Slashdot Mirror


Layoffs at OSDL

daria42 writes "Open Source Development Labs - which employs Linus Torvalds - has apparently cut nine of its fifty-seven staff (although Linus has retained his job). The cuts come as the organisation re-structures. It will establish a European office and expand into Asia. "We're a small enough organisation that what would be a small change in focus for a bigger company has a large effect on us," said a spokesperson."

179 comments

  1. Restructuring Methods by mfh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Let's hope this isn't a three-round layoff. Generally speaking, whenever a company plays the layoff card, they do it three times:
    1. No brainers: the people who most deserve to go, and who everyone agrees
    2. The group of tough choice cuts, generally 60% of the first round, and not often based on performance but more so on overshadowing
    3. The painful cuts who don't deserve to go but they have to cut 40% of the last round numbers, so these will have to do
    But of course since this is to enable the company to move into Europe, and not due to financial problems -- then perhaps this will be the only round as they will be rehiring these positions in a new office. I like the idea that they will be hiring new locals.
    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Restructuring Methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on your estimates that would leave a company of 12 people.

    2. Re:Restructuring Methods by jaseuk · · Score: 1

      How are they going to have the resources to expand if they are laying off staff?

      They'll need those 9 people to babysit the existing operations while others are supporting the new operations.

      Sounds like a troubled expansion plan to me.

    3. Re:Restructuring Methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      57 people.
      Fire 9 (todays announcement)
      then 6 (66% of 9)
      then 3 (50% of 6)

      gives, erm, more than 12.

    4. Re:Restructuring Methods by mfh · · Score: 1

      Based on your estimates that would leave a company of 12 people.
      This is not a correct number. He said:
      First round (9) (total remain: 48)
      Second = 60% * 9 = 5.4 = 5 (43)
      Third = 40% * 5 = 2 = 41 remaining after potential three round cuts

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    5. Re:Restructuring Methods by mfh · · Score: 1

      How are they going to have the resources to expand if they are laying off staff?
      Lay off more workers. It's more important for the new expansion areas to show solid numbers than for the home office to be ahead of the game. It's okay if the home office goes into a little decline to get the expansion areas off the ground.

      But they will want to really watch everyone left in the company, and layoffs are a great way to send the message that employees had better peform. Sadly, layoffs have the side effect of turning good people into emotionless and unpassionate people.

      They'll need those 9 people to babysit the existing operations while others are supporting the new operations.

      Realistically, they only need one manager to run things at head office. It's a small company.

      In order to afford to get things going, pay for the expenses of having new offices and training new employees (although they likely know who they are hiring anyway because it's OPEN SOURCE -- they already have a list of great employees who would die to work for them)... Ergh. It's going to be pretty easy for them after the first pinch.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    6. Re:Restructuring Methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you meant % of the remainder:

      57-9 = 48
      48 * 60% = ~ 28
      48 - 28 = 20
      20 * 40% = 8
      20 - 8 = 12

      When I think of percentage cuts I think of percentage of people left not percentage of the last percentage cut.

    7. Re:Restructuring Methods by mfh · · Score: 1

      I thought you meant % of the remainder:

      Nope, generally it's the percentage of the first round size. So if 1000 people get laid off of from a company of 25,000... the next round will see approx 600 layoffs. And then 240 after that. But that's only if the management is using a formula. Sometimes they just pull the numbers out of their butts (and when they pull the numbers from that lower region, you will see them linked proudly on this website.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    8. Re:Restructuring Methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've pulled used condoms, gerbils, and winter-green flavored dental floss out of my butt. How do you fit a number up it?

  2. A song by ceeam · · Score: 0, Troll

    Fifty-seven staff on the list,
    Fifty-seven of staff.
    You take nine down,
    Cut them around,
    Forty-eight staff on the list.

    (sigh) I'm lame...

  3. I don't know what by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What exactly is their income anyway? Do they have a revenue stream?

    I would be surprised if nobody donated a ton of cash, to say that they are paying Linus' salary.

    --
    No reason to lie.
    1. Re:I don't know what by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I think it's the modern equivalent of medievel patronage.
      The HPs and IBMs and Novells chip in a few bones, and they all avoid cost and risk for developing a kernel.
      Perfect business sense.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:I don't know what by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 4, Informative

      About Osdl

      OSDL - home to Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux - is dedicated to accelerating the growth and adoption of Linux in the enterprise. Founded in 2000 and supported by a global consortium of IT industry leaders, OSDL is a non-profit organization that provides state-of the-art computing and test facilities in the United States and Japan available to developers around the world. OSDL's founding members are IBM, HP, CA, Intel, and NEC. A complete list of OSDL member organizations is provided on the member page at OSDL Members.

    3. Re:I don't know what by BreadMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      They apparently collect monies from different membership levels. For a smallish sized organization that wants to participate in the decision-making, you're out 12K. Once you get beyond a bronze membership, it looks like OSDL wants some cut of your revenue stream. Membership gets you a voting slot on some working groups.

      That's a lot for what's really a club membership, without the golfing and semi-nice place to eat. For most like vendors, OSDL membership doesn't drive sales and on the technical side, you can be a free-rider. IMHO, this doesn't look like a winning business model.

    4. Re:I don't know what by hey! · · Score: 1

      I think it's the modern equivalent of medievel patronage.

      Well, would you rather be the Henry Ford of software development or the Peter Carl Fabergé?

      There's room in the world for both.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:I don't know what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a non-profit .org - they
      don't need a "successful business model".

      Apologies for AC reply, not my comp.

    6. Re:I don't know what by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Then they could afford to keep 57 people. So maybe mfh (56) was right and the people they fired are just the losers who needed to be gone.

    7. Re:I don't know what by max+cohen · · Score: 1

      I thought they were going to give their software away and make money on support.

    8. Re:I don't know what by kfg · · Score: 1

      It's a non-profit .org - they
      don't need a "successful business model".


      You've never run a non-profit, have you?

      KFG

    9. Re:I don't know what by BreadMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Non-profit != not profitable && Non-profit != charity :-)

      No matter what non-profit your running, you still need to make money above your expenses to fund expansion, capital investments and keep a few bucks around for a rainy day or unexpected expenses.

      In the US, there's rules for how much you can retain depending on how you solicit funds. I can't recall the particulars at this point, sorry... Non-profits operating as charities that keep large margins between income and expenses can still get around these rules be setting-up special funds or endowments.

    10. Re:I don't know what by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      that's nice but...

      1) Linux was developed without being boned by them, and would continue to be developed without the aid of a big blue boner

      2) HP, BM, Novell, etc. employ programmers to work on Linux and other OSS projects.

      They donate cash because they're being shaken down.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  4. Passion and free have to end somewhere by mattspammail · · Score: 1, Troll

    Kudos to all who contribute to projects such as Linux. From its inception, it has been a grassroots initiative to provide better for less. It's sad for the people who have been laid off, but it's part of the economy we live in. These people won't be out of the job for long though. Keep your heads up, guys!

    --
    Now accepting PayPal donations!
  5. 'Center of Gravity' by thouth · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The organisation, which calls itself the "centre of gravity" of the Linux movement" How can they possibly be serious? Judging from the average weight of people at a LUG...

    1. Re:'Center of Gravity' by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Apparently they've got a lot of pull.

    2. Re:'Center of Gravity' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus aint exactly skinny either.

    3. Re:'Center of Gravity' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everything is relative. Compared to Michael Moore, Linus looks like a twig.


      I'm human, my word ain't good enough for you?

  6. Balance? by toupsie · · Score: 3, Funny
    The organisation (sic), which calls itself the "centre of gravity" of the Linux movement, made the cuts as part of a plan to rebalance its work force


    Wow, they cut workers on both sides of the fulcrum. Sweet!


    On a side note, doesn't ZDNet have a spell checker?

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Balance? by QMO · · Score: 0
      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    2. Re:Balance? by timster121 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Spell checker?

      "Organisation" is a correct spelling. As is "centre".

      Remember, this is ZDNet Australia.

    3. Re:Balance? by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, "organisation" and "centre" are valid spellings of those words.

    4. Re:Balance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Spelling has already been pointed out but since you want to be the English police I will call you out on two things:

      First, when using "sic" it should be enclosed in square brackets - [sic].

      Second, it is bad form to use [sic] to show off that you found a trivial error.

    5. Re:Balance? by Emetophobe · · Score: 1
      On a side note, doesn't ZDNet have a spell checker?
      According to numerous sources (google and tfd.com) organization and organisation are both valid?
      On a side note, "centre" is a valid word, but they probably meant "center", unless they are a "centre" that deals with gravity.
    6. Re:Balance? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone find it ironic that there's a story about an organisation moving jobs from America to Europe, then an American claims that the writer misspells words when the writer uses the English spellings?

    7. Re:Balance? by KhaZ · · Score: 1
      Everyone has already pointed out the organisation/organization, centre/center dealy (American vs. England (as well as Australia, Canada, well, hell, anyone, not American).

      But it reminds me of one of my bosses... Who also said there was a typo with 'organisation':

      We had hired this nitwit from Seattle, to come work in Vancouver (Canada), and I had asked for time off to go to my girlfriend's family back in Regina (Saskatchewan, Canada).

      He goes, "COOL! I've always wanted to go to Iceland!"

      ...

      (I'm assuming he thought I meant Reykjavik. I could see how the first two letters could confuse you, if you're a complete half-breed)

      Anyways, completely off-topic. Mod me down!

      --
      - - - -

      KickingDragon

    8. Re:Balance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well lets go a step further. If you require the use of too many brackets then you need to re-write your sentence to flow better for the reader. Brackets and parens are for the writer and don't add real value to the reader.

    9. Re:Balance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: they are THE correct spellings.

    10. Re:Balance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you on about?

    11. Re:Balance? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      In Canada, where we retain more of fair Brittania, we use center to indicate the central position, and centre for a facility - e.g. "The Learning Centre".

    12. Re:Balance? by Felonious+Ham · · Score: 1, Funny

      Valid, and wrong.

    13. Re:Balance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, you're a retard.

    14. Re:Balance? by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      Thats what I was trying to say, I live in Canada =)

    15. Re:Balance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah brackets should really just be saved for clarification as in:

      "[President] George [Bush] liked to light small animals on fire as a child."

      or for changing pronouns to proper names as in:

      "...[President Bush] was raised by wolves."

      The only other time it should be used is when signifying to an editor that this is a literal spelling but it should be removed when printed.

    16. Re:Balance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, according to you, British = wrong?

    17. Re:Balance? by Lemm · · Score: 1

      The Oxford English Dictionary would love to hear from you.

      --
      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. Always boom tomorrow. BOOM!
    18. Re:Balance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So, according to you, British = wrong?"

      Yep.

  7. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Um, you want open source in India? Make some.
    Opensource is where people code it, mostly.

  8. Where's my scissors? by HaydnH · · Score: 1

    OSDL cuts, IBM cuts... is the start of another .com bubble burst??? *runs off and sells shares*

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Where's my scissors? by corevps · · Score: 0

      It looks like normal market shift and they are cutting for direction and not money gain. Although it wouldn't surpise me if they were looking to cut costs as well as setting up remote offices isn't cheap

      --
      corevps.com - Root Servers from $7.99/mo
    2. Re:Where's my scissors? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's OSS. I think you mean a ".org" bubble burst.

    3. Re:Where's my scissors? by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      Either way I'm sure catbert evil HR director is behind it!!

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    4. Re:Where's my scissors? by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

      No, not another .com bust... it is long term globalization that is causing this. The USA companies are not the only players any more.

      Now, the UK/USA housing marketing... watch out for that bubble!!

    5. Re:Where's my scissors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Layoffs are not the first indicator of a bubble bursting.

      The typical indicators of a bubble bursting are sudden changes (e.g. bankruptcies) in an area that has seen enormous growth for the past few years.

      Anyone with any common sense shouldn't look for signs of a bubble bursting as much as signs of a bubble forming, in any case, and since the dot.com burst, the technology industry hasn't really had time to end up in a new bubble situation.

      Anything that grows in value significantly without really gaining any practical value is a good indicator of a bubble forming. Right now, it looks like US real estate (in those areas where it is experiencing the most growth in value) could be becoming a huge bubble.

      In the technology industry, there may still be significant overvaluation, but not to the extent of the dot.com bubble, or anything close to what happened to real estate in Japan earlier...

  9. Outsourced by dan14807 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It will establish a European office and expand into Asia.

    Lets be honest here. They are outsourcing those jobs. Hey, I'm not complaining. Hooray for the Europeans and the Asians. But the US is slipping further and further behind in the world of techonology.

    1. Re:Outsourced by DavidNWelton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Europeans are, at this point, probably as or more expensive, especially considering the weak dollar.

      It's not outsourcing, it's expanding. Linux doesn't just exist in the US, you know. There are big opportunities in other parts of the world, and apparently they want to be there.

    2. Re:Outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. The US is slipping so far behind that they are still stuck with Microsoft.

    3. Re:Outsourced by Temkin · · Score: 2, Informative



      So when Linus moved to the US from Europe back in the 90's, did Europe complain that Linux development was being "outsourced"?

    4. Re:Outsourced by justins · · Score: 1
      It's not outsourcing, it's expanding.

      If that were a true statement, wouldn't they be adding jobs instead of just shifting them geographically?
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    5. Re:Outsourced by cranos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes because everyone knows that Open Source Software is only developed in the US and Europe and Asia offer cheaper developers.

      What the fuck? I mean seriously this got and insightful mod? People get a clue here!

    6. Re:Outsourced by dan14807 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not outsourcing, it's expanding. Linux doesn't just exist in the US, you know. There are big opportunities in other parts of the world, and apparently they want to be there.

      They are firing people in the US and replacing them with people not in the US. You could make the "expanding" argument if they weren't doing the firings. They are not "expanding". They are relocating.

    7. Re:Outsourced by BillyBlaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe if the US fixed it's broken and steadily worsening IP policies, it wouldn't be about to be overtaken by so many countries in the IT sector, and this kind of thing wouldn't happen.

    8. Re:Outsourced by fatboy · · Score: 1

      Linux doesn't just exist in the US, you know. There are big opportunities in other parts of the world, and apparently they want to be there.

      What is this "other parts of the world" you speak of? Is that were all those exotic callsigns I talk to on my ham radio are? :)

      --
      --fatboy
    9. Re:Outsourced by Ham_belony · · Score: 1

      It didn't start in the US. Anyway they need to broaden their horizon and since everybody is moving to places were economic growth is the highest and where they can start earning money again it would be the most plausible move.

    10. Re:Outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. Linux comes from Finland. Currently, with so many people working on it in America, the jobs are outsourced at the moment. Shifting them to Europe is bringing them back home, the absolute opposite of outsourcing.

    11. Re:Outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on what markets are in question, the best potential for growth isn't in the US or Europe (and I say this as a European with business interests in IT growth), but in Asia and South America.

      Another thing is that the part of an organization that's most regionally significant is the sales part.

      From my understanding of OSDL, neither of these factors should be that important to them, so it may be more a matter of other things (e.g. legislation - as long as Europe doesn't have software patents)...

    12. Re:Outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No not exactly.

      If I run an american company and want to sell widgets to asia, maybe at first I'll build widgets here and pay boats to float them across the ocean, but at some point I'll reach some volume where it would be far cheaper to simply open a widget-making factory there, to build and sell widgets to Asia.

      It doesn't become outsourcing until I close down all the other factories and pay boats to bring the widgets that used to be made and sold in the US back.

  10. Outsourcing Linux by Gax · · Score: 1

    It is a pity that 9 people have lost their jobs. However, it is unlikely to have an impact in the long-term. The great thing about Linux is that it is so well supported by different organisations and certain aspects can be outsourced to other knowledgeable groups.
    Problems may arise if they cut further jobs and the outsourced responsibilities begin to splinter and fight among themselves.

    1. Re:Outsourcing Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus is a finn, Alan Cox is english and most of the developers outside US. Linux, like the internet, has no physical country boundaries. So there's no issue of outsourcing. Having offices around the world is definitelly a Good Thing.

  11. Probably not a big deal. by Nytewynd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone that has ever worked for a small programming shop knows this probably isn't a huge event. It sounds like of the 9 people let go, most were not programmers. They probably got rid of some sales and marketing people to prepare themselves for an investment. A lot of times to take larger amounts of venture capital, you have to clean house to prepare to take on execs from the VC firm. We had to name one of their board members our President. They also gave us a marketing guy, and sales guy. It is part of selling your soul to make money.

    Hopefully they didn't ditch anyone too integral to the programming. Also, they mentioned consulting positions, so they might have simply decided to not renew some contracts. Without the breakdown of what positions were downsized, it's hard to tell what they are doing.

    The one thing that happened to our company during this process is that some of the engineers got fed up (myself included) and left. We had about 15 people total and only 5 were programmers by the time the restructuring finished. Imagine this: 10 people telling you that we need Product X yesterday, and it gets added to your list of 10 other things that were promised to your top clients.

    --
    /. ++
    1. Re:Probably not a big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm particularly impressed with your "its not so bad; probably only receptionists and marketing" and "it'd be a problem if the programmers went" attitude.

      Receptionists need to pay rent too, chum.

    2. Re:Probably not a big deal. by Nytewynd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you have a small shop, you don't need extra receptionists. When your main function is to turn out code, all that matters is that you have talented programmers and someone with a direction for the company.

      I never said that receptionists were useless. On the other hand, if a company doesn't need receptionists then it isn't thier duty to hire them just so they can pay rent. If you need to downsize, you get rid of non-critical personnel first. Receptionist are definitely in that category, especially since they are most easily replaced out of any staff members.

      Downsizing is never a fun thing, but there is a clear pecking order.

      --
      /. ++
    3. Re:Probably not a big deal. by antic · · Score: 1


      "to take larger amounts of venture capital"

      They're non-profit and membership based. I don't think VC is the issue here.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    4. Re:Probably not a big deal. by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "When your main function is to turn out code, all that matters is that you have talented programmers and someone with a direction for the company. "

      Perhaps this is true for a non-profit, but in the real world if your main function is "to turn out code" you probably won't be in business very long.

      "Receptionist are definitely in that category, especially since they are most easily replaced out of any staff members."

      Good receptionists are much harder to replace than good programmers. It's a buyer's market for programmers.

    5. Re:Probably not a big deal. by penglust · · Score: 1

      If you think so. I have been interviewing for my company for several months. So far everybody I actually thought woyld be competent has turned us down. They all had multiple offers.

    6. Re:Probably not a big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I know two of the people they laid off. One was the official OSDL presence on the DTL (Desktop Linux working group), and the other was assisting the DTL with experiences from her time on the DCL (Data Center Linux) group.

    7. Re:Probably not a big deal. by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      It's very difficult to determine from an interview how well someone will do on the job. The consequence of this is that those who are best at selling themselves are going to be in higher demand.

      If you've been trying for months to hire someone for an non-executive position and haven't succeeded, your need must not be very great.

      I've worked at companies that had jobs open for years that were never filled because their requirements were out of sync with what they were willing to pay. They had a long list of requirements but then said they needed someone with 0-3 years experience. Translation: they wanted to hire an entry-level software engineer with very specific knowledge. There was no such person, so the job wasn't filled.

    8. Re:Probably not a big deal. by Otter · · Score: 1
      One was the official OSDL presence on the DTL (Desktop Linux working group), and the other was assisting the DTL with experiences from her time on the DCL (Data Center Linux) group.

      No offence to your friends, but if those were their full-time positions (which may not be the case -- I can't tell from your phrasing), I don't have any trouble believing they were expendable.

    9. Re:Probably not a big deal. by penglust · · Score: 1

      The one negative that hits us big is the fact that this is San Diego. The sun is nice but it cost just as much to live here as in Silicon Valley now. Very little incentive to move here.
      The second thing is it takes my company 2 to 3 weeks to get through the red tape once a candidate has been selected. This has been too long. In two cases the person had already selected another position.
      Yes we have been looking for specific skill sets but have been offering competitive money. Quite frankly I suspect the bar is being raised again right now.
      I've been doing this a long time and I will admit that I am good as selling myself. Primarily because I state facts, do not hesitate to say I do not have a specific answer down to a line of existing code and back up everything with facts. I can tell within 30 minutes of any interview if the candidate has what I need.
      I must say I have not worked for such companies, for very long that is. This is usually not the only sign of problems. In one case once I got a look at the actual code that was being produced I knew I did not want my name associated with it. I actually just walked out after a week without even asking for the pay check. I just plain did not to admit I had been there.

    10. Re:Probably not a big deal. by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "The one negative that hits us big is the fact that this is San Diego. The sun is nice but it cost just as much to live here as in Silicon Valley now. Very little incentive to move here."

      I live in the San Diego area as well and I would much rather live here than in Silicon Valley or shoveling snow somewhere else. To each his own I guess.

  12. It already is by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OSS is whatever you contribute. There no real dollars chasing OSS based on where you live. It is based on how much you contribute. If you contribute a lot, you will find that HP, IBM, even OSDL would hire you.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  13. In fact,... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I am guessing that half of them will be picked up before the end of the week.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:In fact,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they'll be picked up at the street corner by a gray and gay millionaire in a limousine looking for someone to give him some 'services'.

  14. Re:Outsourced ?. by B747SP · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Also Opensource should be world wide - based on the distribution of intelligence rather than $$$

    That's precisely why there's very little significant OSS coming out of India. Read The Cathedral and the Bazaar and Homesteading the Noosphere and then read The Magic Cauldron. Take particular note of the bits about 'massive independant peer review', the ownership, tenure, customs and in particular the discussion of the quality of the programmers that make it in open source.

    When you're done there, pick any forum on any web site anywhere in the world and look at the discussions of outsourcing to the third world and the devastating quality, communication and reputational problems that companies that make the mistake of outsourcing to India and similar third world countries suffer. Look at the standing joke that IBM, Dell, and Telstra technical support have become as a direct and specific result of their corporate decision to outsource to India.

    Then come back here again and explain to us how exactly OSDN opening an office in darkest India would be a good thing.

    this oughta be good.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  15. Most typical line ever by mattmentecky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The cuts come as the organisation re-structures.

    This has to be the most used line ever when talking about layoffs. One day I want to see a press release about layoffs from some company "Eh...we laidoff people just for the hell of it...we're perfectly structured we just wanted to shake things up a bit. To keep our employees on their toes."

    1. Re:Most typical line ever by gimple · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or how about:

      "We had some dead weight around here, and we wanted to avoid lawsuits for firing them. So, we decided to call it a layout due to restructuring."

    2. Re:Most typical line ever by gimple · · Score: 0

      or LAYOFF even.

    3. Re:Most typical line ever by wheelbarrow · · Score: 1, Troll

      I see a lot of arm chair quarter backs posting here. Why don't one of you start your own company and take on some real life responsibility for once?

      Let's start with you mattmentecky: what's stopping you from starting your own company and running it exactly as you suggest here? Perhaps you can grow a company from start up to a beloved worldwide corporation and never lay anybody off!

    4. Re:Most typical line ever by Nytewynd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "We had some dead weight around here, and we wanted to avoid lawsuits for firing them. So, we decided to call it a layout due to restructuring."

      That's a common one too. I worked for a startup that laid off about 20% of their workforce because the CEO was an idiot and didn't get enough business. To save face, he told some of his buddies that ran the other programming firms in the area that he cut out some dead weight. The 20% of the people let go were mostly really good developers that were let go because they weren't on any projects. They had a hard time getting new jobs because some of the other area companies thought they were dead weight. If it were me, I probably would have sued my previous employer for slander.

      --
      /. ++
    5. Re:Most typical line ever by gosand · · Score: 2, Informative
      This has to be the most used line ever when talking about layoffs. One day I want to see a press release about layoffs from some company "Eh...we laidoff people just for the hell of it...we're perfectly structured we just wanted to shake things up a bit. To keep our employees on their toes."

      Actually, sometimes it actually IS restructuring. Maybe it is too expensive to do your own customer service, so you hire a customer service company to do it for you. What to do with your current employees in that area? Maybe you are getting out of direct sales and going fully to a partnership model. Bye-bye direct sales people. Or maybe you are moving part of your business to another country, and nobody wants to relocate.

      I am all for eliminating double-speak, but companies do re-structure.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    6. Re:Most typical line ever by caino59 · · Score: 1

      Hey buddy, better call the doctor - I think your sarcasm sensor is busted. :o)

      (Sorry, I just couldn't resist)

    7. Re:Most typical line ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes it's true, sometimes it isn't. In a small corporation, it can actually be true. In a large one...in my experience, there's so little realistic information on the actual value and capability of employees on the level where decisions are made that it usually is far less true.

      My personal opinion is that corporations (and governments!) should always be kept small; if the organizations are small, it's easy to see who is doing their jobs effectively and who isn't, and who is to blame for any mistakes. Additionally, since power corrupts, as long as the units are small, there is less risk of corruption of those in charge.

    8. Re:Most typical line ever by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to see is a company that restructures by laying off the most highly paid workers first.

  16. Heh by mfh · · Score: 1

    This is not a correct number. He said:
    My split personality found my /. l/p! Eeek!
    {{{ZZZZZZT]]]
    Er... I found my split personality's /. l/p! Yippie! Time to troll....

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Proof that this place needs a (-1, WTF?!) moderation.

    2. Re:Heh by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      Are you 2-digit-ID guys all burned out like this? :-)

    3. Re:Heh by chewy_2000 · · Score: 1

      He purchased his 2 id account on eBay.

  17. 5 Million a day fines would fix the situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see
    No competition or development, and its not for a lack of brains or competent programmers. Clearly whatever terms or restrictions are both unacceptable and ineffectual in countering a monopoly.
    Pump lots of that fine money with weasel clauses removed, into a lab in Europe, and wait.

  18. If you're fired by an Open Source company... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you were fired by a company that paid you to write Open Source, would you still develop it? If so, I can see how management would say, "what's the point of paying you, exactly?"

    1. Re:If you're fired by an Open Source company... by radja · · Score: 1

      I want a product that does X and Y:
      The employee will write it.
      the free coder will write it if he wants to. sure, he'll write open source, but he'll probably develop something else instead of just another boring business administration program.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    2. Re:If you're fired by an Open Source company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The laid off programmer would find another job. If that job pays him to do the same thing, great. If not, here's why you'd want to keep paying him:

      I have a job writing proprietary software, which I don't like, but at least it puts food on the table. In my spare time I write open source software. All the five minutes of spare time (average) per month that I am not burnt out from work. Expect a 0.0.1 release around this time the next millenium, if I'm not dead by then.

    3. Re:If you're fired by an Open Source company... by Skye16 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, there's the difference between 8-14 hours of development per day and 2-3 hours every few days. These people you're referring to probably aren't going to live on the street and eat out of a dumpster just to keep developing.

    4. Re:If you're fired by an Open Source company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you were fired by a company that paid you to write Open Source, would you still develop it?

      Sure. When and if I felt like it.

    5. Re:If you're fired by an Open Source company... by turgid · · Score: 1
      If so, I can see how management would say, "what's the point of paying you, exactly?"

      I see you are a worthy PHB in the making. I fear for all the innocents who will toil under your ignorant and despotic regieme.

    6. Re:If you're fired by an Open Source company... by kz45 · · Score: 1

      I see you are a worthy PHB in the making. I fear for all the innocents who will toil under your ignorant and despotic regieme.

      OSS advocates have been talking about how great open source is because there are thousands of programmers working projects, for free.

      If a company knows this and decides not to hire someone to save money (or fire someone) (because they know they can get it for free), I see it as smart business.

      you shouldn't expect someone to pay for something they can just as easily get for free (with nearly no loss in benefits from paying). It's human nature.

    7. Re:If you're fired by an Open Source company... by turgid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My point is that most developers need to earn a living. They will obviously be able to spend more time developing if that's what they're paid to do, than if, say, they had to work as a security guard to pay the rent and wrote code on their days off.

      Many of the major Open Source and Free Software projects these days are actually done by professional developers, e.g. the Linux kernel, Red Hat, SuSE, MySQL, gcc, Eclipse, ...

      At the moment, it's cheaper to hire developers in China and India rather than the USA or Europe. People in the USA and Europe are being made redundant and their jobs are going to the Far East. That's where my old job went.

    8. Re:If you're fired by an Open Source company... by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 1
      If you were fired by a company that paid you to write Open Source, would you still develop it?
      Like practically everything else in the universe, the answer to this is, "It all depends."

      As a (painfully!) personal example, I was downsized three years ago by the small software company I had worked for for nine years. The parting was as amicable as such things can ever be: I completely understood their reasons, and even agreed with them -- the cold equations made it clear that someone had to go, and the particular circumstances involved made me the clear and obvious choice. They were good people who weren't out to screw me over (if they weren't, would I have worked there for nine years?).

      At the time, I still had the company's complete source code on my computer at home (telecommuting was not unusual; heck, during the '96 Olympics, the entire company basically shut down and worked from home, except for one programmer who lived right by the office who came in to have someone on-site just in case); if circumstances had permitted me, I would have happily spent some of my time polishing up a couple side projects I had wanted to work on while I was there, but had never had the chance to. They wouldn't have been huge things, or central to the core product -- mostly internal administrative utilities which I thought could use some tweaking and updating, along with a better UI -- but I would still have been writing proprietary commercial software for free, just because I wanted to.

      I also dreamed about singlehandedly porting our entire codebase to Linux, and presenting it to them as a fait accompli (not entirely as insane as it sounds -- twice before in my programming career I had done porting tasks of similar complexity by myself), but, needless to say, that one also never happened.

      But still, I think I can pretty clearly say that yeah, depending on the circumstances, if I were cut loose from a paid Open Source programming position, I might continue to work on the project for free. Of course, as someone else pointed out, I'd be doing so from then on on my schedule, not theirs; and I'd be working on the parts of the project that I watned to work on, which might not have been the parts of the project that the folks who had been paying me would have had me work on. Paying someone who might otherwise have worked for free gets you more than their gratitude: It gets you their undivided attention. Money has a way of doing that.

  19. Re:Outsourced ?. by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Or maybe it just shows how little you know about what is being developed where.

    The myth that US software developers are so much better than their Indian counterparts is just crap. And the idea that Dell support was any good when it was on shore is just plain baloney. It was rubbish then, now its rubbish and cheaper with a more dodgy accent.

    You do know of course that many of the finest mathematicians on the planet are Indian. That senior posts in many technology companies in the US are taken by Indian people, not because they are cheaper but because they are better.

    Rather than moaning, and slinging mud, about elements moving to India, wouldn't it be better to ask how come all these "superior" US developers couldn't break a 50% success rate on projects. Not so hot

    As a friend of mine said

    "We like to pretend that its India thats rubbish, in fact its pretty much everyone".

    And the worst lot are the ones who moan that the other guy is crap, while never checking out the fact that they are worse.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  20. Re:Outsourced ?. by Cylix · · Score: 3, Informative

    Woooah...

    Hold the phone thunder.

    Before they outsourced, I could call up Dell parts and give a base description and get a part.

    Now, if I call up Dell parts I have to search the internet for the part number and give that to them.

    Pretty much the same thing for anything else involved in support now.

    The quality has gone down hill and no matter how you want to spin it... you can't change that fact.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  21. Re:Outsourced ?. by NCraig · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congratulations on creating the ultimate Slashdot Moderator's Dilemma. Your deft combination of hippy manifestos and racism is guaranteed to confuse!

  22. Expense stream by btarval · · Score: 1
    I don't know about their revenue stream, but their expense stream should be between $5-10 Million a year. That's assuming each employee costs them between $100,000 to $200,000 with salary and benefits.

    I'm a little surprised that the industry sponsers aren't keeping up with this. Surely RedHat, IBM, Monte Vista, Wind River, et. al. are making far, far more on Open Source than a measly $10 Million a year?

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
  23. Re:Outsourced ?. by LegendOfLink · · Score: 1

    Hey, Dell and IBM tech support might be a joke, but you know what, Michael Dell can now afford to buy 13 giant mansions with beer fountains instead of 12! OK! OK! Now do you see why outsourcing is great? Who cares about people or American tech jobs, because Michael Dell really needed that extra mansion!

    *end sarcasm*

  24. Indeed, the US is not where the growth is. by ahfoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're absolutely right that expanding into Asia and Europe is hardly synonymous with outsourcing. It's more like being realistic about where the growth is in IT. I'm suprised they aren't also setting up in Brazil.
    The key markets for information technology in the next few decades are not the US, Western Europe or Japan. The key markets key, as in where the majority of goods will be purchsed and consumed-- are Mainlaind China, India, Eastern Europe and South America.
    Where do I get that idea? Easy, hardware manufacturers. People in the wealthy nations often have a hard time imagining how hardware can get any cheaper and still remain profitable and yet it does relentlessly continue to decline in price. The answer to how it remains profitable is simple, volume. And that volume cannot and will not exist in the highly profitable and yet relatively sparsely populated wealthy countries. There simply are not enough consumers.
    So, as a manufacturer, you simply enter new markets by lowering your costs until the real masses, the billions, can afford your products. And you can bet that WiMax is going to be one of the enabling technolgies that is going to make this push into the "third world" happen all that much faster.
    Which means it makes perfect sense for OSDL to have a real presence in these markets. In fact, you could argue they're moving too slowly.
    But none of that has the slightest thing to do with "outsourcing". It's just the reality of where IT is going.

  25. Re:Outsourced ?. by ehack · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Look at the standing joke that IBM, Dell, and Telstra technical support have become as a direct and specific result of their corporate decision to outsource to India. Then come back here again and explain to us how exactly OSDN opening an office in darkest India would be a good thing.

    The argument made for outsourcing to India or China is that you can usually get access to a better class of programmer there than at home. And in fact a lot of stuff is now very well made in India and China. The issues with tech support may be more due to Dell, HP etc going for the lowest bidder and using untrained personnel. After all, most companies view tech support exclusively as a tech center.

    Last not least, I believe parent may have forgotten that the Linux kernel came from some forlorn country that most US schoolchildren couldn't find on a map. And was written by a member of the swedish minority there, people who get are viewed by the locals with the same benvolence extended to puerto-ricans in the US.

    --
    This is not a signature.
  26. Re:Outsourced ?. by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You do know of course that many of the finest mathematicians on the planet are Indian.

    With respect, the population of India is absolutely massive, so of course there are going to be more great Indian mathematicians than those from Malta. (You don't need to be a great mathematician to figure that out ;) )

    That having been said; yes, the Indians do have a good reputation for mathematics and the like.

    I can think of one other country that seems to have a disproportionate amount of technically gifted people... Iran.

    Anyone want to take *that* ball and run with it?

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  27. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let me get this straight dell support got worse?!

    I gave up on them YEARS ago. I did not think that was possible to do. It was already bad.

  28. Re:Outsourced ?. by ehack · · Score: 1

    sorry, first para above is quote from parent. Also s/tech center/cost center/ , I will proofread next time.

    --
    This is not a signature.
  29. Re:more evil than ibm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this sucks, osdl is more evil than ibm!

    More evil?! As I recall, OSDL haven't done anything like selling tabulating equipment to Nazi Germany to enable them to kill six million Jews and "undesirables".

  30. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The myth that US software developers are so much better than their Indian counterparts is just crap. And the idea that Dell support was any good when it was on shore is just plain baloney. It was rubbish then, now its rubbish and cheaper with a more dodgy accent.


    Yeah, and while you're at it fanboy why don't you also explain to the PHB's that not all Indian engineers are super geniuses. My wife's company regularly poaches from the top five percent of their graduates and then brings them up to the US on H1B's, and then magically all of the MBAs seem to think that "OMG... Indian engineers are all geniuses!". From what I've seen a number of them are pretty goddamned lazy, too.

    You do know of course that many of the finest mathematicians on the planet are Indian. That senior posts in many technology companies in the US are taken by Indian people, not because they are cheaper but because they are better.


    As theorists, sure. As far as actually DOING SOMETHING WITH IT give me the Russians and other former eastern bloc math guys. Additionally, I'll put the creativity and practicality of US engineers against the overly academic Indian engineers any day of the week. My biggest laugh is working with engineers from the EU: all theory and very little if any application. And if you'd been paying attention you'd know that Waterloo up in Soviet Canuckistan whips damned near everybody's ass because they're good theorists AND good engineers..

    In addition I've been seeing an increasing number of software engineering projects coming BACK to both the US and the EU because India just flat the hell out couldn't deliver.

    Outsourcing is not going away, but it is not a universal panacea, and I find it gratifying that a number of major companies got burnt by it.
  31. Yipee by beforewisdom · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yipee, offshoring comes to the open source movement

  32. A word of advice to the 9. by east+coast · · Score: 1

    McDonalds is hiring; Fry technicians and Big Mac Engineers.

    Seriously, I doubt this will have any real impact and given the current job market they may be better off. It seems a lot of employees latched onto their jobs fearing they'd never find another not realizing that the employeers often took the same attitude and didn't feel the need to pay the employee as much. I think this is changing in the market.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:A word of advice to the 9. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Seriously, I doubt this will have any real impact and given the current job market they may be better off."

      Let me guess - you have a job. Given the current job market it's a very bad time to lose your job.

  33. /. Editors by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1, Insightful
    With any luck, the first to go will be /.'s "editors".

    Seriously, if they can't pick up the dupes, the typos, RTFA themselves and filter out the blog-whoring shite from prostoalex & rpiquepa then wtf *do* they get paid for?

    1. Re:/. Editors by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1
      Oh my bad!

      Read that as "OSTG".

    2. Re:/. Editors by cianduffy · · Score: 1

      One problem - Slashdot is part of the OSTG. Not the OSDL. Different company...

  34. Re:Outsourced ?. by ajs · · Score: 1

    "pick any forum on any web site anywhere in the world and look at the discussions of outsourcing to the third world and the devastating quality, communication and reputational problems that companies that make the mistake of outsourcing to India and similar third world countries suffer. Look at the standing joke that IBM, Dell, and Telstra technical support have become as a direct and specific result of their corporate decision to outsource to India."

    Well, this doesn't really speak poorly of India, so much as it does of outsourcing to the lowest bidder. How many times have you heard of a *US* company that was the low bidder on a project turning out to be a horrible choice? Does that mean that US companies are incompetent? Hardly.

    In the same way, Indian companies that are selling the "we can offer cheap labor pools" line, are probably a craps shoot, and may or may not be good companies. Add to that the difficulty of coordinating across physical, language and time-zone barriers, and you begin to get a sense of how likely it is that any given relationship will go well.

    It has NOTHING to do with the quality of the education or raw talent of the people in India (which I've found to be excellent in my dealings with a number of folks from that part of the world).

    That said, there is a very large difference between outsourcing and opening a branch office in another country, which is what I understand OSDL is interesting in doing. You might call it "offshoring", but if you're hiring locals and making them part of your business, that's not outsourcing.

  35. Here we go again... by kukickface · · Score: 1

    Just another large corporation laying people off so they can offshore to India. Ref: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/23/192424 4&tid=99

    1. Re:Here we go again... by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      Erm, they're not going to India. I suspect they're looking for a way out of mad US IP policies.

      --
      Me (Blog)
    2. Re:Here we go again... by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      if you rtfa or the dupe from earlier this week, i believe you would find they are offshoring to europe, not india.

      disclaimer, i didn't bother reading this article, because i read the previous one.

  36. Re:more evil than ibm by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1

    Tabulating machines don't kill people. People do.

  37. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, they don't even compare to Britain. IF you want scientific achievement per capita, Britain is No.1.

  38. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "because India just flat the hell out couldn't deliver."

    You know, if you idiot Americans debase the language much further you will COMPLETELY lose the ability to communicate. I just hope you can work out some form of telepathy before then.

    LEARN TO FUCKING MAKE FUCKING SENSE YOU IGNORANT FUCKING CUNT.

  39. Re:Outsourced ?. by rxmd · · Score: 2, Informative
    And was written by a member of the swedish minority there, people who get are viewed by the locals with the same benvolence extended to puerto-ricans in the US.
    This is nonsense. There has been an Swedish minority in Finland ever since the country was a Swedish province; they're well established in society, and the Swedes are pretty much an integral part of the Finnish nation. Finland has a rather liberal system of minority and language rights. Finns learn Swedish at school. And while Finns might sometimes consider the Swedes somewhat arrogant and uppish, comparing them to the situation of Puerto Ricans in the US is just uninformed.

    (Disclaimer: I'm neither Finnish nor Swedish.)
    --
    As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
  40. Re:Outsourced ?. by smallpaul · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. +3 funny.

  41. Re:Outsourced ?. by mkavanagh2 · · Score: 1
    Then come back here again and explain to us how exactly OSDN opening an office in darkest India would be a good thing.


    Because you're one of those awesomely smart Aryan ubermensch, you typoed "OSDL", who employ Linus Torvalds, to "OSDN", who employ CowboyNeal.

    Smrt!
  42. Two different arguments... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    The myth that US software developers are so much better than their Indian counterparts is just crap. And the idea that Dell support was any good when it was on shore is just plain baloney.

    You're mixing two completely different arguments here. Development and support are entirely different beasts.

    But if we're going to talk support, let's talk support:

    Fact of the matter is that support, once moved away, has gone downhill, not just for Dell, but for other companies as well. Probably my worst support experiences have come from SBC, who outsources their support to India. Level one support from them is running down a script and checklist. There is absolutely NO independent thinking from their support.

    Thank God for places like dslreports.com for their Tracy, CA-based help through the forum.

    1. Re:Two different arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God for places like dslreports.com for their Tracy, CA-based help through the forum.
      But don't such forums merely perpetuate the problem. Why bother improving tech support if my customers will provie it for free?

  43. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anyone want to take *that* ball and run with it?

    Sure. GWB already did. He has ignored North Korea and Iran, who now have the bomb (or soon will have). I suspect that some terrorist group will soon show us how gifted the iranians (or the NK) are and aquire the bomb about 3 months after one of the 2 countries blow their first bomb.

  44. Office Politics by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    I think you overestimate the logical basis for layoff choices. Office politics are usually a major factor as well.

  45. Was Andrew Tridgell one of the unfortunate? by kk49 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not that I'm paranoid or anything.

    --
    You can have your god back when you are old enough to handle the responsibility.
  46. What the? by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    What is this Open Sores thing I keep hearing about? And why would I want to develop it? Wouldn't it be better to let it heal?

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  47. Re:Outsourced ?. by HerbieStone · · Score: 1

    Outsourceing doesn't yield poor quality because people are stupid, but because outsourced projects are hard (harder than the CEOs might think) to manage.

  48. I can see you've never run a small company by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you need to downsize, you get rid of non-critical personnel first. Receptionist are definitely in that category, especially since they are most easily replaced out of any staff members.
    I can see you've never run a small company. If you had, you'd realize that a good (or bad) receptionist can make (or break) your business. Think about it--here is one person who typically talks to every employee several times a day, and most of your customers every week or two. The person who watchs who and what enter and leave, gets to see the unguarded moments, the body language, hear the idle gossip--in short, the best clue catcher you'll ever have.

    I'm always amazed at the money people will pay consultants for clues they could have gotten in far less time just by asking the recptionist. Often, the receptionist is the only person in the whole outfit that sees the big picture.

    --MarkusQ

    1. Re:I can see you've never run a small company by Nytewynd · · Score: 1

      I can see you've never run a small company. If you had, you'd realize that a good (or bad) receptionist can make (or break) your business. Think about it--here is one person who typically talks to every employee several times a day, and most of your customers every week or two. The person who watchs who and what enter and leave, gets to see the unguarded moments, the body language, hear the idle gossip--in short, the best clue catcher you'll ever have.
      I'm always amazed at the money people will pay consultants for clues they could have gotten in far less time just by asking the recptionist. Often, the receptionist is the only person in the whole outfit that sees the big picture.


      I have worked for 3 small companies. I agree that a good receptionist is essential for smooth operations. 2 of the companies had the worst receptionists I ever saw, because the guys in charge decided to hire cheap instead of good. They sent the wrong information to the wrong clients, and one almost cost us thousands of dollars by holding a legal document her boss specifically told her not to hold for any reason.

      All I am saying is that a good engineer is far more important that a good receptionist. You won't need a receptionist at all if your product is garbage. You clients won't be calling anymore if you don't fix bugs. A bad receptionist is a burden, but a bad programmer is utterly useless. I've worked with both. At least a bad receptionist can (usually) handle basic tasks. Bad developers ruin a whole project.

      --
      /. ++
  49. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some forlorn country?

    God I fucking despise American stupidity.

  50. Hehe, Linus by rk87 · · Score: 1
    ...(although Linus has retained his job).
    If Linus had been laid off, slashdot would have instantly turned into a single black page saying something to the effect of "REHIRE LINUS, WE NEED HIM", and all sorts of anti-OSDL propaganda.

    I'm sure employers and ISPs around the world alike would rejoice if slashdot is only a single page :)

    --
    I'M NOT ANGRY!
  51. Re:more evil than ibm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But surely killing Jews is a GOOD thing?

  52. Command line humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bash$ %osdl

  53. Does it have any influence... by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... of software patents?
    It would be very interesting to OSDL to be on countries that doesn't acept software patents.

  54. View from Beaverton by Tiresias_Mons · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn the city of Beaverton just gave the OSDL a substantial chunk of funding in order to try and "promote growth and yadda yadda" of the tech market here...I'm sure this isn't what they had in mind...

    Granted, it sounds like a fairly small ripple in the organization, I just hope it isn't a sign of further things to come.

    --
    "But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong" - Dennis Miller
  55. One viable alternative ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of firing people they should consider charging for their software !

  56. It's sad when outsourcing mixes with open source by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The cuts come as the organisation re-structures. It will establish a European office and expand into Asia.

    This is bizspeak for what the rest of humanity calls outsourcing.

    Pretty words to hide real actions.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  57. Re:Outsourced ?. by 51mon · · Score: 1

    "Yep, they don't even compare to Britain. IF you want scientific achievement per capita, Britain is No.1."

    Much as I'd like to believe this do you have a source.

    nationmaster.com does "nobel prizes per capita" and "nobel prizes by GDP" which is interesting, although proximity to Sweden seems to be the dominant factor in who gets nobel prizes.

  58. Re:It's sad when outsourcing mixes with open sourc by kz45 · · Score: 1

    This is bizspeak for what the rest of humanity calls outsourcing.

    Pretty words to hide real actions


    when software is made int oa commodity, expect outsourcing to the lowest bidder.

  59. That's encouraging..... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    When I was part of the layoffs at my odl company I was in round two.

  60. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how you define "scientific achievement" -- the country with the highest per capita rate of scientists is Israel. Ditto for engineers and for patents.

  61. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, have another heart attack over a forum post...

    You must be a lonely, miserable person.

  62. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going spare about some Yank mucking up the langy is a pile of pants, sort of thing, eh what? Innit?
    Punter.

  63. Communism != Viable System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet more evidence that Communism is dead, dead, dead.

  64. Re:It's sad when outsourcing mixes with open sourc by alonsoac · · Score: 1

    What is wrong with hiring open source developers from other countries?

  65. Re:It's sad when outsourcing mixes with open sourc by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Nothing, so long as they're added, not replacing.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  66. Re:Outsourced ?. by rsynnott · · Score: 1

    http://atimes.com/media/CI22Ce01.html Open source hardware and software. Yep, those Indians are useless. :P There's nothing magic about the US's (or the EU's or anyone else's) software developers.

    --
    Me (Blog)
  67. What, OSDL aren't advertising themselves anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the number of times I've seen OSDL slap their "We own Slashdot" tag on the end of OSDL-related Slashdot news articles, I'm surprised to see they didn't tag this one.

  68. Re:Outsourced ?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The myth that US software developers are so much better than their Indian counterparts is just crap.

    That may be true, as a whole. My only experience with India-based software dev houses is that they rip off source that they didn't write and sell it to the US for cut-rate prices.

    I'm sure there are reputable Indian software development companies, but the people complaining about bad apples have grounds for doing so. They aren't *all* disgruntled employees.

    I know some Indian immigrants to the US who are quite good software developers, though.

  69. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this how Bill picks them up?