Slashdot Mirror


A Different Way To Recycle Old PCs

Anonymous Coward writes "Glasgow based artist Sandy Smith has some slightly different suggestions for what to do with those outdated PCs and Apple Macs -- build your home out of them! Photographs of his work; rooms and structures made out of up to 100 (switched-on) computers and other equipment can be seen at computersforart.org/create/; these should be of interest to anyone who has a habit of collecting old (working) computers, or just hates the thought of throwing out their old 486 friend."

213 comments

  1. Hmm. by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Glasgow based artist Sandy Smith has some slightly different suggestions for what to do with those outdated PCs and Apple Macs -- build your home out of them!

    I'll have to ask my mom if I can build a house in her basement.

    Aw, she says I have to bathe first.


    BTW, Coral cache mirror, MirrorDot mirror

    1. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our mac house building overlords.
      lol

    2. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He got 4 of them off me on ebay :0) 4 for a pound!

    3. Re:Hmm. by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmmm... all that CRT radiation will so totally irradiate any geek that stays in these CRT/CPU houses.. not that geeks have any use for those pointy things anyway...

    4. Re:Hmm. by wootest · · Score: 1

      A useful and funny first post?

      You must be new here.

    5. Re:Hmm. by falxx · · Score: 1

      I kept a somewhat diverse store in my parents basement, of old machinery. One day they decided that it was time for some cleanup, and this I were informed about, and took it for granted that they asked me before they threw out all my (old)hardware stashed downstairs.

      But naaah... /: And this is somewhat my _history_ of hardware.

      Hint: don't keep hardware (that you intend to keep) unlocked, unsafe, or in any other way unchecked, in your old folks' basement.

      --
      falxx
    6. Re:Hmm. by putaro · · Score: 1

      AWWWWWWWWWW

    7. Re:Hmm. by coopaq · · Score: 0
      I think he is in a well.

      And what's with the ring design?

      Is that scary girl down there with him?

  2. Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Dude. Holy shit.

      What is your electic bill like these days?

    2. Re:Junk by uncoolcentral · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you're not in earthquake country!

    3. Re:Junk by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

      Dude, all that to run those two little speakers in the corner.... I detect overkill.

      --

      I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  3. You wouldn't need a heater... by Mikito · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...if you had a house built of running PCs.

    That would be quite an electric bill, though.

    --
    Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
    1. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by dncsky1530 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny as it may be, the parent as a point, with the worlds store of oil depleading, and the ozone layer getting worse by the day, projects like this aren't helping the problem. This may only be one case, however many more people keep old, old computers running for no reason, using up alot of electricity that doesn't need to be used.

    2. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but if they are all "running" don't you have a mobile home? though old computers don't have the speed of todays.

    3. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I tried building one once, but I ran out of IP addresses just below the roofline...

    4. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by bablefisk · · Score: 1

      Having all these computers turned on will generate some heat. His ovens will probably have thermostats, so they will simply spend more time being idle. You have probably heard that energy doesn't disappear, it just takes on new shapes? Well, the heat output from a computer compared to the electricity input is no less than that of an oven. It doesn't really matter whether you spend 1000W using an oven or a bunch of computers.

      But I just remembered that large parts of the world isn't quite as cold as Norway, where we have to keep it warmer indoor than outdoor most of the year, not to freeze our asses off. So you might still have a point. ;)

    5. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by ginotech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      he's not blaming the computers, he's just noting that it's one way careless people pollute the environment. sheesh.

    6. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by AceaFox · · Score: 1

      There is one thing to say here, and that is: EX-TER-MIN-ATE!

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    7. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by Skater · · Score: 1

      Electicity is one of the most expensive ways to heat, unless you live off-grid.

      I have a 1-bedroom condo in Alexandria, Virginia, and my electric heating bill (heating only) was around $140 last month. Oh, and I turn the heat off in the bedroom when I'm not using it during the day. (I know usually that's not a smart thing to do, but in my case it's cheaper to turn the heater off.)

    8. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by argent · · Score: 3, Informative

      This may only be one case, however many more people keep old, old computers running for no reason, using up alot of electricity that doesn't need to be used

      How much electricity does it take to make a new computer to replace them?

      Not to mention that when I switched from a new 1.7 GHz PC to a 400 MHz half-decade-old Mac my room became much cooler in the summer. Older computers may well use less electricity than newer ones.

    9. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by wwwillem · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here in (also cold) Canada, I visited a customer recently to discuss a thin-client solution. One of their comments was that when all those PCs would disappear from the desktop they could be having a heating problem. They had a rather new building and when the heating system for that office was dimensioned, the amount of heat produced by the PCs was calculated in. Which resulted in a smaller furnice.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    10. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by mrbcs · · Score: 1
      I took my server out of my basement. Saved $25 a month on electricity.

      Started using my gas fireplace. Now costs me $50 a month MORE than using the server and laser printer. :-(

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    11. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by Mikito · · Score: 1

      AC writes: but if they are all "running" don't you have a mobile home? though old computers don't have the speed of todays.

      In that case, make sure that all of the PCs are of the laptop/notebook variety.

      --
      Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
    12. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Older computers may well use less electricity than newer ones.

      I can confirm this. Having had two Athlon CPUs burn out in the last year in the same computer, I'm all to familiar with how much heat they generate. Your ten year-old Mac probably uses less power than one of my modern Athlon CPUs alone.

    13. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      There's nothing like spending a cold winter's night curled up infront of the firewall...

      When that thing catches fire, my irony meter will go through the roof:

      A wall of firewalls, on fire. Something named after a method of fire prevention, on fire. Someone call the Brits, only they can handle this one...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    14. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by iamnafets · · Score: 1

      Yes because my P2 server running of a 200 watt power supply is so much more wasteful than g4merz and their 600 watt power supplies.

    15. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

      Well given that every 62 million years on earth there is a catastrophic destruction of Life world wide. Combined with the fact that the last time it happened was 65 million years ago. You need to be careful what you wish for. Oh and as a side note. If we end humans, despite what people have told you since elementary school. Geeks are human too. We don't get out of jail on this one. For more info click here

      --

      I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

    16. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Started using my gas fireplace. Now costs me $50 a month MORE than using the server and laser printer. :-(

      Enron was the experiment. The derived, acceptable result is what you get now.

    17. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had an Athlon CPU burn out in a hot room too, damn, is this a common problem? Any free software to shut the computer down if the CPU gets too hot?

    18. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by ectoraige · · Score: 1

      "running for no reason"

      He appeared to be giving out about those who run old computers for the sake of keeping up geek appearances. Certainly, if an old machine does the job, use it, so long as the job isn't adding to the matrix screensavers around your desk.

      --
      Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
    19. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by xpurple · · Score: 1

      I do this myself. Last winter I didn't have to run the heater much at all. Just turn on a few more computers. With the price of natural gas this is cheaper.

      --
      http://www.xpurple.com
    20. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by argent · · Score: 1

      He appeared to be giving out about those who run old computers for the sake of keeping up geek appearances.

      Those tend to be "run" in the sense of "yes, that one still boots up, let me show you...".

      If someone's keeping a computer on just to display a Matrix screensaver and leaves it running much of the time, that's a different kettle of CO2 emissions.

    21. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by ginotech · · Score: 1

      YES, my point was that he was already saying that. jesus.

    22. Re:You wouldn't need a heater... by flawedgeek · · Score: 1

      Feels like Hawaii in my computer room right now.....just need some sand and chicks in hula skirts.

      --
      My other Sig is .40 caliber.
  4. Bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about all the carcinogens?

    1. Re:Bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't inhale the occasional puffs of blue smoke and you'll be fine.

    2. Re:Bad idea. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      So long as they are tied up in the computers like that, they're harmless. It's when they get buried and start leeching into the ground, should you start to worry.

  5. had to say it by sfcat · · Score: 1, Funny

    Imagine a beowolf cluster of these...

    --
    "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    1. Re:had to say it by lskutt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine a beowolf cluster of these...

      Yeah, I can just feeeeel the awsome computing power equivalent to three gameboys and a HP48 pocket calculator.

    2. Re:had to say it by CommandLineGuy · · Score: 1

      The artist would call that an apartment complex.

      --
      [Of course it's client-server; it runs on a LAN]
    3. Re:had to say it by diogenes57 · · Score: 1

      Maybe his house is a beowolf cluster. His site is surviving a slashdotting after all...

    4. Re:had to say it by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Or a junk yard.

  6. Looks like my garage .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. or the study when something's cooking.

    But seriously - what to people consider art ? This looks like someone who just piles computers up and plugs them in. Kind of like kindergarten but with stuff only adults can lift.

    1. Re:Looks like my garage .. by ksheff · · Score: 3, Insightful
      or my living room.

      I would look at some of those pictures and start thinking "I have one of those computers..and one of those..that one too.."

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:Looks like my garage .. by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just as something is humor when it makes you laugh, something is art when it makes you stop and wonder. So art is, just like humor, quite personal, and it's not because you don't get it that it's a bad joke per se.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  7. I hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...her computers don't crash!

  8. When laid off, build your shelter out of your pc. by ABeowulfCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks at old 486... "And this is my living room"

  9. But is it art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think TISM said it best:

    "It's novel, it's unique, it's shithouse."

  10. Biggest Expense... by wcitech · · Score: 0

    Well, I hope he has a lot of surge protectors.

  11. Re:When laid off, build your shelter out of your p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be a ProLiant owner. I installed a blinking red light on the top of mine so airplanes don't hit it.

  12. Re:When laid off, build your shelter out of your p by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    My living room is a Packard-Bell. I'm not inclined to brag about it. How come something that never worked right in the first place refuses to die?

    KFG

  13. Remember by timothv · · Score: 1, Funny

    Lead is good for you.

    1. Re:Remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going to feng shui my garbage and pawn it off on ebay to some unsuspecting idiot who thinks it's art.

  14. GENTOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BLASPHMY. should have installed linux on it and used it as main desktop.

  15. Lain by tricops · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After looking at the "Untitled (The Sky is Blue)" pictures, I have this strange urge to watch Lain again.... For artwork it's pretty neat, but I can't help thinking "mmmm, radiation".

    --
    (\(\
    (^v^)
    (")")
    This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
    1. Re:Lain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After looking at the blue sky, I have this strange urge to watch rain again. For nature it's pretty neat, but I can't help thinking "mmmmm, solar radiation".

  16. I hate to say this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ...but this is actually kind of gay.
    I mean, he hasn't built a house from computers, has he? He's build some room dividers which are about as interesting as piles of dirty laundry. Wake me when he does build a house.

    1. Re:I hate to say this... by conna01 · · Score: 1

      at least do better cable management. Sound pollution and EMF problems are next.

      --
      Acrylic Bubble Panels www.beyond7.com
    2. Re:I hate to say this... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      What? An artist do something "gay"? Unthinkable!

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:I hate to say this... by stellertony · · Score: 1

      'Gay' is not intended to be used as a negative adjective.

      --
      feeding the world its brain food
    4. Re:I hate to say this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't use gay as a negative adjective? That's so queer.

    5. Re:I hate to say this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! That fact has sex with other man-facts!

  17. Queer eye for the... by merpal · · Score: 5, Funny

    basement-dwelling nerd who has saved every system he's owned since 1980. :)

    http://www.computersforart.org/create/blue/big/san dy_smith_07.jpg

    1. Re:Queer eye for the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've totaly lost a computer in my house I can ping it but I don't know where it is....

    2. Re:Queer eye for the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Queer eye for the... basement-dwelling nerd....

      I like how you don't even specify the basement-dwelling nerd's sexuality, as the allusion would imply. I guess if you don't have any sex, your sexual preferences are kind of ambiguous.

    3. Re:Queer eye for the... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      basement-dwelling nerd who has saved every system he's owned since 1980. :)

      Sorry, the vic20 is not rated for heavy loads.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:Queer eye for the... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Informative

      You stole that from bash.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    5. Re:Queer eye for the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow. I looked at that picture at the end of your post.

      Felt a bit of a scary voice in my head. "We are 386. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated"

    6. Re:Queer eye for the... by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, people on bash have stolen things from others, so I say it evens out. (I speak from experience)

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  18. The Matrix is finally here... by thelastguardian · · Score: 0

    Finally we have tge chance to live inside the computer world, literally.

    Now where is my long black coat and sleek sunglasses....

  19. What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Definitions of art:
    http://www.google.nl/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q= define%3Aart
    That's a lot of definitions. Art is art when 'articians' say it is so.
    Authoritarial justification.
    Even extreme things, like burning crosses or crossdressed foetusses can be considered art. And before modding me down for this: I do not agree with the examples I just gave.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    1. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by datafr0g · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree...
      Art is "art" to an observer whenever they think something has the qualities of art.
      Errm, in other words:
      Anything at all is art (to the observer) when the observer thinks it is because of a (artistic) quality or meaning percieved...

      If I find a 5 1/4 inch floppy disk artful, then it is to me because I think it is.
      It is arrogant (and unfortunatly common) though to force a perception of art upon others.... that's what pisses people off about the "what defines art" question.

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by Flounder · · Score: 1

      So, something can only be defined as art by the person doing the defining, and that definition may or may not agree with another's definition. So, if something can have multiple definitions, does it in fact have no definition at all? And this is why I avoided all the art classes I could and just took more science classes.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    3. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

      So, if something don't have a precise definition, it is not worth studing?

    4. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I think what constitutes Art is something that conveys emotions or a new perception to the observer / listener / participant.

      A lot of "modern" art may mean something profound to the creator (they claim) but it singularly fails to convey anything to the observer - at least not without reading a two page explanation of the work, at which point an intellectual understanding of the meaning may be grasped, but nothing that really stirs the emotions or the mind.

      Of course, my definition could conceivably rule out some very good traditional artists who are technically good, but emotionally boring. That's okay with me, although I recognize the skill.

      I feel this is particularly true with a lot of modern photography, but that just may be my particular axe.

      As far as this PC house - I don't consider it Art. What did the artist intend to make me feel or think? I can't tell. There might be people out there who are stirred by this, but it's more likely due to some deeply personal reasons than skill on the artist's part. Say, maybe their parents were crushed in a freak avalanche of badly stacked 486 base units or something...

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by datafr0g · · Score: 1

      It's called Subjectivity...
      For example, my definition for bad art may for example, be a picasso, but there are millions who would disagree.
      Another one: Computers are difficult to use.
      You and I may disagree with that, but there are plenty of people who would agree.

      Subjectivity is what makes us all percieve the world differently and have our own beliefs about things.

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    6. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by Inconnux · · Score: 1

      I think it was Picasso who said "Art is what sells"

    7. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by onlyjoking · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, for the last 50 years or so the Art world hasn't been able to distinguish between a Rembrandt and a pile of shit thrown into a "space". Everything is "post-modern" (yeuch!) now so a piece of rubbish lying in the gutter can become something equal to a Picasso creation if it is simply given a new context in an exhibition. Sad but true.

    8. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by Ziviyr · · Score: 1
      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    9. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by justin12345 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, its like I'm back in art school again! :-)

      I think you are very close to dead on here: art is essentially something that someone calls art. But there is one thing that is being left out. In order to be art there has to be human intervention at some point. Art must be (to at least some extent) man made. Even in the case of those damn painting cats (too lazy to find a link), someone at least had to dip the cat in paint and throw it on a canvas.

      Ultimately the difficulty is not qualifying something as "art" because the term "art" carries with it no inherent value judgment:

      "Look I pooped on the floor, its art!"; "Look I spent the last two years slaving away, painting a masterpiece" --both statements are equally true. The difficulty is organizing art into hierarchies of content and value (both monetary and cultural). The process is very subjective, but in practice it comes down to the fact that the worth of art is determined by persons well placed in the art industry. Essentially, if art makes it into the Met or Matthew Marks Gallery or Mary Boone Gallery, it is expensive and therefor valuable.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    10. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      You are confusing art with illustration, its a very common mistake.

      Art is not inherently supposed to convey anything to you, it is not a form of communication (though sometimes can be). Art is an exploratory process. The meanings you hear assigned to artworks are part of the marketing process, not part of the artwork. Most artists have no clue what their work means and don't give a crap because their work isn't supposed to mean anything. The idea is that when you view the artwork it allows you to perceive the world from a different point of view. The viewer has the responsibility to assign meaning to what they are seeing and that meaning will vary from person to person.

      One of the differences between pre-modern and modern, post-modern, or contemporary art is that pre-modern art is essentially what today would be considered illustration. It was often designed to convey specific ideas, often to an otherwise illiterate audience.

      Example: much western pre-modern art was religious. The reason for this is that painting was used by the church to convey stories to its congregation. It was efficient in this task because the congregation generally couldn't read, and mass was generally held in latin, which they couldn't speak.

      Another example: much per-modern painting was concerned with portraiture. A painted portrait is designed to carry a specific set of information: this is what so and so looks like, this is the type of clothing they could afford to wear, and even: look at he famous artist who they could afford to pay to paint them.

      Many people are much more comfortable will illustration then contemporary art. The reason for this (I believe), is because they are not comfortable assigning meaning to something unfamiliar presented in a gallery or museum. The industry involved in the buying and selling of art is to blame for this. They have a financial interest in making art inaccessible to the general populace because art is sold as a luxury good to a very exclusive set of individuals. By controlling the meaning of the artworks they can better control the monetary value of the artworks. They want it to thought that if you don't like what you are seeing its because you are too dumb/ignorant to understand it. They can then categorize you as unimportant (which if you can't afford to by the $500k photograph you are looking at you are unimportant to them anyway). This way the work retains value among those who can afford to buy it.

      Damn that was a long post. Sorry, its rare that I get to post on something that I know a lot about.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    11. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Anything at all is art (to the observer) when the observer thinks it is because of a (artistic) quality or meaning percieved...

      Ah. I see you're an abstractionist (and delusional). :)

    12. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by Vombatus · · Score: 1
      Yeah...

      One man's art is another man's porn

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
    13. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by vickie_kenosha · · Score: 1

      The firewall display reminded of the works of Louise Nevelson. Her 'art' in the 70's mostly consisted of walls of wooden boxes, all painted one color, with other wooden objects inside them (for a glimpse... http://images.google.com/images?q=louise+nevelson& hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-41,GGLD:en&sa=N&tab=i i&oi=imagest). She was hailed, at least in my art class, as a pioneer artist in an exciting new media, working in a brave new form.

      As a kid in junior high, I didn't think it was art then. Now, as a mature technie, I do not see "Firewall" as art. I see it as a post-modern interpretation of what was called 'art' way back when. Are old, cast off computers the post millenial exciting new media, and these artists experimenters in a brave new form?

    14. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      You are confusing art with illustration, its a very common mistake.

      And you're not listening to what the other person has said, which is an even more common one. ;)

      Seriously though, I offered up a definition of Art that you have just said, "no it's not, use the word illustration instead." I'm afraid I'm sticking with Art.

      I believe that Art must convey meaning and I'd very much disagree with your statement that most artists don't have a clue what their art means. Your statement has an in-built assumption (your own) of what Art is - i.e. anyone who paints is an artist and therefore if someone paints and doesn't convey meaning then Art need not convey meaning. I would say that the painter that conveys nothing to the viewer is not an artist, merely a technician.

      Just to belabour my point, I'll use the example that you did - pre-modern era relgious painting. I've used the word painting rather than Art as you did because it is the definition of this word that we are debating, and I don't wish to argue my case from preconceptions.

      Some of this, as you say, exists merely to convey factual information to the viewer and on this basis, I do not call it Art, it is, to use your own term, illustration. However, you mistake the intention of the painter if you think that it was merely to convey this information. In many cases, the intent is to inspire the viewer with the emotion of the scene. The creation on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel is not so much for illustrative purposes (God made the world like this) but to take away the worshipper's breath with the whole idea of the Creation. At this point, if the work is good at achieving this, then it becomes Art.

      I think we may be talking at slight cross-purposes however as I almost entirely agree with your last paragraph. There is a financial lock-down on the art world, intended to hyper-inflate the price of modern art. And this does rely on convincing people that their statement of what is or is not art is more valid than the viewer's own. I take a very slightly different slant on this however and say that it is not only the increased ease with which this can be done for the unfamiliar (and you have found a VERY good way of putting it); but is also that it exludes many very gifted 'traditional' artitsts who would otherwise compete with those they have groomed.

      And that is more or less my reply. I only wish to add background in that I'm not against "modern" art. Some of it I like very much. But a lot I think is crap because it stirs nothing in the observer / participant. For every Picasso (who could paint exceedingly well technically if he chose), there is a Salvador Dahli.

      However much silly money gets passed around for people's beds / tents or spattered t-shirts, I think it is probably dwarfed by the trade in local artists and traditional works that ordinary (sane) people buy.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    15. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      Forgive me for this incredibly long post...

      "Seriously though, I offered up a definition of Art that you have just said, "no it's not, use the word illustration instead." I'm afraid I'm sticking with Art."

      One of the problems with both our statements is that illustration is also considered art. Art is a horribly imprecise term. I'm not trying to poo poo illustration, its just that the definition of art has considerably expanded from when illustration was the only form of art. You were suggesting that only works that convey specific meaning (emotional response) were art. You also stated that skill was in some way relevant. Neither is the case. Pretty much anything is considered art if it is "man made" (see my post below) and presented in an "art context". For instance: Marcel Duchamp is considered to be one of the most important artists of the 20th century. His break though piece was a urinal he took off the wall, mounted in an art gallery, and titled "fountain". Its considered one of the most important pieces of the 20th century. It certainly doesn't convey emotion, nor did it require any real skill on his part; it simply sits there for you to question.

      "I believe that Art must convey meaning..."

      If you rephrased this as "...art I like must convey meaning..." I could not argue with you. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, art is not.

      "...and I'd very much disagree with your statement that most artists don't have a clue what their art means. Your statement has an in-built assumption (your own) of what Art is - i.e. anyone who paints is an artist and therefore if someone paints and doesn't convey meaning..."

      I should have said "many" not most. I was speaking about a distinct type of artist, but if you include all types of artists then "most" must be reduced to "many". This is not my assumption, its a principal taught foundation year of art school. There are two distinct creative methods employed when creating art work, "product orientation" and "process orientation":

      Product orientation is the method which involves designing, planning, and executing a piece. The yardstick by which the piece is measured is how effectively it fulfills the artists goals in making it: "Does it make you sad?", "Would most people feel moved by this figure?", "Is the technical execution sufficient to convey its message?". This method is considered "illustrational" and is currently used when making most hollywood films, illustrations for magazines, some paintings, websites, etc.

      The other method, product orientation, is considered to be a method more suited to "contemporary gallery art" (there is no good term, many people call it "fine art" but the term is bad shorthand in this instance) because it is believed to produce art work that is original. Process orientation essentially involves an artist confronting a blank canvas (or whatever) and struggling to fill it. The artist relinquishes the control mechanisms that are valued in product oriented work and allows themselves to move freely from idea to idea. The piece almost never has too much to do with the original conception and usually comes as a bit of a surprise. The artist then repeats the process again and again with each new piece feeding from the last. I would liken the process to a cross between personal exploration and pseudo science.

      The artist will often talk about what works produced in this method in terms of the sources that inspired the work. Critics, historians and galleries will attempt to interpret the "meaning" of the work. What you see in the two page blurb is the work of the critics and galleries. As mentioned above, much of that interpretation is often concerned with obfuscation.

      "...exists merely to convey factual information to the viewer and on this basis, I do not call it Art, it is, to use your own term, illustration. However, you mistake the intention of the painter if you think that it was merely to convey this inf

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    16. Re:What defines art? No, it's 'WHO' defines art by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      from an interview with Laurie Anderson:
      The category of art expands, and doesn't mean anything any more. We've become so clever, so sensitive, that we don't need works of art to represent beauty to remind us how to look and how to feel. Some days, everything is tuned really well, and everything you see is sharp, and it's like living in a work of art. And that's what I'm going for, to sharpen my senses to the point where I don't need to make more stuff. I don't know what communication will have to do with it, when we're all so exquisitely tuned. It does make you realizse what a fiction style is, when you start asking yourself: "Why do I think this work of art is finished, or good? Or even art?"

      I thought I'd lead with this quote, as I read it this morning and it seemed pertinent to our discussion. I like what and how she said it, and from what I understand from your posts to be your point of view, I think you would. But implicit in what she has said is the point I'm trying to make - that Art must communicate with the observer / participant. I suppose that you might read the quote differently, and I don't wish to re-read someone else's words in my own voice however... UNLIKE A CERTAIN /. POSTER. *ahem* For example:

      You were suggesting that only works that convey specific meaning (emotional response) were art. You also stated that skill was in some way relevant.

      Ah, no - I hope not! If you inferred that then I have been misread. I think you have in your mind the idea that I'm ignorant of modern art or think that only Renaisance painters were artists. And although I like the consoling remark from one modern artist to a traditional painter: "You're art looks like the thing it's supposed to," (spot the reference please), I'm not so narrow minded. In my previous posts, I didn't say a specific emotional meaning. Anything that conveys an emotional or perceptual insight to the observer / particpant can be Art. Your second statement, that I said skill was relevant - well relevant, yes. It's hard to imagine Jimi Hendrix being successful without being a good guitarist, no matter how finely tuned his musical sensitivity. The sensitivity / perception is not enough, to be an artist, one must be able to share your perception with another. However, I think you are talking only about traditional technical skills such as painting something that looks like the something you're painting. Re-read my quote about Dahli and Picasso. By what you have said my criteria are, I would rate Dahli's melting clock higher than Picasso's 1907 Self-Portrait. In fact, the former leaves me cold, wheras Picasso's portrait is freaky and disturbing - which of these on your wall would unsettle you most? That's the one I would call Art. So although I think the deployment of technical skill is usually important in Art, it is not critical in the way that you are straw-manning my viewpoint.

      If you rephrased this as "...art I like must convey meaning..." I could not argue with you. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, art is not.

      I have offered a definition that includes this subjectivity - if the work reaches you then it is Art for you. But your definition is socially based - what should society consider art - and you argue from this assumption which is buried so deeply in your every statement that I don't think you are aware of it. This is why I believe we are talking at cross-purposes. We are arguing different things. I don't give a flying fuck what anyone else thinks is art, but I care quite a lot if other people accept someone else's criteria for art over their own, if they value something that doesn't convey anything to them. My definition of art frees someone from this, whereas yours is the inverse.

      Again, you are annexing words like illustration and offering up art school definitions which I don't accept. To tell me what my words mean is to trap me, you must understand what I mean by them. Not doing this, is to shift this from an interesting

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  20. Pretty? Scary? Sad? by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know if it's supposed to be pretty or scary.

    Pictures like these remind me of how eery a society we live in. It's actually kind of depressing or even scary.

    (In an I'm-in-front-of-my-computer-at-4:45AM kind of way)

  21. The beowulf cluster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...it now can compile Gentoo as well as provide shelter from the dreaded sunlight.

    1. Re:The beowulf cluster... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      ...it now can compile Gentoo as well as provide shelter from the dreaded sunlight.

      And rain, if you're feeling adventurous.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  22. If you need help... by Catcher80 · · Score: 1

    be sure to call your power company and explain you want to hook in 50 old useless computers in your room and have them permanently plugged in and turned on. They will shortly have a team of very efficient workers there at your beck and call! (it's true and you know it)

    --
    I sell out to The Man every day.
    1. Re:If you need help... by Kryxan · · Score: 1

      or if you dont call the power company first then the cops will show up expecting to find a grow operation with hundreds of plants. boy will they be dissapointed. instead they will just find all your pirated software and music you downloaded off of kazaa.

    2. Re:If you need help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You notice that most of the computers are not turned on. If you buy a peice you would likely only turn it on when its dark and you have guests.

  23. Coral Cache of site by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 0
    --
    "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
  24. Great Concept. by popo · · Score: 1, Insightful


    Amateur Execution.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re: Great Concept. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      Amateur Execution.

      Which is exactly what you get when a stack of old CRTs falls on you.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    2. Re: Great Concept. by FLEB · · Score: 1

      No, no, no, no, no... it's postmodern.

      Obviously, cretin, you do not understand the art.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  25. I am impressed by ribo-bailey · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...at what can be passed of as 'art' these days. To me this looks like a pile of crappy old apples.

    1. Re:I am impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The apples aren't crappy until they've been thoroughly digested, and they're not art until you use them for finger paints.

      But I don't recommend that. The orderlies get pissed.

  26. IANAAC (I am not a art critic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IANAAC (I am not a art critic) but the so-called art in the article is horrible, I wouldn't buy that even to my worst enemy.

    1. Re:IANAAC (I am not a art critic) by artificialj · · Score: 1

      I am an art critic, and this art IS without question horrible.

    2. Re:IANAAC (I am not a art critic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, dude, critics are fucking idiots leaching a living off those that are capable of creativity.

      Criticising is easy, get a fucking life you cheap bastard. What have you ever done that's been worthy of comment?

  27. Computer Box furniture by Kryxan · · Score: 1

    Reminds of one guy who builds all his furniture out of computer boxes. unfortionatly I cant find a link for this, otherwise I would provide it. but just to show im not BSing you can see that it was on TV. Ripley's Believe it or not had it on episode 317.. well here is a link, but it only has one pic / database/ep_317a.html>ep317<URL>

    1. Re:Computer Box furniture by Kryxan · · Score: 1

      eh, so im too tired to make the link correctly. sorry about that. here is another link i found
      http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,49473, 00.html ?tw=wn_story_related

    2. Re:Computer Box furniture by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      I've done this myself.

      I had an old base unit - desktop style - with most of its guts ripped out and installed in other working machines - which now has a piece of perfectly shaped wood on top and acts as a bedside cabinet.

      I also have a sliding cup holder which came as standard in my new PC. In my first PC I had to fit one of those myself but was rather relieved to see they came included with new PCs these days...

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    3. Re:Computer Box furniture by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Sounds like mine. I broke one leg of the cheapo bedframe (the kind that comes with the mattress), so now there's what I'm certain is one of the most structurally heavy-duty junker 486s (dumpster find) I've ever seen holding it up.

      Every so often, I need to mine it for jumpers, but other than that, it's "art".

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  28. Untitled (The Sky is Blue) by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

    Untitled (The Sky is Blue) looks a lot like Darth Vader's throne. Eh?

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
  29. Time management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he could spend some of his time learning how to make HTML tables. Or is that *cough* art too.

  30. His bathroom. . . . by cra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how he wired his bathroom to avoid execution when taking a shower.

    --
    This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for higher security.
    1. Re:His bathroom. . . . by Daxx_61 · · Score: 1

      I was about to say - what happens when it starts to rain? Unless the roof's made out of Macs, that is ;)

      --
      Quoth the server, "404."
    2. Re:His bathroom. . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting indeed. This old stuff surely doesn't support ExecShield...

  31. Looks familiar by Exluddite · · Score: 1
    Right now I'm looking at my main monitor, which is on top of a commodore 1701 monitor, which is on top of my main computer. Next to that is the C64 itself, surrounded by the floppy and tape drive. On the other side is a socket7 box next to a 486. Scattered in neat little piles nearby are apples, amigas, etc.

    Hey, I'm an artist! Who knew?

    --
    What does this button do...
  32. This is not art by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    Foregt about creating a work of art out of old machines. Some of these "creations" look very similar to the desk I actually work on every day.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:This is not art by datafr0g · · Score: 1

      What if someone thinks your desk at work is a piece of art?
      Are they not allowed to?
      Eg, Some 60's memoribilia is now considered art that wasn't thought of as being at the time - but not by everyone, just those who consider it to be art.

      Anything can be art if you believe it is.

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
  33. Igloo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm thinking that, that arch of vdu's would be great for making an entrance into a computer igloo... now that'd be cool!

  34. Oh hell no by EvilStein · · Score: 3, Funny

    My apartment already looks like this. My electric bill is about $700/mo. The neighbors complain about brownouts, and the insane fan noise scares away the women.

    So, if I call it "art" I can claim my pad is an art gallery, eh? :D

    1. Re:Oh hell no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My electric bill is about $700/mo. The neighbors complain about brownouts, and the insane fan noise scares away the women.

      You sure it's the fan noise that scares them?

    2. Re:Oh hell no by MisterSquid · · Score: 3, Funny

      and the insane fan noise scares away the women

      It's probably your cats and not women who are scared by the "insane fan noise." You can't fool your neighbors into thinking you have women over just because you keep saying "Here, pussy, pussy."

      --
      blog
  35. Re:Pretty? Scary? Sad? by xstonedogx · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know if it's supposed to be pretty or scary.

    It's okay. Those things in the picture are called "girls". What you're feeling is natural.

    In any case, you're posting on Slashdot at (apparently) 4:45 your time, so they're nothing you'll ever have to worry about.

  36. 100 per structure... by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Funny

    say, 2000 per house x about 200 watt each.
    400 kilowatt power usage, and emission. The "emission" part would be good if you live in Alaska or Antarctic, or so. The "usage" part would be acceptable if you're a millionaire or own a power plant. I've also seen many CRT monitors. a LOT of them, and old ones, when emission wasn't taken into account so much...

    Run SETI@Home on it all, and expect the aliens will visit you really soon. Your house will be shining like a radio-beacon in the space.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:100 per structure... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      If there was ever a need for a solar powered home, this is probably it. Geothermal cooling would be essential too.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  37. Wooha, tumour time... by Havenwar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously... I get headaches some times when I spend too much time around too many turned on computers. I have three at my desk, or four if you count the desk... (Long story, dont ask.)

    Seriously... that much screen radiation, buzzing, hot air and electrical interferance just cant be good for... well, anything or anyone.

    1. Re:Wooha, tumour time... by AdamReyher · · Score: 1

      I was just about to say this. I worry about my eyes in front of a single CRT, and I'll be switching to LCD in the near future because of this fact.

      --
      The Computations of AdamR
      http://www.adamreyher.com
    2. Re:Wooha, tumour time... by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

      four if you count the desk... (Long story, dont ask.)

      Ummm...I really gotta ask.

      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
  38. The Arch by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The arch seems quite interesting, but I'd build it into spherical shape, like an igloo... then place an egg in the middle... switch them all on to display white screen... leave it on for 3 days... then switch everything off, and watch the egg shine in the darkness. Nice x-ray furnace, I'd say :)

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  39. Re:Computer Box furniture - Mac Boxes=Nice Couches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac Boxes Make Nice Couches

    (Note: this link works correctly as the one above didn't work correctly for me... regards NoKarma)

  40. Re:Pretty? Scary? Sad? by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's okay. Those things in the picture are called "girls". What you're feeling is natural.

    Pfft. Dude, I think I know what girls look like. I do see my mother every once in a while so she can cut my hair.

  41. castle by Maskirovka · · Score: 1

    He should have built a castle, complete with a 20ft tower and battlements. THAT would be cool. and worthy of all our respect.

    Speaking which, I have a surplus auction to budget for and some warehouse space to rent...

  42. you know you have been a nerd too long when... by esmrg · · Score: 1

    those spare computer parts in the closet actually construct the very closet they are stored in...

  43. Electricity bill? by rastakid · · Score: 1

    I wonder what his montly electricity fee looks like...

    1. Re:Electricity bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's not very high, but his neighbor's is staggering!

  44. Another use for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I glad an "artist" has found a use for them. God forbid these pieces of art should be used as "monitors" or "computers" by scheming schoolchildren in some evil third-world country.

  45. How's that song go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Art for Arts sake, Money for Gods sake...

  46. I prefer to do this with old computers by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

    Go to the park with a giant tarp and beat the crap out of the computer. It's fun. Trust me.

    1. Re:I prefer to do this with old computers by anakha · · Score: 1

      PC load letter?! What the fsck does that mean??

    2. Re:I prefer to do this with old computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to the park with a giant tarp and beat the crap out of the computer. It's fun. Trust me.

      I am an old computer you insensitive clod!

  47. Good as heaters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and to drive anyone insane because of the noise...

  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Hong Kong will thank you by houghi · · Score: 1

    The people in Hong Kong will thal you very much.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  50. Is this really recycling? by Bazman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless these machines end up in permanent exhibitions, which I guess few will, all you're doing is moving the problem along. The organisation will have to dispose of them eventually.

    I note the lack of LCD flat screens in these projects - bet it wont be that way in five years time...

  51. Waste of Power & Idea by UnkyHerb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Recycling", sounds more like a bunch of clunkers wasting of power on processes which could be completed with a mere Transmeta.

    --
    Your Momma's so fat she makes emacs look like nano!
  52. Absolutely abject by Ray+Alloc · · Score: 0

    Well, Seems like Slashdot is becoming home for post-modern "art" freaks...

  53. Is it what we call... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
    a computer farm?

    Anyway, that's obvious now artists don't know how to use computers.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  54. Imagine... by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...a beowulf housing development...

  55. The opposite of the homeless geek by gonzo-wireless · · Score: 0

    Here's a guy that, unlike them above, owns a computer and no home. For this poor kid, his desktop is the closest to a house he has. http://www.chrisdiclerico.com/mt/archives/001763.p hp

  56. IANAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not art, it's generated by drones.
    These people have no talent, then cannot program them, nor can they make art from them.

    IANAA.

  57. Crashing house? by krishn_dev · · Score: 0
    Yeah, will be hell, if all PCs are running windows...

    reminds me the joke of Microsoft anf Ford. http://atworkandbored.com/jokes-inc/bill_gates_vs_ henry-ford.html

    1. Re:Crashing house? by Sinus0idal · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, in cars you generally do have to press the start button/twist the 'start' key to turn it off...

  58. call your own cell phone to find it by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 2, Informative

    So just connect to it and:
    while true; do printf "\a"; sleep 1s; done

    1. Re:call your own cell phone to find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That won't work very well... it will beep on his connecting terminal, not on the server he's trying to find.

      If he leaves it running, however, it may drive him insane enough to FORCE him to find the hardware....

  59. A scary enhancement of the art by hermank · · Score: 1

    In the pic, http://www.computersforart.org/create/blue/big/san dy_smith_07.jpg, how about if all screens got BSOD? It'll surely give me nightmares.

    1. Re:A scary enhancement of the art by argent · · Score: 1

      how about if all screens got BSOD?

      Since most are Macs it's not likely... the "unhappy mac" is much more soothing.

  60. Hang on... by krishn_dev · · Score: 0

    I cant find which mouse is connected this freaking PC.....:-D

  61. Junk... by kylegordon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Constructed from 16 monitors and 60 computers in a dimly lit round basement space, the circular structure of The Blackhouse faces outwards, yet allows the viewer to look over and into complicated interior.
    It's the whole 'dimly lit round basement space' that gets me... I walked past this when it was built a few weeks ago, as I live 2 blocks from the Art School, and not only was it in the floorspace of an empty shop, but it was looking out onto a busy main road. To be perfectly honest, it looked like someone was bored and had arranged a pile of junk computers in a circle. Completely uninspiring and boring. I even told my girlfriend about the 'pile of crap in the shop' and that she shouldn't worry as I won't be asking for any of it. I'm sorry, but I can't see how this passes for 'art'...

    1. Re:Junk... by serutan · · Score: 1

      I completely agree that this is crap, and the post was misleading as well. There is no house or "rooms and structures," just some possibly Volkswagen-size piles of computers. Yawn.

  62. Recycled Radiation Shield? by Cybrr · · Score: 1

    A few days ago, i wondered if a wall made out of batteries would stop ionising radiation, since that tends to steal electrons, just like free radicals.

    --
    Why did GEAR crush RDP?
  63. No showers son today by krishn_dev · · Score: 0

    dunno why I was getting shocks...

  64. xbox by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    if you take the component out of an old xbox u can live inside it quite comfortably.

    Maybe people complement it for its roominess.

  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. X-Ray Test Rig for Harmful Radiation by 6800 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Say, one of those pix reminded me of a cubicle (or is it circumacle). If you aimed all the monitors toward the center and sat there at another, you should definitly be able to establish if those monitors have harmful radiation!

  67. Leave it to people... by AdityaG · · Score: 1

    Leave it to people to find new ways to waste electricity in pointless ways. People in the world will eventually have no resources and di...wait... that might not be so bad. Go nerds in basements!

  68. Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of them look like Sun boxes.

    No accounting for taste.

    Wonder if they're networked.

  69. And furthermore... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    You can see the image from the webcam in this shot. It isn't a webcam showing "a quiet road passing the Cuillins, in Skye", it's the main road on and off the island. Not very quiet at all (although there aren't any cars in that shot).

  70. I have one of those! by Nichotin · · Score: 1

    I saw a couple of the pictures, and spotted those beige desktop g3s, and some 8600's and stuff. I recently found a full dumpster of those at my school, and I had to bring as many as I could carry home. I also took a huge load of 3com pci cards. Anyway, those are usable computers, at least by the standard of the norwegian school system. Those 50 or so machines just lying there in the dumpster is more way better than what many schools have.

    1. Re:I have one of those! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      waahh! things like that in a dumpster??? im pretty sure this school doesnt realy throw much away very often and while i would like to think that it'd be better if people didn't throw the stuff out at all, I wouldnt mind finding some more dumpsters like that... long as it all fit in my van..

    2. Re:I have one of those! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Geez, my school is currently in the process of getting rid of some of the last socket 5 Pentium PCs still hanging around. Being the last of the bunch, most of them had been upgraded at some point. When I got to them in the scrap heap, I scored a bunch of 32MB SIMMs and some 4MB Mach64 video cards, as well as CD drives/floppies/Network cards. Not bad at all.

  71. Yes, art. But not science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need at least another 40 or so, I think, to do this in order to say whether EMF causes cancer.

  72. Two words by elronxenu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fire
    Hazard.

    1. Re:Two words by Paisley+Phrog · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the computer lab at my high school, which was 24 Apple //es. Each system has a monitor, printer, and dual disk drives...with all the power strips daisy chained into one outlet (12 in the top and 12 in the bottom). You could flip one power strip and hear 12 Apple drives kick to life.

      Scary.

  73. art, humour, ... what about the creative process by pbhj · · Score: 1

    I think that the creative process is a necessary part of both humour and art.

    If one creates something and thinks it's art, then it is art. There is an intent involved.

    Of course, you could argue that the creation of an image on your retina with a given intent was thus the creation of an artistic work .... and I probably wouldn't argue with that.

    Other things just happen to be nice to look at or funny. I don't call this art / humour.

  74. Sandy Smith is a "his"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  75. As a fellow artist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think some of this work is quite good. Glasgow has always had a solid artistic community.

  76. hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was I the only one who read the link as computerfart?

  77. Linux by Primal_theory · · Score: 0

    He calls himself an artist, and he doesnt use linux? LONG LIVE TEH GIMP (or whatever i cant think right now)

    --
    Your skill in reading has increased by one point!
  78. Kudos by Polski+Radon · · Score: 1

    Good luck with your Heavy metal poisoning soon...

  79. heavy metals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heavy metals?

  80. Yet another geriatric PC to add to the collection by onlyjoking · · Score: 1

    My home network has a dual 2Ghz G5 (2 x 160Gb drives, 256Mb video card and 3Gb RAM) and 2 Athlon XP 2800+ machines (2 x 160Gb disks, 1Gb RAM and Radeon 9800s) running Fedora 3 and XP Pro. I also have an "old" 1.2Ghz Athlon (2 x 120Gb drives, 768Mb RAM) and and older 600Mhz Athlon lying around doing nothing most of the time. These run Linux and Windows 2003 server. Someone tell me why, when my landlady threw out an old Celeron 333Mhz (32Mb RAM, 4.3Gb disk, broken CD-ROM) I derived immense pleasure loading FreeBSD 5.3 onto it via 2 floppies and a base install via ftp then forwarded port 22 on it to my router before speeding off to my mate's to impress him by SSH-ing into my "new server". It's madess. After the novelty wears off it'll just keep the others company filling-up my tiny studio flat. Hey, wait a minute - IPCop firewall. Now, all I need is 2 more NICs. (Races off to find nearby skip, frothing at the mouth).

  81. Stephen King by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    If anyone has ever read King's Darktower books...

    Some of those photos look like the image I got of the passages down below the City of Lud...when Jake got kidnapped by the Tick-Tock man.... King describes the place as being lined very high with old computers and monitors....

    A couple of those shots also kinda' remind me of Doom..... really dark rooms with lit up Tech-walls. But that's just me.

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
  82. Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but does it run Linux?

  83. That's art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn I should've taken a picture of this shit I took this morning. I splattered on the wall of the toilet in an interesting pattern.

    Same goes for those idiots who just splatter paint on walls or canvas, but can't actually paint or draw.

    A bunch of talentless, visionless morons trying to make a quick buck from someone with to much money to spend.

    Here's a better idea, recycle the fucking things. Turn the circuit boards into clocks, clip boards and other stuff.

  84. not recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this aint true recycling.
    eventually, this stuff becomes an eyesore and they throw it away

  85. Any Custom Programming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running some custom software on the 'art' might make it more interesting ...

    There are some fun interactive art exhibits that make of use of computers, cameras, and software to engage the viewer ...

    this doesn't look like one of them.

    1. Re:Any Custom Programming? by anubi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I have been doing that for years!

      I have some old DOS "slideshow" programs.

      I load up an old hard drive with DOS, the slideshow program, and a diskful of .jpg's and let it fly.

      These go in minimal security places, like shopping malls. Ok, if someone gets malicious and vandalizes or steals the whole shebang, its not really any worse than if the trashman did it.

      I mean, what he got was an old '286 with a 40MB 5.25" MFM HD and an old VGA monitor. Good enough to show photos of what's in the food court.

      I just arrange things so that the still operational machines continue to work as designed until the bitter end.

      I still have a couple of crates of old 40MB 5.25" MFM HD's and a couple dozen controllers still laying around I am slowly getting rid of this way.

      I may get into designing a driver board for those large incandescent bulb-matrix displays one sees in front of many businesses, as I constantly see them not working proprely... it kinda pains me to see so much expensive hardware out there that does not function properly because the latest state-of-the-art computer systems don't run all that long before hanging up on something or other.

      Its not at all like those old days I went through when I would get an embedded system going and expect it to go for years without any deviation at all. Much as one would design a motor and expect the same. There's nothing magic about sequencing the bulbs on a sign so they spell text, just as there is nothing magic about designing rotating magnetic fields in a motor so the shaft turns. We don't have to constantly maintain our fans either, unless they made them with badly designed bearings.

      I still enjoy the breeze from 20 year old fans.

      Why is it that the output of older computers is so neglected? Its paid for, and will continue to work for you as long as you give it some power.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  86. Throw it off a cliff... by balford · · Score: 1

    I still enjoy the destruction method: Throwing it off a cliff, Throwing it in a river, Putting it on railroad tracks, The Office Space method, etc.

  87. Re:When laid off, build your shelter out of your p by Kinetix303 · · Score: 1

    I put mine out if its misery in 1997. I decided it had to go when the spark from a lightswitch in the room actually started turning the mouse on and off.

  88. Hair Dryers, Las Vegas, Airconditioning by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    There are so many more wasteful things, both the pseudo art project and all projects it inspires are negligible. Have you ever been to Las Vegas or Times Square? Do you realize how many ozone eating freon air conditioners are still being used? I'm not exactly sure why people pick on personal computers as energy wasters, but there are a lot of much more wasteful appliances that we could worry about.

    1. Re:Hair Dryers, Las Vegas, Airconditioning by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Because we are in a position to do something about shutting off those wasteful computers. Fucking hippy. Using Las Vegas and Times Square as an excuse to do nothing is weak.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  89. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  90. Isn't this a bit late? by EthansJet · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't this have been posted April 1st?

  91. Let me guess the title of that work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Radiation Bath".

    Did I get it right? Huh?

  92. OMG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have this one in my closet right now! I didn't know I was an artiste until I saw this. Thanks, Slashdot !!!

  93. I'd be more worried by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 1, Funny

    about his Cancer treatment and other medical bills.;)

    By the way from a far distance that photo looks like a Borg Cube.

  94. He Must be the Anti-Goldsworthy by possen · · Score: 1

    He seems very influenced by Goldsworthy's artwork (another Scottish artist). but rather than using natural things such as trees, branches and rivers he uses technological items. http://www.sculpture.org.uk/image/504816331403 By the way, I really am a fan of Goldworthy. For a mezmerizing documentary about Goldworthy, see Rivers and Tides.

  95. Re: I define art. by benzapp · · Score: 1

    You are applying your own nihilistic vision of existence upon art. It is attitudes such as your own that are destroying human civilization as we know it.

    Art is not MERELY whatever you want it to be. Art is propaganda. It is the conveyance of an idea, in the hopes that it will instill others with a change in their own value system.

    Your floppy disk is irrelevant in the grand scheme of human existence. It is a tool, not art. No creature alive will be moved by its existence or lack thereof.

    What you call arrogance is the desire of higher forms of humanity to ultimately change the world.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  96. this is great! by sammcj2000 · · Score: 0

    finaly something we can use macs for!

  97. a waste? by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be better to donate old machines to somewhere like Free Geek who 'remanufactures' them and gives them to people who could otherwise not afford them? It seems like a horrible waste to go and build childlike forts out of useful components. What ever happened to using cushons from your couch?

  98. Re: Computer Compost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basement, schmasement, my upstairs computer "lab" looks similar, only the "back sides" are all facing a wall (sonetimes in two rows deep though).

  99. Story of the Desk by Havenwar · · Score: 1

    Okay, I said this is a long story, but of course that depends entirely upon how you tell it. I could just say "because I have a computer built in to my desk" and be done with it... But nah, that's not the way to tell stories.

    So imagine this... a warm summers eve, the wind just barely cools the area down, and under a tree there is three drunken bastards laughing at silly cloud formation. Yeah, THAT drunk.

    So one of the drunkards tell the other drunkard...

    "Hey, you are really good with computers, can't you fix me a computer"...

    The other drunkard, being really drunk, doesn't think about the hours of work this would entail, but picks up on the flattery instead.

    "Yeah, sure, I can build one into a lightbulb for you if you get me enough cash."

    They laugh. The first drunkard continues.

    "Nobody said nothing bout cash. And you couldn't even fit a computer in a... car... or... a desk..."

    *burp*

    The third drunkard goes to pee, and is not found until late next day.

    The second drunkard ponders this challenge for a while, his head immediately filled with ideas about how to build a computerized car.

    "Hey, can I borrow your car?"

    The first drunkard just laughs. So the second drunkard... i.e. Me, goes for the desk.

    "I'll build a computer into my desk, and if I make it, you'll buy one of me for a 10% markup and workcosts."

    Okay, maybe I wasn't as thought as he drunk I was.

    "A desk?"

    But he sure was.

    "Nah, a puter, boxen, gamemachine, yadda yadda."

    "I don't know bout the yadda yaddas, but I'd buy a gamemachine."

    And so started the long story about the desk, that is a computer. No big deal though, just a hidden compartment behind the drawers that has a motherboard in it, extensions for all ports to properly accessible places, well muffled hard drives and yadda yadda. Also a complete power grid built into the desk with enough outlets for my other computerware... which has built up with time.

    Specs?

    Oh, you really don't want them. Oh, okay, you twisted my arm.

    Pentium 2 550Mhz, about 367 MB Ram, 40 Gigs of hard drive, Gforce MX 440 graphics card, yadda yadda.

    Runs Mandrake Linux, works as a downloader. Stuff is downloaded onto the disc, encrypted with PGP, rest is wiped regularly, when I start my storage machine stuff is transferred onto an encrypted bestcrypt partition and deleted from the downloader. This way I can keep the rather quiet desk on all the time, and my noisy main machines only when I use them.

    I highly recommend every system builder to put yadda yadda into their machines. Makes all the difference.

  100. craptastic!!! by torrents · · Score: 1

    an easy recipe for divorce... (for any of the married geeks out there [if you exist])

    --
    Get your torrents...
  101. What about Parts by AvatarofVirgo · · Score: 0

    I have a butt load of really old computer parts. What can I do with them? I don't want to throw them away, but I can't use them either. I always wondered, who I can give them to to make use of them.

    Some parts don't work, like a old mother board for example. But maybe someone with more knowledge than me can take it apart and recycle the parts that do work.

    Any idea?

  102. Save the fukcn world, turn off your computer! by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    I'm the hippy??? I'm calling on you to shut off your goddamn hair dryer, and cut your hair, candy ass! I'm saying attention is better focussed on other things. And you knew what you were talking about, you'd know its the CRTs, not "computers" that use significant energy. Preach to fuktards somewhere else m'kay.

    1. Re:Save the fukcn world, turn off your computer! by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      I didn't say anything about saving the world. You're right, Times Square and Las Vegas are both enormous wastes of resources. But neither you nor I are in a position to do anything about them. But we are in a position to do something about the things in our homes, including shutting off electronic appliances when they're not in use.

      I'm surprised they let you out of school, hippy. Your leaps in logic astound.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  103. Way too insightful for /. by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    If /. still had a thinking audience this would be modded up. The meme about old computers wasting electricity is pretty resilient though. I think its an old marketing gimmick to sell new computers that gotta outta hand. I don't see nearly as much attention paid to the electricity use of CRT monitors, or other peripherals, just "electricity-wasting computers"

  104. Read the subject line by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    I thought you might have been the original poster who was looking to "save the world." Its interesting that you find fault in my logic. The original criticism in this thread, was of the homemade house of computer parts (which we also aren't in a position do much about,) and That's what I was comparing to Las Vegas etc. As far as personal responsibility- we're a small part of a huge mass of people. We'd have to spend a large amount of time and resources to change everyone's habits. Wouldn't it be more efficient to lobby various companies and corporations to be less wasteful? Eh, poopy?