Slashdot Mirror


Apple to Recycle your iPod for Free

rdarden writes "After you get your dough from the recent iPod settlement, why not recycle your old iPod at an Apple retail store (US only). Starting today, that worthless hunk of environmental unfriendliness can be turned into a 10% discount on a new iPod (purchased at the same time)."

290 comments

  1. This sounds funny. by Saven+Marek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's funny how rewording something can make shit sound good.

    "We will recycle your iPod for free!" doesn't sound like half as much a ripoff as "I'll buy your iPod for $30"

    1. Re:This sounds funny. by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      If it's broken, it seems like the amount you would get from the 10% discount could be quite worth it.

    2. Re:This sounds funny. by gauger22 · · Score: 1

      I'll take $30 for something that has a dead and irreplaceable battery. Although it would make a pretty snazzy paperweight.

    3. Re:This sounds funny. by treff89 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah. Just another example of how the iPod is not as good as it is sent up to be. Take this with the requisite metric tonne of salt, however it is my opinion that the iPod line "suck" - or more accurately have gotten worse, and this is one example thereof. It was great when it first come out - 1G and 2G - however has hardly improved since then and the rivals have caught up and surpassed it long ago. Apple needs to focus more on improving features if they want to make it an innovative product, as the only reason people buy it these days is for the "cool" factor (cough BAAAA /cough) or if they are unaware of the competition - namely, the iAudio, iRiver, Creative models, and many more. Apple is so close to having the best (not the most popular - they have achieved that - but the best) player, but they have to improve their game.

    4. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might, but you'd be losing out. I sold my last iPod (sans battery even) on eBay for $130.

    5. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or they buy iPods because they want a music player with one of the best UIs, outstanding music quality, very solid build quality, and extremely good pricing.

      There are many reasons to buy an iPod, and the cool factor is only a minor one.

    6. Re:This sounds funny. by numark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are a couple other reasons you're missing for why people might choose the iPod. For one, it's the only one that plays iTunes Music Store files. Regardless of anyone's personal feelings against the store, it's still the most popular and largest music store online, and people might want to use it and then get an iPod to listen to the songs.

      Also, on the Mac, the iPod is still the best choice in many respects. Virtually every Mac user uses iTunes, and between that and prevalent Firewire ports, it's just a lot easier to use an iPod that's almost guaranteed to work rather than another solution which is designed largely from a Windows standpoint (there may be other ways of loading music, like direct disk access, but most non-iPod devices are still designed for Windows first).

      So, there are a number of valid reasons why people may choose the iPod over the competition, regardless of whether they think it's "cool" or not. The average consumer doesn't want a litany of features that they may never use. Most of them are focused on simplicity, and especially if they own a Mac, the iPod usually comes out on top for them.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    7. Re:This sounds funny. by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      Some poor bastard's like "Woo! I got an iPod... Oh damnit!"

    8. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they do sell the iPod reconditioned (which I doubt), it's still a win-win. People can upgrade their iPods at a discount, Apple gets more sales, and iPods are recycled in an environmentally friendly way. Apple wouldn't be doing it if there wasn't something in it for them, but it's a for-profit company, so that will always be true. If people can sell their iPods for more than $30, they will. Otherwise they will give them to Apple.

    9. Re:This sounds funny. by Meagermanx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Extremely good pricing, huh?
      Okay, do whatever you want with your money, but I think I'll stick with a $20 walkman and a spindle of 50 blank CDs.

    10. Re:This sounds funny. by compm375 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think you meant 250-300 CD-RWs, right? That would cost you at least $200, $220 with your walkman. $300 for an iPod doesn't look so bad anymore, does it? Of course you can get 20GB mp3 players for much less, but that is beside the point.

    11. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I just bought 500 cdr for $80.

    12. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How dare you challenge Apple ?!
      We all know it's Teh Coolness to have an iPod. Moreover, having an Apple logo on it make it better, faster, stronger and cheaper than any other competition's product.

      I will mod you down to the ground for that treachery (even though you gave a balanced POW)

    13. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you. Now you need a backpack to put them in.

    14. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Slashdot financed by Apple or something?

    15. Re:This sounds funny. by mmjb · · Score: 1

      iTunes not just for Macs, of course.

      Between iTunes, Azureus, iPodder and Firefox, all my music "purchasing" software is the same on my PowerBook and wintel desktop. ;)

    16. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CD-R, not CD-RW I am sure. You need to be able to rewrite them, like a hard drive for the comparison to work.

    17. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you need only 30 of them not "250-300" to make it 20 Go.
      Anyway that's a silly comparaison, iPod (like any other HDD powered mp3 player) is just awfully expensive. I have the feeling that a lot of people would be perfectly fine with a flash player with 256 or 512 Mo embedded.
      Somehow I can't believe all these people were aware of what they bought, when they grabbed that 20Go thing in the shop.

      But then again that must be me and my inflated ego.

    18. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think I'll stick with something pocketsize, thanks for the suggestion.

    19. Re:This sounds funny. by syates21 · · Score: 1
      I think you meant 250-300 CD-RWs, right?

      Um, why the heck is this insightful? I guess to a mod that can't do simple arithmetic maybe. 300 CDs would hold a *lot* more than any iPod I'm aware of. In fact it's probably more like 3x the capacity of the largest iPod.

      Clearly CDs don't have the same convenience factor as HD/flash based players, but lets not just make up numbers to prove a point.
    20. Re:This sounds funny. by Silentnite · · Score: 1

      $220 for a walkman w/cd's??

      $30 for a decent walkman, with a box of 200 HP cdr's costing $36.99.

      So 200 CD's, with ~20 songs a cd. And about 3.5 minutes a song.

      200*20=4000 *3.5 = 14000 minutes. Divide that by 60 and you get roughly 233 hours, or close to 10 days of music.

      The downside? Switching between CD's. Total cost $66.99.

    21. Re:This sounds funny. by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Why buy the cdrs? That's just a waste of money. You could use the original CDs.

      Then the cost would only be $30.

    22. Re:This sounds funny. by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

      what the hell is a Mo and a Go?

      I thought is was Mb and Gb.

      --
      -gjr
    23. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An iPod HD can be completely rewritten. CD-R's can't. Look at the cost of CDRW for a fair comparison.

    24. Re:This sounds funny. by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      Um, why the heck is this insightful? I guess to a mod that can't do simple arithmetic maybe. 300 CDs would hold a *lot* more than any iPod I'm aware of. In fact it's probably more like 3x the capacity of the largest iPod.

      That depends on whether you're talking about CDs full of MP3s (AACs, Ogg Vorbis files, whatever), or regular redbook audio CDs. If the latter, then no, they're not going to hold as much music (in running time, not in space taken up) as a higher-capacity iPod can.

    25. Re:This sounds funny. by dougmc · · Score: 1
      So 200 CD's, with ~20 songs a cd. And about 3.5 minutes a song.
      I think what you're missing is that modern Walkmen (is that the plural for a Walkman?) can play mp3s -- just burn a CD-R or CD-RW with mp3 files in an ISO-9660 format. So rather than 20 songs per CD, you get 240, and only need 17 CDs.

      Well, perhaps the Sony Walkman brand Walkman can't play mp3s, but the $20 models I've bought at Fry's recently can. (Hmm, OK, even the Sony models can play mp3s too now. They'll probably cost you more than $20, however.)

    26. Re:This sounds funny. by galfridus73 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, looking on eBay, if the iPod is dead then a $9 (assuming you can buy a shuffle as part of this deal) to $45 discount isn't a bad idea. If you are a student or work for an educational institution, your discount, coupled with the trade-in, would bring the price of a 60GB iPod down by $75 or so...

      However, if the iPod is still working - sell it on eBay! Do a search of completed auctions for the original 5GB iPod and you'll find them still going for $130 or so. Dead iPods, on the other hand, are going for like $40 or $50 - basically what you would get if you bought a new iPod with the trade-in.

      So, it's a good deal - if the iPod is dead (or if the bottom falls out of eBay's iPod sales any time soon).

    27. Re:This sounds funny. by shawb · · Score: 1

      You're right. I personally love my 512 meg shuffle. I would have preferred the 1 gig, but it's really not that different to me in day to day use. a 512 will hold a little over eight hours of music, which for me is plenty to last me a couple days of normal on the go listening. But then again I am a fan of playing music randomly and have been for a long time. It really plays on synchronicity and the 23 principle. Not that I really believe in either of those actually having power over the real life, I just think it's a fun game to play. And if the song seems to be particularilly ill suited for my mood or the situation, then skipping it is trivial even if I'm wearing the Shuffle on the lanyard under my shirt.

      Although I really haven't found a particularilly good piece of software for updating it. I would really like something that can just autofill from a playlist, rather than having to choose between A)random songs from my entire music library or B)manually filling it up. Sometimes filling from the entire library with a little manual editing at the end can prove useful, but it's usually just too tedious for what I want.

      Oh, and the shuffle is really good way to do music for a party. Just use a stereo RCA to mini headphone cable (probably $4 or $5 at Radio Shack) to hook it up to a stereo or PA system. Songs can be skipped if they end up not going over well, and pausing/volume control are fairly simple even if you can somehow lock out the stereo itself (a good thing sometiems.) Best of all, that annoying antisocial drunk guy can't just put in all of the music that he likes which happens to annoy the rest of the party. One thing to remember is mix it up a bit. Have some rocking stuff, have some quiet stuff. Have some really pop bubblegum that everyone knows, have some really cool obscure music that only you know (or that you don't even really know that well yet.) Setting up a playlist and setting the Ipod to playlist mode would probably be the best bet here, but in certain groups shuffle will still have it's place. Caveat: This only works if you aren't that annoying antisocial guy who puts in a whole bunch of music that annoys everyone else. And you have to trust people enough to not steal the thing. But if you don't, why are they in your house anyways?

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    28. Re:This sounds funny. by compm375 · · Score: 1

      I was referring to an iPod with 192kbps mp3s and regular audio cds. By my math, each CD should take up 192kbps/8/1024*80min*60sec=115.2MB. So I was off, because it would actually only need 173.6 CD-RWs, which still costs a lot. (BTW, if the mp3s were 128kbps, which many people listen to, it would take 266.7 CD-RWs)

    29. Re:This sounds funny. by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      what the hell is a Mo and a Go?

      "Mo" stands for Magneto-Optical -- an old recording format used back when people still gave a crap about SyQuest drives. This was pre-Zip drives. Some are still in use in art departments around the world.

      "Go" stands for Gibleto-Optical -- a recording method which allows the user to store data on discarded turkey and chicken giblets. This was the original source of the word "wetware" before it was modified to include the human brain. Recording data on giblets can sometimes be expensive as the availability varies with the season. But generally around the end of November and again toward the end of December, many blank giblets can be had at little or no cost, espeically at homes with large families.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    30. Re:This sounds funny. by kyou · · Score: 1

      I used to have a really old and crappy Maxtor 40Gb HD just for my music. So I was kinda paranoid about my HD dying on me - that's when I decided to buy an mp3 player. I dislike Mac but I still got a 3rd generation 40Gb iPod simply because it was the best around. A couple of months later my HD DID die (that bastard..) and my iPod saved my ass. Losing almost 40Gb of music isn't fun. So yeah... I think the money is worth it and I will probably buy a bigger iPod soon.

    31. Re:This sounds funny. by Paolo+DF · · Score: 1

      Mo is MEGA-OCTET, the french for MEGABYTE

      --
      Pumbaa! I don't wonder; I know.
    32. Re:This sounds funny. by Silentnite · · Score: 1

      I wasn't sure if they do now or not, but that's wonderful, and makes my point even clearer. With all 200 CD's you'd have a lot of music.

      All the more reason not to buy an Ipod, though I do want one. Go figure. The size maybe?

    33. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having just bought a new iPod without a 10% discount, I am almost kicking myself for this. HOWEVER, my girlfriend did just buy my old iPod for $30 so i saved roughly 10% anyhow. AND the iPod stays in the family.

      (i can't just give away my iPod, now can i?)

    34. Re:This sounds funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the second definition a joke?

  2. 10 fricking percent? by RMH101 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    and they get free spares?

    1. Re:10 fricking percent? by pintomp3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      more importantly, they get to sell more new ones. 1. make mp3 player 2. market heavily so most ppl don't know other exist 3. drop quality so they break down faster 4. offer to buy back and sell new one 5. profit! 6. repeat

    2. Re:10 fricking percent? by adpowers · · Score: 1

      When I'm done with my iPod and ready to turn it in, they won't be able to use it as a spare. Hell, it is already completely scuffed up and rickety.

    3. Re:10 fricking percent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple stores don't even sell returned items except during special refreshed item sales, Do you really think they are planning to turn your old busted FW first or 2nd gen into any kind of profit?

  3. Seems fair by JoshMKiV · · Score: 2, Funny

    $20-$30 seems fair... I'm sure they won't resell them. Snort.

    1. Re:Seems fair by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      It's especially horrible when you consider that tax on the new iPod is going to be a chunk out of of that 10% anyway. Add in the fact that you can get iPods for cheaper than retail online (ex), and you're not really saving anything by going to the Apple Store.

      Oh, and never mind the fact that you can sell your broken iPod on eBay for more than that 10%.

  4. Or... by Tyrdium · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You could sell it on eBay for well over $100. Which sounds better to you?

    1. Re:Or... by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      You could sell it on eBay for well over $100. Which sounds better to you?

      That depends on what kind of condition it is in.

    2. Re:Or... by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it's broken, or the battery won't charge anymore, trading it in sounds pretty sweet. eBay is too difficult for some people, and it is sometimes a hassle for me as well, even though I've sold over a hundred items there. If you are well-off and just want a new iPod, trading it in may be the way to go.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    3. Re:Or... by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Um the apple deal for me because only Apple could rip you off in such a stylish manner whilst making you feel good about saving the environment at the same time. Selling on ebay is such a distainfully common thing to do.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    4. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if you want to sell broken shit on eBay and hope the negative feedback doesn't catch up to you. Dick.

    5. Re:Or... by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

      Or, y'know, you could always sell a working one...

    6. Re:Or... by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of selling your broken iPod on ebay?

    7. Re:Or... by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

      Even if it were broken, you could probably sell it labelled as such and make more than you would on a trade-in. Plus, you wouldn't have to spend the money on an iPod.

    8. Re:Or... by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 1
      If you are well-off and just want a new iPod, trading it in may be the way to go.

      Or you could give it to me.

      Or you could give it to a friend you know who isn't as well off but might enjoy an iPod.

      Even if they have to spend $50 - $100 to get a new battery it is cheaper than a new iPod, and doesn't involve selling your soul and losing your friends trying to get a free one from Gratis.

    9. Re:Or... by TheTerrorized · · Score: 1

      You can also sell them to a website such as http://www.ipodresq.com/ for a price that depends on the condition. My ipod was engraved and would not turn on and they offered me $50.

    10. Re:Or... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Or, you could label it as broken and still sell it for more than the 10% discount.

      Moron.

  5. Bah!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No recyling! My ipod will have it's own shrine when it dies!

  6. Well, that goes a long way... by lxt · · Score: 1

    ...to getting the US to sign up to Kyoto.

    That said, it's a pretty good step by a company to reduce the problems with just dumping consumer electronics in tips. It would be nice to see this globally though, and also across all Apple products. But lets be honest - perhaps if the government actually got behind stopping pollution and industrial waste...over here in the UK, the government environmental agency announced yesterday it was asked employees to wear thermal underwear over winter, so they could turn the heating down a few degrees.

    1. Re:Well, that goes a long way... by mindstormpt · · Score: 1

      Hey but that could harm the US's economy!!!

    2. Re:Well, that goes a long way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      China: Total CO2 production=3,051,110,000 metric tons = 2,530 kg per person
      UK: Total CO2 production=535,290,000 metric tons = 9,030 kg per person
      US: Total CO2 production=5,584,760,000 metric tons = 19,910 kg per person
      (1999 figures, http://earthtrends.wri.org/pdf_library/data_tables /cli3_2003.pdf )

      Oh, and global warming is generally accepted as scientific fact by most real scientists worldwide - but you will always find a (US) kooky charlatan to say otherwise.

      You may like to stick your head in the sand, but don't whine when others use your stupidity as an opportunity to kick you in the arse. Yes, you are at fault, by a large %age.

    3. Re:Well, that goes a long way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CIA World Fact Book:
      Chinese population: 1,306,313,812
      US Population: 295,734,134

      1,306,313,812 / 295,734,134 ~= 4.4

      The chinese people* use 4.4 times as much oxygen.
      The chinese people create 4.4 times as much carbon dioxide
      The chinese people shit 4.4 times more than the US (Oh my, all that methane!)

      *People as in living breathing bodies

      Yes, I too believe in Global Warming... Naturally that's what happens between ice ages.

    4. Re:Well, that goes a long way... by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      You forgot to list how many of those real scientists are named Steve.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    5. Re:Well, that goes a long way... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not sure they do all that; in particular, I have my doubts about the population of China shitting 4.4 times as much. Are you saying the average Chinese person eats as much as the average US one?

    6. Re:Well, that goes a long way... by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      "real scientists" Do you mean climatologists, or do you mean "people who may have a degree in a completely unrelated field of study but are "scientists" so therefore their opinions are just as good as someone who ACTUALLY studies climates?" The original report that the White House started drawing their conclusions from included less than 2000 people - few of which were actually scientists who have climate related degrees.
      try reading these two articles on the Global Warming reports:
      http://capmag.com/article.asp?ID=50
      http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/reg15n2g.html

    7. Re:Well, that goes a long way... by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      China: Total CO2 production=3,051,110,000 metric tons = 2,530 kg per person
      UK: Total CO2 production=535,290,000 metric tons = 9,030 kg per person
      US: Total CO2 production=5,584,760,000 metric tons = 19,910 kg per person


      So what you're saying is that having a higher population density means that it's perfectly okay for them not to be a part of the Koyoto treaty?

      Bit weird. I thought we were worrying about the planet here, not about the number of people stuffed into one country.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  7. crush those secondary sales. by SA+Stevens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No hardware vendor makes money from secondary sales ('used' sales) of their hardware. This is also a good tactic from the DRM angle for Apple. It's a benefit to them to 'lock' each individual iPod to an individual.

    1. Re:crush those secondary sales. by tepples · · Score: 1

      No hardware vendor makes money from secondary sales ('used' sales) of their hardware.

      You mean no pure hardware vendor. A lot of hardware vendors make money by licensing code libraries and secret bootloaders that work with their hardware. For instance, Nintendo certainly makes money on the new games purchased by the owner of a used GameCube console.

    2. Re:crush those secondary sales. by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      And yet they don't do this (lock individual iPods to individuals).

    3. Re:crush those secondary sales. by uberdave · · Score: 1

      That explains why there are no used car dealerships on the planet... or used computer shops for that matter.

    4. Re:crush those secondary sales. by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Not formally, they don't. But eliminating the secondary market for used iPod players will keep everybody a registered traceable owner.

    5. Re:crush those secondary sales. by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      And, what - offering to accept used iPods for recycling and granting a same-day 10% discount on the purchase of a new one will eliminate the secondary market? In what world do you see this happening? This is far more about complying with recycling legislation (extant or forthcoming), responding to criticism on environmental impact, possibly getting a new source of parts for refurbishments, and just maybe even a desire to actually do something positive re: environmental impact than about the secondary market for used iPods. The overwhelming majority of people who have iPods with any life left in them at all that they wish to get rid of will surely prefer to sell them for substantially more money than the value of the 10% discount on a new unit.

      And for that matter, what makes you think everyone is a "registered traceable owner"? There's no requirement to register an iPod, and Apple's not trying to "trace" anyone.

    6. Re:crush those secondary sales. by leland242 · · Score: 1

      Since I work in sales for a scientific instrument company, I feel justified in responding. When my/a company sells used hardware, that second sale is almost all profit.

      In our case, we sell a system for $50K. We accept a return for, say, a 10% discount on a new system. Then we sell the refurbished product for $35K...

      All that's happened is the margin on the new system is decreased a bit. Any sale of the refurbished instrument is just gravy.

    7. Re:crush those secondary sales. by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      But if the customer who buys the $35K instrument would otherwise have bought a new $50K instrument, the sale of the refurbished equipment is a net loss of $15K.

    8. Re:crush those secondary sales. by leland242 · · Score: 1

      Right, but the sale of the used instrument is mostly profit. The margin is going to be higher on a used system than a new one. We probably make $15K on a new system sale, but could make up to double that on a used.

  8. Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ok, I am not an evil stock analyst. But is this a sign of market saturation? BAsically, a couple days ago there were rumoes that iPOd inventories were building up because of oversupply. This could be a move to get rid of that excess inventory. As in, they figured out basically that most people who want an ipod already got one .. and so now they are trying to sell it to those who have old ones. Plus they want to reduce the number of people selling their second hand ipods to people (this way they make two sales instead of one).

    Hey people saw star wars three times didnt they?

    1. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some points to add to yours. There is very little difference between any model in the iPod line with the exception of storage space. Basically, they all do the same thing. Other then the "I must have the newest Apple product" people, the general consumer might not care to buy another one as there is no real compelling reason (Gee, another $250-350 for almost the same functionality 2-3 years later). They already paid $300-400 for one of those devices that is now effectively useless and they may have a bad taste in their mouths. This is an attempt to sway those people back into another Apple product with a discount. IMHO, that discount is short lived though. The vendor lock-in with iTunes and the iPod is not going away so you have to stay on the treadmill or loose your entire investment.

    2. Re:Market Saturation by VaticDart · · Score: 1

      Um, wow, quite definitely wrong. Regardless of how good the iPod is (an entirely subjective opinion), it's popularity has almost nothing to do with the fact that it's an Apple gadget. It's popular because it 1.) was the first DMP to get it right in terms of UI and software integration 2.) it continues to be the best DMP for the pure purpose of playing music (subjective, of course), so the idea that "basically, they all do the same thing" is absurd when considering other DMPs 3.) no iPod, even a 1st Gen is "effectively useless" unless something very serious goes wrong with it, and that is a small, tiny proportion, while most "dead" Pods have li-ion batteries that went out (about $20 - 40 to fix from a reputable retailer, much cheaper from eBay or something), or at worse a dead hard drive which is less than $100 to fix. Most people are willing to shell out hundreds of dollars each year for new gadgets, and while there are certainly some who were put off by their experience with the iPod, the idea that this is a sign of market saturation is pretty weak. The iPod's dominance won't last forever, to be sure, but right now it's still the best IMHO, despite not playing ogg, or shaving your legs for you.

    3. Re:Market Saturation by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      There were already signs of market saturation last quarter, when Apple sold a million fewer iPods than was expected by analysts. With a month left in this quarter to reduce inventories, Apple probably wants to get their numbers down so their stock doesn't drop another 20% on bad numbers the next time they report.

    4. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You completely missed my point. You bought an iPod 3 years ago for $400. It breaks and you want a new one. You are bascially buying the another product with the same exact functionality and features as your three year old model for only a slight reduction in price. If you were 100% satisfied with the previous product, having something similar again for roughly the same price might be an advantage. Honsestly? I'd expect something far more advanced that is typical of almost everything in the electronic industry. Think cell phones, home recievers, game consoles, car stereos, palm pilots and many more. Three years offers a complete change of offerings and capability.
      I understand your plain and simple theory driving sales but you can buy a plain and simple portable mp3 player for under $20 so I doubt that is a real actual selling point. That concept sounds good in theory but if that were really something consumers based a majority of the buying decision on, that concept would cross over to every single consumer electronic product made and it has not and it is not going in that direction either. How many people would pay $3000 for a DLP HDTV with a four button remote control and a single input jack on the back because "it was easy to use" and "looks cool" compared to one for the same price that allowed much more flexibility, had numerous connection options, a remote with 75 buttons and a SD/XD card slot for viewing your digital camera pictures directly on the TV screen and a USB and 1394 jack? It is cheaper to remove or not have more functionality, features, and buttons and I doubt there are many people in the world that are truely bothered or have serious issues with the location of a play or volume knob on a piece of equipment.

    5. Re:Market Saturation by wintermute1000 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I know a lot of people who would prefer the simple TV. Most of them are baby boomers who don't want to be bothered to have to read a manual to operate a relatively basic piece of consumer electronics. In other words, people with money, who have kids for whom they also buy things. I mean, jesus, have you never heard a joke about the impossibility of programming a VCR? People are so often thankful for simplicity and a lack of a need for training/help with the things they buy. My grandma could work a freaking iPod, and I think that is one of the huge strengths of it and of the Mac model in general. I might be persuaded to get the complicated TV, but only because I want PC input on any TV I buy. But at least I recognize that I'm in the minority in that opinion.

  9. Worthless? Not so fast by ihatewinXP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >
    >that worthless hunk of environmental unfriendliness
    >

    Actually between the screen and battery (I personally have a dead iPod with a perfect battery) there are still many a useable part on those old pods. Hold buttons, dock connectors, all sorts of parts. Even if gutted outright for internal Apple refurbishing the 10% will surely be recouped if not moreso.

    And the rest will be responsible recycled.

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
    1. Re:Worthless? Not so fast by The+Lerneaen+Hydra · · Score: 1

      >
      >And the rest will be responsible recycled.
      >

      Since when do large multinational companies really do that?

    2. Re:Worthless? Not so fast by shawb · · Score: 1

      When it means good PR. Most Apple customers seems to be fairly politically liberal anyways, so they generally are going to be very pro-environmental. A move that seems environmentally friendly will go a long way towards swaying more of their potential customers to making more Apple purchases.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:Worthless? Not so fast by Reaperducer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of large multinational companies do a lot more recycling than you do. Just because they're large or operate across borders doesn't make them evil. That's just your personal bias showing through.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    4. Re:Worthless? Not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberals like Rush Limbaugh and George W. Bush. Most Apple users are yuppies. Typical more money than brains types. Just some subset of those people happen to be "artists." Those tend to lean left.

  10. Gabba Hey! by Sporkinum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple sold millions of them. Many of them to retarded, wealthy, fashionistas who would think this is a "really good deal" and helps save the Panda from extinction.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Gabba Hey! by cowscows · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of them were actually sold to people who like to have an easy way to listen to music, but good job making up your own stereotype.

      Apple making it easier to recycle ipods is not going to save the rainforests, and noone expects it to, but that doesn't make it a bad idea, or a worthless one.

      Your cynicism does not make you look smarter than the any ipod owner, sorry.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    2. Re:Gabba Hey! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
      I've never read truer words on Slashdot! Thanks for telling it like it is.

      I live about 1 mile from Apple HQ, and need lots of tin foil on my walls to keep the reality distortion field out.

    3. Re:Gabba Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Parent didn't say anything about saving the rainforests. Screw the rainforest. Parent wants to save the Panda.

      /sarcasm

    4. Re:Gabba Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to save Pandas, too! How can I help?

    5. Re:Gabba Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't buy an iPod. Then you don't get to have a slightly cheaper one when it breaks.

      Congratulations! You just saved the world from a few grams of waste.

      Now, about the two V8 trucks/SUVs you have parked outside your house...

    6. Re:Gabba Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the plus side, it will also stop those satellites from Major League Baseball from spying on you.

      /Simpsons

  11. My 1st gen 10GB ipod still works fine. by maynard · · Score: 1

    Only one battery replacement and I've still got a useful mp3 player. I do wish they would have taken that battery back, instead of the ipod though. *That* would have been useful. --M

    1. Re:My 1st gen 10GB ipod still works fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 1st gen 10Gb ipod is also still working fine but while I prefer its design, it is a lot chunkier than the 4th gen ones. I'm half hoping that one day it will die so that my wife will let me upgrade.

    2. Re:My 1st gen 10GB ipod still works fine. by maynard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd like a newer one too. But as long as the damn thing keeps working, why upgrade? And 10GB is still more than enough. *shrug* --M

  12. Finally by m85476585 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple is catching up with everyone advertising free iPods!

    1. Re:Finally by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Yet somehow they got on the receiving end. They should at least have to complete an offer before I give them an iPod.

  13. Will they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they refund my 28 day old Ipod Photo 60 that is suddenly a small white brick for no apparent reason? At $16 a day for it's use, buying Apple was not a good financial choice for me...

    1. Re:Will they by standards · · Score: 2, Informative

      Definitely return it! Depending on what country you live in, your warranty may be two years, one year, or 90 days. And in some US states there are "fitness of merchantability" laws - if it fails after the warranty expires but well before it should, you may still have the right for free repair, replacement, or refund. (I used these laws when my cell phone failed out of warranty, due to an obvious manufacturing defect.)

      Of course if you dropped it from your tree house, you're up the creek without an iPod.

    2. Re:Will they by Refrag · · Score: 1

      Yes, they will.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    3. Re:Will they by mike+at+smu · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you dropped it from your tree house, wouldn't you be up the creek without an iPaddle (or is that iPoddle?)

  14. I doubt it by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    It might look as if the recycling is free. But as a former middle management executive of an IT company, I can attest that in the real world, "nothing is free!"..."there is no free lunch anywhere." How do you justify that to stock-holders? Apple has made calculations to the effect that the money spent will be re-obtained [from consumers] somehow. Like it or not. This is for PR purposes. Remember M$ giving away US$ 1 billion in software "for free?" Was the software really free of charge? You answer that.

    1. Re:I doubt it by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      How do you justify that to stock-holders?

      Ethically selling recycling is a good thing, and fairly easy to any large body of people.

      Fiscally proving that it's a good deal--well, that's where "reducing potential liabilty" and "advertising" and "goodwill" alll come ine.

    2. Re:I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is for PR purposes.

      I'm pretty sure this has more to do with the recent announcement that iPods are no longer flying off store shelves. Most of us on Slashdot are could take 10 broken iPods (same model) and make 5 or 6 working ones. That's fewer sales for Apple.

    3. Re:I doubt it by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      "the money spent will be re-obtained [from consumers] somehow."

      How about in the form of:

      1) The 10% discount goes toward another $350 device.
      2) The "recycled" iPod is refurbished and resold for a hefty profit.
      3) The publicity and goodwill is worth just as much as marketing dollars.

      They won't need to raise prices or anything like that. It's not that different from a car dealer accepting trade-ins on new purchases. The profit from the additional sale is plenty to account for disposal fees (if that's what your particular iPod requires).

    4. Re:I doubt it by Rylz · · Score: 1

      Remember M$ giving away US$ 1 billion in software "for free?" Was the software really free of charge? You answer that.

      The analogy is still good, but I'd like to point out that when MS gave away $1 billion in software, those figures were based on what the software sells for, which is not even close to what the software costs them to make. Let's see... one CD plus packaging per unit... not very high costs. This makes it very easy for MS to justify such a move to share holders, since all they have to do is point out very small losses and the fact that they're getting people used to using their software which will bring more money in later. Sad, but true.

      --
      Sometimes you've gotta roll the hard six.
    5. Re:I doubt it by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1
      This it has to do with being compelled by gov't regulation and trying to get ahead of the curve. More and more states are starting to pass 'e-cycling' bills which require computer manufacturers to provide a way to direct waste from the landfills.

      U.S. consumers retire or replace roughly 133,000 personal computers per day, according to research firm Gartner Inc.

      See for example http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic le/2005/05/31/AR2005053101502.html/ (registration required)

    6. Re:I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But as a former middle management executive of an IT company, I can attest that . . .

      Dude, that gives you about as much credibility as a hot-dog salesman.

    7. Re:I doubt it by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      So smash it with a hammer first, then Apple can't rip you off. Jesus Christ, Apple is damned if they do and damned if they don't.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    8. Re:I doubt it by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying they're ripping you off.. I think it's a great strategy. And if I were at Apple, I'd be fully behind this.

      Contrary to what many Slashdotters feel, I respect a company's ability to make a profit - through advertising, buying a company and marketing the hell out of their products, or simply giving it away for free but charging for support. None of those things are inherently evil.

  15. Great... by wpiman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All of the hazardous material is handled domestically! Excellent news. So the engineering is outsourced (or partially), the manufacturing is done else where, but the really dangerous work- the stuff that impacts the environment the most- is done stateside by US workers. Globalism rocks.

    1. Re:Great... by stevejsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "really dangerous work"? Huh?

      Oh, I get it -- you're talking about the deplete uranium reserves in iPods.

      Yeah, terrible. Poor US workers.

    2. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Of course* it is preferential to have foreign scum handle dangerous waste instead! Yes! Them Arab terrorists shouldn't be gettin' nothin' better than damn hazardous materials!

      Seriously, mate, think about it a little - why is US citizens dying/being exposed to toxic waste any worse than citizens of country x? Racism isn't cool.

    3. Re:Great... by coastalbendy · · Score: 1

      Well Globalism rocked when all the industries, jobs, and virtually everything existed in the US and "rest of the globe" was used to dump the "dangerous work".

    4. Re:Great... by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1
      If you're a citizen of the US or country X, living in that same environment of citizens dying/being exposed to toxic waste or whatever else, you wouldn't want that in your backyard either. Self preservation. Better them than me. Etc.

      Since when does nationality equal race, btw?

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    5. Re:Great... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Well, the USA created it, the USA caused the actual situation of many 3rd world countrys, then those countrys were poor, and so they had cheap workers, and then the USA stated outsourcing.

      You created This Global economy, now eat it.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    6. Re:Great... by g0at · · Score: 1

      So in other words, "not in my back yard please?"

      I'm not sure who has the more narrow view of globalism, here.

      -b

    7. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor is relative. The "slave wages" outsourcing companies pay third-world workers is usually more than enough for a full family to eat.

      Conditions might be an issue, but right now, they're getting "good" money.

    8. Re:Great... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Yep, i didn't say that the companys didn't paid them enough. What i said is that the USA sistematically worked over the last 50 years to sumerge certain nations into poverty, so they can later exploit their workers, and the richness of the country paying them cents, regardless of the fact that those cents may pay for food or not.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    9. Re:Great... by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      > Oh, I get it -- you're talking about the deplete uranium reserves in iPods.

      The depleted uranium is not a problem. It's the un-depleted uranium that you have to look out for. In your iPod. OK, moderate me off-topic. :-)

      jfs

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    10. Re:Great... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      Wait a minute. Let's be a little more specific. "The USA" doesn't systematically work toward destructive ends, unscrupulous transnational groups (certain corporations) do. It is a mistake to treat nations as monoliths, as they consist of multitudes of different people with widely diverging agendas and ethics.

      Individually, Americans are about as nice as anybody else. It's true. However, we are also neurotic, decadent, and brainwashed.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    11. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the economy also really rocked once Henry Ford came up with the "living wages for factory workers" because he thought he'd "be able to make more money if his employees could actually afford the product." But alas, those days are long and far ago.

    12. Re:Great... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      So we have to handle our own trash and can't just dump it on some poor, unsuspecting (well, probably pretty suspecting by now) person in another country? Sounds pretty responsible to me. "Not only will we bring jobs to your country, we *won't* bring our trash."

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  16. Apple should sweeten the deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...by offering to transfer your whole (old) iPod discotheque to your newly purchased iPod, at no extra charge (assuming the old iPod is still in working order).

    1. Re:Apple should sweeten the deal by takev · · Score: 1

      You don't need to, the music on the iPod is nothing but a copy of your iTunes.

      By connecting your new iPod to your iTunes, your new iPod will be a copy of your iTunes, en thus the same as your old iPod.

      From a consumer point of few it is not possible to have more music on your iPod than is in your iTunes.

    2. Re:Apple should sweeten the deal by Impr3ssion · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? If you set your iTunes to upload manually, you can have music on your iPod that you have deleted from your hard drive. I do this myself so I don't have to have 30 gigs of mp3's on my computer all the time.

      --
      ~Impr3ssion
  17. ...not from "consumers" by lxt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You point is completely true - but the money is not reobtained from consumers, but from savings made in the repair shop. Apple (like other electronics companies) state in their warrenties they can replace defective parts with refurbs, which are obviously cheaper than new items (example - my battery replacement they gave me for my iBook was a refurb). Thus, the cost of repair is reduced, and that's where the money is recouped.

  18. No way by LittleGuernica · · Score: 4, Funny

    No way they are going to make me trade in my iPod for one of those new ones with an intel processor in it!

    1. Re:No way by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      No kidding...40+ Watts of heat being disipated would burn a whole in my pants!

  19. No thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hi, I'd like to return this failed ipod to you to recycle"
    "Certainly sir, would you like another at the same time?"
    "I'm returning the product because it is dead. Why would I want another..."

  20. This doesn't make a lot of sense. by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are about a billion ways you can replace the battery for about $50, so I'm not sure what the big deal is here. Even Apple will do it for $99.

    Since a new iPod with similar functionality is $250-$299 (depending on how important extra storage space is to you), I'd say battery replacement is normally going to be worthwhile.

    Unless you have an iPod broken for some other reason, I think the recycling is a bum deal.

    D

    1. Re:This doesn't make a lot of sense. by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Unless you have an iPod broken for some other reason, I think the recycling is a bum deal.

      Or if you were planning to buy a new one anyway and your old one was going to end up in a landfill. It looks like Apple is begining to get ahead of the curve as there are several states that are forcing computer manufacturers to either recycle old equipment at the time of purchase or pay a hefty tax to pay for the state's recycling program. I can easily see these laws spreading to any rechargeable battery powered device, as battery disposal and recycling is a major headache for local governments. With this program in place, Apple is ready if such laws become widespread.

      My Dad worked for the EPA for twenty years and I remember I had a conversation with him in the eighties where he predicted that sometime in my lifetime, all purchases would have to include the cost of disposal in addition to the cost of production. There's a finite amount of space to store trash. Perhaps he was right.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    2. Re:This doesn't make a lot of sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps he was right.

      None of that will happen on GWB's watch. He's already gutted the EPA and is dismantling decades worth of progress in controlling industrial pollution (arsenic levels in water, drilling oil in natural parks, ...).

    3. Re:This doesn't make a lot of sense. by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      I plan to outlive GWB's administration. The problem is not yet so dire that governments are forced to act, which is when it will start to happen.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  21. I used to never like apple by brickballs · · Score: 5, Informative
    I used to never like apple, but my opinion of them is starting to change. I dont see their products as superior, but I do consider them acceptable nowdays.

    I bought an iPod Photo 60GB. Within a month the thing crashed. And I dont mean crashed, where you hit two buttons and it reboots. (that happened the day i got it.) I mean crashed as in it wont reboot, the battery didnt charge, and winblows didnt recognize it. For all intents and purposes it was an expensive brick.

    I sent it back and they fixed it for free, got it back to me in just a few days.

    The thing still crashes occasionaly but now the two button reset always does the job.

    Moral of the story: apples good, but not perfect.

    --
    "What does slashdotting mean?"
    "You've never heard of slashdot?"
    "I know it makes websites not work."
    1. Re:I used to never like apple by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Well I would certainly HOPE they would fix it for "free". You just bought it a month ago and it stopped working! It would still be under warranty - they weren't doing it to be nice. You even say it still crashes.

      If I were you I would send that hunk of junk back for a full refund.

    2. Re:I used to never like apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how when apple's shit jacks up it's okay and having to hit the reset button is acceptable. However, if that had been a microsoft product, this would have been a hissy fit rant.

    3. Re:I used to never like apple by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
      and winblows didnt recognize it

      You story would sound so much more serious if you'd use the real names of the products.

    4. Re:I used to never like apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ok. Here on Slashdot, anyone can use whatever name for Microsoft products (M$, winblows, Microsloth, etc) to better the cause of Open Source.

      But really though, this guy must be a bigtime hater if he has never liked Apple, and doesn't like "winblows". I guess he's a Linux fanboy... or maybe B$D (hahaha, you get it?).

    5. Re:I used to never like apple by wintermute1000 · · Score: 1

      That's really the whole deal, sometimes - the fact that you have a broken product, send it to the company, and they fix it without giving you a whole lot of crap about it. This is such a valuable service and generates brand loyalty better than any single practice I have seen, and it's just shocking that more companies aren't this decent to their customers.

      I had a broken iPod mini (it had a defective seal and dust was collecting between the glass and the screen) and took it to the Apple store eight minths into my warranty and within ten minutes I had a new iPod in my hand.

      I bought a PowerBook a few months ago because I was so impressed at the level of civility I'd seen when dealing with my iPod problems. It's so refreshing not to be treated like a suspect in a criminal case when taking something broken back to the store that I think it's worth paying a premium.

    6. Re:I used to never like apple by brickballs · · Score: 1

      "That's really the whole deal, ... they fix it without giving you a whole lot of crap about it."

      yea, I completely agree. Stuff breaks, but I definately prefer a company that will stand by their products and fix them when they break.

      --
      "What does slashdotting mean?"
      "You've never heard of slashdot?"
      "I know it makes websites not work."
    7. Re:I used to never like apple by chrisxkelley · · Score: 1

      Well try owning an apple computer. I have heard stuff about the ipods locking up and stuff, but once you own one of the computers you have to see the superiority. I mean, even microsoft uses apple g5's for their hardware-intensive rendering and compiling and such... i dont have an ipod myself, but i would like one

    8. Re:I used to never like apple by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      "I mean, even microsoft uses apple g5's for their hardware-intensive rendering and compiling and such"

      Do you have any references to back up that claim?

    9. Re:I used to never like apple by chrisxkelley · · Score: 1

      Not that i could find again, no- but I read it on a news article somewhere a few months ago.. I tried finding the article again but i couldnt. And i'm not bashing microsoft(at the moment), but if you ask anyone who knows about both x86 and ppc software, undoubtedly most of them will say that ppc hardware is superior for doing memory intensive processes. It's not that M$ likes macs, but that there is no x86 machine that matches the power. It's not unlikely that they would anyway

  22. Competitive move by Gates by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    Microsoft will pay you $500 rebate to exchange your ipod for something with its software on it. Only Microsoft employees will be allowed to use the real ipods.

    1. Re:Competitive move by Gates by argux · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft will pay you $2 bucks rebate to exchange your ipod for some crippled piece of junk with a tenth the capacity, corrosive materials and its software on it and offer to kick you in the mouth.

      and it will be successful.

    2. Re:Competitive move by Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember hearing that it is fairly taboo to use an Ipod if you work at Microsoft, even though 70% of DMP users who work there use an Ipod. The solution? They just get a different set of headphones.

  23. Since they make more than 10% on the iPod... by argent · · Score: 1

    Since Apple's margin on the iPod is more like 40% they're still making a nice profit, and a certain amount of the sales will be to people who hadn't planned on buying a new iPod but are reminded of the old 1st gen with the cracked screen in their drawer.

    And at least some of the returns will be good enough to refurbish and feed back into their support and warranty system.

    I don't see this as a cost for Apple at all.

    1. Re:Since they make more than 10% on the iPod... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40% margin on an iPod? Have you even seen the component costs for the off-the-shelf bits Apple uses? If it wasn't for bulk part purchase discounts, Apple couldn't even /make/ it for that price!

    2. Re:Since they make more than 10% on the iPod... by shawb · · Score: 1

      Hmm... consider that many retail outlets sell their products at about twice the price that they actually pay for them (the "cost" figure quoted often times includes internal shipping, storage, expected wages on the item, lighting, advertising, etc.) This doesn't even include the middleman, although that's becoming a smaller piece of the pie as retailers and manufacturers have grown large enough to deal directly with each other, especially in fields like consumer electronics. For the restaurant business a standard sit down meal costs about three times the cost of raw ingredients, but there are is a lot of decently paid labor going in, in addition to decently high facilities and equipment costs.

      In a highly efficient factory with volume discounts, etc, I wouldn't doubt that apple can pump them out for around half the "off the shelf" price of its components. PCWorld puts it at about 30-40% profit on the shuffle. Although I really doubt that includes R&D costs.

      Disclaimer: I have no personal industry experience in consumer electronics, but know a couple of people who do sales. These people, however, generally do not do purchasing on a nationwide/international scale.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  24. After Intel ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starting today, that worthless hunk of environmental unfriendliness can be turned into a 10% discount on a new iPod (purchased at the same time)

    After the Intel announcement all PPC based Apples become worthless hunks ...

    1. Re:After Intel ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the Intel announcement all PPC based Apples become worthless hunks ...

      What are you talking about! They have always been worthless hunks!

  25. Warranty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    WTF?

    You don't have a warranty on it? At least over here every retailer is obliged by law to give at least a 6 months long warranty (service or replacement) on all consumer electronics they sell regardless of whether the manufacturer gives one.

    God bless regulated markets.

    1. Re:Warranty? by Troed · · Score: 1

      6 months? We have 2 years. Sweden.

    2. Re:Warranty? by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Apple's iPod standard warranty (where they're not forced to do something better) is one year, but past six months you pay one way shipping.

      Of course, if the anonymous troll -- err, coward -- dropped his iPod and cracked the screen, it probably isn't covered.

      Warranty text follows. Yawn, I know. But in this case, it's fairly simple and clear...

      Apple Computer, Inc. ("Apple") warrants the iPod and iSight product against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year from the date of original purchase ("Warranty Period").

      If a defect arises and a valid claim is received by Apple within the Warranty Period, at its option, Apple will (1) repair the product at no charge, using new or refurbished replacement parts, (2) exchange the product with a product that is new or which has been manufactured from new or serviceable used parts and is at least functionally equivalent to the original product, or (3) refund the purchase price of the product.

      If a defect arises and a valid claim is received by Apple after the first one hundred and eighty (180) days of the Warranty Period, a shipping and handling charge will apply to any repair or exchange of the product undertaken by Apple.

      Apple warrants replacement products or parts provided under this warranty against defects in materials and workmanship from the date of the replacement or repair for ninety (90) days or for the remaining portion of the original product's warranty, whichever provides longer coverage for you. When a product or part is exchanged, any replacement item becomes your property and the replaced item becomes Apple's property. When a refund is given, your product becomes Apple's property.

    3. Re:Warranty? by Splab · · Score: 1

      Denmark too - Its nice to have consumer watchdogs that works... Or you so one believes - Apple is getting heat around here because the batteries in the iPod dies way too fast, and apple wont fix it without charging for it.

      Contrast that with my muvo^2 - the first one died after 8 months - no question asked they replaced it with a new one (even with extra 2.5GB space). That one just died a week ago and again its off for replacement - now thats good service!

  26. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...iPods recycle YOU!

    See my G5 rig

  27. Are iPod buyers really that stupid? by Oldest+European · · Score: 1

    Probably...

    Doesn't sound like a good deal at all. Guess in most cases you could get more money for it if you just sell it to somebody else. And 10% off is never much. If it wouldn't be for the Apple brand, they could be 20%-30% cheaper anyway. Doesn't mean that they aren't selling a good product, but still...

  28. Why not buy a replacement battery instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 2nd-gen iPod battery life had gotten down to 3 hours last month, so I did a Web search for replacements. I found one at OtherWorld Computing http://www.macsales.com/) that was $39.95 and said that it doubled the life of the original battery (i.e. it would run for 16+ hours). It took about half an hour to change and worked every bit as good as they said. This is not an ad for OtherWorld Computing, BTW. They did not make the battery themselves (I didn't keep the packaging, so I don't recall the manufacturer). I suspect that other companies sell the same thing, but I bought mine from them.

  29. Refurbished by Locarius · · Score: 1

    Obviously they can mix and match the parts from the dead iPods. So, when can I start buying refurbished iPods from apple for a (likely less than 10%) discounted price?

    1. Re:Refurbished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously they can mix and match the parts from the dead iPods. So, when can I start buying refurbished iPods from apple for a (likely less than 10%) discounted price?

      The used parts will go to all the people with broken iPods in for repair. Apple even states so in their warranty.

    2. Re:Refurbished by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Er... Have you ever walked into an Apple store and asked if they had any refurbs in stock?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  30. Steve Handjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL

    1. Re:Steve Handjobs by ian+rogers · · Score: 1

      Hilarious. Now please come clean the non existent coffee off my keyboard that I spit out while laughing at your utterly mind boggling joke.

  31. This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by enosys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The story makes it seem like this is a great deal but in fact it is a terrible ripoff. Search for "broken ipod" on eBay.. For example "ipod 15 gig 3g 3rd gen broken" with what appears to be a broken hard drive is at $82.01 after 8 bids and with 5 and a half hours left.

    1. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, that's not really a good bet though. Considering it's worth significantly less than that. E-bay is full of morons who pay $50 for something they can buy brand new for $25.

    2. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by murr · · Score: 2, Informative

      In fact, if you do that eBay search, you find that 1st generation broken iPods go for about $20. Now, you could trade them in for a $45 discount on the highest end iPod photo. Sounds like a pretty decent deal to me.

      Right now, not too many people will want to recycle their iPods yet, but every year, there are going to be more iPods that have outlived their useful lives. This year, Apple got picketed over the iPod recycling issue, so offering this program seems like a good idea.

      It's not a deal anybody is FORCED to take, but if you can't find a sucker to pay $80 for your broken iPod, you now have an official fallback.

    3. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by MacGod · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if it was a first-generation, 5GB iPod with a battery that won't take a charge, or a broken screen/hard drive etc, then getting $20-$30 is a decent deal. These types of situations would usually result in the iPod going into the garbage.

      A side note: I actually had an iPod run over by a bus. It got pulled off my hip as I was getting off the bus, and it was pulled under the back wheels. Not only is the screen destroyed, but so is the hard drive (it sounds like-and probably is-just a bunch of sand rattling around inside the case). The odd thing is that the battery looks to be in good shape (I've been too scared that it might actually be broken to try transplanting it into the replacement iPod I bought) and the motherboard seems to be fine. I contemplated selling the seemingly non-destroyed bits on eBay, but it just seemed like too much hassle for what I'd get for them.

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    5. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you do for a living or how much you make, but I am always amused by the concept of "too much hassle for what I'd get" when referring to selling on eBay.

      iPod parts and dead iPods seem to hover around US$20 on eBay. More for more complete parts, even more if the battery is intact.

      Let's assume you did decide to sell on eBay. You'll probably spend about 5 minutes creating the auction. When you eventually sell, you'll probably spend about 5 minutes packing the thing, then you just drop it off at the mailbox next time you drive by. So let's assume a generous 15 minutes total to sell something that's otherwise just going to be thrown away (i.e. you aren't spending money or losing something valuable).

      That's an average of over US$1.00 per minute. US$60.00 per hour. I don't make that much. In fact, I don't know anyone (personally) who does. Not only that, but if you want more compensation for your time, you can add on a "handling" fee which won't even be touched by eBay. Some people consider this unethical, but it's well within the rules of eBay, and no bidder has the right to bitch about it as long as it was disclosed up front.

    6. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example "ipod 15 gig 3g 3rd gen broken" with what appears to be a broken hard drive is at $82.01 after 8 bids and with 5 and a half hours left.

      Actually, I would call that a terrible ripoff.

      Apple: Where even broken shit is overpriced.

    7. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by themonkman · · Score: 1

      I once sold an iPod on eBay that had a broken firewire port on it (1st Gen 5GB) and got $70 for it. As far as batteries go, you can purchase a battery replacement very cheaply from a vast number of online stores, such as http://eshop.macsales.com/. Opening up the iPod is easy, and can be done with a small flathead screwdriver, or a set of nylon case openers. In fact, I've seen some kits come with the tools needed to open the case as well.

    8. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      Yeah, eBay.

      To succesfully sell something on eBay you need to:
      - take pictures and transfer them to your PC
      - write a comperhensive description
      - package up your item and get the weight so you can calculate shipping cost
      - search eBay so you can find a reasonable opening price, reserve price and/or Buy it Now price
      - list the item on eBay
      - answer a shitload of questions from people (that never bid)
      - Email notices to the winner
      - Calculate postage
      - Print label
      - with a bit of luck the bidder was from another country so you have to go to the post office to fill out a bunch of forms and mail the piece
      - reply to emails as to why the product hasn't arrived after two days
      - track shipment
      - leave feedback

      In the process you pay:
      - eBay a listing fee
      - eBay a percentage of the final sale price
      - PayPal a certain amount for the transfer
      - Extra shipping cost because the eBay calculator didn't work correctly (this happens especially with international stuff)

      Sure, there's a few things you can do. You can not ship overseas. This usually doesn't have a great affect on how well your item sells if you are in the US. There's plenty of bidders here.

      But not accepting PayPal cuts your bidders significantly.

      I sell stuff on eBay, but if I suspect is going to be less than a $100 then it's just too much hassle. I can totally see how people would just trade the fucker in.

    9. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The eBay sellers word it as if the iPods they are selling might not be actually broken, that's why a $100 shuffle is going on bid for $93 + $7 shipping. Really stupid buyers and con artist sellers. One of the sellers make it sound like he only has a software problem, the other says he "got it from a friend" and haven't tried it, so it might actually work. The highly bidded ones are described like that. If I was to sell a *really* dead iPod and was honest with the description, it won't sell more than $30. (unless there are really stupid buyers, which eBay has proven to have in abundance.)

    10. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      People who are selling "broken" iPods might be selling "broken, but possibly fixable" iPods. I think that the possibly fixable iPods don't really have to be recycled, so we're talking about a different ballpark here.

      Either that or maybe eBay is just a terrible ripoff for buyers of broken iPods.

    11. Re:This is a ripoff! Sell on eBay instead. by brarrr · · Score: 1

      yea, expect the genius who bought one from me that was clearly labeled broken (in all caps, in the title and description) complained about it not working. a swift kick to the junk, and he stopped complaining.

      --
      to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
  32. yet more apple suck by drwho · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Yes, they probably don't want these floating around the used market, as some people know how to replace the batteries apple used for planned obsolencense.

    Ipod is an ugly, overhyped, expensive, unreliable, disposable piece of junk. I think my Create Muvo FM TX 512MB is far better. And it cost only $84. And now they have a 1gb model available for around $120. It's cheaper, lighter, stronger than an iPOD, and takes a single AAA battery - wow, a replacable battery, what a great idea.

    1. Re:yet more apple suck by xwizbt · · Score: 0

      Planned obsolesence? Is this instead of using the magic batteries everyone else has that last forever?



      Sure, it would be nicer to get inside the case without having to use some sort of industrial clamping device, but I don't think Apple did that as a timed self-destruct mechanism.



      I really don't think it's feasible to imagine an iPod running off replacable batteries like you suggest; a 1 gig Creative device and a 60 gig iPod are completely different beasts...

    2. Re:yet more apple suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're obviously comparing to the shuffle, not a standard iPod, nor even a mini.

      Well now ... let's see here.

      Ugly: I have yet to see an ugly Apple product, they are the current kings of industrial design, even down to the packaging. It's your opinion though so I'll let it go.

      Overhyped: Oh noes! They marketed it.

      Unreliable and Disposable: I've heard nothing bad about the shuffle's reliablility, no more so than any other comparable mp3 player. Pure speculation on your part.

      Cheaper: Yeah uh, no. Nice try spanky. The MUVO you mention sells in the same price range as the shuffle. It all depends on where you get it.

      Lighter: Flat out wrong. The shuffle is .78 ounces, the MUVO is 1.1 without the battery. It's most definitely heavier, unless the addition of a battery makes it lighter.

      Stronger: Pure opinion, based on your other opinions.

      In conclusion, you're a mac hater that had to post a diatriabe simply because it was an article about Apple. And you're a stupid one at that, not to mention ignorant of the facts.

      It's ok though, you're excused. Thirty five years of not getting laid and living in a moldy basemement has earned you some allowances.

    3. Re:yet more apple suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC reply above is very thorough and proves you wrong.

      So all I'd like to add is that you're a twat and a retard.

    4. Re:yet more apple suck by RandomSkratch · · Score: 1

      The iPod Shuffle IS a waste of money and a piece of crap. The Muvo is far superior/ 1. The Muvo is much smaller than the shuffle. 2. The Muvo uses a regular battery, the ipod uses its proprietary battery. If you want to use consumer batteries, you need to buy their special "addon" 3. Muvo can get FM radio, iPod cannot 4. Muvo has a line in, iPod does not 5. You can record the radio onto the Muvo 6. You don't need to install iTunes 7. You can store other files on the Muvo (portable HD). I do not know whether or not the iPod can do this. 8. The Muvo has a screen, the iPod does not. The last thing I owned without a screen was a cassette tape player. Back in '95. I don't have a beef with the regular iPod (even though I will never own one). But the shuffle is quite frankly, a piece of junk. You can get much better products for the same price.

    5. Re:yet more apple suck by TooMuchEspressoGuy · · Score: 1
      "It's ok though, you're excused. Thirty five years of not getting laid and living in a moldy basemement has earned you some allowances."

      How exactly did this get modded insightful? This last line clearly betrays the parent as having trollish intentions.

      Oh, wait, he's an Apple fanboy, so I guess that makes it okay...

      --
      Many Bothans died to bring you this sig.
    6. Re:yet more apple suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ipod is an ugly,
      subjective

      overhyped,
      like everything else

      expensive,
      also subjective

      unreliable,
      simply not true

      disposable
      name me one consumer electronic that's not

      piece of junk
      only when it's broken and you can't fix it and then apple will let you use it for a discount.

      I've got boxes and boxes of broken equipment from the last 20 years and every single piece in there was the newest, best, thing on the market when it came out. I also have equipment that is that old that still works... but what's the point in that? It's old.

      Please post in 5 years and let us all know how your Create Muvo FM TX 512MB is doing. (PS. it sure is a lot easier to say 'iPod')

      "Art is not eternal" - Pablo Picasso

    7. Re:yet more apple suck by ChePibe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, obviously your replaceable batteries are wonderful, and I'm sure you dispose of them safely and properly every single time. No environmental damage from your MP3 player, no-siree-bob.

    8. Re:yet more apple suck by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
      Ipod is an ugly, overhyped, expensive, unreliable, disposable piece of junk.

      As a former iPod owner I agree with you. That's why I switch to a SamPod. And my Sampod has SCREWS in the back so I can open it and get to the battery. And it "just works" with Windows. Plug it in, and it'll sync with WMP 10.

    9. Re:yet more apple suck by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I think that Muvo is ugly. I would much prefer m:robe's designs, which I think are the best looking on the market.

      iPod batteries ARE replacible. There are several replacement kits out there, and most of them include tools to do it. Googling iPod battery shows lots of ads. A reputable dealer off the top of my head is Other World Computing, there are a few other reputable dealers.

      I really don't think iPods are fragile. I dropped my U2 iPod four feet onto concrete TWICE and it's still working great. I've seen plenty of competitor's products that are broken just from sitting on the display shelves being handled by prospective customers.

    10. Re:yet more apple suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adding a parting shot in the same tone that was used in the original post neither invalidates the points above, nor makes a post a troll. Otherwise prepare to be modded a troll yourself for the "fanboy" comment.

      Not that it bothers me, I'll wear that label myself. I used to mock the Mac guys, I used to think it was all horseshit. Guess what, I tried it, and found they were right. OSX blows the doors off of anything else available and that was enough for me to make the switch. Throw in the fact that their design department simply makes beautiful hardware, the fact that I've never had a cs issue with them, the fact that their stuff just works, and it's an airtight case.

      I can put my parents on a Mac... no more spending time driving over there to figure out what's wrong with their PC. I use my PowerBook for development and research. My wife uses hers for teaching. Presenters at tech conference use them for presentations. All the same platform. More functionality than either Linux or Windows. Yep I'm proud to be called a mac fanboy, it's just a phrase that means enlightened.

    11. Re:yet more apple suck by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I have been looking to buy a music player dealy and after seeing all the fanboys here I thought i'd look into an iPod. perhaps I will buy one in the future..as of right now, all of the players cost more than I am instersted in paying.

      Cheaper: Although the iPod is competetive with other similar products, it is by no means cheaper than other items of same or even sometimes more features. Its famed robustness probably edges it out in these markets, but we're seing crackups even in that

      Lighter: meh you're probably right, though none of these players seem to be above the weight i'd be willing to carry for portable music

      stronger: probably right also

      Overhyped: definately.. that's how they maintain their price point. If it wasn't a status symbol, it wouldn't be overhyped, but they also wouldn't be defining the player market right now

      Ugly: I have been impressed in general with the designs of apple products, but the design of the iPod is not very inspiring. Its simplicity and general lack of pretension makes it accessable and acceptable, but it reminds me of a subway sign or bus station lettering: Big, simple, obvious symbols so that even people of poor eyesight or who are unable to read can understand the simple message. I don't think this is a bad direction to go in, but its utilitarian look (especially the more recent generations.. the shuttle looks like a construx piece) fails to inspire.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    12. Re:yet more apple suck by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Planned obsolesence? Is this instead of using the magic batteries everyone else has that last forever?

      Sure, it would be nicer to get inside the case without having to use some sort of industrial clamping device, but I don't think Apple did that as a timed self-destruct mechanism.


      Then, why do you suppose that Apple designed the iPod that way?

    13. Re:yet more apple suck by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good asthetic design? Prevention of pieces going everywhere if you drop it? Saving space? So that they don't have users opening up an iPod and zapping the HDD because they aren't grounded and then bitching to Apple?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    14. Re:yet more apple suck by xwizbt · · Score: 1

      Firstly, it is possible to get in the case. However, you have to be really rather serious about it. If you ask me, it's to discourage Joe Public from opening it up on his bed and having the battery explode in his face, as in recent news stories. It's certainly got more to do with that than Apple being desperate to scam the entire universe out of their supreme right to poke around at delicate hardware.

    15. Re:yet more apple suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmm, I own a shuffle and I know damn well I didn't get it so I can look at it with loving eyes... I got it so it can play some music and get out of my sight while I do my work.

      Perhaps you like baroque complexity, but I appreciate simplicity in all it's forms.

    16. Re:yet more apple suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think my Create Muvo FM TX 512MB is far better. And it cost only $84.

      You're entitled to your opinion. But as people constantly forget, the iPod offers other benefits. I bought my first gen 5G ipod used for about $170 about 3 years ago. Never had a battery problem. Sure, it's twice as much as the Muvo, but it's also 10 times as much storage, and I can use it to back up my important documents.

      For an MP3 player, sure, the iPod is on the expensive side. For a 2.5" 30-40GB hard drive, with USB2 and Firewire, AND MP3 player capability, it's not a bad deal.

      If you don't think an iPod is useful, don't buy one. If it is useful for you, buy one.

    17. Re:yet more apple suck by drwho · · Score: 1

      I have about 80gb of MP3s. Way too much to fit on an HD based ipod. But I want to be able to take a long trip without killing the batteries in my laptop, I want something that I can used to tune out the panhandlers on the subway, something cheap and light and robust. The Muvo accomplishes that, I doubt the ipod ever could. I guess you can just keep a backup of your music collection for when your ipod's HD fails (which it almost certainly will). I have heard that if you don't use the ipod a lot, you won't likely get the battery problem. The thing is, I DO use my mp3 player a lot so it wouldn't work for me.

      And yeah, I can store my docs on the Muvo as well. USB2.0 connector, no cable required, use it as a USB flash device. The muvo will also function as a voice record (but will not code into mp3, unfortunately). The thing I wish it had was the ability to play ogg files.

      I may have gone off on a little bit of a tirade, please excuse me. But when the media hype of the ipod seems to be high enough for some rebate on a dead ipod to become a story on slashdot, I have to speak up.

    18. Re:yet more apple suck by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Why not have a simple door that is held on by 1-2 screws that gives access to the battery? Much like how Nintendo designed the Gameboy Advance SP. It would seem better than the current situation of users trying to pry open their iPods, or having to spend a lot of money for Apple to do it for them.

    19. Re:yet more apple suck by robogun · · Score: 1

      I use a Rio Forge, which takes SD cards and runs 20 hours on one AAA battery. It is extremely lightweight & much better than banging around an Ipod in the gym.

      This is easily the best setup if you travel a lot b/c there is no charger and you don't need eurpoean power converters. If your Ipod dies on the plane it kind of sucks. Why would you even want to fool with all that baggage. And these run only $100, mine was $80 after rebate.

    20. Re:yet more apple suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have 80Gb's worth of MP3s and you chose to buy a Muvo, which only holds a measly 1.5Gb?

      I've had my 40Gb iPod for almost 2 years now (and yes, I use it daily for hours on end) and have yet to experience any problems with the battery or the drive.

    21. Re:yet more apple suck by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      I have about 80gb of MP3s. Way too much to fit on an HD based ipod. But I want to be able to take a long trip without killing the batteries in my laptop, I want something that I can used to tune out the panhandlers on the subway, something cheap and light and robust.

      How about an iPod shuffle? 512 Mb of $99 or 1Gb for $149, rugged, long battery life and can be used as a flash drive. Or if you're interested you can get a refurbished iPod mini, 4Gb model for $169 from the Apple store, 10 bucks cheaper than the Zen Micro 4Gb, and that's not a bullshit "after mail-in rebate" price either, unlike the offered price of the Zen MIcro at www.nomadworld.com.

      The Muvo accomplishes that, I doubt the ipod ever could. I guess you can just keep a backup of your music collection for when your ipod's HD fails (which it almost certainly will).

      Wow! You must have one of those new laptops that have the entropy proof hard drive that never fails! I gotta get me one of those. That's sarcasm by the way dipshit, if you don't have your 80Gb of music backed up on that laptop you're going to find out the hard way about hardware failures. My music collection that I load my iPods from is stored on a RAID-1 mirror, and I back that up to a firewire drive and keep the firewire drive in a Pelican case locked inside of a fire-resistant safe.

      I have heard that if you don't use the ipod a lot, you won't likely get the battery problem. The thing is, I DO use my mp3 player a lot so it wouldn't work for me.

      Yeah, I use mine a couple of hours a day. I generally plug it in every couple of days, and I haven't seen a problem with battery life on any of my iPods since my first 10Gb model in 2002 (which was still usable if I plugged it in every night). Apple has fixed the battery problem.

      I have over 120 Gb of MP3s, mostly ripped at 320 VBR so I can get decent sound on my stereo. But I don't keep them all on my iPod. I do keep about 30 Gb on my iPod though, which is about 9 days worth of music, which isn't bad. I update the selection every once in a while . I suppose that if I were some sort of pathetic fetishist I would want all of my music with me all of the time. But you know what? I really don't need to listen to my Christmas music in June.

      And yeah, I can store my docs on the Muvo as well. USB2.0 connector, no cable required, use it as a USB flash device.

      Wow, how stunningly original of Creative, building a a storage device for music that can also store documents. Someone hand them a Nobel prize. This feature has been on the iPod since day one, and the iPod also has the nice ability to act as a bootable, external firewire disk drive.

      The muvo will also function as a voice record (but will not code into mp3, unfortunately).

      A feature which I'm sure is as useful as all of those camera phones out there.

      The thing I wish it had was the ability to play ogg files.

      See, this is where you mark yourself as a total feeb and loser. No-one, outside of the kind of person who spends his lonely nights dry humping a cardboard cut out of Lara Croft cares about fucking Ogg Vorbis. Ogg Vorbis is the OS/2 of music compression codecs. It's the answer to a question that no one is asking.

      I may have gone off on a little bit of a tirade, please excuse me. But when the media hype of the ipod seems to be high enough for some rebate on a dead ipod to become a story on slashdot, I have to speak up.

      Yes, and when ignorant fanboyz such as yourself who have never used an iPod post rapturous reviews of a Creative labs product I have to speak up too.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    22. Re:yet more apple suck by drwho · · Score: 1

      Wow. The first party of your article almost made some sense. Then you got a bit personally offensive, and went back to a zero. Then you went below zero with your bullshit criticism of ogg vorbis (which is a great codec...and this is not just my opinion, but the opinion of people who write audio codecs for a living that I worked for last summer!). Your final assumption that I had never used an Ipod, and calling ME an ignorant fanboy, really just takes the cake.

      I can only hope that this complete lack of tact and good sense that you have in dealing with people online will become dominant, and in your face-to-face conversations you will adopt some of the characteristics you display here, so that someone can give you the punch in the face that you so richly deserve.

  33. Missing the point by sammy+baby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The cracks about "why not just sell it on ebay" aside, this is a very good program.

    Manufacturing computers and consumer electronics is a messy process, and the rapid speed of upgrades ensures that many tons of computer equipment are entering landfills regularly. Many of the components in computers are quite toxic. On a smaller scale, I'm sure the same is true of the iPod.

    Apple's recycling program is probably worded as broadly as it is so as to avoid confusion, but the important part is that they don't exclude iPods that are utterly broken and irreperably from the program. That means that assuming you can get it to them, they'll put it in the recycling program no matter how badly bashed up it is.

    Incidentally, Apple, IBM, and probably a few other manufacturers have recycling programs in place for computers. Many of them require you to pay the company to take your old, beat up jonx.

    1. Re:Missing the point by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I think almost all computer manufacturers have recycling programs. That said, I think one of the reasons Apple is doing this is to try and save face after they were protested by environmentalists. I think it is a good thing they are doing this (and I'll be happy to trade my iPod in (probably sometime in the next year) for a new one), but I think the environmentalists protest are misplaced. The only reason they went after the iPod was because it was popular and well known. If they really want to make a different, they should go after cell phones. There have been, what, 15 million iPods sold ever? Compare that to cell phone sales. People treat cell phones as disposable, so they should be more worried about the waste from those. I've had my cell phone for over three years, but that's because I'm cheap, while most of my friends have really new cell phones because they want new features or because the old ones break.

  34. RE: iPod Photo 60GB problems by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, one of my good friends works a second job at a large electronics retailer, and he said they had a "large number of returns" of the 60GB model of the iPod photo. None of the other models were affected. He suspects they had a bad production run of the 60GB microdrives in them, and Apple hasn't openly acknowledged it yet (perhaps because it's such a limited issue).

  35. Good deal for me. by standards · · Score: 1

    My mom's car ran over my iPod (I left it on her trunk in error... stupid).

    In any case, I kept it as a keepsake. It's good to know that I can now get something!

    1. Re:Good deal for me. by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      Damn those cars. I swear they're plotting to destroy all of our expensive electronics.

  36. Success! by bckspc · · Score: 1

    This is great. It's the Right Thing to do. It's also great to see grassroots pressure from consumers have an impact. Check out this campaign page on iPod recycling from the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition.

  37. Cell phone manufacturers to follow? by standards · · Score: 1

    I wish cell phone manufacturers would offer the same service. Man, I'd be rich with all the obsolete cell phones I have.

    Heck, HP takes used toner carts back. Even though they might be worth some money, its good to see HP taking back what would otherwise be landfilled.

    1. Re:Cell phone manufacturers to follow? by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      most UPS mfgs will take back the old batteries when you order a new one also.

    2. Re:Cell phone manufacturers to follow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Body Shop takes old cellphones and donates them to places where they are refurbished or recycled.

  38. Rip off, not a rip off? by 3770 · · Score: 1

    Some say this is a rip off, but first, nobody is forcing you to do it.

    Second, if you do give it back to able you can be fairly certain that it gets re-used or recycled properly. And that is a good thing, and important to many.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
    1. Re:Rip off, not a rip off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is a good thing...

      Why not just glue some pine cones to it, Martha, and make a centerpiece for your coffee table...?

    2. Re:Rip off, not a rip off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zealot

  39. $100 to replace the battery? by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Has everybody lost their minds?? $100 to replace a battery? In which parallel dimension is this not considered predatory price gouging? What an incredible rip off. I can't understand why there are Apple fanatics that eat this stuff up.

    1. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Li-Ion batteries in that form factor are expensive, and you're also paying for the labor to replace it.

      If you're willing to replace it yourself, you can get the battery for around $50 and swap it yourself.. It's painful, though, especially on the 4gen models (though most 4gen models should still be in the early stages of their battery lifetime)

      -Z

    2. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Funny
      In which parallel dimension is this not considered predatory price gouging?

      You do realize the predatory pricing is anti-competitive because you charging "too little?" And that price gouging is charging "too much?" So to answer your question, in this dimension there is no predatory price gouging. However, there may be in other less logically consistent dimensions.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    3. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by daviddennis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's why there are third parties that also replace the battery, for far less. As long as Apple, which has high overhead, is not trying to suppress these companies or the knowledge that they exist, I see nothing wrong with this.

      It's just like Apple RAM. You can buy RAM for your Apple computer at purchase for exorbitant prices, in part because they're greedy, and in part because their labor costs to install stuff is very high. So when I bought my G5, I bought it with the standard RAM and upgraded it with third-party RAM. All is well and I saved a bundle.

      Apple fans are Apple fans because Steve Jobs personally sweats over the location of every pixel on our screens, making an honest effort to produce as beautiful and wonderful an environment as can be made. Sometimes he fails; sometimes he succeeds, but you know he's there determined and always doing his best to improve things.(*)

      Nobody else has this obsessive determination. Not Bill Gates, not the developers of Gnome or KDE. Steve does. Apple users realize that because of this, things are always going to be a bit more expensive than they are in the Windows or Linux world, but there's going to be a chance of true designer greatness, something no other operating system even tries to measure up to.

      So if you want to know why we're happy bowing to the Great Steve, that's it. He works for us, really hard, to try and make wonderful things. Everyone else wants to make purely money. Sure, Steve wants to make money, and he does. But he REALLY want to make wonderful things.

      And he does.

      If you want wonderful things and you understand this difference, well, Apple has no competition.

      D

      (*) Yes, I know he doesn't do the actual work. I picture him as having enormous horrible meetings with everyone having anything to do with MacOS X, and every position of stuff on the screen being discussed to the pixel. Those meetings are no fun for the participants, but amazing stuff comes out of them.

    4. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      And in which parallel dimension is it acceptable to make it so hard to replace a part that will fail in a $300+ device?

    5. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      You do realize that in replacing the battery they replace your iPod right?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    6. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      I agree, it's really hard to create a removable battery for something that small, I mean...*eyes cell phone* oh, wait, there are similarly sized devices right over there, and not only do they have thin li-ion batteries, they're removable and replaceable. $50 for the battery, I can understand, but it shouldn't be $50 for labor.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    7. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Much thought your question requires mmm yes...this is a sign of the Dark Side at Apple.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    8. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by Michalson · · Score: 1

      Obviously you have never bought anything from Apple that required labor. Example, upgrading RAM:

      You decide to buy a Mac Mini (40GB), but you want them to upgrade it from 256MB (DDR333) to 1GB (DDR333) before shipping it. Now the Mini has only 1 memory slot, so it's a straight replacement job.

      First we subtract the memory from the unit. Since we assume Apple uses good parts, the brand and type used likely retails for about $25 (1x 256MB DDR333).

      Net Part Cost: -$25

      Now we'll add the 1GB stick. Again, we'll give Apple credit and assume they are giving us the good stuff, so the stick will cost about $125 retail (1x 1024MB DDR333).

      Net Part Cost: $100

      Now since we want to determine the labor cost, we're going to subtract the net cost of the parts from the total cost of the upgrade as quoted by Apple, which is $225.

      Labor Cost: $125

      Now these calculations are obviously a bit biased toward Apple - we've assumed that even the budget Mac Mini isn't getting budget parts, and we haven't taken into account that Apple is going to be getting these parts for cheaper then retail, meaning that our estimated net parts cost is almost certainly higher then it really is (meaning the labor cost we've determined is lower then it really is). Despite this however we still end up with the rather amazing figure of $125 for a guy at the Apple factory to put in a single stick of DDR ram before the unit gets shipped out. Now we'll assume he does it in the least efficient way possible: taking an already packaged Mini, carefully taking it out of the box, opening it up, taking out the old stick, placing the new stick in, and finally repacking it. Such a procedure might take as long as 30 minutes to complete. Combined with our labor cost figure, we can determine that Apple pays their low level assembly workers approximately $250/hour, or roughly $500,000 per year (plus benefits).

    9. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by shawb · · Score: 1

      If it's becoming more painful rather than less, that means that they want to do the replacing rather than you doing it. Whether that is because Apple is a predatory company looking to make as much money as they can, or if it's because Apple is acting to prevent predatory lawsuits from customers who get injured in an explosion caused by an el-cheapo(tm) aftermarket battery all depends on whether you like Apple or not.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    10. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      $50 for an iPod battery is insane!

      I was afraid replacing the LiIon battery in my little Canon S100 camera would cost an arm and a leg. Turns out you can get the batteries from the aftermarket for $9. In my experience, their claim of greater-than-OEM capacity is true. As for "labor," there is none - you pop open the battery hatch and put in the new battery.

    11. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by allism · · Score: 1

      Not that it should add much labor time to your estimate, but you have left out testing the Mini after the new memory is installed to make sure it actually works.

    12. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      In every dimension where there are cars.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    13. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    14. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Now that is better.

    15. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I paid like 35 for a new battery after market batter for my ipod. Its not nearly as consistent as the original one, but it typically gets well over 18 hours before needing another charge.

    16. Re:$100 to replace the battery? by nugneant · · Score: 1

      Yeah! And after that lamer Wozniak designed the chip, God Jobs gave him $2500 and used the profits to buy hair grease! That was so kewl! Then he brainwashed Wozniak or did something - read this and tell me it doesn't sound like brainwashing - the guy who designed the goddamn chip that got the whole thing started saying, "I'd like to always be an Apple employee--just a real small paycheck and a badge. You know what, Steve Jobs is real nice to me."

      Some flakey, fishy things be gwine' down at Appleworks.

  40. The point is not what you can get from apple by josephbanks · · Score: 1

    but rather what anyone can get from anyone. this is an ancient technique for increasing resale value and making one's product seem more attractive than the competition. car dealers will frequently accept their own cars at a premium trade-in rate. the point is to add a few percent to the resale value of any ipod because hey, if worse comes to worst, it's still worth ten percent at an apple store. can you get 10% off a new zen micro at best buy when you take a twisted hunk of metal in there? prepare to be laughed at. in reality people are probably not going to actually trade in their ipods nearly as often as people will mention it as a selling point when they are unloading their ipods. this is not, as someone else mentioned, an attempt at crushing secondary sales as much as it is an attempt at maintaining the list of reasons the ipod is the better choice despite the price.

  41. EPA rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is actually a very good thing. Any computer company that is recycling outside the US probably isn't recycling at all. They just dump the stuff in a Burmese junk heap where children are paid to melt the lead out of circuitboards. Seriously.

    In the US, you can't get away with that kind of shit. Sometimes you can get an offical to look the other way, but a fifty ton pile of broken circuitboards on bare earth, chemicals leaching into the ground, is not a reasonable possibility.

    So "recycled stateside" means "recycled in an actual recycling plant by trained workers who are following EPA rules and are protected by worker safety laws at each step of the way."

    That's good stuff all around, including for the local environment. Dealing with poisonous chemicals properly here is better than getting them back in imported asian livestock.

    1. Re:EPA rules by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      That's right. An appropriately-equipped recycling facility can handle electronics without any danger to workers.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  42. Apple: Sue Us, Make us Not Evil ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went into the downtown San Francisco store last month to recycle an old Powerbook NiCd battery. It took appealing to a manager, who I snagged walking past as the desk clerk was denying they ever recycle these things. She said yes we do and took it.

    So I took back two more the next week. Had an even harder time.

    So I took back three more a week later and got a flat out denial from two managers that Apple ever accepts their own batteries back for recycling, and was told to throw them in the trash, despite federal and California law and common sense and common decency (both rare).

    So I left them on the counter and walked out saying, loudly, that this stuff is goddammed poison and they were cretins to tell me to trash it and it was their frigging responsibility to take this toxic crap back like any other company that sells it.

    I love Apple. All you need is a good class action lawsuit, and they behave well, briefly.

  43. Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You used the word fashionistas. You're so cool.

    I use my iPod because it's easy. I never thought I'd be saving Pandas. WTH? They're in china anyway, what does that have to do with Apple??

    I think something is loose in your brain sir. Perhaps you should send that in to God for a 10% discount on the next one.

    1. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think something's loose in GP's brain? I think your Itroll internet troll detection unit has completely backfired. Time to send it in for a 10% rebate on a new one. Or as it has been put so many times before: YHBT, YHL, HAND.

  44. OT: It's easy to properly dispose of batteries by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    This is off topic, but some posts bemoan how "hard" it is to get some retailers to take old NiCd's etc.

    Just keep in mind there are lots of recycle-freindly stores called "Radio Shack". If you go in for nothing else, they will take old batteries for you.

    Also, Staples office supply stores have a big bin for old ink and laser cartridges, no human interaction required, just drop your junk in their box. (Of course the one closest to me always seems to be stuffed to near over-flowing...)

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:OT: It's easy to properly dispose of batteries by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      Also, Staples office supply stores have a big bin for old ink and laser cartridges, no human interaction required, just drop your junk in their box.

      And I wonder just how those discarded cartridges are handled. Are they sent off to one of those brownfield towns in China where peasants scrape them out by hand and then burn the remains? Or, are they actually recycled in a consciencious manner?

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  45. Boycott yankdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    say no to biased, bigotted "news" from this sorry site

  46. Re:crush those secondary sales. - Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No hardware vendor makes money from secondary sales ('used' sales) of their hardware.

    Used markets make new items worth more because it gives them resale value. Apple charges a premium for everything, and if you rummage through eBay and compare prices for old Macs and PCs you'll see that this model has worked very well for the Mac. (And the entire car market.)

    I think this has more to do with recent pressure put on Apple to be more environmentally friendly. Remember Steve's recent tantrum that the greens were picking on poor Apple and giving everybody else a pass? Well, it was bullshit because other hardware companies are making strides - and besides, people expect more from Apple.

    So it's good PR, and probably will accomplish something - I'm sure most of the recycled units will be dead or damaged, and thus better off in Apple's hands than in a dump. 10% isn't enough compared to their resale value to keep people from selling or at least handing down working, used iPods to friends and family.

  47. I'd do it by ChePibe · · Score: 1

    Personally, I plan on running my iPod into the ground - using it until the battery just doesn't hold enough of a charge to make it worthwhile. At that point (probably about a year or two left, could be more but I use it quite often) I plan on upgrading to something better (probably an iPod Photo, which would make my life much easier while I'm on extended trips). By the time it dies, I will probably want the newer model anyways. I personally don't want to hassle with cracking open my iPod and changing the battery. Sure, it can be done relatively cheaply, but I'm not so inclined. I'm also aware that I can get more money for it on eBay, but I'm also aware that selling things on eBay can become a hassle. Sometimes, I don't want to deal with irate or deadbeat buyers, or the occasional PayPal "eCheck" which takes two weeks to clear (just happened to me, delayed me receiving my payment for two weeks!). I think it's an attractive option to be able to walk into a store with your old iPod and walk out with a new one, saving a little bit of money and doing somethint to make sure that your old battery isn't going to cause any environmental problems. It's certainly not for everyone, but I think I'll do it when the time comes rather than mess around with the other options.

  48. OT: Systems already in place by dago · · Score: 1

    Some/many/most (?) ountries have industry programs to recycle old electronics equipment.

    E.g. swico (CH), Fost+ (BE)

    from swico website :

    "The Swico Recycling Guarantee has been in place since 1994. It guarantees that used equipment is taken back comprehensively from the following sectors: informatics; office electronics, consumer electronics, telecommunications; the graphics industry and dental industry.

    Used equipment can be handed in free of charge for recycling. The recycling operations are financed by consumers who pay an amount in the form of an advanced recycling fee (ARF) when they purchase new equipment.

    In 2003 some 30,000 tonnes of used equipment were professionally recycled. This means more than 75% of the material was returned to the raw materials cycle.
    "

    So, if you have stuff no worth ebay, there's free recycling disposal.

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
    1. Re:OT: Systems already in place by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      You better not tell this to any americans, you dirty communist hippie.

      (sarcasm)

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    2. Re:OT: Systems already in place by dago · · Score: 1

      funny thing is that both companies are private answers to recycling ordinances.

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  49. Apple Stores by stoutpuppy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I believe Apple has unveiled new shops in Toronto (Apple.ca)

  50. Re:Seems unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Dell PDA. My infant kid threw it into the pool one weekend. Called Dell Monday and they said warranty doesnt cover misuse. So i opened up the brat. Motherboard was new but all else inside looked like recycled crap. My pool is very clean by the way, but i saw traces of dirt in the PDA guts.

    So Apple just figured, with the speed ipods are selling, why not buy back, repack and resell as new stuff :-) ?

    Just look for the dirt inside.

  51. How is it worthless junk? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    From what i thought, its just due to bogus battery life..

    So spend 50 bucks and buy a new battery... Geesh.

    But, if anyone wants to give me theirs, great.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  52. Must be the photo-pod by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    My regular 4th gen 20gb has NEVER caused me a second of grief..

    I bought it the week they were released and have yet to have any troubles in daily use, save one time i caused my own troubles when i reformatted and didnt have the power pack handy.. doh!

    But the actual device, works perfect...

    However a note to apple: ditch the chrome on the back, it may be cool looking, but that stuff scratches just by looking at it sideways...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  53. Re:Seems unfair by toddestan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had a Dell PDA. My infant kid threw it into the pool one weekend. Called Dell Monday and they said warranty doesnt cover misuse. So i opened up the brat. Motherboard was new but all else inside looked like recycled crap.

    So, what did you do with the PDA?

  54. The boyz in the 'hood by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will recycle it for free too. Just bop around a rough area with the ear-pods visible and someone may make you an offer to take it off your hands for no charge*. (* no charge for the iPod. Other charges may apply.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  55. Re:Apple: Sue Us, Make us Not Evil ... by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Chances are, once you left the store the employees just threw the batteries in the garbage.

  56. Re:Seems unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I definitely interpreted "opened up the brat" as you splitting your kid's skull open. Psycho.

  57. 2nd life: iPod is still an external HD by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll take $30 for something that has a dead and irreplaceable battery. Although it would make a pretty snazzy paperweight.

    Ignoring the fact that iPod batteries are replacable, when a hard-drive based iPod is no longer viable as a player due to the battery charge it is still quite useful as an external HD.

  58. Re:Apple: Sue Us, Make us Not Evil ... by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

    Why should it be their responsibility to dispose of your waste? Sure, they sold it to you, but after that it's yours. If you have a problem with trashing it, deal with it yourself.

    --
    Luke-Jr
  59. Does it sync with iTunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No? Well, that's the main selling point for the shuffle for me. iTunes rocks. And if you don't think it rocks, I'd like to know what media management program you think is better, so I can use it.

  60. Re:Apple: Sue Us, Make us Not Evil ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which is illegal in most countries. And I don't think Apple would be amused very much, either.

  61. Or Instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the battery doesn't hold a charge, you could just spend about $25 for a brand new battery. Or just sell it. I've seen non-functioning iPods sell for up to $70 on ebay.

  62. This is just pathetic by bumptehjambox · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Are consumers so repressed to where it is socially acceptable to sell a well-known poorly made product, and then offer us a coupon towards another one when it breaks?
    Kudos to Apple, keep them jumping through the hoop... makes me wanna dance.

    (perhaps this is just a rhetorical question)

    1. Re:This is just pathetic by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Are consumers so repressed to where it is socially acceptable to sell a well-known poorly made product

      Okay, what products would those be?

    2. Re:This is just pathetic by nugneant · · Score: 1

      Read carefully - there's only one product mentioned in the original parent's post. You even quoted it.

      And the product in question is the iPod

    3. Re:This is just pathetic by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Read carefully - there's only one product mentioned in the original parent's post. You even quoted it.

      I did read carefully. The problem is that the iPod is well known to be a well made product, a few lemons and a few crabby people nonwithstanding.

    4. Re:This is just pathetic by Scudsucker · · Score: 1
      I should have added:

      OMG! Five people, complaining about something on the INTERNET! On a MESSAGE BOARD! That must prove the iPod is absolute shite!!!!

      /sarcasm

  63. Re:Apple: Sue Us, Make us Not Evil ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ahh, personal responsibility, the thing elitists try to subdue through collectivism...

    In the end, nobody really wants to have anything to do with their own waste.

  64. That argument doesn't sail by Urusai · · Score: 1

    There are numerous cheaper, less flashy iPod alternatives available. I have an old 20GB RCA Lyra (around $170 new) myself. Surely the iPod is a better bit of kit, but then I just want an easy way to listen to music at a minimal cost.

  65. iPods as replacements under battery settlement by Go_Ask_Alex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it possible that Apple will use recycled iPods as replacements under the recent iPod battery settlement?

    http://www.appleipodsettlement.com/
    http://www.appleipodsettlement.com/claim.pdf

    1. Re:iPods as replacements under battery settlement by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      It'd be a great way to perpetuate the class-action suit. I can see the legal team in raptures over a chance to lose more money.

      These iPods are old, well used and most likely not working any longer. They won't be good as replacement parts, let alone replacement units.

  66. $30 within the first year by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    I had a drive crash (ipod dropped) and it was $30 to replace the full unit, since it was under a year. When 11th month rolls around just drop it until the drive crashes, and get a new one. :-P

  67. I'll make it simpler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm doing this as anonymous coward because they just added a 10 post a day limit and so I had to go to Mickey D's just to post.

    Anyway.

    I'll make the same offer.

    Sell me your old iPod and I'll give you $30 cash.

    That's a way better deal than Apple is giving. WAAY better. I'm giving cash

  68. Oh brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a bad deal. Plain and simple.

    Apple is doing this for a couple reasons:

    1) They dont' want used iPods floating around competing with new iPods.

    Think of it this way...I have a 30G 3rd gen iPod that I've used for about oh...12-18 months. If a new iPod comes out, maybe I'll buy it, but I'll sell mine first.

    Whats it worth? I dunno...$150-200? So if I sell it to somebody, that's only one sale for Apple. To me.

    But if I'm a complete and utter moron, I'll give to apple for essentially $30-40 *off* the list price of a new one.

    Meanwhile, you can get 10% off iPods over at Target.com about once a month and I keep my iPod.

    2. Rapidly buidling inventories of iPods. Once the initial crush was over, the lineup is showing some real holes (the display-less iPods are a terrifically bad idea and only sell to the trendy, the photo iPods are too expensive for a capability that no one wants).

    3. Feel-goodism for trendy college kids from upper middle class homes who think they're being rebels when they become vegan or criticize those nasty multinations (the ones their dad makes the money to send to private school with).

    Its a stupid deal for stupid people and a great deal for Apple because they'll use them for spares, or crush them and throw them in a landfill and then sell more.

    I hate when you fanbois defend this as a good deal. It ain't. stop it. You're just mindlessly defending Apple.

  69. That's odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fashionistas who would think this is a "really good deal" and helps save the Panda from extinction.

    Odd, when I bought my iPod I was under the assumption that the white case was dyed using the remains of young panda cubs mixed with baby seal extract. Boy is the egg on my face!

  70. Just out of curiosity - how so many batteries???? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    So you had at least five batteries - and I imagine you were ready to go back the following week with eight batteries and ask to recycle them!

    The real question is, how on earth did you have so many batteries to unload in the first place?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  71. iPod Trade in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a little birdie told me that a company named PowerON will be handling Apple's iPod trade ins. http://trade.poweron.com/

    I think that's how they'll get around the vendor not being able to resell their merch.

  72. Oh, come on. Sell it to me! by JeffHunt · · Score: 1

    I know this has been said several times already, but I need to say it, myself, out of protest:

    Please do not 'recycle' your iPod. Get some cash for it by selling it to someone like me!

    --

    "It was hell!" recalls former child.

  73. They already do. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    There's a bin for depositing old phones and batteries at Best Buy stores. The problem is they don't give you any kind of discount for doing it, and I've heard they take the phones in good condition, refirbish, and resell them to consumers with new plans.

    There are also programs in existance where you can donate your old cellphone and they are given to battere women so they have an emergency phone to call for help if needed.

    You can find these and other ideas what to do with your old cellphone here.

  74. You'll Pry My iPod From My Cold Dead Hands by gadlaw · · Score: 1

    Oh no. No way will I give up my ipod for any reason. I've got a warranty and I've got the extended protection plan. Don't even talk to me about it either being dead or giving it away. It ain't happening. Don't even thing about it. And if it was dead it's going in aa box and getting buried in the back yard. In fact, I think I'm going to start selling iPod caskets. Somebody will buy them. Now if Apple wants to take this old dead 386 where do they want it delivered?

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  75. Buying a new ipod? by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    If they are economical about recycling them, the some of the still working parts may find their way into new ipods. Some ipods may even be resold almost as-is, but with a replaced battery or hard disk. But at least it's good for the environment, right?

  76. Brilliant Move by Apple by BWhaler · · Score: 1

    This is brilliant just like the free engraving: both help kill the secondary market for used iPods. Brilliant.

  77. WTF!!! by MozillaMike · · Score: 1

    Don't buy an Ipod and get all that recycling crap.... buy a Creative Zen!!!!

    --
    GCS/MU d- s: a--- C++ W+++ w+ M-- PS--- PE++ t+ R+ tv b+ DI++ G e- h! !y
  78. Cynics would say it's to reduce the settlement! by slapphappe · · Score: 1


    Could Apple be trying to take 1st, 2nd and 3rd gen iPod serial numbers out of circulation to reduce their liability under the recently announced iPod class action settlement?

    http://www.appleipodsettlement.com/

  79. Like car battery warranty... by Palal · · Score: 1

    This is just like the car battery warranty. You get pro-rated, in this case in the ammount of $30, but you still buy from the same company.

    --
    -Palal
  80. Recycle tax. by CRB2500 · · Score: 1

    Just tack a fee on to these things to cover tha cost of processing these things at the dump. Around my parts if I want to dump a freezer it costs $30. Why not make the 1st buyer cough it up? So that when it is dumped it will be "covered" cost wise. Otherwise the cheapskates or ignorant who would rather dump the device on the side of the road or back alley will continue to do so as they can't or won't pay the $30 bucks. Then the city/county has to pick up the tab in the end.

    It should not be that hard to fix a cost on how much effort it takes to recycle these things and it should be paid upfront to a federal/state agency that bids out the job.

  81. Hey, it's a free country. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We will recycle your iPod for free!" doesn't sound like half as much a ripoff as "I'll buy your iPod for $30"

    If they're such a ripoff, why don't you start a competing business that pays to customers more than $30 for dead iPods? I can see your business skyrocket already.

  82. Re: iPod Photo 60GB problems by brickballs · · Score: 1

    I dont think it was the actual drive on mine, because it still had all my music on it when I got it back.

    --
    "What does slashdotting mean?"
    "You've never heard of slashdot?"
    "I know it makes websites not work."
  83. iPods should have user-replaceable batteries. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    I think Apple's arrogance in not allowing end users to change the rechargeable battery will hurt them in the long run.

    After all, virtually all digital still cameras use rechargeable batteries that can be replaced by the end user; why can't Apple go this route on future iPod models?

  84. Shopping list: Caulk, ... by switcha · · Score: 1

    Sooooo. I guess making an aquarium out of them is out of the question?

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  85. Word flame by nugneant · · Score: 1

    Reading through these comments, it seems like people just like the word "iPod". Anything else would be referred to as a "unit" after the second mention per thread.

    Way to support brand saturation, mindless geeks.

  86. Re:Racist pighead by AnusesBaskets · · Score: 1

    How is it racist? The poster obviously just opposes all the tech jobs leaving his country leaving him and the rest of the market of workers with little to choose from in terms of jobs.

    If you know anything about Indo-European ancestry, it would not be accurate to call Indians of a different race.

    I love it when people use the race card inaccurately.