Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own DVR

prostoalex writes "If you have an old computer that had been laying around for a while and are ready to spend a bit on hardware to make into a Digital Video Recorder, this article from Make magazine contains a step-by-step guide on building one. The author spent $150 on TV card and $70 on BeyondTV PVR software." (And with a Linux-friendly capture card, MythTV would save the builder $70.)

267 comments

  1. The guy is not so dumb as to waste $70 by putko · · Score: 4, Informative

    The author's description implies the guy could have saved money if he'd used free software.

    When I read this, I thought, why would someone who is smart enough to build a PVR waste money unnecessarily on software?

    From RTFA, it appears that because the software is bundled, he didn't pay the $70. It was "free as in beer".

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:The guy is not so dumb as to waste $70 by bdc0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      An the author does has his act together. There are various common problems such as automation that he explains work-arounds to. Sounds like he actually used the stuff.

    2. Re:The guy is not so dumb as to waste $70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you must use Windows, Showshifter is probably just as good, and IIRC it's free.

      (Reading TFA is for squares.)

  2. More than $70... by jmcneill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The author spent $150 on TV card and $70 on BeyondTV PVR software." (And with a Linux-friendly capture card, MythTV would save the builder $70.)

    Lets not forget the license fee for Windows XP -- that's significantly more than $70, I'm sure.

    1. Re:More than $70... by nxtr · · Score: 3, Funny

      But in reality, who worries about their Windows XP license fee?

    2. Re:More than $70... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      People who don't want to go to prison?

    3. Re:More than $70... by homeobocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People in Canada. Woot!

      --
      MOUNT TAPE U1439 ON B3, NO RING
    4. Re:More than $70... by JWW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of MythTV users build their own machines.

      Buying the "Other" OS for that box is expensive.

      Also, my myth box has never been tainted by having ever had that other operating system touch its disks ;-), unlike the machines you buy from Dell or whoever.

    5. Re:More than $70... by hillg3 · · Score: 1

      sure, but then we might as well factor in the original cost of the computer - so who knows how much it costs now.

    6. Re:More than $70... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Had you read the article, you would have learned that he had an "extra" license for Win 2000, and that is what he used. He mentioned upgrading to XP, but said that he didn't.

    7. Re:More than $70... by jmcneill · · Score: 1

      Had you read the article, you would have learned that he had an "extra" license for Win 2000, and that is what he used. He mentioned upgrading to XP, but said that he didn't.

      The article summary suggests that this is a possibility for others who are looking to build a personal video recorder. Had you read the Slashdot summary of the article:

      If you have an old computer that had been laying around for a while and are ready to spend a bit on hardware to make into a Digital Video Recorder, this article from Make magazine contains a step-by-step guide on building one.

      Sorry, we don't all have "extra" Windows licenses lying around.

    8. Re:More than $70... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Lets not forget the license fee for Windows XP -- that's significantly more than $70, I'm sure."

      That's one of the reasons I keep my Win2k cd around. No calling home to ask for permission to run.

      For the record, Win2k makes for a great OS on a PVR machine. The one I built worked for months without a problem. (months as in up-time.) The only reason I shut it down was because I didn't have room for it when I moved.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:More than $70... by KillShill · · Score: 1, Redundant

      lets not forget, a lot of people don't pay for OS licenses.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    10. Re:More than $70... by Blastrogath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry, we don't all have "extra" Windows licenses lying around.

      A lot of people don't have an extra computer lying around either. That doesn't mean nobody should sugest ideas for those of us who do.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    11. Re:More than $70... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that LINUX is the other operating system, right?

    12. Re:More than $70... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      puh leeze. you have a better chance of accidentally biting your own penis off than going to prison for pirating windows.

    13. Re:More than $70... by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      If you'd actually read the article, he used a Win2K license that he says he had laying around. He's not even running XP, so your point is offtopic ;)

    14. Re:More than $70... by jmcneill · · Score: 1

      A lot of people don't have an extra computer lying around either. That doesn't mean nobody should sugest ideas for those of us who do.

      I think you need to re-read my original post. The point was, to build a PVR, you need x, y, z. If you already own x and y, good! Makes the job much easier.

      We were, however, comparing the benefits of building a Windows PVR using commercial software with a Linux PVR using free software. The cost of the Windows license is a factor. Just because I already own a capture card doesn't mean that it won't be a factor for someone else.

      You might as well post an article titled "How to build a PVR for free! [1]", and in small text at the bottom of the page have a footnote:

      [1]: Free assumes that you have a spare 2GHz PC, Windows license that can be transferred to this PC, a video capture card, capture hardware, analog cable service, a remote control, etc.

      And before you go off and say "Well, why not mention the cost of a PC?", we're talking about the differences between a Linux PVR and a Windows PVR. The PC is common to the two (so is the capture card, the only relevance it has to the conversation is that it was bundled with the PVR software).

      Hope this helps. I wasn't trying to hurt your feelings, rather I was pointing out that in a comparison of a Windows and Linux PVR, there are more factors than just the cost of the capture card and PVR software. Already having some pieces of the puzzle is nice, but it's not an option for all of us. That's all I was trying to say.

    15. Re:More than $70... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think this comment more than anything differentiates between the Open Source community and the Windows community.

      The F/OSS community respects intellectual property.

    16. Re:More than $70... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      $70 is about right for Windows XP Home. For a PC that is going to essentially going to be an appliance, I don't think any of the limitations of XP Home are going to get in the way.

    17. Re:More than $70... by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      >Already having some pieces of the puzzle is nice, but it's not an option for all of us. That's all I was trying to say.

      And I was trying to say "That doesn't mean nobody should sugest ideas for those of us who do" have a spare windows licence.

      There are probably a lot of people who have a spare copy of windows lying around who have no clue how to use linux, you exclude people either way. Skills are an factor too, for example: nobody would consider a project that required welding widely acessable no matter how cheap and available the materials.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    18. Re:More than $70... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you realize that linux can and does run directly from cdroms, right?

  3. The author actually spent by Mantorp · · Score: 3, Informative
    $150 on the capture card and didn't have to spend $70 on the software because it came with the card.

    Yeah I admit it, I rtfa.

    1. Re:The author actually spent by dragon_imp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course, it would be nice if the article wasn't misleading. In this case, "bundled" does not mean "free as in beer."

      Hauppauge's PVR-250 comes bundled with both BeyondTV and SageTV -- TRIAL VERSIONS! Both have 30 day trial periods.

      I have 3 of the PVR-250 cards and I chose SageTV for my Home Theater PC

    2. Re:The author actually spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I bought my pvr-150 bundled with a FULL version of BeyondTV 3.5. So there...

    3. Re:The author actually spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I admit it, I rtfa.

      Dammit! It's people like you that give /. such a bad name!

  4. The idea has some merit, but... by holyshitholyshit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. an old computer is going to be a big hulking mess compared to a DVR

    2. the DVR will use much less wattage

    3. the DVR doesn't cost much more anyway

    1. Re:The idea has some merit, but... by segmond · · Score: 3, Insightful

      who has a 1.8ghz lying around? My main PC workstations are 450mhz.

      --
      ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
    2. Re:The idea has some merit, but... by kent_eh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BUT...

      DVRs (like Tivo, Replay, etc)may be commonly available where you live, but the aren't everywhere.

      Here in Canada, the options for off-the-shelf DVR are:

      1) whatever your cable company/satellite proivider will provide.

      2) a set-top DVD recorder

      3) buy a used Tivo/Replay box on E-bay and hack it

      4) there is no 4

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    3. Re:The idea has some merit, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who has a 1.8ghz lying around? My main PC workstations are 450mhz.

      I get decent video quality on my 1 GHz box with software compression. Some newer TV tuners compress to MPEG in hardware, so a 450 MHz machine should be enough.

    4. Re:The idea has some merit, but... by lostguy · · Score: 1

      My DVR (Comcast-supplied Motorola 6208) has the very, very annoying problem of excessive fan noise. Since I don't own it, I can't rip it apart to silence the loud hissing when it gets a little warm (which it does at the drop of a hat while watching tv). Well, I could, but if I screw up, I don't want to pay for the privilege of owning a slow, noisy set-top box. I also can't expand the disk space with the version I have, by attaching firewire or usb drives.

      That said, everything else you mentioned is spot on. I don't think it's worth replacing my two pain points for the hassle of integrating channel listings, getting device drivers working, or dealing with a big, ugly, old box (or spending $1500 to build a pretty, tiny box).

      I think people might be solving the wrong problem, but I guess I am not the target audience.

    5. Re:The idea has some merit, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5) Profit!?!?

    6. Re:The idea has some merit, but... by KillShill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you forgot #4

      the one that says you can record anything you want anytime you want and you don't have to watch the dvr's ads in addition to the commercials that are shown on tv.

      and #5 which says you can record it in any format you want and keep it as long as you want. and share it with others.

      also #6 which mentions that you won't be monitored 24/7 on your watching habits. nor will you be required to "phone home" to "update" the electronic program guide and coughhackwheeze upload your personal information coughhackwheeze.

      also there is #7 which states that you won't be FORCED to accept updates against your will (EULAs have no validity in any nation with a sensible notion of just law)

      lets not forget #9 which allows you to do anything you want in regards to the hardware guts of the machine (no cockamamie secret/proprietary HD file systems, protection/drm schemes etc)

      SOME people just want a digital vcr aka a DUMB hw module that does EXACTLY what the owner tells it to, and nothing else. no "related" shows you'd like, updating the EPG bs, etc.

      the above paragraph is only my personal wish but some others concur and are quickly insulted/modded down when they mention it. the other points i make though are valid for anyone with a sense of decency and justice.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    7. Re:The idea has some merit, but... by ksaville00 · · Score: 1

      true, next dvr i get for hdtv I will get the cable provider, cheaper and just as good...

    8. Re:The idea has some merit, but... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      My sig is better.

    9. Re:The idea has some merit, but... by ganley · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I'm setting up a music/file server right now, which I'd love to be a DVR as well - except that my best salvage machine is a 400MHz P3. My very best machine is less powerful than his salvage machine.

  5. Interesting but pointless by nxtr · · Score: 0

    My local cable provider carries only plain channels on analog cable. If I want specialty channels, I gotta get the digital set top box. It becomes impossible to DVR with a PC. Their solution is to get their set top box with DVR functions. The do-it-yourself DVR is a great idea if you like having 70 channels to pick and choose programming from.

    1. Re:Interesting but pointless by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, MythTV (for one) supports infrared control of an existing cable box, so you get all the channels on the PVR you just use the set top box's tuner.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Interesting but pointless by JWW · · Score: 2, Informative

      It also recently got firewire support for use with cable boxes that have firewire output

    3. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It becomes impossible to DVR with a PC.

      Heh? That won't have until July. And, only if the consumer electronics manufacturers cave.

    4. Re:Interesting but pointless by g8way · · Score: 4, Informative

      MythTV now supports capturing TV from a set-top box through Firewire-which would also save you the expense of a TV tuner card.

    5. Re:Interesting but pointless by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Really? As Johnny Carson used to say, "I did not know that."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  6. Free pvr software by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Don't forget that one can get excellent free PVR software, too. In fact, I'm surprised that Make Mazazine didn't go this route -- far more the DIY style. I run GB-PVR (www.gbpvr.com), which can handle DivX, audio, etc. and has plugins for weather, cartoons, and is skinnable. It enables you to select free tv listing from zap2it which cover Canada and the USA, and also supports various XML listing feeds for elsewhere on the planet.

    I also recommend checking out the Hauppage (www.hauppage.com) PVR-150 through PVR-350 series, as well as their MediaMVP box, which allows streaming your tv across ethernet to your television. I suspect you could create a very useable system with free software for well under $100. Just be warned that you'll chew through about 2GB per hour of HD space. The old 30GB drive that's serving as my PVR storage doesn't really cut it in the modern world!

    1. Re:Free pvr software by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Might as well cover titantv.com listings as well.

      Though currently I do use zap2it service as well, but really everyone in some fashion is using zap2it. Most individuals just don't know your listings are coming from the same place.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Free pvr software by Jmechy · · Score: 1

      The tech support for GB-PVR is very good. I have an avermedia m150 (which only has drivers for WinMCE) running on WinXP, and no other PVR software was able to work correctly (or crashed my system). A quick trip to the GB-PVR forums fixed all my programs, and now I have a fully operational DVR.

  7. If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by mauriceh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reliably?

    Myth has a long way to go yet.
    And some really awkward assumptions for defaults.
    "No, you should not see the cursor, that would be too easy to use"

    Free does not necessarily mean "best"

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
    1. Re:If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by w.p.richardson · · Score: 2, Informative
      Answer: Knoppmyth

      Problems solved.

      --

      Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    2. Re:If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, when all i have is a remote why would i want to see a cursor? and that is presumably most everyone's default configuration for myth. as for reliability, mythmusic is about the only thing that ever crashes on me. the frontend and backend are super stable and basically i run the machine until a release and upgrade. that's the only time i kill the backend.

      hell, my mythbox has only been rebooted to upgrade the kernel on occassion, i would call that fairly good reliability.

      most people who have stability problems with myth haven't read the mailing lists to see what the most commonly used hardware is. sure, if you pick rare configurations that haven't been tested as well you are bound to have problems, but who's fault is that?

    3. Re:If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fancy my self a fairly competent pc user. I have zero experience using Linux (I've read quit a bit about it, but it offers very little to me without, 3D Max, games, and my level editors, same with Macs, but that's another story,) and trying to build a pvr using Knoppmyth was like pulling teeth. I eventually just gave up when it took hours just figure out how to install the damn NVIDIA drivers, and I still couldn't get the damn thing to display on the TV correctly. I really wanted it to work out, but man alive it's insane how difficult this thing was to setup. I read their entire forum, wiki, and how-to docs, found a few so called solutions but with no direction on how to follow them through, it was very aggravating. These guys could take a lesson from the Mac discussion forums on how to deal with new users.

      I loaded up windows and was recording shows in just under an hour with very little input, most of which was clicking YES or OK. Linux has a very long way to go if it ever expects to become mainstream or even an option for causal computer hobbyist like myself who enjoy building and USING his pc's.

      Bottom line is that the time I saved was more valuable than the money I spent on the software. Why spend a week struggling with a Linux solution when I could be recording and watching my shows already?

    4. Re:If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by baboon · · Score: 1

      Which of the other options has fully automatic commericial skip, where 70% of the time you watch a show all the way through like it never even had commericals? And when it misses, it's about three key presses to get it back in line.

      On the other hand, a competant first-time install is easily several hours, but for some of us, it's quite worth it, regardless of cost. Of course, I wouldn't even try it without the Hauppauge 250 or 350.

      I like the idea that the people providing my software are doing their best to improve my viewing experience, not devising new ways to force ads on me, or block/force recording of certain programs.

      Also, my mail/web server, mythtv box, and dev box are all the same 1Ghz dinosaur. With a HW encoder, the recording hit is neglible. Now, on-screen SW decoding can burn 70% of said CPU, so compiling at the same time is nearly pointless.

    5. Re:If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mythtv is actually quite straightforward. Try it with KnoppMyth, and you'll see. The setup takes under 20 minutes.

      KnoppMyth can be used both for the backend and the frontend.

      Works great on a 800MHz PIII + PVR-250 (backend) and a hacked XBox as a frontend :-)

    6. Re:If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BeyondTV has a pretty good commercial skip feature. Except, for legal reasons, you need to press a button to skip over them. Not really an issue with an RF remote though.

    7. Re:If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by geckofiend · · Score: 1
      Reliably?

      My uptime of 29 days speaks volumes to the reliability.

      "No, you should not see the cursor, that would be too easy to use"

      That would be because the mouse doesn't work in Myth. Unlike many so called HTPC apps Myth was designed to work with a remote not a mouse.

    8. Re:If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by A1tha1us · · Score: 1

      Shame that you had so much trouble. I wonder what version you used. I installed R5A10 (alpha) and was blown away at how easy it was. I have a few things in my system that helped, a pvr-250 which is vary common, and a plasma tv with vga input so no messing with tv-out. I had the whole thing installed and running 2 hours tops. and it works like a dream. Knoppymth seems to be improving on a relatively regular basis. plus they've just started touting a 'supported' hardware config that you can either buy built from them or build your own so you know you'll have minimum hasstle. all in all I have to say that I've found MythTV particularly through Knoppmyth to be amazing, and well worth keeping an eye on, even if your first experience was bad. I also happen to like that whole 'free' as in freedom AND Beer thing.

      --
      .Sig. temporarily unavailable due to terminal lack of inventivness .we apologise for the inconvenience
    9. Re:If you can spare the time to get MythTV to work by killercoder · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit - my MythTV has not been rebooted in over 2 years.

      Reliably? I've got two hardware encoder cards receiving cable (PVR 250's for those in the know), and two HD3000 cards getting HDTV free from Buffalo.

      My MythTV has been nothing but reliable, it took two days to setup, and has been happily churning ever since.

      File Server, Web Server, Mail Server, etc. I've tried everything else (Windows Media Center, BeyondTV, SageTV, MediaPortal, etc), nothing could match the feature set and Reliability of MythTV.

      Take your knee, and jerk it back to reality.

      For those who are curious:

      - AMD 2800 w/784mb of Ram
      - 2 SATA 200gb HDs, 1x300, 1x250 HD IDE
      - 2x Hauppauge 250PVR's
      - 2x HD3000's
      - NVIDIA Video Card - everything else onboard MB

  8. MythTV would save the builder $70 by dhofstra · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Mythtv would have saved him 70 bucks, and not having paid windows tax on the machine in the first place would have saved even more. I've been a completely happy mythtv user for about 1.5 years, and I am just blown away at it's quality and reliability. Good job isaac and company! Dave Hofstra

    1. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by HillBilly · · Score: 1

      I would rather have my teeth removed through my arse then try to Install mythTV again. I created a partition on my htpc box for linux and mythtv. Big waste of time.

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    2. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by dhofstra · · Score: 1

      You are hardly the typical slashdotter then. Using knoppmyth you could be up and running in literally 1 hr. I have used Mandrake and Suse both, and could get those distros up and running in only a few hours. Plus, there is plenty of good documentation on the mailing list, and IRC channels if you need any help.

    3. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather have my teeth removed through my arse then try to Install mythTV again.
      I can understanding wanting to try to install MythTV again, but why on Earth do you want to have your teeth removed through your arse first?

    4. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by HillBilly · · Score: 1

      Buzzt Wrong, to get my tuner card working I would have to edit and recompile the kernel, which failed.

      I have better things to do.

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    5. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt you completely miss the point, you have revealed yourself to be some sort of ignorant chucklehead who would rather beat off to the playboy channel than learn something useful in spending a WHOPPING TWO HOURS figuring out how to modify some minor part of your operating system.

      I bet your last major purchase was a pair of sports shoes.

    6. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt you completely miss the point, you have revealed yourself to be some sort of ignorant chucklehead who would rather beat off to the playboy channel than learn something useful in spending a WHOPPING TWO HOURS figuring out how to modify some minor part of your operating system.

      Hmm. I think I understand why Microsoft is worth $60,000,000,000 while you're worth $84.34.

    7. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of half-assed tuner did you buy?

    8. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by TheMeddler · · Score: 0, Troll

      *useful*?

      I had DVR for about a year. I didn't use it much. Now I don't even have cable (TV). I learn and accomplish much more than I did with cable/DVR. *That* is useful.

      --
      90% Professional Slacker
    9. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the people who are willing to expend the effort to learn something new who can charge most for their services. Since you have revealed yourself to be someone who is opposed to learning technical skills as well as a microsoft fan boy, it is obvious that you will never amount to much. Enjoy working at Home Depot the rest of your life, winner.

    10. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather have my teeth removed through my arse then try to Install mythTV again.

      Then bend over.

    11. Re:MythTV would save the builder $70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like post to slashdot.

      humm . i really hate the recompile ethos of linux. form an engineering persepctive and mine asa code monkey. its just worng.
      but linux does need a recompiled kernel for some low level drivery changes.
      that just tthe way its designed.

      its a kernel in cinstant development.

      i wouldnt recompile my openbsd kernel.
      or my dads windows 2k one.

      MythTv looks difficult to get 'just right' to me --- doenst mean i wont do it one day.

  9. And for $99... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can buy a TiVo that works out of the box...

    1. Re:And for $99... by Armadni+General · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. He speaks the truth that nobody wants to hear.

    2. Re:And for $99... by SpudB0y · · Score: 1

      Circuit City has them free after rebate occasionally.

      Free as in beer.

    3. Re:And for $99... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can get dirt cheap inkjet printers and razor handles too.

    4. Re:And for $99... by PR_Alistair · · Score: 1

      No Tivo in Canada.

    5. Re:And for $99... by FredThompson · · Score: 1

      There is no commercial TiVo schedule feed for Canada. There is a very active Canadian hacking community with filters to grab scheduling information from the web and use TiVo hardware on the Northern side of the border.

    6. Re:And for $99... by PR_Alistair · · Score: 1

      If it were any harder than plugging it in and turning it on, I'd just use Myth.

    7. Re:And for $99... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clarifying. I was almost under the idea that they'd give me the hardware specs & software after rebate. I was about to go buy a billion!

    8. Re:And for $99... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not without the TiVo subscription service it doesn't.

  10. EFF shameless plug by NotoriousQ · · Score: 4, Informative

    In honor of Broadcast flag becoming law on July 1st, EFF hosts a Broadcast flag awareness and PVR building page with many resources on how to build you own. A good starting place to see many solutions and find many links

    --
    badness 10000
  11. probably better to just get the real thing by updog · · Score: 1, Insightful
    You could build it yourself, but even after many hours of tinkering you're still going to have a product which is:

    -noisy
    -unable to record more than one digital channel at once, and you'll still need a cable/satellite receiver to record digital at all
    -terrible form factor
    -clunky user interface
    -limited epg (electronic program guide)

    I'm usually all for tinkering and rolling your own, but in this case I would suggest just getting a Tivo, or better yet a DirectTivo or a DVR through your cable company (usually an extra $10/month). Everything will just work, you can record multiple digital channels at once (even multiple HD in many areas), and some DVR's even have music/games/pictures software built in.

    1. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by loraksus · · Score: 1

      MythTV has stuff like weather, news headlines, etc.
      It was a pain in the ass to set up for me though. Driver support for some cards is dismally bad.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by The+Vulture · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, MythTV can be a bit of a pain to setup, and yes, driver support for some cards is bad.

      I know that I'm going to sound like a total ass for saying this, but... You need to do some research.

      If you read the mythtv-users mailing list, you'll find that the PVR-250 seems to be the best supported card (unfortunately, unless you have one of the newer ones). PVR-150 support is iffy, but I have a PVR-500 and a PVR-250 (one of the first generation ones) working fine, with a driver that is listed as "testing" in ATrpms.

      I have absolutely no problems setting up MythTV, in fact, it's basically copy/paste. Why?
      1. I use supported hardware
      2. I use ATrpms for the RPMS (on Fedora Core 3)
      3. I follow Jarod Wilson's MythTV HOWTO at http://www.wilsonet.com/mythtv/, which the community contributes to in order to keep it up to date
      4. I read the mythtv-users mailing list (and the -dev list, and ivtv and atrpms-devel as well, but most users don't need to do that).

      -- Joe

    3. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile with a standalone TiVo and a separate receiver, you get:
      -analog
      -separate box with poor channel control
      -multiple remote controls
      -same crappy epg, as now the boxes are not connected
      -one channel at once period
      -"updates" that remove features you want
      -additional monthly subscription

      With a PVR supplied by your TV company, you get:
      -recording of only those shows they want you to record. Just wait for broadcast flag.
      -"updates" that remove features you want
      -potentially poor choice of options (good luck attempting to upgrade the drive on the receiver you do not own)
      -inability to extract shows in a easy to rad format

      The ready solutions have a lot of problems as well. I am taking the option of rolling your own. At least I will be able to record the Superbowl (the first thing that will for SURE broadcast flagged) when my friend asks me to.

      --
      badness 10000
    4. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But of course a commercial product will not allow you to do the following things:

      - backup DVD's or CD's to your hard drive for watching on other PC's in the house
      - stream live or pre-recorded tv to other pc's in the house
      - re-encode files to different formats depending on the quality needed (eg: low bitrates for exercise shows)
      - replace specific components when technology matures (I just threw out my Hauppauge 150 for a Plextor M402U that does divx hardware encoding)
      - etc

      So ya, all-in-one units are fine if you are lazy and are willing to live with the significant limitations imposed on you, but for people who know how to do it and don't mind tweaking, there is no going back.

    5. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by p0rnking · · Score: 1

      #1 Not everyone can get Tivo, let alone DirectTivo
      #2 A cable company's PVR/DVR is limited in what in can do, and what you can do with it, such as weather, emulators, mp3s or whatever format you use, RSS feeds, harddrive space, networking ....

    6. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by updog · · Score: 1
      -recording of only those shows they want you to record. Just wait for broadcast flag.

      No, all DVR's I'm aware of currently allow you to record whatever you want to record. Even with the broadcast flag, with your cable-company provided DVR, you'll still be able to record what you want, you just won't be able to re-distribute it (which you can't currently do anyway with a cable-company provided DVR's, because the streams are re-encrypted before being stored to disk).

    7. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Well, when I set it up it was "use the hardware I had" as opposed to getting the 250 (which I understand is kind of hard to find now because so many people want them)
      I was using the pcHDTV(TM) HD-3000 (the one the eff reccomended which avoided the broadcast flag).
      Didn't work 100% of the time and no errors popped when it didn't.

      To be fair, while building it, I came across a whole bunch of other problems (bad ram, a hard drive that was funky, video card was a pos), but it really bugged me that I had spent 20+ hours setting up a glorified VCR.

      With KnoppMyth, you probably would get running in 20 minutes with your setup. (so yeah, everyone else who is reading this, get the 250 or some hardware from their tier 1 list, save yourself some angst)

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    8. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by Nos. · · Score: 1
      Hmm, I'm looking at a Asus Pundit-R for my setup to go in the living room. Of course I could put the whole works in the basement and run nothing but an IR receiver up to the TV, but in any case:
      • Several HTPC cases are rated at under 30dB - slightly louder than a whisper - that's better than my ExpressVu receiver
      • I can record one show (at a time) for each tuner card I have. you'll need that digital cable/sat box regardless of your choice, unless its an all in one unit
      • I like the style of some of the form factors better than a lot of the other stereo equipment I've seen.
      • I can customize Myth if I really want, but I like the default interface just fine... pretty simple and easy to use as far as I'm concerned
      • The EPG on Myth is better than my local cable provider and Bell Expressvu - by far.
      • Myth can play DVDs, give me local weather and news (and /. headlines) in seconds, act as my MP3 player. It's upgradeable. I can play games on it. I can pull the recordings I've made off of it and burn to DVD.

      Oh yeah, everything above where I said "I" can do it, my wife who is not a computer person, can also do it.

    9. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      you'll still be able to record what you want, you just won't be able to re-distribute it

      How can you be so sure of this. For now all DVR's are letting you record what you want, but sooner or later someone (most likely NFL) have a reason to not want recording of their show to be made (perhaps they want to sell the broadcast of the superbowl on DVD). Then they find themselves in position to be able to stop all recordings, and poof...bye bye to your DVD. Some will complain, but since it is one show, and not that heavily recorded, the number of complaint will be few, and they will be quashed. Then they will take away another show, and then another, and then the only thing you will be able to record are the sitcoms and the local news.

      By the way, I made a mistake on the Broadcast flag, as that will affect over the air recording only. The cable companies will introduce / have introduced their own recording flags, which their own receiver / PVRs support. Law is not going to matter on cable.

      But returning to the discussion...when the cable / sattelite will say you will not reord this show...you will not record that show with their PVR period. Not even in degraded quality. The whole point of having a standalone box is that you will be able to ignore all their rules completely.

      It may be difficult, but it is certainly more free.

      --
      badness 10000
    10. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by KillShill · · Score: 1

      and why would anyone want to support directv after the gestapo tactics they used to go after card program buyers? abusing the legal system and totally showing what ass**oles they are in the process.

      and tivo doesn't have a good track record either. they keep disabling more and more features with each generation. series 2 is far harder to hack, disabling the skip button by default, forcing ads on you, the OWNER of the device, collecting your data etc.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    11. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, you build it yourself and have a product which is:

      -quiet
      -records as many digital or analog channels as you wish
      -gives a choice of form factor, including hiding the capture and storage in another room
      -customizable user intrface
      -better epg than many cable offerings

      And most importantly: that you control.

      It does take time, and it's not cheap. But it does what I want, including recording OTA digital. Get your facts straight, you do not need a cable or satellite receiver to record digital TV in countries which have digital broadcasting.

      I love people who tell that what I've been doing for months isn't possible.

    12. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not everyone lives in America.

      Shocking, I know :)

      A build-your-own is the only option I have in New Zealand.

    13. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by geckofiend · · Score: 1
      -noisy

      My Tivo made more noise than my Myth frontenend does.

      unable to record more than one digital channel at once, and you'll still need a cable/satellite receiver to record digital at all

      If you use DirecTV with HD then yes the Tivo wins. But you know, there's this big thing out there called the world and DirecTivo is only available in one tiny part of that.

      terrible form factor

      I assume you're referring to the case? If so I'd have to disagree.

      clunky user interface

      Spoken like someone who's never used the MythTV interface.

      limited epg (electronic program guide)

      And here's where we realize you realy don't have a clue what you're talking about. Myth gets it's data from the same source as Tivo. Their EPG provides more information than Tivo's does to the user. Then combine that with the fact that Tivo isn't available in many countries an thus has NO EPG....

    14. Re:probably better to just get the real thing by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I've actually found the MythTV program guide (with listings by Zap2It) to be *far* superior to the guide on a Scientific Atlanta 8000 (Time Warner uses a lot of these), and Myth is a WHOLE lot more configurable/controllable.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  12. Braindead way to do it. by loraksus · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html
    Assuming you have the right hardware, etc.
    If not, prepare to spend a couple hours finding drivers / recompiling / all that fun stuff.

    Maybe it is just me, but I don't feel like installing 3 distros and spending hours trying to get some hardware to work, sometimes "just fucking works" is nice.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:Braindead way to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a troll, but I tried to use knoppmyth last month. It installed fine but wouldn't boot. I posted a question on the forums, and found out that this distro has problems with recognizing certain hard drives on nforce2-based motherboards. What kind of BS is that? I wiped it and installed Windows MCE2005. That sucker runs smooth and flawless.

    2. Re:Braindead way to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wiped it and installed Windows MCE2005.

      Really? As far as I could tell MCE cannot be bought separately, it must be bought pre-loaded on a new PC. I wanted to buy MCE but stopped when I saw it requires specific video cards.

      nVidia: GeForce FX5700, FX5900, 6800
      ATI: Radeon 9800, X800

      It wouldn't work on my Dell even though I have a PVR-250. I needed one of those vid cards for output as well.

    3. Re:Braindead way to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MCE can only be purchased OEM, true. But OEM requirements just say it needs to be sold with some piece of hardware. So, go to newegg and buy it bundled with a power cord or something. I'd hazard to say that's how most of the hard core people are running MCE.

      Also, I don't think MCE requires specific cards, they just have to be software encoders, which would rule your PVR-250 out.

  13. $150 too much by biryokumaru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    $150 is way, way, way too much. I got a fully functional TV tuner card that I use with mplayer as a DVR and it only cost me $6 (I got a good deal). But www.pricewatch.com puts capture cards around $20.

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    1. Re:$150 too much by g8way · · Score: 1

      The Hauppage PVR-250 card has an MPEG-2 encoder chip, which offloads a bit of strain from the processor. It's definately useful for lower-powered PVR machines (heat/noise concerns), and the picture tends to look better. Hauppage did recently release the PVR-150, which is around the $60-70 mark, and also encodes to MPEG-2 with (supposedly) equal quality.

    2. Re:$150 too much by sarahemm · · Score: 1

      They've also recently released the PVR-500, which is a dual-tuner version, so you can record two channels at once, or watch live tv on one and record using the other one.

    3. Re:$150 too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, more importantly, the Hauppauge cards come with a remote control.

    4. Re:$150 too much by sarahemm · · Score: 1

      As far as i know, the -MCE models do not come with remotes, only the 'mainstream' retail box models do.

  14. PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. an old computer is going to be a big hulking mess compared to a DVR
    2. the DVR will use much less wattage
    3. the DVR doesn't cost much more anyway


    Amen, thank you.

    If I could get a DVR for the price of TV card + the software, and no more hassle, I'd buy one.

    In fact, it would solve the problem of getting digitised programs off a standalone DVR. However, as this would require leaving my computer all the time (wattage, noise), and more importantly, restrict what I can do with it (bad enough if you use Windows and want decent recording quality- means you can't run game X when your favorite program is on; I run Linux, and not being able to boot into that at will is a killer, straight off, for me).

    The 'old computer' is, as you say, still going to be bulky and noisy (and ugly), and quite honestly, if you want analog recording, you're going to need a pretty decent machine to capture at full resolution. The only machine I can dedicate to this (I use my laptop as a wireless X server for my main machine) is my old Pentium-233. *Way* too slow...

    So, buy a new PC. Cheap one? Still noisy, bulky, and power hungry; and no cheaper than a standalone box, if slightly more flexible.

    Shuttle-type case (nano-ATX where the *hell* are you?); getting expensive, and I'd have to start questioning the merit of not just getting a standalone DVR.

    For me, the latter are likely to come down in price to mass-market breakthrough price by the end of the year; the main problem is getting the video off them. But that in itself isn't enough to persuade me to spend more on the 'cheap' option of a new PC.

    On the other hand, maybe I just don't care enough about TV to consider the ultimate flexibility that a new nano-PC based solution would give to be worth the money. I'll wait for my cheap off-the-shelf box and use my VHS recorder in the meantime.

    1. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could get a DVR for the price of TV card + the software, and no more hassle, I'd buy one.

      Can you?

    2. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      (all prices in Canadian $$$'s)

      My DVR is on a dedicated IBM NetVista desktop box (P4-1.4Ghz, 256MB ram) I got refurbished for $200. It has a 180watt power supply which is whisper quiet and has more than enough to juice for the components I have inside. It's currently got a 200GB hard drive I picked up for about $100, an Asus E616 DVD rom drive for $40 (the quietest region-free DVD drive made I think) and a low end ATI radeon card with TV-out for about $50. For capture, I use the Plextor m402U, which cost me $129, also in Canadian funds. Last but not least since I have a satellite dish, I picked up an IR blaster for about $20. Grand total about $400 Canadian. Then I threw MythTV on there and now I have a DVR that is better than anything sold on the market today. Best of all since the Plextor divx encoder does it all in hardware over USB2, I can add a second or third with almost zero extra load on the machine.

    3. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Badly-phrased; I should have said "If I can convert a PC into a PVR for the price of a TV card + the software, with no more hassle, intrusiveness or power consumption than my current VCR, I'd buy one."

    4. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by The+Vulture · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some people like the simplicity and cheapness of a commerically available DVR. Some people prefer to build their own. I say, to each their own. Building a DVR isn't for everybody, and it can be quite expensive.

      My reasons for building my own (using MythTV):
      1. I can put in multiple tuners. Two tuner units came out six months ago at best, if my memory serves me correctly. I've been using two tuners for over a year now, and I now have three tuners in my machine (a PVR-250 and a PVR-500). This is very convenient when there's three shows on at the same time that I want to watch. (A typical Tuesday night at the moment has Law and Order: SVU, The Shield and Masterminds all on at the same time, 10PM). The scheduler in MythTV can accomodate that fairly well with only one or two tuners, mind you.
      2. The user interface on a lot of the DVRs that come from the cable companies is awful. It's slow, full of ugly colors, and unstable
      3. I use my MythTV machine as my file server as well. So, I was going to have the PC on 24/7 anyway.
      4. MythTV plays back DVDs also, not many DVRs currently do that.
      5. I have complete control over the unit. I can skip commercials at will. I don't have to worry about my DVR expiring shows on me (except when I run out of disk space). My demographics aren't sent to some company. My DVR doesn't pop up ads on me.

      I picked MythTV because it met my needs. If a Windows program worked well for me, then I would have used that, just to make it simple.

      -- Joe

    5. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by kfhickel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      wrong, wrong, wrong.

      The power of a PC based DVR (I use BeyondTV myself even though I have a linux server in the house too), is not that you put one next to every TV. That would be "stupid". Instead, you put one in the basement where you don't care if it's noisy, then you put a $90 MediaMVP box from Hauppage on each TV, and wire it to a switch.

      Compare that to putting a TIVO on 4 TV's, even if you get the box for free, it's $1200 for the lifetime guide access (which is free with BeyondTV), and then more money if you want the home networking option so that you can move programs from one TIVO to another.

      Now, my setup cost more than $1200 (but not that much more), but then my BeyondTV machine is also my X-10 house controller machine, is a 3.2ghz p4 hyperthreaded with 1gb of 800mhz dual channel ram, a 100gb 7200rpm disk for the OS and 4 seagate ata133 7200rpm 300gb drives in a stripe set for the data volume. It's also my backup server. And I can watch any program from any TV in the house.

      I've got right aroun $1500 in the machine, including the OS and software licenses and 4 MediaMVP boxes for a total cost (not including network switches, etc) of $1820 (I got a deal on the MVPs) for 4 TVs, and I could have another TV for free if I put the server next to a TV.

      4 TIVOs would cost more like $2000 (200/box plus 300 guide fee) and would have a lot fewer features and much less storage, and some amount more for the networking option.

      So....

    6. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      But a standalone DVR is so limited in functionality, at least for now. In a few more generations, I suppose they will catch up with what a livingroom PC can do today - not just VCR functionality, but play (networked) video games, DVDs, huge capacity music jukebox, hold all your photos for a slide show, burn shows (or anything else) to DVD... plus whatever WebTV does.

      I'm not saying a livingroom PC is right for everybody, but it probably makes sense for a lot of slashdot readers.

      Mine is an 850 mhz computer I was retiring. Simply replacing the power supply with a quiet one, plus setting the hard drives to auto power-down, took the noise level below the heating, and the refrigerator in the next room.

      It also hosts VNC desktops for my family members, accessible by laptop and the desktop computer in the study. I can even call up my wife's desktop from work to help her figure things out on occasion when she phones for help. And I run Linux Advanced Routing to prioritize VOIP traffic, which keeps the voice quality fine even when I'm listening to music at work (also streamed from my livingroom PC - no mp3's on work computers!).

      Again, not yet for everybody, but it's all very nice and natural once you're accustomed to it.

    7. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      nano-ATX where the *hell* are you?

      Mini-ITX: 6.75" inches square

      http://www.mini-itx.com/hardware/intro.asp

      Thinking about getting one of these as a MythTV head...

    8. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe, just maybe, instead of wasting so much time building PVR's, you should take some time to think about your TV fetish and realize that you're wasting your time watching and recording absolute crap. I would contend that there is virtually nothing on TV worth watching, hence, my lack of a TV.

    9. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just curious, how much did that WinTV PVR 500 cost you and did you have an easy time getting it to work? I'm thinking of buying one for use on Debian Sarge in my own DVR, recording antenna TV. Please reply...

    10. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Two tuner units came out six months ago at best, if my memory serves me correctly.

      Not true. My old hughes tivo has been doing two tuners for three years now. I paid next to nothing for it (well under $200) when I got DirecTV and am floored by what people are spending on DIY approaches. To each is own indeed, but when the DIY costs twice as much as a stand-alone its a geek hobby like case-moding or building the fastest and latest and greatest for idle cycles or the occasional game.

      >The user interface on a lot of the DVRs that come from the cable companies is awful.

      I can't speak for other brands, but my Tivo has a great interface and remote.

      >My demographics aren't sent to some company.

      You can opt-out of Tivo demographic data. Call em.

      >My DVR doesn't pop up ads on me.

      Mine doesnt either.

      Granted, if you want a file server, DVD burner, etc then go the DIY approach, but the commercial products certainly are not as bad as you make them out to be.

    11. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your argument against is actually the beauty of PVR's.

      TV full of crap? Get your PVR to record the few shows a week you actually like, that are often on at stupid hours. Then you can sit down at your lesiure and put on whatever you like from what your PVR's recorded over the last few days.
      Use a PVR as to filter out all that garbage, and suddenly TV is a lot more tolerable.

      This is the main reason I have a PVR. It (MythTv) also holds my entire audio collection, about 100 DVD's and 2500 digital photos.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    12. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a PVR is considerably more useful than a VCR. Why does it have to have the exact same footprint to be acceptable? (note: your new phrase of question changes the meaning significantly)

    13. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Instead you spend your time reading discussion that have absolutely nothing to do with your interests just so you can jerk off to the superior feeling you get by telling everyone how much better you are because you don't own a television? Good plan.

    14. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by toggles · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > I paid next to nothing for it (well under $200)
      > when I got DirecTV and am floored by what people
      > are spending on DIY approaches. To each is own
      >indeed, but when the DIY costs twice as much as a
      > stand-alone its a geek hobby

      Granted I'm a retard, I've spent over $1k on my myth box (3 tuners, 1.2TB, amd64 etc) but I have no monthy recuring fees either, so far you'll have spent over $300 or so just for guide data. So all in all nearly 1/2 the cost of my machine in total and all you can do with it is record tv, mine records radio from around the world, plays dvds, music, photos, the list goes on...

      > You can opt-out of Tivo demographic data. Call em.

      when you can opt out of the monthy fee, i'm in. again, each to their own i guess...

    15. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      2. The user interface on a lot of the DVRs that come from the cable companies is awful. It's slow, full of ugly colors, and unstable

      And if you live where I live (Charter), 50% of the guide display is taken up by ads. Luckily I have Dish, which still lacks that feature.

      --
      this is my sig
    16. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Wavicle · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity... Which commercial DVR are you using as your comparison? I've had a DirecTV with Tivo unit for 3 1/2 years that is free from those problems (except DVD playback).

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    17. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      *clap clap clap*

      well said!

      It's not really a matter of saving money (especially with rebates and other offers making a TiVo STB dirt cheap)... Building your own DVR is about control and the freedom to innovate/customize features while not having to wait for some corporate identity overseeing which features you can and can't have...

      IMHO not having DRM wrapped around my recordings (unless you are running a MCE 2005) is worth the price/effort of admission alone. But that's just may be me, I roll that way.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    18. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by The+Vulture · · Score: 1

      Since only some of the points need addressing, I'll address only those ones:

      2. A couple of different models, unfortunately, I don't know their model numbers. (These boxes are now over a year old, so it may not be a fair comparison). One was a box that I saw on Comcast digital cable (a Motorola one), and one was a Scientific Atlanta that I saw at a friend's house (on Rogers Digital Cable). The Comcast box was awful - slow channel changes (showing the pixellation until the MPEG-2 I-frame came in), slow button response, ugly fonts and all sorts of colors. The Scienfic Atlanta at least had a unified color scheme (but it was yellow, purple and grey), but the fonts were still pretty ugly looking.

      I was impressed with the look and of a Motorola settop that was Windows based (WinCE? I don't remember) that I saw at SCTE last summer. It was a dual-tuner box.

      5. A couple of Slashdot articles:
      TiVo to Sell Your Fast-Forward Button
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/17/15 38219&tid=129&tid=98&tid=17
      Tivo Tracks Superbowl Viewing Habits
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/02/03/18 31222&tid=158&tid=129

      -- Joe

    19. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by jack_call · · Score: 0, Troll
      YES! I'm off the bloody topic
      and 4 seagate ata133 7200rpm 300gb drives in a stripe set for the data volume. It's also my backup server.
      WHAT? You're backing up to a STRIPE SET? ... oh well good luck with that ;-)

      sounds like you've got a pretty good job, being able to do all that, especially when it comes to the power bill. That setup is just not affordable by your normal outsourced geek.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine. My sig is my best friend. It is my life.
    20. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a PVR is considerably more useful than a VCR. Why does it have to have the exact same footprint to be acceptable?

      On the contrary; IMHO one of the major benefits to a PVR/DVR over a VCR is that you *don't have loads of damn tapes lying around*. A massive great PC negates that benefit to some extent.

      And it depends on what you want. To be honest, I'm not really *that* much into TV (if I watch a lot of TV, it's usually because I have nothing better to do; there are very few programs I'll actually make a point of watching). PVRs job, for me, is to make it more convenient to grab some casual viewing, and possibly archive stuff.

      So, personally, a bulky, noisy, power-hungry, expensive machine isn't worth the flexibility (as I said in my original message); if you find that the benefits are worth it, you may disagree about the footprint issue. But you missed out the part about intrusiveness; that intrusiveness includes (eg) being unable to boot the computer into Linux at will, or even use CPU-hungry Windows apps (if you use your current PC).

    21. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by Stalemate · · Score: 1

      ...and then more money if you want the home networking option so that you can move programs from one TIVO to another.

      ...and some amount more for the networking option.

      No argument on the rest of what you said, but the 'networking option' (Home Media Option) no longer costs extra.

    22. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by AaronGTurner · · Score: 1
      "If I could get a DVR for the price of TV card + the software, and no more hassle, I'd buy one."

      In the UK you can pick up a PC with sufficient specification for about 220 pounds, and about 50 pounds for a single Freeview card, about 270 total. You can pick up a hard disk Freeview standalone recorder for as little as 179. If you want two Freeview connections than you are talking 320 (PC) versus around 250 (standalone). Either way unless you have spare PC parts of want something with more than the function of a PVR then a standalone system is probably cheaper.

    23. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      when you can opt out of the monthy fee, i'm in.

      Two of my subscribed TiVos have no monthly fees, though the cost for you to get that has gone up to $299 (I only had to pay $199, and got the lifetime service transferred to two Series2 units through a limited time offer).

      Another of my TiVos runs without monthly service (actually has never been subscribed). Most Series1 standalone units can record without guide data, which you can program to record by time and channel like a VCR.

      There are also new units that come with free TiVo Basic service. They are typically the units with DVD recording ability.

      (And with all this, I still want to build a MythTV box for recording HD and managing my DVD collection.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    24. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by N0decam · · Score: 1

      Where on earth did you get a Plextor m402U for $129?

    25. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by eufreka · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Compare that to putting a TIVO on 4 TV's, even if you get the box for free, it's $1200 for the lifetime guide access (which is free with BeyondTV), and then more money if you want the home networking option so that you can move programs from one TIVO to another.

      I know I should let this pass, but for posterity, let me correct a couple of points:

      I bought 3 tivos a year ago for $50 each (direct from tivo by weborder). I then purchased 3 usb ethernet adapters for $20 each to add them hardwired to my home network. I then signed up for month to month guide service for a total of $27 (13 for first, 7 each for the others).

      So first year cost is/was $534. Second year will be just the 324 in service...for a total 24-month outlay of $858.

      So what do I get for that? All the basic DVR stuff (at tivo quality); full MultiRoom Viewing (which allows me to move shows among the different tivos...even when halfway watched); Photo and Music server in all 3 rooms; the ability to schedule recordings remotely over the internet; and tivo2go from all three devices to a PC for archiving OR legal DVD burning (there are ways to do it with what you have, but you can throw in another $50 for Sonic MyDVD, which hooks straight in).

      Total cost of $900 for 3 tivos for 2 years of use (including the hardware) Even if I added a 4th ($70 for box and ethernet; $238 for 24 months of guide, etc.) the REALWORLD comparison is $1200 versus your $1800 investment.

      Oh, and as an aside, I would love to watch your $1500 machine playback 4 separate streams, and simultaneously record 4 separate programs AT ONCE (because my setup is doing it everyday)! And even if it could, I still have $600 for my next "next" thang.

    26. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by kfhickel · · Score: 1

      Sure, why not backup to a stripe set? My other machines abckup to this machine in case of component failure/stupidity. Sure the stripe set isn't 100% reliable, but unless fire/flood/nuke takes out my whole house, I've still got the data.

      Been using software stripe sets since windows NT first supported them. Never lost any data because of it (stupidity yes, to stripe failure, no).

    27. Re:PC-based DVRs have massive drawbacks... by kfhickel · · Score: 1

      Well, you don't have everything that I have, since I mentioned that my box served several other purposes as well. The box that I replaced with this new monster was an AMD XP 2900 with a gig or fam and 4 120gb drives. Quite a bit cheaper and good enough for quite a bit of use.

      I've had this server running for more than two years, so I would have spent more on the guide than you calculated.

      I have MUCH more storage that your setup, which is good because I'm building a big library of kids shows, which I keep "forever" as opposed to expiring things after I've watched them.

      The reason I went to the trouble of putting all the specs in was so that people could see that by downsizing it just a bit, they could get it for much less. Guess I should have said that.

  15. Not enough on TV to make it worth the effort.. by Sporkinum · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are around 4 shows a week our household likes to watch. If we miss one, I get it off of bittorrent. I'm sure they are fun and convenient, but just not worth it for the limited use. You know, if I really gave it enough thought, we would just do away with cable at $20/month and get our shows from the the 'net.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Not enough on TV to make it worth the effort.. by Free_Trial_Thinking · · Score: 1

      Can't the tv industry get your IP address off of bit-torrent and sue the pants off of you?

    2. Re:Not enough on TV to make it worth the effort.. by loraksus · · Score: 1

      #TVtorrents is down :(
      Know of any other good sources?

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    3. Re:Not enough on TV to make it worth the effort.. by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      try btefnet. Obviously, only use if downloading is legal in your jurisdiction.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    4. Re:Not enough on TV to make it worth the effort.. by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      I used to do this, and still do occasionally. Thing is, torrents follow the very latest season, whereas local broadcast can be on a different schedule. For example, ER is on series 11 in the states, and only series 10 in the uk. I'm using my DVR to grab series 10 off broadcast, so I stay in sync with what I've seen before, and I've got series 11 available for when I finish series 10. The same applies to the various CSI series.

      I used to think torrent was all I needed before I got my mythbox, but it's very nice to be able to record local programs that don't hit torrents; older movies, comedy, documentaries and political shows, or even soaps. I find I'm recording over a dozen extra things a week that I would either watch sporadically, or not at all.

      Now I can do it easily - things that often aren't available for download. Combine that with the DVD's I've ripped to disc, and when I want to watch something, I've always got half a dozen things cued up ready and waiting.
      The BBC did a nice special on Genghis Khan the other day that wouldn't go up on a torrent, and I couldn't have watched. I recorded it with two mouse clicks, far easier than setting a video machine.

      It's also very handy for when there's two things on TV - say a movie on one channel, and my usual show on another. Now I record one and watch the other. I'm seriously thinking of getting another tuner so I can record both, and watch at my leisure.

      Besides, ripping off TV is legal ;)

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  16. GOPchop for removing commercials? by Bryce · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since this uses the Hauppauge WinTV-PVR, I wonder if GOPchop can be used to delete out the commercials? GOPchop 1.1.6 just came out, adding a bunch of patches, and it sounds like the 1.2.0 release is around the corner. Also planned is adding some commandline operation mode, so in theory if you had a way to detect commercial breaks, maybe it could be set up to auto-skip? That'd be a neat trick.

    1. Re:GOPchop for removing commercials? by sokoban · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, one littel trick I ahve found to get rid of commercials is to Use Closed captioning as an indication. Most shows are closed captioned. Most commercials are not.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    2. Re:GOPchop for removing commercials? by spagetti_code · · Score: 1

      Mythtv already automatically detects and removes ads. Its pretty reliable too. Yes, its a neat trick.

  17. How to get a FREE DVR by AgNO3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Call current provider and say, "I'm thinking of switching to another provider because they will give me a free dvr. If you can match that I will stay with you." That's how we got our Dish netowork DVR. Which does 2 tvs. Recently talked to comcast about switching to them but said we want dvrs for 4 rooms. They said yes. (we want on demand feature from comcast) So will probably switch to Comcast when our dish contract is up in a month. Only reservation is that we hear comcast dvr sucks. Dish's is pretty nice.

    --
    OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    1. Re:How to get a FREE DVR by applef00 · · Score: 1

      Having just started seeing a girl who has the Comcast DVR, I can tell you that program quality is just fine and the interface is about as simple as one can wish for. Also, the box itself is fairly attractive.

      And yes, I did kind of post this just to be able to say on Slashdot that I've been seeing a girl.

    2. Re:How to get a FREE DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      peeking at your neighbor through your blinds isn't the same as dating

    3. Re:How to get a FREE DVR by applef00 · · Score: 1

      Shows what you know. She lives 40 miles away. I have to drive to her house to peek through the blinds.

  18. Fine Until by Phil06 · · Score: 1

    Fine until the people who make the content find out how easy and cheap it is to copy then clamp down with digital rights management included in the broadcast.

    --
    "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
  19. enough fucking PVR guides by fallendove · · Score: 0, Troll

    The geek community knows they exist thankyouverymuch

  20. but by sakura+the+mc · · Score: 0

    can i run mythtv on freebsd? never bothered to look, never used freebsd for such an application.

    also, does it defeat the broadcast flag bs thats supposed to go down in june(july?)?

  21. In my experience... by grolschie · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is currently no PVR software that allows capture to DVD. The ones that offer DVD burning, do it after the capture. Time consuming, not convenient. You still can't get close to the convenience of a box-top DVD recorder.

    Also, just don't buy a TV card (or AGP card with TV tuner) made by ATI. You'll have nightmares with drivers and ATI software like the rest of us ATI users do.

    1. Re:In my experience... by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if the software supported that feature, it would be a mistake to use it on most systems. DVD burning is something you have to do all at once, unless you're short of coasters. Running a lot of CPU intensive processes, such as recording and TV show and encoding it to DVD format, has a high liklihood of causing a fatal interruption. Maybe you could do it on a high-end system -- but a consumer DVD recorder is a lot cheaper.

    2. Re:In my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez I wish I'd read this 3 days ago. I bought an ATI tv wonder pro thinking it had ok driver support but in my haste, I didn't realize the "pro" part of the name implied it had a completely different chip inside, the os driver is barely a hello world program, and of course ati driver support is shit.

      I wrote a long rant at ati.com but the session timed out before I could submit and now I'm all pissed off and now am seesawing between trying to help write the driver and just jacking out 150 on a different card.

    3. Re:In my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All modern DVD burners have burn overrun protection. You can run as many CPU intense processes you want, the burn will only take a little longer.

    4. Re:In my experience... by gabebear · · Score: 4, Informative

      All modern DVD burners have burn overrun protection

      I've never seen a DVD burner without buffer underrun protection, but whenever I've ever burned something to fast and actually made use of that protection the DVD that it makes is either really picky about what drives it will work in or it will be a coaster. I've noticed the same thing with CDRs/CDRWs.

      Buffer underrun is nice, but it definately has serious drawbacks.

    5. Re:In my experience... by grolschie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Geez I wish I'd read this 3 days ago. I bought an ATI tv wonder pro thinking it had ok driver support but in my haste, I didn't realize the "pro" part of the name implied it had a completely different chip inside, the os driver is barely a hello world program, and of course ati driver support is shit.

      Yeah man. I bought an ATI Radeon 8500DV because it had a reasonable chip, TV encoder, real-time h/w mpeg encodering, teletext, firewire, etc. What a POS it is. I get rhythmic static coming through on all Nicam Stereo channels (using a roof aerial even) which makes the TV unwatchable. The problem is not there all the time, occasionally it will be fine. No logical cause that I can locate though.

      Their MMC software is flakey at best. Locks up, poor setup, etc, etc. Upgrading your drivers even to the latest WHQL drivers cause major nightmares. NEVER again will I buy ATI, or another TV tuner card. A box-top DVR with HD will be the go.

      I wrote a long rant at ati.com but the session timed out before I could submit and now I'm all pissed off and now am seesawing between trying to help write the driver and just jacking out 150 on a different card.

      Yes! Yes! I know the frustration. It happened to me. I had a couple of tickets open at ati.com. One issue was with their 98SE drivers which could not install properly. After frustration I upgraded to XP. They closed the ticket as being solved, yet upgrading OS when they should've fixed their software is not a solution for everyone.

    6. Re:In my experience... by TooManyNames · · Score: 1
      I don't know if you're wanting much more than a simple TV tuner card, but I have a Hauppauge WinTV card that works well enough. I've had it for a few years and when I bought it, it cost me ~$30 (it is just a basic card). Also, driver support has been decent for both Windows and Linux.

      The bundled TV viewer program could be better (WinTV 2000) as it sometimes crashes on full screen transitions, but overall it's pretty good. For Linux, TVtime is great.

      As for ATI cards, I've had issues with driver support all around... The hardware itself may be good, but the support is painfully lacking (especially with Linux). Anyway, I feel your pain when dealing with ATI.

      Good luck with your TV viewing.

      --
      "Is not a sentence" is not a sentence. Well damn.
    7. Re:In my experience... by Trepalium · · Score: 1
      When using Windows, I often had better luck (and usually better video) using the open source DScaler than Hauppauge's drivers and software. The only problem I've ever had with the software is it will eat up nearly all your CPU capacity even on a very fast machine. A fair bit of tvtime is based on dscaler.

      I don't buy ATI video input cards for a purely practical reason -- I hate paying a $100 premium for a card that I'll eventually upgrade and have to shell out that $100 premium again if I want to keep the same capabilities.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  22. Editing fun by TheMediaWrangler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use a 3rd party capture card for DVR just so I can make funny edits to clips from the shows that my friends watch. Can't do that with Tivo.

    --
    People should not fear what they do not understand; people should fear because they do not understand.
  23. ReplayTV by Mochatsubo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Before building your own PC-DVR, you should take a long look at Tivo or ReplayTV.

    For example. A 40GB ReplayTV unit is $99 + $299 activation. From there you can upgrade hard drive to a huge capacity for the cost of a bare drive. It takes 5 minutes to set up. The interface is serviceable. The GUI is adequate. Video quality is good. There are programs to get files from the Replay unit to your PC.

    It just works. And for god sakes it is just TV. You might save some money but you gotta ask yourself if it is really worth the time and energy.

    -w

    1. Re:ReplayTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone has access to those.

      People do live outside of America.

      So, yes - in many, many cases it is indeed worth the time and energy.

    2. Re:ReplayTV by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If everyone just buys things and never makes things, then we will become a dumb society with idiots everywhere depending on corporates with our skills being zero.

      Go tell your grandma to not spend 4hrs making that sweater or scalf, its only $8.99 at walmart, why waste 4hrs.

      Yes if your a rich prick with $180,000 in the bank, go buy all the shit you want. But many many people are not rich and have tonnes of hours on their hands and tonnes of skills too but perhaps no job for many reasons, perhaps they are disabled, or in a bad location, or need to take care of a baby.

      Besides do you really want to buy more chineese stuff and fund the chineese army?

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    3. Re:ReplayTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm...

      So it's gonna cost $400 minimum, and more if you want a decent-sized drive? Sorry, but $400 for a single-function box full of low-quality parts doesn't cut it. For that much I could put together a slightly out of date SFF PC with a decent capture card.

    4. Re:ReplayTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People do live outside of America.

      Unfortunately, they do. But the U.S. government is bombing them as fast as it can.

    5. Re:ReplayTV by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      Besides do you really want to buy more chineese stuff and fund the chineese army?

      You didn't know?

      Defense of capitalism is being out-sourced to China since the government of the USA is becoming too bankrupt to handle it.

      Since leading officials of the PRC are major stockholders in the world's fastest growing economy, they're buying into the idea.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  24. grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be "If you have an old computer that had been lying around"

    1. Re:grammar by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Why would you mix present and past perf together? I think you are mistaken.

  25. Make that $398 by antizeus · · Score: 1
    That's $99 for the box, and $299 for a lifetime subscription (or else about $13 a month if you don't get that).

    It's probably still worth it, though.

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
    1. Re:Make that $398 by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      The DirecTV Tivo's are $5/month for all of the Tivo's in your house. The boxes are $99 at full price. However, $200 just got me 3 DirecTV Tivos, 1 regular receiver, all 7 coax runs installed and the rest of the installation. If I'd only wanted 1 Tivo instead of 3, it would have all been free for taking a $40/month TV package which I pay for anyway.

  26. Set top boxes by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless I'm mistaken, all set top boxes that can record as they go- can't fit nearly the same length of video on a DVD as a PC can that encodes after the fact, for the simple reason that they can't pick the VBR

    (this was at least the case for some first gen machine I looked at)

    I'd rather have 2 hours & 10 mins of DVD that took 2-4 to encode, than 60 minutes recorded in real time...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Set top boxes by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure if you are tlaking about PVR's that have dvd burners or set-top dvd burners, but my set-top dvd machine can burn anywhere from 1 hour up to 10 hours on a disk (Although I've never tried more than the 4 hour setting since even at that setting it starts to look as bad as vhs).

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  27. ho hum...another boring day at Slashdot, huh? by FredThompson · · Score: 0, Troll

    First it was repetitive "imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!" posts.

    Then the BYO DVR posts.

    For a while, it appeared reposts of hackaday would take the top repetitive post topic.

    Well, it sure looks like the BYO DVR/MythTV/My-time-is-worthless posts are back in the top slot.

    Next up, make your own printer paper. It's "free" because your time is worthless.

    Bah! Why does this junk keep getting posted? Make a BYO-DVR-MythTV-my-time-is-worthless section to Slashdot and keep these out of the main page.

    1. Re:ho hum...another boring day at Slashdot, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I enjoyed building my dvr system , did it because i had the hardware and the interest, it maybe shocking but some people might find building and configuring stuff fun

    2. Re:ho hum...another boring day at Slashdot, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Fred! Sorry to hear about you! Condolences to the wife and kiddies!

      Seriously, man, no one said your time is worthless. Take a chill pill. How others spend their time is up to them. I, for one, like these posts on the main page of Slashdot.

      BTW, you missed one: I, for one, welcome our "my time is worthless", BYO DVR overlords!

    3. Re:ho hum...another boring day at Slashdot, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people don't place a dollar amount on their hobbies. Make no mistake, there are plenty of people on slashdot that enjoy building and tweaking with systems who don't mind putting in 20 hours on a pvr that does what they want it to. Some folks just want a pvr to record family guy. Some like the idea of having a divx library and an assortment of emulators/roms at their beck and call.

  28. But the missing piece is... by afabbro · · Score: 0
    ...the monthly guide, right? Am I missing something, or is the utility of a DVR without some kind of automatically-updated programming guide kind of missing the point?

    I am not much of a TV watcher, but if I could set a DVR to search for and grab old movies I want when they're on and tuck them away for a rainy day, then I'd be interested. But "pausing live TV" and such have little interest for me...

    So without a guide, your remaining option is to search the TV Guide or whatever yourself...right?

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:But the missing piece is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      USA-based mythtv users enjoy an "almost free" 14-days-ahead program guide courtesy of Zap2it; the price is every three months we have to fill out a 20 second online survey which asks about our TV viewing habits. no big deal, and no privacy issues a la TiVo.

      the program guide information which comes from Zap2it is high quality, complete with a lot of metadata, and covers all possible USA channels on all possible USA networks. a happy customer here.

    2. Re:But the missing piece is... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      if you follow the same path as the author of the article Snapstream provides guide/listing data for US/Canada as part of the package.

      SageTV provides listing data for US as part of it's package.

      As noted in another post, zap2it provides 14-day listing service (for US and possibly other areas) in exchange for doing a survey every so often (kinda like how redhat used to provide updates if you maintained an account and did a survey)

      Outside the US there's a plethora of XMLTV screen/web scraping plugins/etc for getting other guide data to your DIY PVR.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  29. Nonstandard. To lie. by Lariano · · Score: 1

    The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition considers "to lay" as an intransitive verb nonstandard usage. So let's let the

    "old computer that had been laying around" lie around instead.

    Source: http://www.answers.com/lay&r=67

    Just some friendly pedantry...

    1. Re:Nonstandard. To lie. by Joska · · Score: 1

      God bless you. I'm glad someone else cares.

    2. Re:Nonstandard. To lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fag

  30. Freevo by MHobbit · · Score: 1

    There's Freevo, an open-source PVR software. There's another way you could save even more money.

    --
    Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
    1. Re:Freevo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another PVR.

      http://fftv.sf.net/

  31. The Internet is my TiVo by qengho · · Score: 1

    Since I (finally!) got a broadband connection, I've been using BitTorrent to grab stuff I've missed. Despite the *AA's efforts, a few sites still provide torrents for TV shows. And I figure I'm not violating copyright if I download a show, watch it, and then trash it. The shows I really like, I'll buy the DVD later...

    1. Re:The Internet is my TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And I figure I'm not violating copyright if I download a show, watch it, and then trash it

      Well, then you're just deluding yourself. I doubt anyone could construct a moral argument against this, but it's silly to pretend that it's perfectly legal.

    2. Re:The Internet is my TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would this be any different than time-shifting? Sony v. Universal already established that's perfectly legal.

    3. Re:The Internet is my TiVo by loraksus · · Score: 1

      #TVtorrents is down :(
      Know of any other good sources?

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    4. Re:The Internet is my TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Umm, strange as it may sound, I have never downloaded a tv program etc. via torrent, but I do have two torrent aggregating sites bookmarked :)

      I've never tried these, and I think they might be relatively new sites, so caveat emptor I guess, but here you go:

      Torrent Typhoon

      IsoHunt.

      Apparently there is also a place called Pirate Bay or something, that is based in a European country that also has links to torrents.

      Again - never used any of them, but hope it helps? (Disclaimer: Information given in the anticipation that it is used for legal purposes only, natch :)

    5. Re:The Internet is my TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Just the delay/distance between the recording date/location and playback date/location are just a little bigger.

    6. Re:The Internet is my TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watching something for free on an air-tv channel, versus watching it for free from an [ILLEGAL!!!] bittorrent download:

      What difference is there anyway? Who really gives a care?

  32. That dell.... by Palal · · Score: 1

    That $299 Dell server is sounding better by the minute

    --
    -Palal
  33. My MythTV experience by DrJohnnie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I put together a mythtv system from an old computer; it was a way for me to learn more about linux.

    But, then after the motherboard went bad (bad caps.) I bought a new motherboard, processor, and memory ($159.) It wasn't "pretty" enough (girl friend didn't like the case next to the TV.) So I bought a silver stone case and power supply ($190.)

    Can't forget the two tuners; pvr-250 ($120) pvr-150 ($60.)

    Total $529...

    My ReplayTV, refurbished 5040, $350/with lifetime service.

    I paid $179 more for a homemade pvr and some linux experience. Not to mention a fun and frustrating hobby.

    I think it was worth it, but my girl friend prefers the replay.

    1. Re:My MythTV experience by KillShill · · Score: 1

      you should have replaced the girlfriend instead.

      oh who am i kidding, it'd be much harder for you to get a new gf. :)

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    2. Re:My MythTV experience by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Yes, you spent a lot of money on your home-brew box, but you certainly didn't need to.

      You can get a (black) desktop ATX cases very cheap (eg $40). You didn't really need a more-expensive PVR-250, you could have gone for 2 PVR-150s just as easily.

      In addition to the price though, you aren't screwed when ReplayTV goes out of business. You can edit and re-encode anything you capture. You can rip DVDs, CDs, etc. You can record any video to standard DVDs, SVCDs, etc. You can upgrade it to HDTV easily and without much expense. You can browse the web with it, you can hook up a second monitor and use it as a normal computer at the same time. You can put in as much disk space as you like, and as many drives as you want. Etc.

      It cost me about $400, total, and 2 weeks to setup my PC DVR (not with MythTV. With webvcr+, mplayer, etc), Now, I've been using it for about 2 years, it takes only minor modifications to get it to switch from analog cable, to digital cable, to satellite, to OTA.

      It's no-doubt saved me a LOT of time and money, since I use it instead of my desktop system to do all the encoding, ripping, downloading, viewing, etc. Just the money I've saved on burnt-out computer monitors over that time makes it worth it. It's really saved me lots of time, since I keep the two completely seperate, which simplifies both systems greatly. My desktop is easy to back-up now that it only has a 40GB hard drive, instead of a couple hundred GBs.

      It's made a huge difference, and I'd recomend spending a little bit of time and money up-front to save themselves more time and money later. Plus, you find that watching/editing/encoding/copying/ripping is MUCH easier and more plesant.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:My MythTV experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It wasn't "pretty" enough (girl friend didn't like the case next to the TV.) So I bought a silver stone case

      Was it one of those Alicia Silverstone cases? Those are nice looking!

  34. another thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can do with the PC is hooke another PC/PS2/xbox and the likes and make what i call "Worlds greatest moments in gaming: A Snapshot of history"

  35. Digital Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this work with a digital cable box? Can you use it to view the channels on digital cable (e.g. HBO, etc.)?

    Any info about it working with the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 3200 would be appreciated.

  36. You missed one big drawback by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    Forget about DVD players; do any DVRs have DVD burners? If you're enough of a TV fan to want a DVR in the first place, odds are there are at least a couple TV shows you enjoy enough to want to archive indefinitely or take to friends' houses. MythTV doesn't do DVD or DVD-ROM burning itself yet, but if you're willing to go outside the Myth interface there's other free software capable of doing the rest.

    1. Re:You missed one big drawback by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      Yes. TiVo sells a Humax made one.

    2. Re:You missed one big drawback by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Informative

      "MythTV doesn't do DVD or DVD-ROM burning itself yet, "

      Uh, yeah, it does. Five seconds with google just proved it.

  37. HD DVR by mgbaron · · Score: 1

    Can anyone recommend a good hdtv tv card? I'm curious about building one of these and have several questions about it.

    How much hard drive spaces does and hd feed take up per hour?

    What software is compatible with HD (I'm flexible with windows or linux)?

    Thanks

    1. Re:HD DVR by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1


      I'm in the initial stages of building one - I've got the video decoder/encoder chips on order from Analog Devices, and I'm going to use a 'soft' CPU in an FPGA for the main cpu. I can use the rest of the FPGA fabric for an ide controller and (initially JPEG, then mpeg2 or H.264) hardware encoder/decoder. My calculations predict ~14 hours of HD on a 400GB drive using JPEG, and ~100 hours when I upgrade it to H.264.

      With luck it ought to come to ~6 chips (inc. ethernet) + some discreet components and an HD. Cost ought to be ~$200 when I've finished - don't hold your breath though, it'll take me a while to code up a verilog H.264 design. I've done most of the other verilog components before though.

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    2. Re:HD DVR by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      Although space cowboy is proposing an intriguing future option... there are OTA ATSC HDTV cards out there i.e. cards that can pick up local broadcast DTV via antenna. Some of these cards have support to pull unencrypted QAM "encoded" (not quite the right term) via digital cable box...

      Also as noted, you can try and pull the HD content over firewire from your digital cable STB...

      The HD feed hard drive space question really depends on several factors... I don't know off hand but it can definitely fill a drive quick (for comparison's sake a modest quality mpeg2 SDTV recording is like 2gigs/hour)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    3. Re:HD DVR by mgbaron · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an interesting project. Good luck!

      H.264 will do great things for the HD consumer. 100 hours!

      I wonder if there is a web repository out there for people attempting projects such as yours. You should definitely post some pictures etc when you finish.

    4. Re:HD DVR by mgbaron · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I wasn't aware that the current situation for HD DVR was so grim. I suppose it all makes sense given the amount of bandwith and the file sizes.

    5. Re:HD DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently purchased a MyHD MDP-130 and have been very pleased with it. It cost $250 off DigitalConnection. As far as I know, it only works with its own proprietary bundled software, but it works great. It comes with a bundled IR remote that works very well too.

      The card is fully hardward-based too. And is capable of outputting either RGB or YPbPr. It'll also upscale any content it plays, so I can get my DVDs at 1080i as well as any regular MPEG files I throw at it.

      I think it does about 5 GB / 30 min., but I don't quite recall.

  38. Or... by SFSouthpaw · · Score: 1

    You could just go to http://btefnet.net/

    --
    ---southpaw
  39. Tivo doesn't work out of the box. by baomike · · Score: 1

    You have to pay them each month.
    It would not handle our Sat receivers (dish UHF).
    You either but the TIVO with the Sat recv, or in the room with the TV. If with the Sat Recv. IR doesn't work with the TIVO. IF with the TV the Tivo can't control the sat recv.

    Great machine other than that.

    1. Re:Tivo doesn't work out of the box. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using TiVo with DirecTv for 5 years. There's a direct cable connection that changes the satellite channels. No problem...

  40. PVR-250 well supported by neckjonez · · Score: 1

    the Hauppauge PVR-250 that the guy uses is well supported under mythtv...but he did want "off the shelf" and mythtv is pretty far from OTS (approaching...RSN)

    1. Re:PVR-250 well supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already a Knoppix version of MythTV. I don't think it can get any easier than that for a homebrew project!

  41. My DIY PVR by xchino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For most people I would recommend just buying a tivo or something off the shelf like that, but if you're a true geek you're going to want a mythtv system. I spent about ~$1,000 total on mine, but it's the nicest PVR me or my friends have ever come across. It's actually more of a media center than just a PVR. Here's the basic setup..

    First I didnt want some clunky beige case sitting beside my TV looking akward, so I opted for a home theater PC case, specifically this one.

    I've got two Hauppauge PVR-500's, which are dual tuner cards, so I have a total of 4 tuners (this way I can record 4 different shows at once if they happen to be broadcast simultaneosly. This comes in handy durin g prime time when you would otherwise be forced to pick between different shows.

    The rest of the hardware is nothing special, a soyo kt400 mb, 512M ram, athlon 2100+, and a geForce fx 5200. Not a top of the line system by any means, but not bad at all. Probably overkill for doing the PVR stuff, but I do alot more with it than just that.

    The software is where it really gets interesting. I use gentoo on most of my machines, and this one was no different, mythtv as well as several plugins are already in portage and installed hassle free. MythTV acts as my front end to TV, weather, DVD's/Movies, Games, etc. I scripted a little GTK frontend to all my emulators and roms, so my PVR is also a NES, SNES, SMS, N64, PSX, etc. (now you see why I needed that GeForce :P) It server as my fileserver and mp3 jukebox, and can stream all of it's data (video,tv,music) to any other PC in my house. I can browse tv listings and schedule show recordings through a web interface from anywhere.

    So all in all I spent about 4 times more than a Tivo and got about 20 times more out of it. Not a bad deal I'd say...

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    1. Re:My DIY PVR by PsychoKiller · · Score: 1

      How is the PVR-500 support in Linux? Last I saw, it was listed as experimental/buggy.

  42. Let's not loose our grasp on standard usage. by Urusai · · Score: 0

    Its important to maintain proper grammer.

    1. Re:Let's not loose our grasp on standard usage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world could end, otherwise. Pedantry will be rewarded in the afterlife, right??!

  43. only problem i see by scottmm01 · · Score: 1

    is Non of the doit yourself DVR's support DirectTV due to the fact no TV card decodes the dish signal. (MAKE A DIRECTTV card reader TV CARD) that would be the only reason to go back to comcast

  44. Surprised with Responses by gradster79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While a PVR has been just out of reach for me in the past couple months, I have a great desire in building one. I was assuming that when I clicked on this thread I would see all kinds of people telling all the different creative solutions they had to making PVRs and the ways to do it. Instead there is a big discussion on whether a PVR or a TIVO or cable provider solution is better. I thought that most of the Slashdot users were all about bringing down "the man". So most people sided with TIVO? I've seen plenty of Google criticism here on Slashdot, but no one mentioned in this thread anything about Google and TIVOs potential partnership. I also assumed most Slashdot readers would have an older 1Ghz machine lying around doing nothing that they could devote to being a TIVO. Not to mention the option of having the all sacred open source software that is so loved her on Slashdot.

  45. Or you could have HDTV with no monthly fee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your choice.

    Tivo is a good choice for some, but it's not for everyone. I don't like monthly fees. I'd rather pay up front and own (and control!) a solution tailored to my needs. So now I have a MythTV box that records and plays HDTV and standard analog TV, plays and burns DVDs, plays music, and is as flexible as I want it to be. I've programmed it from 2500 miles away via ssh. But it's the wrong solution for my brother. He has different needs.

    Everyone knows about Tivo by now. You don't need to remind them anymore. People choose other solutions because they don't want a Tivo.

  46. Re:only problem i see by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    See my post above re: the HD DVR. I'm intending to take a feed from the Y,Cb,Cr (or R,G,B) signals that are the end-result *after* all the decoding by the encrypted cable/dish network/whatever. Digitise, compress, store, and play, all in hardware :-)

    The Analog Devices input chip I'm planning on using has up to 3 (non-simultaneous) HD inputs of Y,Cb,Cr as well as various SD options. The encoder chip has colourspace conversion of RGB->Y,Cb,Cr and has an RGB overlay input - you'd think they'd designed it for a DVR [grin]

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  47. BYOPVR.COM by RedR · · Score: 1

    Hey folks, To cap this off I thought I would mention a site called byopvr.com that helps the general community find their way into selecting hardware, software and configs with Windows and Linux PVR solutions. I've been at it with my own PVR for a bit over 6mo now and thanks to the byopvr.com site I got the setup supporting all the features I wanted from my PVR (weather, web site scheduling, comskip, mp3 support, DVD support) using SageTV with custom plugins (Thanks Cayars and nielm). Check out the site if you are interested in getting your own PVR together, I am sure you'll find there are lots of solutions, some even for free (MythTV, GB-PVR, media portal). Enjoy, RedR

  48. Which DVR lets you network to it and play your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I havent seen a reasonably priced DVR that lets you network it and play your own videos through it. Even one that lets you mount nfs/smb/etc would be cool. Or, even a hackable DVR! Under $200 of course!

  49. Snapstream by wolf- · · Score: 1

    I'm a registered (paid) BeyondTv user. I still run version 3.4 (Build 1334) as it is the latest version to support the writing to divx encoded avis internally. Its buggy. Every 2 weeks the .NET routines die, and it won't update the guide. This means that shows don't get recorded.

    Sure I could update to the 3.5x to solve this problem, but Snapstream removed divx support internally in that and all versions to date. That leaves users to throw a bunch of batch files together, hunt down 3rd party apps to do a function that was IN the software when it was sold.

    Sure MPEG 2 is nice, but not all of us write to DVDs. And the alternative, WMV, truly bites.

    Before you buy, I would STRONGLY suggest that you visit their support groups.
    Some functionality only works with hardware based encoders and other functions only work with software based encoders.

    --
    ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    1. Re:Snapstream by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      Snapstream and SageTV and Meedio (major 3rd party commercial PVR software vendors) all have trial periods and it behooves you to try before you buy.

      Both to see which software "feels" right to you and to make sure it performs well on your hardware.

      Not sure what to tell you re: your issue. I assume you have a software encoding card if you're recording right to divx (unless you have a plextor convertx). I usually record in MPEG2 even if i'm not going to move something over to DVD, but then again I have all harware encoding cards, so I have little choice in the matter.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  50. Re:only problem i see by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    " is Non of the doit yourself DVR's support DirectTV due to the fact no TV card decodes the dish signal. (MAKE A DIRECTTV card reader TV CARD) that would be the only reason to go back to comcast"

    well this is true, if you're doing SDTV and can stomach going from Digital -> Analog -> Digital... you can certainly hook up a direcTV STB with a homebrew PVR. Run the video/audio out to the video/audio in on the tuner/encoder card, use a serial/low speed port cable (or IR blaster) to change the set top box channels and Voila!

    *Shrug*

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  51. MythTV and a Small Form Factor can work well. by JustinCredible · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I built a MythTV box using an Asus Pundit.
    http://www.asus.com/products/desktop/pundit/overvi ew.htm
    The Pundit is a small form factor all in one that looks a lot like any other home theatre component when turned on its side and is quiet too. While it can be a nuisance to set up MythTV, once it is working, it will continue to work well. You just have to make sure all your hardware is linux compatible and works together well.

    There are a lot of nice things you can do with it. Watching any movies or music is simple as they can just be transferred over via a wireless network. SAMBA can be used to share stuff. Emulators for lots of different systems can be used. You also don't have to pay for any service like you do with TiVo or the other companies. Of course, it will record TV as well.

    The main complaints I saw were it would be noisy, unable to record more than one channel at once, ugly form factor, bad UI, and bad tv listings. The pundit isn't noisy or ugly. MythTV will record more than one show at a time, you just need another tuner. MythTV also has a very nice UI, MUCH better than the regular cable DVRs I have seen. Listings come from Zap2It and are very reliable.

    I think the notion is that you just build a DVR out of the scrap that is in your closet. If you do that, sure, it will be ugly and loud. But if you spend a little more for a pundit or similar system it will work out very well.

    A big problem is HD recording though. I will be getting a DVR from my cable company to record HD now because getting HD recording to work with Myth looks scary and expensive. So if anyone wants to buy a slighty used MythTV box, email me at QwQw at earthlink doot net!

    1. Re:MythTV and a Small Form Factor can work well. by chip33az · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a PC that I use as a server for the house and it also has MythTV installed on it.

      I have wanted to get a small PC for the kitchen since I have a TV there and watch quite a bit of TV during dinner.

      I'll have to look at the Pundit. I was interested in the VIA EPIA since Fry's Electronics sell the mobo, but they don't sell a case for them ARGH! The model I was looking for was quiet since it is fanless, but still has MPEG2 decoder for playback.

      Perhaps I'll have to check another Fry's in town...

  52. Free Win32 PVR by topside420 · · Score: 1
    Here at work, we have an bt878 card in one of the windows machines in the NOC to watch TV.

    I'd love to be able to run some type of PVR software on here. I tried BeyondTV however after registering for a trial account it never lets me log in so I can never download the programming for my area.

    As far as MythTV. It looks great...too bad my TV tuner is on a windows box.

    1. Re:Free Win32 PVR by niai · · Score: 1

      Try MediaPortal - "Media Portal turns your PC in a very advanced Multi MediaCenter / HTPC. It allows you to listen to your favorite music & radio, watch your video's and DVD's, view, schedule and record live TV and much more. You get Media Portal for free/nothing/nada/noppes and best of all it is opensource. This means anyone can help developing Media Portal or tweak it for their own needs!".

    2. Re:Free Win32 PVR by halleluja · · Score: 1
      Be sure to checkout http://btwincap.sourceforge.net/ for alternate (excellent) drivers.

      Out here, in the Netherlands, there is nothing worth capturing, so I'll go and enjoy the weather.

  53. Various hauppauge cards: what's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking at the various cards on the hauppauge website. The three main PCI cards(150, 250 and the 350) boast identical feature lists. So what is the difference between these cards?

  54. Build a DVR? That is so lame! by fliptout · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I want to build my own motherboard!
    And I want it to support one P4 Extreme edition, one Athlon 64, and one Ultrasparc. And I need to use all these 72 pin simms I have laying around.. So, I will need about 81 SIMM slots. Yes, 81. Oh, xga graphics, too.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  55. Myth vs MP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MythTv is ok and all, I mean it works.
    But if you have a XP licence lying around I would go for Media Portal.
    The guy's on this project are serieusly building a xbox media center like system that can record from 7 channels at once without a problem.
    It uses xmltv and takes about 10 min. to set up.
    I does need a pretty hefty videocard and I would not run it without 512 megs of memory but it's got everything I wanted from a dvr.
    Get yourself a MCE 2005 remote (MP has support for this out of the box) and a MCE150 hauppauge card.
    MP can use the dscaler codecs and can even use ffd post processing if your cpu has the grunt for it.

    stefan

  56. This isn't totally pointless but... by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It costs me $71.40 to rent the DVR on top of my usual cable subscription... (yes, which subsidizes the DVR cost...) but at $71.40 a year, HDTV capability and no up front or program listing costs... It's worth the money. Now if I wanted an extra DVR for just grabbing regular television you bet I'd tinker with a homebuilt solution. It's a great learning exercise, but not for everyone.

  57. GBPVR!!! by jsrockford · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised there is not more talk about GBPVR (www.gbpvr.com). I use it on my everyday workstation with a Hauppauge PVR-250 in conjunction with a networked Hauppauge MediaMVP connected to my TV. From my couch I can pull up the GBPVR server on the MediaMVP, select what to record or watch, check the weather, read Slashdot headlines, listen to Net radio stations, and more. Free (as in beer) software with great support and lots of additional development community plug-ins. When I was looking at building my own PVR this software was the only package that had it all. I don't need a dedicated box, doesn't slow down my system, is feature rich and works seemlessly with the MediaMVP...what more can you ask?

  58. No good for UK digital satellite by Danj2k · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, homebrew DVRs are not much good for using with digital satellite in the UK... the main reason being that Sky (the satellite company) does not produce or allow any other company to produce CAMs to allow third party products to decrypt their service. So if you want an all-digital DVR, you have to sign up for their Sky+ service and pay £199 (or whatever ridiculous amount they're charging now) for a Sky+ box.

    Digital terrestrial on the other hand is another matter, though currently the number of channels available on it is pitiful compared to Sky. TopUpTV do appear to produce CAMs for their service, so it should theoretically be possible to homebrew a DVR capable of running off it. Pity there's not anything any good on...

    1. Re:No good for UK digital satellite by mikeydb · · Score: 1

      If you're willing to re-align your dish you can receive some channels FTA from other european broadcasters, however free german TV isn't really worth it. I have a UK freeview based PVR and it's worthwhile, but I still need some kind of long-term DVD based storage solution to replace VHS, with only 40Gb available on the PVR, I can easily fill this thing up within a week and still not get round to watching what I want to watch, mostly because I'm away from home often.

    2. Re:No good for UK digital satellite by dawnread · · Score: 1, Funny
      "free german TV isn't really worth it"

      I heartily disagree, I look back wistfully to my years with RTL on a Saturday night... ;)

  59. You missed one big bnenefit by rlauzon · · Score: 1

    The DVD playback is region free. I picked up Kung Fu Hustle on DVD months ago (Region 3), but it plays just fine on my MythTV setup.

    1. Re:You missed one big bnenefit by jdray · · Score: 1

      Is that dependent on the DVD-ROM drive, or is it a software thing? I occasionally run across movies that I want to own on DVD that are not available in Region 1. I wouldn't mind buying them if I could slurp them up and burn them to a Region 1-compatible DVD-R. Or, for that matter, leave them resident on a hard drive.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    2. Re:You missed one big bnenefit by rlauzon · · Score: 1

      It's a software thing. The region encoding is just a bogus way for the MPAA to "control" where movies are purchased.

  60. You are correct sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason people get confused about this is that there are two verbs 'to lie', each with different inflected forms.

    In present tense, the two verbs are conjugated the same:

    1a.) Bush lies about weapons of mass destruction.

    1b.) My dog lies in her own excrement.

    In past tense, the conjugated forms differ:

    2a.) Clinton lied about taking advantage of a woman half his age.

    2b.) Her tender bosom heaving, the young intern lay upon the hallowed floor of the Oval Office.

  61. Extra time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And with a Linux-friendly capture card, MythTV would save the builder $70.) "

    Yeah, and it would also be a much bigger pain in the ass for the average person to use.

  62. Re:your time is worthless? by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    If your time is so valuable, why are you watching tv? The time spent geeking around learning how to make stuff work so that you can record tv is subtracted from the time spent watching crap tv because you haven't got perfect timeshifting. You aren't suggesting there is more good content than you have time to watch, are you?

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  63. Loud by SavvyPlayer · · Score: 1

    I did this for several months, but the sound of the PC's fans in many cases interfered with the overall quality of the 5.1 theater. To really do this properly, you'd need a watercooled system, or one of these: http://www.logicsupply.com/product_info.php/cPath/ 49/products_id/166?referrer=googleAd

    Other factors to consider:

    1. Running a PC 24x7x365 adds to the cost of the solution, as PVRs consume a far less power.
    2. The sound of the PC's fan in ones family room 24x7 can grow tiresome quickly.
    3. The inconvenient lack of a proper remote control cannot be understated.
  64. $1800+ is not the 'cheap' DVR of the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The position I'm in right now is that US $1820 is still a lot of money that (a) I do have, but can't really afford to spend on that sort of thing, and (b) Amn't into TV enough to want to spend that sort of time and money on it.

    There's a fair chance I'll be moving several times in the next few years; the basement isn't necessarily an option (though I could shut it in a closet or something).

    *More importantly*... no offence, but what you described, value-for-money or not (that depends on what you want- in your case it probably is, in mine, probably not) is EXPENSIVE considering that the nature of the original article was a CHEAP DVR.

    My argument was really with that original article. Of course, if you are into it enough, and willing to spend the money, you can get a PC-based solution that is *way* better than an off-the-shelf DVR. But if all you want is something fairly cheap, the PC isn't really the ideal solution some may consider it to be unless you happen to have a small, quiet, decently-powered box lying idle. (And if cheap is your aim, those 4 MediaMVP boxes add up to way more than I can get a cheap standalone DVR for. So it *will* have to go beside the TV).

    1. Re:$1800+ is not the 'cheap' DVR of the article... by kfhickel · · Score: 1

      Except that you're proving my point. The post I was responding to was talking about why PC based DVR/PVRs are no good. I pointed out one reason why they are better than standalone ones. So, you are comparing a single stand alone DVR to the whole house networked DVR that is the entire premis of my post.

      I never said do PC based if you're trying to get a single cheap solution. In that case, if you have a cable company that offers them, just get one from them, that's the cheapest.

  65. I bought a TiVo which "just works" by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    About 3 or 4 years ago. A great investment. It just worked out of the box and apart from upgrading the disks to 250Gb soon after I got it I haven't had to touch it. Much more useful than a video recorder.

    It's single best feature though which none of the others seem to have is the auto recording of stuff it thinks I might like. It searches through all the crap on all the channels and does a fairly good job of picking out the gems.

    The next best feature, again of which the others only seem to have a limited subset is the "season pass", tell it to record an entire season of a show and it goes and does it.

    Is it the cheapest? Well maybe, maybe not, it certainly isn't expensive compared to the competition. But super size you if all you know is McDonalds.

    --
    Deleted
  66. Lie/lay grammar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lay" takes an object: "Lay down your hammer."
    "Lie" doesn't: "Come, lie down."
    So dogs and old computers can by lying around, not laying around.

  67. Another free one: mediaportal by grolschie · · Score: 1
  68. This was an excelent idea. :) by boundless · · Score: 1

    For those who have parts to an extra pc øying around doing nothing, this was an nice idea for building your own PVR for personal use. :)

    --
    -- Kimme Utsi
  69. i recall... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    a freeware dvr system for windows that had a name very similar to mythtv...

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    1. Re:i recall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That would be MyTV

      http://www.mytv.free.fr/

  70. VDR by H9000 · · Score: 1

    Hi, do not forget VDR is't far better than most other solutions regarding DVB. my 0.2 cent

  71. i'm a geek too, but c'mon, value your time. by brentcastle · · Score: 1

    While I've done some completely pointless projects, I've got to say don't waste your time on this one. Its not like its technically challenging to build your own system. Its not geeky, its still just following pre-written instructions. Buy a damn TiVo and work on something more interesting...

    --
    http://www.brentcastle.com
  72. There's only one reason I'd make a DVR... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    ...and that's the Freedom and openness of a linux-based DVR system. Upgradeable kernel, upgradeable DVR software (including future codecs), upgradeable hardware, and reliable online tech. support.

    If you just want something that plays your DVRs for a few years until it hits the end of it's product lifecycle, then yes: there's probably no benefit in a custom-built solution. However, when you factor in those things above, a Linux based DVR starts to look pretty good.

  73. Re:Braindead, thy name is MythTV by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1
    Yes, MythTV can be a bit of a pain to setup, and yes, driver support for some cards is bad.

    Having spent about 100 hours trying to get KnoppMyth and MythTV working on my system, my advice to everyone is this: don't!

    KnoppMyth has bugs(*), MythTV has bugs(*), the drivers have bugs(*), the hardware has bugs(*), the documentation is contradictory, the right documentation is hard to find, and the people on the mailing lists are generally unresponsive and unhelpful even when they do respond.

    I did all the research, looked at all the reports of how people had done it, for months. I bought the best supported TV card (PVR 350), had a reasonably fast system (900 mhz), and used the most up-to-date versions of everything.

    My system is currently workable: it only crashes about once a week and it doesn't play DVD's yet (more hours to spend...) but for the pricetag and the number of hours I spent, I would have been far happier paying $200 for a TIVO and $300 for the lifetime subscription.

    My recommendation: do NOT build your own PVR. You could be very lucky, or it could turn into the most time consuming, annoying hobby you have.

    *) KnoppMyth didn't work with my network card (other Linux distros do, I still don't know what the problem was). This is not a biggie, except that the distro *halted on install*, forcing me to spend hours trying to figure out the problem. A simple "this card doesn't seem to work with this distro" would have been wayyyy too helpful.

    *) Some of the MythTV setup pages plot the "next/prev" buttons below the bottom of the screen... where you can't see them. Only happens on some of the pages, but it makes navigating the setup screens a challenge.

    *) Newer hauppage PVR cards come with new version tuners (type 42 et. al.). There's a driver that detects the tuner type, and another that takes "tuner type" as an argument. These drivers don't work together - I had to recompile the 2nd driver and force the tuner type in code. There's tons of messageboard entries from people who are having trouble with this. (Do *you* know how to debug driver modules in the kernel? You will...)

    *) Getting TV-Out working is relatively easy, only had to spend 4 hours figuring this one out. Requires knowledge of lspci, pasting obscure numbers into obscure X-windows config files. Oh, and there was confusion as to whether the obscure X-window file wanted hex or decimal.

    *) The VIA chip on my motherboard will hang the system when run at close to top DMA speed. This is apparently a common problem, as the VIA chip in question is common. Nothing I can do but accept the fact that the system will lock up occasionally, and hope that the people at VIA technology will spend any time looking into this (they don't have to - no one else but PVR people are reporting this problem). The messageboards show a lot of people having this problem as well.

    *) Google "IVTV" and you'll find the official page and the wiki. Which one is current, and which one has outdated information that will cause grief and aggravation? The answer is, as always, left as an exercise to the reader.

    *) Google "MythTV setup" or "KnoppMyth setup" and the like and you'll find many pages of people telling you how they managed to get their system up and running. Unfortunately, all of these pages refer to out of date versions of the software, and the software has changed so much in the last 3 to 6 months that the information is no longer valid. (Note: The correct information is contained in a messageboard post on one of the Wiki's somewhere. Good luck finding it!)

  74. Working on a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am currently trying to get MythTV to work and am having problems (but that is beside the point, I'm learning as I go). My eventual goal is to build another computer to set in the living room for watching and recording TV (as well as playing DVDs). I have already purchased 2 pcHDTV HD-3000 cards to that end. (I plan to have an all-digital dual-tuner setup).

    I have also been working on a Basic Stamp project to turn the computer on by remote control and at set times (using a dsPocketWatch module). I had the computer-on-by-remote working within an hour of receiving the parts. I am still trying to figure out the best way to synchronize the dsPocketWatch module (via the Stamp) with the computer's real-time clock (I may wind up doing this on power-down). I'll probably have to hack into MythTV to figure out a way of sending the programmed time to the dsPocketWatch (also via the Stamp) as well (probably to turn the computer on several minutes before a scheduled recording).

    I'll probably begin the build in June. (After spending over $300 on the HD-3000 cards and another $300 on the Basic Stamp and assorted parts, I'm hesistant to spend the extra on the computer parts right away.)

  75. Dude, seriously. by mckwant · · Score: 1

    Who the hell are these people?

    "Oh, I just happened to scrape together a 2.5GHz Athlon, 1GB of RAM, and 4 300GB drives for this. I mean, they were just lying around...."

    or, from that guy who put together the digital window:

    "Yeah, I had eight 15" LCDs, so I put a wood frame over them, and had them simulate a window on an interior wall."

    Don't get me wrong. Some of these ideas are great, but I don't know how one gets the hardware. At my WORST hardware hoarding stage, the best I could've come up with was multiple monitor support. I had a lot of RageIIs hanging around.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  76. What kind of card did you get? by billstewart · · Score: 1
    OK, you spent $6 on a card. Cool. What kind of card is it, and what features does it have? (Especially, is it analog or digital, and is it HDTV or regular resolution?) How's the picture quality? Some people have commented that the fancier cards have MPEG-2 encoding/decoding hardware, which makes a big difference if you're using a fanless 800 MHz machine, but 2+GHz Celerons are pretty much free these days, which helps make up for it.

    Are you able to do vaguely TiVo-like recording (I haven't used mplayer, and only briefly looked at the docs, so I don't know how much it can do besides "start recording/playing now".) Are there data feeds that let you do things like "Record every show of Boston Legal", or only "Record channel 7 every Sunday night at 10pm"?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:What kind of card did you get? by biryokumaru · · Score: 1
      It's some chinsy card made in taiwan (with the appropriately accompanying poorly translated manual) called "PV-951TF" but it works fine as an analog tv tuner, and has an RCA video plug (at whatever resolution those do, I use it for my old japanese Playstation). I don't know about the resolution, but it just does normal tv (Not HDTV).

      If I wanna record some show at some time I just set up a cronjob like "Channel X From X:XX to X:XX," like you say. It's not very hard to do that.

      I've mostly just used it for normal TV viewing and copying all my old VHS tapes to digital (ever heard of "The Wizard of Light and Sound?"). It doesn't really have "Pause live TV" but I don't think I'd ever want that, anyways.

      I only have basic cable, but I don't think it'd be a problem to hook it up to a cable box. If I didn't like the quality of the tuner, I could just go through my VCR or any other external tuner to the RCA input for higher quality.

      I don't think the $150 cards have "Record every show of Boston Legal" capacity either... though, you could write a perl script to parse some website with tv listings on it and then have it pick from that fi you really wanted... that'd be pretty easy...

      In short, it turns my computer into a normal TV/VCR combo, which seems to have all the relevant functionality of TiVo.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  77. Software for removing Republicans? Cool! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Sounds like GOPchop is just like what we need around here :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  78. We're talking about *television* here by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Sure, if everybody just buys things and doesn't make things, we'll be couch potatoes who spend all our time in front of the TV. I suppose that making a DVR is good because it makes you spend some number of hours hassling with stupid device drivers from cretinous closed-source manufacturers instead of spending those hours watching television, but you'll probably get finished with that in a few days and be back in front of your TV again :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  79. Re:Braindead, thy name is MythTV by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    "KnoppMyth has bugs(*), MythTV has bugs(*), the drivers have bugs(*), the hardware has bugs(*), the documentation is contradictory, the right documentation is hard to find, and the people on the mailing lists are generally unresponsive and unhelpful even when they do respond.

    I did all the research, looked at all the reports of how people had done it, for months. I bought the best supported TV card (PVR 350), had a reasonably fast system (900 mhz), and used the most up-to-date versions of everything. "

    I'm sorry you had such a horrible experience...

    But a few points of contention... the pvr350 is NOT the most well supported card, the pvr250 is. Ironically, the hardest part of the install (dealing with the pvr350's TV out) was the easiest for you.

    You've got a good point about the coherency/cohesiveness of the documentation out there. Although the best guide I've seen is jarod's fedora core mythtv guides

    I can't speak for the mailing lists, but in general I try to cultivate a helpful community in the byopvr forum, I lurk/search the mailing lists and seemed pretty helpful IMHO.

    What 900mhz system? is it a mini-itx EPIA board? I know recent knoppmyth builds have gotten better at supporting those boards.

    Building a DVR isn't for everyone, and sometimes with some combinations of hardware and software you can fall into a crack like the above poster...

    Would it be blasphemy to suggest that you consider a windoze solution, perhaps GBPVR (which is free as in beer)?

    Good luck, and my condolences on your fustrating experience...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  80. you are mistaken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lie and lay are two words that seem to cause some of the greatest confusion, even among those versed in English grammar. Lie means to recline; lay, on the other hand, means to put or place something. Lay is a transitive verb, meaning that there is always an object after it. (Lay the book on the shelf. Book is the object.) The principle parts of lie and lay are listed below."

    1. Re:you are mistaken by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      It should be "If you have an old computer that had been lying around"
      It should be "If you have an old computer that has been lying around" or "If you had an old computer that had been lying around"

      You are mistaken. My comment was about tense. Read it again.

  81. Okay, prove it to me then by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    My five seconds with Google came up with pages showing you how to burn MythTV files to DVD using avidemux2, nuvexport, transcode, or a few other programs.

    Are all of these pages out of date? Because, you see, the reason they were written is that there was no way to burn DVDs directly from MythTV itself, thus forcing us to use third-party programs to convert MythTV's files into something a DVD player might understand. I'm not saying this is impossible (I use avidemux2 myself), just that it's not part of MythTV and so not integrated into the user interface. It's hard to run transcode from a remote control. Maybe ease of use isn't a problem for you, but it's important for a lot of people - that's why showing people MythTV even impresses Tivo owners, whereas explaining how I could record TV shows with cron and "cat /dev/video0" just got me funny looks.

    But hey, maybe I just haven't explored MythTV's menus enough yet. Which entry gets me to the DVD burner interface?

  82. Just did this last week (MythTV) by anakin513 · · Score: 1

    I just converted my old Dell P3-800 to a MythTV backend server. There are two components to the MythTV setup. You can run the backend, which handles all the scheduling, recording and media management, requiring you to setup a frontend system somewhere, that can be a Mac (works great on my ibook, streamed live television on my 802.11g) or PC, or even XBox (xbmcmythv project on SF.net).

    I setup the box purely as a backend system recording with a Hauppauge PVR-150MCE capture card, and then use my XBox running XBox Media Center as the viewing end.

    I particularly like the feature of auto-skipping commercials. After MythTV is done recording, it scans the recording and flags all the commercials, allowing you to skip right by them with out ever picking up the remote. I didn't have that on my last PVR. Plus, now I'm not bound by how I get my television (Antenna, Cable, Digital Cable, Sat) since the MythTV setup will work with any of those.

    There is a nice packaged install out there for Fedora Core 3 users. Plus this handy walkthrough, for installing FC3 and MythTV http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/

    Helped me out a lot, and made life really easy.

  83. Old Computer? WTF?!? by tedgyz · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    I started with an old PC ... [snip diatribe about new mobo] ... After getting the PC back up and running with this hardware, I had a pretty decent machine with a 1.8 GHz P4 processor, 256MB DDR2100 RAM, and a 20GB HD. Not bad for a resurrected PC.

    I'm sorry, but ANY P4 system doesn't really qualify as an old computer in my book. Some of us don't have unlimited ca$h and hence do not have P4 'puters kicking around like scrap paper.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai