfft.

    2. Re:Still not the only feature I want by humuhumunukunukuapu' · · Score: 4, Informative

      why not turn on sharing in both of your itunes? then you can access one another's libraries.

      --
      i saw the baby, and the baby looked at me
    3. Re:Still not the only feature I want by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Because my girlfriend prefers to use her computer, not mine. When we're just listening that's fine, but not when she's stealing & compiling tracks from the internet.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:Still not the only feature I want by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      not sure about dvd player.app or itunes, but if your desktop is a linux machine you could do something like enable ESD and then use xmms or other open source programs to play your music with the destination as you desktop. Alternately you could use something like mpd to do a simillar thing.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    5. Re:Still not the only feature I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it have to use AirTunes' protocol? How about something like this:
      http://www.apulsoft.ch/wormhole/index.php

    6. Re:Still not the only feature I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had the same problem, solved it with NetTunes, which is a bit clunky for controlling iTunes on my old B&W (maddening for building playlists or anything like that), but it works and allows me to control my music without sitting in front of my desktop. Also allows me to keep my poor little PowBook's 60GB hard drive relatively unencumbered with music.

    7. Re:Still not the only feature I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Jack OS X at http://www.jackosx.com/, it's a port of linux's free Jack audio connection kit. it can stream sound output over the network.

    8. Re:Still not the only feature I want by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I want that, too, in a similar situation with a Windows laptop/desktop. Movie audio over the speakers of a 12" isn't exactly hi-fi. Ideally, there would be an audio driver that reroutes the audio via (wireless) ethernet to some server. And ideally, the laptop would automagically switch to the desktop speakers when they are "in range". As far as I am aware, there is no easy way to do this on Windows. The only thing that comes close is playing the same movie on both systems, ignoring the desktops image and muting the laptops audio. That's not exactly elegant.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    9. Re:Still not the only feature I want by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Shared Library actually works better than AirTunes in this regard - a shared library works irrespective of what each person is doing, unlike AirTunes where iTunes needs to do the work on one machine.

      So, with shared library you can both listen to different things!

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    10. Re:Still not the only feature I want by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Shared Library actually works better than AirTunes in this regard

      About the only "work" I got out of Shared Library was... nothing.

      It would be nice if I could get it to work, but it just doesn't. Apple's instructions and trouble shooting guides are worthless, and nothing seems to show on Google. Even if I turn off the firewalls on both computers, I have yet to see iTunes sharing to work. This is one reason I won't buy the Airport Express. I'd love to get one, really, but I have no confidence that it will work.

      I have a Mac mini and several Windows 2000 PCs on the same switch and subnet, and nothing I do seems to work between any of them.

    11. Re:Still not the only feature I want by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      you have something screwed up with your network then. Either that, or you didnt' tell the other computers to look for shared music. iTunes allows you to share without looking for shared music and look for shared music without sharing yourself. They're two check boxes. Did you hit them both?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    12. Re:Still not the only feature I want by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

      and make sure you are running current versions of iTunes, and that your Airport base station or router or whatever supports Rendezvous (zero-config).

      if it's not something silly, then it's your actual network not liking rendezvous.... that's worth figuring out for more than just the ability to play the iTunes game.

    13. Re:Still not the only feature I want by mithras · · Score: 1

      I'm betting that the girlfriend's iBook and the poster's desktop are on different networks, which is why it won't work.

      Just a guess, though.

    14. Re:Still not the only feature I want by ducman · · Score: 1

      I have the same problem, but haven't been able to explain it very well, apparently, because everybody gives me the same advice you're getting.

      Here's the way I've tried to describe it elsewhere:

      I have a server under the house, with several large drives on it, that contains > 300 CDs worth of music in Apple Lossless format. I have two Macs that access that music via iTunes, one in my office and one in the kitchen. I have an old WallStreet PowerBook in the den, connected to the stereo, and use it to play music from that server, too.

      What I would like to do, is use iTunes on either the computer in the office or the one in the kitchen to play music on the stereo. I think the Airport Express would do exactly what I want, except I hate to pay for another piece of hardware, when I have a laptop sitting there, already. Besides, I've already run wires, so I don't need the wireless part.

      I've experimented with using command-line Unix tools or VNC to remotely control the laptop connected to the stereo. That works, but VNC is painfully slow, and command-line tools are no fun.

      Does anybody know of some way to make something other than an Airport Express show up in iTunes as a remote speaker. Heard of an open-source project to do that which I could help out with? Have another idea for what I'm trying to do?

      I don't want to sit in the den, with the laptop that is connected to the stereo. I want to sit in my office, run iTunes on the computer in my office, and hear music coming out of the den.

      --
      "We have nothing in common, your attitude annoys me, and your political views are appalling."
    15. Re:Still not the only feature I want by dirtstar · · Score: 0

      I haven't used it, but you could try remote tunes
      http://www.ovolab.com/remotetunes/

      --
      I want to walk the Earth and kick ass where needed, like Cain from the TV show Kung-Fu.
    16. Re:Still not the only feature I want by ducman · · Score: 1

      I did try it, but it's not actually iTunes, it just provides an interface that sort of looks like iTunes, and uses Remote Apple Events to control iTunes running on the remote laptop. I'm currently using a simpler version of the same concept. Liveable, but far from ideal.

      --
      "We have nothing in common, your attitude annoys me, and your political views are appalling."
    17. Re:Still not the only feature I want by Xyde · · Score: 1

      http://cvs.opendarwin.org//cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/proj /NetworkAudioDevice/README?annotate=HEAD

    18. Re:Still not the only feature I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently finished setting up an Airport Extreme and Express setup with my PC, Mac, and home stereo. I was having major problems and was beating my head on the wall... aggravated all to hell. The problems eventually boiled down to 2 things: didn't have the latest Airport software on the PC (I had updated the firmware on the routers with the Mac, which also had latest software, but the PC had the out-of-box software that didn't work correctly with the new firmware); and I forgot to check and configure my software firewall on the PC, which was blocking all communications to the Airport Express. The problems were my fault... having the latest software/firmware and checking that firewall are 2 basic steps in troubleshooting. Oh well...

  5. Will the foil fly? by erick99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Airfoil looks like a great product,however, I can't quite tell if it is something that Apple will dislike given how proprietary Apple can be.

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:Will the foil fly? by isa-kuruption · · Score: 5, Informative

      If Apple didn't like it and wanted to be proprietary, they wouldn't have used Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP), which is a well documented and supported protocol, as the transport method.

    2. Re: Will the foil fly? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Your post looks like a good subtle troll, however, I can't quite tell if it's something that the slashdot community will dislike given how free spirited the slashdot community can be.

      In other words, who cares if Apple likes it? If it's good, use it. Do you ask yourself if your car manufacturer will like it that you're plugging an MP3 player into the vehicle's sound system? Oh my god, what if they dislike it??

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:Will the foil fly? by beej69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      huh? do you have any URL's to back up your claim? afaik, apple purposefully used a proprietary algorithm. Jon Lech Johansen (yes... DVD Jon) was the one to reverse-engineer it:
      http://nanocrew.net/blog/apple/revairtunes.html

    4. Re:Will the foil fly? by isa-kuruption · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My claims? Considering Apple uses RTSP for it's Quicktime streaming it would only make sense for them to use the thing they know for their other products. Any more proof? Shall I telnet to port 554 on my Airport Express and show you the RTSP signature? How about a Apple Press Release in which they updated RTSP in the Airport firmware. I'm sure Apple always updates protocols not supported by their hardware!

    5. Re:Will the foil fly? by isa-kuruption · · Score: 1

      This provides more useful information to help backup your claim, but also mine...

      Some random blog

    6. Re:Will the foil fly? by beej69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ok... so if they are using RTSP to stream the bits, they're still using a proprietary method to encode those bits :) so we're both right? or both wrong? ;)

    7. Re:Will the foil fly? by isa-kuruption · · Score: 5, Informative

      As explained in this blog:

      RAOP protocol itself has already been analyzed by DVDJon and its implementation is availabe as an open source C# software called JustePort. RAOP protocol is based on RTSP wrapped with AES and RSA cryptography, on which Apple Lossless files are streamed.

      AES and RSA are also open methods in conjunction with RTSP. Seems pretty open to me.

    8. Re:Will the foil fly? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      AFAIK it only works with the Apple Lossless codec.

    9. Re:Will the foil fly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seems pretty open to me

      It wasn't open before. And it didn't become open because of anything Apple did.

      If Microsoft DRM is reverse engineered some time in the future and it turns out that they're using open algorithms, that doesn't retroactively make MS DRM open.

      The fact that RAOP, an "embrace and extend" version of RTSP, uses open crypto algorithms doesn't make RAOP open.
    10. Re: Will the foil fly? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You should care because Apple can release new firmware that can fuck it up and that would make it a great annoyance to use it. It is worth it to know how they feel about it - probably not very happy, I'm guessing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Will the foil fly? by yanzh · · Score: 1

      Apple has already include airfoil in it's download site. http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/audio/airfoi l.html

  6. Okay... by Delta2.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That will work nice for those who have airport express, but when will other hardware makers put the ability to stream music to a stereo on their routers so the price won't be such a factor?

    1. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First they would need to put audio hardware on their routers. It's not really something that's in big demand.

    2. Re:Okay... by 3nuff · · Score: 2, Informative

      When they realize that everyone is buying an AirPort Express.

      Fortunately the AP Express is not a single purpose device, like other streaming audio solutions. The printing and network extending capabilities make it well worth the $125.

      A great addition to the AirPort would be a remote control with TV display. I'm visualizing being able to see my track info on my TV screen and control the tracks with a remote. I know that there is a TiVO solution (that I won't link to, use google) that works like this, but the cost of all the hardward puts you up there with the non-AirPort Express solution. Then again multitasker capabilties of TiVO also increase it's value over the single task streaming audio devices.

      --
      "Give me taste, give me funk, give me fury, gimme some more."
    3. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roku Labs (www.rokulabs.com) makes a product line called the Soundbridge which incorporates the streaming music, remote control, and a display which shows the track info, and connects to your stereo. You can connect wirelessly or via ethernet. The downside is it won't play protected AACs, but there are ways around that. And, it's only for streaming music...so the benefits of sharing video, files, or printers are lost.

  7. OSX-only by jbellis · · Score: 1

    Damn... still waiting to be able to stream from launchcast.

    1. Re:OSX-only by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Damn... still waiting to be able to stream from launchcast.

      From the LAUNCHcast website :

      LAUNCHcast is currently compatible only with Internet Explorer 5.x and 6.x for Windows based PCs and Netscape 4.5 to 4.79 on the Macintosh OS.

      Seriously?!? Ha-ha!!

      There are a thousand and one different sources for music. Pick one that doesn't require you to use an outdated browser, then buy a Mac mini.

      What, you're saying there isn't a Windows-based solution to do this kind of thing ?

      And what the heck is up with those Launchcast browser requirements, that's so 1999... over 10 million OS X users is a market they don't want to be bothered with ?

    2. Re:OSX-only by beej69 · · Score: 1

      maybe not for long?

      from the FAQ (http://www.rogueamoeba.com/airfoil/faq.php):

      Is there a version for Windows?
      There are no current plans for porting Airfoil to Windows. However, this is the most logical of all our products to be ported, so stay tuned.

    3. Re:OSX-only by jdray · · Score: 1
      Is there a version for Windows?
      There are no current plans for porting Airfoil to Windows.

      Yeah, right...

      Use Airfoil to play audio from RealPlayer, Windows Media Player, Safari, and almost any other application right through your AirPort Express.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    4. Re:OSX-only by s_mencer · · Score: 1

      You do know about this right... Windows Media Player for OSX

    5. Re:OSX-only by jdray · · Score: 1

      News to me. Wish I could mod you "Informative."

      thx

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    6. Re:OSX-only by ahertz · · Score: 1

      You do realize that there's a Mac Version of Windows Media Player, right?

      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized. -AC
    7. Re:OSX-only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that there is a Windows Media Player for OS X, right? And that you can get it from Microsoft here

    8. Re:OSX-only by paulio · · Score: 1

      Windows Media Player does exist on Mac OS X

    9. Re:OSX-only by jrockway · · Score: 1

      There's an OS X version of Windows media player. (I wouldn't install it, though, because once you do you can never get rid of it!)

      --
      My other car is first.
    10. Re:OSX-only by xrissley · · Score: 1

      On the mac plateform, there is a (crippled and outdated, no-DRM included) version of WMP, so that MS can pretend they are not abusing their monopoly and leveraging it to invst the multimedia market ("look, we have WMP for mac too!").

      It doesn't play half of the streams available around the Net, and it comes with no support at all for WMP9 or -10 like DRM.

      The latter point is seen by me as a blessing (the less DRM-infested my media are,the better I am. )

      And no, I do NOT buy from iTunes Music store, although I use iTunes for everything else)

      But this, like most things from MS since they realised they were onto something with Windows, is also part of a lock-in strategy:

      Mr Anyone "I want to buy a Mac, I heard they are so much easier for multimedia and all"

      Wise advisor (only doing his job, don't blame him, I'd be doing the same) : "Yes but they can't play any of the songs you bought online on the MS_DRM infested stores that are popping up like mushrooms in the rain, and they won't play all the holiday vidos you encoded with Windows Movie Maker"

      Mr Anyone : "Oh,then I'll stick to my PC then"

      Consumers want choice, I heard somewhere.
      Well, at least iTMS is on both plateforms. Now if we get it ported to Linux, Apple... Oh I forgot, Linux users will not want DRM. But they will complain they can't use iTMS songs though, nothing makes you feel better than a bit of hypocrisy ;-)

      The world is not perfect I know. And people either. But a bit of ranting and venting anger is always good.

      --
      =====
      I lie all the time, including now
    11. Re:OSX-only by revscat · · Score: 1

      The hooks used by Audio Hijack are lower than the application level. They take what is headed for your sound card and open up a separate stream that pipes the same stream to a different source. WMP just hooks into already existing APIs on OS X, and is really irrelevant in this context.

    12. Re:OSX-only by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

      WiMP9 for mac is only useful for playing WMV3 video inside a WMV container. It will not play WMV3 video inside an AVI container, and VLC for mac plays neither.

      --
      .
  8. So I can get.... by zoharroy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... my game of tetris to play music through it too?

  9. Audio Hijack by mailman-zero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How do they accomplish this? Is there any sort of conversion on the fly being done to the audio? Are they piping it through iTunes somehow or implementing this on their own? Does this involve encryption algorithms?

    --
    Let's play video games with mailmanZERO
    1. Re:Audio Hijack by nguyenhm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes it involves encryption. The signal going to an Airport Express is encrypted Apple Lossless.

    2. Re:Audio Hijack by beej69 · · Score: 5, Informative

      they're the first high-profile implementation of the algorithm that Jon Lech Johansen reverse-engineered:
      (http://nanocrew.net/blog/apple/revairtunes.html)

      and yes... this is THAT Jon... the one that got yanked into court for reverse-engineering the DVD encryption. all hail Jon! :D

      what we need now is for mplayer and VLC and the others to implement airport express streaming directly in the media player...

  10. Apple's not going to like this. by jocknerd · · Score: 2, Informative

    They don't like to share their toys with outsiders.

    Don't flame me. I'm an Apple user. So I know what I speak of.

    1. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by SpamJunkie · · Score: 5, Informative

      It probably won't be a problem, for two reasons:

      1. It's been in beta for a while, Apple could have easily done something about it earlier.

      2. It still uses iTunes. The backend uses the iTunes API to add a local stream to the library and send it to the Airport Express.

      What would really make Apple upset is if someone had discovered the key being used to encrypt the audio, but that hasn't happened here.

    2. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's not going to like what exactly? That Rogue Amoeba made existing technology easier to use?

      JustePort has been sending music to the AirPort Express for quite some time.

    3. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by useosx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple never had a problem with Audio Hijack. I really see no reason that they're going to think anything other than "Oh, now we'll sell more Airport Expresses."

      This is much different than, say, cracking their DRM. I really can't think of a single reason they would disapprove of Airfoil.

    4. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      What would really make Apple upset is if someone had discovered the key being used to encrypt the audio, but that hasn't happened here.

      That has happened. Perhaps you meant the key to decrypt the audio?
    5. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by fiji · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, like what "DVD Jon" did last August: http://nanocrew.net/blog/apple/revairtunes.html

      -ben

    6. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a pathetic karam whoring post.

      Apple loves people to play with their toys nitwit.

      The natural progression at Apple goes something like this:

      1) Internal Apple developer/team creates technology, API or UI, for an Apple product, app or system

      2) The new stuff is recognized to be useful and desireable outside of the single product

      3) Cleaning up the new stuff is set in motion and completely divorced from the parent product

      4) The new stuff is released with proper developer documentation and testing and all the other details needed for pulic use

      This is one of the reasons OS X at times has a variety of UI styles or APIs that all do the same thing. It can be frustrating when you know something you would love to get your hands on exits.

    7. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      It still uses iTunes. The backend uses the iTunes API to add a local stream to the library and send it to the Airport Express.

      So basically it ends up doing for $25 what a more patient user could do for free with icecast, Soundflower, and iTunes all wrapped in a nice package.

      --
      -mkb
    8. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by beej69 · · Score: 1

      2. It still uses iTunes. The backend uses the iTunes API to add a local stream to the library and send it to the Airport Express.

      huh? can you back that up? the FAQ says that the stream is sent directly to the airport express, which is quite believable since DVD Jon cracked the algorithm and posted it publicly ages ago...

    9. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      It probably won't be a problem, for two reasons:

      Anything that encourages use of RealPlayer is a problem. Eeeeew.

    10. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by lpp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Er, no. Apple loves people to play with their toys but only in Apple approved ways.

      I am the developer for QTConvert, an app that just exposes the QuickTime API for format exporting, a feature normally only available for folks who've upgraded to QuickTime Pro. When iTMS first came out, the QuickTime API still supported exporting from Protected AAC to whatever formats were valid targets. However QuickTime Pro had disabled this, by doing a simple check. Since I didn't really care to have my tunes in an encumbered format, and was only using the API Apple had exposed, I slapped together the app and let it loose.

      Within a few months, Apple had released an updated to several of their iApps and to the QuickTime API essentially removing the Protected AAC format as an import format for conversion.

      So while I wasn't doing anything illegal and was making simple use of their API, it wasn't something Apple liked. Now I'm sure my little app wasn't the main reason, or even a big reason, for the API change, but the timing is certainly intriguing enough.

      So the OP was quite on topic about this point, if a bit paranoid.

    11. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Imagine that, people are willing to pay for ease of use and a single point of use. Which is probably why people are willing to shell out lots of money for a calculator when a paper and pencil and a little brain power can do the same thing.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    12. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to complain :) I just think their products are overpriced. (Nicecast is $40? COME ON MAN)

      --
      -mkb
    13. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was this whine modded up?

      Go cry somewhere else.

    14. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your second claim is totally false. The application itself acts as an RTSP streaming server and encrypts all the audio on the fly with AES and then the Airport Express public key before sending it out. Maybe it would help if you actually looked at the webpage before you described the product?

    15. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So while I wasn't doing anything illegal and was making simple use of their API, it wasn't something Apple liked. Now I'm sure my little app wasn't the main reason, or even a big reason, for the API change, but the timing is certainly intriguing enough.

      It probably wasn't your app. You could do this in *any* quicktime app like iMovie or Toast. It was a "little secret" that lots of folks used to remove the DRM bullshit.

      I used the trick regularly. I used to buy at least one album a week from the iTunes store, and I even wrote a script that would semi-automate this trick.

      But I would always check after each QT upgrade, and sure enough, after one of them my script give me an audio file full of nulls.

      I removed the iTunes Music Store from my iTunes playlists and haven't been back since. I don't want that DRM bullshit on my computer. Most of my machines can't even play it.

      I listen to mostly indie labels so I don't have a problem finding a lot of my music in unprotected form from places like bleep.com. However the iTunes store was pretty nice. I hope Apple allows DRM-free versions of the songs if the labels request it. Maybe they already do? I dunno. Not worth the trouble to check.

      Someday I hope every music download has a label next to it that says "DRM-FREE" or "CONTAINS DRM", just like food has to be labeled if it causes cancer or has poison in it, etc.

    16. Re:Apple's not going to like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What food are you eating the causes cancer and or has poison in it?

  11. RealPlayer!? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think I speak for all of us when I say AWESOME!

    Kudos to the hackers though..

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  12. Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can finaly get away from the monopoly of Apple and use Windows. Oh Wait....

    1. Re:Sweet by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      Holy crap...That sucked! Never post again!

  13. Are Airports lossy? by frenchgates · · Score: 1

    Or is the output the same as plugging a cable into the audio out of the computer?

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    1. Re:Are Airports lossy? by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only if you fly with TWA.

    2. Re:Are Airports lossy? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's lossless, but there's lag.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:Are Airports lossy? by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Nope, audio is compressed via the "Apple Lossless Encoder."

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    4. Re:Are Airports lossy? by the+quick+brown+fox · · Score: 1

      It's lossless (compressed/decompressed on the fly using Apple's Lossless codec).

    5. Re:Are Airports lossy? by E-Lad · · Score: 1

      No, they aren't.

      iTunes sends the audio to a Airport Express formatted in the Apple Lossless Audio Codec (ALAC). It does this with everything.

      For example, say you have a whole bunch of 128k MP3 songs you're playing in iTunes. iTunes will decompress those to standard PCM audio, and then re-encode that to ALAC and send it to the APEX. So the quality of sound you hear on whatever your APEX is plugged into will be as low (or as high) in quality that your original source is.

      -dale

    6. Re:Are Airports lossy? by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

      Ok, but what about the DAC? Unless you're using the digital out, you're at the mercy of the quality of the audio circuitry in the airport itself. While it might be as good as your on-board sound, I couldn't imagine it being able to compete with high-end gear.

    7. Re:Are Airports lossy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the original source it massively lossy to begin with... But at least it doesn't get any WORSE.

    8. Re:Are Airports lossy? by E-Lad · · Score: 1

      I output via S/PDIF from my APEX, but the S/PDIF signalling is also done by the DAC chip that the APEX uses.

      Google to the rescue... here's the DAC the APEX uses:
      http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print /pcm270 5.html

      Sure, it's no Focusrite DAC, but it's adequate enough for my tastes. When it's purest audio I want to hear, I don't put my music over the APEX... I use my Metric Halo 2882 and KRK V8 monitors :)

      -dale

    9. Re:Are Airports lossy? by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

      Right, I'm sure the S/PDIF works well enough, but I have a hunch that I woudn't be too big a fan of the 1/8" line out.

    10. Re:Are Airports lossy? by E-Lad · · Score: 1

      I tried the minijack output once when I first got it, just to see how it sounded. It wasn't bad. I mean, it's not like poo suddenly oozed out of my yamaha/bose cube system and covered my floor with a mess.

      If you're playing from a lossy source, any quality misgivings about the DAC in the APEX probably dwarf what you're missing because of a lossy source in the first place.

      What kind of system do you have that you're so anal about eeking the best sound possible out of whatever you're hooking up to it?

      -dale

    11. Re:Are Airports lossy? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Not if you rip from Store bought CD's into Apple Lossless or AIFF (if you have a massive drive).

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    12. Re:Are Airports lossy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you fly with TWA.

      What's wrong with TWA? I like their TWA coffee and their TWA peanuts. Above all, I like their TWA tea, though.

  14. Funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the site, under "Buy" on the right:

    *Before purchase, noise is overlaid on all transmissions longer than 10 minutes.

  15. Dishonest marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    Until now, the only application that can play audio on Apple's Airport Express has been Apple's own iTunes.

    That is dishonest marketing. JustePort has been doing that for quite some time. It's even more dishonest when Rogue Amoeba probably relied on JustePort to write the AirFoil.
    1. Re:Dishonest marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has even been posted on Slashdot.

    2. Re:Dishonest marketing by steve_bryan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did you try to check your claim before making the accusation? If Rogue Amoeba uses an iTunes API to add the audio output as a stream to iTunes then iTunes may be doing all the heavy lifting of conversion to lossless audio, the RSA and AES cryptography, etc. It seems entirely possible that they are just doing audio capture as they always have with their main product and letting Apple do the rest of the work.

      Checking facts seems like it would be the right thing to do before casting aspersions. Now pardon me while I go off to see if Apple has added a convenient new API call to iTunes.

    3. Re:Dishonest marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no Apple API for sending audio to an AirPort Express or for feeding audio samples to iTunes.

      The Apple API that AirFoil uses is QuickTime, which they use for encoding audio samples into Apple Lossless (the only format supported by the AirPort Express).

      Now, for the evidence. Grepping the binary code for AirFoil reveals this string: rsaaeskey
      (it's in AirFoil.app/Contents/Frameworks/SlipStreamKit.fram ework/SlipStreamKit)

      Now, if AirFoil was using some Apple API to send audio to the AirPort Express, that string wouldn't be present in AirFoil, now would it?

      The fact is that you just made up some imaginary Apple API so you could make the dishonest people at Rogue Amoeba look better.

    4. Re:Dishonest marketing by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      Do you really think they would use Justeport when they could just license/request a key from Apple?

      Rogue Amoeba are not some hacker group but rather respected developers.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    5. Re:Dishonest marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you really think they would use Justeport when they could just license/request a key from Apple?

      If they could just license/request a key from Apple, then why didn't they?

      Rogue Amoeba are not some hacker group but rather respected developers.

      Respected developers don't pass of other people's work as their own (I'm referring to the work that went into reverse engineering the AirTunes protocol).

  16. i wish we had this on linux by seringen · · Score: 1

    please please have someone make apple lossless work on linux so we could have streaming to it using dvd jon's little app

    1. Re:i wish we had this on linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, iTunes works using CrossOver on Linux, just tested it couple of weeks ago. Unfortunately I'm not able to test if iTunes over CrossOver is enough to play into Airport Express over ethernet (yes, Airport with AirTunes has this possibility too).

  17. CAN ANYTHING HELP ME WITH STREAMING VIDEO? by geo_10 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I would like to stream video and sound from my Mac to my home theater system. Does this exist???

    1. Re:CAN ANYTHING HELP ME WITH STREAMING VIDEO? by SlamMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure. Look into the hardware from El Gato.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
  18. Don't worry. by JoeBuck · · Score: 1

    The next firmware upgrade from Apple will break this; you can count on it.

  19. Is there an equivalent for windows? by eyeye · · Score: 1

    And also routers that can do this? Its a cool feature that i'd like to have but dont want to switch to macs

    --
    Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    1. Re:Is there an equivalent for windows? by badasscat · · Score: 2, Informative

      And also routers that can do this? Its a cool feature that i'd like to have but dont want to switch to macs

      I don't know about routers, but you can do what I and a lot of others do and have a media server hooked up to your home theater setup through either wireless or (preferably) wired ethernet (still better than wireless for speed and stability). I'm sure there are probably some NAS devices that can act similarly at a lower cost than a full-fledged PC. I admit that I don't quite "get" what's so special about AirPort Express because it seems to actually do quite a bit less than what I'm used to, but maybe it's just the convenience of having this thing that's "always on", I don't know. And of course it's sort of cheap (though not that cheap).

      But if you're bent on using Windows and/or Linux and you don't mind paying a little more for actually greater functionality, then get a cheap little server box, stick a good sound card in there and hook it up to your stereo. I've got mine running iTunes, which I can then pipe either to my laptops around the house or through my main stereo speakers. (It'll obviously work in reverse too, pulling any music I've got on my laptops and playing it through the stereo speakers.) Of course, it also streams video and whatever else I want to throw at it, and displays it all on my TV.

      I can control it through Windows Remote Desktop Connection, so I have no need for a separate monitor. If you're running Linux, you can do the same with a VNC client (though VNC is a lot slower and is harder to deal with as a real remote desktop).

    2. Re:Is there an equivalent for windows? by radish · · Score: 1

      Well you could always get a real networked music player, like a Squeezebox.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  20. Mind Control Rays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to get rid of that tinfoil hat, and get an Airfoil hat...

  21. Or.... by MattHaffner · · Score: 4, Funny

    mplayer, RealPlayer, or VLC...

    Or... Doom3. Wonder how long it will take for the neighbors to call the cops.

  22. Use iTunes Music Sharing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just turn on the iTunes Music Sharing on your girlfriend's iBook. then start your iTunes and connect to her shared Music and play.

    1. Re:Use iTunes Music Sharing! by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      But that doesn't allow you to control the music output from the iBook (without using VNC or some other less elegant solution, anyway). That's the point.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:Use iTunes Music Sharing! by lakeland · · Score: 1

      There is a protocol for accessing all the music on a remote iTunes server (i.e. your GF's iBook). Someone even got it working in KDE yesterday so you can browse their music and play whatever you like (or copy it over, or whatever).

      I would have assumed you could do the same from iTunes on another machine, but since I only have one mac I can't really test that.

  23. Advanced Sound Control Panel by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    I've been hoping for a while that Tiger would include a more advanced sound control panel that would allow the user to direct sound streams and adjust volumes for any combination of sound inputs, outputs, and for each application. It would also be very nice if they would include a maximum volume damping feature on an application by application basis. This is really something that should be handled by the OS. Unfortunately I have not heard of any of these features making it into any of the Tiger betas. Maybe Longhorn will have it, then Apple can copy them for a change.

    1. Re:Advanced Sound Control Panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the function of another Rogue Amoeba product, Detour. Most of that, anyway.

      http://rogueamoeba.com/detour/faq.php

    2. Re:Advanced Sound Control Panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theres a product from Ambrosa software that lets you choose any stream and redirect it to another source. I just forgot the name though. Ambrosia are the neat company that bought you neat little titles like Escape Velocity and Escape Velocity 2..

  24. VLC all the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    using vlc you can stream video over a network. you can even reencode the media on the fly!

  25. Rogue Rawks by mushupork · · Score: 4, Informative

    I purchased Audio Hijack to rip AAR to my iPod (you know... before the election) It was crashing on my iBook however. Rogue's support was great, we went back and forth with emails of things to try for a few days. The conclusion was me getting a new build that cured the problem. YMMV of course, but I'd buy from them again.

    This is a completely unsolicited endorsement (a /. rarity)

    --
    Currently bidding on sig
    1. Re:Rogue Rawks by beej69 · · Score: 1

      what is AAR?

    2. Re:Rogue Rawks by adamfranco · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing "Air America Radio" http://www.airamericaradio.com/

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
  26. VLC streaming to AirPort Express by divinemac · · Score: 5, Informative
    There is an excellent article on (the excellent site) http://www.macosxhints.com/ regarding how to stream from VLC http://www.videolan.org/ to iTunes here without any additional 3rd parts apps:
    http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20041 023154910602&query=VLC

    I've been using this solution for playing DIVX files from my laptop (which is connected to my projector, while the audio is routed to AirPort Express) for some time, and works well, thanks to the author's knowledge, and the power of VLC !

    1. Re:VLC streaming to AirPort Express by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      How the heck does this work? There is a noticeable lag when streaming iTunes music to the airport express speakers, so how the hell does the audio stay in sync with the video?

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    2. Re:VLC streaming to AirPort Express by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      VLC can play the video and audio streams independantly from one another.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  27. Re:I don't want to troll but: by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...considering that only 3% of all computer users use a mac...

    When did we get that extra 1%?

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  28. This is totally wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is totally wrong. No one should EVER modify Apple products without express consent from Apple. We all know that Apple makes the best products out of the box and that no modifications could ever be necessary.

    You think you own the product, so you should be able to do what you want with it? Sorry, but no, it's an Apple product and such notions do not apply to Apple products. Unless Steve Jobs gives the go ahead and gives it his blessing.

    I would like to be the first to say that this is unethical, immoral, and wrong. Since when could another company profit off of hacking another companies product? Since when did you gain the 'right' to modify or change the operation of something you own, even if it isn't a physical modification?

    I, for one, say Apple should sue the crap out of this company like that sued that college kid.

    1. Re:This is totally wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac (a G5 Dual 2.5Ghz Machine w/ 1 GIG of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

      In addition, during this file transfer, Safari will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even SimpleText is straining to keep up as I type this.

      I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Macs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Mac that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart, despite the Macs' faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 2.5 Ghz Dual machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Macintosh is a superior machine.

      Mac addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.

  29. Re:I don't want to troll but: by djh101010 · · Score: 1

    Maybe, just maybe, the Mac owners understand something that you don't, A/C.

  30. Re:I don't want to troll but: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Marketshare = 2 or 3%
    Installed Base (the actual users) = at least 12%

    these figures might be a year or two old, but you get the idea.

  31. This might be what you are looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at Nicecast. They claim "One-Click Broadcasting Of Any Audio On OS X"

    A VideoLAN and VLC setup could also be the solution. It would be cheaper (as in free), but more work to setup.

  32. Actually... by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    ...you're completely wrong, and the fact that you'd say this represents a fundamental misunderstanding on your part. "You can count on it."

    This doesn't crack or break anything (as, e.g., Hymn does) nor does it circumvent any type of DRM or copy protection, and it uses iTunes on the backend to actually send the music anyway, so no, this won't be broken.

    1. Re:Actually... by beej69 · · Score: 1

      do you have any authoritative source for your claim that it uses iTunes on the back end? there was protection on the stream... and it was broken by DVD Jon.

    2. Re:Actually... by paulio · · Score: 1

      sounds like you have some serious hardware problems. my bet would be that your hard drive is retrying because it's failing.

    3. Re:Actually... by xrissley · · Score: 1

      I dont think there is anything wrong with the Mac plateform.
      But here is definitely something wrong with the Mac you are using, I am afraid. (either that, or you are trolling and I feell for it)
      I routinely copy far larger files like that, and it never ever takes hardly anytime.

      Just to humour you, I did a copy from ONE folder to ANOTHER folder on my HARD DRIVE of a 21meg file, and it took 5 seconds (actually less, but it stated five seconds on the remaining time info)
      This was done on a
      2 years old PowerBook G4 867MHz,
      with a 96% full 40gig HD,
      while processor use is at 80% because of about 20 applications (Photoshop, Word and many others) open and some background things.
      RAM is 768meg and I have 3 gig of VM currently (that is a bummer, indeed, because with a full -and old then slow- hard drive, I am feeling the weight of my heavy multitasking with large files in Photoshop).
      Despite that, the machine is always fully responsive. (ok, while I wait for Photoshop to gather back what is spread in the VM, I'll just go and check the latest RSS feeds)

      I guess you haven't used a healthy Mac that is all.
      I don't think that all the people doing intensive mutlitasking and keeping machine with a runtime of over 2 weeks while creating content in Photoshop, Logic or FinalCut Pro would be crazy enough to hold on if a normal Mac was like you described.

      And confronted to such troubles, I'll be like you, I'd ditch it!

      First guess is that HD is failing.
      Second guess is that machine might have a full full full HD and that VM has eaten up the remains (giving it no spare room, so the Mac has to shuffle little bits of files to find room)

      Mac addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems

      Because the Mac is actually :
      - a faster (from a productivity standpoint),
      - cheaper (from a TCO standpoint, and from a user hassle standpoint)
      - more stable machine (from a Unix-in-the-box-heavy-multitasking-protected-memor y stability standpoint) system.

      At least that is why I use it.
      Factoring in the little details that make a huge difference in efficiency too (consistent GUI, universal drag-and-drop, Exposé, proxy icons, expectability -what you guessed it would do if you tried that... is what happens-, &c.)

      I will not blubber over iMovie or Keynote, but oh boy, do people believe I am hugely talented thanks to these well thought-out tools. I know, that is unfair.

      But hey, life is unfair. For once it is in my favor.

      Disclosure: I use a Mac , and I will not go back.

      --
      =====
      I lie all the time, including now
  33. Still valid point. by Sebastian+Jansson · · Score: 0, Troll

    It wasn't apparent on the site that that is the case, so it's good that he informs anyone, who otherwise would have downloaded and tried, that it's just a waste of time if you aren't going to buy it.

  34. Re:Gaaah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm sure the lack of your dimes will make steve j will cry like a little girl.

  35. So then, how vo i delay video a few secs on VLC by pancakegeels · · Score: 1

    supposedly its easy peasy, but i've no idea. And I can't for the life of me get Airfoil to work with mplayer from the commandline.

    1. Re:So then, how vo i delay video a few secs on VLC by ippearx · · Score: 1

      In VLC v0.8.1:

      Preferences->Audio
      ensure the "Advanced" button down the bottom left is ticked

      The option you are looking for is "Audio desynchronisation compensation"

      You will probably need a negative value.
      You have to close and re-open the movie for it to take effect.

  36. Re:I don't want to troll but: by xen0side · · Score: 1

    Yeah and most linux distros have an even lower percentage of users yet they still make it to the front page. If you don't like that apple stores that make it to the front page you can just ignore them. Obviously you pay enough attention to these stories to feel the need to come in an comment. If you don't like the apple stores no one is forcing you to read them.

  37. ding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $25 for that? Sorry, not worth it. If I cared, I'd hack my own. Hopefully somebody will do the same. This is basic functionality that should be enabled by default for any app in the OS. I'd consider paying for it if it showed up as an audio driver in the OS. Even then, I might wait until Tiger.

    Mac developers need to get over themselves. Not every dipshit program that takes 2 days of coding is worth $25-$15 a pop.

    1. Re:ding by 11223 · · Score: 1

      Dear God. I know the RA people. This program took a lot of time to build and test. It's not "every dipshit program" by a long shot. But then again, every dipshit slashdot commentor knows enough about the amount of work involved to make his comment!

  38. Re:OSX-only (getting offtopic, but..) by Achoi77 · · Score: 1
    Launchcast has got some really cool features in it, and I enjoy using it at home. But now that we've been slowly getting macs at work, it've been slowly forgetting about it and started to surf around itunes and shoutcast. It's not as convenient as launchcast, but at least I can listen to something over my macs.

    Launchcast has some great ideas going and it's genre selecting features are pretty awesome, but if I can't even use it simply because I'm on a different platform, then it'll get no support from me anymore. It's a shame such a good idea will go to waste.

  39. Re:Mac OS X only by beej69 · · Score: 1

    dupe post... see thread at http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=141019&p id=11814796 for your answer.

  40. From any program?! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Funny

    Exactly why would I want to stream audio from Notepad.exe?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:From any program?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Notepad.App right?

    2. Re:From any program?! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      No, it says ANY program!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:From any program?! by SharkJumper · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you can't use notepad. You would be circumventing the DRM of John Cage's work.

      SharkJumper

    4. Re:From any program?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried to listen to "the Lord of the Rings.txt" as a 16-bit PCM audio? It's very inspiring. I particularly likes the pops and crackles when Gandalf fought the Balrog.

  41. Wireless everything? by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

    This looks like a pretty good solution for AirPort users... but I'm looking for the whole enchilada. I want to be able to set up speakers in every room, then have a remote control that controls everything, from any room, and I want it all to be wireless (because I live in an apartment and can't run wires everywhere). And here's the real kicker: I want to be able to have anything and everything as an input -- FM/AM, CD, MP3, Shoutcast, Sirius, even the audio from the TV, or whatever. I know there are lots of products out there that let you stream your MP3s all over the house, but I want to stream everything. Is there a complete audio solution like this that doesn't cost a million dollars?

    1. Re:Wireless everything? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Put it together yourself! If it IS out there, it'll be expensive or shit. If you make it yourself, it'll be cheaper, and more suited to your own needs. This sort of technology is classed as luxury in the AV world, so they charge accordingly.

    2. Re:Wireless everything? by MasterOfDisaster · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt there's a single solution that'll do all that, but it can't be too hard to slap something together something like what you're talking about. Basicaly, you need a remote control audio switcher - to take a series of rca inputs and switch them onto a single output. You said you want wireless, however, even radioshack sells some pretty cheap wired A/V switchers that'd work for the job. If you love streaming on the AirPort (why wouldn't you?) you could use the audio in on your computer to facilitate streaming over AirPort. If you don't like the airport, there's a lot of comercial solutions for transporting audio wirelessly.

      --
      The opinions in this post are ficticious. Any similarity to actual opinions, real or imagined, is purely coincidental.
  42. streaming audio and video by bodrell · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure if you are asking about wireless streaming, but I just ran audio cables to my stereo system, and S-Video to my RF modulator (using a DVI-S-Video adapter). Works fine for me. I know you could do something similar with a Powerbook, because I used mine to play DVDs until I got a Playstation 2.

    As someone else pointed out, you could stream video via LAN with (what else?) Video LAN Client (VLC). It has its bugs, too, but is updated and fixed more frequently than any open-source software I've ever used.

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  43. someone make a GPL version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    All the little shit apps for Mac want $10-20. And where are the cool updates? There's pretty much aren't any. I'd rather give my $10 or $20 as a donation to a GPL project that continually improved the product.

    Some of the stuff is less complex than a shell script, but has a pretty GUI made with Xcode. Sad.

    1. Re:someone make a GPL version by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      If it's so simple write it yourself.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:someone make a GPL version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it wrong to want compensation for months of full-time work writing an application that does something that users want? And I'm sorry, you don't seem to have any grasp of the technology required to accomplish this, because it is significantly more complex than "a shell script".

      I mean, if its so easy to come up with this functionality, why don't you just whip up a script and dazzle us.

  44. Rogue Amoeba equivalents by Meostro · · Score: 1

    How bizarre... my brother just asked me about another of their products (Detour) yesterday.

    Anyone know if there is an equivalent product for Windows? I know I can reroute audio as a whole under Control Panel, but I haven't seen anything to give this level of per-program control.

    1. Re:Rogue Amoeba equivalents by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, there's no equivilent program for windows, which is a shame.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:Rogue Amoeba equivalents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you reroute audio as a whole thru control panel?

  45. Cross Platform Alternative by joegtp · · Score: 1

    For only $39.95 you can have a cross platform (apple, windows, linux, hell anything that has line out for that case) FM transmitter. http://www.hobbytron.com/HI-FI-Stereo-FM-Transmitt er.html Or find many more here... http://www.google.com/search?q=fm+transmitter ... all cross platform... and all cheap.

    1. Re:Cross Platform Alternative by tomcio.s · · Score: 1

      This is nothing like the AirTunes. If anything you 'could' use this board to replace the iTrip for iPod.
      AirTunes works over WiFi, meaning digital music delivery (read no quality loss) vs. this FM lossy transmitter.

      Besides, if you live in a large metropolitan area (Toronto) you'd never get enough juice out of this thing to drawn out the adjacent radio station frequencies.

      Analog is fine for some, but what you are suggesting is in no way a replacement for a digital* utility like the AirTunes.

      *Yes I am aware of the fact that WiFi uses the 2.4 GHz spectrum. The TCP/IP connection that travels over it however is 100% digital.

    2. Re:Cross Platform Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, digitally sending LOSSY compressed music!

      The retards have come full circle. They are using our tech now and their multitude of ignorant voices are drowning out any semblance of intelligent discourse about it.

    3. Re:Cross Platform Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, digitally sending LOSSY compressed music!

      Hmm.. So what prevents me from sending uncompressed WAV files or Losless compressed files like OGG, or Apple Lossless to it???

    4. Re:Cross Platform Alternative by usernotfound · · Score: 1

      I thought all digital signals are propogated in the analog spectrum.

      --
      You call it excessive, I call it ambitious.
  46. My .sig Can Beat Up Your .sig... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1, Funny
    Sntx rrr: ls != ls, ffct != ffct, thn!=thn

    Consider yourself disemvoweled...

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    1. Re:My .sig Can Beat Up Your .sig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you utterly and completely pwn3d him. Not only did you disemvowel him but you made all his true statements false. That was a true geek beatdown, I applaud you.

    2. Re:My .sig Can Beat Up Your .sig... by frenchgates · · Score: 1

      Wow, I am really confused.

      Why don't you try that bullsh!t with your source code and see how well your compile goes.

      That's the point. Agrammatical slashdot readers spend endless hours meeting the demands of their compilers/interpreters/html renderers but won't spend five seconds learning or writing correct English.

      Owned.

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
  47. Knowing Apple Like We Do... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Knowing Apple like we do...

    Can their lawyers be far behind?

    YMMV, but I find many of Apple's recent actions the very antithesis of the 1984 commercial that launched the Macintosh.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Knowing Apple Like We Do... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Knowing Apple like we do...Can their lawyers be far behind?

      Has Apple ever sued anyone for releasing software that does something they don't like? Can you provide a link?

  48. Yeah, that iTunes program is wicked expensive by reptilicus · · Score: 4, Informative

    ---But it requires iTunes, so there's one more thing that I'm not going to buy from apple.---

    You do realize that iTunes is free, and works just fine with all sorts of file formats you can rip from your own cd's or buy elsewhere right? It'll even convert your WMA files to AAC.

    ---If I buy a Chevy vehicle, I want it to work with any gasoline that's been refined properly. I don't want to buy Chevy gasoline, or gasoline from an "approved Chevy distributor". Same goes for my music... If I buy something that plays music, I just want it to play my goddamned music... Not music from store A, or through service B.----

    Sounds pretty much like iTunes fits the bill for you then, as long as you avoid buying music downloads from any seller with proprietary DRM (pretty much everyone selling major label songs for download, Apple included).

    --- Until things change, Apple ain't seeing a dime from me.---

    You should really stick it to them by downloading it and using it for free then.

    1. Re:Yeah, that iTunes program is wicked expensive by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      The problem is that I ~have~ downloaded iTunes in the past, and I didn't like it. Apple's software, like their hardware, has many design decisions that are for the benefit of Apple, not me as an end consumer. Even Quicktime is invasive (why the hell do they have that load on startup???).

      Audio players are free these days... Winamp, musicmatch, microsoft, apple... Hell, I've even written my own. The fact that they've locked out their hardware so that only ~their~ free music player will work with it is incentive enough for me to steer clear.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    2. Re:Yeah, that iTunes program is wicked expensive by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      >> But it requires iTunes, so there's one more thing that I'm not going to buy from apple.---

      >You do realize that iTunes is free


      I believe the poster meant "the wireless playback unit requires iTunes, so the wireless playback unit is one more thing I'm not going to buy from apple, because I don't like/want iTunes."

    3. Re:Yeah, that iTunes program is wicked expensive by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The problem is that I ~have~ downloaded iTunes in the past, and I didn't like it. Apple's software, like their hardware, has many design decisions that are for the benefit of Apple, not me as an end consumer. Even Quicktime is invasive (why the hell do they have that load on startup???).

      Why does Windows load IE's render engine on startup?
      Also, what's invasive about iTunes?

      Audio players are free these days... Winamp, musicmatch, microsoft, apple... Hell, I've even written my own. The fact that they've locked out their hardware so that only ~their~ free music player will work with it is incentive enough for me to steer clear.

      Yes... except for XPlay for Windows, gtkpod for Linux, etc. Those free music players work just fine with the iPod.

      Plus, you know something - you don't even need a player, period. Mount an iPod and view the hidden files on there: there's a "Music" hidden folder, and all of your MP3s are inside there as hidden files. Simply copy in your MP3s and set their flags to be hidden too, and they'll show up as if you sync'd with iTunes, XPlay, gtkpod, etc.

      -T

    4. Re:Yeah, that iTunes program is wicked expensive by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Even Quicktime is invasive (why the hell do they have that load on startup???).

      Quicktime is more than a video player, it is also the audio and video libraries upon which iTunes is built. Windows Media player uses a different set that is built into windows and loaded with the OS. Apple uses their own, which is ported from Mac OS.

      The fact that they've locked out their hardware so that only ~their~ free music player will work with it is incentive enough for me to steer clear.

      What? I'm not sure how you intended this sentence to be parsed. iPods work with other audio players that have included support. Their are several players including WinAmp and RealPlayer. Neither will decode Apple's DRM without a hack, but neither will decode MS's DRM without a hack either. Apple's DRM can be legally removed. MS's can't. (The previous two sentences apply within the U.S.) In any case, you can always just not buy DRMed files, and use an iPod, or iTunes with regular mp3, mp4, WAV, etc. You sound like you are very confused.

    5. Re:Yeah, that iTunes program is wicked expensive by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Actually... You switched the subject. We're not talking about iPods, we're talking about AirPort express, remember?

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    6. Re:Yeah, that iTunes program is wicked expensive by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      We're not talking about iPods, we're talking about AirPort express...

      You're saying the airport express is somehow proprietary? It is 802.11 wireless, discovery with ZeroConf, streaming audio with RSTP, and encrypted with AES. All of them are completely open standards. By proprietary did you mean, "Apple did not re-write anyone else's applications to work with it?" I suspect in Tiger the interface will be built into their CoreAudio libraries and developer tools.

  49. Re:OSX-only (getting offtopic, but..) by javaxman · · Score: 1
    Launchcast has some great ideas going and it's genre selecting features are pretty awesome, but if I can't even use it simply because I'm on a different platform, then it'll get no support from me anymore. It's a shame such a good idea will go to waste.

    I actually absolutely agree. It just seems that Yahoo hasn't put one ounce of development effort into it since they bought it, and it's a bit of a shame, because it did have some promise... the whole idea of being able to rate ( and especially, block ) songs and customize streams is pretty neat. Still, at this point... I have songs in my personal collection ( mostly ripped from CDs I own, honest! ) that I've forgotten about... add iTunes playlist sharing ( allowed and actually used quite a bit at my work )... I almost never listen to shoutcast streams anymore, even though I like them. I "party shuffle" my own music...

    I wonder if going to the launchcast feedback page and telling them they're screwing up by not recognizing 10 million potential users in OS X would get them to actually do something...

  50. and how about for Linux? by Cyclonus · · Score: 1

    This is nice, but I have a Linux box that I'd like to stream music to my AirportExpress, from what I hear it's hard to do since the streams need to be in a proprietary apple format.

    --
    http://davedash.com/
  51. Guerilla Poetry by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Get it now,
    Don't be late.
    All is great,
    'Til the next Apple update!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  52. Re:Gaaah! by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Buy a Roku sound bridge, or a SliMP3. It's not like Apple is preventing you from using other devices.

    I, on the other hand, think iTunes is THE killer music organization app, and I wouldn't bother with a system that doesn't integrate seamlessly with iTunes. So, surprise surprise, Apple scratches my itch. I also use the AirPort express as my wireless router, and it's been bulletproof since day 1.

    What's wrong with iTunes?

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  53. Re:I don't want to troll but: by xen0side · · Score: 1

    well I need to learn to proofread... stories not stores.

  54. Uhh... by AtOMiCNebula · · Score: 1

    Apple limits it to iTunes, because they make it. They developed it, and thus they get to choose how its used. If Apple doesn't want other programs but their own to be able to access it, then don't buy it. Wait for some other company to release an AirTunes-equivalent adapter. But Apple doesn't want people to be able to use their devices without using their methods. Yes, there will be 3rd party hacks, and there's not much Apple can do about it.

    But if someone buys an AirTunes adapter, they buy something that is limited to work with Apple software. So don't act like it's your right to use it however you want.

    1. Re:Uhh... by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      That's just it eactly... They developed it, they designed it, and they get to choose how it's used... I acknowledge that. I just think their decision on how it's used is a boneheaded one.

      Apple COULD make products that interoperate with other devices/applications easily, but they don't. Thus, they don't get my (and a lot of other peoples') business. It's frustrating because they have a lot of things that have the kinds of features I want, but keep giving me reasons not to buy.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  55. System sound by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm suprised nobody has managed to get system sound (all programs) working through AirTunes.

    Would be fantastic. I'd love to remotely use my stereo speakers without ugly cables dragged across the room.

    1. Re:System sound by usernotfound · · Score: 1

      You could always neatly route the one cable.

      --
      You call it excessive, I call it ambitious.
  56. Re:Gaaah! by blackmonday · · Score: 1

    The point is, they're giving you something that works. There's no difficult setup involved, right out of the box you get an easy solution to a complicated task. There are other devices that don't tie you in to iTunes, feel free to purchase those instead. It's a free market. But can your parents set up a SlimMP3 or netgear music station all by themselves?

    By the way, iTunes doesn't just play Apple approved music. It plays any Mp3, wav, or aiff. It diesn't play orbis or flac, but that's a market-driven decision. Not enough people care about those formats.

  57. Re:Gaaah! by derubergeek · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yeah, when I buy a Chevy vehicle, I want to be able to put a Ford hood on it. And a Lexus navigation system in it. And BMW wheels on it.

    What's that you say? I can't? Proprietary bastards!

    --
    Trust me. This is an inactive account. Regardless of what the /. bean counters might report.
  58. better than SONOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The coolest part about Sonos is its ability to synch multiple rooms with the same audio. Anyone know how they're doing this? I would guess Sonos is using some precise clocking chips with a synch signal sent via a dedicated frequency. If Airfoil can't synch audio across multiple rooms then what's the point???

  59. Vorbis now streams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This product finally allows me to stream my Oggs to my Express. Yay!

    1. Re:Vorbis now streams! by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Or you could've just used the Ogg Vorbis plugin for Quicktime, and played them from iTunes.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Vorbis now streams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you coudn't. You could play them in iTunes, but *not* over the Express. Why? I don't know.

  60. No need for VNC by aclarke · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey. In case anybody cares, there really isn't a need for VNC, as long as you're not using Windows 98 on your media server. Or maybe XP Home too. Windows NT-based operating systems (i.e. 2000 & XP Pro) allow you to use Terminal Services as you're doing to get into them. There's a Remote Desktop client available for both Linux and Mac OS X (www.rdesktop.org).

    If you're using Linux as your media server, just connect to it using a remote X-Server. It might be a little less intuitive for a Windows user to understand, but you can locally display your programs on your client that are actually running on your server. The client can be Windows, Mac OS X or Linux. On free windows X server can be obtained at www.cygwin.com.

    I'm sure you know all this, but this is just in case anyone else is reading your post looking for options.

  61. Yea... by Georules · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Am I the only one tired of being harrased by constant media pouring out of every possible faucet? Go outside or something, dang.

    ...yes without your iPod, Billy.

  62. Airfoil, foiled again? by Zemplar · · Score: 1

    Does this mean my tinfoil hat will receive signals wirelessly?

  63. Re:OSX-only (getting offtopic, but..) by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    I wonder if going to the launchcast feedback page and telling them they're screwing up by not recognizing 10 million potential users in OS X would get them to actually do something...

    It might, seeing as how they've got a "new media focus" according to press releases, and they've recently posted job openings for that division.

  64. Not really by reptilicus · · Score: 1

    ---I believe the poster meant "the wireless playback unit requires iTunes, so the wireless playback unit is one more thing I'm not going to buy from apple, because I don't like/want iTunes."---

    Understood, but his reasons for disliking iTunes were not very accurate.

    More importantly, the unit in question, Airport Express, does not require iTunes, it's essentially an 802.11 base station compatible with OSX or Windows. If you do want to stream music over it, you can use iTunes, or as pointed out in the article, Rogue Amoeba's Airfoil program.

  65. Maybe if it were free... by Audigy · · Score: 1

    Mac only, and $20 bucks?

    No thanks.

    I wonder if Apple will go after these guys for trying to sell a software hack to one of their products... hmm.

    --
    [an error occured while processing this directive]
    1. Re:Maybe if it were free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah there's a word forguys who sell software to hack Apple products. Oh, yeah. Its "Developers".

    2. Re:Maybe if it were free... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      The are registered developers. They are not hacking anything. I'm sure they obtained an AES key from Apple.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  66. Re:Gaaah! by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

    Apple's business model revolves around the idea that you have to buy their hardware in order to use their software.

    (And in the case of iTunes, they actually allow people to use their software on non-Apple hardware, but don't be fooled, that's because they're trying to sell you some other hardware, in this case the iPod)

  67. airport supports remote controls now.... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    recently they started working with those Keyspan remotes. you plug the USB cable for the receiver in the Airport Express's USB port and it will control iTunes on the main machine. you can often find a refurb one for $99 if that makes it more affordable.

    as for other people making routers with streaming... there are other devices than can get streamed audio (IIRC) but they are not the same type of multi use device that the airport express is (and more $).

  68. Re:Gaaah! by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    The truth of the matter is that you could do all of those things, and not one of those auto makers could do a damn thing about it if you actually sold products that did just that (ie, match parts from one vehicle to another). It isn't very common, but there companies that do business by making adaptors and such to do just what you are asking with automobiles (though most of the time to mount engines/transmissions/diffs, etc - not hoods and such). Then there is the whole "kit car" market (retrofitting a 3rd party body onto a pre-bought chassis).

    Unfortunately, selling software or hardware (that essentially does the same thing) in the world of computers brings out all sorts of lawyers, in many cases - especially if perceived profit is being lost...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  69. Re:Gaaah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    why would you buy a product designed to integrate seemlessly with Apple products if you don't like the apple products. That's like buying a software package for written for IRIX and not wanting to use with SGI hardware.

    This is not for you.

    I pay for Apple products because they integrate seemlessly and provide an enjoyable user experience, not because of vendor lock in and allo your FUD. I think this whole post was a troll. Vendor lock in, have you seen how well an Apple computer holds it's value in the open market. It's easy to get out of an Apple setup and into a X86 setup with the cash from selling the Apple hardware in the classifieds.

  70. IRC... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    Exactly why would I want to stream audio from Notepad.exe?!

    "IRC is just multiplayer notepad."

    (with thanks to Bash.org)

  71. Re:Gaaah! by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

    It's not that I don't like apple products. I like their design, their interface, and in many cases, their technology.

    The problem is that they specifically hobble their equipment so that it doesn't work well with others. It's not that I'm trolling, I'm just frustrated that they put out interesting things, but then cripple them to the point that I don't want to buy them anymore.

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  72. Airport Express? by reptilicus · · Score: 1

    You mean Airport Express, which you can use as an 802.11 base station with Mac or Windows machines? And that you can use to stream audio from any application using Rogue Amoeba's new program? Doesn't sound real proprietary or locked-in to me.

    1. Re:Airport Express? by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Airport Express, which can be used as a base station from Mac or Windows machines, and whose audio streaming capability was crippled by the manufacturer, which requires a previously unavailable $20 3rd party hack to work the way I'd want it to. That one.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  73. Other audio streaming solutions? by FashionNugget · · Score: 1

    Why all the fuss? Are there no other hardware products that do the same thing? Have linksys or d-link seriously not caught on? They don't need a proprietary player like iTunes, they simply need a tray icon that you can right click and select application -- something similar to the airfoil interface..

  74. How can it be "open"... by Otto · · Score: 1

    ...when they're using cryptographic methods and not giving you the public keys to be able to send the audio to the device yourself?

    iTunes had to be hacked to obtain the public keys to be able to send audio to the device. Open protocols can be used to lock devices down too, you know.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  75. so they test it, BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'll take source and reporting bugs. this is a one-trick program that's easily replicated

  76. The other way around by david-bo · · Score: 1

    I wish someone would release a software Airport Express basestation.

    I have a computer standing next to my stereo; I would like to play music on iTunes on the computer I work on and then stream it to the computer at the stereo.

    This way you could have a much better interface to your "media center computer" thna different remote GUI-apps like VNC offers.

    Hopefully for version 2 of this software...

    1. Re:The other way around by Durin_Deathless · · Score: 1

      The problem is, insofar as I can tell, that there is no non-quicktime way to playback ALAC format. As soon as I get ahold of such a library, I'll be racing to finish such a daemon for my FreeBSD server.

      --
      You should use AdiumX on your Mac.
  77. Slashdot provides a solution! by ducman · · Score: 1

    It looks like http://www.jackosx.com/ is exactly what I needed!

    --
    "We have nothing in common, your attitude annoys me, and your political views are appalling."
  78. Re:Gaaah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, iTunes does play Orbis. Just download the Ogg Vorbis component of the QuickTime component project.

    Here is a link.

  79. Works with both... by MattHaffner · · Score: 1
    Who said you had to switch to a Mac?

    Go RTFWPs:

    http://www.apple.com/airportexpress/specs.html
    http://www.apple.com/airportexpress/airtunes.html

    iTunes automatically detects the connection. When you open iTunes on your AirPort-equipped Mac or Wi-Fi-compliant PC, you'll see a popup list at the bottom right of the iTunes window showing your remote speakers. Select it, click play and your stereo becomes the world's greatest digital jukebox.


    mh
  80. Audio Hijack ROCKS! by alex_guy_CA · · Score: 1
    Just as an unsolicited review, Audio Hijack has done more to improve the quality of my life than any program I have bought in the past 5 years. I drive a lot in my work, and those hours in the car can be pretty brutal. The good radio stations fade pretty quickly when you leave San Fran or LA, and not being a fan of Christian broadcasts or Mariachi music, the offerings on highway 5 are pretty dismal. I use Audio Hijack to record my favorite NPR radio shows, and before I leave I drop 20 or so hours worth onto my iPod. Life becomes bearable as I drive and drive and drive.

    As a side note, I don't know why anyone would pay for a radio shark unless the radio they listen to is not streamed online. If it is, Audio Hijack fits the bill for a lot less money.

  81. Re:I don't want to troll but: by xenoandroid · · Score: 1


    Yeah since Microsoft has the overwhelmingly large user base, at least 80% of the front page should be dedicated to them

  82. $129 is expensive? by MacDork · · Score: 1

    What exactly is cheap enough?

  83. two methods come to mind.... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    if the server/desktop has XP PRO, then use remote desktop connection, and "leave audio on server"

    2nd- additionally, if you want to watch via winamp, you can also use output stacker (a plug in that may no longer be available (see stories about ripping from music stores via this method)) to have the audio go out to two different destinations I use output stacker to have the audio from winamp play over a lyra wireless sound device connected to my stereo.

    a third solution, has nothing to do with the audio being on the PC, buy a cheap USB audio adapter, http://www.turtlebeach.com/site/products/audioadva ntage/ thing is smaller than most flash drives, and does 5.1 optical out, or provide a 2nd headphone jack- I have one on an OLD pc that I upgraded to XP, and XP couldn't use my soundcard (srs?) at all.. it is very CPU intensive, (kinda/exactly like a winmodem does)

    for the old PII 300mhz machine it's on, it provides excellent sound, but that machine can't display divx/xvid and audio at the same time..
    (ok, it does, at 3 frames a second or so- even in a box)-- with the audio plug disconnected, video picks up considerably, (but I can't hear it then)

    caveat, it's REALLY touch about it's port, unplug it from a USB connection, and connect it to any other USB port, and you WILL have to reboot

    as for changeover due to proximity? sorry- can't help, but with output stacker as I described, you can turn down the laptop and up the PC when you get closer....

    not sure about the framerate, video over RDC-never tried it.

    Luck....

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:two methods come to mind.... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the suggestions. The RDC is a good idea, but as you mention, I'm not positive that it can handle the framerate of video. You could also use the laptop as a RDC server and transmit the audio to the client/desktop - not sure if that works well, either. Still, it seems like the only viable solution that isn't platform specific.

      The outplug stacker is interesting, although I don't see how it helps solving the issue - you need another plugin that facilitates transmitting the audio over ethernet and reproducing it on a target computer. The stacker simply enables you to send it somewhere and listen to it locally at the same time. Still, I never knew such ethernet tunneling plugins existed for Winamp - that said, I don't own any standalone device, but a desktop computer should be able to look like one to Winamp. The output stacker plugins were in fact removed from Winamps DB, under a ban of Streamrippers, see discussion here and here. Somebody was nice enough to post it to some web board (shame that /. doesn't allow file uploads ;).

      The USB sound card doesn't really help in my situation - the laptop has got a perfectly fine (stereo only) audio out, and the internal sound chip is good enough for casual listening. But I don't want to connect it to my speakers every time I come home - the constant re-connecting, especially considering that my desktop is connected to them with something like 4 cables for surround audio would be extremely painful. And with wireless ethernet, the only cable that I grudgingly am willing to accept at home is a power cable.

      I'm really kind of surprised there isn't an elegant solution already - I always figure it's a problem many people would like solved. But then again maybe that's what you always think about your own problems. :)

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:two methods come to mind.... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      use output stacker to bring audio to both the laptop and the pc -simultaneously with two audio devices out- you can use both sets of speakers, and turn down the laptop when you are in range of the desktop speakers.. which you turn up..

      I suggested the USB soundcard as it has 5.1 optical out- one EXPENSIVE cable to hook to a good stereo.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:two methods come to mind.... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      another thought...
      http://www.maxivista.com/
      makes a pseudo vga driver in your main pc and delivers it via network to a second pc-caveat, can't use mouse/keyboard on local pc to run the app....

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  84. Re:I don't want to troll but: by MacDork · · Score: 1
    Why is it that there are each day 3 new mac stories on the frontpage of slashdot, considering that only 3% of all computer users use a mac....

    Yeah, I mean, why not just shut down Slashdot, since only 3% of all computer users use linux.... Right? -1 flawed logic

  85. I've been doing this for 10 years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rsh musichost mpg123 song.mp3

    Now that SSH is popular, you can do:

    ssh musichost mpg123 song.mp3

    What's the problem? If you want to get fancy, you can put a web interface on it with 10 minutes or so of work.

    Once again, this shows the hatred people have for good solutions that just work.

  86. So go replicate it. by cduffy · · Score: 1

    this is a one-trick program that's easily replicated

    Cool, you're building your own version? Have fun!

    (Not that I don't agree with you -- it is a one-trick program that I'd rather see as a Free cross-platform console app -- but without doing even a preliminary evaluation of the protocol used for communicating with the AirPort Express, and the difficulty of implementing said protocol, "easily replicated" is easier said than done).

  87. Airport Express is Poor Value Product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the same price you can buy a real media receiver like the Linksys or SMC unit which are far superior products. There are a couple nice units listed on the MP3beamer web site.

    They are superior because they include remote controls. Airport requires you to go back to your computer to change the music! Both the Linksys and SMC unit have a graphical display so you can see what's playing, select artists/albums/playlists and include a remote control so you can access it from across the room.

    The Linksys unit even has powered speakers! It's a fantastic unit.

  88. What about encoding / decoding ALAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have anyone had any success in deciphering what compression is used in ALAC and made any effort towards an open source implementation of encoding and decoding?

  89. What horrible fidelity! by rustman · · Score: 1

    The FM transmitters sound horrible, maybe you're lucky if you have 3% harmonic distortion and 48db s/n ratio. It would sound horrible.

  90. Re:Gaaah! by derubergeek · · Score: 1
    You raise good points and I agree. My only point was to tear down the "car" example - the parallel to the original poster's analogy would be if I had to buy special electricity from Apple and only run on Apple networks using Apple ethernet cables, etc.

    But his original gripe was that the Express was designed for iTunes integration - same as if I had a Lexus and wanted to add the navigation system to it. Not like I could just grab a BMW nav system and slap it straight in. Nor would I want to because it would likely be a big ugly hack.

    --
    Trust me. This is an inactive account. Regardless of what the /. bean counters might report.