Slashdot Mirror


Space Weather Warning

SallyMac writes "The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has issued a Space Weather Warning. On Friday, May 13th, NOAA detected a 'geomagnetic storm of extreme proportions'. From the article: 'This event registered a 9 on the K-Index, which measures the maximum deviation of the Earth's magnetic field in a given three-hour period...The scale ranges from 0 to 9, with 9 being the highest. This was a significant event.' See the article on the NOAA site for more information." Spaceweather.com has details on the resulting auroras.

59 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Scientists. by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why couldn't they use a scale of 1 to 10 like EVERYBODY ELSE?

    1. Re:Scientists. by twostar · · Score: 4, Funny

      because they like having more then two options.

    2. Re:Scientists. by Xypheri · · Score: 2, Funny

      so what happens when it registers an A on the scale?
      or F for that matter?

    3. Re:Scientists. by pv2b · · Score: 2, Funny

      This one goes to 11.

    4. Re:Scientists. by shut_up_man · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nigel: Because ours go to nine. See? The numbers all go to nine. Look...right across the board.
      Marty: Ahh...oh, I see....
      Nigel: Nine...nine...nine....
      Marty: ..and most of these instruments go up to ten....
      Nigel: Exactly.
      Marty: Does that mean it's...safer? Is it any safer?
      Nigel: Well, it's one safer, isn't it? It's not ten.

    5. Re:Scientists. by dutchd00d · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean "everybody else" as in the Richter scale (3.5-8)? Or the Beaufort scale (0-12)? Or the stellar magnitude scale (-3.5 - ~25)? Or the Fujita scale (F0-F5)?

    6. Re:Scientists. by osmic234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it doesn't necessarily start at zero - it's a logarithmic scale so negative magnitudes are still meaningful, if not worth worrying about outside seismology research.

      And as for 8 being the upper limit - one of the reasons that the Richter magnitude scale isn't actually used anymore is that it saturates at large magnitudes. In other words as earthquakes keep getting bigger, the richter scale doesn't really keep up - it under-reports the actual size. So an earthquake with a moment magnitude (see below) of 7.5 might have a comparable richter magnitude, but one with a moment magnitude of 8.5 or 9.0 might still only have a richter magnitude of 7.5 or 8.0.

      Moment magnitudes are calculated from the area of fault surface that actually ruptures, how much it moves, and the rigidity of the surrounding rock. A fault can propagate over long horizontal distances (~1000 km in the Sumatran earthquake last year) but only down to a point where the crust is still rigid enough to crack. It's this factor that is the main control on upper earthquake size. Other wise the rupture could just keep spreading down. Then you could have stupidly large earthquakes like a magnitude 15 or 20 that would crack the earth in half. Well, not really.

      Part of the reason is the the richter magnitude scale is a local magnitude - it's not actually giving the true energy release of an earthquake, but how bad it feels at some nearby point (corrected for distance). It's also a bit of a hold-over from the early days of seismology in California. When people started to realise that the are earthquakes outside California as well, the richter magnitude scheme fell out of favour.

      Seismologists don't use the richter (local) magnitude scale anymore really. The reason it's still often reported in the news is that after alarge earthquake, reporters call up their local governmental Geological Survey for a size. If the seismologists then try to give the size in a modern, more accurate scale, the reporters tend to say "Moment magnitude? No one knows what that is - how big was it on the Richter scale?". So, even though it's generally out of date, it still manages to be somewhat self-perpuating.

  2. Thanks for the warning. by syynnapse · · Score: 5, Funny

    I _would_ have taken the freeway home on friday had I known, but instead I got caught in this horrible weather while traveling through the upper atmosphere.
    Way to have 20/20 hindsight NOAA.

    --

    System.out.println(syynnapse.getSig());

  3. So What's the Duration? by virtigex · · Score: 2

    I couldn't get from the article what the duration of disruption is. Anybody know?

    1. Re:So What's the Duration? by Durinthal · · Score: 2, Informative

      About 60 hours, according to how long it took the story to get posted.

  4. Shortwaves were dead by dimss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was very poor shortwave propagation yesterday. Now I see why...

  5. I need to find a new primary news source. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Shit, man. If they knew about the flare on Friday, how come somebody didn't say something, oh, Saturday or something? I totally missed the auroras.

    Is there a RSS feed where I can get this kind of news in a *timely* manner?

    1. Re:I need to find a new primary news source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sign up to the Spaceweather list at http://science.nasa.gov/news/subscribe.asp?checked =sw

    2. Re:I need to find a new primary news source. by drbill28 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can also sign up for AuroraChasers. This will only give you a few minutes warning though. But it will tell you the exact Kp projection for your area. It's helpful if you want to see auroras.

    3. Re:I need to find a new primary news source. by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because they didn't have any idea that there was going to be an extreme geomagnetic storm on friday. On friday, there was just an ordinary M8 class flare on the sun. Nothing special, it didn't even seem to be aimed at the Earth, but for some strange reason a glob of solar spittle, carrying solar magnetic field with it, held together or constructively interfered with itself, and we got an extra dose of it.

      Kind of like the tornado sirens that go off after the tornado has passed. This was less a warning than a report of something that already happened.

    4. Re:I need to find a new primary news source. by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually it was pretty clear that a CME was coming. When a CME is large enough and fast enough it will drive a shock and these shocks accelerate energetic particles. We have spacecraft that detect these particles well ahead of the approaching CME. It was very clear only a few hours after the flare that the CME (or part of it) was heading this way.

      If you go to:

      http://www.sec.noaa.gov/ace/EPAM_7d.html

      You can see the low energy ions (the lower panel) and the electrons (upper panel).
      The initial burst of particles near the end of day 13 was followed by a steady increase in intensity that continued right up until the CME driven shock passed the spacecraft.

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
  6. Great timing by Stripsurge · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two days ago something happened that could have caused some major problems. It didn't. Oh and be sure to catch the auroras yesterday. They sure were great. Thanks for the heads up ;)

    1. Re:Great timing by tehshen · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's the opposite of news?

      Slashdot

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  7. Some other useful links by tqft · · Score: 3, Informative


    Scroll down to Satellite Environment plot
    http://www.sec.noaa.gov/today.html

    there is also a plot which will update live
    http://www.sec.noaa.gov/rt_plots/satenv.html

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
    1. Re:Some other useful links by Stripsurge · · Score: 2, Informative

      This one has a nice map of where auroral activity is taking place and shows relative intensity.
      http://www.sec.noaa.gov/pmap/pmapN.html

  8. Northen lights by Brtchlin · · Score: 5, Informative

    i guess that would explain the light show we saw up here in western canada tonight, very vibrant greens, blues, yellows violets and all dancing like mad. I wonder if anyone else in the world is getting them as well?

  9. This could be as bad as by doofer · · Score: 3, Interesting
  10. Shouldn't affect the Internet by Teddy_Roosevelt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Possible impacts from such a geomagnetic storm include widespread power system voltage control problems; some grid systems may experience complete collapse or blackouts.

    Bah. What's the worst that could h...[NO CARRIER]

  11. A Sunday Morning Report by BRock97 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hell, it would have been nice to know this in advance...

    As it was, got out of work about 0800Z Sunday morning and as I was driving home, thought I saw the most bizarre clouds. When I pulled into the driveway, there were these flashes that moved from west to east in the night sky. Since I live next to a small airfield, I assumed it was the lights from there, but when I looked in that direction, they were turned off. So, drove about 20 minutes west of the big city (damn that light) and was treated to a show that words cannot describe. This being my first aurora event, I had didn't know what to expect. I sat and watched for 45 minutes as the sky literally danced. About 30 minutes in, the aurora moved to right above my head and turned into a completely different show with different bands shooting out above me.

    To anyone who hasn't witnessed an aurora, take the time to travel someplace that you can view them. It is totally worth the trip.

    Judging by the POES Auroral Activity graphic, things are firing up again. Damn my luck that thundershowers are moving in to cloud things up....

    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
  12. All Quiet... by dj245 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All Quiet at the Deblois Wood Chip Power Plant. Not even a blip in the output voltage or vars over the past 12 hours.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  13. Corrections by zerbot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What was observed on the 13th was solar flare activity. It doesn't become a geomagnetic storm until it reaches the earth, which it did on the 15th.

    Is it really that hard to copy the right information out of sources?

  14. well then by ImaLamer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What you need is Spaceweather PHONE from the folks at SpaceWeather.com

    Here is the list of "Space Weather Alerts" they offer:
    • Aurora warnings
    • Geomagnetic storms
    • X-class solar flares
    • CMEs (coronal mass ejection) and solar wind gusts
    • The Interplanetary Magnetic Field
    • Solar radiation storms

    They'll call you with alerts 48-hours in advance when possible. Pretty cool for $4.95/month. Anyone want to buy it for me as a gift?
  15. just to be sure.... by zxnos · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...i want to be sure i have this right, on a scale that ranges from 0-9, 9 is the 'highest'? fascinating.

    --
    always mosh clockwise
  16. Re:Coincidence? by Valcoramizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news, a black cat was spotted walking underneath an open ladder carrying a salt shaker. This so startled the man on the ladder that he dropped the mirror he was holding, shattering the mirror, and crushing the cat.

    --
    We raise our slide-rules high.
  17. Wrong write-up by Chran · · Score: 5, Informative

    Noooo ... A solar flare occured Friday, leading to a forecast about the K-9 geomagnetic storm which occured yesterday. Thanks for reading the articles before posting to Slashdot. Woohoo!

  18. Yes! by ImaLamer · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are pictures from around the world (although mainly the US and Canada) at Spaceweather.com

    They have pictures from California, South Dakota, Kansas and Illinois. Actually, I now see two more pages of fantastic photos.

    1. Re:Yes! by BJH · · Score: 4, Funny

      They have pictures from California, South Dakota, Kansas and Illinois.

      "Around the world", eh? Spoken like a true American.

    2. Re:Yes! by grcumb · · Score: 3, Funny

      " They have pictures from California, South Dakota, Kansas and Illinois. "

      '"Around the world", eh? Spoken like a true American.'

      You have to cut them a little slack. From where they stand, California and Kansas look like different planets. 8^)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    3. Re:Yes! by Kaydet81 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually the US does represent a fairly significant slice of the globe in both lattitude and longitude. Also when someone asks what's happening around the world it's pretty difficult to report on more than that with which one is familiar ... typically one would rely on someone in another true part of the world to report on what they know, to get the whole picture.

      QuitYerBitchin

    4. Re:Yes! by Tophe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since 6 percent is insignificant, please forward me 6 percent of your salary. Thanks.

  19. Now I get it!!! by d474 · · Score: 3, Funny
    "This event registered a 9 on the K-Index..."
    ...So, a "0" on the "K" index means everything's gonna be "0K". I always wondered where that came from.
    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    1. Re:Now I get it!!! by dustmite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is most certainly not German, neither is the origin of the phrase "OK". Did you even read the link that you yourself posted? OK is an Americanism, originating in New York, and is a comical pronunciation of "All Correct". Now, a few people may dispute that explanation, but nobody thinks the origin is German. The first recorded occurrences of the word are all in the US.

    2. Re:Now I get it!!! by Tophe · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Straight Dope claims the letters come from the phrase "Oll Korrect." The phrase comes from a curious fad for "comical abbreviations" that swept the country in the 1830s and 1840s. The estimable Oxford Dictionary concurs, while also noting that the term has several foreign equivalents: the Scots "och aye," the Greek "ola kala," the Choctaw Indian "Oke." http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20050321.html

  20. the weather of the past... by bdigit · · Score: 3, Funny

    is always alot more accurate once it has occured already. thanks slashdot for making sure we get the weather a few days after it has occured

  21. Re:What does this mean for the little man? by redJag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just to be safe, I'd keep your little man away from it.

  22. Re:Why only NOAA? Why not international? by GomezAdams · · Score: 2, Funny

    You've unconvered the great cover up. George Bush and Congelisa Rice have told Chaney to get his pals at Haliburton to create this really, really, top secret Giant Magnetic Device that will fry everyone's brain in the Blue States to clear the way for a Red State migration. The only protection against this new terrible weapon is to wear tin foil under your hat, or if you can find one, a fine holed, metal colander. If the holes are too large then the micro sized Federal agents riding on the magnetic pulses will be able to get through to whisper evil thoughts in your ear and plant tiny alien creatures from Area 52 that will eat your brain. Since you are the one who made this discovery and was foolish enough to post it on the Internet, expect black helicoptors to find you.... Oh no. It's too late. They have you in their sights. Run, run. Run like the wind and don't look back.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
  23. 3-Hour K-Index Charts by trevdak · · Score: 4, Informative

    I found an automatically generated graph here:
    http://www.sec.noaa.gov/rt_plots/kp_3d.html

  24. Re:50's flashback. by circusboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    and while your at it, "Stop, Drop, and Roll!"

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  25. I wore protection! by bokane · · Score: 2, Funny

    Boy, good thing I was rockin' the tinfoil chapeau on Friday...

  26. No Problem here by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Noppepeee. Noo probbbblleem he 20934 hehrr. I don0932t kn203w what yo.....u are all2342 talking about. THe99999-9re is 980980 da800ta corrupt232342ion you2234 Say0--0????

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  27. With apologies to Dr. Streetmentioner by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 4, Funny
    Oh and be sure to catch the auroras yesterday.
    Yeah, they're going to have been great. :-)
  28. Your geekiness is revealed when... by CrackedButter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you are the first to mention the word "Ion" and "Storm" and then using them to create a joke in relation to the news article.

  29. Is this related to Earth's changing magnetic field by goat_of_wisdom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've read that Earth's magnetic field is getting weaker and will soon reverse its polarity. I wonder if a weakening magnetic field is more susceptible to these kinds of solar flares. (i.e. a normal flare results in a larger perturbation of Earth's magnetic field.)

  30. Re:What does this mean for the little man? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Informative
    can someone tell me if I should be worried or not? What do I expect from this?
    1. No.
    2. An article about it on Slashdot that is about three days late.
      Oh, and some pretty pictures of aurorae posted on various web sites.
      Beyond that, not much.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  31. So that explains why... by FoXDie · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...my dead Grandpa started talking to me from my XM Satellite radio...

    In case you are wondering...

  32. Re:1 digit by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F

    There, that's more than 10 things counted with a single digit.

    You must be new here :)

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  33. Re:Is this related to Earth's changing magnetic fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The polarity has, and does indeed reverse; however, 'soon' on the scale in which we speak of these events is on the same order as other geologic or paleolithic phenomena:

    1000 years: Imminate
    1M: Soon
    100M: Long
    250M+: Distant

    While K-index values relate to maximum field purturbance, no, the solar ejectory matter was significantly above 'normal' (it was extreme), and this 9 K event was not an abbreancy related to the Earth's changing magnetic field.

  34. I was unable to find a link but by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    back in the 1800's there was a period of solar activity that was so extreme that aurora was seen in the Carribean and telegraph operators had to disconnect or reverse their batteries!

  35. Cell Service? by Huxley_Dunsany · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm located in southern Nevada, and I noticed that I was having terrible cell reception all day yesterday, and I don't think it was just me. I work in a large electronics store, and all day long (esp. in the afternoon), I overheard customers complaining that they were having dropped calls, or at least much more interference than usual. Would a storm like this have an effect on cell phone reception? I did notice at least one or two posts mentioning that short-wave radio was out yesterday...

    Just a thought.

    Huxley

  36. Slashdot article in error by laughing!oni · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the geomagnetic storm was detected on May 15th. The solar flare that caused the geomagnetic storm took place on May 13th. Someone should correct that slashdot article.

  37. Re:First post? by ccarson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apparently, the Earth magnetic field has decreased by 10% in the last 10 years. During my studies in electrical engineering sub-atomic physics, I learned that a particles velocity can be affected by magnetic fields. Based on Earths weakening magnetic field and the recent increase in solar intensity, I believe this may be one of the reasons causing global warming. If more radiation hits the Earth, shouldn't that also increase the overall temperature of the Earth due to particle scattering and can global warming be contributed to this? I've been bouncing this idea in my head for a while now and I can't see why this MAY not be true.

  38. Solar Weather Data by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  39. Explains strangeness.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    my GPS has been *really* inaccurate in the past few days. It's also way off on the altitude. (Mountain View, CA is not at 2,800 feet)
    Also my Sirius stuff has had more drop-offs than usual, even when the sky was clear outside.

  40. Re:First post? by notasheep · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except that his notion is also backed by scientists world-wide. Yours is backed by you. Though, I'd love to see some links to articles that back up your proposition - always willing to learn something new.

    Until then, I'll place my bet on the more established, and accepted, theory.

    --
    Your mind looks a little cramped. Why don't you stretch it a little?