Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Search Advertisers Get Personal

Alascom writes "According to this AP report, Microsoft is raising privacy concerns by allowing search advertisers to use personal information. Yusuf Mehdi, a corporate vice president with the MSN unit, said Microsoft has gathered this personal information by tracking users who have logged into its Hotmail e-mail program or other Microsoft Web sites in order to allow advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience."

185 comments

  1. Nothing new by suso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did you really expect anything less from Hotmail or Microsoft? I mean come on, this is a website that asks you (auto selected) if you want to subscribe to about 50+ different personalized newsletters when you sign up. I don't see how people can expect their privacy to be respected when the service is free.

    1. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What else is free? Oh wait... Linux...

    2. Re:Nothing new by frankthechicken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mostly agree, and if someone describes their individual wants and needs by signing up to the personalized newsletters, then I would guess they would appreciate some more personalized adverts, rather than requests to buy products they have no desire for. And would probably not recognise that they are being targetted in such a way.

      If you absolutely have to have adverts forced down your throat, then I'm sure the general public would prefer those adverts tailored for them.

    3. Re:Nothing new by suso · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I didn't mean anything free, I meant when its free from a company whose motivation is profit. Its not always true, but there is almost always a profit or information motive.

    4. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it actually legal to do that? I think that they should ask for pemission or something. Anyway it sucks.

    5. Re:Nothing new by coolcold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would say, its free from a company with such a bad record at treating their customers and or their decision making criteria only have profit, profit and 5) PROFIT, would make this news into OldNewsIsSoExciting.jpg

      --
      I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
    6. Re:Nothing new by naylor83 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, this is basically what Google is already doing, not?

    7. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No worries; Yusuf Medhi, his boss David Cole, his patsy Tarek Najm and pretty much every single employee that is involved in the effort are complete dumbasses.

      MSN Ads is the scumbucket of the business (and this is Microsoft we are talking about), and because of that this product will never be good. Mind you, people will still use it because of the website's large audience, but they probably aren't going to shake up any other ad businesses with this steaming pile. Way to play catch up, idiots.*

      *Disclaimer: The above is based on pure opinion. No personal experience or knowledge was used in the formation of this opinion.

    8. Re:Nothing new by dlZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I preper advertising to be tailored if I have to see it. I usually ignore it, but a good example of when it works was my better half wrote me an e-mail about some Hello Kitty stuff (she's a big collector)to my Gmail account. On the side where the ads are were a ton of things related to Hello Kitty, and I was in need of a present. I clicked, found a good deal, and made her very happy.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    9. Re:Nothing new by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      I don't see how people can expect their privacy to be respected when the service is free.

      Privacy? As in personal privacy? Would this not involve them actually knowing something about you other than your machine address? And would that not involve you actually giving them factual personal information?

      Do people actually do that? Like tell them your real name, street address, and demographic info?

      Then again, should ever there come a whiff of ISP's selling personal user data to these Big Brother wannabe's, then things might start to get interesting.

      But until then, pish. It's only issue for those who voluntarily give themselves away. And we all know what those folks deserve, right?

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
  2. Is it in the EULA ? by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess we should have read the license agreement....

    --
    The following statement is true
    The preceding statement is false
    1. Re:Is it in the EULA ? by paulymer5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't matter if you read it when you signed up. The good ol' ever present We-reserve-the-right-to-change-our-policy -at-any-time (read "the We-reserve-the-right-to-screw-you clause") means you're left with the option to agree with the new terms or stop using the service.

    2. Re:Is it in the EULA ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leaving you and me with the right to not use their service and set up our own email service... Bow down to the almighty sendmail daemon! Bow down! bow down! AAAAARRHH!! I am cornholio!

  3. Good by tobybuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once people get a sniff that Microsoft is playing dirty in the search they have even less incentive to move from google.

    I say bring it on.

    1. Re:Good by ack154 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would I have any incentive to move from Google anyways? They bring nothing new to the table that I'm interested in.

    2. Re:Good by filmmaker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're digging their own grave here. Google's Gmail service is bad enough, and it doesn't try and track you by machine address and pass demographics info to 3rd parties.

      MS has really gone way over the deep end this time.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google tracks you by cookie.

  4. Welcome to the Future by cybrthng · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And you don't think this happens anywhere else? Read the TOS of Google, Yahoo and many other websites you visit.

    1. Re:Welcome to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I know - but because this is Slashdot and we are talking about Microsoft it has to automatically be somehow worse than when another company does it.

    2. Re:Welcome to the Future by Otter · · Score: 1
      My understanding was that the ads on Google web searches are driven solely by the keywords*, not by any tracked data from previous searches and certainly not from GMail**. Is that not correct?

      * Which, if I understand correctly, is what's at issue here.

      ** I know that GMail ads are driven by the message content. But even that is based on the single message or thread being viewed, not the whole account history, right?

    3. Re:Welcome to the Future by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What you don't know about google and accept for whatever faith reasons you have is scary.

      Google has more data then we could ever dream up. What they do with it is often illegal for people to discuss because of agreements that are made between publishers & advertisers and 3rd parties they work with.

      Even ads here are tracked. I would be suprised of the partner of sites here don't use the data to define demographics and details of the customer and are part of the "value add" of marketing here.

    4. Re:Welcome to the Future by naylor83 · · Score: 1

      Well, MS is always MS, and Google is always Good. Wrong?

    5. Re:Welcome to the Future by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What you don't know about google and accept for whatever faith reasons you have is scary.

      1) The Google TOS makes it clear that personally identifying information is not being shared. For the sake of argument, let's say that they're in compliance with it.

      2) If you look at the ad buying process, there is no hint that any targeting exists beyond immediate keywords. If they use such targeting, they don't charge for it.

      3) As long as #1 is in place, I don't particularly care whether they track aggregate searches per cookie -- I'm simply stating that they don't, to the best of my knowledge, serve ads based on search history. If I found that issue "scary", I'd look into it more deeply.

      Out of curiosity, if you're so frightened over this issue, you're doing exactly what to protect your secrecy? Hitting Google through proxies?

    6. Re:Welcome to the Future by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      I'm not scared of google, but people are "scared" of microsoft. I just don't understand the "faith based" trust of google but absolute despise for others.

      Google "scares" me more than others because they have the most restrictive policies from any standpoint and you DON'T KNOW what they do with the data because YOUR NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT.

      How do you know the ads are 100% targeted based upon keyword? How do you know they don't use the data they DO collect to build the product and service THEY OWN?

      I find it highly unreasonable to assume your data is safe because they say it is and that is the issue i want to bring up irregardles of the company behind it.

      We are talking about internet marketing here. Even I, the lowly webmaster know how to "Data mine" my logs and my visitors to target more efficiently to generate more revenues.

      You think a PUBLIC company with INVESTORS to satisfy isn't going to do this?

    7. Re:Welcome to the Future by boron+boy · · Score: 1

      There are ads on slashdot??? Oh yeah that's right... geez I love adblock.

  5. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hotmail are using personal data to target ads. Microsoft suck!

    If only Google did this sort of thing with GMail. That'd be O.K, because they're Google. Google arn't evil, like those bastards at Microsoft.

    1. Re:Oh no! by jack_csk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And didn't you guys bash Google when their personalized ads rolled out? Here it comes Microsoft.

      Luckily, we still have products like GPG for those who concern.

    2. Re:Oh no! by northcat · · Score: 1

      MS is selling information to others, google is not. And MS also has other info like info from our profiles on MSN (I'm not sure if they still exist or in what form they exist). But still, the reponses would have been a lot less negative if this was google.

    3. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google doesn't use personal infomation. A machine looks for keywords in the mail your reading and displays ads acordingly.

      Although i havn't seen any ads in gmail yet anyways so your whole statment is invalid.

    4. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only Google did this sort of thing with GMail. That'd be O.K, because they're Google. Google arn't evil, like those bastards at Microsoft.

      Are you implying that Google did something like this? Because they didn't.

      Sure, Google "reads" your e-mail. Just like your pencil "reads" your letters. Personally, I don't really care all that much if inanimate objects like a pencil or a Google server knows what I write, since they're... inanimate.

      Now, Microsoft, on the other hand, is selling personal information to very animate members of advertising companies. While I have no problem with an inanimate object knowing stuff like this, I do have a problem with other people know stuff like this so they can spam me more easily.

  6. This is really scary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I got some really scary ads that have been keeping me up at night! How do they know I HAVE A SMALL PENIS! OMG this is a travesty. I should have given them a fake zip code and should have lied about my penis size on the questionnaire.

    1. Re:This is really scary! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the other end of the scale, they seem to want me to walk around with an 11" penis, DD breasts and a remortgage on my russian bride.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  7. Just like Google... by Bonker · · Score: 1

    But with 95% less ethics!

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Just like Google... by MSFanBoi · · Score: 1

      Do we even know that Google has ethics? Wasn't it just the other day they were caught doing a no-no, something they tell others not to do.

    2. Re:Just like Google... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they also fixed it shortly thereafter. At least they listen to public outcry and decide to fix it. MS? Yeah, they don't give a shit. And they don't need to.

      Of course, the question is, if Google did know about this no-no, and no one else noticed it, would they have fixed it? Or just ignored it. That's the test of a "Good" corporation.

      (And, by "Good", I mean "not a bunch of pricks", as opposed to "we make tons of money".)

  8. Personalised isnt a bad thing by scenestar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The biggest problem with advertising reamins that products advertised are not interresting to me.

    I have yet to find a advert for cheap merch pressing or jobs for young webdesigners. Instead i get bombarded with ads for crazy frog ringtones.

    As long as they dont read my email line by line it's FINE with me

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:Personalised isnt a bad thing by Aidtopia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Read carefully. This isn't just about targeting to certain demographics. They are also providing that specific but non-identifying demographic info back to the advertiser.

      Microsoft would then provide the company with detailed information about the demographics of the people who clicked on its ads.

      If I click one of these ads, Microsoft will report to the advertiser that the user clicking this ad is a 37-year old man in ZIP code 94542, and average household income in that ZIP code is $105,393. This report is the scary part.

      I wonder how specific they get with the birthday. After all, 87% of Americans can be uniquely identified from gender, birthday, and ZIP code. So is it really non-identifying data?

    2. Re:Personalised isnt a bad thing by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To defend the parents' math, in case anyone has a 'that cant be right' knee jerk reaction:
      There are something on the order of 20000 people in each zip code. Gender cuts that in half, 10000. Assume average age is around 35, that gives us about 1 in every 13000 people with each birthday (more or less for different ages). This works out very close to the stated 87%.

    3. Re:Personalised isnt a bad thing by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I take it you're figuring "birthday" to mean "birth date". So out of 10,000 people, lets figure that they're evenly distributed over 70 years, 365 days to a year, brings us to... .4 people.

      Your 1 in 13,000 people with a given birth date assumes a clustering around 35 (13,000 = 365 * 35; it took me a while to figure that out.)

      So I take it you're figuring something like (1-(1/13k))^10k. Yes? I get .46, which means a 54% chance of uniqueness, which isn't really all that close to 87% but I guess it on the right order. But if I figure it with N=20k rather than N=10k, I get pretty much exactly 87%.

      Correct me if I'm wrong; stat was never my strong suit.

      Still, I'm not convinced that the article meant "birth date" rather than "birth day", and the uniqueness gets a lot less likely if you figure 365 unique days rather than 13,000 of them; the odds of being unique goes to nearly 0. Exponentiation does that.

  9. targeted advertising by justforaday · · Score: 2, Funny

    Targeted advertising? Wow, that Microsoft sure does always seem to innovate...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:targeted advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think someone must have patent on this....SCO?

  10. Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    From the article:

    "Microsoft's paid search platform will provide detailed -- but not personally identifiable -- information, such as gender, age and location, for many people who use its search engine, allowing advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience."

    Privacy concerns my ass. This is just one more "Micro$oft is the Devil!" scare story.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  11. As per the /. norm... by bob670 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    this is turning in to an MS-bashfest, but what they are doing isn't far off from what Google and Yahoo do as well, using content from your mail or information from your account to target advertising? Maybe my tinfoil hat is just starting to chafe a little, but I don't think what Google, MSN or Yahoo does in regards to this stuff is really a big deal, at least not bigger a deal than what your credit card, bank or even insurance company do with similair information.

    I'm all for bashing MS, but if we call them on this let's not leave out our most sacred cow, Google.

    1. Re:As per the /. norm... by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      The difference is that Google has a very good reputation (so far). Microsoft's proven themselves untrustworthy (backdoor deals, simple security holes, etc.). That's enough reason for me to bash MS and not Google.

    2. Re:As per the /. norm... by Broiler · · Score: 1

      this is turning in to an MS-bashfest, but what they are doing isn't far off from what Google and Yahoo do as well, using content from your mail or information from your account to target advertising? Maybe my tinfoil hat is just starting to chafe a little, but I don't think what Google, MSN or Yahoo does in regards to this stuff is really a big deal, at least not bigger a deal than what your credit card, bank or even insurance company do with similair information.
      I just thought it should be said again!

      --
      My sigs offend the max # of people all over the world, regardless of race, religion, color, sex or creed. It's a gift.
    3. Re:As per the /. norm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in other words you think your hypocrisy is justified. It's fine to bash MS but if you want to bash MS's actions you need to bash Google, Yahoo, etc as well.

    4. Re:As per the /. norm... by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      I would bash Google's actions as well... if I'd seen them do anything conspicuous. The only security issues we know of were in their beta services. The only privacy issues have been over what they could do, not any particular actions.

      Microsoft, however, has shown a consistent disregard for privacy and security. When Google goes down the same path I'll bash them too.

  12. rant by smallguy78 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Customary slashdot anti-Microsoft, I hate them post

    --
    Nothing costs nothing
    1. Re:rant by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      You're supporting it by reading and responding to it.

  13. MSN has always been a privacy threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    with their GUID server and attempts to make cookies cross domains [bugtraq] bypassing any security restrictions the browser has implemented, nice huh

    the answer is to just block all MSN sites, why micorosft are allowed to produce an OS and then re-direct users to its homepage by default (and average user doesnt know how to change their homepage), how anti-trust/competitives hasnt pulled them on it shows you what they can get away with

    1. Re:MSN has always been a privacy threat by Technician · · Score: 1

      why micorosft are allowed to produce an OS and then re-direct users to its homepage by default (and average user doesnt know how to change their homepage)

      This is different than Firefox, Mozilla, Netscape, or Opera how?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:MSN has always been a privacy threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      his is different than Firefox, Mozilla, Netscape, or Opera how?

      not a convicted monopoly
      don't have 95% of the PC market
      dont sell advertising or derive revenue from selling personal data to the highest bidder
      dont pass on unique identifiers to their "partners"
      dont attempt to avoid cookie security restrictions

      but thats all minor stuff right ?

    3. Re:MSN has always been a privacy threat by naylor83 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Being a convicted monopoly doesn't make everything they do illegal.

    4. Re:MSN has always been a privacy threat by Alranor · · Score: 1

      Possibly because, of all of those companies, Microsoft is the only one which is a convicted monopolist.

      Lots of behaviours which would be legal and acceptable for most companies are illegal for those which have a monopoly in a certain area.

    5. Re:MSN has always been a privacy threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Convicted monopolist, convicted monopolist, squawk!

    6. Re:MSN has always been a privacy threat by stealth.c · · Score: 1

      No, but it's supposed to make bundling illegal. The one big thing that is illegal for monopolies is any attempt to leverage their current monopoly to dominate other markets. Subsidized by their OS and office app monopolies, MSFT's money pits like the XBOX and MSN* continue to exist. I don't know if mere subsidization is "leveraging" enough, but I think it should be.

      They got away with the clearly illegal browser bundling, and are only building upon that. This should, IMHO, make many of their powergrabs illegal. But politicians don't get careers by crusading for what they think is right. They get their careers by bending over for the deep-pocketed corporations. (Why else do you think Democrats are cooperating so nicely with the pro-business, anti-people agenda they claim to oppose?)

  14. People still use Hotmail? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've witnessed a mass-exodus from Hotmail in the last few months. Complaints range from:

    1. Being asked to type in a human-verifier code everytime you send an email
    2. Server Busy errors for hours or even days
    3. Account unavailable due to maintenance issues for hours or even days
    4. Horrible interface
    5. Spotty spam protection from everyone except the copious amount that Hotmail sends you

    I have a Hotmail account that's about 7 years old that I still check from time to time, but I can't imagine using it on a day-to-day basis.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:People still use Hotmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that bad if you block ads and have an account with outlook connectivity wo you can do offline backups.

    2. Re:People still use Hotmail? by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

      You might as well just use gmail then and get the nicer interface too.

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    3. Re:People still use Hotmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      My fiance still uses hotmail and nothing I do will convince her to stop. Even worse her account was never upgraded from 2MB even though MS announced several months ago (last year?) that all users would be upgraded to 250MB.

    4. Re:People still use Hotmail? by naylor83 · · Score: 1

      Yes, they've been talking for very long about those 250 MB, but so far, all I can see is ads for their 2GB Hotmail Plus for so-and-so many $$. I suppose it fits in well with MS's vaporware strategy.

    5. Re:People still use Hotmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spotty spam checking is right.. I have a spambucket account at hotmail that gets practically nothing but spam. Guess how much of it is reported as spam? Less than 5%! And the emails that I do anticipate are almost always marked as spam.

    6. Re:People still use Hotmail? by GundyRage · · Score: 1

      I have no relation to this project but it has made checking those 3 or 4 hotmail accounts that are 7 years old (and that you can't drop) a breeze. There is only ONE way to access your hotmail accounts...

      http://hotwayd.sourceforge.net/news.php

      From the site:

      "Ever wanted to access your hotmail.com, msn.com, lycos.co.uk, lycos.it, lycos.nl, lycos.es, lycos.ch, lycos.de, lycos.at and spray.se emails using Linux, *nix (or even Windows [using cygwin]) without having to battle with the web interface?

      It is now possible using hotwayd in conjunction with your favourite POP3/SMTP implementing mail reader (and soon [read: not so soon] also possible using IMAP4). Hotwayd allows you to do this by using the HTTPMail protocol, the same protocol that Outlook[tm]/OE uses, to access the hotmail or MSN servers."

      You just setup one server on a public IP and let all your friends and family know about it.

      Gabe

    7. Re:People still use Hotmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, you're losing it, but you _do_ fit in with the slashdot mentality, if that's any consolation. I too have a Hotmail account, and, like you, I don't use it daily (more like once a week). But their spam protection works very well, in fact better than Thunderbird. TB brings new spam into my inbox every day, which it then has to "learn" about. It's good, but still tiring. Hotmail correctly routes all spam to the junkmail box. Did you notice that when you empty your junkmail box (which it will do automatically for you if you choose), you can flag messages as "junk mail". So you have zillions of people reporting the spam, and Hotmail _does_ know which are junk. And I get a "spam" message from Hotmail themselves once a month or so, and no I don't bother counting because it's negligible, hardly the "copious" amount you are whining about.

      With exaggerations and inaccuracies like these from you, I suspect the rest of your post is just as useless. You are officially a "slashtard".

    8. Re:People still use Hotmail? by argel · · Score: 1

      The MSN web email interface is . . . Hotmail. But MSN users can also use SMTP/POP3.

      --

      -- Argel
  15. An international view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in Sweden, where this sort of thing is illegal unless you ask your customer for permission first.

    Could this spell problems for Microsoft Sweden, or MS in any other (most likely european) country with the same laws?

    Yes, MS has registered and is using hotmail.se.

    1. Re:An international view by NetNifty · · Score: 1

      In the UK under the data protection act IIRC they can't distribute your information to other companies without your permission, but maybe their EULA gives them permission to do this?

    2. Re:An international view by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 1

      but maybe their EULA gives them permission to do this?

      EULAs (and all other forms of contractual agreement) do not have the power to override the law.

      That is, at least in the US or the UK, I cannot do anything to you that is not permitted by law, even if you've signed a contract explicitly saying I can - same applies to Microsoft (at least until they buy more politicans).

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
  16. Not really personal information... by TheNecromancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article:
    Microsoft's paid search platform will provide detailed -- but not personally identifiable -- information, such as gender, age and location, for many people who use its search engine, allowing advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience.

    Notice they aren't releasing any information (like your name, etc.) that would explicitly identify the person to the advertisers.

    I don't see a real problem with privacy here, it just looks like generalized demographic info that is useful to the advertisers.

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
    1. Re:Not really personal information... by gabacho · · Score: 1

      Notice they aren't releasing any information (like your name, etc.) that would explicitly identify the person to the advertisers. Well, not yet anyway.

      --
      (This sig has been removed at the request of the patent holder for Sigs.)
    2. Re:Not really personal information... by chialea · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >Notice they aren't releasing any information (like your name, etc.) that would explicitly identify the person to the advertisers.

      There is some rather interesting research on this. Gender, age, and location is enough to identify most people, since, really, there are a limited number of people in each cartesian-type category. Note that this is different from aggregate data, which may be less personally identifiable, depending on how it's done.

      The people at the data privacy lab have gone through and identified people in "non-personally identifiable" information released by several sources. Part of the problem is that you can put these sources of data together with high confidence and both narrow down individual people and gather a LOT of information about them. I'm sure they have some papers up if you're interested:

      http://privacy.cs.cmu.edu/

      Lea

    3. Re:Not really personal information... by MoonChildCY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You think your location is not considered information that can identify you? Granted, it depends on the resolution of the location information, but if they go under zip code (like zip+four) info, then this is indeed a violation of your privacy.

      Human Subjects Research guidelines crealy state that zip code from participants in a study are muddy water. Anything below that (zip+4), actual address, etc. is considered private information and written consent from the participant is required for the use of the data. Notice that a permission is required to USE the data. Even if you somehow have the data, you need written permission to use them. Yes yes, EULAs probably grant permission, I know.

    4. Re:Not really personal information... by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that makes sense. Living in San Francisco, I know there is, in fact, only one 28 year old woman in the 94118 area code.

      (At least, I assume there's only one, because I'd rather that be the case than consider the possibility of multiple women not dating me).

    5. Re:Not really personal information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There are additional prohibitions to the gathering of PII (personally identifiable information), including not gathering demographics on a ZIP code with fewer than a certain number of people.

      Microsoft takes PII very seriously, and increasingly so. As an employee there, I had to take multiple courses on it, and the grunts took it very seriously. During the year I worked there (I quit to move into a different career) access to the MSN databases was tightened significantly.

      I know y'all love to hate Microsoft, but seeing it from an inside perspective, I find much of the anti-Microsoft commentary in this thread uninformed.

    6. Re:Not really personal information... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      He should have said birthdate, not age. Given the data Female, 944118 zipcode, and birthdate 1/1/1977, that most likely *does* narrow it down to a single person.

      Birth month and day gets you 365, gender brings it up to 730, and year of birth gives you an effective multiplier of over 40 getting you to around 30 thousand. Most zipcodes have far less than 30 thousand people. That results in a unique indentifier for most people. Even when you're really unlucky it still narrows it down to just two or three people.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    7. Re:Not really personal information... by chialea · · Score: 1

      >Microsoft takes PII very seriously, and increasingly so. As an employee there, I had to take multiple courses on it, and the grunts took it very seriously.

      No one really has a good definition of PII yet, frankly, so it's not really possible for them to eliminate it as yet without taking out a LOT of other information. What constitutes an anonymized database -- especially a USEFUL anonymized database -- is not at all clear. It's an active area of research, and not at all well explored.

      My point is that people have given out this kind of information in the past with the very best of intentions, not knowing what can be done with the data. We /still/ don't know what can be done with the data, so anyone is still capable of releasing "bad" information without realizing it. This has nothing to do with Microsoft, per se.

      Lea

  17. Privacy Schmivacy by Ridgelift · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA: "Microsoft's paid search platform will provide detailed -- but not personally identifiable -- information, such as gender, age and location, for many people who use its search engine, allowing advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience."

    Yeah, right. You target an ad to a person, they respond, and now you've got their age, location, etc. Once again the rights of the corporation outweight the rights of the individual.

    1. Re:Privacy Schmivacy by djplurvert · · Score: 1

      pfft!

      Who gives hotmail real information?

      I'm work in ALL the industries, use my mail accounts for EACH of purposes and I am EVERY age group. I choose at random EVERY time.

    2. Re:Privacy Schmivacy by aurumaeus · · Score: 1

      Last time I responded to an ad, I didn't type in my name and social security number. They don't know anything more after you respond than before, except that you as a demographic category are that much more likely to click on similar ads in the future.

    3. Re:Privacy Schmivacy by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      My God! I just realized that when you stop in a convienence store, they can tell your age and location!

      I will boycott all stores until this inethical collection of information is ended!

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  18. Interesting tidbits & Beware Relational Databa by Fox_1 · · Score: 2, Funny
    From Article:
    Yusuf Mehdi, a corporate vice president with the MSN unit, said Microsoft has gathered this personal information by tracking users who have logged into its Hotmail e-mail program or other Microsoft Web sites, and then matching the data they provided with publicly known demographics, such as average income for a particular ZIP code.

    From Yusuf Mehdi bio:
    In addition, Mehdi is also responsible for leading Microsoft's platform efforts for online advertising and digital marketing with responsibility for brand, direct marketing, pay for performance and business intelligence systems.

    From the article:
    Microsoft has made its name selling software, he (analyst David Garrity) said, and the new model of giving a product away and making money from advertising requires a steep learning curve.

    and I love this name:
    Chris Hoofnagle of the Electronic Privacy Information Center said Microsoft's efforts are part of an industrywide trend of using personal information to garner advertising dollars.

    --
    The rock, the vulture, and the chain
  19. targeted advertising by gabacho · · Score: 1

    This is like Microsoft (and others, to be fair) selling lists to panhandlers of targets and where they live that are more likely to be a soft touch. And it is passed off as an "enhanced web user experience"

    --
    (This sig has been removed at the request of the patent holder for Sigs.)
  20. Not...quite the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    In the case of google, it's bots that are scanning your emails. Personal info is NOT given out to other companies!

    There's a world of difference between that IMO.

  21. What the EULA says by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    MSN Hotmail

    Hotmail collects information during the registration process, including first and last name, country, region or state, Zip or post code, time zone, gender, birth date and occupation. You may update your registration information at any time from within your Hotmail account by clicking the "Options" button on the navigation bar, and then clicking on the "Personal" icon.

    When you create a Hotmail account, you will also simultaneously create a .NET Passport, which you will use for signing in to your Hotmail account. If you cancel this .NET Passport account, you will automatically cancel your Hotmail account. For more information about .NET Passport, visit http://www.passport.net and read the .NET Passport Privacy Statement.

    Your registration information is used to operate the site, for demographic statistics, and to display appropriate individualized advertisements. New users will receive a Hotmail welcome letter explaining the features provided by the service. Hotmail may also send periodic member letters, from which you may not unsubscribe without closing your account, to announce important service changes, new features, technical issue updates and information about other products and services.

    Hotmail is concerned about controlling unsolicited commercial e-mail, or "spam." Hotmail will not sell, lease or rent its member lists to any third parties. While Microsoft continues to actively review and implement new technology, such as expanded filtering features, there is no currently available technology that will totally prevent the sending and receiving of unsolicited e-mail. Using tools such as the Inbox Protector and being cautious about the sharing of your e-mail address while online will help reduce the amount of unsolicited e-mail you receive. For more information on how to best use Hotmail's tools, please contact abuse@hotmail.com.

    http://privacy1.msn.com/fullnotice.armx#SUPPLEME NT ARY

    --
    Quality Hosting e3 Servers
    1. Re:What the EULA says by Pofy · · Score: 1

      Well, since they collect all those things, the obvious thing to do if you don't like it is of course to not give your real info and just enter some bogus one. Problem in part solved.

  22. Sweet! by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason not to use Microsoft Search.

  23. You expected privacy? by catdevnull · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, you signed up to use "free" e-mail from the largest corporate player known for it's less-than-ethical tactics and you expected to get something for nothing from Microsoft? Yikes, people. I refused from the get go. My gut said it was a gimmick.

    Nothing is ever free from a corporation--they've got people studying consumers to find out how to make a buck off of them. That's no conspiracy theory--it's just corporate life. That's why I work at an .EDU. [That and I'm a bit of a masochist].

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    1. Re:You expected privacy? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nothing is ever free from a corporation

      And this applies to Google and Gmail as well. Google trolls your email to "serve" you adverts. Of course, Google is a Slashdot Love Child, so it's kind of OK, sort of winked at. But Microsoft, on the other hand... Pure Evil for something that is half as half baked as the Google deal. Ah, Slashdot.... Full of hypocrisy.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:You expected privacy? by DenDave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yep.. I abandoned my hotmail account years ago when they came with additional terms of use and mandatory passport... as for yahoo, I went to yahoo.co.uk as at the time they didn't register all that much and they are still certain that I am 89 years old living in antarctica and I have an avid interest in receiving free information about birdwatching, these free informational mails are forwarded to my hotmail account, which I haven't even thought about since 1998...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    3. Re:You expected privacy? by DrugCheese · · Score: 2, Funny

      I signed up for free email before hotmail was bought by microsoft. I remember the day I logged in and the little butterfly logo had landed on the page, sad day. The privacy agreements had to of changed.

      On a side note I still think it's hilarious that microsofts mascot is a bug.

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    4. Re:You expected privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was parent modded as flamebait?

      This AC (not me BTW) may be a bit sarcastic, but has a very good point: American universities *have* become more and more like for-profit corporations (esp in the last 5-10 years or so), with the students treated more as captive customers than, well *students*...

    5. Re:You expected privacy? by BBird · · Score: 1

      on gmail settings you can optout ads.
      aditionaly, they are not using your
      personal info, but the message contents.
      (Provided they abide by this rule,
      I see nothing wrong. It can even be usefull).

    6. Re:You expected privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're 89 years old and living in Antarctica too? Your name isn't Albert Einstein just like mine, is it?

      Wow, small world!

    7. Re:You expected privacy? by DenDave · · Score: 1
      Your name isn't Albert Einstein just like mine, is it?
      Nope, my name is jose jimenez..
      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  24. The thing I feel worst about,......Really? by roberthhid · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article: "That's probably the thing I feel worst about over the last few years -- not making our own R&D investment," Ballmer said. Umh, wasn't there a certain monkey dance that is regretted more?

  25. EULA continued by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 1, Informative
    .NET PASSPORT'S USE OF YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION

    How .NET Passport Will Not Use Your Personal Information

    .NET Passport will not sell or rent your personal information to third parties

    .NET PASSPORT'S GENERAL DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION

    .NET Passport occasionally hires other companies to provide limited services on our behalf, such as answering customer support inquiries or performing statistical analyses of our services. .NET Passport will only provide these companies with those pieces of your personal information needed to deliver the services, and the companies and their employees are prohibited from using that personal information for any other purpose.

    Use of Shared Information by .NET Passport Participating Sites and Services .NET Passport participating sites and services with whom you choose to share the information can use it for a variety of purposes. These can include personalizing your experience at their sites and reducing registration time by using information in your .NET Passport account to pre-fill their registration forms. .NET Passport participating sites and services may share your personal information and/or unique identifier with third parties in order to fulfill a service or transaction you may have requested. In addition, participating sites may share your personal information, but not your Unique ID, with other third parties as permitted by their privacy policies.

    --
    Quality Hosting e3 Servers
  26. Outstanding! by futuresheep · · Score: 1

    If they go off the contents of my Hotmail inbox, I'll get direct contact with people that can supply me with the following:

    A larger penis!
    A better sex life!
    Breast Implants! Woohoo!
    And a spic and span clean credit report!

    MSN Search here I come!

  27. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    That is personal information. There's nothing stopping them from giving advertisers personally identifiable info. They just say they will not. I wouldn't trust Microsoft Passport, so why would I trust this?

    When they weren't even trying to share personal information people have been able to get into their systems and take it (e.g. using a simple URL to get into any Passport account). Now that they want to intentionally share some of it we should trust them? No thanks. Don't come crying to /. when you see bogus charges showing up on your credit card.

  28. re: personalization by diplomaticImmunity · · Score: 1

    I always try to put the oldest age that will be accepted on registering for anything, just to see what ridiculous numbers it can take. I suppose that means I'm in line for scads of denture and depends ads....

  29. A Internet business plan that _works..._ by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Collect personal information for years with privacy notice consisting of twenty pages of legal language displayed in a 4"x1" scroll box. First line reads "Your privacy is our foremost concern." Last line reads "Terms may be changed at any time without notice."

    2) Don't do anything until you've got enough information to be valuable.

    3) Change terms without notice.

    4) Sell personal information and PROFIT!

  30. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Followed up with exactly the same thing that Google, Yahoo!, and many other companies do:

    "For example, a car company could choose to have Microsoft display its sports car link when a man types in certain keywords, and a link to an SUV model when a woman uses the search criteria."

    Not a privacy concern. It's using the Internet's advantages to the benefit of 1) the advertiser and 2) the consumer (potentially).

    If I'm surfing for "SUV" then maybe I would rather see sponsored links for SUV companies rather than random, unrelated ads for shower gel. As an advertiser, I know that I can buy a billboard for n dollars and have no idea how many people drove by the billboard, made inquiries into my company as a result of the billboard, or became customers are a result of the billboard. With the Internet, I can do all of that - it lets me be a more informed advertiser, use my money more appropriately, and improve general service for customers.

  31. cookies by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2
    This is the sort of reason that I go through my browser cookies every couple of months and zap anything that I don't recognise and want to keep.

    OK: that won't fix all tracking (including this M$ one) but it helps.

  32. Who didn't see this coming? by StankDawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It could get scarier!

    I went into a discussion on Binary Revolution Radio (http://www.binrev.com/radio/) episode #80 about the possibility (or rather INEVITABILITY) of Microsoft combining all of its databases from all of its individual services (hotmail, MSDN, spaces, search, etc...) and data mining them for common data. Each individual privacy policy becomes meaningless. They may not sell your data, but they can combine it and put together a pretty powerful profile about you.

    The key, and the reason that I pointed it out on this episode, is the new Microsoft genuine program. All of the other databases could have been joined on names, phone numbers, and other PII (Personally Identifiable Information) which is not always reliable. With the new "genuine program" they get a hash of your system as part of the process that uniquely ties you to that computer.

    With one anchor like that that *is* reliable (most of the time) they now have a way to tie your visits to your accounts from that PC to all of your other MS service accounts. For example, logging into hotmail from that "marked" PC.

    It is not rock solid and may not be completely provable (people do use other peoples computers) but it will work most of the time. That is a very scary data warehouse that could provide extremely targeted advertising which would fetch top dollar from advertisers.

    --
    --- The revolution will be digitized! - http://www.binrev.com/ ---
  33. Ah Slashdot.... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How is this any different than Google trolling through your email? Oh, it's not quite as bad, but since it's Microsoft, it's Pure Evil? And of course since Google is our Love Child, it's OK for them to do something that in reality is twice as offensive? Ah Slashdot....

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Ah Slashdot.... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      It's a keyword matching system, that's it, that's all. Yes, they do targetted marketing [based on the content of your email]...

      So, in other words, they "troll" through your email...

      And, keep in mind, what a For Profit Corporation does today, and why they tell you they do it, may change over time as they realize that as a publically traded company, what counts is the finantials.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:Ah Slashdot.... by tajmorton · · Score: 2, Informative
      I hate to feed the trolls, but...
      How is this any different than Google trolling through your email?
      Google isn't reading your mail: http://gmail.google.com/gmail/help/privacy.html
      • We will never rent, sell or share information that personally identifies you for marketing purposes without your express permission.
      • We serve highly relevant ads and other information as part of the service using our unique content-targeting technology. No human reads your email to target ads or related information to you without your consent.

      And, in terms of showing the ads, and parsing through your mail there...how is that different than a spam filter? Does your ISP have a privacy policy that says they won't read your email? I can't even find the privacy policy of my ISP!

      --
      Tell the truth and you won't have so much to remember.
    3. Re:Ah Slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well unfortunatly I am not blessed with selective memory so I can remember Google getting a lot of stick on slashdot for doing something similiar. And post after post of arguments over whether Google had turned Evil or not.

      I'm getting pretty sick of posters who insist on expressing the one/many slashdotters == all slashdotters fallacy. The 'one company does something thats not right so it is ok for anyone else to do it' defense is starting to wear thin too.

    4. Re:Ah Slashdot.... by aurumaeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google doesn't "Troll" through your email. You get ads that are selected based on words that are, at display time, found to be present in whatever email you're looking at. It's annonymous, and not at all based on personal information (and yes, those are two different things). Of course, MSFT wouldn't be the first to target ads with user profile information.

    5. Re:Ah Slashdot.... by Vivski · · Score: 1

      You dont see the difference?

      The Google appraoch: Scans an email for keywords so they can give you a relevant, discreet ad. This is advertising, make no bones about it, but it can also be quite useful.

      The Microsoft approach: Scans your personal details for information to give to 3rd parties for market research and so they can spam you with BS.

      Google has ads quite pleasent to the eye, Microsoft (directly and indirectly) has attention demanding flashing Flash and spam emails.

      Not surprising Slashdotters prefer Google to Microsoft. It's all in the approach. Google has some respect for privacy at this time. Microsoft has never shown their users any respect. You don't have to agree, but it's not hard to understand.

      -Viv-

  34. Simple solution by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1
    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Simple solution by paulymer5 · · Score: 1

      Except you need them to maintain your login. And they'll be reset each time you start a new session. It sounds like the information will be linked with your account and not your session, anyway. Data such as your gender and age isn't as easily gathered by analyzing browsing, but a Passport profile is easy pickings.

    2. Re:Simple solution by v_1_r_u_5 · · Score: 1

      Deleting cookies is a great start, but it's not enough. Sneaky web developers use "web bugs" these days. The trick is simple: have one image (or a series of images) on the web site take on unique expiration dates for each user. When the user connects to the web server, the client sends "Please give me this image if it hasn't been updated since (unique date that can be tied to client)." The server says "Ah, you're Mr. Smith! The image hasn't been modified." Basically, it acts as a cookie. So, to get around that, you either need to disable caching (which is perfectly reasonable with today's broadband) or delete your cache frequently.

  35. Targeted Ads by RagingChipmunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who cares? Who actually uses MS "SEARCH" anyway? It sucks, and if they want it to suck even more, they'll incorporate 'targeted ads'. If they want to follow in the footsteps of AOL thats fine by me. They're going to be fighting AOL for a segment of "very large but mentally insignificant" web-users.

    --
    The only PT Boat Journal on the web: http://www.PT171.org
    1. Re:Targeted Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "very large but mentally insignificant" portion of the market is also the biggest advertising driven segment of the market as well.

      By the way, for successful "incorporation" of ads into web content, please see Ads by Google.

    2. Re:Targeted Ads by CPUGuy · · Score: 1

      Google has 'targeted ads' as well...

      MSN search works very well, and is much more customizeable than Google's, problem is Google has a much larger index of the Web, which, ironically, is also a problem for Google searches.

  36. How is this different than Ad Sense? by with_him · · Score: 1

    I can see how this a user based system instead of conent based system, but how is the end result any different than google ad sense. Selective and refined placement of things I may want. In the execution of the process may be where we all start to hate it! Google ads are generally simple text and non-obtrousive to what I really trying to do on the site. I doubt that microsoft will be so kind in their positioning and placement. My problem, and possibly others problem is not how the ads are selected, but how they are presented.

  37. Their privacy info. by blanks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From their terms of service and privacy info.

    http://privacy1.msn.com/

    These are just random bits I collected that related to advertisers and personal information.

    Also you may want to read the pasport privacy link, as this is how msn connects all their sites.

    http://www.passport.net/Consumer/Privacy Policy.asp?PPlcid=2057

    At some sites, MSN collects personal information, such as your e-mail address, name, home or work address or telephone number. MSN may also collect demographic information, such as your post code, age, gender, preferences, interests and favorites. Information collected by MSN may be combined with information obtained from other Microsoft services and other companies

    The information we collect may be combined with information obtained from other Microsoft services and other companies.

    MSN may also place Web beacons from third parties on our site in order to compile aggregated statistics and to help determine the effectiveness of our joint promotional or advertising campaigns. MSN prohibits Web beacons on our site from being used by third parties to access your personal information.

    Use of Third Party Ad Networks

    The majority of the online banner advertisements you see on MSN Web pages are displayed by MSN.

    Your registration information is used to operate the site, for demographic statistics, and to display appropriate individualized advertisements.

    In addition, MSN allows other companies, called third-party ad servers or ad networks, to display advertisements on MSN Web pages. Some of these ad networks may place a persistent cookie on your computer. Doing this allows the ad network to recognize your computer each time they send you an online advertisement. In this way, ad networks may compile information about where you, or others who are using your computer, saw their advertisements and determine which ads are clicked on. This information allows an ad network to deliver targeted advertisements that they believe will be of most interest to you.

  38. And? by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can you expect privacy when you're giving your info to another person?

    Microsoft didn't force you to login to hotmail. And the fact that you happen to have private information there is your own damn fault.

    It would be different if your ISP was giving out your emails or other details since you pay them for the service...

    And you really don't think Google isn't laughing at the stock of "private" information stored in their gmail archives?

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  39. Ooooh...they wanted my real information? by neckdeepinspecialsau · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does anyone put real information into hotmail or yahoo mail services?

    If you do and you don't want to feel free to use my "real information":

    Bob Smith 1313 Mockingbirdlane Beverly Hills Califonia 90210 555-555-5555 (h) 555-555-5555 (c) alternate email ifjeufeiehhc@yahoo.com

    The real question is do they feel guilty charging for junk data?

    1. Re:Ooooh...they wanted my real information? by bpd · · Score: 1

      You bastard! Get out of my house!

      May I also suggest 321 evergreen terrace, 123 fake street, and 668 Lucifer Lane?

      Seriously, though, the parent post is spot-on. Don't give personal info to people you don't trust, don't trust "people" who are really corporations, and don't answer/click/buy from targetted ads. I apply this to telephone sales, as well - if I didn't initiate the contact, there will be no sale.

    2. Re:Ooooh...they wanted my real information? by kris_lang · · Score: 1

      yeah, but they can compile a lot of accurate data from the contents of your email, like telling Aunt Millie what your flight number is and when you'll be arriving in Toledo can tell them your true town of origin, and reminding her of your phone number gives them (of course) your TRUE phone number, with the area code and exchange identifying your location fairly well.

      Any yahoos or googlies who email you (even if you personally do not have a googly or yahooie account just is another conduit of information to them. Plus with google and the infamous gmail invites, they've almost got a set of useful directed graphs showing linkages between users as the invites propagated.

      Privacy is so paramount, but some idiot emailing you can blow it.

    3. Re:Ooooh...they wanted my real information? by Alsee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, they don't make money selling the junk data. They make money selling RELIABLE data. Any website you go to can see your IP address and that IP address can be matched with the real-world area it serves. In US urban and suburban areas this will most often pin down your true location within a few miles. In rural areas and in other countries it can ususally pin people down within a several dozen miles.

      Just try this website to convert your IP to a real-world address. For me it reported one town over, about a mile away.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    4. Re:Ooooh...they wanted my real information? by stickfigure · · Score: 1
      If you do and you don't want to feel free to use my "real information": Bob Smith 1313 Mockingbirdlane Beverly Hills Califonia 90210 555-555-5555 (h) 555-555-5555 (c) alternate email ifjeufeiehhc@yahoo.com

      Wait a minute. I'm Bob Smith of 1313 Mockingbirdlane in Beverly Hills. I was wondering how all my personal information was getting God knows where. I'm contacting my lawyer right now. Your ass, sir, is mine.

  40. Now THAT's Targetting... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    Just opened up the replies to this Microsoft article and an advert for Linux.com popped up! Those advertising marketeers must be mindreaders...

    Still, it makes a change from a "Microsoft Get The Bulls^H^H^H^H^H Facts" advert popping up on every Linux article...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  41. Whoops.... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    I guess it would help the search if I actually used real information for the account.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  42. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by cupraman · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Adverts are shown on the search results whether I like it or not, the 'personal' information they have on me isn't much (especially if I've lied about anything they don't need to know) so I'd much rather see ads that might actually be useful instead of some random list.

  43. GMail by northcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GMail placed context sensitive ads based on people's private emails. In competition (maybe not in direct competition, but still in competition) MSN is going a step further and doing this. In competition Google or someone else might go a step even further and do something even worse. That's why even a small case of invasion of privacy is bad -- it leads to competition in unhealthy areas and it gives more justification for bigger transgressions -- and that's why some of the hue and cry raised over gmail was justified. (And of course, there is also the justifiable argument that even a small case of invasion of privacy is not acceptable)

  44. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by theVP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sorry, I know this is going to really piss some people off here at slashdot, but I actually LIKE those little ads on the sidebar that are specified to what I'm searching for. Especially when I'm attempting to find something I want to buy. There has been many a time when I'm trying to find something via Google, or I get an email special in my Gmail account, that the links on the side take me to something even better. Not all ads are neccessarily scams. I mean, its not like they're installing software on my computer, so I just really don't see the point in arguing over this. To me, it really ENHANCES my search for products more than it hinders.

    If Microsoft sees this, and they see that it'll bring in some more revenue, why SHOULDN'T they try something like this?

    --
    "No one is more miserable than the person who wills everything and can do nothing." -Emperor Claudius 10 BC - AD 54
  45. Re: personalization by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
    I always try to put the oldest age that will be accepted...

    Which leads me to wonder just how many people actually put in real information?? I mean, I registered on Hotmail once, and gave a zipcode of 90210, which is at least 20,000 away from my *real* zipcode... That was a few years ago, when the first stories linking Hotmail and junk mail came out. The story I vaguely remember included a "researcher" registering an id that was supposedly a young female, and within about 30 minutes junk mail started to accumulate offering penis enlargement cream and other irrelevant services. My Hotmail address never scored much crap, though.

  46. Nothing new here. by Picard102 · · Score: 1

    Typical Slashdot 14 year olds hatting on Microsoft for something pretty common in the real world of advertisements. I wonder how shocked some people would be to know that TV commercials are targeted at a certain programs audience.

    1. Re:Nothing new here. by TimberManiac · · Score: 1
      Typical Slashdot 14 year olds hatting on Microsoft for something pretty common in the real world of advertisements.
      Ah leave them be, they're having so much fun... look at em, with their little penguin t-shirts and Windows boxes... bless.
    2. Re:Nothing new here. by Joules+Burn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When a tv can report back to its master what channel I'm watching, when and for how long, my sole remaining tv will have a new home on the curbside.

    3. Re:Nothing new here. by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Do you use Tivo? You might want to start making a place for it on the curbside.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    4. Re:Nothing new here. by Picard102 · · Score: 1

      The TV you own may not report statistics back. But the ad's you see during specific programs are most definitely targeted at you and the demographic you fit it.

    5. Re:Nothing new here. by Joules+Burn · · Score: 1
      Trust me, I don't fit the typical regional demographic.

      I don't have a problem with generic advertising. I have a problem with being id'd, tracked and targeted by strangers. I liken it to letting someone put blinders on me.

      Targeted advertising only limits my choice based on what someone else THINKS I want. What I really want is to be my own filter and be steered as little as possible by unseen(unclean) hands.

    6. Re:Nothing new here. by Joules+Burn · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't touch something like Tivo with a 10' pole.

  47. Lie down with dogs, catch fleas by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    We're Microsoft! Trust us! Give us your personal data, your messages, your surfing habits, your contact lists, your banking info (solely for billing purposes, we assure you), your family, friends and bachelor party photos. If we weren't trustworthy, do you think the Justice Department would let us keep our declared monopoly? Here, have some candy, baby stranger...

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  48. Microsoft is the Evil and must die! by killerap34 · · Score: 1

    Google is the future. True me!

  49. Good luck getting any ID off my Hotmail by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Some times *I* forget I'm not really William Braski with all the spam that gets sent there.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  50. Who the hell didn't see this coming?? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Did you really think Microsoft would give you anything for free???

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  51. The Moral of the Story by Log+from+Blammo · · Score: 1

    TANSTAAFL: There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

    "Free" services must be paid for with other revenue streams. In this case, as with many others, it is by selling more effective advertising. If you don't like it, pay for e-mail out of your own pocket. The control you gain over your own privacy is well worth the pittance that it costs.

    And the amount you pay need not be in cash, either, if you happen to have a friend with a mail server and a link to the network. Would you like a shell account for a measly two beers per month, that you were probably spending anyway?

    --
    "This quote is a product of the Frobozz Magic Quote Company."
  52. All I get in my hotmail account is spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So all the adds I would get if I used the Micro$oft search would be targeted adds for penis enlargement!

    Gotta love hotmail, create an account and instantly start getting spam without ever doing anything with the account.

  53. Ah [Microsoft]... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh, it's not quite as bad, but since it's Microsoft, it's Pure Evil?"

    Pure Evil is the fact that I can't log in, after a couple failed logins. Yes there's a wait to prevent password-guessing, but I shouldn't have to wait a week.

  54. no adds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what do you want from guys like MS? free-email?

    looking for a free secure email? check those guys-no adds or any bs www.loftmail.com

  55. +1 Funny? by cmclean · · Score: 1

    Only on slashdot (and when talking about Microsoft) could that comment be considered a joke ;-)

    --
    "Any similarity between the hooting of a million eager monkeys and Slashdot is purely coincidental." -THEFLASHMAN
  56. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by malfunct · · Score: 1

    But would you trust Google with your e-mail just because they SAY they won't use the information they mined from it for bad things?

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  57. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

    Keep reading. Also from the article:

    Microsoft would then provide the company with detailed information about the demographics of the people who clicked on its ads.

    In my book, that's where they cross the privacy line.

  58. Worry not by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    How many of you are giving out real information?? It would be pretty silly to do so. Are you giving out bank account or credit card info? Or your address? Hell, how many people log in as "Bill_Gates_*? Why is this an issue? If you send out plain text over the net, you may as well broadcast it on the radio. That's my assumptions when I send out email. I have no expectations of any kind of privacy when I'm using "company"(hotmail, ISP, job, etc.) equipment. I will never expect any as long I need to use somebody else's wire. You shouldn't either.

    --
    What?
  59. Privacy concerns and better advertising by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    How about a check box that is default off, but there are nagging hints that you should turn it on:

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    [x] click here to make ads you see more interesting
    by displaying ads targeted for your location
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Then you can see how users respond to that.

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  60. no simple security holes in gmail, right? by Mr+44 · · Score: 1

    Right, google would never have any any security or privacy issues

    1. Re:no simple security holes in gmail, right? by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      The security holes were found in the BETA version of gmail. Use beta systems at your own risk.

      The privacy complaint was a concern over what they COULD do with the info they have. There were not allegations they did anything wrong.

    2. Re:no simple security holes in gmail, right? by bob670 · · Score: 1

      Okay, so how is this any different in regards to MS or even Yahoo? Niehter have done anythnig wrong with any information as of yet, but we are ringing the alarm bell? Double standards?

    3. Re:no simple security holes in gmail, right? by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Microsoft exposed every detail of every Passport account over the internet with a simple URL. The person who found this was able to read any credit card numbers he desired. MSN used to sell e-mail addresses to advertisers which may then be used for spamming (they may still do this, haven't heard). Media Player (9?) transmits information about the movies or music you play even when you change the setting to prevent it.

      Still think Microsoft hasn't done anything wrong with personal information?

    4. Re:no simple security holes in gmail, right? by bob670 · · Score: 1
      1. Wasn't the Passport flaw more a proof of concept than actual issue? Did anyone suffer any PROVEN theft from this?

      2. Lots of services resell your information, read the license agreement or you have no right to bithc?

      3. More tinfoil hat crap, this was never clearly proven.

      Still want to pretend anti-MS bias doens't cloud almost every discussion on /.?

    5. Re:no simple security holes in gmail, right? by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      1. No. The person who caught it first just happened to be a nice guy and reported it. In fact Microsoft wouldn't even respond to his initial notifications.

      2. AFAIK the emails were being sold without users being informed. It wasn't in the privacy statement or license agreement. It's only after it went to press that MS temporarily stopped.

      3. Really? I don't make stuff up. I back up every statement with information from good sources: http://www.msversus.org/node/8 (includes links to sources) Packet sniffers have proven multiple times that MS apps send more information than is disclosed to users.

      Sure bias clouds /. discussions. But not any of my statements.

  61. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    No, I don't trust them either. But I can understand if others would trust Google. So far they haven't proven untrustworthy (that I know of).

    I use a Yahoo email account for junk and hosted email for everything else. Since my hosting provider doesn't work with advertisers they have little reason to cull information from me.

  62. The /. two-faced monster rises again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is only microscopically worse than G-Mail scanning all your personal mail and doing the same thing.

    Yet on Slashdot, NO ONE cares about that!

    Lets get our philosophes straight. If this upsets you then so should G-Mail, big time. They are 90% the same thing. Either stop using G-Mail and start panning it for the privacy invasion that it is, or STFU about Hotmail.

    You can't pick and choose your philosophy based on a company's name!

  63. This is not what Google does... but it's been done by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Google/Gmail displays ads based on keyword text. The advertiser knows nothing about you as a person, just that your search string/e-mail message contains certain words. Come to think of it, I don't remember ever giving Gmail any statistical info about myself. As far as I remember I just clicked the invite link I got in my e-mail and gave them my desired username and password.

    What Microsoft is doing is what AOL has done for years -- providing data on the actual person such as age, gender, and location. AOL users have an object called the "q_context" that follows them around (like a cookie) that contains basic demographic info about you, and display objects can use info in the q_context to do things like pop up your local weather in a field, or (presumably) an ad targeted at your age and gender as well as your location.

    This is nothing new, and it's really nothing all that bad, but it's still a lot more than Google does.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  64. this is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's interesting that we get so alarmed when we hear an ISP is doing what junk mailers and telemarketers have been doing for years. If they know where you live -- even approximately where you live -- there is a wealth of demographic data about you for sale. Ever thought about what happens when you answer all those questions on a warranty registration card? That data is sold to Experian or somebody, who in turn sells it to marketing organizations, and you find youself on a mailing list for pet owners or whatever.

    We SHOULD be alarmed, but not specifically with the ISPs so much as with the companies who are collecting all this data and building up very detailed databases on your preferences and consumer habits.

    And do you have one of those grocery store club cards? ...

  65. since you're asking: by commo1 · · Score: 1

    I'm 4'6, blonde with red highlights. I love sleigh rides in the snow and cozy nights by the fire cuddling raw starfruit. My turn-ons are Makita power drills and rusted Ladas with Llamas towing them. I mean come on: This is Hotmail! How are they REALLY going to tell who we are?

  66. MSN... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    We call that "OS" - "Original Spammers"...

    Microsoft "raises privacy concerns"...

    Wow.

    Who'd have thought a company that wants to totally control their customers' PCs would have "privacy concerns"?

    Oh, wait, I guess they mean that Bill is concerned that he might not be able to invade your privacy in the pursuit of every last dime in your pocket...

    I mean, if you don't know where that dime is, you can't get it, right?

    When are people going to realize that Bill Gates is NOT a "geek", he's NOT a "genius", he's NOT a "techie" - he's a Harvard poker-playing, misogynist, greedy, rich, son of an asshole lawyer who's only interested in picking your pocket?

    And everybody who works for him wants to be him and will say or do anything he says.

    Including the half of /. that consists of Microsoft shills...

    Read my DSL connection.

    Fuck you.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  67. Hotmail=Junkmail by Etrigan66 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They can look thru my hotmail account all they like. It only ever gets used when I need to provide a valid email address to a website I'm visiting. This way, my home email doesn't get flooded with the porn ads/medications ads that seem to find their way to me after a visit amazon, hahaha.

  68. Microsoft would do something like this: by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In my opinion, Microsoft should make a software activation scheme across all software they make, which would request every imaginable piece of identifying information about a person.

    For example, the system could force users to enter: Date of birth, ethnic affiliation, gender, sexual preference, social security number, driver license number, tax documents filed in the last 15 years, criminal records, photocopies of birth certificates, a list of current and past employers, amount of pay over a 10 year period, number of spouse and children, names, genders, social security numbers, and birth certificates of all family members, and the list goes on and on. It would take the average person a week to collect all of the information and to prepare all the documents for submission to Microsoft to activate a piece of software.

    This would be good for the economy because companies will pop up everywhere that will file for you, similarly to the way that tax preparation companies exist all over the place.

    But here's the best part: When the software is activated, Microsoft's systems would automatically verify all of the information with state and federal computer systems. Any incorrect information would be grounds for lawsuit and police action for fraud.

    Assuming you're not busted for fraud, Microsoft would then sell complete identifying information to advertisers and businesses of all kinds, especially businesses that nobody's ever heard of, which are not reputable, or businesses which are specifically shady and/or illegal. These businesses could then use the information to specifically target advertisements for individual potential customers. They could also enhance their revenue by stealing the identity of those who do not purchase their products, thereby taking advantage of their government-granted right to guaranteed profits from business activities. Microsoft would collect a 99% tax on these profits, to recompense it for building such a vast and complex system.

    Microsoft. Where do you want to go today?

  69. Re:Bogus! Money Quote Follows: by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Well, "detailed information about the demographics" dooesn't include your street address, your driver's license number, etc., etc.

    In my book, you've got a pretty high standard for privacy. I'm surprised you actually use the internet.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  70. Slashdot is already doing this! by GhengisKron · · Score: 2, Funny

    How else would they know to show me ads for Linux servers?

  71. So? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Show of hands: who actually gave correct personal information when creating their hotmail accounts? Ok morons, you can put your hands down now!

    I feel a personal responsibility to put down as much erroneous and conflicting information as possible when filling out web forms. I'm pretty sure hotmail beleives that I am an 18 year old female virgin with an annual income of $0 whose name is Bill Gates and whose address is 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA... yeah, that info should be really useful to potential advertisers!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  72. ROCK ON! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    As long as it does not bother you at all that you are providing statistical data that is being gathered for the explicit and expressed purpose of spamming you. If you have no problem with that, ROCK ON!

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  73. Hear that sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "gathered this personal information by tracking users who have logged into its Hotmail e-mail program or other Microsoft Web sites in order to allow advertisers to target their ads to a specific audience"

    hear that? that's the sound of thousands of spam relay and spambots cowering in fear that their personal info is being mined

  74. Re: personalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similarly, I've managed to register a few accounts stating that my date of birth was yesterday...

  75. But the data are subject to web bug attacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but not personally identifiable ... and location

    Both of the above CAN INDEED be obtained by the advertisers by inserting graphics and HTML tags into the advertisements, which associate the client's IP address with the specific ad campaign.

    IP addresses are considered personally identifiable information, and do indeed reveal your location.

    Further, there is nothing in the Microsoft user agreement which would prevent their advertisers from employing their own cookie-based UID's (e.g. DoubleClick) to correlate your UID (and by extension your email address which these third parties likely already have) with the additional new datum that you happened to receive an email from MSN which targeted only people searching for mortgages.

    The personal data can and will get out.

  76. Big Difference by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Hotmail method: Collect information on people, send databases to advertisers, so that they can target ads based on groups.

    GMail method: Get advertisers to say to whom they want ads to show based on keywords. Automated process selects ads based on keywords. No databases involved.

  77. Re:This is not what Google does... but it's been d by poningru · · Score: 1

    the location is not hard find out, for example if you are the sysadmin for the server I am visiting right now, you can tell that I am from Tampa, FL just from my IP address. And I would assume it would be a pretty simple thing to run a program that can do a look up, and give a location prevelant ad within secs.

    --
    Calm down people, its a religion not an operating system.
  78. Re:This is not what Google does... but it's been d by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 1

    There are so many gotchas with deriving location from IP, particularly for dialup users, that I don't think anyone relies on that by itself any more. Anyway, my point was that AOL knows your location because you tell the software and it in turn tells AOL's login service, which passes that information around the publishing system as you move through it.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  79. My cat provided perfectly true information by billstewart · · Score: 1

    All these people filling out forms with bogus information - really now. My cat provided perfectly true information when she got her hotmail account, and when the Child Online Protection Act came in, the bums dropped her because she was under 13 years old. (Age: 3 Sex: F(neutered) Occupation: self-employed Income: She hasn't been back, and she dropped her Juno account when it started charging money.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks