Slashdot Mirror


Netcraft: 5,600 Phishing Sites Since December

miller60 writes "Netcraft has tracked and blocked 5,600 known phishing sites since the December launch of its anti-phishing toolbar, which it has now updated with a risk rating feature that warns users about new sites with phishy characteristics, based on trends observed in known phishing scams. It has also started a service that makes the full list available of phishing sites as a continuously updated feed for service providers and companies to use in mail servers and web proxies." One bad sign: the phishing attacks I see are getting (on average) more professional in their phrasing -- it used to be easy to toss out the trawlers based on their spelling alone.

181 comments

  1. Spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    the phishing attacks I see are getting (on average) more professional in their phrasing -- it used to be easy to toss out the trawlers based on their spelling alone

    One could say the same for the /. trolls.

    1. Re:Spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and editors

    2. Re:Spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and posters

    3. Re:Spelling by releppes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that trolling for phish or phishing for trolls?

    4. Re:Spelling by Winkhorst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Funny, I get modded troll often enough and my spelling is unpeckable....

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    5. Re:Spelling by OppView · · Score: 1

      Ditto... I came "that close" to getting caught byone the other day... :( D

  2. It's official, phishing is dying!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netcraft confirms... Sorry, I couldn't resist.

  3. Submit a new site, get a gift? by Kozz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Funny thing, I submitted a phishing site to Netcraft and was notified that it was a new one to their database, and what do they do?

    They ask me to reply to their email address with my full name, street address so that they can send me a "gift". I don't know what it is (haven't received it yet), but thought it ironic that they were soliciting information in a phishing-style.

    I sent them the address so they can send me a gift (t-shirt? who knows) since I knew I had contacted THEM about the particular phishing URL, and the info they requested could be gleaned by someone who wanted to find out, but found it humorous nonetheless.

    Anybody know what is this "reward" they mail you? I'm curious.

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    1. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by netcrusher88 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they send you fish?

      --
      There's an old saying that says pretty much whatever you want it to.
    2. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      A video of them laughing at you.

      I play mine at LAN parties.

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    3. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fish?

    4. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by doofusclam · · Score: 5, Informative
      Anybody know what is this "reward" they mail you? I'm curious.


      Well according to this: http://news.earthweb.com/security/article.php/3454 601:

      If a person is the first to submit a link to a new phishing site, the user receives a free prize, such as a coffee mug. Miller said other offerings are in the works as well. An e-mail appears in users' inboxes asking them to return a postal address for the prize, which takes 28 days to deliver.
    5. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      Anybody know what is this "reward" they mail you?

      Wouldn't you like to know? It was a lovely little phish.
      And it went wherever I did go.

    6. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Funny
      An e-mail appears in users' inboxes asking them to return a postal address for the prize, which takes 28 days to deliver.

      Or they can collect on their winnings immediately by clicking on this link, with their accound name and password to paypal ...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    7. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by aaamr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't it make more sense to report the site to the service provider so it gets shut down?

      Last one of these I encountered (an eBay phishing scheme) was hosted on Comcast's network. To Comcast's credit, the site was inaccessible within 2 hours of my reporting it, and I got a very prompt response by email to my report.

    8. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but maybe you just thought you reported the site to Netcraft. Maybe it was that crafty phisher Netrcaft, who, under pretense, posed. You of course, were fooled by the "BDS is dying..." as the first story...

      Ok, Bad Joke. Back to work/.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    9. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get a mug with the Netcraft logo. Larger than the average mug so it holds loads of coffee. Next prize up a sweatshirt with their logo on it. Friend of mine is up to 20 reported sites and has yet to discover prize 3.

    10. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by morcego · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, no one ever doubted the hability of Comcast in making things go offline.

      --
      morcego
    11. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by Golias · · Score: 1

      A sweatshirt also holds a lot of coffee, but it isn't nearly as nice to drink it that way.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    12. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by camcorder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks for letting us know. Now only thing to get a free mug is to setup a phishing site and report it to Netcraft. Well seems like they will reach 10000 very soon.

    13. Re:Submit a new site, get a gift? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would. I submitted another one by the same asshole (who has all these yahoo-login style phishing sites). I got one of them shut down, but then he changed the frameset to point to another version. It's like playing whack-a-mole. I just sent an email to the abuse company who seems to be the registrar/host of the "parent" frameset in the hopes that it will cause trouble for him, but what can one do? Probably as fast as I shut these things down, he's setting up new ones.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  4. Phish Samwitch by WwWonka · · Score: 0

    Is anybody proactively going after these sites with their "l33t sk1llz" when they run across them in their own mailbox?

    --Justin Wondering

    1. Re:Phish Samwitch by Ithika · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but that would be reactive and not proactive.

    2. Re:Phish Samwitch by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      "Proactive" is not a word!!! The word you are looking for is "active."

      --The Syntax Police

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    3. Re:Phish Samwitch by WwWonka · · Score: 0

      How about I "proactively" give you a knuckle sandwich!

  5. One Day by ericschoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The phishing community will learn to read an write in a professional manner. When that day comes, the world will end

    no wait.... only those gullables will find themselves in trouble.

    Phishing is only a problem when you aren't paying attention.

    --
    --
    1. Re:One Day by Seferino · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, but who is always paying attention ? One day, while I was in the middle of a Paypal-arbitrated dispute with an eBay seller, I received a very Paypal-looking mail instructing me that I had been refunded, please check that everything is ok, yada yada, direct link to the dispute history. When I received that mail, I was on the phone, helping my parents with technical problems. I nearly followed that link. One second before doing so, some survival instinct prompted me to check the url. Turned out to be a pure IP, a fact strongly connected with phishing. Oh, yeah, before I forget: my job is related to computer security, safety of information transfers, safety of protocols, etc. But they very nearly had me. Bottom line ? I'm not immune. I can only assume that you aren't either and that nobody is.

    2. Re:One Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One day, the phishing community will learn to read an write in a professional manner ... only those gullables will find themselves in trouble
      Ok. So you're a phisher ? Or not ?
      /confused
    3. Re:One Day by ericschoon · · Score: 1

      Not a phisher, just trying to have a little phun. Please see post at:
      http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=148093&thr eshold=-1&commentsort=0&tid=158&mode=thread&pid=12 411176#12411239
      in response to a similar question.

      --
      --
    4. Re:One Day by ericschoon · · Score: 1

      I do actually agree with you. There are cases, and certain circumstances when even the best professionals are 'had' by a good scheme. However, I also think that if everyone were just a little more careful, the profitability would not be there. If the profits don't justify the risk/cost, no more problem.

      Like you, I have had my close calls, but I think you will agree, most phishing emails/scams are just really poorly done.

      --
      --
    5. Re:One Day by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      I work on computers every day and night. I even reported a phishing scam 3 years ago to eBay.

      And yet I fell for one 3 weeks ago. I feel like such a loser.

      It was the timing. I had just been on my online checking/banking site, and got an email. I thought, huh, I was just there. Didn't even think about it. I figured i needed to get it fixed so I could do the rest of my transactions that day.

      If I fell for it, grandpa and grandma are definately going to fall for it.

      $3600 later....

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    6. Re:One Day by blew_fantom · · Score: 1

      The phishing community will learn to read an write in a professional manner.

      looks like you could use a bit o' help yourself. ;)

  6. Live Bait by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The great crime in this phishing system is at the Patent and Trademark Office. We fund the office, subsidizing corporate IP owners by defending their IP. But when the PTO could enforce trademark IP to protect the consumer, they do little or nothing. How come Citigroup isn't spending billions to protect its trademark, which is used to con thousands of people a day into phishing scams?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Live Bait by hsmith · · Score: 1

      probably because it costs less money to pay out chargebacks and do nothing to help repair stolen credit compared to paying a swarm of lawyers to track down phishers

    2. Re:Live Bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The PTO doesn't enfore antything. It only grants or revokes. Enforcements take place at courts and usually only after charge by the patent/trademark holder.

    3. Re:Live Bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Insightful? Interesting? Who modded this spew of disorganization up?

      "But when the PTO could enforce trademark IP to protect the consumer, they do little or nothing."

      This is because it's left to the trademark owners, not the PTO.

      "How come Citigroup isn't spending billions to protect its trademark, which is used to con thousands of people a day into phishing scams?"

      Should *you* be held liable if someone uses *your* identity to scam others? If someone nabs your SIN and starts causing mischief, should you have to come up with thousands of dollars to make things right again?

      So what is your post advocating? Should the copyright holders be proactive, or the PTO?

    4. Re:Live Bait by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The great crime in this phishing system is at the Patent and Trademark Office. We fund the office, subsidizing corporate IP owners by defending their IP. But when the PTO could enforce trademark IP to protect the consumer, they do little or nothing. How come Citigroup isn't spending billions to protect its trademark, which is used to con thousands of people a day into phishing scams?

      First off, phishers are _hard to catch and prosecute_. They're often located in other countries using and/or using compromised resources such as zombified home machines to serve their pages. They're committing fraud, they're not going to stop because Citigroup sends them a cease and desist. Thats like saying the real crime of the war on drugs is that the IRS hasn't dragged in all of these drug kingpins for not paying taxes.

      Secondly, who the hell is subsidizing anything? The Patent Office takes in more in user fees than it spends - It's a yearly budget battle for them to keep more of what they bring in, not to get more money from congress. They've been totally user fee supported for at least 12 years now.

      --
      Why?
    5. Re:Live Bait by ZipR · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some big corporation should patent phishing and not use it, but instead go after those who infringe on their patent.

    6. Re:Live Bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For the record, they are. I work for the comapny that that does some of it for them; they are very concerned about the problem for a number of reasons

    7. Re:Live Bait by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      probably because it costs less money to pay out chargebacks and do nothing to help repair stolen credit compared to paying a swarm of lawyers to track down phishers

      Bingo - I think you got it. The chargeback hits the merchant. The credit card company really pays nothing anyway AFAIK.

      IMO, it's perfect. The purchase occurs, and the merchant pays the piper.

      Imagine this economy for a second now:

      1) Phishing scam begins
      2) Customer CC#'s are stolen
      3) Computer gear is purchased with stolen CC#
      4) Phisher sells gear on black mkt
      5) Phisher takes money from selling gear to buy cocaine
      6) Cocaine dealer launders money
      7) And on and on through money creation scheme...

      Bring down Phishing, and you've collapsed a money making sector of your economy ;)

      (Maybe I'm being unrealistic here)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:Live Bait by mavenguy · · Score: 1
      But when the PTO could enforce trademark IP to protect the consumer


      The PTO's mission has never included the enforcement of trademark registrations, the same as with patent grants; it just creates them for others who bear the burden of enforcing them (any federal criminal provisions are prosecuted by the US Dept. of Justice).
    9. Re:Live Bait by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      " Thats like saying the real crime of the war on drugs is that the IRS hasn't dragged in all of these drug kingpins for not paying taxes." -- that's what got Al Capone....so maybe the IRS should give it a shot.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    10. Re:Live Bait by northcat · · Score: 1

      I too would like to use any oppurtunity I can get to lash out at the "IP" people, but this just isn't one such case. Phishing is illegal and companies like Citibank have a lot more than just trademark infringement to take action against phishers. You do have a point that Citibank et al should make strong efforts to stop phishing. But I don't know if they're making any considerable efforts to stop this, so I won't make any comments about that. (I do know that they spend a lot of resources to stop credit-card fraud in which they're the ones who lose money)

    11. Re:Live Bait by SwiftOne · · Score: 1

      Actually, IIRC, the IRS allows them to report income and pay taxes on it. I'm not sure if that's WHY they were able to get Capone, or as a result of that, but you can report income on illegal gains and pay taxes on it, and they can't use that record against you.

    12. Re:Live Bait by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that the authorities have to choose between fraud and trademark infringement charges?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:Live Bait by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Both should be proactive - they're both part of the system that protects trademarks from abuse by others. Which is entirely to protect consumers: read the Lanham Act sometime, the basis of trademark law. It requires trademark owners to agressively defend their mark from infringement, because dilution confuses the consumer in navigating the market.

      Then maybe you can spew your disorganized posts, naive questions, and obnoxious bitching, Anonymous clueless Coward.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:Live Bait by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      In point of fact, mistakenly combined the PTO and the Justice Department and Branch, when complaining that we subsidize "the PTO", which doesn't properly defend trademarks from phishers. Just as you just combined the IRS and the FBI, which together fail to drag in all these drug kingpins for not paying taxes. But in fact, failure to pay taxes isn't in the critical path of stopping drug dealers. If you complained about "the FDA" not dragging them in for selling unsafe products without quality or health testing, which causes lots of damage, you'd be closer to the mark - because you'd be right. As for subsidy, the Justice Department/Branch is expensive - and worth it, when protecting consumers from trademark exploits that destroy our savings, like phishing.

      FWIW, the PTO should keep all of its fees, and grow out of its current status as a joke. Hire and train competent examiners, reduce backlog and turnaround to a few weeks, stop printing monopoly money patents on the most diaphonous claims. And perhaps get their own version of the postal police to crack down on these trademark exploits - maybe even somehow recoup some of the money saved in prevented or prosecuted fraud.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Live Bait by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, I posted imprecisely. If I'd posted "PTO and FBI", or "PTO and Justice", I would have been clearer.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    16. Re:Live Bait by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as it's for "the record", how about some info on this "trademark posse"? They might become as celebrated on Slashdot as are the spam blacklisters - and generate a lot of free assistance from the community.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:Live Bait by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      They don't have to choose. They can pursue charges of both fraud and trademark infringement. They're closely related. In fact, if they don't aggressively defend their trademark from dilution, the law requires that they lose their exclusive right to use it in commerce. Not doing so demonstrates that phishing isn't a very high priority for them. For example, have you received an email from your online banking administrator warning you about phishing, showing you how to identify it, how to identify authentic communications, how to report phishing attempts? I haven't, and I've got quite a lot on the line, at some of the biggest banks in the world, largely in special accounts with "premium banking" services attached, including personal online bankers. Meanwhile, every $20:mo ISP I've ever had has given me exactly that kind of info to protect us from password phishing.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    18. Re:Live Bait by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation +1
      40% Insightful
      30% Overrated
      20% Offtopic

      What is "Offtopic" about pointing out that phishing depends on trademark exploits, which the PTO isn't addressing? And that "Overrated" mod is really just the most cowardly TrollMod of all: anonymous, unsupported, but negative.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  7. Gasp! by jleq · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm going to get paid $2 million to transfer $14,000,000 worth of money from the All-Super Bank of Nigeria to an undisclosed location? Sounds too good to be true! Oh, wait...

    1. Re:Gasp! by DeionXxX · · Score: 1

      The nigerian scams aren't Phishing scams.... Phishing scams are the emails you get from your bank or paypal saying that you need to update your information. The link in the email is to a page that looks exactly like your bank's page, but the information you submit goes to the crooks. So they have your bank information or paypal information or whatever.

    2. Re:Gasp! by eric76 · · Score: 1
      I'm going to get paid $2 million to transfer $14,000,000 worth of money from the All-Super Bank of Nigeria to an undisclosed location? Sounds too good to be true! Oh, wait...
      The nigerian scams aren't Phishing scams.... Phishing scams are the emails you get from your bank or paypal saying that you need to update your information.

      Maybe he has a Nigerian Express credit card and phishing scams on Nigerian Express credit cards work that way.

      In other words, he gets an e-mail saying that he needs to update the information on his Nigerian Express credit card and if he does it immediately, they will give him a credit of $14,000,000 of which he can keep $2,000,000.

    3. Re:Gasp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then his account will be "Biigger fo7r HER"?

  8. firefox toolbar? by bdigit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there any toolbar available for firefox? This would be a great thing to install on my relatives computers or anyone's computer for that matter.

    1. Re:firefox toolbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phishing sites, the computers or the relatives?

    2. Re:firefox toolbar? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firefox one-ups this already by doing 2 things:

      1. Encrypted URLS turn the address bar to a gold color to remind you that you're on an encrypted site. And, more importantly,

      2. In the lower right hand corner of the screen, Firefox tells you the name of the site to which the digital signature certificate is assigned.

    3. Re:firefox toolbar? by elid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but that's probably too difficult for the average relative to understand.

    4. Re:firefox toolbar? by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      Most browsers will show a warning when it sees the certificate is invalid/signed by someone you don't trust. Though if they don't understand the "THIS SITE'S CERTIFICATE CAN NOT BE TRUSTED" message, then I don't think theres anything that could help them short of not being allowed to use the computer.

    5. Re:firefox toolbar? by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 1
      Most browsers will show a warning when it sees the certificate is invalid/signed by someone you don't trust.

      Wrong. Most browsers show a warning when they see that the certificate has not been bought by someone a certificate authority deemed trustworthy. If you generate your own certificate, that will most probably cause such a popup. But have you ever clicked 'OK' on a popup from Amazon, Ebay, Hotmail or any other SSL'd site? I guess not, because there was none.

    6. Re:firefox toolbar? by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

      Or all of them..... *cue ominous music*

    7. Re:firefox toolbar? by p0rn133ch3r · · Score: 1

      I installed "schmoo" for firefox. Can't remember the homepage, but I think it's www.schmoo.org or schmoobar.org

    8. Re:firefox toolbar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do NOT go to the site mentioned above. It is a SCAM. My credit has now been ruined.

    9. Re:firefox toolbar? by steelrain · · Score: 1

      I am affilliated with FraudEliminator, LLC. We just released a free toolbar for FireFox. FraudEliminator marks the first advanced anti-fraud tool for Mozilla's popular FireFox browser. FraudEliminator defends against all kinds of online fraud, including phishing, pharming, and DNS exploits, and also shows information about each site you visit, including where it is hosted and when the domain name was registered. Every site is evaluated as the page loads for fraudulent characteristics. Most phishing sites have done great damage before anyone has them on their blacklist. We also collect and blacklist known fraud sites. Give us a try at FraudEliminator

      --
      The closer to your soul you choose your goal, the nearer to your heart the work can start.
  9. "Continuously encrypted list"? by Animats · · Score: 1
    Yet the list of "phishing" sites is apparently encrypted. That helps out the crooks.

    Is that list being provided to law enforcement?

    1. Re:"Continuously encrypted list"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You assume law enforment is actively interested in going after phishing sites.

    2. Re:"Continuously encrypted list"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are assuming that law enforcement is interested in pursuing phishing sites.

  10. why isn't the list free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should people have to pay for this list, when it is submitted for free by netizens? Or is the "gift" supposed to be your payment?

    1. Re:why isn't the list free? by ePhil_One · · Score: 1

      The list is mostly generated by folks using their anti-phishing toolbar. Users of this free toolbar get free access to the data. Its only corporate types looking to protect their user base that would pay for the data.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  11. Neat idea. by going_the_2Rpi_way · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only problem that I see is that those people with the Netcraft toolbar are probably already in the low-risk category for this type of scam (although I guess the fact that they install toolbars at all makes it a slightly more at risk group) since they're reasonably aware of the problem. Still, Netcraft continues to impress me with excellent tools and insight on web traffic and secuirty trends. A daily must-read for webmasters, far more so than Alexa.

  12. New sites: ouch! by jfengel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the factors that goes into the risk rating is the age of the site. That's a good insight: phishers tend to create new sites often, as the old ones get closed down or are simply dropped.

    But man, wouldn't it suck to open a new site only to have Netcraft scare off all your customers?

    I wonder what "new" means. How long do phishing sites stay around? And how badly would this kill the buzz of the initial marketing effort?

    Time isn't the only tool they have in the toolbar, so hopefully novelty as the only warning sign won't ring any alarm bells.

    Eventually, phishers will work around this by creating sites and only activating the phishing attack after the requisite time period has elapsed. But that's work, which weeds out the laziest phishers. Watching the escalation of tactics is going to be fascinating.

    1. Re:New sites: ouch! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Watching the escalation of tactics is going to be fascinating.

      After all, technical solutions have worked SOOOO well against Spam, and email worms.

      /dripping sarcasm

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:New sites: ouch! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      SpamBayes plugin for Outlook works quite nicely - http://spambayes.sf.net/

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    3. Re:New sites: ouch! by alexhohio · · Score: 0

      I thought the rule was pretty much: If you know what phishing is, you aren't going to fall for it... (I read that in a Reader's Digest article, no joke, but I have heard it said many times long before I read the RD article.) I actually did get a letter from PayPal that I thought was phishing- i forwarded it to ebay and they said it was a legit letter. That's beside the point, because I cancelled my PayPal account because of their fee increases, but I digress... I am more worried about a browser hijack leading to pharming...

      --
      Almost every Harvard student was High School Valedictorian- After a year of college, half are in the bottom of the class
    4. Re:New sites: ouch! by imroy · · Score: 1
      After all, technical solutions have worked SOOOO well against Spam, and email worms.
      /dripping sarcasm

      Some do, some don't. I find that most of my spam is now caught by various RBL's like Razor/Pyzor, and DCC. Plus a few of the new tests added in SpamAssassin 3.0. Bayesian scoring seems to do very little now, the spammers have found ways to obscure words so that they don't attract attention. But SA (even before 3.0) has tests for those tricks as well. Plus Clam AV appears to be adding new signatures for common phishing attacks. I sometimes see phishing emails flagged as viruses (by Clam AV) instead of spam (by SpamAssassin) because of this. I use Amavis new to tie SpamAssassin and Clam AV together into a filter system at the MTA (postfix) level.

    5. Re:New sites: ouch! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Ditto here, but as soon as I think I'm making progress, Marketing bitches that they aren't receiving mail from their "industry contacts".

      No, really.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    6. Re:New sites: ouch! by jfengel · · Score: 1

      That's why I like the idea of an anti-phishing toolbar. Maybe you should install this on grandma's computer. I don't think I need it myself, but I'd feel a lot better if your grandmother did, if for no other reason than that maybe it'll decrease the number of idiotic phishing spams I get.

      But it would suck if my new eYarn.com (buy all your yarn online!) site had its intitial Knitting Digest ad campaign, but grandma got scared off just because the site was new. (It turns out eyarn.com is actually taken. I have no idea who they are. I just made this up as an example.)

    7. Re:New sites: ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait, YOU would feel better if MY grandma had it? what do you and grams got going on here buddy?

    8. Re:New sites: ouch! by imroy · · Score: 1

      Do you keep the rejected emails? My "site" is just a small family network providing email for a few people. So the number of spam/virus/phishing emails isn't that large. In fact, my honeypot address now gets far more spam than any of the real email accounts that the system handles.

    9. Re:New sites: ouch! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      How it works is there's a lower bound for non-spam, an upper bound for definate spam, and everythign else gets thrown into a 'suspect' folder which is great for keeping up with changing language.

      I get zero false positives reaching the definate spam bin, 2 or 3 a week from mailing lists get into suspect. I see maybe one a week which hasn't been flagged as suspect and is sitting in my inbox.

      There's only 5 or 6 a day in the suspect folder to deal with, and since it's a Bayesian filter they all help to keep it trained.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  13. Re:FP - Help by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1, Informative
    Can anyone help me? I have an account with amazing karma, that I plan to retire after the next three posts. I thought that I would perform karma suicide with it but,

    From the contents of your post, you seem to be doing quite well, but ...

    I can't figure out an effective way to do it in only three posts.

    Yes, indeed, I think you haven't figured out one very important small detail...

    What would you do?

    Hmmm, ..., maybe log in?

    Can anyone help me?

    You're welcome!

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. netcraft charge to access the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    who said you can't make money from phishing !

  16. Phishers Getting Good by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
    Not only are these fishing sites sneaking past my spam filter, one came worded as an alert that someone was misusing my Ebay account. Of course, I knew it was a fake before I even checked where the URL was going, but man, someone spent a lot of time thinking it up.

    I'm not admiring them. I'm not trying to understsnd them. I just look at it like "what an utter waste of a mind."

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Phishers Getting Good by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Informative

      but man, someone spent a lot of time thinking it up.

      Hint: Enable "full headers" on your e-mail. That way you won't spend a second before hitting the delete button.

    2. Re:Phishers Getting Good by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Dude, I do this for a living. Unless you are intimately familiar with the IP addresses of every host you receive email from, you are wasting more time peering through the headers than employing common sense.

      And I don't just delete the message. Phishing Scams like these I actually forward on to Pay Pal and Ebay's fraud units. It takes a few extra minutes, but it helps me sleep better at night.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Phishers Getting Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until they all start using exploits on the sites they are attempting to phish as outlined in this article http://www.betanews.com/article/What_Phishers_Know _That_You_Dont/1114784531/

    4. Re:Phishers Getting Good by covertbadger · · Score: 1

      Man, I wish I had your discipline. I can't leave it at a simple delete, I can only go a few days without succumbing to the temptation to knock up a quick perl script to fill in the fake form with junk data and leave it running in an infinite loop for a day or two. If I can swamp just one scamming bastard with noise, I feel my time was well spent. Try it, it's therapeutic.

    5. Re:Phishers Getting Good by Leomania · · Score: 1

      Phishing Scams like these I actually forward on to Pay Pal and Ebay's fraud units.

      They sure don't make it easy... I tried forwarding one *twice* today to spoof.ebay.com and they rejected it each time because it wasn't done just the way they wanted. If I can figure out how to tie the pretty bow they want around the forwarded message, I might even succeed in giving them the information next time!

      - Leo

      --
      You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
  17. Spelling-The Untouchables. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The historical phrase everyone's looking for is "Cold War".

  18. Other ways to filter phishers out... by yotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it used to be easy to toss out the trawlers based on their spelling alone.

    I've always detected the trawlers by the fact that they're asking me to give them information via email.

    1. Re:Other ways to filter phishers out... by MandoSKippy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I once received a request from Cisco to give them my CC for a RMA we were doing. (it was a legit request.. they needed me to pay for something.. it was illegit method of delivering the info.) I cried foul and went up the ladder several levels eventually getting to someone high up. I stated that in the world of phishing attacks and such, that to have a "reputable" networking company ask for a CC number via email was awful. I got a free PIX 506e with free shipping out of the deal. They were stupid and they knew it.

  19. Re:FP - Help by lilmouse · · Score: 1, Funny

    Let me get this straight - you've got a great account with lots of karma, and you'd love to transfer it to me, but you first need to get the password. This will take $400US to do that... But, out of the goodness of your heart, and because you found my name on a reputable list, you're willing to share this account with me if I can help with half the $400US fee.

    Great!

    No, wait, wrong post - my bad. My account's karma is having problems, and SlashDot can't confirm some of my details. So, quick, go log into http://slashdt.org/login and give all your personal information before all your past posts are DELETED!!

    Thanks - I'll check up on that.

    --LWM

  20. Slashdot Announcement by x.Draino.x · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dear Slashdot Reader,

    We regret to inform you that our subscription database was lost in a major crash. In order to continue your advertising-free dupe ridden news service, we require you to verify your account details. Please have your credit card handy and head on over to Slashdot Subscription Verification to verify your account. Once again, we apologize for the mis-hap.

    Sincerely, teh Taco.
    1. Re:Slashdot Announcement by kmortelite · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, you'd get 'em all. :-)

    2. Re:Slashdot Announcement by mattjb0010 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please have your credit card handy and head on over to Slashdot Subscription Verification to verify your account

      The site you linked doesn't work. For the record, my credit card details are:
      Name: Mr John Citizen
      Visa Card number: 4940 5233 1123 0876
      Expiry: 06/07
      3 digit verification number: 666
      Billing address:
      202B King William Road
      Hyde Park, SA 5061
      Australia

      BSB (branch routing) number: 065-332
      Account number: 00222334
      Pin number: 3356 ( MY MOTHER'S DATE OF BIRTH )

    3. Re:Slashdot Announcement by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      teehee.slashd0t.org?

      I'm sorry, but one of your DNSes drops all packets on port 53, and the other one doesn't even respond to ping.

      Could you provide alternate contact means so I can send you my personal data?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  21. What we need are a new set of laws... by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It seems the real crooks like the dark shadows, they don't like being seen. The old addage of don't walk alone at night, walk in lighted places, ect... how do they translate for the world of the internet. With the web, there is more anonymity. It is just what the crook wants, a place where they can do their crimes and not be seen. Plus, it is easier to give the perception that you're in a nice well lite area, it's safe here. You can't fake that kind of perception in a ghetto.

    The obvious responce will be more laws. Laws that will take away the freedom of the non-criminal. The RIAA is forcing ISP's to hand over IPA's. Commercial websites track customers. How long until the web requires authentication just to do anything?

    I hope the government really hurts the first people it catches. But until the laws change, I doubt it will be that bad. If you could rip off 1,000 people for $1,000,000, would you? What if it meant 5 years in prision, and you could hide the money so it was there when you were released?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:What we need are a new set of laws... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      The internet is a bad neighborhood. Just assume that and you'll be fine.

      Authentication is all nice in theory, but the disconnects between you in real life and online make it impractical. Look at all of the zombie PC's on the net - someone could successfully authenticate as any of those people.

      The attraction of ID theft and related fraud is that it's so difficult to catch people and the courts haven't been able to figure out how to handle it yet. As you've noted, the cost/benefit analysis comes out in favor of the criminal currently. The system isn't set up to deal with people who are clearly sociopathic. Each individual crime is small, and the system treats it that way. There are class action lawsuits to go after companies who behave this way. There is no recourse against an individual with no significant assets.

    2. Re:What we need are a new set of laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How long until the web requires authentication just to do anything?" Exactly what type of connection are you currently using?

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. I don't see why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no point in this "encryption" since the toolbar client obviously knows how to "decrypt" it without a passphrase or anything. Probably just some lame encoding scheme like the script kiddies use to obscure their hidden password files.

  24. How to catch them... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    One of the factors that goes into the risk rating is the age of the site. That's a good insight: phishers tend to create new sites often, as the old ones get closed down or are simply dropped.

    Force the people who register URL's to have proof of who is buying the domain. Force them to have a credit card to buy, and force them to give a phone number and address that must be verified prior to making the URL go live. Banks do this, they check your social security number, they check your home address. Why can't we do that with URL's?

    Then when a central government agency see's domain after domain from the same person going down, they can track him. If the person uses others to buy the domain, once the government tracks them all down and threatens them with jail time, chances are one of them will give away the guy.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:How to catch them... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Currently, almost all of those are done before opening a new credit account. However, people still find ways of getting this information and doing it anyway. If we were going to take this approach, why not require each person to show up to a police station and give a set of fingerprints to get a domain?

      There are plenty of people who would buy the domain for a third party to get around any of these restrictions. How many people would do it for $100,000,000? How about $1? The result is the same, just the pricing point is up for discussion.

      The government could go after these people right now for the fraud they're committing, but they don't. Find a solution to that problem first. I think the problem is that stealing $5 from 1 million people is 1 million counts of stealing $5, not theft of $5,000,000. The sociopathic aspect of ID theft is not something our legal system handles well.

    2. Re:How to catch them... by morcego · · Score: 1

      Force the people who register URL's to have proof of who is buying the domain. Force them to have a credit card to buy, and force them to give a phone number and address that must be verified prior to making the URL go live. Banks do this, they check your social security number, they check your home address. Why can't we do that with URL's?


      Because not everyone lives on USA. I have several .com and .org domains registered myself. How do you expect DoDaddy or DirectNic will verify my home address ? No to mention country-TLDs. I have some .com.br domains too. I know people who hold domains in no less than 6 different countries.


      Then when a central government agency see's domain after domain from the same person going down, they can track him. If the person uses others to buy the domain, once the government tracks them all down and threatens them with jail time, chances are one of them will give away the guy.


      It will be pretty interesting to watch the FBI raiding a guys house in, let say, Italy, because that guy had several domains that were taken down.

      Please looks outside your windows. There are other things on the internet besides the USA.

      --
      morcego
  25. How the Netcraft toolbar works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually looked into making a Firefox extension that worked with the netcraft phishing list. that you get from using their toolbar. I'm still just learning to code Firefox plugins, so I thought it would be a fun exercise. I put it aside for now since there is a big "DO NOT REVERSE ENGINEER OUR SOFTWARE" type notice in the install license, and I still have a long ways to go in learning to program Firefox extensions. I figured out how it works by reading the log file, is that reverse engineering these days?

    Anyway, how the blocker works is pretty nifty, the toolbar creates an MD5 hash of each the url you visit, then compares it to a file that the toolbar auto-updates with the MD5 hashes of the bad urls. To figure out where info is coming from, take a look at "blocked.log" in the Toolbar directory, you'll see the lines that update "blocklist.dat". The only problem I saw is that www.badsite.com/bleh.html might be in there, but www.badsite.com itself might not be, even if both are really the same page.

    I still think the best anti-phishing software would be a program that just notices when you are doing something really boneheaded. It would do things like shout "Hey, that's your ebay username and password and this isn't ebay! Are you sure you want to do this?" and "This page isn't posting to an encrypted page and that is a credit card number! Are you sure about this?". Just my little idea, I'm sure there are plenty of problems with it.

    1. Re:How the Netcraft toolbar works. by emh0 · · Score: 1
      It would do things like shout "Hey, that's your ebay username and password and this isn't ebay! Are you sure you want to do this?"

      Most people will just click "yes" and carry on.

    2. Re:How the Netcraft toolbar works. by 514CK3R · · Score: 1

      It requires software that was engineered in the first place to reverse-engineer it.

    3. Re:How the Netcraft toolbar works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people will just click "yes" and carry on.

      True. After a point people are just going to go out of their way to stick the key in the electrical socket, even if you hide the socket behind furniture and put a little plastic cap over it. We call most of those people children, but some never grow out of it ;-).

      If the toolbar had a little 5 second timer to make you think about it then it might work, but after a point people are just going to do it anyway. I do know that the delay for installing an extension with FireFox does make me think about it for a second. But if it happened for every form I happened to duplicate a username/password combo on, it would probably lose its effect after a while.

    4. Re:How the Netcraft toolbar works. by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      What would be the drawbacks of maintaining a list of crooked URL's, then having the program add them to the hosts file with an IP mapping to a safe site that explains why the site was blocked and how to unblock it if desired? This could actually be run as a seperate program, as needed, instead of adding that extra (tiny) bit of load time and another toolbar. Run the program and it checks the netcraft list against the hosts file, adding or deleting (if a domain was sold or turned legit) as needed. It would also be easy to allow the creation of a local safe list in case netcraft had any false positives.

      I'm not saying this is a better method. It's just the idea that popped into my head, and I'd like to know if there are drawbacks, in case I or anyone else ever has motivation to create such a program.

  26. Re:I say fuck 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many ways to get burned.

    A friend of mine was asking about this Korean Tech company that was looking for a European sales rep. Wanted to know if I knew the company.

    Had a look at the site, and it looked extremly legit. No Phishing about it. However I didn't reconise the company and further checking realised it didn't exist (wasn't easy).

    Show some checking around here is how the scam worked.

    You would be employed as a sales rep that is required to move cash to the main company. You have to give them a whole load of details, and then they ask you to set up a bank account (with a certain bank). When sales are made you are supposed to send it via western union (minus the 10 percent cut).

    However there were no sales, instead phished bank accounts would get emptied and transferred to the employees account. When the cops come looking the guy sending the cash gets nabbed and the thieves disappear.

    To be honest I don't get caught out by the stupid phish attempts, but if it wasn't for the Western Union part of the job no alarm bells would of sounded in my head.

  27. They did the easy part... by mathmatt · · Score: 1

    Netcraft has tracked and blocked 5,600 known phishing sites

    Yes, but how many unknown phishing sites have they tracked and blocked?

  28. Lazy Getting Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm not admiring them. I'm not trying to understsnd them. I just look at it like "what an utter waste of a mind.""

    I get the same feeling everytime I read a copyright thread.

  29. The biggest problem... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The biggest problem is the inability to email a person who cares at a lot of these places. In the past two weeks I've tried to find contacts for domains that were hosting ebay phishing pages. Emails to 'support', 'webmaster', internic domain contacts all go unanswered and the sites remain. I reported this one a week ago, its still up: http://210.0.213.115/~homepage/Secure/eBay/cgi-bin /index.php

    1. Re:The biggest problem... by hendersj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen to that - I had the same experience with eBay - I am NOT signing up to tell them that someone is trying to scam their customers. Make it easy for me to report, or I'll just bin it.

      After all, if they don't care enough to make it easy to report phishers abusing their name, why should I make the effort to find out how to report it to them?

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    2. Re:The biggest problem... by I+kan+Spl · · Score: 1

      That one is hosted from a luthrian school somewhere that speaks Chinese. Here is there contact information, but don't speak the language so I'm not sure that they would be able to read it if I were to send one.

      mailto:lck@lck.mysch.net

      --
      My UID is prime and so is this number: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0.
    3. Re:The biggest problem... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      Where did you get the contact from? whois on the ip gave me Hutchison Global Communications in Hong Kong email to their support, webmaster, dns contact all unanswered.

    4. Re:The biggest problem... by hazzey · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know how well it works, but there is always: spam@uce.gov It is the FTC's official phishing reporting address. http://www.usdoj.gov/spam.htm

    5. Re:The biggest problem... by jangobongo · · Score: 1

      Send the info to ebay (spoof@ebay.com)- they have a whole department set aside for pursuing these. As I stated in another post previously, here is the link that tells what to do with this info:

      http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/id-account-t heft-spoof.html

      As far as I know, you don't have to be a registered member to report these phishers.

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    6. Re:The biggest problem... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1
      The biggest problem is the inability to email a person who cares at a lot of these places.

      Quoting myself, I know. However, this past weekend, I tried going to http://www.bestbuy.com/ and the site reports that 'I dont have cookies enabled'. They must have some problem on their site so I figure I would report it to them (after testing it from 2 different machines). Emails to 'webmaster' and 'support' bounce. Emails to their DNS contact bounce. Another example of no way to get in touch with someone who gives a shit. As of this posting - its still broken. (though it seems if you go to a link inside their site you can get it).

    7. Re:The biggest problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funniest thing is if you give it a username and password (randomness will work), it says "Your account is not compromised". Yeah, right. Sure. I believe you.

    8. Re:The biggest problem... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      For some reason username fukyou, password phisher works too!

  30. Go Syria! by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

    With a staggering 1 out of 14 websites in Syria categorized as a phising site, I'd like to congratulate Syria for doing a staggeringly good job...

    Eh, I can't even think of a joke. One out of every 14 sites? Jeez.

    Perhaps it's time for a little liberation?

    1. Re:Go Syria! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it's time for a little liberation?

      You forgot the quotes...

      Perhaps it's time for a little "liberation"?

      Otherwise, it would be literal.

    2. Re:Go Syria! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, one of out every fourteen people on the planet have a copy of Dark Side Of The Moon by Pink Floyd. I applaud our phishing scammer Arabian overlords...

  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. still easy to recognize... by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

    "it used to be easy to toss out the trawlers based on their spelling alone."

    while true, they all still contain some form of 'verification' and urgency to the request. I see 'verify' or 'confirm' and I didnt recently sign up for a forum or ask for a password reset, I get rid of it

    --
    By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
  33. Phishing Sites by SpaceAdmiral · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've visited Phishing sites before, but I just don't get it. You'd have to be stoned or something to appreciate their music.

  34. Catching them by McGiraf · · Score: 1

    Why are they so hard to catch?

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. My wife doesn't need it on her Win2K box. by crovira · · Score: 1, Funny

    She's friggin paranoid and doesn't give out ANY info unless you're standing right there in front of her and you'd better not be planning to go anywhere cause she'll take her info back before you do.

    She uses FireFox and ThunderBird, (fuck IE and Outlook,) despite knowing barely enough to switch on the machine.

    My wife... I think I'll keep her. :-)

    As for me... She's taught me well.

    CNet's site been mined for addresses so I got that crap from them (maybe CNet is in worse financial shape that they're letting on,) but its done the phishers no good.

    If I don't already know you, you're going to end up in my Mac's 'Junk Mail' folder.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  37. Known unknown or unknown unknown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Known unknown or unknown unknown?

  38. on the positive side (spf) by nexus987 · · Score: 1

    On the positive side of things, a lot of companies (ebay, paypal, citibank, amazon, etc, etc) are now publishing spf records to help detect forgeries.

    1. Re:on the positive side (spf) by ducttapekz · · Score: 1

      Dear ebay, It seems wrong to me to report companies that commit fraud when you commit more search engine fraud and deception then any other company. . .

  39. What we need are a new set of villians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There are class action lawsuits to go after companies who behave this way. There is no recourse against an individual with no significant assets."

    Doesn't stop the RIAA/MPAA from trying though.

    1. Re:What we need are a new set of villians. by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      They're fighting a different battle. They are trying to protect their business model through legal intimidation. Do you think they could make this work if they didn't have a ton of money to lose on the effort? Their lawsuits are costing them far more than they settle for.

  40. Assuming you don't get a email from the bank by crovira · · Score: 1

    warning you that they're having problems and would you please confirn your SSN and bank account number.

    Bwahahaha.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  41. Money Trees Patented. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Secondly, who the hell is subsidizing anything? The Patent Office takes in more in user fees than it spends - It's a yearly budget battle for them to keep more of what they bring in, not to get more money from congress. They've been totally user fee supported for at least 12 years now."

    Explains the explosion in patents, and copyright, doesn't it?

  42. hard? by Tom · · Score: 1

    it used to be easy to toss out the trawlers based on their spelling alone.

    And it still is. I don't have an account with the First Whatever Bank, so it must be spam. I know that neither paypal or ebay will send me mail asking for my password. I know that my bank doesn't even know my e-mail address.

    What is wrong with you people?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  43. Okay, so netcraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is not making the list publically available ? *shrug* I couldn't find it in any of those links.. lotta good this will do the community.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. Re:FP - Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an account with amazing karma,

    no you dont. everyone has been capped at 50 for over 3 years now. a moron can hit the 50 cap within 3 weeks, but now cince they removedthe number you have no idea what you are at.

    call me when you have a SlashId less than 5 digits.

    otherise you're just a poser wannabe with no clue.

    i'm betting the latter.

    oh and hi troll!

  46. ebay spoofs by jangobongo · · Score: 2, Informative
    I got that ebay spoof, too, a while ago. That kinda scared me until I contacted ebay and they confirmed that, indeed, it was a spoof.

    I got a newer one just a short while ago that said:
    • Subject:*** Your eBay Bid was Cancelled ***


    • Dear eBay Community Member,

      The bid that you entered for the item ( 5569407583[original link removed] ) has been cancelled. You can view the reason provided for the cancellation by selecting the link bellow[sic].

      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Item=55694075 83&BidCancelled=1 [original link removed]

      Regards,
      eBay
    Now, if I had bid on anything at ebay within the last year, I might have panicked and started clicking on links without stopping to think about it. Fortunately, I knew I hadn't bid on anything, so I (as I've learned to do) hovered my cursor over the links and saw that they went to www.kminsectcontrol.com (insect control? interesting).

    I just forwarded it to spoof@ebay.com which, sadly, I have in my address book because I have forwarded several suspicious emails to them. They always get back to me quickly and confirm that, yes, it was a spoof and to ignore it. Then they investigate the forwarded email take any actions they can against whoever sent it.

    And every ebayer should have this page bookmarked: http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/id-account-the ft-spoof.html

    I agree, the phishers are getting better. Phishers like these try to trigger a knee-jerk emotional response and I bet it works way too often.
    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Re:FP - Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just curious, is there actually a karma level called "Amazing"?

  49. how about an OSS/free version of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    cince netcraft is whoring the community for their free data and then selling it to people. Can we make a nice firefox version that reports to FREE servers (ala freeDB style) that we can get going?

    or did netcraft patent it?

    I personally would trust a OPEN list that is under the eyes of many than a closed and encrypted secret list that can have sites or ip addresses secretly added to serve an agenda.

    1. Re:how about an OSS/free version of this? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up..

      Great idea, Even a google group might do the trick if it's properly administered and rules are laid down.

      I submit one right now (got this one the other day in a fake ebay email.)

      http://www.authebay.net
      (info here)
      http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=a uthebay.net

    2. Re:how about an OSS/free version of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the list is not encrypted. The list actually contains a md5 hash of the URL instead of the full URL.

  50. It IS easy to report eBay scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Forward the message (with all headers -- I do this by forwarding as attachment in Thunderbird) to spoof@ebay.com. An automated service checks whether the email came from ebay. They claim to report phished emails to the proper authorities -- it's in their best interest if they do, although I don't know for sure what they do with the email. Still, forwarding an email is pretty darn easy. What have you got to lose?

    1. Re:It IS easy to report eBay scams by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      I did report it to ebay on 4/25. The site is still up 5/2/2005. My point is that there needs to be a better contact system via email to report issues with a website / ip address. It would seem to me its would get a faster reponse if you report it to the company hosting the fraud than the third party. The 'phishing' spam came via email. I reported that to the owner of the mail server ip address and got no response their either.

  51. G-u-l-l-i-b-l-e is an adjective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "The phishing community will learn to read AN write in a professional manner. When that day comes, the world will end
    no wait.... only those gullables will find themselves in trouble. Phishing is only a problem when you're aren't paying attention."

    Gullible is an adjective, not a noun. Writing is only a problem when you're not paying attention.

  52. Re:G-u-l-l-i-b-l-e is an adjective by ericschoon · · Score: 1

    Yes, Gullible is an adjective, and gullables isn't a word. Also, "and" does generally take a 'd' at the end of it. Congratulations. You caught the irony. Sharp as a tack they say. Misusing words, dropping letters, etc tends to be sign that a message could be phishing, especially if they are asking for your social security number.

    --
    --
  53. Apparently it is by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1
    Here's what Merriam-Webster has to say about proactive:


    proactive Main Entry: proactive
    Pronunciation: (")prO-'ak-tiv
    Function: adjective
    1. [1pro-] : relating to, caused by, or being interference between previous learning and the recall or performance of later learning (proactive inhibition of memory)
    2. [2pro- + reactive] : acting in anticipation of future problems, needs, or changes
  54. Netcraft confirms it! by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

    Wait, I thought the sole purpose of Netcraft was to confirm us all that BSD is dead? Has /. betrayed my trust?

    1. Re:Netcraft confirms it! by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      no, they changed their tune, now it's

      Netcraft confirms, phishers are dead.

  55. If you want to block'em at the server... by vhogemann · · Score: 1

    I would recommend AmavisNew+ClamAV+SpamAssassin, it's a killer combo!

    Most of the Phishing is detected as virus by ClamAV on my servers, and the few that escapes from it are stopped by SpamAssassin.

    I administrate a small server, with only a few hundred accounts. But it's still amazing how it effectively stops virus/spans/phishing.

    Funny thing is, we're behind a SymantecAV server... as required by the company "secure policy". But most of the new virii passes through it... and in the end AmavisNew and ClamAV are the real protectors of my network.

    IMHO Symantec/Norton is good for nothing, but the managers refuse to replace it completely, and save a good few bucks. They just cant trust ClamAV to do the job, since it's OpenSource...

    --
    ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
  56. When is the profitability not there? by Aexia · · Score: 1

    However, I also think that if everyone were just a little more careful, the profitability would not be there.

    It's the same principle as spamming. It costs next to nothing to send out the e-mail and you need only a small handful of people to fall for the scam in order to make the whole endeavour worthwhile.

    Hell, it's even better than spamming; at least spammers have some sort of product to sell. Scammers don't have to provide anything. They just empty out your bank account for pure profit.

  57. professional? by drew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One bad sign: the phishing attacks I see are getting (on average) more professional in their phrasing -- it used to be easy to toss out the trawlers based on their spelling alone.

    i'll be worried when i start seeing attacks imitating places that i actually have accounts at. other than paypal, i don't think a single one out of the thousands of phishing attacks i've received has tried to imitate a bank or institution that i actually do business with.

    maybe it's just me, but i would think that when people see hundreds of emails coming from places they've never done businesss with in their life, they might be a little suspicious when they see one that's almost exactly the same except with their bank's logo on it, no matter how well written. or am i expecting too much of the average person?

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  58. It's all phishing! by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
    it used to be easy to toss out the trawlers based on their spelling alone.

    For me, it's still easy. If it says it is from any sort of "phinancial institution", it's a phishing exercise. Email is one thing that I do NOT give to banks, credit card companies, or other companies that deal with my money. If a bank ever tells me that I authorized something to be transfered via electronic means, they damn well better be ready to provide restitution, because I do not and will not authorize any such transfer, except while standing in a bank officer's office with photo ID and a signature check.

    The two exceptions to the "no email" rule are eBay and PayPal... but they each have an unpublished, only-for-them address, so anything claiming to be from them that doesn't come to their special address is automatically tagged & bagged.

    I also monitor our mail servers, and 90% of the time, as the phishers try a new bank (Regions.com is currently the most popular), their first target are several spam traps we have. So, we can add them to our "soft bounce" list within minutes, and very little gets through.

    However, I will say that I've stopped reporting such emails to banks, eBay and PayPal, since they rarely seem interested. Most of the reports are bounced by their systems as spam!

  59. Anyone know a better place to report phishing scam by Cycil · · Score: 1

    Anyone know a better place to report phishing scams other than to registrars? I have seen many that are coming from china, japan, chile, and various others. But since my emails are in english, they may not be understood. Is there a better/another place to report them to help them get shut down? Typically I get the ip and look up the information on http://www.dnsstuff.com/ and then report to their registrar. Any other tips? Thx! -Just doin my part to stop scammers and spam.

  60. Phishing is dead by JazzXP · · Score: 1

    Netcraft confirms it!

  61. C'mon people! Just say no to HTML email! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem solved.

    It is then IMPOSSIBLE to camouflage links to phish sites as legitimate links.

    The next best thing would be to not click links in received HTML email--navigate directly to the site instead with a new browser window.

  62. Their own fault, too! by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
    The link in the email is to a page that looks exactly like your bank's page, but the information you submit goes to the crooks.

    Often, the sites even have Jen-You-Whine graphics from the banks/institutions being scammed, because the real site owners don't even take the precaution of checking the brower referrer header. If you request (say) a Citibank.com graphic and the referring page isn't one one that belongs to Citibank, then it should come up with a graphic that includes "NOT A LEGITIMATE CITIBANK SITE" across it. In many cases, the scammers creating the site would have the graphic cached, and never notice the difference themselves.

    Sure, it's easy to fake a referrer, but why would an innocent user do so? They would simply be visiting the link in an email, not trying to hide their identity. The site itself couldn't cause your browser to send fake a referrer header, so it would at least make the scammers work harder.

  63. The worst phisher of them all.. by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

    has to be these pricks

  64. Here's how you avoid 100% of scams. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never click a link in your email. Ever.

    If you follow this simple procedure, you're not going to get scammed (unless you're also stupid enough to respond with your credit card details or something)

    Places like paypal and such now don't even put clickable links in their emails because that's what scammers use. If they want you to visit a URL they'll either tell you to type it in or simply put it in as a non-clickable URL that you have to copy and paste in.

    It's mildly inconvenient, but no matter how legitimate the email looks if you do not reply and do not click any links in it for any reason, you will not be scammed.

  65. No one cares but the scammed by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
    I've never found anyone who cared about a report of someone trying to scam their customers, or about someone running an illegal operation on their network. My most recent attempt to make such a report made me think so highly of the company involved that I hope they're found to be complicite in any criminal cases that might come down the line from the scams...

    There are two classes of scam IPs, in my experience. Those in SE Asia (Korea, China, etc), and those that are compromised machines here in the U.S. In March I found one of the latter - a church organization in Virginia's webmail server had had an extra script inserted into it, hidden in the graphics directory. It was a hosted service, from a big-name ISP, according to ARIN's records. I reported it to their security people, with details of what directory the script was in, which customer's site had been compromised, etc.

    Just over a month passed, and I got an angry email from NaviSite.com's security department, claiming the company I'd sent the message to (dellhost.com) "is not a navisite company nor is it one of our customers nor is the ip address ... assigned to, hosted by, routed by, or used in any way by NaviSite or any of the companies that we are affiliated with." They followed that with, "Misdirected spam complaints are not much better than actual spam."

    Even though I'd not sent the complaint to NaviSite in the first place, I sent back, "Oh? You better tell ARIN (copy of ARIN record attached) and your own DNS servers (copy of reverse-DNS from their server, announcing that it was one of their customers) that it isn't your subnet, because they disagree with you!"

    Let's see, I should get their "timely response" in about 20 more days...

    About the most productive thing you can do with a scam mail like this is to find a convenient open proxy to hide behind, disable java and javascript in your browser so they can't use it to filter out bad entries, load the link, and start pumping fake information in. PINs with letters are great. If everyone did this, giving them 10 or 100 fake entries for every valid one, it would at least increase the chances of them getting caught, as they try to run scams with the bad info!